Socket Preservation

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

27/10/2017

Healing of Extraction socket


1.External dimensional
changes at the
extraction socket,

2. Internal dimensional

SOCKET PRESERVATION changes within the


extraction socket,

3.dimensional changes
in a damaged extraction
socket,

4 . dimensional changes
in the mucosa1

Al sabbagh - Immediate implant placement- Dent Clin N Am 59 (2015) 73–95

Healing of Extraction socket Healing of Extraction socket



Dimensional changes
• Horizontal ridge reduction  5 – 7
mm
• Vertical ridge reduction  2 – 4.5
mm
• This reduction occurs over a period
of 6 to 12 months, although most
of the changes occur during the
first 3 months.

Al sabbagh - Immediate implant placement- Dent Clin N Am 59 (2015) 73–95


Al sabbagh - Immediate implant placement- Dent Clin N Am 59 (2015) 73–95

1
27/10/2017

Reasons????? Bone Remodelling after Extraction


• loss of blood supply secondary to loss of the periodontal • It has been well documented that the ridge follows a predictable
ligament pattern of resorption following the extraction of a tooth.
• Bone resorption usually is greater in the horizontal plane than in the
vertical plane
• disuse atrophy

• Infections, preexisting root fractures and traumatic


extractions can be additional contributing factors.

Block et al - Dental Extractions and Preservation of Space for Implant Placement in Molar Block et al - Dental Extractions and Preservation of Space for Implant Placement in Molar
Sites. DCNA -2015 Sites. DCNA -2015

Remodeling of ridge after Extraction CLASSIFICATION OF EXTRACTION SOCKET


Stephen T. Chen, Immediate or Early Placement of Implants Following Tooth Extraction.


IJOMI 2004 Elian et al , A simplified socket classification and repair technique, Pract Proced Aesthet
Dent 2007;

2
27/10/2017

CLASSIFICATION OF EXTRACTION SOCKET CLASSIFICATION OF EXTRACTION SOCKET


• Type I sockets are the easiest and most predictable to treat. Most of • Type II sockets are often times the most difficult to diagnose. These
the cases seen demonstrating excellent aesthetics with implants are sockets can be very deceptive, as the inexperienced clinician may
Type I sockets. make the mistake of treating it as a Type I socket.
• This often leads to a less than ideal aesthetic result. The largest group
• This is particularly true if the soft tissue profile is thick and flat as of aesthetic problems comes from improper treatment of Type II
opposed to a highly scalloped, thin profile. sockets because of the posttreatment soft tissue recession that may
occur.

Elian et al , A simplified socket classification and repair technique, Pract Proced Aesthet Elian et al , A simplified socket classification and repair technique, Pract Proced Aesthet
Dent 2007; Dent 2007;

Socket preservation
CLASSIFICATION OF EXTRACTION SOCKET
Technique
• Type III sockets, however, are very difficult to treat and require soft • Atraumatic extraction
tissue augmentation with additional grafts of connective tissue, or • Graft the socket
connective tissue and bone, in a staged approach to rebuild lost
tissue • Protect with a membrane
• These cases are associated with soft tissue recession and loss of the • Prevent collapse of buccal plate
buccal plate on the tooth prior to extraction.

• Sockets in this classification require very high dental experience, skill,


and time commitment for success.

Elian et al , A simplified socket classification and repair technique, Pract Proced Aesthet
Dent 2007;

3
27/10/2017

ATRAUMATIC EXTRACTION ATRAUMATIC EXTRACTION

careful inspection of the


extraction socket

walls are thoroughly curetted to


Periotomes Tooth Sectioning remove all remnants of the
periodontal ligament

Irrigated with normal saline

4
27/10/2017

EXTRACTION SOCKET EVALUATION


Atraumatic extraction
Visual
Examination

Probing
of the
socket

Caplanis et al , Extraction defect Assessment, classification, and management, CDA


2005

Xenograft & collagen membrane Graft the socket

Overfill the socket

5
27/10/2017

Protect graft with barrier membrane Provisionals for soft tissue contouring

Socket preservation for posteriors Atraumatic extraction

6
27/10/2017

Graft and membrane Post extraction defects in buccal plate

Graft and barrier membrane Socket preservation


• Unaugmented sockets decreased in width by an average of 1.7 mm,
while grafted sites decreased by 1.2 mm (a difference of 0.5 mm).
• The quantity of bone observed on histological analysis was slightly
greater in preservation sites, although these sites included both vital
and nonvital bone.

Becker et al - Immediate implant placement: treatment planning and surgical steps


for successful outcome. Periodontology 2000

7
27/10/2017

Socket preservation Technique Is it a valuable technique


• Overall the socket intervention therapies did reduce alveolar ridge • Important to preserve the buccal bone volume for esthetic reasons in
dimensional changes postextraction, but were unable to prevent anteriors
resorption. • Suitable for type 1 and 2 extraction sockets
• Histology did demonstrate a large proportion of residual graft • Less critical in posterior sockets with thick buccal plates
material that may account for some of the difference in alveolar ridge
dimensions at follow up. • Helps in building up the soft tissue thickness crestally

Morjaria et al, Bone Healing after Tooth Extraction with or


without an Intervention - Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2014

Any other alternative?


• Immediate implant placement

• Socket shielding technique

• Guided bone regeneration

You might also like