Scribd
Upload
66 views1 page

Rubrics 1

This rubric evaluates criteria on five levels - strong, satisfactory, developing, beginning, and poor/needs improvement. It assesses the selection and clarity of criteria, distinction between levels, quality of writing, and originality. A strong score is earned when all criteria are clear, levels are logically distinct, writing is understandable with specific language, and there is no plagiarism. A poor score means the criteria are incomprehensible, there is no distinction between levels, the writing is unclear, and the work is plagiarized. Scores decrease as the criteria, distinction, writing quality, and originality become less clear and coherent.

Uploaded by

Blaze Quiban
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
66 views1 page

Rubrics 1

This rubric evaluates criteria on five levels - strong, satisfactory, developing, beginning, and poor/needs improvement. It assesses the selection and clarity of criteria, distinction between levels, quality of writing, and originality. A strong score is earned when all criteria are clear, levels are logically distinct, writing is understandable with specific language, and there is no plagiarism. A poor score means the criteria are incomprehensible, there is no distinction between levels, the writing is unclear, and the work is plagiarized. Scores decrease as the criteria, distinction, writing quality, and originality become less clear and coherent.

Uploaded by

Blaze Quiban
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

CRITERIA STRONG SATISFACTORY DEVELOPING BEGINNING POOR/ NEEDS

(10) (8) (6) (4) IMPROVEMENT


(2)
ALL CRITERIAS ARE CRITERIA CAN BE CRITERIA BEING FEW KEYWORDS UNUNDERSTANDABL
SELECTION CLEAR, DISTINCT IDENTIFIED BUT ASSESSED ARE WERE USED AND E SELECTION OF
AND AND ARE DERIVED NOT ALL ARE UNCLEAR, HAVE CRITERIA IS WORDS AND
CLARITY OF FROM THE CLEARLY STATED SIGNIFICANT UNCLEAR CRITERIA.
CRITERIA APPROPRIATE CHOICE OF WORDS
(ROWS) STANDARDS BUT OVERLAPS TO
THE APPROPRIATE
STANDARDS.
EACH LEVEL IS SOME DISTINCTION FEW LEVELS IS LITTLE OR NO NO DISTINCTION OF
DISTINCTION DISTINCT AND BETWEEN LEVELS DISTINCT AND DISTINCTION OF LEVELS AT ALL.
BETWEEN PROGRESSES IN A IS CLEAR, BUT MAY LEVEL CRITERIAS LEVELS AND ARE
LEVELS CLEAR AND BE TOO NARROW WERE UNCLEAR. NOT
(COLUMNS) LOGICAL ORDER. OR TOO BIG. UNDERSTANDABLE
.
WRITING IS WRITING IS 3-4 WORDS ARE ONLY FEW WORDS THE PIECE OF
UNDERSTANDABLE MOSTLY NOT ARE CLEAR AND WRITING IS NOT
, HAS CLEAR AND UNDERSTANDABLE UNDERSTANDABL THE REST OF THE UNDERSTANDABLE
QUALITY OF SPECIFIC , SOME LANGUAGE E AND UNCLEAR USAGE OF AT ALL.
WRITING LANGUAGE THAT ARE VAGUE OR USE OF WORDS LANGUAGE AND
HELPS STUDENTS UNCLEAR. ARE NOT WORDS ARE
RELIABLY AGREE COHERENT. UNCOHERENT AND
ON THE SCORING UNCLEAR.
LABEL.
CONTEXT AND CONTEXT, WORDS SOME CONTEXT UNCLEAR CHOICES NO MODIFICATION
ORIGINALIT WORDS ARE AND LANGUAGE AND WORDS ARE OF WORDS, HAS MADE, PIECE
Y CLEAR, MODIFIED ARE MOSTLY UNCLEAR AND THE DOESN’T ELICITS WAS CLEARLY
AND THERE WERE CLEAR AND CHOICES OF CREATIVITY AT PLAGIARIZED.
NO TRACE OF MODIFIED AND HAS LANGUAGE ARE ALL.
PLAGIARISM. NO TRACE SOMEWHAT
OFPLAGIARISM. COPIED AND
VAGUE.
TOTAL SCORE:
Rubric adapted from Dr. Bonnie B. Mullinix, NU University MODIFIED AND PREPARED BY: BLAZE R. QUIBAN

You might also like