13 - Fea PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 121

Basics of Finite Element Analysis

What is FEA (Finite Element Analysis)?


A complex problem is divided into a smaller and
simpler problems that can be solved by using the
existing knowledge of mechanics of materials and
mathematical tools

What is FEM (Finite Element Model)?


A 3D model prepared specifically for finite element
analysis

Why FEA ?
Modern mechanical design involves complicated shapes,
sometimes made of different materials that as a whole
cannot be solved by existing mathematical tools.
Engineers need the FEA to evaluate their designs
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 1
Basics of Finite Element Analysis

The process of dividing the model into small pieces is called meshing. The
behavior of each element is well-known under all possible support and load
scenarios. The finite element method uses elements with different shapes.
Elements share common points called nodes.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 2


Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept., SJSU
3
History of Finite Element Analysis
Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was first developed in 1943 by R.
Courant, who utilized the Ritz method of numerical analysis and
minimization of variational calculus.
A paper published in 1956 by M. J. Turner, R. W. Clough, H. C.
Martin, and L. J. Topp established a broader definition of
numerical analysis. The paper centered on the "stiffness and
deflection of complex structures".
By the early 70's, FEA was limited to expensive mainframe
computers generally owned by the aeronautics, automotive,
defense, and nuclear industries. Since the rapid decline in the cost
of computers and the phenomenal increase in computing power,
FEA has been developed to an incredible precision.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 4


Basics of Finite Element Analysis
FEA Applications
• Evaluate the stress or temperature
distribution in a mechanical component.
• Perform deflection (Stiffness) analysis.
• Analyze the kinematics or dynamic response
• Perform vibration analysis
• Perform fatigue analysis
• Check Buckling failure
• Perform drop test
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 5
Size and shape optimization
Basics of Finite Element Analysis
Consider a cantilever beam shown.

Finite element analysis starts with an approximation of the region of


interest into a number of meshes (2D or 3D elements). Each mesh is
connected to associated nodes (black dots) and thus becomes a finite
element.

Node

Element
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 7
Basics of Finite Element Analysis
• After approximating the object by finite elements,
each node is associated with the unknowns to be
solved.
• For the cantilever beam the displacements in x and
y directions would be the unknowns (2D mesh).
• This implies that every node has two degrees of
freedom and the solution process has to solve 2n
degrees of freedom, n is the number of nodes.

Displacement Strain Stress


Partial derivatives Stress & Strain
relationship
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 8
Example – a plate under load
Derive and solve the system of equations for a plate loaded as
shown. Plate thickness is 1 cm and the applied load Py is constant

Py
.

using two triangular elements,

U1 thru U8,
Reaction displacements
forces in x and y
directions

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 9


Example – a plate under load
Displacement within the triangular element (2D) with three
nodes can be assumed to be linear.

u = α1 + α 2 x + α 3 y
v = β1 + β2 x + β3 y

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 10


Example – a plate under load
Displacement for each node,
Node 1
Node 2
Node 3

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 11


Example – a plate under load
Solve the equations simultaneously for α and β,

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 12


Example – a plate under load
Substitute the location of the nodes: x1= 0, y1= 0 (node 1), x2=10, y2= 0
(node 2) and x3= 0, y3=4 (node 3) to obtain displacements u and v for
element 1
Evaluate the constants a, b, and c (3)

10 4 0 0
Element 1 (2)

(1)

Calculations:
2a = 40

a1 = 40, a2 = 0, a3 = 0

b1 = - 4, b2 = 4, b3 = 0

c1 = -10, c2 = 0, c3 = 10
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 13
Example
40 0 0
2a = 40
40 a1 = 40, a2 = 0, a3 = 0
b1 = - 4, b2 = 4, b3 = 0
c1 = -10, c2 = 0, c3 = 10 Change of notations
u 1 = U1, u2 = U3, u3 = U5,
Calculations
v1 = U2, v2 = U4, v3 = U6
α1 = (1)U1
α2 = -(1/10)U1 + (1/10)U3
α3 = -(1/4) U1+ (1/4) U5
β1 = (1)U2
β2 = -(1/10)U2 + (1/10) U4
β3 = -(1/4) U2+ (1/4) U6
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 14
Example
Substitute α and β to obtain displacements u α1 = (1)U1
and v for element 1.
α2 = -(1/10)U1 + (1/10)U3
α3 = -(1/4) U1+ (1/4) U5
u = α1 + α2 x + α3 y
v = β1 + β2 x + β3 y β1 = (1)U2
β2 = -(1/10)U2 + (1/10) U4
β3 = -(1/4) U2+ (1/4) U6

Calculation:

u1 = U1 + [-1/10 (U1) + (1/10) U3] x + [-(1/4) U1+ (1/4) U5 ] y


v1 = U2 + [-1/10 (U2) + (1/10) U4] x + [-(1/4) U2+ (1/4) U6 ] y

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 15


Example
Rewriting the equations in the matrix form,

u1 = U1 + [-1/10 (U1) + (1/10) U3] x + [-(1/4) U1+ (1/4) U5 ] y


v1 = U2 + [-1/10 (U2) + (1/10) U4] x + [-(1/4) U2+ (1/4) U6 ] y

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 16


Example

Similarly the displacements within


element 2 can be expressed as,

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 17


Example
The next step is to determine the strains using 2D strain-
displacement relations,

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 18


Example
Differentiate the displacement equation to obtain the strain
u1 = U1 + [-1/10(U1) + (1/10) U3] x + [-(1/4) U1+ (1/4) U5 ] y

v1 = U2 + [-1/10(U2) + (1/10) U4] x + [-(1/4) U2+ (1/4) U6 ] y

1st element

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 19


Example
Element 2
2nd element

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 20


Normal & Shear components of stress (3D)
Normal stress is perpendicular to the cross section,  (sigma).
Shear stress is parallel to the cross section,  (tau). First subscript indicates
y y the axis that is
perpendicular to the face

3D xy
Element yx
Second subscript
yz xy indicates the positive
direction of the shear
stress

zy x
xz
zx x
Due to equilibrium condition;

z xy = yx
zx = xz
z zy = yz
State of Stress
Three dimensional stress matrix

Two dimensional,
Plane Stress
Stress & Strain Relationship
Uniaxial state of stress σx ≠ 0 , σy = 0 , σz = 0 Poisson ratio

εx = (σx / E ), εy = - ν εx , εz = - ν εx
Using the three dimensional (triaxial state of stress) stress strain
relations for homogeneous, isotropic material and plane-stress,
εx = (σx / E ) - ν (εy) - ν (εz) = (σx / E ) - ν (σy / E ) - ν (σz / E )
ε y = (σ y / E ) - ν (ε x ) - ν (ε z ) = (σ y / E ) - ν (σ x / E ) - ν (σ z / E )
εz = (σz / E ) - ν (εx) - ν (εy) = (σz / E ) - ν (σx / E ) - ν (σy / E )

Stresses in
terms of strains

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 23


Stress & Strain Relationship
There are many practical problems where the stress in the z-direction is zero,
this is referred to as the state of Plane Stress.

Shear stress
E
xy = xy G G=
2(1 + )

Matrix
form
FEA Results - Principal Stresses

Normal stresses on planes with no


shear stresses are maximum and they
are called principal stresses 1, 2,
and 3, where 1 > 2 > 3

The three non-imaginary roots are the principal stresses

3 - (x + y + z) 2 + (x y + x z + y z - xy2 - xz2 - yz2)  -


(x y z - 2 xy xz yz - x yz2 - y xz2 - z xy2 ) = 0
Plane stress, two principal stresses, 3 = 0
3 - (x + y) 2 + (x y - xy)  = 0
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 25
Displacement Strain Stress
Partial derivatives Stress & Strain
relationship

Material

Ductile – Yield strength of the material is used in


designing components

Brittle – Ultimate strength in tension and


compression is used in designing components

Finite element software provides you with,


maximum normal stress (largest principle stress),
maximum shear stress and von Mises stress
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 26
Failure Theories – Ductile Materials
Maximum Shear Stress
Yield strength of a material is used to design components made of
ductile material

• Maximum shear stress theory (Tresca 1886)

(max )component > ( )obtained from a tension test at the yield point Failure

 = Sy Sy
= 2
To avoid failure
Sy
(max )component <
2
 = Sy

Sy
max = 2n
n = Safety factor

Design equation
 =Sy
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 27
Failure Theories – Ductile Material
von Mises Stress
• Distortion energy theory (von Mises-Hencky)

Simple tension test → (Sy)t


Hydrostatic state of stress → (Sy)h
t
h
(Sy)h >> (Sy)t

Distortion contributes to
failure much more than h
change in volume.
h

t
(total strain energy) – (strain energy due to hydrostatic stress) = strain energy
due to angular distortion > strain energy obtained from a tension test at the
yield point → failure
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 28
von Mises Stress
3D case, to avoid failure
(1 – 2)2 + (1 – 3)2 + (2 – 3)2 ½
< Sy
2

2D case (plane stress), 3 = 0


½
 = (1 – 12 + 2 )
2 2
< Sy

Sy
′ = Design equation
n

Where  is von Mises stress

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 29


Failure Theories – Brittle Materials
Maximum Principal Stress
Characteristics of brittle materials;
1. Sut ≈ Syt 2. Suc >> Sut 3. Percent elongation < 5%

Perform two tests, one in compression and one in tension,


draw the Mohr’s circles for both
 tests.

Suc 2 Stress state 1 Sut



Tension test
Compression test

Failure envelope
The component is safe if the state of stress falls inside the
failure envelope. 1 > 2 and 3 = 0
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept., 30
Failure Theories – Brittle Materials
Modified Coulomb-Mohr theory

2 or 3 2 or 3
Sut Sut

Safe Safe Sut I Sut


Suc
1 1
Safe
II
-Sut -Sut
Safe
III

Suc Suc

Cast iron data Three design zones

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept. 31


Failure Theories – Brittle Materials

Zone I 2
Sut
1 > 0 , 2 > 0 and 1 > 2
Sut I Sut
1 = n Design equation
1
II
-Sut
Zone II III
1 > 0 , 2 < 0 and 2 < Sut

Sut -Suc
1 = n Design equation

Zone III
1 1 2 1
1 > 0 , 2 < 0 and 2 > Sut 1 ( Sut – Suc ) – Suc = n

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept., Design equation 32


Formulation of the Finite Element Method
• The classical finite element analysis code (h version)
The system equations for solid and structural
mechanics problems are derived using the principle of
virtual displacement and work (Bathe, 1982).
• The method of weighted residuals (Galerkin Method)
weighted residuals are used as one method of finite
element formulation starting from the governing
differential equation.
• Potential Energy and Equilibrium; The Rayleigh-Ritz
Method
Involves the construction of assumed displacement field.
Uses the total potential energy for an elastic body

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 33


Formulation of the Finite Element Method
Let’s denote the displacements of any point (x, y, z) of the object
from the unloaded configuration as UT
UT = [U(x, y, z) V(x, y, z) W(x, y,z)]

The displacement U causes the strains

 T = [x y z xy yz zx ]


and the corresponding stresses
 T = [x y z xy yz zx ]
The goal is to calculate displacement, strains, and stresses from
the given external forces.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 34


Formulation of the Finite Element Method

fxB fxS fxi


f B= fyB f S= fyS f i= fyi
fzB fzS fzi

f B – Body forces (forces distributed over the volume of the body:


(gravitational forces, inertia, or magnetic)
f S – surface forces (pressure of one body on another, or hydrostatic
pressure)
f i – Concentrated external forces

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 35


Formulation of the Finite Element Method
Equilibrium condition and principle of virtual displacements

∫V   dV = ∑U
T
iT
∫ ∫
T T B S S i
V
U f dV + S
U f dS + F
Internal work Work done by Work done by Work done by
body forces surface forces external forces

The left side represents the internal virtual work done, and the
right side represents the external work done by the actual
forces as they go through the virtual displacement.
The above equation is used to generate finite element
equations. And by approximating the object as an assemblage
of discrete finite elements, these elements are interconnected
at nodal points
Us – denotes the displacement due to surface forces
Ken Youssefi
Ui – denotes the displacement due to point forces
Mechanical Engineering Dept 36
Formulation of the Finite Element Method

Displacement interpolation matrix

The displacement at any point measured with respect to a local


coordinate system for an element are assumed to be a function of the
displacement at the nodes.

Ken Youssefi
H (m) is the displacement interpolation matrix
Mechanical Engineering Dept 37
Formulation of the Finite Element Method

strain-displacement matrix

B (m) is the rows of the strain-displacement matrix

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 38


Formulation of the Finite Element Method
Elasticity matrix

Matrix
form

C (m) is the elasticity matrix of element m and  I(m) are the


element’s initial stresses. The elasticity matrix relates strains
to stress.
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 39
Displacement at any element Displacement at any node

Displacement interpolation matrix

Strain-displacement matrix

Elasticity matrix Initial stress (residual stress)


Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 40
Formulation of the Finite Element Method
The formula for the principle of virtual displacements can be
rewritten as the sum of integration over the volume and areas
for each finite element,

Where m varies from 1 to the total number of elements

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 41


Formulation of the Finite Element Method

 

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 42


Formulation of the Finite Element Method
The equilibrium equation can be expressed using matrix
notations for m elements.

where
B(m) Represents the rows of the strain displacement matrix
C(m) Elasticity matrix of element m
H(m) Displacement interpolation matrix
U Vector of the three global displacement
components at all nodes
F Vector of the external concentrated forces
applied to the nodes

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 43


Formulation of the Finite Element Method


The above equation can be rewritten as follows,

The above equation describes the static equilibrium problem.


K is the stiffness matrix.
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 44
Continuing the example B(m) - Represents the rows of the strain
displacement matrix

C(m) - Elasticity matrix of element m

y
x dx

4
dA = y dx y=4- x
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 1045
Example

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 46


Example
Calculating the stiffness matrix for element 2.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 47


Example
The stiffness of the structure as a whole is obtained by combing
the two matrices, K = K1 +K2

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 48


Example
KU = R The load vector R, equals Rc because only
concentrated loads act on the nodes.

R=

where Py is the known external force and F1x, F1y, F3x, and F3y
are the unknown reaction forces at the supports.
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 49
Example
The following matrix equation can be solved for nodal point
displacements
KU = R

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 50


Example
The solution can be obtained by applying the boundary conditions

No deflection
at the supports

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 51


Example
The equation can be divided into two parts,

The first equation can be solved for the unknown nodal displacements,
U3, U4, U7, and U8. And substituting these values into the second
equation to obtain unknown reaction forces, F1x, F1y, F3x, and F3y

Once the nodal displacements have been obtained, the strains


and stresses can be calculated.
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 52
Finite Element Analysis
FEA is a mathematical representation of a physical system
and the solution of that mathematical representation

FEA requires three steps

• Pre-Processing
• Solving Matrix (solver)
• Post-Processing

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 53


FEA Pre-Processing
Mesh
Mesh is your way of communicating geometry to
the solver, the accuracy of the solution is primarily
dependent on the quality of the mesh.
The better the mesh looks, the more accurate the
solution is.
A good-looking mesh should have well-shaped
elements (proportional), and the transition between
densities should be smooth and gradual without
skinny, distorted elements.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 54


FEA Pre-Processing
The mesh elements supported by most finite-element codes:

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 55


FEA Pre-Processing – Elements
Beam Elements
Beam elements typically fall into two categories; able to
transmit moments or not able to transmit moments.

Rod (bar or truss) elements cannot carry moments.

Entire length of a modeled component can be captured with a


single element. This member can transmit axial loads only and
can be defined simply by a material and cross sectional area.
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 56
FEA Pre-Processing – Elements
The most general line element is a beam.

(b) and (c) are higher order line elements.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 57


FEA Pre-Processing – Elements
Plate and Shell Modeling
Plate and shell are used interchangeably and refer to surface-
like elements used to represent thin-walled structures.

A quadrilateral mesh is usually more accurate than a mesh of


similar density based on triangles. Triangles are acceptable in
regions of gradual transitions.
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 58
FEA Pre-Processing – Elements
Solid Element Modeling

Tetrahedral (tet) mesh is the only generally


accepted means to fill a volume, used as auto-
10-node Quadratic
mesh element by many FEA codes.
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 59
FEA Pre-Processing - meshing
The mesh transition from .05 to .5 element size without control of transition (a)
creates irregular mesh around the hole which will yield disappointing results.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 60


Effect of Mesh Element

Model 1 produces Von Mises stress of 18,000 psi.

It uses a first-order solid tetrahedral element


One element is placed across the
thickness of the plate in bending, not able
to handle the positive and negative
bending.
The elements are highly distorted

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 61


Effect of Mesh Element

Model 2 produces maximum Von Mises stress of 32,000 psi.

The mesh on model 2 is similar to that on


model 1 but uses second-order solid tetrahedral
elements.
the mesh is too coarse to model stress
distribution correctly or detect stress
concentrations. Some elements are still
highly distorted.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 62


Effect of Mesh Element
Model 3 produces maximum Von Mises stress of 49,000 psi
This model uses second-order solid tetrahedral elements and has
finer mesh to model stress distributions properly.
Stress will increase with each mesh
refinement. Thus, the process of
mesh refining and solving the
refined model must continue until
the increase in stress between two
consecutive iterations becomes
sufficiently small. Only then can
results be accepted as final.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 63


Max stress = 18,000 psi.

Max stress = 32,000 psi.

1st order
tetrahedral Max stress = 49,000 psi.
coarse mesh

2nd order
tetrahedral
coarse mesh
2st order
tetrahedral
fine mesh
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 64
CAD Modeling for FEA
CAD and FEA activities should be coordinated at the early stages
of the design process to minimize the duplication of effort.
There are four situations

• CAD models prepared without consideration of


FEA needs.
• Analytical geometry developed by or for analyst
for sole purpose of FEA.
• CAD models prepared by the design group for
eventual FEA.
• CAD models unsuitable for use in analysis due to
the amount of rework required.
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 65
CAD Modeling for FEA
• Solid chunky parts (thick-walled, low aspect ratio)
parts mesh cleanly directly off CAD models.

• Clean geometry
geometrical features must not prevent the mesh from
being created. The model should not include buried
features.

• Parent-child relationships
parametric modeling allows defining features off other
CAD features.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 66


CAD Modeling for FEA
Short edges and Sliver surfaces
Short edges and sliver surfaces usually accompany each other and on
large faces can cause highly distorted elements or a failed mesh.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 67


CAD Modeling for FEA – Sliver Surfaces
The rounded rib on the
Flat surface
inside of the piston has a
thickness of .30 and a
radius of .145, as a result
a flat surface of .01 by 2.5
is created. A mesh size of
.05 is required to avoid
distorted elements. This
results in a 290,000
nodes. If the radius is
increased to .15, a mesh
size of .12 is sufficient
which results in 33,500
nodes.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 68


CAD Modeling for FEA

Sliver surface caused by


misaligned features.

Fillet across shallow angle

Sliver surface caused by a slightly


undersized fillet
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 69
CAD Modeling for FEA – Sliver edge

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 70


CAD Modeling for FEA – Sliver Surfaces

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 71


CAD Modeling for FEA – Sliver Surfaces

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 72


Guidelines for Geometry Planning

• Delay inclusion of fillets and chamfers as long as


possible.
• Where possible, try to use permanent datum as a
reference to minimize dependencies.
• Avoid using fillet or draft edges as references for
other features (parent-child relationship)
• Never bury a feature in your model. Delete or
redefine unwanted or incorrect features.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 73


Guidelines for Part Simplification
In general, features listed below could be considered for
suppression. But, consider the impact before suppression.
• Outside corner breaks or rounds.
• Small inside fillets far from areas of interest.
• Screw threads or spline features unless they are
specifically being studied.
• Small holes and slots outside the load path.
• Decorative or identification features.
• Large sections of geometry that are essentially
decoupled from the behavior of interested section.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 74


Model with full detail Model with details suppressed
Elements = 66727 Elements = 2565

No. of equations = 311421 No. of equations = 14889


Guidelines for Part Simplification
Fillet added
to the rib

Holes removed

Fillet
removed

Ribs needed
for casting
removed
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 77
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 78
CAD Modeling for FEA
Model Conversion
• Try to use the same CAD system for all
components in design.
• When the above is not possible, translate geometry
through kernel based tools such as ACIS or
Parasolids. Using standards based (IGES, DXF, or
VDA) translations may lead to problem.
• Visually inspect the quality of imported geometry.
• Avoid modification of the imported geometry in a
second CAD system.
• Use the original geometry for analysis. If not
possible, use a translation directly from the
original model.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 79


Example of a solid model corrupted by
IGES transfer

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 80


SW Simulation

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 81


FEA Pre-Processing
Material Properties
The only material properties that are generally required by
an isotropic, linear static FEA are: Young’s modulus
(E), Poisson’s ratio (v), shear modulus (G), and yield
strength (or ultimate strength). Strength is needed if the
program provides safety factor or performance result.
G = E / 2(1+v)
Provide only two of the three properties.
Thermal expansion and simulation analysis require
coefficient of thermal expansion, conductivity and
specific heat values.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 82


FEA Pre-Processing
Nonlinear Material Properties
A multi-linear model requires the input of stress-strain
data pairs to essentially communicate the stress-strain
curve from testing to the FE model

Highly deformable, low stiffness, incompressible materials,


such as rubber and other synthetic elastomers require
distortional and volumetric constants or a more complete set
of tensile, compressive, and shear force versus stretch curve.

A creep analysis requires time and temperature dependent


creep properties. Plastic parts are extremely sensitive to this
phenomenon

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 83


FEA Pre-Processing
Comments
If you are selecting the property set from the code’s library,
be aware of the assumptions made with this selection.

• Their properties hold constant throughout the assigned entity.


• Average values are used (variation could be up to 15%).
• Localized changes due to heat or other processing effects are
not accounted for.
• Any impurities present in the parent material are neglected.
The assumption is that there are no defects in the material

If possible, obtain material property values specific to the


application under analysis.
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 84
FEA Pre-Processing
Boundary Conditions (Loads and Constraints)
In FEA, the name of the game is “boundary condition”,
that is calculating the load and figuring out constraints
that each component experiences in its working
environment.

“garbage in, garbage out”

The results of FEA should include a complete


discussion of the boundary conditions.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 85


Boundary Conditions
Loads
Loads are used to represent inputs to the system.
They can be in the forms of forces, moments (torque),
pressures, temperature, or accelerations.
Constraints
Constraints are used as reactions to the applied
loads. Constraints can resist translational or
rotational deformation induced by applied loads.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 86


Boundary Conditions
Linear Static Analysis
Boundary conditions are assumed constant from
application to final deformation of system and all loads
are applied gradually to their full magnitude.
Dynamic Analysis
The boundary conditions (Loads) vary with time.

Non-linear Analysis
The orientation and distribution of the boundary
conditions vary as displacement of the structure is
calculated.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 87


Boundary Conditions
Degrees of Freedom
Spatial DOFs refer to the three translational and three rotational
modes of displacement that are possible for any part in 3D
space. A constraint scheme must remove all six DOFs for the
analysis to run.
Elemental DOFs refer to the ability of each element to transmit
or react to a load. The boundary condition cannot load or
constrain a DOF that is not supported by the element to which it
is applied.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 88


Boundary Conditions
Constraints and their geometric equivalent in classic
beam calculation.

Fixed support

Pin support

Roller support

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 89


Boundary Conditions
A solid face should always have at least three points in
contact with the rest of the structure. A solid element
should never be constrained by less than three points and
only translational DOFs must be fixed.

Accuracy

The choice of boundary conditions has a direct impact


on the overall accuracy of the model.
Over-constrained model – an overly stiff model due
to poorly applied constraints.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 90


Boundary Conditions -Example
Excessive Constraints
Model of the chair seat with patches representing the tops of
the legs.

Patch 1

Patch 2
Patch 3 Patch 4

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 91


Boundary Conditions -Example
It may appear to be acceptable to constrain each circular patch
in vertical translation while leaving the rotational DOFs
unconstraint. This causes the seat to behave as if the leg-to-
seat interfaces were completely fixed.
A more realistic constraint scheme would be to pin the
center point of each circular patch (translational), allowing
the patch to rotate. Each point should be fixed vertically,
and horizontal constraints should be selectively applied so
that in-plane spatial rotation and rigid body translation is
removed without causing excessive constraints.

Patch 1

Patch 2
Patch 3 Patch 4

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 92


Boundary Conditions -Example
• Constraining the center point of patch 1 in all 3
translational DOFs.
• Constraining x and y translations of the center point of
patch 2.
• Constraining z and y translation of the center point of
patch 3.
• Constraining just the y translation of the center point of
patch 4.
This scheme allows in-
Patch 1
plane translation induced
Patch 2
by bending of the seat Patch 3 Patch 4
without rigid body
translation or rotation.
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 93
Legs are fixed to seat

2000 N applied force


distributed over the
surface.
Use On Flat Face restraint
Fixed legs In plane rotation is allowed

Stress Stress

Displacement

Displacement
One leg is restrained in
x,y,z, one in y, one in
x,y, one in y,z

Stress
Displacement
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 97
All patches Displ. = .016 mm
(legs) fixed
All patches (legs) On
Flat Face constrains,
in plane rotation

Displ. = .06 mm

One leg is
restrained in x,y,z, Displ. = .02 mm
one in y, one in x,y,
one in y,z
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 98
Stress=11.6x107 N/m2
Stress=5.8x107 N/m2

All patches (legs)


All patches Stress=10.4x107 N/m2 On Flat Face
(legs) fixed
constrains, in
plane rotation
One leg is
restrained in x,y,z,
one in y, one in x,y,
one in y,z
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 99
Summary of Pre-Processing
• Build the geometry (CAD model for FEA)
• Prepare the model for meshing (simplify)
• Create the finite-element mesh
• Add boundary conditions; loads and
constraints
• Select material or provide properties
• Specify analysis type (static or dynamic,
linear or non-linear, thermal, etc.)
These activities are called finite element modeling.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 100


Solving the Model - Solver
Once the mesh is complete, and the properties and
boundary conditions have been applied, it is time to solve
the model. In most cases, this will be the point where you
can take a deep breath, push a button and relax while the
computer does the work for a change.

Multiple Load and Constraint Cases


In most cases submitting a run with multiple load cases will
be faster than running sequential, complete solutions for
each load case.
Final Model Check

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 101


Post-Processing, Displacement Magnitude
Unexpectedly high or low displacements (by order of magnitude)
could be caused by an improper definition of load and/or elemental
properties.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 102


Post-Processing, Displacement Animation
Animation of the model displacements serves as the best means of
visualizing the response of the model to its boundary conditions.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 103


Post-Processing, FEA of a connecting rod

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 104


Post-Processing, Stress Results
The magnitude of the stresses should not be entirely unexpected.

Second Mode (Twisting)

First Mode (Bending)

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 105


Post-Processing, thermal analysis

Deformation of a duct under thermal load

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 106


Deploy Mechanism – Assembly Analysis

Displacement

Stress
Can crusher stress
analysis
Use finer mesh size
Right click the
Mesh icon and
choose Failure
Diagnostics
Add fillet to the slot
edges (.1 in.)
Apply 200 N Max stress (von Mises) = 43.9 MPa
(45 lb) Sy = 96.5 MPa (Al 2014)

Safety factor
n = 96.5/43.9 = 2.2 > 2.0
Max deflection 1.13 mm < 2 mm

Set gap to 5 in.


Fix the back plate

Design requirements
Safety factor between
2.0-2.5 and deflection
less than 2 mm
Mesh Quality

The ideal shape of a tetrahedral


element is a regular tetrahedron with
the aspect ratio of 1. Analogously, an
equilateral triangle is the ideal shape
for a shell element.

Sometimes, Irregular tetrahedral


are created by the program.
These distorted elements have
high aspect ratio. An aspect ratio
that is too high causes element
degeneration, which in turn affects
the quality of the results.
Aspect Ratio

6 Right click
the Mesh
icon and
select Create
Mesh Plot
1

Select Aspect
ratio

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept. 116


Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 117
Automatic transition - the program
automatically applies mesh controls to small
features, holes, fillets, and other fine details of
your model. Uncheck Automatic transition
before meshing large models with many small
features and details to avoid generating a very
large number of elements.

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 118


View (animated) Post-Processing
Displacements

No Review Boundary
Does the shape of deformations make sense?
Yes Conditions

View Displacement
Fringe Plot

Are magnitudes in line with your expectations? No Review Load Magnitudes


and Units
Yes
View Stress
Fringe Plot
Review Mesh Density
Is the quality and mag. of stresses acceptable? No
and Quality of Elements
Yes
View Results Specific
To the Analysis
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 119
FEA - Flow Chart

Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept 120


Last Comment
“ Finite Element Analysis makes a good
engineer great”

and a bad engineer dangerous !”

Robert D. Cook, Professor of Mechanical


Engineering
University of Wisconsin, Madison

You might also like