100% found this document useful (1 vote)
1K views1 page

Comprehensive Viva Rubric

The document outlines a rubric for comprehensively evaluating a viva with 5 criteria: knowledge, problem solving, presentation, communication, and critical thinking. Each criteria is scored on a scale from satisfactory to excellent based on attributes like depth of knowledge, mapping of theory to practice, relevance of content, clarity of voice, and ability to predict outcomes.

Uploaded by

Anis Maqbool
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
1K views1 page

Comprehensive Viva Rubric

The document outlines a rubric for comprehensively evaluating a viva with 5 criteria: knowledge, problem solving, presentation, communication, and critical thinking. Each criteria is scored on a scale from satisfactory to excellent based on attributes like depth of knowledge, mapping of theory to practice, relevance of content, clarity of voice, and ability to predict outcomes.

Uploaded by

Anis Maqbool
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Comprehensive Viva Rubric:

S.No Criteria Satisfactory Good Excellent


1 Knowledge in Superficial Adequate Demonstrates
basic knowledge of knowledge of deep knowledge;
engineering topic; only most topics; answer the
(20M) able to answer answer the questions with
basic questions. questions, but explanations and
fails to elaboration.
elaborate.

2 Problem Improper mapping Moderate Efficient


solving ability of theory concepts mapping of mapping of
(20M) with practical theory theory concepts
problem solving concepts with with practical
Approaches. practical problem solving
problem Approaches.
solving
approaches .

3 Presentation Less relevant More relevant More relevant


Ability content, poor content, content, good
(20M) coherence with moderate coherence with
inadequate coherence with adequate
illustrations. less illustrations.
illustrations.
4 Communicatio Difficult to hear; clear voice, but clear,
n Skills. occasional eye not as expressive
(20M) contact; some expressive; a voice;
mumbling, little or little nervous, poised, good
no expression; not as polished. posture, no
nervous, some distracting
distracting mannerisms.
mannerisms; reads
much of slide.

5 Critical Is unable to predict Approximately Can predict and


Thinking problem outcomes predicts and defend problem
(20M) for the given input Defends outcomes .
data set. problem
outcomes .

You might also like