BCA Objective With Answer
BCA Objective With Answer
A recent study found that school-age children who participate in school-related sports activities
fight less during school and school-related activities than do those children who do not participate.
It was concluded that sports must satisfy an aggressive impulse which would otherwise be released
through fighting.
Which of the following, if true, weakens the conclusion referred to in the above passage?
a) School-related sports activities are always supervised by adults.
b) Supervisors of school-related sports activities discourage participants from being extremely
aggressive.
c) Approximately 85 per cent of the fights children get into during school or school-related
activities take place during break times.
d) Most schools suspend those who fight during school or school-related activities from the
schools’ sports teams.
2. What was the estimated population of people in the story “Billenium”?
a) 10,000 million b) 15,000 million c) 20,000 million d) 25,000 million
3. Which is not an argument indicator word?
a) Hence b) For c) Cannot d) So
4. What is not used in fax message?
a) Complementary close b) Headings c) Fax Message d) No of pages
5. What doesn’t come under writing section of oral presentation?
a) Brainstorm b) handling questions c) Visual aids d) Writing a draft
6. Choose a short word for the word ‘terminate’?
a) Discontinue b) hold c) Extinguish d) End
7. While compiling minutes which tense is used?
a) Present tense b) Past tense c) Future tense d) All tenses
8. Which comes as a part of AIDA objective of advertisement?
a) Attractive b) Information c) Desire d) Accuracy
9. What is a purpose of leaflet?
a) Publicity b) Vacancy c) Inhibit d) Suppress
10. While designing notice we must not make it _____________?
a) Clear b) Attractive c) Logical d) Incoherent
Short Questions
Long question
(a) Write a summary of the main conclusion and the immediate reasons (basic reasons or intermediate
conclusions) offered for it; (b) identify the reasoning which is meant to support any intermediate
conclusion you have identified.
You cannot tackle every social problem just by banning whatever excess follows from it. The
suggestion of Peter Fahy, the Chief Constable of Cheshire, that the solution to the yobbish conduct of
drunken youths is to raise the legal age of drinking to 21 – and to ban outdoor drinking in public
places – is absurd and unworkable. It is punishing the majority for a minority. It is an attack on the
civilized charms of al fresco refreshment. It is a deeply authoritarian idea, inviting the State and the
Government, once again, to monitor the lives of law-abiding citizens. And it doesn’t get to the root of
the problem, which is about tackling uncontrolled and delinquent social conduct.
I know that these youngsters can be exasperating and even vicious. Their abusive conduct is often
fuelled by cheap alcohol, but to ban alcohol altogether to everyone under 21 would be an unacceptable
assault on liberty. Yes, some US states do, but American culture has never quite shaken off the stern
shades of Prohibition – so popularly supported between 1919 and 1933.
Instead, look at other remedies. Consider how the Latin countries handle alcohol – as with the Jewish
tradition, by seeking to keep it in a civilized social context, especially the context of family meals.
And by regarding drunkenness as shameful, too. Secondly, look at how Britain overcame public
drunkenness previously: by energetic voluntary temperance movements. Often endowed by rich
philanthropists, they emphasized the positive aspects of sobriety. They worked through communities
and churches, sporting activities and even temperance dances.
Instead of bringing in new laws, one sometimes thinks it would be better if a few laws were repealed,
particularly those aspects of the Human Rights Act that prompt yobbos to affirm ‘I know my rights’
whenever they are corrected (if they are corrected). So yes, implement the existing laws against
drunkenness, and devise imaginative ways of reducing the culture of drunkenness, rather than
constantly increasing the intrusive power of the State.
(Extract from Mary Kenny, ‘Passing laws will never sober up Britain’,The Times, Friday 17 August
2007)