The Effect of Text Messaging On The English Language Aspects and Communication PDF
The Effect of Text Messaging On The English Language Aspects and Communication PDF
2; June 2016
The Effect of Text Messaging on the English Language Aspects and Communication
Abstract
This study aims at investigating the effect of Text Messaging on the aspects of English language and
communication. The descriptive research method is used. The findings indicate that: Text Messaging violates the
rules of Standard English by deviating from the existing norms. Text messaging has great effect on the English
language aspects. Furthermore, text messaging has a significant effect on communication. Text messaging
increases confidence and interaction in shy and lonely people. The use of abbreviations leads to differences in
understanding of single words because of the different ways of writing these words. The use of text messaging has
spread and has become a new challenge in communication. The study has also shown that women tend to use
longer and wider text messaging than men. Text messaging increases cheating among users. Moreover, text
messaging wastes valuable resources like time, efforts, and money. It also causes thumb pain, sleep problem and
finally, radiation is harmful to text message users.
Key Words: English language, language aspects, text, text messaging.
1. Introduction
1.1 Background
English language professionals have embraced the world of collaborative opportunities the Internet has
introduced. Many tools such as e-mails, discussion forums and chat are by now familiar to many English language
teachers. Recent innovations- blogs wikis and RSS feeds maybe less familiar but offer powerful opportunities for
online collaboration for both English language professionals and learners. The encouragement of peer-to-peer
networking and buddy learning, so central to a constructivist learning approach, which has made discussion
forums the mainstay of web courses in most disciplines. Language teachers have found that students at many
different levels benefit from the extra writing done in discussion forums and from its use to communicate
meaningfully in real contexts. While dedicated software for creating discussion forums exists (such as WWW
Board), many instructors have access to built-in forums creation in a learning management system (LMS) such as
web CT or Blackboard. Features across the different systems are very similar, although the look and feel may
differ significantly. Some dedicated products, such as Web Crossing, offer additional add-ons such as polls, live
messaging, and enhanced monitoring. Although most commonly used as part of a class, there are certainly uses of
forums outside that setting as well as in learner participation in native speaker forums. For commonly studied
languages, there are on-line forums available on a wide variety of topics, often organized by media outlets or
interest group. As one recent study of their use by language learners points out that students need to approach
such forums with a good understanding of the conventions used and of the cultural dynamic at work.
The advent of SMS has devised existing linguistic forms deviating from the established ones and by reshaping all
the conventional communicative practices. Being the popular medium of communication among young, thumb
generation, the language of SMS has evolved and reinvented its unique stylistic features, which violate the rules
of Standard English. Language and fascinate and tempt many to examine and analyze these distinctive features
exhibited by this new language called ‘Text speak’. Therefore, Electronic English among the people is one of the
informal situations of education and it opens the door for all people, because it breaks the barriers.
13
ISSN 2374-8850 (Print), 2374-8869 (Online) © Center for Promoting Ideas, USA www.ijllnet.com
Moreover, some people feel shy and hesitant so through the text messaging they can easily communicate without
any problems or restrictions. Since the late 1990s, the use of the short messaging system (SMS, also known as
“texting”) available on mobile phones has seen phenomenal growth. Statistics show that on average there are
more than 280,000 SMS messages sent every hour in Norway. This means that more than 6.7 million per day send
those messages in a country with only 4 million inhabitants (Sandvin et al., 2002).Among teens, SMS is the
preferred form of mediated interaction, surpassing instant messaging, e-mail, voice mobile telephony and even
traditional fixed-line telephone calls. SMS messages have several characteristics that make it useful for teens and
increasingly for other groups. First, they are relatively cheap and they are personal, conveying a message directly
from one person to another. Since mobile telephones are now ubiquitous among Norwegian teens, one knows that
if one sends an SMS to a certain telephone number then it will come to that person, and not to another individual.
SMS is asynchronous, meaning it does not necessarily require the immediate attention of the receiver. In addition,
it is relatively unobtrusive. If, for example, a person turns off the ringing sounds on his or her mobile telephone,
nobody is the wiser that a teen is sending and receiving communications. Indeed, research shows that teens send
and receive SMS messages in class at school and through the night. Around 20% of teens say that they send and
receive SMS messages after midnight on a weekly basis (Ling, 2004).
In some ways, SMS is an odd duck. It is difficult to write messages on mobile phones since there is no traditional
keyboard or writing instrument. Moreover, message length is limited to only 160 characters, the displays for
reading the messages are small, and transmission relies on terminals limited by poor batteries. When SMS was
originally designed, the system was not even primarily intended as a form for personal interaction. Rather, it was
created as a way to alert users to voice mail messages and perhaps as a system to broadcast weather or stock
information. Nonetheless, SMS is now a vibrant medium. Text messages where used to coordinate everyday
events, to maintain social networks and to help entertain oneself in the open moments of one’s day.
In the words of one17-year-old boy, “Often when you are sitting on the bus and subway it is boring and so you
can write messages and that entertains you in those boring moments.” To be sure, the culture of SMS is centered
among teens and in particular among female users. In spite of the fact that adult males were early adopters of
mobile telephones (Ling, 2000), it is among females that one currently finds the great motor of SMS culture. In
the words of a focus group informant, "Most of the messages I get from boys are pretty short because they don’t
think it is so fun to sit there and punch in on the phone. That is more of a girl thing" (Erin, 17). In contrast, female
teens write longer messages that are more complex. They include aspects of standard (such as emoticons and
items such as “xxx”), and they are more inclined to include in their SMS messages such refined formalities of
traditional written letters as salutations and closings.
A number of studies are beginning to appear that examine the linguistic properties of e-mail and other computer-
mediated communication (Werry, 1996; Baron, 1998, 2000, 2003; see also Herring, 1996). A central question in
this context is the nature of the communication and the effect of the medium on the formation of the language. It
is the intention of this study to explore the linguistic aspects of this form of communication and its effect on
English language aspects.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
People have different opinions concerning text messaging. Some people agree with the idea that text messaging
enhances and leads to the importance of using English Language among all levels of the community, by using
English in texting . Yet some other people disagree with that idea, and they think that using text messaging leads
to the deterioration of English language. Users use simple abbreviated symbolism language without consideration
to the rules of grammar, syntax, morphology, semantic, punctuation or spelling.
1.3 Research Questions
1. What are the effects of text messaging on different English language aspects?
a. What is the effect of text messaging on syntax?
b. What is effect of text messaging on semantics?
c. What is effect of text messaging on morphology?
d. What is effect of text messaging on phonology?
e. What is effect of text messaging on spelling and punctuation?
2. What is the effect of text messaging on communication?
14
International Journal of Language and Linguistics Vol. 3, No. 2; June 2016
15
ISSN 2374-8850 (Print), 2374-8869 (Online) © Center for Promoting Ideas, USA www.ijllnet.com
The researcher concludes that spelling constitutes a meaning-making source; spelling variants are retrieved using
word-frequency lists, categorized pursuant to form function. Creativity plays an important role in texting despite
physical constraints. he distinct order of the most repeated words in CorTextcan be explained with references to
the frequent phrases they occur therein. Further, application of a spoken grammar model discloses the similarities
and differences.
The third study is“A field Study of Use of Synchronous Chat on Online Courses” by David H. Spencer and
Starr Roxanne Hiltz . New Jersey Institute of Technology in 2003.The study proposes Media Mode as the
independent variable characterized by for nominal values derived from the mixture of asynchronous discussion
forum. The researchers collect data from 29 course sections. Students' perceptions of the use of chats are
investigated. They use university records to determine grade distributions. The study comes to the result that
when students use chat they find it "rewarding" and not "complex.” However, its use not significantly related to
predicted improvements in outcomes for courses. Students seem more satisfied with face-to-face courses that use
Asynchronous Learning Network (ALN) as alternative communication media than courses that are entirely ALN
based.
The fourth study is “The Impact of the Internet on English Language Teaching. A case study at a Thai
Rajabhat University” by Usa Noytim is submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of
Philosophy in July 2006.This study investigates the potential of the Internet to support students' English language
development, superficially reading development. This research was conducted in two stages: stage one is an
enthusiastic investigation of students' current Internet practice both in and outside university. The outcomes of
this stage confirm the development of an English language program that incorporates extensive use of the
Internet. Stage two implements and evaluates the research. The study reveals that the university students have low
overall levels of Internet use, law levels of computer and Internet skills. However, there are highly levels of
interest and enthusiasm. It believes that Internet can play a positive role in supporting English language learning.
It has been confirmed in stage two that Internet is potentially a powerful source for teaching English.
3. Methodology of Research
The method used in the research is the descriptive method .The research paradigm adopted in this study is anti-
positivism approach. A number of descriptive techniques have been adopted. These include content analysis,
discourse analysis, conversational analysis, and text analysis. For data collection, the sources utilized include text
dictionaries, similar previous studies, chat rooms, and reference materials. The data analysis is mainly linguistic
analysis. No numerals are used. All the data are qualitative in nature.
4.4 Data Analysis
English Form Textism Category Process Aspect
Accurate aQr8 Adjective Sound, number abbreviation Phonology
Beautiful Utiful Adjective Abbreviation, sound feature Phonology
Busy BZ Adjective Abbreviation ,shortening ,spoken feature Phonology
That TH@ Demonstrative spoken, symbol feature Phonology
Chocolate Chocl8 Noun Abbreviation, number, sound feature Phonology
Earlier RIER Adverb Spoken feature, shortening Phonology
Forty 4T Number Sound, number abbreviation Phonology
Why Y Question word Spoken feature Phonology
Receive reCv Verb Capitalization of stress sound Phonology
Tomorrow 2moro Adverb Number, sound abbreviation Phonology
Emergency MergNC Noun Stress ,number sound Phonology
16
International Journal of Language and Linguistics Vol. 3, No. 2; June 2016
18
International Journal of Language and Linguistics Vol. 3, No. 2; June 2016
19
ISSN 2374-8850 (Print), 2374-8869 (Online) © Center for Promoting Ideas, USA www.ijllnet.com
20
International Journal of Language and Linguistics Vol. 3, No. 2; June 2016
21
ISSN 2374-8850 (Print), 2374-8869 (Online) © Center for Promoting Ideas, USA www.ijllnet.com
Concerning SMS text messaging, there are a lot of effects on spelling. As mentioned in the table below, some
people write the wrong spelling and other write the textism. Here are some examples of words which are written
in misspelling and textism.
Correct spelling Misspelling Textism
Deviate Deviate DV8
Excess Exess XS
Melody Melody mLOD
Weird Weird wErd
Element Elament LMNt
Embarrassed Embarrassed MbRSd
Excellent Excellent XLNt
Extreme Extreame XtrEm
Genius Genious Gnys
Jealousy Jealousy jLSE
Juicy Juicey juC
Lottery Lottery lotRE
Marvellous Marvillous mRvLS
Relived Releaved rLEvd
Table (4-11) Analysis of spelling
In all these words, there isn’t clear rule for capitalization, also the omission of letters and abbreviation. Some
people make confusion between misspelling and textism and because there is no specific rule for textism, this
makes problem and difficulties in reading and writing text messaging. That one word can be written in many ways
however, people who know this language can communicate easily.
There are several possible explanations for the positive relationship between the use of textims and spelling
ability. The fun of text –messaging one’s friend, and relative freedom of spelling allowed in text messages may
increase children’s overall enjoyment of reading and writing as mentioned in the below table.
There is no clear convention for how words should be abbreviated, and like teenagers a young adults (kemp,2010,
Dejonge & Kemp,2010,Varnhagen et al,2009) here there are variety of textims. The most consistency was shown
for words that could be written as letter/number homophones (eg,r for are) but other words were written in a range
of ways, some dropping letters (e.g.Tthks for thanks),some changing spelling to represent sounds(e.g. Thanx)and
others doing both(e.g.tnx).Words which appear frequently in text- messages did not appear to have undergone
some conventionalized process of abbreviation, for example, the word “because” was re- written in 17 ways and
the word “tomorrow” in 29 ways.
Percentage of each typed of spelling produced for target words, from most to least consistent (spelling of>2%are
combined)
Word Spelling Spelling 2 Spelling 3 and beyond No of
1 spelling
Please plz Please Pls,plese,plse,ples,pleaz,plez,pease,pez,pleas 11
Everyone every1 evry1 Everyone,evone,ev1,ever1,eveone,everyone 8
Because because Cause Because ,coz, cos, becoz ,bcos, cuz, cuse, couse, couse, cas, becus, 17
becous, becau, becose, b1
Someone someone Some1 Sum1,som1,someone,sumone,smone,sme1 8
Thanks thanks Thx Thanx,thnx,thnks, tanks, thks, tnx, thax, thanks, tnks, tnx,ty,thxs, 17
Tks,tare,thanks
Tonight Tonight Tonight 2tnite,tnight,tonite,2nit 6
Birthday B’day Bday Birthday,b-day, B.day, BD, birthday, bifday, birfdi, birth, birthday 12
Tomorrow Tomorro Tomorrow 2moz,tomoz,2moro,2morow,2morro,tomrow,tomorrow,Tommoz,t 29
w mozx,2mo,2mororrow,2moru,2moz,2omoro,2one2tomozzo,morro
w,tmorrow,tmozz,tmrrw,tom,tomo,tomomoTomoro,tomoroz,tomos
,tomox
Table (4-12) Analysis of spelling
22
International Journal of Language and Linguistics Vol. 3, No. 2; June 2016
In the table 13-4 there is example of some words and its category and its use in context to show how texters
exercise it.
Category Example Examples in context
Insider word Hottie MAKE OUT WITH HOTTIE
Insider word Fugly Is that like a fugly slut?
Abbreviation Feein how r u feelin?
Abbreviation Prolly you could prolly look them up on the net
Word combination Wanna I wanna sign up for the yhl
Word combination Gonna I am gonna be gone sat and Sunday
Acronym Bf SHE HAS A BF
Acronym Omg omg that is terrible
Alphabet/letter U What do u wanna talk about?
Alphabet letter 2day Did u go to skool 2day?
Phonetic Yer You get yer stuff done tonight?
Phonetic Wat Wat u doin?
Lower case I I almost cried
Lower case Elyssa R u talking to elyssa?????
Contraction Im Im so exited
Contraction That’s that’s not cool
Emotion word Hahahahaha Hahahhahahaokey
Emotion word Sooooooo Wow imsooooooo glad
Emotion acronym Lol Lolim not talking to you
Emotion acronym Omg Omg for social we have to do this
Upper case THAT Not THAT nervous though.
Upper case WASH U might have to actually WASH that sweater
Emotion punctuation ………….. So I was thinking…………….
Emotion punctuation :) :) doo it haha
Typographical error Crazy im too crazy
Typographical error Frwnch Just finished studying 4 frwnch
Misspelling Embarrassing how embarrassing….
Misspelling Progect It’s for like a psychology progect
Table (4-13) Analysis of context
In the above table (13-4), there is a category of some text messages word use providing examples for each
category. Text language use categorized broadly into short cut, representing modification of the spelling of
specific words and phrases, and pragmatic device, representation changes that reflect pragmatic aspects of the
message. It further classified into short cuts into eight smaller categories and pragmatic devices into smaller
categories. According to Netlingo (http://www.netlingo.com) and Urban Dictionary
(http;//www.urbandictionary.com), this appears to help to identify text language use and etymology. In addition,
there are typographical errors and misspellings.
With the short cuts category, there is classification of slang words which are commonly found on the Web as
insider word (e.g. Ahottie is a very attractive and desirable person; fugly something or someone that is extremely
ugly).Some words are commonly shortened by removing one or more phonemes or morphemes as
abbreviation(e.g. According to Netlingo.com, prolly is a shortened form of probably)and contractions of multiple
words into a single, phonetically spelled word (e.g. Wanna for want to) as word combination. Common acronyms
classified (lol for laughing out loud or bf for boyfriend) as a cronym. This beside substitution of a word or part of
a word with an alphabetic name (e.g. u for you) or a number (e.g. 2morrow for tomorrow)as alphabetic /number
words. Common phonetic spellings like (e.g. Wat for what) as phonetic new language words. In addition, there is
the use of lower case where letters should be capitalized (e.g. as in the first letter of a proper noun) as lower case.
There is also omission of apostrophe (e.g. that for that’s) as contraction. Within the pragmatic devices category,
some words express emotion such as representing laughter (e.g. hahaha)or repeating vowels to mirror pragmatic
lengthening(e.g. what at to represent a drawn out expression of surprise)as emotion words .
23
ISSN 2374-8850 (Print), 2374-8869 (Online) © Center for Promoting Ideas, USA www.ijllnet.com
Moreover, the use of upper case to represent emotion (e.g. WHAT to represent surprise) as upper case and
extraneous use of punctuation for emphasis (e,g.!!!!!!)or as emotions(e.g.,8-) as emotion punctuation. Also, the
common letter typing errors (e.g. know for now) as typographical error and apparently misspelled words (e.g.
hungary for hungry)as misspelling.
Some words received more than one classification; for example, from the table above, the insider word, h ottie,
was in all uppercase letters and so was scored both an insider word and as upper case. Other examples of multiple
classifications include im, classified as lowercase and a contraction error, and lol, classified both as a short cut
acronym and as a pragmatic device emotion acronym. Concerning SMS text messaging, there are a lot of effects
on spelling, as mentioned in the table below. Some people use misspelling, other use word as it in textism.
Correct spelling Misspelling Textism
Deviate Deveate DV8
Excess Exess XS
Melody Mellody mLOD
Weird Weird wErd
Element Elament LMNt
Embarrassed Embarassed MbRSd
Excellent Exellent XLNt
Extreme Extreame XtrEm
Genius Genious Gnys
Jealousy Jealosy jLSE
Juicy Juicey juC
Lottery Lotery lotRE
Marvelous Marvillous mRvLS
Relived Releaved rLEvd
Table (4-14) Analysis of misspelling and textism
In all these words there isn’t clear rule for capitalization, also there is omission of letters and abbreviation .Some
people make confusion between misspelling and textism, and because there is no specific rule for textism,this
leads to problem and difficulties in reading and writing text messaging. That one word can be written in many
ways. However, people who know this language can communicate easily.
Textism Word
& And
@ At
2 To
A ninglish An English
Abbrevi8 Abbreviate
Aftr After
ast*r*sks Asterisks
B Be
b4 Before
Capitls Capitals
Conversatns Conversations
Dictnry Dictionary
Em Them
Emergncy Emergency
Equllay Equally
ex!mants Exclamation
face2face face-to-face
Fone Phone
Hart Heart
hi-ly Highly
Instead Instead
24
International Journal of Language and Linguistics Vol. 3, No. 2; June 2016
Langwij Language
LOL laughing out loud
Luv Love
Mobil Mobile
Msg Message
NE Any
Neibrs Neighbour’s
Neva Never
Nt Not
Othr Other
Ova Over
Parence Parents
Prepard Prepared
R Are
Recv Receive
Rite Write
Sed Said
Shud Should
Sumi Someone
Theyr they’re
Thiev Thieve
Tspoon Lteaspoons
tXt,txt Text
U You
Ur Your
Xept Except
Yung Young
SWDYT So what do you think
BTDT Been there, done that
YYSSWW Yeah ,yeah, sure, whatever
Table (4-15) Analysis of language notes
Text speak is characterized by its distinctive graphology. Its chief feature is rebus abbreviation. Words are formed
in which letters represent syllables, as seen in ‘b’, ‘b4’,‘NE’,‘r’,‘Tspoon’,‘u’,‘ur’,‘xcept’. The use is made of
logograms, such as numerals and symbols as seen in ‘&’,‘@’,‘2’, ‘abbrevi 8’, ‘b4’, ‘face 2 face’ and ‘sumi’.
Punctuation marks and letters are the ‘:-D’ aft title Laugh Out Loud.
Such forms are by no means restricted to Text spoken; they turn up in other electronic domains, such as emails,
chat groups, and blogs. Indeed, rebuses have a much longer linguistic history. The Victorians played games with
them, and children’s Christmas annuals have long contained puzzles using them. The only traditional type of
rebus that does not appear in Text speak is the use of pictures- such as a bee representing the word ‘be’. However,
in Text speak something more radical has taken place.
The nature of telephony, plus the on-screen limitation to 60 characters, has motivated a much more wide- ranging
and innovative set of conventions. Text speak has its own range of direct-address items, such as ‘F2t’ (‘free to
talk?’),’PCM’(‘please call me’), ’mmyt’(‘Mail me your thought’)and ‘RUOK’(‘are you OK?’).Multi –word
sentences and response sequences can be used, to reduce a sequence of initial letters. ‘LOL’ is used in the poem.
Other examples are ‘SWDYT’ (‘So what do you think?’), ‘BTDT’ (‘Been there, done that’?), and ’YYSSWW’
(‘Yeah, yeah, sure, sure, whatever’).Even more ingenious coded abbreviations have been devised, especially
among those for whom argot is a desirable safeguard against unwelcome surveillance. Texters seem to be aware
of high information value of consonants as opposed to vowels. It is fairly unusual to lose unless the words are
likely to be easily recognized as in case of ‘hi-ly’ and ‘rite’.
25
ISSN 2374-8850 (Print), 2374-8869 (Online) © Center for Promoting Ideas, USA www.ijllnet.com
But there are lots of instances where dropped (‘aftr’.‘capitls’,‘cn’, ‘emergncy’, ‘hart’, ‘instead’ ,‘mobil’, ‘nt’,
‘other’ ,‘prepared’,‘theyr’,‘thiev’,‘txt,‘yung’),or two (‘conversants’),or three (‘dictnry’),or four (‘recv’).’Neibrs’
is an interesting example, losing two consonants and two vowels(only one in American English, of course).'Msg’
loses three vowels and one consonant. ‘Equllay’ different-making a word look strange for its own sake (the
standard spelling contains the same letters, ’equally’). ‘A ninglish’ is also different. By moving the position of the
word-break, the spelling suggests a non – standard pronunciation- though in fact running the ‘n’ into the ‘e’ of
English is a perfectly standard practice.
Texters also seem to be well aware of the low information value of punctuation marks. There is no sentence
punctuation at all the poems with the exception of the double exclamation mark in the sixth commandment, and
apostrophes are dropped in ‘neibrs’ and ’theyr’. On the other hand, certain punctuation marks are given new
functions being used ludically in ‘ast*r*sks’ and there is a contrastive use of space (in the second commandment),
type- size (in the fifth and seventh), and colour (‘hat in the first and ‘XEPTIN DIRE EMERGNCY+’ in the ninth
are printed in red).
Hyphens are sometimes respected (three uses in the ’langwj’ poem).Capital letters are conspicuous by their
absence at the beginning of sentences, but are often used for effect- in the ninth commandment, for example, and
also in some of the acronyms(such as ‘LOL’). Why do they abbreviate? There is ergonomic value in abbreviation,
given that the number of key- strokes saved bears a direct relationship to time and energy and formerly
(depending on your service- provider) even the eventual size of your telephone bill. In a creation such as
‘ru2cnmel8r’ (Are you two seeing me later?’), the full form uses over twice as many key-strokes.
In 2004 David Crystal published “A Glossary of Text speak and Net Speak”, and ignoring the difference between
upper-case and lower- case usage, he collected about 500 Text speak abbreviations. However, only a small
number of these actually turn out to be in regular use. The vast majority are there just to be ‘clever’, illustrating
the possibilities of language play. ’ROTFL’ (‘rolling on the floor laughing’) may have had some use at the outset,
but its later developments (such as ‘ROTFLMAO’ and ‘ROTFLMAOWTIME’- ‘rolling on the floor laughing my
ass off…..with tears in my eyes’) illustrate idiosyncratic communicative one- up man ship rather than genuine
community usage .And some texters use such creation as ‘LSHMBB’ (‘laughing so had my belly is bouncing’).
Leaving out letters always runs the risk of ambiguity. From the receiver’s point of view, A single sequence can
have more than one meaning : ‘BN’- ‘been’ or ‘being’, ‘CID’- ‘consider it done’ or ‘crying in disgrace’, ‘cya’-
‘see you’ or ‘cover your ass’, ‘N’- ‘and’ or ‘no’, ‘y’- ‘why’ or ‘yes’. If message of transmitted love gets the reply
‘LOL’, it is up to you to decide whether it means ‘laughing out loud’ or lots of love’. It could make a big
difference to an emerging relationship .And you have to know your recipient before you decode ‘GBH’, which
can be either a ‘great big hug’ or ‘grievous bodily harm’ . There are similar ambiguities in the Text speak of other
languages.
From the sender’s point of view, there are also choices that can be made such as: ‘Good to see you’ can be
‘GTCY’, ‘GTSY’, ‘G2CY’, or ‘G2SY’; ‘I love you’ can be ‘ILU’, ‘ILUVY’, ‘ILY’. ‘Thanks’ can be
‘THNX’,‘THX’, ‘TX’, ‘TNX’ .Also, there is remarkable eight variants for ‘talk to you later’: ‘TTUL’,
‘TTUL8R’,’TTYL’, ‘TTYL8R’, ‘T2UL’, ‘T2UL8R’, ‘T2YL’,and‘T2YL8R’, and there is others like ‘what’s up?’
depending on how many U’s you bother to send: ‘WASSUP?’, ‘SUP?’, ‘WU?’, ‘WSU?’,‘WSUU?’, ‘WSUUU?’.
So, doubtless text- messaging dialects are already evolving.
No texter is entirely consistent use identical conventions. While a few abbreviation are widely (possibly
universally used, such as ‘txt’ and ‘msg’, others are not. Texters write ‘shl’ or ‘shll’ for shall, but Silver doesn’t.
Some would write ‘consult’ as ‘cnslt’. The seventh commandment is only partly respected, in these poems: ‘em’,
‘fone’, ‘langwij’, ‘luv’, ‘parence’, ‘sed’, and ‘shud’ are indeed ions of the way these quasi- phonetic
representation the way these words are pronounced, presumably in Silver’s accent.(That the spelling reflects a
particular accent is clear from such words as ‘neva’ and ‘ova’, where there is no ‘r’.
A West-Country speaker would presumably not want to leave the ‘r’ out- nor, for that matter, would most
Americans.) But other words are not given a phonetic from. The full standard English spelling given to
‘infectious’, ‘children’, ‘vulnerable’, ‘symptoms’, ‘serious’, and so on indicates that we are dealing here with a
literary genre, not a real text situation at all. To my mind, this is one of the most interesting things about the way
texting has evolved. It is a new genre. It began to be used in poetry very early on, in The Guardian’s text-
messaging poetry competitions.
26
International Journal of Language and Linguistics Vol. 3, No. 2; June 2016
It was only a matter of time before a texting poet arrived on the scene, and a website where doubtless the genre
will be fully exploited and explored as time goes by. Text –message stories- even novels- are also already being
circulated. The Silver Poems illustrate the strengths of texting, and also its limitations. The more unusual the
word, the more it needs to be spelt out in full. There must be a serious limit to the amount of information which
can be conveyed using abbreviation and a real risk of ambiguity as soon as people try to go beyond a stock set of
social phrases. The set of possible messages is really very small, and only there are few abbreviations such as
‘C’(‘see’), ‘B’ (be’), ‘2’(to, too, two’), ‘4’(‘for’, ‘fore’, ‘fore’) and ‘U’(‘you’)can be in lots of sentences.
Will Text speak have an effect on the language as a whole? This is unlikely. The whole point of the style is to suit
a particular technology where space is at a premium and when that constraint is dropped, abbreviated language no
longer has any purpose. Its ‘cool’ associations amongst young (or at least, young minded) people will allow some
of its idiosyncrasy to achieve a use elsewhere, and there are occasional reports of Text speak creeping into other
forms of writing, such as essays. However, these are minor trends, only part of the novelty of the medium.
They can be controlled as part of the task of developing in children a sense of linguistic appropriateness in UK,
one of the basic principles behind the National Curriculum in English there. The genre could gain strength from
its literary applications, but it is too soon to say whether these have a long-term future.
Some people object to Text speaks. Some are amused by it. David Crystal said that ’’I am fascinated by it, for it is
the latest manifestation of human ability and young human ability, at that to be linguistically creative and to adapt
language to suit the demands of diverse settings, In Text speak, we are seeing _in a small way_ language in
evolution.
3
There are several possible explanations for the positive relationship between the use of textims and spelling
ability, the fun of text- messaging one’s friend, and relative freedom of spelling allowed in text message may
increase children’s overall enjoyment of reading and writing as mentioned in the table below.
There is no clear convention for how words should be abbreviated, and like teenagers and young adults (kemp,
2010, De jonge & Kemp, 2010,Varnhagen et al, 2009) there are variety of textims. The most consistency was
shown for words that could be written as letter/number homophones (e.g. r for are), but other words were written
in a range of ways; some dropping letters (e.g. thks for thanks),some changing spellings to represent sounds (e.g.
thanx) and others doing both (e.g.tnx).Words which appear frequently in text- message did not appear to have
undergone some conventionalized process of abbreviation: the word because was re- written in 17 ways and the
word tomorrow in 29 ways.
27
ISSN 2374-8850 (Print), 2374-8869 (Online) © Center for Promoting Ideas, USA www.ijllnet.com
5. The use of abbreviations leads to differences in understanding of single words, because there are no agreed-
upon rules for abbreviating words. This resulted in ambiguity and the reader may not be able to guess the intended
meaning. So, the intended meaning will depend on the texter’s intention, unless there is an agreement between the
sender and receiver about the intended meaning.
6. Abbreviations used in text messaging are linguistically incorrect, but communicatively acceptable.
7. Using text messaging in poetry spreads the language of text messaging. Knowing of text messaging can help to
improve the language by adding a new channel of communication.
8. The using of colors, bold letters, capitalization, and repetition of letters in one word indicates stress or
importance of words. In addition, there is an overuse of numbers and symbols in text messaging as means of
abbreviation.
9. People miss-spell words and textism, which may have a negative effect on the correct spelling of English word
linguistically.
10. Women use longer and wider text messaging than men; on the other hand men use shorter and specific text
messaging.
11. Text messaging increases confidence and interaction in shy and lonely people.
12. Text messaging increases cheating among users by nicknames, because some people lie and don’t tell the
truth. Moreover, text-messaging wastes valuable resources like time and money, also it creates thumb pain, sleep
problem and finally, radiation is harmful for the user.
13. Some people think text messaging saves time, by using short words instead of writing complete words that is
why it becomes widespread in all sectors of the society.
14. The style of writing text messaging is informal; however, it spreads in the formal situations in universities,
schools, and companies.
15. Some people misuse text messaging by sending sexy and enticing words and pictures, which creates problems
for younger people. Moreover, texting during driving is dangerous and it results in accidents.
16. Text messaging leads to displacement of authentic, standard and direct communication.
References
Baron, N. (1998a) ‗Letters by phone or speech by other means: the linguistics of email ‘Language and
Communication 18: 133-170.eric.ed.gov, world scientific publishing co, pte ,ltd, Hackensack, London.
Baron,N. (2000),alphabet to Email: How Written English Evolved and where it’s Heading. London, Routledge.
Herring, S. C. (ed.) (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, volume 9, article 5, “social, and cross
cultural perspectives” John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Ling, (2004),The mobile connection: The Cell phones Impact on Society, Elsevier, S an Francisco.
Baron, Naomi S. (2003a.)“Language of the Internet.”In The Stanford Handbook for Language Engineers, ed. Ali
Farghali, 1–63. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications, American university, Washington.
Baron. (2003b.) “Why Email Looks Like Speech: Proofreading Pedagogy and Public, American
university,London.
Sandvin, (2002), “P2P file sharing: the impact of file sharing on service provider networks”, Sandvine Inc.,
[online], available http://www.sandvine.com/, [Accessed 6 October 2009].
A field Study of Use of Synchronous Chat on Online Courses. By: David H. Spencer and Starr Roxanne Hiltz
.New Jersey Institute of Technology. 2003.
Corpus Linguistics Study of SMS Text Messaging A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the
degree of Doctor of Philosophy,. By: Caroline Tagg March 2009.
The Impact of the Internet on English Language Teaching. A case study at a Thai Rajabhat University By:
UsaNoytim. A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
July 2006.
. Text-message Practices and Links to General Spelling Skills: A Study of Australian Children. Researchers:
Catherine Bushness, Nenagh Kemp, and Frances Heritage Martin University of Tasmania 2011.
Ling (2000), Mobile Communication, Tumbridgeweels, Kent,UK.
29