Hartnup - Leo Allatius and The Greek Vampire

CHAPTER SEVEN
THE VRYKOLAKAS
The Revenant in Seventeenth-Century Greek Society
The chapters relating to the vrykolakas are probably the best-known

passages of De Graecorum hodie quorundam opinationibus. In his collection
of vampire lore, the folklorist Montague Summers quoted extensively
from these chapters, remarking on Allatios’ detailed treatment of the
topic.1 Travellers too, notably Robert Pashley in the nineteenth cen-
tury, have made use of Allatios’ text to shed light on their own ex-
periences, but it is not only more recent authors with their interest
in folklore who have bowed to Allatios’ authority on this subject;
writers nearer his own time also acknowledged his expertise.2 As
early as 1676 his chapters on the Greek revenant were quoted by
Georgius Fehlavius in his commentary on Christophoros Angelos’
Enchiridium to elucidate the excommunication ritual of the Greeks.3
Tournefort, who provided one of the most vivid reports of the vryko-
lakas, had also clearly read Allatios.4 Standing at the intersection
Copyright © 2004. Brill Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.
between Greek and Latin culture on this as on other matters, Allatios’

account of the so-called Greek vampire was highly influential on
western descriptions of the phenomenon. Perhaps because of his abil-
ity to explain things for a western audience, Allatios’ own interpret-
ation has never been questioned. In chapters 7 and 8 we will present
a discussion of the evidence provided by Allatios, placing the beliefs
he considers in the context of early modern Greek society and
Orthodox theology, before moving towards an evaluation of Allatios’
own interpretation of the sources.
It may be misleading to use the term vampire in the context of
the Greek revenant. The vampire with which we in the West are
1
Summers, Europe, p. 223.
2
Robert Pashley, Travels in Crete (London, 1837; facsimile reprint, Athens, 1989),
vol. 2, pp. 227–30.
3
Angelos, Enchiridium, ch. 25, pp. 526–55.
4
Tournefort, A Voyage, vol. 1, p. 103 margin notes.
Hartnup, Karen. "On the Beliefs of the Greeks" : Leo Allatios and Popular Orthodoxy, Brill Academic Publishers,
2004. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/princeton/detail.action?docID=3003959.
Created from princeton on 2020-01-17 09:14:42.
174 chapter seven
most familiar is the Dracula of Bram Stoker and ‘B’ movie fame,
with his long flowing cape, fangs, and thirst for blood. Although
both the Greek vampire and its so-called Transylvanian cousin are
revenants, that is, resurrected dead bodies, they differ greatly in style
and in their relationships with members of society. It is not helpful
to call this creature a vampire as the word carries with it connota-
tions alien to the phenomenon. What should be used in its stead?
A plethora of terms for the revenant existed, with each area having
its own variation of the species. It was called among other things,
vrykolakas, vourvoulakas and katachthonios.5 Vrykolakas, however, is the
most common Greek word for the creature and so seems to be the
most suitable.
Although the vrykolakas exhibited none of the traditional behaviour
of the ‘Transylvanian’ vampire, nonetheless it had the ability to cause
great terror within a community. The creature was so frightening
that it could drive whole villages to decamp. Tournefort described
the reaction of a village in Mykonos which discovered a vrykolakas
in its midst:
Whole families quitted their Houses, and brought their Tent-Beds from
the farthest parts of the Town into the publick Place, there to spend
the night. They were every instant complaining of some new Insult;
nothing was to be heard but Sighs and Groans at the approach of
Night: the better sort of People retired into the Country.6
For Allatios too it was the most terrifying of the exotika he discussed,
for he wrote that they were all bearable except for the vrykolakas.
This frightening creature could be recognised by its characteristic
appearance. It was found in the tomb in a black and swollen state,
with teeth, hair and nails intact and because it had not completely
rotted away it was said to be ‘alytos’, literally ‘indissoluble’. According
to Allatios, a vrykolakas consisted of the body of an excommunicated
man whose corpse had been possessed by the devil. He reports that
the possessed corpse rampaged round the town causing havoc and
often bringing death to those it met. Allatios’ description is a curi-
ous one, however, because it does not fit exactly with any of the
5
A wide range of these terms can be found in, Stelios A. Mouzakis, Ofl brikÒlakew:
Dojas¤ew, prolÆceiw ka‹ paradÒseiw s¢ katagraf¢w épÚ toÁw érxa¤ouw ka‹ metabuzan-
tinoÁw xrÒnouw (Athens, 1989), ch. 1.
6
Tournefort, A Voyage, vol. 1, p. 105.
the VRYKOLAKAS 175
sources he presents. In the first example he provides, a canon from

the sixteenth-century Nomokanon of Malaxos, excommunication had
nothing whatsoever to do with the creation of the vrykolakas. Although
the devil did enter the dead body, the church had not previously
indicated through excommunication which bodies were open to the
devil, and the individual was not to blame in any way for the pos-
session. Instead, the source points out that the devil was given the
power to enter the body by the failure of the local community to
follow the prescriptions of the church. In Allatios’ other sources, even
those taken from the same Nomokanon, it was the excommunication
of the body which caused it to remain undissolved, and absolution
which allowed it to disintegrate.7 Once the body had been absolved,
the effects of the excommunication also disappeared. In the excerpt
attributed to Cassian, which Allatios takes from the Enchiridium of
Christophoros Angelos, a dissenting bishop was excommunicated by
the others at a church council and remained undissolved.8 One hun-
dred years later another synod was held in the same place and this
time the bishops absolved their long-dead colleague saying, “A bishop
struck by anathema sinned against the church and the church excom-
municated him. We are also the church and we forgive him, since
it is human to sin.”9 In this source the creation and dissolution of
the body were controlled exclusively by the church. Therefore Allatios’
sources divide into two groups, and only the second group under-
stands excommunication as central to the creation of the revenant.

Allatios’ sources were also at variance over the discovery of the
body. In the first group it was the laity who ‘found’ the undissolved
corpse; in the second, where the deceased had been excommunicated,
it was the clergy.10 The laity had no difficulty at all in sensing the
presence of the corpse: the vrykolakas revealed itself to the people
through dreams and appearances, which the church believed were
deceptions of the devil. There was no question of having to search
for the body — it appeared of its own volition and terrified the
neighbourhood. In contrast, in one example from the second group
7
Allatios, De opin. XIV–XVIII, pp. 149–58.
8
Although Christophoros Angelos attributes this to Cassian, the excerpt is not
contained in any of the extant works of the Church Father. It may have been writ-
ten by a later writer of the same name.
9
Allatios, De opin. XVI, p. 153; Angelos, Enchiridium, p. 524.
10
Compare the sources in Allatios, De opin. XXII, p. 143 to those in XIII–XVI,
pp. 149–57.
176 chapter seven
of sources, the patriarch had to hold a conference with his clerics

to try to remember where an excommunicated body had been buried.11
In comparison to the wild rampaging of the vrykolakas, the excom-
municated corpse or tympaniaios seems curiously passive.
Not only did the revenants in these two groups of sources exhibit
different characteristics, they were also referred to by different names.
While the creature is called a vrykolakas in the first extract from the
nomokanon, in the other sources it is referred to as a tympaniaios. Of
course, the names alone would not imply that they were different
phenomena as there were many names associated with the vrykolakas,
but the work of the anthropologist Juliet du Boulay suggests that the
difference between them may go deeper than this. In her discussion
of the vrykolakas, based on research carried out in a village in Euboea,
she notes that the villagers distinguished between two categories of
undissolved bodies. The village practised exhumation and secondary
burial, a custom which is common in modern Greece. A body which
was undissolved at the time of exhumation was not considered to
be a vrykolakas, but ‘a soul with sins’. Therefore action was taken to
release the soul from the body, whereas, when a vrykolakas revealed
itself, urgent action was required to destroy it.12 A seventeenth-century
source made a similar distinction between two types of undissolved
body. Father Richard, a Jesuit missionary on the island of Santorini,
added the following passage to his reports on the vrykolakas:
There are other dead bodies in Greek cemeteries which, after fifteen
or sixteen years — and sometimes twenty or thirty years, are found
swollen up like balloons and when you throw or roll them on the
ground they resound like drums; so they call them ‘doupi’ [drum]. I
can just assure you that the common opinion of the Greeks is that
such swelling is the true mark of excommunication.13
These bodies, like the tympaniaios, could only have been discovered
when the tomb was opened for some reason, probably to bury another
corpse. The islanders clearly distinguished the bodies they found
11
Ibid., XVI, pp. 154–57, esp. p. 154; Manuel Malaxos, Historia patriarchica
Constantinopoleos, ed. Immanuel Bekker (Bonn, 1849), pp. 118.2–124.21 esp. p. 118;
Manuel Malaxos, Historia politica Constantinopoleos, ed. Immanuel Bekker (Bonn, 1849),
pp. 48.19–50.13.
12
Juliet du Boulay, ‘The Greek Vampire: a Study of Cyclic Symbolism in Marriage
and Death’, Man 17 (1982), 222.
13
Richard, Relation, pp. 224–25.
the VRYKOLAKAS 177
within from the true vrykolakas on the grounds of the inflated drum-
like form of the corpse.14 The doupi shows the same characteristics
as the tympaniaios. It was also passive and had the same swollen
appearance — the word ‘tympaniaios’, like ‘doupi’, indicates the ‘drum-
like’ nature of the corpse. Most important of all, these features of
the doupi were the result of excommunication.
Allatios’ own experience with the undissolved body would seem
to fall into the category of the tympaniaios on the grounds of its
appearance: the corpse was “round as a small bag” and inflated to
such an extent that the local youths used it as a trampoline until
the priest stopped the disrespectful behaviour and closed the grave.15
This undissolved body, like those in Euboea and Santorini, was dis-
covered when the tomb was opened to inter another body, yet despite
its similarities with the tympaniaios, Allatios includes it in his chapter
dealing with the vrykolakas proper. He does not discuss the tympani-
aios until the following chapter, which he opens by stating that:
when the Greeks see similar bodies, which are discovered after death
in cemeteries, undecayed and swollen, with skin stretched like a drum,
they say that [these] are the bodies of the excommunicated.16
Allatios therefore implies that the body he saw in the tomb was both
a vrykolakas and a tympaniaios. In fact he did not really make a clear
distinction between the two types of revenant. For him the vrykolakas:
is indeed the corpse of the most evil and criminal of men: often one
excommunicated by his bishop. . . . The skin is stretched like a drum,
and makes a noise in the same way as a drum if it is struck. Wherefore
it is said to be ‘tumpania›ow’ [‘tympaniaios’].17
For Allatios, the two revenants were one and the same phenom-
enon. However, this does not seem to agree with the Orthodox
understanding of the situation described above where the two revenants
are distinguished from each other. Allatios’ conflation of the two
accounts therefore should not be accepted without investigation.
14
The inflated drum-like appearance of these corpses appears to distinguish them
from the true vrykolakas.
15
Allatios, De opin. XIII, p. 148.
16
Ibid., XIV, p. 149.
17
Ibid., XII, p. 142.
178 chapter seven
The Vrykolakas
Much of the evidence for the vrykolakas comes from nomokanones, texts
of ecclesiastical law which have been compiled over the centuries.
These contain discussions of various aspects of life considered sinful
by the church, guiding monks and secular clergy in their approach
to a wide range of matters and laying down the penances which
should be given for particular sins. The nature of the source presents
a problem for an investigation into the Greek revenant. It is difficult
to assess how far the information contained within the nomokanones
reflects early modern concerns, as the canons were usually compiled
from earlier texts. However, there is little information regarding the
vrykolakas from the Byzantine period. The earliest editions of the
nomokanon, which date to the ninth century, do not mention the vryko-
lakas. Moreover, had the belief been common in the eleventh cen-
tury, Psellos would have included it in his treatises on popular beliefs.
Allatios himself found no accounts earlier than those in the nomokanon
of Malaxos. For the Byzantine period he can only offer extracts from
the Chronographia of Theophanes the Confessor and the Short History
of Nikephoros the Patriarch. The description of the behaviour of the
population in these sources — hallucinating, walking the streets, com-
mitting murder and causing civil disorder — bears some resemblance
to the accounts of the revenant, but the events described relate to
the civil disturbance following the plague and there is no mention

of the vrykolakas by name, nor of the reanimation of dead bodies.18
Greenfield too in his extensive study of Byzantine demonology states
that he has found no trace of the vrykolakas.19
The earliest account unearthed so far occurs in the canonical
responses of Ioasaph of Ephesos (d. 1437) addressed to a certain
priest of Crete called George Drazinos, but it was not until the six-
teenth and seventeenth centuries that canons relating to the vryko-
lakas became prominent in the sources.20 Of course the lack of evidence
18
Ibid., XIII p. 147; Theophanes the Confessor, Theophanes Chronographia, ed. Karl
de Boor (Leipzig, 1963), vol. 1, (AM6238, AD 745/6) p. 423; Nikephoros, Patriarch
of Constantinople, Short History, ed. Cyril Mango (Washington, D.C., 1990), ch. 67,
p. 138.
19
Greenfield, Demonology, p. 295 n. 1028.
20
Arabatzoglou, Fvt¤eiow BiblioyÆkh, pp. 240–48. On Ioasaph of Ephesos see
Patrick Viscuso, ‘Vampires, not Mothers: the Living Dead in the Canonical Responses
of Ioasaph of Ephesos’, St Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly 44 (2000), 169–70.
the VRYKOLAKAS 179
does not mean that the beliefs about the vrykolakas did not exist in
the earlier period. However, there was a dramatic increase in accounts
of the vrykolakas in nomokanones from the mid-fifteenth century onwards.
This points to the late Byzantine and early Ottoman periods as the
time when the belief claimed the attention of the ecclesiastical authors.
In other words, in discussing the vrykolakas, the compilers of post-
Byzantine nomokanones were expressing a current concern.21
As nomokanones were composed to help the church exert its author-
ity over uncanonical practices, it is not surprising that these ecclesi-
astical accounts were extremely hostile to the belief in the vrykolakas:
a penance of six years was laid down for those who disobeyed church
rulings and burnt the body of the supposed vrykolakas.22 The inten-
tion to extirpate or reform the practices surrounding the vrykolakas,
which lay behind the ecclesiastical approach, suggests that the descrip-
tion of the creature in the nomokanones might not reflect the views of
the laity. Rather than treating such discussions as representative of
popular belief and practice, these texts should be viewed as a meet-
ing point between the official church and the laity. From this per-
spective, the nomokanones provide evidence for two different approaches
to the vrykolakas: the popular and the ecclesiastical. The problem with
treating the accounts in nomokanones as faithful representations of popu-
lar perspectives is apparent even when something as basic as the
name of the creature is considered. Both modern anthropology and
early modern travellers’ tales indicate that in each locality the revenant
was known by different names and displayed differing characteris-
tics. However, there was very little variation in the nomokanones, the
revenant being referred to as either a vrykolakas- or, less often, a kat-
achthonios. Its behaviour was always described in the same terms:
walking in the roads, appearing in dreams and harming human
beings and it is difficult to get any sense of local variations in belief.
Thus a standardised belief was imposed through the nomokanon: the
church was prescribing as well as proscribing.
21
See the accounts published in Mouzakis, Ofl brikÒlakew; S. Lambros, ‘Mãrkou
MonaxoË Serr«n «ZÆthsiw per‹ Boulkoulãkvn»’, N°ow ÑEllhnomnÆmvn 1 (1904),
336–55; S. Lambros, ‘Katãlogow t«n kvd¤kvn t«n §n ÉAyÆnaiw Biblioyhk«n plØn
t∞w ÉEynik∞w. GÄ K≈dikew t∞w BiblioyÆkhw ÉAlej¤ou KolubçÉ, N°ow ÑEllhnomnÆmvn
12 (1915), 105–112; A. Papadopoulos-Kerameus, ‘Ofl brikÒlakew parå Buzantino›w’,
ÜOmhrow 5 (1877), 502–505.
22
Allatios, De opin. XII, p. 144; Malaxos, ‘Nomokãnvn’, canon 709 n. 1, p. 460.
180 chapter seven
Ecclesiastical Approaches to the Vrykolakas

Although the nomokanones may not faithfully reflect the popular view-
point, the ecclesiastical authorities needed to be aware of the key
details of the popular approach in order to reform them. The attempt
to change the beliefs of the laity is apparent in the various canons
relating to the vrykolakas. In one type of canon, the author opposed
the popular belief in the vrykolakas and wished to reformulate the
popular practices in terms more acceptable to the church. (Henceforth
this interpretation will be called ‘the spiritual interpretation’). The
ecclesiastical opposition to the belief is apparent from the very first
sentence of the canon: “The dead man will not become a vulko-
laka”.23 Instead the vrykolakas should be seen as the work of the devil,
who, “desiring to deceive someone or other carries out these evil
wonders for the purpose of bringing about disharmony.”24 Through
this formulation, the church immediately placed the revenant in a
cosmological context, positioning the vrykolakas in relation to God
and the devil. Often at night the devil created an illusion of the
vrykolakas and placed:
in the minds of some men <a belief> that a dead man comes up to
those whom he recognised from before and conversed with them. And
they see other ghosts in waking dreams. At another time they see him
on the road, either walking, or standing still, and not only this alone,
but also strangling men.25
At this point in the text the church argued that the power of the
devil was limited — the vrykolakas was only an illusion and had no
real existence: “Oh, the stupidity of pitiful men. Does he who is
dead walk among and kill the living? This is impossible”26 Thus the
church interpreted the phenomenon in terms of the devil, who worked
through his traditional methods of illusion and deception in order
to make the people believe in something that would anger God.
However, the ecclesiastical position seems inconsistent. Later in
the account, the author suggested that rather than working purely
through illusion, the devil actually took possession of the body, for
the canon states, “since they are lacking in pure faith, the devil is
23
Ibid.
24
Ibid.
25
Ibid.
26
Ibid.
the VRYKOLAKAS 181
transformed and puts on the corpse of the dead man as if a piece

of clothing.”27 There is an acknowledgement here that something
other than an illusion had occurred but the emphasis continued to
be on the ability of the devil to exert power over the imagination.
The text continues: “that corpse, which has lain dead in the tomb
for such a time appears to them [my italics] having flesh and blood
and nails and hair.” Thus it only appeared in this way to those who
were poor in faith, who had expected to see the vrykolakas, and not
to more pious members of the community. After people had seen
the creature in their ‘imaginations’, they rushed to burn the body.
The author of the canon now acknowledged that the corpse did
have some existence outside the mind and laid down the procedure
for cases when “a similar corpse is found, which is the work of the
devil.”28 This concession was essential, for it allowed the church to
apply some kind of remedy to the situation and act to dissolve the
body. The vrykolakas was treated as if it was a case of possession,
which allowed the church to proceed with the rite appropriate to
such cases — exorcism. Nevertheless, the material existence of the
creature was merely a consequence of the way the laity was deceived
by the illusions of the devil into believing in the vrykolakas. The canon
insisted that it was the poor faith of the laity and their belief in
the reality of the vrykolakas, in contravention of the instructions of
the church, that gave the devil the power to enter the dead man.
If the people refused to believe in the vrykolakas, the author seems

to be saying, such things would not exist.29
If this canon gave some credence to the belief in the vrykolakas, a
second group of canons rejected it altogether and explained away
the appearance of an undissolved body in the tomb, arguing that
natural factors had retarded decomposition. (Henceforth this inter-
pretation will be called the ‘natural interpretation’.) In the normal
state of affairs it was thought that the body began to dissolve into
its constituent parts, which corresponded to the four humours, soon
after death. In the case of the vrykolakas, insufficient air inside the
tomb meant that the moisture could not be drawn up from the
27
Ibid.
28
Ibid.
29
Lawson, Folklore, pp. 366; 403–404 also discusses this text and notes the con-
tradiction. However, he concludes that this is due to the existence of two oppos-
ing views within the church hierarchy.
182 chapter seven
corpse and therefore it failed to decompose. Since the moisture from

the liquefaction of the humours could not escape because the tomb
was sealed, it seeped into the dead body and caused it to swell up.30
Although this process of decomposition was explained in terms alien
to us, it rested on the classical theory of the four humours, which
remained extremely influential throughout the Byzantine period.
According to the theory, the body, like all matter, was made up of
four basic components: the author of the nomokanon listed them as
blood, phlegm, bile and juices.31 Each of these was linked to one of
the four elements. Blood was related to fire, for it was believed to
be the source of the body’s warmth; juices were associated with air,
bile with earth, and phlegm with water. When the soul left the body,
the physical matter returned to its constituent elements. After death
the body cooled and, as the heat left the corpse, the blood seeped
out; as the humour associated with fire, it could not remain in the
colder temperature of the corpse. However, the juices were unable
to escape to their natural element, air, because the tomb was sealed
and instead they forced themselves into the body cavities of the
corpse. This caused the body to bloat and created the distinctive
appearance of the vrykolakas. The vrykolakas therefore should be under-
stood purely in terms of natural causes. As a consequence of its
emphasis on natural causes, the text provided no remedy for the
vrykolakas: no action needed to be taken because nothing out of the
ordinary had occurred.

Despite their different approaches, both interpretations provided
by the canons were hostile to the popular belief in the vrykolakas.
The spiritual interpretation refashioned the popular revenant in terms
of the supernatural activity of the devil, understanding the physical
state of the corpse as a reflection of the relationship between the
community and God; the natural interpretation understood the exist-
ence of the body in terms of natural causes. The divergence in per-
spective of the two interpretations extends to their explanations of
the appearance of the corpse. Characteristically, the vrykolakas looked
red and bloody. The natural interpretation explained the appear-
30
Mouzakis, Ofl brikÒlakew, p. 69; Lambros, ‘Mãrkou MonaxoË’, 345.
31
Papadopoulos-Kerameus, ‘Ofl brikÒlakew’, 504–505; Lambros, ‘Mãrkou MonaxoË’,
345.
the VRYKOLAKAS 183
ance in terms of the normal process of decomposition but in the

spiritual interpretation it had far more sinister implications.32 Only
once the soul had left, did the corpse lose its blood and begin to
decay and therefore the appearance of the vrykolakas suggested that
the soul remained trapped within the body. The behaviour of the
vrykolakas, stalking through the streets, also required the presence of
a soul, as the body could not act without one.33 However, the church
argued that it was only through God’s power, exercised by his clergy
in the form of excommunication, that the soul was permitted to
remain in the body after death. In all other cases, the soul had to
leave the body and could not return until the Day of Resurrection.
Since the vrykolakas was not an excommunicate, the soul could not
be retained within the corpse and thus the vrykolakas could have no
real existence. If a body other than the tympaniaios remained pre-
served, it would mean that the devil had independent power on the
earth, and could work outside the will of God. The presence of
blood would imply that the devil had the power to bring the bodies
back to a form of life, an anti-life, as it mocked the real resurrection
on the Last Day, and prevented the pitiful victim achieving his/her
eternal life. For this reason in the spiritual interpretation, the exist-
ence of the vrykolakas has to stem totally from the illusions of the devil
and it was therefore important to stress that the appearance and
behaviour of the vrykolakas only took on any kind of reality when
God punished the community for its poor faith.

If the church displayed a reluctance to accept the real existence
of the vrykolakas, even when formulated in terms of an act of the
devil, why did it not reject the belief altogether? As shown above,
some canons did follow this route but more seem to have followed
the spiritual interpretation, where real existence was denied but the
phenomenon was accepted in terms of a diabolic illusion. Both inter-
pretations attempted to combat the lay beliefs and practices but in
different ways. In the spiritual interpretation, where the church was
less rigorous in its rejection of the vrykolakas, the burning of the corpse
was considered to be the most heinous part of the belief and the
penance was specifically related to this act:
32
Lambros, ‘Mãrkou MonaxoË’, 345.
33
Papadopoulos-Kerameus, ‘Ofl brikÒlakew’, 504.
184 chapter seven
They burn that corpse and destroy it completely. The fools do not
see that their punishment in that eternal and inextinguishable fire is
already prepared for them in the terrible second coming of our Lord
Jesus Christ, so that they will burn for all eternity. They burn that
corpse and destroy it in the present time, but in future time, namely
on the Day of Judgement, they will give account of all such things
before the terrible judge and they will hear from him their condem-
nation to go into the fire and be punished for all eternity. If, there-
fore, they repent with all their heart for this great wickedness which
they have carried out, if they are lay people they should remain with-
out communion for six years; if they are priests, they should be entirely
deprived of their priesthood.34
The canon threatened terrible torment for those who cremated the
body unless they showed great repentance, because destroying the
body ended all hope of salvation for the deceased, as it made bodily
resurrection impossible. Therefore, in the spiritual interpretation, the
prime concern of the church was to prevent the laity from burning
the body.
In contrast, the text that advocated the ‘natural’ explanation of
the vrykolakas, aimed to wipe out the belief altogether. However,
although it countered the belief with an alternative explanation of
the undecomposed body, it was one which entailed a complete denial
of the experience of the laity. An explanation of the vrykolakas in
terms of natural causes could not explain why particular kinds of
individuals became vrykolakes. Nor did it take into account the other
phenomena associated with the body, such as the attacks on prop-

erty and family members. For the laity the vrykolakas was not just an
explanation of an undissolved body: people saw vrykolakes walking in
the roads, causing disruption before the tomb was opened. The dis-
covery of the body validated the popular experience of events fol-
lowing the death, but was not the sum total of that experience.
Because the spiritual interpretation did not oppose the belief com-
pletely, it could acknowledge the popular experience, while reinter-
preting it as an illusion of the devil. Moreover, by emphasising the
proper role of the church in dealing with the vrykolakas, the canon
provided an alternative way of disposing of the undissolved body. It
no longer had to be burnt but could be exorcised by the church.
This approach was also more meaningful to members of the clergy.
34
Allatios, De opin. XII, p. 145.
the VRYKOLAKAS 185
In spite of the church’s hostility towards the belief in the vrykolakas,

clergymen and monks related stories of their experiences with this
kind of undissolved body; the abbot of Amorgos was one of the
informants of the Jesuit missionary, Father Richard.35 With such a
wide constituency of belief, including those who were charged with
correcting the errors of the laity, a complete denial of the vrykolakas
would have been unsuccessful in eradicating the practice of burning
the body that was so abhorred by the church.
The Popular Approach to the Vrykolakas
Disposal of the Body

The nomokanones reveal that the church was concerned with reform-
ing lay practices and beliefs surrounding the vrykolakas but they also
provide some details of the popular approach. In order to counter
popular practices, nomokanones included information about key features
of the lay belief that the church wished to correct: the creation of
the creature, its nature and the method of its disposal. In this section
the evidence from nomokanones will be placed alongside accounts from
travellers’ tales which describe popular beliefs and practices in action.
Ecclesiastical accounts express most concern over the popular ten-
dency to cremate the undissolved body. Travellers’ tales confirm this
predilection. In the accounts of Joseph Pitton de Tournefort and
Father Richard the respective populations of Mykonos and Santorini

used fire to destroy the vrykolakas.36 Allatios too comments on the
details of the cremation:
In order that the body of the vulkolaka stands upright while the prayers
are recited, they support it with wooden staves. When it falls into the
fire, they place three bricks under its head in a certain way.37
Did the church have any success in its attempts to reform this aspect
of the popular practice? It is impossible to chart the changing lay
perspectives of the vrykolakas because of lack of evidence but it is
possible to examine the extent to which the laity conformed to eccle-
siastical prescriptions during the early modern period. Evidence from
35
36
Tournefort, A Voyage, vol. 1, pp. 103–107; Richard, Relation, pp. 208–26.
37
Allatios, De opin. XIII, p. 145.
186 chapter seven
the missionary Father Richard shows the population following the

methods laid down by the church. He tells of the body of an Orthodox
priest’s daughter, which was found undissolved:
It happened here some years ago to the body of Caliste, the daugh-
ter of a Greek priest. [Her body] being found intact, she was exor-
cised by a Greek priest who passed for Orthodox and in the presence
of everyone [the body] began to lose its weight and become so odor-
ous that no one was able to stay in the church. Thus it was buried
immediately and she no longer appeared as before.38
In this instance the exorcism was completely successful. As the priest
pronounced the words, the body began to dissolve. The vrykolakas
was never seen again, proving the efficacy of the exorcism.
It was not only priests’ families who were law abiding and sought
out clergymen to solve their problems with the vrykolakas. In Tournefort’s
account too, the population of Mykonos Town called in the priests
to deal with the issue.39 Again, Richard recounts a story of a trades-
man from Patmos who had died away from home.40 The sailors who
transported him realised that he had become a vrykolakas but did not
mention this to anyone. However:
in a little while the dead man revealed what he was for he began to
cause so much terror, entering houses by night, shouting, howling and
hitting, so that [there were] more than fifteen people [who] died in a
few days either from fright or from blows. The priests and the monks
of the place did everything in their power to stop the course of such
a fatal tragedy.41
In such cases the body was often placed in a different tomb and the
burial rites performed again, in addition to the exorcism.42 In the
three examples cited above, the church was the first port of call for
the laity when faced with the threat of the vrykolakas. This is repre-
sentative of the examples from the early modern period. In nearly
all cases the local villagers turned to the church before taking any
action against the body themselves. Thus the attempts of the church
to persuade the laity to abandon the cremation of the body had
38
39
40
41
Ibid., p. 215.
42
Allatios, De opin. XIV, p. 151; Malaxos, ‘Nomokãnvn’, canon 74, pp. 114–15.
the VRYKOLAKAS 187
some effect on the habits of the laity. Ecclesiastical exorcism was

accepted by the laity as an effective and appropriate method of
removing a vrykolakas. The church was now acknowledged to have
special powers in this area and formed the first line of defence against
the revenant. Nomokanones can therefore be seen as having affected
the behaviour of the laity, meeting their needs and bringing the dis-
posal of the vrykolakas into conformity with church teaching.
Unfortunately, exorcism did not always achieve the desired effect
and sometimes the rites of the church were carried out ‘in vain’.43
The body remained entire and whole and continued to harass the
local population. In the case of the unfortunate merchant from
Patmos, the community turned to other more desperate and extreme
measures to bring about the decay of the merchant’s body. When
the exorcisms failed, the priests decided that the ceremony had to be
carried out at the place of death in order to be effective and instructed
the sailors to take the body back to the merchant’s home town:
This did not happen because the sailors unloaded it at the first deserted
island and instead of a tomb they set up a funeral pyre for it. After
it had been reduced to cinders the apprehension and troubles ceased
and the demon appeared to have lost its strength since the dead man
appeared no more.44
Once again, the efficacy of the method was judged by whether or
not the creature reappeared and in this case cremation succeeded
where exorcism had failed.

Thus the lay approach to the vrykolakas was eclectic and oppor-
tunistic.45 If one method did not succeed, after careful consideration
another was applied, and reasons were found to explain away the
failure of the original attempt. If one approach did not work this
might be because of the order in which the ritual had been per-
formed, or because a particular event had occurred during the process.
The priest’s failure to dissolve the body by exorcism could also be
explained by the stubbornness or power of the demon. In other cases
43
Richard, Relation, p. 215.
44
Ibid.
45
Bodies were also destroyed by casting them into water (cf. W.M. Leake, Travels
in Northern Greece (London, 1835), vol. 4, p. 216), and priests as well as laity used
the method of chopping the body into small parts before reburial. This appears to
have been an acceptable method for disposing of the vrykolakas.
188 chapter seven
the ritual was deemed to have been performed incorrectly, and the
error had allowed the demon to escape. In Mykonos, when the body
failed to dissolve after the liturgical rites, the people decided to tear
out the heart of the creature:
on the tenth day they said one Mass in the Chappel where the Body
was laid, in order to drive out the Demon which they imagin’d was
got into it. After Mass they took up the Body, and got everything
ready for pulling out its Heart.46
In Byzantine mystical thought the heart was the location of passion,
feeling and also remembrance of God. This made it the target for
the devil, who wanted to displace God in the heart of man. A report
from Richard also testified that the heart was thought to hold a par-
ticular attraction for the devil. When Richard attended an investi-
gation of a corpse which had been accused of being a vrykolakas he
saw nothing out of the ordinary in its state of decay. The priest pre-
siding over the meeting did not deny this, but a priest standing
nearby replied that “it was enough that his heart was entire to enable
it [the body] to be the seat of a demon.”47
The villagers of Mykonos thought that by removing the heart they
would remove the demon and if they burnt the heart with the demon
trapped inside, it would also destroy the demon. Therefore “they
were of [the] opinion it would be their wisest course to burn the
Man’s Heart on the Sea-shore”.48 They expected this to be the end
of the disturbances, as usually, “with the smoke from the fire the
demon loses his strength.”49 In this case, however, the “Execution
did not make him a bit more tractable; he went on with his racket
more furiously than ever.”50 What had gone wrong? Cremation of
the heart should have put an end to the vrykolakas. The villagers
believed that a mistake had been made in the ceremony. Mass should
have been celebrated after they had extracted the heart, rather than
before, because the liturgy would have sanctified and protected the
body, preventing the demon from re-entering the corpse. As it was,
when the liturgy was over, he was able to re-enter at his leisure.
46
47
48
49
50
the VRYKOLAKAS 189
Finally, when they could think of no other solution, the community

resolved to burn the whole body to expel the demon:
They knew not now what Saint to call upon, when of a sudden with
one Voice, as if they had given each other the hint, they fell to bawl-
ing out all through the City, that it was intolerable to wait any longer;
that the only way left, was to burn the Vroucolacas intire [sic]; that after
so doing, let the Devil lurk in it if he could; that ‘twas better to have
recourse to this Extremity, than to have the Island totally deserted.51
Therefore, despite the efforts of the clergy, the population continued
to resort to cremation as a solution to the problem of the vrykolakas.
Although the laity did adopt the approach prescribed by the church,
when it failed they turned to other methods. Moreover, burning the
body was more successful than the rites carried out by the church,
for there are no examples when the vrykolakas reappeared after cre-
mation. However, the destruction of the body by fire was acknow-
ledged to be an extreme measure and in almost all cases the matter
was referred to the priest in the first instance. The population was
aware of the dire consequences of burning the body and only turned
to this method as a last resort.
Nevertheless, the laity did not lose faith in the power of the church
when ecclesiastical rites alone failed to dispose of the body. Even
after the failure of the exorcism, the church continued to play an
important role in the process because the liturgy and prayers pre-
ceded the cutting out of the heart. When this also failed, the laity
still did not reject the authority of the clergy:
they meet night and morning, they debate, they make Processions three
days and three nights; they oblige the Papas to fast; you might see
them running from House to House, Holy-Water-Brush in hand, sprink-
ling it all about, and washing the doors with it; nay, they pour’d it
into the mouth of the poor Vroucolacas . . . [but] the Vroucolacas was
incorrigible, and all the Inhabitants were in a strange Consternation.52
For the laity, their methods and the methods of the church formed
a unified system. It was the church that drew a dividing line. The
clergy took part in the preparations but, abiding by the instructions
in the nomokanon, they refused to be present at the cremation: “not
51
Ibid., p. 106.
52
Ibid., pp. 105–106.
190 chapter seven
one Papas would be at St George when the Body was burnt”.53

Nevertheless, the ecclesiastical authorities absorbed other practices
from the laity. Although the church did not approve of burning, it
did appear to recognise the efficacy of complete destruction of the
body. One unfortunate man was exorcised all day and then hacked
to pieces with an axe by the priests and buried in a new grave.54
Some priests were less law abiding, however, and even the nomokanones
recognised that priests might take part in cremations, stating that
those who did so should be “entirely deprived of their priesthood.”55
When priests did preside over the ceremony, it took place with
prayers and incense, illustrating once again the integration of these
rituals into popular belief.
The Nature and Creation of the Vrykolakas in Popular Orthodoxy

If the church was at least partially successful in changing lay atti-
tudes to the destruction of the vrykolakas, did it succeed in changing
attitudes in other areas of the belief ? The popular understanding
of the nature of the vrykolakas is not so easily discerned from the
nomokanones as the method of disposing of it. Nomokanones were insist-
ent that the vrykolakas was not a dead man but an illusion of the
devil. Once again, the strenuous rebuttal of a particular position by
the church indicates the viewpoint of the laity — for the laity the
vrykolakas was the body of the dead man — but beyond this the
nomokanones tell us nothing. It is clear, at least, that the people did

not follow the church prescription that the vrykolakas was merely an
illusion of the devil. Tournefort’s account has shown how frighten-
ingly real the vrykolakas could be. Extracts from other travellers have
also confirmed the nomokanones’ description of the vrykolakas as a dead
man or woman who returned to life and walked the streets. But how
did the lay conception of the vrykolakas as a dead man (or woman)
differ from the ecclesiastical understanding of the vrykolakas as a corpse
possessed by the devil? Travellers’ tales suggest that in popular
accounts of the vrykolakas the person as a whole, not just the body,
was animated. It marauded around town, causing chaos, paying par-
ticular attention to friends and relatives. It retained its individuality
53
Ibid., p. 107.
54
Richard, Relation, pp. 220–21. See also Rycaut, Churches, p. 281.
55
Allatios, De opin. XII, p. 145; Malaxos, ‘Nomokãnvn’, canon 709 n. 1, p. 460.
the VRYKOLAKAS 191
and the part of the person that animates and forms relationships: in
contrast to the ecclesiastical conception, the popular vrykolakas retained
its soul.
On the other hand, at least by the early modern period the vryko-
lakas was also understood in diabolic terms. Thus in Mykonos, when
they saw the vrykolakas:
they concluded, that the Deceas’d was a very ill Man for not being
thoroughly dead, or in plain terms for suffering himself to be re-
animated by Old Nick; which is the Notion they have of a Vroucolacas.56
The people, like the church, envisaged the vrykolakas in diabolic terms,
which meant that the vrykolakas was placed within the general scheme
of a battle between good and evil and could be dealt with as a pos-
sessed body using the traditional method of exorcism. However, the
vrykolakas retained far more of the dead man’s personality and char-
acteristics than in the ecclesiastical formulation. The devil had re-
animated the whole person, soul as well as body, not merely dressed
himself in the corpse.57
It is even more difficult to discern from the nomokanones the popu-
lar ideas relating to the creation of the vrykolakas. The belief was
not merely an explanation of the anomalous state of the body, for
the appearance of the vrykolakas conformed to a natural stage of
decomposition which all bodies pass through shortly after death.58
However, only particular corpses were suspected of being vrykolakes
and unearthed, and people were aware of the activity of the vryko-
lakas before the tomb was opened. The appearance of the body in
the grave only confirmed their expectations. Why were certain deaths
suspicious and susceptible to diabolic possession and others not? The
phenomenon of the vrykolakas was suggested in the first instance by
events that occurred before and shortly after death. The types of
death that result in a vrykolakas have been catalogued at length by
anthropologists and folklorists, and include suicides, those who have
been murdered, those who died of plague and those who had been
56
57
In modern Greece it is believed that the soul is destroyed along with the body
in the methods employed against the vrykolakas. Du Boulay, ‘The Greek Vampire’,
222.
58
Paul Barber, Vampires, Burial, and Death: Folklore and Reality (New Haven, 1988),
pp. 103 ff.
192 chapter seven
cursed.59 The early modern examples fall into a number of these

categories: Tournefort’s vrykolakas was a man who had been mur-
dered in a field and had lain there for several days undiscovered.60
The nomokanon too tells us that sudden and violent death led to the
creation of a vrykolakas.61 Moreover, following the unexpected death
of the merchant from Patmos, the body had to be shipped a cer-
tain distance after he had died. Even before the boat arrived at his
home island the process of transformation had occurred. Sudden
death through a virulent illness, such as the plague or black death
could also cause a revenant to form.62 These categories of the deceased
are listed in the Orthodox Canon for the Dead with a special inter-
cessory prayer requesting peace for them after death, suggesting that
they in particular were restless.63
None of the examples of vrykolakes from Tournefort or Richard
were brought about through cursing, but nomokanones describe the
effect of a curse from a member of the family. One nomokanon states,
if anyone was bound by the ‘oath or curse’ of a parent, “he will
have the front parts of his body intact”.64 Similarly a prayer for the
loosing of an undissolved body requests forgiveness for the body even
if it had been bound through excommunication, through the curse
of a father or mother, if the individual had cursed himself in some
way, or had broken his oath.65 Thus there was a range of different
factors which had an adverse effect on the dissolution of the body.
But why should a cursed person, or someone who had died in a

particular way, display these symptoms after death?
The anthropologist Mary Douglas has argued “the body is a model
which can stand for any bounded system. Its boundaries can repre-
sent any boundaries which are threatened or precarious.”66 The state
of the body for example may be a model for the relationship between
the deceased individual and society, or between flesh and spirit.
59
Lawson, Folklore, pp. 375–76; du Boulay, ‘The Greek Vampire’, 221.
60
61
Papadopoulos-Kerameus, ‘Ofl brikÒlakew’, 504.
62
Allatios, De opin. XII, p. 142.
63
Eastern Orthodox Church, ‘Canon for the Dead’, Eastern Churches Review 8
(1976), 105–106.
64
Allatios, De opin. XIV, p. 151; Malaxos, ‘Nomokãnvn’, canon 71, pp. 111–12.
65
Mouzakis, Ofl brikÒlakew, pp. 85–86.
66
Mary Douglas, Purity and Danger: an Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo
(London, 1966), p. 115.
the VRYKOLAKAS 193
Durkheim’s pupil, Robert Hertz, carried out a detailed investigation

into perceptions of the body after death and examined the relation-
ship between the mourners, the soul and the corpse. His examin-
ation concluded that the three were inextricably linked. There existed
“a kind of symmetry or parallelism between the condition of the
body . . . and the condition of the soul” and the ritual actions of the
mourners that centred on the corpse had an effect on the bonds
between body and soul.67 Moreover, the state of the body also reflected
the state of the relationship between the deceased and the commu-
nity, that is, the process of “gradual disentanglement of the living
and the deceased.”68 In anthropological terms the reciprocal relation-
ship between the deceased and the community as well as that between
the soul and the body played an important role in the period sur-
rounding the death and burial of the corpse.
This model is useful for a consideration of the vrykolakas. In the
case of the vrykolakas, the living and the dead remained very much
entangled, so much so that authors have characterised vrykolakes as
those who were overly affectionate towards their family.69 Despite
the belief in possession by a devil, the vrykolakas retained aspects of
its personality and family and community relationships remained
meaningful. One of the strangest accounts Father Richard records
is of the cobbler, Alexander, who returned to his widow:
After his death he appeared to his wife as if he were still alive: he
came and worked in her house, mended his children’s shoes, he went
to draw water from the cistern and was often to be seen in the vales
cutting wood to support his family.70
His relationship with his family seemed to have continued in death
as it did in life, with no terrifying effects. Iannetis Anapliotis’ rela-
tionships were not so happy. After his death he began to rush up
and down the streets, harassing “particularly the houses of all the
family and relations; but he bore much more of a grudge against
67
Robert Hertz, Death and the Right Hand, trans. Rodney and Claudia Needham
(Aberdeen, 1960), p. 45.
68
Richard Huntington and Peter Metcalf, Celebrations of Death: the Anthropology of
Mortuary Ritual, 2nd ed. (Cambridge, 1995), p. 84.
69
Georges Drettas, ‘Questions de vampirisme’, Études Rurales 97–98 (1985), 207;
du Boulay, ‘The Greek Vampire’, 236 quotes the Greek proverb: ‘vrykolakas to soï
kynegaei ’: “the vampire hunts its own kindred.”
70
194 chapter seven
his wife.”71 In Alexander’s case it was the community who took

exception to him, and moved directly to the burning of the body.
The community was reluctant to take action against Iannetis, as,
“being held in esteem, they did not dare publish his name.”72 He
had been one of the wealthiest and most notorious usurers of the
island, and his status seems to have continued after death. The rela-
tionship of both men with their family and community remained
important, yet threatening.
The importance of the relationship between the living and the
dead was expressed in Orthodox worship through intercessionary
prayers and masses said on the anniversary of the death of the indi-
vidual. Ties with the dead were also expressed through the obliga-
tions of the family to the deceased. Relatives, usually female relatives,
had to clean and purify the body to prepare it for burial and the
house too had to be cleansed from the pollution brought by death.73
A vigil was held over the body until the funeral service when mass
was said over it. However, obligations to the dead did not end with
the burial of the body. Ceremonies marked important phases in the
process of transition as the deceased individual moved from the world
of the living to the world of the dead. On the third, ninth, and for-
tieth day after burial and every year for five years a service was held
on the anniversary of the death. Georgirenes, the archbishop of
Samos, reported that a ceremony also occurred at the end of three
months, six months, nine months, and annually thereafter.74 The cere-
monies immediately following the death were thought to be mir-
rored by the process of decay of the body. On the third day the
face dissolved, on the ninth the break down of the body began and
only the heart remained, and on the fortieth the process of decay
was completed as the heart dissolved as well. It was this final dis-
solution of the heart, as we have seen above, that was vital for sal-
vation. The physical dissolution of the body was mirrored by the
progress of the soul. Here, the popular view differed somewhat from
the ecclesiastical perspective, which insisted that the soul departed
immediately after death. In the popular view, the soul remained with
71
Ibid., p. 219.
72
Ibid.
73
Sonnini, Travels, vol. 2, pp. 151–54.
74
Georgirenes, Description, p. 49.
the VRYKOLAKAS 195
the body until three days after death. On the third day it left the
body accompanied by its guardian angels. On the ninth day it had
to pass through the toll gates, where it had to account for its actions
during life and on the fortieth day it approached the throne of God
and was assigned a place to wait in until Judgement Day.75 Through
their participation in the commemoration, family and friends played
a role in the journey that the soul and body were undergoing and
the formal ecclesiastical rites had their corollary in the family cele-
brations. As well as these set days for remembrance, the women of
the family tended to the grave regularly, lighting candles and often
leaving food or drink.
Indeed, the participation of family and community was essential to
the progress of the soul. Normally, the processes of liturgical, psych-
ical and physical separation followed the same pattern. With the
vrykolakas, however, something had gone wrong. Although Orthodoxy
emphasised the community of the living and the dead, it acknow-
ledged that a separation had occurred. The person left his family
and community, the soul left the body, the body lost its form and
decayed. With the vrykolakas this separation between life and death
had not been completed. Reversing the usual processes in a false
resurrection, the deceased had returned from the dead and existed
as an anomaly in the world of the living. The vrykolakas was cer-
tainly identifiable as the dead individual and continued to partici-
pate in the relationship with family and community, but the relationship
had changed. It was now hostile and threatening to the living, except
in the exceptional case where the cobbler continued to live with his
wife and family as before. Even here, however, where the vrykolakas
posed no obvious danger to society, the community perceived it as
a threat and destroyed it.76
In most of the deaths which resulted in vrykolakes, the family was
unable or unwilling to carry out the required rituals which were due
to the deceased immediately after death had occurred.77 The murdered
75
Krumbacher, Studien, pp. 348–49. Note the symmetry between the formation
of the body and the entrance of the soul before birth on the one hand and the
dissolution of the body and departure of the soul after death on the other. See the
discussion of birth in chapter 5 pp. 124–26, 124 n. 75 above.
76
See du Boulay, ‘The Greek Vampire’, 232–35 on the concept of ‘reversal’ in
the formation of the Greek vampire.
77
Barber, Vampires, pp. 124–25; du Boulay, ‘The Greek Vampire’, p. 221 argues
196 chapter seven
man lay in the field for several days before being buried. The mer-
chant had to be transported home before the rites could be carried
out. For those who died during the plague, with the volume of deaths
occurring, it is unlikely that individuals would have received the care
and attention due to them. Those who were cursed were doubly
unfortunate. Cursing used the terminology of binding and knotting,
which had the effect of preventing or hindering normal processes.
It bound the deceased to this world, preventing him/her from passing
to the next. In addition, the imprecation expelled the cursed person
from the community, and in more serious cases from his/her family.
Therefore there might be no one who would carry out the burial
rites after death.
The importance given to burial customs would suggest that all
who died without receiving the appropriate care would become vryko-
lakes. Soldiers killed on the battlefield should have been prime can-
didates for becoming vrykolakes because they died far from family and
community who would have guarded the body and performed the
customary observances. Yet Pashley was informed by the people of
Crete that those killed in war never became vrykolakes.78 Nevertheless,
the treatment by a canon that aimed to disprove the existence of
the vrykolakas, paradoxically reinforced the relationship between the
lack of burial rites and the creation of the revenant. Those most
likely to become vrykolakes, it argued, were those whose burial rites
had been neglected. Once again the paradigmatic case was that of
soldiers who had died on the battlefield far from home. If the devil
ever possessed dead bodies he would choose these because they were
neither guarded nor buried with holy services. However, soldiers
never became vrykolakes and the author therefore concluded that the
vrykolakas did not exist.79 In the course of his argument against this
revenant he revealed the perceived connection between the failure
to perform the appropriate ceremonies and the creation of the vryko-
lakas, emphasising the importance of the fulfilment of obligations to
the dead by church and the family.
that there is a relationship between the creation of the vampire, the cyclical notion
of life and death, and the necessity of anti-clockwise movement around the corpse.
If the direction of the circle is reversed, the blood flows back into the corpse, and
the deceased returns to life as a vrykolakas.
78
Pashley, Travels, vol. 2, p. 222.
79
Lambros, ‘Mãrkou MonaxoË’, 344; Mouzakis, Ofl brikÒlakew, p. 69.
the VRYKOLAKAS 197
In the case of Anapliotis, his reappearance seems to relate not to

the failure to perform burial rites, but to the neglect of a different
kind of obligation. In fact, Father Richard believed that he was not
a vrykolakas at all. Anapliotis had returned, Richard explained, because
his wife had not fulfilled her promise to provide restitution to those
he had wronged during his lifetime, but instead had used her own
judgement to distribute the money in alms. Restitution had not been
made and so he could not rest in peace. He returned to remind her
of her unfulfilled and thus continuing obligations to him. Richard
obviously interpreted this in terms of Catholic theology: Anapliotis’
debts, moral and financial, had not been discharged on earth and
therefore he could not continue to heaven. The Orthodox priests,
however, were insistent that he was a vrykolakas. This case, like others
discussed above, can be understood in terms of the failure of the
family to fulfil their obligations to the deceased, rather than the fail-
ure of the deceased to clear his financial and spiritual debts while
he was still alive. It was essential that all the obligations were fulfilled
so that the ties between living and dead, family and individual, body
and soul, would dissolve. When they remained unfulfilled the body
remained tied to the world. Father Richard has a great deal of sym-
pathy for Iannetis, declaring, “Happy is he who does not place on
others the responsibility for his salvation.”80 However, in the popu-
lar Orthodox view of the progression of the soul, the individual must
rely on the community. The relationship between the individual and

the community is absolutely essential for progress into the other
world.
From a consideration of the nomokanones and the evidence provided

by travellers, some idea of the lay understanding of the vrykolakas can
be obtained. It differed from the ecclesiastical perspective over the
creation, nature and destruction of the vrykolakas. The church placed
the vrykolakas within a Christian framework, which limited the power
of the devil: the vrykolakas was a body possessed by the devil; the
devil could only enter the body because of the community’s disre-
gard of God’s law; the actions of the devil were always limited by
the power of God and he could be expelled from the corpse by the
clergy, God’s representatives on earth. The soul could not remain
80
198 chapter seven
inside the body and the corpse did not retain any characteristics of
the living individual. In the lay understanding, the devil was allowed
a much freer reign. He reanimated the whole of the dead person,
who retained his/her personality and social links and therefore his/her
soul. The devil was also able to resist the exorcism of the church
and in some cases only disappeared when the body was completely
destroyed.
In both the ecclesiastical and popular beliefs surrounding the vryko-
lakas, the community was accorded an important role but the em-
phasis was different. For the church, it was the impiety of the
community which created the vrykolakas, that is, the disruption of the
relationship between the community and God. In the popular belief,
the vrykolakas was related above all to relationships within the human
community, in particular, the obligations of the living to the dead,
which, if they were not properly fulfilled, prevented the deceased
from passing to the next world, causing him instead to return to the
world of the living. The return of the dead and the failure of the
ties between the community and the individual to dissolve, indicated
by the failure of the body to dissolve, threatened the survival of the
community. This is why the community had to destroy Alexander
the cobbler, even though he was living quietly with his wife, with-
out disturbing the daily life of the community. Ultimately, the church
and faithful differed in their priorities when dealing with the vryko-
lakas. The church was most concerned about the afterlife of the indi-
vidual, the laity with the survival of the community. Above all else
the church strove to prevent the burning of the body, which removed
all hope of eternal life for the deceased. Occasionally, to ensure the
future of the community, the laity sacrificed the eternal life of the
individual.
The discussion above has revealed the differences between the lay
and ecclesiastical approaches to the vrykolakas but the hostility of the
church to the vrykolakas suggests once again that the creature should
be distinguished from the ecclesiastically created revenant. To clarify
this issue the beliefs and practices surrounding the tympaniaios, and
its relationship with the vrykolakas must now be considered.

Hartnup - Leo Allatius and The Greek Vampire

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Hartnup - Leo Allatius and The Greek Vampire

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Hartnup - Leo Allatius and The Greek Vampire

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What are some of the differences between the lay and ecclesiastical views of the vrykolakas?

What are some of the differences between the lay and ecclesiastical views of the vrykolakas?

What are some of the characteristics of the vrykolakas according to the text?

What are some of the characteristics of the vrykolakas according to the text?

CHAPTER SEVEN

The Revenant in Seventeenth-Century Greek Society

The chapters relating to the vrykolakas are probably the best-known

between Greek and Latin culture on this as on other matters, Allatios’

sources he presents. In the ﬁrst example he provides, a canon from

stands excommunication as central to the creation of the revenant.

of sources, the patriarch had to hold a conference with his clerics

the civil disturbance following the plague and there is no mention

Ecclesiastical Approaches to the Vrykolakas

transformed and puts on the corpse of the dead man as if a piece

If the people refused to believe in the vrykolakas, the author seems

corpse and therefore it failed to decompose. Since the moisture from

ordinary had occurred.

ance in terms of the normal process of decomposition but in the

God punished the community for its poor faith.

phenomena associated with the body, such as the attacks on prop-

In spite of the church’s hostility towards the belief in the vrykolakas,

The Popular Approach to the Vrykolakas

Disposal of the Body

Father Richard the respective populations of Mykonos and Santorini

the missionary Father Richard shows the population following the

some eﬀect on the habits of the laity. Ecclesiastical exorcism was

where exorcism had failed.

Finally, when they could think of no other solution, the community

one Papas would be at St George when the Body was burnt”.53

The Nature and Creation of the Vrykolakas in Popular Orthodoxy

nomokanones tell us nothing. It is clear, at least, that the people did

cursed.59 The early modern examples fall into a number of these

But why should a cursed person, or someone who had died in a

Durkheim’s pupil, Robert Hertz, carried out a detailed investigation

his wife.”71 In Alexander’s case it was the community who took

In the case of Anapliotis, his reappearance seems to relate not to

rely on the community. The relationship between the individual and

From a consideration of the nomokanones and the evidence provided

You might also like