This document outlines the rubrics used to evaluate students' performance in the Civil Engineering Laboratory 1 course. It includes six criteria assessed on a scale of 1 to 6: appearance and formatting, introduction and objectives, procedure, results presentation, discussion, and conclusions. For each criterion, descriptors are provided for performance levels of 1-2 (poor), 3-4 (acceptable), and 5-6 (excellent). The course aims to enable students to perform civil engineering experiments, analyze and relate data to theory, and produce laboratory reports.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
128 views1 page
Group Rubric For Lab 1
This document outlines the rubrics used to evaluate students' performance in the Civil Engineering Laboratory 1 course. It includes six criteria assessed on a scale of 1 to 6: appearance and formatting, introduction and objectives, procedure, results presentation, discussion, and conclusions. For each criterion, descriptors are provided for performance levels of 1-2 (poor), 3-4 (acceptable), and 5-6 (excellent). The course aims to enable students to perform civil engineering experiments, analyze and relate data to theory, and produce laboratory reports.
Marks Criteria Poor Acceptable Excellent A. Appearance, formatting Limited Demonstrate usage Mastery of tools and grammar/ Sections out of order, sloppy Sections in order, formatting is All sections in order, well- Spelling formatting. Frequent grammar rough but readable. Occasional formatted, very readable. All (5%) and/or spelling errors, writing grammar/spelling errors, grammar/spelling correct style is rough and immature. generally readable with some and very well written. rough spots in writing style. (<2) (2 to < 3.25) (3.25 to 5) No relevancy Some relevancy All relevant contents No background information Some introductory information, Introduction complete and B. Introduction and provided or information is but still missing some major well-written; provides all objective incorrect. Objectives are not points. Objectives are not clearly necessary background (15%) stated. stated. principles for the experiment. Objectives are clearly stated. (<6) (6 to < 9.75) (9.75 to 15) Inadequate Sufficient Accomplished Procedure is missing altogether, Procedure is mostly copied from Procedure is a summary of or missing important steps. the lab description, with little each of the steps taken in C. Procedure attempt at brevity. completing the lab. It is NOT (15%) an exhaustive description containing minute detail. (<6) (6 to < 9.75) (9.75 to 15) Unorganized Fairly organized Well organized Figures, graphs, tables contain Most data, figures, graphs, tables All data, figures, graphs, D. Results: data, errors or are poorly constructed, are presented, some still missing tables are correctly drawn, figures, graphs, have missing titles, captions or important or required features. are numbered and contain tables, etc. numbers, units missing or titles/captions. (25%) incorrect, etc (<10). (10 to < 16.25) (16.25 to 25) Inadequate Sufficient Accomplished Very incomplete or incorrect Some of the results have been All important trends and interpretation of trends and correctly interpreted and data comparisons have been E. Discussion comparison of data indicating a discussed; partial but incomplete interpreted correctly and (30%) lack of understanding of results. understanding of results is still discussed; good evident. understanding of results is conveyed. (<12) (12 to < 19.5) (19.5 to 30) Inadequate Sufficient Accomplished Conclusion is missing, or is in Conclusion is present, and does The conclusion succinctly conflict with the student’s not conflict with the student’s describes what can be experimental results. experimental findings, but fails to concluded from the F. Conclusions address the theoretical basis for experimental results. It is (10%) the lab. aligned with well-written objectives at the beginning of the lab. (<4) (4 to < 6.5) (6.5 to 10)
/100
Course Learning Outcomes:
CLO1: Able to perform laboratory experiment in the field of structure, geotechnical engineering and construction materials CLO2: Able to analyse, interpret and relate experimental data with fundamental theory. CLO3: Able to produce laboratory report