MW Networks PDF
MW Networks PDF
Debapratim Ghosh
e-mail: [email protected]
I There exist network parameters that relate the voltage/currents at one port, with
those at other port(s).
I You are already aware of some of these parameters through your network theory
course; nevertheless, let us revisit them briefly.
Consider the two-port network as shown. The voltages and currents V1 , I1 , V2 , and I2
may originate from sources, or may be developed as a result of sources at other ports or
inside the network.
I1 I2
+ 2-port +
V1 network V2
- -
V1 V1 I1 I1
Z11 = Z12 = (2) Y11 = Y12 = (5)
I1 I2 =0 I2 I1 =0 V1 V2 =0 V2 V1 =0
V2 V2 I2 I2
Z21 = Z22 = (3) Y21 = Y22 = (6)
I1 I2 =0 I2 I1 =0 V1 V2 =0 V2 V1 =0
I If one or more elements in the Z or Y matrix of a network have real values, that
means the network has resistive or conductive elements.
I This means that the network is lossy, as it has elements that dissipate power.
I Moreover, making open- or short-circuits at ports for certain types of networks may
damage the network!
V2- Port 2
I Just like we do for transmission lines, let us try to relate the outgoing waves Vi− at
all ports (1 ≤ i ≤ N) with all incoming waves Vi+ .
I Here, these waves are of the form of Vi+ = Vf e−γx and Vi− = Vb eγx , as per the
solution of Telegrapher’s equations.
I Let [V − ] be an N × 1 matrix that denotes the outgoing waves at all ports, and [V + ]
an N × 1 matrix denoting incoming waves i.e.
− +
V1 V1
V − V +
2 2
[V − ] = +
. and [V ] = . (7)
. .
VN− VN+
I Then, we define the scattering (or S) parameter matrix as
− +
V1 S11 S12 .. S1N V1
−
V S21 S22 .. S2N V +
2 2
. = .
. .. . .
(8)
. . . .. . .
VN− SN1 SN2 .. SNN VN+
Vi−
Sij = + (9)
Vj Vn+ =0,n6=j
I How can we nullify an incoming wave at each port? Simply by connecting that port
with a matched load (equal to feeding line impedance Z0 ).
I Since the pair of waves at any port can result from other ports due to interaction of
waves inside the network, the name ‘scattering’ was given to these parameters.
I As discussed, the voltage and current matrices for an N-port network can be related
using its Z -parameters, viz.
[V ] = [Z ][I] (10)
I In terms of wave equations as solutions for the Telegraphers’ equations, the voltage
and current matrices can be expressed as a sum of forward and backward wave
matrices as
[V ] = [V + ] + [V − ] (11)
1
[I] = ([V + ] − [V − ]) (12)
Z0
I Substituting these in (10), we get
1
[V + ] + [V − ] = [Z ]([V + ] − [V − ]) (13)
Z0
I Grouping the forward-wave and backward-wave terms separately, and defining
1
normalized impedance matrix as [z] = [Z ], (13) becomes
Z0
I Now, if the network is reciprocal, [z]T = [z], and [I] being the identity matrix, is
already a symmetric matrix.
I Therefore, as both matrices are symmetric, the product of their sums will also be
symmetric.
I It was discussed that if a network is lossless, then the Z matrix must be purely
imaginary. However, it is difficult to generalize a lossless S matrix using this
condition alone.
I A lossless network is defined as one where the algebraic sum of the average (real)
power at all ports equals zero i.e. the real power entering the network should equal
the real power leaving it. Mathematically, this means
1
Pavg = Re{VI ∗ } (19)
2
I Denoting the voltages and currents at all ports in the form of matrices, this becomes
1 1
Re{[V ]T [I]∗ } = Re{([V + ] + [V − ])T ([V + ] − [V − ])∗ }
2 2Z0
1
= Re{[V + ]T [V + ]∗ − [V − ]T [V − ]∗ + [V − ]T [V + ]∗ − [V + ]T [V − ]∗ }
2Z0
I Notice that the first two terms inside the bracket would denote squared magnitude
terms, hence they will be real. The remaining two terms denote matrix operation of
the form [A] − [A]∗ , hence they would be purely imaginary and thus, not needed.
I The average power expression then becomes as follows, equated to zero for
lossless property.
1
([V + ]T [V + ]∗ − [V − ]T [V − ]∗ ) = 0
2Z0
∴[V − ]T [V − ]∗ = [V + ]T [V + ]∗
∴[S]T [V + ]T [S]∗ [V + ]∗ = [V + ]T [V + ]∗
Note that transposes are used in order to multiply the single row/column matrices.
I Thus, the S matrix for a lossless network must obey the Unitiary Property.
V−
Sii = i + (21)
Vi V + =0,j6=i
j
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ N
I Does the above expression look familar? It should, because it is similar to the
reflection coefficient Γ at a point on the transmission line connected to the i th port.
I But, we had defined the reflection coefficient simply as the ratio of the backward to
forward wave, without any additional condition. This is because the analysis at that
time was for a single transmission line connecting a source and load.
I Now, for any N-port network, this same ratio of the backward to forward wave at the
i th port will depend on the load connected to the other ports.
I Hence, the terms Sii define the reflection coefficient at the i th port, provided all other
ports are matched. Like Γ, for stable networks, |Sii | ≤ 1.
I The terms Sij , with i 6= j indicate transmission coefficients. It is possible to have
|Sij | ≤ 1, in case the network has active elements like transistors.
I The insertion losses (in dB), corresponding to the transmision coefficients are
defined as
I For low-frequency networks, we would question if they are– (i) reciprocal and (ii)
lossless.
I For microwave networks, we question if they are– (i) reciprocal (ii) lossless and (iii)
matched.
I Can a 2-port network meet all three conditions– reciprocal, lossless, and matched?
I If all ports are matched, then S11 = S22 = 0.
I If the network is reciprocal, then S21 = S12 = S. The matrix then becomes
0 S
[S] =
S 0
I If the network has to be lossless, then it must satisfy the unitiary property, i.e.
[S]T [S]∗ = [I]. Thus,
0 S∗
0 S
[S]T [S]∗ = ∗
S 0 S 0
2
|S| 0
=
0 |S|2
I This is can be equal to the identity matrix if |S| = 1. Thus, it is indeed possible for a
2-port network to satisfy all three conditions!
I Exercise: Prove that, for any three-port network, all of these three conditions can
never be satisfied!
Debapratim Ghosh School of Electrical Sciences, IIT Bhubaneswar
Transmission (ABCD) Parameters
+ 2-port +
V1 network V2
- -
V1 A B V2
= (25)
I1 C D I2
I Once the Z -parameters are obtained, they can be converted into S-parameters,
using (16), and we obtain
A − D + BY0 − CZ0
S11 = (30)
A + D + BY0 + CZ0
2(AD − BC)
S12 = (31)
A + D + BY0 + CZ0
2
S21 = (32)
A + D + BY0 + CZ0
−A + D + BY0 − CZ0
S11 = (33)
A + D + BY0 + CZ0