Forum: General Assembly 3 – Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural Committee (GA3 – SOCHUM)

Issue: Refugees, Immigrants VS The Political Rhetoric: How the current political climate impacts their
lives

Message from the Director

Hello there! 😊

I’m Supraja Saravanan, and I’m a second year undergraduate pursuing an Economics degree at the
University of Bath. I was introduced to the world of MUNs in December 2015, when I attended my first
ever MUN conference, as part of a crisis committee. It’s been 4 years since then, and I’ve come a long way
- from being a novice to a chairperson!

Today’s topic is one that concerns the rights of refugees and immigrants, which have been threatened
thanks to the surge in right-wing nationalist policies around the world. While we as individuals
empathize with them – those who have been forced to flee their homeland and witness unimaginable,
horrific events - our politicians do not echo our sentiments in that regard – repeatedly calling for them to
be expelled from the country.

We have systems in place to help refugees and immigrants rebuild their lives, away from the chaos and
destruction in their homes, not because of any legal pressures, but because it is the morally right thing to
do - it is our moral duty to lend a helping hand to those who suffer for no fault of theirs. The current era
of populism, in my opinion, is more dangerous than beneficial, with hate speech fuelling negative
stereotypes of not just immigrants, but even minority groups residing in the country. Political rhetoric is
powerful enough to cause wars and disrupt the world order, and hence it plays a huge role in our lives.
While we preach the values of tolerance, peace and non-violence, we, as children of the world, are doing
very little to improve the lives of those afflicted by oppression, war and violence. It is quite
heartbreaking.

Here at South-West MUN 2020, I look forward to an interesting debate on how to deal with this unique
situation brought about by an unexpected global movement. And as always, it’s never all work and no
play (not even in real UN conferences, notice the pun.) – so there’s always some room for fun in the
process! All in all, I hope you enjoy this opportunity to undertake diplomacy to solve the world’s most
pressing issues, and I can’t wait to see you soon!

Warm Regards,
Supraja Saravanan
BSc (Hons) Economics, Year 2
University of Bath
e-mail: [email protected]

INTRODUCTION
Although the negative rhetoric around immigrants and refugees isn’t a new phenomenon, it seems to be
more common now than ever, especially with right-wing nationalism gaining traction around the world.
As the international community struggles with civil wars, threats of wars and internal conflicts, many
countries seem to prioritize national security over the safety of refugees, as we have seen in the United
States of America and the European Union, for example.

In this era of polarization, it’s important to address how political rhetoric sways public opinion. In fact, it
could very well be the case that rhetoric, in the current political situation, fuels the problem. As countries
strive to “close” their borders and tighten restrictions on immigration, refugees and the asylum process,
there seems to be no better time than now to address the policies surrounding their rights.

This topic focuses on the political rhetoric surrounding refugees and immigrants, and this document
discusses the concept with special references to the current situation in the United States and the
European Union (and its members). But before we move on, let us remind ourselves of the words of
President Harry Truman of the United States, over the need for asylum laws in the country:

“…These victims of war and oppression look hopefully to the democratic countries to help
them rebuild their lives and provide for the future of their children. We must not destroy
their hope. The only civilized course is to enable these people to take new roots in friendly
soil.”1

President Harry S. Truman, 1945

THE RIGHTS OF REFUGEES

The 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol
In July 1951, a diplomatic conference in Geneva adopted the Convention relating to the Status of
Refugees (‘1951’ Convention), which was later amended by the 1967 Protocol. The documents sought to
define who is a refugee and the kind of legal protection, other assistance and social rights such an

1
TIME Magazine - This Was President Truman's Powerful Message on Why the U.S. Should Help Refugees
individual is entitled to receive. It also defines a refugee’s obligations to host countries and specifies
certain categories of people, such as war criminals, who do not qualify for refugee status.

The 1951 Convention is the only global legal instrument dealing with the status and rights of refugees. In
addition, there are several conventions and declarations that are of relevance in specific regions - for
instance, legal instruments on refugees that apply in Africa, Latin America and the European Union.2
There is also a body of international human rights law that complements the rights of refugees, as
stipulated in the Convention. States are already committed to protecting the human rights of refugees
through their human rights obligations, not least the right to live in security and with dignity. The 1967
Protocol broadens the applicability of the 1951 Convention – it removes the geographical and time limits
that were part of the 1951 Convention.

The 1951 Convention has shown remarkable resilience over the last 60 years, as the nature of conflict, as
well as patterns of migration have changed. The international system of refugee protection has helped to
protect millions of people in various situations. As long as people continue to be persecuted, there will be
a need for the 1951 Convention and its 1967 Protocol. 2

The Rights of Refugees

The 1951 Convention lists the rights and highlights the obligations of refugees towards their host
country.

The cornerstone of the 1951 Convention is the principle of non-refoulement (Article 33) -according to
which a refugee should not be returned to a country where he or she faces serious threat to his or her life
or freedom. This protection may not be claimed by refugees who are reasonably regarded as a danger to
the security of the country, or having been convicted of a particularly heinous crime, are considered a
danger to the commodity.

Other rights contained in the 1951 Convention include:

- The right not to be expelled, except under certain strictly defined conditions (Article 32);
- The right not to be punished for illegal entry into the territory of a contracting State (Article 31);
- The right to work (Articles 17 to 19);
- The right to housing (Article 21);
- The right to education (Article 22);
- The right to public relief and assistance (Article 23);
- The right to freedom of religion (Article 4);
- The right to access the courts (Article 16);
- The right to freedom of movement within the territory (Article 26); and
- The right to be issued identity and travel documents (Articles 27 and 28)

Some basic rights, including the right to non-refoulement, apply to all refugees. A refugee becomes
entitled to other rights the longer they remain in the host country, which is based on the recognition that
the longer they remain as refugees, the more rights they need. Refugees also have obligations - they are
required to abide by the laws and regulations of their country of asylum and respect measures taken for
the maintenance of public order.

THE CONCEPT OF POLITICAL RHETORIC

One of the key reasons why political rhetoric is so relevant is because it plays a huge role in how the
public evaluates policies. It can shape public opinion, affect change, and persuade voters to support or
reject them. As Gottweis in 2007 book chapter "Rhetoric in Policy Making: Between Logos, Ethos and
Pathos" put it, "Rhetoric is typically defined as an integral moment of policy making, and the idea of

2
UNHCR – “The 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and The 1967 Protocol”
rhetoric points to the necessity to convince, persuade, and communicate efficiently in the context of
shaping and implementing public policies." 3

But rhetoric does have a bad name. It is often thought to refer to speech that, if it isn't wholly untrue,
atleast misleading, or perhaps simply vacuous. Sometimes a speech, and a turn of phrase it employs, can
name a whole situation in such a memorable and effective way, that it contributes to historical change.

However, it seems that the past may also have some hopeful examples, the most notable one being from
the United States in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks. Brian Levin, Director of the Center for the Study of
Hate and Extremism at California State University-San Bernardino, noted that the “worst month for all
hate crime (in the United States)” occurred around the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Six days after the
attacks, President George W. Bush had addressed the nation, denouncing anti-Muslim sentiments, “The
face of terror is not the true faith of Islam.” Anti-Muslim hate crime reports dropped by two-thirds the
next day, and for the year 2002 as well.4

Considering a recent spike in events relating to terrorism and other acts of violence, there seems to be a
general climate fuelling violent hate in the country these days. It is in times like these that the President
is looked up to as a moral compass, to help reassure their citizens, and provide a haven for residents of
the country. However, President Trump* has focused on naming specific individuals and groups as
"enemies of the people” and urges his supporters to focus their ire on them. These targets, once singled
out, have been at the receiving end of bigoted, hateful messages. It is no surprise that this could
eventually lead to physical violence against them, with the same rhetoric repurposed to fit the
perpetrators' motives.5

The language used to describe people caught up in the migration crisis has been attacked by a special
representative of the UN as "deliberately invidious" and aimed at poisoning public debate. Using terms
such as "illegal" rather than "irregular" migrants, or "hordes, waves and swarms" rather than simply
"large numbers", conveniently obscures the vulnerabilities that come from being a foreigner, said Louise
Arbour, the UN secretary general's special representative for international migration.6

Arbour, a former UN high commissioner for human rights and former chief prosecutor of war crimes in
Rwanda and former Yugoslavia, said she believed that 2017 had brought the "beginning of a change of
narrative" on migration. "In this field, as in many others nowadays, reality is much better than
perception," she said. She criticized "political decision-makers" who were "not particularly well-
informed" about important, positive aspects of migration. "Outside informed circles...knowledge about
the impact of remittances, for instance, is often limited," she said. 5

While world leaders have taken different stances to address immigration (in general) and the asylum
process, a common thread running through their actions lies in the way they address immigrants and
refugees, often referring to them as "invaders", "criminals", and so on. This affects the public's perception
of immigrants - they begin to perceive them as a threat to their national security and general wellbeing.
Political figures often blame immigrants for major criminal incidents such as terrorist attacks, mass
shootings, etc, while studies have repeatedly shown that immigrants often commit crimes less than
native-born citizens, and that the influx of immigrants and refugees does not lead to higher crime rates in
the country.7

3
Herbert Gottweis - “Rhetoric in Policy Making: Between Logos, Ethos and Pathos.” In Handbook of Public Policy
Analysis: Theory, Politics and Methods
4
POLITICO Magazine - Yes, Political Rhetoric Can Incite Violence.
5
The Guardian - 'Shocking' political rhetoric on refugees aims to poison debate, UN official warns
6
Taylor, E.M. - The Effects of Political Rhetoric on Refugee Policy and Communities in the United States and Germany. El
Rio: A Student Research Journal, pp. 49 – 58
* President Trump was impeached by the US House of Representatives on 18 December 2019. He is yet to face a trial in
the US Senate.
5
The Guardian - 'Shocking' political rhetoric on refugees aims to poison debate, UN official warns
7
Taylor, E.M. - The Effects of Political Rhetoric on Refugee Policy and Communities in the United States and Germany. El
Rio: A Student Research Journal, pp. 49 – 58
THE ERA OF POPULISM AND THE
POLITICAL RHETORIC
Introducing “Populism”
Populism refers to a range of political stances that emphasize the idea of "the people" and often
juxtapose this group against "the elite" – which collectively refers to rich people with political influence.
A common framework for interpreting populism is known as the ideational approach: this defines
populism as an ideology which presents "the people" as a morally good force and contrasts them against
"the elite", who are portrayed as corrupt and self-serving.8

8
Wikipedia (2020). Populism. [online] Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Populism
Anti-Immigration Sentiment & The Rise in Populism
It would seem that the current rise in populism is partially fuelled by anti-immigration sentiment, with
prominent (most often self-proclaimed) "populists" - such as Donald Trump*9 of the US, Boris Johnson of
the UK, Matteo Salvini of Italy, Marine Le Pen of France, and many others - actively promoting hatred
against refugees and sometimes, even immigrants legally residing in the country. They use an array of
political tactics to rally support, as people are easily manipulated by alarmist narratives. Given the
political records of the aforementioned "populists", it would seem that they seek to create anger and
resentment against refugees amongst their supporters, and resort to tactics such as spreading false
information, reinforcing negative stereotypes, blaming refugees for any and all violent incidents, and
engaging in political warfare with opposition groups. Such tactics are quite powerful, given their
pervasiveness and wider outreach. These tactics are also used to introduce inhumane policies to detain
refugees and deter them from seeking protections. Case in point - the Trump administration's efforts to
effectively end asylum processes at the US-Mexico border.

Unfortunately, as political rhetoric plays a key role in how the public evaluates policies, it shouldn't be
surprising that negative rhetoric can lead to a rise in hate crimes in the country. This holds true
especially in the United States - statistics released by the FBI late last year showed that hate crimes in the
United States rose 17% in 2017, compared to the previous year, the third straight annual increase. There
were 7,175 hate crime incidents in 2017, and of the crimes motivated by hatred over race or ethnicity,
nearly half involved African-Americans and 11% were anti-Hispanic.10 The Center for the Study of Hate
and Extremism at California State University-San Bernardino conducted an analysis based on figures
published by the FBI, and the research revealed more specific details, especially when juxtaposed with
political context. The center's director, Brian Levin, said in a statement to the Associated Press, “We see a
correlation around the time of statements of political leaders and fluctuations in hate crimes. Could there
be other intervening causes? Yes. But it’s certainly a significant correlation that can’t be ignored.” 11

Linking political speech to acts of violence is difficult. People commit such acts that may have nothing to
do with political rhetoric or public sentiment. Also, government data on hate crimes is often deemed less
useful, as not all incidents of violence get reported to the police, or to the FBI (in the case of the United
States).10 Amid rising tensions over the 'migrant caravan' in October 2018, President Trump* has sought
to defend his rhetoric on immigration and has also denied stoking tensions that brought forth the
violence, claiming that he "brings people together. Our country is doing incredibly well." However,
immigrants still faced discrimination in all walks of life, particularly at the hands of his supporters.12 His
words have fuelled hatred and popularized conspiracy theories claiming that immigrants were
systematically replacing whites.13

While cause and effect can be harder to establish in individual cases, researchers do have circumstantial
evidence concluding that while rhetoric may not be the key cause of acts of violence, but radical, hateful
language can fuel their rage, and keep them more inclined to indulge in such acts. As people prejudiced
towards particular groups often display deep hatred for other groups, there have been suggestions
stating that bigoted language could have consequences beyond targeted groups.14

9
*The President was impeached by the House of Representatives on 18 December 2019, over charges of abuse of power
and obstruction of Congress.
10
FBI - FBI Releases 2017 Hate Crime Statistics
11
AP News - Trump words linked to more hate crime? Some experts think so.
12
The White House - Remarks by President Trump Before Marine One Departure
13
Taylor, E.M. - The Effects of Political Rhetoric on Refugee Policy and Communities in the United States and Germany. El
Rio: A Student Research Journal, pp. 49 – 58
14
POLITICO Magazine - Yes, Political Rhetoric Can Incite Violence.
MEDIA COVERAGE
Press Coverage on the Refugee Crisis
As the refugee crisis reared its ugly head in 2014, UNHCR and other humanitarian organisations engaged
in a series of large-scale media advocacy exercises, aimed at convincing European countries to help. The
UNHCR commissioned a report from the Cardiff School of Journalism to explore what was driving media
coverage in five different European countries: Spain, Italy, Germany, UK, Sweden.

The report found that there were major differences between countries, in terms of the sources used
(domestic politicians, foreign politicians, citizens or NGOs), the language used, the reasons given for the
rise in refugee flows, the solutions proposed, and the predominant themes to their coverage. For
instance, Germany and Sweden overwhelmingly used the terms 'refugee' or 'asylum seeker', while Italy
and the UK press preferred the word 'migrant'. In Spain, the dominant term was 'immigrant'.

Humanitarian themes were more common than Italian coverage than in British, German or Spanish
press. Threat themes were the most prevalent in Italy, Spain and Britain. Overall, the Swedish press was
deemed to be the most positive towards refugees and migrants, while the UK's coverage was judged to be
the most negative, and the most polarized.15

Anti-Immigration Sentiment in News Reporting

In the early stages of the European Refugee Crisis, the media, in general, did the right thing by pursuing a
strategy of emergency reporting - tracking live events relating to the crisis. But with the current trend of
15
UNHCR - Press Coverage of the Refugee and Migrant Crisis in the EU: Analysis of Five European Countries
'breaking news culture', viewers are often bombarded with sensational events, with the media often
jumping from one sensational news story to another. This is not ideal for viewers - it gives less emphasis
on the big picture, and narrows down to small facts, which leaves more room for misinterpretations and
so on.

Even the style of reporting deserves to be scrutinized - especially the use of stereotypes in their content.
In positive coverage of migrants, it was found that the content typically made use of stereotypes
surrounding innocence and vulnerability, with images of women, children, the sick and the elderly.
Whereas in negative coverage, the content typically zeroed in on people from certain countries, to suit a
political agenda. Images used focused more on able-bodied people gathered at fortifications.

Perhaps the clearest articulation of anti-immigration sentiment can be found in the British press.
Examining 43 million words (i.e., the content addressing migration in 20 popular British newspapers)
between 2010 and 2012, a 2013 report by the Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford, found
that the most common word used in relation to 'migrants' was 'illegal'. Headlines like "Eight-fold
increase in the number of illegal migrants entering Europe" were typical. In order to describe the
security concerns and aspects of legality of migration, words such as "terrorist", "sham" were commonly
used. This kind of language criminalizes migrants who often cross borders in vulnerable circumstances.16

These words would often surge without being substantiated by data, while the media turn out to be far
from objective when it comes to migration and rather take a stance through the language they choose to
echo. This trend is quite alarming, given that the mainstream media is still a primary source of
information for many citizens, and its messages are often transmitted subconsciously to readers,
affecting how they relate to their society. Several studies have found evidence for positive correlation
between media coverage and attributes towards migrants, where extensive news coverage contributes
to the success of populist rhetoric and the rise of anti-immigrant sentiment.17

Bridging the Gap of Alienation

At the same time, some are attempting to reshape the discussion, breaking the demonization of migrants
and highlighting the contributions they make to their host countries. The UK newspaper Migrant Voice,
led by migrants, is actively disseminating their opinions to the public, while introducing readers to their
life stories, aspirations, and so on. It draws attention to migration policies and their consequences,
including economic ones. The objective is to build a more inclusive public debate and shifting the
narrative to change public perceptions.

Migrant Solidarity in Calais, an independent website run by a group in France, documents the daily
abuses of refugees by the French police, while also providing them with legal advice and information on
their rights. Through media, they attempt to share accurate information with the public on the poor
conditions that refugees face.16

16
Victoria Danilova - Media and their Role in Shaping Public Attitudes Towards Migrants
17
Victoria Danilova - Media and their Role in Shaping Public Attitudes Towards Migrants
17
Victoria Danilova - Media and their Role in Shaping Public Attitudes Towards Migrants
RELEVANT UN TREATIES AND
DOCUMENTS (FOR REFERENCE)
General Assembly resolutions relevant to the global compact for migration.

1. 22 January 2018: Modalities for the Intergovernmental Conference to Adopt the Global Compact
for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration
2. 21 December 2016: International Migration and Development (A/RES/71/237)
3. 3 October 2016: New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants (A/RES/71/1)
4. 30 June 2016: High-level plenary meeting of the General Assembly on addressing large
movements of refugees and migrants (A/RES/70/290)
5. 21 October 2015: Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
(A/RES/70/1)
6. 17 August 2015: Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the Third International Conference on Financing
for Development (Addis Ababa Action Agenda) (A/RES/69/313)
7. 3 October 2013: Declaration of the High-level Dialogue on International Migration and
Development (A/RES/68/4)
QUESTIONS RESOLUTION HAS TO ANSWER
Here are some key points to consider while formulating your resolution.

1. The issues at hand are observed within the sovereign territory of the member states. What kind
of action can the UN take to address it?
2. Take the deeper problem into account. Remember that you have many resources at your
disposal, including other agencies of the UN.
3. Acknowledge that countries also pursue other legal measures (policies, bilateral agreements, and
so on) which seek to serve their own interests, but cause harm to refugees and immigrants. What
course of action can the UN take in this situation?
4. How can the UN realistically address the political rhetoric surrounding refugees and immigrants?
5. How can you ensure that the rights of refugees are never violated? What kind of repercussions
would you propose for those who do not comply with the guidelines?
RECOMMENDED RESOURCES
Here’s a list of some resources to help you learn more about the issue:

1. Brazil elections 2018: how will Bolsonaro’s victory affect migration policy in Brazil and South
America? – This is an article about Brazilian President Bolsonaro’s possible migration policy
stance, written in the immediate aftermath of his election. It also has links to other related
documents in the text, so it could be a great resource to start with.

2. The 1951 Refugee Convention – This webpage has a link to the official documents from the 1951
Convention. It helps to gain a better understanding of the rights of refugees for this topic.

3. Protecting Refugees: Questions & Answers – This is a UNHRC Q&A article that addresses some
frequently asked questions about refugees and refugee policies.

4. Political Rhetoric – If you’re unfamiliar with the concept, or want to learn more about it, this link
can help you download a PDF copy of the paper.

5. How politicians and the media made us hate immigrants – This article focuses on the negative
political rhetoric and the media coverage of immigrants and talks about the resulting
demonisation (of immigrants).

6. 2015: The Year in Anti-Immigrant Rhetoric – This article, published in 2015, reflects on the rise
of anti-immigrant rhetoric in that year.

7. Yes, Political Rhetoric Can Incite Violence - POLITICO Magazine – This article talks about the
consequences of negative political rhetoric: violence.

8. Trump words linked to more hate crime? Some experts think so – This article also talks about
how negative political rhetoric can fuel hate crimes in the country.

9. Trump's Worst Policy: Killing Asylum | Patriot Act with Hasan Minhaj | Netflix – This video
provides a good case study on how political rhetoric can cause harm to refugees. While it is
recommended that you remain sceptical of the host’s remarks, do check out the sources quoted in
the episode.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Barbaro, P. (2015). Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S.. [online]Available at:
https://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/12/07/donald-trump-calls-for-banning-muslims-
from-entering-u-
s/?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=8BB93163EE6D313A0386705563B484CE&gwt=pay&assetType=R
EGIWALL

Beauchamp, Z. (2017). Trump says Obama banned refugees too. He’s wrong. [online] Vox. Available at:
https://www.vox.com/world/2017/1/31/14444862/obama-refugee-ban-2011

Berry, M., Garcia-Blanco, I. and Moore, K. (2015). Press Coverage of the Refugee and Migrant Crisis in the
EU: A Content Analysis of Five European Countries. [online] Unhcr.org. Available at:
https://www.unhcr.org/56bb369c9.pdf

Cassese, E. (2019). Partisan Dehumanization in American Politics. [online] Political Behavior. Available
at: https://politicalbehavior.wordpress.com/2019/04/09/partisan-dehumanization-in-american-
politics/

Cole, N. (2019). Do You Know the People Who Helped Donald Trump Become President?. [online]
ThoughtCo. Available at: https://www.thoughtco.com/meet-the-people-behind-donald-trumps-
popularity-4068073

Condor, S., Tileaga, C., Billig, M. (2019): Political rhetoric. figshare. Chapter.
https://hdl.handle.net/2134/11597

Davis, J., Stolberg, S. and Kaplan, T. (2018). Trump Alarms Lawmakers With Disparaging Words for Haiti
and Africa. [online] Nytimes.com. Available at:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/11/us/politics/trump-shithole-countries.html

Danilova, V. (2014). Media and Their Role in Shaping Public Attitudes Towards Migrants - Institute on
Globalization, Culture and Mobility. [online] Gcm.unu.edu. Available at:
https://gcm.unu.edu/publications/articles/media-and-their-role-in-shaping-public-attitudes-towards-
migrants.html

Espinoza, M. and Brumat, L. (2018). Brazil elections 2018: how will Bolsonaro's victory affect migration
policy in Brazil and South America? | LSE Latin America and Caribbean. [online] LSE Latin America and
Caribbean. Available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/latamcaribbean/2018/10/25/brazil-elections-2018-
how-will-a-bolsonaro-victory-affect-migration-policy-in-brazil-and-beyond/

Fabian, J. (2018). Trump: Migrant caravan 'is an invasion'. [online] TheHill. Available at:
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/413624-trump-calls-migrant-caravan-an-invasion

Fbi.gov. (2018). FBI Releases 2017 Hate Crime Statistics — FBI. [online] Available at:
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-releases-2017-hate-crime-statistics

Gabbatt, A. (2015). Donald Trump's tirade on Mexico's 'drugs and rapists' outrages US Latinos. [online]
the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/16/donald-trump-
mexico-presidential-speech-latino-hispanic
Gottweis, H. (2007). “Rhetoric in Policy Making: Between Logos, Ethos and Pathos.” In Handbook of
Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics and Methods, ed. Frank Fischer, Gerald J. Miller and Mara S.
Sidney. CRC Press.

Kalmoe, N. (2018). Yes, Political Rhetoric Can Incite Violence. [online] POLITICO Magazine. Available at:
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/10/30/yes-political-rhetoric-can-incite-violence-
222019

Konnikova, M. (2014) How Headlines Change the Way We Think. [online] The New Yorker. Available at:
https://www.newyorker.com/science/maria-konnikova/headlines-change-way-think

Kunzelman, M. and Galvan, A. (2019). Trump words linked to more hate crime? Some experts think so.
[online] AP NEWS. Available at: https://www.apnews.com/7d0949974b1648a2bb592cab1f85aa16

Levin, B. (n.d.). Special Status Report: Hate Crime in the United States. [online] Available at:
http://theconversation.com/new-data-shows-us-hate-crimes-continued-to-rise-in-2017-97989

Lind, D. (2017). The Trump administration doesn’t believe in the global refugee crisis. [online] Vox.
Available at: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/3/16379016/trump-refugees

McVeigh, K. (2017). “Shocking” political rhetoric on refugees aims to poison debate, UN official warns.
[online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/global-
development/2017/nov/22/shocking-political-rhetoric-refugees-poison-debate-un-official-louise-
arbour

Misra, T. (2015). The Year in Anti-Immigrant Rhetoric. [online] CityLab. Available at:
https://www.citylab.com/life/2015/12/2015-year-anti-immigration-trump/421893/

Mosel, I. (n.d.). Dignity in displacement: from rhetoric to reality. [online] ODI. Available at:
https://www.odi.org/projects/2916-dignity-displacement-rhetoric-reality

Nagarajan, C. (2013). How politicians and the media made us hate immigrants. [online] openDemocracy.
Available at: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/transformation/how-politicians-and-media-made-us-
hate-immigrants/

Rothman, L. (2018). This Was President Truman's Powerful Message on Why the U.S. Should Help
Refugees. [online] TIME. Available at: https://time.com/5315575/truman-refugee-message-1947/

Rupar, A. (2018). Trump’s latest make-believe about voter fraud: Dems change shirts and vote twice.
[online] Vox. Available at: https://www.vox.com/2018/11/14/18095592/trump-voter-fraud-disguises-
cars-daily-caller-interview

Siddiqui, S. (2017). Trump signs 'extreme vetting' executive order for people entering the US. [online]
the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/27/donald-trump-
muslim-refugee-ban-executive-action

Taylor, E.M., 2018. The Effects of Political Rhetoric on Refugee Policy and Communities in the United
States and Germany. El Rio: A Student Research Journal, pp. 49 – 58

The White House. (2017). The Inaugural Address | The White House. [online] Available at:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/the-inaugural-address/
The White House. (2019). Remarks by President Trump Before Marine One Departure | The White
House. [online] Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-
trump-marine-one-departure-58/

Trilling, D. (2019). How the media contributed to the migrant crisis. [online] the Guardian. Available at:
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2019/aug/01/media-framed-migrant-crisis-disaster-reporting
UN (2017). Media coverage frames public thinking on migrants and migration – UN report. [online]
Refugees and Migrants. Available at: https://refugeesmigrants.un.org/media-coverage-frames-public-
thinking-migrants-and-migration-–-un-report

UNESCO. (n.d.). Media and migration, covering the refugee crisis. [online] Available at:
https://en.unesco.org/news/media-and-migration-covering-refugee-crisis

UNHCR (2011). The 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and The 1967 Protocol. Geneva,
Switzerland: UNHCR.

Wikipedia (2020). Populism. [online] Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Populism

Wintour, P. (2017). Donald Trump pulls US out of UN global compact on migration. [online] the Guardian.
Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/dec/03/donald-trump-pulls-us-out-of-un-
global-compact-on-migration

Wood, G. (2020). Ongoing refugee crisis in Greece set to continue in 2020. [online] Available at:
https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/21942/ongoing-refugee-crisis-in-greece-set-to-continue-in-
2020