Hindus Under The Gaznavids
Hindus Under The Gaznavids
Hindus Under The Gaznavids
Indian History
Congress
71st Session
Malda 2010-11
Memhers:
Dr. C. Balan (Kerala)
Professor Ramakrishii;) Chatterjee (West Bengal)
Dr. Sudiandra Gliush (West Bengal)
© Indian History Congress, 201 Dr. JiihrtabiGogoi Nath (Assam)
Dr. NnjarJI;iidsr (DelliiJ
J
igarh Historians Society and piitited by Ratan Gupta
at
Type-set by A I
and BanglaicsJl)
ASM 2)90. Visva-Blarati
MS
Sarita Khetity.
CONTENTS 12. blcmeat of jjaiice -in tl'.e Nauativt Art of AinaravBli
154
Srejxisfti Hay Cfmtdh«rU AM-2294% Dakfhtnttw
Executive Committee (2009-10) Lii Educfli ion in Lar ly Midi iln A Re,in F rn is al
13 .
1 ™
Rules lor Award of Prizes for Best Papers v
14. A Iraditionnl Account im Yayuti Keshari — It3 1-DriUP ion and
Select Abbreviations vtl
Historical Authenticity
213
I're-Modcm InJimi Art Studios. Secular Spaces ami Artist & Jabir Hau*, AH-14353. AUfarh *
1 Rlcphuits. Ivory and Ivory Trade ( A Study in the Orissan Scltiiig M al . ijig A Un i fi ed Society in As wir.
Z4J
Dtifina the Ancient Pfriod) Diganta Kumar Sarma, Assam
ProfiiUa Kumar Mofwnty. LMW3S2. Mayitrhlianj, Orissa 7 1
6. Situating Tribnis in liuty 1 1 (Story of Karnataka 22, Relations of Kashmir whh Indian Tibet' in Mugfial 1 imes
Hamena iVayvka, WO 1272. Mangabn . W FarstmAsfitemAbgath
266
tPiufesior Vijay Kumar Thakar Memorial Prifcc)
23, A Note on Mirza Rnjab Jai SinrJi*s Pwandar and Bijariuj Campaiens
7. Knmargpii mid Bart* Bonnat: gilders landing lU-ir Politic! I
-An Unpublished l-'amiau 0>f AuraiigaeH S6S AD) ( !
300
Anvpama , Delhi
9 Change and Continuity in the Historical mid Cullmal tocography of
26, Siiuaiing Shersfiah in Jhajldiand
Kashmir from Nilanutfl Kurana lo Rajatanuigini 312
129 fndm Kumar Chvudhar}', LM-164S, RancM
Sufitan Jamwcl, LM-SS9, Jamma ,
A
Smlta fiafifor, 3240 Ml l< n
212 LHC Proceedings. 71 si Session, 2010-11
Wciv Delhi. I97.\ p .121. temples and inm£es in his zeal for Isliim. Communal
propel him as a religious fofiaiiciind a bigol Mnli:tni msd I toliib s inllucnliyily
.
!
5 . W RW >r jrf f taif™, vol.l I , pp I! 2-W
ijl'OliaKniit did subsiantially help to after the
popular
16 WlrJtir.i /ki/pjfljf. ycI.H1. p. 230.
work. Sultan Mahmud
projections of Sultan Maliinnd and projcciCLl lis
expeditions as motivated by
Aim tad. unpublished llivsi j, tiled aLio^t. p. 174.
rcccntb' Romila Thapar has shown thai the
} >. Inrliaz
avarice and greed. More 1
hy he
destruction of Somnath was a political act and was perceived
:> B. Mniix&~i Haktati, vel.l 1 1, P-23SIT. I
Jahanflrt. Enulisi TraajlalLori by Hone is and Ueverid^c. 2 volumes, ( Rcprinl). Delhi. snpplenieiil the Undine
50
conic in porarlcs in ikcscmo light? This paper seek^ to
(>f:w.£-i
by historians of
i For a more detailed explanation ol H akin Ali Uilanis.expert mem. refer lolrfan HMb, op-sll,
within the Ghaxnavid empire, army and ailministralion.
I
p.147.
Sultans were able to lap trie rich resources of
ludiu in
43 \fii'n)ir-i tkthiMi. Viol INI, p. 23 9 IT, The Ghaziiavid
Bthcr, Pama. Treasure, tribute, aivd manpower (Soldiers and Slaves)
derived from
-1?. Fen devils, tofar 10 Q. Ah«ad, fVjr/iuj <>f Awto-- nn§ Fenian Imcrlptkua <>j icrnis t»f
SO. 1 111 1 la z Ahmad Farrufchi among were two wives and two daughters of the Shall
(he prisoners
Sibm liirui Puitliad (Sfvtwn II - Medieval iiihari, vjih *e»ton, 2006. p. 4. 1
Delhi, 15*3
drivers
n 2 -93 cheap that ev*n local porter* (hammal), swerpers (kannas). camel
IAj 'aiir itf-f !sw«r, vol. I, pp.1
f>mmal) and slave sellers (nakkhas) became mn3t0rs (fchwaja was khudaband)
5 2
horses
chance a IIukJu physician happened lo examine his fcthcr and assured him of comprised utimernus tindu troops of infantry and cavalry with branded
I
:"
beginning Kc stood in relation to tl e Hindu astronomers as a pupil, since he
slaves comprised Turks. Hindus and some Hajkb, probably Khurasums
was not acquainted with and traditional methods ©I use of Turks and Hindus
Kaik.ies in QahM Namah admires Solum Muhmud's
their peculiar national
science. In course of lime when albeTum began to clarify 10 them the basics
as palace goiifds ( gliti am an Sat ay whereby he ccnsiiiutly overavfed the
I
-i- \
J
nn which In is science res'.s, and pointed out some j tiles of logical deduction
Hindus hy means of Die Turks and the TurKs by
means of (be Hindus. lhe
and scientific methods, the Hindus flocked loecther around AJheruni BJld anonymous author of Tarlkh i Stetan tells us that to suppress lhe
revoti ai
showed eagerness ;o learn from him. They begun lo considered Allci uni a Siestan (ICO}). Sultan Mahmud seni his impcrtai
corps of palute ghotam
Sorcerer. They discussed his knowledge with their turned men atid termed contingents. They
1
Clurctt.
There were also Hindus, in Gha/navirl service, huth in rivil :i\\A mil liny massacring lhe Muslims and also killing the C hristians in their
administration. The Gha/uavids had a multiracial army, but the cere of the Likewise Sultan M^sud Tilak lo suppress the revolt
icnl a J tindu Commander
army constituted mainly of Turk sand Hindus. Nizamul Mufk in Siyusat Natnah of Turkish Commander Lahore. The Hindu force defeated able
Veualligiu it
records thai Sultan Mahmud kept llie various nul ton a lilies. Turks. Hindus. Hie Turkish troops and Tilak ordered them to
mutilate such Turks as, happened
11
Khurasan is, Arabs. Ghurids and Dai tan is In their separate ciftnlc groups and to be the friends of Ycnalligin.
drew advantage from this diversity. ' Nimui ul-Mulk's account tinds support
1
for incarcerated
The liiidii contingents were used as an escort force
1
from Sutlan Main mud's army composition. As a governor. Mahmud collecled sympathising wilh ihc
Turkish Commanders for there was no fear of their
a large army comprised of Hindu: and ihc klialj j kuujioii lii» faliicr Sul ukn^in Aryans and
lurks- Sultan Mnjud overthrew iwo Turkish Commanders
i
of Tajiks and Hindus in lite khan ids." And against Iluk khan,
fight against Hie
horn Hisdtittaa, tie v^as arrested hy the eliiefs of tlK Hindu
troops tftaqibOto-
J under Asiglui^io
ihc '-iili.ii marched to Elalkh with aslrong army composed of Turks. Hindus,
i-finuhum) wilh the support of 300 so Alien. Theollie. ":«. in
Lhnljis. Afghans mid Ghuzz. 2* the Suilan stipulated
was capiurcd and brought back to Gha/Jiiu. lot his sscori, 3
Tlie recruitment of I Itndu soldiers in the army of Muslim rulers dines that 500 of lhe Hindu cavalry and infantry
were lo accompany bim, ' hi die
Sahukiigin who
hack in Saffarids Tin Sn iTsirirl Yafpih b. Lain cmplnyeit a ciiiuin^eiil of Hindu same year (1011) Sultan Masud arrested his uncle Yusuf b.
three naq\hs
soldiers mulct Hie ofTurabil Hind. I, as lb* Salar~i~HundttanJlt I'ur
command was sent away lo a foi tress with a gurnd of three muqaditttta,
the Ghaznavids, -India served as the recruiting ground. Once Abdullah ami live hundred I lindo cavalry \saw»T-i-H\nih\\ to jollier with three thousand
^arali^iiL the then Salat-i-ghatfyatfMk\.9hart, suggested lo Sultan Mahmud iufanrry.
51
that If the Sultan desired, hemay made addition lo Hindu conlingcnh with Although 1 tindu Hoops were held lo be brave and loyal, lhe pour showing
0,000 foot soldiers and numerous cavalrymen.* Alheruni adds ihal the 5
against the Duyids and ai
of the Hindu contingents ul kirman (1034)
I
Karnala Hoops of kantatadesha (Karnataka) were enlisted in the army of Sultan Dandanqan against the Seljuqs seem lo have been Isolated occurrences.
In
Mahmud and were known as kan tiara." the kirman expedition, the Hindus formed one half of the
cavalry force, their
along with 50f)
The chain of command of the Hindu soldiers roHecied the general being 2000 Hindus, I&00 Turks mid 1000 kurds and Arabs
the commander Ahmad
hierarchy ol"Ghaoiavid army. Btflow ihc 1 lojib-i-nuisufg, ihc re was the
Lhe foot soldiers from each conlingetits. Jn the battle field,
Sipnhxalur-i-! fintJuiui followed hy s'Jtir-i* ifindium The Salars commanded Ali Noshiigin made every eflorts bul Ihc Hindus showed feebleness and fled,
the rninfatittiim, iht- nuifilts mid Ihc Kfmif ufltrri hoises. to ihc rest of the troops and Ahmad was forced lo abandon
The panic spread
the baltie field. The Hindus (led lo Siestan llrsl and (hen returned lo Olmznln.
The Hindu soldiers served the Uhaznavids boih as Ibolsoldicrs and
Baibaqi Beinf an eye witness. Informs us thai ihc chiefs of the Hindus were
cavalrymen Tilak as Sipalisylar-i-Hinduan commanded the Hindu troops
kept in lhe dispatch hall of the Oman
hXhalal at Sad llazara garden, liti
consisted of both cavalry and infantry. The Hindus and Dailamrs, as a
several severe orders from Sulian
permanent core, were prominent in lhe Gha/navtd infantry. As a cavalrymen. Said, the ^/ir f/[accoun(anl) brought (
2\(> iHC: Pt acuudings, 7/st Session, 2010-
Medieval India 217
Musud, Finally, Ihe
Hindu chiefs {muqaddam) committed suicide
with their administration of the smaller
daggers (*a/ar<r) so that blond heganj flowing hands of the HiRUS." The chief
iir e;is in the
in tho kali. Baiharji and Hn
eivil omccr of Punjafi Qazi SHiraz appointed
Sfitd informed Ihe Sulci .bout ihe T ihtk as anil (la.\ eoJieciorJ
happenings. Sul.an Masud Said in anger who used to eoitect taxes from Ihe remote areas, Tilak was further prunioted
">x 'they should have used these daggers
at kimian". Rest of them
were to a post in Ihe eentral administration. He worked as tiuhir (seerelary)
and
treated severely, tut in the end they
were freed." lite Hindu troops incurred ^r./flpyVrntinterpreier) Jor the Hindus under iht WaiirAiiniad Hasan
similar dBgrace at Dandonqan when ihey Maimandi
fled before the Turkomans. loweve, 1 during the reign oC Sukah Mahmud. Tfie olher eivil official, Birhal
there the Hindus were not more culpuble had also
than the rest of the army. The Sultan been appointed secretary auti inierpreier
summoned the Hindus and rep,i,„ a nded them. The h>' Sultan Masud who daeed him
Hindu tinsteintuqaddams] nder Ahul Fazl Qaihaqi.*1
so omnly submitted that we are ashamed i
Since we could
not liave sufficient flour a „d barley, especially during ihe
rCf^ll of Sultan Mahmud and his successor Sultan Masud.
Notwiihstanding what
has happened, as long as we Jive we shall
not be found deficit." The Sultan
Among the prominent Hindu governor and eommandcrs Ihe names of
lorgnve thcn> all." Sukhapah, Saundhrai, lajrai. Nalh and Tllak Stand Old conspicuously.
I
These
The (ihaznavid el*phant eorp was formed bommanders held a very high position under the Ghaznavid Sultans.
after the Indian expeditions
Ihere w
fl3 an nnperial elephant
stable [piSkhma] al Ghazmi and a Sultan Mahmud appoSnrcd Sukhupala us governor ofthe Ohamavid Indian
,stafTof
l.»J« elephant drivers was emphwed
under a muqqddam+ptlhanan who possesions in 1006. The contemporary chronicler Garde/i calls him'
He J the high rank ot i iajib." Saifud
fJatila Mahmird b. [hrahim. the governor
Sliukpai « WhrJe Ihe thirteenth centtiry writer fakhr-i-Mudabbir refers m
ol J unj.bC I07GJ,
orfiani^d^A^atKarmu ifand appointed a 1 tindu Chand him as 'Sandhaf which seems another variani ofthe name Sukkapala."
Raias S..perv, S or of that stable," Baihaqi However, the later historians record (he name more correctly as 4 '
.eeords (hat hi 1039. a group often 'Sukapala*
iurkoman horsemen sneaked into (he elepliani or 'Sulthapala Utbi omits the name and simply mentions his epithet 'Nawasa
siable al kundu/ in night after
killing toir Hindu loot Shall." which is being cJanlied oy Gardezi ivho records his original name as
soldiers. Tkey found a Hindu bo> asleep
on the neck
01 an elephant, Hie lurkomans drove the elephant Shukpafa N;ihas,r-i- Shah. 51 or. Sukhapala, the grandson ofthe Shah. As
away. Then they awake the for
boy and threatened to kill him ifhe would ,,ot Sukhap'flla's Muslim name after conversion, Jjrhodhuuni
rcecrs that he was
drive the elephant urckiy. By ti
mo/m,,g. they ltl d reached Sabiirg.™ and n, med Aah Saar. firiahia sn por(ed
f
handed the elephant to Daud Great P Jurhadhqani's evidence and twice eall
d.scredn was ir^urred by this affair,
for it was said that Ls there so much SukhapnlausAuh Saar." UtW calls him the scion of one ofthe Indian tings'
neglect amongst Ihtisc men (aulad-i-mulak-i-Hind). H l-irishia calls him 'the son of one of the tings of
thai ihey allow an elephant to be driven
off" The
natter was reported to Sultan M SSU J who Hi n d ( pi sa raja w - - II i u 1 1 \ h we vet. -a k hr- i- M u da b bi r Ki
was exceedingly vexed and severely ' I i
1
I 1
p c !y m en t to ns
I :
i I
r L b.,Led ihe drives > him as the gioiidsoa of laypala" {Nnhira-i-Shab Ja>pala>."
arnnial, to
( r itb«, t< llt) UJ ,d 0ldcrtd ollc k|c lJlp
.
^ (|
llnrdu eu.umarider Tllak the Jat captured. Probably in these exchanged Irealy. Kukhapala was also released
coMirigent chrused the ,cbc! Turkish
commander Ycnalligin and killed him " and ih en joined the UhEtznav id armies*5
Ihe lull ti.i^ i kHokharoUarnmu
regior) formed the eorcof tf it> arnn
of the Sukhapalii accompanied Stdlan Makmtid
las irh^navid ruler Khusrau
Malik (1 1S4) in the s «,^g/ c against the in Mullan expedition ( I €'06),
Gnu.id and so was
bUllan Mliizuddin Muhammda b. Sam," in the contingents of Ihe Gtaavid
army when Mahmud, tmroate
to Mollan. inflicted crushing defcai on his kinsmen Anandapala in the Valley
As for civil adminislralion. Sultan Mahmud of roshawar. Sultan Mahmud then marched lo Mallon
stems to have followed the and captured the city.
principle established by Muhammad b,
Q
aa ini who had left the focal Meanwhile, he received ihe news of the irruption of llak Khan,
He hurried
Medieval India 219
218 IHC: Proceedings, 7 1st Session, 2010-11
to attend the Ghaznavid courl again
and other faith to him Abu Ali persuaded Hajrai
back Ghaznin leaving the charge of the government of Multan
to Maudud recived Hajrai with all
Sukhapala, who was made him his deputy and sent him to Ghaznin. At Ghaznin, Sultan
Indian possessions in the hands of
favour. Thus, Hajrai rejoined ihc Ghaznavid army."'
Probably by appointing
and Vicegerent {nivabat wa khitafat} of India." Banlh 7*
Sukhapala as the first Ghaznavid viceroy of India, Sultan
Mahmud wanted to One of ihe Hindu commanders of Ghaznavid army was Banh,"
joined the
govern his Indian dominion by and Indian or aristocratic
background- The or Nalh.™ parentage is uncertain.*" It seems that Nalh
whose
such a high Mahmud 's reign and acted as Sator-Urtinduan
appointment ol Sukhapala, a convert scion of the 5 hah is. in Ghaznavid army during Sultan
the lost fortunes or ihe under Suhan masud.*
1
his abode in the mountcms and eloquence associated him with Bahrain, a Persian official to
dissensions with Masud. In India, he had taken up intelligence
Hasan, the Kotwal of as imperial interpreter for the Hindus. Thus.
Tilak make rapid progress
or Kashmir In 1048. Sultan Maudud sent Abu Ali work
chiefs. Having subdued
Ghaznin with an army to suppress the rebel Indian 7
in royal service."
the fort of Mahitah, ' in the vicinity himself with Masud
the rebels of Panjab, Abu Ali advanced to During Sultan Mahmud's reign Tilak secretly allied
Abu then sent message to Hajrai, extended by the time. Tilak was
of Kashmir and Seized the fort. Ali
against his brother Muhammad. It seems that,
to his presence. After pledging his
to him assurances and summoned him
220 INC: Proceedings, 7! si Session, 2010-il Medieval India 22 1
administering the region of Kator, in the Kafiristan province of Northern hi Ihe month of July 1033, news was received that Ahmad Yenaltigtn
Afghanistan." According tc Bailiatp. Tilak render d signal service to Masud had got control of the fori of Lahore. However, lllak had advanced against
by bringing ult the lindus of Kator tin J others to serve Masud, When Sultan
I
him at the head of a large Hindu army. Venaltlgin was sei/cd with panic and
Mastid rcacKcil Hulkh from Heart, where he as sinned the Sovereign slut us, lie there was friction among bis iroops. Saltan Masud immediately dieuiU'it a
Appointed Tilak ihe commander-in-chief of the Hindu army {Slpahsaktr i letter for Tilak and fie was thus directed to move against the rdicl with all
fiinduen). a post which was earlier held by Saundhrai. lilik was honoured speeds
with gold embroidered robe (khilat-i-Zar), a jewel necklace of gold and the
filak mardied rapidly to Lahore. Several .irks either iioKJiers oi traders.
I
were made prisoners on account of their closeness w ith Yenahigln, and T ilak
kellledrum beaten ul Wis quarter in the fashion of Hindu ehiefs. He was also
ordered his men lo cut off the right Fiand of the prisoners.'" This ruthless
1
grunted Ihe privilege of having banners wilh gilded tops. Now he was listed
action so terrified the rebellious troops that many of them descried Ycualiijjiii.
among the high noble {u'yun) joining (he Sultan's inner circle (khatwal} and
surrendered to Tilak and sued for mercy. Ahmad Venaltigin was then pursued
was entrusted with important duties and missions to perform. When Ahmad
by Tilak and his Hindu soldiers. A buttle ensued between the two artistes.
Yenalligin revolted in Lahore, Tilak was given the command of the army
Ye n ah gin was deflated and forced in seek safely in flight, lie was deserted
against Venal tigin at his own request-*'
i
borngreat, men became such, What matters is that men should leave a good
proceeded towards the Panjab.*'
name behind." Tilak 'a reputedly low staias by birlli was also overlooked.
"Though noble birlli is something desirable." says Daihaqi. "ii docs not favours
222 iffC: Proceeding!, ?/sr Session, 20 1 01! Medfevot India 223
Sulci I i
***
Summarizing ihe whole account, Muhammad habib opines
itt:"'
1
of a common kin^; and the superbly oriental feeling of loyalty to (he silt'."" II, AINrumi's llWil, L P
Hindus enjoyed considerably toleration under the trliaznavids. The 14, Daihaqi, p Via
demographic distribution of the Hindus have supported in limping the social 25. Idem, p. 5* 7: To pievfM offtctn anJ Sol die is frem rJe«mn,T thr Si air, (Ik Imiscs were all
composition of ihe Ghaznavid urban centres. Sullan Muhimid granted Hindus bjindtd wtth ii« SulifliTs mark mtnlicntd cAjk^ ui tkmhhi^n'ti. du^h wai usiult} m Hk
Ji.i lt on iie back ,mi.I lb* (Mil oTlhe nojnli al t J4'^ CP, Fililir-i-Mudabbir, p3?3: .
ivii^kai iimi religious ceremonies. Ftambad's discovery oTn staiue of Brahma WatbhmJ 1068. pp. 3i. 15; Matud 6l4-l-$»lfntH. tfwoJt. «1 ft»ihid ^iSltll, T«hnfl 9J0 pp.
1 ' 1
in ihe excavations of a palace at Chaznin built by Sultan Masud III (1112) 111.
cluarly supports the Tact thai Hindu forms of worship were re spiled,' 1,1
2b. Jurbadhqaii.p. 2!6.
FuiUiciiiiuil. Al-Maari describes the scene of Hindu woman's Snti in Ghazmn ft 27. Baihacji.p 5*7.
in the reign of Sultan Mabmud.™4 2i. [dcm. fp 4*2. 624: Alto C.E. Donvortli, TfW ^hsina¥|ris 1 lit ir t-mpirc in Af|hini]lin and
Entien in 'J" i- 'i-id EdiaiMirgh. i«a, n. id I.
1
1 1
j
It, Kaikaui bin likaiiJn, (>n.i WhpM/>, cd. R. Lcvf l»J I. Eogl. Tl B, J mlnwfor .'Vr.ifoj,
lAttumflHl Habit, Sudan Mihnud of G hum In. A%irh JO. lanth-i-Sk^nm. p. J57: cf. IJotMiJfllt, Tk* IJ/MCWrWifi, pp fl<P,l :0; S Jariir R.i?a. HMViiV/
1
1927, Rcpiint Dtlhi, 175 1
Sh-ucai. a SiMtceJar ffit Hi^uiry <\f tht hariy tlhazimtes, Proctedl nus of ihe IHC,
2. Km -I ill TniHT. ScmiMtiio: ihe mar& VcAcei aj a Hukiry. New Delhi, 2C04. . i i .1 1 1. 2Q<J6
3. Cf Abu Shaft N.uch 2afar Aubddli b.
Yorjvm«-:-Tniiki\-i-Y«iinr,i, fd. Dl. .1,1.11.1 Shuir,
.1 r
G aider p
; 1 :
5 Jliibidhqini, p jl Ji. 1 :
.
.1. =
p. 15?.
IX, p 70, irn.nr-n people ,,,-r,- em laved JO. (Utm, pjj. 586, 517.
7. J ii r I
' ,1
p. |Tf Vsiid Ujtsuri Dal Uil, JJ wun. ed. Mil an 111 a cl Uitur Szyai|
dl il j.i u. | p (I iid^ii . :
J7. tfkm, pp. 3SJ, 567:(idrd«ii. p. SO; /Ji *™ . x./ arrt kh >. p. 3Jt.
T«hr*n IJ12,pJ17; MinhaJ*kSjf*j Juijain, ftb%vt~frtfaiM> ed. IfaWbi. Kabul 1961. 64. Vbl.
Up, 229. 11. iJ;von Mmnsi-i-SiuL Salman* p. 2&S.
H Ahdul H man A I i Fi iru ttii Siitani, Ofrtfjt, ed. M. D. S*y =qi Tah.-sn , 1 2 49 ( |). £ 4.
39. Bj>htqi pp. 284, 547: Girdezi. p. 80; ftfmtM-itftltttihl, p 3*6.
I I Mm RlihaMlbfl Abriidb. Muhamflttd Albervni. TiikqifrnafJ ftt lti Rn£l Tr Ed.vard C. Sftpjitn, 41. rijtif-i-Miiokbblr.p. JTS.
Atrvrv/iifltiJia, London in si. Vni 1, pf> Tin. 21 i. A be nun elnrifiei Ihii ihe i:Uid oT I 1
*akwika > tfit Kumair Islands. c tini.-iij;\.v, ihe name nl Ihe penile. *tw ihk
h.l.'ji;, 1 1 1
12. Jufbadliqai i, p. 312.
1
wfiltiih and DFbli.it colour. TIm? mreofa J mi suiuie sndl-avini! a buin likei.iai of Turks. 43. la Hnji 409- Gardezi 209.
i , pp. 10; . p.
They practiced Hindu rvltfioa and hire IwcwIrxiH ofpf^rctng tfcit tin,
44. Mfn»8lH*Siii|j, t, p. J^S.
13, Albwfimlk tmdte, J, p. 1 IS,
-15. A*«il>lii4tit, Cmtintvrw, ft dim Tr, by Mib. hmid b> Abu EJjikr »1-Kuli, cd N.hV
I Jiildrli,
13. Mu'iammaJb ktlUlur HutiaraLMuhFaihr-i-Mudibbir, J'JjA m.ftrf Hiix*5^fl,cd.Ahmid Is Iflniubt d I
n$2
,
j> 2 1 0; A I so I , H.Qurct h tht ^Jminhttfurhm ofthe .SiJlan^ie /
i. < Mh, Sle w
SvlaEI Khwarisail, Tthran 1327. p.42. D*l'ii (MI, pp. 206-7-
II. Albcruni,
p.
I97J
fi: Eriul. Tr.
p. 5.
AfdCtf/ vi-XnynJ.-ii, a f;
Hati™ M.
fu fth, i&.
Slid, Mh.-„.><,\ M™
JJaJdm M. S^iJ j iJ Ram
Phtmacy end M*'4rlp
L'liiiiji Ali, Kiidrlii |97?.
M*tico. Ksraclii
46.
47.
Biiliaqi. pp. 3S5-«6.
G.rdtii, p. 174
4R Kalchr.i-Umtirihir. p502, rnentiWflt S.imlli:il it the gnnKttOn rif Ihe Shah e>t Kali {JtyptH 11 1 I
15. tl.ir.Kvi p. llf,
who Hind w.lilt SjSIiii Wahisiud was (niutcd in Khufisan. This even', las been
rcvdlttdi ir
16. Alhtttni * fWito, 1. p. 2J. recorded lv man ' wrlursbui ihe narrecfiht ciandson cfthc Shah b repwciJ
1
9uk iHintli u
17 Styvwt f/n/rtuh, p. 154. J9. Nizinuddin Ahmad, Tibqal -i -A kbari NnwaJ kishorc edilioi, n.d; vol. 1. p i,
54 Ulbi. p. 2 2 1, >uibadhuan/. p 291; The authors of liiriih-i-ffaidnri. UPB. p. 442 and Tarikh-i- 8J. Gardezi. p. 200. Biihiqi, pp.381, 400.
Alfi. DPB. p, B09 hate probably taken the information fioni Llitit and ihlU rcconl iTic same 84 Gaideii, p. 200. Nizainuddin Ahmad, p 42. I. p. 12. FirithlB. I.
^
55. Finshla, J, p. 24. Jhalan Baihaqi. p. 385. timply refer, to him
Tabqa.-i- Akbati tlales that he wat the
sort of Ja.scr,
56. Nizanmddin, the bans of one oM manutc.ipi of
I. p.6.
ofGardei. W .tehin ed mlo Ja»«n
However, il seems prcbibl* (hat the p.renlal name
Jhalan fi
57 Fakhri-Mudabbir.p 302.
and il funher miitrintcripi «
Uuasin by the later Hiiic-nam.
55 (iardo.i. Fimhla. p26 Confused were the t*o ureal seal of learning for Hindu
179; iiNice Nisrui'ur uiih iV>l,.iv,.Lr
Acco.din B to Albetoni Kashmir and V.rana.i
|i I. I III-
86
m. and Time* ofSmltfK mkmmtitf Ohtmtalt Cambridge. 1931. p 9B Science, dwin fi the elevenlh cenlury Cf. Atbcwl* ln<ittt t 1, p. 173.
$9. Nazijii. The tifir n.l.
60. UI61, p. TO. Jurbadhqairi, p. 1 17; GariJezrj p. 179 87. Saihaqi. pp. 3S5-S6.
sheet IA-B
41. Cf. Niianuddm Ahmad. Kirrshta, SS. Cf (.ran Habib. An Alias of Mugbat Emp.re, Delhi 1982, Reprim 1986,
I, p. I. p. 7/)
65. Cf. A Rahman TfK last /wvi Jyiumiet ufthf Sktthi\, Jjlainab.nl. 1979. pp 149-50. 92. Idem, pp. 345.387.J88
66. Ulbi. p 223: Juibadhqani, p. .Wl; Gardezi, p 179; Fakhr-i-Mudabbir. p 302; himhla. I. p. 93. /Jem. pp. 400-0 1.
20; NfzWHUjdtfin Ahmad. 200, tcwidt thai Tilak ixiltifd if ei.l off one hanrf and eai* oflhc
I, p.6. 94 Idem p 4]0 Gard^i. p.
'
Niazmuddin p. 12, Tihk ordeted Ihe noies and the ears oflhe
67 P priHMrl while accordintj lo 1,
Ulbi, p. 223: Jmbadhqani 291; Gardezi. p 179; Fakhi-i MmisbW, p. 302 According lo
Gatdezi. Sukhapala (Ted lo Kashmir to which Nsiim. op.nt. p 98 n 4 considcri the Copyisl prisoners i a be cut off.
nil lake for khewin by which nunc IhASall Ranjte is commonly known. Uodjvala, SmJiat in 95. For liftand their rel.lion. with tiie Chaz.mvids see S Jabir lb*
pJ«l
Jrto MityliM Ht\tory. Bombay 1957, vet
p 150, opines thai lite wwdj fejHcsenis Kilhlur in II,
SifiJ> Their SilitmtftU atdkHgrUm*. In the cdiled
book IkiJalt, ed Dr Vir Singh, vol. I.
Kaziin, op.cil. p. '*t. futttier opines tlial Sukhapala. piobably, took rcnj|;e in
I
pp 54 64 tdtm. The MaOldJets:
63-74; l«r«af. paxiiugfix J™
the Chaehnama. Zmmd-Ahhhar.
Their Coixfilet wtth Ihe iihtt-.navtd*,
tiitd MA<W^ >*«
Ihc Sill K.injx in F*anjnb ulu-rt- his brother or Cousin Ana nd a pal a Mill mainlaincd his a jlhcrrty. and Tranfiaium. In J** Jvi* vol, II, pp. 4 J-52.
fiul il secmj mile liable, as Ibcy were not in good Icnm since Anandanala had nol extended his 42.
suppoil to Sukhapala when he revolted 96. Gardezi. p.200, w (J followed by Hiiimuddin, I, p. 12, and Firiibti. J. p.
vfi<t achievement! ofAytiz, the S/gvc nf tin- Sultan hfuhmul Unpublished). E'rcsenledi a IHC.
100. Idem, p. J&6
I
{
72. Nizamuddin Ah ni nd. t, p. )5. 102. Al Maart, Riialal ol Ghufran, p, I S3; Also M Nazim. op cil. P 140.
n. ?.
Mahiyii'L in the vicinity of Kashmir lo which Sultan Ibraliim reeaplured, in 1079. Cf. fhwan
Sorf-t- Stitmnn: p. 371. Sec also. Huswonh Jht idler Hhozaovt^.HphttJtiut wid fkury.
.