Ereport 201819
Ereport 201819
Ereport 201819
ANNUAL REPORT
2018-2019
INDEX
Refresher Courses
V Special Programmes
Colloquium on Judicial District Administration: Issues and
1 Challenges HQ 61
2
14 Judicial Colloquium on Anti-Human Trafficking HQ 79
* HQ: TNSJA Headquarters, Chennai; RCC: TNSJA Regional Centre, Coimbatore; and RCM: TNSJA
Regional Centre, Madurai
3
PART-I
09.06.2018
Refresher Training Course-I for Civil Judges
1 RCC* and 54
(Batch-I)
10.06.2018
09.06.2018
Refresher Training Course-I for Civil Judges
2 RCM* and 54
(Batch-I)
10.06.2018
23.06.2018
Refresher Training Course-I for Civil Judges
5 HQ and 60
(Batch-I)
24.06.2018
23.06.2018
Refresher Training Course-I for District
6 RCC and 39
Judges
24.06.2018
23.06.2018
Refresher Training Course-I for Senior Civil
7 RCM and 74
Judges
24.06.2018
23.06.2018
Training Programme for Personal Assistants
8 Chennai and 32
to the Hon'ble Judges
28.06.2018
4
Sl. Place/ No. of
Scheduled Programmes Period
No. Venue Participants
21.07.2018
Refresher Training Course-I for District
16 HQ and 47
Judges (Batch-I)
22.07.2018
21.07.2018
Refresher Training Course-I for Senior Civil
17 RCC and 55
Judges
22.07.2018
21.07.2018
Refresher Training Course-I for District
18 RCM and 46
Judges
22.07.2018
28.07.2018
Refresher Training Course-I for Senior Civil
19 HQ and 61
Judges (Batch-I)
29.07.2018
28.07.2018
Refresher Training Course-I for Civil Judges
20 RCC and 54
(Batch-II)
29.07.2018
28.07.2018
Refresher Training Course-I for Civil Judges
21 RCM and 54
(Batch-II)
29.07.2018
5
Sl. Place/ No. of
Scheduled Programmes Period
No. Venue Participants
18.08.2018
Refresher Training Course-I for Senior Civil
30 HQ and 60
Judges (Batch-II)
19.08.2018
25.08.2018
Refresher Training Course-II for Civil Judges
33 RCC and 51
(Batch-I)
26.08.2018
15.09.2018
Refresher Training Course-I for District
37 HQ and 51
Judges (Batch-II)
16.09.2018
15.09.2018
Refresher Training Course-II for District
38 RCC and 39
Judges
16.09.2018
15.09.2018
Refresher Training Course-II for Civil Judges
39 RCM and 56
(Batch-I)
16.09.2018
29.09.2018
Refresher Training Course-II for Civil Judges
40 RCC and 56
(Batch-II)
30.09.2018
29.09.2018
Refresher Training Course-II for Civil Judges
41 RCM and 54
(Batch-II)
30.09.2018
6
Sl. Place/ No. of
Scheduled Programmes Period
No. Venue Participants
27.10.2018
Refresher Training Course-II for Senior Civil
50 RCC and 54
Judges
28.10.2018
27.10.2018
Refresher Training Course-II for District
51 RCM and 48
Judges
28.10.2018
24.10.2018
In-service Training Programme for Public
54 RCM to 322
Prosecutors (Batch-I)
27.10.2018
10.11.2018
Refresher Training Course-II for Senior Civil
55 HQ and 60
Judges (Batch-I)
11.11.2018
7
Sl. Place/ No. of
Scheduled Programmes Period
No. Venue Participants
10.11.2018
Workshop on Laws relating to Children:
56 RCC and 49
Changing Perspectives
11.11.2018
10.11.2018
Refresher Training Course-II for Senior Civil
57 RCM and 76
Judges
11.11.2018
14.11.2018
In-service Training Programme for Public
59 RCM to
Prosecutors (Batch-II)
17.11.2018
17.11.2018
Refresher Training Course-II for Civil Judges
61 RCM and 51
(Batch-III)
18.11.2018
15.12.2018
Refresher Training Course-II for Civil Judges
67 HQ and 47
(Batch-I)
16.12.2018
15.12.2018
Refresher Training Course-III for Civil
68 RCC and 54
Judges (Batch-I)
16.12.2018
8
Sl. Place/ No. of
Scheduled Programmes Period
No. Venue Participants
9
Sl. Place/ No. of
Scheduled Programmes Period
No. Venue Participants
Workshop on Special Procedure relating to
87 RCC 16.03.2019 64
NDPS cases
16.03.2019
Refresher Training Course-II for Senior Civil
88 HQ and 61
Judges (Batch-II)
17.03.2019
Refresher Training Programme on Court and
89 RCC 17.03.2019 105
Office Administration
Refresher Training Programme on Court and
90 RCM 17.03.2019 108
Office Administration
In-service Training Programme for Public 20.03.2019
91 Prosecutors (Batch-VII) and Police Officers RCM to 123
(Batch-V) 23.03.2019
23.03.2019
Refresher Training Course-III for Senior Civil
92 RCC and 39
Judges
24.03.2019
23.03.2019
Refresher Training Course-III for Civil Judges
93 RCM and 67
(Batch-III)
24.03.2019
Special Evaluation Programme on Judgment-
94 writing Skills for Civil Judges recruited in the HQ 30.03.2019 89
year 2012 (Batch-I)
Special Evaluation Programme on Judgment-
95 writing Skills for Civil Judges recruited in the HQ 31.03.2019 90
year 2012 (Batch-II)
30.03.2019
Refresher Training Course-III for Senior Civil
96 RCM and 74
Judges
31.03.2019
* HQ: TNSJA Headquarters, Chennai; RCC: TNSJA Regional Centre, Coimbatore; and RCM:
TNSJA Regional Centre, Madurai
10
PART-II
INAUGURAL SESSION
11
well-trained judges at all levels to face challenges or the old
time-tested wisdom and knowledge of IPC, Cr.P.C. and the
Constitution, are good enough to deal with new types of cases, and
emphasised that the need of the hour is that the presiding officers of
Subordinate Judiciary, who man the courts of first instance and deal
with this kind of cases, have to be trained and equipped in a much
targeted manner.
12
Session – I
13
Judge, High Court of Calcutta, has quoted Section 134 Cr.P.C. that
quality of evidence is more important than quantity and the court can
persuade the prosecutors to drop the witnesses.
Session – II
14
Session – III
Session – IV
15
Mr. M.L. Sharma, Former Special Director, Central Bureau of
Investigation, explained the positive and negative dimensions of the
amendment where neither “enquiry nor inquiry” cannot be conducted
without permission from the Central Government under Section 17A
of the Act. He also elucidated the nuances of Section 7 where “undue
advantage or favours” are removed in the new amendment. Mr. Vinod
Kumar, Director, Central Vigilance Commission, stated that the new
amendment was extracted from UK Bribery Act and he quoted few
cases such as Vineeth Narayan case and Justice Ganguly’s judgment
and in conclusion, the provisions of new amendment act were
analyzed elaborately.
Session – V
THE PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT,2002: EVOLVING
RECENT TRENDS
The chairperson of Session-V Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.N.
Prakash, High Court of Madras, kickstarted the session with an
extensive explanation about Money Laundering and history of
Enactment of Money Laundering Act. He brushed up the thoughts by
taking the participants through the important provisions of the
Prevention of Corruption Act, and the Money Laundering Act. Mr.
Karnal Singh, Former Director, Directorate of Enforcement,
extensively touched upon many cases of Money Laundering Act and
analysed the amendments made in the Act. He also illustrated the
impact of national economy by the offence of money laundering create.
Mr. Anand Grover, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India,
critically analyzed the Act and put forth questions to be debated and
interpreted both by legislative and judiciary. He also compared the
procedures in Cr.P.C. and Evidence Act with the new laws such as
PMLA and NDPS Act.
The chairperson in his concluding remarks said that the
pragmatic need be approach taken by judiciary, since conundrums
16
emerge as cases of scheduled offences are trial in Magistrate Courts
and PMLA cases in special courts.
Session – VI
The first speaker Mr. Sudhinder, Advocate, New Delhi, said the
special feature of the Act is that, it has extra- jurisdictional
application. He explained the definitions of “current account
transactions”, “capital account transactions” and “person resident in
India”. He shared his personal experience in conducting a case, in
which the question was whether “BCCI” is a person under this act or
not? The Bombay High Court held that BCCI would be considered as
“person” as it is an inclusive definition under the provision of FEMA.
He then briefed about the other provisions of FEMA,1998, in general.
Valedictory Session:
18
PART - III
19
Mr. R. Venkatramani, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India,
spoke on the occasion.
20
On access to justice, it was pointed out that in any society, as it
emerges from conflicts, a large number of people do not have access to
justice and that strengthening access involves engaging the judicial
manpower by way of better court and case management and
augmentation of resources concerning with information and
communication technology, so that the reach could be enhanced and
effectiveness improved. Further, greater infrastructure facilities at the
district-level courts must be taken up in fast pace, so as to make the
courts litigant-friendly, as the resultant effect of the judicial process
will be the instant knowledge of the decision of the cases.
21
PART – IV
REFRESHER TRAINING COURSES
1) DISTRICT JUDGES
Date(s) of Number of
Sl.No. Place
Training Participants
21.07.2018 and 47
22.07.2018
1 Headquarters, Chennai
15.09.2018 and 51
16.09.2018
23.06.2018 and 39
24.06.2018
2 Regional Centre, Coimbatore
15.09.2018 and 39
16.09.2018
21.07.2018 and 46
22.07.2018
27.10.2018 and 48
3 Regional Centre, Madurai
28.10.2018
23.02.2019 and 47
24.02.2019
22
object of the programme, prevailed upon the judicial officers to read
the legal provisions, again and again, so that they could interpret the
same in a manner better and proper, and in consonance with the
objects and reasons of the enactments.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice M. Sundar, Judge, High Court of
Madras/Member, Board of Governors, TNSJA, speaking about the
Commercial Courts Act, 2015, with specific reference to trade mark
suits, referred to the amendments made in C.P.C. with regard to the
commercial disputes and said that the substantive law is left
untouched. His Lordship touched upon the important provisions as
envisaged under the Act and said that in trade mark suits, the law
does not allow side-by-side comparison and what is more important is
the difference or similarity as could be found by a man of average
intelligence, imperfect recollection and ordinary prudence. His
Lordship also spoke about the difference between infringement and
passing off in the light of Section 27 of the Trade Marks Act.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.V.Karthikeyan, Judge, High Court of
Madras/Member, Board of Governors, TNSJA, said that burden of
proof never shifts, but onus of proof does so and on this aspect,
referred to the judgment of the Supreme Court in A.Raghavamma vs.
A.Chenchamma which was delivered as early as 1964. His Lordship
explained the variance between pleadings and evidence and said that
no evidence can be let in without pleadings.
Speaking on the scope and object of the programme, Hon’ble
Mr. Justice N.Sathish Kumar, Judge, High Court of
Madras/Member, Board of Governors, TNSJA, laid an emphasis that
learning is a continuous process, as day-to-day, new and new
interpretation of legal provisions is emerging and that it will be
difficult to the judicial officers if they do not keep track of the
developments of law, which is dynamic in nature.
23
Dr. V. Kamakoti, Professor, Indian Institute of Technology
Madras, delivering a lecture on Emerging Trends in Cyber Crimes,
dwelt, in greater length, on numerous aspects relating to crimes, being
committed by the perpetrators in cyberspace. He pointed out that
cracking such crimes is a difficult task for the technical personnel,
even as new and new systems and methodologies in unraveling the
crimes, which are committed across the borders, are evolving from
time to time.
24
Mr. K. Sukumaran, Advocate, Kumbakonam, took two sessions,
viz. (1) Arrest, Confession and Recovery, and (2) Appreciation of
Evidence in Criminal Appeals. During the course of the lecture, he
dealt with various types of confession and also the procedure to be
adopted by the investigating agency, when arrest is effected. He also
dealt with discovery of fact in the light of the relevant provision under
the Evidence Act. He further pointed out the important questions of
law and of fact to be taken into account while appreciating evidence in
deciding criminal appeals.
25
A session on Emerging Trends in Intellectual Property Laws was
taken by Mr.R.Sathishkumar, Advocate, High Court of Madras, who
took the participants through the recent trends happening on the
issues relating to copyright, patent, trademark, design, and
geographical indication. He also dealt with the appeal and review
proceedings in cases of trade mark violation, passing off, patent
infringement, etc.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.S. Sivagnanam said that the complexity
of delinquency has increased and that the principle to be adopted by
the enquiry officers is preponderance of probabilities. Hon'ble Mr.
Justice C.V. Karthikeyan referred to Article 311(2) envisaging that no
dismissal or reduction in rank shall be handed out except going
through the enquiry proceedings and also dealt with the issues of
affording reasonable opportunity and following the principles of
natural justice. His Lordship also pointed out that the enquiry officer
is not a judge and the presenting officer is not a public prosecutor and
that the enquiry is only a fact-finding proceedings.
Mr. R. Singgaravelan, Senior Advocate, High Court of Madras,
spoke elaborately on various aspects of disciplinary proceedings
including the penalty of suspension to be imposed in contemplation of
the proceedings. The two categories of suspension are punitive and
interim, he said. He also reminded the judicial officers of exercising
much care on the necessary particulars of the charges, which are, in
turn, required to be specific, and the statement of allegations which
should support the charges.
A session on General Exceptions under Sections 76 to 106 of Indian
Penal Code was chaired by Hon'ble Mr. Justice N. Sathish Kumar,
Judge, High Court of Madras/Member, Board of Governors, TNSJA.
Mr. K.Sukumaran, Advocate, Kumbakonam, dealing with the topic,
highlighted the legal provisions dealing with, among others, the right
of private defence and the act of a person of unsound mind. He dealt
with the session on Charge Framing and Alteration of Charge in
26
Sessions Cases and said that as charge framing is the foundation of
trial, much care need to be taken by the judicial officers on framing
charges and that if required, during the progress of the trial, the
charge framed earlier could also be altered.
Mr. Karnal Singh, I.P.S. Director, Enforcement Directorate, New
Delhi, gave a special address and spoke about the evolution of the
Money Laundering Law and its history and said that many countries
in South Asia are not implementing anti-terror initiatives, and the
money laundered are used in terrorist and other activities.
Mr. S. Ravindran, Senior Advocate, High Court of Madras,
handled the session on Practice and Procedure in Labour Court and
Current Trends in Labour Disputes Resolution. During the session, he
explained the kinds of disputes as collective issues, viz. service
conditions, wage increase, lock-out, lay off, strike, closure, etc., and
individual issues, like non-employment, and spoke about the role of
the conciliation officers – the labour officer at the bottom level and the
labour commissioner at the top level. The importance of Sections 10,
17 and 18(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, dealing with reference for
adjudication to be made by the Government, publication of award in
Government Gazette, and the binding nature of the settlements on the
parties, respectively, was highlighted.
27
lucidly explained the ingredients of Sections 26, 35, 35A and Orders 5,
6, 7, 8, 11, 13A, 15A, 18, 19 and 20 of the Civil Procedure Code,
which were amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. His
Lordship extensively dealt with Sections 2(i), 3, 3A 3B, 4, 9, 6, 6A, 7,
and 7A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Mr. K. Sukumaran, Advocate, Kumbakonam dealt with the topic
on General exceptions under Sections 76 to 106 IPC. The resource
person lucidly explained the ingredients of Chapter – IV of I.P.C. He
explained to the judicial officers the difference between General
Exceptions and Specific Exceptions. The importance and significance
of Sections 40, 52, 76 to 106, 124A, 300, 309, 312, 313, of I.P.C. and
Sections 25, 27, 105 of the Indian Evidence Act were also discussed.
The distinction between judicial immunity and executive immunity
was also highlighted. The Resource Person also took the participants
through the various provisions of the Judicial Officers Protection Act
1985. All the relevant and latest case laws on the subject were referred
to. The topic on Comprehensive study of the Prevention of Corruption
Act was also handled by him and he highlighted the importance of
Sections 7, 8, 9, 13, 19, 20 and 24 of the Act, and the effective
measures that can be taken to deliver quality justice in the cases that
are filed under this Act. He pointed out the importance and
significance of Sections 57, 217, 302, 403, 406 and 511 of IPC, and
dealt with the Rule 47 of Directorate of Vigilance and Anti Corruption
Manual.
28
coparcenary system, what would constitute a joint family, what is
pious obligation, what would constitute a Hindu joint family and the
concept of joint family property, were elaborately discussed.
The session which dealt with Labour Law – Recent Trends, was
handled by Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. Chandru, Former Judge, High
Court of Madras. He took the participants through all the latest
developments, explained Sections 19(1) (a), 23, 24, and 36 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, and discussed the powers of the Labour
Court, and the concepts, like labour strike, contract labour disputes
and the method of solving disputes. The salient principles laid down in
the Constitution for the welfare of the working class, were explained.
30
the C.P.C., and pointed out the importance of Section 11 of the Tamil
Nadu Court Fees Act and Suit Valuation Act.
31
Mr. M. Vallinayagam, Senior Advocate, Madurai Bench of
Madras High Court, dealt with the topic on Guardian and Wards Act:
An Overview, and explained the factors that are to be considered while
dealing with the appointment of guardian and for granting custody of
minor children.
32
During the first session Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.N.Prakash,
Judge, High Court of Madras, the chair person of the session, and
Mr.A.Ramesh, Senior Advocate, High Court of Madras, the speaker of
the session, dealt with the topics on 1) Arrest, Remand, Bail –
Procedures with Latest Amendments and Case Laws and 2) Victim
Compensation Scheme and its Procedure. They explained the various
case law for arrest, remand and bail and also dealt with the latest
amendments regarding arrest, remand and bail. He also explained
the procedure for the victim compensation scheme.
33
that to reduce stress, eat good food and do not be worried all the time
and do not get angry with other persons.
34
2) SENIOR CIVIL JUDGES
The Refresher Training Courses for Senior Civil Judges were held
at the Headquarters at Chennai and the Regional Centres at
Coimbatore and Madurai, and the details are given in the following
table:-
Date(s) of Number of
Sl.No. Place
Training Participants
28.07.2018 and 61
29.07.2018
18.08.2018 and 60
19.08.2018
1 Headquarters, Chennai
10.11.2018 and 60
11.11.2018
16.03.2019 and 61
17.03.2019
21.07.2018 and 55
22.07.2018
27.10.2018 and 54
2 Regional Centre, Coimbatore
28.10.2018
23.03.2019 and 39
24.03.2019
23.06.2018 and 74
24.06.2018
10.11.2018 and 76
3 Regional Centre, Madurai
11.11.2018
30.03.2019 and 74
31.03.2019
35
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.Sundar, Judge, High Court of
Madras/Member, Board of Governors, TNSJA, explaining the scope
and object of the programme, stressed the importance of continuous
learning and the necessity of keeping abreast of the developments of
law happening every now and then.
Speaking during the session on Prevention of Corruption Act,
Hon’ble Dr.Justice G.Jayachandran, Judge, High Court of
Madras/Member, Board of Governors, TNSJA, had an in-depth
analysis of the important provisions of the statute and of them, the
term “Expecting to be a public servant” as appear under
Explanation(a) to Section 7, and presumption under Section 20 of the
Act, were a few.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.V. Karthikeyan, Judge, High Court of
Madras/Member, Board of Governors, TNSJA, dealing with the session
on Appreciation of Evidence in Civil Appeals, detailed the practice and
procedure required to be followed by the judicial officers sitting in civil
appeal proceedings, in the light of Order 41 CPC. As to how to deal
with the interlocutory applications being filed in civil appeals, was also
discussed elaborately. The endeavour of the appellate judge should be
to dispose of the appeal early, so that any proceedings as may be
pending and required to be initiated in the trial court, could go on. His
Lordship took another session on disciplinary proceedings and
detailed the procedure to be followed right from the stage when the
delinquent is called upon to give explanation for dereliction of duty, till
the stage when the finding is given by the enquiry officer and
punishment, if any, is awarded by the appropriate authority.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.Sathish Kumar, Judge, High Court of
Madras/Member, Board of Governors, TNSJA, had a discussion and
interaction on practical issues on Case Adjudication and Court
Administration, with the participant-judicial officers, throwing light on
Section 309 Cr.P.C. and its effective use in speeding up the criminal
proceedings. The other legal provisions, His Lordship dealt with, were
36
Sections 350 Cr.P.C. and 174 I.P.C., both dealing with non-attendance
by a witness in obedience to summons.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice N. Seshasayee, Judge, High Court of
Madras, stressed the importance of judgment-writing skills,
highlighting the fact that whatever the knowledge a judicial officer
possesses, must ultimately result in judging matters. Common sense
and prudence are more required in developing conceptual skills and
furthering analytical skills, His Lordship said.
Speaking on the scope and object of the programme Hon'ble Mr.
Justice Abdul Quddhose, Judge, High Court of Madras/Member,
Board of Governors, TNSJA, laid emphasis on the judicial skills and
administration skills, the judicial officers are expected to possess, and
said that time management, being one of the areas where the judicial
officers are required to concentrate, is important, so that
apportionment of time for judicial work can be better done.
Mr. R. Gururaj, Advocate, High Court of Madras, took the
participants through the significant features of the Hindu Marriage Act
and referred to the decisions of the Supreme Court and the Madras
High Court. He also dealt with the effect of absence of ceremonies
during marriage, and other issues, like long co-habitation, procuring
children, cruelty, and DNA test. He also took a session on Specific
Performance of Contracts and during the session, he referred to the
various judgments of the Supreme Court and the Madras High Court
on the points which the judicial officers come across quite often in
their work.
Mr. N. Vijayaraghavan, Advocate, High Court of Madras, during
the session on Recent Trends in Motor Accident Claim Cases,
explained the evolution of law and the manner in which the cases
need to be dealt with, so as to see that the compensation reaches the
victim or his/her kin. By giving illustrations, he explained the doctrine
of no fault liability. He also threw light on the procedure for
adjudicating cases where the drivers of the vehicles involved in the
37
accident were without licence and the vehicles were not covered with
insurance policies.
Mr. R. Shanmugasundaram, Senior Advocate, High Court of
Madras, dealt with framing of charges with the aid of Sections 34, 109,
120-B and 149 IPC and said that Sections 34 and 149 IPC fall in one
category and Sections 109 and 120-B in another. During the session,
problems were given to the participants to find solutions.
Mr. S. Subbiah, Senior Advocate, High Court of Madras, dealt
with the issues relating to gifts, referring to the provisions of the
Transfer of Property Act, while Mr.N.Manokaran, Advocate, High
Court of Madras, handled the session on Law relating to Wills and said
that the privileges given to the testator under Section 63 of the Indian
Succession Act will not extend to witnesses.
Mr. N.R. Elango, Senior Advocate, High Court of Madras,
handled the session on Framing of Charges with the aid of Sections
34, 109, 120-B and 149 IPC, and giving problems to the participants
for finding solutions. He gave illustration of cases which were dealt
with by various courts in the country.
Mr. S. Arunkumar, Advocate, High Court of Madras, explained
the Recent Trends in Motor Accident Claim Cases and the authorities
of the Supreme Court and the Madras High Court in awarding
compensation to the victims or their kin, while Mr.N.Manokaran,
Advocate, High Court of Madras, handled the session on Law relating
to Wills, where he referred to the relevant legal provisions in the
background of the various authorities.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. Swamidurai, Former Judge, High Court
of Madras, took the session on Appreciation of Evidence in Civil
Appeals. The rules under Order 41 C.P.C. were explained in detail,
and the significant aspects to be taken into account by the judicial
officers sitting in appeals from original decrees, were highlighted.
38
The session on Examination of Witnesses in Criminal Cases:
Practice and Procedure was taken by Mr. N. Swaminathan, Advocate,
Tiruvarur, referring to Sections 118 and 154 of the Indian Evidence
Act. Tender of pardon and refreshing memory are, among others, the
areas which he dealt with.
Dr. S.T. Venkateswaran, Head of Department, Department of
Yoga, Government Yoga and Naturopathy Medical College, Chennai,
took a session on Lifestyle and Stress Management, and gave a large
amount of tips and titbits as to how to lead a healthy life.
39
Partnership Firm – Remedies available to parties. The importance and
significance of Sections 7, 8, 14, 29, 39, 44, 52 to 55 and 69 of the
Indian Partnership Act were explained to the participants. He also
dealt with the Elements of Partnership, Types of Partnership, General
Principles and Mode of Dissolution.
40
Mr. V. Sivakumar, Advocate, Coimbatore, dealt with the topic
on Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Recent Trends, pointing out the
importance of Sections 3, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, and
explaining the various provisions of Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 and
Domestic Violence Act 2005. The session which dealt with Transfer of
Immovable Property and Gifts under Transfer of Property Act, was also
handled by him, and he touched upon Sections 38 to 53A and
Sections 122 to 126 of Transfer of Property Act.
41
(c) Regional Centre, Madurai
42
Courts Act. He called upon the participants to understand the
provisions in the true context and not just literally.
43
Constitution of India. He also explained the various provisions of the
Civil Procedure Code. All the relevant and latest case laws on the
subject were also explained by the Resource Person.
The session, which dealt with “Res Sub Judice and Res Judicata
- Sections 10 and 11 CPC, was handled by Mr. V. Lakshmanan,
Advocate, Tiruppur. Referring to the case laws, the Resource Person
explained in detail the procedure to be followed while setting up the
principle of Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice. The Resource Person
extensively dealt with Sections 10 and 11 of CPC. All the relevant case
law on the subject were also explained by the Resource Person.
44
The last session of the programme “Land Acquisition Act: An
Overview” and it was dealt with by Mr. V.P. Sarathi, Advocate,
Coimbatore. The factors to be looked into while handling land
acquisition cases, were deftly explained to the participants. The
difference between old Act and new Act was lucidly explained him. He
extensively dealt with the ordinance promulgated in the year 2014, the
latest amendments, and the recent developments.
45
methods to manage stress. He illustrated several instances,
explaining how stress could be managed properly. Mr.B. ELAYARAJA,
Counseling Psychologist, Chennai, highlighted the stages of stress,
such as relaxed, pressurized, troubled, depression and breakdown,
and gave a large amount of tips and titbits as to how to lead a healthy
life.
CIVIL JUDGES
The Refresher Training Courses for Civil Judges were held at the
Headquarters at Chennai and the Regional Centres at Coimbatore
and Madurai, and the details are given in the following table:-
Date(s) of Number of
Sl.No. Place
Training Participants
1 Headquarters, Chennai 23.06.2018 and
60
24.06.2018
15.12.2018 and
47
16.12.2018
23.02.2019 and
67
24.02.2019
2 Regional Centre, 09.06.2018 and
54
Coimbatore 10.06.2018
28.07.2018 and
54
29.07.2018
25.08.2018 and
51
26.08.2018
29.09.2018 and
56
30.09.2018
15.12.2018 and
47
16.12.2018
3 Regional Centre, Madurai 09.06.2018 and
54
10.06.2018
28.07.2018 and
54
29.07.2018
12.08.2018 54
15.09.2018 and
56
16.09.2018
29.09.2018 and
54
30.09.2018
17.11.2018 and
51
18.11.2018
23.03.2019 and
67
24.03.2019
46
TOPICS AND RESOURCE PERSONS
47
University of Madras, elaborately dealt with the psychological and
psychiatric aspects of children getting in conflict with law, in the light
of the preliminary assessment under Section 15 of the said Act.
Mr. A. Ratnavelu, Former District Judge, shared his experience
as to how to deal with the issues which the judicial officers come
across while hearing cases and disposing of matters. He also explained
the ways in writing good judgments taking into consideration various
aspects relating to narration of facts, framing of issues/charges,
decision/finding to each charge/issue, reasoning for decision/finding,
reference and application of law, and usage of language in lucidity.
Mr. N. Santhosh Kumar, Public Prosecutor, Railways, Chennai
Division, took the participants through the important legal provisions
as envisaged in the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act and
the Railways Act and explained the significance of the enactments by
stating that the RPF officials are not legally called as police officials
and thus, the statements and the confessions recorded by them
during enquiry are admissible in evidence.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. Swamidurai, Former Judge, High Court
of Madras, took the participants through the provisions of the Code of
Civil Procedure, as regards temporary injunction and also referred to
the authorities of the Supreme Court and the Madras High Court in
the matter.
Mr. K.R. Tamizhmani, Advocate, High Court of Madras, took an
overview of the Wildlife Protection Act and highlighted the importance
of protecting the environment and maintaining wildlife. The necessity
of protecting the endangered species and animals was also explained
in greater length and also the initiatives taken by the Governments of
the State and Central, in protecting the environment was also touched
upon.
Mr. R. Gururaj, Advocate, High Court of Madras, took a session
on Specific Performance of Contracts and during the session, he
referred to the various judgments of the Supreme Court and the
48
Madras High Court on the points which the judicial officers come
across quite often in their work.
49
Mr. Mr. V. Lakshmanan also spoke about the procedure relating
to striking out and amendment of pleadings as governed by Order VI
Rules 16 and 17 C.P.C. The difference between the Rules 16 and 17
C.P.C. of Order VI C.P.C. was lucidly explained by the resource
person. He explained that in execution proceedings, amendment can
be done only under Section 153 read with Section 151 C.P.C., and not
applicable with Order VI Rule 17 C.P.C.
50
(o), 17(2), 154, 156(3), 157, 173, 190, 193, 195 read with 340, 199,
202, 204, 281, 309, 325, 313, 482 Cr.P.C. He also dealt with the Rule
47 of Directorate of Vigilance and Anti Corruption Manual. The
Resource Person also touched upon the following topics: Hostile
witness, promulgation, complaint writing, matrimonial offences,
medical negligence, and sustained provocation.
51
explaining the ingredients of Order XXI Rules 2, 32, 33, 35, 36, 55 to
59, 64, 71 to 73, 83, 89 to 97 and 102 C.P.C., in a detailed manner.
The resource person pointed out the various types of interim
applications that may be filed by parties pending execution
proceedings and the modes by which there could be avoidance of
delay.
52
Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.Sathish Kumar, Judge, High Court of
Madras/Member, Board of Governors, TNSJA, spoke about the Scope
and Object of the Refresher Course Programme, calling upon the
participants to regularly update their knowledge and skills, and said
that learning is a continuous process and each training programme is
a platform for sharing knowledge.
53
Mr. S.Meenakshi Sundaram, Senior Advocate, Madurai Bench
of Madras High Court, spoke about the Recent Developments in
Specific Relief Act, explaining how the Limitation Act, Transfer of
Property Act, Contract Act and Registration Act are interlinked with
Specific Relief Act.
54
Mr. M.Vallinayagam, Senior Advocate, Madurai Bench of
Madras High Court dealt with the topic on Suits relating to Mortgage,
while Mr. V.Lakshmanan, Advocate, Tiruppur handled the session on
Res Sub Judice and Res Judicata (Sections 10 and 11 C.P.C.).
55
areas where the jurisdiction of civil Court is based both expressly and
impliedly and also the latest trends under Section 34 of Specific Relief
Act.
56
update one’s knowledge. The judicial officers were called upon to read
the latest judgment, every day, for improving their legal skills.
57
Group discussion to discuss the aspects as set out in the
judgment of the Madras High Court in Murugasamy Vs. State, was
held, where the judicial officers were divided into four groups and each
group discussed one of the following topics, which are elaborately deal
with in the judgment: (1) historical background, (2) Section 164
Cr.P.C, (3) Dying Declaration, and (4) Test Identification Parde. Two
representatives from each group elucidated the historical background
and the practice and procedure to be followed in the matter, which
their groups discussed. All the groups represented the facts in their
best possible way and the nuances were analysed in the session.
59
PART–IV
Of the twelve officers, one Civil Judge Trainee (who had bar
experience for less than four years) underwent further intensive
training for a period of four weeks from 02.07.2018 to 27.07.2018, as
being attached to an Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, and
another Civil Judge Trainee, who could not attend the orientation
programme, underwent training, as being attached to an Assistant
Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, from 02.07.2018 to 13.07.2018.
60
2. FURTHER INTENSIVE TRAINING PROGRAMME
Of the twelve officers, one Civil Judge Trainee (who had bar
experience for less than four years) underwent further intensive
training for a period of four weeks from 02.07.2018 to 27.07.2018, as
being attached to an Assistant Judge, City Civil court, Chennai, and
another Civil Judge Trainee, who could not attend the orientation
progrmme underwent training, as being attached to an Assistant
Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, from 02.07.2018 to 13.07.2018.
PART-V
61
to how the rule of law is administered ever since the Constitution
came into being and touched upon the important Articles of the
Constitution, relating to freedom, equality, protection of life and
personal liberty, etc.
Inaugurating the programme, Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira
Banerjee, Chief Justice, High Court of Madras/Patron-in-Chief,
TNSJA, spoke about the Judicial Behavior: Ethics, Neutrality and
Professionalism, and said that judges are independent and need to be
impartial and that competence can be improved only by hard work.
Her Ladyship also reminded the judicial officers of the conduct of a
judge outside the Court and its importance, and said that the mindset
of the judicial officers should be litigant-centric which enhances
access to justice and in a way, results in citizen-centric.
Proposing vote of thanks, Hon'ble Mr. Justice M. Sundar,
Judge, High Court of Madras/Member, Board of Governors, TNSJA,
touched upon the provisions of the Constitution relating to district
judiciary.
Working Sessions
The colloquium comprises four working sessions and each
session was chaired by a sitting Hon’ble Judge of the High Court of
Madras.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.S. Sivagnanam chaired the session on
Sensitivity on Impact of Arrears and Best Practices and Use of
Technology for Arrears Reduction, and Mr. C. Kumarappan, Registrar
(IT-cum-Statistics), High Court of Madras, and Mr.K.Srinivasa
Raghavan, State Informatics Officer, National Informatics Centre,
spoke about the progress of e-Courts project and the initiatives taken
from time to time to strengthen the information and communication
technology system in the district judiciary.
Session-II on Effective Co-ordination with Judicial Officers, Staff,
Advocates, and Government and Police Authorities, was chaired by
Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.N.Prakash, Judge, High Court of
62
Madras/Member, Board of Governors, TNSJA, and in this session, the
challenges being faced by the stakeholders of the judicial system and
the opportunities to overcome such challenges were discussed. Mr.
Vijay Narayan, Advocate General, Tamilnadu, Dr. A.K.Viswanathan,
I.P.S., Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police, and Mr.
R.Sakthivel, Registrar General, High Court of Madras spoke about the
respective roles of the stakeholders in the justice dispensation system.
Importance of timely sending of number statement, annually,
was stressed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.V. Karthikeyan, Judge, High
Court of Madras/Member, Board of Governors, TNSJA, who chaired
the session on Budgeting, Funds Management and Auditing, and Mr.
H. Krishnan Unni, IAS, Deputy Secretary, Finance Department,
Government of Tamilnadu, spoke in detail the Treasury Code and the
practice and procedure being followed by the Government.
The session on Adjudication through ADR Methods: Legal Aid
and Access to Justice, was handled by Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.
Seshasayee, Judge, High Court of Madras, and in the session,
Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.M. Akbar Ali, Former Judge, High Court of
Madras, and Mr.D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, Senior Mediation Trainer,
Mediator and Advocate, spoke and during the session, the necessity of
invoking Section 89 C.P.C. was emphasised. The judicial officers were
also called upon to invoke the alternative dispute resolution
mechanisms for finding permanent solution to the disputes.
63
2. ONE-DAY SPECIAL EVALUATION PROGRAMME ON
JUDGMENT WRITING AND OTHER SKILLS FOR CIVIL
JUDGES
A first-ever Special Evaluation Programme on Judgment Writing
and Other Skills for Civil Judges belonging to 2015 Batch was
organised on 30th June, 2018, and 01st July, 2018, at TNSJA
Headquarters, Chennai, for the two groups of judicial officers,
separately.
Before the programme was conducted, two judgments from each
of the judicial officers in the cadre of Civil Judge belonging to 2015
batch, were requisitioned and they were evaluated on various
parameters, by the Director and the Deputy Directors of TNSJA, and
the judgments were graded as average, satisfactory, good and very
good. During the programme, each judicial officer had a one-to-one
meeting with the Director/Deputy Director and during that meeting,
the judicial officers were apprised of his/her strengths and
weaknesses and they were also given ideas and thoughts as to how to
improve their judgment-writing skills in future.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.S.Sivagnanam, Hon'ble Dr.Justice
G.Jayachandran, Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.V.Karthikeyan, and
Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.Sathish Kumar, Judges, High Court of
Madras/Members, Board of Governors, TNSJA, gave introduction and
overview of the programme and their Lordships laid an emphasis that
the amount of knowledge, a judicial officer possesses, must reflect in
judgment-writing and that all the skills, knowledge and intelligence
could be utilised in a better manner to discuss the issues and charges,
as the case may be, and find solutions and that ultimately, for any
judge, what matters most is judging matters.
Mr.M.Vallinayagam, Senior Advocate, Madurai Bench of Madras
High Court, handled a session on Framing of Issues and Appreciation
of Evidence in Civil Cases, Mr.K.Sukumaran, Advocate,
Kumbakonam, took a session on Framing of Charges and Appreciation
64
of Evidence in Criminal Cases and that during the respective sessions,
the resource persons took the participants through the various legal
positions relating to judgment-writing and other aspects and also the
importance of questioning the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C.
At the end of each day, the outcome of the one-to-one meeting
was discussed at length and the queries from the participant-judicial
officers were answered and their feedback obtained.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M. Dhandapani, Judge, High Court of
Madras, also spoke during the training programme.
65
money obtained illegally, is given the facade of having a legitimate
source, in the process of money laundering, which is a serious threat
to global financial system and governance and this illegal activity is
also boosting international crimes and terrorist activities.
Underscoring the need for implementing the legal, regulatory and
operational measures for combating money laundering, terrorist
financing and other related threats to the integrity of the international
financial system, His Lordship called upon the participants comprising
judicial officers and public prosecutors to follow the legal provisions,
and the rules and regulations, in a constructive manner so as to see
that such heinous activity is curbed to a large extent.
Mr.K.S.V.V.Prasad, I.R.S., Joint Director, Enforcement
Directorate, Chennai proposed vote of thanks.
Working Sessions
There were three working sessions and each session was chaired
by a sitting judge of the High court of Madras. Session-I on Money
Laundering Law: History, Need and Working was chaired by Hon'ble
Dr. Justice G.Jayachandran, Judge, High Court of Madras/Member,
Board of Governors, TNSJA, and in it, Mr. Karnal Singh, I.P.S.,
spoke. During the session, the various stages, like placement,
layering, and integration, were discussed, and so also the modes of
stashing the money, viz. domestic, returning, inbound, outbound, and
flow-through. The structure of the authorities under the statute was
also explained.
Session-II on Money Laundering Law: Salient Features and
March of Law was chaired by Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.N.Prakash,
Judge, High Court of Madras/Member, Board of Governors, TNSJA,
and Mr.A.C.Singh, Deputy Legal Advisor, Enforcement Directorate,
New Delhi, highlighted the important features of the enactment and
the recent judgments on various aspects of the law, delivered by the
higher courts of the country, were also discussed.
66
The last session on Strict Enforcement of Money Laundering
Law: Role of Stakeholders and Challenges was chaired by Hon'ble
Mr.Justice M.Dhandapani, Judge, High Court of Madras, and in this
session, Mr.G.Rajagopalan, Additional Solicitor General of India,
Chennai and Mr.A.C.Singh, Deputy Legal Advisor, Enforcement
Directorate, New Delhi, spoke, and the former listed the initiatives and
efforts taken by the Government of India in curbing the menacing
activities of money laundering.
Valedictory Session
During the valedictory session, Mr. Karnal Singh, I.P.S. gave
the scope of investigation done by the predicate agencies, like Central
Bureau of Investigation, and the reasons for filing final report with
delay. Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.Manikumar, offered valedictory address
by stating that the programme evaluation details obtained from the
participant-officers are analysed by TNSJA, so as to incorporate any
new topics in the future programmes to improve the content of the
programmes better.
Inaugural Session
67
foster care and that such mechanism for the better care and
protection of children need to be followed.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. Chandru, Former Judge, High Court of
Madras, referring to the Directive Principles of State Policy of the
Constitution of India, under Articles 39(e) and (f) and 45, said that a
legislative change conferring the order of adoption on the District
Magistrate, has been proposed.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Manikumar, Judge, High Court of
Madras/President, Board of Governors, Tamil Nadu State Judicial
Academy/Chairman, Juvenile Justice Committee, inaugurating the
programme, said that TNSJA has been conducting programmes on
women and children as often as possible. Referring to the
Lakshmikanth Pandey case, where timeline was fixed for early disposal
of adoption cases, His Lordship spoke about the importance of Section
61 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015,
which the courts should bear in mind before passing adoption order,
and also enumerated the steps being taken by the Juvenile Justice
Committee at the High Court of Madras – the recent one was to involve
the School Education Department to draw a calendar of programmes
to create awareness and sensitivity among the children as well as the
teachers on the importance of safeguarding the interests of children.
Mrs. Andal Damodaran, President, ICCW, Tamilnadu proposed
vote of thanks.
Working Sessions
Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.Rajamanickam, Judge, High Court of
Madras/Member, Juvenile Justice Committee, during the session on
Adoption of Children in India (Past and present) with reference to Laws
and Guidelines, explained the significance of Sections 58 and 59 of the
Juvenile Justice Act dealing with in-country adoption and inter-
country adoption, respectively, of orphan, abandoned and surrendered
children.
68
Mr. S.Thanasekarapandian, Joint Director, Department of
Social Defence, handled a session on Role of CWC, Specialised
Adoption Agency and State Adoption Resource Authority, while Mrs.
Chandra Devi Thanikachalam, Vice President, ICCW, Tamilnadu,
spoke about the Scrutiny of Adoption Cases and explained the tasks to
be performed by the adoption scrutinizing agencies and the purpose of
home visit.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. Chandru, Former Judge, High Court of
Madras, illustrated the challenges being faced by the courts in
guardianship matters, with special emphasis on curtailing the delay in
disposing of cases, while Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Hemalatha, Judge,
High Court of Madras/Member, Juvenile Justice Committee, gave an
outline of the challenges in Juvenile Justice with specific reference to
the recent amendments and its effects on adoption.
An open house discussion was held at the end of the working
sessions.
69
being faced by them in courts and the judgment in K. Senthilmurugan
vs P. Sathishkumar [2018 (2) MWN (CRL) DCC 56 (MADRAS)], and
thereafter one representative from each group made presentation.
70
Judge, Avinashi, as resource person, who, earlier, underwent training
at the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel National Police Academy, Hyderabad.
The programme was conducted in each judicial district
headquarters for two hours between 6.00 p.m. to 8.00 p.m. after
closure of court hours and during the programme, the topics on
Overview of Cybercrimes and Cyber Law, Digital Evidence: Pre-trial
and Post-trial Stages, Courtroom Practice: Trial Stage and Handling
Electronic Evidence, and Appreciation and Admissibility of Electronic
Evidence, were covered.
71
Preliminary Assessment under Section 15 of Juvenile Justice Act,
2015. She detailed the characteristics of the children who get into
conflict with law, explaining the procedures followed to assess the
mental capacity of the juveniles.
The District Judges and the Senior Civil Judges, in all 55,
handling corruption cases, participated in the workshop on Anti-
Corruption Law: Practice and Procedure, held on 25.08.2018 at TNSJA
Regional Centre, Madurai.
72
modus operandi adopted by the perpetrators of crimes in laundering
money.
73
An overview of Cyber Forensics was taken by Mr.K.Manivannan,
Assistant Director, Computer Forensics Division, Forensic Sciences
Department, Chennai. He detailed the practice and procedure followed
in the forensic laboratory as regards the forensic analysis of digital
evidence. He also requested the judicial officers to follow certain
precautions before sending the electronic data and devices for forensic
examination.
74
evidence. The inquiry aspects in the cases under the aforesaid Acts
were well-explained by Mr.P.Ponraj, Security Commissioner, Southern
Railway Headquarters, who shared his experience of enquiring into
some of the important cases.
Dr. S.T.Venkateswaran, Head of Department, Department of
Yoga, Government Yoga and Naturopathy Medical College, Chennai,
took a session on Lifestyle and Stress Management.
75
The session on Concerns and Challenges relating to Protection of
Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012: (a) Procedure relating to
remand, and recording statements of victim and witness under Section
164 Cr.P.C., and (b) Appreciation of Evidence, was handled by Mr. M.
Madhivanan, Advocate, Coimbatore, who pointed out the scope and
object of the Act and the significance of Sections 161 to 165 of Cr.P.C.
76
The session on Adoption under the Juvenile Justice (Care and
Protection of Children) Act, was handled by Dr. Augustus Samuel
Dodd, Grace Kennett Foundation, Madurai. The role of Judiciary and
the court procedure for adoption of child, was discussed during the
session. The Resource Person touched upon both in-country adoption
and inter-country adoption.
The district judges, dealing with the cases relating to labour law
and industrial disputes, numbering 53, participated in the one-day
Seminar on Labour Law: Problems and Perspectives, held on
17.11.2018 at TNSJA Headquarters, Chennai.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice N. Sathish Kumar, Judge, High Court of
Madras/Member, Board of Governors, TNSJA, giving the scope and
object of the programme, touched upon very many issues where the
judicial officers are required to concentrate on, so that the process of
learning and the application of knowledge will be better.
Mr. S. Ravindran, Senior Advocate, High Court of Madras, said
that labour jurisprudence transformed from pro-labour regime to the
present regime where the rights of the labourers are very hard to win
and that the types of issues which the workers get involved in, are
collective and individual. He referred to the important legal provisions
as contemplated in the Industrial Dispute Act. Illustrating a case, he
informed that the present industrial unrest defied solution through
conciliation proceedings and ultimately, it was resolved by the district
administration.
Mr. S. Senthilnathan, Advocate, High Court of Madras, referred
to the important decisions of the Supreme Court and the Madras High
Court in labour jurisprudence, while Mrs.S.Kalaivani, Additional
Commissioner of Labour (Retd.), Government of Tamilnadu, shared
her experience as a labour officer and a conciliation officer and she
77
spoke about the state of industrial climate having impact on labour
issues, the functioning of work committees and the challenges
involved in conflict management.
78
disability and explaining the nature of injuries that are likely to be
caused in a motor accident and how the disability is calculated
depending on the injuries suffered. He threw much light on the
procedure in case of disability certificate. permanent physical
impairment disability, visual disability, loco motor disability,
assessment of loss of earning capacity, multiple disability and the
guidelines for evaluation of disabilities. The telescopic formula for
calculating disability A+B(90-A)/90 was also explained.
79
where thousands of women and children are trafficked for sex, labour
and organ trade. His Lordship expressed his concern on the increase
of anti-social activities in the trade of trafficking women and children,
which are detrimental to the social fabric of our country. His Lordship
also referred to the statistics vis-à-vis human trafficking as brought
out by the National Crime Records Bureau for the year 2016 and
stated that the statistics gives a grim picture as to the state of affairs
of our country on this aspect. Though there are various legislations
prescribing tough penalties to the perpetrators, there is still lack of
implementation mechanism, which need to be strengthened, His
Lordship said, while urging the judicial officers and other stakeholders
to put into practice a better adjudication process, and investigation
and rescue mechanisms and calling upon the participants to utilise
the opportunity to gain knowledge on these aspects.
80
system and the process, as only by way of collective efforts, things
could be done at a satisfactory level.
81
sessions on various topics, and the discussion and interaction, useful
and beneficial to their day-to-day work involving such cases.
82
encroachment in forest areas. He also lucidly explained the
ingredients of the Sections 9, 29, 39 and 54(1) of the Wildlife
(Protection) Act, and highlighted the importance of Sections 4, 11, 16
and 49 of the Indian Forest Act, and explained the legal issue of
encroachment of forest land by the private persons.
83
orders. She also explained the necessity to improve the infrastructure
of family courts that would help in resolving the conflicts easily. She
also referred to various decisions of the Supreme Court and the High
Courts, propounding principles for granting maintenance.
84
17. ONE-DAY SPECIAL EVALUATION PROGRAMME ON
JUDGMENT WRITING AND OTHER SKILLS FOR CIVIL
JUDGES
A one-day Special Evaluation Programme on Judgment Writing
and Other Skills for Civil Judges belonging to 2012 Batch was
organised on 30th March, 2019, and 31st March, 2019, at TNSJA
Headquarters, Chennai, for the two groups of judicial officers,
separately.
Before the programme was conducted, two judgments from each
of the judicial officers in the cadre of Civil Judge belonging to 2012
batch, were requisitioned and they were evaluated on various
parameters, by the Director and the Deputy Directors of TNSJA, and
the judgments were graded as average, satisfactory, good and very
good. During the programme, each judicial officer had a one-to-one
meeting with the Director/Deputy Director and during that meeting,
the judicial officers were apprised of his/her strengths and
weaknesses and they were also given ideas and thoughts as to how to
improve their judgment-writing skills in future.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.V.Karthikeyan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice
N.Sathish Kumar, High Court of Madras/Members, Board of
Governors, TNSJA, Hon'ble Mr. Justice N. Seshasayee, Judge, High
Court of Madras, gave introduction and overview of the programme
and their Lordships laid an emphasis that the amount of knowledge, a
judicial officer possesses, must reflect in judgment-writing and that all
the skills, knowledge and intelligence could be utilised in a better
manner to discuss the issues and charges, as the case may be, and
find solutions and that ultimately, for any judge, what matters most is
judging matters.
Mr.M.Vallinayagam, Senior Advocate, Madurai Bench of Madras
High Court, handled a session on Framing of Issues and Appreciation
of Evidence in Civil Cases, while Mr.K.Sukumaran, Advocate,
85
Kumbakonam, took a session on Framing of Charges and Appreciation
of Evidence in Criminal Cases and that during the respective sessions,
the resource persons took the participants through the various legal
positions relating to judgment-writing and other aspects and also the
importance of questioning the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C.
At the end of each day, the outcome of the one-to-one meeting
was discussed at length and the queries from the participant-judicial
officers were answered and their feedback obtained.
18. WORKSHOP ON SPECIAL PROCEDURE RELATING TO
NDPS CASES
34 judicial officers in the cadre of District Judge participated in
the one-day workshop held on 16.03.2019 at TNSJA Regional Centre,
Coimbatore.
86
43, 51, 52, and 52(A) of the NDPS Act. His Lordship also explained
about the effect of retracted confession given by the accused in NDPS
offences.
The session on (1) Disposal of Narcotic Contrabands, (2)
Provisions relating to Search and Seizure under the NDPS Act, and (3)
March of Law in NDPS Cases”, was handled by Mr.K.Sukumaran,
Advocate, Kumbakonam. The Resource Person highlighted the
importance of Sections 12, 19, 27 to 43, 49, 52 (A), 54, 66, 67, 68(J)
of NDPS Act, the various provisions of the Cr.P.C, Indian Evidence Act
and Indian Contract Act. He took the participants through Article 21
of Constitution of India. all the relevant case law on the subject were
also explained by the resource person.
PART-VI
EXCHANGE PROGRAMME: VISIT OF TRAINEE CIVIL JUDGES
JUNIOR DIVISION/JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS
FROM MAHARASHTRA
Sharing best practices being adopted in various states of the
country is a method, by which the judicial officers of a state visiting
the other state learn the procedures and practices followed in the
visiting state. Giving its contribution to this process, TNSJA received
40 judicial officers in the cadre of Civil Judge (Junior
Division)/Judicial Magistrate First Class, from the state of
Maharashtra for training for four days from 24th to 27th September,
2018, at TNSJA Headquarters, Chennai.
Inaugurating the programme, Hon’ble Mr. Justice T.S.
Sivagnanam, Judge, High Court of Madras/Member, Board of
Governors, TNSJA, said that learning is a continuous process and
training and development of human resources is one of the core
activities of any organization across the world and that exchange
programme gives greater opportunities for the visiting judicial officers
to learn more about the historical, sociological and cultural
characteristics of the place of visit, in addition to the legal aspects.
87
The judicial officers were given training in TNSJA for two days,
where Hon’ble Mr.Justice B. Rajendran, Former Judge, High Court
of Madras; Mr. G.S. Madhusudan, Senior Programme Adviser, Indian
Institute of Technology Madras; Dr.S.Elumalai, Assistant Professor,
Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University; Mr.V.Karthic, Senior
Advocate, High Court of Madras; Mr. Ravi Kant Upadhyay, I.F.S.,
Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Chennai; Hon’ble Dr. Justice
P. Jyothimani, Former Judge, High Court of Madras; and
Dr.S.Thenmozhi, Associate Professor and Head In-charge,
Department of Counselling Psychology, University of Madras, spoke on
the various law subjects.
On 25.09.2018, the judicial officers visited the Guindy National
Park, where they were explained about the forest crimes being
committed by the perpetrators and how they are investigated. They
were called upon to deal with the cases, keeping always in mind the
necessity of protection of environment for the generations to come.
At the end of the classroom programme on day two, a group
discussion was held, where several groups with each group comprising
certain number of visiting judicial officers and the judicial officers in
the cadres of Senior Civil Judge and Civil Judge from the districts of
Chennai, Tiruvallur and Kancheepuram, were formed, and each group
was given a topic for discussion and thereafter, one each from
Maharashtra and Tamilnadu from each group made presentation.
Interaction session was held followed by the group discussion.
On 26.09.2018, the judicial officers visited the Principal Seat of
the High Court of Madras and the City Civil Court, Chennai, and the
rich heritage of the Madras High Court building was explained to the
visitors.
On the last day, i.e. 27.09.2018, they visited the places of
interest in Chennai and Puducherry, including Mamallapuram and
other historic places.
88
PART – VII
89
PART – VIII
90
2) IN-SERVICE TRAINING PROGRAMMES
Prog. Dates
Batch
Code From To
PP 1 I 24.10.2018 27.10.2018
PP 2 II 14.11.2018 17.11.2018
PP 3 III 11.12.2018 14.12.2018
PP 4 IV 17.01.2019 20.01.2019
PP 5 V 20.02.2019 23.02.2019
PP 6 VI 06.03.2019 09.03.2019
PP 7 VII 20.03.2019 23.03.2019
91
• Role, Duties and • The Prohibition of Child
Responsibilities of Marriage Act
Prosecutors
• Importance of Ethics, • The Child Labour
Integrity and Discipline (Prohibition and Regulation)
Act
• Constitution of India • Bonded Labour System
(Abolition) Act
• Code of Criminal Procedure • Relevant Central and State
Special Enactments
• Indian Penal Code • Sentencing Principles
• Indian Evidence Act • Relevance of Medico-legal
Evidence in Criminal Trials
• NDPS Act • Appreciation of Evidence of
• POCSO Act Forensic Science in Criminal
Trials
• Prevention of Corruption Act • Human Rights Issues
• Pre-Conception and Pre- • Law of Precedents
Natal diagnostic Techniques
Act
• Prevention of Cruelty to • Cyber Law and Crimes;
Animals Act Cyber Forensics
• Tamil Nadu Forests Act • Offences against Women and
Children
• Wild Life Protection Act • Human Trafficking Law
• Prevention of Food • Health and Stress
Adulteration Act Management
• The Immoral traffic • Communication Skills
(Prevention) Act • Interpersonal Skills
92
It was always the endeavour of TNSJA to bring the judicial
officers, public prosecutors, and the police officers in one and the
same programme, so that the interaction and discussion in the
programme, will, in a long way, help better the criminal justice
system, and with this initiative, TNSJA has made it a reality.
PART – IX
93
II. Training Programme for advocates with above 5 and upto
10 years of practice
Sl.No. Topics on Criminal
Sl.No. Topics on Civil Law
Law
As mentioned at I (1) As mentioned at I (1) to
1 to 5 1 to 5
to (5) above (5) above
Proceedings in Civil Proceedings in Criminal
6 6
Appeal cases Appeal/ Revision cases
Law of marriage and Trial proceedings in
7 7
succession Sessions Cases
94
PART – X
TRAINING PROGRAMMES FOR THE STAFF MEMBERS
95
Sl. Description of the Date(s) of Number of
Place
No. Programme Programme participants
Training Programme for
High Court Staff Members Principal
6 in the cadres of Private Seat at 27.10.2018 100
Secretaries / Personal Chennai
Assistants
Training Programme for
High Court Staff Members Madurai
7 in the cadres of Private Bench at 27.10.2018 63
Secretaries / Personal Madurai
Assistants
Training Programme for
Principal
High Court Staff Members
8 Seat at 15.12.2018 100
in the cadre of SO/CO/AE
Chennai
(Batch-II)
Training Programme for
Madurai
9 High Court Staff Members
Bench at 15.12.2018 42
in the cadre of SO/CO/AE
Madurai
(Batch-II)
Training Programme for
High Court Staff Members Principal
10 in the cadres of Assistant Seat at 23.02.2019 100
Section Officers / Chennai
Assistants (Batch-II)
Training Programme for
High Court Staff Members Madurai
11 in the cadres of Assistant Bench at 23.02.2019 101
Section Officers / Madurai
Assistants (Batch-II)
96
particulars of the programmes, which have been conducted by TNSJA,
at the Districts Headquarters, are given in the following table:-
97
the various aspects of the E-Courts project and detailed the present
and future projects to improve the IT infrastructure, and highlighting
the importance of the role of Court Managers in implementing all the
E-Courts projects effectively and in maintaining the IT System
Management efficiently.
98
4. REFRESHER TRAINING PROGRAMME ON COURT AND OFFICE
ADMINISTRATION FOR CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS AND
SHERISTDARS OF DISTRICT COURTS
99
procedures. He also explained the Public Information Officers duties
and responsibilities of public information officers under Right to
Information Act.
After the lunch break, the 3rd session commenced at 02.15 p.m.
This session which dealt with “Right to Information Act- 1) Practice
and Procedure and 2) Duties and Responsibilities of Public
Information Officers” was handled by Mrs. B. Priya, Assistant
Professor, Government Law College, Coimbatore. The Resource Person
pointed out the importance and significance of sections 2f, 2h, 2j, 5 to
11, 18 to 21 of the RTI Act in an elaborate manner. The Resource
Person highlighted the importance of transparency, accountability of
the RTI Act. The Resource person explained about the Offline
Procedure and Online Procedure. She also discussed the duties and
Responsibilities of Public Information Officers. All the participants
101
took an active part in the discussions, by raising their queries and
getting it clarified from the Resource Person.
102
PART-XI
OTHER ACTIVITIES
1) RESEARCH
103
PART-XII
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
104
PART-XIII
WAY FORWARD
TNSJA strives hard, every now and then, to see that the benefits
of every programme, as organised by it, reach those who are
associated with justice administration and dispensation, thus
enabling them to do their best in their respective areas of work, for
expeditious disposal of cases, both in quality and quantity, leading to
greater effectiveness of the institution.
********
105