Lecture 20 - KEY - Multiple Linear Regression Worksheet
Lecture 20 - KEY - Multiple Linear Regression Worksheet
Model Summary
Model R R Square Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Square Estimate
a
1 .712 .506 .421 18.087
a. Predictors: (Constant), coke1, a26to39, asian, other, black, hisp, ghb1,
a40plus, ecstasy1, ketamine1
a
ANOVA
Model Sum of df Mean F Sig.
Squares Square
b
Regression 19457.167 10 1945.717 5.948 .000
1 Residual 18973.644 58 327.132
Total 38430.812 68
a. Dependent Variable: crystal1
b. Predictors: (Constant), coke1, a26to39, asian, other, black, hisp, ghb1, a40plus,
ecstasy1, ketamine1
a
Coefficients
Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig.
1a) What percent of the variance in the number of times using crystal methamphetamine in the
last four months is explained by age, race, and lifetime use of ecstasy, ketamine, GHB and
cocaine?
Adjust R^2 = .421.
1b) According to model 1, describe the relationship between lifetime use of ecstasy and the
number of times using crystal methamphetamine in the last four months.
Adjusted for race, age, lifetime use of, ketamine, GHB, cocaine, a lifetime ecstasy user has used
methamphetamine 0.376 more times in last four months than a non-lifetime ecstasy user (β= 0.376;
p = .002).
1c) According to model 1, describe the relationship between race and the number of times using
crystal methamphetamine in the last four months.
Step 2: enter values for the IVs into the regression to predict the mean value of the DV.
3a) Write out the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis and the estimated regression equation.
H0: β1 = β2 = … = βk =0
Ha: at least one of β slopes is not 0
Outcome = intercept + (-0.02) Male + 0.09 Age + 0.16 Black + 0.08 Hispanic + (-0.21) Asian
+ (-0.23) Others + (-0.01) FamilyIncome + (-0.06) Educ + (-0.16) ParentalDispMarijUse +
0.02 ParentCheckHW + 0.11 ParentLetKnow + (-0.12) DisapMarijUse + 0.11
NumClassmatesMarij + 0.01 FreqReligiousAttend + (-0.002) EverArrested
Yes. Age was significant in the unadjusted model (simple regression/univariate model),
and became non-significant in the adjusted model (multiple regression /multivariate
model).
Yes. The coefficients in the univariate and multivariate model are dramatically different.