Sergio Naguiat Vs National Labor Relations Commission

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Sergio Naguiat vs National Labor Relations Commission

G.R. No. 116123 – 269 SCRA 564 – Mercantile Law – Business Organization – Corporation Law –
Close Corporation – Liability for Tort

Sergio Naguiat was the president of Clark Field Taxi, Inc. (CFTI) which supplied taxi services to
Clark Air Base. At the same time, Naguiat was a director of the Sergio F. Naguiat Enterprises, Inc.
(SFNEI), their family-owned corporation along with CFTI.

In 1991, CFTI had to close due to “great financial losses and lost business opportunity” resulting
from the phase-out of Clark Air Base brought about by the Mt. Pinatubo eruption and the expiration
of the RP-US military bases agreement.

CFTI then came up with an agreement with the drivers that the latter be entitled to a separation pay in
the amount of P500.00 per every year of service. Most of the drivers accepted this but some drivers
did not. The drivers who refused to accept the separation pay offered by CFTI instead sued the latter
before the labor arbiter.

The labor arbiter ruled in favor of the taxi drivers. The National Labor Relations Commission
affirmed the labor arbiter. It was established that when CFTI closed, it was in profitable standing and
was not incurring losses. It ruled that the drivers are entitled to $120.00 (or its peso equivalent) per
every year of service subject to exchange rates prevailing that time.

The NLRC likewise ruled that SFNEI as well as CFTI’s president and vice president Sergio Naguiat
and Antolin Naguiat should be held jointly and severally liable to pay the drivers. The NLRC ruled
that SFNEI actively managed CFTI and its business affairs hence it acted as the employer of the
drivers.

ISSUE: Whether or not the ruling of the NLRC is correct.

HELD: It is only partially correct.

1. NLRC is correct when it ruled that Sergio Naguiat is jointly and severally liable to pay the drivers the
award of separation pay in the amount so determined. As president of CFTI, Sergio Naguiat is
considered an “employer”• of the dismissed employees who is therefore liable for the obligations of
the corporation to its dismissed employees. Moreover, CFTI, being a close family corporation, is
liable for corporate torts and stockholders thereof shall be personally liable for corporate torts unless
the corporation has obtained reasonably adequate liability insurance (par. 5, Section 100, “Close
Corporations”•, Corporation Code). Antolin Naguiat is absolved because there was insufficient
evidence as against him.
2. SFNEI is not liable jointly or severally with CFTI. SFNEI has nothing to do with CFTI. There is no
sufficient evidence to prove that it actively managed CFTI especially so when even the drivers
testified that their employer is CFTI and that their payroll comes from CFTI. Further, SFNEI was
into trading business while CFTI was into taxi services.

You might also like