Afghan Water Conflict
Afghan Water Conflict
Afghan Water Conflict
By
1
University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan; 2COMSATS Institute of Information
Technology Islamabad
Abstract
Pakistan and Afghanistan not only share a 2600km long border but also share numerous
watercourses including the Kabul River. Though both the riparian nations are water stressed,
they have not used the potential to conserve and safeguard their water resources which is rapidly
depleting. Despite the many attempts and facilitation provided by the international organization
there still exist no treaty between the two water sharing states to device mechanism to govern
and manage the shared water resources between the two states. The Afghan government planning
of constructing hydropower projects on Kabul River may affect the flow of water to the lower
riparian state Pakistan. This may lead to affect the performance of agriculture sector of the
Pakistan which is considered as the backbone of the economy. This may trigger a conflict
between Pakistan and Afghanistan as Pakistan is already facing difficulties in providing the
needed water to its agriculture and industrial sector due to water shortage. There is a greater need
of an agreement on the shared water resources between the two states to avoid future conflicts,
maintain a peaceful environment in the region and overcome the water and energy crises in both
states. The issue can be harmoniously resolved through an institutionalized agreement on sharing
the Kabul River water between the two riparian states.
Introduction
The global demand for water is expected to exceed supply by forty percent within the next
twenty years (Palau, 2011). Water security is considered to be the gossamer linking together
food, energy, economic growth, climate and human security challenges. A shortage in water
supply will raise food prices, limit trade, energy availability will be disrupted, increase refugee
flows and undermine authority. In the coming decades, pressures on water resources are set to
1
increase exponentially, pushing the highly interlinked water-food-energy-climate nexus to the
limits. According to a report of 2030 Water Resources Group (2009), agriculture water
withdrawal will increase from 3,100 billion cubic meters (bcm) to 4,500 bcm in 2030. Similarly,
the global demand on industrial water withdrawal will increase from 16 per cent to 22 per cent in
2030; China alone will account for 40 per cent of the additional demand. The world’s population
will approach the eight billion mark by 2030. The estimated economic annual growth rate of six
per cent in emerging countries, in addition to the rapid urbanization processes in developing and
emerging countries, will drastically increase the demand for food, energy and water.
Given that it takes one litre of water to grow one calorie, water use will skyrocket to achieve an
increase in production by 70-100 per cent necessary to match the demand and changing diets of
the world’s population. Furthermore, the International Energy Agency (IEA) forecasts that by
2030, the world economy will require forty per cent more energy compared to today, which will
be dependent on sufficient water availability. Moreover, as long as societies progress in terms of
social and economic development, the use of freshwater increases. Between 1990 and 2000 for
example, while the world population grew by a factor of four, the withdrawal of freshwater grew
by a factor of nine. Many countries are extracting groundwater faster that it can be replenished.
By 2030, if the current trend continues, nearly two-thirds of the world’s population will live in
areas of extraordinary water stress.
Given the abovementioned forecasted trends in global water security, water scarcity is set to
worsen in many regions in the world. Therefore, the risk of eventually ending up in regional
conflicts as a result of an overuse of transboundary water resources will indeed increase,
according to a World Water Council (WWC) report entitled “A New Water Politics”. As long as
water demands increases and water availability decreases, water will more commonly be viewed
as an issue of national security for countries around the world. Such a perception has the
potential to complicate relations between water-dependent countries, as is the case in
Afghanistan. Water-related disputes in Central Asia are increasingly recognized by policymakers
and members of the international community. The United States Senate Foreign Relations
Committee in its report released in February 2011, recommended guidelines for preventing
conflicts over shared water resources. Moreover, Norwegian Institute of International Affairs
(NUPI) in 2008 warned that the key challenges to the stability in Afghanistan and the region are
water resource scarcity and the transboundary water resources management.
2
The four transboundary rivers shared by Afghanistan originate in Afghan territory. The newly
developed projects of hydropower plants and irrigation schemes across the country will have
drastic impacts on the amount of water flowing towards the neighboring nations. Prior to 2001,
largely due to instability and weak governance, Afghan rivers were barely altered, nonetheless
the new status quo is causing serious concerns in Iran and Pakistan. The development of such
projects may lead to the development of crisis situation between Afghanistan and its neighboring
nations. Conflicts may arise between these countries of the region sharing the common waters
due to the water resources scarcity and the growing demand for water from the ever increasing
population of these countries which may become defining feature of insecurity in the region
(Parvez and Khan, 2014).
3
Owing to the rapid growth in the population, systemic drought and increased demand for
resources to fuel economic growth are the factors leading to destabilization and social unrest in
the countries of Central Asia along with Pakistan and Afghanistan. These resource driven
problems possess a serious challenge to the growth and progress of these countries. The main
focus of discussion here is Pakistan and Afghanistan. The two neighboring countries share a
common history, a joint Pakhtun identity and also a shared interest in some of the region’s fresh
watercourses.
Pakistan being a lower riparian state faces water disputes with its neighbors since its
independence. The concerns are even growing as Indian government is not only controlling the
flow of water but is also working on the development of 17 power projects on Chenab River
while 16 such projects on Jhelum River. India is also supporting Afghanistan in constructing
water projects and schemes on the tributaries of the River Kabul flowing to Pakistan. These
projects include construction of dams, electricity generation, flood control facilities and
expanding the irrigation system. These projects, once implemented will drastically reduce the
quantity of water flowing and timing of peak runoff for the lower riparian state Pakistan.
Kabul River, rising in the Sanglakh Range 72kms west of Kabul city, is a 700kms long river that
flows in eastern Afghanistan and north-western Pakistan. It flows 560kms through east
Afghanistan passing Kabul and Jalalabad and to the north of the Khyber Pass it enters into
Pakistan to join the Indus River northwest of capital city Islamabad at Attock (IUCN, 2010). Its
sub-tributaries are Logar, Panjsher, Kunar, Alingar, Bara and Swat rivers (Azam, 2015). An
important tributary of the Kabul River Basin is the Kunar River originating in Pakistan and
enters into Afghanistan in the Kunar province to join the Kabul River at Jalalabad (Parvez and
Khan 2014). The sub-tributary, Kunar River, represents around 12 percent of the total water
available in Afghanistan (IUCN, 2010).
4
Figure 2: Kabul River and its Sub-Tributaries
Conflicts over between the two riparian basin states (Afghanistan and Pakistan) over shared
water resources are becoming complex. Main factors for these disputes are the impacts of
climatic variability and change, increasing demand for water and concerns for environment.
Currently, there are nine rivers shared by Pakistan and Afghanistan with an annual flows of
around 18.3 MAF, while Kabul River alone accounts for 16.5 MAF of it (Mustafa, 2011).
Moving towards some stability the government of Afghanistan has planned to build 12 dams on
Kabul River to meet water shortage, irrigation and power generation. These dams, once built,
will serve mainly as a source of hydropower, with a total potential of about 2400 megawatts
thereby, reducing the gap between 670 megawatts produced and the 3571 megawatts required by
the fast growing population of the country.
The hydropower projects once constructed will bring around 16400 hectares of additional land
under cultivation and will also help increase the water storage capacity from 3 to 24 percent of
the annual surface water availability. With the construction of these projects, the mining industry
(which is considered key to Afghanistan’s economic development), will receive fair share of
5
water and the domestic water supply for Kabul city will also improve which in turn will be
reduce the over-exploitation of ground water resources.
The prospect of dam construction in Afghanistan has long been a source of concern for Pakistani
officials. These projects once developed would result in a dent in Pakistan’s total water intake
from the Kabul River. According to some estimates there might be a decline of around 17
percent of Pakistan’s total water intake (Daily Dawn, 2011). These Indian financed array of dams
on Kabul River will have drastic effects on the agrarian economy of Pakistan (Bakhshi et al,
2011). The main concern of Pakistan is that such dams will enable Afghanistan to interrupt water
supply to Indus River by withholding water during sowing seasons and releasing water during
wet-seasons.
6
which aims at improving, rehabilitating and re-establishing previously irrigated areas. However,
the ecological, economic and political impacts downstream have reportedly not been fully
considered despite the transboundary nature of the country’s freshwater systems, reports
Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.
Flood control efforts and hydroelectric power generation require the construction of
infrastructure (e.g. large dams) along the rivers that result in diminution of water flows and
alteration of the river morphology. These projects will provide adequate flood control
infrastructure to Afghanistan and will fulfill energy requirements of the country, however, it will
significantly alter the water flow to the lower riparian country Pakistan.
Climate change has exacerbated concerns over the utilization and sharing of transboundary water
resources. The main concerns in Central and South Asia are the rates at which glaciers melt.
Several previous studies identified that glaciers in Afghanistan decreased by fifty to seventy
percent during the twentieth century. The melting of glaciers may increase the supply of water in
the short term however, the depletion of freshwater from glaciers will reduce water supply in the
long run. Furthermore, environmental pollution reduces the quality of water resources, rendering
them becoming unsuitable for agriculture or water supply. According to the UNDP, Central Asia
water quality has drastically deteriorated since the 1960s. This is particularly alarming for the
Aral Sea Basin (Amu Darya River is part of it) where fifty per cent of the river flow is extremely
polluted water coming from industrial and urban areas. Mineralization in the lower part of the
river has doubled, and currently water is not suitable for drinking.
There exist no water sharing agreement between the two neighbors Afghanistan and Pakistan on
the shared water resources. In fact there exist no water treaties between Afghanistan and its
neighbors except for an agreement on the Helmand River. In the past, Pakistan tried to bring
Afghanistan to the negotiating table to device a mechanism for a water sharing agreement over
Kabul River. The World Bank though refused to become the guarantor as it is already guarantor
of the Indus Waters Treaty, agreed to facilitate the bilateral water treaty. However, the Afghan
7
administration excused itself saying it was working on its own national water policy and it was
not possible to initiate talks until that policy is ready. In 2003, a technical committee comprised
of nine members was formed to draft a Water Treaty with Afghanistan on the share water
resources of Kabul River. The committee, however, did not receive sufficient river flow data
from Afghanistan authorities and failed to reach an agreement over the shared water resources of
Kabul River.
The World Bank, in 2006, offered assistance for a negotiation process between the two riparian
countries Pakistan and Afghanistan with the main aim of providing energy to the process of
drafting water treaty between the two countries. The role of the World Bank for mediating was
considered appropriate as the World Bank was also involved in the formulation of the Indus
Waters Treaty and mediating water disputes between India and Pakistan in Kashmir. However,
these efforts did not result in a meaningful dialogues between the countries. There is no formal
framework of collaboration currently exists on the Kabul River basin. The factors hampering the
efforts of bilateral cooperation include the power asymmetry between Pakistan and Afghanistan,
dispute over the border (Durand Line) and the recent dispute over the Indus River between
Pakistan and India particularly the interpretation of the Indus Water Treaty with regard to dams
construction in India.
During the Economic and Cooperation Organization (ECO) in March 2009, there was an
agreement among the leaders of Afghanistan, Iran and Tajikistan agreed to speed up projects
implementation focusing on the water-energy nexus. However, there was no such joint
commitments made between Afghanistan and Pakistan. The Islamabad Declaration, adopted after
the third Regional Economic Cooperation Conference on Afghanistan in May 2009 is considered
to be the most impressive joint statement by the two neighboring countries. The declaration
accepted and acknowledged the role of Afghanistan for peace, prosperity and stability of Central
and South Asia and called the international community for a comprehensive approach and
participation in the economic development. The Declaration also noted the active involvement of
the regional organization in ensuring the economic development of Afghanistan and extending
regional cooperation. The declaration urged for greater reginal cooperation in transport, trade,
agriculture, energy, education, counter-narcotics, capacity building, border management and
8
refugee return and re-integration. The Islamabad Declaration to date, however, has not led to
improved cooperation over the shared water resources.
Recent breakthroughs
In late 2014, the World Bank invited representatives of the Afghan water and foreign affairs
ministries to Dubai to discuss shared waters with their Pakistani counterparts. Afghanistan has
since submitted its proposals for sharing water with Pakistan to the World Bank. A follow-up
meeting has not yet been set. The key issues discussed were the construction of two dams on the
Kabul River, the Shaal Dam and the Saagay Dam, as well procedures for exchanging data. Initial
allocations of water were also discussed, according Sultani Mahmood Mahmoodi, an engineer
with MEW.
In October 2015 the Afghan president approved the Extended Policy on Trans-boundary Waters,
which the Supreme Council of Land and Water had been drafting for the last year. The
amendment to the 2011 Afghan Water Law means all Afghan ministries mandated to negotiate
trans-boundary riparian agreements must now have a unified stance in discussions with cross-
border counterpart agencies. The clearer negotiating stance shows a new desire on Afghanistan’s
side to pursue a treaty. Pakistani Foreign Office officials have told the World Bank they are also
ready to pursue the discussions on water with their neighbor. The two countries also began to
collaborate on flood prevention. A representative of the Afghan Ministry of Energy and Water,
Dr. Wasim Iqbal, participated in a conference on strategies to combat Glacial Lake Outburst
Floods (GLOF) in Pakistan hosted by the Ministry of Climate Change and the United Nations
Development Programme (UNDP) in October 2015. More than 3000 glacial lakes have been
mapped as part of the four-year project, 36 of which have been declared potentially hazardous
and on the verge of outburst anytime.
Cooperation over Kabul River
Disputes over water resources are as old as mankind’s history. The history also witnessed
cooperation and mutual agreements on the shared water resources between the parties. Over the
past 50 years, 37 disputes over water resources entailing violence and 150 treaties over shared
water resources have been recorded (UN, 2014). The depleting water resources should make the
water planner aware of the importance of this resource for the survival of the human kind. The
9
dispute over the shared water resource among various nations should be resolved to use the
available supplies of water efficiently and sustainably.
There should be an adequate mechanism for sharing the Kabul River waters equitably between
Afghanistan and Pakistan without causing harm to each other. The emerging hydropower politics
in the South Asia urges for an institutionalized cooperation on these shared water resources
(Chellaney, 2011). The need of cooperation and shared management of the Kabul River has been
stressed by various stakeholders however it has not been taken seriously by the two riparian
states. The Norwegian Institute of International Affairs warns in 2008 about the major challenges
of water scarcity and management not only for Afghanistan but for the whole region (Palau,
2011). To resolve the conflict in its nascent stage and use the potential of water resources, both
Afghanistan and Pakistan, with the help of third party, should enter into a Water Treaty over the
Kabul River. The two neighboring countries should avail the services of World Bank or any
other International organization to not only develop the water basins but also provide platform
for disputes resolution as Pakistan did in case of the Indus Waters Treaty in 1960. Afghanistan is
also looking for the help from these institutions for the development of Kabul River basin.
References
Azam, S. 2015. Kabul River Treaty: A Necessity for Peace-n-Security between Afghanistan and
Pakistan, and Peace in South Asia. Gomal University Journal of Research, 31(2): 134-145.
Bakhshi, G., Kugelman, M., Alam, A. R. 2011. Bridge over troubled waters. Retrieved on May
24, 2015 from: www.indiatimes.com
Chellaney, B. 2011. Water: Asia’s new battle ground. Harper Collins publisher India with joint
venture with India Today group.
IUCN, 2010. Towards Kabul Water Treaty: Managing Shared Water Resources – Policy Issues
and Options. IUCN Pakistan, Karachi. 11 pp.
10
Palau, R. G. 2013. Water Security: Afghanistan Transboundary Water Resources in Regional
Context. Civil military fusion centre. http://www.phibetaiota.net/wp-
content/uploads/2013/10/201310_CFC_Afghanistan_Transboundary_Resources_final.pdf
Parvez, I., and Khan, M. S. 2014. Brewing Conflict over Kabul River; Policy Options for Legal
Framework. ISSRA Papers 2014. Available online at:
http://www.ndu.edu.pk/issra/issra_pub/articles/issra-
paper/ISSRA_Papers_Vol6_IssueII_2014/03-Brewing-Conflict-over-Kabul-River.pdf. Retrieved
on 6th June 2017.
Mustafa, K. 2011. India to help Afghanistan build 12 dams on Kabul River. The News. 12th
May, 2011. Accessed from http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-13-5933-India-to-
helpAfghanistan-build-12-dams-on-Kabul-River.
Daily Dawn, 2011. Sharing water resources with Afghanistan. 13 November, 2011. Accessed
from http://www.dawn.com/news/673055/sharing-waterresources-with-afghanistan.
Water Resources Group (2009) Charting Our Water Future Economic: Frameworks to inform
decision-making. Report available online at http://www.nestle.com/asset-
library/documents/library/events/2009-2030-water-resources-
group/charting_our_water_future_final.pdf. Retrieved on 6th June 2017.
11