Cse Sar PDF
Cse Sar PDF
Cse Sar PDF
1. Name and Address : Jaipur Engineering College and Research Centre, Jaipur
of the Institution Shri Ram Ki Nangal, Via Sitapura, RIICO, OPP. EPIP Gate,
Tonk Road, Jaipur 302022
4. Type of Institution:
University
Deemed University
Government Aided
Autonomous
Affiliated Yes
5. Ownership Status:
Central Government
State Government
Government Aided
Trust
Society
Section 25 Company
7. Details of all the programs being offered by the Institution Under Consideration:
1st Shift
Increa
Year
se
S. of AICTE Accreditation
Program Name (B.Tech) Year Intake Intake
No Increa approval Status
, if
se
any
Electrical Engineering-60
Electronics & Communication
1 Engineering-60
2000 180 - - 13.07.2000 -
Electrical Engineering-60
Electronics & Communication
2 Engineering-60 2001 240 IT-60 2001 14.06.2001 -
Computer Science and Engineering-60
Information Technology-60
Electrical Engineering-60
Electronics & Communication
Biote
Engineering-60
ch-30
3 Computer Science and Engineering-90 2002 300 CSE-
2002 20.06.2002 -
Information Technology-60 90
Biotech-30
Electrical Engineering-60
ME-
4 Electronics & Communication 2003 360 60
2003 12.05.2003 -
Engineering-60
Information Technology-60
Biotech-30
Mechanical Engineering-60
Electrical Engineering-60
Electronics & Communication
Engineering-90 ECE-
Computer Science and Engineering-120 30
5 2004 420 CSE-
2004 25.06.2004 -
Information Technology-60
30
Biotech-30
Mechanical Engineering-60
Electrical Engineering-60
Electronics & Communication
Engineering-90
Computer Science and Engineering-120
6 2005 420 - - 27.06.2005 -
Information Technology-60
Biotech-30
Mechanical Engineering-60
Electrical Engineering-60
Electronics & Communication
Engineering-90
Computer Science and Engineering-120
7 2006 420 - - 20.06.2006 -
Information Technology-60
Biotech-30
Mechanical Engineering-60
Electrical Engineering-60
Electronics & Communication
Engineering-90
Computer Science and Engineering-120
8 2007 420 - - 21.05.2007 -
Information Technology-60
Biotech-30
Mechanical Engineering-60
Mechanical Engineering-90
Civil Engineering-60
Electrical Engineering-60
Electronics & Communication 2 Branch
Engineering-120 (CSE &
11 2010 540 - - 23.08.2010
ECE) dated
Computer Science and Engineering-120
02.03.2009
Information Technology-90
Mechanical Engineering-90
Civil Engineering-60
Electrical Engineering-60
Electronics & Communication 2 Branch
Engineering-180 ECE- (CSE &
12 2011 600 60
2011 01.09.2011 ECE) dated
Computer Science and Engineering-120
02.03.2009
Information Technology-90
Mechanical Engineering-90
Civil Engineering-120
Civil Engineering-120
Electrical Engineering-120
Electronics & Communication EE-
Engineering-240 60
14 2013 870 CSE-
2013 19.03.2013 -
Computer Science and Engineering-180
60
Information Technology-90
Mechanical Engineering-120
Civil Engineering-120
Electrical Engineering-120
Electronics & Communication
15 Engineering-240 2014 870 - - 02.07.2014 -
Computer Science and Engineering-180
Information Technology-90
Mechanical Engineering-120
Civil Engineering-120
Electrical Engineering-120
Electronics & Communication
16 Engineering-240 2015 870 - - 07.04.2015 -
Computer Science and Engineering-180
Information Technology-90
Mechanical Engineering-120
Civil Engineering-120
Electrical Engineering-120
Electronics & Communication
17 Engineering-240 2016 870 - - 05.04.2016 -
Computer Science and Engineering-180
Information Technology-90
Mechanical Engineering-120
Civil Engineering-120
Electrical Engineering-120
18 Electronics & Communication 2017 870 - - 30.03.2017 -
Engineering-240
Computer Science and Engineering-180
Mechanical Engineering-120
Civil Engineering-120
CSE, ME,
Electrical Engineering-120
ECEare
Electronics & Communication Eligible and
Engineering-240 applying 1st
19 2018 870 - - 04.04.2018
time. CE,
Computer Science and Engineering-180
EE ,IT-
Information Technology-90 Eligible but
not applied
Mechanical Engineering-120
2ndShift
S. Year Intake Increase Year of AICTE Accreditation
No Program Name (B.Tech) of Intake, Increase approval
Start if any
To become a renowned centre of outcome based learning and work toward academic,
professional, cultural and social enrichment of the lives of individuals and communities.
M4: Develop human potential to its fullest extent so that intellectually capable and
imaginatively gifted leaders can emerge in a range of professions.
13. Contact Information of the Head of the Institution and NBA Coordinator, If designated:
1. Name : Dr. Vinay Kumar Chandna
2. Designation : Principal
3. Mobile No. : 9891406784
4. Email ID : [email protected]
Criteria
Criteria Mark/Weightage
No.
Program Level Criteria
Continuous Improvement
7. 50
Total 1000
CRITERION 1
Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives (60)
M1: To impart outcome based education for emerging technologies in the field of Computer
Science and Engineering.
M3: To provide platform for lifelong learning by accepting the change in technologies.
To become a renowned center of outcome based learning and work towards academic,
professional, cultural and social enrichment of the lives of individuals and communities.
M2:Identify, based on informed perception of Indian, regional and global needs, the areas of
focus and provide platform to gain knowledge and solutions.
M4: Develop human potential to its fullest extent so that intellectually capable and
imaginatively gifted leaders can emerge in a range of professions.
The above table shows the consistency of Mission of Institute with Mission of the department.
If all the keywords of Mission of Institute are found consistent with the Mission of the Department
then High (H) is marked. If some of the keywords of Mission of Institute are found moderately
consistent with the Mission of the Department then Medium(M) is marked. If some of the
keywords of Mission of Institute are foundconsistent with the Mission of the Department then Low
(L) is marked.
After taking the feedback from all the faculty members of the department if the consistency found
is above 90% then (H) is marked. If consistency is found between 60-90% then (M) is marked and
if <60% then the particular block is marked Low (L).
Why High:
If () is marked in all blocks i.e. all the keywords of Mission of the Institute are found consistent
with the Mission of the Department so it must be rated high.
Why Medium:
If is marked in 50% or above blocks i.e. Mission of the Institute is moderately consistent with
the Mission of the Department.
Why Low:
If is marked in less than 50% i.e. Mission of the Institute is found inconsistent with the Mission
of the Department.
PEO1: To provide students with the fundamentals of engineering sciences with more emphasis
in Computer Science and Engineering by way of analyzing and exploiting engineering
challenges.
PEO2: To train students with good scientific and engineering knowledge so as to comprehend,
analyze, design, and create novel products and solutions for the real life problems in
Computer Science and Engineering
PEO5: To prepare students to excel in Industry and Higher education by Educating Students
along with high moral values and knowledge in Computer Science and Engineering.
1.3 Indicate where the Vision, Mission and PEOs are published and disseminated among
stakeholders (10)
(Describe where (Website, Curricula, and Posters etc.) the Vision, Mission and PEOs are published and detail the
process which ensures awareness among internal and external stakeholders with effective process
implementation.)
(Internal stakeholders may include Management, Governing Board Members, faculty, support staff, students etc.
and external stakeholders may include employers, industry, alumni, funding agencies, etc.)
With the active participation of HOD, Internal Quality Assurance Committee, faculty
members and staff along with the continuous feedback from stakeholders, the Vision and
Mission statement of the department was developed in alignment with Vision and Mission of
the Institute.
These statements are discussed further among faculty members before finalization.
These statements are discussed among students also before finalization.
The new Vision and Mission statements are sent to the Internal Quality Assurance
Committee for changes.
Finally the Vision and Mission are approved by the Principal of Institution.
Our process for establishing and revising Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) is depicted in
Figure 1.4c below. Vision and Mission of the Institute, Department and Graduate attributes
recommended by NBA are taken as directorial factors in forming the PEOs. Stakeholder inputs are
obtained through extensive surveys with follow-up telephone calls by the Department HOD and
associated faculties.
Stakeholder inputs to our program educational objectives are obtained in a number of traditional
ways by the Department HOD & associated faculties. These feedbacks are condensed and
presented to IQAC at the faculty meeting and the final report is sent toPrincipal of the Institution
for review and acceptance.
The above table shows the consistency of PEOs with Mission of the department. The reasons
behind marking High, Medium and Low are as follows:
PEOs are divided into keywords and then correlation is checked with all Mission.
After taking the feedback from all the faculty members of the department if the consistency
found is above 90%, ( ) is marked. If consistency is found between 75-90%, the particular
block is left blank.
Why High:
If () is marked in all blocks i.e. all the keywords of PEOs are found consistent with the Mission
so it must be rated high.
Why Medium:
If is marked in 50% or above blocks i.e. PEOs is moderately consistent with the Mission of the
department.
Why Low:
If is marked in less than 50% i.e. PEOs is found inconsistent with the Mission of the
department.
MISSION
To impart outcome To provide To provide To develop
based education for opportunities platform for aptitude of
emerging technologies for interaction lifelong learning fulfilling
in the field of between by accepting the social
Computer Science and academia and change in responsibiliti
PEO 1
Keywords
Engineering. industry. technologies. es.
Fundamentals of
Engineering
Sciences.
Analyzing &
exploiting
engineering
challenges.
Table B.1.5b: Justification of mapping of PEO 1 with Mission
Academic
environment aware
of excellence,
leadership, written
ethical codes.
Successful
professional career.
Self-motivated life-
long learning.
Table B.1.5e: Justification of mapping of PEO 4 with Mission
Excel in Industry
and Higher
education.
High moral values
and Knowledge.
Table B.1.5f: Justification of mapping of PEO 5 with Mission
CRITERION 2
Program Curriculum and Teaching–Learning Processes ( 1 2 0 )
Exa
Computer Science and Engineering Max. Marks
VI Teaching Hrs. m Comments
Hrs.
Course Subject L T P IA TE TOTA Common with
Code L
6CS1A Computer Networks 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT
6CS2A Design and Analysis of Algorithms 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT
6CS3A Theory Of Computation 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT
6CS4A Computer Graphics and Multimedia 3 3 20 80 100
Techniques
6CS5A Embedded System Design 3 3 20 80 100
6CS6.1A Advance Topics in Operating Systems CS,IT
6CS6.2A Artificial Intelligence 3 3 20 80 100
6CS6.3A Human Computer Interface CS,IT
6CS7A Java Programming Lab 3 45 30 75 CS,IT
6CS8A Computer Graphics & Multimedia Lab 3 30 20 50
Total 18 0 12 1000
Table B.2.1c: Scheme for 3rd Year
Different courses emphasize on contribution to different POs and PSOs resulting in ultimate
attainment of POs and PSOs upon completion of all courses and thus the
program. Every course has decent importance to elementary ideas, tools and techniques
and stress on sensible implementations. This provides a powerful correlation between the
course outcomes and program outcomes, developing necessary skills in students,
creating them practiced engineers.
The following table divides RTU subject in following five course components. It also explains
the contribution of each category among Lecture, Tutorial and Practical. It also explains the
relevance of each course component with POs and PSOs.
University
Curriculum
Experimental
Laboratory Lecture
Video Presentation
Lectures
The following process is used to identify extent of compliance of the University Curriculum for
attaining the POs and PSOs.
Lectures: Faculty of the CSE Department effectively teach students about a concerned
subject. Faculties convey significant information, history, background, theories, analogies
and equations to make the concepts clear.
Tutorials: Faculty helps the students bysolving number of problems by dividing them in
groups and faculty Member mentors the students.
Triangle Method: During lecture HOD visits class room along with two senior faculty
members in which one of the faculty is the expert of the respective subject. They observe
Hand-outs:Gives a quick insight to the course. It helps the slow learners to face the
exams with confidence.
Presentations: Faculty members also provide PPT and Videos related to course. Videos
effectively communicate the working of actual engineering solutions-long learning in the
appropriate societal context.
Group Tasks: Through group task the concepts of engineering that the student has
understood in the course is showcased. This helps to do work in groups effectively.
Fun Activity: Here, each concerned faculty teaches his/her subject with the help of fun
activity like making group and debates based on topics so that the student can learn the
topic in visualized manner.
Government/ AICTE Initiative :All the interactive courses prepared by best teachers in
the country are taught through Swayam, NPTEL, and Virtual lab from IIT Mumbai,
Internshala and ICT courses through NITTTR Chandigarh.
Invited Talks, Workshops and Seminars on the latest trends in technology are done
from the industry person.
Course Attainment
Attainment of POs Justification
Delivery of PSOs
Lecturing PO1,PO2,PO3,PO4,PO8,PO9, PSO1 Faculties of the CSE Department effectively
PO10,PO12 teach students about a concerned subject.
Faculties convey significant information,
history, background, theories, analogies and
equations to make the concepts clear.
Faculties relate engineering practice to the
real world.
Tutorial PO1,PO2,PO3,PO4,PO8,PO9, PSO1 Faculties help the slow learners by solving
PO10,PO12 more number of similar problems.
Any specific problem is also entertained by
Faculty Members.
Presentatio PO1,PO4,PO5,PO9, PO10, PO11 PSO1, Presentations are given to illustrate ideas
ns PSO2 and concepts.
(Still and Presentations give information with data
Video) relating to an issue.
Videos effectively communicate the
working of actual engineering solutions-
long learning in the appropriate societal
context.
Group PO4, PO7, PO8, PO9, PO10, PSO1,PSO2 Here the concepts of engineering that the
tasks PO11 student has understood in the course are
(Projects) showcased. This helps to do work in groups
effectively
Hand-outs PO1, PO2, PO3, PO4, PO12 Gives a quick insight to the course.
-
It helps the slow learners to face the exams
with confidence
Social PO6,PO7,PO8,PO9,PO10 Gives a sense of social responsibility to a
Activities/ - student.
Fun
Teaching students with visualization method
Activity
like debate and quiz
Table B.2.1.1a: Mode of Course Delivery
HU-103 HumanValues - - 2 - - 3 2 3 2 1 - 1
The procedure adopted for finding the curriculum gaps is shown in figure 2.1.1bfor attaining the
POs and PSOs.
Feedback from the teacher handling the course.
Input from Industry experts/ employers.
Based on the feedback from students.
Based on the feedback from parents.
Based on alumni feedback.
Based on the analysis of other universities’ curriculum
Following gaps were identified that are required for industry oriented & learning of emerging
technologies
Salesforce Salesforce
1. Mr. Rajesh 3 months PO1-5, PO9-12 PSO1, PSO2
Technology Training
2 Forsk Technology Training Mr. Yogender 30 hours PO1-5, PO9-12 PSO1, PSO2
T-START Jaipur is situated in the mid of pink city Jhalana in Jaipur. T-START Jaipur is
promoted by technical excellence institute of Department of Technical Education, Govt
of Rajasthan known as Center for Electronic Governance. CEG is known for its mission
is to inculcate technical skills in our youth. It advises Government towards digitalization
of state and its functionaries. T-START Jaipur is best place for startups who wants to
scale in IOT, travel and other sectors.
Faculty Coordinator : Mr.Gajendra Sharma, Mr.Ashish Ameria
Date of Visit : 31/08/2017
No. of Student : 168
Field of Industry : Startup
SPOC of T-Start : Mr. Rohit Sharma (Assistant Manager)
JMRC eInfochips
Figure 2.1.2b: Some Glimpses of Industrial Visit
University Academic
Calendar
Teachers
Plan
Practical Lab
Teaching Academic
Plan/
Lesson Plan Activities
Assignments/
Tutorials
Teaching Quality
For improving teaching quality, the department follows all these processes which are
shown in the diagram below.
Lectures: Faculty of the CSE Department effectively teach students about a concerned
subject. Faculty conveys significant information, history, background, theories, analogies and
equations to make the concepts clear.
Tutorials: Faculty helps the slow learners by solving more number of similar problems. Any
specific problem is also entertained by Faculty Members.
Presentations: Faculty members also provide PPT and Videos related to course. Videos
effectively communicate the working of actual engineering solutions-long learning in the
appropriate societal context.
Expert Feedback on
Fun Social Hackathon Teaching
Activity Lecture
Activity
Swayam
Group Task
Experimental TEDX/MUN
Laboratory Teaching Quality
Improvement
Lectures
Video /Tutorial
Lectures
FDP/Conferen
Presentation Triangle Industry EBook/Digit ce/Workshops
Method Interaction al Library
Hand-outs:Gives a quick insight to the course. It helps the slow learners to face the exams
with confidence.
Triangle Method: During lecture HOD visits class room along with two senior faculty
members in which one of the faculty is the expert of the respective subject. They observe the
teaching method followed by Faculty Member and analyzes the importance of content. After
Class, HOD shares feedback to the faculty member.
Feedback on Teaching: During semester HOD takes feedback from students on random
basis. At the end of the semester concerned faculty members also takes feedback from
students.
Swayam: its main objective is to provide all with best teaching learning resources. All the
courses are interactive and prepared by best teachers in the country. Quality of content of the
course is ensured by seven national coordinators namely, NEPTEL, UGC, CEC, NCERT,
NIOS, IGNOU and IIMB.
TedX/MUN: TedX talk organized JECRC to discuss various topics from the eminent
personalities. JECRC Model United Nations (JECRC MUN) is an opportunity for
participants to showcase their abilities by engaging them in substantial researching, critical
thinking and public speaking.
Group Tasks: Through group task the concepts of engineering that the student has
understood in the course is showcased. This helps to do work in groups effectively.
Fun Activity: Here, each concerned faculty teaches his/her subject with the help of fun
activity like making group and debates based on topics so that the student can learn the topic
in visualized manner.
Center of Excellence:under Centre of excellence different MOU’s was done with industries
to emphasize on Internship, Project, Workshop for Students and Industrial Visits, Students
specific Training . These are Indo Vision Services Pvt. Ltd., SakRobotix Lab, Infosys
Campus Connect, AICTE-Youth4Work, WadhwaniFoundation, CADD Centre,Forsk
Technologies,RedHatTechnologies, Salesforce Technologies Ltd, and Sambhodhi Tech
Solutions,Cyberops, Siemens Ltd.
To improve the quality of Teaching & Learning the department of Computer Science and
Engineering organizes various activities like workshops,FDPs and other programs which have
to minimize the gap identified. Thedetails of FDP are mentioned below.
Name of
Faculty 2017-18 2016-17 2015-16
Member
1. Workshop on Deep
1 Short Term Course on Wireless
Learning at Bennet 1.Short Term Course on Open
Network Technology by NITTTR,
University,Greator Noida 5 Source Technology by
Nov-2015
Ms. Manju Jun- 7 Jun 2018 NITTTR, AUG-16
2. Short Term Course on Cloud
Vyas 2. Five Days FDP on 2. Short Term Course on PHP
Computing by NITTTR, Oct-15
Machine Learning Latex & & MySQL by NITTTR Jan-
Python at SKIT, Jaipur from 2017
11Jun-15 Jun,2018
1.Short Term Course on BIG 1.Short Term Course on Open
Ms. Shikha 1.Short Term Course on Cloud
Data and Data Mining By Source Technology by
Maheshwari Computing by NITTTR, OCT-15
NITTTR, SEPT-17 NITTTR, AUG-16
At the starting of Semester according to program curriculum, faculty designs lecture plan and
discuss with the HOD for smooth delivery of respective course content to ensure the completion
of course on time.
Course Outcomes:-
After Completion of Course Student will be able to
CO1: Examine Finite Automata and Regular Expression.
CO2: Classify regular sets of Regular Grammars.
CO3: Categorize Context Free Language and Design Pushdown automata.
CO4: Design Turing machine, compare Chomsky hierarchy languages and analyze Linear
bounded automata.
Unit
Lect Remark/
No./ Lect
. Date of Actual
Total Topics .
Req Delivery lect.
lec. No.
. Taken
Req.
FA &RE- Introduction about TOC- Basic concepts of FA, DFA
Acceptability & Designing FA, NFA Introduction
NFA - Acceptability of String - Conversion of NFA to DFA
Unit-1 NFA with moves- Acceptability, Conversion to DFA
(5)
Minimization & Equivalence of FA
Moore & Mealy Machines
Conversion of Moore - Mealy Machine vice versa
Regular sets of RG- Basic Definition of formal Languages &
Unit- Grammars
2(10) Regular Expression - Regular Grammar
Recommended books:
1. Aho, Hopcroft and Ullman, Introduction to Automata Theory, Formal Languages and Computation, Narosa
2. Cohen, Introduction to Computer Theory, Addison Wesley
3. Papadimitriou, Introduction to Theory of Computing, Prentice Hall.
Weak Strong
Students List Students List
The department follows the below steps for smooth conduction of examination and evaluation
Process:
b. Course Coordinator prepares and submit their question paper to respective class
coordinator
f. During the exam two invigilators are assigned in each class room and students sits
in the class rooms according to appropriate seating plan.
g. After the completion of exam, answer sheets evaluation, result analysis on basis
of CO, weak/strong student list is prepared by course coordinator and submitted
to Internal Examination Coordinator. Along with the soft copy.
h. If student secures marks less than 60% in some particular CO then he/she will be
considered as weak student. Then course coordinator provides assignment to them
and evaluates.
i. Student who secures marks greater than 60% in some particular CO then he/she
will be considered as strong student. Then they will be encouraged & motivated
for GATE/PSUs/Govt. Exam.
The department gives emphasis on concept building and exposure of latest knowledge of
the subject. For this following measures are taken: practical exposure, communication
skill, ethical values, and social responsibilities. Departments have incorporated
presentations, case studies, group discussion, class tests and tutorials
For developing communication skills, group discussions, presentation on theory based
and general topics are regularly carried out in the class.
For defining the graduate’s attributes, program outcomes are drafted for which the
evaluation is done accordingly.
Course outcomes are defined not only for the subjects but their respective labs also. Then
course outcomes are mapped with the program outcomes. This mapping depicts the
achievement of the particular learning outcome.
The examination evaluation is also performed on the basis of course outcomes which
ensure the result of the achievement of outcomes. Generally this criterion for
achievement is 60%.
Assignments for weak students on the basis of CO Analysis.
The department follows the below steps for Quality ofInternal SemesterQuestion Papers,
Assignments andEvaluation.
EXAMINATION NOTICE
All faculty members who are handling B.Tech (CSE) 3 rd semester are requested to send the soft copy of the question
paper and solution in proper format for MTT-2 on or before 14th November 2017 to corresponding class
coordinators. Syllabus for MTT-2 is remaining 2.5 Units. Subject of Email and document/file name should be in this
format, i.e. subject_code_subject_name_section_facultyname_question/solution.
All Class coordinators of 3rd semester are requested to send soft copy of question papers and solutions of your
respective class to moderation committee on 15th November 2017 at [email protected] positively. Subject of
Email should be in this format, i.e. semester_section_cc name.
The Moderation committee is requested to submit hard copies of question papers to the internal exam coordinators
on or before 16th November 2017, also requested to send (soft copy) solution of selected papers
to [email protected] on 23rd November 2017.
The pattern of question paper is
1. The Question Paper will be of 1 hour & 30 Minutes duration.
2. Question Paper should contain GATE& RTU questions.
3. Course outcome marks should be balanced.
4. The Question paper format is given below
Section Type of Marks
Questions
A MCQ 10
B Subjective 15
C Subjective 15
Total 40
Internal Exam
Submitted
Answer sheet
evaluation by Scrutinizing
course coordinator Committee
Review and Suggestions
Weak Strong
Students List Students List
Figure 2.2.2a: Process of Quality of Internal Question Papers, Semester Assignments and Evaluation
Q3. (CO1). If two finite state machines are equivalent, they should have the
same number of
A states B. edges
Q1. (CO3). A grammar that produce more than one parse tree is called as
[GATE 2004]
A. Ambiguous B. umambiguous
C. Regular D. None of the above
Q2. (C03). The C language is
[GATE 2010]
A. A Context free Languague B. A context language
C. A regular Language D. Parsable fully only by a
turing machine
Q3. (CO3). CFG can be recognized by
4. On the completion of each unit there is a common assignment for all students to
implement, analyze and for better understanding of respective course content.
The tables are shown below representing sample of Internal Assessment on the basis of
CO and weak student list.
Presentations: Faculty members also provide PPT and Videos related to course. Videos
effectively communicate the working of actual engineering solutions-long learning in the
appropriate societal context.
Experimental Laboratory Work: Laboratory work demonstrates how theory can be
verified by experiments through interpretation of results.
Group Tasks: Through group task the concepts of engineering that the student has
understood in the course is showcased. This helps to do work in groups effectively.
Hand-outs: Gives a quick insight to the course. It helps the slow learners to face the
exams with confidence
Social Activity: Gives a sense of social responsibility to a student under ABHUYDAY
which includes Zarurat, Soch, Suhasini and Aashayen group.
FDP/Conference/Workshop: Faculty members take knowledge about the latest
technology and deliver the same to students.
E-Book/Digital Library/Video Lectures: The facility of (multi
Media) Digital Library is available where all interested students & faculty members may
read e-books and e-journals which are available on NPTEL, expert lectures on you tube.
Fun Activity: Here, each concerned faculty teaches his/her subject with the help of fun
activity like making group and debates based on topics so that the student can learn the
topic in visualized manner.
Center of Excellence::under Centre of excellence different MOU’s was done with
industries to emphasize on Internship, Project, Workshop for Students and Industrial
Visits, Students specific Training . These are Indo Vision Services Pvt. Ltd. SakRobotix
Lab, Infosys Campus Connect, AICTE-Youth4Work, WadhwaniFoundation,
The department ensures the correctness in the evaluation system of internal semester
examinations with scrutinizing committee which scrutinizes theanswersheetsas well as checks
whether thereisanyissueintheevaluation. HOD can also scrutinize any answer sheet on random
basis to ensure the correctness in the evaluation system.
The projects are mandatory for VII semester and VIII semester students. Students make their
minor and major projects under the supervision of their respective Guide Faculties. In VII
semester student make their minor project which carries 50 marks in RTU curriculum. The
student may extend the minor project into major project in VIII semester which carries 200
marks in RTU curriculum.
To ensure the quality of projects, IQAC along with project in-charge evaluates the projects
submitted by students. The following members being the part of this Committee as shown in
table:
S.NO FACULTY NAME QUALIFICATION DESIGNATION ROLE
CO1 Graduates will be able to understand the concepts of real world complex problems with
analyzing social impact for sustainable development.
CO2 Graduates will be able to create cost effective solutions in multidisciplinary environments.
CO3 Graduates will be able to Design and Develop Software Applications.
CO4 Graduates will be able to demonstration their work with writing effective Reports, Design
Documentation and Presentation.
Table B.2.2.3b: Project Course Outcomes
solutions in H L M M M L L _ M M H H L M
multidisciplinary
environments.
P Graduates will be able to
Design and Develop M M H M H L _ L H H M H M H
Software Applications.
Graduates will be able to
P demonstration their work
with writing effective
H L L M M L _ _ H H L H - -
Reports, Design
Documentation and
Presentation.
Departmental
Display faculty list with their area
Database of
of interest
faculties
Stop
No
Is project containing 3
students have given
same guide List of guide & Team
formation is prepared
Yes
No
Does each faculty Yes
Are all students
has total 4 allotted a
students guide?
No
Students of IV Year are sorted in chronological order on the basis of their academic
performance.
The students are divided into four categories namely Topper Student List (A), Average
Student List (B), Below Average Student List (C) and Bottom Student List (D). Each
category contains 25% of total final year students.
Display the list of faculty members according to their area of interest.
Select one student from each category and make a team.
Each team selects one guide according to their area of interest and asks the guide for their
project approval after showing the abstract of the project.
Project Identification
Project Filtration
If Practical
Implementation is
possible
No
Yes
Project Allotment
Project Submission
Project coordinator issues a circular at the end of 6th semester to all faculty members
to provide their area of interest and the list of five projects to be given to the
students.
Students are also encouraged to submit the idea of their own for doing the project.
Final list of projects has been made and display on notice board.
The list of previous year projects is also displayed at notice board which ensures no
repetition of project work and also encourages students to enhance the previous
works.
Each group of students decides the project guide according to their area of interest.
Each team selects their own project idea or from list of projects.
Each team or group of students discusses their own project idea with their guide.
If the project idea submitted by the student/ group of students fulfills the basic
requirements, then it will be allotted to that student/ group of students.
If it does not fulfill the basic requirements, then a new project idea is allotted to that
student/group of students from the list of finalized projects.
Project coordinator displays the deadline on notice board for the progress report
presentations and final submission of the project report.
Each group has to summit weekly progress report to the respective guide.
Each team show their project demonstration followed by viva-voice has been carried
out twice in a semester in front of guide, then guide review the progress and gives
suggestions.
A presentation followed by viva voce is also carried out at the end of semester in
front of the external examiner and other students.
Each group of students has to submit a report of their work along with the role of
each team member.
The project exhibition is carried out at the end of semester. Student/group of students
demonstrated the project in front of external examiner and other students.
<Student Name1>
<University Roll No 1>
<Student Name2>
<University Roll No 2>
<Student Name3>
<University Roll No 3>
Industrial
Hackathon Visit
Invited
Talks
Conferences/
Workshops
Technical
Event Judges
Industry
Interaction
TP Squad
TEDX/MUN
Alumni
Sponsorship
Companies
Visited Campus
TedX/MUN: TedX talk organized JECRC to discuss various topics from the eminent
personalities. JECRC Model United Nations (JECRC MUN) is an opportunity for participants
to showcase their abilities by engaging them in substantial researching, critical thinking and
public speaking.
Hackathon: JECRC Hackathon and Smart India Hackathon were organized to promote IT &
e-governance initiatives. Coders, developers & designers will have a prodigious platform to
use their out-of-the-box thinking on Bhamashah, e-Mitra, Artificial Intelligence, Internet of
Things, AR/VR, Blockchain, Machine Learning and Data Mobility. The event will witness
eminent IT leaders, dignitaries and respected Officials from Government of India.
9. Cyberops 15-May-2018
5. CADD Centre: As Asia's biggest network of CAD training centers, CADD Centre Training
Services is the training arm of the 30 year old CADD Centre Group, head quartered at
Chennai, India. They being the only company in India to offer an end-to-end solution to CAD
users specializes in Computer Aided Design (CAD), Computer Aided Engineering (CAE),
and Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM) with our wings spread across the globe.
6. Forsk Technologies: Forsk Technology offer project based learning in IoT (Internet of
Things) and Machine Learning (Data Science). Future courses will be offered based on
industry requirement and/or student/faculty feedback. These future courses will be on
emerging technologies.
7. Red Hat Technologies Pvt. Ltd.: Linux World ('LW') is a fast growing ISO 9001:2008
Certified Organization which is fully governed by young and energetic Technocrats,
dedicated to Open Source technologies and Linux promotion. Since its inception in the year
2005, LW have achieved the status of centre of excellence wherein there is latest technology,
innovative developing methodology, state of the art infrastructure and individual needs of
employees are identified and executed professionally, efficiently & ethically.
8. Salesforce Technologies Ltd.: Salesforce is the primary enterprise offering within the
Salesforce platform. It provides companies with an interface for case management and task
management, and a system for automatically routing and escalating important events. The
Salesforce customer portal provides customers the ability to track their own cases, includes a
social networking in that enables the user to join the conversation about their company
on social networking websites, provides analytical tools and other services including email
alert, Google search, and access to customers' entitlement and contracts.
10. SIEMENS Ltd. With a focus on electrification, automation and digitalization, Siemens India
stands for engineering excellence, innovation, and reliability. As one of the world’s biggest
producers of energy-efficient, resource-saving technologies, Siemens is a pioneer in
infrastructure and energy solutions, as well as automation and software for industry. The
company is also a leader in medical imaging equipment, laboratory diagnostics, and clinical
IT. Siemens also provides business-to-business financial solutions, rail automation and wind
power solutions.
1) Initially Department issue a letter for summer training for every student.
2) Students will show this letter to respective company/organization from where they want to
pursue their training program. Students will go for 60 days internship.
3) After completion of training, they will be issued a certificate or evaluation letter from that
company.
4) Students have to submit their Xerox copy of summer training certificate.
5) A presentation will be taken on their summer training in next semester on which they have to
submit a report.
6) Final evaluation will be done and marks will be given for summer training program.
Approval
NO
YES
Prepare list of interested students and industries for
internship
Approval by HOD
Industrial Training
CRITERION 3
Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes
120
3.1.1. Course Outcomes (COs) (SAR should include course outcomes of one course from each
semester of study, however, should be prepared for all courses and made available as
evidence, if asked) (05)
Code Subject Course Outcomes
CO1: Understand the paradigms of object oriented programming in
comparison of procedural oriented programming.
CO2: Apply the class structure as fundamental, building block for
3CS5A
OOPS
computational programming.
CO3: Apply the major object-oriented concepts to implement object oriented
programs in C++.
CO4: Implement the concept of abstraction inheritance, polymorphism,
dynamic binding and generic structure in building reusable code.
CO1: Understand the purpose of designing a system and evaluate the various
models suitable as per its requirement analysis.
CO2 Understand and apply requirements specification into an
4CS4A
CO3: Formulate a testing strategy for the system design and implement the
concept of OOD & OOA.
CO4: Understand & Implement the various new technologies in software
development.
CO1: Analyze the basic structure of Database and recognize the different
views of the database.
CO2: Examine the use of Relational Data Model, while comparing with
5CS4A
DBMS
Intelligence system.
CO3: Analyze various concepts like Baye’s theorem, fuzzy logic,
Probabilistic Reasoning
3.1.2 CO-PO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1 (six matrices to be mentioned; one per
semester from 3rd to 8th semester) (05)
CO-PSO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1 (six matrices to be mentioned; one per semester
from 3rd to 8th semester)
S.No. Sem Code Subject Cos PSO1 PSO2
CO1 - -
CO2 2 3
1 3 3CS5A OOP
CO3 2 3
CO4 1 3
3.1.3 Program level Course-PO matrix of all courses INCLUDING first year courses (10)
Courses Subject PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
HU-103 HumanValues - - 2 - - 3 2 3 2 1 - 1
3.2.1. Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation
of Course Outcome is based (10)
Internal Assessment
MTT 1 MTT 2
2 3CS2A 49.74 43.07 44.12 33.33 2 3CS2A 62.6 66.7 60.1 52.5 2 3CS2A 90.15 84.45 86.5 74.6
3 3CS3A 38.65 31.28 48.04 46.57 3 3CS3A 85.8 71.2 85.3 70.2 3 3CS3A 75.1 81.8 89.6 82.3
4 3CS4A 85.17 50.15 62.25 47.55 4 3CS4A 83.4 52 75.2 60.1 4 3CS4A 77.7 62.6 64.2 79.2
5 3CS5A 70.18 60.12 58.33 37.75 5 3CS5A 85.9 79.3 84.7 70.7 5 3CS5A 79.2 81.8 89.6 82.3
6 3CS6A 64.7 20 21.57 21.08 6 3CS6A 74.7 24 42.4 72.9 6 3CS6A 52.3 59 77.2 45.5
7 4CS1A 66 45.11 78.13 67.41 7 4CS1A 91.7 75.5 86.3 78.5 7 4CS1A 85.49 73.57 83.56 77.7
8 4CS2A 56.25 65.29 61.75 32.52 8 4CS2A 78.8 60 69.3 64.4 8 4CS2A 89.1 71.5 71.5 77.2
9 4CS3A 55.81 25.15 59.53 49.3 9 4CS3A 54.6 73.6 62.9 72 9 4CS3A 26.90 52.04 42.10 63
10 4CS4A 77.2 53.48 69.3 40.93 10 4CS4A 95.1 70.7 85.3 68.7 10 4CS4A 79.27 79.79 81.3 84.4
11 4CS5A 37.2 21.39 57.67 49.3 11 4CS5A 83.6 51.2 80 61.4 11 4CS5A 66.83 61.65 76.1 55.9
12 4CS6A 72.55 61.39 49.3 49.58 12 4CS6A 86.6 72.4 72.7 68.6 12 4CS6A 82.3 68.3 83.9 74.6
13 5CS1A 64.22 47.55 59.31 67.65 13 5CS1A 87.9 75.5 79 74.8 13 5CS1A 86.3 68.7 75.1 75.6
14 5CS2A 70.05 36.06 44.12 33.33 14 5CS2A 75 64 71 65 14 5CS2A 63.4 35.1 52.6 65.8
15 5CS3A 95.16 62.77 48.04 46.57 15 5CS3A 88.5 65.7 68 64.3 15 5CS3A 93.6 87.3 91.7 74.6
16 5CS4A 89.21 77.1 62.25 47.55 16 5CS4A 77.6 62.1 84.9 64.3 16 5CS4A 95.6 83.9 85.8 76.8
17 5CS5A 72.16 82.28 58.33 37.75 17 5CS5A 86.7 68.4 80.3 75.3 17 5CS5A 87.8 73.1 87.3 82.4
18 5CS6A 96.16 78.16 21.57 54.25 18 5CS6A 65.2 69.8 82.5 68.8 12 5CS6A 90.2 92.1 82.9 82.4
19 6CS1A 82.35 61.76 88.26 77.94 19 6CS1A 85.4 86.8 93.6 84.9 13 6CS1A 91.17 89.7 92.6 79.41
20 6CS2A 89.7 35.29 94.11 72.05 20 6CS2A 82.1 61.1 90.4 78.5 14 6CS2A 64.2 70.1 82.1 77.6
21 6CS3A 94.11 67.72 67.64 80.88 21 6CS3A 90 74.5 74.4 67.1 15 6CS3A 79.65 82.55 68.58 79.85
22 6CS4A 92.64 67.69 68.76 67.36 22 6CS4A 81.8 74 65.3 86.3 16 6CS4A 89.5 55.07 73.13 92.53
23 6CS5A 39.42 53.54 68.52 47.98 23 6CS5A 84 76.7 73.9 82.1 17 6CS5A 62.68 59.7 58.20 74.62
24 6CS6A 85.29 67.57 57.98 67.87 24 6CS6A 87.7 75.4 90.4 75.3 24 6CS6A 86.85 98.88 61.85 91.58
25 7CS1A 85.71 34.42 84.42 82.47 25 7CS1A 90 77.6 86.4 81.5 25 7CS1A 92.24 60.27 59.82 45.21
26 7CS2A 58.49 75.32 48.7 23.38 26 7CS2A 83 71.3 68.9 78.1 26 7CS2A 88.13 76.71 91.32 81.74
27 7CS3A 87.66 40.26 75.97 66.23 27 7CS3A 74.3 35.9 46.6 63.1 27 7CS3A 89.50 69.86 73.06 63.01
28 7CS4A 68.12 55.25 69.23 47.89 28 7CS4A 71.8 81 68.9 75.7 28 7CS4A 97.72 66.67 79.00 76.71
29 7CS5A 13.23 56.52 13.26 21.56 29 7CS5A 81.4 59.2 89.8 91.7 29 7CS5A 78.54 45.21 50.23 91.32
30 7CS6A 21.07 27.94 18.13 29.41 30 7CS6A 78.8 53.8 73.3 60.6 30 7CS6A 48.4 15.07 62.56 65.75
31 8CS1A 80.64 54.83 94.19 91.61 31 8CS1A 75.2 53.3 66.5 84.4 31 8CS1A 82 70.89 68.58 93.58
32 8CS2A 68.38 54.19 56.77 60.64 32 8CS2A 77.1 63 59.2 73.7 32 8CS2A 99.05 69.3 95.6 91.3
33 8CS3A 67.09 71.61 96.12 96.77 33 8CS3A 83.6 59.7 83.4 53.8 33 8CS3A 99.07 81.5 97.68 96.7
34 8CS4A 86.45 61.23 66.45 90.32 34 8CS4A 82.2 80.5 74.2 56.7 34 8CS4A 96 92 96 93.3
Table B. 3.2.2: Attainment of Course Outcomes of all courses with respect to set attainment levels
PO Tool Tools
MTT Result
Final RTU Result
Academic Assessment Project
Lab/Experiments
PO1-PO12
Industrial training
Final Placed Strength
Mentoring
Placement
Soft skill
Higher Studies
Course Exit
Feedback Student Exit
Alumni Exit
Table B.3.3.1a: Assessment process for attaining Pos
PSO Tools
In-house Training
Project
PSO1-PSO2
Technical Events
Conference/
Technical Training
E-Resources
Workshops/Invited Talks
Results of evaluation:This is sample PO1 tools and its rubric and mapping with attainments in the
respective years. Different mappings and attainments are achieved with others POs
PO Attainment(2016-17)
PO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
PO Attainment(2015-16)
PO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
90
80
70
Target Value%
60
50
40 Attained Value % wrt
30 Ideal
20 Gap%
10
0
PO1
PO2
PO3
PO4
PO5
PO6
PO7
PO8
PO9
PO10
PO11
PO12
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
Target
Value% 70.4 68.5 74.1 74.1 70.4 70.4 55.6 55.6 83.3 57.4 70.4 66.7
2015-16 30.6 31.5 38.9 35.9 32.6 35.8 24.4 22.9 39.7 30.5 31.9 31.2
2016-17 53.7 54.8 63.1 57.8 57.4 58.8 44.4 44 63.8 45.8 52.6 52.9
2017-18 59.3 58 66.1 60 61.5 63.2 46.8 46.9 68.2 48.8 55.9 57.3
Table B.3.3.2r: PO Attainment (2017-18, 2016-17 and 2015-16)
Assessment tools and processes used for measuring the attainment of each of the Program
Specific Outcomes
PSO1: Ability to interpret and analyze network specific and cyber security issues in real world
environment.
PSO Attainment CAY(2017-18)
100.00%
90.47% 90.47%
50.00% 59.52%
53.80%
30.95% 36.66%
0.00%
Target Attained value Gap
PSO1 PSO2
90.47% 90.47%
100.00%
80.00% 64.28%
48.57%
60.00% 41.90%
40.00% 26.19%
20.00%
0.00%
Target Attained value Gap
PSO1 PSO2
90.47% 90.47%
64.28%
59.52% 59.52%
53.80%
48.57%
36.66% 36.66%
30.95%
CRITERIA 4
STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE
(150)
0 10 4
Number of students admitted in 2nd year in the same batch via lateral entry (N2)
Nil Nil Nil
Separate division students, if applicable (N3)
Table B.4b: Number of students who have successfully graduated without backlogs
Enrolment Ratio = Students enrolled at the First Year Level on average basis during the previous
three academic years starting from current academic year
CAY
CAYm1` CAYm2
Item (2017-
(2016-2017) (2015-2016)
2018)
180 180 180
Sanctioned intake of the program (N)
Total number of students admitted in first year minus number of 189 189 194
students migrated to other programs/institutions plus no. of students
migrated to this program (N1)
1.05 1.05 1.08
Enrolment Ratio = N1/N
1.06
Average Enrolment Ratio (>=90% students enrolled)
Marks 20
Table B.4.1: Enrolment Ratio
114 80 67
Number of students who have graduated without
backlogs in the stipulated period
Average SI 0.44
0.85
Average Success Index
Table B.4.2.2: Success rate with backlog in stipulated period of study
Note: If 100% students clear without any backlog then also total marks scored will be 40 as both 4.2.1 & 4.2.2 will be
applicable simultaneously.
API = ((Mean of 3rd Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point scale) or (Mean of the
percentage of marks of all successful students in Third Year/10)) x (number of successful students/number of
students appeared in the examination)
Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the final year
Total number of students appeared in the examination (Z) 202 218 202
API = ((Mean of 2nd Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point scale) or (Mean of the
percentage of marks of all successful students in Second Year/10)) x (number of successful students/number of
students appeared in the examination)
Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the Third year
4.5a. Provide the placement data in the below mentioned format with the name of the
Program and the assessment year:
Programs Name and Assessment Year: CSE & 2015-16
Name of the student
Name of the Employer
S.no. placed Enrollment no.
1 Aakanksha Kumawat 12E1JCCSF3XP001 Accenture Services Pvt. Ltd.
2 Aakriti Goyal 12E1JCCSF4XP002 Resonant Cloud Solutions
3 Aastha Gambhir 12E1JCCSF4XP003 TCS
4 Abhishek Baj 12E1JCCSM4XP005 Phone Support
5 Abhishek Galav 12E1JCCSM4XP006 TCS
6 Abhishek Gupta 12E1JCCSM4XP007 TCS
7 Abhishek Soni 12E1JCCSM3XP008 TCS, Accenture
8 Aditya Kumar 12E1JCCSM45P010 Configaware
Aditya Pokharna Mindtree, Accenture,
9 12E1JCCSM4XP013 Microsoft
10 Ajay Sharma 12E1JCCSM4XP301 TCS
Table B.4.6.1a shows the Professional Societies of the Department of Computer Science
&Engineering.Table B.4.6.1b, Table B.4.6.1c and Table B.4.6.1d shows the Engineering Events
organised by the Department of Computer Science & Engineering along with the support of
Professional Societies of the Department of Computer Science and Engineering.
The students & Faculty of the Computer Science & Engineering Department and other department
are the active Participants.
Table B.4.6.1a: Professional Societies of the Department of Computer Science & Engineering
Virtualization
ICT BASED Short 29.08.201 Sangeeta Gupta, It helped our students and
term course on “Open 6 Jr. System faculty members to learn
Source Technologies” programmer, more about Introduction to
at NITTTR, NITTTR,Chandi PHP and Mysql (5 Sem
Chandigarh garh DBMS)
ICT BASED Short Saurabh It helped our students and
term course on “Open Kaushal, faculty members to learn
Source Technologies” 01.09.201 Technical more about Open Source
at NITTTR, 6 Administrator, Security Tools (8 Sem ISS )
Chandigarh NITTTR,
Chandigarh
ICT BASED Short Mala Kalra, It helped our students and
term course on “Open Asst. Professor, faculty members to learn
01.09.201
Source Technologies” NITTTR, more about Mendeley
6
at NITTTR, Chandigarh Reference Tool(Course
Chandigarh beyond Syllabus)
Pre-Placement training 07-01- Mr. Naveen Jain, This event helped our
by Career Launcher 2015 Faulty Career students to Bridge the gap
To Launcher, Jaipur between academics &
13-01- Industry
2015
Workshop on Core 25-02- Mr. Kamal This event helped our
JAVA 2015 Bhatia students to learn basics of
to Faculty, Matrix Java language
04-03- Computers
2015
Workshop on Advance 02-04- Mr. Rahul Hada This event helped our
Java 2015 students to enhance
to knowledge about
05-04- advancedjava programming
2015 such as servlet and applet
Table B.4.6.1b: Workshop /short term course/ Seminar Organized by CSE Department
Figure4.6.1a:NITTR Workshop
Figure 4.6.1f:International Conference on Emerging Trends in Expert Applications & Security’18 – (ICETEAS
2018)
(The Department shall list the publications mentioned earlier along with the names of the editors, publishers, etc.)
(The Department shall provide a table indicating those publications, which received awards in the events/conferences
organized by other institutes.)
CSE department students participated in various inter institutional competitions. Following Table
B.4.6.3a indicates Consolidated inter Institute events participated by the students of CSE
Department. Table B. 4.6.3b indicates CSE department student’s participation in various National
levels and inter institutional events.
8 Abhishek IV-A Annual Socio- API Particip 25- 28- IIT Jodhpur
Pandey Techno- Cultural ated Feb- Feb-
Festival, 16 16
IGNUS'16
9 Abhishek IV-A Annual Socio- Webcraft Particip 25- 28- IIT Jodhpur
Pandey Techno- Cultural ated Feb- Feb-
Festival, 16 16
IGNUS'16
10 Deekshant IV-A Annual Socio- Obfuscato Particip 25- 28- IIT Jodhpur
Mamodia Techno- Cultural r ated Feb- Feb-
Festival, 16 16
IGNUS'16
11 Deekshant IV-A Annual Socio- Augmente Particip 25- 28- IIT Jodhpur
Mamodia Techno- Cultural d Rality ated Feb- Feb-
Festival, Workshop 16 16
IGNUS'16
12 Atul Dada IV-A Annual Socio- API Second 25- 28- IIT Jodhpur
Techno- Cultural Feb- Feb-
Festival, 16 16
IGNUS'16
13 Atul Dada IV-A Annual Socio- Campus Ambass 25- 28- IIT Jodhpur
Techno- Cultural Ambassad ador Feb- Feb-
Festival, or 16 16
IGNUS'16
14 Atul Dada IV-A Internshala Android Interns 1-Dec- 1- Intershala
App hip 15 Dec-
Developm 15
ent
Internship
15 Kanishka IV-A Jaipur H.R.C Particip 2016 2016 Manipal
Goyal International ated Univertisity
Model United , Jaipur
Nations'16
16 Dilip Kumar IV-A ABHIVARTA'16 Cricket Particip 12- 14- Manipal
' ated Feb- Feb- Univertisity
16 16 , Jaipur
Outside State
Programs Name and Assessment Year: CSE &2015-16
S. Name of the Semes Name of the Name Positio Date Name &
No. Student ter & Festival of the n/ From To Place of the
Sectio Event Partici Institute
n pated organized
1
Tech Fest 2015- Techn
Atul Dada Third IIT Bombay
2016 oVoltz
IV-A 2016 2016
2 Escala
Techniche- The
de 6-
Annual Techno- IIT
Atul Dada Jaipur Second 3-Sep-15 Sep-
Management Guwahati
Prelim 15
Festival
IV-A s
3 Escala
Techniche- The
de 6-
Annual Techno- IIT
Garvit Mittal Jaipur Second 3-Sep-15 Sep-
Management Guwahati
Prelim 15
Festival
IV-A s
4 Techniche- The
Esclad 6-
Annual Techno- Partici IIT
Garvit Mittal e- 3-Sep-15 Sep-
Management pated Guwahati
Mains 15
IV-A Festival
5 Ashish Poonia IV-A Techniche- The ROBO Certific 3-Sep-15 6- IIT,
Annual Techno- CALY ate Sep- Guwahati
Management PSE'1 15
Festival 5
6 Ashish Poonia IV-A Techniche- The Escala Certific 3-Sep-15 6- IIT,
Annual Techno- de- ate Sep- Guwahati
Management Mains 15
Festival
65 Rohan Singhal III-C National Working First 2016 2016 S.S. Jain
Science Day- Model Subodh
2016 P.G.Colleg
e
66 Shivani Gupta IV C Nigeria GA-DISEC Cert 9-Apr-16 10- MNIT,
ifica Apr- Jaipur
te 16
67 Abhishek III-A Patrika.com Village Jaipur Cert 6-Aug- 6- Diggi
Gupta ifica 16 Aug- Palace
te 16
16 Avi Bhootna III A SnackDown 2017 CodeC Certific 2017 2017 SnackDown
hef ate
17 Akshita Vijay III A SnackDown 2017 CodeC Certific 2017 2017 SnackDown
hef ate
18
Abhilash CodeC Certific
Tiwari III A SnackDown 2017 hef ate 2017 2017 SnackDown
19
CodeC Certific
Abhinav Soni III A SnackDown 2017 hef ate 2017 2017 SnackDown
20
CodeC Certific
Abhishek Garg III A SnackDown 2017 hef ate 2017 2017 SnackDown
21
Abhishek CodeC Certific
Khandelwal III A SnackDown 2017 hef ate 2017 2017 SnackDown
22 OOPS
Throu
Amit gh Certific 8-Aug- 10/7/
Moolwani III A Matrix Computers C++ ate 17 2017 Jaipur
23 Region
al
Finale Jaipuria
of 8- Institute of
Jaipuria Quiz Jaipuri Certific 8-Nov- Nov- Managemen
Ankit Raj III A League 2017 a Quiz ate 17 17 t, Jaipur
86 Sakshi Gupta VIII B YOUTH Talk for Certifi 13-Feb- 13- Delhi
PEAC Peace cate 18 Feb-
18
87 Sakshi Gupta VIII B Pravah 2017 Vox Populi Certifi 15-Feb- 18- SKIT,
cate 18 Feb- Jaipur
18
88 Rohan Jandu VIII B Rajasthan Rajasthan Certifi 19-Mar- 21- Jaipur
Hackathon Hackathon cate 18 Mar-
4.0 18
89 Priyanshu VIII B Rajasthan Rajasthan Certifi 19-Mar- 21- Jaipur
Gupta Hackathon Hackathon cate 18 Mar-
4.0 18
90 Aparna VI A ZEE Jaipur Registration Volun 2018 2018 Jaipur
Tripathi Literature Department teer
Festival 18
91 Arshin VI A Sabrang 2018 Paridhan Winne 22-Feb- 23- JK
Mahajan r 18 Feb- Lakshmipat
18 University
92 Arshin VI A BLITZSCHL Panache First 2-Feb-18 4- MNIT,
Mahajan AG Positi Feb- Jaipur
on 18
93 Diwanshu VA Rajasthan Rajasthan IT Partici 2-Dec- 3- Udaipur
Soni Digifest Hackathon pated 17 Dec-
17
94 Apoorva VA Rajasthan Rajasthan IT Partici 2-Dec- 3- Udaipur
Agarwal Digifest Hackathon pated 17 Dec-
17
95
3-
Bhavya Rajasthan Rajasthan IT Partici 2-Dec- Dec-
Agarwal VA Digifest Hackathon pated 17 17 Udaipur
96 3-
Rajasthan Rajasthan IT Partici 2-Dec- Dec-
Gagan Goyal V A Digifest Hackathon pated 17 17 Udaipur
97 3-
Ashwinee Rajasthan Rajasthan IT Partici 2-Dec- Dec-
Jain VA Digifest Hackathon pated 17 17 Udaipur
98 3-
Gaurav Rajasthan Rajasthan IT Partici 2-Dec- Dec-
Saxena VA Digifest Hackathon pated 17 17 Udaipur
99 3-
Ayush Rajasthan Rajasthan IT Partici 2-Dec- Dec-
Khandelwal VA Digifest Hackathon pated 17 17 Udaipur
130 Shivani Soni VIII B Celebal Mulesoft Interns 17-May- 17- Jaipur
hip 17 Jul-
17
131 Chinmey VII A RTU Inter- Football Winner 9-Oct-17 11- Arya
Bisen College Oct- College of
Tournament 17 Engineering
&
Technology
132 Vishvaved VII A RTU Inter- Football Winner 9-Oct-17 11- Arya
Nagar College Oct- College of
Tournament 17 Engineering
&
Technology
133 Ankush VII A RTU Inter- Football Winner 9-Oct-17 11- Arya
Kumar College Oct- College of
Tournament 17 Engineering
&
Technology
18 Introduction 48%
To Marks
Programmin Obtain Sep-
Vaishali Goyal III C NPTEL g in C ed Jul-17 17 IIT Kanpur
19
CRITERION 5
Faculty Information and Contributions (200)
Faculty Details:2018-19
Qualification Academic
Research
AssessmentYears
Ph.D. Guidance
Specialization
Designation
University
Department
Professor
Dr. VIJAY
University of
1 SINGH Phd 27/2/2009 YES PROFESSOR 17/8/2016 17/8/2016 CSE Data Minin 1 2 Y Regular
Rajasthan
RATHORE
Dr.SURENDR
Jagannath Computer
2 A KUMAR Phd 30/6/2009 YES PROFESSOR 10/7/2015 10/7/2015 CSE 0 Y Regular
University Networking
YADAV
MohanLalSu Image
DR.BHAVNA ASSOCIATE Processing
3 Phd khadia 13/06/2015 YES 8/1/2016 1/8/2016 CSE 0 Y Regular
SHARMA PROFESSOR and Machine
University
Learning
Suresh
DR.NILAM ASSOCIATE Cloud
4 Phd GyanVihar 3/4/2017 YES 1/8/2017 1/8/2017 CSE 3 Y Regular
CHOUDHARY PROFESSOR Computing g
University
Mohan
DR.SANJAY ASSOCIATE
5 Phd lalSukhadia 1/9/2012 YES 1/8/2017 1/8/2017 CSE Data Mining 4 0 Y Regular
GAUR PROFESSOR
University
DR.NEELAM Banasthali ASSOCIATE Artificial
6 Phd 10/11/2017 YES 7/12/2017 7/12/2007 CSE 0 Y Regular
CHAPLOT University PROFESSOR Intelligence
Jyoti
Dr. VIJITA Vidyapeeth ASST Wireless and
7 Phd 15/07/2018 YES 2/4/2018 2/4/2018 CSE 0 Y Regular
KUMAWAT Women’s PROFESSOR Security
University
MUKESH ASST
8 M.tech BITS Plani 30/6/2018 YES 30/6/2012 1/7/2002 CSE Data Mining 1 Y Regular
AGRAWAL PROFESSOR
Jodhpur
ASST COMPUTER
9 MANJU VYAS M.tech National 28/4/2011 YES 29/08/2011 CSE 0 Y Regular
PROFESSOR SCI.
UNI
SACHIN ASST COMPUTER
10 M.tech RTU 5/2/2018 YES 2/5/2012 CSE 0 Y Regular
GUPTA PROFESSOR SCI.
C.JEBA NEGA Anna ASST COMPUTER
11 M.e 11/10/2011 YES 10/11/2013 CSE 0 Y Regular
CHELTHA University PROFESSOR SCI.
ABHISHEK ASST
13 M.tech SGVU 1/7/2015 YES 2/8/2014 CSE Data Mining 0 Y Regular
DIXIT PROFESSOR
Malaviya
National
ASST COMPUTER
30 AMIT MITHAL M.tech Institute of 6/8/2012 YES 2/12/2004 CSE 0 Y Regular
PROFESSOR SCI.
Technology,
Jaipur
RICHA ASST Computer
31 M.tech RTU 22/3/2016 YES 27/8/2008 CSE 0 Y Regular
SHARMA PROFESSOR Networking
GAJENDRA
ASST COMPUTER
32 KUMAR M.tech JNRU 15/5/2006 YES 4/10/2006 CSE 0 Y Regular
PROFESSOR SCI.
SHARMA
PRAHLAD
ASST
33 KUMAR M.tech RTU 17/8/2016 YES 17/1/2012 CSE Data Mining 0 Y Regular
PROFESSOR
SHARMA
Jodhpur
VINAY ASST Compiler
35 M.tech National 1/7/2013 YES 1/10/2018 CSE 0 Y Regular
AJMERA PROFESSOR Design
UNI
YOGITA Jagannath ASST Image
36 M.tech 30/6/2012 YES 1/8/2011 CSE 0 Y Regular
PANJABI University PROFESSOR Processing
Ph.D.duringtheAssessmentYears
Date of Joining the Institution
Name of the Faculty Member
Ph.D. Guidance
Faculty Receiving
University
S.N0.
Specialization
Designation
Department
Dr. VIJAY
University C
SINGH PROFE 17/8/20 Data Regul
1 PhD of 27/2/2009 YES 17/8/2016 S 7 3 Y
RATHOR SSOR 16 Minin ar
Rajasthan E
E
Dr.SURE
C Computer
NDRA Jagannath PROFE 10/7/20 Regul
2 PhD 30/6/2009 YES 10/7/2015 S Networki 1 Y
KUMAR University SSOR 15 ar
E ng
YADAV
Image
ASSOC
DR.BHAV MohanLal C Processin
13/06/201 IATE 08-01- Regul
3 NA PhD Sukhadia YES 1/8/2016 S g and 3 Y
5 PROFE 2016 ar
SHARMA University E Machine
SSOR
Learning
DR.NILA ASSOC
Suresh C Cloud
M IATE 1/8/201 Regul
4 PhD GyanVihar 3/4/2017 YES 1/8/2017 S Computin 2 Y
CHOUDH PROFE 7 ar
University E gg
ARY SSOR
Mohan ASSOC
C
DR.SANJ lalSukhadi IATE 1/8/201 Data Regul
5 PhD 1/9/2012 YES 1/8/2017 S 8 3 Y
AY GAUR a PROFE 7 Mining ar
E
University SSOR
DR.NEEL
ASST C Artificial
AM Banasthali 10/11/201 7/12/20 2017- Regul
6 PhD YES PROFE 7/12/2007 S Intelligen 4 Y
CHAPLO University 7 17 18 ar
SSOR E ce
T
MUKESH ASST C
M.TE 30/6/20 Data Regul
7 AGRAWA BITS Plani 30/6/2018 YES PROFE 1/7/2002 S 1 Y
CH 12 Mining ar
L SSOR E
Jodhpur ASST C
MANJU M.TE COMPU Regul
8 National 28/4/2011 YES PROFE 29/08/2011 S 3 Y
VYAS CH TER SCI. ar
UNI SSOR E
ASST C
SACHIN M.TE COMPU Regul
9 RTU 5/2/2018 YES PROFE 2/5/2012 S 2 Y
GUPTA CH TER SCI. ar
SSOR E
C.JEBA
ASST C
NEGA Anna 11/10/201 COMPU Regul
10 M.E YES PROFE 10/11/2013 S 3 Y
CHELTH University 1 TER SCI. ar
SSOR E
A
ASST C
ABHILAS M.TE GLA 12/10/201 COMPU Regul
11 YES PROFE 19/11/2013 S 0 Y
HA CH University 3 TER SCI. ar
SSOR E
ARIHANT ASST C
M.TE COMPU Regul
12 KUMAR RTU 10/9/2012 YES PROFE 30/1/2014 S 2 Y
CH TER SCI. ar
JAIN SSOR E
ASST C
ABHISHE M.TE Data Regul
13 SGVU 1/7/2015 YES PROFE 2/8/2014 S 2 Y
K DIXIT CH Mining ar
SSOR E
Faculty Details:2016-17
Specialization
Ph.D.duringtheAssessmentYears
Department
Designation
Ph.D. Guidance
Faculty Receiving
University
S.N0.
DR.(Prof)VIJAY
University of Cloud
1 SINGH PhD 27/2/2009 YES PROFESSOR 17/8/2016 17/8/2016 CSE 5 4 Y Regular
Rajasthan Computing
RATHORE
Dr.SURENDRA
Jagannath Computer
2 KUMAR PhD 30/6/2009 YES PROFESSOR 10/7/2015 10/7/2015 CSE 1 Y Regular
University Networking
YADAV
Image
DR.BHAVNA Sukhadia ASSOCIATE Processing
3 PhD 13/06/2015 YES 08-01-2016 1/8/2016 CSE 3 Y Regular
SHARMA University PROFESSOR and Machine
Learning
NEELAM Banasthali ASST Artificial
4 PhD 10/11/2017 YES 7/12/2017 7/12/2007 CSE 0 Y Regular
CHAPLOT University PROFESSOR Intelligence
MUKESH ASST
5 M.TECH BITS Plani 30/6/2018 YES 30/6/2012 1/7/2002 CSE Data Mining 0 Y Regular
AGRAWAL PROFESSOR
ASST COMPUTER
7 SACHIN GUPTAM.TECH RTU,kota 5/2/2018 YES 2/5/2012 CSE 1 Y Regular
PROFESSOR SCI.
ABHISHEK ASST
11 M.TECH SGVU 1/7/2015 YES 2/8/2014 CSE Data Mining 0 Y Regular
DIXIT PROFESSOR
RICHA ASST
14 M.TECH SGVU 29/11/2014 YES 3/1/2015 CSE CSE 1 Y Regular
UPADHYAY PROFESSOR
ASST COMPUTER
18 ANKUR RAJ M.TECH SGVU 12/11/2014 YES 14/7/2015 CSE 0 Y Regular
PROFESSOR SCI.
ASST Software
24 SARITA M TECH SGVU 30/6/2013 No 1/7/2015 CSE 1 5/5/2018 Regular
PROFESSOR Engineering
Mody Institute
SHIKHA of Technology ASST COMPUTER
25 M. TECH 31/5/2008 YES 1/2/2010 CSE 4 Y Regular
MAHESHWARI & Sciences, PROFESSOR SCI.
Laxmangarh
ANIMA Jagannath ASST Computer
26 M.TECH. 20/7/2013 YES 19/2/2009 CSE 0 Y Regular
SHARMA University PROFESSOR Networks
ASST COMPUTER
28 AMIT MITHAL M.TECH MNIT, Jaipur 6/8/2012 YES 2/12/2004 CSE 0 Y Regular
PROFESSOR SCI.
U2.1 61 63 63
U2.2 63 63 64
U2.3 63 64 59
4 9 27
CAYP1(2018-19) 2 4 32
4 9 27
CAY(2017-18) 2 3 34
4 8 23
CAYm1(2016-17) 2 1 33
Average
RF1=4 AF1=2 RF2=8.66 AF2=2.66 RF3=25.66 AF3=33
Numbers
Table B.5.2: Faculty Cadre Proportion
Case 2: AF1/RF1= 1; AF2/RF2 = 3/2; AF3/RF3 = 5/6; Cadre proportion marks = (1+0.9+0.3) x 12.5 =
limited to 25
Case 3: AF1/RF1=0; AF2/RF2=1/2; AF3/RF3=8/6; Cadre proportion marks = (0+0.3+0.53) x 12.5 = 10.4
FQ = 2.5 x [(10X
S.NO X Y F +4Y)/F)]
>=90% of required Faculty members retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm3 as base year) 25
>=75% of required Faculty members retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm3 as base year) 20
>=60% of required Faculty members retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm3 as base year) 15
>=50% of required Faculty members retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm3 as base year) 10
<50% of required Faculty members retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm3 as base year) 0
Contributions to teaching and learning are activities that contribute to the improvement of student learning. These
activities may include innovations not limited to, use of ICT, instruction delivery, instructional methods,
assessment, evaluation and inclusive class rooms that lead to effective, efficient and engaging instruction. Any
contributions to teaching and learning should satisfy the following criteria:
The department/institution may set up appropriate processes for making the contributions available to the public,
getting them reviewed and for rewarding. These may typically include statement of clear goals, adequate
preparation, use of appropriate methods, and significance of results, effective presentation and reflective critique)
Innovation by Faculty
in Teaching
&Learning
Innovations are introduced to improve the effectiveness in teaching and learning process. Student, al
umni, employer feedback and state of art technologies in the society are considered to introduce inno
vative teaching and learning methodologies.Department encourages faculty members to adapt innova
tive teaching. Following are the three initiatives taken to improve the teaching learning process like
• Motivating students to use modern tools like Prezi, snipping tool etc.
Collaborative Learning: Collaborative Learning is based on the model that knowledge can be
created within a population where members actively interact by sharing experience and take on
asymmetric role. We use Collaborative learning method among faculty and student. Six faculty
members completed the AWS certification and are providing training to the students by lectures /
video lectures.
Also two faculty members successfully completed training on Deep Learning and AI under Leading
India initiative which is a project of Royal Academy of Engineering, UK under Newton Bhabha
program. JECRC being the Zonal partner of this project has formed a research group comprising of
faculty members of CSE and IT. The group will be conducting various trainings and will help the
students to build projects to spread awareness about AI.
Formation of T&P Squad:Conducting training for the students to enhance the aptitude,
technical skills & soft skills before the commencement of placement. Department formed a special
Squad named "T&P Squad - CSE" for Un-Placed Students' Placements. The Squad consists of 6
dedicated willing faculty members, and 12 Students from 4th Year who are already placed.
For development of entrepreneurial skills among the students to start their own enterprise, a
ctivities are conducted by the department of the college.
Students are encouraged to attend various technical events,
workshops, programming contests & paper presentation in contests.
Department conduct online mock test series for students to perform better in GATE,
MCAT, elitmus and other activities.
Meeting Venue and Date: EDC Conference Room A block at 2:00 O’clock on Saturday, December 09, 2017
Chaired By:
Dr. Vijay Singh Rathore
Attendees
Faculty Coordinators: Students Coordinators:
Dr. Sanjay Gaur Ms. Japleen Kaur
Dr. NilamChodhary Ms. Kanishka Goyal
Ms. ShikhaMaheshwari Ms. RidhimaShekhawat
Mr. Abhishek Dixit Ms. ApurviMansingha
M. Priyanka Mitra Mr. Atul Dada
Mr. DikshantMamodia
Mr. NiteshVashishtha
Ms. MohitEaran
The meeting started with motivational triggers connecting the current action with a bigger vision.
12 well trained and placed students of 7th Semester (some listed above) were identified for taking the action further.
It was decided for unplaced 162 students of CSE department, each student coordinator will be allotted a group of 15
students.
Future course of action was chalk out, based on following categories:
For Competition based hiring, the student coordinators under the mentor-ship of faculty coordinator, will help
their group for better preparation by identifying coding tricks and algorithms or training as per the requirements.
For Companies lined up by HR Team, the student coordinators will motivate and extend their help in identifying
the company specific set of questions and training available on the internet.
For Identification of Personal Contacts, faculty coordinator along with students will approach organizations to take
the things further in positive direction.
For Establishing Contact with Alumni, both identified faculty member along with a team of students will approach
Alumni of JECRC Foundation for the placement of students.
Each of these above mentioned strategy is then allotted to the TPC Squad as follows:
Competition Based Hiring – Dr. Sanjay Gaur will coordinate with Dr. NeelamChaplot.
Companies lined up by HR Team- Ms. Priyanka Mitra will coordinate with HR.
Identification of Personal Contacts – Ms. NilamChoudhary will gather the possible contacts from other
faculty members of the Department.
Number of quality publications in refereed/SCI Journals, citations, Books/Book Chapters etc. (6)
Ph.D. guided /Ph.D. awarded during the assessment period while working in the institute (4)
Following are the details of PhD thesis submitted under the guidance of
Research Publications
2016-17
S.No. Name of Faculty/
Title of Paper Name of Journal, Volume, Isssue, Year, Page No.
Author
1 Model for Teaching Undergraduate-Level Database Management
Communication Technology(ICICT 2018)
Systems
27 - 28 February, 2018, Brunel University, London, UK,
To Be Published in Spa ringer-
AISC Series
Dr..(Prof) Vijay
SunghRathore Accepted & Presented in International World Conference
ASMAN Framework: A Framework for Comparison and on Smart Trends in Systems,
Selection of SaaS Services Security and Sustainability (WS4 2017) 15 - 16 February,
2017, London, United Kingdom,To Be Published in
Springer LNNS Series
8 (IJRITCC) International
Journal on Recent and
Mr. A Novel Approach For web Innovation Trends in
Prahalad August 2015 Page Ranking Based on Weights Computing and
Sharma of links Communication, pp.
5268-5272, volume: 3
Issue: 8-August-2015
9
Ms. Astrological prediction for IEEE
IEEE Conference ISBN
Neelam 2015 profession using classification Confere
978-1-4799-8889-1
Chaplot techniques of AI nce
Funded research:
(Provide a list with Project Title, Funding Agency, Amount and Duration)
2017-2018: NIL
2016-17: NIL
2015-16:
Research laboratories
S.No Name of Faculty Research lab name Faculty member/Student name
1 Dr.Vijay Singh Rathore CP-1 Mr. Sandeep Sharma
Ms. Aparajita Dixit
2 Dr.Vijay Singh Rathore CP-2 Ms. Savita Sharma
Ms. Mamta Dadhich
3 Dr.Sanjay Gaur CP-3 Mr.NKTanna
Ms.Darshanapandya
4 Dr.Sanjay Gaur CP-4 Mr.BaaweshKumawat
Ms. Kanchan Parihar
Table B.5.7.1.3b: Research laboratories
Course file:
Each & every faculty prepare course wise lecture schedules, resource material and other related instr
uction material before commencement of semester and is added to moodle. The students can login an
d access the content though internet.
PowerPoint Presentation:
Content wise instruction material is developed including PPT presentations, for all the courses prior t
o the commencement of each semester which is monitored by course coordinators.
Hand Outs:
Where ever necessary, additional material and hand outs are prepared and the same is made a
vailable to students through Moodle.
Laboratory manuals:
Laboratory manuals: are prepared and Laboratory instruction is given through Lab manuals at the be
ginning of each semester and demonstration classes are delivered for better understanding of concept
s behind laboratory experiment.
Relevant Charts are displayed in all Laboratories so that realization becomes easy for the students
A project model competition titled “J-TechTrix” held every year for students to enhance their
interpersonal and intrapersonal skills.
The department has many models created by students and are been displayed in Laboratories. Thi
s prototype models helps the students to understand the working of basics and recent technologies
in a better manner.
2017-18
S.No Name Project Title Funding Agency Amount Duration
3 Ms. ShikhaMaheshwari and Ms. Services for JECRC Rs: 22,000/- 01/05/2016 to
Richa Sharma, Assistant Professor setting up of University
along alongwithMr. Computer Lab 30/06/2016.
KaushalendraNagoria, Lab Technician 16
4 Mr. Sachin Gupta, Mr. Buddhi Services for JECRC Rs: 22,500 01/05/2016 to
Prakash, Mr. setting up of University 30/06/2016
PrahaladSharmaalongwithMr. Shyam Networking
Sunder Sharma,Lab Technicians facility in labs
CP-15,16
5 Mr. Abhishek Dixit, Assistant Services for JECRC Rs.12,500/- 01/04/2016 to
Professor along with Mr. installation of University
TovindraSahu, Lab Technician CCTV 30/05/2016.
cameras
6 Mr. Kishan Sharma and Mr. Bir Singh, consultant for JECRC Rs: 10,000/- 01/05/2016
Lab Technician setting up of University
Wi-Fi in Boys to30/06/2016.
Hostel-3
7 Mr. Anil Sharma and Mr. Atul Sharma consultancy JECRC Rs: 12,500/- 01/05/2016 to
for Wi-Fi University
Lab Technician 30/06/2016.
Setup in Girls
Hostel
Total
:116,500
3 Mr. Amit Mithal and Mr. Abhishek Dixit, Services for JECRC 01/05/2015
setting up of University
Assistant Professor Rs:27, to
Computer Lab
Mr. Bhupendra Singh, Lab Technician 10 500/- 30/06/2015.
Faculty members of Higher Educational Institutions today have to perform a variety of tasks pertaining to
diverse roles. In addition to instruction, Faculty members need to innovate and conduct research for their self-renewal,
keep abreast with changes in technology, and develop expertise for effective implementation of curricula. They are also
expected to provide services to the industry and community for understanding and contributing to the solution of real life
problems in industry. Another role relates to the shouldering of administrative responsibilities and co-operation with
other Faculty, Heads-of-Departments and the Head of Institute. An effective performance appraisal system for Faculty is
vital for optimizing the contribution of individual Faculty to institutional performance.The assessment is based on:
A well-defined system for faculty appraisal for all the assessment years (10)
Its implementation and effectiveness (20)
Based on the Above API report faculty members are given appreciation/advisory
Format for same is mentioned below
Adjunct faculty also includes Industry experts. Provide details of participation and contributions in teaching and
learning and /or research by visiting/adjunct/Emeritus faculty etc. for all the assessment years:
Provision of inviting/having visiting/adjunct/emeritus faculty (1)
Minimum 50 hours per year interaction with adjunct faculty from industry/retired professors etc.
(Minimum 50 hours interaction in a year will result in 3 marks for that year; 3 marks x 3 years = 9 marks)
Jaipur Engineering College and Research Centre
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Details of Adjunct Faculty, Workshop 2017-18
S.No Name of Faculty Involvement in Duration Total Whether the subject
Conference/Semi Teaching covers the RTU
nar/Workshop hours Syllabus or
1 Mr. Vimal Daga Big Data 28Oct 2017 1 Day additional
Beyond Syllabus to
Syllabus
2 Mr. Vimal Daga Machine Learning 9th feb2018 1 Day VI Sem. AI
12 Hrs. in one
20 Dec. month (
3. Mr. Kaushal Kumar 2017 12*3=36Hrs) 4th and 3th Semesters
12 Hrs. in one
20 Dec. month (
4. Dr. KushumRajawat Cyber Security 2017 12*3=36Hrs) 7th and 8th Semesters
12 Hrs. in one 5th and 6th Semesters
Prof.(Dr.) Naveen 19th Dec. month (
5. Hemrajani IOT 2017 12*3=36Hrs)
Table B.5.9a: Details of Adjunct/Visiting Faculty 2017-18
10 Ms. Richa Mehta Seminar on Respberry- 27-02-2016 4 hours Bridging gap between
(Appin Pi academics & Industry
technologies Lab,
Jaipur)
Criteria 6
FACILITIES AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT
(80)
6.1 Adequate and well equipped laboratories, and technical manpower (30)
ODD SEMESTER-2017-18
Weekly
Sr. Lab Name of No. of Name of the Important Name of Designation Quali
utilization
No No. the students equipment the ficati
status (all
Laborato per technical on
the
ry setup(Batc staff
courses
h size)
for which
the lab is
utilized
rd
1 CP 3 24 Intel H61 Chipset, Intel Corei- Kaushalend Sr. Lab MCA
LAB semester 3, 2100, 3.1Ghz, 3M Cache, ra Nagoria Instructor
(Available 33
1 Data 2x2 GB DDR3 Ram, 1333
32 PC)
Structures Mhz, 320 GB SATA 3.0
Lab/ Gbps, 7200, DVD RW, HCL
TH USB Heavy duty Keyboard,
7 Sem –
HCL USB 2 button Optical
Web
Mouse, HCL Digital Colour
Designing
TFT-LED Monitor 18.5",
Lab
uATX (Dasher)
Sr. Lab Name of the No, of Name of the Important Weekly Technical Manpower Support
No No. Laboratory studen equipment utilization
ts per status (all Name of Designati Qualificatio
setup( the the on n
Batch courses technical
size) for which staff
the lab is
utilized
Equipment
S.No. Name Brand Model No. Specification Vendor Invoice No. Date Qty Rate Amount Location
Computer Infiniti L A HCL 11-02-
1 System HCL 380 TRU i3 System Infosystems Ltd. 3239505512 2013 4 23520 94080 CP1
Computer Infiniti L A HCL 28-06-
2 System HCL 380 PRO i3 System Infosystems Ltd. 6000058524 2011 28 20550 575400 CP1
Network Cisco SF- Alliance 01-10-
3 Switch Cisco 300 48 Port Technologies 297/2011-12 2011 1 20400 20400 CP1
Network Alliance 01-10-
4 Switch Linkksys SLM-224 G2 24 Port Technologies 297/2011-12 2011 1 9800 9800 CP1
Alliance 01-10-
5 Patch Panel Dlink 24 Port Technologies 297/2011-12 2011 3 4350 13050 CP1
Network COMRac Alliance 01-10-
6 Rack k 9U Rack Technologies 298/2011-12 2011 1 4800 4800 CP1
OnLine CM/08- 25-03-
7 UPS DB HN 15 KVA Computer Media 09/253 2009 1 187200 187200 CP1-2
Computer Infiniti L A HCL 11-02-
8 System HCL 380 TRU i3 System Infosystems Ltd. 3239505513 2013 28 23520 658560 CP19
Computer Infiniti L A HCL 11-02-
9 System HCL 380 TRU i3 System Infosystems Ltd. 3239505512 2013 28 23520 658560 CP2
Computer Infiniti L A HCL 26-06-
10 System HCL 380 PRO i3 System Infosystems Ltd. 6000058524 2011 3 20550 61650 CP20
Computer Infiniti L A HCL 11-02-
11 System HCL 380 TRU i3 System Infosystems Ltd. 3239505512 2013 7 23520 164640 CP20
Surbhi
Computer Electronet Pvt 13-01-
12 System HP HP 202 i3 System Ltd 224 2015 14 33285 465990 CP20
Computer 21-09-
13 System Compaq E5200 Dual Core Cyber Space 481 2009 4 20748 82992 CP20
Computer Infiniti L A HCL 11-02-
14 System HCL 380 TRU i3 System Infosystems Ltd. 3239505513 2013 28 23520 658560 CP21
Computer Infiniti L A HCL 11-02-
15 System HCL 380 TRU i3 System Infosystems Ltd. 3239505512 2013 28 23520 658560 CP3
PCL XD LCD Hindustan 15-07-
16 Projector Sanyo 2600 Projector Communication 91 2011 1 32000 32000 CP3
OnLine CM/08- 25-03-
17 UPS DB HN 10 KVA Computer Media 09/253 2009 1 140400 140400 CP-3-4
Grand Total=10018983
Table B.6.1d: List of Equipments
Valid Total
S.No. Description Type Qty Vendor Bill Date Till Bill No. Amount
Kamtron Systems Pvt. 31-05-
1 MSDN Academic Alliance 7.0 AE S/W 1 Ltd. 11-07-2007 2013 134 36400.00
2 Tally ERP 9.0 S/W 1 Arihant Computers 21-09-2010 Lifetime SEP/296 30000.00
MicroWorld Software 03-05- NTL/015
3 E-Scan Internet Security for SMB S/W 700 Service Pvt. Ltd. 03-05-2011 2014 9 227498.00
MS Win Starter 7 SNGL OLP Surbhi Electronet Pvt 31-01-
4 Acdmc S/W 50 Ltd 17-02-2012 2014 485 124850.25
5 Digital Language Lab Software S/W 2 Biyani Technologies 05-05-2013 Lifetime 10512 131250.00
ACS/RI/1
Autodesk Autocad 2014 Academic 3-
6 SLM S/W 30 Allianz CAD Solutions 08-08-2013 Lifetime 14/00102 226800.00
Quick Heal Endpoint Security 26-09- RNS/201
7 Business With Antispam S/W 400 RNS Infotech 27-09-2014 2017 4-15/111 159999.00
Designtech System PNQ/141
8 Matlab S/W 30 Ltd. 20-03-2015 Lifetime 5/12061 425768.70
Designtech System PNQ/141
9 Simulink S/W 30 Ltd. 20-03-2015 Lifetime 5/12061 212865.45
Designtech System PNQ/141
10 Signal Processing Toolbox S/W 30 Ltd. 20-03-2015 Lifetime 5/12061 170284.80
Designtech System PNQ/141
11 DSP System Toolbox S/W 30 Ltd. 20-03-2015 Lifetime 5/12061 170284.80
Designtech System PNQ/141
12 Control System Toolbox S/W 30 Ltd. 20-03-2015 Lifetime 5/12061 170284.80
Designtech System PNQ/141
13 Neural Network Toolbox S/W 30 Ltd. 20-03-2015 Lifetime 5/12061 170284.80
Designtech System PNQ/141
14 Communication System Toolbox S/W 30 Ltd. 20-03-2015 Lifetime 5/12061 170284.80
Rajasthan Network RNS/201
15 Cyberoam CR-1500 NGXP-FB S/W 1 Solutions 19-10-2015 Lifetime 5-16/128 351750.00
Rajasthan Network RNS/201
16 Fiber Module MWX-01G-08F S/W 1 Solutions 19-10-2015 Lifetime 5-16/128 43470.00
Cyberoam NGXP-F36 (3 Yr Rajasthan Network 19-10- RNS/201
17 Subscription) S/W 1 Solutions 19-10-2015 2018 5-16/129 513850.00
WINEDU ALNG Upgrad SAPk Surbhi Electronet Pvt 28-02-
18 OLVE 1 Y Acdmc Ent KW5-00359 S/W 200 Ltd 06-04-2016 2017 2 450448.00
Office 365 Plus Open Faculty Surbhi Electronet Pvt 28-02-
19 ShrdSvr ANGSOLVE S3Y-00001 S/W 200 Ltd 06-04-2016 2017 2 323510.40
SYLLABUS
Text books:-
• Hearn and Baker: Computer Graphics, PHI
Reference Books:-
J. Foley, A. Van Dam, S. Feiner, J. Hughes: Computer Graphics- Principles and Practice, Pearson
• INSTRUCTIONAL METHODS:-
Direct Instructions:
1. White board presentation
Interactive Instruction:
• Algorithms
Indirect Instructions:
1. Problem solving
• ASSESSMENT OF OUTCOMES:-
2. Discussion on Algorithms.
• Check whether all peripheral are available at your desktop before proceeding for program.
• Arrange all the peripheral and seats before leaving the lab.
DON’T’S
• No one is allowed to bring storage devices like Pan Drive
/Floppy etc. in the lab.
Algorithm:
• Start.
• Input the two line end-points and store the left end-points in (x1,y1).
• Load (x1,y1) into the frame buffer; that is, plot the first point put x=x1,y=y1.
• Calculate dx=x2-x1 and dy=y2-y1,and obtain the initial value of decision parameter p as: a. p=(2dy-dx).
• Close Graph.
Stop.
#include<stdio.h>
#include<conio.h>
#include<graphics.h>
void main()
{
int x,y,x1,y1,x2,y2,p,dx,dy; int gdriver=DETECT,gmode; initgraph(&gdriver,&gmode,”C:\\tc\\BGI:”);
printf(“\nEnter the x-coordinate of the first point ::”); scanf(“%d”,&x1);
printf(“\nEnter the y-coordinate of the first point ::”);
scanf(“%d”,&y1);
printf(“\nEnter the x-coordinate of the second point ::”);
scanf(“%d”,&x2);
printf(“\nEnter the y-coordinate of the second point ::”);
scanf(“%d”,&y2);
x=x1; y=y1; dx=x2-x1; dy=y2-y1;
putpixel(x,y,2);
p=(2dy-dx);
while(x<=x2)
{
if(p<0)
{
x=x+1;
p=2*x-dx;
}
else
{
x=x+1; y=y+1;
p=p+2*dy;
}
putpixel(x,y,7);
}
getch();
closegraph();
}
Viva Questions:
Sr. Facility Details Reason(s) for Utilization Areas in which students’ are Relevance to
No. Name creating expected to have POs/PSOs
facility enhanced learning
1 Class Fully equipped Faculties use 20 Hrs. Per Subjects (Principles of PO1, PO5
Room Class room with all interactive Week Programming Language, Real
with LCD projector modules like time application oriented
projector with the seating videos/ subjects, Software Engineering,
capacity of 70. presentations Mobile Computing, Data
Comfortable and visually Mining & Warehousing ect.
desks, chairs and attractive
teaching aids , methods of
Fans teaching.
2 E-journal JGate For research Throughout Research activity, paper PO1,PO2,
and project the writing. PO12
activities. To academic Recent trends in engineering
know about session. and software industry
recent trends Project activity
in science
and
technology
3 Internet Ethernet/WiFi Facility to Throughout More knowledge apart from PO1,PO2,
Facility staff and the curriculum, PO5
students academic 24×7 access to learning
for session. resources
enhancing
Teaching
Learning
4 Video’s NPTEL Understandin Throughout Building deep understanding PO1,PO5,PO11
From (National g the Video the semester with expert lectures from
NPTEL, Program on oriented subject experts
SWAYA Technology Teaching and In depth knowledge beyond
M Enhanced learning. Lab.
Learning) is a
joint initiative of
the IITs and IISc.
Through this
initiative,
Students get
certified on
various latest
courses through
online learning
and evaluation
10 MOU CAI is the center To create the Throughout Projects, Application PO1,PO2,PO4,
with for the apps and future the Development PO5,PO9,PO11
KMP ideas which lets android semester. ,PO12
Info students to bring developers
Solutions their dreams into and to create
reality. This more career
program let scope for the
students to come students
up with an idea
and help them to
make their idea
run in the real
world with an
Android
application.
11 Infosys Foundation 1 Months This program provides a PO1, PO2,
Campus Program 5.0 The objective platform to fill the gap between PO3, PO4,
Connect is to industry &academia. PO5, PO8,
Program PO9, PO10,
PO11,PO12
12 Spiritual Sponsored by 1. For Available 1. In the field of Yoga & PO6,PO8
Research DST CSRI & operating Throughout Meditation
Cell JECRC DST CSRI the semester 2. In developing moral values &
sponsored ethics
Research 3. In the area of Spiritual
Project Research Opportunities
2. For
imparting the
wealth of
Indian Yoga
& Meditation
among
Engineering
Students
Maintenance
Regular in-house
Outsource byexpert
maintenance
Sort students in chronological order of academic Project Allotment and Guide Allotment
performance
Figure6.3.1a: Lab maintenance
Project Allotment and Guide Allotment Project
Allotment and Guide Allotment
Sort students
6.3.2 Overall in chronological order
Ambience:-
of academicperformanceSort
Department has enough labs whichinare used for all the years to meet the
students curriculum requirements.onditions of
chairs/benches are in good condition.
chronological order of academic performance Chairs are provided for individual students in Labs.
Each Lab is equipped with white board, computer setup, and high speed Internet facility.
IBM lab is open for the students to carry out research regarding their projects, throughout the
day.
P P P
L/ P P P P P P P P P P
Co P O S S
Sub T/ CO O O O O O O O O O O
de O8 1 O O
P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11
2 1 2
Graduates will be able to
understand the concepts
P of real world complex
problems with analyzing H H M H M M M L H M M H L L
social impact for
sustainable development.
Project 7CS
P Graduates will be able to
Stage-I PR
create cost effective
& II &
solutions in H L M M M L L _ M M H H LM
8CS
multidisciplinary
PR
environments.
P Graduates will be able to
Design and Develop M M H M H L _ L H H M H MH
Software Applications.
Graduates will be able to
P demonstration their work
with writing effective
H L L M M L _ _ H H L H - -
Reports, Design
Documentation and
Presentation.
Table B.6.4b: CO-PO Mapping
2. CP5(Dept LIBRARY) Internet with high speed and open access journals are provided to students
for the project research Work.
• Students will appear in front of the project committee in the order of their merit which is
given below.
• A faculty list is given with their area of specialization/interest. Max of 2 projects will be
allotted to the faculty.
• When two groups formed of the particular faculty, then his name is crossed in the list.
ANKUR RAJ
(PROJECT IN-CHARGE)
Stop
No Is project containing
3 students have
given same List of guide & Team formation
guide is prepared
Yes
No Yes
No
Project Identification
Project Filtration
If Practical
Implementation is
possible
No
Yes
Project Allotment
Project Submission
Project coordinator issues a circular at the end of 6th semester to all faculty members to
provide their area of interest and the list of five projects to be given to the students.
Students are also encouraged to submit the idea of their own for doing the project.
Final list of projects has been made and display on notice board.
The list of previous year projects is also displayed at notice board which ensures no repetition
of project work and also encourages students to enhance the previous works.
Each group of students decides the project guide according to their area of interest.
Each team selects their own project idea or from list of projects.
Each team or group of students discusses their own project idea with their guide.
If the project idea submitted by the student/ group of students fulfills the basic requirements,
then it will be allotted to that student/ group of students.
If it does not fulfill the basic requirements, then a new project idea is allotted to that
student/group of students from the list of finalized projects.
Project coordinator displays the deadline on notice board for the progress report presentations
and final submission of the project report.
Each group has to summit weekly progress report to the respective guide.
Each team show their project demonstration followed by viva-voice has been carried out
twice in a semester in front of guide, then guide review the progress and gives suggestions.
A presentation followed by viva voce is also carried out at the end of semester in front of the
external examiner and other students.
Each group of students has to submit a report of their work along with the role of each team
member.
The project exhibition is carried out at the end of semester. Student/group of students
demonstrated the project in front of external examiner and other students.
Final Assessment of the project and marks finalization is done by the project assessment team
along with external examiner and respective guide
th
Schedule of Major Project Presentation of B.Tech. CSE 8 Sem.
19-Jan-2018
Presentation dates
1st Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-A 1/23/2018
1st Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-B 1/24/2018
1st Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-C 1/25/2018
1st Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-D 1/27/2018
2nd Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-A 2/16/2018
2nd Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-B 2/17/2018
2nd Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-C 2/23/2018
2nd Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-D 2/24/2018
3rd Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-A 3/9/2018
3rd Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-B 3/10/2018
3rd Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-C 3/16/2018
3rd Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-D 3/17/2018
4th Project Presentation of VIII sem. All Sections 3/24/2018
Project Report&
Teamwork Assessment
Demonstration
UniversityViva Project Report
7. Internet of 105Mbps and Wi-Fi campus UG students and Faculty members utilize the internet and Wi-Fi
facility for their Project and research activities,
8. Two 10KVA, one 15 KVA and 1 3KVA Used in case of Power failure
UPS with 200 KVA Genset.
9. Air-conditioner Maintained temperature in Labs
10. PRINTERS (Color and B/W) Printing documents Lab assignments etc.
11. Projector & Scanner UG students and Faculty members utilize the R & D Lab for their
mini and major projects & Scanning documents
12. Server FTP Server, Antivirus server, Account Server
Table B.6.4j:Facilities created in CSE department for projects
Do’s and Don’ts :Specific Safety Rules like Do’s and Don’ts are displayed and instructed
for all students
First aid box: First aid box is kept in Department.
Sufficient no. of fire Extinguishers are installed in the Labs
Easy approach to emergency exit in the Labs
Centralize Earthing
Power junction box
Criteria7
Continuous Improvement
(50)
7.1 Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of each of the POs & PSOs (20)
POs Attainment levels & actions for improvement (2015-16) CAY
Video lectures along with detailed course contents were held and students were also registered
in online courses (i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.
PO2. Problem Analysis:Identify, formulate, research literature, and analyze complex computer
Computer Science and Engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles
of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
PO2 64.8% 31.5% 1. Need of strong analytical power in students was
realized and correlation between Mathematics &
Science with engineering subjects was lacking.
2. Some of the subject like, Compiler Construction,
Principles of Communication, Digital Electronics, and
Embedded System Design needs to be improved to
attain the attainment level.
More home assignments are given for subjects that have computational importance
Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.
Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.
Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.
Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.
More activities on society issues, Social issues and health related problems should be promoted
among students
PO7. Environment and sustainability:Understand the impact of the professional Computer Science
and Engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of,
and need for sustainable development.
Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.
Some of the workshops will be organized to understand the professional ethics, responsibilities
and norms of the engineering practice.
PO9. Individual and team work:Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in
diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings in Computer Science and Engineering.
PO9 83.3% 39.7% Some of the subjects in the curriculum are lacking in
learning effectively as an individual and as a member
or leader in diverse teams and also in multidisciplinary
settings.
Actions
Motivating students to work in groups in technical studies
More activities on Coding contest should be promoted among students to work effectively as
an individual and in a team
PO10. Communication:Communicate effectively on complex Computer Science and Engineering
activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend
and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and
receive clear instructions.
PO10 57.4% 30.5% 1. Communication Skills were not up to the mark and
needs to be improved for presentations to be
performed.
2. Students are lacking in report writing and design
documentation, make effective presentations
Actions
Personality Development Skills will be imparted to students to enhance various aspects of
communication, technical and Presentations skills
Additional classes to be conducted for writing effective reports, design documents and effective
presentations skills.
Workshops and Industrial visits will be included to enhance the capability of students to apply
their Knowledge to make, enhance and manage projects in multidisciplinary environments.
PO12. Life –long Learning:Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in
independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of Computer Science and
Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.
Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.
Additional classes to be conducted for writing effective reports, design documents and effective
presentations skills.
Motivational lectures will be organized for students to understand ethical principles and commit
to professional ethics and responsibilities
Students are encouraged to participate in various Social and cultural events to enhance
leadership qualities in individuals as well as to make them work in team.
Table B.7.1a: POs Attainment levels & actions for improvement (2015-16) CAY
PO Attainment(2015-16)
PO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
20
10
0
Video lectures along with detailed course contents were held and students were also registered
in online courses (i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.
More home assignments are given for subjects that have computational importance
PO3. Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex Computer Science and
Engineeringproblems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with
appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental
considerations.
PO3 74.1% 63.1% 1. Approach towards the solutions of problems and
development of minor and major projects were not
fulfilling the industrial approach.
2. Some of the subject like Data Mining & Ware
Housing, Data Structures and Algorithms, Distributed
Systems, Linux and Shell Programming, Mobile
Computing are needed to be improved to attain the
attainment level
Actions
Encouragement to students regarding proper feasibility analysis and design and
development of the product according to industry requirements
Additional classes to be conducted on design solutions for complex engineering problems
Coding contest should be promoted among students
PO4. Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research
methods including design of Computer Science and Engineering experiments, analysis and
interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
PO4 74.1% 57.8% 1. Students are needed to improve in applying research
based approach to the investigations required for
creating projects.
2. Some of the subject like Statistics and Probability
Theory, Advanced Engineering Mathematics, Data
PO5. Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern
Computer Science and Engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex
computer science engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
PO5 70.4% 57.4% 1. According to latest industry standards and to fill the
gap between industry and academic, up gradation of
tools and software were required.
2. Some of the subject likes Advanced Engineering
Mathematics; Data Mining & Ware Housing is needed
to be improved to attain the attainment level.
Actions
Latest software like Xilinx, MATLAB, SALESFORCE, HADOOP, CLOUDERA, PYTHON,
Android Development Kit and ECLIPSE will be introduced to fulfill this gap.
Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.
Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.
PO6. The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess
societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the
professional Computer Science and Engineering practice.
PO6 70.4% 58.8% 1. Content beyond the syllabus includes subjects
related to needs of health safety and social needs of the
society.
2. Some of the subject likes Advanced Engineering
Mathematics; Data Mining & Ware Housing is needed
to be improved to attain the attainment level.
Actions
Students should be motivated to involve in social initiatives to understand the social aspects
Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.
Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.
More activities on society issues, Social issues and health related problems should be promoted
among students.
PO7. Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional Computer Science
and Engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of,
and need for sustainable development
PO7 55.6% 44.4% 1. It was observed that role of students towards
environment and global awareness needs to be
improved.
2. Some of the subject likes Advanced Engineering
Mathematics; Data Mining & Ware Housing is needed
to be improved to attain the attainment level.
Actions
Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.
Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.
Some of the workshops will be organized to understand the professional ethics, responsibilities
and norms of the engineering practice.
PO9. Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in
diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings in Computer Science and Engineering.
PO9 83.3% 63.8% 1. Few students were not able to make themselves
compatible with other members in a group.
2. Some of the subject like in Data Mining & Ware
Housing, Data Structures and Algorithms, Digital
Image Processing, are needed to be improved to attain
the attainment level.
Action
Motivating students to work in groups in technical studies
More extracurricular events will be organized to enhance leadership qualities in individuals as
well as to make them work in team.
More activities on Coding contest should be promoted among students to work effectively as
an individual and in a team
Additional classes to be conducted for writing effective reports, design documents and effective
presentations skills.
Workshops and Industrial visits will be included to enhance the capability of students to apply
their Knowledge to make , enhance and manage projects in multidisciplinary environments
PO12. Life –long Learning:Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in
independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of Computer Science and Engineering
change.
PO12 66.7% 52.9% 1. Students of 3rd and 4th year need to have conceptual
knowledge of few basic and important courses which
will help them in their future jobs.
2. Some of the subject likes Advanced Engineering
Mathematics; Principles of Communication are needed
to be improved to attain the attainment level.
Actions
Latest software like Xilinx, MATLAB, SALESFORCE, HADOOP, CLOUDERA, PYTHON,
Android Development Kit and ECLIPSE will be introduced to fulfill this gap.
Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.
Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.
Additional classes to be conducted for writing effective reports, design documents and effective
presentations skills.
Students are encouraged to participate in various Social and cultural events to enhance
leadership qualities in individuals as well as to make them work in team.
Table B.7.1c:POs Attainment levels & actions for improvement (2016-17) CAY
PO Attainment(2016-17)
PO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
100
80
60
40
20
0
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
Video lectures along with detailed course contents were held and students were also registered
in online courses (i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.
PO2. Problem Analysis: Identify, formulate, research literature, and analyze complex computer
Science and Engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of
mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
PO2 64.8% 58% 1. Need of strong analytical power in students was
realized and correlation between Mathematics &
Science with engineering subjects was lacking.
2. Some of the subject like Data Compression
Techniques, Advanced Engineering Mathematics,
Compiler Construction, are needed to be improved to
attain the attainment level.
Actions
Students were advised to observe the problems related to real life scenario.
More home assignments are given for subjects that have computational importance
Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.
PO5. Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern
Computer Science and Engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex
computer science engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
PO5 70.4% 61.5% 1. According to latest industry standards and to fill the
gap between industry and academic, up gradation of
tools and software were required.
2. Some of the subject like Compiler Construction,
Digital Logic Design, and Cloud Computing are
needed to be improved to attain the attainment level.
Actions
Latest software like Xilinx, MATLAB, SALESFORCE, HADOOP, CLOUDERA, PYTHON,
Android Development Kit and ECLIPSE will be introduced to fulfill this gap.
Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.
Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.
Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.
More activities on society issues, Social issues and health related problems should be promoted
among students
PO7. Environment and sustainability:Understand the impact of the professional Computer Science
and Engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of,
and need for sustainable development.
PO7 55.6% 46.8% 1. It was observed that role of students towards
environment and global awareness needs to be
improved.
2. Some of the subject like Cloud Computing, and
Advanced Engineering Mathematics are needed to be
improved to attain the attainment level.
Actions
Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.
Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.
Some of the workshops will be organized to understand the professional ethics, responsibilities
and norms of the engineering practice.
PO9. Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in
diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings in Computer Science and Engineering.
PO9 83.3% 68.2% 1. Few students were not able to make themselves
compatible with other members in a group.
2. Some of the subject like Cloud Computing, Real
Time Systems, and Data Mining & Ware Housing are
needed to be improved to attain the attainment level.
Actions
Motivating students to work in groups in technical studies
More activities on Coding contest should be promoted among students to work effectively as
an individual and in a team
PO10. Communication:Communicate effectively on complex Computer Science and Engineering
activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend
and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and
receive clear instructions.
PO10 57.4% 48.8% 1. Communication Skills were not up to the mark and
needs to be improved for presentations to be
performed.
Additional classes to be conducted for writing effective reports, design documents and effective
presentations skills.
Workshops and Industrial visits will be included to enhance the capability of students to apply
their Knowledge to make , enhance and manage projects in multidisciplinary environments
PO12. Life –long Learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in
independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of Computer Science and Engineering
change.
PO12 66.7% 57.3% 1. Students of 3rd and 4th year need to have conceptual
knowledge of few basic and important courses which
will help them in their future jobs.
2. Some of the subject like Advanced Engineering
Mathematics, Compiler Construction and Cloud
Computing are needed to be improved to attain the
Table B.7.1e:POs Attainment levels & actions for improvement (2017-18) CAY
PO Attainment(2017-18)
PO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
Actual /Ideal Value 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54
Target Value 38 37 40 40 38 38 30 30 45 31 38 36
Target Value% 70.4 68.5 74.1 74.1 70.4 70.4 55.6 55.6 83.3 57.4 70.4 66.7
Attained Value 32 31.3 35.7 32.4 33.2 34.2 25.3 25.4 36.9 26.4 30.2 31
Attained Value % w.r.t. Ideal 59.3 58 66.1 60 61.5 63.2 46.8 46.9 68.2 48.8 55.9 57.3
Gap% 11.1 10.5 8 14.1 8.9 7.2 8.8 8.7 15.1 8.6 14.5 9.4
Table B.7.1f: PO Attainment (2017-18)
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
Attained Value %
w.r.t. Ideal PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
2015-16 30.6 31.5 38.9 35.9 32.6 35.8 24.4 22.9 39.7 30.5 31.9 31.2
2016-17 53.7 54.8 63.1 57.8 57.4 58.8 44.4 44 63.8 45.8 52.6 52.9
2017-18 59.3 58 66.1 60 61.5 63.2 46.8 46.9 68.2 48.8 55.9 57.3
Table B.7.1g: PO Attainment (2017-18, 2016-17 and 2015-16)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
Table B.7.1h: PSOs Attainment levels & actions for improvement (2016-17) CAY
100.00%
60.00%
59.52%
40.00% 53.80%
36.66%
20.00% 30.95%
0.00%
Target Attained value Gap
PSO1 PSO2
Actions
Additional classes to be conducted for to interpret and analyze network specific and
cyber security issues in real world environment
Workshops and Training program will be included to enhance the capability of
students to apply their Knowledge to make and manage projects in multidisciplinary
environments
Students will be motivated to participate in coding contest and Hackathon to enhance
their skills to solve in real life problems
Students are encouraged to participate in entrepreneurship and startups programs
PSO2. Ability to design and develop Mobile and Web-based applications under realistic
constraints.
Students must solve problems for development
PSO2 of minor and major projects according to the
90.47 64.28
industrial requirements students’ needs to
work and performing under real life constraints
Actions
Additional classes and training programs will be conducted design and develop Mobile
and Web-based applications under realistic constraints.
Workshops and expert lectures will be included to enhance the capability of students
to apply their Knowledge to make and manage Mobile and Web-based applications in
multidisciplinary environments
Students will be motivated to participate in coding contest and Hackathon to enhance
their skills to solve in real life problems
Students are encouraged to participate in entrepreneurship and startups programs
Table B.7.1j: PSOs Attainment levels & actions for improvement (2016-17) CAY
90.47%90.47%
100.00%
80.00% 64.28%
48.57%
60.00% 41.90%
26.19%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
Target Attained value Gap
PSO1 PSO2
90.47%90.47%
64.28%
59.52% 59.52%
53.80%
48.57%
36.66% 36.66%
30.95%
Members of this Academic audit IQAC team are consisting of program coordinator and
senior faculty members of the department.
Academic Audit is done twice at one semester.
First audit includes, monitoring teaching process, time- table, Teachers Dairy (course
plan and course coverage), lab equipment’s requirements, 1st sessional result analysis
faculty wise.
Second Audit includes, addressing the difficulties faced by students as well as faculty
members and take suitable remedial actions, final result analysis, coverage of syllabus
etc.
IQAC team also looks into the faculty development programs (FDP) along with the technical
and research oriented activities of both students and faculty members.
(ii) To enhance the quality of each component of the departmental functionalities and to ensure
quality of education system in respective to both students as well as faculty members.
Audit
PracticalTeaching Activities Faculty Performance
Learning Related Documents
Documents
CO Analysis Internship/Industrial
(MTT)MTT- Review and Suggestions to visits/Summer Training
IDepartment the Concerned
Activities/Events
Report approved by
Program Coordinator
Submitted to Principal
200
150
100
50 CAYm1 (2016-17)
CAYm2 (2015-16)
0
CAYm3 (2014-15)
Assessment is based on improvement in terms of ranks/score in qualifying state level/national level entrances
tests, percentage marks in Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics in 12 th Standard and percentage marks of the
lateral entry students.
250
200
150
No. of students admitted
Opening Score/Rank
100
Closing Score/Rank
50
0
2018-19 2017-18 2016-17
Criteria 8
STUDENT SUPPORT SYSTEM
(50)
Assessment of faculty
Year
X Y RF qualification (5X+3Y)/RF
No. of
S.No SUBJECT Passed Mean of % 10 scale
Students
1 Communication Skills 524 517 98.66 9.7
2 Human Values 486 476 97.94 9.6
3 Engineering Chemistry 469 398 84.86 7.2
4 Engineering Physics 500 438 87.60 7.7
5 Engineering Mathematics-II 964 874 90.66 8.2
6 Basic Civil Engineering 861 794 92.22 8.5
7 Computer Programming-II 984 826 83.94 7.0
8 Engineering Mechanics 1016 831 81.79 6.7
9 Basic Mechanical Engineering 127 91 71.65 5.1
AVERAGE 656 583 87.70 7.7
Table B.8.3c: Academic Performance 2017-18 Sem.-II
(2017-18 Sem.-I)
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
Communication Engineering Engineering Chemistry & Engineering Fundamentals
Techniques Mathematics-II Physics-II Environmental Mechanical of Computer
Engineering
MTT-I MTT-II
Co Analysis
Internal assessment will be done by taking two Mid Term Tests and assignment/presentations
(co wise) as per the RTU guidelines.
The performance of a student in internal assessment with respect to all the CO’s will be
recorded.
End semester University exam performance of students for the maximum marks will be
considered for external exam performance.
For laboratory assessment, the over all performance of astudentin sessionalwill be assessed
as in Final lab internal test, Final lab internal Viva voce and Class performance during the
whole semester (record + attendance). Totalof these three is considered for internal lab
assessment.
Performance of a student inexternal lab exami.e.Practicalwillbeassessed as inperformance
and viva voce. Total of this is considered for external practical exam performance.
The summation of these two performances is considered ascumulative assessment for a
prescribed lab outcome.
Two internal tests for a maximum marks10 are conducted and total of two internals is
considered for final internal assessment.
The performance of a student in internal assessment with respect to all the CO’s is recorded.
End semester University exam performance ofstudents for the maximum marks100 is
considered for external exam performance.
For laboratory assessment, the over all per formance of a student in sessional is assessed as in
Final lab internal test,Final lab internal Viva voce andClass performance during the whole
semester (Record + attendance). Total of these three is considered for internal lab assessment.
Performance of a student inexternal lab exami.e.Practical is assessedas in performance and
viva voce. Total of this is considered for external practical exam performance.
The summation of these two performance sisconsidered as cumulative assessment fora
prescribed lab outcome.
8.4.2. Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all first year courses(5)
Program shall have set attainment levels for all first year courses.
(The attainment levels shall be set considering average performance levels in the university examination or any
higher value set as target for the assessment years. Attainment level is to be measured in terms of student
performance in internal assessments with respect the COs of a subject plus the performance in the University
examination)
90 76.47
80 72.77 71.28 71.3
70 60.88
Co Attainment (%)
60 50
50
40
30
20
10
0
Comm. Human Engg. Engg. Phy- Engg. Comp.
Skills Values Math-I I Chemistry Prog.
Subjects
90 84.85
77.04 77.93 75.87
80 74.48
70.42
70 65 63.73
Co Attainment (%)
57.18
60
50
40 S…
30
20
10
0
Comm. Human Engg. Engg. Engg. Comp. BME BCE Engg.
SkillsTech. Values Maths Physics Chem. Prog. Mech.
Subjects
100
87.37
90 80.39
74.57
Co Attainment (%)
80
70 60.88
60
48.2
50
40
30
20
10
0
Comm. Engg. Math-I Engg. Phy Engg. Chem. EEE
English Subjects
90 78.87
78.24
80 72.8
Co Attainment (%)
70 63
60 54.44
50
#
40
30
20
10
0
Comm. Tech. Engg. Math- Engg. Phy-II Chem. & Engg. Mech
II Env. Engg.
Subjects
8.5.1: Indicate results of evaluation of each relevant PO and/or PSO, if applicable (15)
The relevant Program outcomes that are to be addressed at first year need to be identified by the
institution.
Program outcome attainment levels shall be set for all relevant PO’s and/or PSO’s through First
year courses.
(Describe the assessment processes that demonstrate the degree to which the Program outcomes are
attained through First year courses and document the attainment levels. Also include information on
assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of each Program Outcome
is based indicating the frequency with which these processes are carried out)
Assessment Process used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of each Program
Outcome is based
Phase –I
PO2: Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, research literature, and analyze complex engineering problems
reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering
sciences.
Rubric
Tool Tools Mapping
70% students >65%=>100% marks
70% students >60%=>80%
MTT Result M 60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else =>0 marks
70% students >65%=>100% marks
Academic 70% students >60%=>80%
Final RTU Result
Assessment M 60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Attendance=> 20%marks
Performance =>20% marks
Lab/Experiments
M Record /File =>10%
Internal assessment -1 =>30%
External assessment -1 =>20%
PO3: Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and
design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration
for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
Tool Tools Mapping Rubric
PO4: Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research
methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the
information to provide valid conclusions.
Tool Tools Mapping Rubric
PO5: Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern
engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an
understanding of the limitations.
Tool Tools Mapping Rubric
PO6: The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess
societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the
professional engineering practice.
Tool Tools Mapping Rubric
PO7: Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering
solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for
sustainable development.
PO9: Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader
in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
PO11: Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader
in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
PO12:Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in
independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.
2018-19
Semeter I
PO PO PO PO PO PO PO
Courses Subject PO1 PO2 PO3 PO7 PO 11
4 5 6 8 9 10 12
PO PO PO1 PO
Course Course Title PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO11
8 9 0 12
Engineering
CO101 3 1 - - - - - - 1 1 - 1
Mathematics-I
Engineering
CO102 2 1 - - - 0.25 - - 1 0.25 - 1
Physics
Engineering
CO102 2 1 0.75 0.5 - 0.75 0.75 - - 0.75 - -
Chemistry
Communication
CO103 - - 2 - - 3 2 3 2 1 - 1
Skills
Programming for 0.2
CO104 1.5 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.25 0.5 0.75 NA 1.25 NA 1.5
Problem Solving 5
Basic Electrical
CO105 2.66 2.33 1 1.33 1.33 - - - 2 0.33 - -
Engineering
Engineering
CO106 2 1 1 - - 0.5 - - 1 1 - 2
Physics Lab
Engineering
CO106 1.66 1.66 - 1 - - 0.66 - 1 2 - -
Chemistry Lab
CO107 Language Lab - 1 - - - 1 - - 3 3 - 1
Computer 0.6
CO108 1.67 1.33 1.67 0.33 0.67 1 NA NA 1 0.67 NA
Programming Lab 7
Engineering 3 2 1 - 1.25 1 2 - 3 2 - 1
MA- Mathematics-II
102
Communication - 1 2 - - 1 - - 3 3 - 1
HU- Skills
101
Computer 3 2 2 - 2 2 2 - - 2 - 2
ME- Aided Machine
104 Drawing
Average
Attainment
1.5 1.8
2.25 2 1.40 1.40 1.50 0.93 1.41 1.25 9 1.70 1.25 1.12
Table B.8.5.1(c) PO Attainment of Sem. II (2017-18)
105 Basic EE 2.8 2.6 2 2 1.4 1.2 1.2 - 1.8 1 1.4 2.2
AverageAttainment
2.7 2.21 1.46 1.03 1.6 1.83 1.53 2 1.51 1.34 0.97 1.57
Table B.8.5.1(d) PO Attainment of Sem.I (2015-16,2016-17,2017-18)
206 FOC 2.75 1.5 1.5 1.2 1.2 1 1.25 - 1.7 1.2 - 1.2
5 5 5 5 5
209 CP Lab 2.7 1.5 1 1.2 1.2 1 1.2 - 1.7 1.2 - 1.2
211 CT Lab - - 1 - - 1 - 1 3 3 - 1
Average Attainment
1.2 1.7 1.4 1.1 2.1 1.7
2.71 1.83 1.5 9 5 6 1.74 6 9 8 1 1.4
Table B.8.5.1(e) PO Attainment of Sem.I (2015-16,2016-17,2017-18)
8.5.2. Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of relevant POs (5)
(The attainment levels by direct (student performance) are to be presented through Program level
Course-PO matrix as indicated)
PO Attainment Levels and Actions for improvement – CAY only – Mention for relevant Pos
PO Attainment Levels and Actions for improvement – CAY (m1) only – Mention for relevant
Pos
(2017-2018)
Action 1: More activities involving designing solutions like Hackathon are initiated in the campus.
Action 2: Students are motivated to improve their participation in technical/social/extra-curricular activities.
PO4: Conduct investigations of complex problems:
PO4: 51.58 46.91 Observations :
Few activities related to understanding of complex
problems and its investigation.
Action 1: The students are motivated to be a part of social groups like Soch, Suhasini, Aashayein, Zarurat available at
Institute.
Action 2: These groups encouraged students to take part in Swachch Bharat drives, Blood Donation Camps, Village visits,
voluntary teaching and mentoring of downtrodden children.
PO7: Environment and sustainability:
PO7 54.66 48.79 Observations :
Less awareness of students about the issues related
to global and environmental sustainability.
Action 1: Students are encouraged to indulge in projects in which global and environmental issues are improved.
Action 2: The activities like Tree Plantation Drive and Cleanliness Drive are organized to instill in them the responsibility
towards environment.
Action 3: The students were mentored to practice rain water harvesting, water conservation and waste recycling at the
individual level.
PO8: Ethics:
PO8 14.27 10.99 Observations:
The students were reluctant to bear upon a
responsibility in the competitive activities.
Moreover, some of the students were found to be
casual in their conduct.
Action 1: As far as professional conduct and behavior is concerned the students are made to attend anti- ragging seminars,
interactive talks on personal conduct and behavior with eminent advisors in the college.
Action 2: The college has a well- established spiritual cell which encourages students to experience professional life with high
moral conduct and spirituality.
PO9: Individual and team work:
PO9 69 63.07 Observations:
Classroom teaching does not provide environment
for team work, whereas student can show his/her
working as a team member or team leader during
Action 1: The students are mentored and encouraged by the faculty to participate in group activities and lead the group as a
responsible leader. The group activities included Hackathon, Fun activities at college fest, Model United Nations etc.
Action 2: The activities like Group discussions, quizzes etc., technical events like J- Techtrix, JECRC Hackathon etc. and
volunteering and coordinating for various events in annual fest Renaissance.
PO10: Communication:
PO10 49.94 40.27 Observations:
The students are found to be hesitant in public
speaking and express their opinion.
Action 1: In order to address this issue, the group of students are asked to prepare and give power point presentations on the
topics within the curriculum as well as the beyond the curriculum.
Action 2: They are encouraged to participate in house and inter-college competitions to enhance their communication skills.
PO11: Project management and finance:
PO11 NA NA Observations:
I Year students are not involved in project
management and finance, but they can learn the
basics by participating in other activities organized
in college.
Action 1: Annual Project exhibition is organized in the college where I year students participate learn the basics of project
handling and finance.
PO12: Life-long learning:
PO12 33.05 25.18 Observations :
The students are ignorant about the significance of
the subject in broader context of life.
Action 1: Lecture content includes applications and advances in subject knowledge of new techniques.
Action 2: Students are mentored to work for better achievement forever.
Action 3: Students are motivated to improve their participation in technical/social/extra-curricular activities.
Table B.8.5.2a PO Attainment Levels and Actions for improvement for 2017-18
2017-18
80
70
60
50
20
10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Figure 8.5.2a Attainment of Po’s From I Year Courses in the year 2017-18
(2016-2017)
Action 1: As far as professional conduct and behavior is concerned the students were made to attend anti- ragging seminars,
interactive talks on personal conduct and behavior with eminent advisors in the college.
Action 2: The college has a well- established spiritual cell which encourages students to experience professional life with high
moral conduct and spirituality.
PO9: Individual and team work:
PO9 71.85 62.4 Observations:
Team activities should be included in regular
practice.
Action 2: The team activities like Group discussions, quizzes etc., technical events like J- Techtrix, and volunteering and
coordinating for various events in annual fest Renaissance, MUN.
PO10: Communication:
PO10 52.4 40.19 Observations:
The students are unable to express their views on
public platform.
Action 1: In order to address this issue, the group of students are asked to prepare and give power point presentations on the
topics within the curriculum as well as the beyond the curriculum.
Action 2: They are encouraged to participate various competitions to enhance their communication skills.
PO11: Project management and finance:
PO11 NA NA Observations:
I Year students are not involved in project
management and finance, but they can learn the
basics by participating in other activities organized
in college.
Action 1: Annual Project exhibition is organized in the college where I year students participate learn the basics of project
handling and finance.
Action 1: Lecture content includes applications and advances in subject knowledge of new techniques.
Action 2: Students were mentored to work for better achievement forever.
Action 3: Students were motivated to improve their participation in technical/social/extra-curricular activities.
Table B.8.5.2bPO Attainment Levels and Actions for improvement for 2016-17
2016-17
80
70
60
50
B.Tech I Year (2016-2017) Target
40
B.Tech I Year (2016-2017)
30 Attainment
20
10
Figure 8.5.2b Attainment of Po’s From I Year Courses in the year 2016-17
5. To attain PO6& PO10: Using Innovative teaching methods in class & outside class in
the form of Industrial Visit.
Presentation by students in class
6. To attain PO7: Students are motivated to celebrate Clean & Green Campus Day
and making it a Regular Practice
7. To attain PO8: Social , cultural and moral values are imbibed into them
Criteria 9
STUDENT SUPPORT SYSTEM
(50)
Professional Guidance/Career
advancement
SOCIAL CULTURAL
We have Human Resource & Development cell (HRD), senior advisor and many senior
dignitaries who guide students for their career and placement.
Different interactive sessions for students with senior advisor and other senior member are
organized to motivate and guide them for enhancing career.
HRD
TPO TPO
C) Entrepreneur cell
Entrepreneurship cell is established by institute under the mentorship of Mr.
SiddharthChaturvedi, our College for encouraging and inspiring students for start-ups and
entrepreneur. Various interactive sessions for students with alumni and start-up representative
are organized to know the importance of being an entrepreneur and ways to get financial
assistance to become an entrepreneur.Cell is responsible for:
1. Initiative and Development of Start-ups/Incubations
2 2018 Mumbai
ADITYA JOHARI MBA, NMIMS, Mumbai
3 Sakshi Singhal 2018 M.Tech, NIT Trichi Trichi
For II and III year we have Tutor Guide (TG) who follows instructions given by Class Coordinator
(CC).
Principal
HOD
Class
Coordinator
Tutor Tutor
Guardian Guardian
30 Students 30 Students
There is departmental Examination Committee in which two faculty members are included
for conduction of Internal Examination and Two for External Examination.
Date/Day: 19/08/2017 Time: 11:30am to 12:00 noon Location: CP3 Lab, Block-A,
Saturday JECRC
Speaker: TG Speaker's Designation: AP Attended by: All Students
Attendees:
Meeting started with the welcome of TG by students. Following were the points of meeting:-
S.No. Points
1 TG interacted with all students.
2 Discuss about course coverage.
Attendees:
Meeting started with the welcome of TG by students. Following were the points of meeting:-
The meeting ended up with the thanks of Chair and next round of meeting would be held with prior
notice.
H) Industrial visits are conducted for students so they can practically observe the
environment and activities in Industries.
Year Name of Object of event Date of event
Company
2015-16 Food tech Industry visit 19-9-2015
2016-17 E-infochip Industry visit 19,20-2-2017
2016-17 JMRC Industry visit 17/01/2017
2017-18 Ted x Industry visit 31-8-2017
Table B.9.1j: Industrial visits for students
I) Teams from JECRC participated in 2017 and 2018 Smart India Hackathon (SIH) were
guided by faculty member so they can perform better.
M)Mentor’s Responsibilities:
Take interest in developing student’s career and well-being.
Mentors keep track of their students’ progress and achievements, setting milestones and
acknowledging accomplishments.
Monitor student’s readiness for Personal Interview (including Resume, Dressing sense etc.)
Evaluate Student Progress and Performance in Computer Based Tests. Keep record of his/her
attendance in the preparatory classes and keep the department HOD informed.
Encourage students for attending all the sessions for sure success.
Informing students about the profile of companies coming for recruitment as per information
obtained from placement department.
Engage the Student beyond the Classroom especially for communication practices and
emphasize the importance of communication for sure success.
Keep the department / panel members informed, if any student is not taking his/her sessions
seriously.
Guide student for practical training and project presentation.
Guide students for technical interview.
Guide and Evaluate student for GD for companies requiring GD.
Guide students for General Knowledge about Industries in their domain.
Provide Ethical Guidance
N) No of Students per mentor: around 20
Course
out
Exit Students
comes/Pr
Survey Feedback
ogram
Outcom
Placement
Training
2) Stakeholder Feedback
Employer Content
survey on Beyond
S&W of the
Students program
• Feedback from • Feedback from
Industry Expert Indusry Expert
• Training and • Alumini
Placement • Senior Advisors
Department
Figure 9.2b: Stakeholder Feedback
3) Average Percentage of students who participate: 80% Students were participated in the year of
2017-18
At the end of each semester, students must complete an end-of-semester survey. In this case, students
will be asked questions that examine the effectiveness of the teaching-learning process to help the
student achieve the respective results of the course through the Google form.
4) Corrective measures:
2017-18 2016-17
TableB9.2c: FDP
Conferences are the great way to learn about research and development going on in
respective fields which inspired many students to publish their own research.
It is also a great starting point for those students who want to pursue their career in
research fields.
TableB9.2d:Conferences
D)Technical Workshops/Activities
We conduct a lot of technical events which are competitive. Not only it results in
bigger number of participants but they can also learn a lot more.
These events bring out the competitiveness in our students which is going to be useful
in real world. Due to this, our students were motivated enough to participate in events
launched by big organization Such as NASA.
Our students also participate in techno culture festivals such robotic festivals, see
Olympiad etc.
Based on the Above API report faculty members are given appreciation/advisory
Format for same is mentioned below
6)Indices used for measuring quality of teaching & learning and summary of the index values
for all courses/teachers
Students Attendance Report
MTT Results
University Results
Final Passing Percentages
Placement Record
Student’s performance in National and International conferences
Student’s performance in Technical Workshops
Student’s participation in Intra and Inter college competitions
(a) Internship
(b) Project Workshop for Students
(c) Industrial Visits
(d) Students specific Training
9. Cyberops 15-May-2018
5. CADD Centre: As Asia's biggest network of CAD training centers, CADD Centre Training
Services is the training arm of the 30 year old CADD Centre Group, head quartered at Chennai,
India. They being the only company in India to offer an end-to-end solution to CAD users
specializes in Computer Aided Design (CAD), Computer Aided Engineering (CAE), and
Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM) with our wings spread across the globe.
6. Forsk Technologies: Forsk Technology offer project based learning in IoT (Internet of Things)
and Machine Learning (Data Science). Future courses will be offered based on industry
requirement and/or student/faculty feedback. These future courses will be on emerging
technologies.
8. Salesforce Technologies Ltd.: Salesforce is the primary enterprise offering within the Salesforce
platform. It provides companies with an interface for case management and task management,
and a system for automatically routing and escalating important events. The Salesforce customer
portal provides customers the ability to track their own cases, includes a social networking plug-
inthat enables the user to join the conversation about their company on social networking
websites, provides analytical tools and other services including email alert, Google search, and
access to customers' entitlement and contracts.
10. SIEMENS Ltd. With a focus on electrification, automation and digitalization, Siemens India
stands for engineering excellence, innovation, and reliability. As one of the world’s biggest
producers of energy-efficient, resource-saving technologies, Siemens is a pioneer in
infrastructure and energy solutions, as well as automation and software for industry. The
company is also a leader in medical imaging equipment, laboratory diagnostics, and clinical IT.
Siemens also provides business-to-business financial solutions, rail automation and wind power
solutions.
Figure 9.2i: Forks Technology Figure 9.2j: RED Hat Linux Training
1)Different feedback collection: Institute has different kind of feedback collection process
collected by students and faculties.
A) Course Feedback:
Meeting arrange by all Class Coordinator with the student.
All issue regarding course or syllabus are discuss (Within 15 days)
A feedback form share with student.
All Data are collected.
Sample of Feedback form by the Departments
1. Course feedback form
C)Lab Feedback:
Meeting arrange by all Class Coordinator with the student.
Meeting arranges By HoD with the Lab In charge.
All issue regarding Lab discuss Like Maintains ,requirement and set up of lab (Within 30days)
A feedback regarding lab also taken.
All Data are collected.
G)Hostel Feedback:
We have system in which faculty stay and visit hostel. Faculty discuss about various services
and facilities provided in hostel
Feedbacks given by students are subject to discuss with the hostel wardens or in-charges resp.
H) Cleanliness feedback:
Soch Initiative (Soch –Coordinator)
SWACHCHH JECRC
SOCH-KUCHH KAR DIKHAANE KI, keeping this motto in mind, the Team Soch of
JECRC stepped an extra mile to realize the dream project of the H’ble Prime Minister Sh.
Narendra Modi, Swachchh Bharat Abhiyan, by launching an innovative digitally
enabled campaign SWACHCHH JECRC. This campaign was aimed to contributing to
the society in terms of cleaning the JECRC campus through the QR code. This campaign
changed the whole idea of cleanliness. Never did anyone think that cleanliness could be
monitored digitally.In this campaign, a special QR code was designed by the technically
advanced students of JECRC and put on the posters, dustbins, all over the campus, to
expedite the cleanliness drive, which could be accessed through any smartphone,
prompting to fill a google form for complaining against any negligence in cleanliness or
giving any suggestions regarding the misplacement of the dustbins, areas not cleaned etc.
for example.The following link can be used for filling the form:
https://goo.gl/EAnOqd
For any trash, smeared environment, a complaint can be filed by scanning the QR code. By scanning
the QR code, a dialog box pops up on the screen which leads us directly to the complaint form. The
data filled in the form reaches our supervisors and a response is given within 24 hours.
We get about 10 to 20 number of complaints every day and making it a count of 375 till date which
is really astonishing.
In this changing era of digitalization, this innovative SWACCH JECRC campaign has done a great
work.
S.No In charge
1 HOD All CC
2 TPO All Mentor
3 CC All Student
4 Lab in charge All Lab technician
5 Mentor All student
6 CAO Block in charge
Departmental in charge
Table B.9.3c: In charge List
Agenda of Meeting:
To discuss the departmental facilities.
Attendees:
Meeting started with the welcome of CC by all students. Following were the points of meeting:-
S.No. Points
1 CC interacted with allstudents.
2 Discuses alldepartmental facility.
2. All students gave different idea regarding the topic.
3. The few common points came out to fill up the feedback.
The meeting ended up with the thanks of Chair and next round of meeting would be held with prior notice.
Agenda of Meeting:
To discuss the regarding course converge
Attendees:
Meeting started with the welcome of HOD, CSE by all CSE faculties. Following were the points of
meeting:-
S.No. Points
1 HOD interacted with departmental faculty regarding course converge of the subject.
2 All faculties gave different idea regarding the topic.
2. The few common points came out like Fill up Feedback regarding course converge.
3. Some faculties were assigned to design the feedback form according to their thoughts and they
were told to inform students also for this work and can take their views as well.
The meeting ended up with the thanks of Chair and next round of meeting would be held with pre
notice, meanwhile those faculties who have given assignment were ask to meet HOD after two days.
1) Self-Learning
For self-learning or learning beyond syllabus during the semesters we provide information sharing
material and organize different types of activities like workshop, training, conferences, club
activities, quiz etc. For these activities academic calendar has sufficient provisions and HOD is
authorized to change in schedule with permission of respective authorities.
1.Internet
Technical
2.Two-Tier Industry Oriented Social Activity
Advancement
library
1. 2-tier Library System Faculties & The institute has the effective 2-tier Library
Students System both at Institute and the Departmental level
2 Availability of Faculties & The project lab is equipped with internet facility
Internet facility in Students and at any time internet can be made available in
All labs. all the labs.
3 GATE Classes Lectures on specific topics are delivered for the
VIIsem students of final year as part of GATE Preparation
students and online exam for updation of Academic
preparation.
4 Moocs like Swayam Faculties & SWAYAM is a program initiated by Government
Students of India, the objective of this effort is to take the
best teaching learning resources to all.
5 Webinars Faculties & Webinars are opportunity for professional
Students development of students and faculty provided on
specific topic.
6 Personality VII Creativity, lateral thinking and communication /
Development people management skills are essential
lectures Components for progress in any sphere. Students
are encouraged to develop these
through goal setting exercises, group
discussions, mock interviews and
Presentations.
11 International Faculties & For sharing new ideas and innovation common
/national Students platform is provided.
Conferences
12 FDP’s Faculty & Development of faculties.
Technical
staff
13 Social activities: All Students All round development essentially means
(A) Zarurat intellectual, physical, moral, sensible and social
(B) Soch development.
(C) AASHAYEI
N
(D) Suhasini
14 Spiritual Training Faculties & For help in increasing mental capacity to focus
Students better
Table B.9.4a: Availability of Facility, Materials and Scope for Learning beyond Syllabus
B)Information Sharing:
Internet and two-tier library are the two information sharing facilities that we have at our institute.
Library
Our library has over two thousand books related to non-engineering genre. Where students
can learn about the daily life, become better at decision making and learn about self-
development.
We also have books for competitive exams like GATE, CAT, and other government
conducted tests.
Library also possesses number of reference books for better development.
Internet
Internet is the best way to see, experience and learn about new things.
Our institute has dedicated 12 Mbps lease line with 100% uptime.
Students are also given special access to registered websites where they can read about latest
research, development and other developments going on in respective field. (eg. – IEEE,
Research GATE)
All the labs are equipped with Internet connections, which makes it easier to connect to the
up to date and latest technology of respective field
Licensed
S.No. Name of Lab No. of PC's Configuration Software
Yes/No
Intel H61 Chipset, Intel Corei-3, 2100, 3.1Ghz, 3M Cache, Ubuntu, Windows
2x2 GB DDR3 Ram, 1333 Mhz, 320 GB SATA 3.0 Gbps,
XP, Java, Turbo
1 CP-1 32 7200, DVD RW, HCL USB Heavy duty Keyboard, HCL USB 2 Yes
button Optical Mouse, HCL Digital Colour TFT-LED
C++, , Acrobat
Monitor 18.5", uATX (Dasher) reader, Winrar
Intel H61 Chipset, Intel Corei-3, 2100, 3.1Ghz, 3M Cache, Ubuntu, Windo, ,
2x2 GB DDR3 Ram, 1333 Mhz, 320 GB SATA 3.0 Gbps,
Acrobat reader,
2 CP-2 28 7200, DVD RW, HCL USB Heavy duty Keyboard, HCL USB 2 Yes
button Optical Mouse, HCL Digital Colour TFT-LED
Winrarws XP, Java,
Monitor 18.5", uATX (Dasher) Turbo C++
Ubuntu, Windows
HCL 18.5" LED,Intel Core i3-3220 3.30 Ghz, Intel H61
XP, Java, gcc,
3 CP-3 28 Chipset,320 GB SATA, 2X2 DDR3 RAM, 10/100/1000 Lan, Yes
DVD RW Model Sim, Acrobat
reader, Winrar
Windows XP,
HCL 18.5" LED,Intel Core i3-3220 3.30 Ghz, Intel H61
Oracle 10g, My Sql ,
4 CP-4 28 Chipset,320 GB SATA, 2X2 DDR3 RAM, 10/100/1000 Lan, Yes
DVD RW Acrobat reader,
Winrar
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz (4 CPUs), Windows 8, MS
3.1GHz, DH61WW MB, NVIDIA GeForce 210 Graphics
office Professonla,
5 CP-5 10 Card, 8 GB DDR3 RAM, Segate HDD 500 GB SATA, Logitech Yes
USB MM KB, Logitech USB Mouse, LG DVD RW, Samsung
Acrobat reader,
SA-300 19.5" LED Winrar
Ubuntu, Windows
HCL PIV 3.0 HT, 512 DDRII, HDD80, 17" TFT, HCL USB XP, Java, Turbo
6 CP-6 28 Yes
Keyboard, HCL USB Mouse, Asus 865/915 MB C++, , Acrobat
reader, Winrar
Ubuntu, Windows
XP, Java, gcc,
HCL PIV 3.0 HT, 512 DDRII, HDD80, 17" TFT, HCL USB
7 CP-7 28 Model Sim, Xiline, , Yes
Keyboard, HCL USB Mouse, Asus 865/915 MB
Acrobat reader,
Winrar
Intel H61 Chipset, Intel Corei-3, 2100, 3.1Ghz, 3M Cache, Windows XP,
2x2 GB DDR3 Ram, 1333 Mhz, 320 GB SATA 3.0 Gbps,
Oracle 10g, My Sql ,
8 CP-8 28 7200, DVD RW, HCL USB Heavy duty Keyboard, HCL USB 2 Yes
button Optical Mouse, HCL Digital Colour TFT-LED
Acrobat reader,
Monitor 18.5", uATX (Dasher) Winrar
HCL Dual-core [email protected], G-41 Intel Chipset MB, Windows XP, Java,
2GB DDR3 RAM, SATA 160 GB HDD, DVD RW, HCL MM PS 2
9 IBM Lab 64 Acrobat reader, Yes
KB, HCL USB OPTICAL Mouse, HCL 18.5" wide LCD with
speaker Winrar
Intel H61 Chipset, Intel Corei-3, 2100, 3.1Ghz, 3M Cache,
2x2 GB DDR3 Ram, 1333 Mhz, 320 GB SATA 3.0 Gbps, Windows XP, Java,
10 Robotics Lab 9 7200, DVD RW, HCL USB Heavy duty Keyboard, HCL USB 2 Acrobat reader, Yes
button Optical Mouse, HCL Digital Colour TFT-LED Winrar
Monitor 18.5", uATX (Dasher)
C)Skill Development:
For the overall development of the students, we focus on technical aspects and personality
improvement. Which not only makes them a better student, they are also being prepared for future
obstacles both on education level and personal level.
Technical Advancements
We provide GATE examination preparation to our students. Which helps them with both
better placements in Govt. PSUs and for those who are interested in higher studies? Due to
this program our no.of students are getting into prominent institutes for higher studies and
some of them have also been selected for govt jobs.
JAIPUR ENGINEERING COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
VALID SCORE CARD DETAILS & ENTREPRENEUR DETAILS 2017-2018
NUMB
ER OF
CANDI
ALL DATE
INDIA APPEA
GATE/GR MARK RANK RED IN
SECT E/GMAT REGISTRATION GATE/OTHE OUT OF IN THIS THIS
S. NO SEMESTER
ION NAME etc NUMBER R SCORE 100 PAPER PAPER
1 8 A Apurvi Mansinghka GATE CS18S33042312 374 27 11021 107893
2 8 A Akshay vijayvargiyaGATE CS18S33041234 350 25 13185 107893
3 8 A Amandeep Goyal GATE CS18S33041870 588 45 1893 107893
4 8 A Ekansh Kushwah GATE CS18S33042445 382 27.67 10374 107893
5 8 A Anushree Jain GATE CS18S33045020 469 35 5255 107893
6 8 A Kapil Khandelwal GATE CS18S33045219 624 48 1349 107893
7 8 A Divaker Soni GATE CS18S33041355 322 22.67 16475 107893
8 8 B Rohit Mathur GATE CS18S33043062 441 32.67 6564 107893
9 8 B Rohit Kumar Gupta GATE CS18S33045027 374 27 11021 107893
10 8 B Mayank Prasad GATE CS18S33042125 413 30.33 8122 107893
11 8 B Sakshi Singhal GATE CS18S33045098 517 39 3493 107893
12 8 B Prakhar Garg GATE CS18S33041394 362 26 12049 107893
13 8 B Nikhil Gupta GATE CS18S33042441 394 28.67 9458 107893
MOHIT
14 8 B KUMAWAT GATE CS18S33045207 441 32.67 6564 107893
15 8 C VINOD KUMAR GATE CS18S33042335 334 23.67 14969 107893
16 8 C SURYANSHI ADANIYA GATE CS18S33041846 330 23.33 15462 107893
17 8 C YASH VIJAY GATE CS18S33042270 350 25 13185 107893
18 8 B Sakshi Garg IELTS 7
19 8 C Sakshi Gupta CAT 90.40%
1 8 B SHIVANSH SHARMA Entrpreneur- Apparel distribution company .
Table B.9.4f: GATE Details
We also conduct mock tests, online tests and quizzes to prepare our students for better
performance which makes it easier for the student to perform and crack those competitive
exams.
In the Digital India, Moocs are the best way to learn a new skill which is the easier way to
Swayam
Registration No. of courses
Name (Y/N) registered Name of Courses registered
Hemlata Soni Y 3 DSA, Prog. in C and Intro to Research
AAKANKSHA JAIN Y 2 Programming data structures and algorithms using Python, Object oriented analysis and design
AAKANKSHA SHARMA Y 2 cloud computing, OOPs
ABHILASH KUMAR TIWARI Y 2 DSA,C plus plus
ABHIMANYU SINGH RATHORE Y 1 OOPs
ABHINAV SONI Y 4 DSA, Prog. in c ++, introduction to programming in c, oops
ABHISHEK AGARWAL Y 1 OOPs
ABHISHEK GARG Y 1 OOPs
ABHISHEK JAIN Y 1 OOPs
ABHISHEK KHANDELWAL Y 1 OOPs
ABHISHEK MOHATA Y 1 OOPs
ABHISHEK PAL SINGH JADON Y 1 OOP
ABHISHEK SHARMA Y 1 OOPs
ADITYA AGARWAL Y 2 data structures and file management, programming in CPP
ADITYA KAUSHIK Y 1 OOPs
ADITYA VYAS Y 3 DSA, prog. in CPP , prog. in C ,
AKASH JAIN Y 2 cloud computing, OOPs
AKASH LAKHERA Y 1 OOPs
AKSHAY GAGRANI Y 1 OOPs
AKSHAY SHARMA Y 4 prog. in c , OOP's , DSA , AI
AKSHAY SHARMA y 3
AKSHITA VIJAY Y 1 OOP's
AMAN BANSAL Y 1 OOPs
AMAN PAREEK Y 1 OOPs
AMAN SRIVASTAV Y 1 OOPs
AMIT KARWA Y 1 OOPs
AMIT MOOLWANI Y 3 Prog. in C , oops, DSA
AMRIT SRIVASTAVA Y 3 Prog. in C,DSA , OOP's
ANEGA MAHESHWARI Y 4 Data Structures & File Management, Introduction to programming in C, Programming in C++, Computer Architecture
ANKIT KUMAR Y 4 Spoken English, C/C++,painting, agriculture
ANKIT RAJ Y 2 Prog. in C, OOPs
ANSHU KUMARI JAIN Y 2 DSA, OOPs
ANTIMA GARG Y 2 prog. in c++, data structures and file management
ANUKRITI PAREEK Y 1 OOPs
APOORVA GUPTA Y 1 OOPs
AROGYA GARG Y 2 DSA,OOPs
ARPIT KUMAR JAIN Y 1 OOPs
ARYAN SHARMA Y 3 DSA,introduction programming in C, programming in C++
ASHISH GUPTA Y 2 DSA,OOPs
ASHISH LAKSHKAR Y 2 DSA,OOPs
ATAVI SHEKHAWAT Y 1 OOPs
AVI BHOOTNA Y 2 DSA, OOPs
YEAR 2017-2018
SEM SECTION NO OF
3 A 69
STUDENTS
3 B 49
3 C 39
4 A 64
4 B 56
4 C 45
5 A 69
5 B 75
5 C 48
Table b.9.4k:no of students attended theses moocs
Year Faculty
2015-2016 Amit Jalan
VishakhaAlok
Nida Siddique
Rajdeep Yadav
Vishal Kumar
Yakshani Arya
Ajinkyachopde
Umang Pathak
Naveen.
Kammela Sai Kishor
BabuS.Somasekhar
Ankit Nagar
Narinder Kaur
Vindhya
Divyanshu Srivastava
Paresh Kothari
Jasvinder Singh
Kumar Aakash
2016-2017 S Somasekhar
Nida Siddique
Vindhya Singh
Kratika Parikh
Shruti Shreya
Nikhil Pratap Sing
SuyashTyagi
Shivam Bansal
Apurva Sharma
H)Industrial Oriented
Industrial Visits:
Students are getting an insight on how their life going to be and what does it mean to be an
engineer?
Industrial visits are conducted on regular basis which a great way to learn and see things in
action.
Trainings are the big part of our culture. We conduct occasional training camps and seminars
at our institute.
It is a great way to learn and develop a skill which would be useful for real life scenarios and
to become a better engineer.
J)Technical Events:
We conduct a lot of technical events which are competitive. Not only it results in bigger
number of participants but they can also learn a lot more.
These events bring out the competitiveness in our students which is going to be useful in real
world. Due to this, our students were motivated enough to participate in events launched by
big organization Such as NASA.
K)Research Oriented
Conference:
Conferences are the great way to learn about research and development going on in respective
fields, which inspired many students to publish their own research.
It is also a great starting point for those students who want to pursue their career in research
fields.
Social Activity
We have students inclined clubs such as Zarurat, Soch, Aashayein and Suhasini among other.
These clubs collectively called ABHYUDAY.
These clubs are managed by our students which conduct free classes for orphaned children,
poor children. This provides them with sense of charity and doing well for others.
Not only they are learning to be better human beings, they are also setting an example by
helping others.
Spiritual Trainings
We heard so much news about student’s suicides which makes it easier to understand that,
how stressful a student’s life can be.
We have special spiritual area where our students can experience calm, learn to meditate and
HRD
TPO TPO
STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT
3 SIH 2K17 March-April 2017 JECRC was among the only twenty
Organized by eight colleges selected in the country.
MHRD, Govt of
India
4 Interactive Session September 2017 This session conducted by Dr. Sanjeev
Figure 9.5d: Interactive Session with Mr. Sanjeev Ohri and Mr. Nikko Philips
NUMB
ER OF
CANDI
ALL DATE
INDIA APPEA
GATE/GR MARK RANK RED IN
SECT E/GMAT REGISTRATION GATE/OTHE OUT OF IN THIS THIS
S. NO SEMESTER
ION NAME etc NUMBER R SCORE 100 PAPER PAPER
1 8 A Apurvi Mansinghka GATE CS18S33042312 374 27 11021 107893
2 8 A Akshay vijayvargiyaGATE CS18S33041234 350 25 13185 107893
3 8 A Amandeep Goyal GATE CS18S33041870 588 45 1893 107893
4 8 A Ekansh Kushwah GATE CS18S33042445 382 27.67 10374 107893
5 8 A Anushree Jain GATE CS18S33045020 469 35 5255 107893
6 8 A Kapil Khandelwal GATE CS18S33045219 624 48 1349 107893
7 8 A Divaker Soni GATE CS18S33041355 322 22.67 16475 107893
8 8 B Rohit Mathur GATE CS18S33043062 441 32.67 6564 107893
9 8 B Rohit Kumar Gupta GATE CS18S33045027 374 27 11021 107893
10 8 B Mayank Prasad GATE CS18S33042125 413 30.33 8122 107893
11 8 B Sakshi Singhal GATE CS18S33045098 517 39 3493 107893
12 8 B Prakhar Garg GATE CS18S33041394 362 26 12049 107893
13 8 B Nikhil Gupta GATE CS18S33042441 394 28.67 9458 107893
MOHIT
14 8 B KUMAWAT GATE CS18S33045207 441 32.67 6564 107893
15 8 C VINOD KUMAR GATE CS18S33042335 334 23.67 14969 107893
16 8 C SURYANSHI ADANIYA GATE CS18S33041846 330 23.33 15462 107893
17 8 C YASH VIJAY GATE CS18S33042270 350 25 13185 107893
18 8 B Sakshi Garg IELTS 7
19 8 C Sakshi Gupta CAT 90.40%
1 8 B SHIVANSH SHARMA Entrpreneur- Apparel distribution company .
Table B.9.5c: GATE Details
Training in Institute:
Year Name of event Object of event No. of students Date of event
participated
2015-16 Pre Placement Bridging gap 180 12-10-2015
training between To
Program by academics & 14-10-2015
FACE Industry
Minutes of Meeting
Agenda –
1. Formation of CSE-Training &Placement Squad
2. Placement strategy for Un-placed students
3. Task assignment.
Meeting Venue and Date: EDC Conference Room A block at 2:00 O’clock on Saturday, December
09, 2017
Chaired By:
Dr. Vijay Singh Rathore
Attendees
1. The meeting started with motivational triggers connecting the current action with a bigger vision.
2. 12 well trained and placed students of 7th Semester (some listed above) were identified for taking
the action further.
5. Each of these above mentioned strategy is then allotted to the TPC Squad as follows:
a. Competition Based Hiring – Dr. Sanjay Gaur will coordinate with Dr.NeelamChaplot.
b. Companies lined up by HR Team- Ms. Priyanka Mitra will coordinate with HR.
c. Identification of Personal Contacts – Ms. NilamChoudhary will gather the possible contacts
from other faculty members of the Department.
d. Establishing Contact with JECRC Alumni – Ms. ShikhaMaheshwari will be responsible for
contacting them.
e. Mr. Abhishek Dixit, TPO-CSE will also be responsible for bridging the gap between HR and
Departmental team, if any.
6. It has been decided the student allotment will be completed by December 11, 2017 with the help
of existing mentors.
7. The meeting ended with a clear understanding of the vision and assignment to be carried out for
achieving the same.
Copy To:
All Concerned
D)Entrepreneurship
Institute has a cell which improves entrepreneurship development skills in students by doing
activities such as seminars, workshops and awareness camps. (Entrepreneurship and
incubation).
To improve Entrepreneurship skills in students.
Cell conducts many workshops and awareness camps for students.
Cell has incubation centre and associated with start-ups.
Cell schedules interactions with alumni start-ups.
Government job cell was established in our institute in the year 2016 to prepare students towards
different competitive examination. In this cell we encourage and inspire students for competitive
examination by doing activities like interactive sessions with central government head, NBS head.
S.No. Name of Event Date Description
1 Interactive Session October 2015 An interactive session
with Major Gen.
NBS by G. D. Bakshi Dr.G. D. Bakshi was
organized for students
in October 2015.
2 Interactive November 2015 An interactive session
Sessionwith with the "Metal King
the "Metal King of of India", Mr. Anil
India" Agarwal, Chairman,
Vedanta Resources
Plc.
3 Interactive Session February 2017 An interactive session
By MHRD, with Sh. Anil Swarup,
Government of India Secretary, (SE & L),
MHRD, Government
of India was
organized for students
of JECRC.
Figure 9.5j: Interactive session with Metal king Sh. Anil Agarwal
F)Industry Visit: We schedule industry visits for students so they can see and learn technologies in
industry also observe professional environment in industry. It helps to bridge gap between industry
and academics. Students learn about latest platforms to be work upon.
2 JRBL 2016-17
3 E-infochip 2016-17
G) All round development:Many technical events like conferences and workshops are organized in
the institute to improve and present technical skills of students.
National level competition for students like Smart India Hackathon was held in institute.
To prepare teams a faculty guide was assigned to a particular team and an intra college
competition like JECRC hackathon was organized to check, improve technical skills level of
shortlisted teams.
15 Expert Talk November An invited talk by prof. Peter Kent &Prof. David
Organized by CSE 2017 Wing, CEO UKE was organized by CSE
department department
16 Sales force Training 2018 Students were trained on modules of Trailhead
17 Interactive Session 2018 Conducted by Dr. Niko Philips, Oxford College
Organized by CSE
department
19 ICETEAS-2018 February ICETEAS was organized at JECRC
2018
20 J-Techtrix 3rd th
17 March JECRC’s student project exhibition.
Edition 2018
An Exhibition
21 SIH-2K18 30th -31st JECRC was among the only twenty eight
(Smart India March 2018 colleges selected in the country.
Hackathon)
organized by
MHRD, Govt. of
India
Table9.5g: Name of Event
C) Students Selected for Educational Tour to Silicon Valley, USA by Rajasthan Government
B) Interactive sessions with industry experts are organized to increase understanding between
students and industry requirements.
Year Session name Date of session
2015-16 Seminar on networking 7-10-2015
2016-17 International Workshop on Open Source Software, Drupal 10-9-2016
2017-18 Start-up Oasis, Jaipur 29,31-8-2017
Table B.9.7b: Session Name
C) Industrial visits are conducted for students so they can practically observe the environment
and activities in Industries.
Year Name of place Object of event Date of event
2015-16 Food tech Industry visit 19-9-2015
2016-17 E-eInfochip Industry visit 19,20-2-2017
2017-18 Ted x Industry visit 31-8-2017
Table B.9.7c: Nameof Place
D) Each team who participated in 2017 and 2018 SIH held at JECRC was guided by assigned
faculty member so they can perform better.
Year No. of students No. of teams
participated
2016-17 12 2
2017-18 30 5
Figure 9.7a: Mr. Abhishek Bachchan and the Jaipur Pink Panther’s team were in JECRC 2015-2016
CRITERION 10
WOMEN CELL
Library
10.2. Budget Allocation, Utilization, and Public Accounting at Institute level Summary of
current financial year’s budget and actual expenditure incurred (for the institution exclusively)
in the three previous financial years.
10.4.2. Internet
PROGRAM OUTCOMES
PSO1: Ability to interpret and analyze network specific and cyber security issues in real world
environment.
PSO2: Ability to design and develop mobile and web-based applications under realistic
constraints.