Cse Sar PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 588

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

JAIPUR ENGINEERING COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE

SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT (SAR) FORMAT

UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING PROGRAMS (TIER-II)

FIRST TIME ACCREDITATION


(Applicable for all the programs, except those granted full accreditation for 5 years as per Jan 2013 Manual)

NBCC Place, 4th Floor East Tower, Bhisham Pitamah Marg,


Pragati Vihar New Delhi 110003
P: +91(11)24360620-22, 24360654
Fax: +91(11) 24360682
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.nbaind.org
(December, 2015)

Self Assessment Report Page 1


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
SAR Contents

Serial Code & Link to the Page


Item
Item No.

PART A Institutional Information 3

PART B Computer Science and Engineering 12


Criteria Summary
Program Level Criteria

1 Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives 14

Program Curriculum and Teaching – Learning


2 35
Processes

3 Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes 105

4 Students’ Performance 125

5 Faculty Information and Contributions 182

6 Facilities and Technical Support 216

7 Continuous Improvement 252

Institute Level Criteria

First Year AcademicsComputer Science and


8 282
Engineering

9 Student Support Systems 325

Governance, Institutional Support and Financial


10 434
Resources

PART C Declaration by the Institution 585


Program Computer Science and Engineering
Annexure-I Outcomes(POs)& Program Specific 586
Outcomes(PSOs)

Self Assessment Report Page 2


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Part A: Institutional Information

1. Name and Address : Jaipur Engineering College and Research Centre, Jaipur
of the Institution Shri Ram Ki Nangal, Via Sitapura, RIICO, OPP. EPIP Gate,
Tonk Road, Jaipur 302022

2. Name and Address : Rajasthan Technical University, Kota


of the Affiliating University Akelgarh Rawatbhata Road, Kota 324010

3. Year of establishment : 2000


of the Institution

4. Type of Institution:

University

Deemed University

Government Aided

Autonomous

Affiliated Yes
5. Ownership Status:

Central Government

State Government

Government Aided

Self Financing Yes

Trust

Society

Section 25 Company

Any Other (Please Specity)

Self Assessment Report Page 3


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
6. Other Academic Institutions of the Trust/Society /Company etc., if any

Name of the Year of Programs of Study Location


Institutions (S) Establishment
Establishment CE, CSE, ECE, IT, ME
JECRC UDML
2007
College of Kukas, Jaipur
Year of Closure
Engineering
2014
School of Engineering,
School of Law, School of
Design, School of Hotel Goner Road,
JECRC University 2012 Management, School of Ramchandrapura,
Management, School of Jaipur
Science and Humanities.
Table A.6: List of Trust/Society

7. Details of all the programs being offered by the Institution Under Consideration:
1st Shift
Increa
Year
se
S. of AICTE Accreditation
Program Name (B.Tech) Year Intake Intake
No Increa approval Status
, if
se
any
Electrical Engineering-60
Electronics & Communication
1 Engineering-60
2000 180 - - 13.07.2000 -

Computer Science and Engineering-60

Electrical Engineering-60
Electronics & Communication
2 Engineering-60 2001 240 IT-60 2001 14.06.2001 -
Computer Science and Engineering-60

Information Technology-60

Electrical Engineering-60
Electronics & Communication
Biote
Engineering-60
ch-30
3 Computer Science and Engineering-90 2002 300 CSE-
2002 20.06.2002 -

Information Technology-60 90

Biotech-30

Electrical Engineering-60
ME-
4 Electronics & Communication 2003 360 60
2003 12.05.2003 -
Engineering-60

Self Assessment Report Page 4


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Computer Science and Engineering-90

Information Technology-60

Biotech-30

Mechanical Engineering-60

Electrical Engineering-60
Electronics & Communication
Engineering-90 ECE-
Computer Science and Engineering-120 30
5 2004 420 CSE-
2004 25.06.2004 -
Information Technology-60
30
Biotech-30

Mechanical Engineering-60

Electrical Engineering-60
Electronics & Communication
Engineering-90
Computer Science and Engineering-120
6 2005 420 - - 27.06.2005 -
Information Technology-60

Biotech-30

Mechanical Engineering-60

Electrical Engineering-60
Electronics & Communication
Engineering-90
Computer Science and Engineering-120
7 2006 420 - - 20.06.2006 -
Information Technology-60

Biotech-30

Mechanical Engineering-60

Electrical Engineering-60
Electronics & Communication
Engineering-90
Computer Science and Engineering-120
8 2007 420 - - 21.05.2007 -
Information Technology-60

Biotech-30

Mechanical Engineering-60

9 Electrical Engineering-30 2008 420 ECE- - 22.07.2008 -

Self Assessment Report Page 5


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Electronics & Communication 30
Engineering-120 IT-30
Computer Science and Engineering-120 Decr
ease-
Information Technology-90 EE-
30
Mechanical Engineering-60 Biote
ch-30
Civil Engineering-60

Electrical Engineering-60 EE-


Electronics & Communication 30 2 Branch
Engineering-120 ME- (CSE &
10 2009 540 30
2009 23.08.2010 ECE) dated
Computer Science and Engineering-120
CE- 02.03.2009
Information Technology-90 60

Mechanical Engineering-90

Civil Engineering-60

Electrical Engineering-60
Electronics & Communication 2 Branch
Engineering-120 (CSE &
11 2010 540 - - 23.08.2010
ECE) dated
Computer Science and Engineering-120
02.03.2009
Information Technology-90

Mechanical Engineering-90

Civil Engineering-60

Electrical Engineering-60
Electronics & Communication 2 Branch
Engineering-180 ECE- (CSE &
12 2011 600 60
2011 01.09.2011 ECE) dated
Computer Science and Engineering-120
02.03.2009
Information Technology-90

Mechanical Engineering-90

Civil Engineering-120

Electrical Engineering-60 CE-


60
Electronics & Communication
ECE-
13 Engineering-240 2012 750 60
2012 10.05.2012 -
ME-
Computer Science and Engineering-120 30
Information Technology-90

Self Assessment Report Page 6


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Mechanical Engineering-120

Civil Engineering-120

Electrical Engineering-120
Electronics & Communication EE-
Engineering-240 60
14 2013 870 CSE-
2013 19.03.2013 -
Computer Science and Engineering-180
60
Information Technology-90

Mechanical Engineering-120

Civil Engineering-120

Electrical Engineering-120
Electronics & Communication
15 Engineering-240 2014 870 - - 02.07.2014 -
Computer Science and Engineering-180

Information Technology-90

Mechanical Engineering-120

Civil Engineering-120

Electrical Engineering-120
Electronics & Communication
16 Engineering-240 2015 870 - - 07.04.2015 -
Computer Science and Engineering-180

Information Technology-90

Mechanical Engineering-120

Civil Engineering-120

Electrical Engineering-120
Electronics & Communication
17 Engineering-240 2016 870 - - 05.04.2016 -
Computer Science and Engineering-180

Information Technology-90

Mechanical Engineering-120

Civil Engineering-120

Electrical Engineering-120
18 Electronics & Communication 2017 870 - - 30.03.2017 -
Engineering-240
Computer Science and Engineering-180

Self Assessment Report Page 7


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Information Technology-90

Mechanical Engineering-120

Civil Engineering-120
CSE, ME,
Electrical Engineering-120
ECEare
Electronics & Communication Eligible and
Engineering-240 applying 1st
19 2018 870 - - 04.04.2018
time. CE,
Computer Science and Engineering-180
EE ,IT-
Information Technology-90 Eligible but
not applied
Mechanical Engineering-120

Table A.7a:1st Shift Intake

2ndShift
S. Year Intake Increase Year of AICTE Accreditation
No Program Name (B.Tech) of Intake, Increase approval
Start if any

1 Mechanical Engineering-60 2012 60 - - 10.05.2012 -


Computer Science and
2 Engineering-60 2013 120 60 2013 19.03.2013 -
Mechanical Engineering-60
Computer Science and
3 Engineering-60 2014 120 - - 02.07.2014 -
Mechanical Engineering-60
Computer Science and
4 Engineering-60 2015 120 - - 07.04.2015 -
Mechanical Engineering-60
Computer Science and
5 Engineering-60 2016 120 - - 05.04.2016 -
Mechanical Engineering-60
Computer Science and
6 Engineering-60 2017 120 - - 30.03.2017 -
Mechanical Engineering-60
Computer Science and CS &ME-
7 Engineering-60 2018 120 - - 04.04.2018 Eligible but
Mechanical Engineering-60 not applied
Table A.7b:2nd Shift Intake

Self Assessment Report Page 8


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Write Applicable One:
 Applying first time
 Granted Provisional Accreditation for two/three years for the period (specify period)
 Granted accreditation for 5/6 years for the period (specify period)
 No accredited (Specify visit dates, year)
 Withdrawn (Specify vision dates, year)
 Not eligible for accreditation
 Eligible but not applied

8. Program to be Considered for Accreditation vide this application:


S. No Program name
1 Computer Science and Engineering
2 Electronics & Communication Engineering
3 Mechanical Engineering
Table A.8: List of Accreditation vide Application

9. Total Number of employees in the Institution:


A. Regular* Employee (Faculty and Staff)

Items CAY P1 CAY CAYm1 CAYm2


(2018-19)
No of Min Max Min Max Min Max
Faculty
Faculty in Engineering M 122 120 132 114 129 102 117
F 58 57 71 56 61 39 61
Faculty in Math, Science M 10 9 14 13 17 15 17
& Humanities
F 18 20 25 24 29 21 28
Non-Teaching Staff M 111 91 106 87 100 81 93
F 13 12 14 12 13 9 12

Table A.9a: Regular* Employee (Faculty and Staff)

Self Assessment Report Page 9


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

A. Contractual Staff Employees (Faculty and Staff): (Non Covered in Table A)

Items CAY P1 CAY CAYm1 CAYm2


(2018-19)
No of Min Ma Min Max Min Max
Faculty x
Faculty in Engineering M 0 7 7 7 7 6 6
F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Faculty in Math, M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Science & Humanities F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Non-Teaching Staff M 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table A.9b:Contractual Staff Employees (Faculty and Staff)

10. Total Number of Engineering Students:


Item CAY P1 CAY CAYm1 CAYm2
(2018-19)
Total No. of boys 3312 3457 3499 3410
Total No. of Girls 686 750 811 815
Total No. of Students 3998 4207 4310 4225
Table A.9c: Total Number of Engineering Students

11. Vision of the Institution:

To become a renowned centre of outcome based learning and work toward academic,
professional, cultural and social enrichment of the lives of individuals and communities.

12. Mission of the Institution:

M1:Focus on evaluation of learning outcomes and motivate students to inculcate research


aptitude by project based learning.

M2:Identify, based on informed perception of Indian, regional and global needs,theareas of


focus and provide platform to gain knowledge and solutions.

M3:Offer opportunities for interaction between academia and industry.

M4: Develop human potential to its fullest extent so that intellectually capable and
imaginatively gifted leaders can emerge in a range of professions.

Self Assessment Report Page 10


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

13. Contact Information of the Head of the Institution and NBA Coordinator, If designated:
1. Name : Dr. Vinay Kumar Chandna
2. Designation : Principal
3. Mobile No. : 9891406784
4. Email ID : [email protected]

14. NBA Coordinator, if designated:


1. Name : Mr. Manish Jain
2. Designation : Dy. Director (Special Projects)
3. Mobile No. : 7229823455
4. Email ID : [email protected]

Self Assessment Report Page 11


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
PART B: Criteria Summary

Name of the program: COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING

Criteria
Criteria Mark/Weightage
No.
Program Level Criteria

1. Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives 60

2. Program Curriculum and Teaching – Learning Processes 120

3. Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes 120

4. Students’ Performance 150

5. Faculty Information and Contributions 200

6. Facilities and Technical Support 80

Continuous Improvement
7. 50

Institute Level Criteria


8. 50
First Year Academics
9. Student Support Systems 50

10. Governance, Institutional Support and Financial Resources 120

Total 1000

Self Assessment Report Page 12


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

CRITERION 1
Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives (60)

Self Assessment Report Page 13


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

CRITERION 1 Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives 60

1. VISION, MISSION AND PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES (60)


1.1 State the Vision and Mission of Department and Institute (5)
(Vision statement typically indicates aspirations and Mission Statement states the broad approach to achieve
aspirations)
(Here Institute Vision and Mission statements have been asked to ensure consistency with the department Vision
and Mission statements; the assessment of the Institute Vision and Mission will be taken up in Criterion 10)

VISION OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT


To become renowned centre of excellence in Computer Science and Engineering and make
competent engineers & professionals with high ethical values prepared for lifelong learning.

MISSION OF COMPUTER SCIENCE& ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

M1: To impart outcome based education for emerging technologies in the field of Computer
Science and Engineering.

M2: To provide opportunities for interaction between academia and industry.

M3: To provide platform for lifelong learning by accepting the change in technologies.

M4: To develop aptitude of fulfilling social responsibilities.

VISION OF JAIPUR ENGINEERING COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE

To become a renowned center of outcome based learning and work towards academic,
professional, cultural and social enrichment of the lives of individuals and communities.

MISSION OF JAIPUR ENGINEERING COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE

M1:Focus on evaluation of learning outcomes and motivate students to inculcate research


aptitude by project based learning.

M2:Identify, based on informed perception of Indian, regional and global needs, the areas of
focus and provide platform to gain knowledge and solutions.

M3:Offer opportunities for interaction between academia and industry.

M4: Develop human potential to its fullest extent so that intellectually capable and
imaginatively gifted leaders can emerge in a range of professions.

Self Assessment Report Page 14


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Consistency of Institute Vision with the Department Vision

Departmental Vision To become renowned centre of excellence in


Computer Science and Engineering and make
Institute Vision competent engineers & professionals with high
ethical values prepared for lifelong learning.

To become a renowned center of outcome based


learning and work towards academic,
H
professional, cultural and social enrichment of the
lives of individuals and communities.
Table B.1.1a: Mapping of Institute Vision with Department Vision

Consistency of Institute Mission with the Department Mission

Departmental Mission To impart outcome To provide To provide To develop


based education for opportunities platform for aptitude of
emerging for interaction lifelong fulfilling
technologies in the between learning by social
Institute Mission field of Computer academia and accepting the responsibiliti
Science and industry. change in es
Engineering. technologies
Focus on evaluation of learning
outcomes and motivate students to
H H H M
inculcate research aptitude by project
based learning.
Identify, based on informed perception
of Indian, regional and global needs, the
H H H H
areas of focus and provide platform to
gain knowledge and solutions.
Offer opportunities for interaction
between academia and industry. H H H M

Develop human potential to its fullest


extent so that intellectually capable and
imaginatively gifted leaders can emerge H H H H
in a range of professions.
Table B.1.1b: Mapping of Institute Mission with Department Mission

Self Assessment Report Page 15


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Justification:

The above table shows the consistency of Mission of Institute with Mission of the department.

If all the keywords of Mission of Institute are found consistent with the Mission of the Department
then High (H) is marked. If some of the keywords of Mission of Institute are found moderately
consistent with the Mission of the Department then Medium(M) is marked. If some of the
keywords of Mission of Institute are foundconsistent with the Mission of the Department then Low
(L) is marked.

After taking the feedback from all the faculty members of the department if the consistency found
is above 90% then (H) is marked. If consistency is found between 60-90% then (M) is marked and
if <60% then the particular block is marked Low (L).

Why High:

If () is marked in all blocks i.e. all the keywords of Mission of the Institute are found consistent
with the Mission of the Department so it must be rated high.

Why Medium:

If  is marked in 50% or above blocks i.e. Mission of the Institute is moderately consistent with
the Mission of the Department.

Why Low:

If  is marked in less than 50% i.e. Mission of the Institute is found inconsistent with the Mission
of the Department.

Departmental To impart outcome To provide To provide To


Mission based education for opportunities for platform for develop
emerging interaction lifelong learning aptitude of
Institute
technologies in the between by accepting the fulfilling
Mission M1 field of Computer academia and change in social
Keywords Science and industry. technologies responsibili
Engineering. ties
Evaluation of Learning
  
Outcomes.
Research aptitude and
   
projects
Table B.1.1c: Justification of mapping of Institute Mission M1 with Department Mission

Self Assessment Report Page 16


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Departmental To impart outcome To provide To provide To
Mission based education for opportunities for platform for develop
emerging interaction lifelong learning aptitude of
Institute
technologies in the between by accepting the fulfilling
Mission M2 field of Computer academia and change in social
Keywords Science and industry. technologies responsibili
Engineering. ties
Informed perception of
Indian, regional and global    
needs
Platform to gain
   
knowledge and solutions.
Table B.1.1d: Justification of mapping of Institute Mission M2 with Department Mission

Departmental To impart outcome To provide To provide To


Mission
based education for opportunities for platform for develop
emerging interaction lifelong learning aptitude of
Institute
technologies in the between by accepting the fulfilling
Mission M3 field of Computer academia and change in social
Keywords
Science and industry. technologies responsibili
Engineering. ties
Academic Institute
  
interaction
Interaction Opportunities    
Table B.1.1e: Justification of mapping of Institute Mission M3 with Department Mission

Departmental To impart outcome To provide To provide To


Mission
based education for opportunities for platform for develop
emerging interaction lifelong learning aptitude of
Institute
technologies in the between by accepting the fulfilling
Mission M4 field of Computer academia and change in social
Keywords Science and industry. technologies responsibili
Engineering. ties
Develop human potential
   
to its fullest
Intellectually capable and
   
imaginatively leaders
Table B.1.1f: Justification of mapping of Institute Mission M4 with Department Mission

1.2 State the Program Educational Objectives (PEOs)(5)


(State the PEOs (3 to 5) of program seeking accreditation)

PEO1: To provide students with the fundamentals of engineering sciences with more emphasis
in Computer Science and Engineering by way of analyzing and exploiting engineering
challenges.

Self Assessment Report Page 17


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

PEO2: To train students with good scientific and engineering knowledge so as to comprehend,
analyze, design, and create novel products and solutions for the real life problems in
Computer Science and Engineering

PEO3: To inculcate professional and ethical attitude, effective communication skills,


teamwork skills, multidisciplinary approach, entrepreneurial thinking and an ability to
relate engineering issues with social issues for Computer Science and Engineering.

PEO4: To provide students with an academic environment aware of excellence, leadership,


written ethical codes and guidelines, and the self-motivated life-long learning needed
for a successful professional career in Computer Science and Engineering.

PEO5: To prepare students to excel in Industry and Higher education by Educating Students
along with high moral values and knowledge in Computer Science and Engineering.

1.3 Indicate where the Vision, Mission and PEOs are published and disseminated among
stakeholders (10)
(Describe where (Website, Curricula, and Posters etc.) the Vision, Mission and PEOs are published and detail the
process which ensures awareness among internal and external stakeholders with effective process
implementation.)
(Internal stakeholders may include Management, Governing Board Members, faculty, support staff, students etc.
and external stakeholders may include employers, industry, alumni, funding agencies, etc.)

 College Website : www.jecrc.in


 Board Room
 Board of Governance
 Departmental Magazine/News Letter
 College Magazine
 Department Library
 Faculty Course File
 HOD Office and Staff Rooms
 Notice Boards
 Laboratories
 Class Rooms
 Placement Office
 Alumni Connect Cell
 Professional Bodies(IEEE, IETE, CSI)
 Industry
 Parents

Self Assessment Report Page 18


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
1.4 State the process for defining the Vision and Mission of the Department, and PEOs of the
Program (25)
(Articulate the process involved in defining the Vision and Mission of the department and PEOs of the program.)

Figure1.4a: Process for defining Vision of the Department

With the active participation of HOD, Internal Quality Assurance Committee, faculty
members and staff along with the continuous feedback from stakeholders, the Vision and
Mission statement of the department was developed in alignment with Vision and Mission of
the Institute.

 These statements are discussed further among faculty members before finalization.
 These statements are discussed among students also before finalization.
 The new Vision and Mission statements are sent to the Internal Quality Assurance
Committee for changes.
 Finally the Vision and Mission are approved by the Principal of Institution.

Self Assessment Report Page 19


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Sample Vision feedback forms

Vision Feedback Form Student

Self Assessment Report Page 20


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 1.4b: Process for defining Mission of the Department

Self Assessment Report Page 21


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Sample Mission Feedback Forms

Mission Feedback Form Faculty

Self Assessment Report Page 22


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Mission Feedback Form Alumni

Self Assessment Report Page 23


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
PEOs are the characteristics of graduates of a program, which enable the students to become
successful professionals in their field. The department has documented measurable PEOs for its
Bachelor of Technology in Computer Science Engineering programmed taking into account the
program’s constituencies and the mission of college. The PEOs are established in the light of the
vision and mission statements of the department.

Our process for establishing and revising Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) is depicted in
Figure 1.4c below. Vision and Mission of the Institute, Department and Graduate attributes
recommended by NBA are taken as directorial factors in forming the PEOs. Stakeholder inputs are
obtained through extensive surveys with follow-up telephone calls by the Department HOD and
associated faculties.

Figure 1.4c: Process for defining PEOs of Department

Stakeholder inputs to our program educational objectives are obtained in a number of traditional
ways by the Department HOD & associated faculties. These feedbacks are condensed and
presented to IQAC at the faculty meeting and the final report is sent toPrincipal of the Institution
for review and acceptance.

Self Assessment Report Page 24


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
PEOs Feedback Form

PEO Feedback Form Industrial Person

Self Assessment Report Page 25


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

PEO Feedback Form Faculty

Self Assessment Report Page 26


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

PEO Feedback Form Parents

Self Assessment Report Page 27


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

PEO Feedback Form Alumni

Self Assessment Report Page 28


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

PEO Feedback Form Industrial Person

Self Assessment Report Page 29


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
1.5 Establish Consistency of PEOs with Mission of the Department (15)
(Generate a “Mission of the Department – PEOs matrix” with justification and rational of the mapping)
Note: M1, M2,….Mn are distinct elements of Mission statement. Enter correlation levels 1, 2 or 3as defined
below
1: slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High) if there is no correlation put”-”
MISSION To impart outcome To provide To provide To develop
based education for opportunities for platform for aptitude of
emerging interaction lifelong learning fulfilling social
technologies in the between by accepting the responsibilities
field of Computer academia and change in
PEOs Science and industry. technologies
Engineering.

To provide students with the fundamentals of


engineering science with more emphasis in
Computer Science and Engineering by way of H H H M
analyzing and exploiting engineering challenges.

To train students with good scientific and


engineering knowledge for Computer Science
and Engineering so as to comprehend, analyze,
design, and create novel products and solutions H H H M
for the real life problems.

To inculcate professional and ethical attitude,


effective communication skills, teamwork skills,
multidisciplinary approach, entrepreneurial
thinking and an ability to relate engineering
issues with social issues for Computer Science M H M H
and Engineering.

To provide students with an academic


environment aware of excellence, leadership,
written ethical codes and guidelines, and the self-
motivated life-long learning needed for a
successful professional career in Computer M H H M
Science and Engineering.

To prepare students to excel in Industry and


Higher Education by Educating Students along
with high moral values and knowledge in H H H M
Computer Science and Engineering.

Table B.1.5a: Mapping of PEOs with Missionof the Department

Self Assessment Report Page 30


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Justification:

The above table shows the consistency of PEOs with Mission of the department. The reasons
behind marking High, Medium and Low are as follows:

PEOs are divided into keywords and then correlation is checked with all Mission.

After taking the feedback from all the faculty members of the department if the consistency
found is above 90%, ( ) is marked. If consistency is found between 75-90%, the particular
block is left blank.

Why High:

If () is marked in all blocks i.e. all the keywords of PEOs are found consistent with the Mission
so it must be rated high.

Why Medium:

If  is marked in 50% or above blocks i.e. PEOs is moderately consistent with the Mission of the
department.

Why Low:

If  is marked in less than 50% i.e. PEOs is found inconsistent with the Mission of the
department.

MISSION
To impart outcome To provide To provide To develop
based education for opportunities platform for aptitude of
emerging technologies for interaction lifelong learning fulfilling
in the field of between by accepting the social
Computer Science and academia and change in responsibiliti
PEO 1
Keywords
Engineering. industry. technologies. es.

Fundamentals of
Engineering   
Sciences.
Analyzing &
exploiting
   
engineering
challenges.
Table B.1.5b: Justification of mapping of PEO 1 with Mission

Self Assessment Report Page 31


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
To impart outcome To provide To provide platform To develop aptitude
MISSION
based education for opportunities for for lifelong learning of fulfilling social
emerging technologies interaction by accepting the responsibilities.
in the field of between academia change in
Computer Science and and industry. technologies.
PEO 2 Engineering.
Keywords

Good scientific and


engineering   
knowledge.
Create novel products
and solutions for the    
real life problems.
Table B.1.5c: Justification of mapping of PEO 2 with Mission

To impart outcome To provide To provide platform To develop


MISSION
based education for opportunities for for lifelong learning aptitude of
emerging interaction between by accepting the fulfilling social
technologies in the academia and change in responsibilities.
field of Computer industry. technologies.
PEO 3
Science and
Keyword
s Engineering.

Professional and ethical


   
attitude.
Communication skills,
 
teamwork skills.
Multidisciplinary
   
approach.
Entrepreneurial thinking.   
Relate engineering
   
issues with social issues.
Table B.1.5d: Justification of mapping of PEO 3 with Mission

To impart outcome To provide To provide platform To develop


MISSION
based education for opportunities for for lifelong learning aptitude of
emerging technologies interaction between by accepting the fulfilling social
in the field of Computer academia and change in responsibilities.
Science and industry. technologies.
Engineering.
PEO 4
Keywords

Academic
environment aware
of excellence,   
leadership, written
ethical codes.
Successful
   
professional career.
Self-motivated life-
  
long learning.
Table B.1.5e: Justification of mapping of PEO 4 with Mission

Self Assessment Report Page 32


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

To impart outcome To provide To provide platform for To develop


MISSION
based education for opportunities for lifelong learning by aptitude of
emerging technologies interaction between accepting the change in fulfilling social
in the field of Computer academia and technologies. responsibilities.
Science and industry.
PEO 5
Keywords
Engineering.

Excel in Industry
and Higher   
education.
High moral values
   
and Knowledge.
Table B.1.5f: Justification of mapping of PEO 5 with Mission

Feedback Form of Mapping of PEOs with Mission

Feedback Form of Mapping of PEO with Mission

Self Assessment Report Page 33


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

CRITERION 2
Program Curriculum and Teaching–Learning Processes ( 1 2 0 )

Self Assessment Report Page 34


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
CRITERION 2 Program Curriculum and Teaching – Learning Processes 120

2. PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND TEACHING - LEARNING PROCESSES (120)

2.1. Program Curriculum (20)


Jaipur Engineering College & Research Centre is affiliated to Rajasthan Technical
University, Kota where the following Program Curriculum for Department of Computer
Science and Engineering has been prescribed.

Scheme of Teaching & Examination for I year B.Tech I Semester


Effective from the session: 2017-18
(Common to all branches of Engineering)
Computer Science and Exam Hrs.
Marks Allocation
I Engineering Teaching Hrs. (Theory
Paper)
Ter
Course Theo Sessio Prac.
Subject L T P m Total
Code ry nal Exam
test
MA-101 Engineering Mathematics-I 3 1 3 80 20 100
HU-101/ Communication Skills /
3 0 3 80 20 100
HU-103 Human Values
PY-101/ Engineering Physics/
3 1 3 80 20 100
CY-101 Engineering Chemistry
CS-101 Computer Programming-I 3 0 3 80 20 100
Environmental Engineering
CE-101 3 0 3 80 20 100
and Disaster Management
Total 15 2 400 100 500
HU-102/ Communication Skills Lab./
2 45 30 75
HU-104 Human Values: Activities
PY-102/ Engineering Physics Lab/
2 45 30 75
CY-102 Engineering Chemistry Lab
Computer Programming-I
CS-102 2 60 40 100
Lab.
Computer Aided Engineering
CE-102 3 60 40 100
Graphics
Mechanical Workshop
ME-101 2 60 40 100
Practice
Discipline &Extra-Curricular
50 50
Activities
Grand Total 15 2 11 400 100 320 180 1000

Self Assessment Report Page 35


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Scheme of Teaching & Examination for I year B.Tech II Semester
Effective from the session: 2017-18
(Common to all branches of Engineering)
Computer Science and Exam Hrs.
Marks Allocation
II Engineering Teaching Hrs. (Theory
Paper)
Ter
Course Theo Sessio Prac.
Subject L T P m Total
Code ry nal Exam
test
MA-102 Engineering Mathematics-II 3 1 3 80 20 100
HU-103/ Human Values/
3 0 3 80 20 100
HU-101/ Communication Skills
CY-101/ Engineering Chemistry/
3 1 3 80 20 100
PY-101 Engineering Physics
CS-103 Computer Programming-II 3 0 3 80 20 100
Elective (any two)*
Basic Electrical and
EE-101
Electronics Engineering 3 0 3 80 20 100
CE-103 Basic Civil Engineering
Basic Mechanical
ME-102
Engineering 3 0 3 80 20 100
OE-101 Engineering Mechanics
Total 15 2 480 120 600
HU-104/ Human Values: Activities
2 45 30 75
HU-102 Communication Skills Lab.
CY-102/ Engineering Chemistry Lab/
2 45 30 75
PY-102 Engineering Physics Lab
Computer Programming-II
CS-104 2 60 40 100
Lab
Computer Aided Machine
ME-104 3 60 40 100
Drawing
Discipline &Extra-Curricular
0 50 50
Activities
Grand Total 15 2 9 480 120 260 140 1000
Table B.2.1a: Scheme for 1st Year from Session 2017-2018

Self Assessment Report Page 36


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
III Computer Science and Engineering Teaching Hrs. Exa Max. Marks Comments
m
Hrs.
Course Subject L T P IA TE TOTAL Common with
Code
3CS1A Electronic Devices and Circuits 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT
3CS2A Data Structures and Algorithms 3 3 20 80 100 EE, EEE, EC,
EIC,CS & IT
3CS3A Digital Electronics 3 3 20 80 100 EE, EEE, EC,
EIC,CS & IT
3CS4A Linux and Shell Programming 3 3 20 80 100 EE, EEE, EC,
EIC,CS & IT
3CS5A Object Oriented Programming 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT
3CS6A Advanced Engineering Mathematics 3 1 3 20 80 100 EE, EEE, CS &
IT
3CS7A Electronic Devices Lab 3 3 45 30 75 CS,IT
3CS8A Data Structures Lab 3 4 60 40 100 CS,IT
3CS9A Digital Electronics Lab 2 3 30 20 50 CS,IT
3CS10A C++ Programming 3 4 45 30 75 CS,IT
3CS11A Unix Shell Programming 2 3 30 20 50 CS,IT
3CSDC Discipline &extra-Curricular 50
Activities
Total 18 1 13 1000

Computer Science and Engineering Teaching Exam Max. Marks


IV Comments
Hrs. Hrs.
Course Subject L T P IA TE TOTAL Common
Code with
4CS1A Microprocessors and Interfaces 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT
4CS2A Discrete Mathematical Structures 3 1 3 20 80 100 CS,IT

4CS3A Statistics and Probability Theory 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT

4CS4A Software Engineering 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT


4CS5A Principles of Communication 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT
4CS6A Principles of Programming Languages 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT
4CS7A Microprocessor Lab 3 3 60 40 100 CS,IT
4CS8A Communication Lab 3 3 60 40 100 CS,IT
4CS9A Computer Aided SoftwareEngineering Lab 3 4 60 40 100 CS,IT
4CS10A Business EntrepreneurshipDevelopment 3 4 30 20 50 CS,IT
4CSDC Discipline &extra-CurricularActivities 50
Total 18 1 11 1000
Table B.2.1b: Scheme for 2nd Year

Self Assessment Report Page 37


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Exa
Computer Science and Engineering Max. Marks
V Teaching Hrs. m Comments
Hrs.
Course Subject L T P IA TE TOTA Common with
Code L
5CS1A Computer Architecture 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT
5CS2A Digital Logic Design 3 3 20 80 100
5CS3A Telecommunication Fundamentals 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT
5CS4A Database Management Systems 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT
5CS5A Operating Systems 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT
5CS6.1A Advanced Data Structure
5CS6.2A Digital Signal Processing 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT
5CS6.3A Information Theory & Coding
5CS7A Database Lab 3 60 40 100 CS,IT
5CS8A System Design in UML Lab. 3 45 30 75
5CS9A Operating Systems Simulation Lab 3 60 40 100 CS,IT
5CS10A Digital Hardware Design Lab 3 45 30 75 CS,IT
5CSDC Discipline &extra-Curricular 50 CS,IT
Activities
Total 18 0 12 1000

Exa
Computer Science and Engineering Max. Marks
VI Teaching Hrs. m Comments
Hrs.
Course Subject L T P IA TE TOTA Common with
Code L
6CS1A Computer Networks 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT
6CS2A Design and Analysis of Algorithms 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT
6CS3A Theory Of Computation 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT
6CS4A Computer Graphics and Multimedia 3 3 20 80 100
Techniques
6CS5A Embedded System Design 3 3 20 80 100
6CS6.1A Advance Topics in Operating Systems CS,IT
6CS6.2A Artificial Intelligence 3 3 20 80 100
6CS6.3A Human Computer Interface CS,IT
6CS7A Java Programming Lab 3 45 30 75 CS,IT
6CS8A Computer Graphics & Multimedia Lab 3 30 20 50

6CS9A Design and Analysis of Algorithms Lab 3 60 40 100 CS,IT


6CS10A Embedded System Design Lab 3 45 30 75
6CS11A Humanities and Social Sciences 30 20 50 CS,IT

6CSDC Discipline &extra-Curricular Activities 50 CS,IT

Total 18 0 12 1000
Table B.2.1c: Scheme for 3rd Year

Self Assessment Report Page 38


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Computer Science and Engineering Teaching Exam Max. Marks
VII Comments
Hrs. Hrs.
CourseCode Subject L T P IA TE TOTAL Common with
7CS1A Cloud Computing 3 3 20 80 100
7CS2A Information System Security 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT
7CS3A Data Mining & Ware Housing 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT
7CS4A Computer Aided Design for VLSI 3 3 20 80 100
7CS5A Compiler Construction 3 3 20 80 100
7CS6.1A Advance Database Management Systems
7CS6.2A Robotics 3 3 20 80 100
7CS6.3A Data Compression Techniques
7CS7A Web Development Lab 2 30 20 50
7CS8A VLSI Physical Design Lab 3 45 30 75
7CS9A Compiler Design Lab. 3 45 30 75
7CSPR Project-I 2 50 50 CS,IT
7CSTR Practical Training* 2 100 100 CS,IT
7CSDC Discipline &extra-Curricular Activities 50 CS,IT
Total 18 0 12 1000

Computer Science and Engineering Exam Max. Marks


VIII Teaching Hrs. Comments
Hrs.
CourseCode Subject L T P IA TE TOTAL Common with
8CS1A Mobile Computing 3 3 20 80 100
8CS2A Digital Image Processing 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT
8CS3A Distributed Systems 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT
8CS4.1A Hardware Testing & Fault Tolerance CS,IT
8CS4.2A Real Time Systems 3 3 20 80 100 CS,IT
8CS4.3A Information Retrieval CS,IT
8CS5A Unix Network Programming & 3 60 40 100
Simulation Lab
8CS6A FPGA Lab. 3 60 40 100
8CS7A Digital Image Processing lab 2 30 20 50 CS,IT
8CSPR Project-II 2 120 80 200 CS,IT
8CSSM Seminar 2 60 40 100 CS,IT
8CSDC Discipline &extra-Curricular Activities 50 CS,IT
Total 12 0 12 1000
Table B.2.1d: Scheme for 4th Year
For reference:
1. http://www.rtu.ac.in/RTU/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Scheme-B.Tech-1st-Year.pdf
2. http://www.rtu.ac.in/RTU/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/CS_3_8_syllabus%2007102015.pdf
The above link states complete detailed syllabus of Department of Computer Science and Engineering.
The curriculum of Department of Computer Science and Engineering is affiliated to Rajasthan Technical
University, Kota. It comprises of mathematics, electronics core and professional core component in relation
Computer Science and Engineering. For identifying the gaps subjects are mapped with program outcomes
where subjects are classified in categories i.e. advanced mathematics, electronics core and professional core,
elective.

Self Assessment Report Page 39


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
PROGRAM OUTCOMES

1. Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering


fundamentals and Computer Science and Engineering specialization to the solution of
complex Computer Science and Engineering problems.
2. Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, research literature, and analyse complex
Computer Science and Engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using
first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
3. Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex Computer Science and
Engineering problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified
needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural,
societal, and environmental considerations.
4. Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and
research methods including design of Computer Science and Engineering experiments,
analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid
conclusions.
5. Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and
modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modelling to complex
Computer Science Engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
6. The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to
assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities
relevant to the professional Computer Science and Engineering practice.
7. Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional Computer
Science and Engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and
demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
8. Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities
and norms of the Computer Science and Engineering practice.
9. Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or
leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings in Computer Science and
Engineering.
10. Communication: Communicate effectively on complex Computer Science and
Engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as,
being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make
effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
11. Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
Computer Science and Engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s
own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary
environments.
12. Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to
engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological
change in Computer Science and Engineering.

Self Assessment Report Page 40


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
PROGRAM SPECIFIC OUTCOMES
PSO1 Ability to interpret and analyze network specific and cyber security issues in real
world environment.
PSO2 Ability to design and develop mobile and web-based applications under realistic
constraints.

Different courses emphasize on contribution to different POs and PSOs resulting in ultimate
attainment of POs and PSOs upon completion of all courses and thus the
program. Every course has decent importance to elementary ideas, tools and techniques
and stress on sensible implementations. This provides a powerful correlation between the
course outcomes and program outcomes, developing necessary skills in students,
creating them practiced engineers.

The following table divides RTU subject in following five course components. It also explains
the contribution of each category among Lecture, Tutorial and Practical. It also explains the
relevance of each course component with POs and PSOs.

Based on RTU Coverage %


Program Course POs PSOs
Component Grouping L T P
36/135=26 6/6= 16/92= -
Applied Science PO1,PO2,PO3, PO12
.66% 100% 17.39%
21/135= - 22/92= PSO1
Electronics Core PO1,PO2,PO3,P05,PO10,PO12
15.55% 23.91%
Professional Core 66/135= - 46/92= PSO1, PSO2
PO1- PO12
(CSE) 48.88% 50%
12/135= - - PO1,PO2,PO3,P04,P05,P08,PO PSO1
Professional Elective
8.88% 9,PO10,PO11,PO12
- - 8/92= PO2,PO3,PO9, PO10, PO11, PSO1, PSO2
Project/Seminar Lab 8.69% PO12
Table B.2.1f:CourseComponent Relevance with POs oftheDepartment

Self Assessment Report Page 41


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
2.1.1. State the process used to identify extent of compliance of the University curriculum
for attaining the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes as mentioned
in Annexure I. Also mention the identified curricular gaps, if any (10)
(State the process details; also mention identified curricular gaps).

A. Compliance of the University Curriculum

Fun Social Handouts


Activity Activity

Group Task Tutorial

University
Curriculum

Experimental
Laboratory Lecture

Video Presentation
Lectures

Figure 2.1.1a: Process of Compliance the University Curriculum


for attaining the POs and PSOs

The following process is used to identify extent of compliance of the University Curriculum for
attaining the POs and PSOs.

 Lectures: Faculty of the CSE Department effectively teach students about a concerned
subject. Faculties convey significant information, history, background, theories, analogies
and equations to make the concepts clear.

 Tutorials: Faculty helps the students bysolving number of problems by dividing them in
groups and faculty Member mentors the students.
 Triangle Method: During lecture HOD visits class room along with two senior faculty
members in which one of the faculty is the expert of the respective subject. They observe

Self Assessment Report Page 42


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
the teaching method followed by Faculty Member and analyzes the importance of
content. After Class, HOD shares feedback to the faculty member.

 Experimental Laboratory Work:Laboratory work demonstrates how theory can be


verified by experiments through interpretation of results.

 Hand-outs:Gives a quick insight to the course. It helps the slow learners to face the
exams with confidence.

 Presentations: Faculty members also provide PPT and Videos related to course. Videos
effectively communicate the working of actual engineering solutions-long learning in the
appropriate societal context.

 E-Book/Digital Library/Video Lectures: The facility of (multi


Media) Digital Library is available where all interested students & faculty members may
read e-books and e-journals which are available on NPTEL, expert lectures on you tube.

 Group Tasks: Through group task the concepts of engineering that the student has
understood in the course is showcased. This helps to do work in groups effectively.

 Social Activity:Gives a sense of social responsibility to a student under ABHUYDAY


which includes Zarurat, Soch, Suhasini and Aashayen group.

 Fun Activity: Here, each concerned faculty teaches his/her subject with the help of fun
activity like making group and debates based on topics so that the student can learn the
topic in visualized manner.

 Government/ AICTE Initiative :All the interactive courses prepared by best teachers in
the country are taught through Swayam, NPTEL, and Virtual lab from IIT Mumbai,
Internshala and ICT courses through NITTTR Chandigarh.

 FDP/Conference/Workshop: Faculty members take knowledge about the latest


technology and deliver the same to students.

 Invited Talks, Workshops and Seminars on the latest trends in technology are done
from the industry person.

Self Assessment Report Page 43


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
B. Attainment of Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes

Course Attainment
Attainment of POs Justification
Delivery of PSOs
Lecturing PO1,PO2,PO3,PO4,PO8,PO9, PSO1  Faculties of the CSE Department effectively
PO10,PO12 teach students about a concerned subject.
 Faculties convey significant information,
history, background, theories, analogies and
equations to make the concepts clear.
 Faculties relate engineering practice to the
real world.
Tutorial PO1,PO2,PO3,PO4,PO8,PO9, PSO1  Faculties help the slow learners by solving
PO10,PO12 more number of similar problems.
 Any specific problem is also entertained by
Faculty Members.

Presentatio PO1,PO4,PO5,PO9, PO10, PO11 PSO1,  Presentations are given to illustrate ideas
ns PSO2 and concepts.
(Still and  Presentations give information with data
Video) relating to an issue.
 Videos effectively communicate the
working of actual engineering solutions-
long learning in the appropriate societal
context.

Experimen PO1,PO2,PO3,PO5,PO9,PO10, PSO1,PSO2  Laboratory work demonstrates how theory


tal and PO12 can be verified by experiments through
laboratory interpretation of results.
work  Experiments are normally done in groups
thereby encouraging students to do team
work.

Group PO4, PO7, PO8, PO9, PO10, PSO1,PSO2  Here the concepts of engineering that the
tasks PO11 student has understood in the course are
(Projects) showcased. This helps to do work in groups
effectively

Hand-outs PO1, PO2, PO3, PO4, PO12  Gives a quick insight to the course.
-
 It helps the slow learners to face the exams
with confidence
Social PO6,PO7,PO8,PO9,PO10  Gives a sense of social responsibility to a
Activities/ - student.
Fun
 Teaching students with visualization method
Activity
like debate and quiz
Table B.2.1.1a: Mode of Course Delivery

Self Assessment Report Page 44


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 2.1.1b: Assessment Tool for Attaining POs and PSOs.

Self Assessment Report Page 45


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Courses Subject PO1 PO2 PO3 PO PO PO PO7 PO PO PO PO PO


4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12
MA-101 Engineering Mathematics-1 3 2 1 - 2 1 2 - 3 2 - 1

HU-103 HumanValues - - 2 - - 3 2 3 2 1 - 1

PY-101 Engineering Physics 2 1 1 - - 1 - - 1 1 - 1


CS-101 Computer Programming-I 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 - - 2 - 3
CE-101 Environmental Engineering andDisaster
2 1 1 1 - 2 2 1 2 1 - 1
Management
HU-104 Human Values: Activities - - 1 - - 3 3 3 1 1 - 1
PY-102 Engineering Physics Lab 2 1 1 - - 1 - - 1 1 - 1
CS-102 Computer Programming-I La 2 3 2 1 - - - - 2 1 - 1
CE-102 Computer Aided EngineeringGraphic 3 - - - - - - - 2 2 - 1

ME-101 Mechanical Workshop Practice 3 - - - - - - - 2 2 - 1


Table B. 2.1.2b: Program level Course-PO matrix of first year courses

Self Assessment Report Page 46


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
S.
PO
N Sem Code Sub PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11
12
o.
1 3 3CSA1 EDC 2.3 1.6 1 1 1 - - - 1 - - 1.6
2 3 3CSA2 DSA 3 2.2 2 1 1 - - - 2 - 1 1.5
3 3 3CSA3 DE 2.2 2 2.3 - 2 1 1 - 1 - 1 3
4 3 3CS4A LSP 3 2 2.3 - 2 1 1 - 2.5 2.5 1 2
5 3 3CS5A OOP 3 2 2.2 2.5 2.5 1.5 1 - 2.2 1.5 2.2 2.5
6 3 3CS6A AEM 3 2 1 - 1 - 1 1 - 1
7 4 4CS1A MP 3 1.7 2.2 1.5 - - 2 1 - 2
8 4 4CS2A DMS 3 3 2.2 2.2 3 2.5 - 1 -
9 4 4CS3A SPT 3 2 2 - 1 1 - 1 1 - 1
10 4 4CS4A SE 3 2.5 3 1.5 2.7 1 1 - 2.7 2 2.2 1.7
11 4 4CS5A POC 3 3 1.7 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1
12 4 4CS6A PPL 3 2 2 - 1 1 1 - 1 - 1 1
13 5 5CS1A CA 3 2.2 2.2 1 - - - - 1 - 1 2
14 5 5CS2A DLD 3 2 2.3 - 2 1 1 - 1 - 1 1.5
15 5 5CS3A TEF 3 2.2 2.2 - 2 1 1 1 - 2 1 2
16 5 5CS4A DBMS 3 2.2 2.2 - 2 1 1 1.5 2 - 2 2
17 5 5CS5A OS 3 2.2 2 - - 1 - - 1 1 1.7 2
18 5 5CS6A ITC 3 2 2.2 2 - 1 1 - 1 1 1 1
19 6 6CS1A CN 3 2 2.2 1.7 1.7 1 1 1.5 1.5 1 1 2
20 6 6CS2A DAA 3 2 2.5 2 - 1 1 - 1 2 - 2
21 6 6CS3A TOC 3 2 2.5 1.7 - 1 1 - 1 1.7 - 1
22 6 6CS4A CG 3 2 2.2 2 1.7 1 1 - 1 2.2 2.2 2.5
23 6 6CS5A ESD 3 1.7 1 - 3 1 1 - 1 - 1 2
24 6 6CS6A AI 3 2 2.2 2 2 1.7 1 - 1 1.7 1.7 1.7
25 7 7CS1A CLOUD 3 2.2 2 1 2.5 1.7 1.6 1 1.7 2.2 2.5 2.7
26 7 7CS2A ISS 3 3 2.5 2 1.5 1.5 - 1 1 1.5 1.5 2
27 7 7CS3A DMW 3 2 2.2 1.7 1.7 1.5 2 1 1.5 - 1.5 1.7
CAD
28 7 7CS4A
VLSI
3 2 2 - 2 1 1 - 1 - 1 1
29 7 7CS5A CC 3 3 2.2 2.2 1 - - - 2 - 2 2
30 7 7CS6A DCT 3 1.6 1 1 - - - - 1 1.3 2
31 8 8CS1A MC 3 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.5 2 - 1 2 2.7 3
32 8 8CS2A DIP 3 3 1.5 1.5 1.7 2 2 2 1.5 1.7 1.7 3
33 8 8CS3A DS 3 2 2 2.5 2 2 - - 1 1 2.7 3
34 8 8CS4A RTS 3 1.7 1.7 1.5 - 2 - - 1.5 1.5 - 2
Table B.2.1.1c: Mapping of POs with Subject

Self Assessment Report Page 47


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

S.No. Sem Code Sub PSO1 PSO2


1 3 3CSA1 EDC - -
2 3 3CSA2 DSA 3 1
3 3 3CSA3 DE 3 -
4 3 3CS4A LSP 2 2
5 3 3CS5A OOP 2 3
6 3 3CS6A AEM 3 -
7 4 4CS1A MP 3 -
8 4 4CS2A DMS 2 2
9 4 4CS3A SPT 3 -
10 4 4CS4A SE 2 3
11 4 4CS5A POC 1 -
12 4 4CS6A PPL 3 3
13 5 5CS1A CA 2 3
14 5 5CS2A DLD 1 -
15 5 5CS3A TEF 3 2
16 5 5CS4A DBMS 3 2
17 5 5CS5A OS 2 2
18 5 5CS6.3 ITC 3 3
19 6 6CS1A CN 3 2
20 6 6CS2A DAA - -
21 6 6CS3A TOC - -
22 6 6CS4A CG 1 1
23 6 6CS5A ESD - -
24 6 6CS6.2A AI 1 1
25 7 7CS1A CLOUD 3 3
26 7 7CS2A ISS 3 3
27 7 7CS3A DMW - 1
28 7 7CS4A CAD VLSI - -
29 7 7CS5A COMPILER - 2
30 7 7CS6.3A DCT 1 1
31 8 8CS1A MC 3 3
32 8 8CS2A DIP 1 1
33 8 8CS3A DS 3 3
34 8 8CS4.2A RTS 3 3
Table B.2.1.1d: Program level Course-PSO matrix of all courses

Self Assessment Report Page 48


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Contribution of Subjects for Attaining


POs
POs
PO1 99.01%
PO2 78.43%
PO3 66.66%
PO4 35.25%
PO5 37.25%
PO6 18.62%
PO7 5.88%
PO8 6.86%
PO9 34.31%
PO10 29.41%
PO11 31.37%
PO12 60.78%
Table B.2.1.1e: Contribution of Subjects for Attaining POs

Self Assessment Report Page 49


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
C. Process used to identify curricular gaps

The procedure adopted for finding the curriculum gaps is shown in figure 2.1.1bfor attaining the
POs and PSOs.
 Feedback from the teacher handling the course.
 Input from Industry experts/ employers.
 Based on the feedback from students.
 Based on the feedback from parents.
 Based on alumni feedback.
 Based on the analysis of other universities’ curriculum

*IQAC- Internal Quality Assurance Committee


Figure 2.1.1c: Process of GAP Identification

Self Assessment Report Page 50


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Identified gaps:

Following gaps were identified that are required for industry oriented & learning of emerging
technologies

 Practical Aspects of Cloud Computing Concepts like Virtualization


 Front end and User interface designing tools
 Open Source Tools required for programming & designing database
 Learning Practical tool required like WEKA, for data mining
 Open Source Cloud Deployment and Security Tools
 Emerging tools like BIG DATA, IoT, Drupal Tool, R Language etc.
 Practical aspects of Android, Web Development, Networking.
 Mobile App Development
 Leadership Skills
 Social Awareness and Ethics

Action taken to Fulfill Identified gaps:

 Lectures on Handpicked Topics by Faculty Members


 Expert Lectures/Talk
 Technical Events
 In-House Training Conducted By Industry Experts
 Industrial Visits
 Workshops/ Seminars/ Conferences

Self Assessment Report Page 51


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
2.1.2. State the delivery details of the content beyond the syllabus for attainment of
POs and PSOs (10)
(Provide details of the additional course/learning material/content/laboratory experiments/projects etc.,
arising from the gaps identified in 2.1.1 in a tabular form in the format given below)
Session 2017-18
Date- Resource
GAP Relevance To
S.No Action Taken Month- Person with
POs
Year designation
1. Leadership Skills Entrepreneurship 29-31 Aug. Mr. Rohit
PO3-PO12
Awareness Camp 2017 Sharma
Tedx (Incubation 31
Leadership Skills Mr.Rohit
2. Centre), Takniki Aug. PO3-PO12
Sharma
Bhawan, Jhalana, Jaipur 2017
ICT BASED Short
term course on
Learning Practical tool PO1,PO2,
“DATA MINING NITTTR,
3. required like WEKA, 4- 8 PO3,PO4,
AND BUSINESS Chandigarh
for data mining Sept.2017 PO5,PO6, PO9,
INTELLIGENCE” at
PO10,PO11,PO12
NITTTR,
Chandigarh
Mobile App Invited Talk on Mobile
12
4. Development Apps By Forsk Mr. Yogender PO1-5, PO9-12
Sept.2017
Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Emerging tools like Workshop on BIG PO1,PO2,
BIG DATA, IoT, DATA Technology
Drupal Tool, R 22-23 Ms. Shradhha PO3,PO4,
5. (IIIT , Kharagpur ,
Language etc. Sept.2017 Godara PO5,PO6, PO9,
Utkranti, 2018
PO10,PO11,PO12

Social Awareness and Ms. Richa


6. Nirbhaya Initiative 7 Oct.2017 PO6,PO8
Ethics Gaur
Emerging tools like PO1,PO2,
BIG DATA, IoT, Workshop on Big Data Mr. Vimal PO3,PO4,
28
7. Drupal Tool, R Technology (
Oct.2017 Daga PO5,PO6, PO9,
Language etc. Linux world pvt. Ltd
PO10,PO11,PO12
Emerging tools like PO1,PO2,
Workshop on
BIG DATA, IoT, Mr. Vimal PO3,PO4,
8. MachineLearning, 9 Feb 2018
Drupal Tool, R
Artificial intelligence Daga PO5,PO6, PO9,
Language etc.
(Linux world pvt. Ltd) PO10,PO11,PO12
Workshop on PO1,PO2,
Front end and User 17- 23 PO3,PO4, PO5,
9. Salesforce by Mr. Rajesh
interface designing March.201
Sambodhi Technology Kumar PO9,
tools 8
Pvt. Ltd. PO10,PO11,PO12
Table B.2.1.2a: Details of Expert Talk/Lecture(2017-18)

Self Assessment Report Page 52


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Session 2016-17
GAP Date-Month- Resource Person
S.No Action Taken Relevance To POs
Year with designation
1 Practical AspectsICT BASED Short 31 Aug.2016 Mr. Amit Doegar, PO1,PO2, PO3,PO4,
of Cloud term course on Asst. Professor, PO5,PO10, PO11,PO12
Computing “Open Source NITTTR, Chandigarh
Concepts like Technologies” at
Virtualization NITTTR,
Chandigarh
2 Front end and ICT BASED Short 29-30 Aug.2016 Dr. Gaurav Kumar, PO1,PO2, PO3,PO4,
User interface term course on Managing Director, PO5,PO9,
designing tools “Open Source Magma Research and PO10,PO11,PO12
Technologies” at Consultancy, Pvt.
NITTTR, Ltd., Ambala
Chandigarh
3 Introduction to ICT BASED Short 29 Aug.2016 Sangeeta Gupta, Jr. PO1,PO2, PO3,PO4,
PHP and MySQL term course on System programmer, PO5,PO9,
“Open Source NITTTR,Chandigarh PO10,PO11,PO12
Technologies” at
NITTTR,
Chandigarh
4 Social ICT BASED Short 31 Aug 2016 Dr. Sarbjeet Singh, PO1,PO2, PO3,PO4,
Networking term course on Associate Professor, PO5,PO6, PO9,
Tools(Course “Open Source UIET, P.U., PO10,PO11,PO12
beyond Syllabus) Technologies” at Chandigarh
NITTTR,
Chandigarh
5 Open Source ICT BASED Short 01 Sept.2016 Saurabh Kaushal, PO1,PO2, PO3,PO4,
Security Tools term course on Technical PO5, PO9, PO10,PO11
“Open Source Administrator, ,PO12
Technologies” at NITTTR, Chandigarh
NITTTR,
Chandigarh
6 Open Source ICT BASED Short 01 Sept.2016 Mala Kalra, Asst. PO1,PO2, PO3,PO4,
Tool term course on Professor, NITTTR, PO5,PO6, PO9,
“Open Source Chandigarh PO10,PO11,PO12
Technologies” at
NITTTR,
Chandigarh
7 R Language for ICT BASED Short 01 Sept.2016 Dr. Naveen PO1,PO2, PO3,PO4,
Analytics term course on Aggarwal, Associate PO5,PO6, PO9,
“Open Source Professor, UIET, PO10,PO11,PO12
Technologies” at P.U., Chandigarh
NITTTR,
Chandigarh
8 GIT Platform for ICT BASED Short 02 Sept.2016 Mr. Vipin Gupta, U- PO1,PO2, PO3,PO4,
Open Source term course on NET Solutions Moga PO5,PO9,
Application “Open Source PO10,PO11,PO12
Development, Technologies” at
Open Source NITTTR,
Cloud Chandigarh
Deployment
9 On Open SourceInternational 10 Sept.2016 Mr. Michael Canon PO1,PO2, PO3,PO4,
technology tools Workshop on Open Chief Operating PO5,PO6, PO9,
Source Software, Officer, Axelerant PO10,PO11,PO12

Self Assessment Report Page 53


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Drupal” Technologies, Inc.,
Atlanta, US
10 Drupal Tool International 10 Sept. 2016 Mr. Nathan Roach PO1,PO2, PO3,PO4,
Workshop on Open (Japan), Content PO5,PO9,
Source Software, marketing associate, PO10,PO11,PO12
Drupal AxelerantTechnologi
es, Inc., Atlanta, US
11 Practical tool ICT BASED Short 29-02 Sept.2016 Dr. Naveen PO1,PO2, PO3,PO4,
WEKA, used for term course on Aggarwal, Associate PO5,PO6, PO9,
data mining “Open Source Professor, UIET, PO10,PO11,PO12
Technologies” at P.U., Chandigarh
NITTTR,
Chandigarh
12 Concepts of IOT Technical Session on 15 Oct.2016 Shri Kaushal Kumar, PO1,PO2, PO3,PO4,
Internet of Things Technical Manager, PO5,PO6, PO9,
e-Infochips, PO10,PO11,PO12
Ahmedabad – 380
006.
13 Concepts of BIGWorkshop on Big21 Jan.2017 Mr. Vimal Daga PO1,PO2, PO3,PO4,
DATA Data Linux World Pvt. Ltd. PO5,PO6, PO9,
Jaipur PO10,PO11,PO12
14 Discussed GATE
Questions and Material Provided
C.J.Nega Cheltha &
Solution, and discussed in 1- 2 Feb.2017 PO1 & PO2
Abhishek Dixit
Discussed Flex class
tool
15 Discussed the
Data
Compression
Techniques to be
Taught in class and
used in the
some Material 3 March 2017 Kirti Choudhary PO1, PO4,PO5
different research
Provided
areas, Audio
Compression
and Video
Compression
Table B.2.1.2b: Details of Expert Talk/Lecture(2016-17)

Self Assessment Report Page 54


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Session 2015-16
Resource
GAP Action Date-
S.No Person with Relevance To POs
Taken Month-Year
designation
1 Basic concepts of Special 08-20 Ms. PO1,PO2, PO3,PO4,
Adv. JAVA Interest Sept.2015 Vijaylaxmi, PO5,PO9,
Group on Asst. Professor PO10,PO11,PO12
“JAVA”
2 Concepts of Special 08-20 Mr. Arihant PO1,PO2, PO3,PO4,
Android Interest Sept.2015 Jain, Asst. PO5, PO9,
Group on Professor PO10,PO11,PO12
“Android”
3 Introduction to PHP Special 08-20 Ms. Seema PO1,PO2, PO3,PO4,
and MySQL Interest Sept.2015 Yadav, Asst. PO5, PO9,
Group on Professor PO10,PO11,PO12
“PHP”
4 Focus on Web Special 08-20 Ms. Sarita, Asst. PO1,PO2, PO3,PO4,
Development Interest Sept.2015 Professor PO5,PO9,
Group on PO10,PO11,PO12
“.NET”
5 Concepts of Special 08-20 Ms. Priya PO1,PO2, PO3,PO4,
Networking Interest Sept.2015 Gupta, Asst. PO5, PO9,
Group on Professor PO10,PO11,PO12
“Networking”
6 Free Web-based MOOC ( 08-20 Mr. Shashikant PO1,PO2, PO3,PO4,
distance learning Massive Sept.2015 Singh, Asst. PO5,PO6, PO7, PO9,
program Open Online Professor PO10,PO11,PO12
Course)
Cloud Computing ICT BASED 12-16 NITTTR, PO1,PO2, PO3,PO4,
Short term Oct.2015 Chandigarh PO5,PO10,
course on PO11,PO12
7 “Cloud
Computing”
at NITTTR,
Chandigarh
File System in NFS,
Material 12 March
8 distributed object Geerija lavania PO1,PO3,PO4
provided 2016
based System
Overview of sensor
Taught in 14 March Shashikant
networks , Sensors PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5
class 2016 Singh
in mobile phones
Table B.2.1.2c: Details of Expert Talk/Lecture(2015-16)

Self Assessment Report Page 55


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Session 2014-15
Resource
GAP Relevance To
S.No Action Taken Date-Month-Year Person with
POs
designation
B-Tree, Selection Lecture Taken,
Sorting, Merge implementation Anima
10 Sept.2014 & PO1,PO2,PO3,P
1 Sorting, Discussed done in Lab, Sharma&
12 Sept. 2014 O12
GATE Questions Material Richa Sharma
and solution Provided
Discussed GATE
Questions and Lecture Taken,
Geerija
2 solution, and implementation 12 Sept.2014 PO1, PO2
lavania
industry work in done in Lab
Linux
Complexity,
Lecture, 12 March 2015& Mukesh
3 Notations, Np PO2,PO3,PO8
Videos 17 March 2015 Agarwal
complete problem
Discussed GATE
Material 13 April 2015 & C.J.Nega
4 Questions and PO1 & PO2
Provided 15 April 2015 Cheltha
Solution
Table B.2.1.2d: Details of Expert Talk/Lecture (2014-15)

Figure 2.1.2a: Some Glimpses of Workshop

Self Assessment Report Page 56


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Sample of Technical Events Details
S.
Event Name Number of participants Faculty In-Charge
No.
TECH PROBE
1 Open for All By Anchors/Volunteers
(Technical Quiz Open for All)
JAVALETS 64x2 = 128
2 Ms. Hemlata Soni
(Coding Competition in JAVA) (64 teams)
JUST C 289x1 = 289
3 Mr. Amit Mithal
(Coding Competition in C) (289 teams)
REVERSE ENGINEERING 113x2 = 226
4 Mr. Mukesh Agrawal
(Hardware Assembling) (130 teams)
B-PLAN 16x4 = 64
5 Ms. Geetika Gautam
(Business Planning) (16 teams)
SUBITO 34x2 = 68
6 Ms. Ashima Tiwari
(App & Web Development) (34 teams)
EMBRYO 48x2 = 96
7 Dr. Bhavna Sharma
(Technical Paper Presentation) (48 teams)
ENLIGHTENMENT 56x1 = 56
8 Mr. Mukesh Agrawal
(Meditation) (56 teams)
Table B. 2.1.2e: Details of Technical Event Participation by Students Year 2016-17

In-house Training Conducted By Industry Experts

S. No Gap Action Expertise Duration Attained POs Attained PSOs


taken

Salesforce Salesforce
1. Mr. Rajesh 3 months PO1-5, PO9-12 PSO1, PSO2
Technology Training

2 Forsk Technology Training Mr. Yogender 30 hours PO1-5, PO9-12 PSO1, PSO2

Training by Mr. Alok


3. Redhat Technology Network 40 hours PO1-5, PO9-12 PSO1, PSO2
Shrivastav
Nuts
Soft and Personality PO8, PO10,
4. Expert Talks Prof. P.K. Tiwari 1 month
Development Skills PO12 NA

Aptitude, Qualitative FACE


5. FACE Experts 1 month PO1, PO12
And Quantitative Classes NA
Table B.2.1.2f: Details of In-house Training Conducted By Industry Experts

Self Assessment Report Page 57


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
1. Details of Industry VisitJaipur Metro Rail Corporation Ltd., Jaipur (2018-19)
Department of Computer Science and Engineering conducted industrial visit for students
to Jaipur Metro Rail Corporation Ltd., Jaipur on January 2018. Jaipur Metro project is
totally funded by the state government and its agencies, namely, Rajasthan Housing
Board, Jaipur Development Authority, Rajasthan State Industrial Development and
Investment Corporation Ltd. The Jaipur Metro uses cab signaling along with a centralized
automatic train control system consisting of automatic train protection and automatic
train signaling modules.
 Faculty Coordinator : Mr. Gajendra Sharma, Mr. Ashish Ameria
 Date of Visit : 31/09/2018
 No. of Student : 150
 Field of Industry : Service
 SPOC of JMRC : Mr. Pulkit Mathur (DGM S&T)
Mr. Arun (Chief Controller OCC)
2. Metro Rail Corporation Ltd., Jaipur (2016-17)
Department of Computer Science and Engineering conducted industrial visit for 2nd Year
students to Jaipur Metro Rail Corporation Ltd., Jaipur on 17th January 2017. Jaipur Metro
project is totally funded by the state government and its agencies, namely, Rajasthan
Housing Board, Jaipur Development Authority, Rajasthan State Industrial Development
and Investment Corporation Ltd. The Jaipur Metro uses cab signaling along with a
centralized automatic train control system consisting of automatic train protection and
automatic train signaling modules.
 Faculty Coordinator : Mr. Gajendra Sharma, Mr. Ashish Ameria
 Date of Visit : 17/01/2017
 No. of Student : 173
 Field of Industry : Service
 SPOC of JMRC : Mr. Pulkit Mathur (DGM S&T)
Mr. Arun (Chief Controller OCC)
3. The Industrial Visit at e-Infochips, Ahmadabad (2016-17)
Department of CSE conducted another successful industrial visit for 3rd year students to
an IT cum Core Company, eInfochip Pvt. Ltd, Ahmadabad from Feb 19th-20th, 2017.
The students got the golden opportunity to understand the know-how the IoT cloud live
process.
 Faculty Coordinator : Mr.Gajendra Sharma, Mr.Ashish Ameria, Ms.Deeksha
 Date of Visit : 19/02/2017 - 20/02/2017
 No. of Student : 27
 Field of Industry : Software
 SPOC of e-Infochips : Mr. Shashank Waman Khare (C.T.O)

Self Assessment Report Page 58


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
3. T-START @ Jaipur (2017-18)

T-START Jaipur is situated in the mid of pink city Jhalana in Jaipur. T-START Jaipur is
promoted by technical excellence institute of Department of Technical Education, Govt
of Rajasthan known as Center for Electronic Governance. CEG is known for its mission
is to inculcate technical skills in our youth. It advises Government towards digitalization
of state and its functionaries. T-START Jaipur is best place for startups who wants to
scale in IOT, travel and other sectors.
 Faculty Coordinator : Mr.Gajendra Sharma, Mr.Ashish Ameria
 Date of Visit : 31/08/2017
 No. of Student : 168
 Field of Industry : Startup
 SPOC of T-Start : Mr. Rohit Sharma (Assistant Manager)

4. Food-Tech By MSME (2015-16)


MSME Development Institute, Govt. of India conducted a National Exhibition cum
Vendor Development Program. The program was a showcase of new generation
technologies, exposition and concurrent technical sessions. The objective of the event
was to promote B2B and B2C activities. Exhibitors ranged from different domains of
Food Processing Industry - machinery, equipment, processed food products and support
services.
 Faculty Coordinator : Mr.Gajendra Sharma, Ms.Anima Sharma
 Date of Visit : 19/09/2015
 No. of Student : 47
 Field of Industry : Ministry of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises
 SPOC of Food Tech : Mr. Prashant Sharma (Dy. Director, Jaipur )

JMRC eInfochips
Figure 2.1.2b: Some Glimpses of Industrial Visit

Self Assessment Report Page 59


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
2.2. Teaching - Learning Processes (100)
2.2.1. DescribeProcessesfollowedtoimprove quality ofTeaching& Learning (25)
(Processes may include adherence to academic calendar and improving instruction methods using pedagogical
initiatives such as real world examples, collaborative learning, quality of laboratory experience with regard to
conducting experiments, recording observations, analysis of data etc. encouraging bright students, assisting weak
students etc. The implementation details and impact analysis need to be documented)

University Academic
Calendar

Teachers
Plan

Practical Lab
Teaching Academic
Plan/
Lesson Plan Activities
Assignments/
Tutorials

Plan Content Projects, Quizzes,


Delivery Methods Workshop, Technical
(e.g. NPTEL, Planning (e.g. Innovative Ways Events, Seminars,
Swayam, Expert of Conducting Practical, Rubrics Training, TEDx,
Lectures, and for Assessment and Designing MUN
Industrial Visits (e.g. Lab Manuals, Experiments)

Implementation during Semester

Tests, Faculty Observation, Class


Coordinator’s Feedback
CO Attainment

Academic Audit of the Course by


Strong Weak IQAC
Students Students

Extra Classes, Identifying CO Attainment Gaps


Technical Paper Individual
Presentations, Interaction, Solving
Student Seminars Question Bank
PO Attainment Calculation

Feedback Activities Figure2.2.1a: Process to Improve Quality of


Teaching Learning

Self Assessment Report Page 60


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Teaching Learning Process

 Departmental Academic Calendar: It includes learning and assessment plans according


to RTU standards, alluding Academic Calendar published on the college's site.
 Various Modes of Lecture Delivery: It includes recalling prior related topics,
generating questions, responding to generated queries, focusing on analytical and creative
thinking, problem solving ,providing notes etc.
 Lab Work: In labs, the delivery tothestudentsisperformedwiththehelpof latest software.
Lab records are maintained by the students and checked in each lab.
 Online Teaching Materials: Faculty provides EBooks, videolecturematerial
toenhancethecapabilityofstudentstonotonlyunderstandthecontextbutalso its practical
approaches.
 Student Evaluation: It includes seminars conducted pertaining to each subject, Oral
Questionnaire and Query Session in each lecture, Unit Tests and Assignments after the
completion of eachunitinrespective subjects
 Learning Program outcomes are a unit obligatory for final and pre-final year students.
Students build their minor and major comes below the direction of their several Guide
colleges.
 Invited Talks, Workshops and seminars on the latest trends in technology are done
from the industry person.
 Industrial Visits organized on yearly basis. Students undergoes for 60days Industrial
training after 3rd year.
 One to One discussion interaction between Faculty Members and students.
 All the faculties are requested to maintain attendance registers, course files, teacher’s
diary.
 Department organizes many events for enhancing group learning, communication,
professional ethics etc.

Teaching Quality
For improving teaching quality, the department follows all these processes which are
shown in the diagram below.

 Lectures: Faculty of the CSE Department effectively teach students about a concerned
subject. Faculty conveys significant information, history, background, theories, analogies and
equations to make the concepts clear.

 Tutorials: Faculty helps the slow learners by solving more number of similar problems. Any
specific problem is also entertained by Faculty Members.

 Presentations: Faculty members also provide PPT and Videos related to course. Videos
effectively communicate the working of actual engineering solutions-long learning in the
appropriate societal context.

Self Assessment Report Page 61


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
 Expert Lecture: Department of Computer Science and Engineering invites industry experts
for delivering the lecture/talk based on content of latest technology used in industry.

 Experimental Laboratory Work:Laboratory work demonstrates how theory can be verified


by experiments through interpretation of results.

Expert Feedback on
Fun Social Hackathon Teaching
Activity Lecture
Activity

Swayam
Group Task

Experimental TEDX/MUN
Laboratory Teaching Quality
Improvement

Lectures
Video /Tutorial
Lectures

FDP/Conferen
Presentation Triangle Industry EBook/Digit ce/Workshops
Method Interaction al Library

Figure2.2.1b: Components of Teaching Learning Process

 Hand-outs:Gives a quick insight to the course. It helps the slow learners to face the exams
with confidence.
 Triangle Method: During lecture HOD visits class room along with two senior faculty
members in which one of the faculty is the expert of the respective subject. They observe the
teaching method followed by Faculty Member and analyzes the importance of content. After
Class, HOD shares feedback to the faculty member.
 Feedback on Teaching: During semester HOD takes feedback from students on random
basis. At the end of the semester concerned faculty members also takes feedback from
students.

Self Assessment Report Page 62


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
 Hackathon: JECRC Hackathon and Smart India Hackathon were organized to promote IT &
e-governance initiatives. Coders, developers & designers will have a prodigious platform to
use their out-of-the-box thinking on Bhamashah, e-Mitra, Artificial Intelligence, Internet of
Things, AR/VR, Blockchain, Machine Learning and Data Mobility. The event will witness
eminent IT leaders, dignitaries and respected Officials from Government of India.

 Swayam: its main objective is to provide all with best teaching learning resources. All the
courses are interactive and prepared by best teachers in the country. Quality of content of the
course is ensured by seven national coordinators namely, NEPTEL, UGC, CEC, NCERT,
NIOS, IGNOU and IIMB.

 TedX/MUN: TedX talk organized JECRC to discuss various topics from the eminent
personalities. JECRC Model United Nations (JECRC MUN) is an opportunity for
participants to showcase their abilities by engaging them in substantial researching, critical
thinking and public speaking.

 Group Tasks: Through group task the concepts of engineering that the student has
understood in the course is showcased. This helps to do work in groups effectively.

 Social Activity:Gives a sense of social responsibility to a student under ABHUYDAY which


includes Zarurat, Soch, Suhasini and Aashayen group.

 FDP/Conference/Workshop: Faculty members take knowledge about the latest technology


and deliver the same to students.

 E-Book/Digital Library/Video Lectures: The facility of (multi Media) Digital Library is


available where all interested students & faculty members may read e-books and e-journals
which are available on NPTEL, expert lectures on you tube.

 Fun Activity: Here, each concerned faculty teaches his/her subject with the help of fun
activity like making group and debates based on topics so that the student can learn the topic
in visualized manner.

 Center of Excellence:under Centre of excellence different MOU’s was done with industries
to emphasize on Internship, Project, Workshop for Students and Industrial Visits, Students
specific Training . These are Indo Vision Services Pvt. Ltd., SakRobotix Lab, Infosys
Campus Connect, AICTE-Youth4Work, WadhwaniFoundation, CADD Centre,Forsk
Technologies,RedHatTechnologies, Salesforce Technologies Ltd, and Sambhodhi Tech
Solutions,Cyberops, Siemens Ltd.

Self Assessment Report Page 63


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Details of Faculty Development Program

To improve the quality of Teaching & Learning the department of Computer Science and
Engineering organizes various activities like workshops,FDPs and other programs which have
to minimize the gap identified. Thedetails of FDP are mentioned below.

Name of
Faculty 2017-18 2016-17 2015-16
Member
1. Workshop on Deep
1 Short Term Course on Wireless
Learning at Bennet 1.Short Term Course on Open
Network Technology by NITTTR,
University,Greator Noida 5 Source Technology by
Nov-2015
Ms. Manju Jun- 7 Jun 2018 NITTTR, AUG-16
2. Short Term Course on Cloud
Vyas 2. Five Days FDP on 2. Short Term Course on PHP
Computing by NITTTR, Oct-15
Machine Learning Latex & & MySQL by NITTTR Jan-
Python at SKIT, Jaipur from 2017
11Jun-15 Jun,2018
1.Short Term Course on BIG 1.Short Term Course on Open
Ms. Shikha 1.Short Term Course on Cloud
Data and Data Mining By Source Technology by
Maheshwari Computing by NITTTR, OCT-15
NITTTR, SEPT-17 NITTTR, AUG-16

1.Short Term Course on BIG 1. Short Term Course on Open


Dr. Neelam
Data and Data Mining By Source Technology by Nil
Chaplot
NITTTR, SEPT-17 NITTTR, AUG-16

1. Short Term Course on BIG


Data and Data Mining By
1.Short Term Course on Open
NITTTR, SEPT-17
Source Technology by
Dr. Bhavna 2. Attended FDP Soft
NITTTR, AUG-16 Nil
Sharma Computing Techniques and
2 .Short Term Course on PHP
Applications in Banasthali
& MySQL by NITTTR
Vidyapeeth ,23-28 December
2017
Mr. 1.Short Term Course on BIG 1.Short Term Course on Open
1.Short Term Course on Cloud
Gajendra Data and Data Mining By Source Technology by
Computing by NITTTR, OCT-15
Sharma NITTTR, SEPT-17 NITTTR, AUG-16
1. Short Term Course on BIG
Data and Data Mining By
NITTTR, SEPT-17. 2. 1.Short Term Course on Open
Ms. Richa 1.Short Term Course on Cloud
Parallel computing at MNIT, Source Technology by
Sharma Computing by NITTTR, OCT-15
OCT-17. 3. IOT NITTTR, AUG-16
and Machine Learning at
MNIT, Jan-18
Ms. Anima 1.Short Term Course on BIG
Nil Nil
Sharma Data and Data Mining By

Self Assessment Report Page 64


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
NITTTR, SEPT-17
1.Short Term Course on BIG 1.Short Term Course on Open
Ms. Shikha 1.Short Term Course on Cloud
Data and Data Mining By Source Technology by
Maheshwari Computing by NITTTR, OCT-15
NITTTR, SEPT-17 NITTTR, AUG-16
1.Short Term Course on BIG 1.Short Term Course on Open
Mr. Rajan 1.Short Term Course on Cloud
Data and Data Mining By Source Technology by
Kr. Jha Computing by NITTTR, OCT-15
NITTTR, SEPT-17 NITTTR, AUG-16
1.Short Term Course on BIG 1.Short Term Course on Open
Mr. Prahalad 1.Short Term Course on Cloud
Data and Data Mining By Source Technology by
Sharma Computing by NITTTR, OCT-15
NITTTR, SEPT-17 NITTTR, AUG-16
1.Short Term Course on BIG 1.Short Term Course on Open
Mr. Sachin 1.Short Term Course on Cloud
Data and Data Mining By Source Technology by
Gupta Computing by NITTTR, OCT-15
NITTTR, SEPT-17 NITTTR, AUG-16
1. Short Term Course on BIG 1.Short Term Course on Open
Mr. Shailesh 1.Short Term Course on Cloud
Data and Data Mining By Source Technology by
Arrawatia Computing by NITTTR, OCT-15
NITTTR, SEPT-17 NITTTR, AUG-16
1. Short Term Course on BIG 1.Short Term Course on Open
Mr. Aashish
Data and Data Mining By Source Technology by Nil
Ameria
NITTTR, SEPT-17 NITTTR, AUG-16
1. Faculty Development
Program on Planning and
1Short Term Course on Data Management through ICT by
Mining and Business NITTR 18-24 Jan 2016, 2.
Intelligence through ICT By FDP -workshop on "Structural
Dr. Sanjay
NITTTR, 4-8 SEPT17 Equation Modeling" FMS- Nil
Gaur
2. Effective Implementation of MLSU Udaipur 27-28 Dec -
NAAC criterian by IQAC RIT 2016
under TEQIP 10-11 march17 3. Advances in OFC
Technology through ICT by
NITTR dec-2016
1.Participated as Organizing
Team Member in International
Conference onEmerging Trends
in Expert Applications & Participated in Short Term
Security (ICETEAS 2018) Course on Open Source Participated in Short Term Course on
Mr. Pradeep
atJECRC,Jaipur, FEB-2018 Technology by Cloud Computing by
Sharma
2. Participated in Short Term N.I.T.T.R,Chandigarh, AUG- N.I.T.T.R,Chandigarh, Oct-2015.
Course on Data Mining & 2016.
Business Intelligence by
N.I.T.T.R,Chandigarh, SEP-
2017.

Self Assessment Report Page 65


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
1.One week ICT Based Short
Term National level workshop
on “PHP & MySQL” w.e.f.
1.One week ICT Based Short Term
23rd Jan 2017 to 27th
National level workshop on “Wireless
Jan2017, in association with
Network” w.e.f. 02-06 Nov, 2015 in
NITTTR, Chandigarh at
association with NITTTR,
JECRC, Jaipur.
Chandigarh at JECRC, Jaipur.
2.Three days workshop on
2.One week ICT Based Short Term
"self learing program on
National level workshop on “Cloud
1. Short Term Course on BIG PYTHON & database" under
Ms. Neha Computing” w.e.f. 12-16, October,
Data and Data Mining By Campus Connect FEP on
Bharti 2015 in association with NITTTR,
NITTTR, SEPT-17 Foundation Program 5.0 at
Chandigarh at JECRC, Jaipur.
Infosys,Chandigarh.w.e.f.14th
3.One week ICT Based Short Term
December 16.
National level workshop on “NBA
3.One week ICT Based Short
Accreditation and Quality
Term National level workshop
Management” w.e.f. 24-28, August,
on “Open Source
2015 in association with NITTTR,
Technologies” w.e.f. 29th
Chandigarh at JECRC, Jaipur.
Aug.-2nd Sept., 2016 in
association with NITTTR,
Chandigarh at JECRC, Jaipur.

Mr. Mukesh 1.FDP on Effective Mentoring


Nil Nil
Agarwal Skills-11-13 July 2017

Table B.2.2.1a: Details of Faculty Development Program

Self Assessment Report Page 66


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Sample of Lecture Plan: 6CS3A Theory of Computation

At the starting of Semester according to program curriculum, faculty designs lecture plan and
discuss with the HOD for smooth delivery of respective course content to ensure the completion
of course on time.

Course Outcomes:-
After Completion of Course Student will be able to
CO1: Examine Finite Automata and Regular Expression.
CO2: Classify regular sets of Regular Grammars.
CO3: Categorize Context Free Language and Design Pushdown automata.
CO4: Design Turing machine, compare Chomsky hierarchy languages and analyze Linear
bounded automata.

JAIPUR ENGINEERING COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
LECTURE PLAN
Subject: Theory of Computation Year/Sem/Sec: III/VI/A

No. of Lecture Req./(Avl.) : (33)(/40)


Semester Starting Semester Ending:

Unit
Lect Remark/
No./ Lect
. Date of Actual
Total Topics .
Req Delivery lect.
lec. No.
. Taken
Req.
FA &RE- Introduction about TOC- Basic concepts of FA, DFA
Acceptability & Designing FA, NFA Introduction
NFA - Acceptability of String - Conversion of NFA to DFA
Unit-1 NFA with moves- Acceptability, Conversion to DFA
(5)
Minimization & Equivalence of FA
Moore & Mealy Machines
Conversion of Moore - Mealy Machine vice versa
Regular sets of RG- Basic Definition of formal Languages &
Unit- Grammars
2(10) Regular Expression - Regular Grammar

Self Assessment Report Page 67


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Regular Languages- RE- Conversion of FA to RE vice versa
Conversion of RE to NF with moves- Thompson’s Rule
Conversion of RE to DFA, Equivalence of RE
Elimination of moves from the transition system
Closure proportion for Regular set- Arden’s Theorem
Pumping lemma for regular sets
Decision Algorithm for Regular set’s- Myhell Nerod Theory-
Organization of FA
CFG- Derivations of Languages- Relationship Between Derivation &
Tree- Ambiguity
Eliminating Ambiguity in Grammar & Left Factoring
Eliminating Left Recursion, Useless Symbol, Null and unit
Unit 3- Production
(7) Normal Form- Chomsky Normal Form
GNF- Lemma 1 & Lemma 2
PDA- Instantaneous Description- DPDA & CFL- Pumping Lemma-
Application
Turing Machines- Computable Languages & Functions- Construction
Storage in Finite Control- Multiple Tracks- Checking of Symbols-
Unit 4- Subroutine
(6) Two way infinite tape- Undesirability- Properties of Recursive & RE
Language
Universal Turing Machines as an Undecidable Problem- Universal
Language- Rice Theorem
LBA- CSL-Chomsky Hierarchy of Languages & Automata
Unit 5-
(6) Organization of LBA Properties of Context Sensitive Language

Recommended books:
1. Aho, Hopcroft and Ullman, Introduction to Automata Theory, Formal Languages and Computation, Narosa
2. Cohen, Introduction to Computer Theory, Addison Wesley
3. Papadimitriou, Introduction to Theory of Computing, Prentice Hall.

Self Assessment Report Page 68


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Evaluation Process

Internal Exam External Exam

Mid Term Test (I &II) Oral Evaluation


Practical Theory
Question paper prepared by course coordinator

Class Coordinator submit all Question Problem Solving


Papers to MODCOM Lecture
Overall Result
Analysis
Moderation committee selects one question
paper among the set of three papers
Review and
Review and
Suggestions
Suggestions

Selected Question Paper


send to Exam Cell

Then Internal Examination Submitted


Coordinator takes Printout of the
final paper
Submitted
IQAC

Answer sheet Submitted


evaluation by
course coordinator Review and
Suggestions
Report generation and
Result Analysis on basis of CO submitted to Program
Coordinator

Weak Strong
Students List Students List

Assignments & Encourage &


Evaluation Guide For
GATE/PSUs/Go
vt. Exam

Figure 2.2.1c: Examination Evaluation Process

Self Assessment Report Page 69


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Evaluation Process and Reforms

The department follows the below steps for smooth conduction of examination and evaluation
Process:

 The department adhere academic calendar prescribed by RTU, Kota

 There is departmental Examination Committee in which two faculty members are


included for conduction of Internal Examination and Two for External Examination.

a. The committee circulates notice a week before the commencement of examination


by taking prior approval from HOD.

b. Course Coordinator prepares and submit their question paper to respective class
coordinator

c. Then class coordinator submits all question papers to Moderation Committee.

d. Moderation Committee in coordination with IQAC selects one question paper


among the set of three papers.

e. Selected Question paper send to Internal Examination Coordinator then internal


examination coordinator takes printout of the final paper.

f. During the exam two invigilators are assigned in each class room and students sits
in the class rooms according to appropriate seating plan.

g. After the completion of exam, answer sheets evaluation, result analysis on basis
of CO, weak/strong student list is prepared by course coordinator and submitted
to Internal Examination Coordinator. Along with the soft copy.

h. If student secures marks less than 60% in some particular CO then he/she will be
considered as weak student. Then course coordinator provides assignment to them
and evaluates.

i. Student who secures marks greater than 60% in some particular CO then he/she
will be considered as strong student. Then they will be encouraged & motivated
for GATE/PSUs/Govt. Exam.

Self Assessment Report Page 70


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Student Performance and Learning Outcomes

 The department gives emphasis on concept building and exposure of latest knowledge of
the subject. For this following measures are taken: practical exposure, communication
skill, ethical values, and social responsibilities. Departments have incorporated
presentations, case studies, group discussion, class tests and tutorials
 For developing communication skills, group discussions, presentation on theory based
and general topics are regularly carried out in the class.
 For defining the graduate’s attributes, program outcomes are drafted for which the
evaluation is done accordingly.
 Course outcomes are defined not only for the subjects but their respective labs also. Then
course outcomes are mapped with the program outcomes. This mapping depicts the
achievement of the particular learning outcome.
 The examination evaluation is also performed on the basis of course outcomes which
ensure the result of the achievement of outcomes. Generally this criterion for
achievement is 60%.
 Assignments for weak students on the basis of CO Analysis.

2.2.2. Quality ofInternalSemester Question Papers, Assignments andEvaluation (20)


(Mention the initiatives, implementation details and analysis of learning levels related to quality of semester
question papers, assignments and evaluation)

For improving the quality of question papers, assignments andevaluationprocessthe


department has drafted a committeenamed as ModerationCommittee and Internal Quality
Assurance Committee (IQAC) whichensures the evaluation flows in the correct way.

The department follows the below steps for Quality ofInternal SemesterQuestion Papers,
Assignments andEvaluation.

 The department adhere academic calendar prescribed by RTU,Kota


 There is departmental Examination Committee in which two faculty members are
included for conduction of Internal Examination and Two for External Examination.

Self Assessment Report Page 71


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
*sample notice for preparing question paper

EXAMINATION NOTICE

All faculty members who are handling B.Tech (CSE) 3 rd semester are requested to send the soft copy of the question
paper and solution in proper format for MTT-2 on or before 14th November 2017 to corresponding class
coordinators. Syllabus for MTT-2 is remaining 2.5 Units. Subject of Email and document/file name should be in this
format, i.e. subject_code_subject_name_section_facultyname_question/solution.

All Class coordinators of 3rd semester are requested to send soft copy of question papers and solutions of your
respective class to moderation committee on 15th November 2017 at [email protected] positively. Subject of
Email should be in this format, i.e. semester_section_cc name.

The Moderation committee is requested to submit hard copies of question papers to the internal exam coordinators
on or before 16th November 2017, also requested to send (soft copy) solution of selected papers
to [email protected] on 23rd November 2017.
The pattern of question paper is
1. The Question Paper will be of 1 hour & 30 Minutes duration.
2. Question Paper should contain GATE& RTU questions.
3. Course outcome marks should be balanced.
4. The Question paper format is given below
Section Type of Marks
Questions
A MCQ 10
B Subjective 15
C Subjective 15
Total 40

a) The committee circulates notice a week before the commencement of examination


by taking prior approval from HOD. And also circulate a notice among all the
faculty members to prepare question paper of their respective subjects.
b) Course Coordinator prepares and submit their question paper to respective class
coordinator
c) Then class coordinators submit all question papers to Moderation Committee.
d) Moderation Committee in coordination with IQAC selects one question paper
among the set of three papers.
e) Selected Question paper send to Internal Examination Coordinator then internal
examination coordinator takes printout of the final paper.
f) During the exam two invigilators are assigned in each class room and students sits
in the class rooms according to appropriate seating plan.
g) After the completion of exam, answer sheets evaluation, result analysis on basis
of CO, weak/strong student list is prepared by course coordinator and submitted
to Internal Examination Coordinator along with the soft copy.

Self Assessment Report Page 72


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
h) If student secures marks less than 60% in some particular CO then he/she will be
considered as weak student. Then course coordinator provides assignment to them
and evaluates.
i) Student who secures marks greater than 60% in some particular CO then he/she
will be considered as strong student. Then they will be encouraged & motivated
for GATE/PSUs/Govt. Exam.
MODCOM committee has been formed to ensure the quality of continuous internal assessment
process.The following members are being the part of this Committee.
Session 2017-18

S.NO FACULTY NAME QUALIFICATION DESIGNATION ROLE

1 Dr. Vijay Singh Rathore Ph.D,M.Tech,MCA, MBA Professor& HOD Chair

2 Dr.Bhavna sharma Ph.D,M.Tech,MCA Associate Professor Member

3 Dr. Sanjay Gaur Ph.D,M.Tech Associate Professor Member

4 Dr. Nilam Chaudhary Ph.D,M.Tech Associate Professor Member

5 Mr. Mukesh Agarwal M.Tech, B.E. Asst.Professor Member

6 Mr. Gajendra Sharma M.Tech, MCA Asst.Professor Member


Session 2016-17
S.NO FACULTY NAME QUALIFICATION DESIGNATION ROLE
1 Ms. Neelam Chaplot M.Tech,BE Associate Professor Chair
2 Dr.Bhavna sharma Ph.D,M.Tech,MCA Associate Professor Member
3 Mr. Gajendra Sharma M.Tech, MCA Asst. Professor Member
4 Mr. Ankur Raj M.Tech, B.Tech Asst. Professor Member
5 Ms. Priya Gupta M.Tech, B.Tech Asst. Professor Member
Session 2015-16
S.NO FACULTY NAME QUALIFICATION DESIGNATION ROLE

1 Ms. Neelam Chaplot M.Tech,BE Associate Professor & Chair


HOD
2 Mr. Mukesh Agrawal M.Tech,B.E. Associate Professor Member
3 Mr. Amit Mithal M.Tech,B.Tech Asst.Professor Member
4 Mr.GajendraSharma M.Tech, MCA Asst.Professor Member

Table B.2.2.2a: Details of Moderation Committee

Self Assessment Report Page 73


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Internal Exam

Mid Term Test (I &II) Oral Evaluation

Question paper prepared by course


coordinator

Class Coordinator submit all Question Problem


Papers to MODCOM Solving Lecture

Review and Suggestions


Moderation committee selects one question
paper among the set of three papers

Selected Question Paper


send to IEC Report generated and
submitted to Program
Coordinator
Then Internal Examination Submitted
Coordinator takes Printout of the
final paper
IQAC

Submitted
Answer sheet
evaluation by Scrutinizing
course coordinator Committee
Review and Suggestions

Result Analysis on basis of CO

Weak Strong
Students List Students List

Assignments Encourage &


& Evaluation Guide For
GATE/PSUs/G
ovt. Exam

Report Generated and submitted

Figure 2.2.2a: Process of Quality of Internal Question Papers, Semester Assignments and Evaluation

Self Assessment Report Page 74


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
*Sample MTT Paper

JAIPUR ENGINEERING COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
SECTION C SUBJECT : Theory of Computation
CODE : 6CS3A
Attempt any one part TIME:1:30 Hr MTT-I MM: 40
Q1.A.(CO2). i. Write Regular Expression for the [1]
language accepting the strings which
are starting with 1 and ending with COURSE OUTCOMES
0, over the set ∑={0, 1} On Completion of this course, student will be able to:
ii. Write Regular Expression for the [2] CO1: Analyze Finite Automata & Regular Expression and also
language consisting of all words differentiate Non- Deterministic Finite Automata and Deterministic
over the set ∑ ={ a,b } having “aa” Finite Automata
as a substring CO2: Categorize regular sets of Regular Grammars.
iii. Write Regular Expression for the [2] CO3: Categorize Context Free Language and Design Pushdown
string in which any number of a’s automata.
followed by any number of b’s is CO4: Design Turing machine, Compare Chomsky hierarchy languages
followed by any number of c’s over and also analyze Linear bounded automata.
the set ∑={a,b,c}
Q1.B.(CO2). Construct a NFA for Regular Expression [10] Instructions: Attempt all sections
(a+b)*abb using Thompson rule
(OR) SECTION A
Q2.A.(CO2). Construct DFA for the regular Expression [7]
(a+b)*(aa+bb)(a+b)* Attempt all questions (objective/fill in the blank) (10 x 1)
Q2.B.(CO2). If a Language L consisting of all strings over [8]
{a,b} ending in ‘a’ then prove that L is Q1. (CO1). There are ________ tuples in finite state machine.
regular Language using Myhill- Nerode A. 5 B. 4
Theorem C. 6 D. unlimited
Q2. (C01). In DFA Transition function maps.
A. Σ * Q -> Σ B. Q * Σ -> Q
C. Σ * Σ -> Q D. Q * Q -> Σ

Q3. (CO1). If two finite state machines are equivalent, they should have the
same number of
A states B. edges

Self Assessment Report Page 75


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
C. states and edges D. none of these Q10.(CO2). Regular expressions are closed under
Q4. (CO1). There are ________ tuples in mealy machine A. Union B. Intersection

A. 5 B. 7 C. Kleen Closure D. All of the above


C. 6 D. None of the above
Q5. (C01). In moore model outputs depends on SECTION B
A. Present state B. Input state Attempt any one part
C. Next state D. Both A and B
Q1.A.(CO1) Explain the basic concept of finite state system. Also [15]
Q6. (CO2). The word 'formal' in formal languages means explain the terms initial state, final state and non final
A. the symbols used have B. they are unnecessary, in state
well-defined meaning reality
C. only form of the string of D. Both (a) and (b) (OR)
symbols is significant
Q7. (CO2). Finite state machine can recognize Q2.A.(CO1) Construct Mealy machine equivalent to the given Moore [8]
Machine
A. any grammar B. only context-free Present Input=0 Input=1 Output
grammar State Next State Next State
q0 q0 q1 0
C. Only regular grammar D. None
q1 q2 q3 1
q2 q1 q3 0
Q8. (CO2). Which two of the following four regular expressions are q3 q3 q0 1
equivalent? (ε is the empty string).
(i) (00)*(ε + 0) (ii) (00)* (iii) 0* (iv) 0(00)* Q2.B.(CO1) Explain the difference between Mealy and moore
[GATE 1996] machine [7]
A. ((i) & (ii) B. (ii) & (iii)
C. (i) & (iii D. (iii) & (iv)
Q9. (C02). Pumping lemma is based on which principal
A. Brute force B. Pigeon hole
C. Context free Grammar D. None of the above

Self Assessment Report Page 76


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

JAIPUR ENGINEERING COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
SECTION C SUBJECT : Theory of Computation
CODE : 6CS3A
Attempt any one part TIME:1:30 Hr MTT-II MM: 40
Q1.A.(C04) Design Turing machine M that recognize the [5]
language {0n1n│n ≥ 1}
COURSE OUTCOMES
On Completion of this course, student will be able to:
Q1.B. (C04). Explain Chomsky Hierarchy of Languages in [10]
detail CO1: Analyze Finite Automata & Regular Expression and also
differentiate Non- Deterministic Finite Automata and Deterministic
Finite Automata
(OR)
CO2: Categorize regular sets of Regular Grammars
Q2.A.(C04) Write short notes on CO3: Categorize and Context free language and Design
i. Universal turing Machine [3] Pushdown automata
ii. Halting problem [2] CO4: Design Turing Machine and compare Chomsky hierarchy
Write short notes on Linear Bounded Automata [5] languages and also analyze Linear bounded automata.
Q2.B.(C04)
Q2.C.C04). Check whether the given production is Context [5]
Sensitive grammar or not Instructions: Attempt all sections
a. A→BB
b. aBAbCD → abcDbcd SECTION A

Attempt all questions (objective/fill in the blank) (10 x 1)

Q1. (CO3). A grammar that produce more than one parse tree is called as
[GATE 2004]
A. Ambiguous B. umambiguous
C. Regular D. None of the above
Q2. (C03). The C language is
[GATE 2010]
A. A Context free Languague B. A context language
C. A regular Language D. Parsable fully only by a
turing machine
Q3. (CO3). CFG can be recognized by

Self Assessment Report Page 77


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
A Push Down Automata B. 2-way LBA Q9. (C04). Type 3 Grammar is also called as
C. Both (A) & (B) D. None of the above
A. Unrestricted Grammar B. Context Sensitive
Q4. (CO3). PDA has ___________________ as auxiliary memory Grammar
C. Context free Grammar D. Regular Grammar
A. Infinite tape B. Stack
C. Finite Tape D. Queue Q10.(CO4). Which of the following are decidable ?
Q5. (C03). A production is said to be unit production when its RHS is a 1. whether the intersection of two 1.regular language is infinite.
single 2. whether a give context free language is regular
A. Symbol B. Non Terminal 3. whether two push down automata accept the same language.
4. whether a given grammar is context free[GATE 2008]
C. Terminal D. Epsilon
A. 1 and 2 B. 1 and 4
Q6.(CO4). Universal Turing machine influenced the concept of
C. 2 and 3 D. 2 and 4
A. A stored program B. computability
C. both (A) and (B) D. neither (a) or (b)
Q7. (CO4). Correct hierarchical relationship among context- free, right- SECTION B
linear, and context-sensitive language is
Attempt any one part
A. context-free ⊂ right- B. context-free ⊂ context-
linear ⊂ context-sensitive sensitive ⊂ right-linear Q1.A.(CO3) Convert the following grammar in to GNF [15]
context-sensitive ⊂ right- D. right-linear ⊂context- S->AB
C. inner ⊂context-free free ⊂context-sensitive
A->BS ǀ b
Q8. (CO4). Which of the following pairs have DIFFERENT expressive B->SA ǀ a
power? (OR)
[GATE 2011]
Q2.A.(CO3) Design a PDA for a Machine M which accept the string [10]
A. DFA and Non- B. DPDA and Non- na(w)<nb(w) where w€(a+b)*
Deterministic finite deterministic pushdown
automata(NFA) automata Q2.B.(CO3) Explain the working of pushdown automata [5]
C. Deterministic single-tape D. Single-tape Turing
Turing machine and Non- machine and multi-tape
deterministic single-tape Turing machine
Turing Machine

Criterion to provide assignments to the students


1. After the completion of exam, answer sheets evaluation, result analysis on basis of CO,
weak/strong student list is prepared by course coordinator and submitted to Internal
Examination Coordinator. Along with the soft copy.
2. If student secures marks less than 60% in some particular CO then he/she will be
considered as weak student. Then course coordinator provides assignment to them and
evaluates.
3. Student who secures marks greater than 60% in some particular CO then he/she will be
considered as strong student. Then they will be encouraged & motivated for
GATE/PSUs/Govt. Exam.

4. On the completion of each unit there is a common assignment for all students to
implement, analyze and for better understanding of respective course content.
The tables are shown below representing sample of Internal Assessment on the basis of
CO and weak student list.

Self Assessment Report Page 78


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Sample of CO Analysis
Examination: B.TECH Main Year/Semester/Section/ Session IV /VII / A/2016-17
Name of College: JAIPUR ENGINEERING COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE
Branch:COMPUTER SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
Subject & Code No.: Compiler Construction & 7CS5A
MTT2 Result Analysis MTT2
Obtained Below- Obtained Below-
Sr. University Roll CO3/Total 60% CO4/Tota 60% in
No. Roll No. No. Name of Candidate 40 10 CO3 % age in CO3 l CO4 % age CO4
1 13EJCCS001 1 AASHI MANAK BOHARA 33 9 16.5 82.5 N 16.5 82.5 N
2 13EJCCS002 2 AAYUDH THAKUR 32 8 16.5 82.5 N 15.5 77.5 N
3 13EJCCS003 3 AAYUSH SRIVASTAVA 34 9 17.5 87.5 N 16.5 82.5 N
4 13EJCCS004 4 ABHISHEK JAIN 35 9 17.5 87.5 N 17 85 N
5 13EJCCS005 5 ABHISHEK JAIN 36 9 18.5 92.5 N 17.5 87.5 N
6 13EJCCS006 6 ABHISHEK LADDHA 37 10 18.5 92.5 N 18.5 92.5 N
7 13EJCCS007 7 ABHISHEK RAJ 32 8 17 85 N 15 75 N
8 13EJCCS008 8 ABHISHEK SHARMA 35 9 17 85 N 18 90 N
9 13EJCCS010 9 ADITI SHARMA 34 9 16.5 82.5 N 17.5 87.5 N
10 13EJCCS011 10 ADITYA MATHUR 32 8 16.5 82.5 N 15 75 N
11 13EJCCS012 11 AKANKSHA PANDEY 20 5 12 60 N 8 40 Y
12 13EJCCS013 12 AKSHAY MISHRA 35 9 17.5 87.5 N 17 85 N
13 13EJCCS015 13 AKSHIT GUPTA 34 9 17.5 87.5 N 16.5 82.5 N
14 13EJCCS016 14 AMAN KUMAR LATA 35 9 19 95 N 15.5 77.5 N
15 13EJCCS018 15 AMOGH PAREEK 32 8 16.5 82.5 N 15.5 77.5 N
16 13EJCCS019 16 ANIRUDH BANSAL 35 9 17 85 N 18 90 N
17 13EJCCS020 17 ANJALI SHARMA 36 9 18 90 N 17.5 87.5 N
18 13EJCCS021 18 ANJALI SINGH 35 9 17 85 N 18 90 N
19 13EJCCS022 19 ANKIT SHARMA 23 6 13 65 N 10 50 Y
20 13EJCCS023 20 ANKUSH GOYAL 35 9 16.5 82.5 N 18.5 92.5 N
21 13EJCCS024 21 ANSHIKA BANGROO 26 7 16 80 N 10 50 Y
22 13EJCCS025 22 ANUJ JAIN 34 9 17.5 87.5 N 16 80 N
23 13EJCCS026 23 ANUJ RASTOGI 34 9 17.5 87.5 N 16.5 82.5 N
24 13EJCCS027 24 ANURAG SAINI 33 9 18.5 92.5 N 14 70 N
25 13EJCCS028 25 APOORV DIXIT 0 0 0 Y 0 Y
26 13EJCCS029 26 APOORVA JAIN 33 9 15.5 77.5 N 17 85 N
27 13EJCCS030 27 ARCHIT WADHWA 31 8 15 75 N 16 80 N
28 13EJCCS031 28 ARPIT TOSHNIWAL 32 8 17 85 N 15 75 N
Sample of Weak Student List:
Department of Computer Science & Engineering
II Mid Term Test (2016-17)
List of weak Students
Year & Semester:- IIV & VII -A
Subject & Code: Compiler Construction & 7CS5A
Faculty: C.J.Nega Cheltha
Assignme Assignme
nt given to nt given to
Weak Weak
CO3 CO4 Students Students
S. No Name of student (Y/N) (Y/N) CO3(Y/N) CO4(Y/N)
1 AKANKSHA PANDEY N Y N Y
2 ANKIT SHARMA N Y N Y
3 ANSHIKA BANGROO N Y N Y
4 DEEPAK SHARMA Y N Y N
5 DEEPANKER KUMAR N Y N Y

Self Assessment Report Page 79


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Assignment Based on CO3:
1. Explain the syntax directed translation schemes in detail
Assignment Based on CO4
1. What is the advantage of DAG. Write steps for constructing DAG
Rajasthan Technical University
Examination: B.TECH Main Shift-I Year/Semester/Section IV/VII/A Session 2016-17
Name of College: JAIPUR ENGINEERING COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE
Branch: COMPUTER SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
Subject and Code No.: Compiler Construction & 7CS5A
Sr. CO3 CO4
Name of Candidate
No. 10 10
1 AKANKSHA PANDEY NA 8
2 ANKIT SHARMA NA 7
3 ANSHIKA BANGROO NA 8
4 DEEPAK SHARMA 8 NA
5 DEEPANKAR KUMAR NA 8
CO Wise Assignments
C01 :Q.1 what the different phases of complier? Explain with examples
CO2: Q.2Calculate canonical collection of set of LR(1) items for the grammar given below
S’->S
S->CC
C->CC/d
CO3:Q.3.Explain the syntax directed translation schemes in detail
CO4:Q.4 What is the advantage of DAG. Write steps for constructing DAG

Assignment’s award list


Examination: B.TECH Main Shift-I Year/Semester/Section IV/VII/A Session 2016-17
Name of College: JAIPUR ENGINEERING COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE
Branch: COMPUTER SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
Subject and Code No.: Compiler Construction & 7CS5A
Sr. CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4
Name of Candidate
No. 10 10 10 10
1 AAYUSH SRIVASTAVA NIL 6 NIL NIL
2 ABHISHEK RAJ NIL 6 NIL NIL
3 AKANKSHA PANDEY 6 6 NIL 8
4 AKSHAY MISHRA NIL 6 NIL NIL
5 AMOGH PAREEK 7 7 NIL NIL
6 ANIRUDH BANSAL NIL 7 NIL NIL
7 ANUJ JAIN NIL 7 NIL NIL
8 ANURAG SAINI NIL 6 NIL NIL
9 ARCHIT WADHWA NIL 7 NIL NIL
10 ARPIT TOSHNIWAL NIL 6 NIL NIL
11 ASHISH KUMAR NIL 7 NIL NIL
12 ASHUTOSH SHUKLA NIL 8 NIL NIL
13 AYUSH GOYAL NIL 6 NIL NIL
14 BHARAT GUPTA NIL 6 NIL NIL
15 BUL BUL KOUL NIL 8 NIL NIL
16 CHAITANAYA SETHI NIL 9 NIL NIL
17 CHAITANYA SWARAJ NIL 9 NIL NIL
18 CHIRAG JAIN NIL 8 NIL NIL
19 DEEPAK SHARMA NIL 7 8 NIL
20 DEKSHANT KHANDELWAL NIL 6 NIL NIL
21 DEVANSH SETHI NIL 6 NIL NIL
22 DIKSHA AGGARWAL NIL 6 NIL NIL
23 GAURAV MAYANK NIL 6 NIL NIL
24 GUNJAN BHARDWAJ NIL 7 NIL NIL

Self Assessment Report Page 80


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
To improve the course outcome achievement less than 60% we perform Unit Tests after the
completion of each unit in each subject. They are again evaluated to ensure they achieve the
criterion of course outcome in each subject. Other measures are

 Mentoring of Weak Student on regular basis.


 On Wednesday 3:00 – 5:00 PM Extra Class for Weak Students as well as for interested
students also.
 Swayam: its main objective is to provide all with best teaching learning resources. All
the courses are interactive and prepared by best teachers in the country. Quality of
content of the course is ensured by seven national coordinators namely, NEPTEL, UGC,
CEC, NCERT, NIOS, IGNOU and IIMB.
 Lectures: Faculty of the CSE Department effectively teach students about a concerned
subject. Faculties convey significant information, history, background, theories, analogies
and equations to make the concepts clear.
 Tutorials: Faculty helps the slow learners by solving more number of similar problems.
Any specific problem is also entertained by Faculty Members.

 Presentations: Faculty members also provide PPT and Videos related to course. Videos
effectively communicate the working of actual engineering solutions-long learning in the
appropriate societal context.
 Experimental Laboratory Work: Laboratory work demonstrates how theory can be
verified by experiments through interpretation of results.
 Group Tasks: Through group task the concepts of engineering that the student has
understood in the course is showcased. This helps to do work in groups effectively.
 Hand-outs: Gives a quick insight to the course. It helps the slow learners to face the
exams with confidence
 Social Activity: Gives a sense of social responsibility to a student under ABHUYDAY
which includes Zarurat, Soch, Suhasini and Aashayen group.
 FDP/Conference/Workshop: Faculty members take knowledge about the latest
technology and deliver the same to students.
 E-Book/Digital Library/Video Lectures: The facility of (multi
Media) Digital Library is available where all interested students & faculty members may
read e-books and e-journals which are available on NPTEL, expert lectures on you tube.
 Fun Activity: Here, each concerned faculty teaches his/her subject with the help of fun
activity like making group and debates based on topics so that the student can learn the
topic in visualized manner.
 Center of Excellence::under Centre of excellence different MOU’s was done with
industries to emphasize on Internship, Project, Workshop for Students and Industrial
Visits, Students specific Training . These are Indo Vision Services Pvt. Ltd. SakRobotix
Lab, Infosys Campus Connect, AICTE-Youth4Work, WadhwaniFoundation,

Self Assessment Report Page 81


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
CADDCentre,ForskTechnologies, RedHatTechnologies, Salesforce Technologies Ltd,
Sambhodhi Tech Solutions, Cyberops, Siemens Ltd.

The department ensures the correctness in the evaluation system of internal semester
examinations with scrutinizing committee which scrutinizes theanswersheetsas well as checks
whether thereisanyissueintheevaluation. HOD can also scrutinize any answer sheet on random
basis to ensure the correctness in the evaluation system.

Sample of Scrutinizing Committee

JAIPUR ENGINERRING COLLEGE & RESEARCH CENTRE


DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE & ENGINERRING
EXAMINATION NOTICE
4TH SEMESTER SCRUITNIZER NAME LIST
SUBJECT SECTION FACULTY NAME SCRUITNIZER NAME
A KIRTI CHOUDHARY PRAHLAD SHARMA
B PRAHLAD SHARMA KIRTI CHOUDHARY
MP
C RAJAN JHA PRAHLAD SHARMA
D PRAHLAD SHARMA RAJAN JHA
A
B Dr. PRAMILA
DMS YOGITA PUNJABI
C VIJAYVARGIYA
D
A
B Dr. PRAMILA
SPT YOGITA PUNJABI
C VIJAYVARGIYA
D
A GEERIJA LAVANIYA Dr. NILAM CHOUDHARY
B VATAN MISHRA Dr. SANJAY GAUR
SE
C Dr. NILAM CHAUDHARY GEERIJA LAVANIYA
D Dr. SANJAY GAUR VATAN MISHRA
A MOHIT RAJPUT S.S MANAKTALA
B S.S MANAKTALA MOHIT RAJPUT
POC
C DEVENDRA SHARMA MOHIT RAJPUT
D MOHIT RAJPUT DEVENDRA SHARMA
A RICHA UPADHYAY SAROJ AGARWAL
B SAROJ AGARWAL RICHA UPADHYAY
PPL
C RICHA UPADHYAY SAROJ AGARWAL
D SAROJ AGARWAL RICHA UPADHYAY

Self Assessment Report Page 82


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
2.2.3. Quality of Student Projects (25)
(Quality of the project is measured in terms of consideration to factors including, but not limited to,
environment, safety, ethics, cost, type (application, product, research, review etc.) and standards. Processes
related to project identification, allotment, continuous monitoring, evaluation including demonstration of
working prototypes and enhancing the relevance of projects. Mention Implementation details including
details of POs and PSOs addressed through the projects with justification)

The projects are mandatory for VII semester and VIII semester students. Students make their
minor and major projects under the supervision of their respective Guide Faculties. In VII
semester student make their minor project which carries 50 marks in RTU curriculum. The
student may extend the minor project into major project in VIII semester which carries 200
marks in RTU curriculum.

To ensure the quality of projects, IQAC along with project in-charge evaluates the projects
submitted by students. The following members being the part of this Committee as shown in
table:
S.NO FACULTY NAME QUALIFICATION DESIGNATION ROLE

1 Dr. Vijay Singh Rathore Ph.D,M.Tech,MCA,MBA Professor& HOD Chair

2 Dr.Bhavna Sharma Ph.D,M.Tech,MCA Associate Professor Project


Coordinator
3 Dr. Sanjay Gaur Ph.D,M.Tech Associate Professor Member
4 Dr. Nilam Chaudhary Ph.D,M.Tech Associate Professor Member
5 Mr. Mukesh Agarwal M.Tech, B.E. Asst.Professor Member

6. Ms. Manju Vyas M.Tech, B.E. Asst.Professor Member


7. Mr.Ankur Raj M.Tech, B.E. Asst.Professor Co-Coordinator
Table B.2.2.3a: Details of Members Involved in Project Evaluation

On completion of the Project:

CO1 Graduates will be able to understand the concepts of real world complex problems with
analyzing social impact for sustainable development.
CO2 Graduates will be able to create cost effective solutions in multidisciplinary environments.
CO3 Graduates will be able to Design and Develop Software Applications.
CO4 Graduates will be able to demonstration their work with writing effective Reports, Design
Documentation and Presentation.
Table B.2.2.3b: Project Course Outcomes

Self Assessment Report Page 83


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Subject Code L/T/P CO P P P P P P P P P P P P P P


O O O O O O O O O O O O S S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 1 O O
0 1 2 1 2
Graduates will be able to
understand the concepts
P of real world complex
H H M H M M M L H M M H L L
problems with analyzing
social impact for
sustainable development.
P Graduates will be able to
Project Stage-I & II

create cost effective


7CSPR & 8CSPR

solutions in H L M M M L L _ M M H H L M
multidisciplinary
environments.
P Graduates will be able to
Design and Develop M M H M H L _ L H H M H M H
Software Applications.
Graduates will be able to
P demonstration their work
with writing effective
H L L M M L _ _ H H L H - -
Reports, Design
Documentation and
Presentation.

Table B.2.2.3c: Mapping b/w Course Outcomes &Project Course Outcomes

Self Assessment Report Page 84


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Start

Database of IV Sort students in chronological


Year Students order of academic performance

Divide students into four categories Topper


List (A), Average List (B), Below Average
List (C) and Bottom List (D).

Departmental
Display faculty list with their area
Database of
of interest
faculties

Select one student from


Project Allotment and Guide
first three categories A,
Allotment
B and C

Repeat above step for each student


in list

Stop

No
Is project containing 3
students have given
same guide List of guide & Team
formation is prepared

Yes

One student from bottom list is allotted Bottom student


to each guide by project in charge database
Yes

No
Does each faculty Yes
Are all students
has total 4 allotted a
students guide?

No

Figure 2.2.3a: Flow Chart of Project Group Formation

Self Assessment Report Page 85


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Project Group Formation

 Students of IV Year are sorted in chronological order on the basis of their academic
performance.
 The students are divided into four categories namely Topper Student List (A), Average
Student List (B), Below Average Student List (C) and Bottom Student List (D). Each
category contains 25% of total final year students.
 Display the list of faculty members according to their area of interest.
 Select one student from each category and make a team.
 Each team selects one guide according to their area of interest and asks the guide for their
project approval after showing the abstract of the project.

Sample of Project Team Member


S.No. Roll No. Group 1 (LEADER) Sec. Roll No. Group 2 Sec.
1 14EJCCS008 ADITI METHI A 14EJCCS001 AAYUSHI JOHRI A
2 14EJCCS010 ADITYA JOHARI A 14EJCCS002 ABHISHEK PANDEY A
3 14EJCCS013 AKSHAY JAIN A 14EJCCS006 ABHISHEK SOMANI A
4 14EJCCS017 AKSHITA JAIN A 14EJCCS016 AKSHITA AGRAWAL A
5 14EJCCS031 ANUSHKA JAIN A 14EJCCS019 AMANDEEP GOYAL A
6 14EJCCS028 ANUSHREE JAIN A 14EJCCS021 ANIRUDDH SHARMA A
7 14EJCCS032 APOORVA GOYAL A 14EJCCS022 ANISHA GOYAL A
8 14EJCCS033 APURVI MANSINGHKA A 14EJCCS023 ANJALI AGARWAL A
9 14EJCCS037 ASHITA BANSAL A 14EJCCS026 ANKITA SINGHAL A
10 14EJCCS038 ASTHA KOUL A 14EJCCS027 ANKUSH KUMAR A
11 14EJCCS040 AVIJIT SINGH A 14EJCCS029 ANUJ SHARMA A
12 14EJCCS042 AYUSHI AERAN A 14EJCCS039 ATUL DADA A
13 14EJCCSO45 BHAWIKA AGARWAL A 14EJCCS044 BHASKAR SHARMA A
14 14EJCCS049 DEEKSHANT MAMODIA A 14EJCCS053 DIVISHA SHARMA A
15 14EJCCS050 DHRUVAL BHARDWAJ A 14EJCCS059 HARISH KUMAR RATHORE A
16 14EJCCS054 DIVYA DAVE A 14EJCCS062 HARSHITA SHARMA A
17 14EJCCS055 DIVYA MAHESHWARI A 14EJCCS066 ISHITA A
18 14EJCCS057 GARVIT MITTAL A 14EJCCS067 ISHU MITTAL A
19 14EJCCS064 ISHA JAIN A 14EJCCS079 LUV KUMAR GUPTA A
20 14EJCCS065 ISHANVI MODI A 14EJCCS080 MANJARI SINGH B
21 14EJCCS068 JAPLEEN KAUR A 14EJCCS083 MEETANSHI RAWAT B
22 14EJCCS071 JAYANTI CHOUHAN A 14EJCCS091 NAVEEN SAINI B
23 14EJCCS073 KAJAL AGARWAL A 14EJCCS097 NETRA SINGHAL B
24 14EJCCS075 KANISHKA GOYAL A 14EJCCS098 NIKHIL GARG B
25 14EJCCS076 KAPIL B KHANDELWAL A 14EJCCS104 PANKAJ KARAMCHANDANIB
26 14EJCCS084 MEGHALI KHANDELWALB 14EJCCS109 POOJA SHARMA B
27 14EJCCS086 MOHIT KUMAR EARAN B 14EJCCS113 PRANAV DUA B
28 14EJCCS087 MOHIT KUMAWAT B 14ejccs116 PRATIBHA AGARWAL B
29 14EJCCS088 MOHIT MAHESHWARI B 14EJCCS122 RAHUL SHAMBHWANI B
30 14EJCCS095 NEHA PIPRONIYAN B 14EJCCS124 RAJESH AYALDASANI B
31 14EJCCS096 NEHA SEWDA B 14EJCCS125 RAKSHANDA KAUL B
32 14EJCCS099 NIKHIL GUPTA B 14EJCCS126 RISHABH SHARMA B
33 14EJCCS103 PALLAVI VARSHNEY B 14ejccs130 ROHAN JANDU B
34 14EJCCS108 POOJA GUPTA B 14EJCCS132 ROHIT KUMAR GUPTA B
35 14EJCCS117 PRIYANKA BHARDWAJ B 14EJCCS134 ROHIT MATHUR B
36 14EJCCS120 RAHUL JASWANI B 14EJCCS135 RONAK PATNI B
37 14EJCCS121 RAHUL KUMAR GUPTA B 14EJCCS137 SAKSHI GARG B
38 14EJCCS127 RISHIKA AGARWAL B 14EJCCS143 SAPNA GOHRANI B
39 14EJCCS138 SAKSHI GUPTA B 14EJCCS147 SHIVAM CHETANI B
40 14EJCCS139 SAKSHI SINGHAL B 14EJCCS148 SHIVANI MAREJA B

Self Assessment Report Page 86


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Team Formation and Guide Allotment

Project Identification

Project Filtration

If Practical
Implementation is
possible

No

Yes

Project Allotment

Project Continuous Evaluation

Presentation and Performance


Feedback

Project Submission

Final Project Assessment Project Assessment Committee

Figure 2.2.3b: Project Evaluation Process

Self Assessment Report Page 87


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
1. Project Identification

 Project coordinator issues a circular at the end of 6th semester to all faculty members
to provide their area of interest and the list of five projects to be given to the
students.
 Students are also encouraged to submit the idea of their own for doing the project.
 Final list of projects has been made and display on notice board.
 The list of previous year projects is also displayed at notice board which ensures no
repetition of project work and also encourages students to enhance the previous
works.
 Each group of students decides the project guide according to their area of interest.
 Each team selects their own project idea or from list of projects.

2. Project Filtration & Allotment

 Each team or group of students discusses their own project idea with their guide.
 If the project idea submitted by the student/ group of students fulfills the basic
requirements, then it will be allotted to that student/ group of students.
 If it does not fulfill the basic requirements, then a new project idea is allotted to that
student/group of students from the list of finalized projects.

3. Project Continuous Evaluation

 Project coordinator displays the deadline on notice board for the progress report
presentations and final submission of the project report.
 Each group has to summit weekly progress report to the respective guide.
 Each team show their project demonstration followed by viva-voice has been carried
out twice in a semester in front of guide, then guide review the progress and gives
suggestions.

4. Procedure of Project Evaluation

 A presentation followed by viva voce is also carried out at the end of semester in
front of the external examiner and other students.
 Each group of students has to submit a report of their work along with the role of
each team member.
 The project exhibition is carried out at the end of semester. Student/group of students
demonstrated the project in front of external examiner and other students.

Self Assessment Report Page 88


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
 Final Assessment of the project and marks finalization is done by the project
assessment team along with external examiner and respective guide
 The procedure of project work is given in Table B.2.2.3d. The procedure for internal
and external evaluation is presented in Table B.2.2.3eand TableB.2.2.3f respectively.

Phase Subject Code Semester Nature of Work Assessment


Project ideas and Abstract
Problem Definition
Submission
Finalize projecttheme/title, Define
ProgressPresentation
Phase I Project-I VII Objectives, CompletionTimeLine
7CSPR ProjectImplementation Project Demonstration
Report Submission and University
Project Report
Viva
New Project idea or extension of
Problem Definition
Minor Project
ProjectImplementation ProgressPresentation
PhaseII Project-II VIII Project Competition, Testing Project Demonstration
8CSPR Project Report&
Teamwork Assessment
Demonstration
UniversityViva Project Report
Table B.2.2.3d: Project Evaluation Process

Session (30) External (20)


Title
Project
S. No of Attendance Report Viva Presentation Demonstration Viva Demonstration
Guide Total (50)
Project (5) (5) (5) (5) (10) (10) (10)

Table B.2.2.3e: Scheme for the evaluation Project-I

Session (120) External (80)


Title
S. Project
of Total
No Guide
Project Attendance Report Viva Presentation Demonstration Viva Presentation Demonstration (200)
(10) (20) (30) (30) (30) (30) (30) (20)

Table B.2.2.3f: Scheme for the evaluation Project-II

Self Assessment Report Page 89


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Sample of Student Project Details:

S# PROJECT NAME PO / PSO


PO1,PO2,PO3,PO10,PO11,PO12/
1 Clean India
PSO1,PSO2
Assistive Technology Tools and Strategies PO1,PO2,PO3,PO10,PO11,PO12/
2
for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder PSO1,PSO2
3 Software management Tool PO1,PO2,PO3,PO10,PO11,PO12
4 Krishi Laabh PO1,PO2,PO3,PO10,PO11,PO12
5 Home automation System PO1,PO2,PO3,PO10,PO11,PO12
PO1,PO2,PO3,PO10,PO11,PO12 /
6 Health Care Management System
PSO2
7 E-Commerce Website Shop Logo PO1,PO2,PO3,PO10,PO11,PO12
8 FORMGET_TESTING PO1,PO2,PO3,PO10,PO11,PO12
PO1,PO2,PO3,PO10,PO11,PO12 /
9 Bookshop
PSO2
10 Roster PO1,PO2,PO3,PO4,PO10,PO11,PO12

Table B.2.2.3g: List of Student Project

Self Assessment Report Page 90


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Sample of Cover Page of Project Report


A
Project Report
On
<PROJECT TITLE IN UPPER CASE>
Submitted in partial fulfillment for the award of degree of
Bachelor of Technology
From
Rajasthan Technical University, Kota
By

<Student Name1>
<University Roll No 1>
<Student Name2>
<University Roll No 2>
<Student Name3>
<University Roll No 3>

Department of Computer Science and Engineering


Jaipur Engineering College & Research Centre
Jaipur
2017-2018

Self Assessment Report Page 91


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
i. Initiatives relatedto industry interaction (15)
(Give details of the industry involvement in the program such as industry-attached laboratories, partial delivery of
appropriate courses by industry experts etc. Mention the initiatives, implementation details and impact analysis)

The department takes following initiatives for interaction with industries.

Industrial
Hackathon Visit

Invited
Talks

Conferences/
Workshops
Technical
Event Judges

Industry
Interaction
TP Squad

TEDX/MUN

Alumni
Sponsorship

Companies
Visited Campus

Figure 2.2.4a: Initiatives for Industry Interaction

 TedX/MUN: TedX talk organized JECRC to discuss various topics from the eminent
personalities. JECRC Model United Nations (JECRC MUN) is an opportunity for participants
to showcase their abilities by engaging them in substantial researching, critical thinking and
public speaking.
 Hackathon: JECRC Hackathon and Smart India Hackathon were organized to promote IT &
e-governance initiatives. Coders, developers & designers will have a prodigious platform to
use their out-of-the-box thinking on Bhamashah, e-Mitra, Artificial Intelligence, Internet of
Things, AR/VR, Blockchain, Machine Learning and Data Mobility. The event will witness
eminent IT leaders, dignitaries and respected Officials from Government of India.

Self Assessment Report Page 92


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
 TP Squad: The HOD along with TPO created a Training & Placement Squad which
focuses on the placement strategy for unplaced students and also interacts with industry
experts so that they may visit campus and recruit the students.
 Companies Visited Campus: Many companies visit campus for the recruitment of students.
The HR along with departmental TPO continuously interacts with industry experts so that
they may visit campus and increase the placement opportunity.
 Conferences/Workshops: The faculty members and students interact with delegates invited
as guest lecture, session chair in conferences and workshops organized in college.
 Alumni: The industry interaction is done with many students who are currently working in
many reputed companies that are spread across the country and world.
 Sponsorship: The sponsorship team visits many companies and institutes. The rewards
obtained in the form of sponsorship in various technical and non-technical events are
obtained.
 Industrial Visit: The department organizes industrial visits on yearly basis, through this
industry members start interactions with campus.
 Invited Talks: Department invites many industry experts to make student familiar with
industry environment and technologies.
 Technical Event Judges: The eminent personalities are invited as judges from industries and
institutes in technical activities like Just C, Java lets and many more.

MOU’s was done with industries to emphasize on


(a) Internship
(b) Project Workshop for Students
(c) Industrial Visits
(d) Students specific Training

S. No. Company Name Date

1. Indo Vision Services Pvt. Ltd. 22-Mar-2017

2. SakRobotix Lab 27-Apr-2017

3. Infosys Campus Connect 12-May-2017

Self Assessment Report Page 93


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
4. Wadhwani Foundation 13-Oct-2017

5. CADD Centre 30-Oct-2017

6. Forsk Technologies 2-Nov-2017

7. RedHat Technologies 7-Nov-2017

8. Salesforce Technologies Ltd. 17-Jan-2018

9. Cyberops 15-May-2018

10. Siemens Ltd. 26-July-2018

11 Techinest Pvt Ltd 18 Oct 2018

Table B.2.2.4a: Details of MOU


The following are the details of MOUs:

1. Indo Vision Services Pvt. Ltd.Indovision Services is an ISO 9001:2015 accredited


company and providing end to end ICT (Information & Communication) services and
solutions. It caters to multiple dimensions of industry. Primarily it provides following
services listed below:
 Emerging Technologies (Cloud, Automation)
 Manpower Solutions
 Training (College, Corporate & Govt.)
 Enterprise Solutions (ERP, IHRMS, ILMS , System Integration, Networking, Smart
City & Smart Campus, etc.)
 We serves both large and small organizations across all industry
sectors(Telecommunications,IT/ITES, Education, BFSI, Automobiles,Govt. &PSU’s)
through our brands and offerings.

2. SAKROBOTICS LAB: Establishing a Robotics Research Centre in the campus of JECRC,


providing Internship to JECRC Students and to engage the students in Robotics Training and
also offering Robotics product development exposure.

Self Assessment Report Page 94


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
3. Infosys Campus Connect:Launched by Infosys in May 2004, CC is a unique academia-
industry initiative to “architect the education experience”. The objective in launching the CC
program is to enhance the quality and quantity of the IT talent-pool; sustain the growth of the
IT industry itself. The portal will provide a digital platform for academia-industry interaction
anytime, and anywhere.

4. WADHWANI Foundation:Launched in 2000 by Dr. Romesh Wadhwani, the Foundations


comprising of Wadhwani Charitable Foundation and Wadhwani Operating Foundation are
working with the primary mission of accelerating economic development in emerging
economies through large-scale job creation with presence in Asia, Africa and Latin America
operating in association with governments, corporate, mentors, investors and educational
institutes. Its Initiatives are driving job creation through entrepreneurship, skills development
and innovation.

5. CADD Centre: As Asia's biggest network of CAD training centers, CADD Centre Training
Services is the training arm of the 30 year old CADD Centre Group, head quartered at
Chennai, India. They being the only company in India to offer an end-to-end solution to CAD
users specializes in Computer Aided Design (CAD), Computer Aided Engineering (CAE),
and Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM) with our wings spread across the globe.

6. Forsk Technologies: Forsk Technology offer project based learning in IoT (Internet of
Things) and Machine Learning (Data Science). Future courses will be offered based on
industry requirement and/or student/faculty feedback. These future courses will be on
emerging technologies.

7. Red Hat Technologies Pvt. Ltd.: Linux World ('LW') is a fast growing ISO 9001:2008
Certified Organization which is fully governed by young and energetic Technocrats,
dedicated to Open Source technologies and Linux promotion. Since its inception in the year
2005, LW have achieved the status of centre of excellence wherein there is latest technology,
innovative developing methodology, state of the art infrastructure and individual needs of
employees are identified and executed professionally, efficiently & ethically.

8. Salesforce Technologies Ltd.: Salesforce is the primary enterprise offering within the
Salesforce platform. It provides companies with an interface for case management and task
management, and a system for automatically routing and escalating important events. The
Salesforce customer portal provides customers the ability to track their own cases, includes a
social networking in that enables the user to join the conversation about their company
on social networking websites, provides analytical tools and other services including email
alert, Google search, and access to customers' entitlement and contracts.

Self Assessment Report Page 95


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
9. Cyberops Cyberops is India’s leading organization in the field of Information security.
Advancement in technology and interconnected business ecosystems has combined to
increase exposure to cyber-attacks. We aim to digitally shield the cyberspace by offering
various products and services. We are hovering to influence our proficiency and global
footprint in the field of information security and cybercrimeinvestigation.Itfoster certified
trainings on Information Security and provides penetration testing for security audits, and
Cyber Crime Investigation services for various sectors to meet their specific needs.

10. SIEMENS Ltd. With a focus on electrification, automation and digitalization, Siemens India
stands for engineering excellence, innovation, and reliability. As one of the world’s biggest
producers of energy-efficient, resource-saving technologies, Siemens is a pioneer in
infrastructure and energy solutions, as well as automation and software for industry. The
company is also a leader in medical imaging equipment, laboratory diagnostics, and clinical
IT. Siemens also provides business-to-business financial solutions, rail automation and wind
power solutions.

Self Assessment Report Page 96


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
2.2.5 Initiatives relatedto Industry Internship/Summer Training (15)
(Mention the initiatives, implementation details and impact analysis)
 Rajasthan Technical University provides 60 days of industrial training in the form of summer
training after their sixth semester during its four year curriculum.
 Students have to pursue a detailed project in the specific company in his field of interest. The
project enables the student to understand the business process and makes them ready for the
corporate careers ahead.

NOC for Summer Training after


Completion of VI Semester

Individual Discussion for Area of


Training

After Successful Completion of


Training, Certificate Issued by
Company/Organization

Submit Copy of Certificate to Respective


Department

Training/Project Presented by Students


in VII Semester

Submit Report by Student

Figure 2.2.5a: Process of Internship/Summer Training Allotment


The process of allotment of summer training is as follows:

1) Initially Department issue a letter for summer training for every student.
2) Students will show this letter to respective company/organization from where they want to
pursue their training program. Students will go for 60 days internship.
3) After completion of training, they will be issued a certificate or evaluation letter from that
company.
4) Students have to submit their Xerox copy of summer training certificate.
5) A presentation will be taken on their summer training in next semester on which they have to
submit a report.
6) Final evaluation will be done and marks will be given for summer training program.

Self Assessment Report Page 97


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Industrial Internship Coordinator

Search for a list of companies related to new Technologies and


placement

Approach to company HR and IQAC for conducting industrial visit

Approval
NO

YES
Prepare list of interested students and industries for
internship

Approval from Internship Coordinator Coordinator

Approval by HOD

Industrial Training

Industry Training Report submitted to Internship


Coordinator submission

Submit Industrial Report to IQAC for analysis

Figure 2.2.5b Evaluation Process of Summer Training

Self Assessment Report Page 98


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Format of NOC for Summer Training:

Self Assessment Report Page 99


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Sample training data of Internship Training 2016-17
S.No. Name TRAINING ORGANIZATION
1 AAKANKSHA KUMAWAT IL&FS Technologies Ltd , Gurgaon
2 AAKRITI GOYAL IL&FS Technologies Ltd , Gurgaon
3 AASTHA GAMBHIR CDAC,JAIPUR
4 AAYUSH DUBE ARYAN INFOMATRIX PVT. LTD., JAIPUR
5 ABHINAV ABHIK Microsoft Technology Associate, Jaipur
6 ABHISHEK BAJ MTS, GURGAON
7 ABHISHEK GALAV GRRAS Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
8 ABHISHEK GUPTA HP Education, Jaipur
9 ABHISHEK SONI INFOSYS-CAMPUS CONNECT
10 ADITYA KUMAR Microsoft Technology Associate, Jaipur
11 ADITYA KUMAR LinuxWorld Infomatics Pvt. Ltd
12 ADITYA POKHARNA Web-Mitra
13 ADITYA SHARMA C-DAC,Jaipur
14 AJAY SHARMA D-ZONE LIMITED,JAIPUR
15 AKANKSHA SHARMA WEBMITRA PVT LTD.
16 AMIT GUPTA Microsoft Technology Associate, Jaipur
17 ANKIT AGRAWAL Microsoft Technology Associate, Jaipur
18 ANKIT SHARMA LinuxWorld Infomatics Pvt. Ltd
19 ANKIT SONI Microsoft Technology Associate, Jaipur
20 ANKIT YADAV INFOSYS CAMPUS CONNECT
21 ANKUR JAIN Microsoft Technology Associate, Jaipur
22 ANSHITA BHATIA CDAC, JAIPUR
23 ARPIT SHARMA INFOSYS CAMPUS CONNECT
24 ARPIT SOMANI Web-Mitra
25 ARTI SHARMA SDJ INFOSOFT PVT.LTD,JAIPUR
26 ARUN SINGH GIRNAR SOFT PVT.LTD. JAIPUR
27 ARVIND BHAT CDC,HCL TECHNOLOGIES,DELHI
28 ASHIQUE HUSSAIN ANSARI Linux World
29 ASRAR HUSSAIN IIHT,Jaipur
30 ASTHA SHARMA IL & FS TECHNOLOGIES LTD,GURGAON
31 AYUSHI GARG WEBMITRA PVT LIMITED
32 AYUSHI KHANDELWAL WEBMITRA PVT LTD.
33 AYUSHI MATHUR CDAC,Jaipur
34 AYUSHI SHARMA HCL CDC JAIPUR
35 BHUMIKA MAROLIA IL&FS Technologies Ltd , Gurgaon
36 BHUPENDER HPES,JAIPUR
37 BHUWANESH PAREEK CMC - A TATA ENTERPRISE, JAIPUR , ERICCSON
JAIPUR

Self Assessment Report Page 100


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
38 CHANDNI MATHUR click mind, Bikaner
39 CHEENA MIDDHA CDAC, JAIPUR
40 CHETAN SINGH RATHORE LinuxWorld Infomatics Pvt. Ltd
41 CHETNA KUMAWAT TATA STEEL,JAMSHEDPUR
42 DEEPAK LODHA WEB MITRA PVT LTD.
43 DEEPAK SARAF WEB MITRA PVT LTD.
44 DHEERAJ SUTHAR NETWORXX , JAIPUR
45 DIKSHA RAINA HP Summer Training Nodal Centre
46 GARIMA CHOUDHARY H&D Software ,Jaipur
47 GAURAV KHANDHARI LinuxWorld Informatics Pvt. Ltd, Jaipur
48 GOURAV GOYAL INFOOBJECTS PVT.LTD.,JAIPUR
49 GUNJAN ASWANI NIC ,JAIPUR & HPES,JAIPUR
50 GURPREET SINGH Bharti Airtel Hexacom Pvt. Ltd. , Gurgaon
SAWHNEY
51 HARSHITA KHANDELWAL C-DAC, JAIPUR
52 HIMANSHU GAUR LinuxWorld Infomatics Pvt Ltd
53 HIMANSHU KUMAR SINGH Pratham Solutions Pvt. ltd
54 JASWINDER SINGH COMSKYNET TECH.PVT.LTD.
55 JYOTI BUDANIA LinuxWorld Infomatics Pvt. Ltd
56 KAPIL NAINANI PLAN MY TOUR,BENGALORE
57 KARAN PANDIT C-DAC JAIPUR
58 KARTIK BOHRA LinuxWorld Infomatics Pvt. Ltd
59 KARTIK ANAND CDC,HCL TECHNOLOGIES,DELHI
60 KARTIKEYA BAHUGUNA CDC,HCL TECHNOLOGIES,DELHI
61 KASHMIR SIHAG INFOSYS CAMPUS CONNECT
62 KSHITIZ KHANDELWAL MTS, GURGAON
63 KUMARI POONAM INFOSYS CAMPUS CONNECT
64 LAKSHI BANSAL ARYAN INFOMATRIX PVT. LTD., JAIPUR
65 LALIT SINGHAL Pratham Solutions Pvt. Ltd, Jaipur
66 M.B.KRRISH KUMAR WEB-MITRA PVT.LTD
67 MAHAK MUNDRA LinuxWorld Infomatics Pvt. Ltd
68 MAHENDRA KUMAR INFOSYS CAMPUS CONNECT
PIRTANI
69 MAHITA SHARMA DATA INFOSYS, JAIPUR
70 MAITRY ARYAN INFOMATRIX PVT. LTD., JAIPUR
71 MANEESH KUMAR GOYAL Microsoft Technology Associate, Jaipur
72 MANISH KALRA HP Summer training
73 MANOJ GOSWAMI Pratham Solutions Pvt. ltd
74 MOHIT JESWANI Webmitrapvt. ltd.
75 MOHIT MAGHANANI MICROSOFT TECHONOLOGY ASSOCIATION,JAIPUR
76 Monika Kaswan H&D Software, Jaipur
77 MONIKA MANGAL INFOSYS CAMPUS CONNECT

Self Assessment Report Page 101


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
78 MS NAHID GUL QURESHI JECRC Campus under Infosys campus
connect program
79 NAMAN AGARWAL Vikram Group of Technologies,Kota
80 NANDANI DIXIT TATA CMC Limited, Jaipur
81 NARANDRA SINGH DEORA LinuxWorld Infomatics Pvt. Ltd
82 NAVEEN SHARMA MICROSOFT TRAINING ASSOCIATE,JAIPUR
83 NISHA JANGIR C-DAC, JAIPUR
84 NITESH SHARMA Bodacious It Hub Pvt. Ltd, Jaipur
85 NITIN UDAWAT LinuxWorld Infomatics Pvt. Ltd
86 NOOPUR MAKKAR NEURO SHARP EDUCATION JAIPUR
87 PALAK C-DAC,Jaipur
88 PALAK GOYAL MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATE,JAIPUR
89 PALLAVI BAJAJ SDJ INFOSOFT PVT.LTD,JAIPUR
90 PANKAJ SUTHAR HP Summer training
91 PARUL VASHISHET SDJ INFOSOFT PVT. LTD, JAIPUR
92 PAYAL JAIN SDJ INFOSOFT PVT.LTD JAIPUR
93 PIYUSH KUMAR BEGWANI Birlasoft (India) Limited, Noida
94 POOJA SHARMA HP SUMMER TRAINING NODAL CENTER
95 PRAFULL MITTAL INFOSYS CAMPUS CONNECT
96 PRAKASH CDC,HCL TECHNOLOGIES,DELHI
97 PRANAV MODI MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATE,JAIPUR
98 PRANAY SINGH NIIT,NAVI MUMBAI
99 PRASHANT AGARWAL INFOSYS CAMPUS CONNECT
100 PRATIBHA AGARWAL HPES, JAIPUR
101 PRATIBHA ZUTSHI CMC LIMITED DELHI
102 PREETI KUMBHAJ HPES INDIA
103 PRIYANKA AGRAWAL SDJ INFOSOFT PVT. LTD,JAIPUR
104 RADHIKA JOSHI WEBMITRA PVT LIMITED
105 RAHUL JAIMAN DUCAT JAIPUR
106 RAJAT MATHUR CMC JAIPUR
107 RAJDEEP GAUTAM Appirio India, BrickVoice Gurgaon
108 RAJEEV RANJAN LinuxWorld Infomatics Pvt. Ltd
109 RAJENDRA H&D Software , Jaipur
110 RAKSHITA MISHRA LinuxWorld Infomatics Pvt. Ltd
111 RASHIKA RAINA LinuxWorld Infomatics Pvt. Ltd
112 RAVI KUMAR SEN doomshell software pvt. ltd. Jaipur
113 RICHA SHARMA LinuxWorld Infomatics Pvt. Ltd
114 1.) HP SUMMER TRAINING NODAL CENTRE, 2.) LINUX
RISHABH GARG
WORLD INFOMATICS PVT. LTD.
115 RISHABH JINDAL Hughes Systique Pvt. Ltd. , Gurgaon
116 RITIKA CHOUDHARY IIHT,Jaipur
117 ROHIT SEERVI NETWORXX , JAIPUR

Self Assessment Report Page 102


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
118 ROMIT JAIN C-DAC,JAIPUR
119 SACHIN KUMAR SHARMA 1.) HP SUMMER TRAINING NODAL CENTRE, 2.) LINUX
WORLD INFOMATICS PVT. LTD.
120 SAHIL GULATI HP SUMMER TRAINING NODAL CENTRE
121 SAILESH CHOYAL CDAC Jaipur
122 SAKSHAM GUPTA WIPRO,InfoTech. Jaipur
123 SAKSHI CHAUHAN BEL, PunjabNational Bank,
124 SALVIYA SIDDIQUE Econnect Udaipur
125 SANGIK SEN IIHT,Jaipur
126 SANIDHYA MATHUR TATA CMC Limited, Jaipur
127 SATISH KUMAR LinuxWorld Infomatics Pvt. Ltd
128 SHAHIDA BANO TATA CMC Limited, Jaipur
129 SHASHI KANT MILLAN SAIL,BOKARO
130 SHASHI PRABHA DWIVEDI LinuxWorld Infomatics Pvt. Ltd
131 SHISHU PAL NETWORXX , JAIPUR
132 SHIVAM AGIWAL Microsoft Technology Associate, Jaipur
133 SHIVANI GUPTA HPES INDIA
134 SHIVANSHI JULANIA HP SUMMER TRAINIG NODAL CENTER
135 SHIVESH BHAT HCL DELHI
136 SHOBHIT AGARWAL C-DAC, Jaipur
137 SHRUTI JAISWAL HPES,BENGALURU
138 SHUBHAM PRAJAPATI 1. C-DAC, Jaipur 2.Infosys Campus Connect 3. Ducat
India(Umang Infotech)
139 SHWETA CHATURVEDI LinuxWorld Infomatics Pvt. Ltd
140 SOHALDEEP KAUR C-DAC, Jaipur
141 SONALI BANSAL IIHT,Jaipur
142 SONALI LAVANIA LinuxWorld Infomatics Pvt. Ltd
143 SOUMYA RANJAN ROUT HCL CDC Jaipur
144 SRISHTI GUPTA CEERI, PILANI
145 SUKRITI JAIN HP Summer Training
146 SUMIT SHARMA MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATE,JAIPUR
147 SURENDRA SINGH MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATE,JAIPUR
148 SWATI GARG LinuxWorld Infomatics Pvt. Ltd
149 TARUN KHARIWAL HPES INDIA
150 TUSHAR GOYAL Microsoft Technology Associate, Jaipur
151 VIDHIT JHALANI HP SUMMER TRAINING NODAL CENTRE
152 VIKAS KUMAR HPES, JAIPUR
153 VISHAL GOYAL SigmaTech Info Pvt.Ltd, Jaipur
154 VIVEK KHANDELWAL WIPRO, InfoTech. Jaipur
155 YOGESH NOGIA ZOOMO BANGALORE

Table B.2.2.5a: Details of Internship Session 2016-2017

Self Assessment Report Page 103


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

CRITERION 3
Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes
120

Self Assessment Report Page 104


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

CRITERION 3 Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes 120


3. COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES (120)
3.1. Establish the correlation between the courses and the Program Outcomes (POs) and
Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs) (20)

Program Outcomes (POs)


1. Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering
fundamentals and Computer Science and Engineering specialization to the solution of
complex Computer Science and Engineering problems.
2. Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, research literature, and analyse complex Computer
Science and Engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of
mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
3. Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex Computer Science and
Engineering problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified
needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural,
societal, and environmental considerations.
4. Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research
methods including design of Computer Science and Engineering experiments, analysis and
interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
5. Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern
engineering and IT tools including prediction and modelling to complex Computer Science
Engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
6. The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to
assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities
relevant to the professional Computer Science and Engineering practice.
7. Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional Computer
Science and Engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate
the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
8. Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and
norms of the Computer Science and Engineering practice.
9. Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader
in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings in Computer Science and Engineering.
10. Communication: Communicate effectively on complex Computer Science and Engineering
activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to
comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective
presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
11. Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
Computer Science and Engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own
work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary
environments.
12. Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in
independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change in
Computer Science and Engineering.

Self Assessment Report Page 105


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs)
PSO1 Ability to interpret and analyze network specific and cyber security issues in real
world environment.
PSO2 Ability to design and develop mobile and web-based applications under realistic
constraints.

3.1.1. Course Outcomes (COs) (SAR should include course outcomes of one course from each
semester of study, however, should be prepared for all courses and made available as
evidence, if asked) (05)
Code Subject Course Outcomes
CO1: Understand the paradigms of object oriented programming in
comparison of procedural oriented programming.
CO2: Apply the class structure as fundamental, building block for
3CS5A

OOPS

computational programming.
CO3: Apply the major object-oriented concepts to implement object oriented
programs in C++.
CO4: Implement the concept of abstraction inheritance, polymorphism,
dynamic binding and generic structure in building reusable code.
CO1: Understand the purpose of designing a system and evaluate the various
models suitable as per its requirement analysis.
CO2 Understand and apply requirements specification into an
4CS4A

implementable design using structured process and UML


SE

CO3: Formulate a testing strategy for the system design and implement the
concept of OOD & OOA.
CO4: Understand & Implement the various new technologies in software
development.
CO1: Analyze the basic structure of Database and recognize the different
views of the database.
CO2: Examine the use of Relational Data Model, while comparing with
5CS4A

DBMS

other data models w.r.t ERD.


CO3: Formulate data retrieval queries in SQL and the Relational Algebra
and Calculus.
CO4: Describe and develop the semantics of a SQL query in set-theoretic
terms.
CO1: Understand the concept of Artificial Intelligence and apply various
searching techniques
6CS6A

CO2: Illustrate various knowledge representation techniques in Artificial


AI

Intelligence system.
CO3: Analyze various concepts like Baye’s theorem, fuzzy logic,
Probabilistic Reasoning

Self Assessment Report Page 106


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
CO4: Apply basic concepts of learning, natural language processing, neural
networks and expert systems.
CO1: Understand the concepts and benefits of Data mining in the real time
scenario.
CO2: Acquire basic knowledge about concept description of data mining
7CS3
DMW algorithms
A
CO3: Illustrate concept of Data Warehouses with OLAP applications and
OLAP deployment.
CO4: Design a data mart for management of information.
CO1: Understand the basic concepts of mobile computing and its
mechanisms.
8CS1
MC CO2: Analyze the data dissemination and management techniques.
A
CO3: Compare the service discovery and its standardization Methods
CO4: Apply and compare AdHoc Networks using different protocols.
Table B.3.1.1:Course Outcomes

3.1.2 CO-PO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1 (six matrices to be mentioned; one per
semester from 3rd to 8th semester) (05)

S. no SEM Subject code Subject


1 3 3CS5A OOP
Pos
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Cos
1 3 1 1 2 2 2 - - 1 1 2 2
2 3 2 2 3 3 2 2 - 2 2 2 3
3 3 3 3 3 3 1 2 - 3 1 3 3
4 3 2 3 2 2 1 1 - 3 2 2 2
S. no SEM Subject code Subject
2 4 4CS4A SE
Pos
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Cos
1 3 2 3 1 2 1 - - 2 - 1 1
2 3 3 3 1 3 1 - - 3 2 3 2
3 3 2 3 2 3 1 - - 3 2 3 2
4 3 3 3 2 3 1 1 - 3 2 2 2
S. no SEM Subject code Subject
3 5 5CS4A DBMS
Pos 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Self Assessment Report Page 107


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Cos
1 3 2 1 - 2 - - 2 - - - 2
2 3 2 3 - 2 - - 2 2 - 2 2
3 3 2 2 - - - - 1 - - 2 2
4 3 3 3 - 2 1 1 1 2 - 2 2
S. no SEM Subject code Subject
4 6 6CS6A AI
Pos
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Cos
1 3 2 1 1 1 1 - - 1 1 1 1
2 3 2 3 2 2 2 - - 1 2 2 2
3 3 1 2 2 2 2 - - 1 2 2 2
4 3 3 3 3 3 2 1 - 1 2 2 2
S. no SEM Subject code Subject
5 7 7CS3A DMW
Pos
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Cos
1 3 2 1 1 1 1 - - 1 - 1 1
2 3 2 3 2 2 2 - - 2 - 2 2
3 3 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 - 2 2
4 3 3 3 2 2 1 2 1 1 - 1 2
S. no SEM Subject code Subject
6 8 8CS1A MC
Pos
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Cos
1 3 1 1 1 1 1 - - 1 1 2 3
2 3 2 2 2 2 1 - - 1 2 3 3
3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 - 1 2 3 3
4 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 - 1 3 3 3
Table B. 3.1.2a: CO-PO matrices of courses

CO-PSO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1 (six matrices to be mentioned; one per semester
from 3rd to 8th semester)
S.No. Sem Code Subject Cos PSO1 PSO2
CO1 - -
CO2 2 3
1 3 3CS5A OOP
CO3 2 3
CO4 1 3

Self Assessment Report Page 108


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
CO1 1 2
CO2 1 2
2 4 4CS4A SE
CO3 2 2
CO4 2 2
CO1 3 2
CO2 3 2
3 5 5CS4A DBMS
CO3 3 2
CO4 3 2
CO1 -
CO2 - -
4 6 6CS6.2A AI
CO3 - -
CO4 2 2
CO1 - -
CO2 - -
5 7 7CS3A DMW
CO3 - 1
CO4 - 1
CO1 3 3
CO2 3 3
6 8 8CS1A MC
CO3 3 3
CO4 3 3
Table B. 3.1.2b: CO-PSO matrices

3.1.3 Program level Course-PO matrix of all courses INCLUDING first year courses (10)
Courses Subject PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

MA-101 Engineering Mathematics-1 3 2 1 - 2 1 2 - 3 2 - 1

HU-103 HumanValues - - 2 - - 3 2 3 2 1 - 1

PY-101 Engineering Physics 2 1 1 - - 1 - - 1 1 - 1

CS-101 Computer Programming-I


1 2 2 2 2 2 1 - - 2 - 3

CE-101 Environmental Engineering


2 1 1 1 - 2 2 1 2 1 - 1
and
Disaster Management
HU-104 Human Values: Activities - - 1 - - 3 3 3 1 1 - 1

PY-102 Engineering Physics Lab


2 1 1 - - 1 - - 1 1 - 1

CS-102 Computer Programming-I


2 3 2 1 - - - - 2 1 - 1
Lab
CE-102 Computer Aided
3 - - - - - - - 2 2 - 1
Engineering
Graphic
Mechanical Workshop
ME-101 3 - - - - - - - 2 2 - 1
Practice
Table B. 3.1.3a: Program level Course-PO matrix of first year courses

Self Assessment Report Page 109


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
S.
PO
N Sem Code Sub PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11
12
o.
1 3 3CSA1 EDC 2.3 1.6 1 1 1 - - - 1 - - 1.6
2 3 3CSA2 DSA 3 2.2 2 1 1 - - - 2 - 1 1.5
3 3 3CSA3 DE 2.2 2 2.3 - 2 1 1 - 1 - 1 3
4 3 3CS4A LSP 3 2 2.3 - 2 1 1 - 2.5 2.5 1 2
5 3 3CS5A OOP 3 2 2.2 2.5 2.5 1.5 1 - 2.2 1.5 2.2 2.5
6 3 3CS6A AEM 3 2 1 - 1 - 1 1 - 1
7 4 4CS1A MP 3 1.7 2.2 1.5 - - 2 1 - 2
8 4 4CS2A DMS 3 3 2.2 2.2 3 2.5 - 1 -
9 4 4CS3A SPT 3 2 2 - 1 1 - 1 1 - 1
10 4 4CS4A SE 3 2.5 3 1.5 2.7 1 1 - 2.7 2 2.2 1.7
11 4 4CS5A POC 3 3 1.7 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1
12 4 4CS6A PPL 3 2 2 - 1 1 1 - 1 - 1 1
13 5 5CS1A CA 3 2.2 2.2 1 - - - - 1 - 1 2
14 5 5CS2A DLD 3 2 2.3 - 2 1 1 - 1 - 1 1.5
15 5 5CS3A TEF 3 2.2 2.2 - 2 1 1 1 - 2 1 2
16 5 5CS4A DBMS 3 2.2 2.2 - 2 1 1 1.5 2 - 2 2
17 5 5CS5A OS 3 2.2 2 - - 1 - - 1 1 1.7 2
18 5 5CS6A ITC 3 2 2.2 2 - 1 1 - 1 1 1 1
19 6 6CS1A CN 3 2 2.2 1.7 1.7 1 1 1.5 1.5 1 1 2
20 6 6CS2A DAA 3 2 2.5 2 - 1 1 - 1 2 - 2
21 6 6CS3A TOC 3 2 2.5 1.7 - 1 1 - 1 1.7 - 1
22 6 6CS4A CG 3 2 2.2 2 1.7 1 1 - 1 2.2 2.2 2.5
23 6 6CS5A ESD 3 1.7 1 - 3 1 1 - 1 - 1 2
24 6 6CS6A AI 3 2 2.2 2 2 1.7 1 - 1 1.7 1.7 1.7
25 7 7CS1A CLOUD 3 2.2 2 1 2.5 1.7 1.6 1 1.7 2.2 2.5 2.7
26 7 7CS2A ISS 3 3 2.5 2 1.5 1.5 - 1 1 1.5 1.5 2
27 7 7CS3A DMW 3 2 2.2 1.7 1.7 1.5 2 1 1.5 - 1.5 1.7
CAD
28 7 7CS4A
VLSI
3 2 2 - 2 1 1 - 1 - 1 1
29 7 7CS5A CC 3 3 2.2 2.2 1 - - - 2 - 2 2
30 7 7CS6A DCT 3 1.6 1 1 - - - - 1 1.3 2
31 8 8CS1A MC 3 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.5 2 - 1 2 2.7 3
32 8 8CS2A DIP 3 3 1.5 1.5 1.7 2 2 2 1.5 1.7 1.7 3
33 8 8CS3A DS 3 2 2 2.5 2 2 - - 1 1 2.7 3
34 8 8CS4A RTS 3 1.7 1.7 1.5 - 2 - - 1.5 1.5 - 2
Table B. 3.1.3b: Program level Course-PO matrix of all courses

Self Assessment Report Page 110


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Program level Course-PSO matrix of all courses

S.No. Sem Code Sub PSO1 PSO2


1 3 3CSA1 EDC - -
2 3 3CSA2 DSA 3 1
3 3 3CSA3 DE 3 -
4 3 3CS4A LSP 2 2
5 3 3CS5A OOP 2 3
6 3 3CS6A AEM 3 -
7 4 4CS1A MP 3 -
8 4 4CS2A DMS 2 2
9 4 4CS3A SPT 3 -
10 4 4CS4A SE 2 3
11 4 4CS5A POC 1 -
12 4 4CS6A PPL 3 3
13 5 5CS1A CA 2 3
14 5 5CS2A DLD 1 -
15 5 5CS3A TEF 3 2
16 5 5CS4A DBMS 3 2
17 5 5CS5A OS 2 2
18 5 5CS6.3 ITC 3 3
19 6 6CS1A CN 3 2
20 6 6CS2A DAA - -
21 6 6CS3A TOC - -
22 6 6CS4A CG 1 1
23 6 6CS5A ESD - -
24 6 6CS6.2A AI 1 1
25 7 7CS1A CLOUD 3 3
26 7 7CS2A ISS 3 3
27 7 7CS3A DMW - 1
28 7 7CS4A CAD VLSI - -
29 7 7CS5A COMPILER - 2
30 7 7CS6.3A DCT 1 1
31 8 8CS1A MC 3 3
32 8 8CS2A DIP 1 1
33 8 8CS3A DS 3 3
34 8 8CS4.2A RTS 3 3
Table B. 3.1.3.2: Program level Course-PSO matrix of all courses

Self Assessment Report Page 111


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
3.2. Attainment of Course Outcomes (50)

3.2.1. Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation
of Course Outcome is based (10)

Evaluation of Course Outcomes

Internal Assessment

MTT 1 MTT 2

CO Assessment of weak students


Analysis

Final Assessment Assignment

Figure B. 3.2.1: Assessment process of Course Outcomes

Self Assessment Report Page 112


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
3.2.2. Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all courses with respect to set attainment
levels (40)
CO Attainment (Target>60%)
CAY(2015-16) CAYm1(2016-17) CAY(2017-18)
S. S.
S.N Subjec CO CO
CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 No Subject CO1 CO2 No Subject CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4
o. t 3 4
. .
1 3CS1A 64.22 47.55 59.31 67.65 1 3CS1A 62.1 79.3 55.1 55.6 1 3CS1A 85.4 77.2 80.3 75.1

2 3CS2A 49.74 43.07 44.12 33.33 2 3CS2A 62.6 66.7 60.1 52.5 2 3CS2A 90.15 84.45 86.5 74.6

3 3CS3A 38.65 31.28 48.04 46.57 3 3CS3A 85.8 71.2 85.3 70.2 3 3CS3A 75.1 81.8 89.6 82.3

4 3CS4A 85.17 50.15 62.25 47.55 4 3CS4A 83.4 52 75.2 60.1 4 3CS4A 77.7 62.6 64.2 79.2

5 3CS5A 70.18 60.12 58.33 37.75 5 3CS5A 85.9 79.3 84.7 70.7 5 3CS5A 79.2 81.8 89.6 82.3

6 3CS6A 64.7 20 21.57 21.08 6 3CS6A 74.7 24 42.4 72.9 6 3CS6A 52.3 59 77.2 45.5

7 4CS1A 66 45.11 78.13 67.41 7 4CS1A 91.7 75.5 86.3 78.5 7 4CS1A 85.49 73.57 83.56 77.7

8 4CS2A 56.25 65.29 61.75 32.52 8 4CS2A 78.8 60 69.3 64.4 8 4CS2A 89.1 71.5 71.5 77.2

9 4CS3A 55.81 25.15 59.53 49.3 9 4CS3A 54.6 73.6 62.9 72 9 4CS3A 26.90 52.04 42.10 63

10 4CS4A 77.2 53.48 69.3 40.93 10 4CS4A 95.1 70.7 85.3 68.7 10 4CS4A 79.27 79.79 81.3 84.4

11 4CS5A 37.2 21.39 57.67 49.3 11 4CS5A 83.6 51.2 80 61.4 11 4CS5A 66.83 61.65 76.1 55.9

12 4CS6A 72.55 61.39 49.3 49.58 12 4CS6A 86.6 72.4 72.7 68.6 12 4CS6A 82.3 68.3 83.9 74.6

13 5CS1A 64.22 47.55 59.31 67.65 13 5CS1A 87.9 75.5 79 74.8 13 5CS1A 86.3 68.7 75.1 75.6

14 5CS2A 70.05 36.06 44.12 33.33 14 5CS2A 75 64 71 65 14 5CS2A 63.4 35.1 52.6 65.8

15 5CS3A 95.16 62.77 48.04 46.57 15 5CS3A 88.5 65.7 68 64.3 15 5CS3A 93.6 87.3 91.7 74.6

16 5CS4A 89.21 77.1 62.25 47.55 16 5CS4A 77.6 62.1 84.9 64.3 16 5CS4A 95.6 83.9 85.8 76.8

17 5CS5A 72.16 82.28 58.33 37.75 17 5CS5A 86.7 68.4 80.3 75.3 17 5CS5A 87.8 73.1 87.3 82.4

18 5CS6A 96.16 78.16 21.57 54.25 18 5CS6A 65.2 69.8 82.5 68.8 12 5CS6A 90.2 92.1 82.9 82.4

19 6CS1A 82.35 61.76 88.26 77.94 19 6CS1A 85.4 86.8 93.6 84.9 13 6CS1A 91.17 89.7 92.6 79.41

20 6CS2A 89.7 35.29 94.11 72.05 20 6CS2A 82.1 61.1 90.4 78.5 14 6CS2A 64.2 70.1 82.1 77.6

21 6CS3A 94.11 67.72 67.64 80.88 21 6CS3A 90 74.5 74.4 67.1 15 6CS3A 79.65 82.55 68.58 79.85

22 6CS4A 92.64 67.69 68.76 67.36 22 6CS4A 81.8 74 65.3 86.3 16 6CS4A 89.5 55.07 73.13 92.53

23 6CS5A 39.42 53.54 68.52 47.98 23 6CS5A 84 76.7 73.9 82.1 17 6CS5A 62.68 59.7 58.20 74.62

24 6CS6A 85.29 67.57 57.98 67.87 24 6CS6A 87.7 75.4 90.4 75.3 24 6CS6A 86.85 98.88 61.85 91.58

25 7CS1A 85.71 34.42 84.42 82.47 25 7CS1A 90 77.6 86.4 81.5 25 7CS1A 92.24 60.27 59.82 45.21

26 7CS2A 58.49 75.32 48.7 23.38 26 7CS2A 83 71.3 68.9 78.1 26 7CS2A 88.13 76.71 91.32 81.74

27 7CS3A 87.66 40.26 75.97 66.23 27 7CS3A 74.3 35.9 46.6 63.1 27 7CS3A 89.50 69.86 73.06 63.01

28 7CS4A 68.12 55.25 69.23 47.89 28 7CS4A 71.8 81 68.9 75.7 28 7CS4A 97.72 66.67 79.00 76.71

29 7CS5A 13.23 56.52 13.26 21.56 29 7CS5A 81.4 59.2 89.8 91.7 29 7CS5A 78.54 45.21 50.23 91.32

30 7CS6A 21.07 27.94 18.13 29.41 30 7CS6A 78.8 53.8 73.3 60.6 30 7CS6A 48.4 15.07 62.56 65.75

31 8CS1A 80.64 54.83 94.19 91.61 31 8CS1A 75.2 53.3 66.5 84.4 31 8CS1A 82 70.89 68.58 93.58

32 8CS2A 68.38 54.19 56.77 60.64 32 8CS2A 77.1 63 59.2 73.7 32 8CS2A 99.05 69.3 95.6 91.3

33 8CS3A 67.09 71.61 96.12 96.77 33 8CS3A 83.6 59.7 83.4 53.8 33 8CS3A 99.07 81.5 97.68 96.7

34 8CS4A 86.45 61.23 66.45 90.32 34 8CS4A 82.2 80.5 74.2 56.7 34 8CS4A 96 92 96 93.3

Table B. 3.2.2: Attainment of Course Outcomes of all courses with respect to set attainment levels

Self Assessment Report Page 113


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
3.3. Attainment of Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes (50)
3.3.1. Describe assessment tools and processes used for measuring the attainment of each
of the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes (10)

Figure B.3.3.1: Assessment process for attaining POs and PSOs

Self Assessment Report Page 114


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
3.3.2. Provide results of evaluation of each PO & PSO (40)

PO Tool Tools
MTT Result
Final RTU Result
Academic Assessment Project
Lab/Experiments
PO1-PO12

Industrial training
Final Placed Strength
Mentoring
Placement
Soft skill
Higher Studies
Course Exit
Feedback Student Exit
Alumni Exit
Table B.3.3.1a: Assessment process for attaining Pos

PSO Tools
In-house Training
Project
PSO1-PSO2

Technical Events
Conference/
Technical Training
E-Resources
Workshops/Invited Talks

Table B.3.3.1b: Assessment process for attaining PSOs

Results of evaluation:This is sample PO1 tools and its rubric and mapping with attainments in the
respective years. Different mappings and attainments are achieved with others POs

Results of evaluation of each PO (2016-17)

PO1: Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering


fundamentals, and Computer Science& Engineering specialization to the solution of complex
Computer Science& Engineering problems.

Tool Tools Mapping Rubric Attainment


70% students >65%=>100% marks
70% students >60%=>80%
MTT Result H 60% students >65%=>60% 3
60% students >60%=>50%
Academic Else =>0 marks
Assessment 70% students >65%=>100% marks
70% students >60%=>80%
Final RTU Result L 60% students >65%=>60% 0
60% students >60%=>50%
Else=> 20 marks

Self Assessment Report Page 115


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Distribution as per rule =>20% marks
Continuous assessment -1 =>20%
Continuous assessment -2 =>20%
Project M 2
Internal assessment -1 =>20%
External assessment -1 =>20%
Else 0 marks
Attendance=> 20%marks
Performance =>20% marks
Lab/Experiments M Record /File =>10% 2
Internal assessment -1 =>30%
External assessment -1 =>20%
>=90% students visited =>100% marks
>=80% students visited=>80%
Industrial training L >=60% students visited =>60% 1
>=50% students visited =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
>=65% students placed => 100%
Final Placed >=60% students placed => 80%
M >=55% students placed => 70% 2
Strength
>=50% students placed => 60%
Else=>= 0 marks
>=100% students mentored => 100%
>=90% students mentored=> 90%
Mentoring M >=80% students mentored => 80% 2
>=70% students studied => 70%
Else=>= 0 marks
>=80% students attended=> 100%
>=70% students attended=> 80% 1
Placement Soft skill L >60% students attended => 70%
>=50% students attended=> 60%
Else=>= 0 marks
>=40% students cleared => 100%
>=35% students cleared => 80%
Higher Studies M >=30% students cleared=> 70% .5
>=25% students cleared => 60%
Else=>= 25% marks
>=35% students cleared => 100%
>=30% students cleared => 80%
PSU/GATE H >=25% students cleared=> 70% .6
>=20% students cleared => 60%
Else=>= 20% marks
>=80% students participated => 100%
>=70% students participated => 80%
Technical Events H >60% students participated=> 70% 3
>=55% students participated => 60%
Else=>= 0 marks
>=60% students attended => 100%
>=55% students attended => 80%
Conference/Worksh
M >50% students attended=> 70% 1.2
Beyond Curriculum ops
>=45% students attended => 60%
Else=>= 0 marks
>=70% students participated => 100%
>=60% students participated => 80%
Social Events L >55% students participated=> 70% .6
>=50% students participated => 60%
Else=>= 0 marks
E-Resources M >=100% students use => 100% 1.6

Self Assessment Report Page 116


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
>=90% students use=> 90%
>=80% students use=> 80%
>=70% students use => 70%
Else=>= 0 marks
>=90% students visited =>100% marks
>=80% students visited=>80%
Industrial visit H >=60% students visited =>60% 1.8
>=50% students visited =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
>=100% students filled=> 100%
>=90% students filled => 90%
Course Exit H >=80% students filled=> 80% 3
>=70% students filled => 70%
Else=>= 0 marks
>=100% students filled => 100%
>=90% students filled => 90%
Feedback Student Exit H >=80% students filled=> 80% 2.7
>=70% students filled =>70%
Else=>= 0 marks
>=90% students filled => 100%
>=80% students filled => 80%
Alumni Exit M >=70% students filled=> 70% 1.2
>=60% students filled => 60%
Else=>= 0 marks
Table B.3.3.2c: Sample of Assessment process for attaining PO1

PO Attainment(2016-17)
PO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

Actual /Ideal Value 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54


Target Value 38 37 40 40 38 38 30 30 45 31 38 36
Target Value% 70.4 68.5 74.1 74.1 70.4 70.4 55.6 55.6 83.3 57.4 70.4 66.7
Attained Value 29 29.6 34.1 31.2 31 31.8 24 23.8 34.5 24.8 28.4 28.6
Attained Value %
53.7 54.8 63.1 57.8 57.4 58.8 44.4 44 63.8 45.8 52.6 52.9
w.r.t. Ideal
Gap% 16.7 13.7 11 16.3 13 11.6 11.2 11.6 19.5 11.6 17.8 13.8
Table B.3.3.2o: PO Attainment (2016-17)

Self Assessment Report Page 117


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

Target Value% Attained Value % wrt Ideal Gap%

Figure B.3.3.2a: PO Attainment (2016-17)

PO Attainment(2015-16)
PO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

Actual /Ideal Value 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54


Target Value 38 37 40 40 38 38 30 30 45 31 38 36
Target Value (in %) 70.4 68.5 74.1 74.1 70.4 70.4 55.6 55.6 83.3 57.4 70.4 66.7
Attained Value 16.5 17 21 19.4 17.6 19.4 13.2 12.4 21.5 16.5 17.2 16.9
Attained Value % w.r.t. Ideal 30.6 31.5 38.9 35.9 32.6 35.8 24.4 22.9 39.7 30.5 31.9 31.2
Gap(in % 39.8 37 35.2 38.2 37.8 34.6 31.2 32.7 43.6 26.9 38.5 35.5
Table B. 3.3.2p: PO Attainment (2015-16)

90
80
70
Target Value%
60
50
40 Attained Value % wrt
30 Ideal
20 Gap%
10
0
PO1
PO2
PO3
PO4
PO5
PO6
PO7
PO8
PO9
PO10
PO11
PO12

Figure B. 3.3.2b: PO Attainment (2015-16)

Self Assessment Report Page 118


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
PO Attainment(2017-18)
PO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

Actual /Ideal Value 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54


Target Value 38 37 40 40 38 38 30 30 45 31 38 36
Target Value% 70.4 68.5 74.1 74.1 70.4 70.4 55.6 55.6 83.3 57.4 70.4 66.7
Attained Value 32 31.3 35.7 32.4 33.2 34.2 25.3 25.4 36.9 26.4 30.2 31
Attained Value % 59.3 58 66.1 60 61.5 63.2 46.8 46.9 68.2 48.8 55.9 57.3
w.r.t.ideal
Gap% 11.1 10.5 8 14.1 8.9 7.2 8.8 8.7 15.1 8.6 14.5 9.4
Table B.3.3.2q: PO Attainment (2017-18)

90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

Target Value% Attained Value % wrt Ideal Gap%

Figure B.3.3.2c: PO Attainment (2017-18)

Comparative Analysis of academic session CAY, CAYm1 and CAYm2


Attained
Value %
w.r.t. Ideal PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

Target
Value% 70.4 68.5 74.1 74.1 70.4 70.4 55.6 55.6 83.3 57.4 70.4 66.7
2015-16 30.6 31.5 38.9 35.9 32.6 35.8 24.4 22.9 39.7 30.5 31.9 31.2
2016-17 53.7 54.8 63.1 57.8 57.4 58.8 44.4 44 63.8 45.8 52.6 52.9
2017-18 59.3 58 66.1 60 61.5 63.2 46.8 46.9 68.2 48.8 55.9 57.3
Table B.3.3.2r: PO Attainment (2017-18, 2016-17 and 2015-16)

Self Assessment Report Page 119


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Figure B.3.3.2d: PO Attainment (2017-18, 2016-17 and 2015-16)

Assessment tools and processes used for measuring the attainment of each of the Program
Specific Outcomes

PSO1: Ability to interpret and analyze network specific and cyber security issues in real world
environment.
PSO Attainment CAY(2017-18)

Tools Mapping Rubric Attainment


70% students attended >65%=>100% marks
70% students attended >60%=>80%
In-House Training H 60% students attended >65%=>60% 1.5
60% students attended >60%=>50%
Else =>20% marks
>=50% students developed =>100% marks
Project H >=40% students Participated=>80% 1.8
>=30% students Participated=>60%
Else=>20%
>=80% students participated => 100%
>=70% students participated => 80%
Technical Events H >60% students participated=> 70% 1.8
>=55% students participated => 60%
Else=>= 20% marks
>=60% students attended => 100%
>=55% students attended => 80%
Conference M >50% students attended=> 70% 0.4
>=45% students attended => 60%
Else=>= 20% marks
>=70% students participated =>100%
>=60% students participated => 80%
Technical Training H >55% students participated=> 70% 1.8
>=50% students participated => 60%
Else=>= 20% marks
E-Resources M >=100% students use => 100% 1.4
>=90% students use=> 90%

Self Assessment Report Page 120


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
>=80% students use=> 80%
>=70% students use => 70%
Else=>= 20% marks
>=90% students visited =>100% marks
Workshops/Invited >=80% students visited=>80%
H >=60% students visited =>60% 1.5
Talks
>=50% students visited =>50%
Else=> 20% marks
Table B.3.3.2s: Attainment Process of PSO1
PSO2:Ability to design and develop mobile and web-based applications under realistic constraints.

Tools Mapping Rubric Attainment


70% students attended >65%=>100% marks
70% students attended >60%=>80%
In-House Training H 60% students attended >65%=>60% 1.5
60% students attended >60%=>50%
Else =>20% marks
>=50% students developed =>100% marks
Project H >=40% students Participated=>80% 3
>=30% students Participated=>60%
Else=>20%
>=80% students participated => 100%
>=70% students participated => 80%
Technical Events H >60% students participated=> 70% 2.4
>=55% students participated => 60%
Else=>= 20% marks
>=60% students attended => 100%
>=55% students attended => 80%
Conference M >50% students attended=> 70% 0.4
>=45% students attended => 60%
Else=>= 20% marks
>=70% students participated =>100%
>=60% students participated => 80%
Technical Training H >55% students participated=> 70% 2.4
>=50% students participated => 60%
Else=>= 20% marks
>=100% students use => 100%
>=90% students use=> 90%
E-Resources M >=80% students use=> 80% 1.4
>=70% students use => 70%
Else=>= 20% marks
>=90% students visited =>100% marks
Workshops/Invited >=80% students visited=>80%
H >=60% students visited =>60% 2.4
Talks
>=50% students visited =>50%
Else=> 20% marks
Table B. 3.3.2t: Attainment Process of PSO2
PSO PSO1 PSO2
Ideal Value 21 21
Target Value 19 19
Target 90.47% 90.47%
Attained value 6.5 11.3
Attained value Ideal wise 30.95% 53.80%
Gap 59.52% 36.66%
Table B. 3.3.2u: PSO Attainment (2016-17)

Self Assessment Report Page 121


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

PSO Attainment 2016-17

100.00%
90.47% 90.47%
50.00% 59.52%
53.80%
30.95% 36.66%
0.00%
Target Attained value Gap

PSO1 PSO2

Figure B. 3.3.2e: PSO Attainment (2016-17)

PSO PSO1 PSO2


Ideal Value 21 21
Target Value 19 19
Target 90.47% 90.47%
Attained value 10.2 13.5
Attained value Ideal wise 48.57% 64.28%
Gap 41.90% 26.19%
Table B. 3.3.2v: PSO Attainment (2017-18)

PSO Attainment 2017-18

90.47% 90.47%
100.00%

80.00% 64.28%
48.57%
60.00% 41.90%
40.00% 26.19%

20.00%

0.00%
Target Attained value Gap

PSO1 PSO2

Figure B. 3.3.2e: PSO Attainment (2017-18)

Self Assessment Report Page 122


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Comparative Analysis of academic session 2016-17 and 2015-16

PSO Attainment (2016-17 & 2017-18)


PSO1 PSO2

90.47% 90.47%

64.28%
59.52% 59.52%
53.80%
48.57%
36.66% 36.66%
30.95%

Target Attained (2016- Attained (2017- GAP 2016-17 GAP 2017-18


17) 18)

Figure B. 3.3.2f: PSO Attainment (2016-17 &2017-18)

Self Assessment Report Page 123


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

CRITERIA 4

STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE
(150)

Self Assessment Report Page 124


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
CRITERION 4 Students’ Performance 150

4. STUDENTS PERFORMANCE (150)


CAY
Item CAY CAYm1
P1
(Information to be provided cumulatively for all the shifts with explicit (2017- (2016-
(2018-
headings, wherever applicable) 2018) 2017)
2019)
Sanctioned intake of the program (N) 180 180 180

192 189 189


Total number of students admitted in first year minus number of students migrated to
other programs/institutions plus no. of students migrated to this program (N1)

0 10 4
Number of students admitted in 2nd year in the same batch via lateral entry (N2)
Nil Nil Nil
Separate division students, if applicable (N3)

192 199 193


Total number of students admitted in the Program (N1 + N2 + N3)

Table B.4a: Total number of students admitted in the Program


CAY – Current Academic Year
CAYm1- Current Academic Year minus1= Current Assessment Year
CAYm2 - Current Academic Year minus2=Current Assessment Year minus 1
LYG – Last Year Graduate minus 1
LYGm1 – Last Year Graduate minus 1
LYGm2 – Last Year Graduate minus 2

Number of students who have successfully graduated


Year of entry N1 + N2 + N3
without backlogs in any semester/year of study
(As defined above) (Without Backlog means no compartment or failures in
any semester/year of study)

I Year II Year III Year IV Year

CAY P1(2018-2019) 192(192+0+0)

CAY (2017-2018) 199 (189+10+0) 168

CAYm1 (2016-2017) 193 (189+4+0) 144 128

CAYm2(2015-2016) 206 (194+12+0) 143 92 92


CAYm3 (LYG)(2014-2015)
218 (198+20+0) 146 121 115 114

CAYm4 (LYGm1)(2013-2014) 207 (193+14+0) 119 88 80 80

CAYm5 (LYGm2)(2012-2013) 158 (133+25+0) 79 69 68 67

Table B.4b: Number of students who have successfully graduated without backlogs

Self Assessment Report Page 125


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Number of students who have successfully
N1 + N2 + N3 graduated
Year of entry (As defined (Students with backlog in stipulated period of
above) study)
I Year II Year III Year IV Year

CAY P1 (2018-2019) 192 (192+0+0)


21
CAYm (2017-2018) 199 (189+10+0)
45
CAYm1 (2016-2017) 193 (189+4+0) 65
51 114 114
CAYm2(2015-2016) 206 (194+12+0)
CAYm3 (LYG) 52 97 103 67
218 (198+20+0)
(2014-2015)
74 119 127 98
CAYm4 (LYGm1) 207 (193+14+0)
(2013-2014)
54 89 90 69
CAYm5 (LYGm2) 158 (133+25+0)
(2012-2013)
Table B.4c: Number of students who have successfully graduated
4.1. Enrolment Ratio (20) Enrolment Ratio= N1/N

Enrolment Ratio = Students enrolled at the First Year Level on average basis during the previous
three academic years starting from current academic year

CAY
CAYm1` CAYm2
Item (2017-
(2016-2017) (2015-2016)
2018)
180 180 180
Sanctioned intake of the program (N)

Total number of students admitted in first year minus number of 189 189 194
students migrated to other programs/institutions plus no. of students
migrated to this program (N1)
1.05 1.05 1.08
Enrolment Ratio = N1/N
1.06
Average Enrolment Ratio (>=90% students enrolled)

Marks 20
Table B.4.1: Enrolment Ratio

4.2. Success Rate in the stipulated period of the program (40)


4.2.1. Success rate without backlogs in any semester/year of study (25)
SI= (Number of students who have graduated from the program without backlog)/ (Number of students admitted in
the first year of that batch and actually admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and separate division, if applicable)
Average SI = Mean of Success Index (SI) for past three batches
Success rate without backlogs in any year of study = 25 × Average SI

Self Assessment Report Page 126


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Last Year of Last Year of Graduate Last Year of Graduate
Graduate, LYG minus 1, LYGm1 minus 2, LYGm2
Item
(CAYm3) (CAYm4) (CAYm5)
(2014-2015) (2013-2014) (2012-2013)

Number of students admitted in the corresponding 218 207 158


First Year + admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry
and separate division, if applicable

114 80 67
Number of students who have graduated without
backlogs in the stipulated period

Success Index (SI) 0.52 0.39 0.42

Average SI 0.44

Table B.4.2.1: Success rate without backlogs

Success rate without backlogs in any year of study = 25 × Average SI = 25 x 0.44 = 11

4.2.2. Success rate with backlog in stipulated period of study (15)


SI= (Number of students who graduated from the program in the stipulated period of course duration)/ (Number
of students admitted in the first year of that batch and actual admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and separate
division, if applicable) Average SI = mean of Success Index (SI) for past three batches
Success rate = 15 × Average SI
Last Year of Last Year of Graduate Last Year of Graduate
Item Graduate(LYG) minus 1, minus 2
(CAYm3) LYGm1(CAYm4) LYGm2(CAYm5)
(2014-15) (2013-14) (2012-13)
Number of students admitted in the corresponding First 218 207 158
Year + admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and
separate division, if applicable
Number of students who have graduated with backlog in 181 178 136
the stipulated period

Success Index (SI) 0.83 0.86 0.86

0.85
Average Success Index
Table B.4.2.2: Success rate with backlog in stipulated period of study

Success rate = 15 × Average SI = 15 x 0.85 = 12.75

Note: If 100% students clear without any backlog then also total marks scored will be 40 as both 4.2.1 & 4.2.2 will be
applicable simultaneously.

Self Assessment Report Page 127


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
4.3. Academic Performance in Third Year (15)

Academic Performance = 1.5 * Average API (Academic Performance Index)

API = ((Mean of 3rd Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point scale) or (Mean of the
percentage of marks of all successful students in Third Year/10)) x (number of successful students/number of
students appeared in the examination)
Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the final year

CAY(2017- CAYm1(2016- CAYm2(2015-


Academic Performance
18) 17) 16)
Mean Percentage of all successful students(X) 6.95 6.73 6.55

Total number of successful students (Y) 202 218 202

Total number of students appeared in the examination (Z) 202 218 202

API = X* (Y/Z) 6.95 6.73 6.55

Average API = (API1+API2+API3)/3 6.74

Academic Performance= 1.5*Average API 10.11

Table B.4.3: Academic Performance in Third Year

4.4. Academic Performance in Second Year (15)

Academic Performance Level = 1.5 * Average API (Academic Performance Index)

API = ((Mean of 2nd Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point scale) or (Mean of the
percentage of marks of all successful students in Second Year/10)) x (number of successful students/number of
students appeared in the examination)
Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the Third year

Academic Performance CAYm1(2016- CAYm2(2015-


CAY(2017-18)
17) 16)

Mean Percentage of all successful students(X) 6.76 6.48 6.26


Total number of successful students (Y) 191 203 214
Total number of students appeared in the examination (Z) 191 203 214

API = X* (Y/Z) 6.76 6.48 6.26


Average API = (API1+API2+API3)/3 6.50
Academic Performance= 1.5*Average API 9.75
Table B.4.4: Academic Performance in Second Year

Self Assessment Report Page 128


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
4.5 Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship (40)
Assessment Points = 40 × average placement

Item CAY CAYm1 CAYm2 (2015-


(2017-18) (2016-17) 16)

Total No. of Final Year Students (N) 218 202 154

No. of Students Placed in Companies or


142 150 111
Government Sector (X)

No. of Students Admitted to higher Studies with


Valid qualifying Scores (GATE or equivalent
9 11
State or National Level Tests, GRE, GMAT etc.) 4
(Y)
No. of Students turned entrepreneur in
4 5
Engineering/ Technology (Z) 1

X+Y+Z= 147 163 127


Placement Index: (X+Y+Z)/N 0.674 0.806 0.824
Average Placement= (P1+P2+P3)/3 0.756
Table B.4.5: Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship

Assessment Points= 40 *0.756= 30.2

4.5a. Provide the placement data in the below mentioned format with the name of the
Program and the assessment year:
Programs Name and Assessment Year: CSE & 2015-16
Name of the student
Name of the Employer
S.no. placed Enrollment no.
1 Aakanksha Kumawat 12E1JCCSF3XP001 Accenture Services Pvt. Ltd.
2 Aakriti Goyal 12E1JCCSF4XP002 Resonant Cloud Solutions
3 Aastha Gambhir 12E1JCCSF4XP003 TCS
4 Abhishek Baj 12E1JCCSM4XP005 Phone Support
5 Abhishek Galav 12E1JCCSM4XP006 TCS
6 Abhishek Gupta 12E1JCCSM4XP007 TCS
7 Abhishek Soni 12E1JCCSM3XP008 TCS, Accenture
8 Aditya Kumar 12E1JCCSM45P010 Configaware
Aditya Pokharna Mindtree, Accenture,
9 12E1JCCSM4XP013 Microsoft
10 Ajay Sharma 12E1JCCSM4XP301 TCS

Self Assessment Report Page 129


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
11 Akanksha Sharma 12E1JCCSF4XP015 Accenture Services Pvt. Ltd.
12 Amit Gupta 12E1JCCSM4XP017 Mindtree
13 Ankit Sharma 12E1JCCSM4XP019 Accenture Services Pvt. Ltd.
14 Ankit Soni 12E1JCCSM3XP020 TCS
15 Ankur Jain 12E1JCCSM4XP022 TCS, Accenture
16 Anshita Bhatia 12E1JCCSF4XP023 Accenture Services Pvt. Ltd.
Arpit Sharma TATA Consultancy Services
17 12E1JCCSM4XP024 Limited
18 Arpit Somani 12E1JCCSM4XP025 TCS
19 Arti Sharma 12E1JCCSF41P026 TCS
20 Arvind Bhat 12E1JCCSM45P027 Just Dial, Teleperformance*
Asrar Hussain ICAR-CSWRI
21 13E1JCCSMXXP302 GOVERNMENT JOB
22 Astha Sharma 12E1JCCSF4XP029 TCS
23 Ayushi Garg 12E1JCCSF4XP303 Mindtree, Accenture
24 Ayushi Khandelwal 12E1JCCSF4XP030 TCS
25 Ayushi Mathur 12E1JCCSF4XP031 TCS, Accenture
Bhumika Marolia TATA Consultancy Services
26 12E1JCCSF4XP032 Limited
27 Bhupender 12E1JCCSM3XP033 TCS
28 Bhuwanesh Pareek 12E1JCCSM4XP034 First American
29 Cheena Middha 12E1JCCSF4XP036 Accenture Services Pvt. Ltd
Chetan Singh
Teleperformance
30 Rathore 12E1JCCSM4XP037
31 Deepak Lodha 12E1JCCSM4XP039 Rebuscode, Capegemini, TCS
32 Deepak Saraf 12E1JCCSM4XP040 Faber works, IKY Technosoft
33 Diksha Raina 12E1JCCSF45P041 ConfigAware
34 Gaurav Khandhari 12E1JCCSM45P043 TCS, Accenture
35 Gunjan Aswani 12E1JCCSF4XP302 TCS, Accenture
Gurpreet Singh
Just Dial
36 Sawhney 12E1JCCSM4XP045
37 Harshita Khandelwal 12E1JCCSF4XP046 TCS, Accenture
Himanshu Kumar
TCS, Accenture
38 Singh 12E1JCCSM45P048
Jaswinder Singh Auditor, central government
39 12E1JCCSM4XP049 job
40 Kapil Nainani 12E1JCCSM4XP050 Infoobject
41 Karan Pandit 12E1JCCSM44P051 Bluecubes
42 Kartik Anand 12E1JCCSM4XP053 Teleperformance
43 Kartikeya Bahuguna 12E1JCCSM45P054 Rebuscode
44 Kashmir Sihag 12E1JCCSM3XP055 Tax assistant-Government Job

Self Assessment Report Page 130


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
45 Kshitiz Khandelwal 12E1JCCSM4XP056 Persistent Soft
46 Kumari Poonam 12E1JCCSF45P057 TCS, Accenture
47 Lakshi Bansal 12E1JCCSF4XP058 Mindtree
48 Lalit Singhal 12E1JCCSM4XP059 Rebuscode
49 Mahak Mundra 12E1JCCSM4XP061 Accenture
Mahendra Kumar
TCS, Accenture
50 Pirtani 12E1JCCSM4XP062
51 Mahita Sharma 12E1JCCSF4XP064 TCS/Realtime Data Services
52 Maitry 12E1JCCSF4XP065 Accenture Services Pvt. Ltd.
53 Manish Kalra 12E1JCCSM4XP067 Accenture
54 Manoj Goswami 12E1JCCSM3XP068 TCS
55 Mohit Maghanani 12E1JCCSM4XP070 Accenture Services Pvt. Ltd.
56 Monika Mangal 12E1JCCSF4XP071 TCS
Ms Nahid Gul
Accenture
57 Qureshi 12E1JCCSF3XP072
58 Naman Agarwal 12E1JCCSM4XP073 TCS, Accenture
59 Nandani Dixit 13E1JCCSFXXP308 Adelante Labs
60 Nitesh Sharma 12E1JCCSM4XP076 TCS
61 Nitin Udawat 12E1JCCSM4XP077 Phone Support
62 Palak 13E1JCCSFXXP312 TCS
63 Palak Goyal 12E1JCCSF4XP078 Accenture Services Pvt. Ltd.
64 Pallavi Bajaj 12E1JCCSF35P079 Accenture Services Pvt. Ltd.
65 Pankaj Suthar 12E1JCCSM3XP080 Persistent Systems Ltd.
66 Parul Vashishet 12E1JCCSF4XP081 TCS, Accenture
67 Payal Jain 12E1JCCSF4XP082 TCS, Accenture
Piyush Kumar
TCS
68 Begwani 12E1JCCSM4XP083
69 Pooja Sharma 12E1JCCSM4XP084 TCS, Accenture
Prafull Mittal Selected government job- GST
70 12E1JCCSM4XP085 inspector
71 Prakash 12E1JCCSM45P086 TCS, Accenture, HSBC
72 Pranav Modi 12E1JCCSM45P087 TCS, Accenture
73 Prashant Agarwal 12E1JCCSM4XP089 TCS
74 Pratibha Zutshi 12E1JCCSF45P091 TCS, Accenture
75 Priyanka Agrawal 12E1JCCSF4XP093 Accenture
76 Radhika Joshi 12E1JCCSF4XP094 TCS, Accenture
77 Rahul Jaiman 12E1JCCSM4XP095 Accenture
78 Rajdeep Gautam 12E1JCCSM4XP097 TCS, Accenture
79 Rakshita Mishra 12E1JCCSF45P099 TCS, Accenture
80 Rashika Raina 12E1JCCSF45P100 TCS

Self Assessment Report Page 131


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
81 Richa Sharma 12E1JCCSF4XP101 TCS, Accenture
82 Rishabh Garg 12E1JCCSM4XP102 mindtree, Accenture
83 Rishabh Jindal 12E1JCCSM45P103 OLLOSOFT PVT LTD
84 Ritika Choudhary 13E1JCCSFXXP315 Phone Support
85 Rohit Seervi 13E1JCCSMXXP316 Ever data Technology
86 Romit Jain 13E1JCCSMXXP317 Accenture
87 Sahil Gulati 12E1JCCSM4XP105 Just Dial
88 Sailesh Choyal 12E1JCCSM3XP106 TCS, Accenture, UpGrad
89 Saksham Gupta 12E1JCCSM4XP107 infoobject
90 Sakshi Chauhan 12E1JCCSF45P108 TCS, Accenture
91 Sangik Sen 12E1JCCSM45P110 Netskope India
92 Sanidhya Mathur 13E1JCCSMXXP318 Phone Support
93 Shahida Bano 13E1JCCSFXXP319 TCS
94 Shivam Agiwal 12E1JCCSM4XP113 TCS
95 Shivani Gupta 12E1JCCSF4XP114 TCS, Accenture
96 Shivanshi Julania 12E1JCCSF45P115 Accenture
97 Shobhit Agarwal 12E1JCCSM45P117 Bluecubes
98 Ravi Kumar Sen 13E1JCCSMXXP314 E- Collect PVT LTD
99 Shubham Prajapati 12E1JCCSM3XP118 ConfigAware, Deloitte
100 Shweta Chaturvedi 12E1JCCSF4XP119 Accenture
101 Sohaldeep Kaur 13E1JCCSFXXP322 Accenture Services Pvt. Ltd.
102 Sonali Bansal 12E1JCCSF4XP304 TCS, Accenture
103 Srishti Gupta 12E1JCCSF4XP122 Accenture,Tata tech
104 Sukriti Jain 12E1JCCSF4XP123 TCS, Accenture
105 Sumit Sharma 12E1JCCSM4XP124 TCS, Accenture
106 Swati Garg 13E1JCCSFXXP324 TCS
107 Tarun Khariwal 12E1JCCSM4XP126 TCS
108 Tushar Goyal 12E1JCCSM4XP127 TCS
109 Vidhit Jhalani 12E1JCCSM4XP128 Just Dial / Jhalani Engineers
110 Vivek Khandelwal 12E1JCCSM4XP131 Accenture
111 Yogesh Nogia 12E1JCCSM1XP132 Just Dial
Table 4.5a.a :Placement Details 2015-16

Programs Name and Assessment Year: CSE & 2016-17


Name of the student
Name of the Employer
S.no. placed Enrollment no.
1 Aashi Manak Bohara 13E1JCCSF4XP001 Accenture
Informatica Business Solution Pvt.
2 Abhishek Jain 13E1JCCSM4XP004 Ltd.
3 Abhishek Jain 13E1JCCSM4XP005 Accenture

Self Assessment Report Page 132


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
4 Abhishek Laddha 13E1JCCSM4XP006 Accenture
Quick Silver Conneccting the Dots
5 Akanksha Pandey 13E1JCCSF45P012 Services Pvt Ltd
6 Akshay Mishra 13E1JCCSM4XP013 Aayat Softech
7 Akshit Gupta 13E1JCCSM45P015 Micro Focus(HBE)
8 Aman Kumar Lata 13E1JCCSM4XP016 Technocopacetic
9 Amogh Pareek 13E1JCCSM4XP018 Celubal India Pvt Solution
10 Anjali Singh 13E1JCCSF45P021 Accenture
11 Anshika Bangroo 13E1JCCSF45P024 Aayat Softech
12 Anuj Jain 13E1JCCSM4XP025 Mind IT
13 Anuj Rastogi 13E1JCCSM4XP026 Accenture
14 Anurag Saini 13E1JCCSM3XP027 DLB Software
15 Arpit Toshniwal 13E1JCCSM4XP031 Aayat Softech
16 Ashita Sharma 13E1JCCSF4XP033 Accenture
17 Ashutosh Shukla 13E1JCCSM4XP035 Accenture
18 Ayushi Gupta 13E1JCCSF4XP037 Accenture
19 Bulbul Koul 13E1JCCSF45P039 Aayat Softech
20 Chaitanaya Sethi 13E1JCCSM4XP040 Accenture
21 Deepak Sharma 13E1JCCSM4XP045 DLB Software
22 Deepanker Kumar 13E1JCCSM45P046 Just Dial
23 Deepanshu Kumar 13E1JCCSM35P047 Appcino Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
24 Dekshant Khandelwal 13E1JCCSM4XP048 Bullseye
25 Diksha Aggarwal 13E1JCCSF4XP050 Accenture
26 Dipesh Bhatia 13E1JCCSM4XP051 Mind IT
27 Himalya Goyal 13E1JCCSM4XP057 Gluto impex private limited
28 Jyoti Prajapati 13E1JCCSF3XP062 Accenture
29 Kanak Kumar Jain 13E1JCCSM4XP063 OYO
30 Karan Chaparwal 13E1JCCSM3XP064 Celebal Technologies
31 Kartik Laddha 13E1JCCSM4XP065 Accenture
32 Khushi Gupta 13E1JCCSF4XP068 Celebal India sol
33 Komal Kumari Garg 13E1JCCSF4XP072 Newzen
34 Aditya Mathur 13E1JCCSM4XP011 Accenture
35 Harsha Haryani 13E1JCCSF4XP055 Accenture/HPE
36 Khyati Tandon 13E1JCCSF4XP071 Accenture
37 Krishana Kumar 13E1JCCSM35P073 IPSoft Global Service
38 Ankush Goyal 13E1JCCSM4XP023 Mindtree/TCS
39 Khyati Goyal 13E1JCCSF45P070 SRC Private Ltd
40 Ayush Goyal 13E1JCCSM4XP036 Accenture
41 Abhishek Sharma 13E1JCCSM4XP008 GIPL

Self Assessment Report Page 133


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
42 Anirudh Bansal 13E1JCCSM4XP019 Infoobject
43 Anjali Sharma 13E1JCCSF4XP020 Accenture
44 Gunjan Bhardwaj 13E1JCCSF4XP054 Accenture
45 Kavish Goyal 13E1JCCSM45P067 Soprasteria
46 Kriti Tanwani 13E1JCCSF4XP074 Accenture
47 Lokesh Devnani 13E1JCCSM4XP077 Causecode/Calsoft
48 Lokesh Patni 13E1JCCSM4XP078 Mindtree
49 Luv Mathur 13E1JCCSM4XP079 Intime Tech
50 Manu Singhal 13E1JCCSF4XP081 Accenture
51 Megha Jain 13E1JCCSF4XP084 Accenture
52 Milind Jain 13E1JCCSM4XP087 Componence software pvt. ltd.
53 Mohammed Talha 13E1JCCSM3XP090 Mind IT
54 Mohit Garg 13E1JCCSM4XP091 Accenture
55 Mugdha Bhatia 13E1JCCSF45P094 Accenture
56 Mukul Agarwal 13E1JCCSM4XP095 Accenture
57 Naman Jain 13E1JCCSM4XP098 Accenture
58 Niharika Jain 13E1JCCSF4XP103 Mindtree
59 Nikita Kochar 13E1JCCSF4XP105 Accenture
60 Palak Baid 13E1JCCSF4XP108 Accenture
61 Palkesh Jain 13E1JCCSM45P109 Optimize IT Systems Pvt. Ltd.
62 Pankaj Kalwani 13E1JCCSM4XP110 Newzen
63 Pankaj 13E1JCCSM35P111 uCertify
64 Prachi Tomar 13E1JCCSF45P116 Accenture
65 Pragya Vashishtha 13E1JCCSF4XP118 Accenture
66 Pramod Bhobharia 13E1JCCSM3XP119 GIPL
67 Pranav Kachroo 13E1JCCSM45P120 Aayat Sotech/Just dial
68 Prasook Jain 13E1JCCSM4XP121 Mindtree
69 Pratham Yadav 13E1JCCSM3XP122 Accenture
70 Praval Jain 13E1JCCSM4XP123 Cloudthing Pvt Ltd
71 Priyanka Malhotra 13E1JCCSF4XP128 Accenture
72 Priyash Khandelwal 13E1JCCSM4XP129 Soft Clouds
73 Radhika Juneja 13E1JCCSF4XP131 Accenture
74 Ratish Udawat 13E1JCCSM4XP133 just dial
75 Raunak Garg 13E1JCCSM4XP134 HPE/MicroFocus
76 Rewati Raman 13E1JCCSM4XP135 Activant Solutions
77 Mukund Khandelwal 13E1JCCSM4XP095 Cyntexa Lab
78 Rohan Malhotra 13E1JCCSM4XP139 Causecode
79 Sakshi Agarwal 13E1JCCSF4XP141 Accenture
80 Sameeksha Garg 13E1JCCSF4XP143 Accenture/HPE

Self Assessment Report Page 134


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
81 Sankalp Gupta 13E1JCCSM4XP144 Accenture
82 Preety Sharma 13E1JCCSF4XP126 Mind IT
83 Mahesh Khandelwal 13E1JCCSM4XP080 Accenture
84 Ojasvi Singhal 13E1JCCSF4XP107 Accenture
85 Poorva Soni 13E1JCCSF3XP115 Accenture
86 Samarth Paboowal 13E1JCCSM4XP142 Mindtree
87 Rishabh Sharma 13E1JCCSM4XP136 just dial
88 Rohit Advani 13E1JCCSM4XP140 Tech Ahead
89 Medhavi Garg 13E1JCCSF4XP083 Mindtree
90 Neha Goyal 13E1JCCSF4XP102 Accenture
91 Parag Hurkat 13E1JCCSM4XP113 Accenture
92 Neha Arora 13E1JCCSF4XP101 Accenture
93 Priyanka Goyal 13E1JCCSM4XP127 Accenture
94 Preetam Swami 13E1JCCSM3XP125 Aayat Sotech
95 Pulkit Agarwal 13E1JCCSM4XP130 Intime Tech
96 Mayank Patni 13E1JCCSM4XP082 MarkMyBook
97 Nikhil Ameria 13E1JCCSM4XP104 Mind IT/ OPPO
98 Pinal Jain 13E1JCCSF4XP114 TATA Consultancy Services Ltd.
99 Kumar Pawan 13E1JCCSM45P075 Mind IT
100 Sanket S. Phatak 13E1JCCSM4XP145 Coders Brain, Redhat
101 Sarvesh Sharma 13E1JCCSM4XP146 Aayat Sotech/Just Dial
102 Shikha Swarnkar 13E1JCCSF3XP149 Accenture
103 Shivani Gupta 13E1JCCSF4XP155 Accenture
104 Shivansh Ahuja 13E1JCCSM4XP156 Mind IT
105 Shreya Kaul 13E1JCCSF45P158 Accenture
106 Shreyansh Jain 13E1JCCSM4XP159 Accenture
107 Shritansh Kumar Verma 13E1JCCSM45P160 Aayat Softech/Whitehat InfoTech
108 Shubham Sharma 13E1JCCSM4XP162 Accenture
109 Shubham Sharma 13E1JCCSM4XP163 Coders Brain
110 Tanvi Trackroo 13E1JCCSF45P169 Accenture
111 Tarun Jain 13E1JCCSM4XP170 mindtree
112 Udit Vasu 13E1JCCSM4XP171 TCS/HPE/ JUSPAY
113 Varsha Parihar 13E1JCCSF3XP178 Accenture
114 Varunika Yadav 13E1JCCSF4XP180 Accenture
115 Ved Prakash 13E1JCCSM45P181 BizViz Technologies Pvt. Ltd,
116 Vinayak Parashar 13E1JCCSM45P182 Click Labs Pvt Ltd.
117 Vishal Acharya 13E1JCCSM4XP183 Soprasteria
118 Vishnu Singh 13E1JCCSM4XP185 GIPL/TCS
119 Vivek Gupta 13E1JCCSM4XP186 ICU MEDICAL INDIA PVT LTD

Self Assessment Report Page 135


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Yadhuveer Singh
Tata Consultancy Service
120 Bharthala 13E1JCCSM4XP187
121 Yash Singhal 13E1JCCSM4XP188 TATA Consultancy Services Ltd.
122 Shivangi Kalra 13E1JCCSF4XP852 Accenture
123 Saba Nafees 13E1JCCSF4XP857 Accenture
124 Kaveri Sood 14E1JCCSF40P551 Aayat Sotech
125 Irfan Hussain Silawat 14E1JCCSM30P202 Aayat Sotech/Just Dial
126 Jagdish Singh Rathor 14E1JCCSM40P203 Accenture Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
127 Vikash Sharma 14E1JCCSM40P210 Pixel Point Technology
128 Yash Jha 14E1JCCSM40P212 Aayat Softech
129 Sidharth Gilhotra 13E1JCCSM4XP164 Accenture
130 Sheetal Jain 13E1JCCSF4XP148 Accenture/HPE
131 Sakshi Mittal 13E1JCCSF45P855 Accenture
132 Shilpi Gupta 13E1JCCSF4XP152 Accenture
133 Varun Chawla 13E1JCCSM4XP179 Tech Ahead
134 Ashish Purohit 13E1JCCSM4XP853 Accenture
135 Tanisha Laddha 13E1JCCSF4XP168 Techno Softwares, Accenture
136 Surbhi Bhatia 13E1JCCSF4XP166 Techno Software, Kota
137 Shilpee Patidar 13E1JCCSF35P151 Accenture/HPE
138 Shivali 13E1JCCSF45P153 Accenture
139 Umang Jain 13E1JCCSF4XP173 HSBC, Hyderabad
140 Anmol Dayal 13E1JCCSF4XP859 Accenture
141 Nidhi Gupta 13E1JCCSF4XP851 Accenture
142 Varnali Sharma 13E1JCCSF4XP854 Accenture
143 Shikhar Saxena 13E1JCCSM4XP150 Mind IT
144 Supriya Kaul 13E1JCCSF45P165 Aayat Softech
145 Law Kumar Sah 14E1JCCSM35P205 Mind IT
146 Neha Singh 14E1JCCSF40P206 Lantern's
147 Shaheen Khan 13E1JCCSM3XP147 Bulls Eye
148 Deeksha Sharma 13E1JCCSF4XP401 Accenture
149 Teena Agrawal 13E1JCCSF4XP400 Mind IT
150 Moinuddin 13E1JCCSM3XP093 Conduent
Table 4.5a.b :Placement Details 2016-17

Self Assessment Report Page 136


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Programs Name and Assessment Year: CSE & 2017-18
Name of the
Name of the Employer
S.no. student placed Enrollment no.
1 Aayushi Johri 14E1JCCSF40P001 Accenture
2 Abhishek Jain 14E1JCCSM40P004 Componence portal service Pvt ltd
3 Abhishek Sarawag 14E1JCCSM30P005 ATCS
4 Abhishek Somani 14E1JCCSM40P006 InfoSys
5 Adarsh Julania 14E1JCCSM45P007 Accenture
6 Aditi Methi 14E1JCCSF40P008 NIIT Technology, Global Logic
eBizneeds (India) Internet Solutions Pvt.
7 Akanksha Kaul 14E1JCCSF45P011 Ltd
8 Akshat Trivedi 14E1JCCSM40P012 Capital Trust
9 Akshay Jain 14E1JCCSM40P013 Mindtree/TCS
10 Akshita Agrawal 14E1JCCSF40P016 Accenture
11 Akshita Jain 14E1JCCSF40P017 Accenture
12 Aman Agrawal 14E1JCCSM40P018 Artech
Amit Kumar
MarketingMindz
13 Agrawal 14E1JCCSM40P020
14 Anisha Goyal 14E1JCCSF40P022 IBM
15 Anjali Agarwal 14E1JCCSF40P023 Infosys limited
16 Ankit Jhawar 14E1JCCSM40P025 Accenture
17 Anuj Sharma 14E1JCCSM40P029 ATCS
18 Anushka Jain 14E1JCCSF40P031 Matrix
19 Anushree Jain 14E1JCCSF40P028 EY Global
20 Arpit Kalra 14E1JCCSM40P034 Celebal
21 Ashish Agarwal 14E1JCCSM40P035 TCS
22 Ashita Bansal 14E1JCCSF40P037 Accenture/Causecode
23 Astha Koul 14E1JCCSF45P038 SkillRock/HSBC
24 Atul Dada 14E1JCCSM40P039 Hexaview/Infoobject/
Avijit Singh
Mindtree
25 Shekhawat 14E1JCCSM40P040
26 Ayushi Aeran 14E1JCCSF40P042 Accenture
27 Badal Jain 14E1JCCSM40P043 Smartsign Design Pvt. Ltd.
28 Bhaskar Sharma 14E1JCCSM40P044 Mindtree/TCS
29 Bhawika Agarwal 14E1JCCSF40P045 Accenture
30 Chinmay Bisen 14E1JCCSM40P046 Sopra Steria
31 Chitrangana Singh 14E1JCCSF40P047 Accenture
32 Deekshant Mamodia 14E1JCCSM40P049 TCS
33 Dhruval Bhardwaj 14E1JCCSM40P050 EY Global Delivery Services India LLP
34 Divaker Soni 14E1JCCSM30P052 Celebal

Self Assessment Report Page 137


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
35 Divisha Sharma 14E1JCCSF40P053 ATCS
36 Divya Dave 14E1JCCSF40P054 Mindtree
37 Divya Maheshwari 14E1JCCSF40P055 IBM
38 Garvit Mittal 14E1JCCSM40P057 SkillRock
39 Harshita Sharma 14E1JCCSF40P062 Celebal
40 Isha Jain 14E1JCCSF45P064 Accenture
41 Ishanvi Modi 14E1JCCSF40P065 IBM
42 Ishita 14E1JCCSF40P066 METACUBE
43 Japleen Kaur 14E1JCCSF40P068 Accenture/TCS
44 Jatin Garg 14E1JCCSM40P070 SkillRock
45 Jayanti Chouhan 14E1JCCSF40P071 Mindtree
46 Kajal Rai 14E1JCCSF45P074 ARN FOCUS IIT/ Oasis Technosoft
47 Kanishka Goyal 14E1JCCSF40P075 IBM
48 Kishan Mangal 14E1JCCSM40P078 Career Point
49 Manjari Singh 14E1JCCSF40P080 Accenture
50 Meetanshi Rawat 14E1JCCSF40P083 Accenture/TCS
51 Meghali Khandelwal 14E1JCCSF40P084 Newgen Software
52 Mohit Jain 14E1JCCSM45P085 TCS
53 Mohit Kumar Earan 14E1JCCSM40P086 Matrix
54 Mohit Maheshwari 14E1JCCSM40P088 Mindtree
55 Naman Goyal 14E1JCCSM40P089 ARN FOCUS IIT
56 Naman Jain 14E1JCCSM45P090 BriskMinds
57 Naveen Saini 14E1JCCSM30P091 Celebal
58 Neetesh Vashishtha 14E1JCCSM40P094 Accenture
59 Neha Piproniyan 14E1JCCSF40P095 Simplyforce
60 Neha Sewda 14E1JCCSF40P096 Accenture/HSBC
61 Netra Singhal 14E1JCCSF40P097 IBM India Pvt Ltd
62 Nikhil Garg 14E1JCCSM45P098 TCS
63 Nimitt Chauhan 14E1JCCSM40P101 Mindtree
64 Nirmal Goyal 14E1JCCSM40P102 Capital Trust
65 Pallavi Varshney 14E1JCCSF40P103 IBM
66 Pankaj 14E1JCCSM40P104 Accenture
67 Paresh Rajvanshi 14E1JCCSM40P105 Nagarro
68 Pavan Bhansali 14E1JCCSM40P106 Mindtree
69 Pooja Gupta 14E1JCCSF40P108 Accenture
70 Pooja Sharma 14E1JCCSF40P109 Hexaware
71 Prabhakar Dubey 14E1JCCSM45P110 Gurukripa, Infosys
72 Pradhumn Trivedi 14E1JCCSM40P111 Bestpeers
73 Pranav Dua 14E1JCCSM40P113 Celebal

Self Assessment Report Page 138


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
74 Pranav Gopal 14E1JCCSM40P114 Capital Trust
Rafaiy Abdul
Marketing Mindz
75 Rehman 14E1JCCSM40P119
76 Rahul Jaswani 14E1JCCSM40P120 Matrix
77 Rahul Shambhwani 14E1JCCSM40P122 Metacube
78 Rahul Tiwari 14E1JCCSM45P123 Celebal
79 Rajesh Ayaldasani 14E1JCCSM40P124 Punchh
80 Rakshanda Kaul 14E1JCCSF45P125 Accenture
81 Rishabh Sharma 14E1JCCSM40P126 Accenture Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
82 Rohan Jandu 14E1JCCSM30P130 TCS
83 Rohit Mathur 14E1JCCSM40P134 Sopra Steria
84 Ronak Patni 14E1JCCSM40P135 TCS
85 Saloni Mehta 14E1JCCSF40P140 Musikaar
86 Samarth Tholia 14E1JCCSM40P141 Appirio
87 Sapna Gohrani 14E1JCCSF40P143 Mindtree
88 Sarvesh Kumar 14E1JCCSM45P144 AdHoc Networks
89 Shivam Chetani 14E1JCCSM40P147 TCS
90 Shivani Mareja 14E1JCCSF40P148 Matrix
91 Shivani Soni 14E1JCCSF30P149 Accenture
92 Shubham Bansal 14E1JCCSM40P152 E Connent Pvt Solutions
93 Shubham Gupta 14E1JCCSM40P154 Hexaware
94 Shubham Kalani 14E1JCCSM40P155 TCS
Shubham
Accenture
95 Khandelwal 14E1JCCSM40P156
96 Shubham Serva 14E1JCCSM30P157 Mindtree
97 Shubham Sharma 14E1JCCSM40P158 TCS
98 Aakanksha Raj 14E1JCCSF35P300 Bestpeers/Metacube
99 Abha Kabra 14E1JCCSF40P301 Mindtree
100 Abhidha Vatsa 14E1JCCSF40P307 Hexaware
Aditya Vikram
Skyway
101 Singh 15E1JCCSX40P200
102 Ajay Bhandari 15E1JCCSX40P201 Just Dial
103 Ankit 15E1JCCSX30P203 Capital Trust
104 Banshi Lal Nain 15E1JCCSX40P205 Capital Trust
105 Jahanvi Bhatt 14E1JCCSF40P302 ATCS
106 Jayesh Agarwal 14E1JCCSM40P194 Accenture
107 Mahima Joshi 15E1JCCSX40P209 Skyway
108 Manali Goswami 15E1JCCSX40P210 Interview Air
109 Rakesh Prajapat 15E1JCCSX30P215 Capital Trust
110 Romi Kumari 14E1JCCSF35P306 Accenture

Self Assessment Report Page 139


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
111 Siddharth Gupta 14E1JCCSM40P159 TCS
112 Sidhima Shekhawat 14E1JCCSF40P160 Accenture
113 Simpi Arora 14E1JCCSF40P198 Accenture Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
114 Srishti Jain 14E1JCCSF40P162 TCS
115 Subham Middha 14E1JCCSM40P163 Mindtree
116 Subigya Rai 14E1JCCSF45P164 Accenture
117 Suhani Sharma 14E1JCCSF40P165 Accenture
118 Tanya Raj 14E1JCCSF40P167 Accenture
119 Tejasv Kulshrestha 14E1JCCSM40P168 TCS
120 Tushar Jain 14E1JCCSM40P169 Mindtree
Umesh Kumar
ATCS
121 Dhakar 14E1JCCSM30P171
122 Vaibhav Jain 14E1JCCSM40P174 GKM IT/Sopra Steria
123 Vaibhav Saxena 15E1JCCSX40P218 Just Dial
124 Vaishali Agarwal 14E1JCCSF40P175 Newgen Software
125 Varsha Dewani 14E1JCCSF40P176 Gurukripa
126 Vinayak Gupta 14E1JCCSM40P178 Artech
127 Vinita Bulchandani 14E1JCCSF40P179 Newgen Software
Vipendra Singh
Mindtree
128 Devara 14E1JCCSM40P181
129 Vishal Verma 14E1JCCSM40P184 Interview Air
130 Vishesh Koul 14E1JCCSM45P185 Kotak Life Ins.
131 Yash Shah 14E1JCCSM40P190 ATCS
132 Apurvi Mansinghka 14E1JCCSF40P033 Accenture
Akshay
JRBS/ Oasis Technosoft
133 Vijayvargiya 14E1JCCSM40P015
134 Ekansh Kushwah 14E1JCCSM40P056 Sopra Steria
135 Kapil Khandelwal 14E1JCCSM40P076 App-Perfect
136 Rohit Mathur 14E1JCCSM40P134 Sopra Steria
137 Mayank Prasad 14E1JCCSM45P082 Skyway, Oasis Technosoft, Metric Stream
138 Nikhil Gupta 14E1JCCSM40P099 Mindtree
139 Mohit Kumawat 14E1JCCSM40P087 App-Perfect
140 Vinod Kumar 14E1JCCSM30P180 Accenture
141 Yash Vijay 14E1JCCSM40P191 Sopra Steria
142 Jatin Agarwal 14E1JCCSM40P069 Sofocle Technologies

Table B.4.5a.c: Placement Details 2017-18

Self Assessment Report Page 140


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
4.6 Professional Activities (20)

4.6.1 Professional Societies/Chapters and Organizing Engineering Events (5)


(The Department Shall provide relevant information)

Table B.4.6.1a shows the Professional Societies of the Department of Computer Science
&Engineering.Table B.4.6.1b, Table B.4.6.1c and Table B.4.6.1d shows the Engineering Events
organised by the Department of Computer Science & Engineering along with the support of
Professional Societies of the Department of Computer Science and Engineering.

The students & Faculty of the Computer Science & Engineering Department and other department
are the active Participants.

S.No Name Events Organized Event Outcome


Of the
Society
International This Conference helped our students to gain knowledge
Conference on from many research Scholars. Also our students got
CSE- Emerging Trends in opportunity to publish their research paper.
JMS Expert Applications &
Security
(ICETEAS'18)-
Springer International
Conference
1 International Congress This conference gave opportunity to interact with many
Information and researches
Communication
Technology
2018,London
National Conference This conference helped our students to gain knowledge
on Recent Trends in from many research Scholars and also share their
Computing and knowledge in different fields.
Communications'18
(RTCC'18)

National Level This event helped our students to improve leadership


Events- (Techno Fest) quality. Students of JECRC and other Colleges are the
active participant of this contest

Table B.4.6.1a: Professional Societies of the Department of Computer Science & Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 141


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Name of
Acad
Event Resource
emic Organized Event Event Outcome
Date Person/
Year
Institute
FDP-Datamining & NITTTR 2017 This event helped our faculty
Business Intelligence 4-8 Sept members to enhance
2017 knowledge about Data
mining
Big Data IIT Kharagpur This event helped our
22-23 students to enhance
Sept 2017 knowledge in the field of Big
Data
Kon Banega Steve Engineers Day This helped our students to
Jobs 15-Sep Celebration enhance more technical
2017 knowledge. This event
supported by CSE-JMS
Big Data Mr. VimalDaga, This event helped our
Linux World students to enhance
28-Oct-17
knowledge in the field of Big
Data
Improvement in Prof. (Dr.) P.K. National Seminar for Faculty
CAYm1 (2017-2018)

Faculty API- National 23-Nov- Mishra API helped our faculty


Seminar 17 members to improve API
score
SalesForce Mr.Rajesh This helped our students to
Technology 17 Feb, complete training in
23 March Salesforce Technology. Also
2018 Students got opportunity to
learn about this technology
Forsk Technology Mr.Yogender This event helped our
St
1 Feb students to complete Training
2018-22 in Forsk Technology. Also
Mar 2018 Students got opportunity to
learn about this technology
Mr. This event helped our
AlokShrivastav students to complete Training
40 Hours
Redhat Technology in Redhat Technology. Also
Jan, Feb
Students got opportunity to
2018
learn about this technology

Entrepreneurship Startup Oisis, This event helped our


Awarness Camp 29-31 Jaipur students to enhance
Aug 2017 knowledge in Business
Entrepreneur Development

Self Assessment Report Page 142


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Name of
Acad
Event Resource
emic Organized Event Event Outcome
Date Person/
Year
Institute
Entrepreneurship Startup Oisis, This event helped our
Awarness Camp 29-31 Jaipur students to enhance
Aug 2017 knowledge in Business
CA Entrepreneur Development
Y Machine Learning Mr. VimalDaga, This event helped our
(20 Linux World students to enhance
9th Feb
17- knowledge in the field of
2018
201 Machine Learning also many
8) projects were made
MUN GeetikaGautam This event helped our
7th& 8th &ShikhaMahesh students to learn about
April wari, Faculty diplomacy, international
2018 Coordinators relations and the United
Nations
ICT BASED Short Dr. Sarbjeet It helped our students and
term course on “Open Singh, Associate faculty members to learn
31.08.201
Source Technologies” Professor, UIET, more about Social
6
at NITTTR, P.U., Chandigarh Networking Tools(Course
Chandigarh beyond Syllabus)
ICT BASED Short Mr. Amit This event helped our
term course on “Open Doegar, Asst. faculty members and students
Source Technologies” 31.08.201 Professor, to enhance knowledge about
at NITTTR, 6 NITTTR, Open Source Technologies
Chandigarh Chandigarh Also it covers concepts of
CAYm1 (2016-2017)

Virtualization
ICT BASED Short 29.08.201 Sangeeta Gupta, It helped our students and
term course on “Open 6 Jr. System faculty members to learn
Source Technologies” programmer, more about Introduction to
at NITTTR, NITTTR,Chandi PHP and Mysql (5 Sem
Chandigarh garh DBMS)
ICT BASED Short Saurabh It helped our students and
term course on “Open Kaushal, faculty members to learn
Source Technologies” 01.09.201 Technical more about Open Source
at NITTTR, 6 Administrator, Security Tools (8 Sem ISS )
Chandigarh NITTTR,
Chandigarh
ICT BASED Short Mala Kalra, It helped our students and
term course on “Open Asst. Professor, faculty members to learn
01.09.201
Source Technologies” NITTTR, more about Mendeley
6
at NITTTR, Chandigarh Reference Tool(Course
Chandigarh beyond Syllabus)

Self Assessment Report Page 143


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Name of
Event Resource
Organized Event Event Outcome
Date Person/
Institute
ICT BASED Short 01.09.201 Dr. Naveen It helped our students and
term course on “Open 6 Aggarwal, faculty members to learn R
Source Technologies” Associate Language for
at NITTTR, Professor, UIET, Analytics(Course beyond
Chandigarh P.U., Chandigarh Syllabus)
ICT BASED Short 31.08.201 Mr. Amit This event covers concepts
term course on “Open 6 Doegar, Asst. of Virtualization
Source Technologies” Professor,
at NITTTR, NITTTR,
Chandigarh Chandigarh
ICT BASED Short Dr. Gaurav It helped our students and
term course on “Open Kumar, faculty members to learn
Source Technologies” 29.08.201 Managing more about Web Designing.
at NITTTR, 6& Director, Magma Also it Covers front end and
Chandigarh 30.08.201 Research and User interface designing
6 Consultancy, tools
Pvt. Ltd.,
Ambala
ICT BASED Short Dr. Gaurav It helped our students and
term course on “Open
CAYm1 (2016-2017)

Kumar, faculty members to learn


Source Technologies” 29.08.201 Managing more about Web Designing.
at NITTTR, 6& Director, Magma Also it Covers front end and
Chandigarh 30.08.201 Research and User interface designing
6 Consultancy, tools
Pvt. Ltd.,
Ambala
ICT BASED Short 31.08.201 Dr. Sarbjeet It helped our students and
term course on “Open 6 Singh, Associate faculty members to learn
Source Technologies” Professor, UIET, about Social Networking
at NITTTR, P.U., Chandigarh Tools(Course beyond
Chandigarh Syllabus)
ICT BASED Short Dr. Naveen It helped our students and
29.08.201
term course on “Open Aggarwal, faculty members to learn
6 to
Source Technologies” Associate about Data Mining.It covers
02.09.201
at NITTTR, Professor, UIET, practical tool WEKA, used
6
Chandigarh P.U., Chandigarh for datamining
ICT BASED Short Sangeeta Gupta, It helped our students and
term course on “Open Jr. System faculty members to learn
29.08.201
Source Technologies” programmer, about Introduction to PHP
6
at NITTTR, NITTTR,Chandi and Mysql
Chandigarh garh

Self Assessment Report Page 144


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Name of
Event Resource
Organized Event Event Outcome
Date Person/
Institute
ICT BASED Short Saurabh It helped our students and
term course on “Open Kaushal, faculty members to learn
Source Technologies” 01.09.201 Technical about Open Source Security
at NITTTR, 6 Administrator, Tool which is course
Chandigarh NITTTR, beyound syllabus of 8 Sem
Chandigarh Information Security System
ICT BASED Short Mala Kalra, It helped our students and
term course on “Open Asst. Professor, faculty members to learn
01.09.201
Source Technologies” NITTTR, about Mendeley Reference
6
at NITTTR, Chandigarh Tool
Chandigarh
ICT BASED Short 1/9/2016 Dr. Naveen It helped our students and
term course on “Open Aggarwal, faculty members to learn
Source Technologies” Associate Language for
at NITTTR, Professor, UIET, Analytics(Course beyond
CAYm1 (2016-2017)

Chandigarh P.U., Chandigarh Syllabus)


International 10/9/2016 Mr. Michael Students understood Open
Workshop on Open Canon Chief Source Software, Drupal”
Source Software, Operating
Drupal” Officer,
Axelerant
Technologies,
Inc., Atlanta, US
International 10/9/2016 Mr. Nathan Students understood Open
Workshop on Open Roach (Japan), Source Software, Drupal”
Source Software, Content
Drupal marketing
associate,
AxelerantTechn
ologies, Inc.,
Atlanta, US
Technical Session on Shri Kaushal It helped our students to learn
Internet of Things Kumar, IoT
Technical
15/10/201
Manager,e-
6
Infochips,
Ahmedabad –
380 006.
Workshop on Big 29.08.201 Mr. VimalDaga This event helped students to
Data 6 Linux World enhance knowledge in the
Pvt. Ltd. Jaipur field of Bigdata

Self Assessment Report Page 145


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Name of
Acad
Event Resource
emic Organized Event Event Outcome
Date Person/
Year
Institute
TEDX 25th AnshulMithal, This helped our student
March Faculty communities and individuals
CAYm1 (2016-2017)

2017 Coordinator to Spark Conversation

Microsoft 29.08.201 Sangeeta Gupta, It helped our students to


Certification Summer 6 Jr. System learn about Web Designing
training Program in programmer, which covers User interface
.NET NITTTR,Chandi design,styles and themes
garh

Microsoft 25-05- Mr. It helps to Bridge the gap


Certification Summer 2015 to RanjanChhetri between academics &
training Program in 24-07- Industry
Android 2015
Microsoft 25-05- Mr. Abhishek It includes basic java
Certification Summer 2015 to Singh Rathore programming language
training Program in 24-07-
Core Java 2015
Microsoft 25-05- Mr. Aditya It includes advanced java
Certification Summer 2015 to Kumar programming such as servlet
training Program in 24-07- and applet
Advance Java 2015
CAYm2(2015-2016)

Microsoft Mr. Ashish This event helps to Bridge


25-05-
Certification Summer Rathore the gap between academics
2015 to
training Program in & Industry
30-05-
Embedded & Robotics
2015
with AVR Controller
PHP &MySql 13-07- Mr. Amit This event covers basic and
Training Program 2015 to Kumar, Faculty, Advanced SQL queries in
25-07- Sigmatech addition to PHP
2015 Infotech , Jaipur
Seminar on Mr. Khawar 6B.Tech1A.(Networking) It
Networking Butt Senior Covers advanced networking
Network tools and techniques and its
7/10/2015
Consultant, practical knowledge
Synergy
Network Ltd
Workshop on Cloud 12/10/201 Ms. Mala Kalra This event helped students to
Computing by 5 To 16- NIITR, understand cloudSim
NIITTR 10-2015 Chandigarh concepts

Self Assessment Report Page 146


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Name of
Acad
Event Resource
emic Organized Event Event Outcome
Date Person/
Year
Institute
Workshop on Cloud 12/10/201 Mr. Vipin Gupta This event helped students to
Computing by 5 to 16- , U-Net learn Cloud Storage
NIITTR 10-2015 Solutions, Moga
Workshop on Cloud 12/10/201 Mr. Mayank This event helped students to
Computing by 5 to 16- Arora CCET , learn Application
NIITTR 10-2015 Chandigarh development using cloud
Workshop on Cloud 12/10/201 Mr. Mani This event helped our
Computing by 5 to 16- Madhurkar, students to learn IaaS and
CAYm2(2015-2016)

NIITTR 10-2015 IBM, Banglore PaaS

Pre Placement training 12/10/201 FACE It helps to Bridge the gap


Program by FACE 5 to 14- between academics &
10-2015 Industry

Workshop on Big Mr.RakeshJangi It helps to Bridge the gap


Data & Hadoop d (Cloubia between academics &
11/1/2016
Technologies Industry
Pvt. Ltd.)
Seminar on Ms. Richa Mehta It helps to Bridge the gap
Respberry-Pi (Appin between academics &
27-02-
technologies Industry
2016
Lab, Jaipur)

TECHNOPAC 25-09- Mr. Uttam This event helped our


2014 Kumar students to learnbasic
to Faculty, Aptech networking concepts
27-09- Technology
2014
CAYm3(2014-15)

Pre-Placement training 07-01- Mr. Naveen Jain, This event helped our
by Career Launcher 2015 Faulty Career students to Bridge the gap
To Launcher, Jaipur between academics &
13-01- Industry
2015
Workshop on Core 25-02- Mr. Kamal This event helped our
JAVA 2015 Bhatia students to learn basics of
to Faculty, Matrix Java language
04-03- Computers
2015

Self Assessment Report Page 147


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Name of
Acad
Event Resource
emic Organized Event Event Outcome
Date Person/
Year
Institute
Workshop on Android
02-02- Mr. This event helped our
IIT-D 2015 UmangKejriwal students to enhance
to Faculty, Times knowledge about android
04-02- Globacom
2015
Workshop on .NET 06-02- Mr. This event helped our
CAYm3(2014-15)

MVC 2015 BrijeshAwasthi students to learn about .NET


to Mr.
07-02- Rajanchhetri,
2015 Faculty,
Shreyanshi
Consultancy pvt.
Ltd.

Workshop on Advance 02-04- Mr. Rahul Hada This event helped our
Java 2015 students to enhance
to knowledge about
05-04- advancedjava programming
2015 such as servlet and applet
Table B.4.6.1b: Workshop /short term course/ Seminar Organized by CSE Department

Academic Name of the Conference/ Event National/ Duration


Year International
Event
Springer- International Conference on International 17-18 Feb
CAY Emerging Trends in Expert Applications & Conference 2018
(2017-2018) Security’18 – (ICETEAS 2018)

National Conference on Recent Trends on National 25-28 Mar


Computing and Communication’18 (RTCC Conference 2018
2018)

International Congress Information and International 27& 28th


Communication Technology Conference Feb 2018
2018(ICICT’18),London

Smart India Hackathon’18-Nodal Centre National 30-31


March
2018
CAYm1 Smart India Hackathon’17-Nodal Centre National 1-2 April
(2016-17) 2017
Table B.4.6.1c: Conference & SIH-Nodal Centre organized by the Department of Computer Science &
Engineering and supported byCSE-JMS

Self Assessment Report Page 148


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
S.No Date Event Name Venue Timing Faculty Co-ordinator
Paper Dr. Bhavna Sharma
1 8-Mar-17 Presentation / C501 11:00-2:00 Ms.DeekshaMathur
Embryo Ms. Priyanka Mitra
Mr. Mukesh Agarwal
H/W Mr. Prahalad Sharma
2 9-Mar-17 CP5 9:30-11:30
Assembling Mr. Ankur Raj
Mr. Shashikant Singh
Mobile App & Ms. Geetika Gautam
3 10-Mar-17 Web Dev. CP3,CP4,CP5 9:30-4:30 Mr. Sachin Gupta
(Subito) Mr. GeetKalani
Mr.Ranjeet Pandey
Enlightenment/
4 10-Mar-17 Spiritual Cell 9:30-12:30 Ms.RichaUpadhyay
Meditation
Ms. KirtiChoudhary
Mr. Amit Mithal
Ms. ShikhaMaheshwari
5 11-Mar-17 Just C IBM 9:30-11:30
Ms. Richa Sharma
Mr. ShaileshArrawatia
Mr. Vatan Mishra
B-Guru / B-
6 11-Mar-17 Plan/ New C401 10:00-2:00 Ms.GeetikaGautam
Venture Ms.GeerijaLavaniya
Ms. Sarita
Ms. HemlataSoni
7 11-Mar-18 JAVA Lets IBM 12:00-2:00 Mr. Abhishek Dixit
Ms. Priya Gupta
Enlightenment Meditation Lab, 11:00 AM – 3:00 PM RichaUpadhyay
8
26/3/18 CP-3, CP-4, HemlataSoni
Sunday Java Lets IBM Lab (CSE 11:30 AM - 4:30 PM JebaNegaCheltha.C
9 & IT)
RajanJha,
Tech Probe C-501 (CSE) 9:30 AM – 12:30 PM Mohit Jain
10 Saroj Agarwal
26/3/18 Hardware Quadrangle A Ankur Raj
9:30 AM – 3:30 PM
11 Monday Assembling Block (CSE/IT) Anoop Kumar Mehta
CP-1 to CP-8, Richa Sharma
27/3/18 Just C IBM Lab (CSE 9:30 AM - 03:30 PM
12 Tuesday & IT) Arihant Jain
28/3/18 Subito CP-1, CP-2, 9:30 AM – 4:30 PM Sachin Gupta
Wednesday IBM Lab
13 (CSE/IT)
Table B.4.6.1d: Various National Level Technical Event (Techno Fest) supported by CSE- JMS

Self Assessment Report Page 149


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure4.6.1a:NITTR Workshop

Figure 4.6.1b Big Data Workshop

Figure 4.6.1c Technical Session on IOT

Self Assessment Report Page 150


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 4.6.1d: Faculty API- National Seminar

Figure4.6.1e :Smart India Hackathon

Figure 4.6.1f:International Conference on Emerging Trends in Expert Applications & Security’18 – (ICETEAS
2018)

Self Assessment Report Page 151


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
4.6.2 Publication of Technical Magazines, newsletters, etc (5)

(The Department shall list the publications mentioned earlier along with the names of the editors, publishers, etc.)

Year/Month Name of the Advisors Name of the Name of the


Editors Technical Publisher
Magazines/
Newsletter
2016-17 Mr. RanjeetPandey, Mr. Mr. MukeshAgarwal, CSE SCOOP Department of
Vatan Mishra Mr. Arihant Jain (Yearly Publication) Computer Science &
Engineering
2017-18 Ms.PriyankaMitra Dr.Vijay Singh CSE SCOOP Department of
Rathore (Yearly Publication) Computer Science &
Dr.Bhavna Sharma Engineering
2017-18 Ms.Priyanka Mitra, Dr.Vijay Singh CSE BYTES Department of
JULY’17 Rathore (Monthly Computer Science &
Dr.Bhavna Sharma Publication) Engineering
2018-19 Ms.Priyanka Mitra, Dr.Bhavna Sharma CSE BYTES Department of
JULY’18 Ms. Girija Lavania Ms. Manju Vyas (Monthly Computer Science &
Publication) Engineering
2018-19 Ms.Priyanka Mitra, Dr.Bhavna Sharma CSE BYTES Department of
AUGUST’18 Ms. Girija Lavania Ms. Manju Vyas (Monthly Computer Science &
Publication) Engineering
Table B.4.6.2: CSE Departmental Magazines/ Newsletter

Figure 4.6. CSE departmental Magazines/ Newsletter

Self Assessment Report Page 152


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
4.6.3 Participation in inter-institute events by Students of the program of study (10)

(The Department shall provide a table indicating those publications, which received awards in the events/conferences
organized by other institutes.)
CSE department students participated in various inter institutional competitions. Following Table
B.4.6.3a indicates Consolidated inter Institute events participated by the students of CSE
Department. Table B. 4.6.3b indicates CSE department student’s participation in various National
levels and inter institutional events.

No.Of Students Participated


Description CAY (2017-18) CAYm1(2016-17) CAYm2(2015-16)
Within the State 142 76 44
Outside State 25 11 7
Prize/Awards
28 21 12
Received
Table B.4.6.3a: Consolidated Students Participation in inter-institute events

Within the State


Programs Name and Assessment Year: CSE &2015-16
S.N Name of the Semes Name of the Name of Positio Date Name &
o. Student ter & Festival the Event n/ From To Place of
Sectio Partici the
n pated Institute
organized
1 Japleen Kaur IV-A Jaipur H.R.C Particip 2016 2016 Manipal
International ated Univertisity
Model United , Jaipur
Nations'16
2 Kajal IV-A Annual Sports & LAKSHY Particip 16- 18- Poornima
Cultural Fest A ated Apr- Apr- University,
15 15 Jaipur
3 Kajal IV-A Annual Sports & Volley Particip 16- 18- Poornima
Cultural Fest ball ated Apr- Apr- University,
15 15 Jaipur
4 Akshay Patni IV-A Annual National Debate First 26- 26- JNIT,
Level Techno & Feb- Feb- Jaipur
Management 16 16
Fest VERVE
5 Akshay Patni IV-A Annual National Business Second 27- 27- JNIT,
Level Techno & Plan Feb- Feb- Jaipur
Management 16 16
Fest VERVE

Self Assessment Report Page 153


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
6 Akshay Patni IV-A Pravah 2016 Vox Particip 29- 5- SKIT,
Populi ated Feb- Mar- Jaipur
16 16
7 Abhishek IV-A Annual Socio- Augmente Particip 25- 28- IIT Jodhpur
Pandey Techno- Cultural d Rality ated Feb- Feb-
Festival, Workshop 16 16
IGNUS'16

8 Abhishek IV-A Annual Socio- API Particip 25- 28- IIT Jodhpur
Pandey Techno- Cultural ated Feb- Feb-
Festival, 16 16
IGNUS'16
9 Abhishek IV-A Annual Socio- Webcraft Particip 25- 28- IIT Jodhpur
Pandey Techno- Cultural ated Feb- Feb-
Festival, 16 16
IGNUS'16
10 Deekshant IV-A Annual Socio- Obfuscato Particip 25- 28- IIT Jodhpur
Mamodia Techno- Cultural r ated Feb- Feb-
Festival, 16 16
IGNUS'16
11 Deekshant IV-A Annual Socio- Augmente Particip 25- 28- IIT Jodhpur
Mamodia Techno- Cultural d Rality ated Feb- Feb-
Festival, Workshop 16 16
IGNUS'16
12 Atul Dada IV-A Annual Socio- API Second 25- 28- IIT Jodhpur
Techno- Cultural Feb- Feb-
Festival, 16 16
IGNUS'16
13 Atul Dada IV-A Annual Socio- Campus Ambass 25- 28- IIT Jodhpur
Techno- Cultural Ambassad ador Feb- Feb-
Festival, or 16 16
IGNUS'16
14 Atul Dada IV-A Internshala Android Interns 1-Dec- 1- Intershala
App hip 15 Dec-
Developm 15
ent
Internship
15 Kanishka IV-A Jaipur H.R.C Particip 2016 2016 Manipal
Goyal International ated Univertisity
Model United , Jaipur
Nations'16
16 Dilip Kumar IV-A ABHIVARTA'16 Cricket Particip 12- 14- Manipal
' ated Feb- Feb- Univertisity
16 16 , Jaipur

Self Assessment Report Page 154


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
17 Dilip Kumar IV-A VARCHAS'15 Cricket Third 2015 2015 Chiranjoy
Chattopadh
yay
18 Annual Socio-
Business 25- 28-
Techno- Cultural Particip
Ankit Dixit Plan Feb- Feb- IIT Jodhpur
Festival, ated
Workshop 16 16
IV-A IGNUS'16
19 Harshat IV-A Annual Socio- Business Particip 25- 28- IIT Jodhpur
Techno- Cultural Plan ated Feb- Feb-
Festival, Workshop 16 16
IGNUS'16
20 Divaker Soni IV-A Annual Socio- Augmente Particip 25- 28- IIT Jodhpur
Techno- Cultural d Reality ated Feb- Feb-
Festival, Workshop 16 16
IGNUS'16
21 Abhishek IV-A Annual Socio- Augmente Particip 25- 28- IIT Jodhpur
Pandey Techno- Cultural d Reality ated Feb- Feb-
Festival, Workshop 16 16
IGNUS'16
22 Ayush Garg IV-A Annual Socio- Business Particip 25- 28- IIT Jodhpur
Techno- Cultural Plan ated Feb- Feb-
Festival, Workshop 16 16
IGNUS'16
23 Garvit Mittal IV-A Annual Socio- Robosocc Particip 25- 28- IIT Jodhpur
Techno- Cultural er ated Feb- Feb-
Festival, 16 16
IGNUS'16
24 Garvit Mittal IV-A Annual Socio- Line First 25- 28- IIT Jodhpur
Techno- Cultural Reguider Feb- Feb-
Festival, 16 16
IGNUS'16
25 Garvit Mittal IV-A Annual Socio- Light Particip 25- 28- IIT Jodhpur
Techno- Cultural Following ated Feb- Feb-
Festival, Boy 16 16
IGNUS'16
26 Garvit Mittal IV-A Annual Socio- Obfuscato Particip 25- 28- IIT Jodhpur
Techno- Cultural r ated Feb- Feb-
Festival, 16 16
IGNUS'16
27 Garvit Mittal IV-A DAKSH'14 Robo Particip 13- 14- Sri Balaji
Race ated Nov- Nov- College of
14 14 Engg. &
Technology
28 Garvit Mittal IV-A JIGYASA'15 Line First 2015 2015 GTC,
Follower Jaipur

Self Assessment Report Page 155


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
29 Shivansh VI C PLINTH 2016 Ambasssa 22- 24- LNM IIT,
Ahuja dar Jan-16 Jan- Jaiput
16
30 Shivansh VI C Rheerica'15 MUN- Best 12- 13- Mody
Ahuja Delegate Delegat Sep- Sep- University
of e 15 15
Singapur
31 Shivansh VI C Jaipur Technical Robotics Particip 15- 17- ISLE,
Ahuja Festival Coordinat ated Feb- Feb- ISHRE &
or 14 14 CLUB
FIRST
32 Shivansh VI C GTC MUN UNHRC Particip 12- 13- GTCMUN
Ahuja ated Mar- Mar-
15 15
33 Shivansh VI C IPU MUN'16 GERM Particip 16- 17- Indraprasad
Ahuja ANY ated Jan-16 Jan- University
16 Model
United
Nations
34 Shivansh VI C Biochrome Extempor Second 15- 17- Dr.B.Lal
Ahuja e Oct-15 Oct- Institute of
15 Technolog
35 Shivansh VI C Cosmos’2015 Extempor Particip 8-Oct- 8- The IIS
Ahuja e ated 15 Oct- University
15
36 Ashish Poonia IV-A Ignus Line Certific 19- 22- IIT,
Seguidor ate Feb- Feb- Jodhpur
13 15
37 Ashish Poonia IV-A Ignus Obfuscator Certific 19- 22- IIT,
ate Feb- Feb- Jodhpur
13 15
38 Ashish Poonia IV-A Pravah 2015 Line Certific 2015 7- SKIT,
Follower ate Jul- Jaipur
05
39 Ashish Poonia IV-A Ignus Robosoccer Certific 25- 25- IIT,
ate Feb- Feb- Jodhpur
16 16
40 Ashish Poonia IV-A Ignus Obfuscator Certific 25- 25- IIT,
ate Feb- Feb- Jodhpur
16 16
41 Ashish Poonia IV-A Ignus Robowar Certific 25- 25- IIT,
ate Feb- Feb- Jodhpur
16 16

Self Assessment Report Page 156


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
42 Ashish Poonia IV-A Ignus Light Certific 25- 25- IIT,
Following ate Feb- Feb- Jodhpur
Boy 16 16

43 Ankush IV-A Football CM Football Certific 25- 29- University


Kumar ate Dec- Dec- of
15 15 Rajasthan
44 Vishwaved IV-C DESPORTIVO’ Table Certifi 24- 24- LNMIT
Nagar 15 Tennis cate Jan-15 Jan-
15

Outside State
Programs Name and Assessment Year: CSE &2015-16
S. Name of the Semes Name of the Name Positio Date Name &
No. Student ter & Festival of the n/ From To Place of the
Sectio Event Partici Institute
n pated organized
1
Tech Fest 2015- Techn
Atul Dada Third IIT Bombay
2016 oVoltz
IV-A 2016 2016
2 Escala
Techniche- The
de 6-
Annual Techno- IIT
Atul Dada Jaipur Second 3-Sep-15 Sep-
Management Guwahati
Prelim 15
Festival
IV-A s
3 Escala
Techniche- The
de 6-
Annual Techno- IIT
Garvit Mittal Jaipur Second 3-Sep-15 Sep-
Management Guwahati
Prelim 15
Festival
IV-A s
4 Techniche- The
Esclad 6-
Annual Techno- Partici IIT
Garvit Mittal e- 3-Sep-15 Sep-
Management pated Guwahati
Mains 15
IV-A Festival
5 Ashish Poonia IV-A Techniche- The ROBO Certific 3-Sep-15 6- IIT,
Annual Techno- CALY ate Sep- Guwahati
Management PSE'1 15
Festival 5
6 Ashish Poonia IV-A Techniche- The Escala Certific 3-Sep-15 6- IIT,
Annual Techno- de- ate Sep- Guwahati
Management Mains 15
Festival

Self Assessment Report Page 157


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
7 Ashish Poonia IV-A Techniche- The Escala Certific 3-Sep-15 6- IIT,
Annual Techno- de- ate Sep- Guwahati
Management Jaipiur 15
Festival Prelim
s

Within the State


Programs Name and Assessment Year: CSE &2016-17
S.N Name of the Semes Name of the Name Positio Date Name &
o. Student ter & Festival of the n/ From To Place of
Sectio Event Partici the
n pated Institute
organized
1 Mehak IV B Pravah2017 Vox Certific 15-Feb- 18- SKIT,
Populi ate 17 Feb- Jaipur
17
2 Mehak IV B BLITZSCHLAG Poster- Certific 24-Feb- 26- MNIT,
Tangnoo 2017 Presenta ate 17 Feb- Jaipur
tion 17
3 Nischay IV B BLITZSCHLAG Poster- Certific 24-Feb- 26- MNIT,
Krishan 2017 Presenta ate 17 Feb- Jaipur
tion 17
4 Aditya III A EDUMUND'S USG Design 12-Nov- 13- Jaipur
Agarwal mun 2016 Design ated 16 Nov-
16

5 Aditya III A Inter College Badmin Certific 18-Nov- 19- Mahveer


Agarwal Tournament ton ate 16 Nov- College of
Tourna 16 Commerce,
ment Jaipur
6 Bhavya III A Venturesity Mobilit Certific 22-Aug- 26- Jaipur
Agarwal y Hack ate 16 Aug-
Camp 16
7 Ayush III A MNIT MUN 6A Repres 10-Apr- 10- MNIT,
Khandelwal 2016 DISEC entativ 16 Apr- Jaipur
e 16
8 Ayush III A IBM Hackcamp Career Certific 13-Aug- 13- IBM, India
Khandelwal Challen ate 16 Aug-
ge 16
9 Ashit Mundra III A Venturesity Mobilit Certific 22-Aug- 26- Jaipur
y Hack ate 16 Aug-
Camp 16

Self Assessment Report Page 158


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
10 Ashish Jain III A IBM Hackcamp Career Certific 13-Aug- 13- IBM, India
Challen ate 16 Aug-
ge 16
11 Mobilit 26-
Apoorva y Hack Certific 22-Aug- Aug-
Agarwal III A Venturesity Camp ate 16 16 Jaipur
13 Abhishek III A Patrika.com Global Certifi 6-Aug-16 6- Diggi
Gupta Village cate Aug- Palace,
16 Jaipur
14 Archit Gupta III A Expressive Music Mega 2016 2016 Jaipur
Talent Winne
Hunt r
15 Apoorva III A TCS Codevita Team Certifi 29-Jul-16 30-Jul- TCS
Agarwal Technof cate 16
reak
16 Aparna Tripati III A GTC MUN Delegate Certifi 14-Oct- 15- GTC
cate 16 Oct-16

17 Divang III A Alphonic SMO A 15-Sep- 30- SMO


Bhargava Network Grade 16 Sep-16 Technolo
Solution gies
18 Diwanshu III A PAC Club android Certifi 5-Oct-16 5-Oct- PAC
App cate 16 Club
Develop
ment
19 Deeksha III A STAMP 2016 Student Certifi 23-Oct- 23- Rentula
Bhargava Ambass cate 16 Oct-16 Inc
ador
20 Abhishek III A SAP SAP 93% 5-Oct-16 3-Dec- Walldorf
Bagherwal Applicat Marks 16
ion Obtain
Develop ed
ment
21 Abhishek III A SAP Imagine 81% 28-Sep- 17- Walldorf
Bagherwal IoT Marks 16 Nov-
Obtain 16
ed
22 Abhishek III A SAP Bigdata 81% 6-Sep-16 5-Oct- Walldorf
Bagherwal Marks 16
Obtain
ed

Self Assessment Report Page 159


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
23 Abhishek III A SAP Basics of 57% 7-Sep-16 14- Walldorf
Bagherwal Design Marks Oct-
Research Obtain 16
ed
24 Yash Kedawat V- C TCO 16 India TCO 16 Certific 30-Jul- 30- Jaipur
Regional ate 16 Jul-
Event 16
25 Yash Shah V- C TCO 16 India TCO 16 Certific 30-Jul- 30- Jaipur
Regional ate 16 Jul-
Event 16
26 Image IT
Web 15- Solution
Siddharth Web Technologi Compl 1-Aug- Oct- PVT ltd,
Gupta V- C Technologies es eted 16 16 Jaipur
27 Image IT
Web 15- Solution
Shivansh Web Technologi Compl 1-Aug- Oct- PVT ltd,
Sharma V- C Technologies es eted 16 16 Jaipur
28 2nd 1-
LAN Positio 29-Sep- Oct-
Udit Koolwal V- C JNU Gaming n 16 16 JNU, Jaipur
29 #IBMinclu 13-
Utkarsh IBM de<geek.te Certific 13-Aug- Aug-
Mundra V- C Hackcamp ch> ate 16 16 IBM, India
30 #IBMinclu 13-
IBM de<geek.te Certific 13-Aug- Aug-
Vartika Goyal V- C Hackcamp ch> ate 16 16 IBM, India
31 #IBMinclu 13-
Vinita IBM de<geek.te Certific 13-Aug- Aug-
Bulchandani V- C Hackcamp ch> ate 16 16 IBM, India
32 #IBMinclu 13-
IBM de<geek.te Certific 13-Aug- Aug-
Vinod kumar V- C Hackcamp ch> ate 16 16 IBM, India
33 #IBMinclu 13-
IBM de<geek.te Certific 13-Aug- Aug-
Tanya Raj V- C Hackcamp ch> ate 16 16 IBM, India
34 Suhani Sharma V- C IBM #IBMincl Certific 13-Aug- 13- IBM, India
Hackcamp ude<geek. ate 16 Aug-
tech> 16
35 Srishti Jain V- C IBM #IBMincl Certific 13-Aug- 13- IBM, India
Hackcamp ude<geek. ate 16 Aug-
tech> 16
36 Tejasv V- C IBM #IBMincl Certific 13-Aug- 13- IBM, India
Kulshrestha Hackcamp ude<geek. ate 16 Aug-
tech> 16

Self Assessment Report Page 160


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
37 Vaishali V- C IBM #IBMincl Certific 13-Aug- 13- IBM, India
Agarwal Hackcamp ude<geek. ate 16 Aug-
tech> 16

38 Divyang VA Alpohonic Social A 16-3-17 16-4- Jaipur


Bhargava Network Media Grade 17
Solutions Optimizat
ion
39 Deekha VA ZEE Jaipur Registrati Volunt 2017 2017 Jaipur
Bhargava Literature on eer
Festival 17 Departme
nt
40 Aditya VA ZEE Jaipur Author Volunt 2017 2017 Jaipur
Agarwal Literature Liaison eer
Festival 17
41 Abhishek VA ZEE Jaipur On- Volunt 2017 2017 Jaipur
Gupta Literature Ground eer
Festival 17 Digital
Departme
nt
42 Aakash VA BLITZSCHLA Tamasha Certific 24-Feb- 26- MNIT
Mourya G 2017 ate 17 Feb- Jaipur
17
43 Saurabh III-C IBM #IBMincl Certific 13-Aug- 13- IBM, India
Agarwal Hackcamp ude<geek. ate 16 Aug-
tech> 16
44 Chhavi Jain III-C Talk To a C and Certific 2016 2016 Jayothi
Teacher Cpp ate Vidyapeeth
Women's
Universit
45 Chhavi Jain III-C Spoken C Test Certi 2016 2016 Jayothi
Tutorial Project ficate Vidyapeeth
Women's
University
46 Surbhi Sneha III-C Spoken C Test Certi 2016 2016 Jayothi
Tutorial Project ficate Vidyapeeth
Women's
University
47 Surbhi Sneha III-C Talk To a C and Cpp Certi 2016 2016 Jayothi
Teacher ficate Vidyapeeth
Women's
University
48 Ram Nath III-C National Working Certi 2016 2016 S.S. Jain
Sharma Science Day- Model ficate Subodh
2016 P.G.College

Self Assessment Report Page 161


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
49 Ram Nath III-C Green Internationa A 2016 2016 ICCE
Sharma Revolution l Center for Score
Culture &
Education

50 Sonali Vyas IV C Web HTML, Com 1-Mar- 30- Image IT


Technologies CSS plete 16 Mar- Solution
d 16 Pvt Ltd,
Jaipur
51 Sonali Vyas III-C Programming Programmi Com 1-Aug- 30- Image IT
in C++ ng in C++ plete 16 Sep- Solution
d 16 Pvt Ltd,
Jaipur
52 Ronak Pansari IV C Web Technologies HTML, Com 1-Mar- 30- Image IT
CSS plete 16 Mar- Solution
d 16 Pvt Ltd,
Jaipur
53 Ronak Pansari III-C Programming Programmi Com 1-Aug- 30- Image IT
in C++ ng in C++ plete 16 Sep- Solution
d 16 Pvt Ltd,
Jaipur
54 Sonu Gupta III-C Programming Programming Co 1-Aug- 30- Image IT
in C++ in C++ mpl 16 Sep- Solution
eted 16 Pvt Ltd,
Jaipur
55 Sonu Gupta III-C National Working Sec 2016 2016 S.S. Jain
Science Day- Model ond Subodh
2016 P.G.Colleg
e
56 Sonu Gupta IV C Programming Programming Co 1-Mar- 30- Image IT
in C in C mpl 16 Apr- Solution
eted 16 Pvt Ltd,
Jaipur

57 Sonu Gupta III-C Green International A 2016 2016 ICCE


Revolution Center for Scor
Culture & e
Education
58 Hemant III-C GTC MUN Denmark Del 14-Oct- 15- GTC
Khandelwal gate 16 Oct-
16
59 Sakshi Gupta III-C Jump Heights Dared toJump Cert 4-Nov- 4- Jaipur
ifica 16 Nov-
te 16

Self Assessment Report Page 162


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
60 Shubham III-C Web Web Cert 25-Sep- 25- Web Tech
Jindal Development Development ifica 16 Sep- Ltd
te 16
61 Shubham III-C Super Slam Super Slam Cert 25-Jul- 25- Jaipur Club
Jindal dunks dunks ifica 16 Jul-
te 16
62 Soniya Raina III-C Green International A 2016 2016 ICCE
Revolution Center for Scor
Culture & e
Education
63 Shubham III-C Programming Programming Co 1-Aug- 20- Image IT
Ameta in C, C++ and in C, C++ and mpl 16 Nov- Solution
Web Web eted 16 Pvt Ltd,
Technologies Technologies Jaipur
(HTML, CSS) (HTML, CSS)
64 Shivani Gupta III-C National Working First 2016 2016 S.S. Jain
Science Day- Model Subodh
2016 P.G.Colleg
e

65 Rohan Singhal III-C National Working First 2016 2016 S.S. Jain
Science Day- Model Subodh
2016 P.G.Colleg
e
66 Shivani Gupta IV C Nigeria GA-DISEC Cert 9-Apr-16 10- MNIT,
ifica Apr- Jaipur
te 16
67 Abhishek III-A Patrika.com Village Jaipur Cert 6-Aug- 6- Diggi
Gupta ifica 16 Aug- Palace
te 16

68 Abhishek IV A ZEE Jaipur On Ground Vol 2017 2017 Jaipur


Gupta Literature Digital unte
Festival 17 Department er

69 Prabhakar VB Matrix Python Cert 17-May- 14- Mansarova


Dubey Computers ifica 17 Jun- r, Jaipur
te 17
70 Chinmey V A RTU Inter- Football Win 10-Sep- 12- Arya
Bisen College ner 16 Sep- College of
Tournament 16 Engineerin
g
&Technolo
g

Self Assessment Report Page 163


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
71 Vishvaved VC RTU Inter- Football Win 10-Sep- 12- Arya
Nagar College ner 16 Sep- College of
Tournament 16 Engineerin
g&
Technolog
y

72 Ankush VI C RTU Inter-College Footba Winner 10-Sep- 12- Arya


Kumar Tournament ll 16 Sep- College of
16 Engineerin
g&
Technolog
y
73 Divyansh IV A RTU Inter-College Footba Winner 10-Sep- 12- Arya
Raina Tournament ll 16 Sep- College of
16 Engineerin
g&
Technolog
y
74 Vishwaved VC LAN Gaming Counte Second 29-Sep- 1- JNU
Nagar r 16 Oct-
Strike 16

75 Vaishali IV C 2016 FINISHER AU Compl 14-Feb- 14- Jaipur


Agarwal Jaipur eted 16 Feb-
Marath 16
on
76 Vishwave VC LAN Gaming Count Second 29-Sep- 1- JNU
Nagar Strikee 16 Oct-
r 16

Self Assessment Report Page 164


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Outside State
Programs Name and Assessment Year: CSE &2016-17
S. Name of the Semes Name of the Name of Positio Date Name &
No. Student ter & Festival the Event n/ From To Place of
Sectio Partici the
n pated Institute
organize
d
1 Naveen Jangid IV B TechKriti Android Certific 23-Mar- 26- IIT
App ate 17 Mar- Kanpur
Developme 17
nt
2 Pradeep Suthar IV B TechKriti Android Certific 23-Mar- 26- IIT
App ate 17 Mar- Kanpur
Developme 17
nt
3 Piyush Palod IV B TechKriti Android Certific 23-Mar- 26- IIT
App ate 17 Mar- Kanpur
Developme 17
nt
4 Piyush Joshi IV B TechKriti Android Certific 23-Mar- 26- IIT
App ate 17 Mar- Kanpur
Developme 17
nt
5 Aditya III A Antaragni Nukkad Certific 20-Oct- 23- IIT
Agarwal Natak ate 16 Oct-16 Kanpur

6 Aditya III A Abhivyakti Garba -Rass Certific 3-Sep-16 28- Ahmedab


Agarwal & Dandia ate Sep-16 ad
7 Akash Maurya III A Antaragni Nukkad Certific 20-Oct- 23- IIT
Natak ate 16 Oct-16 Kanpur
8 Akshita Joshi III A Antaragni Nukkad Certific 20-Oct- 23- IIT
Natak ate 16 Oct-16 Kanpur
9 Android
Deeksha Developme Certific 24-Feb- 27-
Bhargava VA Tryst-2017 nt ate 17
Feb-17 IIT-Delhi
10 Accident Steel
Database Authority
Managemen of India
Mayank Vocational t System for Certific 15-May- 15- ltd,
Prasad VI B Training Sail ate 17 Jun-17 Ranchi
11 Certific Ttullaha
Ankush ate 12- Univ,
Kumar VI- A Football CM Football 4-Jan-17 Jan-17 Bhopal

Self Assessment Report Page 165


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Within the State
Programs Name and Assessment Year: CSE &2017-18
S.N Name of the Semes Name of the Name of Posi Date Name &
o. Student ter & Festival the tion From To Place of the
Sectio Event / Institute
n Part organized
icip
ated
1 Naveen Jangid V B Rajasthan Digifest Rajasthan Cert 2-Dec- 3- Udaipur
IT ifica 17 Dec-
Hackatho te 17
n
2 Pradeep Suthar V B OOPS Through Matrix Cert 21-Jun- 20- Jaipur
Core JAVA Computer ifica 17 Sep-
s te 17
3 Lakshay VB Rajasthan Digifest Rajasthan Cert 2-Dec- 3- Udaipur
Khandelwal IT ifica 17 Dec-
Hackatho te 17
n
4 Mahima VB Salesforce Bodaciou 89% 7-Jun-17 22- Jaipur
Aggarwal Administration s IT Hub Mar Jul-
Pvt.Ltd ks 17
Obta
ined
5 Harshita VB Cloud Computing- Appin Cert 26-Aug- 26- Jaipur
Gulwani Salesforce Cloud Technolo ifica 17 Aug-
gy Lab te 17

6 Kunal Sarna VB Rajasthan Digifest Rajasthan Cert 2-Dec- 3-12 Udaipur


IT ifica 17 -17
Hackatho te
n
7 Kunal Sarna VB Rajasthan Digifest Rajasthan Cert 17-Aug- 18- Kota
2017 IT ifica 17 Aug-
Hackatho te 17
n-2017
8 Manan Gupta VB Rajasthan Digifest Rajasthan Cert 2-Dec- 3- Udaipur
IT ifica 17 Dec-
Hackatho te 17
n
9 Mehak VB Content writing Interns Certific 28-Apr- 28- Instanode
Tangnoo Internship hala ate 17 Apr-
17

Self Assessment Report Page 166


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
10 Mohit Sharma VB Rajasthan Digifest Rajast Certific 2-Dec- 3- Udaipur
han IT ate 17 Dec-
Hackat 17
hon
11 Akash Lakhera III A SnackDown 2017 CodeC Certific 2017 2017 SnackDow
hef ate n 2017
12 Aditya Vyas III A Oasis 2017 Cultur Certific 31-Oct- 4- BITS, Pilani
al Fest ate 17 Nov-
17
13 Divyansh III A Symetree Interns Certific 21-Mar- 30- Symetree
Saxena hip ate 17 Nov-
17
14 Divyansh III A Oasis 2017 Cultur Certific 31-Oct- 4- BITS, Pilani
Sharma al Fest ate 17 Nov-
17
15 Gaurav Sahu III A DigitalOcean Hackto Certific 27-Nov- 27- DigitalOcea
berfest ate 17 Nov- n
Challe 17
nge

16 Avi Bhootna III A SnackDown 2017 CodeC Certific 2017 2017 SnackDown
hef ate
17 Akshita Vijay III A SnackDown 2017 CodeC Certific 2017 2017 SnackDown
hef ate
18
Abhilash CodeC Certific
Tiwari III A SnackDown 2017 hef ate 2017 2017 SnackDown
19
CodeC Certific
Abhinav Soni III A SnackDown 2017 hef ate 2017 2017 SnackDown
20
CodeC Certific
Abhishek Garg III A SnackDown 2017 hef ate 2017 2017 SnackDown
21
Abhishek CodeC Certific
Khandelwal III A SnackDown 2017 hef ate 2017 2017 SnackDown
22 OOPS
Throu
Amit gh Certific 8-Aug- 10/7/
Moolwani III A Matrix Computers C++ ate 17 2017 Jaipur
23 Region
al
Finale Jaipuria
of 8- Institute of
Jaipuria Quiz Jaipuri Certific 8-Nov- Nov- Managemen
Ankit Raj III A League 2017 a Quiz ate 17 17 t, Jaipur

Self Assessment Report Page 167


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
24 Jaipuri Jaipuria
a Quiz 8- Institute of
Jaipuria Quiz Leagu Certific 8-Nov- Nov- Managemen
Ankit Raj III A League 2017 e ate 17 17 t, Jaipur
25 Jaipuri Jaipuria
a Quiz 8- Institute of
Anega Jaipuria Quiz Leagu Certific 8-Nov- Nov- Managemen
Maheshwari III A League 2017 e ate 17 17 t, Jaipur
26

Abhishek CodeC Certific


Mohta III A SnackDown 2017 hef ate 2017 2017 SnackDown
27 Aditya CodeC Certific
Kaushik III A SnackDown 2017 hef ate 2017 2017 SnackDown
28 Abhishek CodeC Certific
Sharma III A SnackDown 2017 hef ate 2017 2017 SnackDown
29 Jaipuri Jaipuria
a Quiz 8- Institute of
Abhishek Jaipuria Quiz Leagu Certific 8-Nov- Nov- Managemen
Sharma III A League 2017 e ate 17 17 t, Jaipur
30 Jaipuri Jaipuria
a Quiz 14- Institute of
Jaipuria Quiz Leagu Certific 14-Nov- Nov- Managemen
Darshit Gupta III A League 2017 e ate 17 17 t, Jaipur
31 Jaipuri Jaipuria
a Quiz 14- Institute of
Himanshu Jaipuria Quiz Leagu Certific 14-Nov- Nov- Managemen
Dhamani III A League 2017 e ate 17 17 t, Jaipur
32 Darshit Gupta III A Jaipuria Quiz Jaipuri First 14-Nov- 14- Jaipuria
League 2017 a Quiz Positio 17 Nov- Institute of
Leagu n 17 Managemen
e t, Jaipur
33 Darshit Gupta III A Jaipuria Quiz Jaipuri Certific 8-Nov- 8- Jaipuria
League 2017 a Quiz ate 17 Nov- Institute of
Leagu 17 Managemen
e t, Jaipur
34 Antima Garg III A Jaipuria Quiz Jaipuri Certific 8-Nov- 8- Jaipuria
League 2017 a Quiz ate 17 Nov- Institute of
Leagu 17 Managemen
e t, Jaipur
35 Abhishek III A Jaipuria Quiz Jaipuri Certific 8-Nov- 8- Jaipuria
Khandelwal League 2017 a Quiz ate 17 Nov- Institute of
Leagu 17 Managemen
e t, Jaipur

Self Assessment Report Page 168


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
36 Abhishek Garg III A Jaipuria Quiz Jaipuri Certific 8-Nov- 8- Jaipuria
League 2017 a Quiz ate 17 Nov- Institute of
Leagu 17 Managemen
e t, Jaipur
37 Abhinav Soni III A Jaipuria Quiz Jaipuri Certific 8-Nov- 8- Jaipuria
League 2017 a Quiz ate 17 Nov- Institute of
Leagu 17 Managemen
e t, Jaipur
38 Amit III A Jaipuria Quiz Jaipuri Certific 8-Nov- 8- Jaipuria
Moolwani League 2017 a Quiz ate 17 Nov- Institute of
Leagu 17 Managemen
e t, Jaipur
39 Arogya Garg III A Jaipuria Quiz Jaipuri Certific 8-Nov- 8- Jaipuria
League 2017 a Quiz ate 17 Nov- Institute of
Leagu 17 Managemen
e t, Jaipur
40 Jaipuri Jaipuria
a Quiz 8- Institute of
Abhilash Jaipuria Quiz Leagu Certific 8-Nov- Nov- Managemen
Kumar III A League 2017 e ate 17 17 t, Jaipur
41 9-
Aman Social Weapons of Interns Certific 2-Aug- Aug-
Srivastav III A Jaipur hip ate 17 17 Rajasthan
42 Akshay III A Oasis 2017 Cultural Certifi 31-Oct- 4- BITS,
Sharma Fest cate 17 Nov- Pilani
17
43 Anega III A SOLOLEARN C++ Certifi 21-Oct- 21-
Maheshwari Tutorial cate 17 Oct-
Course 17
44 Aditya III A Inmhacks2.0 Inmhac Certifi 11-Nov- 12- LNMIT
Kaushik ks2.0 cate 17 Nov- ,Jaipur
17
45 Abhishek III A Jaipuria Quiz Jaipuria Certifi 8-Nov- 8- Jaipuria
Mohta League 2017 Quiz cate 17 Nov- Institute of
League 17 Manageme
nt, Jaipur
46 Chirayu Jain III A DigitalOcean Hackto Certifi 27-Nov- 27- Hacktoberf
berfest cate 17 Nov- est
Challen 17 Challenge
ge
47 Deepesh Shah III A DigitalOcean Hackto Certifi 27-Nov- 27- Hacktoberf
berfest cate 17 Nov- est
Challen 17 Challenge
ge

Self Assessment Report Page 169


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
48 Abhishek III A Oasis 2017 Cultural Certifi 31-Oct- 4- BITS,
Mohta Fest cate 17 Nov- Pilani
17
49 Utsav VI C Rajasthan Rajasth Certifi 19-Mar- 21- Jaipur
Khandelwal Hackathon an IT cate 18 Mar-
Day 18
50 Rishabh VI C Rajasthan Rajasth Certifi 19-Mar- 21- Jaipur
Singhal Hackathon an IT cate 18 Mar-
Day 18
51 Shreyansh VI C Rajasthan Rajasth Certifi 19-Mar- 21- Jaipur
Khandelwal Hackathon an IT cate 18 Mar-
Day 18
52 Saurav VI C Rajasthan Rajasth Certifi 19-Mar- 21- Jaipur
Agarwal Hackathon an IT cate 18 Mar-
Day 18
53 Shubham VI C Rajasthan Digifest Rajastha Certif 2-Dec- 3- Udaipur
Dudeja n IT icate 17 Dec-
Hackath 17
o
54 Shubham VI C Rajasthan Digifest Rajastha Certif 2-Dec- 3- Udaipur
Jindal n IT icate 17 Dec-
Hackath 17
on
55 Shubham VI C Rajasthan Digifest Rajastha Certif 2-Dec- 3- Udaipur
Singh n IT icate 17 Dec-
Kalyanwat Hackath 17
on
56 Shubham VI C Rajasthan Digifest Rajastha Winn 2-Dec- 3- Udaipur
n IT er 17 Dec-
Hackath 17
on
57 Ram Nath VI C Goeduhub Bigdata Certif 25-Mar-
25- Jaipur
Sharma Technologies Hadoop icate 18 Mar-
18
58 Rishabh VI C Codeground.in Code Certif 16-Dec- 16-
Singhal Byte 40 icate 17 Dec-
17
59 Sakshi Gupta VI C BLITZSCHLAG Flim & First 2-Feb-18 4- MNIT
2018 Photogra Positi Feb- Jaipur
phy on 18
Club
60 Vaibhav Jangir VI C Matrix Computers OOPS Certif 18-Aug- 17- Jaipur
Through icate 17 Nov-
Core 17
JAVA

Self Assessment Report Page 170


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
61 Oracle A 30-
Road Ahead SQL Grad 15-Oct- Oct-
Rohit Soni VI C Technologies Expert e 17 17 Jaipur
62 Hement VI C GTC MUN Special Certifi 24-Feb- 25- GIT , Jaipur
Khanelwal Mention cate 18 Feb-
18
63 Shubham Sahu III C Plinth 2017 Roborace Certifi 2017 2017 LNMIT
cate ,Jaipur
64 Sarvesh III C Redhat Redhat Compl 13-Nov- 13- REDHAT
Jhanwar Certified eted 17 Nov-
Engineer 17
65 Sarvesh III C Redhat Redhat Compl 13-Nov- 13- REDHAT
Jhanwar Certified eted 17 Nov-
System 17
Administrator
66 Soumil III C Rajasthan Rajasthan Certifi 2-Dec- 3- Udaipur
Khandelwal Hackathon Hackathon cate 17 Dec-
3.0 17

67 Vaishnavi III C Thinkmerit Thinkmerit Intern1-Feb-17 0- Thinkmerit


Ajmera ship Aug-
17
68 Vinayak III C Redhat Redhat Compl 13-Nov- 13- REDHAT
Mathur Certified eted 17 Nov-
System 17
Administrator
69 Vinayak III C Redhat Redhat Compl 13-Nov- 13- REDHAT
Mathur Certified eted 17 Nov-
Engineer 17
70 Jatin III B Jaipuria Jaipuria Quiz Certifi 8-Nov- 8- Jaipuria
Quiz League cate 17 Nov- Institute of
League 17 Managemen
2017 t, Jaipur
71 Jaipuria Jaipuria
Quiz 8- Institute of
League Jaipuria Quiz Certifi 8-Nov- Nov- Managemen
Sejal Jain III B 2017 League cate 17 17 t, Jaipur
72 Jaipuria Jaipuria
Quiz 8- Institute of
League Jaipuria Quiz Certifi 8-Nov- Nov- Managemen
Menal Jain III B 2017 League cate 17 17 t,
73 Mansha III B Jaipuria Quiz Jaipuria Certific 8-Nov- 8- Jaipuria
Paliwal League 2017 Quiz ate 17 Nov- Institute of
League 17 Managemen
t, Jaipur

Self Assessment Report Page 171


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
74 Pallavi III B Jaipuria Quiz Jaipuria Certific 8-Nov- 8- Jaipuria
Agarwal League 2017 Quiz ate 17 Nov- Institute of
League 17 Managemen
t, Jaipur
75 Lakshaya III B Jaipuria Quiz Jaipuria Certific 8-Nov- 8- Jaipuria
Khandelwal League 2017 Quiz ate 17 Nov- Institute of
League 17 Managemen
t, Jaipur
76 Priyanka III B Jaipuria Quiz Jaipuria Certific 8-Nov- 8- Jaipuria
Maheshwari League 2017 Quiz ate 17 Nov- Institute of
League 17 Managemen
t, Jaipur
77 Payal Devnani III B Jaipuria Quiz Jaipuria Certific 8-Nov- 8- Jaipuria
League 2017 Quiz ate 17 Nov- Institute of
League 17 Managemen
t, Jaipur
78 Khushbu III B Jaipuria Quiz Jaipuria Certific 8-Nov- 8- Jaipuria
Singhal League 2017 Quiz ate 17 Nov- Institute of
League 17 Managemen
t, Jaipur
79 Mahima VI B Salesforce Salesforce Compl 27-Dec- Salesforce
Aggarwal Administratio eted 17
n
80 Mayank Gupta VI B LinuxWorld Linuxworl Compl 23-Dec- 23- Jaipur
Informatics d eted 17 Jan-
Pvt Ltd 18
81 Mayank Gupta VI B Redhat Redhat Compl 23-Dec- 23- REDHAT
Certified eted 17 Jan-
System 18
Administra
tor
82 Priyank VI B Rajasthan Rajasthan Certific 19-Mar- 21- Jaipur
Makwana Hackathon 4.0 Hackathon ate 18 Mar-
18
83 Mohit Sharma VI B Rajasthan Rajasthan IT Certifi 2-Dec- 3- Udaipur
Digifest Hackathon cate 17 Dec-
17
84 Kanhaiya VI B Rajasthan Rajasthan Certifi 19-Mar- 21- Jaipur
Kumar Hackathon Hackathon cate 18 Mar-
4.0 18
85 Sakshi Gupta VIII B REDINNO Global Ancho 27-Mar- 27- Jaipur
Outreach r 18 Mar-
Education 18
Conference
and Awards

Self Assessment Report Page 172


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
2018

86 Sakshi Gupta VIII B YOUTH Talk for Certifi 13-Feb- 13- Delhi
PEAC Peace cate 18 Feb-
18
87 Sakshi Gupta VIII B Pravah 2017 Vox Populi Certifi 15-Feb- 18- SKIT,
cate 18 Feb- Jaipur
18
88 Rohan Jandu VIII B Rajasthan Rajasthan Certifi 19-Mar- 21- Jaipur
Hackathon Hackathon cate 18 Mar-
4.0 18
89 Priyanshu VIII B Rajasthan Rajasthan Certifi 19-Mar- 21- Jaipur
Gupta Hackathon Hackathon cate 18 Mar-
4.0 18
90 Aparna VI A ZEE Jaipur Registration Volun 2018 2018 Jaipur
Tripathi Literature Department teer
Festival 18
91 Arshin VI A Sabrang 2018 Paridhan Winne 22-Feb- 23- JK
Mahajan r 18 Feb- Lakshmipat
18 University
92 Arshin VI A BLITZSCHL Panache First 2-Feb-18 4- MNIT,
Mahajan AG Positi Feb- Jaipur
on 18
93 Diwanshu VA Rajasthan Rajasthan IT Partici 2-Dec- 3- Udaipur
Soni Digifest Hackathon pated 17 Dec-
17
94 Apoorva VA Rajasthan Rajasthan IT Partici 2-Dec- 3- Udaipur
Agarwal Digifest Hackathon pated 17 Dec-
17
95
3-
Bhavya Rajasthan Rajasthan IT Partici 2-Dec- Dec-
Agarwal VA Digifest Hackathon pated 17 17 Udaipur
96 3-
Rajasthan Rajasthan IT Partici 2-Dec- Dec-
Gagan Goyal V A Digifest Hackathon pated 17 17 Udaipur
97 3-
Ashwinee Rajasthan Rajasthan IT Partici 2-Dec- Dec-
Jain VA Digifest Hackathon pated 17 17 Udaipur
98 3-
Gaurav Rajasthan Rajasthan IT Partici 2-Dec- Dec-
Saxena VA Digifest Hackathon pated 17 17 Udaipur
99 3-
Ayush Rajasthan Rajasthan IT Partici 2-Dec- Dec-
Khandelwal VA Digifest Hackathon pated 17 17 Udaipur

Self Assessment Report Page 173


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
100 Manipal
ABHIVART Partici University,
Aniket Dixit VI A A'18 CRICKET pated 2018 2018 Jaipur
101 25-
BITS Open Partici 21-Sep- Sep-
Aniket Dixit VA Sport Cricket pated 17 17 BITS, Pilani
102 21-
Divansh Runne 19-Sep- Sep- SKIT,
Raina VI A AAVEG'18 Football r-Up 18 18 Jaipur
103 15-
Ritika Certifi 15-May- Jul-
Safaya VIII B Web Mitra OCA, OCP cate 17 17 Jaipur
104 Appiro India
Cloud 10-
Rahul Solutions Pvt Certifi 22-May- Jul-
Shambhwani VIII B ltd Internship cate 17 17 Jaipur
105 Automats
Deployment
of Cloud
Shailendra Linux World Computing 15-
Singh Informatics &Virtulizatio Certifi 17-May- Jul-
Chouhan VIII B Pvt Ltd n cate 17 17 Jaipur
106 Shailendra VIII B Redhat System Certifie 17-May- 15- Jaipur
Singh Administrat d 17 Jul-
Chouhan or 17
107 Mayank VIII B Microsoft Software Certific 24-Aug- 24- Microsoft
Prasad Technology Developme ate 17 Aug- Technology
Associate nt 17 Associate
Fundamenta
ls
108 Mohit Earan VIII B Training in CodeOrang Certific 16-May- 15- Aryan
Advance e ate 17 Jul- InfoMatrix
Java 17 Pvt Ltd
109 Neetesh VIII B Training in CodeOrang Certific 16-May- 15- Aryan
Vashishtha Advance e ate 17 Jul- InfoMatrix
Java 17 Pvt Ltd

110 Neha VIII B AdhocNetwo Orchestratio Certific 22-May- 5- Redhat


Piproniyan rks n ate 17 Jul-
17
111 Abhishek VI A ZEE Jaipur On Ground Volunt 2018 2018 Jaipur
Gupta Literature Digital eer
Festival 18 Department

Self Assessment Report Page 174


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
112 Mohit VIII B Hawkscode Android Certific 15-May- 15- Jaipur
Maheshwari Application ate 17 Jul-
Developme 17
nt
113 Netra Singhal VIII B AdhocNetwo Orchestratio Certific 22-May- 5- Redhat
rks n ate 17 Jul-
17
114 Rohit Jaiswal VIII B AdhocNetwo Orchestratio Certific 22-May- 5- Redhat
rks n ate 17 Jul-
17
115 Rishika VIII B Web Mitra OCA, OCP Certific 15-May- 15- Jaipur
Agarwal ate 17 Jul-
17
116 Rahul VIII B Appiro India Internship Certific 22-May- 10- Jaipur
Jaswani Cloud ate 17 Jul-
Solutions Pvt 17
ltd

117 Rakesh VIII B Hawkscode Advance Certifi 17-May- 15- Jaipur


Sewda Java cate 17 Jul-
17
118 Pallavi VIII B Web Mitra OCA, OCP Certifi 15-May- 15- Jaipur
Varshney cate 17 Jul-
17
119 Meetanshi VIII B Bodacious IT Salesforce Certifi 5-Jun-17 10- Jaipur
Rawat Hub Pvt Ltd Developer cate Oct-
17
120 Manjari Singh VIII B Back Office IT Certifi 31-Jan- 1- Back Office
IT Solutions Department cate 18 May- IT ltd
Pvt Ltd Training 18

121 Prabhakar VIII B Training in Hospital Certifi 15-May- 15- Aryan


Garg core Java Managemen cate 17 Jul- InfoMatrix
t System 17 Pvt Ltd

122 Sarvesh VIII B Deployment Python Certifi 22-May- 5- Adhocnetw


Kumar Of Super WebUI cate 17 Jul- orks
Computer 17
123 Sandeep VIII B C-DAC Shopping Certifi 16-May- 21- C-DAC
Gausi Tech-Sangam Cart cate 17 Jul- ATC
Program 17 NETCOM,
Jaipur

Self Assessment Report Page 175


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
124 Rohit Kumar VIII B AdhocNetwo Deployment Certifi 22-May- 5- Redhat
Gupta rks of Super cate 17 Jul-
Computers 17
of Super
Computers
125 Rakshanda VIII B E-Commerce PHP Certifi 24-May- 6- SO
Kaul Site Technology cate 17 Jul- InfoTech
17 Ltd
126 Shubham VIII B AdhocNetwo Deployment Certifi 22-May- 5- Redhat
Gupta rks of Super cate 17 Jul-
Computers 17
of Super
Computers
127 Samarth VIII B Appiro India Internship Certific 23-Jun- 8- Jaipur
Tholia Cloud ate 17 Aug-
Solutions Pvt 17
ltd
128 Samarth VIII B Hospital at Java Interns 17-May- 17- Compucom
Tholia Your door hip 17 Jul- Software
17 Ltd
129 Shivani Soni VIII B MCD-API Developer Certific 10-Jul- 10- Mulesoft
Design ate 17 Jul- Certified
Associate 17 Developer

130 Shivani Soni VIII B Celebal Mulesoft Interns 17-May- 17- Jaipur
hip 17 Jul-
17
131 Chinmey VII A RTU Inter- Football Winner 9-Oct-17 11- Arya
Bisen College Oct- College of
Tournament 17 Engineering
&
Technology
132 Vishvaved VII A RTU Inter- Football Winner 9-Oct-17 11- Arya
Nagar College Oct- College of
Tournament 17 Engineering
&
Technology
133 Ankush VII A RTU Inter- Football Winner 9-Oct-17 11- Arya
Kumar College Oct- College of
Tournament 17 Engineering
&
Technology

Self Assessment Report Page 176


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
134 Divyansh VA RTU Inter- Football Winner 9-Oct-17 11- Arya
Raina College Oct- College of
Tournament 17 Engineering
&
Technology
135 Taru Bansal VC RTU Inter- Football Winner 9-Oct-17 11- Arya
College Oct- College of
Tournament 17 Engineering
&
Technology
136 Aman Pareek III A RTU Inter-College Footba Winner 9-Oct-17 11- Arya
Tournament ll Oct- College of
17 Engineering
&
Technology
137 Rajesh Soni VB Rajasthan Rajast Partici 26-Jul- 26- Bikaner
HAckathon 5.0 han pated 18 Jul-
HAcka 18
thon
5.0
138 Tarun Chahar III C GIT Mun’18 High GTC 24-Feb- 25- GIT
Comm MUN 18 Feb-
endati 18
on
139 Tarun Chahar III C Poornima Mun’18 Lok Lower 25-Mar- 25- Poornima
Sabha House 18 Mar- MUN
of 18
Parlim
ent
140 Diksha III A Jaipuria Quiz Jaipuri Certific 8-Nov- 8- Jaipuria
Agarwal League 2017 a Quiz ate 17 Nov- Institute of
Leagu 17 Managemen
e t, Jaipur
141 Akshita Vijay III B Jaipuria Quiz Jaipuri Certific 8-Nov- 8- Jaipuria
League 2017 a Quiz ate 17 Nov- Institute of
Leagu 17 Managemen
e t, Jaipur
142 Akshay III B Jaipuria Quiz Jaipuri Certific 8-Nov- 8- Jaipuria
Sharma League 2017 a Quiz ate 17 Nov- Institute of
Leagu 17 Managemen
e t, Jaipur

Self Assessment Report Page 177


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Outside State
Programs Name and Assessment Year: CSE &2017-18
S.N Name of the Semes Name of the Name of Positio Date Name &
o. Student ter & Festival the n/ Fro To Place of the
Sectio Event Partici m Institute
n pated organized
1 Jateen VB Introduction To NPTEL 51% Jul- 17- IIT Kanpur
Kashyap Programming in C Marks 17 Sep
Obtaine
d
2 Akshay III A PyCon India Microsoft Attende Nov- Nov- Delhi
Gagrani e 17 17
3 Aditya III A NPTEL Program 85% Jul- Sep- IIT
Agarwal ming in Marks 17 17 Kharagpur
C++ Obtaine
d
4 Aditya III A PyCon India Microsoft Attende Nov- Nov- Delhi
Agarwal e 17 17
5 Garima Gill III A NPTEL Introducti 86% Jul- Sep- IIT Madras
on to Marks 17 17
Modern Obtaine
Applicati d
on
Develop
ment
6 Aman Parteek III A National Football CP Winner 16- 18- Goa
Championship Football May- May-
Associati 17 17
on
7 Aman Bansal III A NPTEL Introducti 40% Jul- Sep- IIT Madras
on to Marks 17 17
Modern Obtaine
Applicati d
on
Develop
ment
8 Amrit III A NPTEL Program 79% Jul- Sep- IIT
Shrivastava ming in Marks 17 17 Kharagpur
C++ Obtaine
d
9 Amrit PyCon India Microsoft Attende Nov- Nov- Delhi
Shrivastava e 17 17

Self Assessment Report Page 178


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Outside State
Programs Name and Assessment Year: CSE &2017-18
S. Name of the Semes Name of the Name of the Positio Date Name &
No. Student ter & Festival Event n/ From To Place of the
Sectio Partici Institute
n pated organized
10 Anega III A NPTEL Programmin 69% Jul-17 Sep- IIT
Maheshwari g in C++ Marks 17 Kharagpur
Obtain
ed
11 Anega III A NPTEL Programmin 60% Jul-17 Sep- IIT
Maheshwari g in C Marks 17 KanwsrD
Obtain
ed
12 Vishal VI C NPTEL Programmin 86% Jul-17 Sep- IIT Madras
Singhania g DSA using Marks 17
Python Obtain
ed
13 Tanmay VI C SIH'2018 Freaks & Certific 30-Mar- 31- Pune
Gautam Geeks ate 18 Mar-
18
14 Utsav VI C SIH'2018 Freaks & Certific 30-Mar- 31- Pune
Khandelwal Geeks ate 18 Mar-
18
15 Vaibhav III C Techkriti Android Certific 23-Mar- 26- IIT Kanpur
Kumar Gupta Developmen ate 18 Mar-
t Workshop 18
16 Shubham III C Techkriti Android Certific 23-Mar- 26- IIT Kanpur
Singh Developmen ate 18 Mar-
t Workshop 18

17 Abhilash III A PyCon India Microsoft Attend Nov-17 Nov- Delhi


Kumar Tiwari ee 17

18 Introduction 48%
To Marks
Programmin Obtain Sep-
Vaishali Goyal III C NPTEL g in C ed Jul-17 17 IIT Kanpur
19

Jatin Attend Nov-


Khemchandani III B PyCon India Microsoft ee Nov-17 17 Delhi

Self Assessment Report Page 179


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Outside State
Programs Name and Assessment Year: CSE &2017-18
S. Name of the Semes Name of the Name Positio Date Name &
No. Student ter & Festival of the n/ From To Place of the
Sectio Event Partici Institute
n pated organized
20
31- College of
orazon Partici 30-Mar- Mar- Engineering
Aisha Jha VI A SIH'2018 e pated 18 18 , Pune
21 31-
orazon Partici 30-Mar- Mar- College of
Chahal Pansari VI A SIH'2018 e pated 18 18 Engg,Pune
22 31- College of
orazon Partici 30-Mar- Mar- Engineering
Amit Sharma VI A SIH'2018 e pated 18 18 , Pune
23
Operat 31- College of
Diwanshu ion_A Partici 30-Mar- Mar- Engineering
Soni VI A SIH'2018 ct pated 18 18 , Pune
24
Operat 31- College of
ion_A Partici 30-Mar- Mar- Engineering
Gagan Goyal VI A SIH'2018 ct pated 18 18 , Pune
25 18-
Mayank A+ 19-Jun- Jul-
Prasad VIII B RCPL Python Grade 17 17 Ranchi

Table B.4.6.3b: Students Participation in inter-institute events

Self Assessment Report Page 180


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

CRITERION 5
Faculty Information and Contributions (200)

Self Assessment Report Page 181


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
CRITERION 5 Faculty Information and Contributions 200

5. FACULTY INFORMATION AND CONTRIBUTIONS (200)

Faculty Details:2018-19

Qualification Academic
Research

Currently Associated (Y/N) Date of Leaving (In


Date on which Designated as Professor/Associate

Nature of Association (Regular/Contract)


Year of attaining higher qualification

case Currently Associated is (“No”)


Faculty Receiving Ph.D.during the
Association with the Institution

Research Paper Publications


S.No.

Date of Joining the Institution


Name of the Faculty Member

Degree (highest degree)

AssessmentYears
Ph.D. Guidance
Specialization
Designation
University

Department
Professor

Dr. VIJAY
University of
1 SINGH Phd 27/2/2009 YES PROFESSOR 17/8/2016 17/8/2016 CSE Data Minin 1 2 Y Regular
Rajasthan
RATHORE
Dr.SURENDR
Jagannath Computer
2 A KUMAR Phd 30/6/2009 YES PROFESSOR 10/7/2015 10/7/2015 CSE 0 Y Regular
University Networking
YADAV
MohanLalSu Image
DR.BHAVNA ASSOCIATE Processing
3 Phd khadia 13/06/2015 YES 8/1/2016 1/8/2016 CSE 0 Y Regular
SHARMA PROFESSOR and Machine
University
Learning
Suresh
DR.NILAM ASSOCIATE Cloud
4 Phd GyanVihar 3/4/2017 YES 1/8/2017 1/8/2017 CSE 3 Y Regular
CHOUDHARY PROFESSOR Computing g
University
Mohan
DR.SANJAY ASSOCIATE
5 Phd lalSukhadia 1/9/2012 YES 1/8/2017 1/8/2017 CSE Data Mining 4 0 Y Regular
GAUR PROFESSOR
University
DR.NEELAM Banasthali ASSOCIATE Artificial
6 Phd 10/11/2017 YES 7/12/2017 7/12/2007 CSE 0 Y Regular
CHAPLOT University PROFESSOR Intelligence
Jyoti
Dr. VIJITA Vidyapeeth ASST Wireless and
7 Phd 15/07/2018 YES 2/4/2018 2/4/2018 CSE 0 Y Regular
KUMAWAT Women’s PROFESSOR Security
University
MUKESH ASST
8 M.tech BITS Plani 30/6/2018 YES 30/6/2012 1/7/2002 CSE Data Mining 1 Y Regular
AGRAWAL PROFESSOR
Jodhpur
ASST COMPUTER
9 MANJU VYAS M.tech National 28/4/2011 YES 29/08/2011 CSE 0 Y Regular
PROFESSOR SCI.
UNI
SACHIN ASST COMPUTER
10 M.tech RTU 5/2/2018 YES 2/5/2012 CSE 0 Y Regular
GUPTA PROFESSOR SCI.
C.JEBA NEGA Anna ASST COMPUTER
11 M.e 11/10/2011 YES 10/11/2013 CSE 0 Y Regular
CHELTHA University PROFESSOR SCI.

GLA ASST COMPUTER


12 ABHILASHA M.tech 12/10/2013 YES 19/11/2013 CSE 0 Y Regular
University PROFESSOR SCI.

ABHISHEK ASST
13 M.tech SGVU 1/7/2015 YES 2/8/2014 CSE Data Mining 0 Y Regular
DIXIT PROFESSOR

GEETIKA ASST Machine


14 M.tech JIIT 5/7/2014 YES 19/1/2015 CSE 3 Y Regular
GAUTAM PROFESSOR Learning

Self Assessment Report Page 182


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
HEMLATA ASST COMPUTER
15 M.tech RTU 12/9/2012 YES 2/1/2015 CSE 0 Y Regular
SONI PROFESSOR SCI.

RICHA ASST COMPUTER


16 M.tech SGVU 29/11/2014 YES 3/1/2015 CSE 0 Y Regular
UPADHYAY PROFESSOR SCI.

SHASHI KANT Jagannath ASST Image


17 M.tech. 20/7/2013 YES 15/7/2015 CSE 0 Y Regular
SINGH University PROFESSOR Processing
ASST COMPUTER
18 ANKUR RAJ M.tech SGVU 12/11/2014 YES 14/7/2015 CSE 0 Y Regular
PROFESSOR SCI.
GEERIJA JECRC ASST COMPUTER
19 M.tech 27/12/2014 YES 13/8/2015 CSE 0 Y Regular
LAVANIA University PROFESSOR SCI.

ANKITA ASST COMPUTER


20 M.tech RTU 7/3/2015 YES 13/7/2015 CSE 0 Y Regular
AGARWAL PROFESSOR SCI.
ANOOP
ASST
21 KUMAR M.tech IIIT Jabalpur 19/7/2016 YES 1/8/2016 CSE Data Mining 0 Y Regular
PROFESSOR
MEHTA
Central ASST COMPUTER
22 GEET KALANI M.tech 10/7/2013 YES 2/1/2017 CSE 0 Y Regular
University PROFESSOR SCI.
SAROJ ASST COMPUTER
23 M.tech RTU 3/10/2016 YES 15/7/2016 CSE 1 Y Regular
AGRAWAL PROFESSOR SCI

ASHISH Jagannath ASST COMPUTER


24 M.tech 22/07/2014 YES 19/7/2016 CSE 0 Y Regular
AMERIA University PROFESSOR Networking

Singhania ASST Software


25 GARIMA OJHA M.tech 17/08/2012 YES 1/4/2017 CSE 1 Y Regular
University PROFESSOR Engineering

ASHIMA JECRC ASST COMPUTER


26 M.tech 1/9/2017 YES 1/4/2017 CSE 0 Y Regular
TIWARI University PROFESSOR SCI.
Mody
SHIKHA Institute of ASST COMPUTER
27 M. Tech 31/5/2008 YES 1/2/2010 CSE 0 Y Regular
MAHESHWARI Technology PROFESSOR SCI.
& Sciences,
Laxmangarh
ANIMA Jagannath ASST Computer
28 M.tech. 20/7/2013 YES 19/2/2009 CSE 0 Y Regular
SHARMA University PROFESSOR Networks

RAJAN Jagannath ASST Image


29 M.tech 20/7/2013 YES 17/12/2009 CSE 0 Y Regular
KUMAR JHA University PROFESSOR Processing

Malaviya
National
ASST COMPUTER
30 AMIT MITHAL M.tech Institute of 6/8/2012 YES 2/12/2004 CSE 0 Y Regular
PROFESSOR SCI.
Technology,
Jaipur
RICHA ASST Computer
31 M.tech RTU 22/3/2016 YES 27/8/2008 CSE 0 Y Regular
SHARMA PROFESSOR Networking
GAJENDRA
ASST COMPUTER
32 KUMAR M.tech JNRU 15/5/2006 YES 4/10/2006 CSE 0 Y Regular
PROFESSOR SCI.
SHARMA
PRAHLAD
ASST
33 KUMAR M.tech RTU 17/8/2016 YES 17/1/2012 CSE Data Mining 0 Y Regular
PROFESSOR
SHARMA

SHAILESH ASST COMPUTER


34 M.tech RTU 5/2/2018 YES 2/5/2012 CSE 0 Y Regular
ARRAWATIA PROFESSOR SCI.

Jodhpur
VINAY ASST Compiler
35 M.tech National 1/7/2013 YES 1/10/2018 CSE 0 Y Regular
AJMERA PROFESSOR Design
UNI
YOGITA Jagannath ASST Image
36 M.tech 30/6/2012 YES 1/8/2011 CSE 0 Y Regular
PANJABI University PROFESSOR Processing

PRADEEP Jagannath ASST COMPUTER


37 M.tech 1/7/2013 YES 1/02/2014 CSE 0 Y Regular
SHARMA University PROFESSOR SCI.

PRIYANKA Banasthali ASST Image


38 M.tech 2/7//2012 YES 2/7//2016 CSE 0 Y Regular
MITRA University PROFESSOR Processing

Self Assessment Report Page 183


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Faculty Details:2017-18

Currently Associated (Y/N) Date of Leaving


Academic

Date on which Designated as Professor/Associate Professor


Qualification
Research

Nature of Association (Regular/Contract)


(In case Currently Associated is (“No”)
Research Paper Publications
Year of attaining higher qualification

Association with the Institution


Degree (highest degree)

Ph.D.duringtheAssessmentYears
Date of Joining the Institution
Name of the Faculty Member

Ph.D. Guidance

Faculty Receiving
University
S.N0.

Specialization
Designation

Department
Dr. VIJAY
University C
SINGH PROFE 17/8/20 Data Regul
1 PhD of 27/2/2009 YES 17/8/2016 S 7 3 Y
RATHOR SSOR 16 Minin ar
Rajasthan E
E
Dr.SURE
C Computer
NDRA Jagannath PROFE 10/7/20 Regul
2 PhD 30/6/2009 YES 10/7/2015 S Networki 1 Y
KUMAR University SSOR 15 ar
E ng
YADAV
Image
ASSOC
DR.BHAV MohanLal C Processin
13/06/201 IATE 08-01- Regul
3 NA PhD Sukhadia YES 1/8/2016 S g and 3 Y
5 PROFE 2016 ar
SHARMA University E Machine
SSOR
Learning
DR.NILA ASSOC
Suresh C Cloud
M IATE 1/8/201 Regul
4 PhD GyanVihar 3/4/2017 YES 1/8/2017 S Computin 2 Y
CHOUDH PROFE 7 ar
University E gg
ARY SSOR
Mohan ASSOC
C
DR.SANJ lalSukhadi IATE 1/8/201 Data Regul
5 PhD 1/9/2012 YES 1/8/2017 S 8 3 Y
AY GAUR a PROFE 7 Mining ar
E
University SSOR
DR.NEEL
ASST C Artificial
AM Banasthali 10/11/201 7/12/20 2017- Regul
6 PhD YES PROFE 7/12/2007 S Intelligen 4 Y
CHAPLO University 7 17 18 ar
SSOR E ce
T
MUKESH ASST C
M.TE 30/6/20 Data Regul
7 AGRAWA BITS Plani 30/6/2018 YES PROFE 1/7/2002 S 1 Y
CH 12 Mining ar
L SSOR E
Jodhpur ASST C
MANJU M.TE COMPU Regul
8 National 28/4/2011 YES PROFE 29/08/2011 S 3 Y
VYAS CH TER SCI. ar
UNI SSOR E
ASST C
SACHIN M.TE COMPU Regul
9 RTU 5/2/2018 YES PROFE 2/5/2012 S 2 Y
GUPTA CH TER SCI. ar
SSOR E
C.JEBA
ASST C
NEGA Anna 11/10/201 COMPU Regul
10 M.E YES PROFE 10/11/2013 S 3 Y
CHELTH University 1 TER SCI. ar
SSOR E
A
ASST C
ABHILAS M.TE GLA 12/10/201 COMPU Regul
11 YES PROFE 19/11/2013 S 0 Y
HA CH University 3 TER SCI. ar
SSOR E
ARIHANT ASST C
M.TE COMPU Regul
12 KUMAR RTU 10/9/2012 YES PROFE 30/1/2014 S 2 Y
CH TER SCI. ar
JAIN SSOR E
ASST C
ABHISHE M.TE Data Regul
13 SGVU 1/7/2015 YES PROFE 2/8/2014 S 2 Y
K DIXIT CH Mining ar
SSOR E

Self Assessment Report Page 184


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
ASST C
GEETIKA M.TE Machine Regul
14 JIIT 5/7/2014 YES PROFE 19/1/2015 S 2 Y
GAUTAM CH Learning ar
SSOR E
ASST C
HEMLAT M.TE COMPU Regul
15 RTU 12/9/2012 YES PROFE 2/1/2015 S 2 Y
A SONI CH TER SCI. ar
SSOR E
RICHA ASST C
M.TE 29/11/201 COMPU Regul
16 UPADHY SGVU YES PROFE 3/1/2015 S 2 Y
CH 4 TER SCI. ar
AY SSOR E
SHASHI ASST C Image
M.TE Jagannath Regul
17 KANT 20/7/2013 YES PROFE 15/7/2015 S Processin 1 Y
CH. University ar
SINGH SSOR E g
ASST C
SEEMA M.TE Banasthali COMPU Regul
18 19/2/2015 YES PROFE 7/7/2015 S 2 Y
YADAV CH University TER SCI. ar
SSOR E
ANKITA ASST C
M.TE COMPU Y Regul
19 AGARWA RTU 7/3/2015 NO PROFE 13/7/2015 S 0
CH TER SCI. ar
L SSOR E
ASST C
ANKUR M.TE 12/11/201 COMPU Regul
20 SGVU YES PROFE 14/7/2015 S 2 Y
RAJ CH 4 TER SCI. ar
SSOR E
GEERIJA ASST C
M.TE JECRC 27/12/201 COMPU Regul
21 LAVANI YES PROFE 13/8/2015 S 3 Y
CH University 4 TER SCI. ar
A SSOR E
KIRTI ASST C Image
M.TE Jagannath Regul
22 CHOUDH 23/8/2012 YES PROFE 1/7/2015 S Processin 3 Y
CH University ar
ARY SSOR E g
ANOOP ASST C
M.TE IIIT Data Regul
23 KUMAR 19/7/2016 YES PROFE 1/8/2016 S 0 Y
CH Jabalpur Mining ar
MEHTA SSOR E
ASST C
GEET M.TE Central COMPU Regul
24 10/7/2013 YES PROFE 2/1/2017 S 3 Y
KALANI CH University TER SCI. ar
SSOR E
SAROJ ASST C
M.TE COMPU Regul
25 AGRAWA RTU 3/10/2016 YES PROFE 15/7/2016 S 1 Y
CH TER SCI ar
L SSOR E
COMPU
ASST C
ASHISH M.TE Jagannath 22/07/201 TER Regul
26 YES PROFE 19/7/2016 S 5 Y
AMERIA CH University 4 Networki ar
SSOR E
ng
ASST C
VATAN M.TE Jagannath 04/06/201 COMPU 4/7/2 Regul
27 NO PROFE 9/7/2011 S 2
MISHRA CH. University 3 TER SCI 018 ar
SSOR E
ASST C Software
GARIMA M.TE Singhania 17/08/201 Regul
28 YES PROFE 1/4/2017 S Engineeri 5 Y
OJHA CH University 2 ar
SSOR E ng
ASST C
ASHIMA M.TE JECRC COMPU Regul
29 1/9/2017 YES PROFE 1/4/2017 S 0 Y
TIWARI CH University TER SCI. ar
SSOR E
M ASST C Software
5/5/2 Regul
30 SARITA TEC SGVU 30/6/2013 No PROFE 1/7/2015 S Engineeri 1
018 ar
H SSOR E ng
Mody
Institute of
SHIKHA M. Technolog ASST C
COMPU Regul
31 MAHESH TEC y& 31/5/2008 YES PROFE 1/2/2010 S 6 Y
TER SCI. ar
WARI H Sciences, SSOR E
Laxmangar
h
ASST C
ANIMA M.TE Jagannath Computer Regul
32 20/7/2013 YES PROFE 19/2/2009 S 1 Y
SHARMA CH. University Networks ar
SSOR E
RAJAN ASST C Image
M.TE Jagannath Regul
33 KUMAR 20/7/2013 YES PROFE 17/12/2009 S Processin 3 Y
CH University ar
JHA SSOR E g
Malaviya
National ASST C
AMIT M.TE COMPU Regul
34 Institute of 6/8/2012 YES PROFE 2/12/2004 S 1 Y
MITHAL CH TER SCI. ar
Technolog SSOR E
y, Jaipur
ASST C Computer
RICHA M.TE Regul
35 RTU 22/3/2016 YES PROFE 27/8/2008 S Networki 1 Y
SHARMA CH ar
SSOR E ng
GAJEND
ASST C
RA M.TE COMPU Regul
36 JNRU 15/5/2006 YES PROFE 4/10/2006 S 1 Y
KUMAR CH TER SCI. ar
SSOR E
SHARMA

Self Assessment Report Page 185


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
PRASHA ASST C
M.TE COMPU 1/4/2 Regul
37 NT RTU 22/0/2017 NO PROFE 17/03/2008 S 1
CH TER SCI. 018 ar
YADAV SSOR E
PRAHLA
ASST C
D M.TE Data Regul
38 RTU 17/8/2016 YES PROFE 17/1/2012 S 2 Y
KUMAR CH Mining ar
SSOR E
SHARMA
SHAILES
ASST C
H M.TE COMPU Regul
39 RTU 5/2/2018 YES PROFE 2/5/2012 S 3 Y
ARRAWA CH TER SCI. ar
SSOR E
TIA

Faculty Details:2016-17

Currently Associated (Y/N) Date of Leaving


Date on which Designated as Professor/Associate Professor
Academic

Nature of Association (Regular/Contract)


Qualification

(In case Currently Associated is (“No”)


Research
Association with the Institution

Date of Joining the Institution


Name of the Faculty Member

Research Paper Publications


Year of attaining higher qualification
Degree (highest degree)

Specialization

Ph.D.duringtheAssessmentYears
Department
Designation

Ph.D. Guidance
Faculty Receiving
University
S.N0.

DR.(Prof)VIJAY
University of Cloud
1 SINGH PhD 27/2/2009 YES PROFESSOR 17/8/2016 17/8/2016 CSE 5 4 Y Regular
Rajasthan Computing
RATHORE
Dr.SURENDRA
Jagannath Computer
2 KUMAR PhD 30/6/2009 YES PROFESSOR 10/7/2015 10/7/2015 CSE 1 Y Regular
University Networking
YADAV
Image
DR.BHAVNA Sukhadia ASSOCIATE Processing
3 PhD 13/06/2015 YES 08-01-2016 1/8/2016 CSE 3 Y Regular
SHARMA University PROFESSOR and Machine
Learning
NEELAM Banasthali ASST Artificial
4 PhD 10/11/2017 YES 7/12/2017 7/12/2007 CSE 0 Y Regular
CHAPLOT University PROFESSOR Intelligence

MUKESH ASST
5 M.TECH BITS Plani 30/6/2018 YES 30/6/2012 1/7/2002 CSE Data Mining 0 Y Regular
AGRAWAL PROFESSOR

Jodhpur ASST COMPUTER


6 MANJU VYAS M.TECH 28/4/2011 YES 29/08/2011 CSE 3 Y Regular
National UNI PROFESSOR SCI.

ASST COMPUTER
7 SACHIN GUPTAM.TECH RTU,kota 5/2/2018 YES 2/5/2012 CSE 1 Y Regular
PROFESSOR SCI.

C.JEBA NEGA Anna ASST COMPUTER


8 M.E 11/10/2011 YES 10/11/2013 CSE 1 Y Regular
CHELTHA University PROFESSOR SCI.

ABHILASHA GLA ASST COMPUTER


9 M.TECH 12/10/2013 YES 19/11/2013 CSE 0 Y Regular
KUMARI University PROFESSOR SCI.

ARIHANT ASST COMPUTER


10 M.TECH RTU 10/9/2012 YES 30/1/2014 CSE 2 Y Regular
KUMAR JAIN PROFESSOR SCI.

ABHISHEK ASST
11 M.TECH SGVU 1/7/2015 YES 2/8/2014 CSE Data Mining 0 Y Regular
DIXIT PROFESSOR

Self Assessment Report Page 186


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
GEETIKA ASST Machine
12 M.TECH JIIT 5/7/2014 YES 19/1/2015 CSE 0 Y Regular
GAUTAM PROFESSOR Learning

HEMLATA ASST COMPUTER


13 M.TECH RTU 12/9/2012 YES 2/1/2015 CSE 2 Y Regular
SONI PROFESSOR SCI.

RICHA ASST
14 M.TECH SGVU 29/11/2014 YES 3/1/2015 CSE CSE 1 Y Regular
UPADHYAY PROFESSOR

SHASHI KANT Jagannath ASST Image


15 M.TECH. 20/7/2013 YES 15/7/2015 CSE 0 Y Regular
SINGH University PROFESSOR Processing

Banasthali ASST COMPUTER


16 SEEMA YADAV M.TECH 19/2/2015 YES 7/7/2015 CSE 0 Y Regular
University PROFESSOR SCI.

ANKITA ASST COMPUTER


17 M.TECH RTU 7/3/2015 NO 13/7/2015 CSE 0 Y Regular
AGARWAL PROFESSOR SCI.

ASST COMPUTER
18 ANKUR RAJ M.TECH SGVU 12/11/2014 YES 14/7/2015 CSE 0 Y Regular
PROFESSOR SCI.

GEERIJA JECRC ASST COMPUTER


19 M.TECH 27/12/2014 YES 13/8/2015 CSE 3 Y Regular
LAVANIA University PROFESSOR SCI.

KIRTI Jagannath ASST Image


20 M.TECH 23/8/2012 YES 1/7/2015 CSE 2 Y Regular
CHOUDHARY University PROFESSOR Processing

ANOOP KUMAR ASST


21 M.TECH IIIT Jabalpur 19/7/2016 YES 1/8/2016 CSE Data Mining 1 Y Regular
MEHTA PROFESSOR

ASHISH Jagannath ASST COMPUTER


22 M.TECH 22/07/2014 YES 19/7/2016 CSE 0 Y Regular
AMERIA University PROFESSOR Networking

VATAN Jagannath ASST COMPUTER


23 M.TECH. 04/06/2013 NO 9/7/2011 CSE 2 4/7/2018 Regular
MISHRA University PROFESSOR SCI

ASST Software
24 SARITA M TECH SGVU 30/6/2013 No 1/7/2015 CSE 1 5/5/2018 Regular
PROFESSOR Engineering
Mody Institute
SHIKHA of Technology ASST COMPUTER
25 M. TECH 31/5/2008 YES 1/2/2010 CSE 4 Y Regular
MAHESHWARI & Sciences, PROFESSOR SCI.
Laxmangarh
ANIMA Jagannath ASST Computer
26 M.TECH. 20/7/2013 YES 19/2/2009 CSE 0 Y Regular
SHARMA University PROFESSOR Networks

RAJAN KUMAR Jagannath ASST Image


27 M.TECH 20/7/2013 YES 17/12/2009 CSE 0 Y Regular
JHA University PROFESSOR Processing

ASST COMPUTER
28 AMIT MITHAL M.TECH MNIT, Jaipur 6/8/2012 YES 2/12/2004 CSE 0 Y Regular
PROFESSOR SCI.

RICHA ASST Computer


29 M.TECH RTU Kota 22/3/2016 YES 27/8/2008 CSE 1 Y Regular
SHARMA PROFESSOR Networking
GAJENDRA
ASST COMPUTER
30 KUMAR M.TECH JNRU 15/5/2006 YES 4/10/2006 CSE 0 Y Regular
PROFESSOR SCI.
SHARMA
PRASHANT ASST COMPUTER
31 M.TECH RTU 22/0/2017 NO 17/03/2008 CSE 1 Y Regular
YADAV PROFESSOR SCI.
PRAHLAD
ASST
32 KUMAR M.TECH RTU 17/8/2016 YES 17/1/2012 CSE Data Mining 0 Y Regular
PROFESSOR
SHARMA
SHAILESH M.TEC ASST COMPUTE
33 RTU,kota 5/2/2018 YES 25/4/2012 CSE 1 Y Regular
ASSAWATIA H PROFESSOR R SCI.
NEHA M.TEC ASST COMPUTE 30/11/20
34 RTU,kota 07/06/2015 YES 13/07/2015 CSE R SCI. 0 Regular
MUDGAL H PROFESSOR 17
Lovely COMPUTE
DEEKSHA M.TEC ASST 13/11/20
35 professional 15/205/2015 YES 14/07/2015 CSE R SCI. 0 Regular
MATHUR H PROFESSOR 17
UNi
UDBHAV 10-02- 11-07-
Jaganath ASST 06/02/20
36 BHATNAG Mtech 2012 NO 2011 CSE CSE 0 Regular
University PROFESSOR 17
AR

Self Assessment Report Page 187


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

5.1. Student-Faculty Ratio (SFR) (20)


(To be calculated at Department Level)
No. of UG Programs in the Department (n): 1
No. of PG Programs in the Department (m): NA
No. of Students in UG 2nd Year= u1
No. of Students in UG 3rd Year= u2
No. of Students in UG 4th Year= u3
No. of Students in PG 1st Year= p1=NA
No. of Students in PG 2nd Year= p2=NA

No. of Students = Sanctioned Intake + Actual admitted lateral entry students


(The above data to be provided considering all the UG and PG programs of the department)
S=Number of Students in the Department F = Total Number of Faculty Members in the Department
(excluding first year faculty)
Student Faculty Ratio (SFR) = S/F

Year CAY P1(2018-19) CAY(2017-18) CAYm1(2016-17)

U1.1 202 193 205


U1.2 193 205 219
U1.3 205 219 206
UG1 600 617 630

U2.1 61 63 63
U2.2 63 63 64
U2.3 63 64 59

UG2 187 190 186


Total No. of Students in the
Department (S) 787 807 816
No. of Faculty in the
Department (F) 38 39 36
Student Faculty Ration (SFR) SFR=20.71 SFR1=20.69 SFR2=22.66
Average SFR SFR=(20.71+20.69+22.66)/3=21.35
Table B.5.1: Student Faculty Ratio
Note:
 Minimum 75% should be Regular/ full time faculty and the remaining shall be Contractual Faculty as
per AICTE norms and standards.The contractual faculty (doing away with the terminology of
visiting/adjunct faculty, whatsoever) who have taught for 2 consecutive semesters in the corresponding
academic year on full time basis shall be considered for the purpose of calculation in the Student
Faculty Ratio.

Self Assessment Report Page 188


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
5.1.1. Provide the information about the regular and contractual faculty as per the format
mentioned below:
Total number of
Total number of regular contractual faculty in the
faculty in the department department
CAY P1(2018-19)
38 0
CAY(2017-18) 39 0
CAYm1(2016-17) 36 0
Table B.5.1.1: Regular and Contractual Faculty

5.2. Faculty Cadre Proportion (25)


The reference Faculty cadre proportion is 1(F1):2(F2):6(F3)
F1: Number of Professors required = 1/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 20:1 Student-
Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1
F2: Number of Associate Professors required = 2/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 20:1
Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1
F3: Number of Assistant Professors required = 6/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 20:1
Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1

Faculty Cadre Proportion

Professors Associate Professors Assistant Professors


Year
Required F1 Available Required F2 Available Required F3 Available

4 9 27
CAYP1(2018-19) 2 4 32

4 9 27
CAY(2017-18) 2 3 34

4 8 23
CAYm1(2016-17) 2 1 33
Average
RF1=4 AF1=2 RF2=8.66 AF2=2.66 RF3=25.66 AF3=33
Numbers
Table B.5.2: Faculty Cadre Proportion

Cadre Ratio Marks=AF1 + AF2x 0.6 +AF3x 0.4 x 12.5


RF1 RF2 RF3

Cadre Ratio Marks= (0.5+0.184+0.514)*12.5=14.97

Self Assessment Report Page 189


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
 If AF1 = AF2= 0 then zero marks
 Maximum marks to be limited if it exceeds 25
Example: Intake = 60 (i.e. total no. of students= 180); Required number of Faculty: 9; RF1= 1, RF2=2 and
RF3=6
Case 1: AF1/RF1= 1; AF2/RF2 = 1; AF3/RF3 = 1; Cadre proportion marks = (1+0.6+0.4) x 12.5 = 25

Case 2: AF1/RF1= 1; AF2/RF2 = 3/2; AF3/RF3 = 5/6; Cadre proportion marks = (1+0.9+0.3) x 12.5 =
limited to 25
Case 3: AF1/RF1=0; AF2/RF2=1/2; AF3/RF3=8/6; Cadre proportion marks = (0+0.3+0.53) x 12.5 = 10.4

5.3. Faculty Qualification (25)


(FQ =2.5 x [(10X +4Y)/F)] where x is no. of regular faculty with Ph.D., Y is no. of regular faculty with M.Tech. F
is no. of regular faculty required to comply 20:1Faculty Student ratio (no. of faculty and no. of students required
are to be calculated as per 5.1)

FQ = 2.5 x [(10X
S.NO X Y F +4Y)/F)]

1 CAY P1(2018-19) 7 31 39 12.43


2 CAY(2017-18) 6 33 40 12.0
3 CAYm1(2016-17) 3 32 41 9.63
Average Assessment 11.35
Table B.5.3: Faculty Qualification
5.4. Faculty Retention (25)
No. of regular faculty members in CAYm3= 30 CAYm1= 35 CAY= 39 CAY P1=38
Item
Marks
(% of faculty retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm3 as base year)

>=90% of required Faculty members retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm3 as base year) 25

>=75% of required Faculty members retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm3 as base year) 20

>=60% of required Faculty members retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm3 as base year) 15

>=50% of required Faculty members retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm3 as base year) 10

<50% of required Faculty members retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm3 as base year) 0

Table B.5.4: Faculty Retention


No of faculty in 2018-19=38
No of faculty retained since 2015-16 =23
CAYm2=34
Faculty Retention =20/30=67%
Total Marks for Faculty Retention =15

Self Assessment Report Page 190


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
5.5. Innovations by the Faculty in Teaching and Learning (20)
(Innovations by the Faculty in teaching and learning shall be summarized as per the following description.

Contributions to teaching and learning are activities that contribute to the improvement of student learning. These
activities may include innovations not limited to, use of ICT, instruction delivery, instructional methods,
assessment, evaluation and inclusive class rooms that lead to effective, efficient and engaging instruction. Any
contributions to teaching and learning should satisfy the following criteria:

The work must be made available on Institute website

The work must be available for peer review and critique

The work must be reproducible and developed further by other scholars

The department/institution may set up appropriate processes for making the contributions available to the public,
getting them reviewed and for rewarding. These may typically include statement of clear goals, adequate
preparation, use of appropriate methods, and significance of results, effective presentation and reflective critique)

Innovation by Faculty
in Teaching
&Learning

Teaching & Skill Monitoring


Learning process Development Students

 MOOCs  Technical  Mentoring


 Ebooks Events  Class
 Peer  Social Events Coordinators
Learning  T&P Squad

Figure 5.5a: Teaching Learning Process Diagram

Innovations are introduced to improve the effectiveness in teaching and learning process. Student, al
umni, employer feedback and state of art technologies in the society are considered to introduce inno
vative teaching and learning methodologies.Department encourages faculty members to adapt innova
tive teaching. Following are the three initiatives taken to improve the teaching learning process like

Self Assessment Report Page 191


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
A. Innovations introduced in Teaching and Learning process –
Students are motivated to learn and prepare seminar presentation topic through research paper
and e-books .They are also motivated for collaborative learning and peer learning methods. Students
are prepared through multiple choice questions, roleplay, codingcontest, webinar and video lecture
following are the methods
• Learning through e-Books, Research papers

• Providing MCQ to students Before MTTs

• Role Play on different topics in classroom

• Motivating students to use modern tools like Prezi, snipping tool etc.

• TopCoder Contest for improving coding skills

• Participation of students in Codevita, NinjaEngineX, Testimony/Enquode for improving


coding skills.

• Webinars, video lectures, MOOCs etc.

• Peer Learning / Collaborative Learning

B. Skill Development Initiatives –


Formation of Club: We believe in the holistic grooming of our students and hence we stress
equal emphasis on round the year extracurricular activities which are facilitated through the various
active student clubs at JECRC. For students inclined towards social services we have club i.e.
Zarurat, SOCH, and Aashayein.
a) Zarurat: on a theme “The Help Beyond” an Initiative by JECRC students for social concern
that is educating the underprivileged kids who can not avail the facility of schooling. Limca Book
of Records (National Record): Students of Team Zarurat, JECRC, Jaipur assembled 24,626
tricolored handmade origami flowers in a flower basket - a record for the largest display of origami
flowers - at the college premises. The target was accomplished over two phases; the first was the
making of the origami flowers, which took place on 26th February 2017, over 11 hours, and the
second was the assembly of the flower basket, symbolizing the national flag on 7th March 2017,
over 10 hours. The certificate was issued in December 2017.
b) SOCH (Sochkuchkardikhaneki): Soch is a social initiative in JECRC started by the
students to help needy persons of slum areas. Members of SOCH doing help such as providing
food cloths, give education to poor of children’s. Activities done by SOCH are orphanage children
interactive program (ocip) 2018, vastra-samman, orphanage children interactive program, jecrc
cleanliness drive, and no food wastage campaign.

Self Assessment Report Page 192


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
c) ASHAYEIN: AashayeinEkAbhiyaan is club managed and run by JECRCians. The objective
of Ashayein Club is Blood donation, Fest and Birthday Celebration in Old Age Homes, and Trees
Plantation. The team aspires to inspire and motivate the youth of nation to be a part of this supreme
deed. We aim to spread awareness among masses, so as to serve not only Rajasthan, but the entire
nation.

Collaborative Learning: Collaborative Learning is based on the model that knowledge can be
created within a population where members actively interact by sharing experience and take on
asymmetric role. We use Collaborative learning method among faculty and student. Six faculty
members completed the AWS certification and are providing training to the students by lectures /
video lectures.
Also two faculty members successfully completed training on Deep Learning and AI under Leading
India initiative which is a project of Royal Academy of Engineering, UK under Newton Bhabha
program. JECRC being the Zonal partner of this project has formed a research group comprising of
faculty members of CSE and IT. The group will be conducting various trainings and will help the
students to build projects to spread awareness about AI.

Formation of T&P Squad:Conducting training for the students to enhance the aptitude,
technical skills & soft skills before the commencement of placement. Department formed a special
Squad named "T&P Squad - CSE" for Un-Placed Students' Placements. The Squad consists of 6
dedicated willing faculty members, and 12 Students from 4th Year who are already placed.

 For development of entrepreneurial skills among the students to start their own enterprise, a
ctivities are conducted by the department of the college.
 Students are encouraged to attend various technical events,
workshops, programming contests & paper presentation in contests.
 Department conduct online mock test series for students to perform better in GATE,
MCAT, elitmus and other activities.

Year No. of Student Appeared


online exam
2015-16 180
2016-17 184
2017-18 186
Table.5.5: Number of Students Appeared in online Exam

Self Assessment Report Page 193


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Sample of MOM for T&P Squard:


Jaipur Engineering College & Research Centre, Jaipur

From: CSE-T&PSquad To: All Concerned


Noting Reference No. JECRC/CSE-TnPS/MoM/2017/December/09 09/12/2017
Minutes of Meeting
Agenda –
 Formation of CSE-Training &Placement Squad
 Placement strategy for Un-placed students
 Task assignment.

Meeting Venue and Date: EDC Conference Room A block at 2:00 O’clock on Saturday, December 09, 2017
Chaired By:
Dr. Vijay Singh Rathore

Attendees
 Faculty Coordinators:  Students Coordinators:
Dr. Sanjay Gaur Ms. Japleen Kaur
Dr. NilamChodhary Ms. Kanishka Goyal
Ms. ShikhaMaheshwari Ms. RidhimaShekhawat
Mr. Abhishek Dixit Ms. ApurviMansingha
M. Priyanka Mitra Mr. Atul Dada
Mr. DikshantMamodia
Mr. NiteshVashishtha
Ms. MohitEaran

Points put up for Discussion as per agenda:–

 The meeting started with motivational triggers connecting the current action with a bigger vision.
 12 well trained and placed students of 7th Semester (some listed above) were identified for taking the action further.
 It was decided for unplaced 162 students of CSE department, each student coordinator will be allotted a group of 15
students.
 Future course of action was chalk out, based on following categories:
 For Competition based hiring, the student coordinators under the mentor-ship of faculty coordinator, will help
their group for better preparation by identifying coding tricks and algorithms or training as per the requirements.
 For Companies lined up by HR Team, the student coordinators will motivate and extend their help in identifying
the company specific set of questions and training available on the internet.
 For Identification of Personal Contacts, faculty coordinator along with students will approach organizations to take
the things further in positive direction.
 For Establishing Contact with Alumni, both identified faculty member along with a team of students will approach
Alumni of JECRC Foundation for the placement of students.

 Each of these above mentioned strategy is then allotted to the TPC Squad as follows:
 Competition Based Hiring – Dr. Sanjay Gaur will coordinate with Dr. NeelamChaplot.
 Companies lined up by HR Team- Ms. Priyanka Mitra will coordinate with HR.
 Identification of Personal Contacts – Ms. NilamChoudhary will gather the possible contacts from other
faculty members of the Department.

Self Assessment Report Page 194


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
 Establishing Contact with JECRC Alumni – Ms. ShikhaMaheshwari will be responsible for contacting
them.
 Mr. Abhishek Dixit, TPO-CSE will also be responsible for bridging the gap between HR and Departmental
team, if any.
 It has been decided the student allotment will be completed by December 11, 2017 with the help of existing mentors.
 The meeting ended with a clear understanding of the vision and assignment to be carried out for achieving the same.

5.6. Faculty as participants in Faculty development/training activities/STTPs (15)

 A Faculty scores maximum five points for participation


 Participation in 2 to 5 days Faculty development program: 3 Points
 Participation>5 days Faculty development program: 5 points

Max 5 Per Faculty


S.NO NAME OF FACULTY
2017- 2016- 2015-
1 PROF.(DR.) VIJAY SINGH RATHORE 3
18 -17 NA
16
2 DR. SURANDRA KUMAR YADAV - - -
3 DR. SATISH CHAND KULHARI NA NA -
4 DR.BHAVNA SHARMA 5 5 NA
5 DR.NEELAM CHAPLOT 5 5 5
6 MANJU VYAS 5 3 5
7 DR.NILAM CHOUDHARY 5 NA NA
8 DR.SANJAY GAUR 5 NA NA
9 PROF. MUKAT BIHARI NA NA -
10 AMIT MITHAL 5 5 5
11 GAJENDRA KUMAR SHARMA 5 5 5
12 PRASHANT YADAV 5 5 3
13 RICHA SHARMA 5 5 5
14 ANIMA SHARMA 5 5 -
15 RAJAN KUMAR JHA 5 5 5
16 SHIKHA MAHESHWARI 5 5 3
17 UDBHAV BHATNAGAR NA NA 3
18 VATAN MISHRA 3 3 5
19 PRAHLAD KUMAR SHARMA 5 5 5
20 SACHIN GUPTA 5 0 5
21 SHAILESH ARRAWATIA 5 5 5
22 C.JEBA NEGA CHELTHA 5 5 5
23 ABHILASHA - 5 5
24 MANISHA RAJ KALANI NA NA 5
25 ARIHANT KUMAR JAIN 3 3 5
26 JITENDRA SINGH YADAV NA NA 3
27 ABHISHEK DIXIT 5 5 5
28 RAJAT BHARDWAJ NA NA -
29 HEMLATA SONI 5 5 3
30 RICHA UDADHYAY 5 5 5
31 GEETIKA GAUTAM 5 5 5
32 SARITA K 3 5 5
33 SEEMA YADAV - - 5
34 ANKITA AGARWAL - - -

Self Assessment Report Page 195


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
35 NEHA MUDGAL NA - -
36 ANKUR RAJ 5 5 5
37 DEEKSHA MATHUR 3 5 5
38 SHASHI KANT SINGH 5 5 5
39 GEERIJA LAVANIA 5 5 5
40 KIRTI CHOUDHARY 5 5 -
41 ASHISH AMERIA 3 5 NA
42 ANOOP KUMAR MEHTA 5 - NA
43 GEET KALANI 5 - NA
44 ASHIMA TIWARI - - -
45 GARIMA OJHA - NA NA
TABLE 5.6 a: Faculty FDP Details

NUMBER OF FACULTY CAY CAYM1 CAYM2


SUM* 148 129 130
RF= NUMBER OF FACULTY 39 35 34
REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH
20:1 STUDENT-FACULTY
RATIO AS PER 5.1
ASSESSMENT = 3 X 22.76 22.11 22.94
(SUM/0.5RF)
(MARKS LIMITED TO 15)
AVERAGE ASSESSMENT OVER 15
THREE YEARS (MARKS
LIMITED TO 15) =

Table 5.6 b: Number of Faculty FDP Calculations


5.7. Research and Development (30)

5.7.1. Academic Research (10)


Academic research includes research paper publications, Ph.D. guidance, and faculty receiving Ph.D.
during the assessment period.

 Number of quality publications in refereed/SCI Journals, citations, Books/Book Chapters etc. (6)

 Ph.D. guided /Ph.D. awarded during the assessment period while working in the institute (4)

All relevant details shall be mentioned.


Details of Ph.D.
A. Details of Faculty who got Ph.D. degree during the assessment years:

 Dr. NeelamChaplot is awarded with Ph.D. in Computer Science and Engineering in


November 2017 from BanasthaliVidyapeeth , Banasthali, Rajasthan under guidance of
(Prof.) Dr. Praveen Dhyani Executive Director BanasthaliVidyapeeth and Co Guide Dr.
O.P.Rishi Associate Professor University of Kota with thesis entitled " Analysis and Decision
Support System for Astrological Prediction using Case Based Reasoning"

Self Assessment Report Page 196


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
B. Details of Faculty who are pursuing Ph.D.:

Name of the Ph.D. Pursuing Year of Details of Area of Status of Work


Faculty University Registration Guide Research & No.
work of publications
Ms. Jaipur National 2012 Prof. P S Artificial on submission
ShikhaMaheshwa University, Saxena Intelligence
ri Jaipur
Ms. Kirti Jagannath Jun-14 Dr. Meenudave Swarm About to complete
Choudhary university Intellegence 5 paper has
published
Ms. Manju Vyas JECRC July 2016 Dr. Naveen Machine About to complete
University Hemrajani Learning
Table B.5.7.1a: Details of Faculty pursuingPh.D.

C. Details of Successfully guided PhDs from the faculty of Department:

Following are the details of PhD thesis submitted under the guidance of

S. Faculty Name Name of Year Date of Title of the PhD Thesis


No the scholar Regd Submissi
on
Ms. “Safe Mode Login Transaction (SMLT) for
1 Purnima 2012 2016 Forced Online Banking Intrusion Activity
Jaiswal (FOBIA)
Mrs. Neetu “Congestion Control Mechanism in
2 2009 2016
Sharma Multimedia Traffic in 3G Networks”
Mrs. “Study and Analysis of Data Warehouse
3 Monika 2010 2017 Implementation in RDBMS and design a
Rathore generalized framework of Implementation”
Analysis of effectiveness of ERP
Ms.
4 2013 2017 implementation in colleges with special
SonuHeer
Prof.(Dr.) Vijay reference to education sector in Haryana
Singh Rathore Ms. Deepu A study and analysis of security issues in E-
5 2013 2017
Saini Commerce network system.
Ms. Design of Load Balancing hybrid model for
6 JyotiRathor 2014 2018 cloud environment
e
Ms. Madhu A Freamework and design for safe mode alarm
7 2013 2018
Sharma reporting technique (Smart) in ATMs
Design & Implementation of an Efficient ICT
Model for e-Government Service Delivery
Mr. K.L. System
8 2014 2018
Jhawaria

Ubiquitous Institutional Learning services


Yogesh
9 2014 2017 using hybrid clouds: A case study of E-
Patel
learning clouds
Dr. Sanjay Gaur
Privacy Preserving System Using Pseudo
SheshangD
10 2015 2018 Zernike Moment with SURF & Affine
egadwala
Transformation on Dual RST Attacks”
Table B.5.7.1b: Details of Successfully guided PhDs from the faculty of Department

Self Assessment Report Page 197


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
D. Current PhD Scholars under joint Supervision (PhD) of Dr. Vijay Singh Rathore

S. Name of Research Area Year of University


N PhD admission
o Scholar
1 Ms. Rajni VANET 2014 Rajasthan Technical
Sharma (Computer App) University, Kota
2 Mr. Software Engineering 2014 Rajasthan Technical
SubhashKu (Computer App) University, Kota
mar Jat
3 Mr. Sandeep Blood Image Enhancement using OTCA 2014 Rajasthan Technical
Sharma (Computer App) University, Kota

4 Ms. Course work going on 2015 Rajasthan Technical


Aparajita (Computer App) University, Kota
Dixit
5 Ms. Savita Course work going on 2016 Rajasthan Technical
Sharma (Computer Engg) University, Kota
6 Ms. Mamta Development of a framework for selection of an appropriate 2011 IIS University,
Dadhich software as a service in cloud computing Environment Jaipur
(Computer App)
Table B.5.7.1c: Current PhD Scholars under joint Supervision

Research Publications

JAIPUR ENGINEERING COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE, JAIPUR


Publication session 2017-18
S.N Faculty Date of Paper title Internatio Internation ISS E- Volume/I Source &
O publicati nal al Journal N ISS ssue Indexing
on Conferenc N
e
1 Prof. (Dr.) Feb. Impact of Open-Ended ICICT Yes - To To Be SCOPUS,
Vijay Singh 2018 Project-Based Collaborative 2018, Springer Be Updated Springer
Rathore Learning Model for Teaching London AISC Upd Soon Link,
Undergraduate-Level ated DBLP
Database Management Soo
Systems n
Feb. Design and Performance ICICT Yes - SCOPUS,
2018 Evaluation of Hybrid Wired- 2018, Springer Springer
Wireless Network on chip London AISC Link,
Interconnect Architectures DBLP
Feb. Impact of Try A-Gain - an ICETEAS Yes - SCOPUS,
2018 Online Game App for Society 2018 Springer Springer
AISC Link,
DBLP
Feb. Incessant Ridge Estimation ICETEAS Yes - SCOPUS,
2018 Using RBCA Model 2018 Springer Springer
AISC Link,
DBLP
Feb. Comparative Analysis of ICETEAS Yes - SCOPUS,
2018 Load Balancing Algorithms 2018 Springer Springer
using Cloud Analyst AISC Link,
DBLP

Self Assessment Report Page 198


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Feb. Conceptual Structure of ICETEAS Yes - SCOPUS,
2018 ASMAN Framework to 2018 Springer Springer
Compare SaaS providers AISC Link,
DBLP
Feb. Improved Google Page Rank ICETEAS Yes - SCOPUS,
2018 Algorithm 2018 Springer Springer
AISC Link,
DBLP
09/07/1 Analysis and Comparative Springer, 978 97 584 SCOPUS,
905 Exploration of Elastic Search, Singapore - - 8- Springer
MongoDB and Hadoop Big Soft 981 98 Link,
Data Processing Computing: -10- 1- DBLP
Theories 569 10-
and 8-7 56
Application 99-
s 4
09/07/1 ASMAN Framework: A Yes Springer, 978 97 18 SCOPUS,
905 Framework for Comparison Singapore - - 8- Springer
and Selection of SaaS Smart 981 98 Link,
Services Trends in -10- 1- DBLP
Systems, 691 10-
Security 5-4 69
and 16-
Sustainabili 1
ty. Lecture
Notes in
Networks
and
Systems
09/07/1 OTCA Approach Towards Yes Information 978 97 625 SCOPUS,
905 Blurred Image Feature and - 8- Springer
Estimation and Enrichment Communic 981 98 Link,
ation -10- 1- DBLP
Technology 550 10-
. Advances 7-2 55
in 08-
Intelligent 9
Systems
and
Computing
09/07/1 Radius based cellular ICCCNT, IEEE 978 97
905 automata approach for image 2017 Xplore -1- 8-
processing applications 509 1-
0- 50
303 90-
9-2 30
38-
5
2 Dr. Bhavna Feb. Design and Performance ICICT Yes - SCOPUS,
Sharma 2018 Evaluation of Hybrid Wired- 2018, Springer Springer
Wireless Network on chip London AISC Link,
Interconnect Architectures DBLP
Feb. Abnormality Detection in ICETEAS Yes - SCOPUS,
2018 Brain CT Images Using 2018 Springer Springer
Support Vector Machine AISC Link,
DBLP
3 Dr. Sanjay Feb. A Comparative Analysis of ICETEAS Yes -
Gaur 2018 Wavelet Families for 2018 Springer
Invisible Image Embedding AISC

Self Assessment Report Page 199


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Feb. Multiple Objects Tracking ICETEAS Yes -
2018 Under Occlusion Detection in 2018 Springer
Video Sequences, AISC
Feb. Performance Evaluation of ICETEAS Yes -
2018 Cryptographic Algorithm 2018 Springer
AISC
Feb. Detection of Anomalous ICETEAS Yes -
2018 value in Data Mining 2018 Springer
AISC
4 Dr. Nilam 01/09/2 “A Review of Techniques to RACCCS- Springer SCOPUS,
Chaudhary 017 Determine the Optimal Word 2017 Springer
Score in Text Classification” Link,
2nd International Conference DBLP
on Computer,
Communication and
Computational Sciences
(RACCCS-2017) Aryabhatta
College of Engineering &
Research Center, Ajmer,
India September 2-3, 2017.
01/01/2 Cloud Implementation Model IRECS STM SCOPUS,
018 for Technical Educational 2018 Springer
Institution” presented in Link,
International Conference on DBLP
Engineering, Computers and
Sciences (IRECS 2018)
during January 19-21, 2018
Goa INDIA.
5 Dr.Neelam Feb. Sentiment analysis of live ICETEAS Yes - SCOPUS,
Chaplot 2018 tweets after elections 2018 Springer Springer
AISC Link,
DBLP
Sentiment analysis of movie IJCA 097 Vlo 179 Google
review of using machine 5- scholar
learning techniques 888
7
6 Ms. Richa 17-18 A review on face recognition Yes
Sharma Feb using raspberry pi
2018
7 Ms. Anima 17-18 A review on face recognition Yes
Sharma Feb using raspberry pi
2018
Ms. Feb. Impact of Open-Ended ICICT To be
ShikhaMahesh 2018 Project-Based Collaborative 2018 updated
wari Learning Model for Teaching soon
Undergraduate-Level
Database Management
Systems
8 Feb. Impact of Try A-Gain - an ICETEAS
2018 Online Game App for Society 2018
Feb. A Review on Machine ICETEAS
2018 Translation system with 2018
special reference to English -
Hindi Languages

Self Assessment Report Page 200


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Nov. A Study on Effect of RACCCS Springer - 219 97 696
2017 Semantic Noise Parameters 2017 AISC 4- 8-
on Corpus for English-Hindi Ambient 535 98
Statistical Machine Communic 7 1-
Translation ations and 10-
Computer 73
Systems 86-
1
Mr. Rajan Kr. 17th Feb Contemporary Encryption ICCMC18 Internation
Jha 2018 Technique for Images using al
CLEFIA conference
19th Feb A pioneering Encryption ICETEAS Yes - SCOPUS,
9
2018 Technique for images 2018 Springer Springer
AISC Link,
DBLP
Mr. Prahalad 23rd An Ingenious Encryption IJACEN 232 23 Volume- Google
Sharma March Technique for Video 0- 21- 6, Issue-1, Scholar
2018 210 20 Jan.-2018
6 63
10
17th Feb Contemporary Encryption YES
2018 Technique for Images using
CLEFIA
Ms. 17th Feb Contemporary Encryption ICCMC18
C.JebaNegaCh 2018 Technique for Images using
eltha CLEFIA
19th Feb A pioneering Encryption ICETEAS 978 465034(6
2018 Technique for images 2018 - 4)
981
-13-
11 228
4-6
23rd An Ingenious Encryption IJACEN 232 23 Volume- Google
March Technique for Video 0- 21- 6, Issue-1, Scholar
2018 210 20 Jan.-2018
6 63
Mr.Arihant 17-18 A review on face recognition ICETEAS
Kumar Jain Feb using raspberry pi 2018
2018
01/05/2 Review of Offline IJCTT 22 Volume
12 017 Handwriting Recognition 31- 47
Techniques in the fields of 28 Number 3
HCR and OCR 03
Ms.HemlataSo
13 ni Feb. Performance impact on ICETEAS Yes - SCOPUS,
2018 different parameters by the 2018 Springer SpringerLin
continuous evolution of AISC k, DBLP
distributed algorithms in
WSNs: A study
03/02/2 The drive for driverless cars: YES NIL NO
018 Mobility 4.0 T
Ms.RichaUpad 17-18 1.Comparative Analysis of ICETEAS yes
hyay Feb TCP, SCTP and MPTCP in 2018
14
2018 transport layer of wireless
sensor network
Ms. Seema 17-18 1.A Survey paper on different Yes yes
Yadav Feb Steganography Techniques.
15 2018 2. A Video Database for
Intelligent Video
Authentication

Self Assessment Report Page 201


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
16 Mr. Ankur Raj 17-18 1. A Survey paper on ICETEAS Yes - SCOPUS,
Feb different Steganography 2018 Springer Springer
2018 Techniques. AISC Link,
2. A Video Database for DBLP
Intelligent Video
Authentication
17 Mr. 17-18 1. A Survey paper on ICETEAS Yes - SCOPUS,
Shashikant Feb different Steganography 2018 Springer Springer
Singh 2018 Techniques. AISC Link,
2. A Video Database for DBLP
Intelligent Video
Authentication
18 Ms. Kirti Jan,201 MULTI-OBJECTIVE - yes 097 - - -
Choudhary 8 PARTICLE SWARM 6-
OPTIMIZATION FOR 636
FLEXIBLE JOB SHOP 7
SCHEDULING PROBLEM
GeetKalani 17-18 utility of li-fi in railways Yes nil in in in springer
feb 2018 pro pro progress
19 gres gre
s ss
GEERIJA 4-5 april Review of compression Yes ICITDA 232 VOL 12
LAVANIA 2018 standrads: H.264/AVC and 1-
20
H.265/HEVC standrads and 346
their comparison technique 9
GARIMA 17-18 utility of li-fi in railways Yes nil in in in springer
OJHA feb 2018 pro pro progress
21
gres gre
s ss
AMIT 15/10/2 Novel way of finding initial - YES - 24 VOL 2 GOOGLE
MITHAL 017 means in k-means clustering 56- ISSUE 5 SCHOLAR
22
and validation using WEKA 33
07
MANJU A Review on Software 23
VYAS Cost and Effort Estimation 49- Index
Octobe Techniques for Agile 76 vol 5 Copernicu
r 2017 Development Process IJRRA 88 issue1 s
23
Various techniques for 22
Spam Filtering using 50- VOl 8
April Machine Learning 24 Special
2018 Algorithms IJETAE 59 Issue 4
Table B.5.7.1d: Publication session 2017-18

2016-17
S.No. Name of Faculty/
Title of Paper Name of Journal, Volume, Isssue, Year, Page No.
Author
1 Model for Teaching Undergraduate-Level Database Management
Communication Technology(ICICT 2018)
Systems
27 - 28 February, 2018, Brunel University, London, UK,
To Be Published in Spa ringer-
AISC Series
Dr..(Prof) Vijay
SunghRathore Accepted & Presented in International World Conference
ASMAN Framework: A Framework for Comparison and on Smart Trends in Systems,
Selection of SaaS Services Security and Sustainability (WS4 2017) 15 - 16 February,
2017, London, United Kingdom,To Be Published in
Springer LNNS Series

Self Assessment Report Page 202


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Accepted & Presented in ICICT – 2016 Second
International Congress on Information and
Co mmunicat ion Technology 12 - 13 December, 2016
OTCA Approach towards Image Blob Estimation Bangkok, Thailand, To Be published
in Conference Proceedings by Springer AISC Series
http://www.springer.co m/series
Accepted & Presented in ICICT – 2016 Second
International Congress on Information and
Improved Google Page Rank Algorithm
Co mmunicat ion Technology 12 - 13 December, 2016
Bangkok, Thailand, To Be published
in Conference Proceedings by Springer AISC Series
http://www.springer.co m/series
Accepted & Presented in ICICT – 2016 Second
Unique Data Model (UDM) for Data Warehouse: International Congress on Information and
Limitations Co mmunicat ion Technology 12 - 13 December, 2016
Bangkok, Thailand, To Be published
in Conference Proceedings by Springer AISC Series
2
Chaplot N., Dhyani P., Rishi O.P. (2017) Predictive Approach of
CBR in Artificial Intelligence: A Case of Astrological Predictions
About the Status of Person. In: Modi N., Verma P., Trivedi B. Springer, Singapore. Print ISBN 978-981-10-2749-9,
(eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Communication Online ISBN 978-981-10-2750-5, DOI 10.1007/978-981-
and Networks. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 10-2750-5_64.
vol 508.
NeelamChaplot, Praveen Dhyani, and O. P. Rishi. (2016).
Ms.
Predictive Approach of Case Base Reasoning in Artificial
NeelamChaplot
Intelligence: In Case of Astrological Predictions About Famous ACM, New York, USA, Article, 89. ISBN: 978-1-4503-
Personalities. In Proceedings of the Second International 3962-9 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2905055.2905148
Conference on Information and Communication Technology for
Competitive Strategies (ICTCS '16).
International Journal of Computer Applications, Volume
Astrological Prediction for Profession Doctor using Classification
122 - Number 15, pp 28-31, DOI : 10.5120/21778-5052,
Techniques of Artificial Intelligence"
ISSN: 0975 – 8887.
3 Tiwari Rishi., Sharma Bhavna “A comparative study of Otsu and
Published in IEEE Xplore. DOI:
entropy based segmentation approaches for lesion extraction”, in
10.1109/INVENTIVE.2016.7823182
RTEICT-2016,
SaxenaMohit Bansal Priyanka, Sharma Bhavna, “Low error rate
based secure sharing of personal health record in cloud computing
using DWT steganography” ,8th International Conference on
Dr. Bhavna Sharma Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN
2016) published in IEEE Xplore
Sharma Bhavna., ShrivastvaDevesh., “Automatic Classification of
Hematomas in Brain CT Images using Support Vector Machines in
Second International Conference on ICT for Sustainable
Development (ICT4SD- 2016) held at Goa, India during 1 - 2
July,2016, LNNS, Springer series.
4 January 17 Volume 5 Issue 1 , International Journal on
Mr. Prashant “Improved Dynamic Parallel K-Means Algorithm using Dunn’s Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and
Yadav Index Method” Communication (IJRITCC), ISSN: 2321-8169, PP: 342 –
348
5
International Journal for Scientific Research &
Ms. Improvements in Corpus Quality for Statistical Machine
Development (IJSRD)[ISSN (online): 2321-0613],
ShikhaMaheswari Translation
Volume 2, Issue 05, 2014, Page No 125-127
6 International Journal of Recent and Innovation Trends in
Mr. Rajan Kr. Jha BATTLE AGAINST PHISHING
Computing & Computation -2013 Volume 1,Issue 4
7 Efficient malicious domain detection using word segmentation and Second International Conference on Recent Advances and
Mr. Sachin Gupta
BM pattern matching Innovations in Engineering -2016
8
International Journal of Recent and Innovation Trends in
Mr. Conservative multi-generational age based garbage collection with
Computing 7 Computation -2016 Volume 11,Issue 4 page
ShaileshArrawatia fast allocation
143-150
9 Ms. An innovative Encryption Method for Images using RSA, Honey IEEE International Conference ICCPEIC’17 on March
C.JebaNegaCheltha Encryption and inaccuracy tolerant system using Hamming code 22nd and 23rd March 2017, 978-1-5090-4324-8/17

Self Assessment Report Page 203


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
10
Mr.Arihant Kumar Review of Offline Handwriting Recognition Techniques in the International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology
Jain fields of HCR and OCR (IJCTT) – Volume 47 Number 3 May 2017

11 Suresh GyanVihar University Journal of Engineering &


Hybrid Approach to Search Engine Optimization (SEO)
Mr. Abhishek Dixit Technology (An International Bi‐Annual Journal) Vol. 1,
Techniques
Issue 2, 2015, pp.1-5 ISSN: 2395‐0196
12 Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on
Comparative analysis between Image denoising Algorithm based
Ms.GeetikaGautam Inventive Computation Technologies ( ICICT 2017)
on Wavelet transform
©IEEE
13
3.IJCAR,ISSN:O:2319-6475,ISSN:P:2319-6505,Impact
3.Adaptive Thresholding Wavelet based Denoising using Whale
Ms.RichaUpadhyay Factor:SJIF:5.995 Volume 6;Issue 9;September 2017;Page
Optimization Algorithm
No. 5743-5747

International Journal of Digital Application &


Ultrasonic Low Power Energy Aware Acoustic Data Modem for
Contemporary Research (IJDACR). ISSN: 2319–4863,
Underwater Data Communication in Underwater WSN
Volume 02 Issue 11, June- 2014.

International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trend in


14
Mr. Ankur Raj “Scanned Document Compression Technique” Computing and Communication (IJRITCC-2016) January
2016, ISSN: 2321–8369, Volume 04 Issue 11, Jan- 2016.

International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trend in


“Shadow Detection using DWT with Multi-wavelet Selection &
Computing and Communication (IJRITCC)ISSN: 2321–
User Configureurable Variance Parameter”
8369, Volume 03 Issue 11, Nov- 2015.
Proceedings of the 10th INDIACom; INDIACom-2016;
Job Shop Scheduling Algorithms- A Shift from Traditional IEEE Conference ID: 37465,2016 3rd International
15 Techniques to Non-Traditional Techniques Conference on “Computing for Sustainable Global
Development”, 16th - 18th March, 2016
International Conference on Information, Communication
Approaches to Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problem - A Survey and Computing Technology,Jagan Institute of
Management Studies, New Delhi
Particle Swarm Optimization: A Detailed Study in reference to Job INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF computer application
Shop Scheduling and Flexible Job Shop Scheduling {ISSN NO.:2250-1797, impact FACTOR*: 3.12 (2015)}
Ms. International Journal of Engineering Research &
KirtiChoudhary Particle Swarm Optimization Approach for Scheduling of Flexible Technology (IJERT),Vol. 1 Issue 5, July - 2012,ISSN:
Job Shops 2278-0181
Wide area of Expert system in artificial intelligence
International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering,
“Three Tier architecture of Data Warehouse”.
Management & Applied Science (IJLTEMAS)
“Real Time Toll Rate Determination Using Image Processing &
International journal of computer science(IJCS)
Network Database”.
Modified Round Robin Algorithm International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering,
Management & Applied Science (IJLTEMAS)

ActaPhysicaPolonica B, Volume 47, October 2016, pp.


16 Anoop Mehta Controlling Spread of Rumor using Neighbor Centrality
2325-2339.
International Journal of Engineering Research &
17 Ashima Tiwari Security Issues In MANET and Black Hole Attack : A review Technology (IJERT)
, Vol. 2 Issue 11, ISSN: 2278-0181, November - 2013
Twin wavelet frame difference based multiple moving objects
18 Hemlata Soni IEEE Explore ICRAIE 2016
detection and tracking surveillance applications
Table 5.7.1 e: Publication session 2016-17

Self Assessment Report Page 204


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
2015-16
JAIPUR ENGINEERING COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE, JAIPUR
Department: Computer Science and Engineering Session:2015-
16
Publication
S# Faculty Date of Paper title ISSN E-ISSN Volume/Issue Source & Indexing
publication
1 Mr. A Novel Approach For web Volume: 3 Issue:
Prahalad August-2015 Page Ranking Based on Weights 2321-8169 NIL 8, PP: 5268 – NIL
Sharma of links 5272
2 An Enhanced Page Ranking
Mr. Algorithm Based
Volume 34
Prahalad Apr 2016 on Weights and Third level 2231-2803 NIL NIL
Number 1
Sharma Ranking of the
Webpages
3 Efficient malicious domain
978-1-
Mr. Sachin detection using word
Dec 2016 5090-2806 5090- IEEE
Gupta segmentation and BM pattern
2807-8
matching algorithm
4 RESEARCHERID
THOMSON REUTERS,
Mr. Conservative Multi-Generational Volume: 4 Issue:
cross ref,
ShaileshAr Nov, 2016 Age-Based Garbage Collection 2321-8169 11, PP: 143 –
worldjournalAlerts,
rawatia with Fast Allocation 150
Academia.edu,Google
Scholar
5 Shadow Detection using DWT ISSN:
ISSN: Volume: 3 Issue:
Nov,2015 with Multi-Wavelet Selection & 2321- 6422 - 6426
Mr. Ankur 2321-8169 11
user 8170
Raj
ISSN:
Scanned Document ISSN: Volume: 4 Issue:
Jan,2016 2321- 103 - 108
Compression Technique 2321-8169 1
8170
6 Job Shop Scheduling IEEE
Ms.
Algorithms- A Shift from Confere
KirtiChoud March,2016 - - -
Traditional Techniques to Non- nce ID:
hary
Traditional Techniques 37465
7
Mr. Amit A Graceful Motion of Robot Elixir International
Nov, 2015
Mithal using SLAM and Kalman Filter Journal - November 2015

8 (IJRITCC) International
Journal on Recent and
Mr. A Novel Approach For web Innovation Trends in
Prahalad August 2015 Page Ranking Based on Weights Computing and
Sharma of links Communication, pp.
5268-5272, volume: 3
Issue: 8-August-2015
9
Ms. Astrological prediction for IEEE
IEEE Conference ISBN
Neelam 2015 profession using classification Confere
978-1-4799-8889-1
Chaplot techniques of AI nce

Table 5.7.1f: Publication session 2017-18

Self Assessment Report Page 205


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
E. Course Development
S.no Faculty Name Course Duration Year
1 Dr. Sanjay Gaur Digital Marketing 7 days CAY
2 Dr. NilamChoudhary Latex & Python 6 Days CAY
3 Mr. Mohit Jain Programming Exercise 15 Days CAY
4 Ms. Geetika Gautam Writing Review Papers 10 Days CAY
CAYm1
Table 5.7.1g: Course Development
CAYm1

5.7.2. Sponsored Research (5)

 Funded research:

(Provide a list with Project Title, Funding Agency, Amount and Duration)

Funding amount (Cumulative during CAYm1, CAYm2 and CAYm3):


Amount >20 Lakh – 5 Marks
Amount >= 16 Lakh and <= 20 Lakh – 4 Marks
Amount >= 12 Lakh and < 16 Lakh – 3 Marks
Amount >= 8 Lakh and < 12 Lakh – 2 Marks
Amount >= 4 Lakhand< 8 Lakh – 1 Mark
Amount <4 Lakh – 0 Mark

2017-2018: NIL

2016-17: NIL

2015-16:

Name of PI Project Title Duration Funding Amount


Agency
Mr. Mukesh Validation and 3 years DST 42,56,500/-
Agarwal Scientific basis of CSRI
meditation and
omnics to cure
various diseases
and their role as
therapeutic targets.
Table B.5.7.2: Sponsored Research Details

5.7.3. Development activities (10)


Provide details:
 Product Development
 Research laboratories
 Instructional materials
 Working models/charts/monograms etc.

Self Assessment Report Page 206


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
S.No. Project Title Team Members Description
1 Try A-Gain...JINDA- Diwanshu Soni, Ayush The Anti Blue Whale Game i.e. "Try
DIL-KHEL Khandelwal, Aman Vijay, A-Gain...JINDA-DIL-KHEL" which
Divyang Bhargava, Aniket Dixit gives hundreds of reason to live the
and Apoorva Agrawal under the life with the smile while connecting
kind guidance of Prof. (Dr.) Vijay users to their roots.
Singh Rathore, Head- CSE & Ms.
ShikhaMaheshwari, Assistant
Professor, CSE, JECRC
2 Handy application to Tarun Jain, Sankalp Gupta, Vivek Project aims to build a handy
connect farmers Gupta, Vinayak Parashar, Atul application to connect farmers directly
Dada, Shubham Sharma to their target consumers like retailers.
Which removes the middleman cost
involved in the transmission chain?
The algorithm of the application
ensures that retailers or wholesalers to
get the items from the farmers which
are at nearest distance and providing
overall least cost. It is developed in
Smart India Hackathon 2017 for
Ministry of Food Processing.
3 Department of Rural Vishnu Singh, Chitrangana Singh, The App ensures fund transfer and
Development Samarth Paboowal, Ankush Goyal, flow from banks to all rural areas also
Lokesh Devnani, Priyanka Goyal ensure the validity of the same
4 The Ultimates Tejasv Kulshrestha, Srishti Jain This App provides the information
Utkarsh Mundra, Umesh Kumar about the availability of seats in the
bus at the upcoming stations.
5 Krishi Labh Deekshant Mamodia, Astha Koul This app is for the framer which
ShubhamSharma,ApurviMansingh describes the techniques and process
ka,Atul Dada for how to do best farming.
6 ISeeu Nakul Joshi,Pallavi Agarwal, This app is based on AI Technology
MeenalJain,SejalJain,Priyanka which is used for face detctetion of
Maheshwari ,Lakshya Khandelwal person with all details
Table B.5.7.1.3a: Product Development

Research laboratories
S.No Name of Faculty Research lab name Faculty member/Student name
1 Dr.Vijay Singh Rathore CP-1 Mr. Sandeep Sharma
Ms. Aparajita Dixit
2 Dr.Vijay Singh Rathore CP-2 Ms. Savita Sharma
Ms. Mamta Dadhich
3 Dr.Sanjay Gaur CP-3 Mr.NKTanna
Ms.Darshanapandya
4 Dr.Sanjay Gaur CP-4 Mr.BaaweshKumawat
Ms. Kanchan Parihar
Table B.5.7.1.3b: Research laboratories

Self Assessment Report Page 207


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Instructional materials

 Course file:
Each & every faculty prepare course wise lecture schedules, resource material and other related instr
uction material before commencement of semester and is added to moodle. The students can login an
d access the content though internet.

 PowerPoint Presentation:
Content wise instruction material is developed including PPT presentations, for all the courses prior t
o the commencement of each semester which is monitored by course coordinators.


Hand Outs:
Where ever necessary, additional material and hand outs are prepared and the same is made a
vailable to students through Moodle.

 Laboratory manuals:
Laboratory manuals: are prepared and Laboratory instruction is given through Lab manuals at the be
ginning of each semester and demonstration classes are delivered for better understanding of concept
s behind laboratory experiment.

Working models/charts/monograms etc.

 Relevant Charts are displayed in all Laboratories so that realization becomes easy for the students
 A project model competition titled “J-TechTrix” held every year for students to enhance their
interpersonal and intrapersonal skills.
 The department has many models created by students and are been displayed in Laboratories. Thi
s prototype models helps the students to understand the working of basics and recent technologies
in a better manner.

5.7.4. Consultancy (from Industry) (5)


(Provide a list with Project Title, Funding Agency, Amount and Duration)
Funding amount (Cumulative during CAYm1, CAYm2 and CAYm3):
Amount >10 Lakh – 5 Marks
Amount >= 8 Lakh and <= 10 Lakh – 4 Marks
Amount >= 6 Lakh and <8 Lakh – 3 Marks
Amount >= 4 Lakh and <6 Lakh – 2 Marks
Amount >= 2 Lakh and <4 Lakh – 1 Mark
Amount <2 Lakh – 0 Mark

2017-18
S.No Name Project Title Funding Agency Amount Duration

1 Dr. Vijay Singh Indian Higher Education GR Foundation 3,60,000 July,2017


Rathore Knowledge Delegation
to UK
Table B.5.7.1.4a: Consultancy Details 2017-18

Self Assessment Report Page 208


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
2016-17

S.No. Name Project Title Funding Amount Dura


Agency tion
1 Mr. ShaileshArrawatia, Assistant Services for Therachem Rs.16,000/- 01/04/2016 to
Professor in Computer Science establishing Research 30/04/2016.
Engineering Department and Mr. Sunil the Computer Medilab(I)
Bhardwaj, System Administrator Networking Pvt.Ltd
2 Mr. Mukesh Agrawal and Mr. Services for JECRC Rs: 21,000/- 01/05/2016 to
RajanJha, Assistant Professor along setting up of University
with Mr. Bhupendra Singh, Lab Computer Lab 30/06/2016.
Technician 15

3 Ms. ShikhaMaheshwari and Ms. Services for JECRC Rs: 22,000/- 01/05/2016 to
Richa Sharma, Assistant Professor setting up of University
along alongwithMr. Computer Lab 30/06/2016.
KaushalendraNagoria, Lab Technician 16

4 Mr. Sachin Gupta, Mr. Buddhi Services for JECRC Rs: 22,500 01/05/2016 to
Prakash, Mr. setting up of University 30/06/2016
PrahaladSharmaalongwithMr. Shyam Networking
Sunder Sharma,Lab Technicians facility in labs
CP-15,16
5 Mr. Abhishek Dixit, Assistant Services for JECRC Rs.12,500/- 01/04/2016 to
Professor along with Mr. installation of University
TovindraSahu, Lab Technician CCTV 30/05/2016.
cameras

6 Mr. Kishan Sharma and Mr. Bir Singh, consultant for JECRC Rs: 10,000/- 01/05/2016
Lab Technician setting up of University
Wi-Fi in Boys to30/06/2016.
Hostel-3

7 Mr. Anil Sharma and Mr. Atul Sharma consultancy JECRC Rs: 12,500/- 01/05/2016 to
for Wi-Fi University
Lab Technician 30/06/2016.
Setup in Girls
Hostel

Total
:116,500

Table B.5.7.1.4b: Consultancy Details 2016-17

Self Assessment Report Page 209


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
2015-16

Name Project Title Funding Amoun Duration


S.No. Agency t
1 Mr. Mukesh Agrawal and Mr. Prashant setting up of JECRC Rs: 01/05/2015
Yadav, Assistant Professor Computer Lab 8 University 24,500 to
/- 30/06/2015
Mr. Anil Sharma, Lab Technician
2 Ms. NeelamChaplot and Ms. Services for JECRC 10/05/2015
ShikhaMaheshwari, Assistant Professor setting up of University Rs:
Computer Lab 9 to
Mr. Shyam Sunder Sharma, Lab 25000/
Technician - 10/07/2015.

3 Mr. Amit Mithal and Mr. Abhishek Dixit, Services for JECRC 01/05/2015
setting up of University
Assistant Professor Rs:27, to
Computer Lab
Mr. Bhupendra Singh, Lab Technician 10 500/- 30/06/2015.

4 Mr. Sunil Bhardwaj, System Administrator Services for JECRC 21/05/2015


along with Mr. TovindraSahu, Mr. Atul Networking University Rs: to
Sharma, Mr. KaushlendraNagoria, Lab facility in labs 30,000 20/07/2015.
Technician CP-8,9,10

Total: Rs. 1,07,000

Table B.5.7.1.4c: Consultancy Details 2015-16

5.8. Faculty Performance Appraisal and Development System (FPADS) (30)

Faculty members of Higher Educational Institutions today have to perform a variety of tasks pertaining to
diverse roles. In addition to instruction, Faculty members need to innovate and conduct research for their self-renewal,
keep abreast with changes in technology, and develop expertise for effective implementation of curricula. They are also
expected to provide services to the industry and community for understanding and contributing to the solution of real life
problems in industry. Another role relates to the shouldering of administrative responsibilities and co-operation with
other Faculty, Heads-of-Departments and the Head of Institute. An effective performance appraisal system for Faculty is
vital for optimizing the contribution of individual Faculty to institutional performance.The assessment is based on:
 A well-defined system for faculty appraisal for all the assessment years (10)
 Its implementation and effectiveness (20)

Self Assessment Report Page 210


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Jaipur Engineering College and Research Centre, Jaipur
FACULTY APPRAISAL FORM (Session 2017-18)
For best faculty award
Total 200 points
Name of Faculty Member: Department:
Designation:
S. Item Name Maximu Points
No. m obtained
Points
1 Academic result 30 points average (90% students having more than 70% : 30 30
points, 80-89% students having more than 70% result: 27 points, 70-79%
students having more than 70% result: 24 points, 60-69% students having more
than 70% result: 21, 60-69% students having more than 60% result: 18 points,
50-59% students having more than 60% result: 15 points else ZERO)
Example:
Theory Subject Points obtained
Sub-1 30
Sub-2 27
Sub-3 0
Sub-4 18
Average points scored 75/4 i.e. 18.75
No marks for Labs subjects

2 Research Publication 20 points average (1 sci indexed publication: 10 points, 1 20


publication having ISSN number : 5 points, Else ZERO)
3 Faculty development programme 10 point average (one faculty development 10
programme minimum 5 days attended 5 points, 2 points for attending 2 days
workshop, subject to maximum of 10)
4 International / National conference 10 points average ( 5 points for attending 10
International, 3 points for attending National of repute, 2 points for National
conference)
5 Research grant average 20 points for having grant of more than 5 lakh, if only 20
project submitted to DST/other govt agency: 10 points, subject to maximum 20
6 Patent 10 points / Product development / startup 10 points 10
7 New Skills / additional specialization / certification course 25
8 Innovation in teaching learning, video lecture, online MOOCs, Online notes 20
uploading, any other 20 points
9 Technical activity organized 5 points 5
10 Participation in social responsibility 5 points / activity subject to maximum of 10
10
11 Institute level activity organized 5 points, participation 2 points subject to
maximum of 5 5
12 Any award received, session chair in conference, guest lecture, invited talk, etc. 5
5 points
13 HOD recommendation maximum 30 points (Departmental responsibility 2 30
points, NBA related activity 5)
Total 200
Note: HOD will verify the documentary proof. Signature of Faculty
Signature of HOD

Based on the Above API report faculty members are given appreciation/advisory
Format for same is mentioned below

Self Assessment Report Page 211


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Advisory noteAppreciation letter

5.9. Visiting/Adjunct/Emeritus Faculty etc. (10)

Adjunct faculty also includes Industry experts. Provide details of participation and contributions in teaching and
learning and /or research by visiting/adjunct/Emeritus faculty etc. for all the assessment years:
 Provision of inviting/having visiting/adjunct/emeritus faculty (1)
 Minimum 50 hours per year interaction with adjunct faculty from industry/retired professors etc.
(Minimum 50 hours interaction in a year will result in 3 marks for that year; 3 marks x 3 years = 9 marks)
Jaipur Engineering College and Research Centre
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Details of Adjunct Faculty, Workshop 2017-18
S.No Name of Faculty Involvement in Duration Total Whether the subject
Conference/Semi Teaching covers the RTU
nar/Workshop hours Syllabus or
1 Mr. Vimal Daga Big Data 28Oct 2017 1 Day additional
Beyond Syllabus to
Syllabus
2 Mr. Vimal Daga Machine Learning 9th feb2018 1 Day VI Sem. AI
12 Hrs. in one
20 Dec. month (
3. Mr. Kaushal Kumar 2017 12*3=36Hrs) 4th and 3th Semesters
12 Hrs. in one
20 Dec. month (
4. Dr. KushumRajawat Cyber Security 2017 12*3=36Hrs) 7th and 8th Semesters
12 Hrs. in one 5th and 6th Semesters
Prof.(Dr.) Naveen 19th Dec. month (
5. Hemrajani IOT 2017 12*3=36Hrs)
Table B.5.9a: Details of Adjunct/Visiting Faculty 2017-18

Self Assessment Report Page 212


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Jaipur Engineering College and Research Centre
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Details of Adjunct Faculty 2016-17
S.No Name of Faculty Involvement in Duration TotalTeachi Whether the subject
Conference/Semina ng hours covers the RTU
r/Workshop Syllabus or
th
1 Dr. KushumRajawat Cyber Security 10 Dec. 12 Hrs. in 8 and 7th Semestersto
additional
2016 one month ( Syllabus
12*3=36Hrs
2 Prof.(Dr.) Naveen IOT th
5 Dec. )12 Hrs. in 8th and 7th Semesters
Hemrajani 2016 one month (
12*3=36Hrs
3 )16 Hrs. in
20 Dec. one month (
Mr. Kaushal Kumar 2017 12*3=36Hrs 4th and 3th Semesters
4 Mr. Michael Canon International 10-09- )3 Hours On Open Source
Chief Operating Officer, Workshop on Open 2016 technology tools (7
Axelerant Technologies, Source Software, Sem web design lab)
6 Inc.,Nathan
Mr. Atlanta,Roach
US (Japan), Drupal”
International 10-09- 3 Hours Drupal Tool (Course
Content marketing Workshop on Open 2016 beyond Syllabus)
associate, Source Software,
7 AxelerantTechnologies,
ShriKaushal Kumar, Drupal Session on October
Technical 6 Hours Course beyond
Inc., Atlanta,
Technical US
Manager, e- Internet of Things 15, 2016 Syllabus
Infochips, Ahmedabad –
380 006.
8 Mr. Vimal Daga Workshop on Big 21/01/2017 6 Hours Bridging gap
Linux World Pvt. Ltd. Data between academics
Jaipur & Industry
Table B.5.9b: Details of Adjunct/Visiting Faculty 2016-17

Jaipur Engineering College and Research Centre


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Details of experts from industry 2015-16
S.No Name of Faculty Involvement in Duration Total Whether the subject covers
Conference/Seminar/ Teaching the RTU Syllabus or
Workshop hours additional to Syllabus

1 Mr. NavneetTiwari Microsoft Certification 25-05-2015 3 Hours daily 7B.Tech.7A(Web


Summer training to Designing),this covers User
Program in .NET 24-07-2015 interface design, styles and
themes
2 Mr. RanjanChhetri Microsoft Certification 25-05-2015 3 Hours daily Bridging gap between
Summer training to academics & Industry
Program in Android 24-07-2015
3 Mr. Abhishek Microsoft Certification 25-05-2015 3 Hours daily 6B.Tech.7A(Java)
Singh Rathore Summer training to It includes basic java
Program in Core Java 24-07-2015 programming language
4 Mr. Aditya Kumar Microsoft Certification 25-05-2015 3 Hours daily 6B.Tech.7A(Java)
Summer training to It includes advanced java
Program in Advance 24-07-2015 programming such as servlet
Java and applet

Self Assessment Report Page 213


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
5 Mr. AshishRathore Microsoft Certification 25-05-2015 3 Hours daily Bridging gap between
Summer training to academics & Industry
Program in Embedded 30-05-2015
& Robotics with AVR
Controller
6 Mr. Amit Kumar PHP &MySQL Training 13-07-2015 40 hours 5B.Tech.4A(DBMS)
Faculty, Program to It Covers basic and
SigmatechInfotech 25-07-2015 Advanced SQL queries in
, Jaipur addition to PHP
7 Mr. Khawar Butt Seminar on Networking 07-10-2015 4 Hours 6B.Tech1A.(Networking) It
Senior Network Covers advanced networking
Consultant, tools and techniques and its
Synergy Network practical knowledge
Ltd.
8 FACE Pre Placement training 12-10-2015 18 Hours Bridging gap between
Program by FACE to academics & Industry
14-10-2015
9 Mr.RakeshJangid Workshop on Big Data 11-01-2016 4 hours Bridging gap between
(Cloubia & Hadoop academics & Industry
Technologies Pvt.
Ltd.)

10 Ms. Richa Mehta Seminar on Respberry- 27-02-2016 4 hours Bridging gap between
(Appin Pi academics & Industry
technologies Lab,
Jaipur)

Table B.5.9c: Details of experts from industry 2015-16

Self Assessment Report Page 214


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Criteria 6
FACILITIES AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT
(80)

Self Assessment Report Page 215


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
CRITERION 6 Facilities and Technical Support 80

6. FACILITIES AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT (80)

6.1 Adequate and well equipped laboratories, and technical manpower (30)

ODD SEMESTER-2017-18

Weekly
Sr. Lab Name of No. of Name of the Important Name of Designation Quali
utilization
No No. the students equipment the ficati
status (all
Laborato per technical on
the
ry setup(Batc staff
courses
h size)
for which
the lab is
utilized

rd
1 CP 3 24 Intel H61 Chipset, Intel Corei- Kaushalend Sr. Lab MCA
LAB semester 3, 2100, 3.1Ghz, 3M Cache, ra Nagoria Instructor
(Available 33
1 Data 2x2 GB DDR3 Ram, 1333
32 PC)
Structures Mhz, 320 GB SATA 3.0
Lab/ Gbps, 7200, DVD RW, HCL
TH USB Heavy duty Keyboard,
7 Sem –
HCL USB 2 button Optical
Web
Mouse, HCL Digital Colour
Designing
TFT-LED Monitor 18.5",
Lab
uATX (Dasher)

Intel H61 Chipset, Intel


2 CP 7thSem- 24 33 Tovindra Sr. Lab MCA
Corei-3, 2100, 3.1Ghz, 3M
LAB Compiler Kumar Instructor
(Available Cache, 2x2 GB DDR3 Ram,
2 Constructi Sahu
28 PC 1333 Mhz, 320 GB SATA
on/Web
3.0 Gbps, 7200, DVD RW,
Designing
HCL USB Heavy duty
Lab
Keyboard, HCL USB 2
button Optical Mouse, HCL
Digital Colour TFT-LED
Monitor 18.5", uATX
(Dasher)
Software- Ubuntu, Windo, ,
Acrobat reader, Winrarws
XP, Java, Turbo C++

Self Assessment Report Page 216


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
HCL 18.5" LED,Intel Core
3 CP 5thSem- 24 27 Atul Lab Tech. MCA
i3-3220 3.30 Ghz, Intel H61
LAB System Sharma
(Available Chipset,320 GB SATA, 2X2
Design in
3 28 PC DDR3 RAM, 10/100/1000
UML Lab/
Lan, DVD RW
Software- Ubuntu, Windows
XP, Java, gcc, Model Sim,
Acrobat reader, Winrar

HCL 18.5" LED,Intel Core


4 CP 5thSem- 24 27 Bhupendra Lab Tech. PGD
i3-3220 3.30 Ghz, Intel H61
LAB Database Singh CA
(Available Chipset,320 GB SATA, 2X2
4 Lab)
28 PC DDR3 RAM, 10/100/1000
Lan, DVD RW Software-
Windows XP, Oracle 10g,
My Sql , Acrobat reader,
Winrar

Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400


5 CP Digital (Available 18 RamkeshM Lab Tech. M.Co
CPU @ 3.10GHz (4 CPUs),
LAB Library 10 PC eena m
3.1GHz, DH61WW MB,
5
NVIDIA GeForce 210
Graphics Card, 8 GB DDR3
RAM, Segate HDD 500 GB
SATA, Logitech USB MM
KB, Logitech USB Mouse,
LG DVD RW, Samsung SA-
300 19.5" LED
Software- Windows 8, MS
office Professonla, Acrobat
reader, Winrar

HCL PIV 3.0 HT, 512


6 CP 3Rd SEM- 24 24 RamkeshM Lab Tech. M.Co
DDRII, HDD80, 17" TFT,
LAB Unix shell eena m
(Available HCL USB Keyboard, HCL
6 programm
28 PC USB Mouse, Asus 865/915
ing lab/
MB software- Ubuntu,
5thsem-
Windows XP, Java, Turbo
operating
C++, , Acrobat reader,
System
Winrar
Simulatio
n Lab

Self Assessment Report Page 217


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
HCL PIV 3.0 HT, 512
7 CP 3rdSem- 24 27 ShyamSund Lab Tech. MCA
DDRII, HDD80, 17" TFT,
LAB C++ ar Sharma
(Available HCL USB Keyboard, HCL
7 Programm
28 PC USB Mouse, Asus 865/915
ing Lab
MB Software’s- Ubuntu,
Windows XP, Java, gcc,
Model Sim, Xiline, , Acrobat
reader, Winrar

Intel H61 Chipset, Intel


8 CP 5thSem- 24 27 Narendra Lab Tech. DCA
Corei-3, 2100, 3.1Ghz, 3M
LAB Operating Uchanniya
(Available Cache, 2x2 GB DDR3 Ram,
8 System
28 PC 1333 Mhz, 320 GB SATA
Simulatio
3.0 Gbps, 7200, DVD RW,
n Lab
HCL USB Heavy duty
Keyboard, HCL USB 2
button Optical Mouse, HCL
Digital Colour TFT-LED
Monitor 18.5", uATX
(Dasher)Software- Windows
XP, Oracle 10g, My Sql ,
Acrobat reader, Winrar

HCLIntel core(TM)i3 3220


9 IBM 7THSem 64 18 MukeshCha Lab Tech. M.Sc.
[email protected], 3300MHz
– Project ndel (CS)
LAB 2Core(s),2 Logical Pro. .
Lab
4GB DDR3 RAM, 320 GB
SATA HDD,DVDRW, HCL
18.5” LED, USB KB &
Mouse, Software- Windows
8, MS office Professonla,
Acrobat reader, Winrar

10 CP 7THSem 24 HCL Dual-core E- 33 DashrathVe Lab Tech. B.Te


LAB Web [email protected], G-41 Intel rma ch.
(Available Chipset MB, 2GB DDR3
21 Desining
28 PC RAM, SATA 160 GB HDD,
Lab/
DVD RW, HCL MM PS 2
5thSem- KB, HCL USB OPTICAL
Digital Mouse, HCL 18.5" wide
Hardware LCD with speaker
Design Software- Windows XP,
Lab Java, Acrobat reader, Winrar

Self Assessment Report Page 218


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
11 CP 7thSem- 24 HCL Dual-core E- 27 Anil Kumar Lab Tech. PGD
LAB VLSI - [email protected], G-41 Intel Sharma CA
(Available Chipset MB, 2GB DDR3
22 Physical
28 PC RAM, SATA 160 GB HDD,
Design
DVD RW, HCL MM PS 2
Lab KB, HCL USB OPTICAL
Mouse, HCL 18.5" wide
LCD with speaker
Software- Windows XP,
Java, Acrobat reader, Winrar
Table B.6.1a: Odd Semester 2017-18

Even Semester (2017-18)

Sr. Lab Name of the No, of Name of the Important Weekly Technical Manpower Support
No No. Laboratory studen equipment utilization
ts per status (all Name of Designati Qualificatio
setup( the the on n
Batch courses technical
size) for which staff
the lab is
utilized

Intel H61 Chipset, Intel


Corei-3, 2100, 3.1Ghz, 3M
Cache, 2x2 GB DDR3 Ram,
th
6 Sem-Design 1333 Mhz, 320 GB SATA 3.0
& Analysis Gbps, 7200, DVD RW, HCL
CP
Algorithm USB Heavy duty Keyboard, Kaushalendr Sr. Lab
1 LAB 24 33 MCA
Lab/ HCL USB 2 button Optical a Nagoria Instructor
1
Computer Mouse, HCL Digital Colour
Graphics Lab TFT-LED Monitor 18.5",
uATX (Dasher)Ubuntu,
Windows XP, Java, Turbo
C++, , Acrobat reader, Winrar

Intel H61 Chipset, Intel


Corei-3, 2100, 3.1Ghz, 3M
th Cache, 2x2 GB DDR3 Ram,
4 Sem 1333 Mhz, 320 GB SATA 3.0
CP Business Gbps, 7200, DVD RW, HCL
Entrepreneurs Tovindra Sr. Lab
2 LAB 24 USB Heavy duty Keyboard, 12 MCA
hip Kumar Sahu Instructor
2 HCL USB 2 button Optical
Development Mouse, HCL Digital Colour
Lab TFT-LED Monitor 18.5",
uATX (Dasher)Software-
Ubuntu, Windo, ,Acrobat

Self Assessment Report Page 219


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
reader, Winrarws XP, Java,
TurboC

HCL 18.5" LED,Intel Core


th
8 Sem – i3-3220 3.30 Ghz, Intel H61
CP FPGA Lab/ Chipset,320 GB SATA, 2X2
th
LAB 6 Sem- DDR3 RAM, 10/100/1000 Atul
3 24 33 Lab Tech. MCA
Humanities Lan, DVD RW Software- Sharma
3 Ubuntu, Windows XP, Java,
and Social
Sciences gcc, Model Sim, Acrobat
reader, Winrar

HCL 18.5" LED,Intel Core


8thSem- i3-3220 3.30 Ghz, Intel H61
CP Digital Image Chipset,320 GB SATA, 2X2
Bhupendra
4 LAB Processing 24 DDR3 RAM, 10/100/1000 30 Lab Tech. PGDCA
Singh
4 Lab/ 6THSem Lan, DVD RW Software-
– HSS Windows XP, Oracle 10g, My
Sql , Acrobat reader, Winrar

Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400


CPU @ 3.10GHz (4 CPUs),
3.1GHz, DH61WW MB,
NVIDIA GeForce 210
Graphics Card, 8 GB DDR3
CP RAM, Segate HDD 500 GB
RamkeshMe
5 LAB 10 SATA, Logitech USB MM Lab Tech. M.Com
ena
5 KB, Logitech USB Mouse,
Digital Library LG DVD RW, Samsung SA- 18
300 19.5" LED Software-
Windows 8, MS office
Professonla, Acrobat reader,
Winrar

HCL PIV 3.0 HT, 512


th DDRII, HDD80, 17" TFT,
8 Sem- UNPS
CP HCL USB Keyboard, HCL
Lab/ 6thSem- RamkeshMe
6 LAB 24 USB Mouse, Asus 865/915 33 Lab Tech. M.Com
Computer ena
6 MB Software- Ubuntu,
Graphics Lab
Windows XP, Java, Turbo
C++, , Acrobat reader, Winrar

HCL PIV 3.0 HT, 512


DDRII, HDD80, 17" TFT,
6thSem-JAVA HCL USB Keyboard, HCL
CP
Lab/ USB Mouse, Asus 865/915 ShyamSund
7 LAB 25 33 Lab Tech. MCA
Computer MB Software’s- Ubuntu, ar Sharma
7
Graphics Lab Windows XP, Java, gcc,
Model Sim, Xiline, , Acrobat
reader, Winrar

Self Assessment Report Page 220


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Intel H61 Chipset, Intel
Corei-3, 2100, 3.1Ghz, 3M
Cache, 2x2 GB DDR3 Ram,
1333 Mhz, 320 GB SATA 3.0
CP 6thSem- CASE
Gbps, 7200, DVD RW, HCL Narendra
8 LAB Lab/ 4thSem- 25 33 Lab Tech. DCA
USB Heavy duty Keyboard, Uchanniya
8 BED Lab
HCL USB 2 button Optical
Mouse, HCL Digital Colour
TFT-LED Monitor 18.5",
uATX

HCL 18.5" LED,Intel Core


i3-3220 3.30 Ghz, Intel H61
Chipset,320 GB SATA, 2X2
IBM 8thSem – DDR3 RAM, 10/100/1000 Mukesh
9 64 Lan, DVD RW Software- 18 Lab Tech. M.Sc. (CS)
LAB Project Lab Chandel
Windows XP, Java, gcc,
Acrobat reader, Winrar

Table B.6.1b: Even Semester 2017-18

Jaipur Engineering College Research Centre, Jaipur


COMPUTER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
AREA of LAB
S.No Name Name of Course Name of the Laboratories Total area of Lab

1 Computer B.Tech. Computer B.Tech. Computer Lab-1 7.5*7.5=56.25sq.m


Lab-1 Engineering GROUND FLOOR (Main
Building)
Table B.6.1c: Area of lab

Self Assessment Report Page 221


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
List of Equipments and its Configuration

Equipment
S.No. Name Brand Model No. Specification Vendor Invoice No. Date Qty Rate Amount Location
Computer Infiniti L A HCL 11-02-
1 System HCL 380 TRU i3 System Infosystems Ltd. 3239505512 2013 4 23520 94080 CP1
Computer Infiniti L A HCL 28-06-
2 System HCL 380 PRO i3 System Infosystems Ltd. 6000058524 2011 28 20550 575400 CP1
Network Cisco SF- Alliance 01-10-
3 Switch Cisco 300 48 Port Technologies 297/2011-12 2011 1 20400 20400 CP1
Network Alliance 01-10-
4 Switch Linkksys SLM-224 G2 24 Port Technologies 297/2011-12 2011 1 9800 9800 CP1
Alliance 01-10-
5 Patch Panel Dlink 24 Port Technologies 297/2011-12 2011 3 4350 13050 CP1
Network COMRac Alliance 01-10-
6 Rack k 9U Rack Technologies 298/2011-12 2011 1 4800 4800 CP1
OnLine CM/08- 25-03-
7 UPS DB HN 15 KVA Computer Media 09/253 2009 1 187200 187200 CP1-2
Computer Infiniti L A HCL 11-02-
8 System HCL 380 TRU i3 System Infosystems Ltd. 3239505513 2013 28 23520 658560 CP19
Computer Infiniti L A HCL 11-02-
9 System HCL 380 TRU i3 System Infosystems Ltd. 3239505512 2013 28 23520 658560 CP2
Computer Infiniti L A HCL 26-06-
10 System HCL 380 PRO i3 System Infosystems Ltd. 6000058524 2011 3 20550 61650 CP20
Computer Infiniti L A HCL 11-02-
11 System HCL 380 TRU i3 System Infosystems Ltd. 3239505512 2013 7 23520 164640 CP20
Surbhi
Computer Electronet Pvt 13-01-
12 System HP HP 202 i3 System Ltd 224 2015 14 33285 465990 CP20
Computer 21-09-
13 System Compaq E5200 Dual Core Cyber Space 481 2009 4 20748 82992 CP20
Computer Infiniti L A HCL 11-02-
14 System HCL 380 TRU i3 System Infosystems Ltd. 3239505513 2013 28 23520 658560 CP21
Computer Infiniti L A HCL 11-02-
15 System HCL 380 TRU i3 System Infosystems Ltd. 3239505512 2013 28 23520 658560 CP3
PCL XD LCD Hindustan 15-07-
16 Projector Sanyo 2600 Projector Communication 91 2011 1 32000 32000 CP3
OnLine CM/08- 25-03-
17 UPS DB HN 10 KVA Computer Media 09/253 2009 1 140400 140400 CP-3-4

Self Assessment Report Page 222


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
PCL XD LCD Hindustan 15-07-
18 Projector Sanyo 2600 Projector Communication 91 2011 1 32000 32000 CP4
Computer Infiniti L A HCL 11-02-
19 System HCL 380 TRU i3 System Infosystems Ltd. 3239505512 2013 28 23520 658560 CP4
PCL XD LCD Hindustan 15-07-
20 Projector Sanyo 2600 Projector Communication 91 2011 1 32000 32000 CP5
Motorize Hindustan 15-07-
21 Screen Screen Communication 91 2011 1 7500 7500 CP5
Surbhi
Computer Assemble Electronet Pvt 23-02-
22 System d i5 System i5 System Ltd 501 2012 10 35200 352000 CP5
Computer HCL 28-06-
23 System HCL P4 System Infosystems Ltd. 6090000279 2006 28 26989 755699 CP6
OnLine CM/08- 25-03-
24 UPS DB HN 10 KVA Computer Media 09/253 2009 1 140400 140400 CP6
Computer HCL 28-06-
25 System HCL P4 System Infosystems Ltd. 6090000279 2006 28 26989 755699 CP7
Computer Infiniti L A HCL 26-06-
26 System HCL 380 PRO i3 System Infosystems Ltd. 6000058524 2011 23 20550 472650 CP8
Computer Infiniti L A HCL 11-02-
27 System HCL 380 TRU i3 System Infosystems Ltd. 3239505513 2013 5 23520 117600 CP8

Micro Power 06-11- IBM &


28 Online UPS Numeric 15 KVA 15 KVA Solutions 25 2012 1 166000 166000 CP7
Computer Infiniti L A HCL 03-08-
29 System HCL 330 Pro i3 System Infosystems Ltd. 6000001646 2010 50 17940 897000 IBM Lab
Computer Infiniti L A HCL 14-08-
30 System HCL 330 Pro i3 System Infosystems Ltd. 6000003475 2010 14 18787 263012 IBM Lab
IBM P
Series server Invention Digital IDS/2006- 05-03- Server
31 Server IBM P505 AIX Server System 2007/1082 2007 1 227000 227000 Room
IBM X 226
Server 8648 Invention Digital IDS/2006- 27-09- Server
32 Server IBM IZS Server System 2007/0492 2006 4 65000 260000 Room
Rajasthan
Cyberoa CR-1500 Network RNS/2015- 19-10- Server
33 Firewall m NGXP-FB H/W Firewall Solutions 16/128 2015 1 395220 395220 Room

Grand Total=10018983
Table B.6.1d: List of Equipments

Self Assessment Report Page 223


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

List of Softwares in Lab

Valid Total
S.No. Description Type Qty Vendor Bill Date Till Bill No. Amount
Kamtron Systems Pvt. 31-05-
1 MSDN Academic Alliance 7.0 AE S/W 1 Ltd. 11-07-2007 2013 134 36400.00

2 Tally ERP 9.0 S/W 1 Arihant Computers 21-09-2010 Lifetime SEP/296 30000.00
MicroWorld Software 03-05- NTL/015
3 E-Scan Internet Security for SMB S/W 700 Service Pvt. Ltd. 03-05-2011 2014 9 227498.00
MS Win Starter 7 SNGL OLP Surbhi Electronet Pvt 31-01-
4 Acdmc S/W 50 Ltd 17-02-2012 2014 485 124850.25

5 Digital Language Lab Software S/W 2 Biyani Technologies 05-05-2013 Lifetime 10512 131250.00
ACS/RI/1
Autodesk Autocad 2014 Academic 3-
6 SLM S/W 30 Allianz CAD Solutions 08-08-2013 Lifetime 14/00102 226800.00
Quick Heal Endpoint Security 26-09- RNS/201
7 Business With Antispam S/W 400 RNS Infotech 27-09-2014 2017 4-15/111 159999.00
Designtech System PNQ/141
8 Matlab S/W 30 Ltd. 20-03-2015 Lifetime 5/12061 425768.70
Designtech System PNQ/141
9 Simulink S/W 30 Ltd. 20-03-2015 Lifetime 5/12061 212865.45
Designtech System PNQ/141
10 Signal Processing Toolbox S/W 30 Ltd. 20-03-2015 Lifetime 5/12061 170284.80
Designtech System PNQ/141
11 DSP System Toolbox S/W 30 Ltd. 20-03-2015 Lifetime 5/12061 170284.80
Designtech System PNQ/141
12 Control System Toolbox S/W 30 Ltd. 20-03-2015 Lifetime 5/12061 170284.80
Designtech System PNQ/141
13 Neural Network Toolbox S/W 30 Ltd. 20-03-2015 Lifetime 5/12061 170284.80
Designtech System PNQ/141
14 Communication System Toolbox S/W 30 Ltd. 20-03-2015 Lifetime 5/12061 170284.80
Rajasthan Network RNS/201
15 Cyberoam CR-1500 NGXP-FB S/W 1 Solutions 19-10-2015 Lifetime 5-16/128 351750.00
Rajasthan Network RNS/201
16 Fiber Module MWX-01G-08F S/W 1 Solutions 19-10-2015 Lifetime 5-16/128 43470.00
Cyberoam NGXP-F36 (3 Yr Rajasthan Network 19-10- RNS/201
17 Subscription) S/W 1 Solutions 19-10-2015 2018 5-16/129 513850.00
WINEDU ALNG Upgrad SAPk Surbhi Electronet Pvt 28-02-
18 OLVE 1 Y Acdmc Ent KW5-00359 S/W 200 Ltd 06-04-2016 2017 2 450448.00
Office 365 Plus Open Faculty Surbhi Electronet Pvt 28-02-
19 ShrdSvr ANGSOLVE S3Y-00001 S/W 200 Ltd 06-04-2016 2017 2 323510.40

Self Assessment Report Page 224


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
WIN IntuneOpnhrdSvrANGSubs Surbhi Electronet Pvt 28-02-
20 VLOVL ELIC - 3LN-00001 S/W 200 Ltd 06-04-2016 2017 2 88740.70
WINHOME10SNGOL{ NLAE Surbhi Electronet Pvt 28-02-
21 Legal GGS ELIC-KW9-0031 S/W 215 Ltd 06-04-2016 2017 2 1725102.00
WinsvrStd ALNG Lic SAPK OLV 1 Surbhi Electronet Pvt 28-02-
22 Y Acdmc AP-P73-05566 S/W 1 Ltd 06-04-2016 2017 2 3349.59
Win SrCLANGcSAPKOLVE1-R18- Surbhi Electronet Pvt 28-02-
23 03500 S/W 50 Ltd 06-04-2016 2017 2 8930.24
Surbhi Electronet Pvt 28-02-
24 SLSrSdALGLicSAPK-228-09539 S/W 1 Ltd 06-04-2016 2017 2 5694.01
SLCLANGL SAPkOLVE1Admc - Surbhi Electronet Pvt 28-02-
25 359-05410 S/W 50 Ltd 06-04-2016 2017 2 65881.55
EPS Business with Additional Packs Rajasthan Network 26-09- RNS/201
26 400 User S/W 400 Solutions 26-09-2017 2020 7-18/168 179360.00
Digital Language Lab Software AMC 07-02-
27 Charges S/W 40 Biyani Technologies 12-02-2018 2019 1577 23600.00

Table B.6.1e: List of Softwares

Expenditure on Internet Usage


S.No. Vendor Speed Bill No. Duration Date Amount
(mbps)
1 Aircel 40 71704201 1-4-14 to 30-6-14 09-03-2014 179776
2 Aircel 40 71850663 1-7-14 to 30-9-14 08-06-2014 179776
3 Aircel 40 71996430 1-10-14 to 31-12-14 08-09-2014 179776
4 Vodafone 65 36070012015 22-11-14 to 31-3-15 01-01-2015 191012
5 Vodafone 65 70329401 1-4-15 to 30-6-15 01-03-2015 191012
6 Vodafone 65 85289367 1-7-15 to 30-9-15 01-06-2015 193800
7 Vodafone 65 100827846 1-10-15 to 31-12-15 01-09-2015 193800
8 Vodafone 65 118265252 1-1-16 to 31-3-16 01-12-2015 194650
9 Vodafone 65 136818069 1-4-16 to 30-6-16 01-03-2016 194650
10 Vodafone 65 156405034 1-7-16 to 30-9-16 01-06-2016 195500
11 Vodafone 65 173342255 1-10-16 to 31-12-16 01-09-2016 195500
12 Vodafone 65 192585695 1-1-17 to 31-3-17 01-12-2016 195500
13 Vodafone 105 216024437 1-4-17 to 31-6-17 01-04-2017 59478
14 Vodafone 105 228881545 1-7-17 to 30-9-17 01-06-2017 236790
15 Vodafone 105 EIRJ08170001397 1-10-17 to 31-12-17 01-09-2017 242967
3
16 Vodafone 105 EIRJ11700032286 1-1-18 to 31-3-18 01-12-2017 242967
17 Vodafone 105 EIRJ02800053274 1-4-18 to 30-6-18 01-03-2018 242967

Table B.6.1f: Expenditure

Self Assessment Report Page 225


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Sample Lab Manual:

Course outcome and CO-PO Mapping

Self Assessment Report Page 226


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

SYLLABUS

Class: VI Sem. B.Tech. Evaluation

Branch: Computer Engg. Examination Time =Three (3) Hours

Schedule per Week Maximum Marks = 50

Practical Hrs.: 2 [Sessional/Mid-term (30) &End term (20)]

Self Assessment Report Page 227


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
BOOKS:-

Text books:-
• Hearn and Baker: Computer Graphics, PHI

• Multimedia Systems Design, Prabhat Andleigh and Thakkar, PHI..

Reference Books:-

J. Foley, A. Van Dam, S. Feiner, J. Hughes: Computer Graphics- Principles and Practice, Pearson
• INSTRUCTIONAL METHODS:-

Direct Instructions:
1. White board presentation

Interactive Instruction:
• Algorithms

Indirect Instructions:
1. Problem solving

• LEARNING MATERIALS:-9.1. Text/Lab Manual

• ASSESSMENT OF OUTCOMES:-

A. End term Practical exam (Conducted by RTU, KOTA)

B. Daily Lab interaction.

• OUTCOMES WILL BE ACHIEVED THROUGH FOLLOWING:-

1. Lab Teaching (through marker and white board).

2. Discussion on Algorithms.

Self Assessment Report Page 228


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
INSTRUCTIONS of LAB
DO’s
• Please switch off the Mobile/Cell phone before entering Lab.

• Enter the Lab with complete source code and data.

• Check whether all peripheral are available at your desktop before proceeding for program.

• Arrange all the peripheral and seats before leaving the lab.

• Properly shutdown the system before leaving the lab.

• Keep the bag outside in the racks.

• Enter the lab on time and leave at proper time.

• Maintain the decorum of the lab.

DON’T’S
• No one is allowed to bring storage devices like Pan Drive
/Floppy etc. in the lab.

• Don’t mishandle the system.

• Don’t leave the system on standing for long

• Don’t bring any external material in the lab.

• Don’t make noise in the lab.

• Don’t bring the mobile in the lab. If extremely necessary


then keep ringers off.

• Don’t enter in the lab without permission of lab In charge.

• Don’t delete or make any modification in system files.

Self Assessment Report Page 229


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Sample Experiment
Aim:
To implement Bresenham’s Algorithm for Line Drawing

Algorithm:

• Start.

• Declare variables x,y,x1,y1,x2,y2,p,dx,dy and also declare gdriver=DETECT,gmode.

• Initialize the graphic mode with the path location in TC folder.

• Input the two line end-points and store the left end-points in (x1,y1).

• Load (x1,y1) into the frame buffer; that is, plot the first point put x=x1,y=y1.

• Calculate dx=x2-x1 and dy=y2-y1,and obtain the initial value of decision parameter p as: a. p=(2dy-dx).

• Starting from first point (x,y) perform the following test:

• Repeat step 9 while(x<=x2).

• If p<0,next point is (x+1,y) and p=(p+2dy).

• Otherwise, the next point to plot is (x+1,y+1) and p=(p+2dy-2dx).

• Place pixels using putpixel at points (x,y) in specified colour.

• Close Graph.

Stop.

Self Assessment Report Page 230


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Source Code:
/* C program to draw a line */

#include<stdio.h>
#include<conio.h>
#include<graphics.h>
void main()
{
int x,y,x1,y1,x2,y2,p,dx,dy; int gdriver=DETECT,gmode; initgraph(&gdriver,&gmode,”C:\\tc\\BGI:”);
printf(“\nEnter the x-coordinate of the first point ::”); scanf(“%d”,&x1);
printf(“\nEnter the y-coordinate of the first point ::”);
scanf(“%d”,&y1);
printf(“\nEnter the x-coordinate of the second point ::”);
scanf(“%d”,&x2);
printf(“\nEnter the y-coordinate of the second point ::”);
scanf(“%d”,&y2);
x=x1; y=y1; dx=x2-x1; dy=y2-y1;
putpixel(x,y,2);
p=(2dy-dx);
while(x<=x2)
{
if(p<0)
{
x=x+1;
p=2*x-dx;
}
else
{
x=x+1; y=y+1;
p=p+2*dy;
}
putpixel(x,y,7);
}
getch();
closegraph();
}

Self Assessment Report Page 231


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Output:

Figure6.1a: Result of experiment


Result:
Hence, Bresenham’s algorithm is implemented.

Viva Questions:

• Differentiate DDA and Bresenham’s Line drawing algorithm

• Explain the Bresenham’s Line drawing algorithm

Sample Evaluation Criteria of Lab

S. Title of Project Session (30) External (20)


No Project Guide Attendance Report Viva Presentation (15) Viva Copy (10) Total (50)
(5) (5) (5) (10)

Table B.6.1g: Evaluation of lab

Self Assessment Report Page 232


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 6.1b: Result of experiment

Self Assessment Report Page 233


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
1.2. Additional facilities created for improving the quality of learning experience in
laboratories (25)

Sr. Facility Details Reason(s) for Utilization Areas in which students’ are Relevance to
No. Name creating expected to have POs/PSOs
facility enhanced learning
1 Class Fully equipped Faculties use 20 Hrs. Per Subjects (Principles of PO1, PO5
Room Class room with all interactive Week Programming Language, Real
with LCD projector modules like time application oriented
projector with the seating videos/ subjects, Software Engineering,
capacity of 70. presentations Mobile Computing, Data
Comfortable and visually Mining & Warehousing ect.
desks, chairs and attractive
teaching aids , methods of
Fans teaching.
2 E-journal JGate For research Throughout Research activity, paper PO1,PO2,
and project the writing. PO12
activities. To academic Recent trends in engineering
know about session. and software industry
recent trends Project activity
in science
and
technology
3 Internet Ethernet/WiFi Facility to Throughout More knowledge apart from PO1,PO2,
Facility staff and the curriculum, PO5
students academic 24×7 access to learning
for session. resources
enhancing
Teaching
Learning
4 Video’s NPTEL Understandin Throughout Building deep understanding PO1,PO5,PO11
From (National g the Video the semester with expert lectures from
NPTEL, Program on oriented subject experts
SWAYA Technology Teaching and In depth knowledge beyond
M Enhanced learning. Lab.
Learning) is a
joint initiative of
the IITs and IISc.
Through this
initiative,
Students get
certified on
various latest
courses through
online learning
and evaluation

Self Assessment Report Page 234


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
5 Seminar Fully equipped To present Throughout To bridge the band gap between PO1,PO8,
Hall shared seminar technical the semester academic and industry PO9,PO12
hall with talk/ project curriculum.
Computer, seminars/ To upgrade students to industry
Projector, 70 research standard.
Student Desk, papers/ Gaming Contest, Quizzes
White Board, Air workshops/
conditioner, industry
Cushion chair, interaction
Microphone, presentation
Speaker, LED and Guest
lights, Podium, Lectures and
Well Equipped Expert Talk.
Audio System.
6 Compute Using Scrap To provide 5 hours per Real time experience of PO1,PO12
r /Unused complete week dissembling,
Hardwar computers picture of locating the devices, assembling
e Lab hardware the system
devices for
better
understandin
g of the
subjects
7 MOU Forsk was The objective 3 Months FORSK will offer project based PO1,PO4,PO5,
with founded by Dr. of this MoU learning in IoT(Internet of PO9,PO11,
FORSK Sylvester is to bring Things) and Machine PO12
technolo Fernandes and industry Learning(Data Science) to
gies Yogendra Singh approach of JECRC students., helps in
in mid-2015. solution finding solution to real life
Forsk is working development problems
for a paradigm and product
shift in industry engineering
and academia to
partnership for engineering
skill candidates
enhancement and through
improved project based
industry learning
engagement .
8 MOU Network NUTS The objective 1 Months After completion of training PO1,PO4,PO5,
with (A unit of AR of this MoU students will get prepared for PO9,PO11,
REDHA Network NUTS is to bring RHCSA (Red Hat Certified PO12
T Pvt. Ltd.) prouds industry System Administrator) Exam
to be "India's approach of and after this exam they will be
only networking solution RHCSA certified which will
institute by development help them in grabbing various
Corporate and product job opportunities.
Trainers.). Led engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 235


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
by a techie to
himself. engineering
Established in candidates
2003 with the through
mission of project based
bridging the gap learning by
from classroom data and
to the workplace. technology.
9 Sales Sales force is an To train the 3 Months Project, Industrial Training PO1PO2,,PO4,
force innovative students and PO5,
company behind make them PO9,PO11,
the worlds #1 industry PO12
CRM platform. ready

10 MOU CAI is the center To create the Throughout Projects, Application PO1,PO2,PO4,
with for the apps and future the Development PO5,PO9,PO11
KMP ideas which lets android semester. ,PO12
Info students to bring developers
Solutions their dreams into and to create
reality. This more career
program let scope for the
students to come students
up with an idea
and help them to
make their idea
run in the real
world with an
Android
application.
11 Infosys Foundation 1 Months This program provides a PO1, PO2,
Campus Program 5.0 The objective platform to fill the gap between PO3, PO4,
Connect is to industry &academia. PO5, PO8,
Program PO9, PO10,
PO11,PO12
12 Spiritual Sponsored by 1. For Available 1. In the field of Yoga & PO6,PO8
Research DST CSRI & operating Throughout Meditation
Cell JECRC DST CSRI the semester 2. In developing moral values &
sponsored ethics
Research 3. In the area of Spiritual
Project Research Opportunities
2. For
imparting the
wealth of
Indian Yoga
& Meditation
among
Engineering
Students

Self Assessment Report Page 236


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
13 Cyber Security Cyberops Throughout Students will be able to provide PO1PO2,,PO4,
Training InfoSec is the semester assistance in detecting the flaw PO5,PO9,PO11
MoU Conducted by India’s and handling the cybercrime ,
Cyberops Infosec
With leading incidents and provide PO12 ,PSO2
Cyberops organization consultancy to the law
InfoSec in field of enforcement agents and
Information advocates handling the same.
security.

Table B.6.2a: Additional facilities

6.3. Laboratories Maintenance and overall ambience (10)

6.3.1 Laboratories Maintenance

Maintenance

Regular in-house
Outsource byexpert
maintenance

 Printer Refilling  SMPS Repairing


 Trouble ShootingSystem  Motherboard Repairing
 Installation  Printer Repairing
 NetworkTroubleshooting etc.  Network EquipmentsRepairing etc.

Sort students in chronological order of academic Project Allotment and Guide Allotment
performance



Figure6.3.1a: Lab maintenance
Project Allotment and Guide Allotment Project
Allotment and Guide Allotment
Sort students
6.3.2 Overall in chronological order
Ambience:-

of academicperformanceSort
Department has enough labs whichinare used for all the years to meet the
students curriculum requirements.onditions of
chairs/benches are in good condition.
chronological order of academic performance Chairs are provided for individual students in Labs.

 Each Lab is equipped with white board, computer setup, and high speed Internet facility.

 Each Lab is air-cooled & with proper lighting

Self Assessment Report Page 237


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
 Wifi facility available 24X7 for all faculties and students to carry lab work.

 Well-furnished IBM computer lab used for project work.

 Technical support for the students is available throughout the day.

 IBM lab is open for the students to carry out research regarding their projects, throughout the
day.

6.4 Project laboratory:

On completion of the course:


CO1 Graduates will be able to understand the concepts of real world complex problems with analyzing social impact
for sustainable development.
CO2 Graduates will be able to apply design and develop software applications
CO3 Graduates will be able to create cost effective solutions in multidisciplinary environments.
CO4 Graduates will be able to demonstration their work with writing effective reports and design documentation via
presentation tools.
Table B.6.4a: Project Lab Course Outcome

Project Lab CO-PO Mapping:

P P P
L/ P P P P P P P P P P
Co P O S S
Sub T/ CO O O O O O O O O O O
de O8 1 O O
P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11
2 1 2
Graduates will be able to
understand the concepts
P of real world complex
problems with analyzing H H M H M M M L H M M H L L
social impact for
sustainable development.

Project 7CS
P Graduates will be able to
Stage-I PR
create cost effective
& II &
solutions in H L M M M L L _ M M H H LM
8CS
multidisciplinary
PR
environments.
P Graduates will be able to
Design and Develop M M H M H L _ L H H M H MH
Software Applications.
Graduates will be able to
P demonstration their work
with writing effective
H L L M M L _ _ H H L H - -
Reports, Design
Documentation and
Presentation.
Table B.6.4b: CO-PO Mapping

Self Assessment Report Page 238


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

S.No. Name of the Laboratory Facilities available to conduct Project works


and Research work
1. IBM LAB (Project Lab) Internet with high speed provided to students for their project work.

2. CP5(Dept LIBRARY) Internet with high speed and open access journals are provided to students
for the project research Work.

Table B.6.4c: Project Labs

SAMPLE OF PROJECT NOTICE:

JAIPUR ENGINEERING COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE, JAIPUR


DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING

NOTICE 21st Dec. 2017


It is informed to all final year students of academic session 2017-18 of CSE Department that their
guide allotment will be held on January 02, 2018. The guidelines are as under
• Students cannot form a group by their self.

• Students will appear in front of the project committee in the order of their merit which is
given below.

• A faculty list is given with their area of specialization/interest. Max of 2 projects will be
allotted to the faculty.

• A group of students will be of 4 in max and 3 in min.

• Group of students will be taken from each section.

• Students came in specified order and will select a guide.

• When two groups formed of the particular faculty, then his name is crossed in the list.

• Section has to come in following time in IBM lab (A-Block).

ANKUR RAJ
(PROJECT IN-CHARGE)

Self Assessment Report Page 239


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Start

Database of IV Sort students in chronological


Year Students order of academic performance
One student from bottom list is
allotted to each guide by project in
charge One student from bottom
Departmental Sort Faculties in accordance of
list is allotted to each guide by
Database of faculties research area specialization Bottom
project in charge
student database Bottom student
database
Design Faculties group under
various technical areas

Sort Student list (75 %


Topper and 25 % weak) Project Allotment and Guide
as per academic Allotment
performance

Repeat above step for each student


in list of top % students

Stop

No Is project containing
3 students have
given same List of guide & Team formation
guide is prepared

Yes

One student from % bottom list is % bottom


allotted to each guide by project in student
charge database
Yes

No Yes

No

Figure 6.4a: Project Allotment Flowchart

Self Assessment Report Page 240


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
1. Project Group Formation
 Students of IV Year are sorted in chronological order on the basis of their academic
performance.
 The students are divided into four categories namely Topper Student List (A), Average
Student List (B), Below Average Student List (C) and Bottom Student List (D). Each
category contains 25% of total final year students.
 Display the list of faculty members according to their area of interest.
 Select one student from each category and make a team.
 Each team selects one guide according to their area of interest and asks the guide for their
project approval after showing the abstract of the project.
S.No. Roll No. Group 1 (LEADER) Sec. Roll No. Group 2 Sec.
1 14EJCCS008 ADITI METHI A 14EJCCS001 AAYUSHI JOHRI A
2 14EJCCS010 ADITYA JOHARI A 14EJCCS002 ABHISHEK PANDEY A
3 14EJCCS013 AKSHAY JAIN A 14EJCCS006 ABHISHEK SOMANI A
4 14EJCCS017 AKSHITA JAIN A 14EJCCS016 AKSHITA AGRAWAL A
5 14EJCCS031 ANUSHKA JAIN A 14EJCCS019 AMANDEEP GOYAL A
6 14EJCCS028 ANUSHREE JAIN A 14EJCCS021 ANIRUDDH SHARMA A
7 14EJCCS032 APOORVA GOYAL A 14EJCCS022 ANISHA GOYAL A
8 14ejccs033 apurvi mansinghka A 14EJCCS023 ANJALI AGARWAL A
9 14EJCCS037 ASHITA BANSAL A 14EJCCS026 ANKITA SINGHAL A
10 14ejccs038 ASTHA KOUL A 14EJCCS027 ANKUSH KUMAR A
11 14EJCCS040 AVIJIT SINGH A 14EJCCS029 ANUJ SHARMA A
12 14EJCCS042 AYUSHI AERAN A 14EJCCS039 ATUL DADA A
13 14EJCCSO45 BHAWIKA AGARWAL A 14EJCCS044 BHASKAR SHARMA A
14 14EJCCS049 DEEKSHANT MAMODIA A 14EJCCS053 DIVISHA SHARMA A
15 14EJCCS050 DHRUVAL BHARDWAJ A 14EJCCS059 HARISH KUMAR RATHORE A
16 14EJCCS054 DIVYA DAVE A 14EJCCS062 HARSHITA SHARMA A
17 14EJCCS055 DIVYA MAHESHWARI A 14EJCCS066 ISHITA A
18 14EJCCS057 GARVIT MITTAL A 14EJCCS067 ISHU MITTAL A
19 14EJCCS064 ISHA JAIN A 14EJCCS079 LUV KUMAR GUPTA A
20 14EJCCS065 ISHANVI MODI A 14EJCCS080 MANJARI SINGH B
21 14EJCCS068 JAPLEEN KAUR A 14EJCCS083 MEETANSHI RAWAT B
22 14EJCCS071 JAYANTI CHOUHAN A 14EJCCS091 NAVEEN SAINI B
23 14EJCCS073 KAJAL AGARWAL A 14EJCCS097 NETRA SINGHAL B
24 14EJCCS075 KANISHKA GOYAL A 14EJCCS098 NIKHIL GARG B
25 14EJCCS076 KAPIL B KHANDELWAL A 14EJCCS104 PANKAJ KARAMCHANDANIB
26 14EJCCS084 MEGHALI KHANDELWALB 14EJCCS109 POOJA SHARMA B
27 14EJCCS086 MOHIT KUMAR EARAN B 14EJCCS113 PRANAV DUA B
28 14EJCCS087 MOHIT KUMAWAT B 14ejccs116 PRATIBHA AGARWAL B
29 14EJCCS088 MOHIT MAHESHWARI B 14EJCCS122 RAHUL SHAMBHWANI B
30 14EJCCS095 NEHA PIPRONIYAN B 14EJCCS124 RAJESH AYALDASANI B
31 14EJCCS096 NEHA SEWDA B 14EJCCS125 RAKSHANDA KAUL B
32 14EJCCS099 NIKHIL GUPTA B 14EJCCS126 RISHABH SHARMA B
33 14EJCCS103 PALLAVI VARSHNEY B 14ejccs130 ROHAN JANDU B
34 14EJCCS108 POOJA GUPTA B 14EJCCS132 ROHIT KUMAR GUPTA B
35 14EJCCS117 PRIYANKA BHARDWAJ B 14EJCCS134 ROHIT MATHUR B
36 14EJCCS120 RAHUL JASWANI B 14EJCCS135 RONAK PATNI B
37 14EJCCS121 RAHUL KUMAR GUPTA B 14EJCCS137 SAKSHI GARG B
38 14EJCCS127 RISHIKA AGARWAL B 14EJCCS143 SAPNA GOHRANI B
39 14EJCCS138 SAKSHI GUPTA B 14EJCCS147 SHIVAM CHETANI B
40 14EJCCS139 SAKSHI SINGHAL B 14EJCCS148 SHIVANI MAREJA B

Self Assessment Report Page 241


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
S.No. Roll No. Group 3 Sec Roll Roll No. Group 4 Sec
1 14EJCCS004 ABHISHEK JAIN A 14EJCCS012 AKSHAT TRIVEDI A
2 14EJCCS005 ABHISHEK SARAWAG A 14EJCCS015 AKSHAY VIJAYVARGIYA A
3 14EJCCS007 ADARSH JULANIA A 14EJCCS018 AMAN AGRAWAL A
4 14EJCCS009 Aditi Parikh A 14EJCCS024 ANKIT DIXIT A
5 14EJCCS011 AKANKSHA KAUL A 14EJCCS041 AYUSH GARG A
6 14EJCCS014 AKSHAY PATNI A 14EJCCS056 EKANSH KUSHWAH A
7 14EJCCS020 AMIT KUMAR AGRAWAL A 14EJCCS058 GOVIND MALL A
8 14EJCCS025 ANKIT JHAWAR A 14EJCCS061 HARSHIT RANKA A
9 14EJCCSO30 ANUPAM KHERA A 14EJCCS063 HASRAT ALI A
10 14EJCCS034 ARPIT KALRA A 14EJCCS069 JATIN AGRAWAL A
11 14EJCCS035 ASHISH AGARWAL A 14EJCCS077 KARTIK LOVEVANSHI A
12 14EJCCS036 ASHISH POONIA A 14EJCCS078 KISHAN MANGAL A
13 14EJCCS043 BADAL JAIN A 14EJCCS082 MAYANK PRASAD B
14 14EJCCS046 CHINMAY BISEN A 14EJCCS099 NEERAJ KUMAR BANSAL B
15 14EJCCS047 CHITRANGANA SINGH A 14ejccs100 NIKHIL JINDAL B
16 14EJCCS051 DILIP KUMAR A 14EJCCS102 NIRMAL GOYAL B
17 14EJCCS052 DIVAKER SONI A 14EJCCS105 PARESH RAJVANSHI B
18 14EJCCS070 JATIN GARG A 14EJCCS107 PIYUSH KUMAR BINDAL B
19 14EJCCS074 KAJAL RAI A 14EJCCS114 PRANAV GOPAL B
20 14EJCCS085 MOHIT JAIN B 14EJCCS115 PRATEEK SHARMA B
21 14EJCCS089 NAMAN GOYAL B 14EJCCS119 RAFAIY ABDUL REHMAN B
22 14ejccs090 NAMAN JAIN B 14EJCCS128 RITIKA SAFAYA B
23 14EJCCS094 NEETESH VASHISHTHA B I4EJCCS131 ROHIT JAISWAL B
24 14EJCCS101 NIMITT CHAUHAN B 14EJCCS136 ROUNIT KUMAR B
25 14EJCCS106 PAVAN BHANSALI B 14EJCCS150 SHIVANSH SHARMA B
26 14EJCCS110 PRABHAKAR DUBEY B 14EJCCS151 SHUBHAM AGARWAL B
27 14ejccs111 PRADHUMN TRIVEDI B 15EJCCS200 ADITYA VIKRAM SINGH C
28 14ejccs112 PRAKHAR GARG B 15EJCCS201 AJAY BHANDARI C
29 14EJCCS118 PRIYANSHU GUPTA B 15EJCCS202 AKASH SHARMA C
30 14EJCCS123 RAHUL TIWARI B 15EJCCS203 ANKIT C
31 14EJCCS129 RITU MITTAL B 15EJCCS204 ANKIT PANDEY C
32 14EJCCS140 SALONI MEHTA B 15EJCCS205 BANSHI LAL NAIN C
33 14EJCCS141 SAMARTH THOLIA B 15EJCCS206 GARIMA JOSHI C
34 14EJCCS142 SANDEEP GAUSI B 15EJCCS207 JUGAL CHAUDHARY C
35 14EJCCS144 SARVESH KUMAR B 15EJCCS208 KAYYUM KHAN C
36 14EJCCS145 SHAILENDRA SINGH CHOUHAN
B 15EJCCS209 MAHIMA JOSHI C
37 14EJCCS152 SHUBHAM BANSAL B 15EJCCS210 MANALI GOSWAMI C
38 14EJCCS155 SHUBHAM KALANI B 14EJCCS195 NAVEEN KUMAR C
39 14EJCCS157 SHUBHAM SERVA B 15EJCCS212 NITENDER SINGH SHEKHAWAT
C
40 14EJCCS192 ARPIT TRIPATHI C 15ejccs213 PRIYANKA C
Table B.6.4d: Project Group Division

Self Assessment Report Page 242


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Team Formation and Guide Allotment

Project Identification

Project Filtration

If Practical
Implementation is
possible

No

Yes

Project Allotment

Project Continuous Evaluation

Presentation and Performance


Feedback

Project Submission

Final Project Assessment Project Assessment Committee

Figure 6.4c Project Evaluation

Self Assessment Report Page 243


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
2. Project Identification

 Project coordinator issues a circular at the end of 6th semester to all faculty members to
provide their area of interest and the list of five projects to be given to the students.
 Students are also encouraged to submit the idea of their own for doing the project.
 Final list of projects has been made and display on notice board.
 The list of previous year projects is also displayed at notice board which ensures no repetition
of project work and also encourages students to enhance the previous works.
 Each group of students decides the project guide according to their area of interest.
 Each team selects their own project idea or from list of projects.

3. Project Filtration & Allotment

 Each team or group of students discusses their own project idea with their guide.
 If the project idea submitted by the student/ group of students fulfills the basic requirements,
then it will be allotted to that student/ group of students.
 If it does not fulfill the basic requirements, then a new project idea is allotted to that
student/group of students from the list of finalized projects.

4. Project Continuous Evaluation

 Project coordinator displays the deadline on notice board for the progress report presentations
and final submission of the project report.
 Each group has to summit weekly progress report to the respective guide.
 Each team show their project demonstration followed by viva-voice has been carried out
twice in a semester in front of guide, then guide review the progress and gives suggestions.

5 Procedure of Project Evaluation

 A presentation followed by viva voce is also carried out at the end of semester in front of the
external examiner and other students.
 Each group of students has to submit a report of their work along with the role of each team
member.
 The project exhibition is carried out at the end of semester. Student/group of students
demonstrated the project in front of external examiner and other students.
 Final Assessment of the project and marks finalization is done by the project assessment team
along with external examiner and respective guide

Self Assessment Report Page 244


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Phase Subject Code Semester Nature of Work Assessment
Project ideas and Abstract Submission Problem Definition
Finalize projecttheme/title, Define ProgressPresentation
Objectives, CompletionTimeLine
PhaseI Project-I VII ProjectImplementation Project Demonstration
7CSPR Report Submission and University Viva Project Report
New Project idea or extension of Minor Problem Definition
Project
ProjectImplementation ProgressPresentation
Project Competition, Testing Project Demonstration
PhaseII Project-II VIII
8CSPR Teamwork Assessment Project Report&
UniversityViva Demonstration
Project Report
Table B.6.4f: Project Phases

Figure 6.4e: Project Evaluation Flowchart

Self Assessment Report Page 245


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

S. Title Project Session (30) External (20)


No of Guide Attendance Report Viva Presenta Demonstratio Viva Demonstra Total
Project (5) (5) (5) tion (5) n (10) (10) tion (10) (50)

Table B.6.4g: Scheme for the evaluation Project-I

S. Title of Project Session (120) External (80)


No Project Guide Attenda Repor Viva Prese Demonstra Viva Prese Dem Total
nce t (20) (30) ntatio tion (30) (30) ntatio onstr (200)
(10) n (30) n (30) ation
(20)

Table B.6.4h: Scheme for the evaluation Project-II

Self Assessment Report Page 246


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Sample of Cover Page of Project Report

Self Assessment Report Page 247


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Jaipur Engineering College and Research Centre, JAIPUR


Department of Computer Science and
Engineering

th
Schedule of Major Project Presentation of B.Tech. CSE 8 Sem.
19-Jan-2018
Presentation dates
1st Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-A 1/23/2018
1st Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-B 1/24/2018
1st Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-C 1/25/2018
1st Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-D 1/27/2018
2nd Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-A 2/16/2018
2nd Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-B 2/17/2018
2nd Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-C 2/23/2018
2nd Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-D 2/24/2018
3rd Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-A 3/9/2018
3rd Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-B 3/10/2018
3rd Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-C 3/16/2018
3rd Project Presentation of VIII sem. Section-D 3/17/2018
4th Project Presentation of VIII sem. All Sections 3/24/2018

Table B.6.4i:Schedule of Major Project Presentation

VANUE: IBM LAB (A-Block)


ANKUR RAJ
PROJECT INCHARGE

Self Assessment Report Page 248


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Phase Subject Code Semester Nature of Work Assessment

PhaseI Project-I VII Literature


ProgressPresentation
7CSPR Survey,ProblemDefinition
Finalize projecttheme/title, Define
ProgressPresentation
Objectives, CompletionTimeLine
InterimReport Project Report

PhaseII Project-II VIII


ProjectImplementation ProgressPresentation
8CSPR
Project Competition, Testing Project Demonstration

Project Report&
Teamwork Assessment
Demonstration
UniversityViva Project Report

Table B.6.4i:Project Evaluation Process Contd.

S.No. Name of the Facilities Utilization


rd
1. Turbo C 3.0, 3 semester – Data Structure and Algorithm , C++ Programming,
rd th
2. Ubuntu 6th
3 &semester students
8th semester Computer
students, Graphicsand
UG students Lab,Faculty
8 semester –
members.
Compiler
th Design Lab students and Faculty members.
3. Red Hat
Java Linux
SE Development Kit 6th & 8 semester students and Faculty members.
rd th
4. Visual professional
Microsoft Office Studio , , 2nd,3 and 4 year students and Faculty
5. Adobe
My Sql,Reader
Xamp (PHP) 6th ,7th, 8th semester students and Faculty
6. OPEN Source Softwares .All Semester

7. Internet of 105Mbps and Wi-Fi campus UG students and Faculty members utilize the internet and Wi-Fi
facility for their Project and research activities,
8. Two 10KVA, one 15 KVA and 1 3KVA Used in case of Power failure
UPS with 200 KVA Genset.
9. Air-conditioner Maintained temperature in Labs
10. PRINTERS (Color and B/W) Printing documents Lab assignments etc.
11. Projector & Scanner UG students and Faculty members utilize the R & D Lab for their
mini and major projects & Scanning documents
12. Server FTP Server, Antivirus server, Account Server
Table B.6.4j:Facilities created in CSE department for projects

Self Assessment Report Page 249


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
6.5. Safety measures in laboratories (10)

 Do’s and Don’ts :Specific Safety Rules like Do’s and Don’ts are displayed and instructed
for all students
 First aid box: First aid box is kept in Department.
 Sufficient no. of fire Extinguishers are installed in the Labs
 Easy approach to emergency exit in the Labs
 Centralize Earthing
 Power junction box

Self Assessment Report Page 250


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Criteria7
Continuous Improvement
(50)

Self Assessment Report Page 251


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
CRITERION 7 Continuous Improvement 50

7.1 Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of each of the POs & PSOs (20)
POs Attainment levels & actions for improvement (2015-16) CAY

POs Target Level Attainment Observations


Level
PO1. Engineering Knowledge:Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering
fundamentals, and Computer Science and Engineering specialization to the solution of complex
Computer Science and Engineering problems.
PO1 70.4% 30.6% 1. Students need to improve in implementing practical
knowledge according to theoretical subjects.
2. Some of the subject like, Compiler Construction,
Advanced Engineering Mathematics, Principles of
Communication, Statistics and Probability Theory,
Information Theory & Coding is needed to be
improved to attain the attainment level.
Actions
 Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.

 Video lectures along with detailed course contents were held and students were also registered
in online courses (i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.

 Additional classes to be conducted on Compiler Construction, Advanced Engineering


Mathematics, Principles of Communication, Statistics and Probability Theory, Information
Theory & Coding.

PO2. Problem Analysis:Identify, formulate, research literature, and analyze complex computer
Computer Science and Engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles
of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
PO2 64.8% 31.5% 1. Need of strong analytical power in students was
realized and correlation between Mathematics &
Science with engineering subjects was lacking.
2. Some of the subject like, Compiler Construction,
Principles of Communication, Digital Electronics, and
Embedded System Design needs to be improved to
attain the attainment level.

Self Assessment Report Page 252


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Actions
 Students were advised to observe the problems related to real life scenario.

 More home assignments are given for subjects that have computational importance

 Remedial classes to be conducted on subject in which target is not achieved.

PO3. Design/development of solutions:Design solutions for complex Computer Science and


Engineeringproblems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with
appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental
considerations.
PO3 74.1% 38.9% 1. Approach towards the solutions of problems and
development of minor and major projects were not
fulfilling the industrial needs or requirements.
2. Some of the subject like, Engineering Mathematics,
Statistics and Probability Theory, Design and Analysis
of Algorithms, Information Theory & Coding, Data
Structures and Algorithms needs to be improved to
attain the attainment level.
Actions
 Encouragement to students regarding proper feasibility analysis and design and development of
the product according to industry requirements
 Additional classes to be conducted on design solutions for complex engineering problems
 Coding contest should be promoted among students
PO4. Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research
methods including design of Computer Science and Engineering experiments, analysis and
interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
PO4 74.1% 35.9% 1. Some of the students were lacking in applying
research based approach for creating projects.
2. Some of the subject like Statistics and Probability
Theory, Design and Analysis of Algorithms, Digital
Logic Design needs to be improved according to the
requirement to attain the level.
Actions
 Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.

 More activities on Coding contest should be promoted among students


 Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.
PO5. Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern

Self Assessment Report Page 253


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Computer Science and Engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex
computer science engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
PO5 70.4% 32.6% 1. According to latest industry standards and to fill the
gap between industry and academic, up gradation of
tools and software were required.
2. Some of the subject like, Compiler Construction,
Cloud Computing, Design and Analysis of Algorithms,
are needed to be improved to attain the attainment
level.
Actions
 Latest software like Xilinx, MATLAB, SALESFORCE, HADOOP, CLOUDERA, PYTHON,
Android Development Kit and ECLIPSE will be introduced to fulfill this gap.

 Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.

 Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.

 More activities on Coding contest should be promoted among students


PO6. The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess
societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the
professional Computer Science and Engineering practice.
PO6 70.4% 35.8% 1. Content beyond the syllabus needs to be included in
the curriculum related to health safety and social needs
of the society.
2 Some extra activities needed related to the engineer
and society
Actions
 Students should be motivated to involve in social initiatives to understand the social aspects
which will help them to solve the problems of society with engineering practices.

 Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.

 Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.

 More activities on society issues, Social issues and health related problems should be promoted
among students
PO7. Environment and sustainability:Understand the impact of the professional Computer Science
and Engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of,
and need for sustainable development.

Self Assessment Report Page 254


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
PO7 55.6% 24.4% 1. It was observed that role of students towards
environment and global awareness needs to be
improved.
2. Some extra activities needed related to the
professional engineering solutions in societal and
environmental contexts
Actions
 Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.

 Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.

 More activities on professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts


and demonstration of the knowledge for sustainable development should be promoted among
students
PO8. Ethics:Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms
of the Computer Science and Engineering practice.
PO8 59.3% 22.9% 1. Along with increase in technical knowledge, ethical
knowledge is also required in graduates
2. Some of the subject in the curriculum are lacking in
learning the principles and commit to professional
ethics and responsibilities.
Actions
 Motivational lectures will be organized for self-realization ethical principles and commit to
professional ethics and responsibilities

 Students are encouraged to participate in various Social and cultural events.

 Some of the workshops will be organized to understand the professional ethics, responsibilities
and norms of the engineering practice.

PO9. Individual and team work:Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in
diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings in Computer Science and Engineering.
PO9 83.3% 39.7% Some of the subjects in the curriculum are lacking in
learning effectively as an individual and as a member
or leader in diverse teams and also in multidisciplinary
settings.
Actions
 Motivating students to work in groups in technical studies

 More extracurricular events will be organized to enhance leadership qualities in individuals as

Self Assessment Report Page 255


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
well as to make them work in team.

 More activities on Coding contest should be promoted among students to work effectively as
an individual and in a team
PO10. Communication:Communicate effectively on complex Computer Science and Engineering
activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend
and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and
receive clear instructions.
PO10 57.4% 30.5% 1. Communication Skills were not up to the mark and
needs to be improved for presentations to be
performed.
2. Students are lacking in report writing and design
documentation, make effective presentations
Actions
 Personality Development Skills will be imparted to students to enhance various aspects of
communication, technical and Presentations skills

 Expert Talks to enhance aptitude, qualitative skills of the students

 Additional classes to be conducted for writing effective reports, design documents and effective
presentations skills.

PO11. Project Management and Finance:Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the


Computer Science and Engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as
a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
PO11 70.4% 31.9% 1. Students were lacking in implementing the
feasibility of various projects and managing according
to the financial availability.
2. Some of the subject are lacking in learning and
applying work to manage projects in multidisciplinary
environments.
Actions
 Students are encouraged to participate in entrepreneurship and startups programs.

 Additional classes to be conducted for demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the


engineering and management principles to manage projects in multidisciplinary environments.

 Workshops and Industrial visits will be included to enhance the capability of students to apply
their Knowledge to make, enhance and manage projects in multidisciplinary environments.

PO12. Life –long Learning:Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in
independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of Computer Science and

Self Assessment Report Page 256


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Engineeringchange.

PO12 66.7% 31.2% 1. Students were confined to only subjective and


theoretical knowledge. Some changes in technical skills
according the industrial requirements have to be
included in curriculum.
Actions
 Latest software like Xilinx, MATLAB, SALESFORCE, HADOOP, CLOUDERA, PYTHON,
Android Development Kit and ECLIPSE will be introduced to fulfill this gap.

 Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.

 Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.

 More activities on Coding contest should be promoted among students

 Additional classes to be conducted for writing effective reports, design documents and effective
presentations skills.

 Additional Technical classes to be conducted in the context of technological changes.

 Motivational lectures will be organized for students to understand ethical principles and commit
to professional ethics and responsibilities

 Students are encouraged to participate in various Social and cultural events to enhance
leadership qualities in individuals as well as to make them work in team.
Table B.7.1a: POs Attainment levels & actions for improvement (2015-16) CAY

PO Attainment(2015-16)
PO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

Actual /Ideal Value 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54


Target Value 38 37 40 40 38 38 30 30 45 31 38 36
Target Value (in %) 70.4 68.5 74.1 74.1 70.4 70.4 55.6 55.6 83.3 57.4 70.4 66.7
Attained Value 16.5 17 21 19.4 17.6 19.4 13.2 12.4 21.5 16.5 17.2 16.9
Attained Value % w.r.t. Ideal 30.6 31.5 38.9 35.9 32.6 35.8 24.4 22.9 39.7 30.5 31.9 31.2
Gap(in % 39.8 37 35.2 38.2 37.8 34.6 31.2 32.7 43.6 26.9 38.5 35.5
Table B.7.1b: PO Attainment (2015-16)

Self Assessment Report Page 257


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
90
80
70
60
50 Target Value%
40 Attained Value % wrt Ideal
30 Gap%

20
10
0

Figure 7.1a: PO Attainment (2015-16)

POs Attainment levels & actions for improvement (2016-17)

POs Target Level Attainment Observations


Level
PO1. Engineering Knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering
fundamentals, and Computer Science and Engineering specialization to the solution of complex
Computer Science and Engineering problems.
PO1 70.4% 53.7% 1. Students are needed to improve in implementing
practical knowledge according to theoretical subjects.
2. Some of the subject like, Advanced Engineering
Mathematics, Data Mining & Ware Housing, and
Principles of Communication are needed to be
improved to attain the attainment level are needed to be
improved to attain the attainment level.
Actions
 Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.

 Video lectures along with detailed course contents were held and students were also registered
in online courses (i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.

 Additional classes to be conducted on Advanced Engineering Mathematics, Data Mining &


Ware Housing, and Principles of Communication

Self Assessment Report Page 258


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
PO2. Problem Analysis: Identify, formulate, research literature, and analyze complex computer
Science and Engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of
mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
PO2 64.8% 54.8% 1. Need of strong analytical power in students was
realized and correlation between Mathematics &
Science with engineering subjects was lacking.
2. Some of the subject likes Advanced Engineering
Mathematics; Data Mining & Ware Housing is needed
to be improved to attain the attainment level.
Actions
 Students were advised to observe the problems related to real life scenario.

 More home assignments are given for subjects that have computational importance

 Remedial classes to be conducted on subject in which target is not achieved.

PO3. Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex Computer Science and
Engineeringproblems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with
appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental
considerations.
PO3 74.1% 63.1% 1. Approach towards the solutions of problems and
development of minor and major projects were not
fulfilling the industrial approach.
2. Some of the subject like Data Mining & Ware
Housing, Data Structures and Algorithms, Distributed
Systems, Linux and Shell Programming, Mobile
Computing are needed to be improved to attain the
attainment level
Actions
 Encouragement to students regarding proper feasibility analysis and design and
development of the product according to industry requirements
 Additional classes to be conducted on design solutions for complex engineering problems
 Coding contest should be promoted among students
PO4. Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research
methods including design of Computer Science and Engineering experiments, analysis and
interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
PO4 74.1% 57.8% 1. Students are needed to improve in applying research
based approach to the investigations required for
creating projects.
2. Some of the subject like Statistics and Probability
Theory, Advanced Engineering Mathematics, Data

Self Assessment Report Page 259


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Mining & Ware Housing, is needed to be improved to
attain the attainment level.
Actions
 Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.
 More activities on Coding contest should be promoted among students
 Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.

PO5. Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern
Computer Science and Engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex
computer science engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
PO5 70.4% 57.4% 1. According to latest industry standards and to fill the
gap between industry and academic, up gradation of
tools and software were required.
2. Some of the subject likes Advanced Engineering
Mathematics; Data Mining & Ware Housing is needed
to be improved to attain the attainment level.
Actions
 Latest software like Xilinx, MATLAB, SALESFORCE, HADOOP, CLOUDERA, PYTHON,
Android Development Kit and ECLIPSE will be introduced to fulfill this gap.

 Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.

 Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.

 More activities on Coding contest should be promoted among students

PO6. The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess
societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the
professional Computer Science and Engineering practice.
PO6 70.4% 58.8% 1. Content beyond the syllabus includes subjects
related to needs of health safety and social needs of the
society.
2. Some of the subject likes Advanced Engineering
Mathematics; Data Mining & Ware Housing is needed
to be improved to attain the attainment level.
Actions
 Students should be motivated to involve in social initiatives to understand the social aspects

Self Assessment Report Page 260


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
which will help them to solve the problems of society with engineering practices.

 Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.

 Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.

 More activities on society issues, Social issues and health related problems should be promoted
among students.
PO7. Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional Computer Science
and Engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of,
and need for sustainable development
PO7 55.6% 44.4% 1. It was observed that role of students towards
environment and global awareness needs to be
improved.
2. Some of the subject likes Advanced Engineering
Mathematics; Data Mining & Ware Housing is needed
to be improved to attain the attainment level.
Actions
 Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.

 Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.

 More activities on professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts


and demonstration of the knowledge for sustainable development should be promoted among
students
PO8. Ethics:Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms
of the Computer Science and Engineering practice.
PO8 59.3% 44% 1. Along with increase in technical knowledge, ethical
knowledge was also required in graduates but due to
less moral ethics few were behind in practical
situations.
2. Some of the subject like Advanced Engineering
Mathematics ,Data Mining & Ware Housing, Data
Compression Techniques
Actions
 Motivational lectures will be organized for self-realization ethical principles and commit to
professional ethics and responsibilities

Self Assessment Report Page 261


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
 Students are encouraged to participate in various Social and cultural events.

 Some of the workshops will be organized to understand the professional ethics, responsibilities
and norms of the engineering practice.

PO9. Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in
diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings in Computer Science and Engineering.
PO9 83.3% 63.8% 1. Few students were not able to make themselves
compatible with other members in a group.
2. Some of the subject like in Data Mining & Ware
Housing, Data Structures and Algorithms, Digital
Image Processing, are needed to be improved to attain
the attainment level.
Action
 Motivating students to work in groups in technical studies
 More extracurricular events will be organized to enhance leadership qualities in individuals as
well as to make them work in team.
 More activities on Coding contest should be promoted among students to work effectively as
an individual and in a team

PO10. Communication: Communicate effectively on complex Computer Science and Engineering


activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend
and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and
receive clear instructions.
PO10 57.4% 45.8% 1. Communication Skills were not up to the mark and
needs to be improved for presentations to be
performed.
2. Some of the subject likes Advanced Engineering
Mathematics; Principles of Communication are needed
to be improved to attain the attainment level.
Actions
 Personality Development Skills will be imparted to students to enhance various aspects of
communication, technical and Presentations skills

 Expert Talks to enhance aptitude, qualitative skills of the students

 Additional classes to be conducted for writing effective reports, design documents and effective
presentations skills.

PO11. Project Management and Finance:Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the


Computer Science and Engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as
a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.

Self Assessment Report Page 262


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
PO11 70.4% 52.6% 1. Implementation and feasibility of various projects
can be done by properly analyzing and managing them
according to the financial availability.
2. Some of the subject likes Advanced Engineering
Mathematics; Principles of Communication are needed
to be improved to attain the attainment level.
Actions

 Students are encouraged to participate in entrepreneurship and startups programs.

 Additional classes to be conducted for demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the


engineering and management principles to manage projects in multidisciplinary environments.

 Workshops and Industrial visits will be included to enhance the capability of students to apply
their Knowledge to make , enhance and manage projects in multidisciplinary environments

PO12. Life –long Learning:Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in
independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of Computer Science and Engineering
change.
PO12 66.7% 52.9% 1. Students of 3rd and 4th year need to have conceptual
knowledge of few basic and important courses which
will help them in their future jobs.
2. Some of the subject likes Advanced Engineering
Mathematics; Principles of Communication are needed
to be improved to attain the attainment level.
Actions
 Latest software like Xilinx, MATLAB, SALESFORCE, HADOOP, CLOUDERA, PYTHON,
Android Development Kit and ECLIPSE will be introduced to fulfill this gap.

 Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.

 Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.

 More activities on Coding contest should be promoted among students

 Additional classes to be conducted for writing effective reports, design documents and effective
presentations skills.

 Additional Technical classes to be conducted in the context of technological changes

Self Assessment Report Page 263


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
 Motivational lectures will be organized for students to understand ethical principles and commit
to professional ethics and responsibilities

 Students are encouraged to participate in various Social and cultural events to enhance
leadership qualities in individuals as well as to make them work in team.

Table B.7.1c:POs Attainment levels & actions for improvement (2016-17) CAY

PO Attainment(2016-17)
PO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

Actual /Ideal Value 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54


Target Value 38 37 40 40 38 38 30 30 45 31 38 36
Target Value% 70.4 68.5 74.1 74.1 70.4 70.4 55.6 55.6 83.3 57.4 70.4 66.7
Attained Value 29 29.6 34.1 31.2 31 31.8 24 23.8 34.5 24.8 28.4 28.6
Attained Value %
53.7 54.8 63.1 57.8 57.4 58.8 44.4 44 63.8 45.8 52.6 52.9
w.r.t. Ideal
Gap% 16.7 13.7 11 16.3 13 11.6 11.2 11.6 19.5 11.6 17.8 13.8
Table B.7.1d: PO Attainment (2016-17)

100

80

60

40

20

0
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

Target Value% Attained Value % wrt Ideal Gap%

Figure 7.1b:POAttainment (2016-17)

POs Attainment levels & actions for improvement (2017-18) CAY

POs Target Level Attainment Observations


Level
PO1. Engineering Knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering
fundamentals, and Computer Science and Engineering specialization to the solution of complex
Computer Science and Engineering problems.
PO1 70.4 59.3% 1. Students are needed to improve in implementing
practical knowledge according to theoretical subjects.

Self Assessment Report Page 264


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
2. Some of the subjects like, Data Compression
Techniques, Advanced Engineering Mathematics, and
Compiler Construction are needed to be improved to
attain the attainment level.
Actions
 Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.

 Video lectures along with detailed course contents were held and students were also registered
in online courses (i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.

 Additional classes to be conducted on Data Compression Techniques, Advanced Engineering


Mathematics, and Compiler Construction.

PO2. Problem Analysis: Identify, formulate, research literature, and analyze complex computer
Science and Engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of
mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
PO2 64.8% 58% 1. Need of strong analytical power in students was
realized and correlation between Mathematics &
Science with engineering subjects was lacking.
2. Some of the subject like Data Compression
Techniques, Advanced Engineering Mathematics,
Compiler Construction, are needed to be improved to
attain the attainment level.
Actions
 Students were advised to observe the problems related to real life scenario.

 More home assignments are given for subjects that have computational importance

 Remedial classes to be conducted on subject in which target is not achieved.

PO3. Design/development of solutions:Design solutions for complex Computer Science and


Engineeringproblems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with
appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental
considerations.
PO3 74.1% 66.1% 1. Approach towards the solutions of problems and
development of minor and major projects were not
fulfilling the industrial requirements.
2. Some of the subject like Cloud Computing, Linux
and Shell Programming, Data Mining & Ware Housing
are needed to be improved to attain the attainment
level.

Self Assessment Report Page 265


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Actions
 Encouragement to students regarding proper feasibility analysis and design and development of
the product according to industry requirements
 Additional classes to be conducted on design solutions for complex engineering problems
 Coding contest should be promoted among students
PO4. Conduct investigations of complex problems:Use research-based knowledge and research
methods including design of Computer Science and Engineering experiments, analysis and
interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
PO4 74.1% 60% 1. Students are needed to improve in applying research
based approach to the investigations required for
creating projects.
2. Some of the subject like Data Compression
Techniques, Advanced Engineering Mathematics, and
Compiler Construction are needed to be improved to
attain the attainment level.
Actions
 Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.

 More activities on Coding contest should be promoted among students

 Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.

PO5. Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern
Computer Science and Engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex
computer science engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
PO5 70.4% 61.5% 1. According to latest industry standards and to fill the
gap between industry and academic, up gradation of
tools and software were required.
2. Some of the subject like Compiler Construction,
Digital Logic Design, and Cloud Computing are
needed to be improved to attain the attainment level.
Actions
 Latest software like Xilinx, MATLAB, SALESFORCE, HADOOP, CLOUDERA, PYTHON,
Android Development Kit and ECLIPSE will be introduced to fulfill this gap.

 Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.

 Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of

Self Assessment Report Page 266


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.

 More activities on Coding contest should be promoted among students


PO6. The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess
societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the
professional Computer Science and Engineering practice.
PO6 70.4% 63.2% 1. Content beyond the syllabus includes subjects
related to needs of health safety and social needs of the
society.
2. Some of the subject like Compiler Construction,
Digital Logic Design, and Cloud Computing are
needed to be improved to attain the attainment level.
Actions
 Students should be motivated to involve in social initiatives to understand the social aspects
which will help them to solve the problems of society with engineering practices.

 Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.

 Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.

 More activities on society issues, Social issues and health related problems should be promoted
among students
PO7. Environment and sustainability:Understand the impact of the professional Computer Science
and Engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of,
and need for sustainable development.
PO7 55.6% 46.8% 1. It was observed that role of students towards
environment and global awareness needs to be
improved.
2. Some of the subject like Cloud Computing, and
Advanced Engineering Mathematics are needed to be
improved to attain the attainment level.
Actions
 Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.

 Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.

 More activities on professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts


and demonstration of the knowledge for sustainable development should be promoted among

Self Assessment Report Page 267


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
students
PO8. Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms
of the Computer Science and Engineering practice.
PO8 59.3% 46.9% 1. Along with increase in technical knowledge, ethical
knowledge was also required in graduates but due to
less moral ethics few were behind in practical
situations.
2. Some of the subject like Advanced Engineering
Mathematics, Data Compression Techniques, and
Cloud Computing are needed to be improved to attain
the attainment level.
Actions
 Motivational lectures will be organized for self-realization ethical principles and commit to
professional ethics and responsibilities

 Students are encouraged to participate in various Social and cultural events.

 Some of the workshops will be organized to understand the professional ethics, responsibilities
and norms of the engineering practice.

PO9. Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in
diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings in Computer Science and Engineering.
PO9 83.3% 68.2% 1. Few students were not able to make themselves
compatible with other members in a group.
2. Some of the subject like Cloud Computing, Real
Time Systems, and Data Mining & Ware Housing are
needed to be improved to attain the attainment level.
Actions
 Motivating students to work in groups in technical studies

 More extracurricular events will be organized to enhance leadership qualities in individuals as


well as to make them work in team.

 More activities on Coding contest should be promoted among students to work effectively as
an individual and in a team
PO10. Communication:Communicate effectively on complex Computer Science and Engineering
activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend
and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and
receive clear instructions.
PO10 57.4% 48.8% 1. Communication Skills were not up to the mark and
needs to be improved for presentations to be
performed.

Self Assessment Report Page 268


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
2. Some of the subject like Advanced Engineering
Mathematics, Compiler Construction, and Cloud
Computing are needed to be improved to attain the
attainment level.
Actions
 Personality Development Skills will be imparted to students to enhance various aspects of
communication, technical and Presentations skills

 Expert Talks to enhance aptitude, qualitative skills of the students

 Additional classes to be conducted for writing effective reports, design documents and effective
presentations skills.

PO11. Project Management and Finance:Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the


Computer Science and Engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as
a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
PO11 70.4% 55.9% 1. Implementation and feasibility of various projects
can be done by properly analyzing and managing them
according to the financial availability.
2. Some of the subject like Advanced Engineering
Mathematics, Compiler Construction, and Cloud
Computing are needed to be improved to attain the
attainment level.
Actions

 Students are encouraged to participate in entrepreneurship and startups programs.

 Additional classes to be conducted for demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the


engineering and management principles to manage projects in multidisciplinary environments.

 Workshops and Industrial visits will be included to enhance the capability of students to apply
their Knowledge to make , enhance and manage projects in multidisciplinary environments

PO12. Life –long Learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in
independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of Computer Science and Engineering
change.
PO12 66.7% 57.3% 1. Students of 3rd and 4th year need to have conceptual
knowledge of few basic and important courses which
will help them in their future jobs.
2. Some of the subject like Advanced Engineering
Mathematics, Compiler Construction and Cloud
Computing are needed to be improved to attain the

Self Assessment Report Page 269


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
attainment level.
Actions
 Latest software like Xilinx, MATLAB, SALESFORCE, HADOOP, CLOUDERA, PYTHON,
Android Development Kit and ECLIPSE will be introduced to fulfill this gap.
 Video lectures should be planned for students and motivate them to register in online courses
(i.e. Swayam, NPTEL, MOOCs) launched by AICTE.
 Workshops and technical activities were included in curriculum to enhance the capability of
students to relate it to the classroom lectures.
 More activities on Coding contest should be promoted among students
 Additional classes to be conducted for writing effective reports, design documents and effective
presentations skills.
 Additional Technical classes to be conducted in the context of technological changes
 Motivational lectures will be organized for students to understand ethical principles and commit
to professional ethics and responsibilities
 Students are encouraged to participate in various Social and cultural events to enhance
leadership qualities in individuals as well as to make them work in team.

Table B.7.1e:POs Attainment levels & actions for improvement (2017-18) CAY

PO Attainment(2017-18)
PO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
Actual /Ideal Value 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54
Target Value 38 37 40 40 38 38 30 30 45 31 38 36
Target Value% 70.4 68.5 74.1 74.1 70.4 70.4 55.6 55.6 83.3 57.4 70.4 66.7
Attained Value 32 31.3 35.7 32.4 33.2 34.2 25.3 25.4 36.9 26.4 30.2 31
Attained Value % w.r.t. Ideal 59.3 58 66.1 60 61.5 63.2 46.8 46.9 68.2 48.8 55.9 57.3
Gap% 11.1 10.5 8 14.1 8.9 7.2 8.8 8.7 15.1 8.6 14.5 9.4
Table B.7.1f: PO Attainment (2017-18)

90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

Target Value% Attained Value % wrt Ideal Gap%

Figure 7.1c:PO Attainment (2017-18)

Self Assessment Report Page 270


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Comparative Analysis of academic session 2017-18, 2016-17 and 2015-16

Attained Value %
w.r.t. Ideal PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
2015-16 30.6 31.5 38.9 35.9 32.6 35.8 24.4 22.9 39.7 30.5 31.9 31.2
2016-17 53.7 54.8 63.1 57.8 57.4 58.8 44.4 44 63.8 45.8 52.6 52.9
2017-18 59.3 58 66.1 60 61.5 63.2 46.8 46.9 68.2 48.8 55.9 57.3
Table B.7.1g: PO Attainment (2017-18, 2016-17 and 2015-16)

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Figure 7.1d: PO Attainment (2017-18, 2016-17 and 2015-16)

PSOs Attainment levels & actions for improvement (2016-17) CAY

PSO Target Level Attainment Observations


Level
PSO1. Ability to interpret and analyze network specific and cyber security issues in real world
environment
Solutions of problems and development of
minor and major projects were not fulfilling
90.47 30.95% the industrial requirements and students are
PSO1
lacking working and performing under real life
constraints
Actions
 Additional classes to be conducted for to interpret and analyze network specific and
cyber security issues in real world environment
 Workshops and Training program will be included to enhance the capability of
students to apply their Knowledge to make and manage projects in multidisciplinary
environments

Self Assessment Report Page 271


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
PSO2. Ability to design and develop Mobile and Web-based applications under realistic
constraints.
Students must solve problems for development
PSO2 of minor and major projects according to the
90.47 53.80%
industrial requirements students’ needs to
work and performing under real life constraints
Actions
 Additional classes and training programs will be conducted design and develop Mobile
and Web-based applications under realistic constraints.
 Workshops and expert lectures will be included to enhance the capability of students
to apply their Knowledge to make and manage Mobile and Web-based applications in
multidisciplinary environments

Table B.7.1h: PSOs Attainment levels & actions for improvement (2016-17) CAY

PSOs Attainment levels & actions for improvement (2016-17) CAY

PSO PSO1 PSO2


Ideal Value 21 21
Target Value 19 19
Target 90.47% 90.47%
Attained value 6.5 11.3
Attained value Ideal wise 30.95% 53.80%
Gap 59.52% 36.66%
Table B.7.1i: PSO Attainment (2016-17)

PSO Attainment 2016-17

100.00%

80.00% 90.47% 90.47%

60.00%
59.52%
40.00% 53.80%
36.66%
20.00% 30.95%

0.00%
Target Attained value Gap

PSO1 PSO2

Figure 7.1e: PSO Attainment (2016-17)

Self Assessment Report Page 272


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
PSOs Attainment levels & actions for improvement (2017-18) CAY

PSO Target Level Attainment Observations


Level
PSO1. Ability to interpret and analyze network specific and cyber security issues in real world
environment
Solutions of problems and development of
minor and major projects were not fulfilling
90.47 48.47 the industrial requirements and students are
PSO1
lacking working and performing under real life
constraints

Actions
 Additional classes to be conducted for to interpret and analyze network specific and
cyber security issues in real world environment
 Workshops and Training program will be included to enhance the capability of
students to apply their Knowledge to make and manage projects in multidisciplinary
environments
 Students will be motivated to participate in coding contest and Hackathon to enhance
their skills to solve in real life problems
 Students are encouraged to participate in entrepreneurship and startups programs

PSO2. Ability to design and develop Mobile and Web-based applications under realistic
constraints.
Students must solve problems for development
PSO2 of minor and major projects according to the
90.47 64.28
industrial requirements students’ needs to
work and performing under real life constraints
Actions
 Additional classes and training programs will be conducted design and develop Mobile
and Web-based applications under realistic constraints.
 Workshops and expert lectures will be included to enhance the capability of students
to apply their Knowledge to make and manage Mobile and Web-based applications in
multidisciplinary environments
 Students will be motivated to participate in coding contest and Hackathon to enhance
their skills to solve in real life problems
 Students are encouraged to participate in entrepreneurship and startups programs
Table B.7.1j: PSOs Attainment levels & actions for improvement (2016-17) CAY

Self Assessment Report Page 273


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
PSO PSO1 PSO2
Ideal Value 21 21
Target Value 19 19
Target 90.47% 90.47%
Attained value 10.2 13.5
Attained value Ideal wise 48.57% 64.28%
Gap 41.90% 26.19%
Table B.7.1k: PSO Attainment (2017-18)

PSO Attainment 2017-18

90.47%90.47%
100.00%
80.00% 64.28%
48.57%
60.00% 41.90%
26.19%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
Target Attained value Gap

PSO1 PSO2

Figure 7.1f: PSO Attainment (2017-18)

Comparative Analysis of academic session 2016-17 and 2015-16

PSO Attainment (2016-17 & 2017-18)


PSO1 PSO2

90.47%90.47%

64.28%
59.52% 59.52%
53.80%
48.57%
36.66% 36.66%
30.95%

Target Attained Attained GAP 2016-17 GAP 2017-18


(2016-17) (2017-18)

Figure 7.1g: PSO Attainment (2016-17 &2017-18)

Self Assessment Report Page 274


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
7.2. Academic Audit and actions taken thereof during the period of Assessment (10)
(Academic Audit system/process and its implementation in relation to Continuous Improvement)
Academic Audit system at JECRC, Computer science and engineering department is projected for
both faculty and students to monitor and better enhancement in the quality of teaching & learning
process with their appropriate guidelines and support. Self-assessment of individual faculty members
along with the students is the prime goal of the departmental IQAC (Internal Quality Assurance
Committee) team.

 Members of this Academic audit IQAC team are consisting of program coordinator and
senior faculty members of the department.
 Academic Audit is done twice at one semester.
 First audit includes, monitoring teaching process, time- table, Teachers Dairy (course
plan and course coverage), lab equipment’s requirements, 1st sessional result analysis
faculty wise.
 Second Audit includes, addressing the difficulties faced by students as well as faculty
members and take suitable remedial actions, final result analysis, coverage of syllabus
etc.
 IQAC team also looks into the faculty development programs (FDP) along with the technical
and research oriented activities of both students and faculty members.

OBJECTIVES OF ACADEMIC AUDITING:

(i) To ensure academic continuous improvement.

(ii) To enhance the quality of each component of the departmental functionalities and to ensure
quality of education system in respective to both students as well as faculty members.

DOCUMENTS TO B E PRODUCED FOR AUDIT TEARCHERS DIARY AND COURSE


FILE
Following documents are maintained at the department level for the purpose of academic audit:

1. Class Time Table & Faculty Time Table.


2. Teacher’s Diary for all the courses including practical, seminar, project etc.
3. Course File
4. Lab manuals for practical courses
5. Equipment Stock register used in Laboratories
6. Consolidated Attendance & marks statement of students
7. Seminar &Project (Mini project/Design project/Final semester project) progress review
report

Self Assessment Report Page 275


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
8. Register of internal evaluation marks
9. Result Analysis
10. Department Activities / Events register
11. Internships/ Industrial visits/ Summer training / Workshops/ Technical competitions
attended by students
12. Details of students’ Placements, Higher education, competitive exams etc.
13. Students feedback reports
These documents are updated regularly in the process of quality assurance.

Audit Notice by IQAC

Lab Resources Student Performance


Documents Document

Audit
PracticalTeaching Activities Faculty Performance
Learning Related Documents
Documents

CO Analysis Internship/Industrial
(MTT)MTT- Review and Suggestions to visits/Summer Training
IDepartment the Concerned
Activities/Events

Student’s Feedback Student’s Placements,


Higher Education
Audit report preparation

Report approved by
Program Coordinator

Submitted to Principal

Figure 7.2a: Audit Process of CSE Department

Self Assessment Report Page 276


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
The Following are the team members of IQAC audit for session (2016-17)
S.NO. Name Designation Responsibilities
1. Dr. Bhavna Sharma Associate Professor Dept.NBA coordinator
2. Mr. Amit Mithal Assistant Professor II Shift Program coordinator.
3. Mr. Gajendra Sharma Assistant Professor EDC, IIPC coordinator.
4. Mrs. Anima Sharma Assistant Professor Training & Placement Officer.
5. Ms. ShikhaMaheshwari Assistant Professor 3rd Year Class Coordinator.
6. Mrs. HemlataSoni Assistant Professor 2nd Year Class Coordinator.
7. Ms. C JebaNegaCheltha Assistant Professor Examination In charge.
Table B.7.2a: IQAC audit Member of session (2016-2017)

Sample of 1st audit meeting in session (2016-2017):


Criterion Items Reviews

Teaching learning related Documents


Course Formatting Alignment, Table Format, Page Layout
File Content Content Improve, Assignments, Weak Student list
Time Time slots Extra Co-Curricular Activities, Library Period, Timing, Analytical
Table Aspect in Research
Student Performance Documents
Result Improvement Analysis of Weak Student, Activities of Student, Problem Analysis
Analysis

Faculty Performance Documents


Result Improvement Analysis last year result faculty wise
Analysis
Performan Faculty Concern Subject knowledge, Team Work ideal for a professional,
ce Social Service Activities, Interact with Students
Teaching PPT, Video, Expert Lecture, Course Planners, Awareness Program,
Methods Team Work, Project Management, Professional Competency
Syllabus Completion
Notes Availability
FDP Quality Technical, Communication Supportive, Guest Lectures, Interview
Facing Skills, Ethics
Area Concern Related to Subject, In-house Research Projects
Lab Resources Documents
Stock Stock Register Stock register are maintained properly

Table B.7.2b:IQAC 1st audit Meeting of session (2016-2017)

Self Assessment Report Page 277


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Sample of 2nd audit meeting in session (2016-2017):
Criterion Items Reviews

Teaching learning related Documents


Course Formatting Updated ass mentioned in previous audit meeting
File Content Updated ass mentioned in previous audit meeting
Lecture Time Table Updated ass mentioned in previous audit meeting
and Labs
Student Performance Documents
Class Attendance Most of the students are having less attendance, conduct some
Record extra classes
Debarred list Not prepare till yet
Result Improvement Analysis of Weak Student and give them some assignments
Analysis
Faculty Performance Documents
API Faculty Analysis of Research, Results

Department Activities / Events


FDP Quality Technical ,Communication Supportive
Event Intra class Related to Subject
Quiz
Paper Plan to conduct
presentation
Lab Resources Documents
Stock Stock Register Required to properly maintain with in charge signature
Internships/ Industrial visits/ summer training
Internship Record File Some of the Student record are missing
Industrial Record File Mapping with Course benefits, Feedback of student
Trip
Summer Record File The level of company, No objection certificates, presentation the
training training work
Students’ Placements, Higher education
Placements Record File Analysis student performance, Extra mentioning on week students
Extra classes Attendance, performance
Higher Record File Maintain the record of the student
Education
Extra classes Attendance, performance
Student’s feedback
Feedback Record File Feedback form record, analyze accordingly for further
improvement
Table B.7.2c:IQAC audit 2nd Meeting of session (2016-2017)

Self Assessment Report Page 278


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
The Following are the team members of IQAC audit for session (2017-18)
S.NO. Name Designation Responsibilities
1. Dr. Bhavna Sharma Associate Professor NBA coordinator
2. Mr. Amit Mithal Assistant Professor II Shift Program coordinator.
3. Mr. Gajendra Sharma Assistant Professor EDC, IIPC coordinator.
4. Dr..Neelam Choudhary Assistant Professor Training Incharge
5. Dr. Sanjay Gaur Assistant Professor NBA Coordinator.
6. Mrs. Hemlata Soni Assistant Professor 2nd Year Class Coordinator.
7. Ms. C Jeba Nega Cheltha Assistant Professor Examination In charge.
Table B.7.2d: IQAC audit Member of session (2017-2018)

7.3 Improvement in Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship


Assessment is based on improvement in:
 Placement: number, quality placement, core industry, pay packages etc.
 Higher studies: performance in GATE, GRE, GMAT, CAT etc., and admissions in premier institutions
 Entrepreneurs
Item CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3
Total No.of Final Year Students (N) (2016-17)
202 (2015-16)
154 (2014-15)
156
No.of Students Placed in Companies or
Government Sector (X)
152 112 86
No.of Students Admitted to higher Studies with
Valid qualifying Scores (GATE or equivalent 9 11 11
StateoforStudents
No. Nationalturned
Levelentrepreneur
Tests, GRE, in
GMAT
etc.) (Y)
Engineering/ Technology (Z)
4 4 0
X+Y+Z= 165 127 97
Placement Index: (X+Y+Z)/N 0.816 0.824 0.621
Average Placement= (P1+P2+P3)/3 0.753
Table B.7.3: Improvement in Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship
250

200

150

100

50 CAYm1 (2016-17)
CAYm2 (2015-16)
0
CAYm3 (2014-15)

Figure 7.3: Improvement in Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship

Self Assessment Report Page 279


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
7.4. Improvement in the quality of students admitted to the program (10)

Assessment is based on improvement in terms of ranks/score in qualifying state level/national level entrances
tests, percentage marks in Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics in 12 th Standard and percentage marks of the
lateral entry students.

Item 2018-19 2017-18 2016-17


No. of students admitted 192 189 189
National Level Entrance
Examination(Name of Exam:AIEEE) Opening Score 151 155 176
Closing Score 74 78 112
No. of students admitted 0 10 4
Lateral entry details Opening Score/Rank NA NA NA
Closing Score/Rank NA NA NA
Table B.7.4: Improvement in the quality of students admitted to the program

250

200

150
No. of students admitted
Opening Score/Rank
100
Closing Score/Rank

50

0
2018-19 2017-18 2016-17

Figure 7.4: Improvement in the quality of students admitted to the program

Self Assessment Report Page 280


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Criteria 8
STUDENT SUPPORT SYSTEM
(50)

Self Assessment Report Page 281


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
CRITERION 8 First Year Academics 50

8. FIRST YEAR ACADEMICS (50)

8.1 First Year student faculty Ratio (5)


Data for first year courses to calculate FYSFR

No. of faculty Assessment =


No. of students
members (5×20)/Average
Year (Approved intake FYSFR
(Considering FYSFR (Limited to
strength)
fractional load) Max. 5)
2018-2019 990 46 21.52 4.64

2017-18 997 48 20.77 4.81

2016-17 1020 51 20 5.0

Average 1002 48.33 20.76 4.81


Table B. 8.1: First Year student faculty Ratio

8.2 Qualification of Faculty Teaching First Year Common Courses (5)


Assessment of qualification = (5X+3Y)/RF, X = No. of Regular Faculty with Ph.D., Y = No. of Regular Faculty with Post
Graduate qualification, RF = No. of faculty members required as per SFR of 20:1, faculty definition as define in 5.1

Assessment of faculty
Year
X Y RF qualification (5X+3Y)/RF

2018-19 22 24 49.50 3.67


2017-18 24 24 49.85 3.85
2016-17 29 22 51.00 4.13
Average Assessment 3.88
Table B. 8.2a:Assessment of Qualification

Self Assessment Report Page 282


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
8.3 First Year Academic Performance (10)
Academic Performance = ((Mean of 1st Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10
point scale) or (Mean of the percentage of marks in First Year of all successful students/10)) x(number of
successful students/number of students appeared in the examination)

S. No. CAY Academic Performance (10 Scale)

1 CAY (2018-19) Result yet to be declared


2
CAY-1 (2017-18) 7.9
3
CAY-2 (2016-17) 7.9
Table 8.3a Academic Performance(10 Scale)

First Year Academic Performance is shown in the table below:

Academic Performance (10 Scale)


9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
CAY (2018-19) CAY-1 (2017-18) CAY-2 (2016-17)
Figure 8.3b: Academic Performance(10 Scale)

Self Assessment Report Page 283


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
2017-18 (II Sem)

No. of
S.No SUBJECT Passed Mean of % 10 scale
Students
1 Communication Skills 524 517 98.66 9.7
2 Human Values 486 476 97.94 9.6
3 Engineering Chemistry 469 398 84.86 7.2
4 Engineering Physics 500 438 87.60 7.7
5 Engineering Mathematics-II 964 874 90.66 8.2
6 Basic Civil Engineering 861 794 92.22 8.5
7 Computer Programming-II 984 826 83.94 7.0
8 Engineering Mechanics 1016 831 81.79 6.7
9 Basic Mechanical Engineering 127 91 71.65 5.1
AVERAGE 656 583 87.70 7.7
Table B.8.3c: Academic Performance 2017-18 Sem.-II

(2017-18 Sem.-I)

S. No. Subject No. of Students Passed Mean of % 10 Scale


1 Communication Skills 490 484 98.78 9.8
2 Human Values 523 500 95.60 9.1
3 Engineering. Chemistry 511 464 90.80 8.2
4 Engineering Physics 474 379 79.96 6.4
5 Engineering Mathematics I 974 794 81.52 6.6
Environmental Engineering and
6 986 930 94.32 8.9
Disaster Management
7
Computer Programming 994 892 89.74 8.1

AVERAGE 707 635 90.10 8.1


Table B.8.3d: Academic Performance 2017-18 Sem.-1

(2016-17 Sem. - II)

S. No. Subject No. of Students Passed Mean of % 10 Scale


1 Communication Techniques 1001 993 99.20 9.8
2 Engineering Mathematics-II 992 791 79.74 6.4
3 Engineering Physics-II 1005 880 87.56 7.7
4 Chemistry &Environmental 1001 936 93.51 8.7
Engineering
5 Engineering Mechanics 1001 866 86.51 7.5

6 Fundamentals of Computer 976 808 82.79 6.9


Programming
AVERAGE 996 879 88.21 7.8
Table B.8.3e Academic Performance 2017-18 Sem.-II

Self Assessment Report Page 284


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
(2016-17 Sem.-I)

S. No. Subject No. of Students Passed Mean of % 10 Scale

1 Communicative English 1015 965 95.07 9.0

2 Engineering Mathematics-I 1014 822 81.07 6.6

3 Engineering Physics-I 1009 803 79.58 6.3

4 Engineering Chemistry-I 1014 959 94.58 8.9

5 Basic Electrical and Electronics 1019 875 85.87 7.4


Engineering
AVERAGE 1014 885 87.23 7.6

Table B.8.3f Academic Performance 2016-17 Sem.-I

(2015-16 Sem. - II)


S. No. Subject No. of Students Passed Mean of % 10 Scale
1 Communication Techniques 1005 981 97.61 9.5
2 Engineering Mathematics-II 999 872 87.29 7.6

3 Engineering Physics-II 1002 906 90.42 8.2

4 Chemistry &Environmental 998 918 91.98 8.5


Engineering
5 Engineering Mechanics 1002 846 84.43 7.1

6 Fundamentals of Computer 1018 856 84.09 7.1


Programming
AVERAGE 1004 896 89.30 8.0
Table B.8.3g Academic Performance 2015-16 Sem.-II

10 scale (2017-18 II Sem)


12.0
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0

Figure 8.3b Academic Performance 2017-18 I Sem. (10 Scale)

Self Assessment Report Page 285


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
10 Scale 2017-18 I Sem
12.0
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0

Figure 8.3c Academic Performance 2017-18 I Sem. (10 Scale)

10 Scale (2016-17 II Sem)


12.0

10.0

8.0

6.0

4.0

2.0

0.0
Communication Engineering Engineering Chemistry & Engineering Fundamentals
Techniques Mathematics-II Physics-II Environmental Mechanical of Computer
Engineering

Figure 8.3d Academic Performance 2016-17 II Sem. (10 Scale)

Self Assessment Report Page 286


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
10 Scale (2016-17 I Sem)
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
Communicative Engineering Engineering Physics-I Engineering Basic Electronics and
English Mathematics-I Chemistry Electrical
Engineering

Figure 8.3e Academic Performance 2016-17 I Sem. (10 Scale)

8.4. Attainment of Course Outcomes of first year courses (10)


8.4.1. Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the
Evaluation of Course Outcomes of first year is done (5)
(Examples of data collection processes may include, but are not limited to, specific examquestions, laboratory
tests, internally developed assessment exams, oral exams assignments, presentations, tutorial sheets etc.)
The assessment process used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of
course outcomes of first year is done is as follows:

Evaluation of Course Outcomes of First Year

Internal Assessment (MTT Result)

MTT-I MTT-II

Co Analysis

Assessment of Weak Students

Final Assessment Assignments

Submitted to Dean Office

Figure 8.4a Attainment of Course Outcome of First Year Course

Self Assessment Report Page 287


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Assessment Process for the Year 2018-19

 Internal assessment will be done by taking two Mid Term Tests and assignment/presentations
(co wise) as per the RTU guidelines.
 The performance of a student in internal assessment with respect to all the CO’s will be
recorded.
 End semester University exam performance of students for the maximum marks will be
considered for external exam performance.
 For laboratory assessment, the over all performance of astudentin sessionalwill be assessed
as in Final lab internal test, Final lab internal Viva voce and Class performance during the
whole semester (record + attendance). Totalof these three is considered for internal lab
assessment.
 Performance of a student inexternal lab exami.e.Practicalwillbeassessed as inperformance
and viva voce. Total of this is considered for external practical exam performance.
 The summation of these two performances is considered ascumulative assessment for a
prescribed lab outcome.

Assessment Process for the Year 2016-17 & 2017-18

 Two internal tests for a maximum marks10 are conducted and total of two internals is
considered for final internal assessment.
 The performance of a student in internal assessment with respect to all the CO’s is recorded.
 End semester University exam performance ofstudents for the maximum marks100 is
considered for external exam performance.
 For laboratory assessment, the over all per formance of a student in sessional is assessed as in
Final lab internal test,Final lab internal Viva voce andClass performance during the whole
semester (Record + attendance). Total of these three is considered for internal lab assessment.
 Performance of a student inexternal lab exami.e.Practical is assessedas in performance and
viva voce. Total of this is considered for external practical exam performance.
 The summation of these two performance sisconsidered as cumulative assessment fora
prescribed lab outcome.

Self Assessment Report Page 288


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

8.4.2. Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all first year courses(5)
Program shall have set attainment levels for all first year courses.
(The attainment levels shall be set considering average performance levels in the university examination or any
higher value set as target for the assessment years. Attainment level is to be measured in terms of student
performance in internal assessments with respect the COs of a subject plus the performance in the University
examination)

Attainment of Course Outcome


Target for Assessment Year 2017-2018= 60%
Semester I (2017-2018)
S. Subject CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 Average
No. Attainment
1 Communication Skills (HU-101) 79.63% 67.70% 82.10% - 76.47%

2 Human Values (HU-103) 75.38% 66.79% 76.15% - 72.77%

3 Engineering Mathematics-I(MA-101) 70.92 75.60 51.43 44.78 60.68%

4 Engineering Physics (PY-101) 70.75 69.55 73.53 - 71.28%


5 Engineering Chemistry (CY-101) 77.31% 66.07% 72.43% 69.42% 71.30%
6. Computer Programming-I(CS-101) 48.2 51.1 47.3 53.5 50%%
7. Environmental &Disaster 89.15 90.30 85.71 82.88 87.01%
Management(CE-101)
Table B.8.4.2a Attainment of Course Outcome Semester I (2017-2018)

CO Analysis: B. Tech. I Yr. Sem.- I

90 76.47
80 72.77 71.28 71.3
70 60.88
Co Attainment (%)

60 50
50
40
30
20
10
0
Comm. Human Engg. Engg. Phy- Engg. Comp.
Skills Values Math-I I Chemistry Prog.
Subjects

Figure 8.4.2a CO Analysis B.Tech I Yr. Sem.-I (2017-18)

Self Assessment Report Page 289


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Target for Assessment Year 2017-2018= 60%
Semester II (2017-2018)
S. Subject CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 Average
No. Attainment
1 Communication Skills (HU-101) 80.34 55.91 87.21 - 74.48

2 Human Values (HU-103) 70.49 67.62 73.15 - 70.42


3 Engineering Mathematics-I(MA-101) 81% 59% 79% 39% 65%
4 Engineering Physics (PY-101) 76.57 75.45 79.05 -- 77.04
Engineering Chemistry (CY-101)
60.83 43.99 71.16 52.73 57.18
6. Computer Programming-I(CS-101)
65.83 58.14 66.86 64.11 63.73
7. Basic Mechanical Engineering (ME-
101) 82.38 87.32 - - 84.85
8. Basic Civil Engineering (CE-103)
85.07 83.23 66.75 76.64 77.93
9. Engineering Mechanics (OE-101) 80 78.57 87.96 56.94 75.87
Table B.8.4.2b Attainment of Course Outcome Semester I (2017-2018)

CO Analysis: B. Tech. I Yr. Sem.- I

90 84.85
77.04 77.93 75.87
80 74.48
70.42
70 65 63.73
Co Attainment (%)

57.18
60
50
40 S…
30
20
10
0
Comm. Human Engg. Engg. Engg. Comp. BME BCE Engg.
SkillsTech. Values Maths Physics Chem. Prog. Mech.

Subjects

Figure 8.4.2b CO Analysis B.Tech I Yr. Sem.-II (2017-18)

Self Assessment Report Page 290


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Target for Assessment Year 2016-2017= 60%
Semester I (2016-2017)

S.No. Subject CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 CO5 Average


Attainment
1 Communicative 82.36 78.81 80.09 - - 80.39
English(101)
2 Engineering 70.73 49.99 61.93 - - 60.88
Mathematics-I(102)
3 Engineering 92.68 82.05 - - - 87.37
Physics-I(103)
4 Engineering 86.53 79.66 57.54 --- --- 74.57
Chemistry(104)
5 Basic Electrical & 54.27 44.04 42.43 47.81 52.5 48.20
Electronics
Engg.(105)
Table B.8.4.2cAttainment of Course Outcome Semester I (2016-2017)

CO Analysis: B. Tech. I Yr. Sem.- I

100
87.37
90 80.39
74.57
Co Attainment (%)

80
70 60.88
60
48.2
50
40
30
20
10
0
Comm. Engg. Math-I Engg. Phy Engg. Chem. EEE
English Subjects

Figure 8.4.2c CO Analysis B.Tech I Yr. Sem.-I (2016-17)

Self Assessment Report Page 291


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Target for Assessment Year 2016-2017= 60%
Semester II (2016-2017)
S.No. Subject CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 CO5 Average
Attainment
1 Communication 76.22 84.41 74.11 - - 78.24
Technique(201)
2 Engineering 67 82 66 37 - 63
Mathematics-II(202)
3 Engineering Physics- 77.26 80.48 - - - 78.87
II(203)
4 Chemistry & 85.74 68.96 63.76 - - 72.8
Environmental Engg.
(204)
5 Engineering 60.33 48.56 - - - 54.44
Mechanics(205)
6 Fundamentals of 77 60.5 79.3 53.8 67.65
Computer
Programming(206)
Table B.8.4.2dAttainment of Course Outcome Semester II(2016-17)

CO Analysis: B. Tech. I Yr. Sem.- II

90 78.87
78.24
80 72.8
Co Attainment (%)

70 63
60 54.44
50
#
40
30
20
10
0
Comm. Tech. Engg. Math- Engg. Phy-II Chem. & Engg. Mech
II Env. Engg.
Subjects

Figure 8.4.2d CO Analysis B.Tech I Yr. Sem.-II (2016-17)

Self Assessment Report Page 292


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
8.5: Attainment of Program Outcomes from I year courses (20)

8.5.1: Indicate results of evaluation of each relevant PO and/or PSO, if applicable (15)

The relevant Program outcomes that are to be addressed at first year need to be identified by the
institution.

Program outcome attainment levels shall be set for all relevant PO’s and/or PSO’s through First
year courses.

(Describe the assessment processes that demonstrate the degree to which the Program outcomes are
attained through First year courses and document the attainment levels. Also include information on
assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of each Program Outcome
is based indicating the frequency with which these processes are carried out)

Assessment Process used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of each Program
Outcome is based

Process to Calculate Attainment of PO’s (Annualy)

Phase –I

Figure 8.5.1a Process to Calculate Attainment of PO’s

Self Assessment Report Page 293


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Phase –II

Figure 8.5.1bProcess of Finalization of Rubrics

Rubrics for PO Attainment


PO1: Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering
fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering
problems.

Tool Tools Mapping Rubric

70% students >65%=>100% marks


H
70% students >60%=>80%
MTT Result 60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else =>0 marks
L 70% students >65%=>100% marks
Academic Final RTU 70% students >60%=>80%
Assessment Result 60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else=> 0 marks
M Attendance=> 20%marks
Lab/Experiment Performance =>20% marks
s Record /File =>10%
Internal assessment -1 =>30%
External assessment -1 =>20%
>=80% students participated =>100% marks
70-79% students participated=>80%
Technical 60-69% students participated=>60%
Beyond H
Events 50-59% students participated=>50%
Curriculum
Else=> 0 marks
>=25% students participated =>100% marks
Social Events NA
20-24 % students participated =>80%

Self Assessment Report Page 294


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
15-19 % students participated =>60%
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
>=50% students =>100% marks
40-49 % students =>80%
E-Resources M 30-39 % students =>60%
20-29 % students =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
>=25% students participated =>100% marks
20-24 % students participated =>80%
Extra Curricular
NA 15-19 % students participated =>60%
Activity
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks

>=100% students mentored => 100%


>=90% students mentored=> 90%
>=80% students mentored => 80%
Mentoring H

>=70% students studied => 70%


Else=>= 0 marks

>=80% students retained=> 100%


>=70% students retained=> 80%
Soft Skills NA >60% students retained => 70%
>=50% students retained=> 60%
Else=>= 0 marks
Table B.8.5.1aAssesment Process for Attaining PO1

PO2: Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, research literature, and analyze complex engineering problems
reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering
sciences.

Rubric
Tool Tools Mapping
70% students >65%=>100% marks
70% students >60%=>80%
MTT Result M 60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else =>0 marks
70% students >65%=>100% marks
Academic 70% students >60%=>80%
Final RTU Result
Assessment M 60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Attendance=> 20%marks
Performance =>20% marks
Lab/Experiments
M Record /File =>10%
Internal assessment -1 =>30%
External assessment -1 =>20%

Self Assessment Report Page 295


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
>=80% students participated =>100% marks
70-79% students participated=>80%
Technical Events H 60-69% students participated=>60%
50-59% students participated=>50%
Else=> 0 marks

>=25% students participated =>100% marks


20-24 % students participated =>80%
Social Events NA 15-19 % students participated =>60%
Beyond 10-14 % students participated =>50%
Curriculum Else=> 0 marks
>=50% students =>100% marks
40-49 % students =>80%
E-Resources M 30-39 % students =>60%
20-29 % students =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
>=25% students participated =>100% marks
20-24 % students participated =>80%
Extra Curricular
NA 15-19 % students participated =>60%
Activity
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
>=100% students mentored => 100%
>=90% students mentored=> 90%
Mentoring M >=80% students mentored => 80%
>=70% students studied => 70%
Else=>= 0 marks
>=80% students retained=> 100%
>=70% students retained=> 80%
Soft Skills NA >60% students retained => 70%
>=50% students retained=> 60%
Else=>= 0 marks
Table B.8.5.1bAssesment Process for Attaining PO2

PO3: Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and
design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration
for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
Tool Tools Mapping Rubric

Academic MTT Result M 70% students >65%=>100% marks


Assessment 70% students >60%=>80%
60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else =>0 marks
Final RTU Result NA 70% students >65%=>100% marks
70% students >60%=>80%
60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Lab/Experiments NA Attendance=> 20%marks
Performance =>20% marks
Record /File =>10%
Internal assessment -1 =>30%

Self Assessment Report Page 296


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
External assessment -1 =>20%
Beyond Technical Events M >=80% students participated =>100% marks
Curriculum 70-79% students participated=>80%
60-69% students participated=>60%
50-59% students participated=>50%
Else=> 0 marks

Social Events H >=25% students participated =>100% marks


20-24 % students participated =>80%
15-19 % students participated =>60%
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
E-Resources L >=50% students =>100% marks
40-49 % students =>80%
30-39 % students =>60%
20-29 % students =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Extra Curricular NA >=25% students participated =>100% marks
Activity 20-24 % students participated =>80%
15-19 % students participated =>60%
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Mentoring H >=100% students mentored => 100%
>=90% students mentored=> 90%
>=80% students mentored => 80%
>=70% students studied => 70%
Else=>= 0 marks
Soft Skills NA >=80% students retained=> 100%
>=70% students retained=> 80%
>60% students retained => 70%
>=50% students retained=> 60%
Else=>= 0 marks
Table B.8.5.1cAssesment Process for Attaining PO3

PO4: Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research
methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the
information to provide valid conclusions.
Tool Tools Mapping Rubric

Academic MTT Result NA 70% students >65%=>100% marks


Assessment 70% students >60%=>80%
60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else =>0 marks
Final RTU Result NA 70% students >65%=>100% marks
70% students >60%=>80%
60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Lab/Experiments NA Attendance=> 20%marks

Self Assessment Report Page 297


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Performance =>20% marks
Record /File =>10%
Internal assessment -1 =>30%
External assessment -1 =>20%
Beyond Technical Events H >=80% students participated =>100% marks
Curriculum 70-79% students participated=>80%
60-69% students participated=>60%
50-59% students participated=>50%
Else=> 0 marks

Social Events NA >=25% students participated =>100% marks


20-24 % students participated =>80%
15-19 % students participated =>60%
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
E-Resources L (2) >=50% students =>100% marks
40-49 % students =>80%
30-39 % students =>60%
20-29 % students =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Extra Curricular NA >=25% students participated =>100% marks
Activity 20-24 % students participated =>80%
15-19 % students participated =>60%
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Mentoring H >=100% students mentored => 100%
>=90% students mentored=> 90%
>=80% students mentored => 80%
>=70% students studied => 70%
Else=>= 0 marks
Soft Skills NA >=80% students retained=> 100%
>=70% students retained=> 80%
>60% students retained => 70%
>=50% students retained=> 60%
Else=>= 0 marks
Table B.8.5.1dAssesment Process for Attaining PO4

PO5: Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern
engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an
understanding of the limitations.
Tool Tools Mapping Rubric

Academic MTT Result NA 70% students >65%=>100% marks


Assessment 70% students >60%=>80%
60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else =>0 marks
Final RTU Result NA 70% students >65%=>100% marks
70% students >60%=>80%
60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%

Self Assessment Report Page 298


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Else=> 0 marks
Lab/Experiments NA Attendance=> 20%marks
Performance =>20% marks
Record /File =>10%
Internal assessment -1 =>30%
External assessment -1 =>20%
Beyond Technical Events H >=80% students participated =>100% marks
Curriculum 70-79% students participated=>80%
60-69% students participated=>60%
50-59% students participated=>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Social Events NA >=25% students participated =>100% marks
20-24 % students participated =>80%
15-19 % students participated =>60%
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
E-Resources L >=50% students =>100% marks
40-49 % students =>80%
30-39 % students =>60%
20-29 % students =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Extra Curricular NA >=25% students participated =>100% marks
Activity 20-24 % students participated =>80%
15-19 % students participated =>60%
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Mentoring H >=100% students mentored => 100%
10% >=90% students mentored=> 90%
>=80% students mentored => 80%
>=70% students studied => 70%
Else=>= 0 marks
Soft Skills NA >=80% students retained=> 100%
>=70% students retained=> 80%
>60% students retained => 70%
>=50% students retained=> 60%
Else=>= 0 marks
Table B.8.5.1eAssesment Process for Attaining PO5

PO6: The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess
societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the
professional engineering practice.
Tool Tools Mapping Rubric

Academic MTT Result NA 70% students >65%=>100% marks


Assessment 70% students >60%=>80%
60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else =>0 marks
Final RTU Result NA 70% students >65%=>100% marks
70% students >60%=>80%

Self Assessment Report Page 299


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Lab/Experiments NA Attendance=> 20%marks
Performance =>20% marks
Record /File =>10%
Internal assessment -1 =>30%
External assessment -1 =>20%
Beyond Technical Events NA >=80% students participated =>100% marks
Curriculum 70-79% students participated=>80%
60-69% students participated=>60%
50-59% students participated=>50%
Else=> 0 marks

Social Events H >=25% students participated =>100% marks


20-24 % students participated =>80%
15-19 % students participated =>60%
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
E-Resources L >=50% students =>100% marks
40-49 % students =>80%
30-39 % students =>60%
20-29 % students =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Extra Curricular L >=25% students participated =>100% marks
Activity 20-24 % students participated =>80%
15-19 % students participated =>60%
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Mentoring H >=100% students mentored => 100%
>=90% students mentored=> 90%
>=80% students mentored => 80%
>=70% students studied => 70%
Else=>= 0 marks
Soft Skills NA >=80% students retained=> 100%
>=70% students retained=> 80%
>60% students retained => 70%
>=50% students retained=> 60%
Else=>= 0 marks
Table B.8.5.1fAssesment Process for Attaining PO6

PO7: Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering
solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for
sustainable development.

Tool Tools Mapping Rubric

Academic MTT Result M 70% students >65%=>100% marks


Assessment 70% students >60%=>80%
60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%

Self Assessment Report Page 300


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Else =>0 marks

Final RTU Result L 70% students >65%=>100% marks


70% students >60%=>80%
60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Lab/Experiments NA Attendance=> 20%marks
Performance =>20% marks
Record /File =>10%
Internal assessment -1 =>30%
External assessment -1 =>20%
Beyond Technical Events L >=80% students participated =>100% marks
Curriculum 70-79% students participated=>80%
60-69% students participated=>60%
50-59% students participated=>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Social Events H >=25% students participated =>100% marks
20-24 % students participated =>80%
15-19 % students participated =>60%
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
E-Resources L >=50% students =>100% marks
40-49 % students =>80%
30-39 % students =>60%
20-29 % students =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Extra Curricular NA >=25% students participated =>100% marks
Activity 20-24 % students participated =>80%
15-19 % students participated =>60%
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Mentoring H >=100% students mentored => 100%
>=90% students mentored=> 90%
>=80% students mentored => 80%
>=70% students studied => 70%
Else=>= 0 marks
Soft Skills NA >=80% students retained=> 100%
>=70% students retained=> 80%
>60% students retained => 70%
>=50% students retained=> 60%
Else=>= 0 marks
Table B.8.5.1gAssesment Process for Attaining PO7

Self Assessment Report Page 301


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and
norms of the engineering practice.

Tool Tools Weightage Mapping Rubric

Academic MTT Result NA NA 70% students >65%=>100% marks


Assessment 70% students >60%=>80%
60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else =>0 marks
Final RTU Result NA NA 70% students >65%=>100% marks
70% students >60%=>80%
60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Lab/Experiments NA NA Attendance=> 20%marks
Performance =>20% marks
Record /File =>10%
Internal assessment -1 =>30%
External assessment -1 =>20%
Beyond Technical Events NA NA >=80% students participated =>100% marks
Curriculum 70-79% students participated=>80%
60-69% students participated=>60%
50-59% students participated=>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Social Events NA NA >=25% students participated =>100% marks
20-24 % students participated =>80%
15-19 % students participated =>60%
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
E-Resources NA NA >=50% students =>100% marks
40-49 % students =>80%
30-39 % students =>60%
20-29 % students =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Extra Curricular NA NA >=25% students participated =>100% marks
Activity 20-24 % students participated =>80%
15-19 % students participated =>60%
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Mentoring NA NA >=100% students mentored => 100%
>=90% students mentored=> 90%
>=80% students mentored => 80%
>=70% students studied => 70%
Else=>= 0 marks
Soft Skills NA NA >=80% students retained=> 100%
>=70% students retained=> 80%
>60% students retained => 70%
>=50% students retained=> 60%
Else=>= 0 marks
Table B.8.5.1hAssesment Process for Attaining PO8

Self Assessment Report Page 302


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

PO9: Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader
in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.

Tool Tools Mapping Rubric

Academic MTT Result NA 70% students >65%=>100% marks


Assessment 70% students >60%=>80%
60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else =>0 marks
Final RTU Result NA 70% students >65%=>100% marks
70% students >60%=>80%
60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Lab/Experiments NA Attendance=> 20%marks
Performance =>20% marks
Record /File =>10%
Internal assessment -1 =>30%
External assessment -1 =>20%
Beyond Technical Events L >=80% students participated =>100% marks
Curriculum 70-79% students participated=>80%
60-69% students participated=>60%
50-59% students participated=>50%
Else=> 0 marks

Social Events H >=25% students participated =>100% marks


20-24 % students participated =>80%
15-19 % students participated =>60%
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
E-Resources NA >=50% students =>100% marks
40-49 % students =>80%
30-39 % students =>60%
20-29 % students =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Extra Curricular H >=25% students participated =>100% marks
Activity 20-24 % students participated =>80%
15-19 % students participated =>60%
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Mentoring L >=100% students mentored => 100%
>=90% students mentored=> 90%
>=80% students mentored => 80%
>=70% students studied => 70%
Else=>= 0 marks
Soft Skills NA >=80% students retained=> 100%
>=70% students retained=> 80%
>60% students retained => 70%
>=50% students retained=> 60%
Else=>= 0 marks

Self Assessment Report Page 303


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Table B.8.5.1iAssesment Process for Attaining PO9

PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the


engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write
effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear
instructions.
Tool Tools Mapping Rubric

Academic MTT Result L 70% students >65%=>100% marks


Assessment 70% students >60%=>80%
60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else =>0 marks
Final RTU Result L 70% students >65%=>100% marks
70% students >60%=>80%
60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Lab/Experiments NA Attendance=> 20%marks
Performance =>20% marks
Record /File =>10%
Internal assessment -1 =>30%
External assessment -1 =>20%
Beyond Curriculum Technical Events M >=80% students participated =>100% marks
70-79% students participated=>80%
60-69% students participated=>60%
50-59% students participated=>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Social Events L >=25% students participated =>100% marks
20-24 % students participated =>80%
15-19 % students participated =>60%
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
E-Resources L >=50% students =>100% marks
40-49 % students =>80%
30-39 % students =>60%
20-29 % students =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Extra Curricular Activity L >=25% students participated =>100% marks
20-24 % students participated =>80%
15-19 % students participated =>60%
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Mentoring L >=100% students mentored => 100%
>=90% students mentored=> 90%
>=80% students mentored => 80%
>=70% students studied => 70%
Else=>= 0 marks
Soft Skills NA >=80% students retained=> 100%
>=70% students retained=> 80%
>60% students retained => 70%

Self Assessment Report Page 304


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
>=50% students retained=> 60%
Else=>= 0 marks
Table B.8.5.1jAssesment Process for Attaining PO10

PO11: Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader
in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.

Tool Tools Mapping Rubric

Academic MTT Result NA 70% students >65%=>100% marks


Assessment 70% students >60%=>80%
60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else =>0 marks
Final RTU Result NA 70% students >65%=>100% marks
70% students >60%=>80%
60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Lab/Experiments NA Attendance=> 20%marks
Performance =>20% marks
Record /File =>10%
Internal assessment -1 =>30%
External assessment -1 =>20%
Beyond Technical Events NA >=80% students participated =>100%
Curriculum marks
70-79% students participated=>80%
60-69% students participated=>60%
50-59% students participated=>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Social Events NA >=25% students participated =>100%
marks
20-24 % students participated =>80%
15-19 % students participated =>60%
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
E-Resources NA >=50% students =>100% marks
40-49 % students =>80%
30-39 % students =>60%
20-29 % students =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Extra Curricular Activity NA >=25% students participated =>100%
marks
20-24 % students participated =>80%
15-19 % students participated =>60%
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks

Self Assessment Report Page 305


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Placement Mentoring NA >=100% students mentored => 100%
>=90% students mentored=> 90%
>=80% students mentored => 80%
>=70% students studied => 70%
Else=>= 0 marks
Soft Skills NA >=80% students retained=> 100%
>=70% students retained=> 80%
>60% students retained => 70%
>=50% students retained=> 60%
Else=>= 0 marks
Table B.8.5.1kAssesment Process for Attaining PO11

PO12:Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in
independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.

Tool Tools Mapping Rubric

Academic MTT Result L 70% students >65%=>100% marks


Assessment 70% students >60%=>80%
60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else =>0 marks
Final RTU Result L 70% students >65%=>100% marks
70% students >60%=>80%
60% students >65%=>60%
60% students >60%=>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Lab/Experiments NA Attendance=> 20%marks
Performance =>20% marks
Record /File =>10%
Internal assessment -1 =>30%
External assessment -1 =>20%
Beyond Technical Events L >=80% students participated =>100%
Curriculum marks
70-79% students participated=>80%
60-69% students participated=>60%
50-59% students participated=>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Social Events L >=25% students participated =>100%
marks
20-24 % students participated =>80%
15-19 % students participated =>60%
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
E-Resources L >=50% students =>100% marks
40-49 % students =>80%
30-39 % students =>60%
20-29 % students =>50%
Else=> 0 marks

Self Assessment Report Page 306


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Extra Curricular Activity L >=25% students participated =>100%
marks
20-24 % students participated =>80%
15-19 % students participated =>60%
10-14 % students participated =>50%
Else=> 0 marks
Placement Mentoring L >=100% students mentored => 100%
>=90% students mentored=> 90%
>=80% students mentored => 80%
>=70% students studied => 70%
Else=>= 0 marks
Soft Skills L >=80% students retained=> 100%
>=70% students retained=> 80%
>60% students retained => 70%
>=50% students retained=> 60%
Else=>= 0 marks
Table B.8.5.1lAssesment Process for Attaining PO12

PO Attainment Levels through First Year courses:

2018-19
Semeter I
PO PO PO PO PO PO PO
Courses Subject PO1 PO2 PO3 PO7 PO 11
4 5 6 8 9 10 12
PO PO PO1 PO
Course Course Title PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO11
8 9 0 12
Engineering
CO101 3 1 - - - - - - 1 1 - 1
Mathematics-I
Engineering
CO102 2 1 - - - 0.25 - - 1 0.25 - 1
Physics
Engineering
CO102 2 1 0.75 0.5 - 0.75 0.75 - - 0.75 - -
Chemistry
Communication
CO103 - - 2 - - 3 2 3 2 1 - 1
Skills
Programming for 0.2
CO104 1.5 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.25 0.5 0.75 NA 1.25 NA 1.5
Problem Solving 5
Basic Electrical
CO105 2.66 2.33 1 1.33 1.33 - - - 2 0.33 - -
Engineering
Engineering
CO106 2 1 1 - - 0.5 - - 1 1 - 2
Physics Lab
Engineering
CO106 1.66 1.66 - 1 - - 0.66 - 1 2 - -
Chemistry Lab
CO107 Language Lab - 1 - - - 1 - - 3 3 - 1
Computer 0.6
CO108 1.67 1.33 1.67 0.33 0.67 1 NA NA 1 0.67 NA
Programming Lab 7

Table B.8.5.1(a) PO Attainment of Sem. I (2017-18)

Self Assessment Report Page 307


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
2017-18
Semeter I

Cours Subject PO1 PO PO3 PO PO PO PO7 PO PO PO PO 11 PO


es 2 4 5 6 8 9 10 12
MA- Engineering 3 2 1 - 1.25 1 2 - 3 2 - 1
101 Mathematics-1
HU- Human
103 Values - - 2 - - 3 2 3 2 1 - 1

PY- Engineering Physics


2 1 1 - - 1 - - 1 1 - 1
101
CS- Computer
2.75 1.75 1.50 1.75 1.5 1.25 1 - - 1.25 - 2.5
101 Programming-I
CE- Environmental 2 0.75 1 0.5 - 1.75 1.75 1 .75 .5 - 1
101 Engineering and
Disaster Management
HU- Human Values: - - 1 - - 3 3 3 1 1 - 1
104 Activities
PY- Engineering Physics
2 1 1 - - 1 - - 1 1 - 1
102 Lab
CS- Computer
102 Programming-I Lab 2 3 2 1 - - - - 2 1 - 1
CE- Computer Aided - - - - - -
102 Engineering
Graphic 3 - 2 2 - 1
ME- Mechanical Workshop
101 Practice 3 - - - - - - - 2 2 - 1
Average Attainment 2.3 1.6 1.1
2.46 1.58 1.21 1.08 1.37 1.71 1.95 3 3 1.27 _ 5
Table B.8.5.1(b) PO Attainment of Sem. I (2017-18)

Self Assessment Report Page 308


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
2017-18
SEM II
Cours Subject PO1 PO PO3 PO 4 PO PO 6 PO7 PO PO PO PO 11 PO
es 2 5 8 9 10 12

Engineering 3 2 1 - 1.25 1 2 - 3 2 - 1
MA- Mathematics-II
102
Communication - 1 2 - - 1 - - 3 3 - 1
HU- Skills
101

CY- Engineering 2 1 0.5 0.5 - 0.25 0.5 - - 0.5 - -


101 Chemistry
computer 2.25 1.7 1.5 2.25 2 1.75 2 -- - 2 - 1.75
CS- Programming- 5
103 II
BAsic Civil 1.5 1 .5 - - .25 .5 .25 .75 .25 .5 .25
CE- Engineering
103
Basic 2.25 - .75 2.25 .75 . 2 5 1.5 2.25 . 5 1.25 - 1
ME- Mechanical
102 Engineering
Engineering 2 2 - 1 - - - - 1 2 - -
CY- Chemistry Lab
102
Computer
CS- Programming-
104 II 2 2 3 1 - -- - - 2 1 2 1
Communication - 1 - - - 1 - - 3 3 - 1
HU- Skills Lab
102

Computer 3 2 2 - 2 2 2 - - 2 - 2
ME- Aided Machine
104 Drawing

Average
Attainment
1.5 1.8
2.25 2 1.40 1.40 1.50 0.93 1.41 1.25 9 1.70 1.25 1.12
Table B.8.5.1(c) PO Attainment of Sem. II (2017-18)

Self Assessment Report Page 309


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
2016-2017(I Semester)

Courses Subject PO1 PO2 PO3 PO PO PO PO7 PO PO PO PO PO


4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12
101 Communicative - 1 1 - - - 1.3 - - 3 - 1
English

102 Engg. Maths-I 3 3 1.6 1 1 1 1 - 2 2 - 1

103 Engg. Physics-I 3 3 1 .75 1.5 2.5 1.75 - 2 1.25 1 1.5

104 Engg. Chemistry 2 1.3 1 1 - 2 2 - - 1 - 1

105 Basic EE 2.8 2.6 2 2 1.4 1.2 1.2 - 1.8 1 1.4 2.2

106 Physics Lab 3 3 2.5 1 2.5 3 2.5 2 2.5 1 1 2

107 Chemistry lab 2 1.67 1.67 1 - 2 2 - 1 1 - 1

108 EE Lab 2.8 2.9 1.4 - - 2 - - 0.33 - - 3

110 Workshop 3 1.5 1 0.5 - 1 0.5 - 1 0.5 0.5 1.5

AverageAttainment

2.7 2.21 1.46 1.03 1.6 1.83 1.53 2 1.51 1.34 0.97 1.57
Table B.8.5.1(d) PO Attainment of Sem.I (2015-16,2016-17,2017-18)

Self Assessment Report Page 310


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
2016-2017(II Semester)
Courses Subject PO1 PO PO PO PO P PO P PO PO P PO
2 3 4 5 O 7 O 9 10 O 12
6 8 11
201 CommunicationTechn - 1 2 - - 1 - 1 3 3 - 1
iques
202 Engg. Maths-II 3 2 1 - 1.2 1 2 - 3 2 - 1
5

203 Engg. Physics-II 3 3 2 1 1.8 2.2 2 - 1.6 1.4 1 2

204 Chemistry &Env. 2 1.33 1 - - - 2 - - 1 - 1


Engg.

205 Engg. Mechanics 3 2 - - - - - - - - - 2

206 FOC 2.75 1.5 1.5 1.2 1.2 1 1.25 - 1.7 1.2 - 1.2
5 5 5 5 5

207 Physics Lab-II 3 3 2.5 2 3 3 1.5 1.5 2.5 2 1 2

208 Chemistry lab 2 1 1 1 - 1 2 - 1 1 - 1

209 CP Lab 2.7 1.5 1 1.2 1.2 1 1.2 - 1.7 1.2 - 1.2

210 Machine Drawing 3 2 2 - 2 2 2 - - 2 - 2

211 CT Lab - - 1 - - 1 - 1 3 3 - 1

Average Attainment
1.2 1.7 1.4 1.1 2.1 1.7
2.71 1.83 1.5 9 5 6 1.74 6 9 8 1 1.4
Table B.8.5.1(e) PO Attainment of Sem.I (2015-16,2016-17,2017-18)

Self Assessment Report Page 311


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

8.5.2. Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of relevant POs (5)

(The attainment levels by direct (student performance) are to be presented through Program level
Course-PO matrix as indicated)

PO Attainment Levels and Actions for improvement – CAY only – Mention for relevant Pos

 2018 -19 session going on (Results awaited)

PO Attainment Levels and Actions for improvement – CAY (m1) only – Mention for relevant
Pos

(2017-2018)

POs Target Level in % Attainment Level Observations


in %
PO1: Engineering knowledge:
PO1 58.05 46.93 Observations:
 Targets are not fully achieved in RTU results.
 Students are not exposed to complex engineering
problems.
Action 1: More technical activities were conducted to improve the participation of students.
Action 2: University question papers are solved in classes.

PO2: Problem analysis:


PO2 67.38 55.61 Observations :
 Students are not exposed to complex engineering
problems
 Curriculum designed for I Year does not contain
literature research and analysis of problem
Action 1: Students are motivated to participate in science project exhibition for developing an analytical mind which can
work towards problem solving.
Action 2: Students are motivated for optimum utilization of E-Resources to enhance their knowledge.
PO3: Design/development of solutions:
PO3 67.79 62.75 Observations :
 I Year curriculum include only basic knowledge of
Engineering and sciences.

Action 1: More activities involving designing solutions like Hackathon are initiated in the campus.
Action 2: Students are motivated to improve their participation in technical/social/extra-curricular activities.
PO4: Conduct investigations of complex problems:
PO4: 51.58 46.91 Observations :
 Few activities related to understanding of complex
problems and its investigation.

Self Assessment Report Page 312


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Action 1: Workshops are conducted to give the hands on experience to students and faculty.
Action 2: They are motivated to use E- Resources and register themselves in online courses.

PO5: Modern tool usage:


PO5 55.54 50.31 Observations :
 Target and attainment both are less as students learn
basics of computer programming in I Year.
 Other subjects does not use modern IT tools for
problem solving.
Action 1: Technical events are organized at institute level so that students can participate and learn latest techniques and
methods of problem solving.
Action 2: Students are motivated to participate in inter college events to get exposure to real world problems.
PO6: The engineer and society:
PO6 61.8 56.33 Observations :
 The students are found to be less active as far as social
activities were concerned; also they were unaware
about the basic health and safety issues with
engineering point of view.
 Most of the courses of B.Tech first year are not
addressing the needs of, health, safety and social
concerns regarding engineering practices in real life.

Action 1: The students are motivated to be a part of social groups like Soch, Suhasini, Aashayein, Zarurat available at
Institute.
Action 2: These groups encouraged students to take part in Swachch Bharat drives, Blood Donation Camps, Village visits,
voluntary teaching and mentoring of downtrodden children.
PO7: Environment and sustainability:
PO7 54.66 48.79 Observations :
 Less awareness of students about the issues related
to global and environmental sustainability.
Action 1: Students are encouraged to indulge in projects in which global and environmental issues are improved.
Action 2: The activities like Tree Plantation Drive and Cleanliness Drive are organized to instill in them the responsibility
towards environment.
Action 3: The students were mentored to practice rain water harvesting, water conservation and waste recycling at the
individual level.
PO8: Ethics:
PO8 14.27 10.99 Observations:
 The students were reluctant to bear upon a
responsibility in the competitive activities.
Moreover, some of the students were found to be
casual in their conduct.

Action 1: As far as professional conduct and behavior is concerned the students are made to attend anti- ragging seminars,
interactive talks on personal conduct and behavior with eminent advisors in the college.
Action 2: The college has a well- established spiritual cell which encourages students to experience professional life with high
moral conduct and spirituality.
PO9: Individual and team work:
PO9 69 63.07 Observations:
 Classroom teaching does not provide environment
for team work, whereas student can show his/her
working as a team member or team leader during

Self Assessment Report Page 313


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
practical classes and other co curricular activities.

Action 1: The students are mentored and encouraged by the faculty to participate in group activities and lead the group as a
responsible leader. The group activities included Hackathon, Fun activities at college fest, Model United Nations etc.

Action 2: The activities like Group discussions, quizzes etc., technical events like J- Techtrix, JECRC Hackathon etc. and
volunteering and coordinating for various events in annual fest Renaissance.
PO10: Communication:
PO10 49.94 40.27 Observations:
 The students are found to be hesitant in public
speaking and express their opinion.

Action 1: In order to address this issue, the group of students are asked to prepare and give power point presentations on the
topics within the curriculum as well as the beyond the curriculum.
Action 2: They are encouraged to participate in house and inter-college competitions to enhance their communication skills.
PO11: Project management and finance:
PO11 NA NA Observations:
 I Year students are not involved in project
management and finance, but they can learn the
basics by participating in other activities organized
in college.

Action 1: Annual Project exhibition is organized in the college where I year students participate learn the basics of project
handling and finance.
PO12: Life-long learning:
PO12 33.05 25.18 Observations :
 The students are ignorant about the significance of
the subject in broader context of life.

Action 1: Lecture content includes applications and advances in subject knowledge of new techniques.
Action 2: Students are mentored to work for better achievement forever.
Action 3: Students are motivated to improve their participation in technical/social/extra-curricular activities.
Table B.8.5.2a PO Attainment Levels and Actions for improvement for 2017-18

Self Assessment Report Page 314


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Attainment of Po’s From I Year Courses in the year

2017-18

80

70

60

50

40 Target of I Year 2017-18


Attainment for I Year 17-18
30

20

10

0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Figure 8.5.2a Attainment of Po’s From I Year Courses in the year 2017-18

Self Assessment Report Page 315


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
PO Attainment Levels and Actions for improvement – CAY (m2) only – Mention for relevant
Pos

(2016-2017)

POs Target Level in % Attainment Level Observations


in %
PO1: Engineering knowledge:
PO1 62.53 53.64 Observations:
 Participation in technical events can be improved.
 In RTU result, students are attaining less marks.
Action 1: RTU question papers were solved discussed in regular classes to improve the RTU result.
Action 2: Extra classes based on university question paper & pattern was taken.
Action 3: more technical activities were conducted to improve the participation of students.
PO2: Problem analysis:
PO2 70.03 50.03 Observations :
 Curriculum designed for I Year does not contain
literature research and analysis of problem

 Use of e- resources was less so it can be improved.


Action 1: Department took the initiative to organize National/International conferences.
Action 2: Students are motivated to participate in science project exhibition for developing an analytical mind which can work
towards problem solving.
Action 3: Students are guided to use more & more e-resources.
PO3:Design/development of solutions:
PO3 67.18 55.46 Observations :
 I Year curriculum include basic knowledge of
Engineering and sciences.
 Participation in technical & social activities was less.

Action 1: Students were motivated to improve their participation in technical/social/extra-curricular activities.


Action 2: Students are motivated to join various Technical Clubs in Institute.
PO4: Conduct investigations of complex problems:
PO4: 42.65 38.1 Observations :
 Participation in technical activities was less.

 Use of e- resources was less .


 Students have less understanding of complex
problems and its investigation.
Action 1: Participation in technical activities was increased by mentoring & motivation.
Action 2: Workshops are conducted to give the hands on experience to students and faculty.
Action 2: They are motivated to use E- Resources and register themselves in online courses.

PO5: Modern tool usage:


PO5 44.44 38.8 Observations :
 Target and attainment both are less as students
learn basics of computer programming in I
Year.
 Other subjects does not use modern it tools for
problem solving.

Self Assessment Report Page 316


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Action 1: More of technical events are organized at institute level.
Action 2: Students are motivated to join robotics/moon rider etc.
PO6: The engineer and society:
PO6 61.2 51.04 Observations :
 Students need to be made more sensitive towards
social issues.
Action 1: The students are encouraged to join social groups like Soch, Suhasini, Aashayein, Zarurat etc.

PO7: Environment and sustainability:


PO7 48.88 39.49 Observations :
 Less awareness of students about the issues related
to global and environmental sustainability.
Action 1: Students are encouraged to indulge in projects in which global and environmental issues are improved.
Action 2: The activities related to environment and sustainability are organized.
PO8: Ethics:
PO8 8.14 7.61 Observations:
 The students were reluctant to bear upon a
responsibility in the competitive activities.
Moreover, some of the students were found to be
casual in their conduct.

Action 1: As far as professional conduct and behavior is concerned the students were made to attend anti- ragging seminars,
interactive talks on personal conduct and behavior with eminent advisors in the college.
Action 2: The college has a well- established spiritual cell which encourages students to experience professional life with high
moral conduct and spirituality.
PO9: Individual and team work:
PO9 71.85 62.4 Observations:
 Team activities should be included in regular
practice.

Action 2: The team activities like Group discussions, quizzes etc., technical events like J- Techtrix, and volunteering and
coordinating for various events in annual fest Renaissance, MUN.
PO10: Communication:
PO10 52.4 40.19 Observations:
 The students are unable to express their views on
public platform.

Action 1: In order to address this issue, the group of students are asked to prepare and give power point presentations on the
topics within the curriculum as well as the beyond the curriculum.
Action 2: They are encouraged to participate various competitions to enhance their communication skills.
PO11: Project management and finance:
PO11 NA NA Observations:
 I Year students are not involved in project
management and finance, but they can learn the
basics by participating in other activities organized
in college.

Action 1: Annual Project exhibition is organized in the college where I year students participate learn the basics of project
handling and finance.

Self Assessment Report Page 317


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
PO12: Life-long learning:
PO12 36.08 32.05 Observations :
 The students were ignorant about the significance
of the subject in broader context of life.

Action 1: Lecture content includes applications and advances in subject knowledge of new techniques.
Action 2: Students were mentored to work for better achievement forever.
Action 3: Students were motivated to improve their participation in technical/social/extra-curricular activities.
Table B.8.5.2bPO Attainment Levels and Actions for improvement for 2016-17

Attainment of Po’s From I Year Courses in the year

2016-17

80

70

60

50
B.Tech I Year (2016-2017) Target
40
B.Tech I Year (2016-2017)
30 Attainment

20

10

Figure 8.5.2b Attainment of Po’s From I Year Courses in the year 2016-17

Self Assessment Report Page 318


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Gap fulfilling activities
Based on the above observations following actions are taken to overcome the gap
1. To attain PO 1 : Facilitating & making them learn the use of E- resources while learning:
 Soft copy of notes is provided to students for reference.
 One or two questions are given in assignment which is to be searched from internet
only.

Self Assessment Report Page 319


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
 List of online books is circulated among students which are ready to use on college server.

2. To attain PO 2: Remedial/Problem Solving Classes

 J-Techtrix(Project Exhibition) Organized by 1st Year(15-16, 16-17, 17-18)

3. To attain PO 4: Mentoring by Class Coordinators

Self Assessment Report Page 320


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

4. To attain PO 5: Motivating students to participate in technical activities

5. To attain PO6& PO10: Using Innovative teaching methods in class & outside class in
the form of Industrial Visit.
 Presentation by students in class

 Some Pics of Industrial Visit of I Year Students 17-18

Self Assessment Report Page 321


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

6. To attain PO7: Students are motivated to celebrate Clean & Green Campus Day
and making it a Regular Practice

7. To attain PO8: Social , cultural and moral values are imbibed into them

8. To attain PO 9: Making them learn to be ready for Social Cause:

Self Assessment Report Page 322


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

9. To attain PO 12: Making Induction more informative and interactive to provide a


new comer a feeling of trust and belongingness.

Self Assessment Report Page 323


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Criteria 9
STUDENT SUPPORT SYSTEM
(50)

Self Assessment Report Page 324


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
CRITERION 9 Student Support Systems 50

9.1 Mentoring System to help at individual level (5)


(Type of mentoring: Professional guidance/ career advancement/ course work specific/ laboratory specific/ all-
round development. Number of faculty mentors: Number of students per mentor: Frequency of meeting
(The institution may report the details of the mentoring system that has been developed for the students for various
purposes and also state the efficacy of such system)

1) Professional Guidance/ Career Advancement


An effective Student mentoring system has already been implemented in our college to mentor
throughout activities, performance and over all development of students.

Professional Guidance/Career
advancement

Professiona Entrepreneu PSU Spiritual Career All round


l Mentoring r Mentoring Mentoring Mentoring Counsellin developmen
g/Higher t
Studies

HRD, PRE- STARTUPS/ GOVT. JOB SPIRITUAL GUIDE CO -


PLACEMENT INCUBATION CELL, RESEARCH APPOINTED CURRICULA
TRAINING, S CELL APTITUDE CELL FOR ISSUE R EXTRA
GUEST TEST LOR CURRICULA
LECTURER R
ACTIVITIES

SOCIAL CULTURAL

Figure 9.1a: Professional Guidance/ Career Advancement

Self Assessment Report Page 325


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
S.No. Type of Mentoring Name
1 PSU Mentoring Professor (Dr.) Vinay Kumar Chandna
Mr. P.K.Tiwari (Rtd. IPS)
2 Professional Mentoring Dr.S.N.Gupta
Mr. Mukt Bihari
3 Entrepreneur Mentoring Mr. SiddharthChaturvedi
4. Social and Spiritual Mentoring Mr. Mukesh Agarwal
5. Higher Studies Mentoring Ms. NeelakshiChaturvedi
6. Overall Development Mr. Anshul Mittal
Table B.9.1a: Type of Mentoring
A) Professional mentoring

We have Human Resource & Development cell (HRD), senior advisor and many senior
dignitaries who guide students for their career and placement.
Different interactive sessions for students with senior advisor and other senior member are
organized to motivate and guide them for enhancing career.
HRD

TPO TPO

MENTOR MENTOR MENTOR MENTOR MENTOR MENTOR

STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT

STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT

Figure .9.1b: Professional mentoring


 Resume writing sessions: Organized for students to guide them for effective resume writing.

S.No. Year Speaker Date No.of participants

1 2015-16 Mr. P.K.Tiwari 23 July,2015 143

2 2016-17 Mr. P.K.Tiwari 25July,2016 157

3 2017-18 Mr. P.K.Tiwari 21 July,2017 165

Table B.9.1b: Resume writing sessions

Self Assessment Report Page 326


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
 Training conducted for improving specific technical domain practical knowledge in campus
itself.
Year Name of event Object of event No. of students Date of event
participated
2015-16 Pre PlacementBridging gap 180 12-10-2015
training Program between academics To
by FACE & Industry 14-10-2015
2016-17 Pre placement Bridging gap 184 18-7-2016 to 6 -8-
training by Face between academics 2016
& Industry
2017-18 Pre placement Bridging gap 202 20-7-2018
training program between academics onwards
by Face & Industry
Table B.9.1c: Conducted training

Figure 9.1c: Pre Placement Training Session 2017-18

Self Assessment Report Page 327


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.1d: Topic wise time Table Session 2017-18

Figure 9.1e: MOC Drill

Self Assessment Report Page 328


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.1f: Need based Training (level-3)

Figure 9.1g: Need based Training (level-4)

Self Assessment Report Page 329


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.1h: Pre Placement training Program by FACE

B) Government Job Cell


The Initiative taken by institute under the mentorship of Prof. (Dr.) Vinay Chandna for
making students career in government sector in 2016-17.Cell is under the guidance of Mr.
P.K.Tiwari and Mr. O.P.Jain in institute to prepare students towards different competitive
examination. In this cell we encourage and inspire students for competitive examination like
GATE, CAT, and MAT etc.
 Organized classes for GATE aspirants.
 Provided course material to students.
 Career opportunities in government sector are shared with the interested students.

Figure 9.1i: JECRC Government Jobs Cell

Self Assessment Report Page 330


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.1j: JECRC Government Jobs Cell Study Material

Figure 9.1k: Gate Mock Test

Self Assessment Report Page 331


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Session 2017-18
S. SEM SEC NAME GATE/GRE/GMAT REGISTRATION GATE/OTHER MARK ALL NUMBER
NO etc. NUMBER SCORE OUT INDIA OF
OF 100 RANK CANDIDATE
IN APPEARED
THIS IN THIS
PAPER PAPER

1 8 A ApurviMansinghka GATE CS18S33042312 374 27 11021 107893

2 8 A Akshayvijayvargiya GATE CS18S33041234 350 25 13185 107893


3 8 A Amandeep Goyal GATE CS18S33041870 588 45 1893 107893
4 8 A EkanshKushwah GATE CS18S33042445 382 27.67 10374 107893
5 8 A Anushree Jain GATE CS18S33045020 469 35 5255 107893

6 8 A Kapil Khandelwal GATE CS18S33045219 624 48 1349 107893


7 8 A DivakerSoni GATE CS18S33041355 322 22.67 16475 107893
8 8 B RohitMathur GATE CS18S33043062 441 32.67 6564 107893

9 8 B Rohit Kumar Gupta GATE CS18S33045027 374 27 11021 107893


10 8 B Mayank Prasad GATE CS18S33042125 413 30.33 8122 107893
11 8 B SakshiSinghal GATE CS18S33045098 517 39 3493 107893
12 8 B Prakhar Garg GATE CS18S33041394 362 26 12049 107893
13 8 B Nikhil Gupta GATE CS18S33042441 394 28.67 9458 107893
14 8 B Mohit kumawat GATE CS18S33045207 441 32.67 6564 107893
15 8 C Vinod kumar GATE CS18S33042335 334 23.67 14969 107893

16 8 C Suryanshi adaniya GATE CS18S33041846 330 23.33 15462 107893


17 8 C Yash vijay GATE CS18S33042270 350 25 13185 107893
18 8 B Sakshi Garg IELTS 7
19 8 C Sakshi Gupta CAT 90.40%
Table B.9.1d: Student gate detail Session 2017-18

C) Entrepreneur cell
Entrepreneurship cell is established by institute under the mentorship of Mr.
SiddharthChaturvedi, our College for encouraging and inspiring students for start-ups and
entrepreneur. Various interactive sessions for students with alumni and start-up representative
are organized to know the importance of being an entrepreneur and ways to get financial
assistance to become an entrepreneur.Cell is responsible for:
1. Initiative and Development of Start-ups/Incubations

Self Assessment Report Page 332


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
2. Initiative towards centre of excellence
3. Relationship with companies
4. Motivate students, guide and help them in the same direction.
An Entrepreneurship awareness camp organized on 2ndsep, 2016 in which our students
and faculties participated.
 Institute has success stories for every pass out year as a result of Entrepreneurship cell
and incubation centre.
S.No NAME BATCH ORGANIZATION
1 UTKARSH NAGPAL 2017 Heal Nectar
2 VISHESH MODI 2017 Business
3 PANKAJ THAWANI 2017 Business
4 CHIRAG JAIN 2017 Business
5 NISHA JANGIR 2016 YouTube
6 SHISHU PAL 2016 Entrepreneur
7 SOUMYA RANJAN ROUT 2016 Nutrition Hub
8 ASHIQUE HUSSAIN 2016 Nutrition Hub
ANSARI
9 SHIVANSH SHARMA 2018 Apparel distribution company
Table B.9.1e: Students Success Stories 2017-18
.
D) Spiritual Mentoring
A special initiative has been taken by our institute in the form of SPIRITUAL RESEARCH CELL.
The cell was established on 6th October, 2016. The inauguration was done by the auspicious
presence of The Executive Secretary, Brahmakumaris& Vice Chairman, Rajyoga Education
& Research Foundation, RajyogiMruthyunjaya Ji, Dr. U.S Agarwal, Principal, SMS Medical
College, Jaipur and Meditation Expert, BK SushmaJi.This cell motivates students mentally and
builds up their confidence.

Figure 9.1l: Inauguration of Spiritual cell

Self Assessment Report Page 333


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
E) Career Counselling /Higher studies
A Guide has been appointed specifically for higher study counselling and career counselling
in December 2016. Guide counselled many students and encouraged them for further studies
on the right path for career. Letter of recommendation (LOR) has been issued to some
students.
S.No. Dept. Name No. of LOR
issued(Approx)
1 CSE 12
Table B.9.1f:No.Of LOR Issued

S.No NAME BATCH ORGANIZATION Location


Trinity college Dublin,
1 2018 Ireland
Sakshi Garg Ireland for MS

2 2018 Mumbai
ADITYA JOHARI MBA, NMIMS, Mumbai
3 Sakshi Singhal 2018 M.Tech, NIT Trichi Trichi

PGDM ( MBA), K.J.


4 2018 Somaiya Institute of Mumbai
Management Studies and
Sakshi Gupta Research
5 UTKARSH SINGHAL 2017 MBA
6 VANISHA GAUR 2017 MDI Gurgaon Gurgaon
7 UMANG SHARMA 2017 MDI Gurgaon Gurgaon
8 APOORVA JAIN 2017 IIM Rohtak Rohtak
9 PRATIMA GOYAL 2017 TAPMI Manipal Manipal
10 CHHAVI INANI 2017 NJIT,USA USA
11 KRISHNA PATHAK 2017 IIM, Mumbai Mumbai
12 RITIKA DHOOT 2017 MBA
Rochester Institute of
13 2017 USA
DEVANSH SETHI technology
CHANDNI MATHUR
University of Illinois at
14 2016 Urbana
Urbana Champaign
Champaign
15 MOHIT JESWANI 2016 IIIT-B Bangalore
16 HIMANSHU GAUR 2016 IIT Madras IIT
17 VIKAS KUMAR 2016 IIT Bombay Bombay

Self Assessment Report Page 334


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
SHRUTI JAISWAL Dallas this
18 2016
University of Texas fall.
PRATIBHA 2016
19
AGARWAL MBA at. IIM Indore
GARIMA 2016 M.Tech., AMITY
20 CHOUDHARY UNIVERSITY Delhi
ADITYA SHARMA MBA from MDI,
21
2016 Gurgaon Gurgaon
22 AAYUSH DUBE 2016 MICA Mumbai
Table B.9.1g: Students Higher Studies Detail2017-18

Course Work Specific/ Laboratory Specific

For II and III year we have Tutor Guide (TG) who follows instructions given by Class Coordinator
(CC).

Principal

HOD

Class
Coordinator

Tutor Tutor
Guardian Guardian

30 Students 30 Students

Figure 9.1m: Flow Char of Course Work Specific/ Laboratory Specific

Self Assessment Report Page 335


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
The department follows the below steps for smooth conduction of examination and evaluation
process:
 The department adhere academic calendar prescribed by RTU, Kota

 There is departmental Examination Committee in which two faculty members are included
for conduction of Internal Examination and Two for External Examination.

a. The committee circulates notice a week before the commencement of examination by


taking prior approval from HOD.
b. Course Coordinator prepares and submit their question paper to respective class
coordinator
c. Then class coordinator submits all question papers to Moderation Committee.
d. Moderation Committee in coordination with IQAC selects one question paper among
the set of three papers.
e. Selected Question paper send to Internal Examination Coordinator then internal
examination coordinator takes printout of the final paper.
f. During the exam two invigilators are assigned in each class room and students sits in
the class rooms according to appropriate seating plan.
g. After the completion of exam, answer sheets evaluation, result analysis on basis of
CO, weak/strong student list is prepared by course coordinator and submitted to
Internal Examination Coordinator. Along with the soft copy.
h. If student secures marks less than 60% in some particular CO then he/she will be
considered as weak student. Then course coordinator provides assignment to them and
evaluates.
i. Student who secures marks greater than 60% in some particular CO then he/she will
be considered as strong student. Then they will be encouraged & motivated for
GATE/PSUs/Govt. Exam.

Jaipur Engineering CollegeandResearch Centre


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Minutes of Meeting

Date/Day: 19/08/2017 Time: 11:30am to 12:00 noon Location: CP3 Lab, Block-A,
Saturday JECRC
Speaker: TG Speaker's Designation: AP Attended by: All Students

Agenda of Meeting: To discuss about course coverage.

Attendees:
Meeting started with the welcome of TG by students. Following were the points of meeting:-
S.No. Points
1 TG interacted with all students.
2 Discuss about course coverage.

Self Assessment Report Page 336


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Attendees:
Meeting started with the welcome of TG by students. Following were the points of meeting:-

 Discussed about Course and content delivery


 Discussed about problems in the class room
 Coverage of Course and requirement of extra classes

The meeting ended up with the thanks of Chair and next round of meeting would be held with prior
notice.

F) All round Development


The Initiative taken by institute under the mentorship of Mr. Anshul Mittal is responsible for
the overall development of student. His responsibility is to encourage students to participate
in different co-curricular and extracurricular activities.
SDO Responsibilities:
 Planning, developing and delivering a variety of student services and activities (co-curricular
and extracurricular activities)
 Motivate and engage students also oversee students activity on campus
 Handles promotions of college events manual and e-promotions
 Providing support to student council
 Providing support, guidance and advocating for students and faculty in all aspects of student
life.
Co-curricular Activates:
Year Name of event Conducted by Date Participants

2015- PHP &MySQL Training Mr. Amit Kumar 13-07-2015 B.Tech 3


16 Program Faculty, Sigmatech to year
Infotech , Jaipur 25-07-2015
2016- ICT BASED Short term Dr. Gaurav Kumar, 29.08.2016 B.Tech 4
17 course on “Open Source Managing Director, &30.08.2016 year
Technologies” at Magma Research and
NITTTR, Chandigarh Consultancy, Pvt. Ltd.,
Ambala

2017- Machine Learning Mr. Vimal Daga 8th March B.Tech 4


18 2018 year
Table B.9.1h: Co-curricular Activates

Self Assessment Report Page 337


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

G) Interactive sessions with industry experts are organized to increase understanding


between students and industry requirements.
Year Session name Date of session
2015-16 Seminar on networking 7-10-2015
2015-16 PHP Technology 13-250July 13-25July
2015

2015-16 BIG DATA &HADOOP 11 Jan 2016


2015-16 Raspberry-pi 27 Feb 2016
2016-17 International Workshop on Open Source Software, 10-9-2016
Drupal
2017-18 Start-63up Oasis, Jaipur 29,31-8-2017
Table B.9.1i: Interactive sessions

H) Industrial visits are conducted for students so they can practically observe the
environment and activities in Industries.
Year Name of Object of event Date of event
Company
2015-16 Food tech Industry visit 19-9-2015
2016-17 E-infochip Industry visit 19,20-2-2017
2016-17 JMRC Industry visit 17/01/2017
2017-18 Ted x Industry visit 31-8-2017
Table B.9.1j: Industrial visits for students

I) Teams from JECRC participated in 2017 and 2018 Smart India Hackathon (SIH) were
guided by faculty member so they can perform better.

Year No. of students No. of teams


participated
2016-17 12 2
2017-18 30 5
Table B.9.1k:No. of students participated

 Teams participated in JECRC hackathon 1.0 in 2018 were guided by faculty


member(one mentor with each team)

Year No. of students No. of teams


participated
2018 400 80
Table B.9.1l:No. of students participated

Self Assessment Report Page 338


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
J) Extracurricular activity:

S.N0. Activity/Event Date

1 Blood Group check-up camp 11 Sep, 2017


2 Engineers Day 15 Sep, 2017
3 SwachhtaPakhwada 1 to 15 Sep,2017
4 Interactive Session with Dr. Kiran Seth 8 Sep 2017
5 Rally on rivers Seminar 26 Sep,2017
6 OMEN gaming Championship 7 Oct,2017
7 Interactive session with Mr. Niko Philips 1 Nov, 2017
8 VandeMataram-Voice of Unity 8 Nov, 2017
9 National Girl Child Day Celebration, 24 Jan, 2018
10 Orphanage Children Interactive Program 12 Feb, 2018
11 Soch 12 Feb 2018
12 Renaissance 2018 25 to 28 March 2018

13 Seminar on Careers in Entertainment Industry 12 March 2018

Table B.9.1m: Extracurricular activity Events list

K) Class Coordinator Responsibilities:


 Creating learning opportunities and motivating the student community.
 Providing guidance on academic, personal and career matters.
 Resolving academic issues of students.
 Tracking academic and extra-curricular performance of students.
Class coordinator collects all data of students from the Tutor guardian
No of students per class coordinator: around 60
No of students per tutor guide: around 30
S.No. Year No of Class No. of Tutor Guide
1 2015-16 9 18
coordinator
2 2016-17 9 18
3 2017-18 9 18
Table B.9.1ln: No of Class coordinator
K) Tutor Guardian responsibilities

Self Assessment Report Page 339


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
 Meet the students periodically and monitor their performance and their activities
Frequency of meeting once a month
 For IV year we have Mentor Mentee system for guiding students.
The mentor is a model, a guide by the side, a motivator, a trainer and a counsellor to the student.
Mentoring is a process for the informal transmission of knowledge, social capital, and the
psychosocial support. Mentoring entails informal communication, usually face-to-face and during
a sustained period of time, between a people who is perceived to have greater relevant
knowledge, wisdom, or experience (the mentor) and a person who is perceived to have less.

M)Mentor’s Responsibilities:
 Take interest in developing student’s career and well-being.
 Mentors keep track of their students’ progress and achievements, setting milestones and
acknowledging accomplishments.
 Monitor student’s readiness for Personal Interview (including Resume, Dressing sense etc.)
 Evaluate Student Progress and Performance in Computer Based Tests. Keep record of his/her
attendance in the preparatory classes and keep the department HOD informed.
 Encourage students for attending all the sessions for sure success.
 Informing students about the profile of companies coming for recruitment as per information
obtained from placement department.
 Engage the Student beyond the Classroom especially for communication practices and
emphasize the importance of communication for sure success.
 Keep the department / panel members informed, if any student is not taking his/her sessions
seriously.
 Guide student for practical training and project presentation.
 Guide students for technical interview.
 Guide and Evaluate student for GD for companies requiring GD.
 Guide students for General Knowledge about Industries in their domain.
 Provide Ethical Guidance
N) No of Students per mentor: around 20

S.No. Year No. of Mentor


1 2015-16 12
2 2016-17 12
3 2017-18 9
Table B.9.1o: No of Students per mentor
Session 2017-18 Mentor List

Self Assessment Report Page 340


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
No .Of
Mentor Name Students
S.No. Alloted
1 Mohit Jain 25
2 Jeba Nega 25
3 Deeksha Mathur 25
4 Vatan Mishra 25
5 Sarita 25
6 Kirti choudhary 25
7 Geetika Gautam 25
8 Manju Vyas 25
9 Ankur Raj 23
Table B.9.1p: No of Students per mentor
9.2 Feedback analysis and reward /corrective measures taken, if any (10)
Feedback collected for all courses: YES/NO; Specify the feedback collection process; Average Percentage of
students who participate; Specify the feedback analysis process; Basis of reward/ corrective measures, if any;
Indices used for measuring quality of teaching & learning and summary of the index values for all
courses/teachers; Number of corrective actions taken
Feedback collected for all courses: YES/NO; YES
Feedback Analysis Process
1) Students Feedback Process
Teching
Learnin
g
process

Course
out
Exit Students
comes/Pr
Survey Feedback
ogram
Outcom

Placement
Training

Figure 9.2a: Students Feedback Process

2) Stakeholder Feedback

Self Assessment Report Page 341


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
• Feed back From expert • Feedback from stake
to identify gap between Holders
I &I • Training and
placement
Industry Department
Program • Senior Advisors
ecpert
Outcomes
survey

Employer Content
survey on Beyond
S&W of the
Students program
• Feedback from • Feedback from
Industry Expert Indusry Expert
• Training and • Alumini
Placement • Senior Advisors
Department
Figure 9.2b: Stakeholder Feedback

 The Institute understands that the teaching-learning system followed by an educational


institution must be constantly improved. To form this process of continuous improvement,
the institution must adopt a feedback system that takes into account the suggestions of the
students and the interested parties in each program. This finally helps to refine the teaching-
learning process and the curriculum.
 The institution shall follow a well-defined and formal feedback system implemented at
different levels
 Student comments on the teaching-learning process are also collected from students at class
committee meetings.
 At the end of each semester, students must complete an end-of-semester survey. In this
case, students will be asked questions that examine the effectiveness of the teaching-
learning process to help the student achieve the respective results of the course through the
Google form.
 Being an institution that molds people to build technologies for the future, the Institute
constantly insists on updating the students with the current knowledge and skills desired.
 To do this, the institution must regularly gather opinions on the most demanding industrial
skills, directly from industry personnel.
 Industry experts will be invited to stakeholder meetings organized by each department, and
their views on emerging technologies will be taken periodically.
 Employer surveys should be conducted annually to gather information about the strengths
and weaknesses of the students who enrolled in this Institute.
 The employer survey is a key element in determining the skills that students lack
experience. The course delivery must be modified to address these gaps for future groups of
students.
 Industry experts invite comments from Alumni to be another important component of the
commenting system. The Institute has one of the strongest alumni networks. The alumni of

Self Assessment Report Page 342


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
the institution cover the whole world and are well connected to the institution thanks to
alumni associations. The comments on this link, including individuals from all walks of
life, have been essential to improve the quality of education over the years. Comments
should be collected periodically from the alumni by appropriate means.
 Graduates should gather opinions to assess whether the institution has been able to impart
the skills necessary to achieve the program's objectives. This survey should be used to
identify the difficulties encountered by students during their course at the Institute.
 The meetings of the stakeholders of each department, and the views on the emerging
technologies become a next will take.
 Departmental committees have Committees for Thematic Groups. Beyond the content, they
select the Program that must be provided to the Students, based on the views of the
Meetings Collected from the contradictory Interested Parties with the Industry Experts
Surveys. Employers Must be done annually compile for information About Students
Strengths Weaknesses recruited who are this Institute.
 The employer's investment is a key element in determining the skills with which
experiments are experienced. The course entry is found throughout the space for future
summaries for student groups.
 The institution aims to produce socially competent and socially competent individuals.
Suggestions from members of the local community and social workers should be collected
by the institution. To facilitate this, social workers and members of the local community
will be invited to all stakeholder meetings. Your views should be used to shape the
program.
 For the general improvement of a student's character, the Institute must take into account
the reactions of parents and guardians. These will meet at Teacher Parents meetings and
stakeholder meetings. The stakeholder meeting should be convened once a year at the
departmental level to solicit the views of interested parties on various aspects of the
program.

3) Average Percentage of students who participate: 80% Students were participated in the year of
2017-18

Type of Feed back Total Intake Participate %


Course Feedback 680 80
Exit Survey 210 90
Lab Feedback 680 80
Alumni Feedback 210 70
Table B.9.2 a: Average Percentage of students who participated

Sample Feedback Form 1

At the end of each semester, students must complete an end-of-semester survey. In this case, students
will be asked questions that examine the effectiveness of the teaching-learning process to help the
student achieve the respective results of the course through the Google form.

Self Assessment Report Page 343


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 344


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 345


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 346


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 347


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 348


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.2c: Subject Feedback

4) Corrective measures:

Self Assessment Report Page 349


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Institute has IQAC (Internal Quality Assurance Committee) which evaluate and analysis feedbacks
and take corrective actions.

These are action taken by IQAC:2017-18


Feedback given by Feedback on Entity Nature of feedback Action taken
Student infrastructure Water cooler Maintenance Repairing done
Student Faculty/Course Course coverage Extra Classes taken
Student Faculty Teaching skills Advisory/Appreciation
Given
Student Course Topic of course FDPs
Student New skills New technology required FDPs , Conferences
Student Course Beyond Syllabus should be Expert
covered Lectures/seminar
Student Technical Events Technical Events proposed Technical Event
conducted
Student Labs Practical Required Workshops
Table B.9.2b: Corrective measures

A) Details of corrective action taken:


 For students and faculty FDP and National and International Conferences was
conducted

2017-18 2016-17

FDP on Effective Mentoring


Skills-11-13 July 2017
Short Term Course on Open
1Short Term Course on BIG Data and Data
Source Technology by NITTTR,
Mining By NITTTR, SEPT-17
AUG-16

TableB9.2c: FDP

B)National and International Conferences

 Conferences are the great way to learn about research and development going on in
respective fields which inspired many students to publish their own research.

 It is also a great starting point for those students who want to pursue their career in
research fields.

Self Assessment Report Page 350


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

TableB9.2d:Conferences

Figure 9.2d: ICETEAS 2018

C)National and International Conferences Details

S. Topics No. of No. of Remarks


No Faculty students
. Members attended

Self Assessment Report Page 351


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
1 Springer- 39 50 International Conference on Emerging Trends in
International Expert Applications & Security (ICETEAS
Conference - 2018) held on Feb 17-18, 2018 at JECRC, Jaipur
ICETEAS 2018
2 RTCC 2018 38 40 Two day National Conference on Recent Trends
in Computing & Communications ( RTCC )
2018 held on March 26-27, 2018 at JECRC
Jaipur.
3 ICICT’18,London 1 - JECRC Foundation organized the Third
International Congress on Information and
Communication Technology ( ICICT2018) at
Brunel, University, London, United Kingdom on
February27-28, 2018.

Table B.9.2e: National and International Conferences Details

D)Technical Workshops/Activities
 We conduct a lot of technical events which are competitive. Not only it results in
bigger number of participants but they can also learn a lot more.
 These events bring out the competitiveness in our students which is going to be useful
in real world. Due to this, our students were motivated enough to participate in events
launched by big organization Such as NASA.
 Our students also participate in techno culture festivals such robotic festivals, see
Olympiad etc.

Self Assessment Report Page 352


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Table B.9.2f: Technical Workshops


Event Faculty Co-ordinator
S.No Date Event Name Venue Timing
CSE
Meditation Lab, 11:00 AM –
Enlightenment
1 26/3/18 Badminton Court 3:00 PM Richa Upadhyay
Sunday CP-3, CP-4, IBM 11:30 AM - Hemlata Soni
Java Lets
2 Lab (CSE & IT) 4:30 PM Jeba Nega Cheltha.C

9:30 AM – Rajan Jha,


Tech Probe C-501 (CSE)
12:30 PM Mohit Jain
3 Saroj Agarwal
26/3/18 Hardware Quadrangle A Block 9:30 AM – Ankur Raj
4 Monday Assembling (CSE/IT) 3:30 PM Anoop Kumar Mehta
CP-1 to CP-8, IBM 9:30 AM -
27/3/18 Just C Richa Sharma
Lab (CSE & IT) 03:30 PM
5 Tuesday Arihant Jain
28/3/18 CP-1, CP-2, IBM 9:30 AM –
Subito
6 Wednesday Lab (CSE/IT) 4:30 PM Neha Bharti

Table B.9.2g: Technical Event list 2016-17

Self Assessment Report Page 353


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Embryo Hardware Assembling

New Ventura Java Lets

Figure 9.2e: Technical Event

5)Reward for Faculty in the form of Appraisal

Faculty Appraisal Form

Jaipur Engineering College and Research Centre, Jaipur


FACULTY APPRAISAL FORM
For Best faculty award
Total 200 points
Name of Faculty Member: Department:
Designation:
S. Item Name Maximum Points
No. Points obtained
1 Academic result 30 points average (90% students having more than 70% : 30
30 points, 80-89% students having more than 70% result: 27 points, 70-79%
students having more than 70% result: 24 points, 60-69% students having
more than 70% result: 21,60-69% students having more than 60% result: 18
points , 50-59% students having more than 60% result:15 points else ZERO)

Self Assessment Report Page 354


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Example:
Theory Subject Points obtained
Sub-1 30
Sub-2 27
Sub-3 0
Sub-4 18
Average points scored 75/4 i.e. 18.75
No marks for Labs subjects
2 Research Publication 20 points average (1 sci indexed 20
publication: 10 points, 1 publication having ISSN number : 5
points, Else ZERO)
3 Faculty development program 10 point average (one faculty development 10
programme minimum 5 days attended 5 points, 2 points for attending 2 days
workshop, subject to maximum of 10)
4 International / National conference 10 points average ( 5 points 10
for attending International, 3 points for attending National of
repute, 2 points for National conference)
5 Research grant average 20 points for having grant of more than 20
5 lakhs, if only project submitted to DST/other govt agency: 10
points, subject to maximum 20
6 Patent 10 points/Product development / start-up 10 points 10
7 New Skills / additional specialization / certification course 25
8 Innovation in teaching learning, video lecture, online MOOCs, 20
Online notes uploading, any other 20 points
9 Technical activity organized 5 points 5
10 Participation in social responsibility 5 points / activity subject 10
to maximum of 10
11 Institute level activity organized 5 points, participation 2 points
subject to maximum of 5 5
12 Any award received, session chair in conference, guest lecture, 5
invited talk, etc. 5 points
13 HOD recommendation maximum 30 points (Departmental 30
responsibility 2 points, NBA related activity 5)
Total 200
Note: HOD will verify the documentary proof.
Signature of Faculty Signature of HOD
Figure 9.2f: Faculty Appraisal Form

Based on the Above API report faculty members are given appreciation/advisory
Format for same is mentioned below

Self Assessment Report Page 355


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.2g: Advisory noteFigure 9.2h: Appreciation letter

6)Indices used for measuring quality of teaching & learning and summary of the index values
for all courses/teachers
 Students Attendance Report
 MTT Results
 University Results
 Final Passing Percentages
 Placement Record
 Student’s performance in National and International conferences
 Student’s performance in Technical Workshops
 Student’s participation in Intra and Inter college competitions

Self Assessment Report Page 356


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
 Co-curricular and Extra-curricular activities.
7) Number of corrective actions taken
A)Pre Placement Training/ Extra Technical Classes
Year Name of event Object of event No. of students Date of event
participated
2017-18 Pre placement Bridging gap 260 20-7-2018
training between onwards
program by academics &
Face Industry
Table B.9.2h: Pre Placement Training/ Extra Technical Classes

B) Company Based Placement Training

Year Name of Event Object of Event

2017-18 Sales force Training Students were trained on


modules of Trailhead
2017-18 Red Hat Linux Training Students were trained on
modules of Red Hat Linux.
2017-2018 Forks Technology Data Science/ Machine Students are trained on Machine
Learning Learning
2017-2018 Forks Technology IOT Students are trained on IOT
Table B.9.2i: Company Based Placement Training

C)MOU’s was done with industries to emphasize on

(a) Internship
(b) Project Workshop for Students
(c) Industrial Visits
(d) Students specific Training

S. No. Company Name Date


1. Indo Vision Services Pvt. Ltd. 22-Mar-2017

2. SakRobotix Lab 27-Apr-2017

Self Assessment Report Page 357


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
3. Infosys Campus Connect 12-May-2017

4. Wadhwani Foundation 13-Oct-2017

5. CADD Centre 30-Oct-2017

6. Forsk Technologies 2-Nov-2017

7. RedHat Technologies 7-Nov-2017

8. Salesforce Technologies Ltd. 17-Jan-2018

9. Cyberops 15-May-2018

10. Siemens Ltd. 26-July-2018

11 Techinest Pvt Ltd Oct 2018


Table B.9.2j: Details of MOU

Self Assessment Report Page 358


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
The following are the details of MOUs:
1. Indo Vision Services Pvt. Ltd.Indovision Services is an ISO 9001:2015 accredited company and
providing end to end ICT (Information & Communication) services and solutions. It caters to
multiple dimensions of industry. Primarily it provides following services listed below:
 -Emerging Technologies (Cloud, Automation)
 -Manpower Solutions
 -Training (College, Corporate & Govt.)
 -Enterprise Solutions (ERP, IHRMS, ILMS , System Integration, Networking, Smart
City
 & Smart Campus, etc.)
 -We serves both large and small organizations across all industry
sectors(Telecommunications,
 IT/ITES, Education, BFSI, Automobiles,Govt. &PSU’s) through our brands and
offerings.

2. SAKROBOTICS LAB: Establishing a Robotics Research Centre in the campus of JECRC,


providing Internship to JECRC Students and to engage the students in Robotics Training and also
offering Robotics product development exposure.

3. Infosys Campus Connect:Launched by Infosys in May 2004, CC is a unique academia-industry


initiative to “architect the education experience”. The objective in launching the CC program is
to enhance the quality and quantity of the IT talent-pool; sustain the growth of the IT industry
itself. The portal will provide a digital platform for academia-industry interaction anytime, and
anywhere.

4. WADHWANI Foundation:Launched in 2000 by Dr. Romesh Wadhwani, the Foundations


comprising of Wadhwani Charitable Foundation and Wadhwani Operating Foundation are
working with the primary mission of accelerating economic development in emerging economies
through large-scale job creation with presence in Asia, Africa and Latin America operating in
association with governments, corporate, mentors, investors and educational institutes. Its
Initiatives are driving job creation through entrepreneurship, skills development and innovation.

5. CADD Centre: As Asia's biggest network of CAD training centers, CADD Centre Training
Services is the training arm of the 30 year old CADD Centre Group, head quartered at Chennai,
India. They being the only company in India to offer an end-to-end solution to CAD users
specializes in Computer Aided Design (CAD), Computer Aided Engineering (CAE), and
Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM) with our wings spread across the globe.

6. Forsk Technologies: Forsk Technology offer project based learning in IoT (Internet of Things)
and Machine Learning (Data Science). Future courses will be offered based on industry
requirement and/or student/faculty feedback. These future courses will be on emerging
technologies.

Self Assessment Report Page 359


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
7. Red Hat Technologies Pvt. Ltd.: Linux World ('LW') is a fast growing ISO 9001:2008 Certified
Organization which is fully governed by young and energetic Technocrats, dedicated to Open
Source technologies and Linux promotion. Since its inception in the year 2005, LW have
achieved the status of centre of excellence wherein there is latest technology, innovative
developing methodology, state of the art infrastructure and individual needs of employees are
identified and executed professionally, efficiently & ethically.

8. Salesforce Technologies Ltd.: Salesforce is the primary enterprise offering within the Salesforce
platform. It provides companies with an interface for case management and task management,
and a system for automatically routing and escalating important events. The Salesforce customer
portal provides customers the ability to track their own cases, includes a social networking plug-
inthat enables the user to join the conversation about their company on social networking
websites, provides analytical tools and other services including email alert, Google search, and
access to customers' entitlement and contracts.

9. Cyberops Cyberops is India’s leading organization in the field of Information security.


Advancement in technology and interconnected business ecosystems has combined to increase
exposure to cyber-attacks. We aim to digitally shield the cyberspace by offering various products
and services. We are hovering to influence our proficiency and global footprint in the field of
information security and cybercrimeinvestigation.Itfoster certified trainings on Information
Security and provides penetration testing for security audits, and Cyber Crime Investigation
services for various sectors to meet their specific needs.

10. SIEMENS Ltd. With a focus on electrification, automation and digitalization, Siemens India
stands for engineering excellence, innovation, and reliability. As one of the world’s biggest
producers of energy-efficient, resource-saving technologies, Siemens is a pioneer in
infrastructure and energy solutions, as well as automation and software for industry. The
company is also a leader in medical imaging equipment, laboratory diagnostics, and clinical IT.
Siemens also provides business-to-business financial solutions, rail automation and wind power
solutions.

Self Assessment Report Page 360


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.2i: Forks Technology Figure 9.2j: RED Hat Linux Training

9.3 Feedback on facilities


(Assessment is based on student feedback collection, Analysis and then Corrective Action Taken)

1)Different feedback collection: Institute has different kind of feedback collection process
collected by students and faculties.

S. Facility How Type of Action Taken


No. feedback is Record
taken
1 Hostel Entry in the About Stay in Sharing of
register / the hostel room changed
Sh P. K. Gupta (CAO discussion from 4 to 3
/Chief warden) with warden About Food Student
/ written committee and
application / warden
Grievance About Timing Boys and girls
cell timings are
fixed but on
demand as per
requirement
permission is
provided.
Maintenance Entry in
register and
corrective
action
Medical Ambulance
Exigency register
2 Transport Written Route Recorded with
Sh. Ravi Bhatnagar application Fees bus in charge

Self Assessment Report Page 361


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
(Bus Incharge) with Bus In Flexibility / and
charge Maintenance appropriate
of buses action is taken
3 Library Departments Timing Appropriate
are taking Books action taken
Dr. Anita Jain (Chief feedback Publication by Library
Librarian) related to E-books incharge
library and Swayam
thus
submitted to
librarian
4 Sports Feedback Ground Sports
taken by Participation incharge takes
Dr. Rajesh Sharma sports appropriation
(Sports Incharge) incharge decision
5 Over all maintenance Feedback About
from Block maintenance &
Sh. Yogendra Sharma Incharges Safety
6 Security Over all Meetings every Feedback in
Sh. P. K. Tiwari security month the meeting
7 Medical Facility CAO is Files Medical OPD
responsible maintained First aid
Table B.9.3a: Different feedback collection

A) Course Feedback:
 Meeting arrange by all Class Coordinator with the student.
 All issue regarding course or syllabus are discuss (Within 15 days)
 A feedback form share with student.
 All Data are collected.
Sample of Feedback form by the Departments
1. Course feedback form

Self Assessment Report Page 362


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 363


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 364


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 365


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.3a: Course Feedback Form

Self Assessment Report Page 366


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
B) Program Exit Form

Self Assessment Report Page 367


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 368


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 369


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 370


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 371


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 372


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.3b: Program Exit Survey Form

C)Lab Feedback:
 Meeting arrange by all Class Coordinator with the student.
 Meeting arranges By HoD with the Lab In charge.
 All issue regarding Lab discuss Like Maintains ,requirement and set up of lab (Within 30days)
 A feedback regarding lab also taken.
 All Data are collected.

Self Assessment Report Page 373


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
D) Sample of Feedback form by the Departments:

Self Assessment Report Page 374


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 375


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 376


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.3c: Lab Feedback Form

F) Alumni Feedback form

Self Assessment Report Page 377


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 378


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 379


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 380


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 381


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.3d: Alumni Feedback Form

G)Hostel Feedback:
 We have system in which faculty stay and visit hostel. Faculty discuss about various services
and facilities provided in hostel
 Feedbacks given by students are subject to discuss with the hostel wardens or in-charges resp.

H) Cleanliness feedback:
 Soch Initiative (Soch –Coordinator)
 SWACHCHH JECRC
 SOCH-KUCHH KAR DIKHAANE KI, keeping this motto in mind, the Team Soch of
JECRC stepped an extra mile to realize the dream project of the H’ble Prime Minister Sh.
Narendra Modi, Swachchh Bharat Abhiyan, by launching an innovative digitally
enabled campaign SWACHCHH JECRC. This campaign was aimed to contributing to
the society in terms of cleaning the JECRC campus through the QR code. This campaign
changed the whole idea of cleanliness. Never did anyone think that cleanliness could be
monitored digitally.In this campaign, a special QR code was designed by the technically
advanced students of JECRC and put on the posters, dustbins, all over the campus, to
expedite the cleanliness drive, which could be accessed through any smartphone,
prompting to fill a google form for complaining against any negligence in cleanliness or
giving any suggestions regarding the misplacement of the dustbins, areas not cleaned etc.
for example.The following link can be used for filling the form:
https://goo.gl/EAnOqd

Self Assessment Report Page 382


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.3e: Cleanliness Feedback Form

For any trash, smeared environment, a complaint can be filed by scanning the QR code. By scanning
the QR code, a dialog box pops up on the screen which leads us directly to the complaint form. The
data filled in the form reaches our supervisors and a response is given within 24 hours.
We get about 10 to 20 number of complaints every day and making it a count of 375 till date which
is really astonishing.
In this changing era of digitalization, this innovative SWACCH JECRC campaign has done a great
work.

Figure 9.3f: TEAM SOCH

Self Assessment Report Page 383


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
 15 days celebration took place as “SwacchataPakhwada” in JECRC, students were
participated in this activity, checked for clean campus.
 Students as well as faculties were involved to clean the campus and program continued for 15
days.

Figure 9.3g: “SwacchataPakhwada” celebrated, Cleanliness raised

Corrective action taken regarding feedback:-

A) Course feedback corrective action:


 All data which collected by feedback is discuss to HOD by Class Coordinator like course
coverage, course learning, content delivery etc.
 HOD assigns a faculty for collected Course Coverage.
 Discuses with subject faculty regarding Strategy for coverage of remaining units.

B) Lab Feedback corrective action:


 HOD discuses all feedback with Departmental lab in charge.
 Departmental Lab in charge collected all lab status and requirement with budget.
 All data are mention in Lab maintain File.

DEPARTMENT Of. COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING


MAKE &
NAME OF REPAIRIN STATU REMARK
S.NO. MODEL FAULT
ITEM G DATE S S
NO.
Keyboard and 28 New
1 Keyboard, mouse Cp6 7/7/2017 ok
mouse are not mouse and
Matlab
working not Matlab
keyboards
2 Software Cp 3 9/8/2017 ok
installed installed
issued in 28
Keyboard and 25
systems New
3 Keyboard, mouse Cp7 10/7/2017 ok
mouse are not mouse and
Mother
working board Motherboard
keyboards
4 Motherboard Cp3 18/10/2017 ok
problem repaired
issued
Matlab not Matlab
5 Software Cp 4 29/11/2017 ok
installed installed in
systems

Self Assessment Report Page 384


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
System
6 Monitor Cp4 No display 14/12/2017 ok
service
Ubuntu not Ubuntu
7 Operating System Cp2 9/1/2018 Ok
installed installed in 5
Installed
systems
8 Window Cp3 Windows problem 17/1/2018 Ok
window in 10
Input output port Input
system output
9 I/O Cp4 6/2/2108 Ok
not working port changed
Networking LAN cable
10 LAN cable IBM 21/2/2018 Ok
problem changed
Motherboard Problem
11 Motherboard Cp6 24/2/2018 Ok
problem solved
Display not Problem
12 Monitor Cp1 7/3/2018 Ok
working Resolved
Wi-Fi is not Wi-Fi
13 Wi-Fi Cp7 28/3/2018 Ok
working reconfigured
Motherboard Problem
14 Motherboard Cp6 18/4/2018 Ok
problem solved
Projector not Change VGA
15 Projector IBM 24/4/2018 Ok
working connector
Networking
16 I/O Cp8 9/5/2018 Ok I/O replaced
problem
New mouse
17 Mouse Cp5 Not working 15/5/2018 Ok
issued

Table B.9.3b: Technical Event list

I) LAB MAINTANCE SHEET


SESSION 2017-18

S.No In charge
1 HOD All CC
2 TPO All Mentor
3 CC All Student
4 Lab in charge All Lab technician
5 Mentor All student
6 CAO Block in charge
Departmental in charge
Table B.9.3c: In charge List

Session Name of Lab Lab Incharge


2015-16 Cp1 Kaushalendra Nagoria
Cp2 TovinderSahu
Cp3 Vishnu Nagoria
Cp4 DashrathVerma
Cp5 DashrathVerma
Cp6 Manish Sharma
Cp7 Shyam Sunder Sharma
Cp8 Bhupendra Singh
IBM Anil Sharma
2016-17 Cp1 Kaushalendra Nagoria

Self Assessment Report Page 385


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Cp2 TovinderSahu
Cp3 Vishnu Nagoria
Cp4 DashrathVerma
Cp5 DashrathVerma
Cp6 Manish Sharma
Cp7 Shyam Sunder Sharma
Cp8 Bhupendra Singh
2017-18 IBM Anil Sharma
Cp1 KaushalendraNagoria
Cp2 TovinderSahu
Cp3 Atul Sharma
Cp4 Bhupendra Singh
Cp5 RamkeshMeena
Cp6 Kuldeep Singh
Cp7 Shyam Sunder Sharma
Cp8 Narendra uchhaniya
IBM Anil Sharma
Table B.9.3d:Incharge List

Jaipur Engineering College and Research Centre


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Minutes of Meeting
Date/Day: 19/9/2015 Time: 11:30am to 12:15 pm Location: CP3 Lab, Block-A,
Saturday JECRC
Speaker: CC Speaker's Designation: AP Attended by: All student

Agenda of Meeting:
To discuss the departmental facilities.
Attendees:
Meeting started with the welcome of CC by all students. Following were the points of meeting:-
S.No. Points
1 CC interacted with allstudents.
2 Discuses alldepartmental facility.
2. All students gave different idea regarding the topic.
3. The few common points came out to fill up the feedback.

The meeting ended up with the thanks of Chair and next round of meeting would be held with prior notice.

Jaipur Engineering College and Research Centre

Self Assessment Report Page 386


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Minutes of Meeting
Date/Day: 1/10/2016, Time: 11:30 pm to 12:15 pm Location: EDC, Block-A JECRC
Saturday
Speaker: MS. Neelam Speaker's Designation: HOD, Attended by: All CC CSE faculty
Chaplot CSE Department members

Agenda of Meeting:
To discuss the regarding course converge

Attendees:
Meeting started with the welcome of HOD, CSE by all CSE faculties. Following were the points of
meeting:-
S.No. Points
1 HOD interacted with departmental faculty regarding course converge of the subject.
2 All faculties gave different idea regarding the topic.
2. The few common points came out like Fill up Feedback regarding course converge.
3. Some faculties were assigned to design the feedback form according to their thoughts and they
were told to inform students also for this work and can take their views as well.

The meeting ended up with the thanks of Chair and next round of meeting would be held with pre
notice, meanwhile those faculties who have given assignment were ask to meet HOD after two days.

9.4. Self-Learning (5)


(The institution needs to specify the facilities, materials and scope for self-learning / learning beyond syllabus, Webinars,
Podcast, and MOOCs etc. and evaluate their effectiveness)

1) Self-Learning

For self-learning or learning beyond syllabus during the semesters we provide information sharing
material and organize different types of activities like workshop, training, conferences, club
activities, quiz etc. For these activities academic calendar has sufficient provisions and HOD is
authorized to change in schedule with permission of respective authorities.

Self Assessment Report Page 387


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Beyond
Curricula

Information Skill Application Ethics


Sharing developement Based learning Impartment

1.Internet
Technical
2.Two-Tier Industry Oriented Social Activity
Advancement
library

Personality Research Spiritual


Improvement Orientated Training

Figure 9.4a: Chart of self-learning or learning beyond curricula

A)Availability of Facility, Materials and Scope for Learning beyond Syllabus

S.No. Activities Beneficiary Details

1. 2-tier Library System Faculties & The institute has the effective 2-tier Library
Students System both at Institute and the Departmental level
2 Availability of Faculties & The project lab is equipped with internet facility
Internet facility in Students and at any time internet can be made available in
All labs. all the labs.
3 GATE Classes Lectures on specific topics are delivered for the
VIIsem students of final year as part of GATE Preparation
students and online exam for updation of Academic
preparation.
4 Moocs like Swayam Faculties & SWAYAM is a program initiated by Government
Students of India, the objective of this effort is to take the
best teaching learning resources to all.
5 Webinars Faculties & Webinars are opportunity for professional
Students development of students and faculty provided on
specific topic.
6 Personality VII Creativity, lateral thinking and communication /
Development people management skills are essential
lectures Components for progress in any sphere. Students
are encouraged to develop these
through goal setting exercises, group
discussions, mock interviews and
Presentations.

Self Assessment Report Page 388


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
7 Face classes VII Special classes conduct to improve Aptitude,
Reasoning (Verbal and nonverbal), Soft skill and
communication of students for placement purpose.
8 Industrial visit V,VI To bridge the gap between Industry and academia,
various modules are covered.
9 Training program All students To enhance knowledge and develop technical skill.
/Workshop/Seminars
10 Technical Events All students To enhance the technical knowledge.

11 International Faculties & For sharing new ideas and innovation common
/national Students platform is provided.
Conferences
12 FDP’s Faculty & Development of faculties.
Technical
staff
13 Social activities: All Students All round development essentially means
(A) Zarurat intellectual, physical, moral, sensible and social
(B) Soch development.
(C) AASHAYEI
N
(D) Suhasini
14 Spiritual Training Faculties & For help in increasing mental capacity to focus
Students better
Table B.9.4a: Availability of Facility, Materials and Scope for Learning beyond Syllabus

B)Information Sharing:

Internet and two-tier library are the two information sharing facilities that we have at our institute.

Library

 Our library has over two thousand books related to non-engineering genre. Where students
can learn about the daily life, become better at decision making and learn about self-
development.
 We also have books for competitive exams like GATE, CAT, and other government
conducted tests.
 Library also possesses number of reference books for better development.

Self Assessment Report Page 389


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Table B.9.4b: Details of E-books available

Internet

 Internet is the best way to see, experience and learn about new things.
 Our institute has dedicated 12 Mbps lease line with 100% uptime.
 Students are also given special access to registered websites where they can read about latest
research, development and other developments going on in respective field. (eg. – IEEE,
Research GATE)
 All the labs are equipped with Internet connections, which makes it easier to connect to the
up to date and latest technology of respective field

Self Assessment Report Page 390


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Computer Detail

Licensed
S.No. Name of Lab No. of PC's Configuration Software
Yes/No
Intel H61 Chipset, Intel Corei-3, 2100, 3.1Ghz, 3M Cache, Ubuntu, Windows
2x2 GB DDR3 Ram, 1333 Mhz, 320 GB SATA 3.0 Gbps,
XP, Java, Turbo
1 CP-1 32 7200, DVD RW, HCL USB Heavy duty Keyboard, HCL USB 2 Yes
button Optical Mouse, HCL Digital Colour TFT-LED
C++, , Acrobat
Monitor 18.5", uATX (Dasher) reader, Winrar
Intel H61 Chipset, Intel Corei-3, 2100, 3.1Ghz, 3M Cache, Ubuntu, Windo, ,
2x2 GB DDR3 Ram, 1333 Mhz, 320 GB SATA 3.0 Gbps,
Acrobat reader,
2 CP-2 28 7200, DVD RW, HCL USB Heavy duty Keyboard, HCL USB 2 Yes
button Optical Mouse, HCL Digital Colour TFT-LED
Winrarws XP, Java,
Monitor 18.5", uATX (Dasher) Turbo C++
Ubuntu, Windows
HCL 18.5" LED,Intel Core i3-3220 3.30 Ghz, Intel H61
XP, Java, gcc,
3 CP-3 28 Chipset,320 GB SATA, 2X2 DDR3 RAM, 10/100/1000 Lan, Yes
DVD RW Model Sim, Acrobat
reader, Winrar
Windows XP,
HCL 18.5" LED,Intel Core i3-3220 3.30 Ghz, Intel H61
Oracle 10g, My Sql ,
4 CP-4 28 Chipset,320 GB SATA, 2X2 DDR3 RAM, 10/100/1000 Lan, Yes
DVD RW Acrobat reader,
Winrar
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz (4 CPUs), Windows 8, MS
3.1GHz, DH61WW MB, NVIDIA GeForce 210 Graphics
office Professonla,
5 CP-5 10 Card, 8 GB DDR3 RAM, Segate HDD 500 GB SATA, Logitech Yes
USB MM KB, Logitech USB Mouse, LG DVD RW, Samsung
Acrobat reader,
SA-300 19.5" LED Winrar
Ubuntu, Windows
HCL PIV 3.0 HT, 512 DDRII, HDD80, 17" TFT, HCL USB XP, Java, Turbo
6 CP-6 28 Yes
Keyboard, HCL USB Mouse, Asus 865/915 MB C++, , Acrobat
reader, Winrar
Ubuntu, Windows
XP, Java, gcc,
HCL PIV 3.0 HT, 512 DDRII, HDD80, 17" TFT, HCL USB
7 CP-7 28 Model Sim, Xiline, , Yes
Keyboard, HCL USB Mouse, Asus 865/915 MB
Acrobat reader,
Winrar
Intel H61 Chipset, Intel Corei-3, 2100, 3.1Ghz, 3M Cache, Windows XP,
2x2 GB DDR3 Ram, 1333 Mhz, 320 GB SATA 3.0 Gbps,
Oracle 10g, My Sql ,
8 CP-8 28 7200, DVD RW, HCL USB Heavy duty Keyboard, HCL USB 2 Yes
button Optical Mouse, HCL Digital Colour TFT-LED
Acrobat reader,
Monitor 18.5", uATX (Dasher) Winrar
HCL Dual-core [email protected], G-41 Intel Chipset MB, Windows XP, Java,
2GB DDR3 RAM, SATA 160 GB HDD, DVD RW, HCL MM PS 2
9 IBM Lab 64 Acrobat reader, Yes
KB, HCL USB OPTICAL Mouse, HCL 18.5" wide LCD with
speaker Winrar
Intel H61 Chipset, Intel Corei-3, 2100, 3.1Ghz, 3M Cache,
2x2 GB DDR3 Ram, 1333 Mhz, 320 GB SATA 3.0 Gbps, Windows XP, Java,
10 Robotics Lab 9 7200, DVD RW, HCL USB Heavy duty Keyboard, HCL USB 2 Acrobat reader, Yes
button Optical Mouse, HCL Digital Colour TFT-LED Winrar
Monitor 18.5", uATX (Dasher)

Self Assessment Report Page 391


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Compaq Dual- Core [email protected], Intel® Chipset G31 Windows XP, Java,
MB, 2 GB DDR2 RAM, 320 GB SATAN HDD, COMPAQ USB
11 Innovation Academy 9 Acrobat reader, Yes
KB, COMPAQ USB Optical Mouse, LIGHTSCRIBE DVDRW,
BENQ TFT-LCD 17" Winrar
Intel H61 Chipset, Intel Corei-3, 2100, 3.1Ghz, 3M Cache,
2x2 GB DDR3 Ram, 1333 Mhz, 320 GB SATA 3.0 Gbps, Windows XP, Java,
12 CP-11 28 7200, DVD RW, HCL USB Heavy duty Keyboard, HCL USB 2 gcc, Acrobat reader, Yes
button Optical Mouse, HCL Digital Colour TFT-LED Winrar
Monitor 18.5", uATX (Dasher)
Intel H61 Chipset, Intel Corei-3, 2100, 3.1Ghz, 3M Cache,
2x2 GB DDR3 Ram, 1333 Mhz, 320 GB SATA 3.0 Gbps, Windows XP, Java,
13 CP-12 28 7200, DVD RW, HCL USB Heavy duty Keyboard, HCL USB 2 gcc, Acrobat reader, Yes
button Optical Mouse, HCL Digital Colour TFT-LED Winrar
Monitor 18.5", uATX (Dasher)
Intel 865 Chipset, Intel P-IV 2.8 Ghz, 1x2 MB DDR2 Ram, Windows XP, Java,
14 CP-13 32 80 GB SATA, CD R, HCL PS2 Keyboard, HCL USB 2 button gcc, Acrobat reader, Yes
Optical Mouse, HCL TFT-LCD Monitor 17", uATX (Dasher) Winrar
Compaq Dual- Core [email protected], Intel® Chipset G31 Windows XP, Java,
MB, 2 GB DDR2 RAM, 320 GB SATAN HDD, COMPAQ USB
15 CP-14 28 gcc, Acrobat reader, Yes
KB, COMPAQ USB Optical Mouse, LIGHTSCRIBE DVDRW,
BENQ TFT-LCD 17" Winrar
Table B.9.4c: Computer Detail

Table B.9.4d: Internet Bill

Self Assessment Report Page 392


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

C)Skill Development:

For the overall development of the students, we focus on technical aspects and personality
improvement. Which not only makes them a better student, they are also being prepared for future
obstacles both on education level and personal level.

Technical Advancements

 We provide GATE examination preparation to our students. Which helps them with both
better placements in Govt. PSUs and for those who are interested in higher studies? Due to
this program our no.of students are getting into prominent institutes for higher studies and
some of them have also been selected for govt jobs.
JAIPUR ENGINEERING COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
VALID SCORE CARD DETAILS & ENTREPRENEUR DETAILS 2017-2018

NUMB
ER OF
CANDI
ALL DATE
INDIA APPEA
GATE/GR MARK RANK RED IN
SECT E/GMAT REGISTRATION GATE/OTHE OUT OF IN THIS THIS
S. NO SEMESTER
ION NAME etc NUMBER R SCORE 100 PAPER PAPER
1 8 A Apurvi Mansinghka GATE CS18S33042312 374 27 11021 107893
2 8 A Akshay vijayvargiyaGATE CS18S33041234 350 25 13185 107893
3 8 A Amandeep Goyal GATE CS18S33041870 588 45 1893 107893
4 8 A Ekansh Kushwah GATE CS18S33042445 382 27.67 10374 107893
5 8 A Anushree Jain GATE CS18S33045020 469 35 5255 107893
6 8 A Kapil Khandelwal GATE CS18S33045219 624 48 1349 107893
7 8 A Divaker Soni GATE CS18S33041355 322 22.67 16475 107893
8 8 B Rohit Mathur GATE CS18S33043062 441 32.67 6564 107893
9 8 B Rohit Kumar Gupta GATE CS18S33045027 374 27 11021 107893
10 8 B Mayank Prasad GATE CS18S33042125 413 30.33 8122 107893
11 8 B Sakshi Singhal GATE CS18S33045098 517 39 3493 107893
12 8 B Prakhar Garg GATE CS18S33041394 362 26 12049 107893
13 8 B Nikhil Gupta GATE CS18S33042441 394 28.67 9458 107893
MOHIT
14 8 B KUMAWAT GATE CS18S33045207 441 32.67 6564 107893
15 8 C VINOD KUMAR GATE CS18S33042335 334 23.67 14969 107893
16 8 C SURYANSHI ADANIYA GATE CS18S33041846 330 23.33 15462 107893
17 8 C YASH VIJAY GATE CS18S33042270 350 25 13185 107893
18 8 B Sakshi Garg IELTS 7
19 8 C Sakshi Gupta CAT 90.40%
1 8 B SHIVANSH SHARMA Entrpreneur- Apparel distribution company .
Table B.9.4f: GATE Details

Self Assessment Report Page 393


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

S.No NAME BATCH ORGANIZATION Location


1 Sakshi Garg 2018 Trinity college Ireland
2 ADITYA JOHARI 2018 Dublin,
MBA, Ireland for
NMIMS, Mumbai
Mumbai MS
3 Sakshi Singhal 2018 M.Tech, NIT Trichi Trichi
4 Sakshi Gupta 2018 PGDM ( MBA), Mumbai
5 UTKARSH SINGHAL 2017 K.J. Somaiya
MBA
Institute of
6 VANISHA GAUR 2017 MDI Gurgaon Gurgaon
Management
7 UMANG SHARMA 2017 MDI and
Studies Gurgaon Gurgaon
8 APOORVA JAIN 2017 Research
IIM Rohtak Rohtak
9 PRATIMA GOYAL 2017 TAPMI Manipal Manipal
10 CHHAVI INANI 2017 NJIT,USA USA
11 KRISHNA PATHAK 2017 IIM, Mumbai Mumbai
12 RITIKA DHOOT 2017 MBA
13 DEVANSH SETHI 2017 Rochester Institute USA
14 CHANDNI MATHUR 2016 of technology
University of Urbana
15 MOHIT JESWANI 2016 Illinois at
IIIT-BUrbana Champaign
Bangalore
Champaign
16 HIMANSHU GAUR 2016 IIT Madras IIT
17 VIKAS KUMAR 2016 IIT Bombay Bombay
18 SHRUTI JAISWAL 2016 University of Texas Dallas this
19 PRATIBHA 2016 MBA at. fall.
IIM Indore
20 AGARWAL
GARIMA 2016 AMITY
CHOUDHARY
21 ADITYA SHARMA 2016 UNIVERSITY
MBA from MDI, Gurgaon
22 AAYUSH DUBE 2016 Gurgaon
MICA Mumbai

Table B.9.4g: Higher Studies Details

 We also conduct mock tests, online tests and quizzes to prepare our students for better
performance which makes it easier for the student to perform and crack those competitive
exams.

Year No. of Student Appeared


online exam
2015-16 180
2016-17 184
2017-18 186
Table B.9.4h: Online Test Data

 In the Digital India, Moocs are the best way to learn a new skill which is the easier way to

Self Assessment Report Page 394


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
advance your Career. Programs like SWAYAM is being used in our institute and many
students and faculties have enrolled and learning new skills.

S.No. Name of Faculty Subject Registered on Swayam Portal


1 Dr. Vijay Singh Rathore Cloud Computing
1. Outcome based pedagogic principles for effective
teaching 2.
2 Dr. Bhavna Sharma Introduction to Machine Learning
3 Ms. Neelam Chaplot Introduction to Machine Learning
4 Mr. Mukesh Aggarwal DSA
5 Mr. Gajendra Sharma OOPs
6 Mr. Prashant Yadav Introduction to C
7 Ms. Richa Sharma Computer Architecture and Organization
8 Ms. Shikha Maheshwari Outcome based pedagogic principles for effective teaching.
9 Mr. Rajan Kr. Jha Introduction to Research
10 Mr. Prahalad Sharma 1. Introduction to Machine Learning
11 Mr. Sachin Gupta Introduction to Research
12 Mr. Shailesh Arrawatia Introduction to Research
13 Mr. Arihant Kumar Jain Introduction to Machine Learning
14 Mr. Abhishek Dixit Introduction to IOT
1.Data Structures and File Management, 2.Introduction to
15 Ms. Neha Bharti Research
16 Mr. Pradeep Sharma 1.Introduction to Research 2. Introduction to IOT
1.Data Structures and File Management, 2.Introduction to
17 Ms. Hemlata Soni Research
18 Ms. Geetika Gautam cloud computing
19 Ms. Richa Upadhyay Introduction to Research
20 Ms. Sarita cloud computing
21 Mr. Ankur Raj Fundamentals of database systems, Programming in C plus plus
22 Mr. Shashi Kant Singh Introduction to Machine Learning
23 Ms. Deeksha Mathur Introduction to Internet of things
24 Ms. C.Jeba Nega Cheltha Introduction to Research, Technical English for Engineers.
25 Ms. Priya Gupta Computer Architecture and Organization
26 Ms. Kirti Chodhary Dbms
27 Mr. Ashish Ameria Introduction to Research
28 Mrs. Saroj Agarwal Artificial intelligence
29 Ms. Priyanka Mitra Outcome based pedagogic principles for effective teaching
30 Mr. Ashima Tiwari Intoducyion to IoT
31 Mrs. Seema Yadav Fundamentals of Database Systems
32 Mr.Amit Mithal 1) Introduction to Programming in C2) Introduction to internet of things
33 Mrs.Abhilasha 1.Introduction to Research 2. Educational Leadership
34 Mr.Mohit Jain Introduction to Programming in C
35 Mr. Rajnjeet Pandey Introduction to Research
36 Mr.Vatan Mishra Introduction to Research
37 Mrs.Geerija Lavania Introduction to C Programming
38 Mr.Geet Kalani Introduction to Research
39 Mr.Anoop Kumar Mehta Introduction to ResearchIntroduction to Research
40 Mrs.Garima Ojha Communication in Engg techniques
Table B.9.4i:Details of Faculty registered in SWAYAM

Self Assessment Report Page 395


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
E)Details of students registered in SWAYAM

Swayam
Registration No. of courses
Name (Y/N) registered Name of Courses registered
Hemlata Soni Y 3 DSA, Prog. in C and Intro to Research
AAKANKSHA JAIN Y 2 Programming data structures and algorithms using Python, Object oriented analysis and design
AAKANKSHA SHARMA Y 2 cloud computing, OOPs
ABHILASH KUMAR TIWARI Y 2 DSA,C plus plus
ABHIMANYU SINGH RATHORE Y 1 OOPs
ABHINAV SONI Y 4 DSA, Prog. in c ++, introduction to programming in c, oops
ABHISHEK AGARWAL Y 1 OOPs
ABHISHEK GARG Y 1 OOPs
ABHISHEK JAIN Y 1 OOPs
ABHISHEK KHANDELWAL Y 1 OOPs
ABHISHEK MOHATA Y 1 OOPs
ABHISHEK PAL SINGH JADON Y 1 OOP
ABHISHEK SHARMA Y 1 OOPs
ADITYA AGARWAL Y 2 data structures and file management, programming in CPP
ADITYA KAUSHIK Y 1 OOPs
ADITYA VYAS Y 3 DSA, prog. in CPP , prog. in C ,
AKASH JAIN Y 2 cloud computing, OOPs
AKASH LAKHERA Y 1 OOPs
AKSHAY GAGRANI Y 1 OOPs
AKSHAY SHARMA Y 4 prog. in c , OOP's , DSA , AI
AKSHAY SHARMA y 3
AKSHITA VIJAY Y 1 OOP's
AMAN BANSAL Y 1 OOPs
AMAN PAREEK Y 1 OOPs
AMAN SRIVASTAV Y 1 OOPs
AMIT KARWA Y 1 OOPs
AMIT MOOLWANI Y 3 Prog. in C , oops, DSA
AMRIT SRIVASTAVA Y 3 Prog. in C,DSA , OOP's
ANEGA MAHESHWARI Y 4 Data Structures & File Management, Introduction to programming in C, Programming in C++, Computer Architecture
ANKIT KUMAR Y 4 Spoken English, C/C++,painting, agriculture
ANKIT RAJ Y 2 Prog. in C, OOPs
ANSHU KUMARI JAIN Y 2 DSA, OOPs
ANTIMA GARG Y 2 prog. in c++, data structures and file management
ANUKRITI PAREEK Y 1 OOPs
APOORVA GUPTA Y 1 OOPs
AROGYA GARG Y 2 DSA,OOPs
ARPIT KUMAR JAIN Y 1 OOPs
ARYAN SHARMA Y 3 DSA,introduction programming in C, programming in C++
ASHISH GUPTA Y 2 DSA,OOPs
ASHISH LAKSHKAR Y 2 DSA,OOPs
ATAVI SHEKHAWAT Y 1 OOPs
AVI BHOOTNA Y 2 DSA, OOPs

Self Assessment Report Page 396


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
AYUSH AGGARWAL Y 2 data structure & file management ,programming in c++
AYUSH JOHRI Y 2 data structure and file managment,oop
CHARUL SHARMA Y 1 OOPs
CHIRAG CHANDAK Y 2 DSA,OOPs
CHIRAG GOYAL Y 3 DSA, programming in C, programming in C++
CHIRAG GOYAL Y 2 DSA, programming in C++
CHIRAYU JAIN Y 2 oops, dsa
DARSHIT GUPTA Y 3 DSA, prog. in C++ , prog. in C ,
DEEPAK FAUZDAR Y 2 DSA,OOPs
DEEPESH SAH Y 2 dsa, oops
DEEPESH THAWANI Y 2 DSA,OOPs
DESHANSH GARG Y 2 DSA,OOPs
DHAIRYA GULGULIA Y 2 DSA,OOPs
DIKSHA GOYAL Y 2 DSA, OOPs
DIVAKSHI SINGH Y 2 DSA, OOPs
DIVYANSH SAXENA Y 1 OOPs
DIVYANSH SHARMA Y 1 OOPs
FAISAL KHAN Y 1 OOPs
GARIMA GILL Y 1 OOPs
GAUR TUSHAR Y 1 OOPs
GAURAV SAHU Y 2 AI and dsa
GOURAV SHARMA Y 1 programming in c plus plus
HARSH NABERA Y 1 OOPs
HARSH SHARMA Y 2 DSA,OOPs
HARSHITA SINGH Y 1 OOPs
HIMANI MODI Y 2 DSA, OOPs
HIMANSHU DAMANI Y 2 data structure & file management ,programming in cpp
HIMANSHU SINGH Y 1 OOPs
HITESH GAUD Y 1 OOPs

Table B.9.4j:Details of students registered in SWAYAM

NO OF SUDENTS ATTENDED THESES MOOCS

YEAR 2017-2018

SEM SECTION NO OF
3 A 69
STUDENTS
3 B 49
3 C 39
4 A 64
4 B 56
4 C 45
5 A 69
5 B 75
5 C 48
Table b.9.4k:no of students attended theses moocs

Self Assessment Report Page 397


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
F)Personality Improvement
 With our efforts in personality development and face classes no. of students have been selects
at prominent companies with good starting packages.

 PD classes are the part of curriculum for all students.

Year Name of event Object of event No. of students Date of event


participated
2015-16 Pre Placement Bridging gap 180 12-10-2015
training Program between To
by FACE academics & 14-10-2015
Industry
2016-17 Pre placement Bridging gap 184 18-7-2016 to 6 -
training by Face between 8-2016
academics &
Industry

2017-18 Pre placement Bridging gap 186 20-7-2018


training program between onwards
by Face academics &
Industry

Table B.9.4l: personality development and face classes

Figure 9.4d: Pre-placement Training 2017-18

Self Assessment Report Page 398


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
G) We invite faculties from various institutes for the face classes which teach our students about
aptitude, verbal and non-verbal reasoning etc.

 Mentors of Face Classes :

Year Faculty
2015-2016  Amit Jalan
 VishakhaAlok
 Nida Siddique
 Rajdeep Yadav
 Vishal Kumar
 Yakshani Arya
 Ajinkyachopde
 Umang Pathak
 Naveen.
 Kammela Sai Kishor
 BabuS.Somasekhar
 Ankit Nagar
 Narinder Kaur
 Vindhya
 Divyanshu Srivastava
 Paresh Kothari
 Jasvinder Singh
 Kumar Aakash
2016-2017  S Somasekhar
 Nida Siddique
 Vindhya Singh
 Kratika Parikh
 Shruti Shreya
 Nikhil Pratap Sing
 SuyashTyagi
 Shivam Bansal
 Apurva Sharma

Self Assessment Report Page 399


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
2017-18  Amit
 Vishakha
 Nida
 Rajdee
 Vishal
 Yakshani
 Anjinkya
 Umang
Table B.9.4m: Mentors of Face Classes

H)Industrial Oriented

Industrial Visits:
 Students are getting an insight on how their life going to be and what does it mean to be an
engineer?
 Industrial visits are conducted on regular basis which a great way to learn and see things in
action.

Year Location Company Name No of students


enrolled
2015-2016  Food tech  47
2016-2017  Ahmedabad  E-infochip  27
 Jaipur  Jaipur Metro Rail  27
Corporation limited
2017-2018 Takniki  Ted x  23
Bhawan,
Jhalana, Jaipur
Table B.9.4n: Industrial Visits:

Figure 9.4e: Industrial Visit

Self Assessment Report Page 400


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
I)Training/workshop/seminar:

 Trainings are the big part of our culture. We conduct occasional training camps and seminars
at our institute.
 It is a great way to learn and develop a skill which would be useful for real life scenarios and
to become a better engineer.

Year Name of Event Object of Event


2015-16 Microsoft Certification This event helps to Bridge the gap between
Summer training Program in academics & Industry
Embedded & Robotics with
AVR Controller
2015-16 Microsoft Certification It helps to Bridge the gap between academics &
Summer training Program in Industry
Android
2015-16 Microsoft Certification It includes basic java programming language
Summer training Program in
Core Java
2015-16 Microsoft Certification It includes advanced java programming such as
Summer training Program in servlet and applet
Advance Java
2015-2016 Pre Placement training Bridging gap between academics & Industry
Program by FACE

2016-17 Microsoft Certification It helped our students to learn about Web


Summer training Program in Designing which covers User interface design,
.NET styles and themes
2016-17 Pre placement training by Bridging gap between academics & Industry
Face
2017-18 Pre placement training Bridging gap between academics & Industry
program by Face
2017-18 Sales force Training Students were trained on modules of Trailhead
2017-18 Red Hat Linux Training Students were trained on modules of Red Hat
Linux.
2017-2018 Forks Technology Data Students are trained on Machine Learning
Science/ Machine Learning
2017-2018 Forks Technology IOT Students are trained on IOT

Table B.9.4o: Training detail table

J)Technical Events:

 We conduct a lot of technical events which are competitive. Not only it results in bigger
number of participants but they can also learn a lot more.
 These events bring out the competitiveness in our students which is going to be useful in real
world. Due to this, our students were motivated enough to participate in events launched by
big organization Such as NASA.

Self Assessment Report Page 401


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
 Our students also participate in techno culture festivals such robotic festivals, Olympiad etc.

K)Research Oriented

Conference:

 Conferences are the great way to learn about research and development going on in respective
fields, which inspired many students to publish their own research.

 It is also a great starting point for those students who want to pursue their career in research
fields.

Table B.9.4p:Confrence/Event detail table

 Social Activity
We have students inclined clubs such as Zarurat, Soch, Aashayein and Suhasini among other.
These clubs collectively called ABHYUDAY.
These clubs are managed by our students which conduct free classes for orphaned children,
poor children. This provides them with sense of charity and doing well for others.
Not only they are learning to be better human beings, they are also setting an example by
helping others.

 Spiritual Trainings

We heard so much news about student’s suicides which makes it easier to understand that,
how stressful a student’s life can be.
We have special spiritual area where our students can experience calm, learn to meditate and

Self Assessment Report Page 402


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
learn to deal with the bad situations in life in a healthy way.
Of audio and video books are also available.
This is very important, because they are learning to face and deal with their problems not run
away from them.

9.5 Career Guidance, Training, Placement(10)


(The institution may specify the facility, its management and its effectiveness for career guidance
including counselling for higher studies, campus placement support, industry interaction for
training/internship/placements, etc.)

HRD

TPO TPO

MENTOR MENTOR MENTOR MENTOR MENTOR MENTOR

STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT

Figure 9.5a: Flow chart of HRD Process


1) Professional Guidance:-

We provide opportunities to students to improve placement percentage like interactions with


MNC, Exhibition to provide internship.
S.No. Name of Event Date Description
1 Placement Guidance August 2016 The event was graced by Mr. Sanjeev
Khosla,
Organized by HRD MD, Accenture & Mrs.
ShobhaKariappa, VP, Recruitment.

2 ISRO Exhibition April 2016 For the first time in Rajasthan an


exhibition of the “Space Endeavours
of India” was conducted by ISRO
(Indian Space Research
Organization) at JECRC University in
April 2016.

3 SIH 2K17 March-April 2017 JECRC was among the only twenty
Organized by eight colleges selected in the country.
MHRD, Govt of
India
4 Interactive Session September 2017 This session conducted by Dr. Sanjeev

Self Assessment Report Page 403


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Organized by Ohri ,Uk.
SanjevOhri
5 Interactive Session September 2017 Conducted by Dr. Kiran Seth, founder,
SPIC MACAY SPIC MACAY

6 Awareness January 2018 Workshop about second edition of


Workshop smart India hackathon
(SIH 2K18)
7 JECRC Hackathon 10th January 2018 200 students teams participated in a 24
And 11th January hour nonstop digital product
2018 development competition
8 Careers in 2018 Held a screening of a short film
Entertainment “masalePyarVaale” of New York Film
industry Academy.
(“masalePyarVaale”)
9 Exhibition April 2018 Space Endeavours of India was
Organized by ISRO. conducted by ISRO
10 SIH 2K18 30th -31st March JECRC was among the only twenty
Organized by 2018 eight colleges selected in the country.
MHRD, Govt of
India
Table B.9.5a: Placement Related Activities

Figure 9.5c: ISRO Exhibition 2018

Self Assessment Report Page 404


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.5d: Interactive Session with Mr. Sanjeev Ohri and Mr. Nikko Philips

Figure 9.5e: Smart India Hackathon 2K17

Figure 9.5f: JECRC Hackathon 1.0

Figure 9.5g: SIH 2K18 Awareness Camp

Self Assessment Report Page 405


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.5h: Smart India Hackathon 2K18


A)GATE Examination Preparation
 We provide GATE examination preparation to our students which help them with both better
placements in Govt. PSUs and for those who are interested in higher studies. Due to this
program our no.of students are getting into prominent institutes for higher studies and some
of them have also been selected for govt jobs

JAIPUR ENGINEERING COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE


DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
VALID SCORE CARD DETAILS & ENTREPRENEUR DETAILS 2017-2018

NUMB
ER OF
CANDI
ALL DATE
INDIA APPEA
GATE/GR MARK RANK RED IN
SECT E/GMAT REGISTRATION GATE/OTHE OUT OF IN THIS THIS
S. NO SEMESTER
ION NAME etc NUMBER R SCORE 100 PAPER PAPER
1 8 A Apurvi Mansinghka GATE CS18S33042312 374 27 11021 107893
2 8 A Akshay vijayvargiyaGATE CS18S33041234 350 25 13185 107893
3 8 A Amandeep Goyal GATE CS18S33041870 588 45 1893 107893
4 8 A Ekansh Kushwah GATE CS18S33042445 382 27.67 10374 107893
5 8 A Anushree Jain GATE CS18S33045020 469 35 5255 107893
6 8 A Kapil Khandelwal GATE CS18S33045219 624 48 1349 107893
7 8 A Divaker Soni GATE CS18S33041355 322 22.67 16475 107893
8 8 B Rohit Mathur GATE CS18S33043062 441 32.67 6564 107893
9 8 B Rohit Kumar Gupta GATE CS18S33045027 374 27 11021 107893
10 8 B Mayank Prasad GATE CS18S33042125 413 30.33 8122 107893
11 8 B Sakshi Singhal GATE CS18S33045098 517 39 3493 107893
12 8 B Prakhar Garg GATE CS18S33041394 362 26 12049 107893
13 8 B Nikhil Gupta GATE CS18S33042441 394 28.67 9458 107893
MOHIT
14 8 B KUMAWAT GATE CS18S33045207 441 32.67 6564 107893
15 8 C VINOD KUMAR GATE CS18S33042335 334 23.67 14969 107893
16 8 C SURYANSHI ADANIYA GATE CS18S33041846 330 23.33 15462 107893
17 8 C YASH VIJAY GATE CS18S33042270 350 25 13185 107893
18 8 B Sakshi Garg IELTS 7
19 8 C Sakshi Gupta CAT 90.40%
1 8 B SHIVANSH SHARMA Entrpreneur- Apparel distribution company .
Table B.9.5c: GATE Details

Self Assessment Report Page 406


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
B)Campus Placement Support/Training
A training and placement cell is established and responsible for campus placement (off campus also)
and training which improve students skills both technical and behavioral. A cell provides various
opportunities for student placements and organizes sessions / training programs.
1 Interactive Session Aug,2015 An interactive session
with Anurag Chawla
(TCS Representative) and Vaibhav Bansal
both employed at TCS
2 Interactive Session 2017 The talent acquisition
head, North India for
(TCS Commune TCS, Mr. Narendra
Program) Chandel visited JECRC
to interact with students
regarding the TCS
Campus Commune
Program...
3 Sales force Training 2018 Students were trained
on modules of
Trailhead
Table B.9.5d: Campus Placement Support/Training

Training in Institute:
Year Name of event Object of event No. of students Date of event
participated
2015-16 Pre Placement Bridging gap 180 12-10-2015
training between To
Program by academics & 14-10-2015
FACE Industry

2016-17 Pre placement Bridging gap 184 18-7-2016 to 6


training by Face between -8-2016
academics &
Industry

2017-18 Pre placement Bridging gap 186 20-7-2018


training between onwards
program by academics &
Face Industry
Table B.9.5e: Training in Institute:

Self Assessment Report Page 407


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
C)TP Squad:-Our institute has a group of faculties called TP squad which interact with
companies/industries for training/internship/placement.

Jaipur Engineering College and Research Centre


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Minutes of Meeting

From: CSE-T&PSquad To: All Concerned

Noting Reference No. JECRC/CSE-TnPS/MoM/2017/December/09


09/12/2017

Minutes of Meeting

Agenda –
1. Formation of CSE-Training &Placement Squad
2. Placement strategy for Un-placed students
3. Task assignment.

Meeting Venue and Date: EDC Conference Room A block at 2:00 O’clock on Saturday, December
09, 2017

Chaired By:
Dr. Vijay Singh Rathore

Attendees

1. Faculty Coordinators: 2. Students Coordinators:


Dr. Sanjay Gaur Ms. Japleen Kaur
Dr. NilamChoudhary Ms. Kanishka Goyal
Ms. ShikhaMaheshwari Ms. RidhimaShekhawat
Mr. Abhishek Dixit Ms. ApurviMansingha
Ms. Priyanka Mitra Mr. Atul Dada
Mr. DikshantMamodia
Mr. NiteshVashishtha
Ms. MohitEaran

Points put up for Discussion as per agenda:–

1. The meeting started with motivational triggers connecting the current action with a bigger vision.
2. 12 well trained and placed students of 7th Semester (some listed above) were identified for taking
the action further.

Self Assessment Report Page 408


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
3. It was decided for unplaced 162 students of CSE department, each student coordinator will be
allotted a group of 15 students.
4. Future course of action was chalk out, based on following categories:
a. For Competition based hiring, the student coordinators under the mentor-ship of faculty
coordinator, will help their group for better preparation by identifying coding tricks and
algorithms or training as per the requirements.
b. For Companies lined up by HR Team, the student coordinators will motivate and extend
their help in identifying the company specific set of questions and training available on the
internet.
c. For Identification of Personal Contacts, faculty coordinator along with students will
approach organizations to take the things further in positive direction.
d. For Establishing Contact with Alumni, both identified faculty member along with a team of
students will approach Alumni of JECRC Foundation for the placement of students.

5. Each of these above mentioned strategy is then allotted to the TPC Squad as follows:
a. Competition Based Hiring – Dr. Sanjay Gaur will coordinate with Dr.NeelamChaplot.
b. Companies lined up by HR Team- Ms. Priyanka Mitra will coordinate with HR.
c. Identification of Personal Contacts – Ms. NilamChoudhary will gather the possible contacts
from other faculty members of the Department.
d. Establishing Contact with JECRC Alumni – Ms. ShikhaMaheshwari will be responsible for
contacting them.
e. Mr. Abhishek Dixit, TPO-CSE will also be responsible for bridging the gap between HR and
Departmental team, if any.
6. It has been decided the student allotment will be completed by December 11, 2017 with the help
of existing mentors.
7. The meeting ended with a clear understanding of the vision and assignment to be carried out for
achieving the same.

Copy To:
All Concerned

D)Entrepreneurship

Institute has a cell which improves entrepreneurship development skills in students by doing
activities such as seminars, workshops and awareness camps. (Entrepreneurship and
incubation).
 To improve Entrepreneurship skills in students.
 Cell conducts many workshops and awareness camps for students.
 Cell has incubation centre and associated with start-ups.
 Cell schedules interactions with alumni start-ups.

Self Assessment Report Page 409


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
S.No. Name of Event Date Description
1 Interactive September An interactive session for students by renowned
Session 2015 motivational speaker Mr. Vijay Batra
Motivational
speaker
2 Workshop Feb, 2016 A workshop was conducted by EDC JECRC on
On Entrepreneurship Skill Development The
Entrepreneurship expert speaker was Dr. Pankaj Bharti from
Skill Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India,
Development
3 Entrepreneurship March A three day Entrepreneurship Awareness Camp was
awareness camp 2016 organized at JECRC in association with DST The
camp witnessed a registration of 300 students and a
footfall of 12 eminent speakers from the start
upecosystem of the country.
4 JOSH Meets May 2016 JOSH Meets, an opportunity for interactive sessions
with six
achievers from various fields
5 Interactive August An interactive session with the alumnus of JECRC
session 2016 &Co-Founder,Celebal, Sh. Anirudh Kala was
conducted training& placement opportunities for
students of JECRC at Celebalwere identified.
With Alumni
6 Orientation 2017 Career Development Centre, JECRC &Intervarsity
Session organized an orientation session for students to help
them grab internationalinternship opportunities. Dr.
Organized by Harsh Mishra, Founder iSEED&Dr.K.
Career C. Jacob, President & Managing Consultant, Horton
Development Internationalspoke to students about opportunities in
Centre, JECRC Singapore & Hong Kong.
7 TEDx Talk March The first TEDx talk in any RTU affiliated college was
2017 conducted in
JECRC on 25th March 2017 wherein 10 international
speakers
spoke to our students
Table B.9.5d: EDC Events list

Self Assessment Report Page 410


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.5: Entrepreneurship awareness camp

E)Government Job Cell

Government job cell was established in our institute in the year 2016 to prepare students towards
different competitive examination. In this cell we encourage and inspire students for competitive
examination by doing activities like interactive sessions with central government head, NBS head.
S.No. Name of Event Date Description
1 Interactive Session October 2015 An interactive session
with Major Gen.
NBS by G. D. Bakshi Dr.G. D. Bakshi was
organized for students
in October 2015.
2 Interactive November 2015 An interactive session
Sessionwith with the "Metal King
the "Metal King of of India", Mr. Anil
India" Agarwal, Chairman,
Vedanta Resources
Plc.
3 Interactive Session February 2017 An interactive session
By MHRD, with Sh. Anil Swarup,
Government of India Secretary, (SE & L),
MHRD, Government
of India was
organized for students
of JECRC.

4 JECRC MUN April 2017 The 6th edition of


JECRC MUN was
held in April 2017,
presenting five
different committees
UN GA-DISEC, NSC,
UN HRC, SOCHUM
& ICJ.

Self Assessment Report Page 411


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
5 7th Edition of JECRC April 2017 GA-DISEC, UNSC,
MUN UN-HCR, CSW AND
Loksabha along with
international press
Table B.9.5e: EDC Events list

Figure 9.5i: Interactive session with MajorGen(Dr.) G.D.Bakshi

Figure 9.5j: Interactive session with Metal king Sh. Anil Agarwal

Self Assessment Report Page 412


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.5l: JECRC MUN

F)Industry Visit: We schedule industry visits for students so they can see and learn technologies in
industry also observe professional environment in industry. It helps to bridge gap between industry
and academics. Students learn about latest platforms to be work upon.

S.No. Name of Industry Session

1 Food tech 2015-16

2 JRBL 2016-17

3 E-infochip 2016-17

4 Ted x @ Taknikibhavan, 2017-18


Jhalana jaipur
Table B.9.5f: Industry Visit

G) All round development:Many technical events like conferences and workshops are organized in
the institute to improve and present technical skills of students.
 National level competition for students like Smart India Hackathon was held in institute.
 To prepare teams a faculty guide was assigned to a particular team and an intra college
competition like JECRC hackathon was organized to check, improve technical skills level of
shortlisted teams.

S.No. Name of Event Date Description


1 Ideation Feedback Nov, 2015 contest under theDigital for Customer
And Social Media Engagement program of SAP, U.S.was
Contest organized exclusively for students of JECRC.
2 J Techtrix Nov, 2015 A two day exhibition of projects of 1st Year
An Exhibition students was held at JECRC
3 National Conference August 2016 A two-day national conference RTDEEE-2016,
(Recent TechnologicalDevelopments in
RTDEEE-2016 Electronics & Electrical Engineering)

Self Assessment Report Page 413


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
4 Interactive Session 2015 The talent acquisition head, North India for
TCS, Mr.Narendra Chandel visited JECRC to
( TCS Campus interact with studentsregarding the TCS Campus
Commune Program ) Commune Program
5 Interactive Session Aug,2015 An interactive session with Anurag Chawla and
(TCS Vaibhav Bansal both employed at TCS
Representative)
6 Interactive Session Oct,2015 An interactive session with world's only HEXA
(HEXA CCIE + CCIE +CCDE, Khawar Butt was organized for
CCDE) students
BY Khawar Butt
7 "Sustainability From 12th To Mechanical Department in association with
Development: 16th October NITTTR,Chandigarh on "Sustainability
Challenges & 2015 Development: Challenges &Opportunities.
Opportunities.
(Short term training
course)
8 Workshop on February A two day workshop on "Implementation of
"Implementation of 2016 logicaloperations in Software, Image Processing
logical and GUI directlyfrom industry experts,
operations in MATLAB, MATLAB projects &interaction
Software, Image with renowned Industry Experts" was held for
Processing and GUI students by IIT Mumbai and Techienest Jaipur
(Workshopby IIT
Mumbai and
Techienest Jaipur)
9 "Automotive Design From 8th To "Automotive Design and Development" in
and Development” 22nd association with Elite Techno Group
(A training Program) February
2016.
10 International September An international workshop on open source
Workshop 2016 software was conducted
(Open source at JECRC in association with CSI, Jaipur
software) Chapter and Drupal Jaipur Community. Our
special guests were Mr.
Micheal Canon, COO and Mr. Nathan Roach,
Content Marketing
Associate, Axelerant Technologies, Atlanta, US

11 J Techtrix April 2017 J Techtrix, a daylong exhibition of projects of


our students was held at JECRC in April 2017
(An Exhibition) wherein more than forty selected projects
were on display
12 SIH-2K17 April 2017 The grand finale of Smart India Hackathon
(Smart India organized by MHRD, Govt
Hackathon) Of India was held at JECRC. JECRC was among

Self Assessment Report Page 414


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
the only
organized by twenty-six colleges selected in the country for
MHRD, Govt this event wherein 47teams from all over India
of India came to participate in a 36-hour nonstop
Coding competition.
13 Interactive Session 2017 The talent acquisition head, North India for
TCS, Mr. NarendraChandel visited JECRC to
(TCS Commune interact with students regarding the TCSCampus
Program) Commune Program...

14 National Conference October A two-day national conference RESSD-2016,


(Renewable EnergySources& Sustainable
(RESSD-2016) Development) was conducted keynote speaker
was Prof. S. K. Ghosh, Dept. ofCivil
Engineering, and IITRoorkee.

15 Expert Talk November An invited talk by prof. Peter Kent &Prof. David
Organized by CSE 2017 Wing, CEO UKE was organized by CSE
department department
16 Sales force Training 2018 Students were trained on modules of Trailhead
17 Interactive Session 2018 Conducted by Dr. Niko Philips, Oxford College
Organized by CSE
department
19 ICETEAS-2018 February ICETEAS was organized at JECRC
2018
20 J-Techtrix 3rd th
17 March JECRC’s student project exhibition.
Edition 2018
An Exhibition
21 SIH-2K18 30th -31st JECRC was among the only twenty eight
(Smart India March 2018 colleges selected in the country.
Hackathon)
organized by
MHRD, Govt. of
India
Table9.5g: Name of Event

H) MOU’s was done with industries to emphasize on


(a) Internship
(b) Project Workshop for Students
(c) Industrial Visits
(d) Students specific Training

Self Assessment Report Page 415


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
S. No. Company Name Date
1. Forsk Technologies 2-Nov-2017

2. RedHat Technologies 7-Nov-2017

3 Infosys Campus Connect 12-May-2017

4 CADD Centre 30-Oct-2017

5 Wadhwani Foundation 13-Oct-2017

6 SakRobotix Lab 27-Apr-2017

7 Salesforce Technologies Ltd. 17-Jan-2018

8 Indo Vision Services Pvt. Ltd. 22-Mar-2017

9 Cyber Security May-2018

Table9.5h: MOU Details

The following are the details of MOUs:


1. ForskTechnologies:Forsk Technology offer project based learning in IoT (Internet of
Things) and Machine Learning (Data Science). Future courses will be offered based on
industry requirement and/or student/faculty feedback. These future courses will be on
emerging technologies.

Self Assessment Report Page 416


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
2. Red Hat Technologies Pvt. Ltd.: Linux World ('LW') is a fast growing ISO 9001:2008
Certified Organization which is fully governed by young and energetic Technocrats,
dedicated to Open Source technologies and Linux promotion. Since its inception in the
year 2005, LW have achieved the status of centre of excellence wherein there is latest
technology, innovative developing methodology, state of the art infrastructure and
individual needs of employees are identified and executed professionally, efficiently &
ethically.
3. Infosys Campus Connect: Launched by Infosys in May 2004, CC is a unique academia-
industry initiative to “architect the education experience”. The objective in launching the
CC programme is to enhance the quality and quantity of the IT talent-pool; sustain the
growth of the IT industry itself. The portal will provide a digital platform for academia-
industry interaction anytime, and anywhere.
4. CADD Centre: As Asia's biggest network of CAD training centers, CADD Centre
Training Services is the training arm of the 30 year old CADD Centre Group, head
quartered at Chennai, India. They being the only company in India to offer an end-to-end
solution to CAD users specializes in Computer Aided Design (CAD), Computer Aided
Engineering (CAE), and Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM) with our wings spread
across the globe.
5. WADHWANI Foundation:Launched in 2000 by Dr.RomeshWadhwani, the Foundations
comprising of Wadhwani Charitable Foundation and Wadhwani Operating Foundation are
working with the primary mission of accelerating economic development in emerging
economies through large-scale job creation with presence in Asia, Africa and Latin
America operating in association with governments, corporate, mentors, investors and
educational institutes. Its Initiatives are driving job creation through entrepreneurship,
skills development and innovation.
6. SAKROBOTICS LAB: Establishing a Robotics Research Centre in the campus of
JECRC, providing Internship to JECRC Students and to engage the students in Robotics
Training and also offering Robotics product development exposure.

Figure 9.5m: J-Techtrix 2018

Self Assessment Report Page 417


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

9.6 Entrepreneurship development cell (5)


(The institution may describe the facility, its management and its effectiveness in encouraging entrepreneurship and
incubation) (Success stories for each of the assessment years are to be mentioned)

1) Entrepreneurship cell is established in mentorship of Mr. SiddharthChaturvedi, our College


for encouraging and inspiring students for start-ups and entrepreneur. Various interactive
sessions for students with alumni and start-up representative are organized to know the
importance of being an entrepreneur and ways to get financial assistance to become an
entrepreneur.

Self Assessment Report Page 418


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
S.No. Name of Event Date Description
1 Interactive Session September 2015 An interactive session
for students by
Motivational speaker renowned
motivational speaker
Mr. Vijay Batra
2 Feb, 2016 A workshop was
Workshop conducted by EDC
On Entrepreneurship JECRC on
Skill Development Entrepreneurship Skill
Development The
expert speaker was Dr.
Pankaj Bharti from
Entrepreneurship
Development Institute
of India,

3 Entrepreneurship March 2016 A three day


awareness camp Entrepreneurship
Awareness Camp was
organized at JECRC in
association with DST
The camp witnessed a
registration of 300
students and a
footfall of 12 eminent
speakers from the start
up
ecosystem of the
country.

4 JOSH Meets May 2016 JOSH Meets, an


opportunity for
interactive sessions with
six
achievers from various
fields

Self Assessment Report Page 419


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
5 Interactive session August 2016 An interactive session
with the alumnus of
JECRC & Co-Founder,
With Alumni celebal, Sh. Anirudh
Kala was conducted
training & placement
opportunities for
students of JECRC at
Celebal
were identified.

6 Orientation Session 2017 Career Development


Centre, JECRC &
Organized by Career Intraversity organized
Development Centre, an orientation session
JECRC for students to help
them grab international
internship opportunities.
Dr. Harsh Mishra,
Founder iSEED & Dr.
K.
C. Jacob, President &
Managing Consultant,
Horton International
spoke to students about
opportunities in
Singapore & Hong
Kong.

7 TEDx Talk March 2017 The first TEDx talk in


any RTU affiliated
college was conducted
in
JECRC on 25th March
2017 wherein 10
international speakers
spoke to our students

Table9.6a: EDC Event list

Cell is responsible for:


 Relationship with companies:
 Company like Celebal tech has visited our campus for 2017-18 batch placements and
this company is owned by jecrc alumni.
 Backbone soft wares also visited jecrc campus and owned by JECRC alumni.(2010
batch)
 Motivate students, guide and help them in the same direction.

Self Assessment Report Page 420


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
A) EDC Activities:
Year Name of the event Conducted by Date
2015-16 Entrepreneurship awareness camp DST Govt of raj 28-3-2016 to 30-3-2016
2016-17 Entrepreneurship awareness camp DST Govt of raj 2-9-2016
2017-18 Entrepreneurship awareness camp JECRC 29,30-8 2017
Table B.9.6b: EDC Activities
B) Institute has success stories for every pass out year as a result of Entrepreneurship cell and
incubation centre.
SNO Name Batch Branch Organization Place
1 Nisha Jangir 2016 CSE Youtube Jaipur
5 Shishu Pal 2016 CSE Entrepreneur Jaipur
6 Soumya Ranjan Rout 2016 CSE Jaipur
7 Ashique Hussain Ansari 2016 CSE Nutrition Hub Jaipur
10 Pulkit Agrawal 2016 CSE Encode Zero Delhi
11 Utkarsh Nagpal 2017 CSE Heal Nectar Jaipur
12 Vishesh Modi 2017 CSE Business Jaipur
13 Pulkit Agrawal 2017 CSE Encode Zero Delhi
14 Chirag Jain 2017 CSE Business Jaipur
15 Shivansh Sharma 2018 CSE Urban Clothing Factory Jaipur
Table B.9.6c: Success Stories

C) Students Selected for Educational Tour to Silicon Valley, USA by Rajasthan Government

Figure 9.6a: Success stories


9.7 Co-curricular and extracurricular activities
(The institution may specify the co-curricular and extra-curricular activities) (Quantify activities such as NCC, NSS
etc.)

Self Assessment Report Page 421


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
A) Co-curricular Activities:
Year Name of event Conducted by Date Participants
2015- PHP &MySQL Training Mr. Amit Kumar 13-07-2015 B.Tech 3
16 Program Faculty, Sigmatech to year
Infotech , Jaipur 25-07-2015
2016- ICT BASED Short term Dr. Gaurav Kumar, 29.08.2016 B.Tech 4
17 course on “Open Source Managing Director, & year
Technologies” at Magma Research and 30.08.2016
NITTTR, Chandigarh Consultancy, Pvt. Ltd.,
Ambala

2017- Machine Learning Mr. Vimal Daga 8th March B.Tech 4


18 2018 year

Table B.9.7a: Co-curricular Activities

B) Interactive sessions with industry experts are organized to increase understanding between
students and industry requirements.
Year Session name Date of session
2015-16 Seminar on networking 7-10-2015
2016-17 International Workshop on Open Source Software, Drupal 10-9-2016
2017-18 Start-up Oasis, Jaipur 29,31-8-2017
Table B.9.7b: Session Name

C) Industrial visits are conducted for students so they can practically observe the environment
and activities in Industries.
Year Name of place Object of event Date of event
2015-16 Food tech Industry visit 19-9-2015
2016-17 E-eInfochip Industry visit 19,20-2-2017
2017-18 Ted x Industry visit 31-8-2017
Table B.9.7c: Nameof Place

D) Each team who participated in 2017 and 2018 SIH held at JECRC was guided by assigned
faculty member so they can perform better.
Year No. of students No. of teams
participated
2016-17 12 2
2017-18 30 5

Table B.9.7d:No. of students participated

Self Assessment Report Page 422


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
E) Extra-Curricular Activities
Session 2017-2018
S. no. Name of event date Details
1 Deputy high July 2017 Visit of Deputy High
commissioner of U.K. Commissioner was held
visited JECRC. in JECRC.
2 JECRC Alumni were Aug 2017 An induction day for
awarded on first year 2021 batch was
induction day. celebrated and alumni
were awarded on this
day.
3 An engineer’s day Sep 2017 An engineer’s day
celebration, Top rankers celebrated in JECRC,
in RTU and achievers in top rankers and
sports were decorated. achievers were awarded.
4 “SwacchataPakhwada” 1 to 15 Sep 2017 15 days celebration took
celebrated, Cleanliness place as
raised. “SwacchataPakhwada”in
JECRC, students were
participated in this
activity, checked for
clean campus.
5 Seminar on “Rally for Sep 2017 A seminar on “Rally for
Rivers”. Rivers” was held in
JECRC. Students were
participated.
6 An interactive session by Sep 2017 A session by Mr. Kiran
kiranseth on SPIC seth on SPIC MACAY,
MACAY. students were part of
this.
7 OMEN by HP and Oct 2017 A college championship
mountain dew ESL India of gaming competition
college gaming was held.
championship.
8 Blood donation drive Oct 2017 Blood donation camp
was organized for
students. They donated
blood.
9 Vandeymatram-voice of Nov 2017 Thousands of student
unity participated across state.
JECRC students were
also part of this.
10 An invited talk with Nov 2017 Session was organized
prof.peterkent and prof. in JECRC for students.
david wing CEO UKEI.

Self Assessment Report Page 423


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
11 National girl child day Jan 2018 National girl child day
celebration was celebrated in
JECRC.
12 69 th republic day Jan 2018 Republic day was
celebration celebrated
13 OCIP(orphanage children Feb 2018 An event organized by
interactive program) by abhyuday group-SOCH,
Abhyuday group- SOCH which were for
orphanage children.
14 An invited Talk on” Feb 2018 Chancellor RTU kota
Society and control presented talk on
system” by vice Society and control
chancellor RTU Kota. system.
15 National level cultural March 2018 National level cultural
fest RENAISSANCE. fest RENAISSANCE
16 Social group activity by March 2018 Abhyuday group-Zarurat
Abhyuday group-Zarurat organized an event for
children , some
competitions were held
in JECRC
17 Sports activity during March 2018 Many sports activities
RENAISSANCE. and competitions were
organized for students
during annual fest
RENAISSANCE.
18 Seminar on entertainment March 2018 Seminar was held by
industry by alumnus. JECRC alumnus on
entertainment in JECRC.
19 An Exhibition by ISRO April 2018 ISRO conducted
exhibition in JU,
students of JECRC were
participated
Table B.9.7e: Extra-Curricular Activities

Self Assessment Report Page 424


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.7a: Mr. Abhishek Bachchan and the Jaipur Pink Panther’s team were in JECRC 2015-2016

Figure 9.7b: An exhibition by ISRO

Figure 9.7c: Josh Meet 2015-16

Self Assessment Report Page 425


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.7d: 8th Edition of AU Jaipur Marathon 2016-17

Figure 9.7e: Regional auditions for antaragini , fest of IIT Kanpur.

Figure 9.7f:BDC 2016-17

Figure 9.7g: VandeMatram

Self Assessment Report Page 426


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.7h: Rajiv Gupta RTU Vice Chancellor

Figure 9.7i: Soch 2016-17

Figure 9.7j: Abhyuday 2016-17

Self Assessment Report Page 427


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.7k: Alumni meet 2016-17

Figure 9.7l: Renaissance 2016-17

Figure 9.7m: Accenture Women’s Day 2016-17

Self Assessment Report Page 428


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.7n: Induction Day 2016-17

Figure 9.7o: Annie Mathew visited JECRC

Figure 9.7p: Blood donation drive 2017-18

Self Assessment Report Page 429


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.7q: Sports Activities 2017-18

Figure 9.7r:Engineer’s Day 2017-2018

Figure 9.7s: Seminar on entertainment industry by alumnus

Self Assessment Report Page 430


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.7t: Blood Donation Camp 2017-18

Figure 9.7u: Raily for Rivers 2017-18

Figure 9.7v: Social group activity by Abhyuday group-Zarurat 2017-18

Self Assessment Report Page 431


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Figure 9.7w: Induction Day 2017-18

JECRC Alumni Activities


S.No. Name of Event Date Place of Event
1 Alumni VS Faculty Cricket Match 25/03/2018 JECRC
2 Seminar on Career in Entertainment Industry 12/03/2018 JECRC
3 JECRC Alumni Startup Meet 15/02/2018 JECRC
4 Distinguished Alumni Awards 13/08/2017 JECRC
5 #R17 Let’s Hangout 16/03/2017 JECRC
6 #R17 Cricket Match 16/03/2017 JECRC
7 Alumni Panel Discussion Second Edition 11/03/2017 JECRC
8 Career Oriented Interaction with Alumni 11/03/2017 JECRC
9 JECRC Alumni Meet 28/05/2017 Patna, Bihar
10 Reminisce-A Flash from the past 05/03/2017 JECRC
11 Interactive Session with JECRC Alumni 26/08/2017 JECRC
12 JECRC Alumni Meet 11/12/2016 Mumbai-Pune
13 Alumni Meet and Greet Session 29/09/2016 JECRC
14 JECRC Alumni Meet 17/09/2016 New York
15 Josh Meets 29/05/2016 JECRC
15 Alumni Treasure Hunt Alumni Panel 22/03/2016 JECRC
Discussion
16 Mr. and Ms. Alumni Competition-2016 07/03/2016 E Competition
17 Let’s Hangout 01/03/2016 JECRC
TableB9.7f: JECRC Alumni Activities

Self Assessment Report Page 432


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Let’s Hangout March 17

Figure 9.7x: Alumni VS Faculty Cricket Match

Figure 9.7y: JECRC Alumni Startup Meet

Figure 9.7z :R17 Cricket Match Faculty VS Alumni

Self Assessment Report Page 433


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

CRITERION 10

GOVERNANCE, INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES(120)

Self Assessment Report Page 434


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Governance, Institutional Support and Financial


CRITERION 10 120
Resources

10. GOVERNANCE, INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES


10.1.1. State the Vision and Mission of the Institute

Self Assessment Report Page 435


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
10.1.2. Governing body, administrative setup, functions of various bodies, service rules,
procedures, recruitment and promotional policies 2017-2018

Self Assessment Report Page 436


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 437


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 438


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Functions and Responsibilities

Self Assessment Report Page 439


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 440


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 441


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Frequency of the Meetings

Self Assessment Report Page 442


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 443


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Minutes of the meetings

Self Assessment Report Page 444


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 445


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 446


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 447


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 448


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Attendance therein

Self Assessment Report Page 449


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
The published rules including service rules, policies and procedures

Self Assessment Report Page 450


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 451


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 452


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 453


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 454


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 455


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 456


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 457


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 458


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 459


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 460


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 461


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 462


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 463


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 464


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 465


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 466


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 467


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 468


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 469


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 470


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 471


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 472


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 473


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
10.1.3. Decentralization in working and grievance redressal mechanism

Self Assessment Report Page 474


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 475


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Composition of grievance redressal cell including Anti-Ragging Committee & Sexual
Harassment Committee

Self Assessment Report Page 476


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 477


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 478


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 479


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 480


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 481


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 482


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 483


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 484


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 485


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 486


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 487


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 488


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 489


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 490


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 491


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 492


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 493


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 494


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 495


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 496


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 497


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 498


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 499


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 500


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 501


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 502


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 503


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 504


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 505


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 506


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 507


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 508


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 509


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 510


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 511


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 512


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

WOMEN CELL

Self Assessment Report Page 513


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 514


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
10.1.4. Delegation of financial powers

Self Assessment Report Page 515


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 516


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
10.1.5. Transparency and availability of correct/unambiguous information in public Domain
All Information’s are available at College Website, Students Broachers, and Liberty etc.

Self Assessment Report Page 517


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 518


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 519


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 520


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 521


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 522


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 523


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 524


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 525


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 526


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 527


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Library

Self Assessment Report Page 528


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 529


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 530


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 531


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 532


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 533


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 534


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 535


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
College Broachers

Self Assessment Report Page 536


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 537


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 538


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 539


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 540


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 541


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 542


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 543


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 544


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 545


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 546


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

10.2. Budget Allocation, Utilization, and Public Accounting at Institute level Summary of
current financial year’s budget and actual expenditure incurred (for the institution exclusively)
in the three previous financial years.

Self Assessment Report Page 547


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 548


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 549


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 550


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 551


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 552


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
10.3. Program Specific Budget Allocation, Utilization

Self Assessment Report Page 553


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 554


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 555


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 556


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 557


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 558


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 559


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Utilization of allocated funds

Self Assessment Report Page 560


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 561


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 562


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 563


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 564


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 565


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

The audited statements

Self Assessment Report Page 566


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 567


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 568


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 569


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
10.4. Library and Internet

Self Assessment Report Page 570


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 571


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 572


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 573


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 574


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 575


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 576


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 577


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
10.4.1. Quality of learning resources
Relevance of available learning resources including e-resources
Accessibility to students
Support to students for self-learning activities

Self Assessment Report Page 578


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 579


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 580


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 581


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

10.4.2. Internet

Self Assessment Report Page 582


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Name of the Internet provider: VODAFONE
Available bandwidth: 150Mbps
Wi Fi availability: YES
Internet access in labs, classrooms, library and offices of all Departments: YES
Security arrangements: Yes

Self Assessment Report Page 583


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 584


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 585


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Self Assessment Report Page 586


Department of Computer Science and Engineering
ANNEXURE I

PROGRAM OUTCOMES

1. Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering


fundamentals and Computer Science and Engineering specialization to the solution of
complex Computer Science and Engineering problems.
2. Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, research literature, and analyse complex Computer
Science and Engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of
mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
3. Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex Computer Science and
Engineering problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified
needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural,
societal, and environmental considerations.
4. Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research
methods including design of Computer Science and Engineering experiments, analysis and
interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
5. Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern
engineering and IT tools including prediction and modelling to complex Computer Science
Engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
6. The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to
assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities
relevant to the professional Computer Science and Engineering practice.
7. Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional Computer
Science and Engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate
the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
8. Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and
norms of the Computer Science and Engineering practice.
9. Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader
in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings in Computer Science and Engineering.
10. Communication: Communicate effectively on complex Computer Science and Engineering
activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to
comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective
presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
11. Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
Computer Science and Engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own
work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary
environments.
12. Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in
independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change in
Computer Science and Engineering.

Self Assessment Report Page 587


Department of Computer Science and Engineering

PROGRAM SPECIFIC OUTCOMES (PSOs)

PSO1: Ability to interpret and analyze network specific and cyber security issues in real world
environment.
PSO2: Ability to design and develop mobile and web-based applications under realistic
constraints.

Self Assessment Report Page 588

You might also like