0% found this document useful (0 votes)
146 views8 pages

30 15 Short Interval 1.5 PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 8

The

30/15 high intensity interval

A brief practical guide

by Martin Bonnevie-Svendsen
B.Sc., M.Sc., Dr.Med.

wattkg.com

wattkg.com

With the exception of the referenced literature, it should be pointed out that the
information in this PDF is experience-based only. You should never blindly adopt
this or any other training strategy without considering your individual fitness and
health first. In no way does this document constitute medical advice, nor does it
replace such advice. Regarding concerns related to your health you should
always consult professional medical personell.

wattkg.com
The 30/15 High-Intensity Interval
Oslo, 2019

The 30/15 high-intensity interval session is described in detail in a 2015


paper published in the Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in
Sports by Rønnestad and colleagues (1).

The authors report a 12% lift in threshold power and 40-min time trial power
and a 8.7% increase in VO2 max following ten weeks of two weekly 30/15
sessions in well-trained competitive cyclists.

This pdf provides my pragmatic experiences with the 30/15 interval session.

The workout

The workout in questions consists of alternating work periods of 30 seconds


at high intensity and recovery periods of 15 seconds where low-intensity work
is performed. In the original paper by Rønnestad et al, the riders completed
continous work/recovery cycles for 9.5 minutes (13 cycles) before a 3 minute
break.

This was then repeated for a total of three 9.5 minute efforts (in total, 39
cycles).

The interval intensity

The subjects in this study were instructed to perform the high-intensity cycles
at their «maximal sustainable work intensity». That means they were to aim
for achieving the highest possible average power output.

wattkg.com
Power output during the recovery periods were 50% of that achieved during
the high-intensity work.

If you own a power meter, at this point you will probably wonder «what does
this correlate to in percentage of FTP?»

In my experience, this will vary significantly depending on the individual rider


and his/her capacity at higher power outputs.

I know some coaches who utilize VO2 max testing prescribe this workout at
power values correlating to power at 100% of VO2 max. However, unless you
have recently performed a VO2 max test, this will not be of much help.

My experience is that most riders will hit the «spot» for this workout
somewhere between 120 and 140% of FTP.

However, I would recommend giving the workout a go without worrying about


your FTP. Simply aim for an intensity you think you will just be able to sustain
for the total duration of the session. If you are close to dying towards the end,
but able to get through the last cycles (without big power drops), you hit the
spot.

A well executed session will usually collect you a good chunk of time at heart
rates at and above 90% of your maximum heart rate.


wattkg.com
How to perform the workout

If you are a well trained cyclist you should be able to adopt the following
session protocol:

15-20 min warm up

30 sec high-intensity High-intensity cycles at approx.

15 sec low-intensity x 13 120-140% of FTP, but allow your


legs to set the pace.

3 min recovery

30 sec high-intensity
15 sec low-intensity x 13
3 min recovery

30 sec high-intensity You should be able to just about

15 sec low-intensity x 13 maintain your average power for


the last couple of 30 sec cycles.

5-10 minute low-intensity cool down

Tip - you can play around with shortening the 3 min recovery between sessions. I
would suspect a shorter recovery period would allow more time at higher heart rates
(shorter drop and less ground to make up for before reaching higher HR next
session). However, this would probably result in slightly lower average session
power. This might somewhat shift the focus between cardiovascular and local
neuromuscular stimuli. However, I am only speculating here, and I have no way of
saying which is better.


wattkg.com
If you are a moderately trained cyclist you might consider starting with the
following protocol:

15-20 min warm up

30 sec high-intensity
15 sec low-intensity x 10 Don’t worry too much about your
heart rate during the first session.

3 min recovery
If you hit the correct intensity, you
30 sec high-intensity
15 sec low-intensity x 10 should be approaching 90% of
your max heart rate during the
second session.

3 min recovery

30 sec high-intensity
15 sec low-intensity x 10
PAIN FINISHED

5-10 min low-intensity cool down

Tip - if you are unsure if this protocol is to brutal for you, try adding up the total
duration of your favorite high-intensity intervals (e.g. 6 x 2 min = 12 min). You can
then assign a number of 30-second cycles and distribute them equally across three
series so that it adds up to the same total duration (8 cycles of 30 sec x 3 = 12 min).


wattkg.com
A quick note on alternative short interval formats

Short high-intensity intervals like the 30/15 format is by no means new. They
have been used by cyclists and studied for decades.

However, the study of Rønnestad is the first to compare the method to report
such significant results against a documented and effective control session
(4x5 min), in well-trained cyclists and over a relatively long intervention
period (10 weeks).

For your consideration, numerous variations of short intervals exist, such as:

• 15/15 sec
• 30/30 sec
• 40/20 sec
• 45/15 sec
• 60/60 sec
• 60/30 sec

Interestingly, Rønnestad and colleagues argue that the 2:1 work to recovery
ratio seems to allow more time spent above 90% of VO2 max (1).

This might be in favour of formats such as 30/15, 40/20, 45/15 and 60/30.

As of today, there is no available research to suggest which of the above


methods are more efficient.

However, you can get a fair idea yourself by trying out the different formats.
By reviewing your time in heart rate zones and average power you should get
a decent indication of which induce the greater training stimuli.

Best of luck with your training!

- Martin

wattkg.com
References:

1. Rønnestad BR et al. Short intervals induce superior training adaptations


compared with long intervals in cyclists – An effort-matched approach.
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 2015;25:143-151

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24382021

wattkg.com

You might also like