Kay Sunderland IGB 16
Kay Sunderland IGB 16
Kay Sunderland IGB 16
Situation Analysis: Attain offered custom business solution that combined traditional
corporate training methods with dynamic multimedia content and case studies. The main
product line was focussed on developing financial acumen in non-financial managers. Caroline
Nicholas, founder and CEO of Attain Learning, had signed an initial contract with Gramen
Equipment Company to train its employees in company headquarters. As per the agreement,
Attain would provide customized online financial course 60 middle level managers. After the
end of the program, Attain would facilitate aa 3 day program to strengthen their financial
principles.
Gramen was an important project for Attain learning as the success of this project would help
them grab a long-term contract. To carry out this project, Chama thought Sunderland to be fit
for handling this challenging project and ensure that the deployment was flawlessly conceived
and executed. Kay Sunderland was one of the two Account directors responsible for client
service activities at Attain. She had been handling 3 high profile clients at Attain and was well
respected by her workers. Sunderland had a great strategic mindset and was straightforward in
expressing her critical views. As a manager her main source of power was the control which
she had over her workers. Once she got the order, she would carry out the job single-mindedly
and was inflexible as well as over demanding.
Mike Morgan, content director, managed the content creation for Attain’s custom program.
The account director and content director would have a series of meetings with the client to
understand his needs and the content director would then create a rough sketch of the content
which would be presented to COO. After COO’s valuable input and with proper revised
content, account director would schedule meeting of content director and client where the
content director would pitch several ideas for programs content to the client and account
management team. Mike liked the entrepreneurial environment and had out of the box approach
to the problem. His main source of power was his openness and flexibility which facilitated his
style of working. He would often challenge the client’s idea and develop creative content.
During the Gramen project, Mike and his team spent a lot of time in taking inputs to develop a
tailormade content for the firm. His team met with Nunez, Chief Learning Officer of Gramen,
who was not convinced with the content and made clear his two priorities which were
increasing inventory turnover and capital utilization. Morgan had less than a month to develop
an entirely new case study and finish the content development.
The problem arrived when Nunez reached out to Nicholas about Mike’s voice messages which
had irritated Nunez. Morgan had called directly to Nunez which was forbidden as it was the
account director who was authorised to contact client.
Sunderland, as an account director should talk to Morgan to make him clear about the
delegation of power. Also, she should intimate Chama about the same to placate the situation
at his level with Gramen Equipment company. Morgan overstepped his boundaries by directly
reaching out to Nunez which irked him a lot. Nunez conveyed his displeasure about Morgan
and this could have strained the client relation thereby jeopardizing the possible future long-
term contract. The issue with Morgan was that he didn’t follow the proper channel. He didn’t
like the bureaucracy and hence failed to understand the importance of a proper channel of
communication. Sunderland should meet Morgan face to face and advise him not to repeat any
such behaviour as this might cause severe repercussions in the future for the company. Also,
Sunderland should also keep in regular touch with the progress of the project, ask for any kind
of problem they might have come across and give useful inputs or take it to the COO for
suggestions.