101 PDF
101 PDF
101 PDF
Principal Stresses
101
102 CHAPTER 4. PRINCIPAL STRESSES
Figure 4.1: Stress ellipsoid and principal stress axes. White lines indicate the principal planes of
stress.
Therefore, the principal stresses equal the normal stresses working on the principal stress planes.
Shear stress vanishes on the planes. The normal and shear stresses are written in this coordinates as
If there is a plane on which traction vanishes, the state of stress is said to be plane stress (§3.4).
The stress tensor corresponding to this state has a null principal stress. If σ3 = 0, traction on the
σ1 σ2 -plane vanishes. Combining Eq. (4.1) and n21 + n22 + n23 = 1, we have
2 2 2
t1 (n) t2 (n) t3 (n)
+ + = 1. (4.4)
σ1 σ2 σ3
This is an ellipsoid equation whose principal axes coincide with the stress axes and radii equals |σ1 |,
|σ2 | and |σ3 | (Fig. 4.1). This is called Lamé’s stress ellipsoid. Regarding t(n) as a position vector
with its initial point at the coordinate origin, the end point of the vector is on the ellipsoid, provided
that 0 < σ3 . The ellipsoid becomes a sphere for the hydrostatic state of stress and its radius equals
the hydrostatic stress. The stress ellipsoid is given uniquely from the stress tensor regardless of the
orientation of coordinate axes, although Eq. (4.1) was derived for a specific orientation of the axes.
The basic invariants (§C.6) of the stress tensor r are σI , σII and σIII . Those of the tensor S are
SI , SII and SIII . These quantities designate the “absolute values” of the stress tensor, independent
from the orientation of rectangular Cartesian coordinates. We can define variables with the same
4.2. TECTONIC STRESS 103
independence from the basic invariants. Among them is the stress ratio
σ2 − σ3
Φ= . (4.5)
σ1 − σ3
It is seen that the ratio is in the range of 0 ≤ Φ ≤ 1. When the state of stress is hydrostatic, the stress
ratio is not defined. For anisotropic stress states, the stress ratio designates the shape of the stress
elliosoid. If Φ = 0, σ3 = σ2 < σ1 , then, the ellipsoid is prolate. Φ = 1 corresponds to an oblate
ellipsoid, σ3 < σ2 = σ1 . The stress ellipsoid has axial symmetry for the extreme cases Φ = 0 and 1.
In contrast, intermediate Φ indicates triaxial stresses σ3 = σ2 = σ1 . In this case, the stress ellipsoid
and stress tensor have orthorhombic symmetry.
σ1 + σ2 + σ3 trace r σI S1 + S2 + S3 trace S SI
σ0 ≡ = = or S0 ≡ = = (4.6)
3 3 3 3 3 3
is said to be mean stress.
For lithostatic stresses, mean stress coincides with pressure. Accordingly, it is convenient to
define deviatoric stress
s = r − σ0 I (4.7)
as the deviation from the lithostatic state of stress. This is the deviatoric tensor introduced in Section
C.6. Let us define the symbol T as
T = S − S0 I. (4.8)
It is obvious that a deviatoric tensor is symmetric, so that the tensor has its principal orientations
parallel to the stress axes (§C.5). If T1 , T2 and T3 are the principal deviatoric stresses, they are
related to the principal stresses as
Ti = S i − S 0 . (4.9)
Combining Eqs. (4.6), we have
Hubbert-Rubey model
In the previous chapter, we considered only the lithostatic state of stress. Our first application of the
deviatoric stress tensor is the statics of a thrust sheet. There are thrust sheets that travel horizontally
for more than 100 km. The Hubbert-Rubey model explains why such long-distance displacement is
possible or what it implies. The very low friction of the fault surface is the key [86, 87].
Consider a thrust sheet that has a thickness of t and is advancing in the x direction (Fig. 4.2).
For simplicity, the topographic surface coincides with the top of this sheet. We pay attention to a
part of the sheet with length L in the x direction and unit length in the y direction. The tectonic
forces pushing at the rear and front of this portion are τxx t in the +x direction and −(1 + Δ)τxx t
in the −x direction. Therefore, the net force to push the portion of the sheet in the +x direction is
−Δτxx t. Frictional resistance is the one significant force for the sheet. The resistance per unit basal
area is σzx , and the law of friction gives σzx = μf σzz = μf ρgt, where μf is the coefficient of friction
and ρ is the mean density of the sheet. Therefore, a portion feels the resistance, −μf ρgLt, in the +x
direction. The motion of the sheet is so slow that inertia is negligible. Hence, all forces acting on the
portion is balanced: −Δτxx t = −μf ρgLt. Therefore, we obtain Δτxx = ρμf gL. In order to evaluate
the coefficient of friction, we substitute Δτxx = 100 MPa as the representative magnitude of tectonic
stresses and ρ = 2.75 × 103 kg m−3 in this equation. We consider a thrust sheet that travels hundreds
of kilometers so that we assume L = 100 km. The result is that μf = 0.036. The friction at the base
of those giant thrust sheets is very low compared to the coefficient of the friction of ordinary rocks.
Pore fluid lowers the friction (§6.5).
The deviatoric stress tensor has the characteristic equation shown in Eq. (C.48), and its first basic
invariant is
TI = trace T = T1 + T2 + T3 = 0. (4.12)
4.2. TECTONIC STRESS 105
Figure 4.3: Basic invariants of deviatoric stress tensor versus stress ratio.
1 2 1
TII = T1 + T22 + T32 = (T1 + T2 + T3 )2 − 2T1 T2 − 2T2 T3 − 2T3 T1
2 2
= −T1 T2 − T2 T3 − T3 T1 . (4.14)
The transformation at the second equal sign is based on Eq. (4.12). Substituting Eq. (4.11), we
obtain
Φ2 − Φ + 1
TII = (ΔS)2 . (4.15)
3
Therefore, TII ranges from 41 (ΔS)2 at Φ = 12 to 13 (ΔS)2 at Φ = 0 and 1.
The third basic invariant is TIII = T1 T2 T3 . Combining this equation and Eq. (4.11), we have
(2 − Φ)(2Φ − 1)(Φ + 1)
TIII = − (ΔS)3 .
27
For the convention that compression is positive stress, we use the symbol σSoct for the octahedral
shear stress.
Figure 4.5: Mohr’s circles illustrate the admissible combinations of normal and shear stresses, σN
and σS , for a given set of principal stresses σ1 , σ2 and σ3 which are indicated by shaded area. The
sign σS indicate the sense of shear. The centers of the circles are located at σ2 +σ 3
, 0 , σ1 +σ3
, 0
2 2
and σ1 +σ
2
2
, 0 . The maximum shear stress equals Δσ/2.
for a given state of stress are represented by areas bounded by three circles C1 , C2 and C3 on O-σN σS
plane (Fig. 4.5). They are called Mohr’s circles. The horizontal axis O-σN passes the centers of the
circles of which the diameters are σ1 − σ3 , σ1 − σ2 and σ2 − σ3 . The first one equals the differential
stress Δσ. The circles are symmetric with respect to the horizontal axis O-σN , so that the upper half
of Mohr’s stress diagram, or Mohr diagram can illustrate the state of stress. No matter how great or
small the magnitude of σ2 is, the maximum shear stress for a given state of stress is determined only
by σ1 and σ3 as
σ1 − σ3
Maximum shear stress = . (4.18)
2
This is equal to the diameter of the outermost circle C2 (Fig. 4.5).
Given the principal stresses and the unit normal of a surface element, the normal and shear
stresses on the element are represented in Fig. 4.5 as the shaded area bounded by the Mohr’s
circles. The relationship between the position of the point in the diagram and the direction of
n = (cos φ, cos β, cos θ)T is established by taking Fig. 4.6 into consideration. These components
are the direction cosines of n. Since a stress tensor has orthorhombic symmetry, Fig. 4.6(a) shows
the first octant of a sphere on which a point Q represents the direction of n. The line segment QP is
parallel to n, where P is the center of the sphere. It is shown (Exercise 4.1) that the octant is mapped
onto the shaded area in Fig. 4.6(b), and that the points “A” through “H” on the octant correspond to
the points “a” through “h” in the figure. The point “Q” that represents the direction of n corresponds
108 CHAPTER 4. PRINCIPAL STRESSES
Figure 4.6: Correspondence between the direction of n and the point in Mohr’s stress diagram. (a)
The direction is represented by a point “Q” on an octant of a sphere. The points “K”, “Q” and “D”
indicate the directions that meet the σ1 axis at the common angle φ. (b) The points “a”, “b” and “c”
are plotted at the points (σ1 , 0), (σ2 , 0) and (σ3 , 0), respectively. The points “A” through “H” and
“Q” on the sphere correspond to the points “a” through “h” and “q” in the diagram. The small circle
“KQD” corresponds to the circle “kqd”.
Lithostatic or hydrostatic pressure (σ3 = σ2 = σ1 = p): The normal stress across all planes is equal
to pressure p, but there are no shearing stresses. In this case, the state of stress is symmetric,
r = pI. The stress plots on the Mohr diagram degenerate into a point on the abscissa.
4.3. MOHR DIAGRAM 109
Uniaxial compression (0 = σ3 = σ2 < σ1 ): The only stress applied is a compressive stress in one
direction. The state of stress has axial symmetry about the σ1 axis. The Mohr diagram for this
case is a single circle tangent to the ordinate at the origin.
Uniaxial tension (σ3 < σ2 = σ1 = 0): The only stress applied is a tension in one direction. The
state of stress has axial symmetry about the σ3 axis. The Mohr diagram for this case is a single
circle tangent to the ordinate at the origin.
Axial compression (σ3 = σ2 < σ1 ): The state of stress has symmetric about σ1 axis. The Mohr
diagram degenerates into a single circle.
Axial tension (σ3 < σ2 = σ1 ): Some authors avoid using this term, because “tension” seems to
indicate negative principal stresses. The distinction should always be made clear [248]. The
state of stress has symmetry about the σ3 axis. The Mohr diagram degenerates into a single
circle for this case.
Plane stress (0 = σ3 < σ2 ≤ σ1 ): If a principal stress is zero, plane stress is said to exist. This is
synonymous with biaxial stress [91]. The state of stress has orthorhombic symmetry.
Pure shear stress (σ3 = −σ1 , σ2 = 0): The normal stress on planes of maximum shear stress
is zero. The state of stress has orthorhombic symmetry. The Mohr diagram for this case is
symmetric with respect to the ordinate and to the origin.
Triaxial stress (σ3 < σ2 < σ1 ): All the principal stresses are different. The state of stress has
orthorhombic symmetry. Three distinct circles compose the Mohr diagram.
If there are planes on which traction vanishes (σN = σS = 0), they are called free surfaces or free
boundaries. Uniaxial and plane stresses have those planes. If O-3 axis is chosen tobe perpendicular
to the surface, then σ33 = σN = 0 and the shear stress on the surface is |σS | = σ31 2
+ σ32
2
= 0.
Therefore σ31 = σ32 = 0. Consequently, the stress tensor for the stress state has the form
⎛ ⎞
• • 0
r = ⎝• • 0⎠ , (4.19)
0 0 0
where the black dots represent the components that are not determined by the boundary condition.
The admissible combinations of normal and shear stresses for a given state of stress are illustrated
by a Mohr diagram that consists of a single circle. To see this, suppose a stress tensor
σ1 0
r= ,
0 σ2
for which the rectangular Cartesian coordinates O-12 are taken as parallel to the principal stress axes
(Fig. 4.8). Other coordinates O-1 2 are defined to have the same origin O with the former coordi-
nate system. The coordinate axes meet at an angle of θ. The orthogonal tensor for this coordinate
transformation is given by Eq. (C.8). Thus, stress components are transformed from O-12 to O-1 2
as
σ11 σ12 cos θ sin θ σ1 0 cos θ − sin θ
=
σ21 σ22 − sin θ cos θ 0 σ2 sin θ cos θ
σ1 cos2 θ + σ2 sin2 θ −(σ1 − σ2 ) sin θ cos θ
= . (4.20)
−(σ1 − σ2 ) sin θ cos θ σ1 cos2 θ + σ2 sin2 θ
It is obvious in Fig. 4.8(a) that σN and σS are equivalent to σ11 and σ12 , respectively. These stress
4.3. MOHR DIAGRAM 111
Figure 4.8: Mohr diagrams for two-dimensional problems. The axes O-12 and O-1 2 represent two
rectangular Cartesian coordinate systems with a common origin O. The former axes are taken to be
parallel to the principal stress axes. O-1 axis is taken to be parallel to N that is the outward normal
to the surface element on which the traction is considered. This surface element has positive and
negative directions for N and n, respectively, leading to the opposite sign of the shear stress, SS and
σS . See Fig. 3.2 for the relationship between positive shear directions. (b, c) Mohr’s circles for each
of the sign conventions.
σN = σ11 = σ1 cos2 θ + σ2 sin2 θ,
σS = σ12 = −(σ1 − σ2 ) sin θ cos θ.
Using the formulas, sin2 θ = (1 − cos 2θ)/2, cos2 θ = (1 + cos 2θ)/2 and sin θ cos θ = 1
2 sin 2θ, we
obtain
1 1
σN = (σ1 + σ2 ) + (σ1 − σ2 ) cos 2θ (4.21)
2 2
1
σS = − (σ1 − σ2 ) sin 2θ. (4.22)
2
112 CHAPTER 4. PRINCIPAL STRESSES
Figure 4.9: (a) Planes perpendicular to the O-3 axis are assumed to be the free surfaces. (b) Mohr
diagram for the plane stress.
Plane stress Suppose a state of plane stress where the free surface is parallel to the O-12 plane
(Fig. 4.8(a)). That is, the stress tensor has the components
⎛ ⎞
S11 S12 0
S = ⎝S21 S22 0⎠ .
0 0 0
The Mohr’s circle for this stress is drawn as the following procedure. The center of the circle B in
Fig. 4.9(b) is located at SN = (S11 + S22 )/2, because the trace of a tensor is invariant to coordinate
rotations. The points A and D on the circle represent the traction on the right-hand and top faces,
respectively, of the rectangular parallelepiped in Fig. 4.8(a). The line segment AD is the diameter
of the circle, as the faces make a right angle. The phase angle in a Mohr diagram is twice as much
as an angle in physical space. The line segment AB in Fig. 4.8(b) is the radius of the circle, and
2
AB = (S11 − S22 )/2 + S12
2
.
the coordinates O-123 are defined in Fig. 4.10. The traction t(I) is exerted on material I at the point
P on the interface. Likewise, material II feels the traction t(II) at the same point. If all forces are
balanced and the materials are at rest, we have
Figure 4.10: Schematic illustrations for the explanation of stress boundary coditions. (a, b) Materials
I and II are firmly fixed at the O-12 plane. O-2 axis is perpendicular to the page. (c, d) Materials I
and II with a lubricated interface.
Given the unit normal to the interface n = (0, 0, −1)T , the first traction vector is written as
⎛ (I) (I) (I) ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ (I) ⎞
σ11 σ12 σ13 0 σ13
t(I) = r(I) · n = ⎝σ21 σ22 σ23 ⎠ ⎝ 0 ⎠ = − ⎝σ23 ⎠ .
(I) (I) (I) (I)
(I) (I)
σ31 σ32 σ33
(I) −1 (I)
σ33
(II) (II) (II)
The unit normal for material II is −n = (0, 0, 1)T , and we have t(II) = (σ13 , σ23 , σ33 )T . Substitut-
ing these traction vectors into Eq. (4.23), we obtain
(I) (I) (I) (II) (II) (II)
σ13 , σ23 , σ33 T = σ13 , σ23 , σ33 T .
as the boundary condition of the stress field at the interface2 . The black dots in these matrices
represent the stress components that are not constrained by the boundary condition.
If the interface is not fixed but lubricated, the shear stress vanishes on the interface. That is, we
have that the boundary condition for this case is
⎛ ⎞
• • 0
r = ⎝• • 0 ⎠ . (4.24)
interface 0 0 σ33
2 This is a special case of the jump condition of physical properties at a surface. If the surface and the materials on its sides
move with different velocities, the impluse by the differential motions should be taken into account [38].
114 CHAPTER 4. PRINCIPAL STRESSES
Namely, only the normal stress σ33 is transmitted across the interface, but the shear stress is not.
Values of the components σ11 , σ22 and σ12 may jump across the interface. The σH axes are oriented
NNW–SSW far from the San Andreas Fault. However, those are nearly perpendicular to the fault
trace near the fault, suggesting a very low friction on the fault surface3 [277].
Vertical and horizontal stresses The stress tensor in Eq. (4.24) is diagonalized for the third
column and row. Therefore, σ33 is a principal stress and the third coordinate axis O-3 is the stress
axis corresponding to this principal stress. That is, one of the stress axes is perpendicular to a
lubricated surface. The other stress axes lie on the surface.
The solid Earth is covered by the atmosphere or seawater. These fluids have much less viscosity
than rocks. We regard the surface of the Earth as a lubricated interface which is covered by a fluid.
Therefore, Eq. (4.24) holds at the surface of the Earth. The solid Earth is exerted a shear stress
by winds and ocean bottom currents, but the shear stress is much less than tectonic stress. For this
reason, we neglect those drag forces in the discussion of tectonics. The result is that one of the stress
axes is perpendicular to the surface at the shallow levels in the Earth. In addition, if we assume that
the Earth has a level surface, the stress axis is largely vertical.
The component σ33 in Eq. (4.24) is, in these cases, the atmospheric or hydrostatic pressure at the
surface of the solid Earth. The atmospheric pressure is about 0.1 MPa, which is negligible compared
to tectonic stress. The pressure at the bottom of ocean is usually negligible. Therefore, we have the
stress boundary condition at the surface,
⎛ ⎞
• • 0
r
= ⎝• • 0⎠ .
surface 0 0 0
This is, of course, applicable to the surface of airless planets and satellites. However, hydrostatic
pressure at the bottom of ocean trenches may not be negligible, as the pressure reaches 100 MPa.
If one of the stress axes is vertical, stress in the shallow part of the Earth is expressed as
⎛ ⎞
σH 0 0
r=⎝0 σh 0 ⎠,
0 0 σv
where σH and σh are the maximum and minimum horizontal stresses, and σv is the vertical stress
that is usually approximated by the overburden stress (Eq. (3.29)). The σH - and σh -axes are the
corresponding horizontal principal axes. Some researchers use the notation, σHmax and σHmin , for the
horizontal axes.
Figure 4.11: Deformed borehole determined by well logging at ∼3 km below the surface [180].
The present state of stress is estimated by several methods. Among them, two methods of in-situ
stress measurement in boreholes are introduced in this section4 .
If a deep borehole is filled with a fluid that has a smaller density than the surrounding rocks,
there is a great gap between the pressure in the fluid and in the rocks. The pressure difference
sometimes deforms or even collapses the borehole. Figure 4.11a shows the geometry of a borehole
no longer smooth or round. A zone along the wall of a well which has failed is called borehole
breakout. There are a few types of breakouts reflecting the state of stress in the surrounding rocks.
Detailed observation of the borehole geometry allows us to infer the principal orientations of stress
perpendicular to the hole.
Hydraulic fracture stress measurement is an active measurement of in-situ stress. Hydraulic
fracture or hydrofracturing is a process of breaking up the rocks immediately out of the wall of
a borehole under pressure by pumping water into an interval of the hole of which both ends are
sealed. Hydraulic fracture experiments are usually done to increase permeability in hydrocarbons
and geothermal reservoirs. The pressure opens the pre-existing discontinuity surface including joints
and bedding planes. The opened surfaces tend to be oriented parallel to the far field σH orientation.
Therefore, the borehole geometry again indicates the stress orientations. The experiment not only
determine the orientations but also the stress magnitudes.
Figure 4.12: A basaltic dike intruding Oligocene basaltic lavas and tuffs cropping out on the Japan
Sea coast of Northeast Japan. Dotted lines outline the dike. Note that the dike expands its width at
the level of the tuff layer. The dike looks like the head of a cobra. A close-up photograph of the
lower left part of the cliff (indicated by angles) is shown in 4.13.
Figure 4.13: A dike (D) broken into three parts by bedding parallel faults (solid lines) in the tuff
layer neighboring the dike shown in Fig. 4.12.
The Mohr diagram in Fig. 4.14(a) shows the admissible orientations of dike intrusion relative to
the principal axes of stress in the country rock. Consider a rock mass in which magma is intruding
with a pressure pm , which has pre-existing cracks with various attitudes. The hatched area is bounded
by the vertical line σN = pm , and the normal stress on the crack is smaller than the magma pressure
in the area. Magma pressure has to overcome the normal stress for intrusion. The state of stress
in the country rock is illustrated by the Mohr’s circles in Fig. 4.14(a), and the dark gray portion
of the Mohr diagram shows the condition under which the magma pressure overcomes the normal
stress. This portion designates the traction on the surfaces whose orientations are shown by the dark
gray portion on the sphere in Fig. 4.14(b). Magma can intrude cracks with orientations that are
indicated by the dark gray part of the sphere. As the magma pressure increases, if pm is smaller than
σ3 , no magma intrusion occurs. When the pressure is slightly above the minimum principal stress
(pm σ3 ), magmas can only intrude cracks nearly perpendicular to the σ3 -axis. As the pressure
increases, the admissible orientations of dike intrusion expands. Finally, magma with pm > σ1
intrudes any crack, resulting in a network of intrusions.
The above argument demonstrate that a dike does not necessarily indicate the orientation of stress
118 CHAPTER 4. PRINCIPAL STRESSES
Figure 4.14: (a) Mohr diagram showing the magnitude of normal stress on surfaces. (b) Diagram
showing the attitude of the surfaces relative to the stress axes of country rocks.
axes when it intruded. If the magma pressure was appropriate, that is, slightly greater than σ3 , dikes
are paleostress indicators perpendicular to the σ3 -axis5 . If a dike swarm, parallel dikes, occur in a
large regional area, they are evidence for paleo σ3 orientation.
One good point of dike swarms in determining paleostress is that the age of the paleostress is
known from the radiometric age of the dikes. However, it should be determined from other types of
data whether a horizontally extensional or compressional stress field affected the area.
Magma pressure may decrease with the distance of a magma chamber. Dikes accompanied by
the Otoge cauldron shown in Fig. 4.15 illustrate this idea. The magmatism occurred at ∼15 Ma.
NNE–SSW to N–S trending dikes penetrates a Mesozoic basement in this area, but there are ring
dikes in the vicinity of the cauldron. The dike swarm is perpendicular to the present σH orientation,
but is parallel to the Median Tectonic Line, which is the most significant fault in Southwest Japan.
The line is parallel to the arc, and juxtaposes the high T/low P metamorphic belt and the low T/high P
belt. There are cauldrons with the same age along the Median Tectonic Line, and one other cauldron
in the central part of the arc has a dike swarm parallel to the line. The swarm was associated with
normal faulting, therefore, the dikes indicate an arc perpendicular extensional stress field at ∼15 Ma
[102, 108].
Figure 4.15: (a) Dike swarm and (b) ring dikes accompanied by the Otoge cauldron in Central Japan
[235]. The cauldron is the result of extensive volcanism in the Southwest Japan arc at ∼15 Ma. There
are too many dikes in this area so that their density, i.e., number per a length of 1 km across the trend
of the dikes, is shown. Note the difference of scale.
First of all, it was shown that there are vast regions where the principal orientations of stress are
roughly uniform. This was doubted because there are a variety of stress sources in the lithosphere
including topographic and lithological variations. Lithosphere thickness is a reference to argue how
the stress field is uniform. The thickness of the mechanically strong part in the lithosphere has spatial
and temporal variations, but is several tens of kilometers. There are regions where σH orientation
is uniform over the dimension 20–200 times greater than the thickness of the lithosphere beneath
the regions. The central to northwestern North America is one of them, where σH axis is oriented
ENE–WSW. In the Far East, the axis is oriented E–W between Japan and northern China.
The first-order stress field in each tectonic plate is believed to be controlled by collisional forces
at plate boundaries. If this is the case, the intraplate stress field is determined by the forces and the
shape of the boundary. In the northern Indo-Australia plate, σH -axis is parallel to the velocity of the
plate relative to the Eurasia plate. The Indo-Australia plate is bordered by a mid-oceanic ridge. The
axis is oriented perpendicular to the boundary, due to the ridge push force.
The second point is that the stress gradients within a plate are smaller than expected. The small
gradients suggest that the viscous coupling of the lithosphere and the underlying mantle is weak. If
the plate had been fixed upon the stationary or horizontally travelling deep mantle, plate boundary
forces caused by differential movement of neighboring plates would have resulted in some gradients
120 CHAPTER 4. PRINCIPAL STRESSES
Figure 4.16: σH orientations in the shallow levels of the crust [279]. Altitude and ocean depth are
indicated by a gray scale.
in the intra plate stress field. The observed first-order stress field is not consistent with absolute
motion, which also demonstrates little coupling.
The third point is that plateaus coincide with the region of extensional tectonics. The Basin and
Range Province in the western United States is an example where the surface has an altitude of ∼2
km and the vigorous extensional tectonics has been going on since the late Tertiary. However, it
should be noted that topographic height is not the only source of intra plate stress. This is demon-
strated by the existence of continental rifts such as the Suez, where rifting occurs near and under the
sea level.
4.8. EXERCISES 121
Figure 4.17: Mohr diagram showing a triaxial stress. The points P, Q and R designate the centers of
Mohr’s circles.
4.8 Exercises
4.1 Explain mathematically why the admissible combinations of normal and shear stresses are
indicated by Mohr’s stress diagram. Show the correspondence of the points with the labels of upper-
and lower-case letters in Fig. 4.6.
4.2 A stress state is designated by the Mohr diagram in Fig. 4.17. (a) What are the orientations of
the planes corresponding to the closed circles A, B, C and D in the diagram? (2) Which is the point
in the diagram corresponding to an octahedral plane?
4.3 Suppose a hot diapir with a diameter of L = 1 km ascending through the crust. The diapir
loses its heat during the ascent, so that it has to rise rapidly to cause contact metamorphism in the
country rocks when it reaches a shallow level of the crust. Estimate the lower bound of the ascending
velocity of the diapir for the metamorphism to occur. Use the thermal diffusivity κ = 10−6 m2 s−1
and a distance of 10 km for the diapir to ascend.