Scribd
Upload
282 views1 page

Appeal Procedure Flowchart 2

This document outlines the appellate jurisdiction and rules of procedure for various Philippine courts. It shows the hierarchy and relationships between the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, lower courts, and specialized tribunals. Appeals and petitions for review can be made from lower courts to higher courts according to the Rules of Procedure spelled out in the chart. The Supreme Court has jurisdiction over appeals and petitions from the Court of Appeals, COMELEC, specialized courts, and lower courts in certain cases.

Uploaded by

Morphues
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
282 views1 page

Appeal Procedure Flowchart 2

This document outlines the appellate jurisdiction and rules of procedure for various Philippine courts. It shows the hierarchy and relationships between the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, lower courts, and specialized tribunals. Appeals and petitions for review can be made from lower courts to higher courts according to the Rules of Procedure spelled out in the chart. The Supreme Court has jurisdiction over appeals and petitions from the Court of Appeals, COMELEC, specialized courts, and lower courts in certain cases.

Uploaded by

Morphues
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

SUPREME COURT

Rule 64: Review of Judgments and Final P.D. 1606 amended by R.A.
Orders or Resolutions of the 8249
COMELEC and COA Rule 45: Appeal by Certiorari Rule 45: Appeal by Certiorari
to the SC R.A. 6734, Article IX, §6
Rule 45: Appeal by COMELEC Rules of Procedure, Part VII, to the SC
Rule 37 Rule 65: Certiorari, Prohibition Rule 65: Certiorari, Prohibition
Certiorari to the SC and Mandamus
E.O. 292, §31: COA on Certiorari and Mandamus

OMBUDSMAN COMELEC, COURT OF SANDIGANBAYA SHARI’A


(CRIMINAL) COA APPEALS N APPELLATE
COURT

Rule 41: Appeal from the RTC Rule 45: Appeal by


UST Faculty vs. Rule 43: Appeals from Rule 42: Petition for Review from the Certiorari to the SC
Bitonio the CTA & Quasi- RTCs to the CA Rule 65: Certiorari,
(under Rule 65) Judicial Agencies to P.D. 1606
Rule 44: Ordinary Appealed Cases Prohibition and
the CA amended by
Rule 47: Annulment of Judgments Mandamus
Fabian vs. Desierto R.A. 8249, §4 R.A. 6734,
or Final Orders and Resolutions Rule 122, §3c Appeal by
(under Rule 43) Rule 65: Certiorari, Prohibition and Notice of Appeal Article IX, §5
Mandamus (Criminal Cases)
National Federation of St. Martin Funeral Rule 122, §3a Appeal by Notice of Rule 122, §3d: Automatic
Labor vs. Laguesma Home vs. NLRC Appeal (Criminal Cases) Review (Criminal
(under Rule 65) (under Rule 65) Rule 122, §3b Petition for Review Cases)
(Criminal Cases)

SHARI’A
OMBUDSMAN SECRETARY BLR NLRC COURT OF TAX FAMILY REGIONAL TRIAL DISTRICT
(ADMINISTRATI OF LABOR APPEALS, COURT COURTS COURT
VE) AND QUASI- S
EMPLOYMEN JUDICIAL
T BODIES Rule 40: Appeal from the MTC to the RTC
Rule 65: Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus
P.D. 442, Article 223 PD 1083,
Rule 122, §3a Appeal by Notice of Appeal
Article 144
(Criminal Cases)

LABOR MTC, METROTC, SHARI’A CIRCUIT


ARBITER MTCC, MCTC COURT

You might also like