www.ijemr.

net ISSN (ONLINE): 2250-0758, ISSN (PRINT): 2394-6962

Volume-7, Issue-2, March-April 2017

International Journal of Engineering and Management Research
Page Number: 522-528

Analysis, Design and Estimation of G +7 Storey Building Structure by

using IS Code Methods and by Software's
Imam Usman Shekh1, Udaysinh Redekar2, Kartar Rathod3, Sagar Sabale4, Sachin Ghatule5, Pranay Khare6, N.L.Shelke7
1,2,3,4,5,6,7
Civil Engineering Department Dr. D Y Patil School of Engineering and Technology Charholi via Lohegaon, Pune,
INDIA

ABSTRACT Prakash Sangamnerkar et al. (2015). Static and

Analysis, Design and Estimation of G +7 Storey dynamic behaviour of reinforced concrete framed
Building Structure by using IS Code Methods and by regular building.
Software's He has done the comparative study on the static
and dynamic behaviour of reinforced concrete framed
Keyword-- SMRF, Seismic behaviour and design, Auto- regular building. Comparison of static and vibrant
CAD, STAAD Pro, Revit, Estimation and costing, IS behaviour of a six storey’s structure is considered in this
code -Limit State methods paper and it is analysed by using computerized solution
available in all four seismic zones i.e. II, III, IV and V.
This is important for building design and resistant from
I. INTRODUCTION earth quack.
M. S. Aainawala et al. (2014). Comparative study of
Severe damage of buildings in the most multi-storeyed R.C.C. Buildings with and without
distressing consequence of most natural hazards Shear Walls.
especially earthquake and due to ++. In the past limiting He did the comparative study of multi-storeyed
damage was not a prime objective of seismic design R.C.C. Buildings with and without Shear Walls. They
codes which concentrated only on providing an adequate applied the earthquake load to a building for G+12,
level of life safety. Seismic load, wind load, dead load G+25, G+38 located in zone II, zone III, zone IV and
and live load is calculated and applied on structure. From zone V for different cases of shear wall position. They
these load combination maximum factor of safety is calculated the lateral displacement and story drift in all
consider so the structure will not fail during natural the cases. It was observed that Multi-storeyed R.C.C.
hazards or due to overloading. Reinforced concrete Buildings with shear wall is economical as compared to
special moment frames are used as part of seismic force- without shear wall. As per analysis, it was concluded
resisting systems in buildings that are designed to resist that displacement at different level in multi-storeyed
earthquakes. Beams, columns, and beam-column joints building with shear wall is comparatively lesser as
in moment frames are proportioned and detailed to resist compared to R.C.C. building without shear wall. Which
flexural, axial, and shearing actions that result as a is important for building design and use of shear walls.
building sways through multiple displacement cycles P. Rajaram, A. Murugesan, G.S. Thirugnanam
during strong earthquake ground shaking. STAAD. Pro (2010).Experimental study and research on behavior of
features a state-of-the-art user interface, visualization interior RC beam column joint subjected to cyclic
tools, powerful analysis and design engines with loading.
advanced finite element and dynamic analysis He discuss about Experimental study and
capabilities. From model generation, analysis and design research on behavior of interior RC beam column joint
to visualization and result verification. IS codes are used subjected to cyclic loading is carried. Beam column joint
for manual calculations. For manual calculations of G+7 is an important component of reinforced concrete
storey building construction limit state method is used. moment resisting frames and should be designed and
Therefore, it is need of time to analyze & design such detailed properly, especially when the frame is subjected
hazard resisting structures so as to save human life and to earthquake loading. Failure of beam column joints
avoid property damage. during earthquake is governed by bond and shear failure
mechanism which are brittle in nature. Therefore, a
II. LITERATURE REVIEW current international code gives high importance to
provide adequate anchorage to longitudinal bars and
confinement of core concrete in resisting shear. Modern
522 Copyright © 2016. Vandana Publications. All Rights Reserved.
www.ijemr.net ISSN (ONLINE): 2250-0758, ISSN (PRINT): 2394-6962

codes provide for reduction of seismic forces thorough

provisions of special ductility requirements. Details for
achieving ductility in reinforced concrete structure are
given in IS 13920:-1993. This paper covers the analysis
and design of two bay five stories R.C.C moment
resisting frames for general building using ETABS as
per IS 1893-2002 code procedures and detailed as IS
13920-1993 recommendations.
Mohit Sharma et. al. (2015). To study the dynamic
analysis of multi-storeyed Building. FIG 1BEAM STRESSES
He considered a G+30 storied regular
reinforced concrete framed building. Dynamic analysis
of multi-storeyed Building was carried out. These
buildings have the plan area of 25m x 45m with a storey
height 3.6m each and depth of foundation is 2.4 m. &
total height of chosen building including depth of
foundation is 114 m. The static and dynamic analysis has
done on computer with the help of STAAD-Pro software
using the parameters for the design as per the IS-1893- Fig 2 SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENT
2002-Part-1 for the zones- 2 and 3. It was concluded that
not much difference in the values of Axial Forces as
obtained by static and dynamic analysis.
Anwaruddin M. et. al. Carried out the study on non-
linear Static Pushover Analysis of G plus 3 medium
rise reinforced cement concrete structure with and
without vertical irregularity.
It was seen that irregularity in height of the
building reduces the performance point of structure.
FIG 3 FORCES ACTING ON MEMBER
There was reduction in displacement or deformation of
the RCC building also.

III. METHODOLOGY
Process of designing G+7 building structure by
using software’s.

Fig-5

523 Copyright © 2016. Vandana Publications. All Rights Reserved.

www.ijemr.net ISSN (ONLINE): 2250-0758, ISSN (PRINT): 2394-6962

Table1 Seismic Zones of India Showing % Town

Fig 6 Map of India Showing Seismic Area

IV. ANAYLYSIS OF G + 7 STOREY LOADS  IS-875(PART 2) :CODE FOR IMPOSED

BUILDING LOADS  IS-875(PART 3) :CODE FOR WIND
LOADS
Material properties: The analysis has been done SOFTWARES  This project is mainly based
considering the following material properties on software and it is essential to know the details about
Structural Steel: Tor steel these software’s  Staad pro(v8i)  Auto cad.
Reinforced concrete: Reinforced concrete of design mix STAAD (Staad stands for structural analysis
with grade M 25 and design)  staad is the powerful design software
Steel reinforced: Fe 415 licensed by bentley . Staad stands for structural analysis
Stirrups and links: Fe 415 and design  To calculate S.F.D and B.M.D of complex
Load calculation: Following assumption are made for loading beam it takes about an hour.  So when it comes
load calculation up to building with several members it will taken a
Density of concrete: 25kN/m3 week.  staad pro is a very powerful tool which it does
Density of brick: 18kN/m3 this job in just an hours staad is a best alternative for
Density of brickbat coba: 20kN/m3 high rise buildings.  Now a days most of the high rise
Thickness of slab: 150mm buildings are designed by staad which makes a
Thickness of wall: 230mm compulsion for a civil engineer to know about this
Thickness of brickbat coba : 150mm software
Floor finish load: 1kN/m Auto cad  Auto cad is powerful software
LL on floor slabs: 3kN/m2 licensed by auto desk company and cad stand for
Evaluation of loads computer aided design.  It is used for drawing different
Dead load of slab= layouts, elevations, details, sections different sections
0.150x1x25 = 3.750kN/m can be shown in auto cad.  We used for drawing the plan
LL on floors = 3X1 =3kN/m
of multi stored building.  It is very useful for civil,
mechanical, and also electrical engineer.
V. DESIGN AND ANALAYSIS OF G+7 STATEMENT OF THE PROJECT 1.Utility
STOREY BUILDING USING STAAD PRO of building :Residential building 2.No of storeys
:G+73.No.of staircases :8 no's 4.Shape of the building
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF MULTI-STORIED :rectangular 5.Type of construction : R.C.C framed
BUILDINGS structure 5.Type of walls :brick wall
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION CODES Geometric details:  Ground floor :3.5M  Floor
SOFTWARE’S STATEMENT OF PROJECT height :3.5M  Height of plinth :2M from below
LOADS ON THE STRUCTURES OBJECTIVES foundation  Depth of foundation :700MM
OF STRUCTURAL DESIGN DESIGN AND Material details:  Concrete Grade : M25  All steel grade
ANALYSIS REFERENCES : Fe415 grade  Type of steel bars : HYSD  Bearing
INTRODUCTION  Our project is based on capacity of Soil : >180 KN/M2
the design and analysis of the multi-storied buildings  DIFFERENT TYPES OF LOADS ON THE
Analysis is done through using the STAAD- PRO  STRUCTURES Dead loads Imposed loads Wind
Notation adopted through out the project is same as in loads
IS-456-2000 Dead loads Involves self weight of  RCC slab 
CODES  IS-456:200 :DESIGN CODE FOR RCC Beams & columns  Plinth  Walls
STRUCTURES  SP-16 : DESIGN CODE FOR
COLUMNS  IS-875(PART 1) :CODE FOR DEAD
524 Copyright © 2016. Vandana Publications. All Rights Reserved.
www.ijemr.net ISSN (ONLINE): 2250-0758, ISSN (PRINT): 2394-6962

Imposed loads  Imposed also known live loads  Loads @ 190 mm c/c section capacity based on reinforcement
over the floor i.e. Load of persons it is calculated as 1 required (kns-met) puz : muz1 : 9975.46 muy1 :
KN/m2  This load is applied over the length of structure 9975.46 nteraction ratio: 0.00 (as per cl. 39.6,
Wind loads  Wind is air in motion  Wind loads are is456:2000) section capacity based on reinforcement
calculated according to IS:875(part 3)  Intensity of wind provided (kns-met) worst load case: 3 end joint:
and exposure are applied in the direction as required 1197 puz : ********* muz : 10063.36 muy :
Load combinations  The structures should be 10063.36 ir: 0.00
analysed for combination of loads as in practice we have Shape of column is rectangular For columns,
numbers of loads in various directions act  Some of the the dimension of column is 300*600mm Factored load
combinations to be checked are  1.5(DL+LL)  on column 1090.10kn For footings, the bearing capacity
1.5(DL+WL)  1.5(DL+LL+WL) of soil is 175kn/m2 To provide the dimensions of
OBJECTIVES OF STRUCURAL DEIGN  footing is 12.5m*2.7m
Structure designed should satisfy the criteration of ANALYSIS  Analysis is done using STAD
ultimate strength.  Structures should satisfy the PRO developed by BENTLEY  Once the loads and load
servicablity  It should satisfy the stability against combinations are assigned to the structures, analysis is to
overturning, sliding, and buckling be done  Analysis is done for RCC structure
The main objective of the design are 1. Assign the properties of structures
Foundation design Column design Beam design Slab 2. Assign loads on the slab
design 3. Load assign on the walls
DESIGN PRINCIPLE, ASSUMPTION AND 4. Assign wind load on the structures (x+ve direction)
NOTATION ASSUMED  The notation adopted 5. Assign wind load on the structures (x-ve direction)
6. Assign wind load on the structures (z +ve direction)
through out the work is same as in IS 456-2000  Using
7. Assign wind load on the structures (z -ve direction)
partial safety factors for loads in accordance with clause
RCC analysis  Code is assigned as IS:456-2000
36.4 of IS 456-2000  Partial safety factor for material in
accordance with clause 36.4.2 IS456-2000 is taken as 1.5  The parameters are assigned to the structure 
Commands to be given are 1. concrete design 2. define
for concrete and 1.15 for steel  Using partial safety
parameters 3. Command
factors in accordance with clause 36.4 of IS 456-2000
combination of load  (D.L+L.L) 1.5  (D.L +L.L+W.L)
1.2
Density of materials used MATERIAL Density
1.Plain concrete 24.0 kn /m3 2.Reinforced 25.0 k /m3
3.Flooring material(c.m) 20.0kn/m3 4.Brick masonry
19.0kn/m3 5.Fly ash 5.0kn/m3 LIVE LOADS: In
accordance with IS 875-86 1.Live load on slab
=3.0kn/m3 2.Live load on passage =3.0kn/m3 3.Live
load on stair =3.0kn/m3
Structural design  For slab, depth is 150 mm provided. 
For beams, after calculations are done . the dimensions
of beam is 350x350mm factored load on beam iskn/m
Total unfactored weight of the structure = 21065.078 kn Fig 7 STAAD PRO Model
Total unfactored weight of the structure applied =
20636.455 kn total volume of concrete = 894.1
cu.meter.
Column no.2580 design results
length:3000.0mm cross section:450.0 mm x 450.0mm
cover: 40.0 mm guiding load case:1
end joint: 1194 tension column design forces (kns-met)
design axial force (pu) : -1.79 about z
about y initial moments:3.46 0.0moments due to
minimum ecc. : 0.04 0.04 slenderness
ratios : - moments due to
slenderness effect : - moment reduction
factors : - addition moments (maz
and may) : - total design moments
: 3.46 0.04 reqd. Steel area : 1782.00
sq.mm. Reqd. Concrete area: 200718.00 sq.mm.
Main reinforcement : provide 16 - 12 dia. (0.89%,
1809.56 sq.mm.) (equally distributed)
tie reinforcement : provide 8 mm dia. Rectangular ties

525 Copyright © 2016. Vandana Publications. All Rights Reserved.

www.ijemr.net ISSN (ONLINE): 2250-0758, ISSN (PRINT): 2394-6962

mm away from end supportvy = 9.40 mx = -0.02 ld=1

provide 2 legged 8í @ 140 mm c/c
CONCLUSIONS:  The design of slab, beam, column,
rectangular footing and staircase are done in limit state
method which is safe at control of deflection and in all
aspects  Using staad.pro software, the design
consideration has been taken as per the is codes. The
design is safe in all conditions  On comparison with
drawing, manual design and the geometrical model using
staad.pro the area of AST required for the beam, column,
footing and slab are comparatively similar to that of the
requirement
REFERENCES  Structural analysis by
Table 2 Summary of beam reinforcement area S.RAMAMRUTHAM  For load calculation on structure
by pankaj agrawal  IS456-2000 CODE used  SP16
Shear design results at distance d (effective CODE used  AUTO CAD & STAAD PRO packages 
depth) from face of the support Design of RCC structures by B.C PUNMIA.
shear design results at 535.0 mm away from PRESENTED BY: Udaysinh RedekarImam
start support vy = 9.40 mx = -0.02 ld=1 provide 2 ShekhKartarsing RathodSagar SableSachin Ghatule
legged 8í @ 140 mm c/c shear design results at 535.0 Guided by:Pranay KhareNagesh Shelke

Fig 8 STRESS DIAGRAM MOMENT DISTRIBUTION

STAAD SPACE 10 389678

CONCRETE TAKE OFF 12 219886
(FOR BEAMS, COLUMNS AND PLATES DESIGNED 16 7526
ABOVE) 20 8272
NOTE: CONCRETE QUANTITY REPRESENTS 25 683
VOLUME OF CONCRETE IN BEAMS, COLUMNS, TOTAL= 812575
AND PLATES DESIGNED ABOVE. TOTAL TRANSLATIONAL = 12
REINFORCING STEEL QUANTITY REPRESENTS TOTAL ROTATIONAL= 12
REINFORCING STEEL IN BEAMS AND COLUMNS TIME PERIOD FOR X 1893 LOADING = 0.50000
DESIGNED ABOVE. SEC
REINFORCING STEEL IN PLATES IS NOT SA/G PER 1893= 2.000, LOAD FACTOR= 1.000
INCLUDED IN THE REPORTED QUANTITY. FACTOR V PER 1893 AT GL= 0.0320 X 21065.07
TOTAL VOLUME OF CONCRETE = 894.1 FACTOR V PER 1893 AT 30 M= 0.0160 X 21065.07
CU.METER FACTOR V PER 1893= 0.0293 X 21065.07
FINISH
BAR DIA WEIGHT Page 2461 of 2462Z:\CIVIL\STAAD PRO\imam\water
(in mm) (in New) tank add seven.anl
8 186154 Tuesday, April 11, 2017, 03:59 PM

STAAD SPACE PAGE NO. 2462

***** END OF THE STAAD.Pro RUN *******

526 Copyright © 2016. Vandana Publications. All Rights Reserved.

www.ijemr.net ISSN (ONLINE): 2250-0758, ISSN (PRINT): 2394-6962

Fig 9 3D Render View

while software also gives required sizes of bar and

members but with factor of safety.
Auto-cad plan gives detailed information of the
structure members length, height, depth, count etc.
After running model in Revit software it gives
more plan details and various design options. This
software gives more decorative building structure.
STAAD PRO has the capability to calculate the
reinforcement needed for any concrete section. The
program contains a number of parameters which are
designed as per IS: 456(2000). Beams are designed for
flexure, shear and torsion.
From the STAAD PRO result required different
Fig 10 load Diagram
types, size and number of bars are found.
And final evaluation and valuation is confirmed by
VI. CONCLUSION estimation and costing software.
Due to manual and software calculations, the required
After analysing the G+7 storey building amount and material will be minimize so the structure
structure, concluded that structure is safe in loading like comes under healthy for environment and safe for human
dead load, live load, wind load and seismic load. beings.
Member dimensions (Beam, Column, Slab, Footing) are
changed by calculating the load type and it’s quantity SCOPE FOR FURTHER STUDIES
applied on it.
Manual calculations gives min. diameter of
bars, thickness of slab and same for column, footing
1. All the analysis can be repeated by changing plan [3] Indian Standard Code Of Practice For Ductile
dimensions and height of the structure. Detailing Of Reinforced Concrete Structures To Seismic
2. A comparison of cost may be studied by changing Forces IS: 13920-1993, Indian Standard Institute, New
different grade of steel and concrete. Delhi.
3. Analysis and design of frames with dual systems. [4] Indian Standard Code Of Practice For Plain And
4. Analysis and design of frames with dual systems Reinforced Concrete IS: 456-2000 Indian Standard
(moment resisting frames with shear walls) Institute, New Delhi.
5. A comparison of cost may be studied by changing [5] Indian Code For Resistant Design Of Structures IS:
different grade of steel and concrete. 1893-2002 Indian Standard Institute, New Delhi.
[6] Uma S.R. and Prasad Meher A.,(2003) Analytical
REFERENCES Model For Beam Column Joints In R/C Moment
Resisting Frames Pacific Conference On Earthquake
[1] Ashok Jain, Limit state design. Engineering.Rajaram P.,(2010),Behaviour Of Interior
[2] Fischer Gregor and C. Li Victor, (2003) intrinsic Beam Column Joint Subjected To Cyclic Loading.
response control of moment resisting frames utilizing [7] Prakash Sangamnerkar et al. International Research
advanced composite materials and structural elements. Journal Of Engineering And Technology (IRJET)
ACI structural Journal V.100, N0.2. Volume:02 Issue: 04 | July-2015

527 Copyright © 2016. Vandana Publications. All Rights Reserved.

www.ijemr.net ISSN (ONLINE): 2250-0758, ISSN (PRINT): 2394-6962

[8] Piyush Tiwari et al. 07 Oct 2015 International

Research Journal Of Engineering And Technology
(IRJET).
[9] Dr. S.R. Karve & Dr. V.L. Shah - “Illustrated design
of Reinforced concrete Buildings”
[10] N. Krishna Raju - “Advanced Reinforced Concrete
design”
[11] “STAAD Pro 2004 – Getting started & tutorials” -
Published by: R .E. I.
[12] “STAAD Pro 2004 – Technical reference manual” -
Published by: R.E.I.

BIBLOGRAPHY

IS CODES

1. IS 875 - BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

MANAK BHAVAN, 9 BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR
MARG NEW DELHI 110002
2. IS 456 - BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS
MANAK BHAVAN, 9 BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR
MARG NEW DELHI 110002
3. IS 1893-2000 - BUREAU OF INDIAN
STANDARDS MANAK BHAVAN, 9 BAHADUR
SHAH ZAFAR MARG NEW DELHI 110002
4. IS 1893-2002 - BUREAU OF INDIAN
STANDARDS MANAK BHAVAN, 9 BAHADUR
SHAH ZAFAR MARG NEW DELHI 110002IS 1893-
2002 - BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS MANAK
BHAVAN, 9 BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG NEW
DELHI 110002

528 Copyright © 2016. Vandana Publications. All Rights Reserved.