My Inventory
My Inventory
DEVELOPMENT
Outcomes & Evidence
Progress Inventory*
MINOR IN LEADERSHIP STUDIES
Center for Student Leadership Development
Memorial Union
University of Rhode Island
*The Outcomes & Evidence Progress Inventory is the intellectual property of the Center for Student Leadership Development (CSLD)
at the University of Rhode Island and cannot be reproduced in part, or in its entirety, without the written permission of the acting
Assistant Director of the CSLD.
OUTCOMES
● Outcomes (Self-Leadership, Interpersonal and Organizational, Leadership Theories, Inclusive
Leadership, Critical Thinking)
● Targeted Classes
● Experiences
● Evidence
GENERAL INFORMATION
● Regardless of your major, you can minor in Leadership Studies.
● Requirements may be satisfied by completing 18 or more credits related to leadership and offered by more than one department.
● Twelve (12) of the 18 credits must be at the 200 level of instruction or above. A course grade of “C” or better must be earned in each graded course. At least 12 of the credits
must be earned at URI.
● No course may be used to apply to both the major and minor fields of study. Courses in General Education or for other minors may be used for the minor* (*this does not
apply to students in the College of Business). With the exception of internship credit, all courses for the minor must be taken for a grade. The Introductory class must be taken
before the internship and the capstone course.
● Application for the minor must be filed in your academic dean’s office no later than the beginning of the final semester or term.
● Approval of the minor does not guarantee that the suggested courses will be available to you on a schedule correlated with your graduation plans nor guarantee space in any
required course.
Leadership Inventory Revised 08/22/2017 3
CORE REQUIREMENTS- 9 Credits
Required Element Class options Notes
Introductory Course HDF 190: FLITE Only offered in spring for first-year students
3 credits or
HDF 290: Modern Leadership Issues Offered Fall and Spring for sophomores & juniors
Internship HDF 417: Leadership Internship Requires 40 hours/credit with a min. of 80 hours & a max. of 120 hours of documented
3 credits or internship experience for graded credit
Experience through Office of Experiential Learning & Community Engagement
or
Internship Class in Academic Major The only time the major and minor can overlap
Capstone HDF 412: Historical, Multi-ethnic & Alternative Leadership Offered only in the fall with preference given to seniors
3 credits or
COM 402: Leadership & Motivation Offered in the spring and summer with Dr. Leatham
or
BUS 441: Leadership Skills Development Offered in the fall and spring with Dr. Cooper
or
HPR 411/412: Honors Senior Seminar Must be in Honors or have GPA of 3.3
Portfolio HDF 492: Leadership Minor Portfolio Taken last spring semester of enrollment (some exceptions)
1 credit
AAF 300: Civil Rights Movement in the US COM 402: Leadership and Motivation (capstone option) HDF 416: Leadership in Organizations
BUS 341: Organizational Behavior COM 407: Political Communication HDF 417: Leadership Minor Internship
BUS 342: Human Resource Management COM 415: The Ethics of Persuasion HDF 437: Law & Families in the U.S.
BUS 441: Leadership & Motivation (capstone option) COM 421: Advanced Interpersonal Communication HDF 450: Introduction to Counseling
BUS 443: Organizational Design & Change COM 422: Communication and Conflict HPR 118: Honors Course in Speech Communications
BUS 448: International Dimensions of Business COM 441: Race, Politics and the Media HPR 203: The Prepared Mind
BUS 449: Entrepreneurship COM 450: Organizational Communication HPR 412: Honors Seminar (capstone option)
COM 100: Communication Fundamentals COM 461/462: Managing Cultural Differences in Organizations MSL 101: Introduction to Military Leadership
COM 202: Public Speaking CSV 302: URI Community Service MSL 201: Leadership & Military History
COM 208: Argumentation and Debate GWS 150: Introduction to Women’s Studies MSL 201: Military Skills and History of Warfare
COM 210: Persuasion: The Rhetoric of Influence GWS 310: Race, Class, Sexuality in Women’s Lives MSL 202: Leadership & Team Building
COM 221: Interpersonal Communication GWS 350: International Women’s Issues MSL 301: Leadership & Management
COM 250: Small Group Communication HDF 190: First‐Year Leaders Inspired to Excellence (FLITE) PEX 375: Women in Sport ‐ Contemporary Perspectives
COM 302: Advanced Public Speaking (introductory course option) PHL 212: Ethics
COM 308: Advanced Argumentation HDF 290: Modern Leadership Issues (introductory course option) PSC 304: Introduction to Public Administration
COM 322: Gender & Communication HDF 291: Rose Butler Browne Program Peer Mentoring Program PSC 369: Legislative Process and Public Policy
COM 351: Oral Comm. in Business & the Professions HDF 412: Historical, Multi‐Ethnic, & Alternative Leadership PSC 504: Ethics in Public Administration
COM 361: Intercultural Communication (capstone option) SOC300/WMS350: Women and Work
COM 383: Rhetorical Theory HDF 413: Student Organization Leadership Consulting THE 221: Stage Management
COM 385: Communication and Social Influence HDF 414: Leadership for Activism and Social Change THE 341: Theater Management
HDF 415: FLITE Peer Leadership
Leadership Inventory Revised 08/22/2017 4
BECOMING A POSITIVE LEADER THROUGH DEVELOPMENT & INVOLVEMENT
Wilson, 1998 (URI Memorial Union / Center for Student Leadership Development)
Revised after the publication of Exploring Leadership: for College Students Who Want to Make a Difference by Komives, McMahon and Lucas, 1998.
You need to have your own act together before you can lead others:
2. Lead Yourself
Time management
Organization
1. Know Yourself
Self care
Lead Others Self discipline
Strengths Perseverance
Weaknesses Develop and maintain family,
Values PROGRESS
interpersonal, and intimate relationships
P Needs Academic, social, personal goals and
Styles objectives
R
Learning
O Teaching
G P
Personality
R Membership R
E Leadership O
S G
S RE-EVALUATE R
E
former stages
S
Develop and as you progress S
Refine
Skills
3. Broaden Your Perspectives…
Leadership theory and
practice Understand others
Communication
Group Development Hierarchy of needs
Inclusion PROGRESS Racial, cultural, gender, sexual orientation,
Citizen Activist Skills religious, class, ability, etc. diversity and
Critical Thinking commonalities
Teaching and Programming Power, privilege, oppression, liberation;
individual and institutional discrimination
New Revised
HDF 190 Font
3 4
HDF 413 Font
6 5
7 17
45 42
46 114
89
90
119
120
121
122
125
126
132
133
SEE EVIDENCE #3
4. Student will demonstrate knowledge of URI 101 SOLC, Production Assistant In URI 101 the class was taught ways of how to approach a stressful situation. Stress is something
stress management methods everyone has to deal with, it is not a thing we all look forward to dealing with, it just is what it is.
However, you need to find ways to destress and take time for oneself. My URI 101 mentors had told us
to get involved with something that is not academically based that just allows you to relax and from an
article I had read from the American Heart Association just reinforced what they have said to us as a
class. This was the exact moment when I decided to join SOLC and just focus on being around friends.
The clubs and organization I have joined have helped me realize that stressful situations only come up
because of my poor time management and through lots of practice I have seen improvement in ways I
deal with my stress. Adding on top of that that I work as well allows me to get off campus for a lot of
time when I can get my mind off of schoolwork or anything else I have going on at a time. In addition
to SOLC, during the Fall semester of 2019 I have decided to go back to my old high school as
an intern working with my old show choir. I knew this would be super helpful with the stress
that was to come from this semester. During this fall I have faced a lot of problems
academically and socially. The one place I have had been able to escape to is rehearsals with
my students. I know when I am feeling the pressure, I tend to shut down but when I am in front
SEE EVIDENCE # 8
9. Student will demonstrate practice of the HDF 190 In my personal life In HDF 190 I was able to learn about my top values through the VIA test. My personal values
personal values statement statement that I created from my values is, ““Through times of distress I will use my kindness and
positivity to cope with whatever I have going on. I will use my curiosity to find the answers to help me
serve as better leader. With bravery, I will only speak with truth and stand up for others. I will use my
creativity to find answers to the problems I know I can solve. And at the end of the day I will find humor
in whatever situation it is.” Within my life I have been through a lot of distress and trauma in all reality.
The one event in particular that I relate this statement to most is that at the end of my senior year of
high school I was sexually assaulted. I used to just wipe the thought of the event out of my head but
through college I have learned to cope with what had happened to me and to learn more about
advocacy and sexual assault prevention. During my first semester of college I saw that through the
trauma I could be kind and positive and use my bravery to help others share their stories and start my
own healing process. I also have used my creativity to seek ways of how I can learn more about the
statistics of college sexual assault and present new ways to prevent it from happening to my friends,
family and even strangers. Lastly, when I am feeling down or have flashbacks I use my humor to calm
myself down and center myself and find that life is more than one tragic event and how it does not
define myself as a person or define my future.
Learn What the 34 CliftonStrengths Themes Mean | Gallup. (n.d.). Retrieved March 6, 2019, from
https://www.gallupstrengthscenter.com/home/en-us/cliftonstrengths-themes-domains
Outcome Target class Additional Experiences Descriptive notes regarding learning and practice
19 Student will show knowledge of the
“Authority and Bureaucracy” theory of
. leadership Weber
20 Student will describe personal application
of the above theory (Weber)
.
21 Student will show knowledge of the
“Scientific Management” theory of
. leadership by Taylor
22 Student will describe personal application
of the above theory (Taylor)
.
23 Student will show knowledge of the
“Management by Objectives” theory of
. leadership by Drucker
24 Student will describe personal application
of the above theory (Drucker)
.
25 Student will show knowledge of “Theory
X and Theory Y” theory of leadership by
. MacGregor
26 Student will describe personal application
of the above theory (MacGregor)
.
27 Student will show knowledge of the HDF190 In HDF 190 we have been taught the theory of servant leadership by Robert Greenleaf. The premise of
“Servant Leadership” theory of leadership servant leadership is based upon 10 characteristics which are: listening, empathy, healing, awareness,
. by Greenleaf persuasion, conceptualization, foresight, stewardship, commitment to people, and building community.
The most important thing to note about this theory is that you are serving others not helping, or fixing
There is a key difference between the three, as stated by Remen in her article, “Helping, fixing and
serving represent three different ways of seeing life. When you help, you see life as weak. When you
fix, you see life as broken. When you serve, you see life as whole. Fixing and helping may be the work
of the ego, and service the work of the soul.” To serve means to seek understanding and empathize
with others, and to see the future and create long term goals of how to build a better community.
Service in itself is one of the most important things in the human life cycle. As stated before the ten
characteristics can be broken down into three different categories. The servant category entails
listening, empathy, healing and awareness. Within these 4 characteristics is how we build relationships
and become the servant first. Listening and empathy go hand in hand, with listening you are able to
learn more about circumstances a person or community are going through. With empathy you develop
an understanding which then leads to awareness and how to teach others about how to serve others.
Healing comes into play when all of these are met, when one knows they are being heard rather than
listened to their hearts will become full again. On the flip side the leadership category contains
persuasion, conceptualization and foresight which are future oriented. All three allow for strategic
thinking and going through the motions of planning out what the best way to serve someone is.
Persuasion and conceptualization contain ways of how to gain consensus and brainstorm. Foresight
Leadership Inventory Revised 08/22/2017 12
allows for leaders to see into the future and dive into the longtime repercussions after one has been
served. Stewardship, commitment to people, and building community fall into the combined category.
Stewardship allows for ownership of what one does for a community and on a greater scale the world.
As stated by Greenleaf, “It also emphasizes the use of openness and persuasion, rather than control.”
Commitment to people allows for nurturing and promising to be there for one’s in need. Lastly the most
important aspect of servant leadership is building community. When a group of people serve it creates
a sense of camaraderie between the people being served as well as those who are serving and it is
one of the most amazing things when you know you have touched someone’s life by doing a simple
thing like holding the door or by letting someone know that you are there for them and create new and
strong connections everyday. With these ten characteristics combined we can see a servant leader
come to fruition and inspire others to lead in a way that makes people realize that a leader is not
someone who always is first, but is in reality someone who goes last.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1991). The servant as leader. Indianapolis, IN: Robert K. Greenleaf Center.
Remen, R. N. (n.d.). Helping, Fixing or Serving? Retrieved February 27, 2019, from
https://www.uc.edu/content/dam/uc/honors/docs/communityengagement/HelpingFixingServing.pdf
28 Student will describe personal application HDF 190 Rotaract In HDF 190 the class had learned about Robert Greenleaf’s theory of Servant Leadership. When I
of the above theory (Greenleaf) relate this to my own life I have used servant leadership within one of my organizations that I am part
. of: Rotaract. In the fall semester of my freshman year I had been involved with many different events
that Rotaract had been a part of. The one event that was the most memorable for me was the Mew’s
Tavern 5k race. It was held on November 18th, and we as an organization served the community by
volunteering as flaggers for the runners. It was a super fun day and I saw connections with this event
and three parts of the theory which are awareness, empathy and building community. I used
awareness to help out with anything that was needed from the organizers of the event and to help be
the best flagger possible for the runners. I used empathy to learn from others about why they were
running and who they were running for. I also saw this as an event that has built community, the race
itself has been around for 19 years and the turn out for the event keeps on growing year after year.
Also with such a big URI presence we were able to spread the word of serving the community to
people who have never heard of Rotaract and even got to talk to people about how they could even get
involved community groups like the Rotary Club, etc. As human beings we are called to serve our
community and through events like this and through organizations like Rotaract. Serving is something
that we should do to continue to grow and develop into better people, even though sometimes it is
difficult to get yourself motivated there is something so rewarding when an event or process is over
and you know that you have made a change in someone else’s life.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1991). The servant as leader. Indianapolis, IN: Robert K. Greenleaf Center.
29 Student will show knowledge of the
“Principle Centered Leadership” theory
. by Covey
30 Student will describe personal application
of the above theory (Covey)
.
31 Student will show knowledge of the “14
Points / TQM” theory of leadership by
. Deming
32 Student will describe personal application
of the above theory (Deming)
.
33 Student will show knowledge of the
“Visionary Leadership” (now often cited
.
Leadership Inventory Revised 08/22/2017 13
as “Transformational Leadership”) theory
by Sashkin
34 Student will describe personal application
of the above theory (Sashkin)
.
35 Student will show knowledge of the
“Individuals in Organizations” leadership
. theory by Argyris
36 Student will describe personal application
of the above theory (Argyris)
.
37 Students will demonstrate knowledge of HDF 190 In HDF 190 we had learned about the 4 V’s theory of leadership by Grace. The 4-V Model of Ethical
the “4 V’s” theory of leadership by Grace Leadership is a umbrella theory that combines the “inner beliefs and values” of a person with the
. (Center for Ethical Leadership) “external behaviors and actions” for the purpose of creating positive change and integrating one’s
being to show others how to be an ethical leader. The model was created by Dr. Bill Grace, he used
his own leadership research and personal faith and ethics to create the foundation of the 4-V’s. The 4-
V’s of the theory are values, vision, voice and virtue. Values are the core of our identities,” we begin
the process of integrating our unique values with our choices on all levels of our personal and civic
lives”. With vision we guide ourselves to figure out the picture of life and what things truly means
through things like service and self development. We use our voices to shape our vision of the world
and share our thoughts as to why things are the way they are. In essence when we practice what we
preach we use our virtue and connect all 4 V’s together and an ethical leader tends to asks
themselves “How are my values, vision, and voice in keeping with the common good?” Through the 4
V’s we see the heart of leadership through ethics, compassion and the empathy that all of us contain.
Center for Ethical Leadership. (2007). The four –v model. Retrieved from
http://www.ethicalleadership.org/philosophies/ethical-leadership
Center for Ethical Leadership. (2007). The four –v model. Retrieved from
http://www.ethicalleadership.org/philosophies/ethical-leadership
Leadership Inventory Revised 08/22/2017 14
SEE EVIDENCE #38
39 Student will show knowledge of the
“Situational Leadership” theory by Hersey
. & Blanchard
40 Student will describe personal application
of the above theory (Hersey & Blanchard)
.
41 Student will show knowledge of the HDF 190 In HDF 190 we have learned about the relational leadership model by Komives, McMahon & Lucas.
“Relational Leadership” model by The relational leadership model is based on three things: knowing, being and doing. Knowing deals
. Komives, McMahon & Lucas deals with a person knowing who they are, being open to change, and that the fact that there are
different views than your own. Being entails a person being ethical, having principles, open, caring, and
inclusive. Doing has to deal with how we as leaders should act in socially responsible ways,
consistently and congruently, as a participant in a community and on your commitments and passions.
There are five other parts which lie underneath knowing, being and doing. They are Inclusive,
Empowering, Purposeful, Ethical and Process-oriented. It starts off with process and developing the
leadership skills. Then empowering which is when you are lifting others up and showing that they are
heard and matter. Inclusivity allows for other to feel like they are a part of the bigger picture and again
make others feel needed and wanted in a group. Ethical allows for people to make morally correct
decisions and for people to develop fairness. These all intertwine, without one of these things there is
no balance and will never lead to the final purpose of something/a goal. Being purposeful and finding
purpose for things is the most important part of this model in my eyes. If there is no purpose then why
should one feel obligated to do it? I ask myself that everyday, I try to find passion in everything I do and
it is important to ask questions to develop the proper relationship skills because it the foundation of
how to be a good leader.
Komives, S, Lucas, N., & McMahon, T. (1998). Exploring Leadership for College Students What Want
to Make A
Difference. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. (68-72).
42 Student will describe personal application HDF 190 High School Theater, SOLC In HDF 190 we had learned about Relational Leadership. With learning more about this theory I can
of the above theory (Komives et al) relate it to my own life. When I look back on my high school years the one example I can use with
. someone having bad relational leadership skills deals with my high school director. He was a great guy
but not the best leader, he created unnecessary drama and division within the program. The one major
situation that occurred between him and I was during my senior year after auditions for the winter
musical. After many years of being told “it is not your time yet Michael”, “you have a lot of growing to
do”, etc. I decided to try to have a meaningful conversation with this man about why after doing 14
other shows that I had never received a big part. Linking this experience to the 5 components the only
2 parts that occurred were process oriented because there was a process for the audition and callback
and trying to get feedback after the whole fiasco of not getting a part. The other being purposeful, he
had a purpose for the way he chose things. He wanted the shows to sell out and if he knew that certain
kids could not sing, he would choose a better actor any other day of the week instead of looking for an
entire package. However, there was no common ground for decisions it was his way or no way for all
of us. We would be forced not to ask questions about why things were the way they were and could not
comment on his decisions because they were “disrespectful” to him. Other than that there was no
inclusivity because of my director having his favorites and pushing every other student who had never
gotten a chance out of the way. He would degrade his own students even about how their auditions
would go, there was no “this is how you take the steps that can improve on the following skills” it was
more along the lines of “this is what you did wrong” with many comments about things that cannot
change about one’s physical appearance, many students other than myself often felt miniscule in a
program that was supposed to make you feel empowered. Lastly my old director would often contradict
himself, he would use the statement “we are a family” but then would go behind students’ backs and
would stir the pot about certain he said/she said and division happened because of his non-ethical
Leadership Inventory Revised 08/22/2017 15
ways. If you want to have a somewhat decent program, organization, business, etc. These 5 main
components are very important to leadership and this whole experience could have been different if
they were applied. Especially with being inclusive to everyone, not just his favorites. If there was
inclusivity then the other two parts of being ethical and empowering would come along. Within the URI
community the most prevalent places where relational leadership is apparent is in student
organizations. In SOLC we use relational leadership model on a weekly if not daily basis. The
model consists of five components: Purpose, Inclusive, Empowering, Ethical, and Process.
These five parts focus on “a group or organization's positive social development and
advancement” (ModelTheWay). Each component can be applied to the organization especially
through the Knowing-Being-Doing example that Robert Vincent introduced in HDF 190. When
you know what your objective is, you can be proactive in getting to your goal and achieve
whatever that may be. The purpose of SOLC is to serve our community through running
student led retreats and work on goals organizations may have. We are inclusive through many
different things, every student comes from a different background and we embrace sharing new
ideas and methods. We empower everyone to take a new chance and try new things all the time
by providing new opportunities to grow as facilitators. We are ethical in the way the
organization is run and by being cognizant of how we recognize others' differences and treat
everyone with the respect and dignity they deserve. Lastly, we have a process as to how we as
an organization get things done efficiently and effectively. Through the five characteristics it
fulfills the mission of the organization by “promoting and using peer leadership to help URI’s
student groups to effectively achieve their goals” (URI) not just with other campus
organizations but with ourselves as well.
Komives, S, Lucas, N., & McMahon, T. (1998). Exploring Leadership for College Students What Want
to Make A
Difference. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. (68-72).
Education Broadcasting Corporation. (2004). Constructivism as a paradigm for teaching and learning.
Retrieved
Education Broadcasting Corporation. (2004). Constructivism as a paradigm for teaching and learning.
Retrieved
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development
(Vol. 1). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Mcleod, S. (2017, February 5). Kolb's Learning Styles and Experiential Learning Cycle.
Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.html.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development
(Vol. 1). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
47 Student will show knowledge of the HDF 190 In HDF 190 I was taught the Social Change Model (SCM). The SCM was developed in 1994 and was
“Social Change Model of Leadership initially researched at UCLA. The SCM provides insight about leaders who may not hold traditional
. Development” by Astin et al roles of leadership, but rather want to make positive impact on the world and leave their mark without
having a title of some sorts. The biggest concept of this model is that leadership as a process. Within
the SCM there are 7 C’s which are Consciousness of Self, Congruence, Commitment, Collaboration,
Common Purpose, Controversy with Civility and Citizenship. The 7 C’s are separated into two
categories individual and group settings. The first three deal with an individual basis. “Consciousness
of Self requires self-awareness of personal beliefs, values, attitudes, and emotions. Congruence is
when one knows their personal values, beliefs, attitudes and emotions and acts consistently with those
values, beliefs, attitudes and emotions. Commitment requires an intrinsic passion, energy, and
purposeful investment toward action.” While on the other hand the other 4 deal with a group setting.
Collaboration deals with the effort to use other people’s strengths to a groups advantage and help the
group as a whole to make the process move at a quicker pace. Common Purpose is when a group
shares similar values and visions and trust. Controversy with Civility is when you seek to understand
multi-perspectives and have civil discourse to lead to solutions. Citizenship is when one is connected
to a community/environment and actively seeks to show their concern and care through their own
community involvement. However there is an 8th C which is Change. Change is the ultimate goal of
the SCM. “It gives meaning and purpose to the other C’s. It means improving the status quo, creating
a better world, and demonstrating a comfort with transition and ambiguity in the process of change.”
Overall the SCM is a very crucial part of leadership and ties together ethical, relational and servant
leadership and is the root of how societies grow and develop and on a smaller scale even with
personal change and growth.
Higher Education Research Institute (HERI). (1996). A social change model of leadership
development: Guidebook version III. College Park, MD: National Clearinghouse for Leadership
Programs
Higher Education Research Institute (HERI). (1996). A social change model of leadership
development: Guidebook version III. College Park, MD: National Clearinghouse for Leadership
Programs
Outcome Target class Additional Experiences Descriptive notes regarding learning and practice
69 Student will demonstrate how cultural
anthropology / paradigms relate to
. leadership
70 Student will describe personal example
of using cultural anthropology /
. paradigms as a leader
71 Student will demonstrate knowledge of
the “Cycles of Socialization” (Harro)
. theory and its uses in leadership
72 Students will demonstrate personal
application of the “Cycles of
. Socialization” (Harro)
73 Student will demonstrate knowledge of
the “Cycles of Liberation” (Harro) theory
. and its uses in leadership
74 Student will demonstrate personal
application of the “Cycles of Liberation”
. (Harro)
75 Student will demonstrate knowledge of
the “Configuration of Power” (Franklin)
. and its relationship to leadership
76 Student will demonstrate personal
application of the “Configuration of
. Power” (Franklin)
77 Student will demonstrate knowledge of
racial identity development (Cross &
. Fhagen-Smith; Rowe, Bennett &
Atkinson; Ferdman & Gallegos; Kim;
Horse; Renn etc.)
78 Student will demonstrate personal
application of model(s) of racial identity
. development above
79 Student will demonstrate knowledge of
models related to gender / identity /
. gender identity development (Lev;
Bussey; Bussey & Bandura; Bilodeau;
Gilligan; Belenky et al; etc.)
80 Student will demonstrate personal
application of model(s) of gender identity
. above
81 Student will demonstrate knowledge of
additional social identity development
. model(s): Sexual ID, Faith & Spirituality,
Disability, Social Class (Dillon et al;
Fowler; Parks; Astin et al; Peek; Smith;
90 Students will demonstrate personal HDF 413 RAM position In HDF 413, I had learned about Bennett’s Model of Intercultural Sensitivity. After learning about
application of the “Model of Intercultural the Model of Intercultural Sensitivity I believe I am in the Acceptance of Difference stage. It
. Sensitivity” by Bennett describes me best because I am constantly learning about new cultures as well as my own. I
believe that everyone’s story should be heard and shared. There is something intriguing about
learning a person’s history and why they have developed into the person they are. The ideation
and empathetic part of myself comes out when I try to connect with others with my own
background and find common grounds between new and innovative ideas that I have never
thought of. When you connect with others through our trials of life it makes you able to develop
a part of yourself that will make you appreciate your privileges and own life even more so. I
have seen this through my own time as a RAM when I held my own diversity program for my
residents. We had watched a TEDTalk and talked about diversity and inclusion within three
main focuses of our own lives, the university and the world as a whole. I was lucky enough to
have students from all backgrounds talk to me about sensitive topics such as race, socio-
economic status, and prejudice they had faced. The conversation allowed for a breakthrough in
my eyes that my students are growing and wanting to be a change within our own campus. In
addition to that experience I think through having more experiences of meeting new people will
allow me to grow into the integration of difference stage. I do not know how long it would take
me to get to that point, but I am constantly growing and changing, and I hope that I will soon be
able to integrate and understand more in my life.
Outcome Target class Additional Experiences Descriptive notes regarding learning and practice
98. Student will show knowledge of principles
of critical thinking and fallacies (logic is
used in this minor)
99. Student will demonstrate proficiency of
critical thinking
100 Student will show knowledge of
metaphorical analysis to critically analyze
. self and leadership situations
101 Student will demonstrate proficiency of
metaphorical analysis to critically analyze
. self and leadership situations
102 Student will show knowledge of at least five
decision making methods
.
103 Student will describe personal examples of
having used five decision making methods
.
104 Student will show knowledge of at least five
problem solving / conflict management
. methods, as well as understanding the
roots of conflicts
105 Student will describe personal examples of
having used five problem solving / conflict
. management
Outcome Target Additional Experiences Descriptive notes regarding learning and practice
class
109 Student will demonstrate knowledge of
active listening techniques
.
110 Student will describe examples of using
active listening skills
.
111 Student will demonstrate knowledge of
functions of group communication by
. Hirokawa
112 Student will describe personal application
of functions of group communication
. (Hirokawa)
113 Student will show knowledge of techniques COM 100 In COM 100 one of the big topics that the class talked about was how to provide feedback and criticism
regarding giving and accepting of feedback properly. My professor had told the class from the beginning that it is all in the way you say something.
. Your tone and use of the words always matter when trying to provide feedback. When someone asks
for advice or guidance you do not want to be rude and discouraged one’s ideas. Instead of blatantly
saying you do not like an idea, use your words to empower and provide at least three good things
about what the person said and then focus in and help find a clearer purpose for the parts you do not
agree with. When you turn something down super fast, most of the time the person whose idea it was
will either turn a person completely off from participating in a discussion or being a part of the group
setting entirely. There is a difference between being brutally honest and being impeccable with your
words and how you can help with developing someone’s thoughts or ideas.
Leadership Inventory Revised 08/22/2017 25
114 Student will describe examples of giving COM 100 Production Assistant In COM 100, when I was developing my last speech for class, the students had to bounce ideas off of
and accepting feedback. one another to see if their motives for their speech were clear and if they had a concise vision on how
. they were going to get their points across. When developing my group speech, we as a collective
decided to do ours on water pollution. I told my fellow classmates about different types of water
pollution we could cover in the speech such as trash island, oil pollutants, even URI’s own campus
pollution, etc. There was one person in particular who did not like my ideas and gave me feedback of
the ideas not being clear but after much discussion and persuasion we went forward with the idea and
continuously kept giving subjects to bring up to each other and working together to get to the common
goal of getting a good grade on our final project. Through the process of giving positive feedback and
criticism there was a sense of clarity and allowed for the group to progress further than we had
expected. In addition to what I learned last year from giving and accepting feedback, this year I
have taken major strides into the arts education world and I realized when one is on a
professional staff it is more important to take things more seriously. When it came to designing
my students show for their competition set, a lot of communication decisions took place on
what works and what will not work in regards to staging and cost. Through this process I
gained the confidence to be able to share my own ideas and was able to be heard not as a
student but as a colleague and a member of the directing staff. Through the multiple
conversations over a couple weeks, major decisions were made and we had a cohesive show
that we all were proud of and were confident in the results that we are anticipating to receive
once competition season comes around.
Tuckman, Bruce W., & Jensen, Mary Ann C. (1977). ‘Stages of small group development
revisited’, Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 419- 427.
Kolb, David A. 1984. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and
Development. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Kolb, David A. 1984. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and
Development. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Bolman, L. G. & Deal, T. E. (2013). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice & leadership (5th
ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
126 Student will describe personal application HDF 413 TLC Coffee Roasters After learning about the 4 frames of organizations and breaking the frame and reframing in HDF
of organizational analysis using the four 413, I decided to look within my own organizations and work life and can relate to the first
. frames of organizations, and breaking the frame mostly. Within my own job at TLC I am directly in the Structural Frame. In the
frame / reframing (Bolman and Deal) metaphorical pyramid of the structural frame there are 3 layers. On top of the pyramid is my
boss/owner who oversees all of us staff and takes care of major issues within his company.
Beneath him is my manager who takes care of day to day progress of the store and is our
Human Resource manager as well who deals with any issues in the staff or problems that any
worker may have outside of work. Under her is all of the staff who are trained in all positions.
Each of us have our duties and contribute to the success of the company. If you would take out
any of the three parts the business would fall apart. In a world where most companies are
within this structure/frame it is important to consider what is brought to the table among all
levels of positions and the symbiotic relationship between everyone involved.
Bolman, L. G. & Deal, T. E. (2013). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice & leadership (5th
ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Tuckman, B. (1965) Developmental Sequence in Small Groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-
399.
Tuckman, B. & Jensen, M. (1977) Stages of Small Group Development. Group and
Organizational Studies, 2, 419-427
Tuckman, B. (1965) Developmental Sequence in Small Groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-
399.
Tuckman, B. & Jensen, M. (1977) Stages of Small Group Development. Group and
Organizational Studies, 2, 419-427