Periodontal Surgery Biological Width
Periodontal Surgery Biological Width
Periodontal Surgery Biological Width
access)
To facilitate removal of subgingival deposits
To facilitate plaque control
Recontouring of gingival +/- bony contours to achieve positive architecture
Pocket reduction/elimination
Periodontal regeneration
Our Goal
ENHANCE the long-term preservation of the periodontium
The decision to do periodontal surgery is normally made at the re-evaluation visit(s) (so we know about the
pts compliance, prognosis)
Better assessment of the teeth and gums
Gums are healthier (easier to manipulate surgically) and there has been a reduction in inflammation
and as much healing has occurred after non-surgical treatment.
Patient compliance can be more accurately assessed
Once the prognosis of teeth have been confirmed.
Contraindicaionts
Patient co-operation
Uncontrolled cardiovascular disease
Organ transplantation l
Blood disorders
Hormonal disorders
Neurologic disorders
Smoking
Surgical principles
Anaesthesia
Incision
Flap elevation
Debridement
Management of bone or tooth structure
Flap closure
Post-op care
Access surgery
Allows us to move the gingiva out the way to allow visual access to the area
Check for anatomical defects
Root grooves
Root fractures
Improved access for deep sites
Improved access for furcations
Improved access to remove overhangs
Pic on the right, we now have good access and the amount of bone loss in the furcation area.
Osseous surgery
Recontouring bone
Osteoplasty(removal of supporting bone around the tooth) /ostectomy (reshaping bone)
Eliminate infrabony defects
Allows the gingiva to be replaced and provide positive gingival architecture
Flap design
The original Widman Flap
Aimed to remove (infected) pocket epithelium and inflamed connective tissue to facilitate
debridement of the root surfaces
Bone recontouring was recommended to achieve more ideal bone contours
The modified Widman Flap (just internal bevel incision
Adv:
Close adaptation of soft tissues to root surface
Minimal trauma to alveolar bone and soft CT
Less exposure of root surfaces/recession
Osteoplasty/Ostectomy
Osteoplasty
Recontouring of alveolar bone
Purpose is to create a physiological bone contour with removing supporting bone
Ostectomy
Removal of bone which was supporting the tooth
Often necessary for pocket elimination
Comparing surgical/non-surgical
Surgical is good for higher PD (>5mm), but in a long term, there outcome for treatment become
smaller.
Serino et al. (2001) reported that in patients with advanced periodontal disease, surgical therapy
provided better short and long-term reduction of pocket depth and may lead to fewer subjects
requiring adjunctive additional therapy
Biologic Width and Papillas
Biological width
Dimension of the soft tissue which is attached
to the portion of the tooth coronal to the crest
of the alveolar bone
Need to anesthetize the pt
Check the PD
Then, push down through the CT
attachment to hit the bone
This no. minus pocket PD.
Usually we don’t have to do this, unless we are considering crown lengthen
When we combine the biologic width with the pocket depth, we get an idea of the distance
required between the restorative margin and the alveolar crest
For most patients this would mean a distance of around 3-5 mm between the restorative
margin and the bone crest
There will be problems if the restorative margin placed sungingivally.
Studies shown that pt with subgingival margins basically lost attachment over the 1 st
few years.
Cuz the gingiva tissues are trying to move away from the restoration
Might end up recession or PD
Restoration is difficult
Isolation (control of material during placement
Moisture control (contamination of the cavity prep & decreased bonding and
microleakage)
Laser might help for bleeding issues
BUT there is potential risk to damage periodontal support
Papilla
5 mm or less = the distance from CEJ and bone level, we get papilla present 100% of the time.
≤5mm – the papilla was present almost 100% of the time
6mm – the papilla was present 56% of the time
≥7mm – the papilla was present 27% of the time or less
Management of papillas:
Non-surgical
prosthetic masking by apically lengthening the contact area between the teeth or use of gum
coloured acrylic/composite
Surgical
Several case reports have been published (Beagle 1992 and Azzi et al. 1998), however the
predictability and long-term data of these surgical techniques for reconstruction of deficient papillae
has not been documented
PT can always consider a crown in the future after the perio condition is stable, but gaining a full
papilla height is hard