1 Page 1 of 726

Forbidden Knowledge For The People.

The Journey From (Might Is Right) To (Right

Is Might).

Fasten Your Seat Belts (Freqummechanics)..

And :(Alkhubathaa` )

By The Red Monk.

(Volume Five of Five)

Freqummechanics :
A Branch Of Science Founded Entirely By Myself.

726 1
 2 Page 2 of 726

DEDICATED;
To the true Queen of England :
Patricia Pearson Thompson
Whose only concern Even while she was dying that of:
What Will Become Of Me ( Her Ex Husband )?Since she
had already witnessed at first hand :Not just Daily but
Hourly !!Not just for Years but for Decades !!What these
British State Bullies and its Thugs (In Uniform Or Out
Of Uniform )Have done to us? What animals could not
have done :The cruel manipulations! The crude
Heartless Mindless Sick and Sickening Obsessions !etc.
We not asking here anyone to believe anything !Only to
have the mind and heart to investigate anything they
find Unbelievable !Not for our sake but for the sake of
the whole world.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rebellion Against Tyranny Is Obedience To God *
RED MONK. Is my penname.
RED-----------stands for :The will and desire for change------ --Rebellion .
MONK-------stands for: Committed to None-Violence---Religious tendencies .
My real name Isam .T . Saleh.

© Isam .T . Saleh. London -2005.

726 2
 3 Page 3 of 726

Contents.

1-Chapter One ------------Introduction Plus Cipher. Plus

The First Genocide ? Page--

2-Chapter Two-------------------------Taxi. Page--

3-Chapter Three ---Fate And The Democracy of killers Page--

4-Chapter Four : Alkhubathaa.(The Malignants)

Plus:Women Of the World Unite. Page---

5-Chapter Five:

Philosophical Abstracts Of The Fifth Kind. Page---Plus:The Iron Wedge.

6- Chapter Six.

There Is Something Of The Dark Night In The English Character? Page--

7- Chapter Seven.

*The Journey : From Might Is Right To Right Is Might .

Also: The Pharaohs Of Germany. Page---

8-Chapter Eight. Political Theory. Page---

9- Chapter Nine :Philosophical Discourses Of The Third Kind .And The learned

ones? The invisible prisons of Britannia. Plus:(The Forbidden From Love) Page---

10- Chapter Ten. And There Was Another Unloved Child Of God ! Recap Of Some Of

The Points(Excerpts) Raised In My Original Letter To Senator Bob Dole In 1995?

Page---

726 3
 4 Page 4 of 726

11-Chapter Eleven. (And There Was Murder In The South.) Plus:

The Killing Fields Of Britannia.(When A Thug In Uniform Start Playing God)? Page---

12- Chapter Twelve.

The First Hypocrisy. When the corrupt lead the corrupts ? Page------

13-Chapter Thirteen.

Methods Of Science In Politics(36-Methods)!Also: The Poisonator Page---

14-Chapter Fourteen.

Why We Ought To Thank God For The French Revolution ? Page-

15-Chapter Fifteen. ------------Final Secrets ? Made In Britain. Page--

16- Chapter Sixteen: Flags And National Anthems. Page--

17- Chapter Seventeen. *The Five Arithmetic(S) . Page----

18-Chapter Eighteen: *Fasten Your Seat Belts.

Prepare To Take Off Physically In This Chapter !So Fasten Your Seat Belts?Plus:

Introducing The Universality Of Quantum Mechanics. Plus: Micro Philosophy!

Page--?And :Frequmechanics (Branch Of Science Founded Entirely By Myself).

19-Chapter Nineteen. (The Forbidden From Knowledge and Recognitions).

Page-----

20-Chapter Twenty - The Island Of Perpetual Inequities Plus: Silent Genocides ?

Plus:The Second American Civil War. Plus island of zero conscience . Page---

Plus: War Or Peace And The Criminal Genes .The Final Conclusions.

726 4
 5 Page 5 of 726

Frequency Mechanics Or Frequmechanics. ©

Frequmechanics is branch of science founded entirely
by myself its based on the following:
1- Retrievability:
Though frequencies are Scalars its possible to
Retrieve Any original information by forward or
backward (Vector Operators).
Many examples will be quoted in this book.
2- Duality.
Any frequency (Ω ) Arbitrarily split in to two
Frequencies ῳCutting And Ω ) [ ῳGluing )The first cutting
some (Cosmic Flux)And the other is gluing it with lag
(Phase )Angle : ‖ ɸ ‖ = ῳC / ῳg . Such That:
Ω2 = ( ωC )2 +( jωg )2
3-
Reality and Connectivity:
Frequencies are the only Real Physical Observable
Connecting The microscopic world to the
macroscopic i.e. Quantum mechanics to classical

mechanics.

726 5
 6 Page 6 of 726

4-Introducing: Two Wave Functions Instead Of One .

When i split the frequency Ω in to two (ωCutting ) And (ωgluing )
We are essentially Manufacturing Two Wave Functions guided
by one and only one condition that :
Their total probability is one i.e. P (ωC ) +p(ωg )=1.

Since the phase or lag angle :(ɸ ) = f (J ῳ Gluing /ῳCutting )

For example if the Eigen Vector (ɸ ) = 3

Then the discrete Eigen Vales are = 3/1 ? 6/2? 9/3 .etc.

And in general If (ɸ ) = m Then the Discrete Eigen Values are

= m.n/n Where n=1,2,3,4,5,eyc ?
(ɸ ) = m.n/n And Since :

Ω2 = ( ωC )2 +( jωg )2 = (nm)2 - n2 =n2( m2 - 1)

As you see this is just a Number i.e. ( Ω )Now been reduced in
to a number !And this tally with my concept expressed
elsewhere in this book that Every Particle Inside Any System
Can Be Assigned An Identity Frequency By (Emotion?
Oscillation ? or vibrations )And if we Freeze That System Inside
That One Single Second Then this identity will become just
number e.g. if the particle emitting 50 HZ Then Inside That
Universe Of Just One Second we can only count fifty cycles
assigning it to that particular particle in that particular
dynamical system. And so forth.

726 6
 7 Page 7 of 726

5-
“Everything in the universe is quantifiable! The
question is how ?” The Red Monk.

“If we to accept Quantum Mechanics As solid proven science ?

We need to accept the Duality of the universe(Parallel

Universe Best Illustrated By The Schrodinger Cat)Or as

the Quran Repeatedly Talk of the Two Worlds of Uns (Man)And
Jins (Genies).
And if we find the concept of parallel universe Imposed by
quantum mechanics Inescapable the idea of Medium I call
Cosmic Flux Connecting both universes will be Equally
Inescapable !The irony is : Though we cannot see or feel the
effects of this Cosmic Flux yet we can calculate it with my
Frequmechanics.”

726 7
 8 Page 8 of 726

“Frequmechanics is branch of science founded and established

Entirely by myself !Recorded and registered in my own
name :Isam .T.Saleh. (September -2016) Defined As Follows :
Frequmechanics is the study of physical relationships between
Frequencies ! Physics! And geometry !By superimposing
frequencies on Physical Objects spectroscopically ( e.g. By
Coloring And by observing the geometrical rules for that
Particular Shape Illustrated by the following examples :

“In a nutshell :Quantum mechanics pictures the world as

(Fuzzy Balls )!My Frequmechanichs Picture it a world of
frequencies !! Since anything Fizzy Must be oscillating around
certain point or fixed mean we call hereafter the Center Of
Frequency Or Vibration .”

“As we shall see later every particle in the universe is cutting

the cosmic flux at point (Front) With constant frequency ( ωN)
And Variable radius RFront ! Then Gluing it at point (Tail)with
variable frequency ( ωn.)And constant radius (RTail )!! “

726 8
 9 Page 9 of 726

The Cosmic Flux Junction And My Universal Constant Q;

X=Distance? V=velocity?+g=Acceleration due to

gravity ?-g =Deceleration due to gravity ? h=Planck

constant=Energy? Ω2 = ( ωC )2 +( jωg )2
ωC =Frequency Cutting The Cosmic flux.
ωg =Frequency Gluing Or joining The Cosmic flux.
R= Some arbitrary radius as defined in (My theory on
quantum gravity part-two) ?
₸ (Tau)=The Transfer Period in seconds as defined by
all classical system control theories ?
Due to Typing Restrictions accented operators e.g. The
energy operator and energy eigen function: E ἕ Or
ω  ῶ. etc?
Definitions:
The Cosmic Flux Junction is the point when and where
the Probability of the second derivative of any physical
observable e.g. (d2X/dt2) Changing sign Reaches One .
Example :
Velocities are Vectors (Not scalars ) i.e. they have
directions therefore When a particle thrown vertically

726 9
 10Page 10 of 726

Upward its direction is opposite to that of coming

down therefore its velocities must have opposite signs
and if we assign its upward velocity as (-v) them (+V)
when its falling :
Hence climbing particle has (-d2X/dt2 =-g)i.e.
Deceleration Due to gravity While its (+g)When its free
falling. But the most significant part of my argument is
the point or Micro-Instant when the acceleration (g)
Switches from the negative to the positive which I am
calling ( The Cosmic Flux Junction) The Reasons ?
Purpose? And Significance of This Will be made clearer
©
throughout my book (Frequmechanics) .

This Junction Has The Following Two Properties:

1-Ω=0 2- Acceleration Switches Signs .

My Universal Constant (Q).

In this book we often come across ῶ Or ῷ These should
Be treated as Operators for the Frequency (ω C/S )!
Treating these as Operators Can be Justified by the
following argument :

726 10
 11Page 11 of 726

Since E = h. ω for the photon: Then by symmetry then

the operators analogue should be : ἕ = q .ῶ

Therefore by dividing the second equation by the

First : [ἕ = q . ῶ ]/ ( E = h. ω)
Giving ἕ/E = q/h (ῶ/ ω) = ἕ/E = Q (ῶ/ ω)
Where (Q)=My Universal Constant for particular (q).

Hence; ἕq. ω =Q(ῶ.E )q.-------------EQN-!

And The Eigen Value Equation:

ἕq (Ω) = ἕq (ῶ C )q + ἕq (ῶg)q ------EQN-2

Substituting EQN-1 In 2  ἕ (Ω) =Q.E (ῶ C + ῶg)
The Schrodinger Equation For Free Particle In
Potential(V):
[ -h2/(2m.R.₸ )∂2 /∂ Ω2 +V(Ω)] ἕE (Ω) = Eἕ . (Ω)
Subsituting EQN-1 In To The Above :

[-h2/(2m.R.₸ ) ∂2/∂ Ω 2+V(Ω)]{ ἕq (ῶC )q+ ἕq (ῶg)q }=Eἕ (Ω)

Giving Concrete Relationships Between :

((ῶC?ῶg ?Energy ?m ? etc).
Exercise :

Compute the value of (Q) Given h=1.05x1027 erg.sec ?

726 11
 12Page 12 of 726

Redefining Frequency: (Page One Of Seven).

“Distances can be measured by length! Mass can be
measured by weight!etc.: But frequency can only be
Observed as Number of cycles per time. It’s the same if
this Number was round the earth or round a nucleus
and can only be differentiated when the Observer
Measure the radius for each from within i.e. From
Same Frame Of Reference (Relativity)! There again it’s
no longer frequency but angular velocity etc.”

What Is Frequency ?

1-if we say 50 Hz it means 50 cycles per second but

time itself is cyclic and the second can be written as

1/60 Minute or 1/60 Cycle therefore the frequency can

be rewritten as:

F = 50 X 60 Cycle/Cycle =50 X60 i.e. a Number !

2-Frequenvcy is Differentiable Number .

726 12
 13Page 13 of 726

3-Frequency is a Number Differentiable w.r.t Itself And To

Time(T)Only.

Very Important Result. (Page Two Of Seven).

“Any Cyclic Number NCyclic Can be differentiated w.r.t
any other Cyclic Function e.g. Time (t).”
Let: dNCyclic /dt =a

Integrating both sides :

∫ dNCyclic = ∫a.dt

NCyclic = a.t + b.

At t=0 NCyclic = b .

At a=b: NCyclic = b .t + b = b( t+1).

Therefore if (NCyclic)is the week’s Seven Days i.e.

NCyclic=7. Then : Let b=7

At t= 0?1?2?3?etc .

NCyclic = 7 (0 +1) =7

NCyclic = 7 (1 +1) =14

NCyclic = 7 (2 +1) =21

726 13
 14Page 14 of 726

NCyclic = 7 (3 +1) =28 Etc. etc.…………………..

Time Reversal:
“The most striking result will be the reversal of time by
the above equations such that if we now let:”
a= - b And as before: b=7 Therefore:

NCyclic = - b .t + b = 7( 1 - t).
Then: At t= 0? 1? 2 ? 3? etc .
NCyclic = 7 ? 0 ? - 7 ? - 14 ? - 21 ? - 28 ? Etc. etc.…
(See Page---------------Frequmechanics (Part-Eleven) ?
“Contrary to all conventional expectations: The Square
Of Any Cyclic Number yields a set of negative not
positive numbers!”
Proceeding from the previous section where a= b

giving: NCyclic = b .t + b = b( 1+t ). And a= -b Gives :

NCyclic = b( 1 - t). Therefore:

(NCyclic)2 = b ( 1 – t2 ). If b=±7 As in the Two Examples

2

Above then clearly At t= 0 Sec? ± 1? ± 2 ?± 3? Etc.

NCyclic = 49 ? 0 ? – 3X49 ? – 8 X 49 ? – 15 X 49 ? etc.
726 14
 15Page 15 of 726

(Page Three Of Seven ).

What Is This Cosmic Flux? (Page Four Of Seven)

“Geometrical lines with concrete physical manifestations.“

In the year (2005)At the Beginning of writing my book

It was stated how we all are familiar with Pythagoras
theorem? The concrete relationship between the sides of the
triangle !

The Mental Abstract:

Whether we draw this triangle in the sand or in the air (Inside
Our Minds)This relationship hold true.

The Material Physical :

Or if we Fit Solid square on the hypotenuse of righ angle
triangle its Area still remain the total sum of the areas of the
solid Laminas Fitted on the other sides of the triangle!
These squares can be all metallic or one metallic the other
plastic and the other is drawn inside our mind the prelateship
remains concrete .
Similarly the cosmic flux has concrete relationships which my
book (Freqummechanics)Trying to formulate! One such

726 15
 16Page 16 of 726

example is the formula below explaining the sun corona

phenomenon:

The Corona Phenomenon And The Cosmic Flux.

“ My theory on the cosmic flux can explain many
phenomena such as why the universe is accelerating
instead of retarding as I explained elsewhere in my
book (Frequmechanics A branch of science founded
entirely by myself ) Under the title The Accelerating
Universe(Parts -One &Two). Written in 2005 !Now this
theory of mine can Solve The Puzzle Why the corona is
so much hotter than the sun surface as follows :”
1-keeping in mind the Diagram Below is only two
dimensional cross section of three dimensions
situations.
2- The cosmic flux envelope the sun as shown not
exactly trapping the heat but Constricting Its Flow!
Some kind of Gigantic Hot House Effect .
3 -The lag or phase angle (ɸ ) = ῳCutting /ῳGluing .

726 16
 17Page 17 of 726

The rate by which the cosmic flux is cut and glued by

the sun as defined at many parts of my book acts as
Amplifier to the temperature at the sun surface
According to My Following Equation :
(Page Five Of Seven).

Temperature Inside The Corona =T X ɸ .

Where ( T )Is the temperature at the sun surface .

4- Thus the larger the value of ( ɸ ) The hotter it’s;

5-
The value of (ɸ )Varies according to how huge or small
each of ; ῳCutting Or ῳGluing Are :
For example outside Black Hole: (ɸ ) 0
While (ɸ )∞ outside the super bright objects in the
universe some of these are Thousands Times Brighter
Than Our Sun !
6- Let :R= The Radial Distance between the Sun
Surface and the outer peripheries of the Corona Zone .
Then:dR/d ɸ =K (Constant in units of distance)
Integrating both sides :

726 17
 18Page 18 of 726

∫ dR = ∫ d ɸ . K
R= K. ɸ +B Or ɸ= 1/K (R-B)
Substituting in Temperature Inside The Corona =T X ɸ .
Temperature Inside The Corona =T X 1/K (R-B)
(Page Six Of Seven).

(Page Seven Of Seven).

At R=0 (At the Sun Surface ) The temperature is =T
Temperature Inside The Corona = T X –B/K
T= T X-B/K Giving -B = K .
Substituting back:
Temperature Inside The Corona =T X 1/K (R +K)
Temperature Inside The Corona =T X (R/K +1)
7-
If the data received in (November -2018 )From the
latest probe to the sun (Parker)Indicates there is some
sort of Temperature Gradient Inside the corona then its
Concrete Vindication of my theory.

726 18
 19Page 19 of 726

The Isamic Diagrams:

“What the isamic diagrams will be trying to do :Is to
relate geometry and physics Organically !
That is to give geometry physical meanings and physics
geometrical meaning as follows :”
Frequmechanics.
“By reading and relating the Frequencies Emitted by
various geometrical shapes colored spectroscopically.”

The First Hypothesis.

Examples Of The Simplest Case : Triangle Of Sides A,B,C :

“First we we colour the sides of the triangle a,b,c Such That
they emit frequencies (fc ,fa , fb ).
Secondly we choose these frequencies Such That they satisfy
the following :”

726 19
 20Page 20 of 726

First Degree Isamic Diagrams.

C < a +b.  fc < fa + fb
Clearly the frequencies 2Hz,3Hz,4hz(Or their multiples satisfy
this case ).

Second Degree Isamic Diagrams.

C2 =a2 +b2  (fc )2 =(fa )2 +(fb )2

Clearly the frequencies 3Hz,4Hz,5hz(Or their multiples satisfy
this case ).

Third Degree Isamic Diagrams.

726 20
 21Page 21 of 726

Tan Θ = a/b = fa /fb , Sin Θ = fa/fc etc.

Clearly the frequencies 3Hz,4Hz,5hz(Or their multiples e.g.

3MHz ,4MHz,5Mhz )satisfy All The Above Three Cases..

The Second Hypothesis.

What Is A Wave?
In the final analysis a wave is a particle or particles moving in
certain path that must have Periodic Shape i.e.
Wave = Particle (Physics )+Shape (Geometry)+Frequency.
But What Is Cosmic Flux?
“Future generations will be able to harness the cosmic flux to
Neutralize Gravity whenever required just as its now energy is
tamed for the same purpose.”
See My Book ((Freqummechanics )) A branch of science founded entirely
by myself ?
If we draw exactly parallel (n)Number of lines them shine light
on them measuring their Average Frequencies measured by an
observer from exactly the same point as the source of light :
Then we have Average Natural Frequency of these Flux Lines in
the plane of the paper ( Ωn ). If the distances separating these
lines are (∆x ) And the differences between the measured

726 21
 22Page 22 of 726

frequencies are ( ∆Ω )Then: ∆x . ∆Ω =Constant (IS -For my

isamic constant in Cm/Sec).
Where : n. ∆x =X And n. ∆Ω = Ω
Alternatively:
∆x . ∆p =h(Planck’s Constant.) Then since p= E/c
∆x . ∆ (E/C )=h But E =h Ω Hence : ∆x . ∆( h Ω)/c =h Giving:
∆x . ∆ Ω) =C (Constant Speed Of Light ).

Exercise One.
If :
u,v,w Are Uinits Vectors Along a,b, And c Respectively
Such that : v +u =w.
Find : u. fa + v.fb=?
Which of the following results significant??
a- (fc )2 =(fa )2 +(fb )2
b- W. fc = u. fa + v.fb
c- W. fc = u. fa - v.fb
Exercise Two.
“Please distinguish between measuringt frequency and cutting
or gluing it.”
Two substances one is red the other is blue their
respective masses are: mRed And mBlue. Emitting frequencies
fRed. And fBlue. Respectively! When mixed together
Vigorously their combined masses mRed. + mBlue = MRB.
Now is emitting fRB.

726 22
 23Page 23 of 726

Which of the following can be proven in the

Laboratory?
a- mRed. X fRed. + mBlue X fBlue = MRB X fRB.
b- mBlue X fRed. + mRed XfBlue = MRB X fRB.
c- mRed. + mBlue = K.MRB. Where K = mRed. / mBlue

Exercise Three.
As before: U,V, w, R Are Uinits Vectors Along the lines Emitting
the frequencies f1, f2, f3, f4 etc ? And (t) is The Time Dimension

where (f.t) = N just a number (The number of cycles not per

second but for the total operation of measurements. e.g.
t. f3= N3 OR t. f4= N4 .
U2.(f1)2 + v2.(f2)2 + w2.(f3)2 = R2.(f4)2
But u.u=v.v=w.w=R.R =1 Therefore :
(f1)2 + (f2)2 + (f3)2 = (f4)2
Where (f1,2,3,4,etc )Are the frequencies emitted by the individual
substances respectively as before ! To obtain the Acceleration
Matrix ( L ) :

u v X f1 f2 =L
w. Ct f3 f4
Note that: u.v=0= u.w=v.w. And All irrelevant
(incompatible) terms are also designated trivial =0 e.g.

726 23
 24Page 24 of 726

u.f3 + v.f1 = u. f2 = v. f3 =u. f4= v. f4 =0 etc. ?

L= u. f1 + v. f3 u. f2 + v. f4 Giving:

W . f1 + t. f3 W . f2 + t. f4

L=(u. f1 + v. f3)( W . f2 + N4 ) - (W . f1 + N3 )(u. f2 + v. f4 )

L= (u .w. f1 . f2 + N4 u f1 + vw, f2 f3 + N4 f3) –(uw f1 f2 + VW f1 f4

+ N3U f2 + N3V f4

= u .w. f1 . f2 + N4 f3– uw f1 f2 - VW f1 f4- N3U f2 - N3V f4

L = N4 u f1 + vw, f2 f3
Since: N4 f3 = VW f1 f4= N3U f2 = N3V f4 =0 (Irrelevant.)
But : W f3 = U. f1 + V f2 Reinserting above :
L = U. f1 + V f2 (U. f1 + V f2 )
L = N U. f1 +V .V (f2 )2 + U. f1 . V f2 )
= NU. f1 + V .V (f2 )2 + o ) .= U. f1 + (1) (f2 )2

dL/dt = C [ -2 (f1)2 - 3(f2 )3 +etc

For Multi-Dimensional :
dL/dt

=(Minus) ∑N. n (U)n (fn)n+1 + n(V)n ( fn )n+1 +n (w)n (fn )n+1 +etc.

726 24
 25Page 25 of 726

Since U = (V)n = (W)n =etc =1.

dL/dt = - Same Distance X∑N. n (fn)n+1+ n( fn )n+1 +n(fn )n+1 +etc

Now to obtain expressions for Force? Energy ?etic ???We need to
Introduce the Density Matrix: u.v.w ( ᵹRed. ? ᵹBlue. ? ᵹMixture ).
For each substance described earlier !

However for simplification we use just one (ᵹ ) Since it’s

possible to equate all three densities for these three

substances if ᵹRed. = ᵹBlue. Mixed vigorously obtaining a

homogenous substance.
Where ( ᵹ) Is the density of the Mixed Substance
keeping in mind when multiplying only the unit volume
(u.v.w. ᵹ) Counts?Therefore when multiplying for
example the first term it will be reduced to :

v.w ᵹ X n (u)n+1 (fn)n+1 =u. v.w ᵹ. n (u)n (fn)n Similarly = u..w

ᵹ X n (V)n+1 = U.V.W n (V)n (fn)n Etc. Since :
U . U =V.V=W.W Etc =1. Hence: (U)n =(V)n= (W)n.=1
As you see it does not change the results! Therefore:

m.dL/dt =Distant Travelled Per Cycle X (Minus) U. V.W.

X [N. ᵹ .(f1)2 +2∑ ᵹ. n (fn)n+1 +Etc.] . Where:

n

726 25
 26Page 26 of 726

m=Mass.
N =Just the number of cycles for the total
measurements.(Not Per Unit of Time ).
n= 2,3 ,3.4.5 etc. For all dimensions!
ᵹ=The density in grams per unit volume.

Exercise Four.

Proceeding as with earlier exercises where : U,V, w, R Are

Uinits Vectors Along the lines Emitting the frequencies f1, f2, f3, f4

etc ? And ᵹRed. , ᵹBlue , ᵹMixture Are the density in gm/cm3 ?

t=Time. C =Constant (velocity of Light ). Multiply

following three matrices:

L= ᵹRed ᵹBlue X u v X f1 f2
ᵹMixed Ct w. Ct f3 f4

726 26
 27Page 27 of 726

!-List all the negligible terms ?

2-Which is the most significant term? And Why ??

3-Find the expression for energy:

Energy = ∑ ᵹ . C2

Exercise Five.

L3 = ᵹRed ᵹBlue X u. f1 + v. f3 u. f2 + v. f4

ᵹMixed C.t. W . f1 + t. f3 W . f2 + t. f4

Here Its Feasible To Expand Only The First Terms As Guide To

How To Proceed Through The Rest Of These Complex

Calculations ? Note: ᵹMixed = ½ (ᵹRed. + ᵹBlue. )

L3=[ ᵹRed . u. f1 + ᵹRed .v. f3 + ᵹBlue . W . f1 + ᵹBlue .t. f3 ]

X [ ᵹMixed . u. f2 + ᵹMixed .v. f4 + C.t. W . f2 + C.t2. f4 ]

-(Minus) [ᵹRed . u. f2 + ᵹRed .v. f4 + ᵹBlue .W. f2 + ᵹB.t. .v. f4 ]
X[ᵹMixed . u. f1 + ᵹMixed . V. f3 + C.t. W +Ct f3]
The First Terms:
1-ᵹRed ᵹMixed . u.u. f1 f2 = ½ ᵹRed (ᵹR + ᵹB) (1) f1 f2

726 27
 28Page 28 of 726

2- ᵹRed ᵹMixed . u.v. f1 f4 = ᵹRed ᵹMixed . (0). f1 f4 =0

3- ᵹRed . u. f1 .ct.w f2 = ᵹRed . u.w f1 .ct. f2 = ᵹR . (δ) f1 .ct. f2= δ(Delta)
4- ᵹRed . u. f1 . C.t2 f4 = ᵹR UC (t2 . f1 f4) = ᵹR U. C
5- Thus : ᵹR U. C =Momentum resolved by Speed of light
polarized by the red substance at side (a)of the triangle.
And So Forth Proceeding With The Rest Of Terms ?

EXERCISE SIX.

“Unit Momentums For The Quantum Ensemble (L3)”

Prove That : L3 / C2 =H

Where Capital H is my universal constant (in Terms Of

Frequencies)as defined elsewhere in this book similar

(But not the same units ) To the Gaussian:

∆p .∆ x = (h-Planck Constant).p is momentum !And

(Ct)2 =Z2 + w2 At Z=0 : Ct =w Hence : L3 X W =H

L3 Xw= ᵹRed ᵹBlue X w.u w.v X f1 f2

-ᵹ Mixed ᵹMixed w. w . w.w f3 f4

726 28
 29Page 29 of 726

= ᵹRed ᵹBlue X δ -δ X f1 f2

-ᵹ Mixed ᵹMixed 1 1 f3 f4

L3 / C2 = (ᵹRed .δ . ᵹMixed +δ ᵹ Blue. ᵹMixed ) (f1 f4 - f2 f3 )

= ᵹMixed .δ (ᵹRed +ᵹBlue ) (f1 f4 - f2 f3 )

But : (ᵹRed +ᵹBlue )/2 = ᵹMixed

L3 / C2 = 2 (ᵹMixed )2 .δ . (f1 f4 - f2 f3 ) And Since :

δ = 1/√2. (See The Isamic Delta) ?

L3 / C2 = 2 / √2 (ᵹMixed )2 . (f1 f4 - f2 f3 )

= √2 (ᵹMixed )2 (f1 f4 - f2 f3)

L3 = √2 . C2 (ᵹMixed )2 (f1 f4 - f2 f3 )Dynes.

Defining The Universal Constant Of Time Tore ( ).

Where ; = C/g Or C2=(g. )2

Therefore: L3 = √2 . g2. t2 (ᵹMixed )2 . (f1 f4 - f2 f3 )

726 29
 30Page 30 of 726

= √2 . g2. (ᵹMixed )2 . t2 (f1 f4 - f2 f3 )

=√2 . ( Force )2 . t2 (f1 f4 - f2 f3 ) Dynes.

That Was For The Two Dimensional.

Note ;Compare the above (Tore)With that of the Schwartzchild

Metric: d(Tore)2 = (1- 2GM/r . C2)

Exercise Seven: For Higher Dimensional (n):

Ln = 2 π n √2 ( Fi,j,k,etc… )n . tn . f1 * * Dynes.
* * *
* * fn

L n =2 π n √2 ( Fi,j,k,etc… )n . tn Det [ n X n]for (f) . Dynes.

Reading In To My Universal Constant :

1-Clearly my universal constant is different for each dimension

but constant for that specific dimension.

2-At zero gravity when g =0 Ln =0 Dynes.

(See Distance In Vacuum -Frequmechanics) ?

726 30
 31Page 31 of 726

3-As g∞ ( As In Black Holes) ? n0 And :

Ln =√2. (ᵹMixed .g. t .)0 Det ( nX n )For (fn) .

Ln = √2 . ( 1 ) . Det ( nX n )For (fn) Dynes.

The Eigen Value Of The Ensemble Inside Black Hole.

The Question Now :
Can there be any frequencies inside the black hole B.H? And if
there are what are they ?? =0?=One ?=n?
We do not know : All we know that light cannot escape from
any B.H.Therefore it’s reasonable to assume that:
If there are any frequencies inside B.H. ? For it to be
meaningful the Eigen Value ( ᴧ -Lambda) For this ensemble has
to be of higher frequencies than that of the light thus:
ᴧ >> ῳLight. (Cycles Per Seconds)

Thus Arriving At The Universal Equation For Frequencies:

(ᴧ )nxn = (√2 )n . ῳLight.

726 31
 32Page 32 of 726

To understand this problem make Random Choice of any n-

Number of frequencies in the Visible Light! Take their Eigen
Value !Then proceed as above ?#

Notice;
“The complimentary principle in nature and how the term
(√2.)In the above equations cancels out when inner spaces and
outer spaces Crumbles In To One inside black holes?”

Which Of The Following Are Correct ?

1- (ᴧ )nxn = (√2 )n . ῳLight.

2- (ᴧ )nxn = (√2 . ῳLight)n

3- (ᴧ )nxm = (√2 . ῳLight )n/m.

4- (ᴧ )nxm = (√2 )n. (ῳLight)m

726 32
 33Page 33 of 726

5- (ᴧ )2nxn = 2 . (ῳLight. )2

6-(ᴧ )2nxm = (√2 . ῳLight. )2n/m

7-(ᴧ )2nxm = 2n/m . (ῳLight. )2n/m

Inner And Outer Spaces Insde Black Hole(B.H.).

“Apart from that of light not escaping B.H: The only
Other Data we have about B.H. is the existence of the
term (√2.) Above implying How inner spaces (Dot
Products) And Outer Spaces (Cross Products) Crashes
in to one?”
“By definitions Black Holes Are of infinite gravity hence
infinite uniformity! Therefore to maintain this Absolute
Homogeneity Any displacement (Hypothetical or
otherwise) Such (dx)Has to be Simultaneously
Synchronized With others such as (dy) or (dz) Giving :
dx/dy =1 Or dr /dx = 1/√2. Indicating We Are On The
Right Track In all our analysis above of the B.H.
726 33
 34Page 34 of 726

Assured by the persistent occurrences of this term

(√2.)”
Inner Space.
“Recall the benefits of Free Range Eggs ?By applying
the same logic it’s not difficult to conclude that
(NOT)Free Range People also can never be free in real
terms .”

Distance In Vacuums.
“Inside pure vacuum :Physics and Geometry becomes
one and the same !”

726 34
 35Page 35 of 726

“To measure the distance of any length inside any Pure

Vacuum By any instrument from the inside the vacuum
will forfeit its status as Pure Vacuum therefore it must
be done from the outside :How?”

Isamic Thought Experiment Number Five:

If instead of coloring the sides of the triangle we now
use three Light Beams Each running along each side of
the above triangle in various colors emitting three
different frequencies Again Such That the geometrical
rules are not violated. Then we only let the beam of
light representing the side ( C ) Inside this pure
vacuum
(fc )2 =(fa )2 +(fb )2
This Hypothetical Vacuum Has The Following Qualities:
1-Its an Absolute Vacuum.

726 35
 36Page 36 of 726

2-Purely hypothetical (its boundaries not necessarily

physical.)ie we can for thesake of argument ignore the
refractive index (n)where v=C/n.
3- Varies in length according to the changes in length of
the beam describing the side ( C )Of the triangle and
emitting the frequency (fc ).
Therefore the lengths (a)And (b)Will vary accordingly
and by measuring these two outside the vacuum we
can determine the length of the side (C )Inside the
vacuum without changing its status as pure vacuum
simply from: (fc )2 =(fa )2 +(fb )2

Let L=The length of side ( C )Outside the vacuum .

L” = The length of side ( C )When enveloped by the
vacuum.
L”
L”
L L

Absolute Vacuum.

726 36
 37Page 37 of 726

Let m=L . ϬL.( One-dimensional density.See later)

d Sinθ/dt = d Sinθ /d θ . dθ/dt =Cosθ . ωCutting
Similarly :
dCos θ/dt = -Sin θ. ωGluing.
Therfore:
m(d Sinθ/dt)2 + m(dCos θ/dt)2
= m(Cosθ . ωCutting)2 + m( -Sin θ. ωGluing.)2
= m. ω2 (At ωCutting= ωGluing. )

This fully conform with the result obtained later

under the title (The Cosmic Flux And The Problem

Of Locality))Where :

ωCutting = ωGluing. ± 1. (Excellent Proof).

H (jω) =1/[1+ j (ωCutting /ωGluing)]

Where H is the approximated Transfer Function.

726 37
 38Page 38 of 726

BOTTOM LINE.
“By comparing the value of (fc ) Before and after
inserting the beam of side ( C )Inside the Pure Vacuum
we can see how the Distance Of The Same Length
varies ? The Central Question Now Can This (L” ) Be
Related To That In S.R.Where :
Let L=The length of side ( C )Outside the vacuum .
L” = The length of side ( C )When enveloped by the
vacuum. Now Compare it to the Lorentz Contractions:
L” =L √1-B2 And B=v/C.”

Its known fact that if you look at a mountain from a

distance you are certain its only five minutes walk or
so ?Until you start walking towards it then the more
you walk the further its ! So the five minutes becomes
five hours or days depending on the terrain between
you and the mountain !
That is because the Line Of Sight Between the eyes and
the mountain is only filled with thin air !While that
between the feet of the observer and and the base of

726 38
 39Page 39 of 726

the mountain are filled with Denser terrain !!And the

time it take to walk largely depend on how dense the
terrain is ?
The Question Now What Is Distances Inside Vacuums ?
Hence inside hypothetically pure vacuum and
proceeding from the following premises:
a-
Light is our only means of measuring distant objects.

b-
Unobstructed light should be travelling in straight lines.

c-
There are no other particles except for photons inside
observable pure vacuum.
d-
Therefore the only mass inside such vacuum will be :
∑n mϒ =M And :

ϬV = ∑ mϒ /XYZ =Density.
n

Where:
n=Number of Photons Or Neutrinos inside the vacuum.
726 39
 40Page 40 of 726

mϒ =The recently discovered mass of the photon or

Neutrino applied as rays to measure distances..
M=Total Mass.
XYZ= Unit volume of the vacuum.
ϬVolumetric =Three dimensional density. =(Sigma)V Or ϬV
ϬLinearatric. = One-dimensional density. = ϬL.

e-
Time ( T )for the elementary particle it takes is function
of the density (Ϭ ). Or :
T = g (A Constant ) . Ϭ.

f-
And since light is the only means we have to measure
distances inside vacuum it’s reasonable to incorporate
in the constant (C ) :
g= k/c.
Therefore:
C.T = k . ϬV EQN---1.

726 40
 41Page 41 of 726

g-
if we take XYZ As three vectors and the time for each
will be : T (tx , ty , tz )

h-
Substituting the above in EQN-1.

C (tx + ty + tz ) = k . Ϭ.

=k.∑ mϒ /XYZ EQN-2

n
X+ Y +Z = k . Ϭ.

i-
Now multiplying (XYZ)By the Scalar
product with (X + Y + Z) Giving ;
X2 + Y2 +Z2 = k . ∑n mϒ EQN---3.
j-

726 41
 42Page 42 of 726

We also know that light is directional (Like

Time)Therefore its reasonable to take only the
(Z)Direction for this particular purpose.
k-
That (Z )Now Satisfy the metric from Special Relativity
:
(C t)2 = X2 +Y2 +z2 = = k . ∑ mϒ
n

OR for our One Directional Photons :

(C t)2 = z2 EQN-3.
Density (ϬV) = M/ z3 OR: z3 = M/ ϬV

z2 = M/z. ϬV ------------------------------------EQN-4.

(C t)2 = M/ z. ϬV Giving :Time = 1/C √ M/ z. ϬV

t = ( 1/C )√ (∑ mϒ ) / (z. ϬV).
n

L-
Its Central To This Hypothesis That ( EQN-! )Can Only

Hold True If Beam Of Particles Each Mass ( mϒ ) Are

In A Row Of Straight Line Hence The Density :
ϬL = M/z ---EQN-5

726 42
 43Page 43 of 726

From Eqn-4
z2 = M/z. ϬV But
M/z3 = ϬV Therefore ;
ϬVolumetric / ϬLlinearitric. =1 / z2 -----EQN-6.
The Rate Of Cutting The Flux =The Curvature( 1 / z2)
= ϬVolumetric / ϬLlinearitric.
Similarly for :
ϬArea = ∑n m ϒ / XY Since now X= Y And Z =0.

X2 =1/2 (C t)2 And ϬArea = M/ X2 -------EQN-7

Dividing EQN -7 By EQN-5

ϬArea / ϬLlinearitric.= Z/ X2 But from EQN-6

Z= √ (ϬL / ϬV) Giving :

ϬArea / ϬLlinearitric.= √ (ϬL / ϬV) . 1 / X2

X2 = √ (ϬL / ϬV)( ϬLlinearitric.) / ϬArea ----EQN- 8.

726 43
 44Page 44 of 726

= (ϬL )3/2 /(ϬV)1/2 .( ϬArea ) And:

Y2 =(ϬL )3/2 (ϬV )-1/2 .( ϬArea ) -1-------------EQN-9

Now after substituting the above In:

X2 +Y2 +z2 =(C t)2

Contradicting the laws of the world outside the Vacuum

since it means the denser the medium the less time it
takes and vice versa?

Relative Density :
“Hence the observer line of observation has the same density
every which way they look . Implying that all distances for him
are equal inside the vacuum.Since any resistance in any
direction to any photon(Or Neutrinos) Will be equal ! ? ! “

But this anomaly can be resolved by (EQN-5)

726 44
 45Page 45 of 726

Where :
Ϭ V / Ϭ L = 1 / z2
Hence the observer line of observation has the same density
every which way they look. Implying that all distances for him
will be equal ! ? !
As you see the questions I raised above are no Stranger To
Relativity which stipulate that light (Our only means of
measuring distant objects ) !
Or the fabric of ( Space-Time )Are distorted by strong
gravitational fields i.e. By Higher Density !
And So Forth :
You will note that these Isamic Diagrams try to solve and to
illustrate this problem from various angles throughout this
book by trying to simplify complex concepts with geometrical
means Sometimes Without Much Success but as you will also
notice it opens up and explains many other prospects . .

Relative Density Distance And Resistance :

“Hence the observer line of observation has the same
density every which way they look . Implying that all
distances for him are equal inside the vacuum.Since
any resistance in any direction to any photon(Or
Neutrinos) Will be equal ! ? ! “

726 45
 46Page 46 of 726

But this anomaly resolved by(EQN-5)Where : ϬV / ϬL =1

Hence the observer line of observation has the same
density every which way they look. Implying that all
distances for him will be equal ! ? !
As you see the questions I raised above are no Stranger
To Relativity which stipulate that light (Our only
means of measuring distant objects ) Or the fabric of
( Space-Time )Are distorted by strong gravitational
fields i.e. By Higher Density ! And So Forth : You will
note that these Isamic Diagrams try to solve and to
illustrate this problem from various angles throughout
this book by trying to simplify complex concepts with
geometrical means Sometimes Without Much Success
but as you will also notice it opens up and explains
many other prospects .

Relating Relative Densities: ϬL ? ϬA ?And ϬV.

From EQNs -5 ,8 and 9 :
Ϭ V / Ϭ L = 1 / z2
z2 = ϬL/ ϬV
X2 = (ϬL )3/2 /(ϬV)1/2 .( ϬArea ) And:
Y2 =(ϬL )3/2 (ϬV )-1/2 .( ϬArea ) -1 Since X2 = Y2

726 46
 47Page 47 of 726

Now let (CT)= S=The distance to be measured.

S2 = z2 + X2 + Y2
Assuming : (ϬV )- = (ϬL )3-=( ϬL . ϬA) etc? Then:

S2 = ϬL/ ϬV +(ϬL )3/2 /(ϬV)1/2 + (ϬL )3/2 /(ϬV)1/2

= ϬL/ √ ϬV [ 1 + 2 (ϬL )1/2 ]
= ϬL/ (ϬL )3 [ 1 + 2 (ϬL )1/2 ] = + 2 / (ϬL)3/2
S2 = 1/(ϬL )2 (1 + 2 .ϬL )= 1 / ϬA (1 + 2 .ϬL ) . EQN---A.

Results One :
1-Implying the distances inside Pure Vacuum will be the same
in all directions .

Results Two :
2-That the distance in Strictly Pure vacuum  0

Let : m/ = mϒ/ √ (1-B2 ) Where B =v/C

Z/ = (z- BCt)/ √ (1-B2 ) Also ;X/ = X and Y/ = y

Therefore:

Ϭ/ = m/ / Z/ X/ Y/
726 47
 48Page 48 of 726

= (1/XY ) mϒ/ √ (1-B2 ). √ (1-B2 )./ (z- BCt)

1 / Ϭ/ = (XYZ – BCTXY)/ mϒ

1 / Ϭ/ = 1 / ϬV -BCt/ ϬA = (ϬA - ϬV BCt)/ (ϬV ϬA )

Ϭ/ = (ϬV ϬA )/ (ϬA - ϬV .BCt) Or:

Ϭ/ = (ϬV ϬA )/ (ϬA - ϬV .B.S)
Ϭ/ (ϬA - ϬV .B.S) = ϬV ϬA
Ϭ/ ϬA - ϬV ϬA = Ϭ/ ϬV .B.S.
S= (Ϭ/ ϬA - ϬV ϬA )/( Ϭ/ ϬV .B.).
S= ϬA/ ϬV B. - ϬA /Ϭ/.B.).
S = (ϬA/ B.) ( 1/ ϬV - 1 / Ϭ/ ).
S2 = ϬA/ B.)2 ( 1/ ϬV - 1 / Ϭ/ )2.------------------EQN-B.

Now back to EQN-A.

S2 = 1 / ϬA (1 + 2 .ϬL)
Equating both sides :

1 / ϬA (1 + 2 .ϬL) = (ϬA/ B.)2 ( 1/ ϬV - 1 / Ϭ/ )2

1+2 ϬL =[(ϬA)3 / B2. ϬV ] - [(ϬA)2/ B2.( Ϭ/ )2]

[(ϬA)2/ B2. ( Ϭ/ )2] =[(ϬA)3 / B2. ϬV ] -2 ϬL-1

726 48
 49Page 49 of 726

1/( Ϭ/ )2 = B2 / (ϬA)2 . [(ϬA)3 / B2. ϬV -2 ϬL-1 ]

1/( Ϭ/ )2 = 1/ϬV -2 ϬL B2 / (ϬA)2 - B2 / (ϬA)2 ]

1/( Ϭ/ )2 = [ (ϬA)2 - 2 B2 ϬL .ϬV - B2 ϬV ]/ / ϬV ( ϬA)2

Or:

( Ϭ/ )2 = ϬV ( ϬA)2 / B2 [(ϬA)2 /(B)2 -2 ϬL .ϬV - ϬV]

Ϭ/ = (√ ϬV . ϬA /B )[(ϬA)2 / √ [(B)2 -2 ϬL .ϬV - ϬV]—--EQN-C

This Is An Expression For (Ϭ/) In Terms Of : ϬL ,ϬA =,Ϭv .

Now recall :
(ϬL)2 = ϬA And Ϭv = ϬA .ϬL

Substituting the above in EQN -C :

Ϭ/ = (√ϬL ϬA.) ϬA /B ) [(ϬA)2/ √ [(B)2 -2 ϬL . ϬL ϬA- ϬL ϬA- ]
Ϭ/=√ϬL (ϬL)2 . (ϬL)2 /B [(ϬL)4 /√ [(B)2 -2 ϬLϬL ϬL (ϬL)2 ϬL(ϬL)2]
Ϭ/ = (ϬL)9/2/B [(ϬL)4 /B - 2(ϬL)8
Ϭ/ = (ϬL)4 √ϬL/B [ 1/B -2(ϬL)4]
In The Final Analysis :

Ϭ/ (L) =(ϬL)9/2 [ 1/B2 -2 /B (ϬL)4] 1/2

726 49
 50Page 50 of 726

Ϭ/ (A)= (ϬL)9 [ 1/B2 -2 /B (ϬL)4]

Ϭ/ (V)= (ϬL)27/2 [ 1/B2 -2 /B (ϬL)4] 3/2

Indicating That (Pure)Vacuum Can Only Be Reached If The

Densities (Or Resistance )Hence Distances Are The Same
(Function of ϬL Only )In All Directions.

Conclusion:
“That inside Pure Or Absolute Vacuum There exist only the
Cosmic Flux offering the same equal resistance to Any Particle
Travelling In Any Direction ! Or to put it retrospectively :
If there was no cosmic flux there will be no distances or all:
Distances = 0 inside such vacuum.”

The Cyclical Nature Of Information.

“Information Theory (Part-Three).”
““The Cyclical Nature Of Information provide the key (If not the
answer )To what I claimed elsewhere that Everything In The

Universe Is Quantifiable!The Question Is How ?”

Exercise Four:

726 50
 51Page 51 of 726

Let ( i) Any arbitrary unit of information assigned as in the

following diagram :Where would you mark (Place)Frequencies)
In the two diagrams below ?? Keeping in mind that according
to the Gyroscopic principle the the frequency of Clockwise
Rotations Produces A Vector In Opposite Direction To That
Produced By Anti Clock Wise rotations ???

Numbers ( N ). i

Tensors(T) =3/2 π.i Scalars ( S) ½ π .i

Vectors ( V) = π. I

The Algebra Of Frequmechanics.

First Cycle; Second Cycle; Third Cycle; Etc.

1) S+ V =T T + V = S +N. etc

2) T – V = S T -S=-V etc

3)T +S = N. S+T=N etc

726 51
 52Page 52 of 726

From First Cycle :

2 T + 2 S =T+S + N Giving N= T + S.

From Second Cycle :

3T + V = S-V +2N Giving:

2N = 3T -2V-s.

But from the first cycle 2T-2V= 2S substituting in the

above :

2N = T+ (T-V)-S = T +2 S-S =T +S.

Giving:
NSecond Cycle = ½ NFirst cycle

And so forth for other cycles ?

Exercise Five:

Explore the Immense Prospects offered by this algebra

when multiplying (Or dividing)?
Moreover how you can you obtain COVECTORS ? ?
Proceeding as follows:
Let ( R1,2,3 )And (C1,2,3.) Represents the (Rows 1,2,3 ) And
(Columns 1,2,3.)Respectively .

C1R1 + C1R2, + C1R3  2S +2T=T+ S+N S+T=N= C1R3.

726 52
 53Page 53 of 726

C2R3 X C2R2 (T-S)2 =V2---EQN-1

C1R3 X C2R3 (T+S)2 =N2 ---EQN-2

EQN-1 +EQN-2 = 2T2 + 2S2 =(N2+V2)

EQN-1 -EQN-2 = -4ST = V2 -N2 Giving :

N2 = V2 + 4ST..

Evaluating From The Diagram Above :

N2 =[ (3/2 ) π.i ]2 +4 -(π/2 .i). (3/2 ) π.i

N2 = (π.i )2 (9/4) + 3) ≈ 5 (π.i )2

And so forth for the rest of the cycles we can obtain

concrete relationships between all S,.T, And V ? ! ?

Exercise Six:
If we arbitrarily assign one unit strength value of
information to (Scalars)And Two units of the same to
Vectors where would you place the following on the
scale 1-10 ?
Scalars eg time ?Frequency??etc One unit.

726 53
 54Page 54 of 726

Vectors eg distance ?Force?etc. Two units.

Velocity =Distan/Time = one unit +Two units =3units.
Acceleration =Velocity .Frequency = 3units +one unit=
4 units.
Momentum = m(Mass).Velocity = mass To be
determined later) +3 units.
Force =m.. acceleration = m+4units
Impulse = Force Xtime = m+4units +one
unit.=m+5units
Energy =Force XDistance =m+4units +Two units
=m+6units.
Also energy =Action . Frequency Or:
m+6units = Action + One Unit Giving :
Action = m+ 5units.=Energy . Time =m+6units +One
init =m+7units

Frequmechanics ( Part-One) The Universal Constant.

“ If we can accept all the arguments that produced :
( E= h. ω.) For the Microscopic world ?Then it should be
equally valid for (E=H. ω.) In the Macroscopic world
When the latter is subjected to my Prolificacy Principle”

726 54
 55Page 55 of 726

“So far most of the calculations have not been exact !If
not totally wrong !Because they are only meant to
explore the Order Of Magnitude of My Proposed
Universal Constant (H)!We can now derive an exact
expression for this (H).”

“Let us now explore various versions for this universal

constant just to see which of these applicable ? ”

Abstract:
Let :
n=The minimum number of Microscopic Objects
Observable ?
N=The minimum number of Macroscopic Copies
required to observe any quantum effects ??
h=Plank’s Constant.
726 55
 56Page 56 of 726

H=My proposed Universal Constant ????

Then:
h X N = H X n.
Note:
When n=N=1 Then h =H.
And that (N) Is a Multiples of (n).e.g.
For the Water Molecule:
N=1 ?n=3 ??
If h =The Planck Constant for Microscopic world
=1.05 X 10-27(erg . second)
H= My proposed Universal Constant for the
Macroscopic world ??

We can evaluate (H)from the following identity :

h (erg. second)X H(erg. second)=Unitary (erg. second) 2
Therefore:
H ≈ [1/1.05 ] x 10+27. (erg. second).

The Heisenberg Picture:

726 56
 57Page 57 of 726

“Only god can observe macroscopic objects the way

we observe microscopic objects “ The Red Monk.

The Heisenberg picture of quantum mechanics may

provide Alternative Illustration of this hypothesis to
the ill defined regions of the universe discussed earlier
by calculating (T) Then substituting it in to the
Heisenberg relationship of : ∆ P X ∆X = h.
Where (T ) Is the total number of microscopic objects
=nN.
N=T/n And n= T/N.
Where (n) Now =Number Of Microscopic Objects Per
Each Macroscopic Object Inside Any Quantumly
Observable Formations .

Linearizing The Units.

“The dyne (Force)Is a vector! But both time and

distance need not be directional. Therefore Instead Of
Squaring the triangle we split it in to two triangles each
representing one set of homogeneous units then we

726 57
 58Page 58 of 726

superimposed them on each other’s !This was

permitted by applying Unitary Operators.”
In the triangle ABC below Where

AB,BC=Dynes ?BA,CB=cm.s ?

(AC) =Dyne.cm.s [Not (Dyne.cm.s)2 ] !

Similarly:

CB,BA=cm .s ?CA=Dynes (BC)2 = Dyne.cm.s

Giving [AC ]2=(erg . second)

B Dyne. C B Cm.S C

Dynes. X Cm.S
A
A

BOTTOM LINE.

What we need to do next:

a-

726 58
 59Page 59 of 726

After calculating (H) We need to establish the minimum

number (N)Of macroscopic objects required to display

quantum effects.

(For The Definition Of -N-See The Prolificsy Principle Page---).

b-

Look out for these Quantum Effects in Regions of outer

space made from arbitrarily drawn (Chosen)

configurations containing (N) With methods similar to

those of the Monte Carlo methods.

Also;

(See Page -----------------Calculating My Universal Constant ) ?

TWO: The Prolificsy Principle.

“Quantities are in the habit of transforming itself to
quality ! And quality is in the habit of producing
quantities !!The question is when ? And how??”

726 59
 60Page 60 of 726

The Red Monk.

“If there are Enough Copies of any macroscopic object?

Observed at Optimal distances ??We should be able to
detect its quantum effects as if they were microscopic
objects.”
Let :
N=The Minimum number of copies required to detect
quantum effects.
A=The size of the smallest atom in that object .
Z=Size of this object measured in multiples of (A).
(This is Not The Same as the number of atoms inside
this object.)
K=Some constant.
Then:
N=K. Z (A).

Now putting: N=1 ?

A=5.3 X10-9 cm(Lowest Bohr Orbit.)

726 60
 61Page 61 of 726

Depending on our path of observation ?We have chosen

the case (By volume):

Giving (Z)By volume :

= 4/3 X∏ (5.3 X10-9 )3 ≈ 500 X 10-27.

It follows that:

K= 1/500 X 10+27

≈ ¼ X (The Fine Structure Constant) X H i.e.

(In the order of magnitude of our Universal Constant

given above.)

BOTTOM LINE.

N/Z =K.A

However calculating the Optimal Distant for observing

these Macroscopic Quantum Effects is a complex
subject delegated to my next book.

Defining (Copies)By The Isamic Diagrams.

726 61
 62Page 62 of 726

Stated earlier if there was - N- copies of any (Thing)We

should observe Quantum Effects in that thing!

We also defined (N)but not what is meant by these

Copies ?Is it at the Elementary Particles Domain ?

At the Atomic? Molecular ?Or Geometrical Lines? Or

What?For this definition we need to make use of the

isamic diagrams discussed earlier.

If we observe Macroscopic Objects from sides-A-B-C-D-

E .etc? And we find them to be identical in A-B-C !But

not in D and E.Then we can say that the state of the

observation is given by the angle of projection ;

ΨA,B,C. But we cannot say: ψD,E,etc.

Hint: We can determine the Optimal Distance for

observing quantum effects by the angles of projections
above.
(For the real stuff on theses Isamic Diagrams :See section ( 16 )Of
the list of equations at the end of the summary ?)

THE FOURTH SECRET : We Are Not Alone.

726 62
 63Page 63 of 726

“The good news there are in the universe as many

other lives of different shapes and forms! As there are
elements in the Mendeleev table !The bad news :
In the event when there are more than one of the same
shape and form of life i.e. Based on the same elements
and are Recognizable By Each Other (e.g. Carbon
based life)Then by definition these are kept at
unreachable (Untouchable Physically ) Distances from
each other’s! Hence the Ceiling on The SPEED OF LIGHT
Defining Our Limitations.”

Man is the Final Total Sum Of all the Physical Conditions And

Accidental Combinations On our planet .

Therefore it follows that other planets or stars and there are billions

of them (Not Necessarily Exo Planets ) Can also produce :

The Final And Total Sum Each Of Its Own Conditions Or Any

Combinations Of Conditions.

726 63
 64Page 64 of 726

However it does not necessarily mean these products or Units Of

Life will be identical to ourselves orRecognizable By Each Other’s ?

There is whole range of expectations!

Moreover this view does not contradict religious beliefs since many

Muslims believe that Jesus himself was not made of flesh and blood

but of light.How ridiculous it seems even to ourselves to think our

form of life is so special ?When we Know For Certain How

Imperfect Its?Or Middle Of The Road Mediocre Its ??Therefor

there has to be other forms of life higher or lower than ourselves.

BOTTOM LINE.
“It’s only when we assume our Form of life is (Special)
Can we Negate the existence of other forms of life in
the universe. Since it presupposes the Conditions
producing our life form are also necessary to produce
any other form of life.”
Alternatively.
“The bad news: We are not alone!The good news: Lives
of the same shape and forms are not allowed physical
contacts.”

726 64
 65Page 65 of 726

Calculations.

To simplify the above statements I now introduce my

own equation giving the following concrete calculations

Speed Of Light. X The Total Age Of Life On Our Planet.

=The Minimum Allowed Distant Of The Nearest

Celestial Object Containg Life Recognisable By

Ourselves .

That is to say if physical beam of light (Or any other

electromagnetic wave)Was shone on our planet it

cannot reach us until all life forms had become extinct

on our planet. And vice versa !

726 65
 66Page 66 of 726

PROOF AND DERIVATIONS.

Again this is very lengthy and complex subject !Involves deriving

relationship between Planck’s constant (h)?My own universal

constant (H).However this correlation will become more apparent

as we read on !But basically according to Microscopic Quantum

Mechanics:

( Pauli Exclusion Principle ):

(No Two Same Particles Can Exist At The Same State.)

The analogue of this in My Macroscopic Quantum Mechanics

(No Two Same Life Forms Can Exist in The Same State)

Now we need to define what we mean by this life form First it’s

function of each element in the chemical table Then a function of

the physical distances between themselves if they ever were

allowed to exist simultaneously Plus the universal constant

(H)must be taken to account and many other factors too long to

even to list let alone expatiate here.

726 66
 67Page 67 of 726

Hints And Guidance For Research .

“Before we can continue with my Frequmechanics Here
is sunmary of some of the breakthroughs inside my
book. “
1-

The Maximum possible age of life as we know it on our planet is

determined by the Already Known Time Sealing of our sun when

it will turn in to Red Giant enveloping the earth.

2-

The Inverse Of The Distance calculated above of the nearest object

containing life recognisable by the inhabitant of planet earth at the

time is of the orders of Atomic Dimensions e.g. the Angstrom!.

726 67
 68Page 68 of 726

The Enigma of Life : Questions And Answers.

“Let it be known to all generations that I personally can
scientifically confirm there is definite existence beyond
the material !Is it God ?I do not know !Is it Satan ??I
do not know??Is it Both or something in between what
we recognize as the Status Qua ???I leave this to
future generations to prove scientifically.” The Red
Monk.

“At one American university in the fifties !One certain

physics graduate (Stanley Miller-1953) Managed to Re-
Create life inside the laboratory by passing electric
currents through test tube filled with primeval soup !
There is no problem in all of that. Except it present us
with the following Three questions”

726 68
 69Page 69 of 726

Question One:
Why should life at the primeval level need to reproduce
itself without certain External Influences ?

The Conscientiousness Of Being.

Question Two:
We go further by asking :Why does life need to defend
itself at all at that primeval level with such Vigour
without being conscientious?

Question Three:
Crystals also known to grow(Reproduce)But neither
willing nor can defend itself. Can the Conscientiousness
Of Being Exists even at the chemical level??

726 69
 70Page 70 of 726

External Factors Or Purpose ?

“ I fear God therefore I Live . “ The Red Monk.

“Its well established scientific fact that plants and

Trees Are far more recent on earth than the animal
kingdom ! What has escaped the attention of most if
not All theologians ? That all the holly scriptures (The
Bible ! the Quran)All talk of god’s first creation Adam
and Eve Been told not to touch the apple Tree ! They
were not told : Do Not Touch This Fish Or That Amoeba
??A fact which tally with the Creationist Scale more
than that of Darwinian evolution. No matter how we
Negate? Permutate ? Or Analyze the logic! I.e. god
could have said instead :Do not touch that primeval sea
animal .”

726 70
 71Page 71 of 726

And the delicate logic we need to grasp :

That until the point was reached when these primitive forms of

life had become advanced enough just to defend itself ?Millions of

years had elapsed !

More Than Enough to wipe out their existence before the Cycle

For Survival Was allowed to gel with all the known Calamities

now known to man i.e. Imminent Extinction by Natural

(External)or the Internal (Diseases)etc. At these Crucial Epochs

Of Evolution. That is to say: In all probabilities life would have

ran in to extension during the millions of years between the

moment when primeval life was formed to the point of reaching

enough complexity to defend its own existence Without An

External Purpose (When There Was No Internal Purpose)

Whichever path of evolution? And whatever Construction in

natural history we may consider ??

726 71
 72Page 72 of 726

The Construction.( By Creationists).

“How ironic? That the key to solving the mystery of life
should be held by the most obvious moment inside the
most basic of actions ! At that very Nano Second prior
to acquiring any nervous system assuming its what
defended life ? When life resolutely defended itself ! “

“Will the tree ever evolve in to creature ?With one of

its branches holding a sword defending itself against
anyone picking its fruits or whatever ??”

” The cruellest confrontation for any believer:

When faced by pictures of innocent children like
Maddy Mcain Or April Jones Who had vanished by
Cruellest and Pointless acts of men ! Taking with them
all the Reasons and Arguments With which we may
allude ourselves to the contrary . Its at times like these
we need to explore the Alternative View .”

726 72
 73Page 73 of 726

In this opinion the most fundamental difficulty in understanding

the evolution of life as we know it: Was :

Result of Confusion! Most people (Including Scientists )Confuse

the issue of Reproduction with that of life being Conscious Enough

To defend itself !Take for example : Crystals : Can Grow !

Take for example: Trees : These can Reproduce!

But generally speaking none has that Enough Consciousness of

being alive to defend it self Spontaneously! True

There are plants that react mechanically and spontaneously to

stimuli (Or threats)Just as the individual cell does react chemically

or biologically but the Spontaneity Is almost always reactive not

active i.e. part of the universal principle of Mechanical Action And

Reaction and not part of any Construction inside that member of

species itself.

This We Believe Is Totally Independent Of How Advanced That

Particular Form Of Life Have Had Evolved.

726 73
 74Page 74 of 726

BOTTOM LINE.
“The preservation of life has two separate components
which should Not Be Confused because they can be
totally independent of each other’s!”

“There has to be one Gene Carrying the singular

Abstract Instruction made up of six letters only
(DEFEND)Period.This will be interpreted by the species
as defend your existence by reproduction! Then it will
be Passed On To The Individual Without Adding One
Single Letter Eventually it will be interpreted by the
individual members of species for each to defend itself!
But the notion of abstraction (Without any objective )
Cannot easily be accepted by the science of genetics
since it could mean if there was the abstract instruction
to (KILL)Then all species will be annihilating each
other. Such Abstract Strip Carrying Instructions
LikeThat : Can Only Be Issued By Abstract Entity i.e.
The Deity. i.e.By Devine Intervention. With Its Own
Logic Completely Separate To Ours.”

726 74
 75Page 75 of 726

1-

The preservation of the species(Reproduction)

2-

The preservation of the individual member of that species.

(Self Defence).

True self defence mechanism can evolve slowly by slow mutations!

But what is needed here is careful analysis to decide ?

Was that Crucial Moment of self defence reached: Chemically ?

Biologically or by Conscious Self Defence (Not Pre prescribed

Spontaneity ) Because if we can determine this then we are half

way in to solving the enigma of life ?

Since any such determination will either reaffirm or negate the

existence of that External Purpose discussed earlier.

726 75
 76Page 76 of 726

Abstraction Of Fear And The Creation Of God.

“Only recently it was discovered that Agro Phobia Not
necessarily caused by fearing everything outside in the
open but rather by the accumulation of the components
of fearing many things outside.”
First man feared lightening or fire ! So he worshipped fire !! Then
he worshipped the wind !!! The goddess Zeus etc ? Eventually as
man became more sophisticated he Abstracted All of his fears in to
one called God Or fearing god which he thought he himself had
created like all the other goddesses but does this negate the
existence of god
Man created the shield to protect himself ! Then the aeroplanes to
shorten distances !! But does it mean that neither the shields or
the aeroplane ? Nor their Functions Exists??
Similarly when we created god and feared him does this refute the
existence of god?
Not unless we consider ourselves and each of us as Centre Of The
Universe Instead of all of us being just part of it ! Part of the
universe !
Hence if god pops out from within ourselves its all the more
proving his existence .

726 76
 77Page 77 of 726

Was Self Defence Act Of Divine Intervention ?

“Trees are full of life! But no self-defence!!”

“What an irony ?That the secret of creation should be

hiding inside the most obvious??What has always been
taken for granted ???It’s called Self-Defence .”

“How odd? Truly odd!! That such seemingly trivial

moment in our evolution should be Pivotal For
creationists?? The Moment the Individual of any
species exercised Self Defence! Was the Moment it(The
Individual) Separated itself from all the Physical Laws!
Logics !And Equations in the universe. This can only
happen by divine interference. Go and think about it?”

726 77
 78Page 78 of 726

Stated earlier :

How the External Purpose was imparted to life at some point of its

evolution to defend itself in addition to Preserving the species !

The Void Chronically (Time Ordered) Between Causality And

Effects Does Not Dilute This Argument But Enhances It.

Now it may be clearer to see how the two are connecting us to that

divine design ?

Since There Is No Law In Physics Requesting A Bunch Of Atoms

Or Stones To Defend Themselves !No Matter How Complex The

Molecules Become !

Or how:

Advance ?

Complex?

Big?And Beautiful ?

The tree had become?

The Logic Is just Not There.

726 78
 79Page 79 of 726

Alternative View : Life Is A Mistake.

“ I fear therefore I Exist . “ The Red Monk.

“Life is a mistake? An accidental anomaly??And since

we are living inside it and thriving within it! We assume
it must be the norm !The absolute norm!!Hence
:everything outside it must be the anomaly not us .”

“Inside The Depths Of Oceans next to geysers?

Scientist Have discovered Even Sulphur Based Life “

” The cruellest confrontation for any believer :

When faced by pictures of innocent children like
Maddy Mcain Or April Jones Who had vanished by
Cruellest and Pointless acts of men ! Taking with them
all the Reasons and Arguments which we may kid
ourselves to the contrary . Its at times like these we
need to explore the Alternative View.”

726 79
 80Page 80 of 726

“Life is a mistake !Therefore it cannot be explained ! It

will never be explained because its not meant to be
explained ?A set of Chaotic Windows And we are simply
caught inside one of its motley billions tiny windows!!
Like flowers that temporally flourishes in the passing
spring moving to another window perhaps? We too are
caught inside just one of these inexplicable windows !
Rest of the windows !Who knows ?”

“That is to say : We live inside one Gigantic Error We

call existence ! And any logic developed inside this
existence as far as we are concerned : Is the correct
logic! Therefore we are incapable of recognizing the
error even if it was staring us in the face !”

726 80
 81Page 81 of 726

Its more than Certain that life(Our form of carbon based life) Does

exist on other places in the universe .

But it’s not without reason we are kept at Unreachable distances

from each others. We are never meant to touch each other!

Because life is a Mistake !A Freak of nature ! Like spring flowers

appears only to disappear !Destined to destroy itself by itself !To

annihilate itself by its own intelligence !(See Page---The

Inevitability Of Nuclear War.) i.e. : If there was life on certain

planet (X )Then By Definition it will be Unreachable and vice

versa ? Conversely if its Unreachable then there must be life on it.

The Problem Never Technical. No scientist or engineer with any

degree of honesty will ever tell you that space explorations can

offer much beyond what is sensational .The Material Returns like

all other misadventures e.g. those wars the U.S.A. Found itself

inside are Minimal !Hardly worth the sacrifices or the expenses !

Also See : Space Explorations (Part-One).

726 81
 82Page 82 of 726

The Construction (By Evolutionists).

“Creationists and evolutionist do not Necessarily
contradict themselves except in the construction “

The nearest illustration which may explain this Second type of

construction is:

If a bullet fired at a wall Randomly then we draw a circle around

the hole on the wall claiming it to be the target ! Then if we repeat

this process drawing circles around each hole made by bullets fired

Randomly At this wall . Whatever Pattern may emerge from these

circles we Construct Our own logic to fit these patterns and draw

our own conclusions convincing ourselves of its purpose and

meaning ! That these were meant targets ! Whereas in fact none of

these were the targets nor Intended to be Targets . And there was

never any purposes except our own purposes .

726 82
 83Page 83 of 726

Proving The Devil.

“Even if we do not know or we do not wish to know
god? We certainly know the devil very well (Even if we
do not know that we know it)!!”

Let us ask ourselves why do we need turning from persecuting

homosexuals to persecuting (Homophobes)Albeit by stealth?

From persecuting the Jews to the Jews persecuting us ??

Why not just leave homosexuality a personal issue ?Why allow

cunning opportunists politicians turning it in to political issue?

Laughing at us with ridiculous notions and passing fads like gay

marriages! Unless there was Unpreventable Constant Of

Destructivity?And persecution is certainly the worst form of

destructivity ! Introducing for now this Constant Of Destructivity

(D)in the equation yet to be explored and expounded several times

between the pages of this book: [ D X T = T X D.]=Constant.

The ( D -For Destructivity) Clearly it stand here for the (D)In the

Devil himself!
726 83
 84Page 84 of 726

BOTTOM LINE.
“What this consist pattern or phenomenon(If you like)Trying to
tell us ?Is there intrinsic (Built by nature)Constant of
destructivity which must be obeyed. Must be satisfied? Fed and
maintained one way or another !Can never be violated come
what may ?Driven by some Involuntarily Dark forces beyond
our control? Moreover can we Quantify this constant by the
time (T) the destructivity (D)Takes to reach its final value in
the equation ( D X T = T X D ) =Constant.? ! ? ”
“The difference between fascism and Colonialism: The first is
Quick Death !The latter is Slow Death!!And the choice is
entirely not yours.”
Proving the existence of (D-The devil ) Implicitly prove the

existence of god !For without this counter balance we call god :

(D)Would have destroyed everything i.e.

(D) Here Kept Constant Not Infinite! !

(See Page-----------------------------------------Backtracking) ?
(See Page----Quantifiably-On How We Can Calculate Morality
From Immorality ) ?
(See Page-----------------------------------------Infinite Time .) ?
(See Page-----------------------------------------Proving God ) ?

726 84
 85Page 85 of 726

Becoming Of Age Or Overaged.

“There is a book written by the American scientist(Ferris)Titled
Be Coming Of Age :
The book about the physics and sciences of our universe
concluding that our universe is still becoming of age i.e. in its
early formations!
I personally Half Agree with that in the sense there are
Certainly Plenty Of Imbalances Physical Biological Even Social
suggesting we are at one or other extreme of creation !
Meaning we are either as the book conclude we are becoming
of age or we are already inside the other extreme i.e. Over
Aged.”

Time Density (Imbalances).

Ages Of The Universe.

Time Density =Number Of Events (Any Events)Per Unit Time.

726 85
 86Page 86 of 726

My Greatest Discoveries.
“ There are Destructivity For The Sake Of Destructivity
it cannot be rationalized by any Political !Social! Or any
other argument except for the biological. Period .”

“There is in nature a Constant Of Destructivity This

constant require agents to keep it constant !And the
E.S.P.(English Speaking People) Intrinsically Are its
main agents . Again You Do Not Need To Believe
Anyone :Just watch out how anything they touch is
turned to ashes ?And let the figures speak for itself.”

“Ignore it at your peril: The English are sheer destructivity for

destructivity sake.” The Red Monk

726 86
 87Page 87 of 726

I have had lived as foreigner inside the E.S.P. For several decades

Observing ?Studying ? And analyzing ?Their (Deep Seated Subtle

Racism) And like most observers I simply put it down to :

Race ! Color !Creed !Or even economics and environmental

factors.

But over the decades Deeper Analysis Had exposed something far

more fundamental than these elements :

And (Bingo ! Eureka) ! ? ! I found it ! ? !

Briefly without beating round the bush I discovered the D.N.A. Of

the E.S.P. Is riddled with Criminal Genes.

And that it was no other than these very criminal genes behind all

the of following three and many more left for the readers

themselves to find out:

a-

The Laughable Excuses They offer for destroying the lives of

vulnerable individuals like Myself !

726 87
 88Page 88 of 726

The Tragic Lies They coin to destroy entire nations like My Country

of (Iraq)!!

Or even destroying entire Regions like the Middle East :

First by planting Israel then keep stoking the conflict :

Maliciously.

Systematically by Machiavellian Maneuvers beyond the ability of

the simpletons of the region to suspect.

b-

“Only carriers of Criminal Genes Can be so callous to

allow such extraordinary polarization inside societies
part of the developed world and awash with wealth be
it Indigenous Wealth as it’s the case with the USA !Or
Stolen Wealth As it’s the case with Britain and
Australia.”

726 88
 89Page 89 of 726

In spite of the tremendous wealth in the case of the USA ! And the

stolen wealth from other nations in the case of Britain and

Australia these nations have the Cruelest Polarization Between

their own

classes Even By third world standards! Yes worse much worse Even

When compared with many third world countries: (See Page---On

What Mother Theresa The Expert On Worldwide Poverty Had

Said About The Poverty Inside The Real Britain )?

C-

Driven by no other factors than these Criminal Genes from

California to London to Sidney Australia they have the biggest

number in the entire world of prisoners (Per Capita )And

Murderous Police Culture That goes with it which is eating their

mentality or any other culture they may have had Inside Out ! ? !

726 89
 90Page 90 of 726

BOTTOM LINE.
”Somehow these Criminal Genes Seems to be telling
them (The E.S.P.)They can achieve anything and
everything by crime (Lies !Deceptions !!etc. ) Soon they
will find out different ?Very differently and very
definitely ???” The Red Monk.
“Reading through this book you will discover like I did:
That the existence of these Criminal Genes Are not
talks of propaganda ?Emotionalist ??Or any ulterior
motives ???They are substantiated in this book by
Concrete Examples ! Scientific Equations! Graphs ! And
Numerous Proofs ! Which you can check for yourself by
yourself. Without any need to believe anyone.”
(See Pages----Matters Of Science Proving The Criminal Gene)?
(See Page--- Further Interpretation Of My Equation 0n The
Constant Of Destructivity And Graph Eleven.)?
(See Page--------- In This Book We Only Allow Numbers Figures
And Equations To Speak Out. ) ?
(See Page---What Is Genetic Mutation)?
(See Page---Carriers Of The Criminal Genes) ?
726 90
 91Page 91 of 726

(See Pages----Criminal genes Parts 1,2,3,etc )?

Proving God.

Such a mess?

A World full of nonsense !

Like knitting roll its head missing.

There is only one point in the compass can make sense

of it all.

The point we call god.

Thus we may know god not from order!

But in chaos and disorder!

The Red Monk.

“There is no escape from that (Material Dialectic )

Whichever way we look its still staring at us !
Fortunately :Its not the full picture !And there is still
room left for us to breath??” The Red Monk.
(See Page ------------------------------------Proving The Devil) ?

726 91
 92Page 92 of 726

Man And His Religions.

“No values! No honour! No closures. Where anything
goes as long as not caught. “ The Red Monk.

Whether it was fear of the unknown (After life) Or by an external

factor (e.g. god) What made man Climb out of the animal kingdom

is not the issue at this point of our discussion!

The issue here (On The Whole) Religion had raised man from the

animal kingdom!

Later this role had been taken up by education!

Positive Education structured on religious ethics. T

Consciously turning most Experiences And Consequences of all

things that was good to himself and his communities in to

permanent or semi-permanent Values And Lessons.

Man could have just as easily developed Systems Of Beliefs Well in

harmony with his basically evil practices without Even imperilling

the species!

726 92
 93Page 93 of 726

Yet he opted to preach (At least hypothetically) what we classify now

as (Good).

Religion Is What Had Taken Man Out Of The Animal Kingdom

And Such Statements Of Facts Cannot Be Altered And Hold True If

God Invented Man ?Or Man had Invented God??

Because if it was man who invented god then assigned to god the

qualities most religions had agreed upon??

It just goes to show that man had risen at Some Point from the

animal kingdom to Aspire These higher qualities he himself had

assigned to god.

Keeping In mind the word (Aspire) In English Imply success is not

always guaranteed! ? !

BOTTOM LINE.

“The god news: There is god!

The bad News: His logic not the same as ours !!”
726 93
 94Page 94 of 726

Brief Philosophical Discourses On Creation And

Evolution.

“The Interrogative (Why) Presume there must be

Purpose For everything ! A habit we picked from the art
of survivals and science of reproduction! But is there
rational purpose to everything??”

How The universe was created ? This can be understood though

not exact starting from the Big Bang Theory to the evolutions of
Bio Spheres Like our planet earth to it culminating in its ultimate
product of Intelligent Life like that of ours or those of higher or
lower intelligence Possibly existing on other Exo Planets !

More or less so far so good The How of these can be well

understood at least by scientists !the problem !The real problem is
in the Interrogative Why? When we start asking The Why :

Why the universe was created ? Why we are created etc ??

It’s Here We Find Ourselves Either Going In Circles Of Various

Format Of Logics Or Hitting A Wall Of Irrationalities.

726 94
 95Page 95 of 726

It seems the only way out of this Dilemma is to Omit the word why
from our dictionary!

Since Asking Why Imply There Is Purpose Behind It All.

To have purpose behind everything is our own logic evolved

through the dialectics of survivals and reproductions inside our
daily lives .

However once we Eliminate the word why we fall in to the Terrain

Of No Purpose Except that for the universe going in cycles of
creating and destroying itself (Observe how we programmed to
enjoy all bad things repelling all that is good for health)?Also

(See Pages--The Self Destructivity Of Man Parts 1,2,3,Etc)?

Some of us like the English Even Worship wars:(See Page -----

War Worshiping Nation ) ? Hence its Cyclic Universe Which tally
with the Latest Theories In Astro Physics But runs counter to all
known intuitions!

The Creationist: Solve this dilemma by one single word : We created

to worship Him(God)?

The Evolutionists: Going in circles inside a terrain without this

(Why)?Therefore the enigma remains (Enigma)! Perhaps it’s meant
726 95
 96Page 96 of 726

to stay this way ?Or perhaps in this case Quantum Logic ?Rather
the (None Logic Of Quantum Theory )May shed some light?

Man And His Systems .

“We can blame Capitalism? We can blame Socialism?
It’s we and the Corruption inside us that should be
blamed for System Failure! Any system!! Keeping in
mind the individual always do his best and most
therefore not responsible for system failure! Failure
only occur when the system allow it ? And in some
cases even encourages corruption e.g. the medieval
system of Britain where the corruption is so
systematically hidden it had become almost the
acceptable norm ! ? ! “
Application.
The main problem is that of application:
Electric or mechanical circuits are designed by men (Engineers)
According to certain logic to serve man ! Systems Of Governance
Are also designed by men to serve man.
The difference that the first set may fail due to wear and tear or
unexpected variations in temperature or pressure ! While in the
second case the system can fail because the very men who created

726 96
 97Page 97 of 726

will try to circumvent or cheat the system itself. Here is an example

Parasites:

Negative Jobs :
This book repeatedly described professions like the police or

bankers as Negative Jobs Or parasites!

Is it because they hate me ?Or I hate them??No:Its only because

such personal spend approximately twenty per cent of their time and

provided resources on their real meant functions while the rest

(80%)Spent either to justify their unworthy existence or in self

serving purposes. Eventually in the fist case of the police this eighty

per cent will grow in Arithmetical Progression While in the second

case it will blow up according to Geometrical Progressions. They

weigh heavily on the society blocking its progress and happiness.

“There is only one thing in this world worse than

Racism Its hidden racism! And who hide it but the
System.”

726 97
 98Page 98 of 726

“There is only one thing worse than Loneliness in this

world and its loneliness imposed by British state
thugs.”

In the Universe : Perfection Is Verboten.

“That is why some people see ghosts ! Or the Genuine
sighting of U.F.O. s !! These are Precious Peeps or if you
like Quick Windows Between the parallel universes not
supposed to happen yet they do happen because there
is No Perfection.”
“Observe how perfectionist nations like Germany are
rewarded tactically but penalized strategically?”
DEFINITION OF LIFE.
“Life can be based On Any or Combinations Of Any of
the elements in the Mendeleev chemical table of
elements. Provided it can satisfy the following
conditions:”
1- Dynamics:
“If you had examined closely the science of anatomy!
The way I did !! There are not hundred but thousands
of
726 98
 99Page 99 of 726

bones inside the human body !Not one of them describe

Ninety Degrees Angle ?And there are far more
fundamental reasons behind it ! Which is to do with
mobility !! Independent mobility both Translational &
Transposal Movements.”

a-Movements in One Dimension (as in Bacterium.)

b-In Two Dimensions as in Plants.
c-In Three Dimensions as in animals.
d-In Four Dimensions as in human.
Unlike animals !Man has fourth dimension ?The Time
Continuum !What men leave behind e.g. Heritage.

2- Growth and Movements

These rarely are in straight lines always tangential

(Drawing Smooth Curves !Rarely sharp angles).

3- Reproduce Copies Of Itself.

4-Plus Other Conditions that will be revealed in the

secrets yet to come.

BOTTOM LINE.

726 99
 100Page 100 of 726

“The less ~the number of the conditions stated above

there are? The more forms and shapes of life that can
be discovered !But the more difficult it will be to
recognise .”

Frequmechanics (Part-Two).
Philosophy And Geometry Not Physics .(Part-One.)

“On (Page---)

Science was compared to the Curve(s) ?

While Philosophy to the Octave Enveloping these

curves.

According to science Airplanes fly because of the lift

created by the air foil !

Similarly the Gyroscope the Governor and Rockets all

experience lifts due to mechanical reactions to certain

mechanical efforts .

According to the Octave (Philosophy) :

726 100
 101Page 101 of 726

They all experience lift because their Cosmic Flux is

cut at certain angle with certain speed.”

Four Notes On Geometry And Frequency :

1-Moment of inertia is a function of its own geometry.

2-Every point can be assigned a frequency of oscillation

around an arbitrary or actual point (e.g. the centre of
the earth) !

3-Each line (AB) Can be represented by either the total

sum of these frequencies =∑ fn !
Or the average ∑ fn /n !
Or simply the differences = fA – fB
However once the appropriate method had been
determined it should be carried throughout the
geometrical construction.

726 101
 102Page 102 of 726

4- Alternatively every line has signature frequency that

distinguish its Length? Shade??And Colours from all
other adjacent lines .

(See Page-----------Calculating ῳcutting And ῳgluing ) ?

Empirical.
“Scientists and engineers are baffled why should
rockets at take-off always tilt by minute amounts from
the Absolute Vertical ? Mainly :
To acquire enough escape momentum the rocket need
to increase the amount of the area of flux its cutting
which has been restricted by its pointed head !!
Designed as such for Aero Dynamical Considerations.
i.e. there is conflict of designs between aero dynamics
and cutting the flux.” (See Page----------------On Airships) ?

Excerpts From New Physics :

They say that (Airships )Were notoriously unstable due to

several factors (e.g. Climate)!
My Alternative Physics Proposes they were just not cutting and
gluing the cosmic flux fast enough !!i.e. the :

726 102
 103Page 103 of 726

Lag (Phase)Angle = [ῳCutting / ῳGluing] Was just too big.

(See Page---------------Calculating ῳcutting And ῳgluing ) ?

Four: SPEED OF LIGHT (Part-One).

“Nature is full of constants! But the speed of Anything
is not one of them”

“I know of nothing in nature which can reach the

colossal speed of light in (No time) ! And comes to a
halt again Instantaneously !! It contradicts all the
known laws of nature including quantum mechanics
(Especially quantum mechanics )!Even god himself took
six days to construct the universe.”

“Speed of light (Due to the restrictions in our technical

measurements) Appears to be constant inside each
region of the universe! And varies from one region to
the other! These values are determined by the

726 103
 104Page 104 of 726

Chronicle Order Of that particular region in the

evolution of the universe since the Big Bang!
As to what define these regions of space is discussed by
the section of this book on the Universality Of Quantum
Mechanics (PAGE----)!! e.g. :

Inside our region of space :

C=Speed of light= 1010 X 2.99 Cm/S !
In other region it could be :
Constant (D)= Speed of light= 1015 X 2.99 Cm/S ! Or
Constant (E) = Speed of light= 105 X 2.99 Cm/S ! etc.
Generally:
Speed of light= SN=10N X 2.99 Cm/S
N = k.n
Where (K ) Is some constant:
(n)=The age of that particular region of space in
seconds.
Substituting for values inside our galaxy for K= N/n.
SN = C=1010 X 2.99 Cm/S. Where N=10.
Age of our solar system in seconds:

726 104
 105Page 105 of 726

n=4.5 X 109 X 3,165 X 107 Seconds.

K= 10 ÷ 4.5 X 109 X 3,165 X 107 Seconds.
~ 7.245 X 1015 S --1 . (ABRADABARA CADABRA)This
constant turned out to be the Period (T ) Of our
(Natural) Frequency! The Red Monk.

Three Notes On The Above Equations:

1-The equations discussed above may prove to be an exercise in

tautology!
For how can we determine the age of any region in space
(Including ours) ?Without predetermining the speed of light first ??

2- On the other hand if we take the summation of both sides of the

equation we can Average The Speed Of Light But here again there
is one problem to overcome:
∑ n = The total sum of the Age(s)of all the region of space is not
equal to the KNOWN age of the universe ≈ 13 Billion years!

726 105
 106Page 106 of 726

3-However the equation can reveal some Very Interesting Aspects if

we take the logarithms (To The Base Ten)of both sides then
rearranging by assuming that :

∑ nz -------------- ∞

Perhaps the following Graph and Exercise May shed

some light on this problem:
Log (SN ) ≈ N =K.n.

Log (SN )

726 106
 107Page 107 of 726

θ
Big Bang. N1 N2 N3 Netc.
Where :
Tan θ = Log (SN ) / N =K. cm/s2. I.e. Multiple of (g).
Exercise:
1-Is: N3 N2 = N2 N1 ? Or N3 N2 > N2 N1 ??etc.
2- Is: SN3 SN2 = SN2 SN1 ? Or SN3 SN2 > SN2 SN1 ??etc.

Comments :

“If it works? Why not??”

I know it seem to be pushing it a bit with the methods

of back tracking? And it’s a bit of cheek to pick a

numerical result :The already known speed of light

inside our region of the universe then attempting to

construct scientific principle from it!!

726 107
 108Page 108 of 726

However clearly the logarithmic scale on the Y-Axis is

Nonlinear!

And regardless whether the scale on the X-Axis is linear

or not?? ( K ) Will represent the acceleration of this

speed. If It Works? Why Not??

“What a pity that my hypothesis above was not made

public before that space craft was sent to Pluto and
beyond the solar system (Voyager -1)? It may have
detected such variations in the speed of light??”

“Relativity was the patch up work to explain this

anomaly Not the other way round i.e. the anomaly did
not produce relativity”

“At least three years after I have written this article

726 108
 109Page 109 of 726

(And the date of this article can be verified)!

C.E.R.N. Laboratories of Geneva -Switzerland by
directing a beam of Neutrinos To other laboratories in
Italy have calculated that the speed of light may not be
constant after all.
For details please see full report in the: Independent
News Paper –London-Saturday-24/September/2011.”

By Pure Logic.
“The power of logical deduction or Intuitive Science
not to be underestimated! Thousands of years ago the
Greek philosopher Democrateus described the atom
with amazing precision just by reflecting on the sands
of sunny Greek beaches!! “

726 109
 110Page 110 of 726

“The speed of anything is a ratio of two things !One of

the main tenets of quantum mechanics : Its not
possible to measure two things simultaneously .”
The Red Monk.

As every driver knows the fact that He/She may cruise at constant

speed of 60 M.P.H but they could never accelerate from rest to this

speed in no time at all. Therefore our calculations must be

Incomplete when we assume that speed of light or speed of sound

(Phonons)Or to that matter any speed have Always been constant”

One day in the future a New Generation Of Instruments will prove

that the speed of light cannot be constant ! Nothing in nature can

jump from zero to “C” ( Speed of Light-Photons),Or from Zero to

“S” (Speed of Sound –Phonons) in zero time. Therefore it must be

the ceilings for these speeds but even this doubtful ! It runs counter

726 110
 111Page 111 of 726

to the logic of nature ?Therefore I attribute it to our limited

powers of observations and measurements nothing else .Zero

time ? There is no such thing as zero time !Because it means no

time at all No time means infinite distance in infinite space.Where

space start to curve or curl infinitely on itself before infinitum

according to relativity itself hence we observe the contradictions.

The speed of anything!

Can be anything!

But constant.

It has nothing to do with the linguistics?

Or the expression itself!

As much as its to do with the very calculations and how we measure

this speed !

As every driver knows the fact that :

He/She may cruise at constant speed of 60 M.P.H but they could

never accelerate from rest to this speed in no time at all.

726 111
 112Page 112 of 726

Therefore our calculations must be Incomplete when we assume

that speed of light or speed of sound (Phonons) Or to that matter

any speed have Always been constant.

“One day in the future a New Generation Of

Instruments will prove that the speed of light cannot
be constant ! Nothing in nature can jump from zero to
“C” ( Speed of Light-Photons),Or from Zero to “S”
(Speed of Sound –Phonons) in zero time. Therefore it
must be the ceilings for these speeds but even this
doubtful ! It runs counter to the logic of nature ?
Therefore I attribute it to our limited powers of
observations and measurements nothing else .”

726 112
 113Page 113 of 726

“Zero time ?There is no such thing as zero time !

Because it means no time at all ! No time means infinite
distance in infinite space. Where space start to curve
or curl infinitely on itself before infinitum according to
Relativity itself hence we observe the contradictions.”

Isamic Thought Experiment Number One.

If we place system of mirrors at the vertices of triangle

ABC and shine a beam of light from (A) after splitting it

in to two beams. One directed towards (C).

And the other along the path (ABC).

If the space or straight path (AC)Is curved (According

to relativity itself)As it would at time =Zero ?Then it

will follow the path of (ABC).As shown in the diagram :

Where v=Velocity . c= The Constant speed of light.

726 113
 114Page 114 of 726

C
v=c
B v=c

V=0. A

As you see this violate the triangle inequality.

Isamic Thought Experiment Number Two.

“The constancy of speed of light is not Intrinsic

property of light\(Photons) itself but that of the upper
limits of our technical abilities in measurements”
The Red Monk .

Imagine a man travelling in a rocket through space of

pure vacuum. There are no portholes(windows)and

since there no matter outside(Pure Vacuum)there is no

726 114
 115Page 115 of 726

way for him whatsoever to measure the distant directly

except by two devices his watch and the speed of his

rocket measured while he was travelling in near

vacuum space.

If the watch is the only instrument that can tell this

traveller the distance (keeping in mind we are

still using the notion of distant)He had travelled in pure

vacuum then this can only mean one thing time is an

identity of space and if time is cyclical (by definition)so

is space (i.e. curved ).

BOTTOM LINE

“All laws of physics are obtained(Calibrated)inside a

world filled with matter .Can they hold inside pure
vacuum ? ”
What we all need to ask ourselves :If there was no yard

sticks(Instruments) in Pure Vacuum to measure the

726 115
 116Page 116 of 726

speed of light then we cannot know this speed !On the

other hand if we do have these instruments they all

including the walls of the vehicle itself are made in the

past i.e. Calibrated outside the vacuum i.e. unreliable

results of measurements.

Questions:

“Questions? Questions?? Questions ???:As you see

there are more questions than answers.”

1-How can this traveller ever be certain of the distant

he travelled in pure vacuum when there was no matter

(No Sign Posts )what so ever ?

726 116
 117Page 117 of 726

2-On the other hand if this traveller was riding a photon

travelling at the constant speed of light !

How was he ever accelerated to this speed since he

was riding with a constant speed of light “C”?

3-Was the Difference as Infinitesimal as it may be due

to the fact once the Rocket Inside the Pure Vacuum the

vacuum is No Longer Pure? ? i.e. disturbed by the very

presence of the rocket ? ? ?

4-With the limits of our present day Technical Abilities

the speed of light does look constant and indeed its

constant as far as the limits of our present day

calculations are concerned but My Hunch that this

726 117
 118Page 118 of 726

constancy runs counter to the grains of all the logic yet

known to man.

5-One day in the future a new generation of

instruments will prove that the speed of light is not

constant.

6-

There has been two Scientific experiments:

a-

The Michelson – Morley experiment(U.S.A.)Proving that

the speed of light is Constant.

Thus vindicating Relativity .

b-

726 118
 119Page 119 of 726

The Cynaque experiment (Paris-1958)Proving that the

speed of light was Not Constant!

This particular experiment hardly ever appears in any of

the text books and not taught at western universities !

The Philosophy Behind The Physics.

“Nature is full of constants !But the speed of Anything
is not one of them” The Red Monk.

One of the well known rules of Quantum Mechanics

It’s impossible to measure two quantities
Simultaneously.
Speed is a Ratio of two quantities.
There are only three possibilities (Scenarios).

1-Both quantities of the ratio are variables.

726 119
 120Page 120 of 726

Can only yield variable never constant except for the

pseudo constant .

2-Both are constants. Yield Meaningless constant !

3-One is constant the other is variable ! Can only yield

variable never constant again except for the pseudo
constant discussed below :

1- Pseudo Constants.

The ratio of two variables(When ≠ 1 )

Cannot produce real constant only pseudo constant!

Something that appears to be constant the Non-

Parallax Method).?It become Meaningless to arrest

(Fix) both variables (To measure them) simultaneously

In the first case? And in the Second Case :

(When =1)The Problem Is Quadrupled.

726 120
 121Page 121 of 726

2- Homogeneity Of Measurements.
“There is no homogeneity of Calibration between time
which is cyclical and distance which is not”
In the second case ?The ratio itself is
arrested(Fixed)and the ratio of two constant is itself a
constant !Therefore it cannot be the speed of
(Anything)!Three oranges per dollar is a Fixed Price
not the speed of the price.

3- Velocity.
“In the third case e.g. Velocity is the ratio of distance
over time! While we can arrest the distant to measure
it. How can we arrest time?” Also:
(See Page----New Physics.)

Inside the Zero to (C ) Epoch.

“The rate of change of anything is a concept far more
complex than we can possibly suspect.” The Red Monk.
A separate book is needed to cover this epoch ! Most of

it will be relativistic calculations the bottom line of it all

726 121
 122Page 122 of 726

that:

If this epoch to shrink by any degree then space itself

becomes infinitely curved !

Infinitely curved space imply the Photons will remain

bounded !! Bounded photon means no light hence we

note the contradictions inherent to relativity.

The Anti-Epoch of : ( C ) to Zero.

Curiously similar Calculations Reveals how this Anti

Epoch Not always equal to the Epoch itself ?Yet it’s the

most interesting of the two for it raises very interesting

questions :

Such as the fate of the photon !

Where does it go after losing its energy ? When it does

not disintegrate into sub particles??

Physicists usually fudge this question by saying it

726 122
 123Page 123 of 726

fizzles out ! But they know better than me and you

nothing fizzles away

The fact that the Anti Epoch and the Epoch Itself are

Not Equal Can be taken as clear evidence that the

speed of light is not constant.

Time !Space!And Pure Vacuum.

Inside Pure Vacuum Time Cannot exist !Since by
definition there is no way to measure Time from within!
Only from Without which render the measurement
obsolete !The same can be said about the Distance
inside pure vacuum !Moreover how can we distinguish
the boundaries of this pure vacuum except by the
disappearances of one or the other of the (Time And
Space)Or both joined together at the Boundary which
tally with the theory relativity !Putting it in reverse :
How can we tell Pure Vacuum Except by one of the two
disappearing at one end of the Pure vacuum and
726 123
 124Page 124 of 726

reemerging at the other end. Otherwise the very notion

of Pure Vacuum will be disturbed or annulled therefore
what really count is our own measurement outside this
Pure vacuum i.e. the Span Of Time Between Its
Disappearance And That Of Reappearance That Is All
We Can Know About Pure Vacuum.
(See My Scientific Paper On Time To Il Nouvo Cimento -1978 :
By Visiting: www.scribd.com/isamtahersaleh

Graphs Eight & Nine.

“Present day instrumentation incapable of
distinguishing between the constancy of the areas
enclosed by ABCD (Below)And that of seed of light.”
X-axis= Time ! Y-axis = Speed of Light.
AB=The Epoch. CD= The Anti Epoch. AB ≠CD. BC≈ct.

θ C

B------------ Graph Eight. AB<CD.

A D

726 124
 125Page 125 of 726

B-------------

θ C

Graph Nine. AB>CD.

A D

Let :

c=Constant speed of light.

S=Variable speed of light .

AB=a. BC=b . CD=d. And Y at B &C = YB & YC

Then:

t=√[( a2 - (YB)2 ] +√[( b2 – (YC –YB )2 ]+√[(d2 - (YB)2].

Rearranging for y= f(x):

dy/dx =dS/dt ≠ 0.

Implying that (S) Can Not be Constant .

726 125
 126Page 126 of 726

And remember we Claimed the area A(x,y) Remains

constant implying : dA(x,y)/dt =0 !

Now ?From previous sections of equations and

diagrams on the dimensional relationships between
Areas? Lengths ??etc? Work out the rest for yourselves:
Why current generation of instrument can only read the
constant area ?

TWO PROOFS IN ONE.

Referring to the Isamic Diagrams for classical

probabilities:
Let m&n. this time represent the two sides of the
triangle AB &AC .
Let ( C )be the Constant speed of light.
Now if a source of light is placed at (A)and there is an
observer sitting either at (B)Or (C )(it makes no
difference).
Then the length of Ab = Ct1
And that of AC= Ct2.
Ct1 –(Minus Not Plus) Ct2 = f (Ct)=f(BC).

726 126
 127Page 127 of 726

Where (t1 ? t1&t ) Represent the time each beam of

light takes to travel each side of the diagrams
subsequently.[Remember the observer can measure the
difference between the two Paths Of Light reaching
him
The path ABC and path (AC.)for an observer sitting
at(C)!]

Now Here Is The Issue! The Crunch Of The Matter !

When( m) and( n) are equal and the speed of light is
constant then it can only mean one thing that:
BC=Zero.
Which is impossible therefore either that (m )Can never
be equal to (n) Which Proves the Purpose of my Isamic
Diagrams.
Or that the speed of light can never be a constant .
So Which One Is It ?

BOTTOM LINE.

“At least three years after I have written this article

726 127
 128Page 128 of 726

(And the date of this article can be verified)!

C.E.R.N. Laboratories of Geneva -Switzerland by
directing a beam of Neutrinos to another laboratories in
Italy have calculated that the speed of light may not be
constant after all.
For details please see full report in the: Independent
News Paper –London-Saturday-24/September/2011.”

Hypotheses.

“ My hypothesis states that :

“ If and when the speed of light ever proven to be not

constant the metric inside Einstein’s general relativity
(G.R) Still Hold True Only it will become far more
complicated ! Since it has to accommodate speed of
light as function ! This is made possible because the
metric itself Already Accommodated the speed of light
726 128
 129Page 129 of 726

as function except it has been wittingly or otherwise

Approximated Or Suppressed To constant and this
Implicit Function Been forgotten in the process and
treated as number when in fact it’s always been a ratio.
A function that has been arrested to simplify an already
complicated calculations.” The Red Monk.

Five. Cosmic Flux And The Isamic Diagrams.

“The intersection of two lines is the point.

The intersection of two areas is a line .
The intersection of two volumes is area .
The intersection of higher dimensional objects in the
universe is the frequency (Multiplied Off Course By The
Relevant Vector)” The Red Monk.

726 129
 130Page 130 of 726

1-Every Geometrical Line in the universe has concrete

Physical manifestation as long as its Geometrical i.e.
Non Trivial Mathematically. e.g. c2 = a2 + b2

2-We call these lines Permeating the universe :

Cosmic Flux. That can be cut or glued simultaneously.

3- One example is the Aeroplane :

According to the conventional analysis of classical

mechanics the aeroplane flies because of the
differential pressure around the (Foil).
According to my hypothesis it flies simply because it
cuts the cosmic flux at certain angle and with certain
frequency.
The same can be said of the Gyroscope ? The Helicopter
etc.
Another example from nature itself is the Planet Earth.
Keeps itself in orbit around the sun by two movements
or manoeuvres:

726 130
 131Page 131 of 726

By rotating about itself thus cutting the flux between

itself and the rest of the universe.
And by cutting the cosmic flux between itself and the
sun by revolving around the sun.
The Earth cut the cosmic flux in Elliptical Orbit
implying that :Cutting The Flux Between Any Two
Objects Is Elliptical .
This should not come as surprise ! Since the law of
gravitation always contains the non linear term of (R 2 )

The Governor;
“Elsewhere in this book we quoted the gyroscope! The
attack angle in the air foil of airplanes ?Or the tilt in
rocketry ??But the good old governor seems to offers
the best illustrations to the cosmic flux.Since the lift of
its arms depends on the angular velocity (Ω) and the

number of lines (n) cut and glued by (ωC ) and (ωg )

as follows:
At Position (A) n=3. At (B) n= 5 Lines.

726 131
 132Page 132 of 726

B----

A----------

Lines Of Cosmic Flux.

Frequmechanics (Part-Three).
The Isamic Diagrams.

The best way to understand these diagrams is to

imagine Thick Sheet Of Viscous Fluid With Viscosity (V)
lying flat in the XZ-Plane.
And two Hypothetical Mirrors :
Mirror (A) placed in the XY-Plane and mirror (B ) In the
ZY-Plane.

726 132
 133Page 133 of 726

If we cut this sheet of fluid with pairs of scissors then:

While we are cutting the sheet it will subsequently and
Almost immediately glue itself .
Moreover its assumed here that mirror (A ) Can Only
Reflect? Record ??Or read the cutting that is taking
place at frequency of (ῳCutting. )!And mirror B can Only
Detect the gluing action at (ῳGluing.).
The First Alternative :
“What these two hypothetical mirrors A&B in effect
do? Is to freeze momentarily the process of cutting
and gluing.”

In practice this can be achieved by:

a-The mobile positioning of the two mirrors
b-The line of cutting the fluid (Need not be straight .)
c-The speed of cutting and the time delay (Viscosity).
Hence :
ῳCutting. - ῳGluing. = fv (Viscosity) [ Line A-Line B ].
Second Alternative :
Let vector V=V Sin θ +V Cos θ.

726 133
 134Page 134 of 726

Replace Sin θ=t1 Cos θ = t2 (t1 and t2 Both are time in

Millisecond.)
V(x,y,z) = V(x,y) t1 - V(z,y) t2 =v dt.
Third Alternative:
If we place two sources of light under the scissors!
One In Front of the scissors beaming towards a screen
placed in the XY-Plane and the other Behind the
scissors directed towards screen placed in the ZY-plane.
There are off course number of other more
Sophisticated devices one can design for this very
purpose but the idea remains exactly the same.
“For more accurate and formal presentation see the list
of equations at the end of the summary “ ?

The Fourth Alternative: Understading Space.

Illustration-A.

Let the Lamina or Parallelogram (ABCD ) Lay flat along

the Z-Axis inside the XZ-Plane making the Solid angle

(Ω )With the vertical.

726 134
 135Page 135 of 726

Let powerful source of light placed on top of the Y-Axis

shine on this ABCD Of Area (m+n)??

As the parallelogram rotates about the Z-Axis. From the

flat to vertical position the projection or shadow of the

area (m+n)Is reduced accordingly until it reaches the

vertical position when the area can only be

represented by One Single Line !Either (m )or (n ).

However during this rotation (Apparent -θ ) Changes

by the same rate as (Real-Ω) i.e. dθ /dt =dΩ /dt Or

Area (m+n) = f [θ]090. = f [Ω]900.

Illustration-B.

A B
m [ ψi,j.k.l.etc. ].

θ n C
D
A B
726 135
 136Page 136 of 726

m [ ψi,j.k.l.etc. ].

Ω n C
D

If we now let [Ω] Subtended by another lamina in the

same way as ABCD But vertical to the plane subtending

[θ] Then we have a volume instead of an area that will

undergo reduction in size till the lamina ABCD Reaches

the vertical position !

And this volume again eventually can only be

represented by a Line.

Illustration-C.

From the two above illustrations A & B We seen the

area reduced to a line and also the volume been

reduced to one line!!But what about the line itself? Any

line ?? Can it be reduced to a point ???

726 136
 137Page 137 of 726

The answer is Yes and No !It can be reduced to a point

if the line was (Singular) i.e. Not part of any

geometrical constructions!

And No if it was not singular this is because a point is

meaningless geometrical entity that can only be

defined by two lines (Scissors-Defined By Two Lines

And Cut By Two Lines.)At the very least

In Conclusion Higher Orders Than Volume Can Also Be

Reduced Without Loss Of Information.

(For the real stuff on theses Isamic Diagrams :See section ( 16 )Of
the list of equations at the end of the summary ?)

GEOGRAVS.

“Geogravity lines for Geometrical-Gravitational strings ”

1-They are what is behind attraction never repulsion.

726 137
 138Page 138 of 726

2-Could be cut at certain frequencies.

3-The frequency is decided by the following definition:

Frequency =the difference between the speed at which these

Geogravs lines are cut ῳn and the speed at which they glued

back together again (.ῳm ).

i.e.

ΩGravity.=ῳcutting. -ῳGluing.

TEST –EXPERIMENT(Isamic Thought Experiment

Number Three.
“To settle the issue in concrete laboratory terms I have
designed the following Basic but Sufficient experiment
to verify my theory ”
Ultra sensitive weighing machine.

726 138
 139Page 139 of 726

Suspended Magnet

+ve.

Negative.

Floored Magnet.
VACUUM

The apparatus encased by vacuum .

“The only way to defy gravity in vacuum by cutting the
cosmic flux”

726 139
 140Page 140 of 726

If we place two magnets of different polarity and of simple

Geometrical Configuration i.e. calculable Moments Of Inertia
and known Natural Frequency not horizontally but one on top of
each other.
One is floored (fixed to the ground) The other is suspended from
a Weighing Machine .
When a rotor (a coil) is placed between the two then current will
flow. The entire apparatus is placed inside vacuum as pure as
possible vacuum.
At certain speed of the rotor electric current will flow .
As the coil start to cut the cosmic flux with certain frequency
approaching that of the Natural Frequency of the magnets.
Levitation should be detected .
The magnet should begin to lose weight as it will be indicated by
the weighing machine. Or better still detected by extra sensitive
stress or strain gauges?

Or even by one of the many other devices (e.g. lasers) that are so
accurate these days they will be able to discount any Noise in this
experiments(e.g. Torque? Vibrations??etc)to the order of :
Micro- Grams or even much less !

726 140
 141Page 141 of 726

Whatever instruments are deployed they need to be with

sensitivity much higher in order of magnitude than those
employed by Seismography.
Since the rotor will be cutting not only The Magnetic Flux
between the two magnets but in addition to that and at certain
speed the Cosmic Flux. Therefore causing the upper magnet to
displace its equal volume of the Cosmic Flux.

BOTTOM LINE.
“The detection equipment has to be Fundamentally
sensitive and microscopic! Its next to impossible
isolating the Noise.(Technical noise e.g. Torsion?
Vibrations?etc?) Its due to this very Intrinsic reason
why no one has managed to detect the cosmic flux
yet.”
Proposing Here Three Applications To My Theory Of
Cutting The Cosmic Flux.

The Accelerating Universe.Part-One (First Application).

“According to Conventional Physics the universe should
be Slowing Down Not accelerating !My theory of cosmic

726 141
 142Page 142 of 726

flux offers the best explanation There Is for a runaway

universe”
“The longer the time (The more objects are Formed Or
Deformed (Geometrically)The more they get in each
other’s way gravitationally (Cutting the Cosmic Flux)?
The more the universe runs away in its expansion.
“And there is the question of why the solar system
remained Co-Planar ?When the primordial disc of
plasma began the process of condensation there was
no reason whatsoever for the components to remain
Co- Planer .Gravitation towards the centre (The Sun)Is
necessary but not sufficient condition to prevent them
from flying out of the condensing disc !Only
explanation left is that the gaseous disc had already
carved a pocket in the cosmic flux which made it easier
for these components forming our planets to remain
inside the disc.”

ABSTRACT.

F=f(i,j).

726 142
 143Page 143 of 726

This equation is far more important than its Prima

Facia .!Its deeply rooted in Quantum Mechanics and

the principle of prolificacy (We introduced in chapter

eighteen).And here is what it says:

[The larger the number of particles becomes ?The more

total resultant force Varies nonlinearly].

Let:

A=The resultant Acceleration of the universe

mi =The number of object formed (condensed)e.g.

Stars ,Planets ,Moons .etc.(Per period of time).

nj =number of objects destroyed e.g. super novae. (Per

Same Period Of Time).

Fi,j =Resultant force produced per same period of time

MI,J = Total matter in the universe.

726 143
 144Page 144 of 726

It’s meant by [ -------------∞ ] as it grow larger.

THEN:

∑ mi + ∑ni = MI,J

∑ mi - ∑ni =-ve at n>m (Dark Matter?)

∑ mi - ∑ni = O

A MI,J = Fi,j

As i,j -------------∞ and since F is accumulative.

Fiji ------------∞

Therefore: A MI,J = Fi,j -----------∞

but MI,J is constant then it follows that :

A-----------------∞

Explaining why the universe expansion is accelerating

instead of retarding! Note at m=n F=O.

Conclusion.

726 144
 145Page 145 of 726

“Therefore according to this view the acceleration of

the universe due to the Geometrical Formations And
Deformations Of the cosmic configurations of objects.
For while the Mass Remains Constant the constantly
changing geometry (Shapes)Changes the rate of
cutting of the cosmic flux ! Hence varies at every unit of
time we care to devise .”

My theory of Cosmic Flux Can offer the best explanation There

Is as to why the universe expansion contrary to all conventional

expectation ! Why its accelerating instead of slowing down ! ? !

According to this Cosmic Flux theory the more objects are

condensed and formed in the universe (e.g. Stars, Planets,

Galaxies etc.) the more they are likely to get in each other’s way

and therefore cutting the Geogravs between these objects thus

hindering them from talking to each other’s Geogravically (Note

726 145
 146Page 146 of 726

Geogravically From The Geogravs discussed Above with the letter

–V-?Not Geographically)

Alternatively: As First Approximation(Without Relativity) :

Force = Mass x Acceleration.

Function of The Difference Between Objects Formed And Deformed(Geometrically)Per Unit Time.
The Acceleration= ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Mass Of The Visible Universe .

Force = Function of the (Number of celestial objects

formed – (Minus)Those deformed (Geometrically) Per

unit time).

Since the total mass Remain Constant the disturbances

to the gravitational fields in this universe are a

function of the difference between the number of

objects formed or deformed geometrically !

Therefore if:

726 146
 147Page 147 of 726

σ =The Disturbance.

n=Number Of Objects Formed And Destroyed In One Region.

N=Number Of Regions.

Where {

∑ n /s=N

Then;

σ ≠  n

σ =f (acceleration) .

Second Application.

Future travels will not be achieved by the current rudimentary

methods of Propulsion ! Combustion ! Or Inductions Or

Reactions ! But by applying the more subtle principle of cutting

the cosmic flux with constantly varying frequencies and angles as

proposed by the experiment I have designed above .

726 147
 148Page 148 of 726

Third Application.

Energy.

726 148
 149Page 149 of 726

Frequency Electrical Fluxial-Anti gravitational.

Testing.

One method of testing my hypothesis is to slice (Cut) Conical

section (Light Cone) Between the eyepiece of the telescopic
observer and any distant galaxy ! Then the rate of acceleration of
universe measured inside the cone should be a function of the
number of observables created and destroyed at given period.
Inside the cone.

Frequmechanics (Part-Four).

“When the ancient philosophers Euclid’s or Pythagoras

drew their First Lines In The Sand They did not drew
these lines out of their own free will! They were
imitating nature itself !! Abstracting what was in front
of them !!Then eventually discovering the secret
relationships existing between the components of
these geometrical shapes.
Conversely :I believe that any object in the universe
Under Geometrical Equilibrium Has specific physical
manifestations a Cipher That One Day Will Be Decoded !

726 149
 150Page 150 of 726

What these diagrams are saying There Are More To

Geometry Than Topology. ?”
A B
m [ ψi,j.k.l.etc. ].

θ n C
D

What have been said so far is Deeply Rooted in Quantum

Mechanics and the Prolificacy Principle introduced in Chapter

Eighteen. i.e.:

When one of the “m” changed to “n” by the operators

ψIsotopic ? ψElectrostatic. Etc??etc??It means only one thing:

that we have inflicted an observation on “m” which

yielded “n”. Or to put it the other way round only one

Singular Property of one of the equal “m” have

726 150
 151Page 151 of 726

changed while all the rest of properties remain

unchanged!

(See Page---The Graph).

Symmetry In Three Dimensional Trigonometry,

(Θ)
Let Sin = Sin Ω At θ ?

Let Sin = Sin Ω At ( ∏/2 - θ ).

(Θ)

Similarly:

(Θ)
Let Cos = Cos Ω At θ ?

726 151
 152Page 152 of 726

Let Cos Ω = Cos Ω At ( ∏/2 - θ ).

(Θ)

Now:

(Θ) (Θ)
( Sin ) + (Cos )2 = 1.
2

(Θ)
Sin - Cos =0.
(Θ)

BOTTOM LINE.

Its essential to keep in mind two fundamental points :

1-Geometrical Equilibriums is not the same as

symmetry but derived from mathematical symmetry.

726 152
 153Page 153 of 726

2-Whenever we say equilibrium by that we mean both

quantities ( m and n ) Remains identical in every way

except that specified property designated e.g. by

Electrical? Thermal etc.

Examples:

When:

Ψ Geometrical Equilibrium. m = n.

ψElectrical Equilibrium. m≠ n.

ψThermal Equilibrium. m = n.

726 153
 154Page 154 of 726

ψQuantum(Macroscopic or Microscopic.) m=n or m≠ n.

Exercice:

U(Unitary Thermal Unit) X ψThermal. = Ψ Geometrical.

ψElectrical. / Ψ Geometrical. = (m – n) X e (Unit charge).

ψQuantum(Microscopic,) / ψQuantum(Macroscopic.) = h/ H

where h.H = 1 (h is Planck’s Constant ?H is my own universal

Constant.

(See Page -----------------Calculating My Universal Constant ) ?

Test Yourself.

“Can Ψ Be represented by the followings:”

For Ψ Geometrical Equilibrium.

If m and n represent the Areas in the figure (ABCD ) above then:

AB X BC =m +n -----> m or n = (AB X BC )/2

726 154
 155Page 155 of 726

If m and n represent Volumes in the same diagram then :

AB X BC X DB =m+n ------> m or n = ( AB X BC X DB)./2

Question :

Under what Circumstances DB= 1(Unitary) ?

Similrly for ψElectrical Equilibrium : From Ohm’s law Let :

Voltage =m – n. Current (I)= dm/dt. or – dn/dt. R=Resistant (The constant).

Giving : R .dm=(m –n)dt Or R .dn = (n - m)dt.

Question:

-1
Under what Conditions The Constant ®becomes Inversely Unitary (U) ?

Philosophy And Geometry Not physics (Part –Three).

(Part -Two is not quoted in this summary).
In parts one and two it was stated that given a batch of ten

objects each one kilograms ?After dividing them into two

batches! We move one half of this batch into new frame of

reference (x`y` z`) Then dividing this new batch again in to two

726 155
 156Page 156 of 726

halves and moving the new half in to the next frame of reference

(x`` y`` z``) And so forth :The energy required to move these

divisors along the X- Axis Each Time by ( hx ) = M/2 (g hx ) +

M/4 . (g. hx )+ etc ?On the L.H.S we have the relativistic energy

= M .C2. R.H.S = ∑n M.g .( 1/22n ). hx . Giving: C2 / g, g`, g`` R,

R`,R`` (Where g, g`, g``etc )Are the localized acceleration.

hx = ∑n C2 / g( 1/22n ) Similarly for hy And hz Along the ( y) and

(z) Axes . After rearranging and collecting terms we have:

√ (hx) )2 + (hy) )2 + (hz) )2 = Length of the diagonal separation =

F( R [ῳcutting. _ ῳGluing ]. (See Graphs 0ne To Nine)?

How To Construct The Isamic Diagrams ? And The

Meaning Of Geometrical Equilibrium.

“Please distinguish carefully between the two words

(Volume)? And (Cube) ??”

726 156
 157Page 157 of 726

Step Zero-Volume Zero (V0 )

Consider a Cube of sides x =(a).

And of diagonal y= √2 x.

V0 = √2 x3.

Step One -Volume One (V1 ) .

Reshape (Collapse) V1 in to another Cube of sides :

X= (√2 .a3 )1/3 = 21/6 .a And Construct ( V1 )from the

two sides and diagonal y=√2 (21/6 .a ) Giving :

V1= (21/6 .a) . (21/6 .a ) √2 (21/6 .a) =21/6+1/6+1/2+1/6 a3.

= 2. a3.

Step Two (V2 ).

Again Reshape V1 in to a cube of sides :

X = (2. a3.)1/3 Diagonal y =√2 ( 21/3 .a)Giving:

V2 =(21/3 .a ).( 21/3 .a ). √2 ( 21/3 .a)=23/2 . a3.

Similarly Step Three giving:

726 157
 158Page 158 of 726

V3 = 22 . a3 . And so forth Yielding the expression:

Vn = 2(n+1)/2 . a3

Implying Closure and Unitarity at a3 = 2 2/(n+1)

And this is what is meant by Geometrical Equilibrium.

Exercise:

1-What happens at m=n ?

2-At which turning points in the following graph :

a-The Electro Magnetic Flux is cut?

b-The Cosmic Flux is cut ??

Graph-One.

Drawing the following graph from the relationship

derived above : Vn = 2(n+1)/2 . a3

Where (V)is represented by the (Y-Axis)and (n)By the

(X-Axis).

726 158
 159Page 159 of 726

V/√2

n= 0

O
-n n=-2 n=-1 +n.

Clearly from the above graph and by putting dy/dx=o .

The following points at n=0?n=-1 ?n=-2?etc?Are

turning points.(See Page—The Cosmic Flux) ?

Isamic Diagrams –(Part Two ).

Repeating the above procedure but instead of multiplying the

area ( a2) Of the side square by the diagonal going through

the Centre of gravity of this Square ?We now multiply this area

by the diagonal going through the centre of the Cube itself ??

726 159
 160Page 160 of 726

To obtain the volumes from these cubes by repeating the

same steps as in part-one?

Graph Two.

This graph is left as an exercise for the reader by calculating :

Vo = √3 . a3  Deformed to cube of sides (31/6 . a)

V1 = 31/6 +1/6+1/2+1/6.a3  Deformed to cube of sides (31/3 .a)

V2 = 31/3+1/3+1/2+1/3 .a3 Deformed to cube of sides (31/2 .a)

And so forth? What does Graph Two going to look like??

Graph Three .

The area of cross section of a sphere radius -r- is (∏ r 2 ).

Construct the volume :

V1 (a Cylinder )By (∏ r2 ).r.= (∏ r3 ).

726 160
 161Page 161 of 726

Deform this volume in to another volume of Any Shape but of

the new dimension (R1 ) = (∏ r3 )1/3 = ∏1/3 r

Repeat this procedure as follows:

V2 = ∏ (R1 )2 R1 =∏ (R1 )3 =∏2 . r3

V3 =∏2 . r3 ….etc ?

Giving:

Vn = ∏n X r 3

Now plot this graph as before (graph-One. )? And

compare??

Graph Four.

Draw Graph Four By repeating the same procedures as

above taking the volume (Of Any Shape Or Form)

deforming it to New Volume Of The New Dimension (R).

By taking the (n)th Root of (V). Where :

726 161
 162Page 162 of 726

Ri,j,k… = (Vi,j,k…)1/n

Vi,j,k = (Ri,j,k… )2 Ri,j,k…

Question:
Does these shapes and forms has to be Symmetrical ?
Or in Geometrical Equilibrium ??Or do we ever need to
picture them at all as any shapes or forms inside that
Inner Space (See Graph Five-Chapter Seventeen.) ? ! ?

Six : The Law Of Conservation Of Energy.

“Although we May not distinguish between the “m”s
from the “n”s !The fact we separate them Arbitrarily
causes a reduction in the state ψ”
Let:

The Population Density ( P ) M>> M*

726 162
 163Page 163 of 726

Energy of the People . (E) M << M*

∆ P X ∆E ≈ Constant.

ψ (M*) M ≈ M* ψ (M*)

“To illustrate the point we have slightly violated the

laws of conversation of energy “

The star ( * )Denoting the Number of population or their

Energy After the revolution.
This theorem constructed upon Two Premises And by the

Imaginary Potential Wall (W)drawn earlier separating the State

Of Affairs before and after the revolution. We have :

a-Everyone should agree that if this Potential Wall represented

a war or revolution then there will be Reduction In The State !

(In this case its the number of the population).

b- Most historians will agree that revolutions almost always are

followed by Surge of energy !It energizes the masses !! And

726 163
 164Page 164 of 726

there are Myriads Of Reasons behind this surge ?Some

mathematical i.e. the law of conservation of energy

(Compensating for the reduction in the population )?Others

Psychosomatic where the masses behave like a genie released

from its bottle! etc. Therefore:

(∆E )Can be measured from any available but reliable

economic parameters e.g. (Productivity)
(See Page---The Science Of Separation.).
Also :(See Page--- Mathematics and Society For the New
terminology Quantifiably !Not Quantifiable ??)
For More Details ?Please See Volume Number Five By Visiting :
www.scribd.com/isamtahersaleh

Thermodynamics.

“For those preferring physical analogue to the above. “

Let ( V2 )Be the volume of one certain ice cube frozen from

water of volume ( V1 )Thus giving an amount of Heat (dH )or

releasing Energy (dE ) .

726 164
 165Page 165 of 726

dV = V2 – V1 Therefore:

dV=f (dH ). Or F ( ∆E ) .

But dV always inversely proportional to the density ∆P .

Hence it follows that: 1/∆P =F( ∆E ) Or:

∆P . ∆E =Constant.

BOTTOM LINE.

Perhaps there is more to the above thermodynamics

than just the convenient physical analogy? Especially if
we recall that Eighty Percent of the human body
consists of water.
Does this mean that?
8. ∆P . ∆E = 10 (K) Where K is a constant ? ! ?

Seven: The OverLap Integral.

“When one single ensemble of (m) Copies of
Macroscopic particles begins to separate in to
two(m&n) !Each will start tracing its own curve in the
graph and until the point of total separation they will
overlap each other’s just as it’s the case in the

726 165
 166Page 166 of 726

Microscopic world .However Its Extremely Essential To

Remember That The Overlapping Area Is Not Constant
But Variable At Speed Proportional To The Speed Of
Separation”
Exercise:
Let (A) be the intersection of the areas inside the
Ovelap Integral As the two ensembles are slowly
separated !Show that :
(- 1)n . dA/dt =f ( Vx,y,z,t )2
Where ( Vx,y,z,t ) Is the direction of (Cutting & Gluing )of
the scissors inside the ZX-Plane as defined at the
beginning of this chapter .
T=Time.
Also note :When (n)Is odd the expression is negative.

Field Of View :
“The reason why we cannot observe quantum effects in
macroscopic objects :Because according to my
Prolificacy Principle there are just not enough copies
falling inside our field of view .”

726 166
 167Page 167 of 726

Let
r =The radius of the smallest atom that display
quantum effects singularly.
R=The radius of the macroscopic objects .
n= The number of copies of the Macroscopic in any
ensemble required in our field of view before we can
observe any quantum effects .
Then :
[R/r ]3 = the required minimum number of copies in
any observable ensemble displaying quantum effects .
Clearly this shows how the size of the Macroscopic
object multiplies shooting up ?While the Microscopic
size of the standard atom is miniaturized cubically !!

Hence the number (n)Of copies required to fall within

our field of view must be huge.
However at extremely far away astronomical distances
it’s possible to observe quantum effects if there were
enough copies falling inside our field of view:

726 167
 168Page 168 of 726

O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O Observable Ensemble-B of (n-
Macroscopics)

O
O
Field Of View.
O
Not Observable Ensemble-A of (n)Macroscopics.

Red Balls Of Ensemble -A Falls Outside The View.

BOTTOM LINE.
It has been proposed on (Page----)That if we had one
hundred macroscopic objects each of one kilograms
then separating them in to two ensembles:

726 168
 169Page 169 of 726

1-At what distance the observer from these objects will

begin to observe quantum effects ?

2-Can we determine the number of objects required

before the observer at the Said Distance above can
observe any quantum phenomena relating to the
overlap integrals ??

3-Does the above points imply quantum effects can be

our optical interpretations of what is taking place ???

Eight Neuther Current.

“There is intrinsic symmetry in (m)Copies of dentical
Macroscopic Particles ! Therefore just at the point of
separating them in to (m & n)i.e. just before the

726 169
 170Page 170 of 726

symmetry breaks down a current analogous to Neuther

current will flow or in terms of ohm’s law :
[dm/dt = -dn/ dt ]Except this time it need not be
electrical hence we stated earlier that :
Ψ Equilibrium(Electrical? Economical?Thermal?etc.)

Bottom Line.
“Needless to state that both hypothesis above (Seven &
Eight)Can be observed strictly under the prolificacy
principle discussed earlier. And the minimum numbers
of Copies that was calculated to be necessary before
any such observations are accomplished.”

Nine: The Constancy Of Destructivity.

Let us first recall the definitions(On Page----):

The BUVO-----The British Unit Of Venom (B.U.V)

726 170
 171Page 171 of 726

The EUVO --- The European Unit Of Venom (E.U.V)

One BUVO=The total number of people killed by the British

During any chosen period ÷(Divided by) Total population of

Britain during that very Same Period .

One EUVO =The total number of people killed by the Europeans

during any chosen period ÷ (Divided by) The total population of

Europe during that Very Same Period?

Both rates are measured over any given scale of Real Time i.e.

Averaged over sufficient Periodical Span!

Now the shocking result is that the BUVO always larger than the

EUVO no matter how you do your calculations! ! ! i.e.

B.U.V>>E.U.V { >>means much larger?}

The Application Of D1/ P1=constant= D2/ P2.

D colonialist. X PColonialist.=DFascit. X PFascit. = Constant.

Where:

726 171
 172Page 172 of 726

D=Destructivity per unit time. P=The period it lasts. Not the time it
may take (T) Where P =1/T.
Let us now Plug In some figures in to this equation that have

appeared in various forms in this book and see what happens?

We know for certain that the Nazis only lasted six years therefore

P1=6. We also know they murdered about :

[Six Million Jews +Four Million Slavs]. Therefore. D1= 6+4

substituting for D1/ P1 =[ 6+4]/6 =1.7 approx?

We also know that British colonialism been current for the past one

hundred and fifty years i.e. P2 ≈ 150 Years.

Hence [6+4]/6=1.7 =D2 /(150.) This gives:

D 2=The number of people murdered by the British= 170 Millions.

At the very least. ! !

This should surprise no one because it tally very well with our

concrete knowledge of today e.g. according to official figures

released by the Colonialists Own Institutions Themselves :

726 172
 173Page 173 of 726

The number of Iraqis killed just in the few years 2003-20009 have

passed the one Million And Half Mark and if you have the stomach

for more see a report by the London news paper (The

Independent)- 1st/January/2010. How the British army used “Secret

Squads “to abuse Iraqis including the raping of women children

and even the animals!

(See The Baby Killers On Page----)

Keeping in mind that Iraq is just one of the many Small Populated

countries visited by the British. Needless to say how this proves the

British to be much more atrocious than the Nazis ever were? Just

like what that journalist has discovered

To his disbelieve from direct experience that the British are

hundred times more evil than the Nazis have ever been? (See

Page---).Only that the British have reached the state of the art in

covering up their crimes against mankind(just sneakier and slower

726 173
 174Page 174 of 726

with it ) that is all!(see the London Cage-in the first pages of this

book)?ALTERNATIVELY if we to conduct some Unbiased research

in to history to determine how many people exactly (to the nearest

million)the British have murdered so far? And substitute this

number in to the equation above we can predict with some

precision the date of the final demise of British colonialism? ? ?(i.e.

when the Brits will blow up and bust their own ratio???)

WARNING

For proper calculations we need to insert the values of the BUVO

and EUVO.(see earlier)?Also those of the relative densities (not

totals )of the populations of the two nations in comparison.

However this will not alter the order of magnitude of the result

dramatically !

The Continuity Of The Constant Of Destructivity,

726 174
 175Page 175 of 726

“The difference between fascism and Colonialism: The first is

Quick Death !The latter is Slow Death!!And the choice is
entirely not yours.”

”Countless millions killed by the British in Asia! Africa!!And the

Middle East All had been justified in English Language! By
English Logic !Logistics !!And Venom.”

The most striking result is how the Ratio of the Buvo to the Euvo

(as defined on page ---)?Remain constant even at Peace Time !This

can be verified by taking the BUVO Now as the number of overseas

students killed or disabled inside Britain since the second world war

divided by the population of Britain while the EUVO Similarly

measured by taking the number of foreign students killed or

disabled inside Europe divided by the population of Europe! ? !

You will find the Ratio Of The Two Rato-S(Plr ) Staying constant

through out war and peace ! ? !

BOTTOM LINE.
726 175
 176Page 176 of 726

“(D X T = T X D )Is a Mathematical Philosophical Field

where Causality And Effects Exchange places
simultaneously .”
“The most amazing application of my equation:
(D X T = T X D )When both D & T Exchange their units”
(See page---Introducing The Heterogeneous Units Of
Measurements) ?
“Let us pray my theory is wrong! Otherwise it can only
mean one thing: That the Nazis did not reach the figure
that was struck by the colonialists? There fore we need
to embrace ourselves for the return of the Nazis (Not
necessarily Germans ) To make up the difference ! To
satisfy the constant of the equation.”

“Oh! Sinners of the world? This is a call from the

biggest sinner of them all: Let us all come clean? Clear
your conscience? And ask yourself : Could the Nazis
ever match these figures?! The Red Monk.

If you happened not to like equations just do Simple Totals?

726 176
 177Page 177 of 726

The number of people the British killed in India alone was officially

recognised to be fifty five millions ! ? !

Not to mention Miscellaneous like:

Iraq (Pop-17 millions)lost one million killed and many more

dislocated!

Palestine (pop-one million) lost half million and much more

dislocated forever,

And the list believe you me is endless from Sudan to Afghanistan.

Now clear your conscience?

Come clean?

And ask yourself:

Can the Nazis ever mach these figures? ! ?

And figures do not lie.

SYMMETRICAL examples on PROTRACTING TORTURE .

726 177
 178Page 178 of 726

“This Japanese Most Favoured method of torture can

act as Ideal definition for Protracted Torture “
Typical example is that practised by Another Island Race? The

Colonialist Japanese !Their infamous method of tying the P.O.W.

(Prisoner Of War)flat on the ground under a tap water that was

only dripping!

The drops ! will not kill the victim but after few hours or even

days you can imagine the rest?

In fact looked at individually the torture may even seem to be

trivial !However the picture as a whole convey the most

destructive form of torture to both the victim as well as the

torturer ! ? ! It’s difficult to identify and even more difficult to

follow because by definition Protracted Torture spread over

lengthy heathen periods and well beyond what human nature can

comprehend let alone believe ! ? !

BOTTOM LINE.

726 178
 179Page 179 of 726

Tortures often practiced for no other reason than that of the

Japanese or the British they simply have deep seated (Genetic)

disrespect for all foreigners in war time or in peace time ! Often

just scenting vulnerability in the targeted individual is enough

reason?

Protraction seems to be an Indigenous Creature of all island

races

In this case [ δ θ =is represented by the drop of water.].

@ θc---the victim cracks up. And the process becomes more

Physical than mental.

@ θk-- the victims kill themselves.

WHERE ∫ck dθ - ∫oc dθ = θr . and r = f(t)

Graph Seven.

726 179
 180Page 180 of 726

THE WORD “BY” WAS DERIVED DIRECTLY FROM EQUATIONS

[1+2+3+4] WHILE THE WORD “ON” WAS A CONSEQUENCE OF
EQUATION-5. ●

1/T
Inverse of time or the period’s axis.
●
----------------- Line of constant destructivity--------------------------●-----------

●
●

BRITAIN------------GERMANY----------RUSSIA-----JAPAN. –--------------
Colonialism---------------------fascism------------------militarism.

And one practical application of the above formalism that: we can

actually calculate the demise (time/amount) of any colonialist by

plugging in the values of what we already know of the shock fascist.

And how true and prophetic the equations written in 1995 proved to

be?

When you study state of the colonialist now days?!

726 180
 181Page 181 of 726

I don’t want to go to details that may Remotely benefits the enemies

of mankind(the Brits& Jews )but it does not require much

intelligence to see how they are certainly the shadows of their

previous selves ? !

Industrially? Economically? Politically???

Technologically????Even biologically?????

Not only that but Revenge &Retributions will be inevitable?

They will be hunted down by the Forces Of History!

Inside their own homes for their past Crimes Be it against helpless

individuals or genocides alike !

As it was amply demonstrated in no uncertain terms by the

Precursor of “Things To Come” by the events of 7/7.

(See Page-----------------Graph Eleven)?

726 181
 182Page 182 of 726

The Politics Of Right Or Left And Two Dimensional

Analysis.

If the properties assigned to the Conventionally Accepted notions

of right and left are represented by the X-Axis alone (The horizontal

line below)?

For example those who are for working class liberation are

delegated to the ( Left )While those who disapprove of

homosexuality and gay marriages are considered to be of the

(Right)!!But : Where can we place some one (P-For person) ?Who

stands for both i.e. for working class or women liberation as well

as for family values opposing homosexuality and is against gay

marriages.? Clearly The answer cannot be resolved by one

dimensional (The X- Axis)/!What is required is another dimension

of (Y-Axis):Where we can assign all the positions taken on

Economic questions to this (Y- Axis) !And those taken on Social

questions to the (X- Axis)

726 182
 183Page 183 of 726

.For example those who are for the working classes(The

Progressives )Can be represented by the upper half of the (Y –Axis)!

While those of conservative economic views (The Regressive)Are

represented by the lower half of the (Y- Axis.).Hence we can find

our person (P) Mentioned above who stands for both the Economic

liberation of women or working classes as well as standing for the

Social Family values against homosexuality or gay marriages in

the first quarter (Upper Right ) Represented by the point (P) Below:

And so forth!

Y-Axis (Progressive).

(x,y) (P)

Left X-Axis. Right.

Regressive

726 183
 184Page 184 of 726

“Since the inception of Militant Zionism at the

beginning of the twentieth century :
Political dimensions had become increasingly
Ambiguous !
With Zionists acting as Confusion Agents Running like
rats inside their tunnels !Inside some secret conduits
between right and left so much so that inside the USA
itself the far right and Zionists are becoming one and
the same !
While in Europe one can no longer tell the difference
between their left or Zionists.
In all of this Zionists have one and only powerful tool:
And it’s not the ideology or any common values shared
with rest of mankind because they have none !But it
can be summed up with one single word (Money).
How long will this (Power By Gild)Will last is another
matter ?
But judging by the past :It will not be long before it will
be coming down on their unworthy heads and Their
tendency for sodomy.”

726 184
 185Page 185 of 726

In Search Of Scientific Definition Inside Non Scientific Subjects.

Before entering the next section discussing the Constant Of

Destructivity with Scientific Scales We need to seek Scientific

Definition for Destructivity,As we said in (Red Monk Law—See

Page )?We cannot define Morality but we certainly can define

Immorality and we gave the example of murder its immorality or

criminality which can never be disputed by any two(A)&(B)1

But let us assume that A Wrong B Then Why? and how ?is

debatable !If A kills B Then it can be still debatable (Was it in self

defense ?Was it provoked ??etc.)However if A Kills Hundreds then

the dispute turns to certainty The Certainty Of Wrong Doing and

this is what makes any definition Irreducible Scientifically i.e. valid

for all seasons.But notice we said if A kills hundreds meaning the

Figure Of Hundred is what brought the certainty about !

Hence Figures And Numbers Plays Central Role In Determining

How Scientific Our Definitions Are ?As we shall see later :

726 185
 186Page 186 of 726

Inescapable Responsibilities.
“Here The Quantity (Numbers)Determine The
Responsibility Beyond any reasonable doubt i.e. the
bigger the quantity the higher the number is ?The more
inescapable the responsibility becpmes.”

“I hate Indians ! They are a beastly people !With a beastly

religion” Winston Churchill (Documented)

”Once in public debate about the Holocaust one afro

patriot I believe he was from Nigeria got up and angrily
shouted ((What about us ?Nearly hundred millions
killed in sub-Sahara Africa by British colonialism
according to respectable reliable international
organizations and not a sound about it !Are we too not
humans ?Or do we not count like the Jews???”

726 186
 187Page 187 of 726

As you see Facts And Figures Not propaganda propelled emotions

must play central role in our definitions ! No one can dispute the

Immorality Criminality Or Sheer Destructivity of deliberately and

Systematically making hundred millions perish.I.e. no excuse will

be enough to evade responsibility.

Acts of genocides or Sheer destructivity can be Temporarily white

washed by sophisticated lies or expensive propaganda but History

Operate Differently Once the figures had become too massive to be

covered up :(See Page---The British Art And Science Of White

Washing History ) ?

Another example ((keeping in mind )) its only one

example from thousand plus similar atrocities committed by the

British)) is the :Jallianwala Bagh Massacre -1919.

Jallianwala Bagh is a garden temple where the Indians gather once

a year to pray and to chant religious songs.

The English general (Dyer) Came in with troops lined his soldiers

726 187
 188Page 188 of 726

up and ordered them to fire to kill the peaceful worshipers as result

thousands died or injured in this totally Uncalled For Massacre By

The English.

The Indians much later on forced court hearing by which the

English general claimed that the worshippers tried to rush his

troops yet his own bodyguard and sergeant testified Under Oath

that none of them were armed and none of them tried to rush us!

in fact they were totally indulging in peaceful prayer not even

aware of our presence until we fired .

Now the reader may be in position to accept Figures as concrete

guide for our definitions : For example if we add up the:

Total Destructivity Of The British = Killed Thrty Five Millions In

The Indian Subcontinent (The Partition)+Ehty Seven Millions In

Africa +Eleven Millions In The Mifddle Est (Including The Iraq

War)+One Million In Ireland (Perioshed In The Infamous Potatoe

Poisoning) = 132 Millions (At The Very Least Victims Of English

Colonialism)
726 188
 189Page 189 of 726

On the other hand if we add up the Nazi crimes of :

The Total Destructivityof The Nazis =6millions Jews +27 Of Our

Slavic Brothers +2millions Others =35 Millions

As you see the crimes of destructivity by the Nazis will fade away

when compared to the British crimes against mankind ! That is why

the English will do everything to kill any Scientific Treatment to

these crimes knowing it will then be extremely difficult for them to

wriggle out of it !

To extricate themselves by sophisticated lies! show trials! and

expensive propaganda.

That is why the English will never allow such Concrete Scientific

Treatment To develops such Concrete Yard Stick that will Pin Them

Down (Identify Them Indisputably )as the Sole Global Criminal

Enemies Of Mankind !All Of Mankind..

(See Page---The Enemies Of Mankind ) ?

726 189
 190Page 190 of 726

The Self Destructivity Of Man And The Constants Of

Destructivity.
“Most of these equations are just exercises which may
not even be fully accurate yet but they prepare us for
the real stuff located inside the list of equations at the
end of the summary.”

D1/ P1=Constant= D2/ P2

Or:

Any Issue
[D 1 X T2 ]d2d1 = D 2 X T1 ]t2t1

Or Simply: DXT=TXD

Subscript (1) Denoting the values for protracting fascists ( e.g.

The colonialists).

Subscript (2) Denoting those values for shock or non protracting

fascist e.g. Nazis.

726 190
 191Page 191 of 726

D= Is the total amount of destruction per period (P).This can be

measured by the number of people killed ?Maimed or their lives are
ruined? Or : Number of Square Metres of building destroyed ?Or
number of Square Kilometers of crops ruined.
T= Units of time inside Real time window e.g.:
Such window for colonialists like the British can Stretch From the
Nineteenth Century Where British soldiers played polo with the
heads of Australian aborigines after severing their heads for no
other purpose than this (See Page----English Polo) ?
To the Twentieth Century Where British troops literally machined

gun hundreds of Unarmed civilians to death at Amstar –India

-1919. To the bloody Sunday when British soldiers killed tens of

Unarmed peaceful demonstrators in northern Ireland in the early

seventies .To the Twenty First Century When the British were

systematical goring(Carving out) The eyes again of unarmed

civilians during The Iraq War of 2003-2013.

“Larceny in the name of democracy” Part-18.

(See Page-----Iraq From An Ango-Indian Sub Colony !
To Anglo -Jewish Colony ) ?

726 191
 192Page 192 of 726

While such period for the non protracting fascists will be Confined

to the narrow window of Six Years of the second world war during

which the Nazis gassed six million Jews.

BOTTOM LINE.

“(D X T = T X D )Is a Mathematical Philosophical Field

where Causality And Effects Exchange places
simultaneously .”

D1 > D2

T1 > T2

And for absolue values :

T1/ D1 > T2/ D2

( See Page----- New Physics) ?

726 192
 193Page 193 of 726

How Much More Can We Read In To The Equation Of :

DXT=TXD

“There are more to this equation than meets the eyes!

However we left it as exercise to readers to help them
Focus on this equation? Here is few hints”

1-It means destructivity is constant.

2-All parties plugged in to the equation will strive to satisfy the

constant numerically i.e. the colonialists will not rest? Cannot rest

until they kill same as the Nazis! Same as the Stalinists etc! i.e.

there is an involuntary mechanism .

3-Germans just do not have the stomach as the British to maintain

such atrocities in Long Protracting Cool Calculated Callous

Fashion Never Ending Agonies in time of peace! (see page on the

three C`s).It’s just not in the German character and outside their

abilities to sustain a British-like campaigns of venom forever.

726 193
 194Page 194 of 726

4- Hence the only real difference is the timing ?The period these

atrocities against humanity take ?That is all.ie;

Again scientifically speaking the British practice “things” like

mass killing in Times Of Peace(e.g. that of overseas students) to

make up for what the Nazis practiced in the Short Years Of The

War .

5-If you study closely the psychology of the average Briton (Who

have not been told yet that his Britain have ALREADY killed more

people than the Nazis ever did )You will see him having a grudging

feeling of being short changed that they(the Brits)did not kill as

many as the Germans !

Therefore They Had Lots Of Catching Up To Do !

Indicating the existence of An involuntary Motivating Force inside

him !A Concrete Scientific Evidence that this average Briton Carry

A Charge inside driving him consciously or otherwise to satisfy the

constant of the equation numerically i.e. by striving to kill as many

as their next door (The Joneses)Had killed ! ? !

726 194
 195Page 195 of 726

6- More Interpretations:
“Whether it’s by Gun or by the Poison Bottle The
Criminal Gene that runs inside every E.S.P(And the –P-
Now for Person) Does not care !And waiting there to
manifest itself one way or another”
Once upon time at a bus stop I entered in to casual conversation in

Arabic with an extraordinarily good looking Algerian. Of white

complexions and tall dimensions. While waiting for the bus we

shared our impressions of the world telling me that he went to the

USA to study English but found it very unsafe due to the gun

violence there. Hence he came to Britain ! Yet again he still feel

unsafe here !! I do not know what its?? But there is something not

right about these people too ?Though I cannot put my finger on it!

I Felt Safer In France Although The French Hate Us(Meaning

The Algerians).Said He.

Then I asked him if he had ever as a kid watched Tarzan movies?

Where the extremely noisy forests crowded with wild animals

726 195
 196Page 196 of 726

Suddenly goes silent! Falling in to deafening silence ?

Reason being ? Though these animals had no radars or cellular

technology but instinctively could feel approaching dangers

including thunder and lightening.Nature has endowed all of us by

this Instinctive Radar !By this Sixth Sense !To sense forthcoming

dangers.You see what this Algerian had felt is the two sides of the

coin?Two manifestations or expressions for the Constant Of

Destructivity described by the given equation : ( D XT = T X D.)!

Where the Open gun violence inside the USA was Replaced by the

Clandestine destructivity of poison bottles and protraction of the

U.K Practised Even by the British state itself!

Or vice versa that is to say:The Sneaky Clandestine British ways of

destructivity By Stealth ? By Protractions ?By Poison Bottles !etc .

Have Re Emerged on the other side of the Atlantic at the USA with

Visible gun violence etc.The two sides of the Same Constant In

the above equation.

726 196
 197Page 197 of 726

Another Significant Application For My Equation :

D X T = T X D.
Translation:
“Fascism is Self Destructive Evil !Colonialism is Self
Perpetuating Evil. “
“Due to the short outbursts of Shock Fascists
Crimes(Maximum six years in the case of the Nazis)
The Criminal Gene was not given enough time to
Mutate Throughout the population as it was the case
with the Protracting Fascists (Centuries of colonialism )
e.g. the British )And here Once More we have
discovered another Significant Application for my
equation. Appearing in many shapes and forms inside
this book ? Rest is left as an exercise for the reader ?”
“Hence you note the people of Germany are far more
honest than any other Europeans By Any Standard.”
“Whilst in Germany you still see racist thugs on their
streets! In Britain these racist thugs are Firmly And
Cozily Hidden Inside the power points of the British
state itself.”For More Application Of My Equation See:

726 197
 198Page 198 of 726

Introducing The Heterogeneous Units Of Measurements.

The Scientific Relationship Between Fascism And

Colonialism.

D X T = T X D.

“The above equation appearing in various shapes and

forms at several stations inside this book together with
the help of The Scientific (Statistical) Tables Of
Destructivity.(Part –Two). Should have made us all
acquainted with its deeper meanings ?Here we take
another look at this equation relating fascism to
colonialism in concrete scientific terms:”

“It’s no coincident that the Nazi Salute was identical to

that of the Romans.”

“It’s no coincident that the royal family of Britain had

been photographed performing the Nazi Salute .”

726 198
 199Page 199 of 726

Most people are shocked by the latest(July-2015) photographs

which was Accidently Released !

Proving how deep and direct had been the connections between the

royal family of Britain and the Nazis of Germany ??

Some royals were Even Blood relatives with senior gestapo

officers ! Others were dining and winning with Hitler himself !!

Other photographs showed them wearing Nazi uniforms and

performing the Nazi Salute !!!

These latest revelation may have had shocked most people except

those who had fully understood both the Implications And

Applications of the above equation relating fascism to colonializing

in Concrete Scientific terms.

You see like the romans like the Nazis the British Royal Family

Inner Thinking Proceed from the premise of the Absolute !

That Is The Absolute Right To Absolute Superiority!!

726 199
 200Page 200 of 726

They interpret their Absolute Privileges a divine right that must

have descended upon them from god himself by virtue of the fact

they remain unchallenged(the fact they had installed themselves at

several points of history by the sword and this right was not

descended upon them from god but had descended upon human

skeletons ! ? !)

Such facts had been conveniently misled inside the countless pages

of history !

In the case of the Nazis they assumed the Absolute Superiority of

the Aryan race (e.g. by virtue of the fact they made better cars )! ? !

Similarly no colonialist can colonize anything without the brutality

of proceeding from similar Platforms Of Arrogances :

Convincing themselves one way or another of the absolute

unquestionable right to destroy! I said (To Destroy )Because

destruction is inevitable inside any such criminal enterprise called

colonialism !
726 200
 201Page 201 of 726

Since the Colonialized Like all victims of crime will not be greeting

the invaders with flowers. Moreover they all destined to fail !

Like the Nazis they all are doomed .

As To What Is Keeping The Royal Family Of Britain ?

Is The Duality Of British Society !

But This Cannot Go On For Ever!!

At Some Point In The Future This Duality Will Split Britain Itself

In To Pieces And No One Can Do Anything About It!

Not Even Their American Dogs !!!

(See Pages-------------------Duality Parts 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 ,Etc ) ?

Bottom Line.

“Any Absolute platform of assumptions automatically

yields Absolute mathematical values (Numbers).”

726 201
 202Page 202 of 726

HATE MACHINES(PLR).
“In socio political affairs as in the physical world there
is a concrete relationship ((The Longer (By Stealth)Is
Practised ! The Lesser Will Be The Feedback !The Bigger
Is The Lag (Phase)Angle ).” The Red Monk.

“To kill and maim such huge numbers of people! The

Nazi of Germany (Anglo-Saxons) and the colonialists of
Britain (Anglo-Saxons) needed not only bullets and
helicopters but also colossal Hate Machines that begins
at their Kinder Garden schools”

Now we are in a position to calculate the amount of

pure venom by the A.U.V.(The Anglo-Saxons Unit of
Venom).

A.U.V. =The total number of people killed by the said

(corresponding) Anglo-Saxon country [÷] {Divided}

By the total population of that country.

726 202
 203Page 203 of 726

Probabilty !Triangular Inequality :The Contradictions.

“There are contradictions in the Mathematical Concept
of probability.”

“Unless we can guarantee a result after certain number

of throws(e.g. Of the Dice)The whole concept of
probability remains problematic.” The Red Monk.

726 203
 204Page 204 of 726

Unless it can be absolutely guaranteed that we get an

Event If we throw f(n)-times for probability of(Pn )For

such event(S)Then the very concept of probability itself

must be flawed !In Fact There Is No Guarantee If We

Throw Million Times.

Consider a particle at the point (A) Intending to reach

the point (C) There are two ways for this :

The straight path (AC) or the longer path (ABC)!!

Logically speaking the particle will take the shortest

path and we say the probability for this:

(PAC )Is higher than that for the longer path (PABC ).

I.e. If we allow (AC ) To represent the first probability and

(ABC ) The second then the triangle inequality is Violated !

On the other hand The only alternative left is for the inverses of

these length to represent these two probabilities . i.e.

1/AC ≥ 1/ABC. 1/(AC) 2 ≥ 1/ (ABC)2.

726 204
 205Page 205 of 726

But:

This too violate the triangle inequality at Right Angles Since :

(AC)2 + (AB)2 ≥ (AC)2. I.e. Again contradictory

BOTTOM LINE.

Contradictory ?

Or Meaningless Invention ? ?

Its on upon this Opposing Principle that Quantum Theory

should be Reconstructed ! Instead of basing it on extended

concepts of classical probability.

726 205
 206Page 206 of 726

At The Point Of Separation.

Imagine there is an ensemble of one hundred and

twenty identical macroscopic objects e.g. balls ?

They are governed by one single probability

(Distribution)Curve? Then if we are to separate them in

to two batches of sixty balls each ? There will be two

curves instead of one overlapping each other’s at the

Moment Of Separation The question now :

What happens if we to simultaneously separate this

ensemble in to three batches of forty balls each ??

Do We Obtain Three Dimensional Curves?

And If So What Does It Mean??

Exercise Seven:

How can we relate this hypothesis to Graphs numbers :

One? Two ??And Three???

726 206
 207Page 207 of 726

Examples and Applications.

The Multiplier. λi =mj - nk

“ ( λi )The Multiplier Is the Mathematical Tunnel

connecting our Economical activities with the Socio-
Political To the very Physical World of physics and
geometry.”∑

Most of the methods and equations described in this book were

borrowed from the methods of mathematical physics when solutions

sometimes are pulled out of the blue so to speak ! Then tested to see

if it was the correct solution! Its called(Back tracking).

Similarly we related economical classes ! Their behaviour !! And

the outcome of their behaving !!!By assigning values such as (n1 ?

n2 ? n3 ? etc! )These values may seem to be too arbitrary! Unfair

or Unfounded !until we plug in some economical values in to the

equations scattered through out this book such as the one above to

see what happens?

726 207
 208Page 208 of 726

KARL MARX ? L T V ?and Reality.

LTV=Labour Theory of Value.

R=Rate Of Profit. S=Surplus value K= Fixed(Not Constant)

Capital.

In Chapters Nine And Ten (Das Kapital)Karl Marx Struggled With

The Value –Price-Labour Relationships introducing as first

approximation R(ri?rj ? rk ?)=S/K ? Eventually he left the issue

unresolved and quite rightly so because its like rocket science too

many variables and Never Enough Integral Equations. So did

Adam Smith recognising the complexity of the issues involved

(Both Marx and Smith Were not mathematicians but Maynard

Keynes was).

They all seems to have had underestimated the complexity of the

calculations involved !

For where does ( R ) goes ?

726 208
 209Page 209 of 726

The flow of money locally or globally ? etc? etc ??

Denoted As Follow:

How was it distributed?

( i , j , k,… etc. Respectively).

How its invested?

(i+j+k,+…etc. Subsequently ).

How is it Reinvested ?

(I X j X k X…etc. Consequently).

They are all complicated series(es)Each with life of its own! All

concurrent ! And none congruent !!

However in this book you will come across many equations

offering simple but clearer guidance to explore any uncharted

opportunities offered as in My second approximation e.g.

R(ri?rj ? rk ?)= λi,j,k. ∑ Si,j,k. / Ki,j,k.

726 209
 210Page 210 of 726

Where ( λi,j,k.)As defined above.

Exercise.

Its left up to the reader’s insight !expertise! And versatility to plug

whatever economical or social numbers in to the equations offered

by this book :

1-How can we relate (r-the rate of profit)to Maxwell - Boltzmann

distribution? And to the equations inside this book such as the one

above ?

2-Is this the reason ? Why we left (m&n )Deliberately undefined as

mass or whatsoever? The Multiplier λi =mj - nk (In this particular

case : i,j.k. Are time ordered.)

726 210
 211Page 211 of 726

3- If you plug the values in to the appropriate equation from this

book would it be nearer to reality than the extremely complex

equations familiar to economists relating quantities such as:

Price Of Production To Value To Labour etc?etc??

4-

How can you fit the global tendencies for R(Rate of Profits)In to the

General picture of:

Ψ Economical Equilibrium. Stated at the beginning of this chapter?

(See ?Hasok Chang Inventing Temperature :

Measurement And Scientific Progress -Oxford -2004.) ?

Also See:

726 211
 212Page 212 of 726

(Francoise Quesnajin (1759) And The French Economists

Known As The Physiocrats.) ??

Also See:

( Forebenius Mathematical Models.) ? ? ?

Power And Production.

“Perhaps its purely coincidental that both Power and

Production starting with the letter (P) In Latin ??
Perhaps its another hint from metaphysics for us to
take closer look at this irony ? At the relationship
existing between the two ?? Most appropriately after
the above discussion on positive and negative
professions ??”

These two are more related physically and metaphysically than has

been so far recognized !

Production is simply dictated by the need of the masses to survive!

726 212
 213Page 213 of 726

Power is dictated by the need to organize production !!

Power feed or leeches on production. yet paradoxically it hinders

production by its own logic that have developed and has taken life

of its own i.e. the logic of power gradually but surely will be

diverging from what is necessary for production ! ? !

Therefore production aims to abolish or at least limit power !

But power by now and By Definition Resist such tendencies again

by definition with all full powers available to its own !

The paradox is both need each others but only in Certain Ratios

Which is a must for healthy coexistence ! However once this Ratio

Is violated then both try to eliminate each others by fighting each

others ! The process is that of conflict ! Adjustments and !

Evolution created by the need to each other. This ratio is expressed

by the letters ( m & n )Inside the first arithmetic ,

726 213
 214Page 214 of 726

(See Page---The First Arithmetic On Revolution.) ?

BOTTOM LINE.

“Power without production is Paper Tiger“

The Red Monk.

“----Because Real Life is not about the profits made by

few Jewish Bankers! Or few rich homosexuals leeching
on the Derivatives Of paper money !! Real life is about
everyone having the right to get up in the morning
feeling needed ! Wanted !! And going to work in real
726 214
 215Page 215 of 726

jobs ? Then returning home feeling he had earned his

living by fiat not charity .
A sense of satisfaction snatched in modern times from
the average homosapiens by Jewish bankers and the
leeching parasites of Irresponsible State Homosexuals.”

By Definition:

1-Every thing in the universe is quantifiable! The question is

how ?
2-There are no Massless particles ! If we perceive or conceive it
to exist then it must have mass(Including Photons.)!!The
problem is that of measurements?

3- No speed in the universe is constant ! The Answer is in the

question : Why?

4-Every geometrical line in the universe that is not

mathematically trivial e.g. (c2 =a2 + b2 ) Represent concrete
physical existence! The issue is that of cutting and gluing the

726 215
 216Page 216 of 726

line simultaneously ? If the diagonal of rectangle !Triangle etc.

can be related algebraically to others e.g. Its sides then every
Such line potentially has hidden agenda waiting to be
discovered.
5- There are (At Least)As many life forms as the number of
elements in the Mendeleev table If Not More !Except that no
physical contacts are allowed ?

On Information Theory And The Limits Of Hypocrisy:

(Part-One)
“The secret never found in the lie itself ! But inside:
Why is the lie ?” The Red Monk.

“Hypocrisy is misinformation! And misinformation is

hypocrisy.” The Red Monk.

726 216
 217Page 217 of 726

“You see it’s not just about ethics: Mostly about how
hypocrisy allow the creeping of dangerously skewed
cognitive process totally at odd with reality and
hindering the ability to analyze reality correctly .”

“Whenever I read German or French newspaper I am

looking for the news! When I read British newspaper I
am guided by one and only one quest: Why are they
lying ?This way I manage turning their Sheets Of Lies
And Deceptions (Including self-deception )In to an
Encyclopedias Of Real Information! But it requires
intelligent readings and some Direct experience with
the British art of Double Deception. “

726 217
 218Page 218 of 726

“A nation like the Brits is Doomed by its own

hypocrisy :
You see hypocrisy is not just about ethics !In practice it
create Dangerous Misundestandings! Miscalculations !
And Irreversible Lag (Phase)Angles. Its when men
short change themselves by getting too clever.”

Practicals : On The Limits Of Hypocrisy:

“To comprehend the limits of hypocrisy in tangible
practical terms all you need is to examine the British
case :”

“The consequences of any Invisible Major or minor

crimes committed by the colonialists :Sooner or later
becomes Visible But by then it will be very much
Irreversible.” The Red Monk.

726 218
 219Page 219 of 726

“My own Practical Experiences with the world that is

both the written or unwritten world are telling me that
you can sit on anything but not for long !And you can
pretend everything but not for ever !!So why the
delay ?Why operating at this vast Lag (Phase)Angle
Between illusions and the reality of their own size and
resources? It does no one any good whatsoever???”

Here the Lag (Phase)Angle Between British Ambitions And The

Reality Of their Size Or Resources is as massive as black hole !And

its doing them more harm than any good. But the Brits do not know

or do not want to know that because they are hypocrites !Caught

inside make belief world of dancing in the rain. Drowning in

universal hypocrisy spreading from tampering with the holly grail

(Police Log Book See Page---) !To fiddling most essential

government statistics !To doctoring the daily news !!!!Perfect

practical illustration :While the role of the press in most

democracies to expose corruptions you will find the role of the press

726 219
 220Page 220 of 726

inside this British Pseudo Democracy Is to cover-up corruptions as

we had seen elsewhere in this book how the British press cheekily

and unashamedly calling for the police to apologize for

investigating crimes of sexually assaulting boys or in some cases

even murdering them just because these ghastly crimes were

committed by high ranking army and political personnel ! ?

(See Page---Pseudo Democracy ) ?

When The Differences Between The State And

Institutionalized Crime Reaches The Vanishing Point.
“ n
N =∑(n/2 )π.Hence: L- N.l =0(See Page-Angle of lie)“
0

So if Britain is Doomed .How did they manage so far ?? Simple:

726 220
 221Page 221 of 726

By Compensation !By compensating their short falls with Excessive

Brutalities !Untold Cruelties Some had been described by In this

book under the title of Written Off Ranging from sending their own

(Commoners )All the way to Australia in chains to die with

dysentery! To the more recent poisoning or burning to death of

(Wogs) Inside Britain itself!(See Silent Genocides)?Also by

Protraction and second to none system of (Doing It By Stealth) !

Briefly by Institutionalizing Crime As Source Of Large Part Of

Their National Income To the extent that decent behavioral living is

deliberately criminalized!

It’s When The Differences Between The State And Institutionalized

Crime Reaches The Vanishing Point.

However with the advent of I.T This (By Stealth)Factor will be

increasingly debilitated if not diminishing altogether and all these

British Peculiarities Will be exposed to the world Systematically !

726 221
 222Page 222 of 726

World reaction may be slow patchy and latent but definitely

inevitable!

(See Page--------------------------------------Angle Of Lies)?

(See Page----------------------------Material Dialectics Part-3)

(See Page-------The Truth Index) ? (See Page—---Lag Angle) ?

Machine Calculations:
“Here we provide an alternative to the information
theory proposed inside the Fifth Arithmetic!”
To simplify the ideas proposed earlier (The Fifth Arithmetic):

Let us say there is machine (M) Where [ M f (T).]That

recognizes a lie (L)when it does not fit in to the general truth

(T)!But what is the General Truth?

If we say (All Men Are Idiots) Or (All Idiots Are Men ) Or (All

Men Are Women )The machine (M)will recognise these

726 222
 223Page 223 of 726

nonsensical statements Directly from the Mechanical Position of

the word (All) !And the machine need not be programmed

with anything Qualitatively More complicated than your average

computer! Applying similar Logic Gate Only with slight

modification .

As follows: All Men Are Idiots  Men Are Idiots Men Idiots 

Idiotic Men. etc ?

Let (L-For lie)Be the value in Known Kilobytes of such

misinformation.

Let (T)=Truth. In Unknown Kilobytes?

Then:

M(L) = ∆ L + ∆ T.

Now we insert these values back in to the machine:

M(∆ L + ∆ T.)= ( ∆ L)2 +2∆ T ).

And so forth we keep Pumping Back all these values for the

726 223
 224Page 224 of 726

machine not only to churn out figures ?But also acting as Filter !

Or even a Converter !!

Giving :

M ( ∆ L)2 +2∆ T )  ( ∆ L)n + nT .

Or:

M (L) - n∑0 (T) = ( ∆ L)n

M (L) - ∞∑0 (T) = 0.

Quantum Thresholds.
“Quantum threshold is not a barrier! It’s not there until
you try to climb it !! These are no ordinary barriers!!! It
only erect itself instantaneously the moment you try to
climb it and only after certain factors (Conditions) Had
accumulated on both sides of the barrier !!!!”

“Although it may be ignited by inequities!

Revolutions do not happen Just because of inequities!
The world is full of inequities!
726 224
 225Page 225 of 726

And probably shall remain so indefinitely .

Revolutions are all about Energizing !
Rejuvenating the society!!
Again You Donot Need To Believe Anyone :
Just look at the Quantum Surge in discoveries and
innovations of the arts and sciences which followed
each and every revolution in history ?
Society without successful revolution (like Britain) is a
dead society except by name !Revolution is Recharging
a battery with the Poles being the following ( m&n):”
Three examples already discussed by this book :

1-

On Revolution

If we designate the following quantities as described in the first

arithmetic:

M= Total number of the population of any society before the

revolution i.e. on the left hand side of the potential barrier!

726 225
 226Page 226 of 726

Let ( h) = The height of the barrier?

M= Total number of the population of any society before the

revolution i.e. on the left hand side of the potential barrier!

Let ( m )= The number of people engaged in Direct production?

Let ( n )= All other people.

P = m-n =The polarization inside that society.

And that :M* ,m*, n* ,P*

Starred quantities are for those after the revolution on the right

hand side of the (Potential Wall).

My Theory On Revolution Is Based On The Following

Premises :
a-
That by definition revolutions are like wars always accompanied by
Some But Certain Reduction in the population: M >> M*
b-
Again by definition of any (Successful) Revolution there will be
definite reduction in the polarization of the society where: P >> P*

726 226
 227Page 227 of 726

True Revolution Take Place When:

H=The Inverse of (h)2= f (P)

In the First arithmetic we tried to void Differential

Calculus by improvising analogues with tubes and balls

But this also can be equally derived from the Isamic

Diagrams As follows:

Let (ABCD )The usual rectangle where(m& n)

Representing the Areas Of The Two Halves Divided by

AC .

Where θ = Angle (ACD.)

The moment the two Equal Halves (m &n) Changes

Infinitesimally To : m≠n Then : δ θ = f(m-n).

But : δ θ =1/√2 = m – n = 1/h.

Giving h=Ac= √2 .
∞

726 227
 228Page 228 of 726

H2 = 1/h2 = AC X ∫ 0 d(ac).

This is only true in the two dimensional case of the

Isamic Diagrams. For higher dimensions consider:

J/h =m – n (Where J=√-1) See the Graphs?

This Opens Up Tremendous Possibilities For The

Calculation Of The Energy Required To Climb This

Barrier: Physical? Economical? Demographical?etc.

And This Will Be Discussed At Length In My Next Book?

The Law Of Conservation Of Space .

© Isam .T . Saleh. London -2005

SXY. (m – n).= - SXZ. (m – n) .

“With reference to the Eulerian Angles :

If you cut a disc in the XY-Plane? Where does it go ??
Except towards you i.e. Added to the XZ-Plane!
Per equal assumption: That is if any assumption

726 228
 229Page 229 of 726

Whatsoever Is valid inside the (XY-Plane)? Why not

the other (Inside the XZ-Plane)??”

And that the differences in units areas (m – n) Are not Crushed to

zero ! But Crunched In to the next dimension perpendicular to

the paper (OZ) Through (AC). Like taking tiles from the floor of (

m&n)And sticking it on to the wall between (m&n ) Vertical to

both. δ θ -----In The Limits---- 1/√2 .

2- On Torture :
“All games of torture inevitably comes to torture for
torture sake. Due to the following Three Reasons :

A-
Not at any single moment of time : Either The Torturer

726 229
 230Page 230 of 726

Or The Tortured Can ever be certain that The Purpose

Of The Torture is complete. Therefore Continuity of the
game of torture is Unavoidable .

B-
Innocent or Guilty The Tortured Shall never forgive.

C-
In the case of innocence strong tendencies develop to
continue the Game Of Torture to circumvent the Guilt
of the Torturer. ”

Not all sufferings produces Jesus Christ ! The most

disturbing face of torture not its inhumanity !

Immorality !Or even futility :

It’s the very end product invariably produces .

Once I came a cross this colleague of mine (A School

Teacher –White English)Who had found himself in the

726 230
 231Page 231 of 726

British army and eventually captured by the Japanese !

Needless to say the Japanese tortured all their POW

without discriminations .

He had the sickest personality psychosomatically

speaking that I had ever known and I did not know

whether to hate him ?Or pity him??

Again You Do Not Need To Believe Anyone :

Just examine the personalities of Most Israeli

politicians products of the Nazi perid?

They behave as if there wasn’t anything called Natural

Laws or that the world had no more any values or

conscience left!

Hence we arrive at the following (Cyclic –θ )Formulae :

The Nazis of Germany broke all the rules of Man &

Nature (The Holocaust) :

726 231
 232Page 232 of 726

Leading To The ----Breaking down of all rules by the

Israelites !Similarly :The Anglo -Americans broke all

these rules in Iraq (e.g. Abu Ghraib ?Basra??etc.) .

Leading To The -- The ISS Breaking all similar rules

e.g. the flattening of the most ancient city on earth

(Nimrod of Nainava ) (March-2015)? ! ?

(See The Five Arithmetic-s On Torture )?

Where :

∫ck dθ - ∫oc dθ = θr .And r = f(t)

What Is Protracting Torture ? And Why ??

“They make you feel the whole world is turning against
you until you turn against your own self! Taking your
own life !And they have developed over the centuries
system and methods for such dark practices en masse.”
Unlike the fascists (e.g. Nazis of Germany )Who kills you straight
away !The protracting fascists (e.g. the colonialists of Britain )
Wants you to kill yourself by yourself ! i.e. Driving you to suicide in

726 232
 233Page 233 of 726

premeditated relentless protracting game with coldness outside

human domains !This way they can evade any evidence or
responsibility i.e.The Colonialists Want It Both Ways ! This element
of protraction contain in itself another Lethal Factor : Such
prolonged campaigns inevitably develops not only a Taste For
Sadistic Masochism !But Also An Army Of Sadistic Masochists
Hence these colonialists eventually become very much Addicted to
torture for torture sake. Infecting not just the scum of their society
but surprisingly Even their own crème de le crème As we had
witnessed in the scandals breaking out one after the other in this
Early Twenty First Century Exposing the Dark Side of British M.P.s
! Ministers! Even Their Prime Ministers !Royals? etc. “
(See Scientific Table Two )? For The Differences Between
Fascism And Colonialism.

3-
On The Self Destructivity Of Man And The Constant Of
Destructivity.

Any Issue
[D 1 X T2 ]d2d1 = D 2 X T1 ]t2t1

DFascist X TColonialist = TFascist X Colonialist Translation:

726 233
 234Page 234 of 726

“The difference between fascism and Colonialism: The

first is Quick Death !The latter is Slow Death!!And the
choice is entirely not yours.”
BOTTOM LINE.
“Absolute valid attitudes allow us to plug in absolute
numbers in to the above mathematical relationships. “
(See Page ---The Quantified And The Quantifiable ) ?

Home Goals .
The colonialist have reached such degree of
sophistication they are now actually inducing (Wogs)
To perform Self Goals ! ? ! “
(See Page-------------------------Nimrud-2015) ?

Frequmechanics (Part-Five).
New Physics. New Philosophy.
“It’s well to remember that highly prestigious
universities (e.g. Scottish universities)Call their
departments of physics instead : Departments of
Natural Philosophy Because physics except for the
ignorant is the philosophy of nature .

726 234
 235Page 235 of 726

“We all familiar with the Spinning Top! Floating around

defying gravity before our very own eyes.”

1-Instead of saying:
The airplane flight is due to the Pressure Differentials
At the foil (Wings) ! I claim it fly because it cuts the
cosmic flux at optimal angle.

726 235
 236Page 236 of 726

2-And that the Gyroscope Behave the way it does

because it’s Cutting And Gluing The cosmic flux
between itself and its surroundings instantaneously.

3-Instead of the rocket flying due to action and

reaction :
This view Claims because its moving along the lines of
the cosmic flux negotiating its path along not across !
Between the lines of flux.

4-And that the Earth Stays in its orbit due to two

actions :

a-Cutting the cosmic flux between itself and the

universe by Rotating around its own axis.

726 236
 237Page 237 of 726

b-Cutting the flux between itself and the sun by

Revolving
around the sun itself.

5-
They say that (Airships )Were unstable disasters due to
several factors (e.g. Climate)!
My Alternative Physics Claims that they were just not
cutting and gluing the cosmic flux fast enough !! i.e.
there is Lag Angles between the cutting and gluing of
the cosmic flux.:

Lag (Phase )Angle = f [ῳCutting / ῳGluing] Was just too big

resulting in (Hunting) Or Anti- Resonances .

The Philosophy Behind My Alternative Physics.

“If we replace the classical frameworks constructed with
velocities by translating all velocities (Vectors) In to
frequencies (Scalars)! Then a new world with new concepts
may emerge:”
In Classical Mechanics This Will Be:
V = ῳ.r

726 237
 238Page 238 of 726

In Quantum Mechanics:
Re [ ei(ῳ.t –k.x) ] = Cos ῳ.t –k.x)

EQUATIONS OF MOTION.
“Every Stable object in the universe microscopic or
macroscopic has two frequencies (ῳCutting )Which is
cutting the cosmic flux between itself and all
surrounding objects !And (ῳGluing.)Which is gluing this
cosmic flux After its been cut in time (∆t).”

“The trick is to think of (ῳ) As pair! One of them is just

Before reaching its own final value in time (∆t) ”

First Equation Of Motion.

We split [J ῳ]2 In to +ῳ= ῳGluing And - ῳ= ῳCutting
For one dimensional movement along the X-axis :

[ῳCutting - ῳGluing] 0 -Jθ = dῳ = K dx.

[ῳCutting - ῳGluing ] 0 -Jθ ~ d2ῳ = K2 dx.

[ ῳCutting + ῳGluing ] 0 -Jθ

726 238
 239Page 239 of 726

The Full expression on the left I had in mind is more complex

than what can be printed here! However to Present The Bare
Idea. These expressions should Suffice.)
Clearly : k= 1/ri,j,k.. Where ri,j,k =The radii (Plr).
Similarly: d ῳ = K dy. And d ῳ = K dz. Etc.
Exercise Eight:
If one of these (ῳ )s Is known as the Natural Frequency ?
Can you determine the other (ῳ )From the following
constellation of objects :
X,Y,Z

∑k(dx,dy,dz).
For objects :
(O)Placed at the origin?Object (A)Placed at (-x)?(B) Placed at

(+x)?(C)Placed at (+y)?(D) placed at ( –y) and (E) at+z ? (F)At

(–z )? etc ? Can Any Of This Relate To The S.H.O ?Or S.H.M.??

Second Equation Of Motion.

“The intersection of two lines is the point.
The intersection of two areas is a line .
The intersection of two volumes is area .

726 239
 240Page 240 of 726

The intersection of higher dimensional objects in the

universe is the frequency (Multiplied Off Course By The
Relevant Vector (r i,j,k,etc.)” The Red Monk.

Let ( an ) And ( bn ) Two objects of dimension (n)

Where [ a > b ] ? Their intersection is ( bn-1 ).
Let ;

1/ ῳCutting – 1/ ῳGluing = ∆t.

And

[ῳCutting - ῳGluing] 0 -Jθ = ∆ῳ

Then:
∆ῳ . r i,j,k,etc = bn-1 / ∆t.

But;

dbn/db = bn-1

726 240
 241Page 241 of 726

(∆ῳ . ∆t ) . r i,j,k,etc = dbn/db

- (ῳCutting - ῳGluing )2 / ῳG ῳC = dbn/db

After Substituting ! Rearranging !!And Approximating !!!

[ ∆ῳ / ∆ῳG,C ]2 ≈ - ( dbn/db).

Keeping in mind that both (∆ῳ) And ( ∆t) Are

infinitesimal .

<---------------------------- dῳ ? dt ??db ???

Calculating ῳCutting And ῳGluing .

1-Moment of inertia is a function of its own geometry.

726 241
 242Page 242 of 726

2-Every point can be assigned a frequency of oscillation

around an arbitrary or actual point (e.g. the centre of
the earth) !

3-Each line (AB) Can be represented by either the total

sum of these frequencies =∑ fn !
Or the average [ ∑ fn /n ] !
Or simply the differences = fA – fB
However once the appropriate method had been
determined it should be maintained throughout the
geometrical construction.

4- Alternatively Every line has signature frequency that

distinguish its Length? Shade??And Colours from all
other adjacent lines (Spectra).

If F= Function of (2 л. r ) And f =frequency

representing the corresponding lines in the (Isamic)

Diagram below:

726 242
 243Page 243 of 726

A B
m [ ψi,j.k.l.etc. ].

θ n C
D

ῳGluing . =The areas (m + n) =F/2 (fab fad + fbc fdc ) . And

ῳCutting =Area (m – n) =F/2 (fab fad - fbc fdc ).

For higher dimensions than areas:

(m ±n)= F/n (fab fad fac ---- fan ) ± ( fbc fdc fac----- fnc ).

At m =n

ῳCutting =0

ῳGluing =2m=2n = D nD/2 = D mD/2 (See Graphs 1-9) ?

D = Number of dimensions higher than that of area.

Disproving ( C).

C = Constant Velocity of light.

726 243
 244Page 244 of 726

Ra,b,c,etc. =The Radii from each of these points to the

arbitrary or real centre of rotation .

If Va,b.c.etc.= Variable velocities of Sensor Sources Placed

at these points a,b,c,etc On the line (DB) Then:

fa,b.c.etc.= Va,b.c.etc./ Ra,b,c,etc. Or fn = Vn /Rn

And the average : V = ∑ fn /n X Rn (Since R is variable).

Proving ( C ).
If we now place light sources at these points along the
line( DB )Where Vn = C Then: fn = C /Rn
And The Average ∑ fn /n X Rn =C

Which is meaningless since all these Points! Lines!

Areas etc. Have the same frequencies for the same
diagram therefore there is only one value for the
velocity and that is the constant ( C )Velocity of light .

Geometry With Teeth.

“In this analysis geometrical constructions are treated as
physical objects! With frequencies (By painting each line or side
with different colours in the Spectrum) !! Density=p (Row) :

726 244
 245Page 245 of 726

The number of molecules per unit area in the laminas (Before

stretching) etc?etc??Then:”

+δm=-δn = - δөm δr x unit length = - δөn .K = δ (1/p).

Now do not forget inside (ψi,j.k.l.etc)If i=Represent state of

electrical properties e.g. semiconductors !K=Molecular
texture?? etc. then :
mi ≠ni And mk ≠nk etc?

At: m=n δө =0.

A B
m [ ψi,j.k.l.etc. ].

θ n C
D

At: m=n δөm= δөn

dө
m n

726 245
 246Page 246 of 726

Figure one.

At: m ≠ n δөm ≠ δөn

B”
δөm δөn DB =r
DB”=r + δr.
m n

D
Figure two.

dөm/dt = ῳCutting dөn/dt = ῳGluing

Test:
If in figure one : dө= δөm + δөn
And in figure two : δөm = - δөn
Compute: The two ( ῳ )s

Probing Higher Dimensins By Physical Frequencies.

Introducing Two Frequencies:
A- Mechanical Frequencies (F):
Spectator /Spectrometer.

726 246
 247Page 247 of 726

Blue V

Red

Radius(R).

The circle above represent the earth with radius (R) Rotating at
Constant Frequency (F) !At the surface of the earth geometrical
construction with one face in the plane of the paper the lamina
ABCD (As in the Isamic Diagrams)!Then every single point on
this construction should have the same Constant Frequency(F).
B- Specrtal Frequency(f n) :
We paint the line DC With the colour (Red)And DA with
(Blue)And so forth with the rest of the construction in different
colors !The Spectrometer will register frequency (fRed )For DC
and (fBlue ) For DA. And so forth for the rest of the
construction(s).

3- Relating Mechanical And Spectral Frequencies .

“Proceeding from the Anzast that frequencies are Scalars!
While velocities are Vectors that can be added or subtracted.±”

726 247
 248Page 248 of 726

Essentially by turning the frequencies in to velocities as

follows:
a-We multiply both sides of the equation by unit vector (r )
B-Then by Wave Length ( λn ) Where n=Number of dimensions.
C-Then removing r
F.R.r = ∑ (F± fn ).r. λn Giving:
F.R =∑ni (F± fn ) .λn
F.R – n.F = ∑ni (fn ) . λn
F= ∑ni (fn ) . λn ]/ ( R- n) -------------------------Equation-One.

4- How To Neutralize The Doppler Effect?

By averaging its effect:

V2 =[ ( fRed )2 + ( fBlue )2 ] (λn )2

+[ (λn )2 + (λn )2 ] ( f )2 Etc. ] / n2 -----------Equation-Two.

Now differentiating both sides of Equation-One with respect to

time! Then substituting for Equation-Two We obtains:
O=dv/dt Hence velocity here is constant !

726 248
 249Page 249 of 726

Also giving;

5- F = ∫ d/dt [∑ni (fn ) . λn ]/ (R- n) ].

For example to see what is happening at the 26th Dimension put
n=26 And the units will follow?

6- Alternatively:

F.R =[ ∑ni ri . Cos (өi )] /n = [∑ni fi . λi ] /n.

F.R.n =[ ∑ni ri . Cos (өi )] = [∑ni fi . λi ]

Where :
ri = The distant between the point (i)And the centre of
mechanical rotation.
өi =The angle between (R ) And (ri).
fi = The spectral frequency recorded for point ( i) By the
spectrometer .
λi =The wave length at that point.
Now differentiate all sides of the above equation w.r.t:

d/dt [ ∑ni ri . Cos (өi )] = d/dt [∑ni fi . λi ] .

726 249
 250Page 250 of 726

0=∑ni [dr/dt Cos (өi )-r. Sin (өi ) ]= ∑ni [o + fi . d λi /dt.].

∑ni Tan (өi ). r = - r. dr /dt. And d λi /dt = 0

Giving :

λ =Constant .

In the limits :

2π ~ -(Minus) dr /dt.

Since :

df/dt =0

And since :

∑ni Tan(өi )--- ∑ni (өi ).

∑ni (өi ). ≤ 2 π.

(i.e. Closed Ring ).

Seven Important Notes And Results:

726 250
 251Page 251 of 726

The Philosophy:

----------------
Quantity Quality (Quantitative Jump).
---------------

The Physics :
“Quantum effects are observed not Only Due to their
Microscopic sizes!But Also Due to the Prolificacy Of the
Copied Observables at the macroscopic level “

“According to My (Principle of Prolificacy) Stated earlier

the atom is confined to the potential well between (–x
And +x) Not just because of its microscopic size but
also because its crowded (Squeezed)By other Copies.”
The Red Monk .

1-

I used the terms Gluing and Cutting Instead of Attraction

726 251
 252Page 252 of 726

And Repulsion To avoid any confusion with other concepts

used in other disciplines of science e.g. electricity .

Since the terms I used will be describing the dynamics of the

process of gluing and cutting !Not the Intrinsic Properties of the

object itself ie different to that of electrons always negatively

charged while protons positive etc.

2-

Every stable object in the universe must have been put

together or ( Glued ) By certain energy at certain frequency

( ῳGluing )Macroscopically! Or microscopically (The Compton

Wave length)! And can be separated or ( Cut )With another

energy at different frequency (ῳCutting ). The difference between

these two frequencies we call (Stiffness Factor -∆).

3-

726 252
 253Page 253 of 726

By reducing the energies in to frequencies we simplify the

relationship between the microscopic forces and the

macroscopic Van Der Velt Force (V)Where:

V = 1/ r6 -1/ R12 ≈ 1/n2

4-

These terms apply to all scales Macroscopic !Microscopic !

Molecular !Atomic !Subatomis !Or Nuclear Scales! e.g.

If : ῳGluing - ῳCutting = ∆ῳ

Then for proton (The most stable object in the universe);

∆ῳ = 0 ! For Neutron ∆ῳ = α For Pion ∆ῳ= ᵝ etc And

Van Der Veldt Molecular Forces =[ ∑n ∆ α, ∆ᵝ,etc ] 1/n .

5-The mechanical energy required to join the parts of any

Object in the universe is equal to the energy required to

726 253
 254Page 254 of 726

Separate its parts !But the total sum of the energy required

to join or separate its microscopic parts is not the same as

that required to separate it or to join it macroscopically !

The difference is shown by the following set of equations:

If we have an Ensemble Of Mechanical Frequencies (f) Rotating

around with arbitrary radius (r) Then :The Probability Of

Classical Orbits =

2 π r f1+ 2 π r f2 + -----2 π r fn = ψ(f,t)

2 π r f1 X 2 π r f2 X--------2 π r fn

Or: The Probability Of Classical Orbits =

(2 π r) ∑n fn = ψ(f,t)
1- n

f1 f2 ---- ------fn

6- Frequency As Signature For Energy.

Frequency in itself is not energy! But it can be an accurate
signature for any energy: Microscopic or macroscopic? Celestial
physical or even biological??As in the following examples:
Energy/h(Plank Constant)= 1/Time(The Period)= ῳ.

7- Calculating My Proposed Universal Constant ( H ).

“On the expense of shedding some information we
Simplify By reducing the energy terms in to those of

726 254
 255Page 255 of 726

frequencies! Then we Reconstruct These terms by the

expressions for (ψ) Described above:
Thereafter we can actually obtain more informative
general view. And That Changes In The Frequencies
Can Become A Tool To Determine Changes In The State
Function (ψ).”

”Although I called my proposed (H)A constant ?Its

organically linked to the classical probability of (f)!!i.e.
It’s only a constant within Range Of Frequencies(fn )
Determined by ψ(f,t) !I am denoing it here as H *(H-Star
Or the conjugate of (H)Where (HH*=1 ).”

Therefore:
H *= H ( ψn ) ---- Hn

Proceeding From Two Premises:

a-

726 255
 256Page 256 of 726

The De Broglie Hypothesis The Wave-Particle Duality.

I.e. To avoid complex but quite possible Relativistic

calculations for this purpose we assume that: If a wave

can bend around an object so does the particle.

b-The Eherfests Theorem:

m d<x> ψ = < P >ψ

dt And:

d<P> ψ = < dv/dt >ψ =< F >ψ F-Force.

dt
Imagine there is light source of (Photons) Or a sound

source (Phonons) Emitting With frequency (ῳ) ?Now if

these sources are caught in orbit of radius (R)

Describing Rotational frequency (f)?Then we can have

two simultaneous expressions for the energy:

A- Energy = h X ῳ
B- Energy = H* X f
Where both ( h )And (H )Are as defined above.

726 256
 257Page 257 of 726

Equating both expressions by decreasing the (ῳ)As far

as possible and increasing(f)As much as possible until
both (ῳ) And (f)Are in the same Region Of Magnitudes
(Not necessarily identical)Then we have :
h/H* = f/ῳ

Universal Resonances(Plr). Part-One.

Since both both (f) And (ῳ)Are measurable and (h ) Is

already known we can determine the value of (H).

In the limit when: f = ῳ ( Universal Resonance)

We obtain: h = H*.

Note:
“In Part-Three Of Universal Resonancve there will be
More subtle and less vague ebvaluations of ( H*.)”
H* =H Cos θ = ½ h.( Ωθ/f ) {1- ( ɸ)2 }

The Coupling Equation Of Classical And Quantum

Mechanics .

726 257
 258Page 258 of 726

“If we pick any atom (Or its Isotopes) From the

chemical table emitting the Lowest Possible spectra of
frequency (ῳ)? Then if we place this atom in
mechanical (Macroscopic) Orbit (e.g. the Cyclotron)
Rotating with radius (R) At frequency (f) !Then in
principle we can increase this (f)By reducing the radius
until f = ῳ. Since in theory at least as :
R---------0. f-----∞ ! Where (f =velocity /R).”

Quantum .

Energy = h(Plank Constant) X ῳ. For Microscopic Objects.

ψ(ῳ,t) = Re [ ei(ῳ.t –k.x) ] = Cos (ῳ.t –k.x)

Classical.

Energy = H* X f For Macroscopic Objects.

ψ(f,t)= (2 π R)1- n ∑n fn = The Probability Of Classical Orbits

f1 f2 ---- ------fn

726 258
 259Page 259 of 726

Both of the above two equations can be Quantized by

(u^). As follows:

Diagonal Unitary Representation Of Perturbation

Theory: At d ≠0 But d2 = 0.

t t U0(t t ) ,
/

t U0(t t )
,
/
o V(t /
)

Ti (Time) U 0(t /
, t//)

U(t
1, t1) = o U0(t 1, t1) + oV ( t/) +
o V( t //
)

U0(t , t /
1 )

t1 t1 t1 U0(t //
, t 1)

t1

726 259
 260Page 260 of 726

Where :

ih ∂ ψ/∂ t = H . ψ = ( H0 + V ) ψ

H=The Hamiltonian .

Ψ(t) = U(t)ψo

ih ∂ U/∂ t ψo = H . ψo

ih ∂ U/∂ t = H = (H)0 +V (t/ )

Lowest order :

ih ∂ U0/∂ t = (H)0

Giving :

U0 = e-i/h(Ha)0 .t

But we said above ; In the limit when : f = ῳ : h = H*.

Therefore ; U0 = e-i/H(Ha)0 .t

[- h2 /2µ X ∂2/ ∂r2 + V(r) ]ψ(ῳ,t) = (H )2 ( U0 . ψ(f,t) )

= H2 e-i/H*(H)0 .t . ψ(f,t) ---------Equation (A).

726 260
 261Page 261 of 726

Where:

H* = My proposed Universal Constant .

µ =e/2me C X M.

C=Speed of light.

M=Angular Momentum.

e=Zeeman electron.

V= The Potential

ψ(f,t) As before : = (2 π R)1- n ∑n fn Equation –B.

f 1 f2 ---- ------fn

Now let us make the following anzast :

{-h2/2µ X∂2/ ∂r2+V(r) }ψ(ῳ,t)= (H)f 2 {1/√2 π ∫- e-t2/2}dt.

Equation –C.

You will recognise the expression on the right as the

normal probability integral?

726 261
 262Page 262 of 726

Back Tracking.

The above Result Can be proven with the methods of

Back Tracking By the following steps: (Keeping in mind
these steps are just guidelines or hints )! The formal
proof itself is rather Long And Complex Therefore
delegated to my next book!:
a-
Frequencies offer the Lowest Common Denominator
between classical and quantum mechanics.
b-
We need frequencies because they are both Cyclical
and Physically Measurable.

c-
We chose above the Zeeman expression for the energy
on the left because Magnetic Waves Offer the Lowest
Possible range of frequencies (ῳn) Nearest to the
region of the Highest Obtainable Mechanical
frequencies (fn ) That can be reached. At least In order
of magnitude.

726 262
 263Page 263 of 726

d-Since it’s not possible to determine Simultaneously

the microscopic (Quantum) And macroscopic (Classical)
frequencies (ῳ) and (f ) :We need an Ensemble of
frequencies At Least In One of the two sets say (fn )!
Now back to the The Probability Of Classical Orbits :

ψ(f,t)= (2 π R)1- n ∑n fn
f1 f2 ---- ------fn
e-

By further tweaking of the terms in equations Then

substituting in to(B).
f-Also we make use of Fourier Transformations :

F(t) =1/√2 π ∫ eitx f(x) dx.

F(x) =1/√2 π ∫ eixt f(t) dt.

Notice how the term (1/√2 π)Above corresponds to the

L.H.S. of equation –C ?

g- Smoothing The variables since [df (1-n).= dt(n-1) ].

726 263
 264Page 264 of 726

At this juncture we can Either follow the route of

Integrating By Parts ? Or by the following
approximation:

h-

Keeping in mind:

d ex/dx = ex And

∫ ezx dx =1/z . ex

∫ f (ezx ) dx =1/z . ∫ f(zx)/ezx dx =1/z .

i-

If (E- the Energy)And ψ(x,t) Is a function of e-i.E.t/h

Then: -ih d ψ/dt = E.ψ

j-

Now back to Fourier transformations ;By substituting

and tweaking equations (A,B,C,D,E,etc) Should yield

the required results .

ψ(x,t)= ∫ eikx . ei.ῳ.t ] ψ (k, ῳ) dῳ d K--------

726 264
 265Page 265 of 726

h2 K2 + V (i Ṽk ) ψ (k, ῳ ) = ih ῳ ψ (k, ῳ). Equation -D.

Escape Frequency:
“We all familiar with the value of velocity required to
escape earth gravity. I am proposing here to replace
this velocity (VE )by Escape Frequency (ῳE ).”

Since by multiplying through with any arbitrary radius( r )We get:

r.ῳE = r.ῳCutting – r.ῳGluing =VE .
Then by removing the (r) we are left only with frequencies again:

ῳE = ῳCutting - ῳGluing

Defintions:
Hence we now can define the escape frequency as:
“It’s the frequency required for any object to escape its
own surroundings”

“By degrading (Reducing )The Energy terms in to that

of Frequencies we establish a Tunnel Common to both

726 265
 266Page 266 of 726

Quantum and Classical Mechanics .But first we need to

explore the following hints or tools:“

New Dimensions.
1-The Rock Bottom Common Denominator for both classical and
quantum mechanics naturally is (x,t)!

2-Notice the L.H.S. of equation (C) Above contains Spatial term

(∂2/ ∂r2)Which does not correspond to the terms of Normal
Probability Integral on R.H.S. of the equation.
Therefore I am introducing here New Dimensions Both are now
Scalars And both constituting the very Next Possible Lowest
Common Denominators For both Quantum and Classical
Mechanics ;The inverses of (x,t)Are :( 1/x ,1/t).

The first (1/x) Defined as sigma (ᶞ)= Space Densit(Another Scalar).

While the second (1/t) Recognisable as the Frequency (fn ).

3-All frequencies (fn ).are Scalars i.e. can be added or subtracted

numerically .Similarly space densities (ᶞn )Are also scalars.

726 266
 267Page 267 of 726

ψ ( ᶞ, f ) = N.e-ihf -----Equation –E.

2-
The analogue to Velocity In these new dimensions which I am
calling :

The Flow =dᶞ/d fn

And The the analogue to Acceleration In these new dimensions:

The Blow =d2ᶞ/d fn2

3- The Graph:

ᶞ The Blow.

The Flow.

fn

726 267
 268Page 268 of 726

Dimensionally:

dᶞ/d fn = t2/x2 (dx/dt) .

The Flow = T2/L2 . L/T =T/ L .

=1/ Velocity.
The Blow = 1/Acceleration.
Force X L =ML T--2 . L =M L2 T—2 = Energy .
Mass = (The Flow)2 X Energy.
Mass = (The Blow) X Force.

4-Substituting AllThe Above Results In Equation (A-E)etc.

{-h2/2µ X (d2ᶞ/d fn2)+V(r) }ψ(ᶞ,f)

= (H)f 2 {1/√2 π ∫- e-t2/2}dt.

After Applying The Above Terms:

{-h2/2µ X (The Blow)+V(r) }ψ(ᶞ,f)

= (H*)f 2 {1/√2 π ∫- e-t2/2}dt.

Result.
726 268
 269Page 269 of 726

“This is extremely significant result for calculating the

Blow at Universal Resonances.”

Concrete Results.

Now collecting most of the earlier stated equations:

a-From the prolificacy principle (One,Two,And Three).

n=The minimum number of Microscopic Objects Inside

any macroscopic unit.
N=The minimum number of Macroscopic Copies
required to observe any quantum effects at distant (D).
h=Plank’s Constant.
H=My proposed Universal Constant ????
Then:
h X N = H X n.
b- h X ῳ=HXf
c-
And from the second equation of motion discussed
earlier:

726 269
 270Page 270 of 726

[ ∆ῳ / ∆ῳG,C ]2 ≈ - ( dbn/db) ≈ a Where (a&b)Are any

adjacent sides of the Isamic Diagrams.Gives values for

(ῳ & ῳG,C) In terms of the spectral frequencies at(a& b).

d- Critical Hints:

Diagonal Representation Of Perturbation Theory:

As before : (2 π r)1- n ∑n fn = ψ(f,t) At d ≠0 But d2 = 0.

f1 f2 ---- ------fn

ψ ψ U0(ψ ψ ) ,
/

ψ U0(ψ ψ ) ,
/
o V(ψ /
)

Ti (Time) U 0(ψ /
, ψ//)

U(ψ1, ψ1) = o U0(ψ 1, ψ1) + oV ( ψ/) +

o V( ψ //
)

U0(ψ , ψ /
1 )

Ψ1 ψ1 ψ1 U0(ψ //
, ψ 1)

726 270
 271Page 271 of 726

ψ1

e-
Now equating equations one and two above :
h X N = H X n.
h X ῳ=HXf.
Giving :

N/ ῳ = n/f = h/H.
But : n X N = ∑ n Substituting back for (N ):

∑ n /n2 = ῳ /f = H/h.

And from equation (4) This is :

Ψ = K [ῳ / f ]. But :
N=K. Z (A). From above where :
N=The Minimum Number of copies required to detect
quantum effects.

726 271
 272Page 272 of 726

A=The size of the smallest atom in that chosen unit .

Z=Size of this object measured in multiples of (A).
(This is Not The Same as the number of atoms inside
this object.) K=Some constant.

Often it’s very difficult if not impossible to measure the energy of

objects under indirect or even direct investigations!

However it’s possible to measure their frequencies!

Frequency in itself is not energy but by converting energies in to

frequencies then comparing an ensemble of frequencies each

treated as a sign or signal of the corresponding energy !We can

establish the energy by eliminating the constants in the equations.

For Rigid Objects:

ῳGluing - ῳCutting ~0

For None Rigid Objects :

ῳGluing - ῳCutting ≠ 0

726 272
 273Page 273 of 726

The practical significant of the above two equations will be revealed

in my next book. e.g. By introducing the Stiffness Factor above and
the differences between the frequency of (Impact))And that of
(Recoil) We can measure the size of photon from its momentum !
And other known properties.

The Laboratory.
“Where to look in practice for these Universal
Resonances?”
1-
Similar to Electrical Batteries There are Mechanical Batteries To
restore excessive mechanical energy!
These are cylinders suspended inside casings of magnetic fields
rotating frictionless at incredibly high speeds!!
They are kept underground not for any sinister reasons but only to
avoid disastrous accidents if any of them break away!
Spinning at such extraordinary speed can cause damages
equivalent to the explosions of thousands of TNT ! ? !
If their angular velocities start touching the lowest range of
spectral frequency then the phenomenon of Universal Resonance
Should be observed!

726 273
 274Page 274 of 726

2-
Another place to look for are the Cyclotrons :The particles inside
these are accelerated to incredibly high speeds where their linear
velocities can reach the Speed Of Light But unfortunately their
rotational angular velocities are not so high yet ?

3-
On The Self Destructivity Of Man And The Constant Of
Destructivity.

Any Issue
[D 1 X T2 ]AB = D 2 X T1 ]BA

Or To Borrow The Concept Of (Impulse )From Physics :

t1 ∫ t
F(Fascist) . dt = ∫ t1
t
F(Colonialist) . dt

Where
F=Force of destruction
T-Time the force is applied.

726 274
 275Page 275 of 726

F(Colonialist0 << F(Fascist)

T(Colonialist0 >> T(Fascist)

Introducing The Heterogeneous Units Of Measurements.

“Playing acrobatics with logic! Can yield new insights to
unitary dimensions.”

“ One Apple +One Orange = Two Fruits.”

Two Fruits. +One Sandwich = Lunch.”

726 275
 276Page 276 of 726

“At first sight this book may seem to be cavalier (Easy )

About Physical Units !Its not !!It just that any equation
can be multiplied through by any constant which can
transform the physical units .”

All dimensions can be transformed from the

conventional to Purpose Built Dimensins :
To illustrate this point we take as Example Only :The
equation of the constant of destructivity which keep
appearing at many parts of this book in various
context and formats :
D X T =T X D.= Constant

The constant in the equation is kept constant by

Exchanging the following three :

A-
Their position in the equation i.e. :
DXT=TXD

B-

726 276
 277Page 277 of 726

By exchanging their absolute numerical values i.e. :

3 X 2 = 2 X 3 = 6.

C–

By exchanging the units of each i.e.:

If the units of D =Number of people destroyed in

millions.

And

T=Time in years

Then :

Destruction (D) . Years (Y) = Years . Destruction (D).

Or:

DY = YD = Constant.

And Since Its Constant :

This Can Be Scaled Down To Units Of YD Or DY.

726 277
 278Page 278 of 726

And the above example becomes:

3 D X 2Y= 2Y X 3 D= 6 DY = 6YD.

Applications.

Imagine a black box (Of unknown) But Quantified

particles (D)? And we need to do work or obtain work

from them (e.g. by moving) in finite time (T)!

Then:

[D]d1d2 X [T] t2t1 = [ T ]d1 d2 X [ D ]t1t2

Or Simply : DXT=TXD

Where: d1 = 0 T1,t2,d2 ≠ 0

If two are known the rest of the four can be

determined

726 278
 279Page 279 of 726

If one is known and the other can be estimated i.e.

Quantified the rest of the four can be determined!!

See later for the difference between Quantifiable and

Quantifiable?
Now We Quote Three Very Fundemental Applications
A? B ?And C :

A-Speed Of Light (Part-Two) Dimensionless Analysis.

“According to G.R time and space can intermingle
(Exchange Units Or Dimensions) Under certain
conditions (e.g. Black Holes).
By switching notations the following two black boxes
effectively become our black hole.
From one box we measure the distance moved only!
From the other we measure the time taken only!!
Per say per same specific amount of effort”

726 279
 280Page 280 of 726

If we move inside the above box Cluster of particles (D)

In time (T)Head on against something e.g. another

cluster then by denoting each cluster with d1,d2,d3,etc

Then if we have another identical black box of Identical

But Still Unknown Particles?

By subjecting it to certain identical effort e.g. work

Already Measured From The Previous Box we can

dispense with all the (d )s by denoting each cluster this

time by (t1, t2. t3 , etc ) Instead of (d1,d2,d3,etc) i.e.

by substituting it with time(t) Measured Outside The

Second Box.

Thus by moving one Cluster Against the other we can

establish the number of particles moved:

But the most interesting result is when the process is

inverted Again By knowing the (d )s this time e.g.

726 280
 281Page 281 of 726

number of photons we can actually tell how long it will

take them to move Without Measuring The Time Itself !

This can be shown to be another proof of the constancy

of speed of light inside this black box But only in

Localized Regions Of Space .

B- In Quantum Mechanics;
“We already said above (classically): Only one of the
four need to be determined to estimate the rest.”

a¬ = ∫D*(t) an D(t) dt = an
∫ T*(d) T(d) ∂(d)

726 281
 282Page 282 of 726

The choice of the letter (d) Was unfortunate but clearly

d(d) mean The diff of (d).

Where

an =The average.

D, D* =The state and its conjugate.

C-
Taking this idea further let us now imagine our
constant this time is a cake (Denoted by the letter -C)
Made from the following ingredients:
2 Eggs +3 Apples + Oranges. etc.=Cake “C”.

At one stage of the logic we can say that one egg

makes only half cake and one apple a third of the cake!
etc. Therefore this can be represented as follows:
A cake is made of half cake plus one third cake +etc .
OR:

C= ½ C+1/3C +1/4 C= 13/12 C

726 282
 283Page 283 of 726

Generally speaking
For Tree
T =x Carbons+ y Nitrates+etc. OR:

T= x+y
XY

And the Carbon =1/x while

the nitrates =1/y ----etc.
Applying group theory we can find the new unit for any
element by a permutation of intersections representing
the Identity? Just the way a single point can be
identified by the intersection of ANY two lines drawn
through it ? ! ?
Most units of measurement are of predetermined parameters?
e.g. that of force is simply units of

Mass x units of acceleration.

1/ F = 1/ [ FMass. + F Accelerations. ] etc ? ?

726 283
 284Page 284 of 726

F= ma
m+a m+a
1/m + 1/a =--------------- = ---------------=1.
ma. F.

At unity F=m+a. or :

F=ma-----------F(m+a)

Similarly for other units of measurements.

As to what purpose this equivalence employed is not of any

concern! As long as it is homogeneous? What I am proposing

here is Backtracking on this! i.e. first we determine the

objective of measurement then organically link this to the

units! For example? Let us introduce an [x arbitrary units] of

whatever it takes to produce an apple tree? And this is equal to

“Y” units of calories required plus “Z” -units of sunshine or

whatever catalyst is required? Therefore;

One “apple- like unit of measurement” is [ 1/x=1/y+z+etc.]

Similarly in social domains we can say:

” Revolution -like units” = 1/ [K-number of population +Y-

number of rebels +S-units of sunshine etc?]

726 284
 285Page 285 of 726

(Believe it or not the Russian October revolution happened in

November after Exceptionally Long Hot Russian Summer!”

Needless to say that this system of measurements will be

organically linked to the objective? And varies from one

objective to another! i.e. .

BOTTOM LINE-S.
“The truth like positron dies the moment we discover
it” The Red Monk.

“When all the curtains of lies are drawn! The truth

remain dancing solo! And singing soprano!”
The Red Monk.

“Like deaf and dumb(Village Idiot) in a Brazilian

carnival the truth inside Britain is dancing solo “
The Red Monk.

726 285
 286Page 286 of 726

“Even a lie is a piece of information! Will tell us

something about the liar” The Red Monk.

“The easiest thing in the world for the ignorant-s of the

world to dismiss anything incomprehensible as
paranoia .” The Red Monk.

The Quantified ? Quantifiable And the Quantifiably .

“Here we express these three with Socio –Political
Parameters !For Physical Parametrics See chapter
seventeen and eighteen.”

The Quantified.

If we need to make list of countries to compare their deviation from

what is considered to be (Normal) ? :

726 286
 287Page 287 of 726

We can choose one singular anomaly of (Any Available Reliable

Statistics)e.g. The number of homosexuals inside the nation then

dividing this number by the population of that nation !Simple.

And this is Quantified .

(See Page----Degrees Of Anomalies )?

The Quantifiable .

When colonialists like the British occupied and colonised killing

countless millions from Africa to the Middle East to the Indian

Subcontinent and back to the Middle East !They could not have

achieved all of that by charging their own population with love or

tolerance but with hate and only hate which I shall call hereafter

English Venom.

This hate or venom cannot be measured directly but only by its

726 287
 288Page 288 of 726

consequences? Simple but concrete scale of Direct Proportionality

i.e. it will be a Function of the number of people killed by the

British during any given period( Divided ) By the population of

Britain during that period of time.

I called this quantity the B.U.V.O (The British Unit Of Venom).

And if we repeat the same procedure for the rest of Europe calling

this result the E.U.V.O . for (European Unit Of Venom ).

I found out that the : BUVO >>EUVO ( Always much larger .)

The Constant Of Constant-s..

What is most striking about these constants the BUVO And EUVO

That their ratio Remain Constant Even during peace times ! ? !

This can be proven as follows:

If we take the number of Overseas Students or people in general of

Foreign Origin who had entered Britain since the end of the second

world war and who had been deliberately Disabled or had been

stealthily sentenced to premature Deaths(As described by this book)

726 288
 289Page 289 of 726

Then dividing these numbers by the average population of Britain

since the second world war denoting this as (Peace Time- BUVO).

Then repeating the procedure with other (Normal )European

nations e.g. France or Italy denoting the result as :

(Peacetime- EUVO). To our shock and horror we discovered that :

The ratio of : BUVO(Peace Time )÷ (Divided)by the EUVO (Peace

Time )= BUVO(War Time )÷ (Divided)by the EUVO (WarTime)

= Constant! ? ! And these are the Quantifiable;

(See Page-----------------------------The BUVO And The EUVO ) ?

(See Page-S -------------------Silent Genocides Parts 1,2,3,Ec) ?
(See Page------Death Squads Parts 1,2,3 ,Etc ) ?
The Quantifiably .

We can not measure Morality directly but we can measure

Immorality .

For example We All Agree That murder is immoral (To say the

least)!Therefor the measured degree of Morality is the inverse

726 289
 290Page 290 of 726

function of the degree of Immorality Already measured from

calculating the Number Of Murders Per Say .

(See Page----The Red Monk Law) ?

(Seepage-----------Let the Statistics Speak For Itself)? Also :

(See Six Calls To The United Nations On Pages--- ) ?

This Was Only The Summary !For The Rest See Volume

Three(the Five Arithmetic-s By Visiting :

www.scribd.com/isamtahersaleh

In This Book We Only Allow Numbers Figures And

Equations To Speak Out.
“Here we list Most of the equations Derived by this
book.”

1- The Constant Of Destructivity.

726 290
 291Page 291 of 726

Let:
d = the absolute or total destruction.
T=Time it had taken.
D = Destructivity or the rate of destructivity D= d/T.
Then for any two entities (A & B) :
We have:
DA X TB = DB X TA

Dimensionally :

dA / T 2 = dB / T 2

Which Is Consistent With The Graphs Of Decay And Destruction:

[ ℮kT ]
Destruction.

Time.

Now if we Plug In all the available figures (Given inside this book
726 291
 292Page 292 of 726

or by any other Independent Source ) For:

A=Germany. And B=Britain.
We arrive at one and only one conclusion that is :
The Total Destruction (d)By Britain Is At Least Ten Times Bigger
Than That Of Germany .
Curiously.
If we now substitute the units of distance for (d) Instead of
(Destruction) And add (d)To both sides of the equation then
multiply both sides by (ό ) Sigma = Mass per unit length :We get :
dA / T2 + d .ό = dB / T2+ d .ό
Which is Analogous to the all too familiar equation of :

Force = Acceleration X Mass.

Graph Ten:
Militarism

Fascism

Colonialism
θ
O--BRITAIN------------GERMANY----------RUSSIA-----JAPAN. –----

726 292
 293Page 293 of 726

Where (θ)Is the constant of destructivity applied in the

equations derived earlier as follows :
1- The Constant Of Destructivity.
Let:
d = the absolute or total destruction.T=Time it had taken.
D = Destructivity or the rate of destructivity D= d/T.
Then for any two entities (A & B) :We have:
DA X TB = DB X TA
Dimensionally : dA / T2 = dB / T2

Any
(θ) [D 1 X T2 ]d2d1 = D 2 X T1 ]t2t1

Further Interpretation Of My Equation 0n The Constant

Of Destructivity And Graph Eleven.
“The most striking part how the proof to my theory
present itself Even at the Tail End Of The Argument i.e.
Even in Peace Time When the Ratio of overseas
students destroyed by the British to the population of
Britain is equal to the Ratio of overseas students
destroyed by the Germans to the population of
Germany and its equal to constant!”
726 293
 294Page 294 of 726

[D 1 X T2 ]Y(Fascists) = [D 2 X T1 ]X (Colonialists)
Let :
D1 , D2=The Number Of People Killed Directly By The

Fascist And The Colonialists.

T1 ,T2 = Time Taken To Kill Thèse People In Each Case By The
Fascistes And Colonialiste .
And Let :
X= Total World Population During The Period When British
Colonialism Began .
Y= Total World Population During The Second World War.

1-First we need to calculate the constant of the

equation from Available Concrete Figures for example :

We know for certain now that during the Six years of

the second world war i.e. T1 = 6 Years.The Germans

(Nazis) Killed At Least Thirty millions (Six Millions Jews

Plus Twenty Four Millions Slavs).

726 294
 295Page 295 of 726

Therefore the constant of the equation :

= D1 / T1 = 30/6 = 5.

2-We also know For Certain That British Direct Colonialism did

last (Again) At Least Seventy years i.e. T2= 70 Years.

3-Now plugging All the numbers above in the equation :

D1 / T1 = 5 = D2/ T2

Will give the number of people killed by the British as

D2 =One third of a Billion !

4-So what has gone wrong with this equation because

Surely the Brits could not have killed One Third Of

Billion When the population of the entire world was

only one billion? ! ?

5-The answer is found in the (Inflationary Term (X/Y):

Just as one thousand pounds nowadays is equivalent

726 295
 296Page 296 of 726

(Purchasing power)to fifty pounds at the beginning of

British colonialism similarly: X And Y as defined above:

X= One billion world population while :

Y= Four billions world population during the second

world war.

Hence introducing the inflationary factor X/Y = 1/4.

6-And the full equation of mine become :

[D 1 X T2 ]= [D 2 X T1 ] ( X/Y ).

[30 /6]4(Fascists) = [D 2 /200 ]1 (Colonialists)

Or:

[5]4(Fascists) = [D 2 /70 ]1 (Colonialists)

Giving :

726 296
 297Page 297 of 726

D2 = 5 X 70 X 1/4 . ≈ 80.7 Millions People killed by the British

worldwide and this most certainly tally with all available

recodrs when you add it all up as follows :

Total people killed by the British :

= 35 millions in the Indian Subcontinent + 5 millions in the

Middle East + Eleven millions In Africa + Unknown Miscilanous

e.g. ( South East Asia +American Red Indians +Australian

Aboriginaries ) + etc +etc ≈ Eighty millions.

Please Note The Following :

a-We had taken the safest First Order Of Approximation By

plugging the Absolute Minimum :

This was indicated above by the words (At Least).

b-We only counted the number of years (70)As the minimum in

direct (Contact Killings Colonialism) Inside the Three Centuries

of British colonialism.

C- And The Numbers Still Rising.

726 297
 298Page 298 of 726

What this equation is telling us in Concrete terms that

the British had murdered the Equivalent of one billion
people in today’s terms (By Today’s Scale) !Or just less
than One Tenth of entire world population in
yesterday’s terms. Period. However to predict an
estimate for the size of atrocities committed by any
growing power e.g. the U.S.A. We proceed as before but
replacing Past Period ( X ) By the Future Period (Z ):

[D 1 / T1 ]Y= [D 2 /T2 ]X = [D 3 /T3 ]Z

With The (Inflationary Period )Now (Z/Y):And So Forth:

(See Page---------- Numbers That Speak Louder Than Words)?

Graph Eleven:

After Superimposing Graph Seven On Graph Ten:

With:

TColonialists >> TMilitarists >> TFascits.

Whereas now : T=Time (The inverse of the periodicity shown in

graph seven) And by substituting :

TFascits. =Six year of Nazi Germany (Second World War)

726 298
 299Page 299 of 726

TColonialists = Four Centuries of British colonialism.

Etc:

Militarism

Fascism. Time-T.

Colonialism
θ
O--BRITAIN------------GERMANY----------RUSSIA-----JAPAN. –----

Intrinsic Propensity For Destructivity The (I.P.D.).

“Our equation now reappears in the form of :
(T/d)A=Constant = (T/d )B
And we define the absolute value of destructivity for
any entity (A) As the Inverse Of the Rate of total
destruction to determine the Intrinsic Property for
destructivity inside each entity (A,B, etc. :
DA = ( T/d )A”
If we now plug in the figures (A) For Germany And (B)For

726 299
 300Page 300 of 726

Britain in the above equations :

We all know that the Germans were directly responsible for
killing At Least thirty million people in the second world war
which lasted six years i.e. :
DGermany = 6/ 30 = 1/5.
And we also know that during British colonialism of Two
Centuries (200 Years)the British had killed At Least Thirty Five
Millions In The Indian Sub Continent Plus Five Millions In The
Middle East And Nearly Ten Millions In Africa.
Therefore :

DBritan. = 200 Years ./(Divided by )35 + 5 + 10 = 50 Millions = 4.

2- Back Tracking.
“Again we apply the scientific methods of
backtracking”
We cannot measure the amount of hate required to kill certain

amount of people but we certainly can measure the number of

people killed by that amount of hate which I call :

Communal Venom.

726 300
 301Page 301 of 726

Hence we define: The Ratios:

BUVO (British Unit of Venom)

= Number of people killed by Britain during any specific period

of time Divided By the population of Britain during this period.

EUVO (European unit of venom)

= Number of people killed by Any European Country during any

specific period of time Divided By the population of that same

European country during this period.

Notice:
Observe the wording (At Least ) i.e. The Safe Solid Absolute
Minimum In all of these calculations ?

3- The Constant.
“What prompted this study in the first place was the
Phenomenon of the inertia of killing (Wogs)By the
British extending itself even in to peace times !
(See Silent Genocides ) ?”
A-
We already calculated the (I.P.D) for both Germany
726 301
 302Page 302 of 726

DGermany = 1/5 And that for Britain DBritan = 4.

Therefore their war time ratio (W) For destructivity was that of
Britain to Germany W = 4 Divided by (1/5) = 20
i.e. British destructive is At Least Twenty Times worse than that
of Germany .
Curiously This ratio stays the same even inside Conditions Of
Peace Times as follows:
B-
Now if we calculate both the BUVO and EUVO as given above in
conditions of peace (P)Then take the ratio of the (BUVO)
Divided By The (EUVO)We find it Stays the same Even at peace
times (See Silent Genocides inside Britain )Where P = 20.?i.e. a
constant of the two constants W/ P = 20/20 =1

The I.P.D. The Analogue Of P.E.

“The Intrinsic Propensity for Destructivity (I.P.D. )Is
the Potential Destructivity analogous to the Potential
Energy (P.E).”.
Question:

If we already know the British had killed At Least Twenty times

more than the Germans? Then why do we need to redefine

726 302
 303Page 303 of 726

(Destructivity )As the inverse of the rate of destructions ?

Why can’t we just simply say Britain had killed so many more
than Germany ?
Answer :
Yes knowing the concrete figures of the number of people killed
by each tell us the absolute truth but does not offer us the Scale or
(The Metric) To measure the Destructivity Of Each in all
circumstances e.g. (War Or Peace)!To apply the Metric For any
period of history or (Even To Predict The Future) Its analogous to
the P.E (Potential Energy) Term in physics! But only in the sense
its ( Potential Destructivity):
The definition need to be clear and closed (Not open ended) For
this we must insert the Time Dimension i.e. we need the inverse of
the rate of destruction which contains (Time) .

The Metrics Of Relative Destructivity.

We already calculated the I.P.D for Germany was (1/5).
And for Britain =( 4).
Therefore we said their Relative Destructivity is :
(4)/(divided)By (1/5) = 20. I.e.
Britain in Real Terms is Twenty Times More destructive than
Germany! Meaning :

726 303
 304Page 304 of 726

If in Peace Time the Germans destroy the life of one Schwarze

(Wog)Per day ? Britain is destroying twenty .
Similarly it’s recorded fact that during the Algerian war of
independence the French killed one million Algerians in the last
year or two of this war !Hence;
French I.P.D =One Year /(Divided By)One Million =1
(Approximately).
And the Relative Destructivity of Britain to France will be 4/1 =4.
i.e. if the French again inside Peace Time Destroy the life of one
Gypsy Per Day ?
The British will destroy Four Times that much.
And so forth:

Application.
“In this book we only allow numbers figures and
equations to speak for themselves.”

726 304
 305Page 305 of 726

From available Figures we can build a list for most of nations

similar to those we constructed for the Degrees Of Anomalies :
(See Page------ Degrees Of Anomaly) ?
Which was based on the total number of homosexuals inside the
nation divided by the total number of its population!
The Most Striking Discovery Which Comes Out Of Comparing
The Two Lists:
They Are Found To Be In Close Correspondence With Each
Other!
Proving That Homosexuality Is Just Another Form Of
Destructivity.

(See Page ------ Crime And Homosexuality) ?

Angels Of Destructivity.
“To maintain this constant? Destructivity needs its own
Permeant agents or angels! Clearly the above equations are
telling us who are these angels of Destruction? They are the
E.S.P (And Their Jews) .” (See Page-----Killer Race ) ?
“By the end of this book it should had become abundantly clear

726 305
 306Page 306 of 726

for anyone who read it properly:

That given a choice between the fascism of Hitler and Mussolini
or the Protracting Indefinite Latent Colonialism of Britain and
France ? The first is much more preferable to the latter because
at least there was light at the end of the tunnel.”
(See Page-----------------------------------------Super Glue ) ?
Rejoice:
“Rejoice for the English Speaking People Finally had shown their True
Colors Even For The Simpletons Of This World To See ! From
the Semi Daily Shooting to death black people as if they were
clay pigeons inside the USA ! To the Systematic Poisoning of
foreigners in England And Wales! To the slaughtering of Fifty
Muslims Within Seconds on the other side of the world
(Newzealand-March-2019)!All clear evidence that this Killer
Race :These Enemies Of Mankind Are committing atrocities in
Peace Times What others will not commit in War Times.”
(See Page---Killer Race Parts One –Twenty Seven)?

Memorial Days.
“In addition to the United Nations Declaring January
the 27th as memorial day to remember the Jewish
holocaust in Europe :
The united nations should in addition (Not instead)

726 306
 307Page 307 of 726

allocate another Memorial Day To remember the

Countless Millions of (Wogs)Killed by the colonialists in
Asia The Middle East And Africa !
(So it may never happen again)!
Or does the U.N Not consider the lives of these
(Wogs)Of the same value as those of the Jews or other
Europeans “

Islands And Penesulas.

“Peninsula =3/4 Island.”

For more details on this subject see five arithmetic-s

(See Page-------Islands And Peninsulas )?

The Power And Irony Of Colonialists Propaganda .

“Again You Di Not Need To Believe Anyone Just Note

That: While the streets of (Fascist)Vienna and

726 307
 308Page 308 of 726

Germany are filled with the statues of Artists !Great

Composers !!And Philosophers !!You will find the
streets of (Democratic )England filled with the statues
of killers e.g. that of Nelson at Trafalgar square (killer
of Spaniards and French) !Or the statue of (Sir Francis
Drake )Killer of Spaniards !OR(Sir)Winston Churchill
killer of millions of (Wogs) ! Believe me the list is
endless !But I there again what else can you do ?When
you do not have genuine great men civilized
dispositions instead of wars ? Make statues of Fake
achievers and Copiers who bound to be exposed
sooner or later by history before their statues had time
getting oxidized ( Grey/green)? Exposed By History As
You Will Gather From Between The Lines Of This Or
similar Books.?”

2-The Graph Of Decay Of Nations.

(The Decay Of Nations Part Four).

Growth.

726 308
 309Page 309 of 726

A B

Ascension. Role Inversions.

O Angle-Ѳ Time. Angle –β ( C

Angle βetta >> >Always Much Larger Than Ѳ.

Symptoms at (OA) =Fascism Or Famine !
(See Page---Hunger Is The Progenitor Of Their Fascism) ?

Symptoms Of (BC)= Inversions of Rloes ! Of Logic! And

Of Priorities !Even of Sexuality (i.e. Homosexuality).!!
(See Page---------------------The Pink Pound ) ?
The bigger angle betta the more sever are the
inversions in some cases when(Maximum β =π/2)
There will be Total inversions e.g. Dr Shipman (See
Page--) ?Or the Grenfell tower fire (See Page---)?

C.C.G. (Carriers Of The Criminal Genes ,

What Is Genetics ?

“When a bird is singing ?Flying? Or Picking ?

726 309
 310Page 310 of 726

It did not go to any school teaching it how to do so!

The bird often without any help not Even From its own

mother does it driven by Genetics that had been

mutated in several generations.

Similarly when an E.S.P. (English Speaking Person)

Hates or shoot at black people like clay pigeons (See

Page---Clay Pigeon) ?Or committing those Verified

Crimes against humanity in Basra ?Abugraib?Etc?

(Iraq)!Or the May Lay massacre (Vietnam)!He did not

learn it at any school or whatever? He or she (e.g. Ms

England of Abu Graib)Are driven by genetics that been

formed during Five Centuries of Chattel Slavery

followed by at least Three Centuries of Direct

Colonialism!

726 310
 311Page 311 of 726

It’s for these very same reasons you will observe inside

nations that did not practice slavery like Russia and

Germany Racism is always Short Lived and superficial.

For Brevity And since there is no other Motives for

these criminal acts committed by the E.S.P(And the “P”

Now stands for People) :

Hereafter this book will call these motives as (English

Venom )!Or pure English venom.”

(See Page---What Is Genetic Mutation)?

(Seepage---The Second American War) ?

(See Pages------------Matters Of Science ) ?

What Is Genetic Mutations ?

“They tell us how genetics are behind this illness or
that disease ?But they dare not tell you how genetics

726 311
 312Page 312 of 726

are behind the notorious criminality(Both

Institutionalized Or Otherwise)Of the E.S.P.!!”

“ Genetic Mutations Inside human beings do not

happen overnight! It takes time !Lots of time !! Lots of
Generations !Measured in scales of magnitude its only
compatible to the Centuries of British colonialism and
before it that period of slavery ! Not the Decades of
Nazi Germany or Japanese militarism. That is why
racism inside Germany we note is Transient Superficial
Open :Therefore Curable.
While the racism of the E.S.P. Is Deep Institutionalized
Subtle Stubborn Sly Slimy Sneaky Therefore Incurable.”
(See Page----Fundamental Forces )?On Why British Or
American Policemen See Blood At The Very Sighting Of Any
Black Person ??Also: (See Pages –Clay Pigeons) ?

Guns do not kill people !Only people kills people! To kill so many

people ?You need so much hate. Both the Shock Fascists (The

Nazis)And the Protracting Fascist (The Colonialists)In addition to

726 312
 313Page 313 of 726

arms and armaments they needed hate ! Lots of hate ! Such amount

of hate(Real Or Fabricated) Does not come out of the blue! It

needs to be Generated And Sustained Systematically !

A lengthy process of Indoctrination! Arguments ! Even Mythologies

(As it’s the case with the Israelis)To motivate their own people and

industry to killWeather this hate can be Quantified Or not is

Immaterial Because its consequences are very much Material !

It’s the Concrete Number of people killed by the Concrete Number

of people who hated them! Period .It really baffles me how such

concrete Direct Correlations Between the (Amount)Of hate and its

consequences had escaped these scientists so far.

(See Page-----Moral Melt Down Inside The E.S.P.(And Their

Jews)Part-1 ) ?

Criminal Genes In Action (Parts 1-72).

“ Nature knows only Vengeance !Not Forgiveness!!Its i
am afraid its Measure For Measure.” The Red Monk.

726 313
 314Page 314 of 726

“Its direct reaction to Phenomenal Scarcity inside their

own bleak barren island the English Addiction to
Overestimate Themselves While Underestimating The
Rest Of The World Around Them.!This may have had
worked in the past but no more!! its this lack of Space
and Resources what is behind their Unshakable Habit
of always trying to get something out of nothing by
Protractions and Blackmailing others with Most Basic
Needs !!!!!”

Heaven and hell are here on earth not just in the life after:

726 314
 315Page 315 of 726

There is principle in the Science Of Biology that Even if an

Innocent Child abuse their body or get abused by others there will

be No Forgiveness And that part of the body will eventually hit

back in Later Years With related Punishment ! Similarly when a

race like the English Persist (By Protractions) On committing

atrocities against their fellow men (Overtly Or Covertly )!

Then these crimes will not just go away but are both Stored And

Spread in what we call Criminal Genes only to come back haunting

them Later Here On Earth Not In Life -After !

That is why you see inside the English speaking nations their

ordinary daily lives are plagued with the miseries of crime and

criminals !

Stewing inside the Hell Of Mass Paranoia Comes as standard in

these crime infested nations.

Again You Do Not Need To Believe Anyone :

Just Check It Out For Yourself :

726 315
 316Page 316 of 726

How Britain By Far the most Destructive Virulent and Protracting

Compared to all other colonialists can now happily claim having

By Far : the Highest Rate Of Suicides and the Lowest Quality Of

Life?

As for the Question :

Why the British were not punished for their Crimes Against

Mankind Same as the Nazis ?

Good Question :

You see unlike the Nazis the crimes committed by the English were

Largely By protraction (Invisible To The Naked Eye) Similarly

their punishment will be also Largely by protraction (Invisible To

The Naked Eye)!

Like I Said I Am Afraid Measure For Measure.

Here Is A Concrete Illustration :

726 316
 317Page 317 of 726

Examole:
“When the English colonialists Captain Cook And his so called
(Explorers) Arrived in new Zealand :The simple unsuspecting
tribal peasants and their chiefs welcomed such novelties with
flowers and dance !
Hours later the English rounded them up and slaughtered
everyone insight!! (it was considered necessary Routine to
terrorize the natives before declaring New Zealand Dominion
for her Britannic majesty )!it was just one of countless
massacres committed by the English All Over The World !Most
were unprovoked and unnecessary genocides meant to
Terrorize the population even when the natives had long since
given up any hope of getting rid of this Curse! This Super Glue!!
Now Please Tell Me Who Is The Bigest Terrorist On This Planet
That Still (2019)At Large (Thanks To Uncle Sam)???
This year(2019)The British ambassador (Commissioner)To
Newzealnd Apologized to the tribal chiefs for this uncalled for
atrocity !! I Am Afraid This Is Not How Nature Operate? These
tribal chiefs may have swallowed the apology ? Because not in
the distant future one of these Slender Necked Insignificant
Looking Black Mauri Will be arriving in London carrying a
suitcase laden with ticking Atom Bomb To ward off the Evil
Spirit the English inflicted om his ancestors.

726 317
 318Page 318 of 726

And remember this was just one of the Countless Massacres the
English had committed All Over The World Most were
Unnecessary Unprovoked And Pure Hooliganism Meant to
Terrorize the population Even When the natives had long since
given up any hope of getting rid of this Super Glue !
Now please tell me Who Is The Biggest Terrorist Of Them All in
history ? This is how Blood Thirsty The English Been ?And
Always Will Be ??As plenty evident from the latest massacres
of (Wogs)Inside England itself e.g. the Grenfell Genocide of
Eighty Immigrants (2016 ) or Again New Zealand the massacre
of Fifty Muslims (2019) By Australian of English desfent
Organized Executed And Covered Up by very official English
circles! Ignore These Morbid Facts At Your Peril.”
(See Pages—Super Glue Parts 1-) ? (See Page--English Polo )?
(See Page---The First Genocide ) ?(See Page---The Latest Genocide ) ?
(See Pages---The Enemies Of Mankind ) ? ()See Page –Killer Race ) ?
(See Page--- Criminal Genes Parts 1-72) ?
“Do not waste your time sooner or later you will discover that :
Britain is Organized Crime organized against mankind! And i
mean all of mankind!!Rest is window dressings(Cosmetics)”
(See Pages---Agents of Destructivity) ?
“Do Not Expect the criminal genes to jump out of the
skin just because the body jumps in to police uniform.”
The Red Monk.

726 318
 319Page 319 of 726

Colonialism From The Objective To The Chronic To The

Genetic.
“In the beginning the colonialists colonised by the
Objective necessity to obtain Raw Materials !Then after
centuries as its the case with the English it became
Chronic !! Then the chronic turned in to Genetic
Mutations For the criminal ways of life and living !!
Again You Do Not Need To Believe Anyone : Just
observe how crime and criminals in all the strata of
their communities plays central role inside the average
life of the E.S.P.(And the –P-Now is for person )”
Scientists who deliberately or otherwise missed this crucial point !

By not providing the required scale for measuring it !

It Seems The Lack Of Honesty Can Extend Itself Even To Scientific

Community? Because though Hate Itself cannot not be Quantified !

Its certainly Quantifiable !

As we shall see from the following scale I am proposing for these

calculations :

726 319
 320Page 320 of 726

K(The Ratio Of Hate)

=Number Of People Who Are Indoctrinated To Hate so
they can kill /(Divided)By :
The Number Of People Who Are Killed By That Amount
Of Hate :

KP = GK.P.
Where :

G is the genetic factor Coagulated after the period (P-In

Years)?
And(K )Raised to the power of (P-Years)!

BOTTOM LINE.
“The above equation all that is telling us that the
criminal genes are Transmitted According to the Rapid
geometrical not arithmetical progression.”

(See Page------Criminal Intent ) ?

726 320
 321Page 321 of 726

Exercise:
“(D X T = T X D )Is a Mathematical Philosophical Field
where Causality And Effects Exchange places
simultaneously .”
1-Can you Superimpose the above equation:
KP = GK.P.
On my master equation of : D X T =T X D.= Constant .

2-Can you deduce the point of Quantum Threshold reached?

3-Why this Quantum Threshold Telling us that :

Once the point is passed then the amount of hate though
becomes Invisible Its Irreversible (Only for the Protracting
Fascists i.e. the Colonialists )? ?

4-Is this Irreversibility Has anything to do with the

Irreversibility Of Time i.e. The Longer The Time (Protraction)
The More Irreversible It Becomes .

5-Does the resulting equations indicate Geometrical or

Arithmetical Progression of the criminal genes ?
Also:(See Chapter Five--------The BUVO And The EUVO ) ?

726 321
 322Page 322 of 726

Matters Of Science. Proving The Criminal Genes.

“The most significant results obtained by this book are
those on the Criminal Genes (C.G).”

“Although we do not know the Absolute numbers of

criminal genes for each case ! We can by comparison
calculate their Relative Existence .”

726 322
 323Page 323 of 726

We already discussed under the titles of Back Tracking and

(Quantifiably)That not everything can be quantified directly .

In science often indirect methods are applied to measure the

observable :Be it the Invisible Atom or the remote Visible Stars It’s

still Exact Science.

We also quoted at various sections of this book that:

By Going As Far Back As Possible In History That Is As Far Back

As Recorded Well Documented History Can Allow :

You will be surprised how accurate and well verified these

collected numbers can be ? For example by comparing these Real

Figures and Concrete Numbers it was discovered that the Ratio Of

the Total Number of people killed or disabled by the British is at

least Twelve Times the total number of people killed or maimed by

the Germans .We also discovered to our Ultimate Surprise That this

Ratio (Not The Absolute Numbers)Remained constant Even during

Peacetimes!

726 323
 324Page 324 of 726

A constant that is stubbornly refusing to budge ? !

Invariably pointing out to the solid existence of certain Natural

Forces !

Insisting that be it War Or Peace Or any other conditions in

between :

There are :

Permanent Motivating Forces Carried and driven by the most

fundamentals inside our beings? i.e.

By biophysical-s such as Criminal Genes.

Which can only be permanently maintained by Bio-Forces.

Again by Comparisons :

We can obtain the Exact Mathematical Ratio Of these C.G.

Though not their absolute numbers as follows:

726 324
 325Page 325 of 726

Total number of people killed by the British at:

War times ÷(Divided)By Total number of people killed

by the Germans at Wartimes:=Equal

Total number of (Wogs) Killed Or Traumatized by the

British at Peace Times (See Pages---Silent Genocides)? ÷

(Divided)By the Total number of (Auslanders)Harmed

by the Germans at Peace Times:=(Equal)

The Rate(Per Capita)of common crimes committed

inside countries of similar Economic Systems e.g.

Britain or USA ÷(Divided )By the Rate (Per Capita)Of

common crimes committed inside a nation of similar

economic system e.g. Germany = (Equal):

The number of Criminal Genes Carried by the Average

E.S.P. ÷(Divided)By the number of Criminal Genes

carried by the Average German =8 to 12.6

726 325
 326Page 326 of 726

Important Notes:
1-All Of These Totals Are Measured Over Equal Periods Of Time
Spans For Each Case Indicated Going As Far Back As Concrete
Indisputable Records Of History Permits.
2-When we talk about the ( Rate )Of common crimes we mean
the Rate of the total crimes divided by the population of the
indicated nation !Or what is known as (Per Capita –Per Head)!
Then we only begin to understand the horrors presented by
these equations when we plug the Concrete Numbers !
For example inside the USA alone the American police shot
dead three hundred sixty (360)Unarmed Black persons during
the first five months of (2015)Alone! ? !
These are only crimes committed by the police themselves and
when you add to it crimes committed by None Police the rate
for the E.S.P will become unbelievably massive compared to
those of Modern Germany Where the police had shot no one
during those five months of-2015(There was only one single
shooting incident in the Past Fifty Years !)As for the Rate of
common crimes by None Police in Germany Its minimal.
Germany Was Chosen For Comparison:As Worst Case Scenario!

726 326
 327Page 327 of 726

How The Criminal Gene Is Fed?And Why Its Growing??

. >>>>Criminal Gene.

Fascism Racism
V
Slavery

<<< Colonialism

(See Page-----Matter Of Science ) ?

(See Pages---The Criminal Genes Parts 1-72 ) ?

726 327
 328Page 328 of 726

Relative Sizes Of The Blue Discs Represent The Relative

Percentages Of Criminal Genes Present In Each Nation:
Criminal Genes

Fascism Racism (One Unit)

(One Unit)
Chattel Slavery.
One Unit(The Minimum)
Colonialism(One Unit)
The British Case Average Criminal Genes (C.G) Fed By:
C.G = Racism +Chattel Slavery +Colonialism + Fascism
= Four Units  in real (3)Dimension world= 43 = 64%

The French Case Average Criminal Genes (C.G) Fed By

C.G = Racism +Colonialism + Fascism = Three Units 
in real (3)Dimension world of the DNA= 33 = 27%

The German Case Average Criminal Genes (C.G) Fed B

C.G = Racism + Fascism = Two Units  in real
(3)Dimension world of the DNA = 23 = 8%

726 328
 329Page 329 of 726

The Compulsive Genes .

“The Direct Proof To the existence of these criminal
genes is not by the horrendous facts and figures
described in concrete terms by the above equations!
Not Even in their Frequency Or To That Matter Anything
Else! But found in their Compulsive Nature.
Their Persistent pattern surfacing with Constant Rates
and Inescapable Ratios By these equations under :
all conditions and by Any Argument Or Standard .
The Only Required Condition For These Rates And
Ratios To Remain Persistently Constant Is To Be Among
The E.S.P.Meaning It Can Only Be Genetic. Period.”

“What we need is to identify not only the Frequency of

these crimes but also the Compulsion Behind all these
Unnecessary Crimes with scientific methods which
Eliminate Any other driving motives or forces from the
argument except those of the criminal genes.”

726 329
 330Page 330 of 726

How it manifest itself right across the social board with Persisting

Constant Ratio Under All Conditions ?In peace times and in war.

In the conditions of common crimes committed by ordinary people

who are not paid trained or meant to protect life and property !

As well as by those we call the police who are trained paid and

meant to protect life and property !Or under any other possible

conditions !

{{During the first five months of (2015) Alone :

The American police had shot dead three hundred and sixty

(360)Unarmed Black people (Official Figures )And the British

police is not any different at all except these prefer the Silence of

Poisons ! Tasers!Or By Car Accidentsas As Well As Bullets!

Whichever Untraceable

(See Pages-----The Variety Principle Or How Unlike The Fascists

The British State Avoid Suspicions And Detections Parts: 1-
2,3,Etc) ?

726 330
 331Page 331 of 726

“When there is no pattern ! There will be neither suspicions nor

detections! And no fingers pointing at the state only at
individuals Superficially involved in these crimes.”
Also: (See Pages ---Silent Genocides Parts 1,2,Etc) ?

Their Victims include children or Even Elderly people over eighty

years old !(Official Statistics) ! Strikingly the (Rate) Of victims of

crimes committed by the British police themselves is Phenomenally

of similar order of magnitude as that inside the USA in spite of the

huge differences between their conditions ! ? ! }}

What We Need Is To Identify The Compulsion Behind All These

Unnecessary Crimes. By Scientific Methods That Eliminate Any

Other Driving Motives Or Forces Except Those Of The Criminal

Genes.To Achieve This:

Let us award ourselves few moments of reflection on these figures

by asking yourself :Can I shoot a cat to death just because it was

black and no one is looking (No Witnesses )?The answer is clearly

(NO).That is :

726 331
 332Page 332 of 726

If You Happened To Be Not One Of Carrier Of Criminal Genes .

However carriers of the criminal genes inside Britain and USA

Even when they are Trained Paid And Meant to protect life and

property like their police :Find it Irresistible Not to commit crimes

including the crime of murdering anyone they happened not to like

e.g. Shooting to death Unarmed Black people as long as they

reckon no one is watching (No Witnesses )As it had been proven

(360)Times in the first five months of (2015) ?

This is how Compulsive these criminal genes can be ?

And this is the Ultimate Proof To their existence ?

They are as Compulsive as the Alcoholic Genes Carried by Most Of

the Irish. Period.

“Just ask yourself : Are you able to shoot a cat to death

just because it was black and No One Is Looking ?
Clearly –No !But the carriers of criminal genes can and
will ! Moreover they do not even know why??”
(See Page---Clay Pigeons)? (See Page--Killer Race Parts 1-27) ?

726 332
 333Page 333 of 726

BOTTOM LINE .
“Do not let Yourself ! Myself !Or Themselves !Be the
judge . Let only these equations of Facts ! Figures !And
History judge this race of criminals and faggots.”

Whenever you come across a member of the E.S.P. Trying to

defend or find excuses for their daily crimes against humanity :

Do not argue back !

You Will Be Wasting Your Time Since They Are Driven Like I Said

Purely By Genetics. Meaning They Not Even Aware Of It Or Do

Not Wish To Be Aware !!

Just Add To The Equations Stated above the daily number of people

they Kill? Maim? Or Traumatize ???

And do not let Yourself? Myself ? Or Themselves Be the judge

Let only these equations of Facts !Figures! And History Judge this

race of criminals and faggots.

726 333
 334Page 334 of 726

4- The Red Monk Law .

“ Again we apply here the scientific methods of
backtracking.”

“From the beginning mankind was an accidental birth

in pain to live in pain! It’s the duty of all politics and
religions to act as doctors lessening the pain whenever
and wherever they can but this does not mean
abandoning the very set of rules that was evolved for
this very purpose”
The Red Monk.

“When there are no values? The vacuum is filled by the

culture of Crime And Punishment. Inside every corner
of their life !(See Page----The Kojak Culture) ?

726 334
 335Page 335 of 726

Defining The (U.V.M)Unit Value Of Morality.

Just as pound coin inside your pocket had travelled

from one hand to another !
And from one generation to the next as Monetary Unit !
And just as the pound grows in time (Yields) In to
Three Pounds (Due to inflation or otherwise e.g.
investments) The units value of ethics can also
synthesise (See Page---No Value No Synthesis)?
There are also Units Of Morality That was coined (For
Example) By the catholic church then passed from one
age to the next until it re-emerged at the other side of
the French revolution as the three universal values of :
(Fraternity ,Liberty, Equality!).
Therefore a nation like Britain of zero values is
considered to be Morally Bankrupt A condition often
precede Material Bankruptcy. Therefore we define the:

U.V.M = Constant /Divided by units of Immorality e.g.

the concrete number of crimes per unit population. “

726 335
 336Page 336 of 726

Since we cannot measure directly morality (M) But we certainly can

measure immorality e.g. the number of people killed where; M=1/
(Divided By)the number of people killed.
Now keeping in mind that we are discussing here Communal
Morality Of which Individual Morality is only one of its Derivatives
And if we denote materialism by (m)Which is unlike morality its
certainly quantifiable:
Then we have:
dm/dt = +ve.

m = for material. t = for time.

dM/dt = -ve.

M = Average (Not Individual) Moral values.

We have already stated that we cannot measure morality (M) But we

can measure immorality e.g. the number of overseas students

destroyed by the Brits).

Then simply morality:

M=1/The Immorality.

726 336
 337Page 337 of 726

HINTS.

What is dM/dm =? Positive or Negative ??

What does the word Negate in the section above (w.r.t)

What the lag or phase angle “ф”) means ? ?

Can you deduce [ ℮iф ] from the above ?

Plugging in some figures in to the equation :

Let Өi =Reaching the moon (Energy spent equivalent to that of one

atom bomb !Half mega ton of TNT.).

ӨO = Killing one million Vietnamese,(just think of the Inhumanity?

How immoral And Unnecessary it was to deploy Agent O.R.A.N.G.E

Then: Ф = ӨO - Өi = Theta Output –Theta Input .

It’s essential for our definition to note the condition of :

(Zero Reasons) Or (Not Necessary )It was to apply the Defoliage

Agent Orange. A defoliage not only still killing God’s greens but

also human beings! (See Pages--------------------Killer Race ) ?

Also : (See Page---American Sniper ) ?

726 337
 338Page 338 of 726

Ethically Flat Societies .

“For the sake of one person? One king ? And One Lust ?
One entire nation was stripped naked for centuries
from any ethics except for the fig leaf of doing it (By
Stealth)! Scratch the surface little and you will find
nothing but the ethics of pirates running loose in our
world stark naked ethically (With the morality of the
dogs they like and liked by them !Biting anything in
sight)!Committing one act of piracy after another.”

“Conversely: Imagine there was no real church in

France Preserving Real values (At least subconsciously)
Their society would have remained Ethically Flat With
no French revolution and its three famous values.
They would have become like post Henry The Eight
England Where anything goes causing huge distresses
to itself and to the world at large. i.e. Pain in the neck
for mankind.”

726 338
 339Page 339 of 726

States Within State The Summary:

“When (Doing it By Stealth :Becomes an end in itself )?
It’s only natural that many states mushrooms within
the state itself .(See Cipher: B-For By Stealth ) ?”

“Here is summary of(state within state parts one to six)

In addition to Masonic !Royals and Royalists circles
there are at least the following Three States within the
British state (A,B,And C): “

726 339
 340Page 340 of 726

A- In The Name Of Security:

“The duty of any security circles is to identify and
neutralize any breach to the security of any Given
system As Its ! Not to Redesign This system each and
every time to fill any breaches .”
This is how the S.U.C.P.(Soviet Communist Party)Should have
made it clear to their K.G.B. !This is what every government in
the world should tell their so called security personnel.
1-
Under the titles of (The Killing Fields Of Britannia) This book had
proven beyond reasonable doubts : How the B.S.S. Had turned
British hospitals in to execution grounds of its own undesirables.
2-
And under the titles of Role Inversion it been proven that the Police
Federation Virtually operating police state within state with its own
rules and regulations living completely outside the laws of the land
Even Nature itself.
3-We also seen under the titles (Silent Genocides)And inversion of
roles how institutions like fire brigades or M.I.4 (e.g. Doctor
Shipman )Are burning or poisoning to death Asian families or
overseas students weekly and systematically .

726 340
 341Page 341 of 726

B- The Jewish State Within State.

“Jews have an agenda at total variance with
everything and everyone else”
Under the title (No State Within State )It was pointed out how
Modern Germany Does not have a Jewish state within the German
state this was presented to show how Even Fascism had Beneficial
Leftovers By leaving German society united .Unlike Britain whose
Jewish state within state can be visible even to idiots
And There Is No Consolation By Saying (Oh Well What About The
USA? They Too Have Jewish State Within State ?) Think again.?
1-
First Of All :The USA is just too big for the disastrous effects of the
Jewish state within sate to be noticed Yet by ordinary people like me
or you !
2-Secondly:
Even now it’s devastating effects can already be seen on American
foreign policy : How lopsided and Self-Defeating Especially in the
middle east because anyone familiar with the Calculus Of The
Middle East Can see for themselves how the USA lost the war in
Iraq just as it did in Vietnam. Period.

726 341
 342Page 342 of 726

C-The Homosexual State Within State.

“Homosexual fascism is our latter day tyranny !!”

“Who is the commander in chief of these British state

thugs??The official Prime Minister ? Or Mr Cashman
(Head of the so called Gay Pride Organization )? ?
Which had arrogantly turned Britain in to Homosexual
Theocracy”

726 342
 343Page 343 of 726

Moral Vacuums.
“Ten years of Thatcher’s (Golden )Era In Hypocrisy!
Followed by Tony Blair’s Decade of Another (Golden )
Era in Deep Immoralities Had left British society
ethically naked and Brothelized to the point that
homosexuals e.g. Gay Pride Under the guise of
tolerance are running state within the British sate
having its own Agenda Of Witch-Hunting Anyone who
happened to disagrees with their disgusting way of life
which had turned Britain in to Homosexual Theocracy”

Under various titles in numerous parts :

This book had exposed the tragic dimensions of the homosexual

state within the British state and its new fascism :

726 343
 344Page 344 of 726

So much so that people like myself and believe it or not there are too

many of us at the receiving end of this British homosexual fascism

are earnestly asking :

Who is in charge of this Britain and its state thugs be it those in

uniform ?Or out of uniform??

The official Prime Minister(Without naming any names) ?

Or Mr Cashman (Head of the so called Gay Pride Organization )? ?

Who had arrogantly turned Britain in to Homosexual Theocracy .

(See Page-----) ?

And Attached Document By visiting :

www.scribd.com/isamtahersaleh

On How Two Gay Policemen Had Attacked Me On Richmond

Hill Believe It Or Not !For No Other Reason Than That :

Because An Asian Woman Was Holding My Hand ? ! ?

726 344
 345Page 345 of 726

5- Angle Of Lie.

let

Θ=The angle of lie.

l = The line describing straight forward solutions.

L= The line representing solutions by lies.(Pseudo Lines) Then:

L – l = dL L = jl Where: j = √-1.

We also know that the British addiction to Lies ! Self Deception !!

And Universal Hypocrisy will never allow :

Θ=Zero.(When the solution is not by lies)

Ninety degr
∑ L [1 –Cos Θ] =1/zero
Zero.

1/ ∑L ∑90. L [1 –Cos Θ] =0
*
Θ L
l

726 345
 346Page 346 of 726

6-Information Theory And The Limits Of Hypocrisy.

(Part-Four)

Alternatively :

Let :

n= Number Of Lies .

N = Number Of Reversals Of Fortunes.(Simple Turning

Points On The Graph Of Any Two Variables .)!

Then:

n
N = ∑(n/2 )π. Hence L- N.l = 0
0

Meaning it will all come to zero for any society that has made

hypocrisy one of its pillars i.e.

Doomed.

726 346
 347Page 347 of 726

BOTTOM LINE.

“Hypocrisy is the enemy of learning.”

The Red Monk.

“Hypocrisy is misinformation! And misinformation is

hypocrisy.” The Red Monk.

“Hypocrisy is one of the biggest contributor to the lag

(Phase)angles described above “

“The greatest hindrance to the learning process is

hypocrisy “ The Red Monk.

“Hypocrisy distort the cognitive process and damages

our capacity for correct analysis hence we find history
keep repeating itself.” The Red Monk.

726 347
 348Page 348 of 726

7- The Law Of Friendliness.

“Inside densely populated regions of the world (e.g.

the islands of Britain or Japan ) Persons becomes
numbers! And the numbers are Non Persons !!”

Let
P = The population density .(Number of people per square
kilometre.
Let
F=The degree of friendliness. On an arbitrary scale from zero to
ten?
Then:

F = f ( 1/P. ) (Inner Space Again) I.e.

F=Zero when P is large and :

F= Ten when P=Zero ! ? !

*(For more accurate and formal presentation of these equations see

(List Of Equations)Inside the summary)?

726 348
 349Page 349 of 726

THE PROOF.
“Except for the rare occasions of having suicidal
tendencies! You are going to be very friendly with your
own self at Row (P)=1.”

Put: p=o And he above expression become

meaningless.
p=1 i.e. one person alone !
Except in the rare events of suicides ! The person

usually become very friendly towards himself.

Put p=2 e.g. Adam &Eve.

These two people become so friendly towards each

other’s until they turn to a couple of intimate

dispositions. But still occasionally Hostile to each other.

Put (p)=3. i.e. Threesome?

Here murder start raring its head ! Murder loom in the

horizon! e.g. (Abel and Cable)?

726 349
 350Page 350 of 726

Just Another Paradox From Nature:

“Inside Sunless Inner Spaces: Not only the quality of
life and living has gone down! But even the
unperformed personal odour is worthy of pigsty.”
Inside densely populated islands like Britain people appear to be

breathing down each other’s neck !

Hence men becomes increasingly Anti Social .

To compensate for this repulsions among themselves ! They turn en

masse To dogs for company ! ? !

Nearly every English family already holed up in the Inner Spaces of

miniaturised pits they call (With tongue in check ) Dwelling keeps a

dog !But this increases the Density And The Dirt Instead of

alleviating it. Hence the hostility always on the rise Exponentially !

Its paradoxical in full by words and by deeds .

(See Page----The Social Life Of Les Animal Anglaise) ?

(See Page ----- Theory Of Affinity.) ?
(See Page-----The Pig Cycle ) ?

726 350
 351Page 351 of 726

8- Crtuelity!Humidity And Sunshine.

Let H=Humidity .

θ=1/Direct Sunshine. (per square metre )

Then we have:

Cruelty = Curvature (1/R.) XH X PX θ.)P-As before).

NOTICE: The Absence of terms for Temperatures or

Pressure since both of these are incorporated in “H”.

Hint:

Compare Real Physical Energy With Nervous Energy.

EXAMPLE.

Both Britain and Israel are Humid and Densely

Populated ?Both are legendarily cruel ?just look at

Israelis Daily Criminal Cruelties in Gaza(2008) ! ? !

726 351
 352Page 352 of 726

9- DEGREES OF ANOMALY. ∆(Delta) .

One way to calculate the deviation in any society is to

use the homosexual scale. (Other suitable yard sticks

e.g. Pedophiles can also be used! Although Of all the

anomalies homosexuality offers bigger samples

therefore its More Reliable Statistically .

According to the Zero to one scale.

Let

N= Total number of people in any given Community? Society? Or

Country.

H=Total number of homosexuals in “N” .

H
Then the degree of anomaly ∆ =------------- X 2.7
N-H

(See Page----Crime Is The Mother Of All Anomalies)?

726 352
 353Page 353 of 726

10- The Buckling Ratio (B.R).

It’s the point when the so called security services

(Including the police)Moves from the state of informing

on problems in order to solve the problem ! Moving

instead to that state when these services actually start

creating problems deliberately or otherwise (e.g. by

getting in each other’s way)In order to have something

to inform upon and its calculated as follows:

B.R = Total number of informers (Spies) / (Divided) by

the total number of ordinary (Non spies) Citizens .

(Subjects Or Commoners ) As they are called in Britain.

Critical ratio:

When this B.R Reaches critical value ?The society

begin to buckles under its own weight as it was in the

case of the U.S.S.R.

726 353
 354Page 354 of 726

11- The Breaking Free Ratio.

“The critical ratio of breaking free from the colonialists
for any country is approximately ( 1/10.)X2.7 .”

Population of the colonialist (e.g. Britain).

=--------------------------------------------------=5-1
The population of the colonized (e.g. Iraq).

(Also See Page --- The Breaking Free( Liberation)Ratio. On how

the Liberation Period starts?
*(For more accurate and formal presentation of these equations see
(List Of Equations)Inside the summary)?
Observe the following Significant Mathematical Relationships ?

Nine years genuine revolutionary period in Iran

The Ratio =--------------------------------------------------------=3.
Three years true revolutionary period in Iraq

Cross Ratios:
But this is exactly the ratio of the population of Iran to that of
Iraq.

The Origin Of The Ratio (3)Above .

For those interested to be thorough ?
The previous ratio of (3)in the Section above was obtained by
dividing the Breaking Free Ratio for Iran by that of Iraq.

726 354
 355Page 355 of 726

12- Cooperation Versus Competitions :

© Isam .T . Saleh. London -2005

The Coupling Constant ;

Cooperation X Competition = Constant .

C X C = C ≠ C2

Translation :
“The more there is competition the less there are
cooperation .And vice versa. “

It’s fortunate for the Memory All three words :

Cooperation, Competition and Constant Start with the

letter (C )In English.

726 355
 356Page 356 of 726

Now for the sake of simplification we choose the

smallest of groups i.e. made of two elements (a and b):

When these two are cooperating they add to each other

or ( a +b).

When they are competing Against each other obviously

they will be subtracting from each other or (a –b).

Substituting in the above equation C X C = C.

( a +b) X ( a -b) =Constant.= a2 – b2

Generally :

am – bn = Constant.

Curiously this general term for Competition at higher

indices (Powers ) i.e. at (am – bn ):

Always include At Least one term of Cooperation:

(a + b)In the expanded polynomial ! ? !

(See Page--------------------When Life Is Just A Game ) ?

726 356
 357Page 357 of 726

13-Coupling Equations Of Classical And Quantum Mechanics .

“If we place any atom emitting frequency (ῳ) Inside
any mechanical orbit of frequency (f)”
h ῳ = H* f
{-h2/2µ X∂2/ ∂r2+V(r) }ψ(ῳ,t)= H* (f)2 {1/√2 π ∫-e-t2/2}dt.
Where:h=Planck Constant.
H* = My proposed Universal Constant .
Where H H* =1 And H* = H ψ(f,t) Where :
ψ(f,t) The classical probability for ( fn ) = (2 π R)1- n ∑n fn
f 1 f2 ---- ------fn
µ =e/2me C X M. C=Speed of light V= The Potential.
M=Angular Momentum. e=Zeeman electron.

Universal Resonances (Plr). Part-One.

Since both (f) And (ῳ)Are measurable and (h ) Is already
known we can determine the value of (H).
In the limit when: f = ῳ ( Universal Resonance)
We obtain: h = H*.
Note:
“In Part-Three Of Universal Resonancve there will be More
subtle and less vague ebvaluations of ( H*.)”
H* =H Cos θ = ½ h.( Ωθ/f ) {1- ( ɸ)2 }

726 357
 358Page 358 of 726

14- Frequmechanics (Part-Six). New Dimensions.

“See irreducible dimensions “
a-
The Rock Bottom Common Denominator for both classical and

quantum mechanics naturally is (x,t)!

b-

Notice the L.H.S. of equation (C) Above contains Spatial term:

(∂2/ ∂r2) Which does not correspond to the terms of Normal

Probability Integral on R.H.S. of the equation.

Therefore I introduce New Dimensions Both are now Scalars And

both constituting the very Next Possible Lowest Common
Denominators For both Quantum and Classical Mechanics ;
The inverses of (x,t)Are :( 1/x ,1/t).

The first (1/x) Defined as sigma (ᶞ)= Space Densit(Another Scalar).

While the second (1/t) Recognisable as the Frequency (fn ).

726 358
 359Page 359 of 726

c-
All frequencies (fn ).are Scalars i.e. can be added or subtracted

Numerically .So are space densities (ᶞn )

ψ ( ᶞ, f ) = N.e-ihf Equation (E)

d-
The analogue to Velocity In these new dimensions which I am

calling : The Flow =dᶞ/d fn

And the analogue to Acceleration In these new dimensions:

The Blow =d2ᶞ/d fn2

e- Graph Twelve:

ᶞ The Blow.

The Flow.

fn

726 359
 360Page 360 of 726

f- Dimensionally:

dᶞ/d fn = t2/x2 (dx/dt) .

The Flow = T2/L2 . L/T =T/ L .

=1/ Velocity.
The Blow = 1/Acceleration.
Force X L =ML T--2 . L =M L2 T—2 = Energy .
Mass = (The Flow)2 X Energy.
Mass = (The Blow) X Force.
g-
SubstitutingThe Above Results In Equation -C

{-h2/2µ X (d2ᶞ/d fn2)+V(r) }ψ(ᶞ,f)

= (H)f 2 {1/√2 π ∫- e-t2/2}dt.

After Applying The Above Terms:

{-h2/2µ X (The Blow)+V(r) }ψ(ᶞ,f)

= (H)f 2 {1/√2 π ∫- e-t2/2}dt.

Result.
“This is extremely significant result for calculating the
Blow at Universal Resonances.”

726 360
 361Page 361 of 726

15- THE ACCELERATING UNIVERSE (Part- Two).

“According to Conventional Physics the universe should
be slowing down not accelerating !My theory of cosmic
flux offers the best explanation There Is for a runaway
universe”

“The longer the time (The more objects are Formed Or

Deformed (Geometrically)The more they get in each
other’s way gravitationally (Cutting the Cosmic Flux)?
The more the universe runs away in its expansion.

Function of The Difference Between Objects Formed And Deformed(Geometrically)Per Unit Time.
The Acceleration= ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Mass Of The Visible Universe .

726 361
 362Page 362 of 726

More Evidnce From Practice.

1-
“And there is the question of why the solar system
remained Co-Planar ?When the primordial disc of
plasma began the process of condensation there was
no reason whatsoever for the components to remain
Co- Planer .Gravitation towards the centre (The Sun)Is
necessary but not sufficient condition to prevent them
from flying out of the condensing disc !Only
explanation left is that the gaseous disc had already
carved a pocket in the cosmic flux which made it easier
for these components forming our planets to remain
inside the disc.”

2-“Another proof is that of the total area of ( All )The

wings of aeroplane is determined not just by its weight
but also by its length.
3-“Also that of how the ply wings of Early aeroplanes
proved to be of (Little) Help.”

726 362
 363Page 363 of 726

16- The Cosmic Flux:

“Every stable object in the universe remains stable only
by cutting the cosmic flux between itself and every
other object with certain Angular Speed And at certain
Special Angles peculiar to itself alone.” The Red Monk.

ΩGravity.=ῳcutting. -ῳGluing.

Isamic Thought Experiment Number Four.

y

B
A

θ (90 – θ) x
r .Cos θ
Z r. Sinθ

726 363
 364Page 364 of 726

If we place along the line ( r ) Drawn above ?a (Zip Fly )The kind

used in trousers that subsequently and consequentially cuts the zip

then stitch it together . Or measure the difference between the

vibrations at the bow and stern of a ship?

Or better still as we said earlier in this book place viscous fluid with

known but suitable viscosity in the (XZ) Plane.

Then we place two magic mirrors or cameras ( A & B ) Inside the

two planes XY And ZY Subsequently

Now when we cut this fluid in the direction of ( r)By scissor or knife

the fluid will re-join itself after been cut by a lag(Phase) angle (∆t).

If mirror or camera (A)Is positioned or programmed to record only

the front of the knife while mirror or camera (B)The tail end of the

cutting then this amount (∆t). Can be recorded Since its evident

that the signal take longer to reach (B)Than (A) Proceeding off

course on the assumption that the speed of light is constant and (r )

Is not at equidistant as follows :

726 364
 365Page 365 of 726

If The Speed of Light Is Not Constant :

r.ῳcutting. / ῳGluing. = K1 r .Sin θ / Cos θ.

Or:

Tan θ = K2 [ῳcutting. / ῳGluing. ].

If The Speedof Light Is Constant: :

( r.ῳcutting. – r.ῳGluing. ). ∆t =K3 ( r .Sin θ - r .Cos θ )

∆t = K3 (Sin θ -Cos θ )
ῳcutting. – ῳGluing.

ΩGravity.=ῳcutting. -ῳGluing. =± K3

Depending on the value of :

θ =90. Or θ =0.

726 365
 366Page 366 of 726

Test –Experiment(Isami Thought Experiment Number

Three )
“To settle the issue in concrete laboratory terms I have
designed the following Basic but Sufficient experiment
to verify my theory”
Ultra sensitive weighing machine.

Suspended Magnet

+ve.

Negative.

Floored Magnet.
VACUUM

726 366
 367Page 367 of 726

17- Introducing The Hybrid Unit Of Space-Time.

“The Lines May Be Abstract! But The Description
Calculations And Prescriptions Are Solid Meaningful
Physics! If we can represent the lines of the walls and
roof of a house by the lines of triangle then abstract
them in to C2 = a2 + b2 (Pythagoras ) ?
We can represent other physicals by (Cosmic Lines)As
geometric as may be they had already explained to us
many dynamics e.g. the gyroscope etc. in earlier
sections of this book and shall explain more !”
“At certain point inside the relativity metric Time And
Space exchange themselves! Therefore it’s reasonable:
To pluck out of this Epoch Not just the concept of
Space-Time But also Hybrid unit of this space time:
(1-S.T.) Now we said earlier the Rock Bottom Common
Units For both classical and quantum mechanics are
r(x,y,z)=Distances .t=Time. Hence what I am proposing
here that the very next higher Bottom Common Units
(Lowest Upper Limits)For Both Mechanics will be the
Inverses of these units i.e. :”

726 367
 368Page 368 of 726

(1/t )Which you will recognise as the frequency Ω!

And 1Unit S. T/ r(x,y,z)===>(Implies) C/ r(x,y,z)= σ
(Sigma).
Which I am calling Space Density!!Both are Scalars!
Also it’s reasonable to note both are in correspondence i.e.
Ω ===== σ
The Units.
Flux / Unit Space =Constant X (1/ Unit Time.)
Radians /Unit Space =Constant X(1/ Unit Time.)
Anything / Unit Space = Same Thing X (Unit Time).

What I am also proposing is to Hypothetically Split ΩGravity.

(The frequency of falling body with(g) In to two
frequencies :One that cuts the cosmic flux (ῳcutting.)And the
other (ῳGluing) Gluing it back together where:
ΩGravity.=ῳCutting. -ῳGluing. OR ΩG=ῳC -ῳg

If:

726 368
 369Page 369 of 726

σ (Sigma) As defined earlier = Space Density (C/ r(x,y,z) ) (Another

Scalar).
Ω, ῳ =Frequencies.
I=Moment of Inertia.
E=Energy.
g=Gravitational Acceleration.
C=Speed Of Light.
ΩGravity.=ΩG =Frequency of falling body.

Then:

E= ½ I Ω2 = I (Ợ)2 .C2.

Now if a mass (m)Stationary then ΩG = 0

And when it’s falling;
Then :

ῳcutting. ≠ ῳGluing.

726 369
 370Page 370 of 726

This is extremely Important Result confirming the feasibility of

splitting of (ΩG )In to two Differing Frequencies ( ῳcutting. And
ῳGluing. ) .
Since:
ΩG ≠ 0.
For all bodies in free fall.
Giving more insight in to the gravitational Waves And
Frequencies?

“The Lines May Be Abstract! But The Description

Calculations And Prescriptions Are Solid Meaningful
Physics!”

{ALL Copy rights by–Isam.T. Salih}.

726 370
 371Page 371 of 726

The Cosmic Flux And The Isamic Diagrams.

ΩGravity.=ῳCutting. -ῳGluing.

The Isamic diagrams are simple rectangles (OBCD) Fixed in the

XY-Plane. Translating the above equation as follows:
r(x,y,z)
σ
Pn

P
Ω
ΘrT. T
Po
One Limb (Or Tail )of the curve is Ω0 As T ∞! Another
Limb Of the curve (Space Density) σ 0 As r  ∞
At point (P) Ω = σ . Where: Time (T) ≡ Space (r(x,y,z).):Its
Where we can pull and apply the Hybrid Unit Of Space-Time
Discussed earlier Anywhere Along The Line (OP).

σ (Space Density) = ΘrT e Ω

726 371
 372Page 372 of 726

Y =N

A B
Point (P)
Vθ (σ)
θNΩ
O C Ω= 1/T ( Period).

Splitting this diagram in to A,B,and C:

One Unit.
σ =1/r.
ΘὀΩ Ω=1/t.
Zero (One Unit)

Diagram A. (The Hybrid Unit Of Space Time)

(Inside one unit of Space –Time Pulled out from

anywhere along the line (OP)!Also it can be situated
betweenn the towo vertices of the Hyparobola.)

726 372
 373Page 373 of 726

r(Space)

ΘrT
T(Time).

Diagram B.

Y= Ợ=N.
--
--
--
N=1-- θxyPlane.
X= ῳGluing.
ΘxzPlane.

Z=ῳCutting.
Diagram –C.

726 373
 374Page 374 of 726

Looking at diagram –A : At Ω = 0 Tan θxy -- ∞.

Looking at diagram –C. : At Ω = 0 Tan θxz -- 1

Therefore;

Tan θxy = ½
Tan θxz
Giving:

θxz = 2 θxy

But this is exactly the Mirror Image of the object

since its Moving Twice As Fast as the object itself :
Implying that the XZ-Plane is the mirror by which
we tried to explain these Isamicdiagrams at previous
sections of this book !

(Wherever Appropriate Mass Implicitly Included As

Unit Mass ).

726 374
 375Page 375 of 726

I.T.D. And I.S .D.??Redefining Densities :

“Inverse Time Density (I.T.D )And Inverse Space
Density( I.S.D) Becomes identity at the points(Pn):
Ω = σ. Implying Time (T) ≡ Space (r(x,y,z).)”

What is density ?
Density (Something (Not NecessarilyThe Rate Of Something )Happening or
existing per(Something else)Existing or happening
We already came across Time-Density (1/T ) Several times but only

recogned as Frequency (Ω).Similarly: σ =1/r(x,y,z ) Is the Space Density

.As I had Claimed earlier under the title (Introducing The Hybrid Space

Time Unit ).Where: OC = Ω. And CB= σ. It follows that:

From diagram 1: Cot θ = Ω / σ =Velocity.

From diagram 2 : Tan θ =r/t = Velocity.

Hence at the Maximum of the first diagram:

Ω = σ =1. And V=√2 (In the second diagram).

ΩGravity./ σ =ῳCutting./ σ -ῳGluing. / σ

VGravity. =VCutting. - VGluing Therfore at : ῳcutting. ≠ ῳGluing.

VCutting. ≠ VGluing.

726 375
 376Page 376 of 726

P-Hypothetical point outside the paper .

R=Arbitrary Radi (Not shown)Drawn at Equidistances From (P)

Outside the paper in to all the poins inside the plane .

That is to say we Throw All our calculations in to dimensions

ouside the paper then retrieve them as follow :

We Replace The Units Of Distances In The Y-Axis By The

Number (N)Of Cosmic Flux Lines Inside The Box (OBCD) Per

Each Second Running Parallel To The X-Axis As Shown Above.

An object cutting these lines along the Y-Axis with velovity

VY = ῳY .R.

Similarly an object cutting these lines along (OB) With velocity

(Vθ = ῳθ .R )

The object moving along (OC)Can only cut (Meet) these lines at

infinity (∞ ). Also:

VY = ῳy .R. = (Vθ = ῳθ .R ) Cos θ

726 376
 377Page 377 of 726

Or:

ῳy = ῳθ . Cos θ.

But :

(Vθ )2 = (VY )2 + ( 1/T )2. R2

Therefore:

(ῳθ)2 = (ῳY)2 + (1/T )2 R2

= (ῳθ . Cos θ)2 + ( 1/T )2 R2

(ῳθ)2 [1- Cos θ]2 = 1/T2 R2

(ῳθ)2 [Sin θ]2 = 1/T2 R2

(ῳθ) [Sin θ] = 1/T .R :

Similarly for ( Cos θ )

Where the ( R) Cancels out giving :

Tan θ = (1/T )/N. = 1/NT.

N(Total Lines Per One Second)

= 1/ (T. Tan θ.) Equation –A.

726 377
 378Page 378 of 726

But Tan θ = σ /Ω

dỢ /dt = Tan θ d Ω/dt.

-1/v [Vlocity ]C = - Tan θ ( Ω )2

C= The Limiting Factor Of Speed Of Light.

C ( Ω )2 = Cot θ

But From Equation –A.

Cot θ = 1/NT . Equation –B.

Therefore from A & B:

C ( Ω )2 = 1/NT

N = 1/ CT ( Ω )2

N= C2 (σ )2

(Wherever Appropriate Mass Implicitly Included As

Unit Mass ).
726 378
 379Page 379 of 726

For Higher Dimensions (n).

Now back to the equation we derived above :

N= 1/ (T. Tan θ.)

Giving:

At T=0 Or θ= 0 N∞

At T=1 And θ= π/4 N=1

At T= T And θ= π/2. N  0.

Questions .

If the object can cuts (N) lines along the Y-Axis ?

Only one line along the diagonal (OB) ??

But zero along the X-Axis ?

Then what hapens between the diagonal and theX-Axis ?

Afractured Lines??A Fraction of line (0.N )???Or what ????

Negative lines ?????

726 379
 380Page 380 of 726

Or simply the breaking down of gravity ??????

Its far more Revealing If we go to higher dimensions (n)Where :

NNn ! (θ) Stays the same! And 1/T (The Period) also stays the

same!

Keeping In Mind The Whole Box Is Per Second And we had

replaced distances (Y0By (N) ? We have:

Nn = 1/ [T. Tan θ.] = ῳ Cot θ.

dN/dT= -1/T2 Cot θ. = - ῳ2 Cot θ

dN/d θ = - ῳ Csc2 θ.

dθ/dT = - ῳ2 Cot θ X 1/ - ῳ Csc2 θ.

dθ/dt = ῳ Sin θ Cos θ . Or:

ῳcutting. /ῳGluing. = Sin θ Cos θ.

ῳ ∑ϴ=0 ϴ=Л/4 [Cot θ ]= ∑NN=1 [N]

ῳ ∑ϴ=Л/4 ϴ=Л/2 [Cot θ ] = ∑N=1N=0 [N].

726 380
 381Page 381 of 726

Regions Of Pure Vaccuum And The Cyclic Conditions.

“Both time densities and space densities (Or their
Inverses)Are cyclic satisfying the cyclic condion:”
At the point (Pn)Time density and space density or Their Inverses
are an identity i.e.: σ≡Ω
However as (T) And (Y)∞ Both Ợ And ΩZero. i.e. both
become equal again at point (Pn )!And these are the regions
of pure vacuums since both time and space cease to exist at
these poles or point regions (Pn )!As shown by the following
two diagrams:
σn
Y
σ

Pn

P1
Ω Ωn
ΘrT. T

726 381
 382Page 382 of 726

P0

In the rectanguar hiparabola above:

YT =k.
Space Density; σ = 1/Yn
And
Time Density: Ω= 1/ Tn

YT= k ℮2i Л(m/L).  ±(k)m/L.

Where (m)And (L) Are Integers And i =√-1.

Note:
According to this hypothesis the two limbs of the curve:

( σ, Ω)Never touches the (Y,T)Axes :Not just because of

the geometry of the asymptotic curve but also due to the
limitation factor imposed by the velocity of light (C) .
Pn

σ Ω

726 382
 383Page 383 of 726

P0 ΘrT

Experimentals :
“Time densities are measurable with instruments !The
question now can we measure space dfensities ?
Since at the point (P) : (1/T )= (1 /Y) ==== 
Implying Time =Space And Space Density σ= ῳ/C.”

If particle of mass (m)Held stationary above earth surface then:

ΩGravity. =ῳCutting. -ῳGluing = 0. Or ῳCutting. =ῳGluing.

AS: r  ∞

r =The Distant Between The Particle And That Hypothetical

Point (P ).

If its falling then the particle will emitt Signiture Frequency Of :

ΩGravity. =ῳCutting. -ῳGluing < 0 Or: ῳCutting. < ῳGluing. r 0.

If its ascending then :

ΩGravity. =ῳCutting.-ῳGluing > 0 Or: ῳCutting. > ῳGluing. 0r.

Thus its possible to evaluate all of these three frequencies :

726 383
 384Page 384 of 726

(ΩGravity. ,ῳCutting. And ῳGluing).

Applications.
“Splitting the frequency (ΩAttraction. or ΩGravity) In to:
(ῳCutting.And ῳGluing).Opens up tremendous opportunities”
Once These Three Frequencies Are Evaluated Then We Can
Calculate The Number Of Lines Of Cosmic Flux (N)Per Unit
Length/Area /Volume !
Or Vise Versa !
Subsequently How To Defy Gravity With Lesser Energies?And
How To Exploit Resonances?
Keeping In Mind That We Replaced Distances-Y:
By (N).And The Flux In This Case Running Along The X-Axis !
Flux(es)Crossing Each Others From Other Directions Do Not
Efect Each Other.
Exercise Nine :
“When an atom bomb explode !It Rip-Off The Fabric Of
Space Due to the tremendous energies released in very
short time (Nano Seconds)!”
If a particle travelling along the line (P0 Pn ) In the above
diagrams with Ten Units Of S.T (Space-Time) :

726 384
 385Page 385 of 726

How far does it travells in one second ?

How long does it take to travell one metre ??

Exercise Ten:
What is the signifcance of the Area (P0, σ, Pn, Ω) In the above
diagrams?Which of the following units will be applicable :
(cm)2 ? (Sec)2 ? (cm.Sec) ? Or (Sec.cm) ?

Exercise Eleven:
How ?And why values of the points (Pn ) Are Discrete ??

Exercise Twelve:
By applyng the equation derived earlier :
σ (Space Density) = ΘrT eΩ.
Draw the paths of the particle:
a-By substituting: ΩGravity. =ῳ
b-By substituting : ΩGravity. =-ῳ
c-By substituting : ΩGravity. =±dῳ

Exercise Thirteen:

726 385
 386Page 386 of 726

What are the results of superimposing the three paths

obtained above on the earlier diagram of: (Y-T/ σ - Ω )?

The Proof.
“The proof is surprisingly simple! But the logic is very
delicate demanding exceptional concentration!!
The mathematics behind it will follow shortly. Three
Parts:”
Part One:
If there is Rigid Body of length (AB)Cutting in the (XY)
Plane some Super Fluid we call the Cosmic Flux .
P-Is a point outside the paper at Equidistance (r) From
the two ends A & B .Then we can describe the Vibration
of the Front (A)With frequency( ῳCutting.) And Linear
velocity (V= r. ῳCutting.) Similarly for the end (B)of the
cutter where the fluid Glue Itself Back: VB= r . ῳGluing.
So far so good! Until the cutting object AB deflect itself
by :( ∆θ) (While end (B)Remains at the origin of (XY-
Plane.) Then At Least one of the ( r) (r - ∆r) .
But since VB = r. ῳGluing And VA = (r - ∆r) ῳCutting

726 386
 387Page 387 of 726

It can only mean the linear velocities at A & B are no

longer equal .This is not possible since the cutting
object (AB) Is Rigid Body With all its points are moving
with the same velocity (Vxy.).

Conversely :
The object negotiate its path in order to keep both
frequencies ( ῳCutting.And ῳGluing )Appearing to be one and
the same since there is only one linear velocity (V)And
this explain for example why the planets Axis Of
Rotation maintain such Skewed directions .i.e. :
There Are In Principle Two Not One Latent Frequencies.

Part Two :
There is one fundamental difference between what
happens at A & B.
The cutting and the gluing can never be Simultaneous.
Constantly Lagging behind by certain amount of time
(t).We call the Lag or (Phase).Angle
If (L) Is the length of the cutting object then:
L=V.t t= L/V = Constant. Since both (L&V)Are

Constant . V = r X ῳG = ( r-∆r.) X ῳC

726 387
 388Page 388 of 726

The Lag (Phase)Angle = K.t.

=Constant X the Modulus of [ῳCutting. / ῳGluing ].
(Wherever Appropriate Mass Implicitly Included As
Unit Mass ).

The Basic Idea.

“Every object in the universe is microscopically

oscillating or macroscopically vibrating around an
arbitrary point ( P ).” The Red Monk.

“The coordinates are fixed as such : No flux is cut by

726 388
 389Page 389 of 726

staying exactly inside the XY-Plane. Only by climbing

out of it by ( ∆θ)”

The (Cutter Of The Cosmic Flux)Is locked inside the :

XY-Plane because we can only Discern one frequency at

the time .

However once the cutter’s end (A) in the XY-Plane

climb out of the (XY-Plane ) By ( ∆θ) In to the:

XZ-Plane. Then (ῳA )Or (ῳCutting. )Will disturb the value of

(Ω ) By (±dῳ).

In other words the(Cutter)Need to negotiate at the

Microscopic Scale the flux either with:

A-Different paths .

B-Different frequencies .

Where:

726 389
 390Page 390 of 726

∆θxz = ∆ f(rxz) =f (dῳA). = f (d Ω).

Just as we had on the Macroscopic Scales the space

craft that was sent to outer space powering itself by

negotiating a special path between the various

gravitational fields of the planets etc.

Each plane has its own Peculiar Frequency !Perhaps it

was more than just a coincident the Aircraft in English

was called Air Plane Since after all its climbing what we

can only discern as planes .

The Law Of Conservation Of Space.

SXY. (m – n).= - SXZ. (m – n) .

“With reference to the Eulerian Angles :

If you cut a disc in the XY-Plane? Where does it go ??
Except towards you i.e. Added to the XZ-Plane!
Per equal assumption: That is if any assumption
726 390
 391Page 391 of 726

Whatsoever Is valid inside the (XY-Plane)? Why not

the other (Inside the XZ-Plane)??”

Part Three.
“To fully understand the picture? Splitting the
frequency (ΩGravity)In to (ῳCutting. And ῳGluing.)Is not
enough? We need also to split (Moments of Inertia)As
follows :”
Let: ῳCutting. = ῳC ῳGluing. =ῳG
(Ω )= ῳC - ῳG
Ir =Moment of inertia at (A)Around(P).
Ir-∆r=Moment of inertia at (B) Around(P).
Then by the Matrix :
( Ω) ῳC . Ir-∆r -√Ir-∆r

- √Ir ῳG . Ir

= [Ω (ῳC) . Ir-∆r X( ῳG ) . Ir ] - [Ω √Ir . √Ir-∆r] -- Mv2

= Energy
Where; VA = r X ῳG = VB = ( r-∆r.) X ῳC

(Ω)2 = (ῳC - ῳG )2 =(ῳC)2 + ( ῳG )2 -2 ῳC . ῳG

726 391
 392Page 392 of 726

Clearly: [ Ir ( ῳG ) - Ir-∆r (ῳC)]2 >>0.

The Cutting Cross Section-Concrete Calculations.

In the limits : ∆θ--dθ. And. ∆r-- dr.
The cross section cutting the flux = dN Sinθ.
ῳC =( dN Sinθ)/dt. = Sinθ dN/dt. But:
dN/dt. = dN/ dθ . dθ/dt. Therefore:
ῳC = Sinθ dN/ dθ . dθ/dt.
But : dθ/dt.= ΩGravity. And
dr. dΩGravity/dt =Gravitational Acceleration(g ).
dr. dῳC/dt = Sinθ dN/ dθ . dr . d2 θ/dt2.
= Sinθ (dN/ dθ) . dr. dΩ/dt .= (g) Sinθ dN/ dθ .
g = (1/ Sinθ) dῳC/dN .dr. dθ .
But Sinθ = dr/dx. Therefore :
g = dῳC/dN . dx. dθ. Or N= KῳC/g . (dx. dθ).
Where (K)Measured in (Rad Per Sec )Which is your
good old watch or clock!
One Interpretation :
The gravitational acceleration(g) Is due to the Rate by
which frequency (ῳC)Is cutting the flux lines numbered
(N)Moving distance (dx)Inside the XY-Plane And

726 392
 393Page 393 of 726

climbing (dθ)Out of it .

Important Results.
The above expression for (ῳc)Was :
N= KῳC/g . (dx. dθ).------------A.
Although (ῳg )Is Lagging Behind (ῳc):
It’s still gluing the exact number of flux lines as ( ῳC )
Was Cutting .i.e. (N )Remain the same for both.
Now looking again at at equation-A.
Any expression for (ῳg )Cannot contain (g )Since the
accelerant is neutralized and we Assume its absorbed
by the Constant Of Integration (K).Also the expression
for any (ῳg ) Cannot have (dθ )Since (ῳg ) Remains as
we said strictly in the XY- Plane .However for the sake
of argument instead of zero we assign:(dθ )= 1
Radian. Hence the expression for (ῳg )Becomes :
N = (ῳg )dx---------------------B.
Giving :
KῳC/g . (dx. dθ) =(ῳg )dx. Or
dθ = g/K (ῳg / ῳc.)------------(C)
And (dθ )Turned out here to be a factor [g/K]of the

726 393
 394Page 394 of 726

Lag (Phase)Angle As defined earlier !

Kinematics Of Free Falling Particle (m): Example One.

m ῳC = ῳG

ῳC >> ῳG ῳC <<ῳG

m
Velocity = r. (Ω )
Acceleration Along Path (L):
= Unit Vector dL . dΩ /dt= dL .(dῳC/dt-dῳG/dt)
Acceleration Perpendicular to The path= r. (Ω )2
Example Two.
We already defined space density as (σ )=1/dx.
Therefore from equation (A): N/dx=KῳC/g . (dθ).
σ .N =[K/g] ῳC . dθ. But ῳC = dθ/dt. Substituting
σ.N.dt [g/k] = (dθ)2 Or dθ=√ σ.N.dt [g/k] Then from
(C) dθ = g/K (ῳg / ῳc.)= √ σ.N.dt [g/k] Or:
Lag Angle (ῳg / ῳc.)2= σ.N. K/g . dt At N=1 and ῳg = ῳc.
Vm =dx/dt = K/g=Constant as it will be at the highest
726 394
 395Page 395 of 726

point of the projectile .(See example two?)

Irreducible Dimensions .
What I am proposing here is to reduce the dimensions
of space (x,y,z) And Time (t) In to Irreducible
Dimensions : the Space Density (σ=1/x) And Time
Density ( Ω=1/t ) As defined above .
Applications:

Microscopic:
Nuclear Radius =10-12 cm. Low-- σ=10+12 cm High.
Nuclear Time.:
7 X 10-24 Sec. Low- Ω= 1/7 X 10+24 sec High.

Macroscopic:
Earth radius ≈ X 10+3 m High- σ=10-3 m(Low).
Earth time =24X60X60 Sec. High- Ω
=2 Л /24X60X60. Rad/Sec ( Low ).
(Wherever Appropriate Mass Implicitly Included As

726 395
 396Page 396 of 726

Unit Mass ).

Delicate Logic:
The graph above (Repeated Below )Can explain the
importance of these Irreducible Dimensions :
At The Point (P ) Y=T Therefore 1/Y=1/T Or σ = Ω
Since at Y≠ T σ ≠ Ω.
At the point(P) Both ( σ) And ( Ω) Are Organically
Identical .
However as they ( σ & Ω) Begin to separate organically
from each other they can only do so asymptotically along
the asymptotic curve while (y) and (t )Can only move
along the (Y) and (T)Axes.
The important point to remember is that ( σ) And ( Ω)
Can never in reality touch the (Y) and (T)Axes.
Therefore we assume that only at some Hypothetical Or
Imaginary Values ( σ)n (Ω )n :
These will be reaching (0)As both (Y) And (T)---∞.
( σ)n = σ +∆ σ = 0 = (Ω )n = Ω +∆ Ω
Giving:

726 396
 397Page 397 of 726

σ - Ω = ∆ Ω -∆ σ

σn
Y
σ

Pn

P1
Ω Ωn
ΘrT. T
Pn

σ P1 Ω

P0 ΘrT
σ

The Blow.= =d2 σ /d fn

The Flow.= d σ /d f n

726 397
 398Page 398 of 726

fn

Quantum Mechanics: The Three Isamic Postulates.

© Isam .T . Saleh. London -2005

“ (∆ Ω & ∆ σ.)Do not represent only the Short Falls

(Which In Reality Can Never Be Crossed )Between the
(σ ,Ω) Axes and the Y-T Axes !But also the Amount Of
Information Lost by reducing the (x,y,z,t)Dimensions in
to (σ,Ω) Dimensions.”

“It’s inside these Three Postulates :The missing link

between Gravity and Quantum Mechanics may be
found.”
726 398
 399Page 399 of 726

The Equation Derived Above :

σ - Ω = ∆ Ω -∆ σ.
Can be translated in to three postulates:

The First Postulate:

The difference between Space Density and Time Density Is the same
as the difference between any increments in each of them.

The Second Postulate:

The above imply that any increase in Space Density or Time Density
will be proportional to its original magnitude of (σ or Ω). i.e.
∆ σ =k σ And ∆ Ω =kΩ Where (k)Are equal
constants.(As in any restoring resistance .)?

The Third Postulate:

∆ σ . ∆ Ω = Constant = [h]k. (h=Plank Constant )
±K Is another constant (See universal constant ) ?
(Wherever Appropriate Mass Implicitly Included As
Unit Mass !
Also See Hybrid Units Of Space-Time Discussed Above).

726 399
 400Page 400 of 726

Fundamental Notes :
1-
Ω =Frequency = Time Density = 1/T.
σ =The Potential =Space Density =1/r(x,y,z.).
2-
σ and Ω Climbing Discreetly by(h )k to Higher Equality
at each point :P1, P2, Pn σ1 = Ω1, σ2 = Ω2, σn = Ωn
But it does not follow that : σ1 = σ2 Or Ω1 = Ω2 etc ?

3- From The First Postulate Above :

σ - Ω =∆ Ω -∆ σ Squaring both sides;(σ- Ω)2=(∆ Ω-∆σ)2
σ2 + Ω2 -2 (σ Ω) = (∆ Ω)2+(∆σ)2 -2 ( ∆ Ω∆σ)
From The Second Postulate :
∆ σ =k σ And ∆ Ω =kΩ Therefore: ∆ Ω∆σ =K Ω.σ
And from the Third Postulate : ∆ σ . ∆ Ω =h .
BY substituting and rearranging the terms we have :
K1 (∆σ)2 + K2 (∆ Ω )2 – K3(h) = (∆ Ω)2+(∆σ)2 – K4 (h).
(∆σ)2 [K1 – 1] + (∆ Ω )2 [K2 -1 ] =(h)[ K3 - K4 ).
(∆σ)2 K5 + (∆ Ω )2 K6 =(h)K7. All (K)s Are constants. Or
(∆σ)2 KA + (∆ Ω )2 KB = (h )k

726 400
 401Page 401 of 726

Two Exercises: Exercise-A :

Proceeding from :

(∆σ)2 KA + (∆ Ω )2 KB = (dL)2

Find expressions for the line integrals of :

dL ? d σ ??d Ω ???

After Scalar Multiplying through by vector (V) Relating

all these three ?

Then approximating the Circular Line integral of :

∫ v.(dL) To [(∆σ) 2
- (∆ Ω )2 ]1/2 ≈ (h).

Though : [(∆σ)2+ (∆ Ω )2 ]=(h )k

[(∆σ)2- (∆ Ω )2 ]1/2 ≈ (h).

How does these relate to World Lines?

And how these in turn relate to the Cosmic Flux ??

726 401
 402Page 402 of 726

Exercise-B:
“The Grand Equation Of Motion :G.E.M.“

(dL)2 =(∆σ)2 KA + (∆ Ω )2 KB =(dy)2 KC+ (dt)2 KD

Let : KA= KB= KC= KD

Then multiplying through by (dt)2 We have:

(dt/dy)2+ 1=(dy. dt)2+ (dt)4 = (dt)2 [(dy)2+ (dt)2 ]

But (dy)2+ (dt)2 =(dL)2 Hence:

1/ (Vy)2 + 1 =(dt)2 (dL)2 =(dt)4 (VL)2

1/(dt)4 = (VL)2 [1/ (Vy)2 + 1] -1

(d Ω )4=(VL)2 [ (1 + (Vy)2)/(Vy)2] -1

(d Ω )4 =(VL)2 [(Vy)2/(1+(Vy)2)]

At Sin ΘrT = 1/√2 =(Vy) /(VL)

(VL) = √2 (Vy) Substituting :

726 402
 403Page 403 of 726

(d Ω )4 = 2 (Vy)2 [(Vy)2/(1+(Vy)2)]

(d Ω)2 =√2 (Vy)2 /√(1+(Vy)2

The G.E.M.

dΩ.r(Unit Vctor)=[√2 (Vy)2 /√(1+(Vy)2] 1/2

Alternatively

1/(dt)4 = (VL)2 [1/ (1 +Vy)2 ] -1

1/(dt)4 ≈ (VL)2 [ 1 - (Vy)2 ] ≈ (VL)2 - (VL)2 (Vy)2]

≈ [√2 (Vy)]2 - [√2 (Vy)]2 (Vy)2

≈ 2 [(Vy)2 - (Vy)4 ] =2 (Vy)2 [1- (Vy)2]

dΩ.(r Unit vector)≈ [√2 (Vy)√(1-Vy ) (1 + Vy] 1/2

726 403
 404Page 404 of 726

Again You Do Not Need To Believe Anyone :

Just Compare For Yourself My G.E.M With The Metrics
of S.R. (Einstein’s Special Relativity ):

t” = t – βx/c And x” = x - βct

√ 1 - β2 √ 1 - β2

Now Just See For Yourself By substituting :

t” =1/ ῳ” x” = 1/ σ”
Where : β = v/c.

Keeping In Mind How Frequencies Can Bypass Lorentz

Transformations ?
By restoring the unit mass (m)Implicit in all of the
above expressions !
And Reinstating ( Ω =dῳ )i.e. d Ω =d2 ῳ
dn ῳ/dtn =(-1)n (ῳ)n+1And dn σ /dyn = (-1)n (σ)n+1
Which Of The Following Can Be Expressed :
Energy ? Impulse?? Action???

The G.E.M. Answers :

726 404
 405Page 405 of 726

“Proceed as follow on My Hypothesis of :

dx/dt = dx/dt” But dv/dt≠ dv/dt”. ”
t” = t – βx/c And x” = x - βct
√ 1 - β2 √ 1 - β2
t – βx/c = x – βct
t” x”
(Time Density ῳ” ) X(t – βx/c )
=(Space Density σ”) X (x – βct ).
ῳ”(t – βx/c ) = σ”(x – βct ).--------------------------A
Keeping in mind that :
dῳ/dt =- ῳ2 ?dσ/dx = -σ2 ? dx/dt =v.
dv/dt =g. And dv/dt” =g”.
dσ/dt = dσ/dx . dx/dt =-x2 .V
d ῳ/dx = d ῳ/dt .dt/dx =- ῳ2/v dσ/dx = -x2 .And :
dv/dx = dv/dt . dt/dx. = g/v. And C=The Constant
Speed Of Light. Now let (ῳ/σ )=R.

dR/dt = (σ d ῳ/dt - ῳ dσ/dt )/ σ2

dR/dt = (σ. ῳ2 – ῳ .v.x2 )/ σ2

dR/dx = (σdῳ/dx - ῳ dσ/dx )/ σ2

726 405
 406Page 406 of 726

= (-σ .ῳ2/v + ῳ .v.x2 ) / σ2

Giving: dx/dt = Velocity
=(σ. ῳ2 – ῳ .v.x2 )/(-σ .ῳ2/v + ῳ .v.x2 ).
= (σ. ῳ2 – ῳ .v.x2 )/( ῳ .v.x2 - σ .ῳ2/v ).
=(σ. ῳ2 – K )/( K - σ .ῳ2/v ).
= (L-K)/ (K- L/v )---------------------------------- B
Where:
L= σ. ῳ2 And K = ῳ .v.x2
Now differentiate through equation (A)w.r.t.(Time) :
d ῳ.t/dt - 1/c2 [-ῳ.t (v.x) +g(ῳ.x)( ῳ.v)
(-t ῳ2 + ῳ) -1/ ῳ [v+gx –x2]
--- o - ῳ/C2 [v+gx-x2).
d/dt (R.H.S.)
= σ.v –x3.v+ cx3 .v +g.c.σ.t + c.σ .t.
Giving :
g ≈ (x2 – v(c-x)n + c.x.)/( x- c3/v ῳ.).-------------C

Likewise To Obtain Equation (D) :

726 406
 407Page 407 of 726

Differentiate equation (A)w.r.t. (Space –X).

However like all marathon mathematical calculations
there bound to be many small errors but this will not
alter neither the concept nor the final conclusion :
Then express (g) And (g” )In both equations C &D in
Terms of L & M as defined by equation B ?
Compare and see for yourself ?
Finally with specific reference to the graph above

where ; At Ω = σ We can Put : ῳ”= σ”

Then multiply through by [1/m(Mass)]:
An expression for (E =mc2 ) Can be obtained in terms of
( ῳ”And σ” ).
Giving the following relationship different meaning and
applications.
Time Density /Space Density =Velocity.
But Be Prepared ?
Be Very Prepared ??
For Interpretations Full Of Surprises ?

Frequmechanics (Part-Seven).

726 407
 408Page 408 of 726

Frequency And The Isamic Diagrams : Relationships

And Applications.
“The only way for any observer to distinguish between
ῳCutting. And ῳGluing (ῳC. And ῳG ) Is by riding the beam
of light cutting the diagram along its diagonal.”

“Introducing what I call (Relativistic Areas )Instead of

Relativistic Distances Offering nearer insight to the
Fabric of space.”

“In my theory :Dividing the rectangle area by two is

Profanity !Since each observer can measure their own
area as : (m) Or (n )Or (m+n)And nothing else .”

Finally We might be in better position to understand what my

726 408
 409Page 409 of 726

Isamic Diagrams Are all about ?As follows:

A C
m [ ψm,n,(m+n). ].

θ n B
O

Let O be at the origin of ordinary Cartesian coordinates

(X,Y) .A beam of light Cutting (Travels) From (O) along
the diagonal (OC).
Proceeding From The Following Two Remises:

1- By Inverting Relativity .

2- By The Quantum Notion Of:

Simultaneous Observations Are Not Possible.

726 409
 410Page 410 of 726

3-Relativistic Areas (When The Diagram Is At Rest ).

“Introducing the Relativistic Areas instead of distances
can give better perspective to the Fabric of space.”
Let the observer ride a photon cutting a diagram along
the diagonal (OC).Hereafter this observer shall be
referred to as (Mr. Photon )!While A and B as the (Mr
and Mrs Observed ).
If the diagram is stationary then Mr Photon Will see
(B) Receding from it with speed (C).
If Mr Photon looks (Right)He need to assign Mrs
Observed (B) The dimension of (X” )Instead of (X).
Whilst Y=Y.
If he looks left then its Y” Instead of Y And X=X.
Hence the area as measured by Mr Photon on the side
of Mrs Observed (B) will be : m= X” . Y
Similarly for Mr Observed (A):Area n = X .y”.
Where :
x” = x – βct And y” = y – βct
√ 1 - β2 √ 1 - β2

726 410
 411Page 411 of 726

Therefore:

m= Y. x – βct = (y.x-yBct)/√ 1 - β2
√ 1 - β2

n= X.( y – βct) = (x.y-xBct) Where : Ɣ(Gamma)=√ 1 -β2

Ɣ Ɣ

Ɣ (m-n) = xBct –yBct = Bct (X-Y)

---------------------A.

m+n = 2xy-yBct -xBct =2xy - Bct (X+Y)

Ɣ Ɣ

Ɣ (m+n) =2xy - Bct (X+Y ).-----------------------------(B)

Now by adding equations (A + B) --------

2m. Ɣ =2xy+Bct(y+X+x-y) =2xy+Bct(-y-x+x-y).

=2xy-2yBct= 2y((x-Bct).
Giving :

726 411
 412Page 412 of 726

Ɣ .m = y( x-Bct).-------------------C
And by subtracting equation (A)From(B):
(B-A) -------------------------------
2n. Ɣ = 2xy –Bct(y+x). –Bct (x-y).
=2xy-Bct [ (x+y) +(x-y)] =2xy –Bct (2x).=2xy –2xBct .
Ɣ .n = x(y- Bct).-------------------------------D.

4-Relativistic Areas:

(When The Diagram Is Moving With Velocity Vx ).

A C
m [Vx , Vy =0.].

θ n B
Then:

(Ux)” = C . [ Cos θ - v/c ]

[1- (v/c )Cos θ]

(Uy)” = C . [ Sin θ √1- v2/c2 ]

[1- (v/c )Cos θ]

726 412
 413Page 413 of 726

Where:
(Ux)” And (Uy)” Are the two components of the velocity
of Mr Photon. In the X And Y Directions.

5-
“For the sake of the current argument introducing :The
universal magical (Hypothetical )Unit of time (Tore-Ť )!
That can turn Any Velocity in to Distance i.e. (V. Ť=x) !
And The universal unit radius vector (ř )That can turn
Any Frequency in to velocity i.e.( ῳ. ř = V. )Also the
universal density (Mass Per Unit Volume(σ)!Then we
can shed these three with the help of Plank Constant .”

Therefore;

X” = Ť . (Ux)” And Y”= Ť .(Ux)”

When Mr Photon looks (Right) The he can only

measure the area with (X”.Y)!
Conversely if He look left then the area will be (X.Y”).

726 413
 414Page 414 of 726

6- Conclusions :
a-
Clearly from equation (A) m≠ n.
Except at x=y. i.e.
Only Squares Not Rectangles .

b-
Clearly from (A) And (B) Areas (m) And (n)Can
Transform relativisticaly by (Ɣ)s Just as Velocities can
transform with(Ɣ).
ῳCutting. /ῳGluing. =ῳC /ῳG = ῳ”/ῳ. =t/t”. Also:

β =v/c= ῳC . ř /ῳG. ř = t/t”.

As you see :
By substituting for ( ῳ”=ῳ) Inside (Ɣ )One equation will
blow up !
While the other one goes to infinity !
Hence ( ῳ”≠ ῳ).
And there is after all two frequencies inside one:
If Relativity Not To Be Violated.

726 414
 415Page 415 of 726

6- Already shown that :

m≠ n.

m= ∫ 0 yd(x”)

Where :(C.t”)2 = (x”)2 +y2.

n= ∫ 0 xd(Y”)

Where :(C.t”)2 =( x)2 +(y”)2.

726 415
 416Page 416 of 726

7-Introducing The Relativistic Volumes(V1)& (V2).

m z”

V 1= ∫ 0 yd(x”) ∫ 0 . dz
”.

n z”

V 2= ∫ 0 x.dY”) ∫ 0 . dz
”.

Where:

z” = √ [(X”)2 +(Y”)2 –(Ct)2].

726 416
 417Page 417 of 726

Clearly V1≠ V2 And it follows that :

(V1 . σ ≠ V2. σ ).
I.e. the masses are neither equal nor symmetric
and that the energies also cannot be equal :
E1 ≠ E 2
Finally concluding that the two frequencies
cannot be the same since:
E1=(h) ῳ” And E2 =(h). ῳ
Again Proving that :
ῳ”≠ ῳ
Where (h)As before is the Plank Constant.

BOTTOM LINE.
We need to keep in mind that Physically The area
remains one and the same :However the above
calculations are Concrete Evidence that the Fabric Of
Space Can be cut and glued simultaneously by same
observer with two different frequencies disguised as
one !

726 417
 418Page 418 of 726

Further Illustrations On My Isamic Diagrams.

A Square Lamina of one Unit Area Made of Uniform
Material Where the cosmic flux flowing perpendicular
at Equidistance through each side from left to right
with the total number of flux lines at each side of the
square = n.
If a particle is cutting the flux along the diagonal (OC)
Then it will do so with one frequency (ῳn )Where:
(ῳn ) =The Number Of Lines The Particle Is Cutting Per
Unit Time.
However if the square now is elongated in to Rectangle
where the lines of flux through side (OA) Still =n while
the number of these lines through side (OB) =N Where:
N >n.
Now the particle Need to cut the flux again with angle
(θ )But with two frequencies instead of one i.e. with
(ῳn )And (ῳN ). Clearly (ῳN ). > (ῳn ).
Now remember we said this diagram was a Unit Area :
For total area we need to multiply by either (m) Or (n)
As defined in previous sections..

726 418
 419Page 419 of 726

Kinematics Of Free Falling Particle (M): Example Two.

h ῳC = ῳG h

ῳC >> ῳG ῳC <<ῳG

O O

a-We stay inside the Isamic Diagram ( I.D). i.e

We stay inside One Unit Of Area Per One Unit Of Time .
Where the particle of mass (M )Cutting the flux at Right
Angle.
b-Velocity = r. (ῳ) Where (r)Is any hypothetical radius
running from utopian (Hypothetical) Point at
equidistance to the centre of each frequency :
(ῳC ) And (ῳG )Or else:
C-We can Even Use the dimension (y) Of the particle
Instead of ( r )Because as we shall see later it makes no
difference at all to the result !

726 419
 420Page 420 of 726

d-The particle climbing from rest to height (h):

Ascending with ( ῳc - ῳg >1.)And descending With :

( ῳc - ῳg < 1.) Now:

(ῳc )2 - (ῳg )2 =( ῳc - ῳg )( ῳc + ῳg ). OR:

[(ῳc )2 - (ῳg )2 ].r =( ῳc - ῳg ).r ( ῳc + ῳg ).

(ῳc )2 .r- (ῳg )2.r =( ῳc .r - ῳg .r ) ( ῳc + ῳg ).

Ac - Ag = (Vc - Vg ) (∑ῳ )

Where A=Acceleration !V=Velocity !And ∑ ῳ= ῳc + ῳg

Or:
∆A = ∆v ∑ῳ

The First Route :

∆A /∆v =∑ῳ
Now althugh (∆A & ∆v )May not be constants
themselves but their ratio (∆A /∆v )Certainly is
constant otherwise they will be Unhinged Organically.
Justifying that :In The Limits:
∆A /∆v -- dA /dv =∑dῳ ----equation (1)

Integrating both sides :

726 420
 421Page 421 of 726

0∫ g
dA = ∫V(h)
0 dv . ∑dῳ

Now at (h ) : ( ῳc = ῳg ) Hence ∑dῳ =2 ῳ

The Second Route:
Since we are operating inside the (I.D)i.e Per One Unit
Of Time Justifyng. ∆v /Unit of time = A Then
substituing in Eqution (1) Above:
∆A /A = ∑dῳ

∫g dA /A = ∫2w dῳ. [Log A ]g = 2ῳ +K

Acceleration = ek . e√m . 2ῳc. . e-√n . 2ῳg

( m ) And (n) Are as defined in the ( I.D)!

And we are still inside one unit area or (Distant)
Providing units for the acceleration .
The constant (K) Can be obtained from the end
conditions of the particle path.

726 421
 422Page 422 of 726

Let the path of the particle (OC=X):

X =xo emt. e-nt.
Where now : m= ῳC. And n=ῳG
At This Stage m&n Are Taken As Constants.
dx/dt = xo m.emt. e-nt. - xo n .emt. e-nt.
d2x/dt2 = xo m2 emt. e-nt. + xo n2 emt. e-nt.
Acceleration = xo [m2 + n2 ] e(m-n)t. -- Equation-1.
From section (D)Above and after substituting :
xo=r. And m= ῳc n= ῳg
(ῳc )2 - (ῳg )2 =( ῳc - ῳg )( ῳc + ῳg ). Multiplying by(r)

[(ῳc )2 - (ῳg )2 ].r =( ῳc - ῳg ).r ( ῳc + ῳg ).

(ῳc )2 .r- (ῳg )2.r =( ῳc .r - ῳg .r ) ( ῳc + ῳg ).

Ac - Ag = (Vc - Vg ) (∑ῳ )

(Ac - Ag )= (Vc - Vg ) (ῳc + ῳg ) e(m-n)t.

Squaring Both Sides And Rearranging Terms:

[(Ac - Ag )/ (Vc - Vg ) ]2 = [(ῳc + ῳg ) e(m-n)t.]2

[(Ac - Ag )/(Vc - Vg ) ]2=[(ῳc)2+(ῳg)2+2 ῳc ῳg]e(m-n)t

726 422
 423Page 423 of 726

[ ∆ Acceleration /∆Velocity]2 = (∑ῳ )2 e(m-n)t.

[ ∆ Acceleration/∆Velocity] = (∑ῳ ) e(m-n)t. -----Equation-2.

But from Equation -1. Above :

Acceleration = xo [m2 + n2 ] e(m-n)t.
e(m-n)t. = Acceleration / xo [m2 + n2 ]
Hence after substitution in Equation -2.

[ ∆ Acceleration/∆Velocity]= (∑ῳ ) Acceleration/xo [m2 + n2 ].

Acceleration = xo . [ ∆A/∆V] . [m2 + n2 ] /(ῳc + ῳg).

.

726 423
 424Page 424 of 726

Frequmechanics (Part-Eight).
Final Illustrations On My Isamic Diagrams (I.D).
“Please read my Definitions , Anzast And Axioms
Carefully”
Let :
h= The height the particle (M)Climbing or falling.
N=Number of flux lines at any active surface.
= The rate these lines been cut or glued
by two virtual particles (m And n) Where: (m,n ) ‫ﬤ‬ M (
‫ﬤ‬ Means Belong to as in group theory).Such that :
M= m ± n
Vm =Linear velocity Of ῳC = ῳm Which is Cutting .
Vn = Linear velocity Of ῳG = ῳn Which is Gluing.
Am = Centripetal Acceleration by ῳC .
An = Centripetal Acceleration by ῳG .
And as defined in earlier sections:
σ = dx/dt =Space Density. ῳ= dN/dt =Tme density.
Also Recall From Exercise (B)In Earlier Section :
dn ῳ/dtn =(-1)n (ῳ)n+1And dn σ /dyn = (-1)n (σ)n+1

726 424
 425Page 425 of 726

1-
If there is flux ?Any flux: Magnetic?
Electromagnetic? Gravitational ?It must be
cosmic : I am calling it the Cosmic Flux.

2-
And If There Was a flux then there must be the
followings:
Every stable object (Moving or otherwise)in the
universe has Two Not One Natural Frequencies:
One is cutting the cosmic flux between itself and
all its surrounding objects we call ῳCutting. Or (ῳc)
And the other gluing this flux after the cutting by
frequency ῳGluing Or (ῳG).

726 425
 426Page 426 of 726

3-
These (I.D)Are an arbitrary Geometrical Units of
shapes Chosen By Backtracking and placed inside
the flux to Measure The Flux. Analogous to the
Stress And Strain Gauges Conveniently
Orientated for best analysis .
We let these hypothetical points defines both the
position and determine the shape of the
(I.D)Required for each particular measurement.
Rather than the shape itself determining the
point. i.e. its again Backtracking!

4-
The lag (Phase)Angle between cutting and gluing
is: =Modulus [[ῳC./ῳG ]] This Preclude the two
frequencies running counter to each other. i.e.
Synchronized .

726 426
 427Page 427 of 726

5-Clearly The Following Reasonable

Assumptions:
a-
That the object cannot cut and glue the flux from
the same side but it must cut this flux from one
side called the Cutting Gate (m)!And gluing it
always from another side the Gluing Gate(n) .
b-
If the object not stationary then :
The Cutting Gate is always equal or larger than
the Gluing Gate. m ≥ n.
C-At Equilibrium (Top of trajectory):
ῳC. = - Minus (ῳG) i.e. ῳC. ≠ (ῳG).
m
6- P ῳC.
OC Clockwise.

A ῳg og
Clockwise n O

726 427
 428Page 428 of 726

7- Centre Of Frequency:
“In a nutshell :Quantum mechanics picture the world as
(Fuzzy Balls )!My theories picture it a world of
frequencies !! Since anything Fizzy Must be oscillating
around certain point or fixed mean we call hereafter
the center of frequency.”
Is the point where the frequency of any
Oscillation ?Vibration ?Or Any other Cyclical
Motion is measured without any need for any
relativistic calculations due to the Compensatory
Nature Of Cyclical Motion! The centres are (OC And
Og) In the diagram below :
C

B
m
n P
OC
A Og Ɣ θ

726 428
 429Page 429 of 726

8- The Radius ( R ).
a-If (P)Is the position of the particle along the
diagonal (OC)Then R= (OP).
b-The Frequency ,The Oscillation, vibration or
any other circular motion around (OC And Og)Are
measured by the Radii ( O,OC )and ( O, Og)
Respectively . Such that :
ῳC. =2π (RCos θ) /t. ῳG=2π (RCos Ɣ ) /t
9- At the point (O) The radii of each circle above
representing the accelerations Am And An Each is
normal to the tangent representing velocity( Vm )
Or (Vn ) At that point (O).That is : The Direction
Of Centripetal Acceleration Of The Cycle (m)Is In
The Same Direction Of The Angular Velocity For
The Cycle (n)!And The Direction Of The
Centripetal Acceleration Of Cycle (n) Is The Same
Direction Of The Angular Velovity For Cycle (m).
Also (See Page---The Hodograph) ?
726 429
 430Page 430 of 726

Exercise Fourteen :
The Questions :
A-Why the following three diagrams can only be
drawn only if the following two conditions are
satisfied:
1- ooC ≠ oog
2- And that (OOC ) Perpendicular To (OOg ):

B-Investigate the relevance of shaded area

(dA)To all previous (Isamic Diagrams)?
OOCutting
OOGlueng
OOCutting

OOGlueng

O
726 430
 431Page 431 of 726

The Answer:
Now superimposing the above two diagrams on
each other’s to obtain the Third Diagram:

Its not possible to draw these two circles

Representing The Two Cycles of cutting and
gluing or to produce the shaded overlap area
(dA)in the third diagram without the above
stated two conditions
Its From This Overlap Area (dA) The Idea Of
Splitting Frequencies had risen.
726 431
 432Page 432 of 726

The Physical Significance Of The Overlap Area (dA).

a-
That the two circles representing the two frequencies
of the same particle at the same Instant are not
Disjoint (Not completely separated ).

b-
Although they are describing the One And Same
Particle At The Same InstantThey can never be drawn
without overlapping each other meaning they cannot
be the same !Never identical.

c-
If the particle e.g. at the point of resonance had only
one (Not Dual )Frequencies these two circles would
have been concurrent?

726 432
 433Page 433 of 726

10-
We Assume the Flux Lines Are Uniformly Spaced
Therefore N=The number of flux lines entering
the Cutting Gate.While n=Number of lines glued .
Where : N ≥ n.

11-
The most Central Point to remember is that :
m =f (N) =F (ῳC. )And n=f (N-S) =F (ῳg)
Where (S )Are the number of lines escaping the
gluing process therefore: S =F( Acceleration )
Also the Gate Of Entry for the Domain;[m =f (N)]
Before the flux reaches the other domain :
[n=f (n) ] Is larger than the Gate for the domain
of gluing (n). i.e. m>>n. And that :
The Overlap Area (dA)Of The Two Areas
Described By The Two Frequencies (dArea.)= F (S).

726 433
 434Page 434 of 726

12-Clearly :

If: ῳC. ≥ ῳG

Then surely it follows that :

Am ≥ An And Vm ≥Vn

And that (The diagonal (OC) Act as valve

Reducing or even Preventing the flow of flux
such that at : Ɣ =0Will be the case shown in
section (15)Below when Resonance occur at :
ῳGluing =0.

13-

Here We Start With The (Simplest )Geometrical

Shapes Of These Objects :

726 434
 435Page 435 of 726

A C Square:
n m m-n =0 Not Moving
O B

A C Rectangle :

n m=f(N) >n=f(n)
O θ m B

m-n >1 Moving In The Direction Of (OC).

726 435
 436Page 436 of 726

A m C Triangle:
R Cos θ R Sin θ m = √2 . n.
n B
O

Since the flux always enter and exit at right

angles. Moving at (√2 . n -n ) =n(√2 -1 ).

Sphere :
m m=n.
Rotating at (m +n)=2m Or 2n.

726 436
 437Page 437 of 726

14-
Kinematics Of Free Falling Particle (M):Example Three.
h g=Gravitational Acceleration height.

O Ground Level. O
Am An
Vm

Vn
Net Acceleration Net Angular Velocity(∆Velocit)

= Am +An = V m – Vn

Direction of flux between

Particle (M) And Earth.

726 437
 438Page 438 of 726

(ῳC.)2 . R Cos θ –(ῳG.)2 . R Sin θ =g

For The Sake Of Illustration :

Let : Sin θ = Cos θ =1/√2 Or:

(Ac - Ag ) =√2 . g = k . ∆ Acceleration But:

(ῳC.)2 –(ῳG.)2 =(√2/R ). g

And : R=(√2 ). g . 1/ ∆ω2 ------------Equation-1 .

(ῳC.)2 –(ῳG.)2 = (ῳC.–ῳG.) (ῳC.+ῳG.)

Multiply both side by ( R) :

R. (ῳC.–ῳG.) (ῳC.+ῳG.) = √2 . g (From Eq-1)

(Vc - Vg ) (ῳC.+ῳG.) =√2 . g

[∆Velocity] .(∑ῳ ) =√2 . g =∆ Acceleration --- Equation-2.

Acceleration/∆Velocity =∑ῳ ----Equation -3

726 438
 439Page 439 of 726

Integrating Equation -1 w.r.t. First ῳC.

Then w.r.t ῳG:Where ῳG =f(N) And multiplying

both sides by ( R/√2).

ωg ∫ωc dω =(ῳC.–ῳG.)

(ῳC.–ῳG.)2 = [ ωg∫ dω ]2
ωc

But : ∆ῳ2 = ( ∆ῳ )2 +2 (ῳC.ῳG.)

∆ῳ2 =[ ωg∫ dω ]2 = ( ∆ῳ )2 +2 (ῳC.ῳG.)

ωc

( R/√2). ∫ [∆ῳ] dω +∫ 2(ῳ .ῳ .) dω =g∫ d ῳ

2
c C G c C

Since ; ∫ 2(ῳ .ῳ .) dω =2 (ῳ .) /2ῳ (ῳ )+k

C G c C
2
c G

( R/√2) ∫ [(∆ῳ) dω 2
c / ῳC]+ ῳC .ῳG. =Kc Eq -4.

726 439
 440Page 440 of 726

Now integrating w.r.to ῳG :

( R/√2). ∫ [∆ῳ] dω 2
g + ῳC.ῳG.) dωg=g d ῳg ∫
Similarly:

∫ 2(ῳ .ῳ .) dω
g c g =2 (ῳg.)2/2ῳg (ῳc)+k R/√2).

( R/√2) ∫ [(∆ῳ) dω 2
g / ῳg]+ῳG .ῳc) =KG Eq-5.

Equating Equations Four And Five :

( R/√2). ∫ [(∆ῳ) dω 2
c / ῳC] +ῳc .ῳg = K

( R/√2). ∫ [(∆ῳ) dω 2
g / ῳg] + ῳG .ῳc) = KG

∫(∆ῳ) dω / ῳ
2
c C ∫
+ῳc .ῳg)= (∆ῳ)2 dωg/ ῳg+ῳc .ῳg

726 440
 441Page 441 of 726

Rearranging !Eliminating The Constants And

Dividing Both Sides By (∆ῳ)2 :

∫dω c / ῳC +ῳc .ῳg)= ∫dω g / ῳg +ῳg .ῳc)

Log ωc = Log ῳG + K

K= Log (ωc/ωg )

ek = ( ωc/ωg ) ----------------- Equation -6

726 441
 442Page 442 of 726

15- Frequmechanics (Part- Nine).

Kinematics Of Free Falling Particle (M):Example Four.
“If My Splitting of frequencies proved true? It
will be the greatest discovery after Splitting the
atom.”

“Here is another example on how geometry can

simplify complex calculations .”
726 442
 443Page 443 of 726

Direction Of Flux Between Particle (M) And Earth.

B
m
n P
ῳC
A ῳG Ɣ θ
O

Net Acceleration = Am Cos θ + An Cos Ɣ

Am An

Net Velocity = Vm Cos Ɣ – Vn Cos θ

VC

726 443
 444Page 444 of 726

VG

n m
OG Ɣ θ OC
O

Am
Vm An Vn

Ɣ θ
O

726 444
 445Page 445 of 726

Applying the same rectangle (OACB )Except this

time (OC)Is in the direction of the particle
trajectory i.e. (h)where:(m) As before is the
Cutting Gate and (n )is the Gluing Gate .
ῳC And ῳG Are as shown cutting the flux along

(OB) And (OA)Respectively :

P- is the position of the particle ( M) . h =OP.

And (P )is at (R Sin θ) And (R Cos θ ) Distances

from (OB) And (OC )Respectively .

Another Most Important Point To Always Keep In

Mind That :

The particle (M)Is moving vertically from point

(P1) To (Ph) Where (h )Is the height of the
trajectory .

726 445
 446Page 446 of 726

And this should Never Be Confused with the

circular paths of (m &n) Where m &n are Virtual
particles each rotating in one of the two cycles
describing the two frequencies (ῳC And ῳG )
cutting and gluing the flux such that :
(m,n ) ‫ﬤ‬ M
(‫ ﬤ‬Means Belong to as in group theory).
Therefore the dynamics of the particle (M) In free
trajectory itself what determine the values and

directions of (Vm, Vn , Am , An ,etc ) !

Not the other way round .
Another Point To Keep In Mind That By Definition :

ωc ≥ωg ! Vm≥ Vn !And Am ≥ An.

Clearly from the above Diagrams :

726 446
 447Page 447 of 726

A- Resolving Horizontally :
Velocities Are : Vm Sin Ɣ , (Minus)Vn Sin θ
Accelerations Are : Am Sin θ , An Sin Ɣ
But There Is No Horizontal Movement Hence :
Vm Sin Ɣ -Vn Sin θ =0
Or Vm / Vn = Sin θ / Sin Ɣ =Tan θ Equation -7
On The Other Hand If The Horizontal Differences In The
Velocities Were ≠0 But Equal To Some Costant (K)
Since Eq-6 Imply That The Ratio Of Velocities Remain
Constant !Hence Their Differences Should Also Be
Another Constant? Then:
dV/dt = Am Sin Ɣ - An Sin θ =d (K)/dt =0
Am Sin Ɣ = Am Cos θ =An Cos θ Giving;
Am / An =Cot θ -----------Equation-8.
But from Eq-7 :
Vm / Vn =Tan θ Therefore:

Am / An= Vn / Vm ---------------Equation-9.
726 447
 448Page 448 of 726

Am . Vm = An . Vn Equation-9.
.

B-
Resolving Vertically :
Velocities Are : Vm Cos Ɣ, (Minus) Vn Cos θ
Accelerations Are : Am Cosθ , An Cos Ɣ
The Acceleration = Am Cosθ - An Cos Ɣ Equation -10
Giving At Top Of Trajectory:
V= Vm Cos Ɣ - Vn Cos θ =0;
Vm / Vn = Cos θ/ Cos Ɣ =Cot θ.
On The Other Hand If The Vertical Cmponents Of
Velocity Were ≠0 ?Then:
dV/dt = Am Cos Ɣ - An Cos θ =0 Eq -11.

726 448
 449Page 449 of 726

Now equating both equations (10 & 11):

Am Cosθ -An Cos Ɣ = Am Cos Ɣ - An Cos θ
Or;
Am (Cosθ - Cos Ɣ ) = An (Cos Ɣ - Cos θ ).
Am / An = (Cos Ɣ - Cos θ ) / (Cosθ - Cos Ɣ )
Am / An = ( Sin θ - Cos θ ) / (Cos θ - Sin θ )
Giving: Am / An = -1. But : Am / An =Cot θ
Hence : θ = Ɣ = ¾ .π
Therefore Confirming equation -1 in the previous
section and that ∑v =0 Horizontally :
Since From Eqn-1 ; R=(√2 ). g . 1/ ∆ω2

.
g= k.(R/√2 ). ∆ω2 Equation- 12
.

726 449
 450Page 450 of 726

Clearly It Follows That At The Top Of The Trajectory :

VNet = Vm - Vn =0
Or
Vm = Vn
Substituting in equation seven above :
Am / An = -1 ≠ 0.
Where : g= -2 Am= -2 An
Alternatively : Substituting Equations 3,5,6,9:
From Equation -3 ∆ Acceleration /∆Velocity =∑ῳ

Or ;

∆Velocity . ∑ῳ = ∆ Acceleration

Proof-One :

Vh =Vm Cos Ɣ -Vn Cos θ.

Vh =Vm Sin θ -Vn Cos θ.

Vh = hCos θ . (ῳC.) – h Sin θ. (ῳG.)

726 450
 451Page 451 of 726

Now let Sin θ =Cos θ = 1/ √2

dVh /dt = √2 [dh/dt . (ῳC.)+ h .d(ῳC)/dt ]+

√2 [dh/dt (ῳg.)+ h . d(ῳg.)/dt But : dVh /dt =g

g = √2 [Vh . (ῳC.)-h. (ῳC)2 +Vh . (ῳg)-h. (ῳg)2

But At The Top Of The Trajectory Vh = 0.

Giving:

g = √2 [ h. (ῳC)2-h. (ῳg)2 ]

g= √2 h [ (ῳC)2-(ῳg)2 ]

From Eqn-12 : g= (R/√2 ). ∆ω2

Substituting for ∆ω2 =g . (√2 /R )

g= √2 h . g .√2 /R )

R=2h.

Since h=H (Total Height )=Constant :

726 451
 452Page 452 of 726

Imply that : ∆ω2 Also constant.

Proof –Two.
“We already said that dA=The difference between the
two areas of the two cycles (m & n) = f (S) =N-n.”
dA = f (S)= π (h Cosθ )2 - (h Sin θ)2

= π h2 [ (Cosθ )2 - (Sin θ)2 ]

dS/dt = π2h(dh/dt) [ (Cosθ )2 -(Sin θ)2]

= 2 π h Vh [ (Cosθ )2 -(Sin θ)2]

But: Vh (Cosθ ) =Vn And Vh (Sin θ ) = Vm

Therefore :

dS/dt =2 πh [ Cos θ .Vn - Sinθ .Vm ]

d2S /dt2 =2 π h. [ (An Cos θ - Am Sin θ ).

+ dh/dt ( Cosθ .Vn - Sinθ .Vm )]

But : In the limits when h =H At the top of the

726 452
 453Page 453 of 726

trajectory:

dh/dt =0 Therefore :

d2S /dt2 =2 π H. [ (An Cos θ - Am Sin θ ).

Or At : Cos θ = Sin θ And (Am- An )=Δ A

d2S /dt2 = -(Minus)2 √2 π . H. Δ A

Since (dS /dt ) = The rate of cutting the Escaped flux

= ωNet =(ῳC) -(ῳg) And:

d2S /dt2 = d ωNet/dt = (ῳC)2-(ῳg)2 = Δ (ῳC)2

Δ A = H. Δ (ῳC)2 Hence :

d2S /dt2 = -(Minus)2 √2 π . H. H. Δ (ῳC)2

But from Eqn-12 ; g= k.(R/√2 ). ∆ω2

Substituting for ∆ω2 = g.√2/k.R.

d2S /dt2 = -(Minus)2 √2 π . H. H. g. √2/k.R.

726 453
 454Page 454 of 726

At : k. R =H :

d2S /dt2 = -(Minus) 8.π . H. g. ---------Equation -13.

Which tally with Eqn-1.

Where k= 1/H=Space Density (ϭ ).

First Result :

From Equation -6 :

ek = ( ωc/ωg ) .

Implying ratio (ωc/ωg) Is constant Even when

both (ωc And ωg)Varies to give VNet=0.

Second Result ;
From Equation -9 Am . Vn = An . Vm =Constant .
At certain point of the trajectory :
V m = Vn Then ∆Velocity =0.

726 454
 455Page 455 of 726

Implying The Ratio Of Both Accelerations Is Constant

Even When VNet= 0 .

Predictibilty And Periodicity: Third Result:

“If predictability (By time )Still preferred to that by
periodicities (Tn) Its well to remember that any graph
for time is the exact inverse of the periods thus from
Eqn-1: Simply plot :”

∑ Ϭn Against ∑ ωn

Or;
dS/dt = f (h) = f (∆ωn )
or;
d2S /dt2 =f (∆ῳ2 )
etc.etc.etc

Plotting The Graph Of These New Functions

Against Real Time (That Of The Frequencies ) Can
Tell Us Every Thing We Need To Know By Remote
726 455
 456Page 456 of 726

Measurments With ( Signiture Frequencies ).

Giving Better View Of The Fabric Of Space.

And These Are My-13 Grand Equations Of Motion.

“If My Splitting of frequencies proved true by the
above Twelve Equations Derived only by myself ?
It will be the greatest discovery since Splitting
the atom.”
Clearly from the expressions derived above or those that will

be derived for the following : M =m + n , M*=m – n.

Force In Terms Of Frequencies: M.g =mAm ± nAn

Energy In Terms Of Frequencies : MV2 =m(vm)2 ± n(vn)2

And how these can be dependent on the Geometrical Shapes

of the object itself ?

A Universal Statement and reminder of another

geometrically dependant physical quantity:

Moment Of Inertia.? Also recall Plank’s :

726 456
 457Page 457 of 726

E = hω. And P = h [K].

16- Hybrid Quantities.

“Both (m) And (n)Represent Hybrid quantities as
follows :”

a-
By the definition of (N ) Above :
Both (m ) And (n)Can represent Units of Length
And subsequently those of Areas ( m2 And n2 ):
m=f (N) And n = f (n).

b-
Representing frequencies since (m) And (n)
represent the Number Of Flux Lines Per Unit Time

726 457
 458Page 458 of 726

That Been Cut Or Glued Subsequently By The Two

Frequencies .

My Theory Having The

Potential Of Replacing
Newtonian Mechanics.

Isam .T . Saleh. ©
September -2016-London.
(Part-Two). Sixty Eight Pages.

726 458
 459Page 459 of 726

For Further Detais Pleas See Volume Three In My Book

And Frequmechanics By Visiting:
www.scribd.com/isamtahersaleh

Frequmechanics (Part- Ten).

Two Cases (A &B) :

B (r.ῳCutting = r. ῳGluing) C

. Direction of Flux
ῳC >> ῳG ῳC <<ῳG

A D

726 459
 460Page 460 of 726

All are in the plane of the paper.

For More on The Definition Of The Cosmic Flux See The

Second Hypothesis In My Frequmechanics By Visting:
www.scribd.com/isamtahersaleh
Here are Some extracts :

The First Hypothesis.

Examples Of The Simplest Case : Triangle Of Sides A,B,C :

“First we we colour the sides of the triangle a,b,c Such That
they emit frequencies (fc ,fa , fb ).
Secondly we choose these frequencies Such That they satisfy
the following :”

First Degree Isamic Diagrams.

C < a +b.  fc < fa + fb
Clearly the frequencies 2Hz,3Hz,4hz(Or their multiples satisfy
this case ).

Second Degree Isamic Diagrams.

726 460
 461Page 461 of 726

C2 =a2 +b2  (fc )2 =(fa )2 +(fb )2

Clearly the frequencies 3Hz,4Hz,5hz(Or their multiples satisfy
this case ).

Third Degree Isamic Diagrams.

Tan Θ = a/b = fa /fb , Sin Θ = fa/fc etc.
Clearly the frequencies 3Hz,4Hz,5hz(Or their multiples
e.g. 3MHz ,4MHz,5Mhz )satisfy All The Above Three
Cases..

The Second Hypothesis.

What Is A Wave?

726 461
 462Page 462 of 726

In the final analysis a wave is a particle or particles

moving in certain path that must have Periodic Shape
i.e.
Wave = Particle (Physics )+Shape (Geometry)
+Frequency.

But What Is Cosmic Flux?

“Future generations will be able to harness the cosmic flux to
Neutralize Gravity whenever required just as its now energy is
tamed for the same purpose.”
See My Book ((Freqummechanics )) A branch of science founded entirely
by myself ?
If we draw exactly parallel (n)Number of lines them shine light
on them measuring their Average Frequencies measured by an
observer from exactly the same point as the source of light :
Then we have
Average Natural Frequency of these Flux Lines in the plane of
the paper ( Ωn ). If the distance separating any two adjacent
lines are (∆x ) And the differences between their corresponding
emitted frequencies are ( ∆Ω )Then:
∆x . ∆Ω =Constant (IS -For my isamic constant in Cm/Sec).
Where : n. ∆x =X And n. ∆Ω = Ω
Where : n. ∆x =X And n. ∆Ω = Ω

726 462
 463Page 463 of 726

Alternatively:
∆x . ∆p =h(Planck’s Constant.) Then since p= E/c
∆x . ∆ (E/C )=h But E =h Ω Hence : ∆x . ∆( h Ω)/c =h Giving:
∆x . ∆ Ω) =C (Constant Speed Of Light ).

Exercise One.
If :
u,v,w Are Uinits Vectors Along a,b, And c Respectively
Such that : v +u =w.
Find : u. fa + v.fb=?
Which of the following results significant??
d- (fc )2 =(fa )2 +(fb )2
e- W. fc = u. fa + v.fb
f- W. fc = u. fa - v.fb
Exercise Two.
“Please distinguish between measuringt frequency and cutting
or gluing it.”
Two substances one is red the other is blue their
respective masses are: mRed And mBlue. Emitting frequencies
fRed. And fBlue. Respectively! When mixed together
Vigorously their combined masses mRed. + mBlue = MRB.
Now is emitting fRB.

726 463
 464Page 464 of 726

Which of the following can be proven in the

Laboratory?
a- mRed. X fRed. + mBlue X fBlue = MRB X fRB.
b- mBlue X fRed. + mRed XfBlue = MRB X fRB.
c- mRed. + mBlue = K.MRB. Where K = mRed. / mBlue

Exercise Three.
As before: U,V, w, R Are Uinits Vectors Along the lines Emitting
the frequencies f1, f2, f3, f4 etc ? And (t) is The Time Dimension

where (f.t) = N just a number (The number of cycles not per

second but for the total operation of measurements. e.g.
t. f3= N3 OR t. f4= N4 .
U2.(f1)2 + v2.(f2)2 + w2.(f3)2 = R2.(f4)2
But u.u=v.v=w.w=R.R =1 Therefore :
(f1)2 + (f2)2 + (f3)2 = (f4)2
Where (f1,2,3,4,etc )Are the frequencies emitted by the individual
substances respectively as before ! To obtain the Acceleration
Matrix ( L ) :

u v X f1 f2 =L
w. Ct f3 f4
Note that: u.v=0= u.w=v.w. And All irrelevant
(incompatible) terms are also designated trivial =0 e.g.

726 464
 465Page 465 of 726

u.f3 + v.f1 = u. f2 = v. f3 =u. f4= v. f4 =0 etc. ?

L= u. f1 + v. f3 u. f2 + v. f4 Giving:

W . f1 + t. f3 W . f2 + t. f4

L=(u. f1 + v. f3)( W . f2 + N4 ) - (W . f1 + N3 )(u. f2 + v. f4 )

L= (u .w. f1 . f2 + N4 u f1 + vw, f2 f3 + N4 f3) –(uw f1 f2 + VW f1 f4

+ N3U f2 + N3V f4

= u .w. f1 . f2 + N4 f3– uw f1 f2 - VW f1 f4- N3U f2 - N3V f4

L = N4 u f1 + vw, f2 f3
Since: N4 f3 = VW f1 f4= N3U f2 = N3V f4 =0 (Irrelevant.)
But : W f3 = U. f1 + V f2 Reinserting above :
L = U. f1 + V f2 (U. f1 + V f2 )
L = N U. f1 +V .V (f2 )2 + U. f1 . V f2 )
= NU. f1 + V .V (f2 )2 + o ) .= U. f1 + (1) (f2 )2

dL/dt = C [ -2 (f1)2 - 3(f2 )3 +etc

For Multi-Dimensional :
dL/dt

=(Minus) ∑N. n (U)n (fn)n+1 + n(V)n ( fn )n+1 +n (w)n (fn )n+1 +etc.

726 465
 466Page 466 of 726

Since U = (V)n = (W)n =etc =1.

dL/dt = - Same Distance X∑N. n (fn)n+1+ n( fn )n+1 +n(fn )n+1 +etc

Now to obtain expressions for Force? Energy ?etic ???We need to
Introduce the Density Matrix: u.v.w ( ᵹRed. ? ᵹBlue. ? ᵹMixture ).
For each substance described earlier !

However for simplification we use just one (ᵹ ) Since it’s

possible to equate all three densities for these three

substances if ᵹRed. = ᵹBlue. Mixed vigorously obtaining a

homogenous substance.
Where ( ᵹ) Is the density of the Mixed Substance
keeping in mind when multiplying only the unit volume
(u.v.w. ᵹ) Counts?Therefore when multiplying for
example the first term it will be reduced to :

v.w ᵹ X n (u)n+1 (fn)n+1 =u. v.w ᵹ. n (u)n (fn)n Similarly = u..w

ᵹ X n (V)n+1 = U.V.W n (V)n (fn)n Etc. Since :
U . U =V.V=W.W Etc =1. Hence: (U)n =(V)n= (W)n.=1
As you see it does not change the results! Therefore:

m.dL/dt =Distant Travelled Per Cycle X (Minus) U. V.W.

X [N. ᵹ .(f1)2 +2∑ ᵹ. n (fn)n+1 +Etc.] . Where:

n

726 466
 467Page 467 of 726

m=Mass.
N =Just the number of cycles for the total
measurements.(Not Per Unit of Time ).
n= 2,3 ,3.4.5 etc. For all dimensions!
ᵹ=The density in grams per unit volume.

Exercise Four.

Proceeding as with earlier exercises where : U,V, w, R Are

Uinits Vectors Along the lines Emitting the frequencies f1, f2, f3, f4

etc ? And ᵹRed. , ᵹBlue , ᵹMixture Are the density in gm/cm3 ?

t=Time. C =Constant (velocity of Light ). Multiply

following three matrices:

L= ᵹRed ᵹBlue X u v X f1 f2
ᵹMixed Ct w. Ct f3 f4

726 467
 468Page 468 of 726

!-List all the negligible terms ?

2-Which is the most significant term? And Why ??

3-Find the expression for energy:

Energy = ∑ ᵹ . C2

Exercise Five.

L3 = ᵹRed ᵹBlue X u. f1 + v. f3 u. f2 + v. f4

ᵹMixed C.t. W . f1 + t. f3 W . f2 + t. f4

Here Its Feasible To Expand Only The First Terms As Guide To

How To Proceed Through The Rest Of These Complex

Calculations ? Note: ᵹMixed = ½ (ᵹRed. + ᵹBlue. )

L3=[ ᵹRed . u. f1 + ᵹRed .v. f3 + ᵹBlue . W . f1 + ᵹBlue .t. f3 ]

X [ ᵹMixed . u. f2 + ᵹMixed .v. f4 + C.t. W . f2 + C.t2. f4 ]

-(Minus) [ᵹRed . u. f2 + ᵹRed .v. f4 + ᵹBlue .W. f2 + ᵹB.t. .v. f4 ]
X[ᵹMixed . u. f1 + ᵹMixed . V. f3 + C.t. W +Ct f3]
The First Terms:
1-ᵹRed ᵹMixed . u.u. f1 f2 = ½ ᵹRed (ᵹR + ᵹB) (1) f1 f2
2- ᵹRed ᵹMixed . u.v. f1 f4 = ᵹRed ᵹMixed . (0). f1 f4 =0

726 468
 469Page 469 of 726

3- ᵹRed . u. f1 .ct.w f2 = ᵹRed . u.w f1 .ct. f2 = ᵹR . (δ) f1 .ct. f2= δ(Delta)

4- ᵹRed . u. f1 . C.t2 f4 = ᵹR UC (t2 . f1 f4) = ᵹR U. C
5- Thus : ᵹR U. C =Momentum resolved by Speed of light
polarized by the red substance at side (a)of the triangle.
And So Forth Proceeding With The Rest Of Terms ?

EXERCISE SIX.

“Unit Momentums For The Quantum Ensemble (L3)”

Prove That : L3 / C2 =H

Where Capital H is my universal constant (in Terms Of

Frequencies)as defined elsewhere in this book similar

(But not the same units ) To the Gaussian:

∆p .∆ x = (h-Planck Constant).p is momentum !And

(Ct)2 =Z2 + w2 At Z=0 : Ct =w Hence : L3 X W =H

L3 Xw= ᵹRed ᵹBlue X w.u w.v X f1 f2

-ᵹ Mixed ᵹMixed w. w . w.w f3 f4

726 469
 470Page 470 of 726

= ᵹRed ᵹBlue X δ -δ X f1 f2

-ᵹ Mixed ᵹMixed 1 1 f3 f4

L3 / C2 = (ᵹRed .δ . ᵹMixed +δ ᵹ Blue. ᵹMixed ) (f1 f4 - f2 f3 )

= ᵹMixed .δ (ᵹRed +ᵹBlue ) (f1 f4 - f2 f3 )

But : (ᵹRed +ᵹBlue )/2 = ᵹMixed

L3 / C2 = 2 (ᵹMixed )2 .δ . (f1 f4 - f2 f3 ) And Since :

δ = 1/√2. (See The Isamic Delta) ?

L3 / C2 = 2 / √2 (ᵹMixed )2 . (f1 f4 - f2 f3 )

= √2 (ᵹMixed )2 (f1 f4 - f2 f3)

L3 = √2 . C2 (ᵹMixed )2 (f1 f4 - f2 f3 )

Defining The Universal Constant Of Time Tore ( ).

Where ; = C/g Or C2 =(g. )2

Therefore: L3 = √2 . g2. t2 (ᵹMixed )2 . (f1 f4 - f2 f3 )

= √2 . g2. (ᵹMixed )2 . t2 (f1 f4 - f2 f3 )

726 470
 471Page 471 of 726

=√2 . ( Force )2 . t2 (f1 f4 - f2 f3 )Dynes.

That Was For The Two Dimensional.

Note ;Compare the above (Tore)With that of the Schwartzchild

Metric: d(Tore)2 = (1- 2GM/r . C2)

Exercise Seven. For Higher Dimensional (n):

Ln = 2 π n √2 ( Fi,j,k,etc… )n . tn . f1 * * Dynes.
* * *
* * fn

L n =2 π n √2 ( Fi,j,k,etc… )n . tn Det [ n X n]for (f) . Dynes.

Reading In To My Universal Constant :

1-Clearly my universal constant is different for each dimension

but constant for that specific dimension.

2-At zero gravity when g =0 Ln =0 Dynes.

(See Distance In Vacuum -Frequmechanics) ?

3-As g∞ ( As In Black Holes) ? n0 And :

726 471
 472Page 472 of 726

Ln =√2. (ᵹMixed .g. t .)0 Det ( nX n )For (fn) .

Ln = √2 . ( 1 ) . Det ( nX n )For (fn) Dynes.

The Eigen Value Of The Ensemble Inside Black Hole.

The Question Now :
Can there be any frequencies inside the black hole B.H? And if
there are what are they ?? =0?=One ?=n?
We do not know : All we know that light cannot escape from
any B.H.Therefore it’s reasonable to assume that:
If there are any frequencies inside B.H. ? For it to be
meaningful the Eigen Value ( ᴧ -Lambda) For this ensemble has
to be of higher frequencies than that of the light thus:
ᴧ >> ῳLight. (Cycles Per Seconds)

Thus Arriving At The Universal Equation For Frequencies:

(ᴧ )nxn = (√2 )n . ῳLight.

To understand this problem make Random Choice of any n-

Number of frequencies in the Visible Light! Take their Eigen
Value !Then proceed as above ?#

726 472
 473Page 473 of 726

Notice;
“The complimentary principle in nature and how the term
(√2.)In the above equations cancels out when inner spaces and
outer spaces Crumbles In To One inside black holes?”

Which Of The Following Are Correct ?

1- (ᴧ )nxn = (√2 )n . ῳLight.

2- (ᴧ )nxn = (√2 . ῳLight)n

3- (ᴧ )nxm = (√2 . ῳLight )n/m.

4- (ᴧ )nxm = (√2 )n. (ῳLight)m

5- (ᴧ )2nxn = 2 . (ῳLight. )2

6-(ᴧ )2nxm = (√2 . ῳLight. )2n/m

726 473
 474Page 474 of 726

7-(ᴧ )2nxm = 2n/m . (ῳLight. )2n/m

Inner And Outer Spaces Insde Black Hole(B.H.).

“Apart from that of light not escaping B.H: The only
Other Data we have about B.H. is the existence of the
term (√2.) Above implying How inner spaces (Dot
Products) And Outer Spaces (Cross Products) Crashes
in to one?”
“By definitions Black Holes Are of infinite gravity hence
infinite uniformity! Therefore to maintain this Absolute
Homogeneity Any displacement (Hypothetical or
otherwise) Such (dx)Has to be Simultaneously
Synchronized With others such as (dy) or (dz) Giving :
dx/dy =1 Or dr /dx = 1/√2. Indicating We Are On The
Right Track In all our analysis above of the B.H.
Assured by the persistent occurrences of this term
(√2.)”
Inner Space.

726 474
 475Page 475 of 726

“Recall the benefits of Free Range Eggs ?By applying

the same logic it’s not difficult to conclude that
(NOT)Free Range People also can never be free in real
terms .”

Introducing The Isamic Delta.

“My Isamic delta is the inverse of the kronicker delta.”
δ C,G =0 At C =G When C(Cutting)=G(Gluing)

And δ C,G =π/4

At C≠ G. When C(Cutting) ≠ G(Gluing). Also:

V= r . ω

r= The radius a Constant Running from infimum per

unit mass . As defined by at several parts of my book

(Fequmechanics)Also Seee Volume three.

ω =The frequency as Defined And Motivated In my

book Frequmechanics.(See Pages---Attack Angles In Aero-

Dynamics ?The Governors? The Gyroscope? Etc.) ?

726 475
 476Page 476 of 726

g=Known acceleration of gravity in Cm/Sec. Sec.

Mass=S.ợ =2m m= S.ợ /2 Ϭ (Sigma)=Density.

S=Distance between the two origins: OCutting.& OJoini

A-
The General Case Of Projectiles:
“In case of Projectile i.e. when the particle is not
ascending or descending in absolute verticals as
shown above but following curved path at angle (θ )To
the vertical:”

AT θ
θ g
ACentripetal

We are talking here about three types of accelerations:

g=Constant acceleration of gravity.
AC =Centripetal acceleration perpendicular to the
tangential velocity (V).
AT =Tangential acceleration of the particle

726 476
 477Page 477 of 726

V= r. (ῳCutting - ῳGluing )

ACentripetal = dv/dt =r . [ -(ῳCutting )2 + (ῳGluing )2

= - r . [ (ῳCutting )2 - (ῳGluing )2 ]

The Tangential Acceleration (AT ):

“This tangential acceleration not to be confused
with others e.g. the centerpitel? It’s the direct
function of the differential (r. d Ω) Between the
two velocities produced by two different
frequencies. where :”
Vertical

θ
λ ωCutting

ωGluing
γ
λ + γ=π/2

726 477
 478Page 478 of 726

dλ/dt = - dγ/dt =Constant (K) Rad/Sec.

Therefore if :
dλ/dt=+K Then dγ/dt=-K

Ω ≠ ωCutting -ω Gluin

But: d Ω = ωCutting ± j ωGluing.

r. d Ω = r.ωCutting ± r.j ωGluin VCutting – VJoining.=dV.
r.d Ω/dt =r. dV/dt = g.

∫r. d Ω = ∫g dt.
r. Ω = g .t + Constant of integration.

Clearly At t =0 i.e. When the Particle at Rest:

r. Ω = Constant of integration.

Therefore: r.Ω=0 + V0

r. d Ω/dt =d V0/dt And Since r ≠ 0 Therefore:

726 478
 479Page 479 of 726

d Ω=0 = ωCutting - ωGluin Hence when particle at

rest: ωCutting = ωGluin

Alternatively:

V=r(ωCutting -ω Gluin )

Let ωc =fr +m.t And ωg =fr +n.t

Where m= g/2r And n = - g/2r

r (ωCutting -ω Gluin ) = V = r.(m-n)t =g.t

Giving: dv/dt = g. Also :

At t=o ωCutting = ωGluin

By Induction: r. Ω = Velocity - V0

r = 1/ Ω (Velocity - V0 )

726 479
 480Page 480 of 726

Ω =What I call the Duality Frequency (ω, jω )In

full sense of the word. i.e. Differentiable Master
Frequency for Classical Systems !
( ω ) Is The Average Frequency for any Quantum
Ensemble :

Classical Ω = 1/n ∑n ωCutting - 1/n ∑n ωGluing

r =n.(Velocity + V0 )/ ∑n ωCutting - ∑n ωGluing

And The Potential (1/r) =

(∑n ωCutting - ∑n ωGluing ) /n.(Velocity + V0 )/r

Now To Bring The Particle Of Mass (M)To Rest At

Point(D) i.e.
The Force Required To Equalize Ωcutting & Ωgluin Will Be :

F=mg F= r.m. d Ω/dt.

r.m .d Ω =F .dt. Ω =1/r.m ∫F. dt Giving:

Ω= Impulse (I) X Potential (P)Per Unit Mass.

726 480
 481Page 481 of 726

r = I/ m. Ω. Ω= I.P/m
Relativesticly Speaking by substituting V=r. Ω.
And E=mc2 For elementary particles when ( I) is
very small : E=I. c2/V

Isam .T . Saleh. ©

The First Proof:

“No scientist with any degree of Impartiality Can
possibly dismiss the following concrete result as mere
coincident.”

Escape Velocity =√2 .Orbital Velocity =2374 m/s.

G=6-6X10-11 N-m2/Kg Potential Energy =Gm.M/R
Substituting In My Equation : Ω= I.P/m.
Ω=I. Gm.M/R .m Where I as before =∫F. dt F.T.
R. Ω=I. G.M = F.T.G.M.= mg .G.M.
VOrbital = m.g. 6-6X10-11 X Mass Of earth in Kg.
VEscaope. /√2 ≈ m.g. 6.6X10-11 X 6X24 .T
2374m/s. ≈ √2 X1 m/s.s X 6.6X10-11 X 6X24

726 481
 482Page 482 of 726

Taking m the average load = 6 X103 Kg.

And the day =60X60X24 ≈6X 104 s Therefore;
T ≈ 105 / 6 X 104 S = 10/6 Days The time taken for
average space craft of the above specified average
weight weight (m) Which tally
Completely with all the practical results available for
and from space explorations.

Quantum Gravity.
For Time Dependant Operastor ( Ấ(t) ) Of the state
Function (ȹ ) the following equation is Equally Valid
for both Classical And Quantum :
Quantum Ω = < ȹ I Cutting I ȹ> - < ȹ I Gluimg I ȹ >
Quantum Ω = < ȹ I Ấ I ȹ> - < ȹ I Ấ I ȹ >
r =(Velocity + V0 )/ Quantum Ω
= (Velocity + V0 )/< ȹ I Ấ I ȹ> - < ȹ I Ấ I ȹ >
And the potential:
P= (< ȹ I Ấ I ȹ>-< ȹ I Ấ I ȹ >)/(Velocity + V0 ) Ấ(t) =
e+jɷh .t A e-jɷh.t
Ω(t)ȹ =<ȹ I Ấ Iȹ >
Ω(t)ȹ = ɷ ȹ(t)

726 482
 483Page 483 of 726

As Defined Earlier :
ɷ =Average Frequency ?
j=√-1 ?
h=Planck Constan

(Compare This Solution To The Seventh Solution In

Frequmechanics Part-Thirteen)? 1/rn ~ Ke-2n

The Second Proof:

“P.P. For Perfect Probabilities. The Natural Philosophy
(The Physics) Behind the mathematics is that (ωCutting
& ωGluing.) Intrinsically Keep opposite signs .”

726 483
 484Page 484 of 726

“The whole idea is that we cannot measure both

frequencies Simultaneously! Its follow up to the
Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and natural
consequences from it! Therefore all we need is to prove
that : Ω2=Constant . Implying That :
ωCutting X ωGluing =Some constant (H).”

First Proving Ω2=Constant.

The general Convention for the Impulse ;

Impulse. = ∫F. dt Is to treat ( F )The Force as

constant while ( T) Is the length of Total time

the force is applied thus :

L.H.S. Of The Identity = F. Circular ∫T.dt

R.H.S. Of The Identity =N. ∫F. dt =F [ t – t ]2 1

Where (N)=Number of strokes per cycle.

F.T= F.(1/ ωCutting -1/ ωGluing. )=
726 484
 485Page 485 of 726

 T=N. ( ωC - ωG )/ (ωC X ωG)=N.dΩ/ ωC(ωG)

Since we already defined dΩ = ωC - ωG
Integrating both sides after multiplying both
sides by (dt).Then cancelling them later:

L.H.S. = Cir/N∫T.dt . R.H.S. = ∫ dΩ/ ( ωC .ωG) . dt

Now my Duality Frequency (Conjugated Ω) Require

Splitting the procedure in to two: A & B.

(All Constants Are Denoted By The Letters K Or C).
A-
Keeping ωg Constant:

Cir/N∫T.dt .= 1/( ωg )∫ dΩ/(+ ω C ).

Cir /N∫ T.dt .= 1/( ωg )∫ dΩ/(+ ω C ).

Cir ∫.T/N .dt = 1/( ωg ) [ Log Ω. + Constant KA)

Multiplying Through By (ωg):

ωg Cir/N ∫T. dt.-KA = Log Ω.

726 485
 486Page 486 of 726

∫T dt.-K ∫T dt -KA
Ω= eωg Cir/N =CA. eωg Cir/N Where CA = e.

B-Similarly This Time Keeping ωC Constant:

Cir/N∫ T.dt .= 1/( +ωC )∫ dΩ /(ω g ).

ωC Cir/N ∫T .dt = [ Log - Ω. +KB)

∫T dt.-KB ∫T dt -KB
Ω=eωC Cir/N = CB. eωc Cir/N Where CB = e.

Multiplying A X B Gives :
∫T dt ∫T dt
Ω2 = CA. eωg Cir/N X CB. eωc/N Cir

∫T dt ∫T dt
Ω2 = CA. X CB. X eωg Cir/N X eωc Cir/N

∫T dt
Ω2 = CA. X CB. X e (ωc +ωg) Cir/N

Clearly at ( ωc = - ωg ) Ω2 = Constant.

Recall we already said that ωc & ωg Intrinsically keep

opposite signs therefore :

∫T dt ∫T dt
[eωg Cir/N X eωc Cir/N ]* Can be normalized to One.

The Star Hereafter indicating Normalization by

conjugation.

726 486
 487Page 487 of 726

Secondly How To Prove :

ωCutting X ωGluing =Certain constant ?
∫T dt
From ( A) : Ω = CA. eωg Cir/N

∫T dt
Ω2 = CA. e 2ωg Cir/N

Log (Ω2 / CA ) =2ωg Cir/N∫T.dt

ωg = ln (Ω2 / CA )/2 Cir∫T.dt

ωg = ln Constant K1 / Cir/N∫T.dt Since Ω2 = Constant.

Similarly From ( B ):
∫T dt
Ω2 =CB. e 2ωc Cir/N

ln (Ω2 / CB ) =2ωc Cir/N∫T.dt

ωc = ln Constant K1/ Cir/N∫T.dt Since Ω2 = Constant.

Now Let Cir/N∫T.dt = Z

ωg = ln K2 / Z And ωc = ln K1 / Z

Therefore To Evaluate The Constants:

ωc / ωg = (ln K1 –ln Z )/ (ln K2 –ln Z)
726 487
 488Page 488 of 726

At ωc = ωg K1. =K2

ωc X ωg = ( ln K1 / Z) X ( ln K2 / Z )
ωc X ωg = (K3 –ln z )X (K3 –ln Z )
ωc X ωg = ( K3 )2 - 2ln z (K3 ) + (ln Z)2
ωc .ωg = ( K3 )2 - 2(K3) ln z + (ln Z)2
This Becomes Quadratic Equation When Either ωc Or
ωg =0 That Can Be Solved For Either (K3)
And /Or ln z .
Even Without solving this equation Either Way the

solution for (ωc .ωg )is certain to be an expression of

constants which include my universal constant (H).

Moreover ln Cir/N∫T.dt Can be Normalizable thus :

ωc X ωg =(K3 –ln z )X (K3 –ln Z )) 

ωc X ωg
e = e (K3 –ln z )X (K3 –ln Z )
ωc X ωg
e = e 2K3 e –2z

ωc X ωg = Constant ln (-2Z). 

ln Cir/N∫T.dt  ∞ ∫∞ T.dt :

∞∫∞ (N T.dt ) (N T.dt )*=∞∫

∞
( N.T.dt ) (N* T.dt )

726 488
 489Page 489 of 726

Where (N)Now Becomes Part Ofthe Normalizing

Constant.OR :

2
‖Z ‖ =1.

(See Frequmechanics Part One---For My Universal

Constant (H) And The Heisenberg Picture ) ?

The Third Proof.

“It’s essential to verify that r.dΩ/dt Ξ dV/dt. Valid in
all situations .”
N N

Π∫ (F.dt) = Π F.∫(.dt)
N N

If N=2 Then:

∫∫ (F.dt) 2
= F. ∫∫(.dt) 2

726 489
 490Page 490 of 726

L.H.S. = ∫∫ (r.m. dV/dt Xdt) 2

=

R.H.S. =F. ∫∫(.dt) 2

The Particular Or Restricted Case of N=1:

R.H.S.=F. ∫( 1/ωc - 1/ωg = ωc - ωg / ωc X ωg ) 2

And as before (In the Second Proof) We Split the

frequency Except This Time:

∫( dΩ/ ωc  Log ωc +K1 And

∫( dΩ/ ωg  ( Log ωg+K2)

A- As before keeping ωg Constant :

R.H.S = F. 1/ ωg ∫( dΩ/ωc  F/ ωg (Log ωc +k1)

B-Now keeping (ωc) Constant:

R.H.S = F. 1/ ωc ∫( dΩ/ωg  F/ ωc (Log ωg +k1)

726 490
 491Page 491 of 726

L.H.S. = ∫ F,dt =(r.m. dV/dt ) .dt = r.m (V + K 3 )

R.H.S.= F/ ωg (Log ωc +k1)

=( r.m dΩ/dt )/ωg (Log ωc +k1) Or:
R.H.S.= F/ ωc (Log ωg +k2) = r.m / ωc (Log ωg +k2)
L.H.S= r.m (V + K3 )
=R,H,S=( r.m dΩ/dt)/ωg (Log ωc +k1)
After rearranging by eliminating (r.m)From both sides:

A-dΩ/ dt (Log ωc +k1) /ωg = V+K3

B-dΩ/dt (Log ωg +k2) /ωc= ( V+K3 )

A -∫dΩ (Log ωc +k1) = ∫ ( V+K3 ) dt

(Ω + K4 )(Log ωc +k1) /ωg =( V +K3 ) (T+K5 )

B- (Ω + K4 )(Log ωg+k2) /ωc =( V +K3 ) (T +K5)

Subtracting:

(Ω + K4 ) [(Log ωc +k1) /ωg - (Log ωg+k2) /ωc =0

Giving ;

726 491
 492Page 492 of 726

Either (Ω = Constant ( -K4 ) Or:

ω c/ ωg = (Log ωg+k2)/ (Log ωc +k1)

As before :

At ωc = ωg this yield K1 =K2

Substituting Back in Equations A & B Above;

(Ω + K4 )(Log ωc +k) /ωg =( V +K3 ) (T+K5) Eq- A1

(Ω + K4 )(Log ωg+k) /ωc =( V +K3 ) (T +K5)Eq-B1

Hitherto It Was Not Possible To Define (Ω) Only

(dΩ)Was defined as (ωc ± jωg )And That Ω≠(ωc--ωg ):

We also said that at the top of the trajectory:

(Points B &C) V=0 Staionary And ωc = ωg .

Let : ωc+k=X ωg +K=Y And Z=(Ω + K4 )

Substituting in Eq A&B (I am using Log Instead of (In)

More Distinguishable in computer printing .

726 492
 493Page 493 of 726

(Ω + K4 ) Log x/ωg. =( 0 +K3 ) (T +K5 ) ---EQN- A2

(Ω + K4 ) Log y/ωc =( 0 +K3 ) (T+K5 )-------Eq-B2

Since ( T ) The starting point can either be taken T=t

Or T=0. For convenience we take the latter giving:

(Ω + K4 ) Log x =ωg. ( K6 )

(Ω + K4 ) Log y = ωc ( K6 )

Where k3k5=K6 All constants s defined earlier.And let

(Ω + K4 ) =S.

Log x =ωg/S ( K6 ) And Log y = ωc/S ( K6 )

X=eK6.ωg/S = e
-k6.ωgS
EQn-----A3 Similarly

-K6.ωcS
Y= e k6.ωc/S
= e Eqn-----B3

Differentiating both w.r.t:

dX/dt = ωc= (Minus) K6.ωg.S e K6.ωg/S

dy/dt = ωg= (Minus) K6.ωc.S e K6.ωg/S

726 493
 494Page 494 of 726

S = Minus ( ωc / K6.ωg) . e Minusk6.ωg/S

---EQN-A4

S = Minus ( ωg / K6.ωc) . e Minusk6.ωc/S

----EQN-B4.

dS/dt =Ω= Plus ( ωc / K6.ωg)2 . eMinusk6.ωg/S EQN---A5.

dS/dt=Ω*= Plus( ωg / K6.ωc)2.(eMinusk6.ωc/S )*EQN—B5.

But it was already stated that my (Ω)Is Quantum (Ω)

And Hereafter the Superscripted Star denotes
conjugation : (Ω) .( Ω)* =1.
Therefore: A6 X B6 = 1

Giving:

ωc . ωg/ ( K6.ωg .ωc)2 =1

Once More we proved that ωc . ωg = 1/k6 =Remains

Constant For All Values As claimed .

By substituting these values in to A1 &B1 we can obtain

concrete expression for the velocity (V) Alternatively:

726 494
 495Page 495 of 726

There are Several Ways to obtain expressions for the

velocity (V) Most of it very complex and too tedious!

Fortunately there is a short cut as follows:

By Dividing A2 &B2

(Ω ) = ωg/ Log x ( K3 T +K3K5 ) –K4 .

(Ω ) = ωc/ Log y ( K3 T +K3 K5 ) –K4 .

We obtain :

Log x/ωg. = Logy/ ωc OR ωc /ωg. = Logy/ Log x.

Since It Was Already Proven Twice In The Second And

Third Proofs That (ωc .ωg )=Constant (K7)

It Can Be Easily Shown That :

(Log. Logy/ ωc . ωg)

Is Also a constant (K8 ).

After rewriting A1 & B1 As :

Z(Log x) /ωg =( V +K3 ) (T+K5) Eq- A1

Z* (Log y) /ωc =( V +K3 ) (T +K5)Eq-B1

726 495
 496Page 496 of 726

At : T=0

After substituting and Multiplyingthrough:

Z. Z* [Log x . Log y /ωc. ωg] =(K5 V)2+2Vk3 (K5)2 +

(K3K5)2

Since :

Z. Z* = 1 And

[Log x . Log y /ωc. ωg] =K8

The Above Gives The Following Concrete Quadratic

Equation For Velocity (V ) .

(K5 V)2+2Vk3 (K5)2 +(K5k3)2 – K8 = 0

(V)2+2V (k3 ) +(K3)2 –K9=0

Where K9 = K8/(K5)2

Clearly By differentiating w.r.t :

2v dv/dt+2k3=0

726 496
 497Page 497 of 726

dv/dt = -K3 /V It Follows That

dNv/dtN =(Minus)k3 . v-Minus(N) 0 As N∞

(Minus when N = Odd )

And Plus when N =Even)

Where (N) As defined earlier ?

Also see The Hints Below ?

Important Results:
1-The result obtained above of ωc . ωg =constant
Is far more significant than at first face value :
For it imply that the two frequencies (ωc & ωg) Are
Organically Linked ! And their separation is not as
arbitrary as it may seemed at first sight !!

726 497
 498Page 498 of 726

After all this is not just mathematics:

Its very much physics or Natural Philosophy as physics
still called by all prestigious (Non Jewish) Universities.
2- “The logic is delicate but the results are concrete “
Already stated that:

Ω ≠ ωCutting -ω Gluin

But: d Ω = ωCutting ± j ωGluing

Therefore r. d Ω =dv
However we need to prove that the Tangential
Acceleration remains a constant representing (g).
we cannot obtain Directly the tangential
acceleration from (r. d Ω =dv ) Since by dividing

Algebraically each side with (dt) It will Define

this acceleration but will not allow us to
differentiate w.r.t (ωCutting ± j ωGluing ).
3-

726 498
 499Page 499 of 726

Therefore the only way to prove that the

tangential acceleration remains constant by
proving that (r. d 2Ω /dt2=d2v/dt2 )=0
Implying the tangential acceleration (r. d Ω/dt )
must be constant since the derivative of any
constant =0 .
4-
d/dt (ωCutting ± j ωGluing )= - (ωC)2 – (-(ωg)2
= (ωg)2 - (ωc)2 =(ωg - ωc) (ωg + ωc )
5-The term (ωg - ωc)Represent the Instant when:
(ωc) Flips over to ( ωg) At V=0.At the top of the
trajectory as shown by the diagrams above !
While ( ωc & ω g) Flip over each other there is
Micro Instant When they become equal while

passing each other .This Micro Instant will seem

for the observer as Macro Time ( The
Stereoscopic Effect)when the particle looks
stationary.
Applications.
726 499
 500Page 500 of 726

To quote Just one example out of too many practical

Applications :
Constant (g) Can be determined by Distant
Measurements from the Frequencies Emitted by any
distant or celestial object.
Exercise Fifteen :
A-
How does this compare to the Riemannian Metric ?:
(dS )2 = g11 dv +2 g12 dv .dw + g22 dw.

Hint:
Re-Evaluate my third proof proceeding this time by
starting with N=2 instead of N=1 ?The calculations will
be far more tedious !

B-
1-
How S.R (Special Relativity )Can explain why the Point
Of Inflexion above Appears To Be Stationary For Any
Observer ?

726 500
 501Page 501 of 726

2-
How can G.R. Show that this Point Of Inflexion above is
the point Where And When time and space exchange
places??

3-
It was already stated that My (Ω)Is Quantum (Ω)
Therefore (Ω) .( Ω)* =1.
4
-Can we determine the order of magnitude of this
instant when ωg =±j ωc From Stereoscopic Effect
Stated above ?
5-Or from S.R??
And what is the comparison??

C- My Frequency Cone.

Time.

ωGluing Particle ωCutting

Descending
726 501
 502Page 502 of 726

Gravitational Field Electromagnetic Field

Ascending

ωCutting ωGluing

Frequency.

Not shown behind the cone the field of Electro Weak Forces.

Lag (Phase)Angle (ɸ ) = ‖ωCutting ⁄ωGluing ‖

Exercise:
What conclusions can be obtained by comparing
my Frequency Cone To the Light Cone ?

Now Back To The Diagram.

B C

∆ V

726 502
 503Page 503 of 726

A D

The Vertical Components Of Velocity:

V= r.ωCutting Cos λ - r.ωGluing Cos γ

726 503
 504Page 504 of 726

Vertical Acceleration ( AV )= dv/dt

= r.[ ( - (ωC)2 Cos λ + ωC (-Sin λ) .K )

- {- (ωg)2 Cos γ + ωg (-Sin γ ) . (- K ) }

= r.[ (ωg)2 Cos γ - (ωC)2 Cos λ + ωg (+Sin γ )k

-ωC (Sin λ) .K ]

= r . [(ωg)2 Cos γ - (ωC)2 Cos λ]

+r.k[ωg (+Sin γ ) -ωC (Sin λ) . ]------ EQN-1

If The Particle Path To Remain Vertical Then:

ωC . Sin λ = -ωg Sin γ

Substituting in EQN-1 Gives:

726 504
 505Page 505 of 726

AV = r .[(ωg)2 Cos γ - (ωC)2 Cos λ] -2 K ωC (Sin λ)

EQN-2

= r.[{(ωg)2 Cos γ - (ωC)2 Cos λ} -2 K ωg (Sin λ)

-----EQN-3.
The Horizontal Components Of Velocity:
V= r.ωCutting Sin λ - r.ωGluing Sin γ

Horizontal Acceleration ( AH )= dv/dt

= r.[ ( - (ωC)2 Sin λ + ωC (Cos λ) .K )

+ {- (ωg)2 Sin γ + ωg (Cos γ ) . (- K ) }

=r .[ - {(ωC)2 Sin λ + (ωg)2 Sin γ

+ K (ωC (Cos λ) - ωg (Cos γ ) ]

Now If The Particle Path To Remain Horizontal

Then: ωC . Cos λ =ωg Cos γ
Giving :

726 505
 506Page 506 of 726

AH = - r .[ (ωC)2 Sin λ + (ωg)2 Sin γ ] EQN-4

And the general picture for particle in curved

path will be :
Acceleration = √ (AV)2 + (AH )2 ----EQN -5.
Now to see for yourself the concrete results:
Exercise;
“What are the concrete results and conclusions
obtained? If you let :”
1-λ =0

2- γ=0

3- Both : λ = γ=0

4- λ =π/2

5- γ=π /2

6- λ =0 γ=π /2

726 506
 507Page 507 of 726

7- γ=0 λ =π/2
Answers:
1- λ =0

AV = r.{(ωg)2 Cos γ - (ωC)2 }

AH = - r .[ (ωg)2 Sin γ ]

2- γ=0

AV = r .[(ωg)2 - (ωC)2 Cos λ] -2 K ωC (Sin λ)

= r.[{(ωg)2 - (ωC)2 Cos λ} -2 K ωg (Sin λ)

AH = - r .[ (ωC)2 Sin λ ]

3- λ = γ=0

AV = r .[(ωg)2 - (ωC)2 ]

= r.[{(ωg)2 - (ωC)2 }

AH = 0 (Since both λ & γ =0 when the particle

ascending or descending vertically .
4- λ =π/2

AV = r .[(ωg)2 Cos γ - ] -2 K ωC

726 507
 508Page 508 of 726

= r.[{(ωg)2 Cos γ - } -2 K ωg

AH = - r .[ (ωC)2 + (ωg)2 Sin γ ]

5- γ=π /2 AV = r .[ - (ωC)2 Cos λ] -2 K ωC (Sin λ)

= r.[{ - (ωC)2 Cos λ} -2 K ωg (Sin λ)

AH = - r .[ (ωC)2 Sin λ + (ωg)2 ]

6- λ =0 γ=π /2

AV = r .[ - (ωC)2 ] = r.[ - (ωC)2 }

AH = - r .[ + (ωg)2 ]

7- γ=0 λ =π/2 !

AV = r .[(ωg)2 ] -2 K ωC = r.[{(ωg)2 } -2 K ωg !

AH = - r .[ (ωC)2 ]

Conclusions:
If we apply : Acceleration = √ (AV)2 + (AH )2
On the above two simplest cases of (6 &7) :

6- AT =√ r2 .[ - (ωC)2 ]2 + r2 .[ (ωg)2 ]2

726 508
 509Page 509 of 726

= r √ [ (ωC)4 +(ωg)4 ]
7-
AT = √r2 .[(ωg)4 - 4 K(ωg)2 (ωC) +4 K2 (ωC)2 +
r2 .[ (ωC)4 ]

=√ r2 [(ωg)4 + (ωC)4 – 4K .ωC { ωg)2 – K.ωC}]

Now recall case (3) For (ωg)4 + (ωC)4

Most Significant Results;
Clearly by careful analysis of the seven cases
above we can obtain semi geometrical expression
for (g) And the proof to my theory in concrete
terms! The calculations are tedious and
Cumbersome!! However the seventh case above
offers quick illustration because it has Two

Branches Giving expressions for the

Constant (K)In terms of Frequencies.
Once we have had obtained this expression:

726 509
 510Page 510 of 726

Then we are almost there by inserting this

expression back in to the more complicated cases
we can see the results in no uncertain terms.
First Branch Of The Seventh Case :

AT =r .√ [(ωg)4 + (ωC)4 – 4K .ωC { ωg)2 – K.ωC}]

Second Branch Of The Seventh Case:

AT = r. √ [(ωg)4 + (ωC)4 – 4K { ωg)3 – 4k2.(ωg)2]

– 4k.(ωg)2 . ωC +4K .{ ωc)2 =– k.(ωg)3 +4k2.(ωg)2

4k2. [(ωc)2 - .(ωg)2] = 4k.(ωg)2 (ωc - ωg)

K (ωc - ωg) (ωc + ωg) =.(ωg)2 (ωc - ωg)

K= (ωg)2 / (ωc + ωg). ----- EQN -1

First Result.
726 510
 511Page 511 of 726

“Recall constant (K) Rad/Sec.”

(ωg)2 -K ωc -K ωg =0. EQN-2.

Second Result.
d/dt (K )= d/dt [(ωg)2 / (ωc + ωg)]
0= (ωc + ωg) d/dt [(ωg)2 - (ωg)2 d/dt (ωc + ωg)Or:
(ωc) d/dt [(ωg)2 + (ωg) d/dt (ωg)2 –[ (ωg)2 X

- (ω )c
2
- [ (ωg)2 X - (ωg)2=0

( ω c) X - 3(ω )
g
3
+ (ωg) X - 3 (ω ) g
3
–[ - (ω ) (ω )
c
2
g
2

- (ω )g
4
=0

-3 (ωc) (ωg)3 -3 (ωg) (ωg)3 +(ωc)2(ωg)2

+ (ωg)4 =0.

-2 (ωg)4 -3 (ωc) (ωg)3 +(ωc)2(ωg)2 =0

2 (ωg)4 +3 (ωc) (ωg)3 -(ωc)2(ωg)2 =0 OR:

726 511
 512Page 512 of 726

2 (ωg)2 +3 (ωc) (ωg) -(ωc)2 =0 -------EQN-3.

Now multiplying EQN-3 By (r ):

2 Agluing +3.r (ωc) (ωg) - ACutting =0
ACutting -2 Agluing = 3.r (ωc) (ωg)

3.(Vc) (ωg) = ACutting - 2 Agluing

OR:3.(Vg) (ωc) = ACutting - 2 Agluing

[ACutting -2 Agluing]2 =9 .r2 (ωc ωg)2

(ACutting )2+4(Agluing)2=4ACuttingAgluing+9.r2 (ωc ωg)2

(ACutting )2+4(Agluing)2
= 4ACuttingAgluing +9 ACuttingAgluing = 13 ACuttingAgluing
But :(AT)2= (ACutting )2 + (Agluing)2 Therefore :
(AT)2 = 13 ACuttingAgluing - 3(Agluing)2 -----EQN- 4

Evaluate When:
a- ωc =ωg
b- b-Either ωc Or ωg =0.

Third Result.
726 512
 513Page 513 of 726

“Recall constant (K) Rad/Sec.”

From EQN -1
K= (ωg)2 / (ωc + ωg).
K2= (ωg)4 / (ωc + ωg)2
AT = 1/π2 [ r/n. (ωg)4 / (ωc + ωg)2.]
Where : n=Discrete Numbers .
(r) Need Not Be Known Since Its Absorbed By
The Acceleration due to (ωg): Agluing = r. (ωg)2
The Acceleration due to (ωC): ACutting = r. (ωC)2
When The Particle Is Stationary i.e. ωc= ωg

AT = 1/4π2 [ Agluing .] -------EQN-5

OR:
AT = 1/4π2 [ Agluing .] X(ωg /ωC)2

AT = 1/4π2 [ Agluing .] X H2

726 513
 514Page 514 of 726

For quick illustration we apply the limiting case stated

in Frequmechanics Part-Nine EQN-6) ? Where H is the
transfer function eKθ =( ωc/ωg)
Therefore:
AT = 1/4π2 [ Agluing .] X e2kθ Also:
From The Diagram: θ =γ+π/2
When The Particle In Free Fall i.e. ωc= 0
AT = 1/π2 [ Agluing .] -------EQN-5
Multiplying through EQN-2 By ( r ):
At ωc= 0 Agluing =r/ K ωg
At ωg = 0 ωC = 0
Giving :
ACutting/ Agluing = ( 1/π2 -1 )
Integrating EQN-2:
r.∫[(ωg)2 -K ωc -K ωg]dt=0.
 r .e-ῳg =r.K ( ωc /ωg ) K H=r.K e2k +Constant.
 g = r .e-ῳg - r.K e2k = r. (e-ῳg - K e2k )
And In General:
g(For Any Planet).
= r/n.π2 [ (ωg)4 /( ωc + ωg)2] -----EQN-6.

726 514
 515Page 515 of 726

Why The Particle Not Pulled In Centripetal Directions ?

“To compensate for the Lag (Phase )Angle the Dual
centripetal forces form Two Equal And Oppsite
Couples : P1 And P2”
ῳCutting≠ ῳGluing
r. ῳCutting =v1 And r. ῳGluing =v2
dv1./dt ≠ dv2 /dt
But the difference :
ῳG - ῳG = dῳ
Remains constant throughout the Free ascend or
descend :
dῳ/dt =g.
To Answer The Above Question:
Since the directions of ῳGluing is Clockwise and that of
ῳCutting Anti Clockwise therefore these two Different
centripetal accelerations Align themselves at such
angles (γ -Gamma ) And (λ )That their horizontal and
vertical components cancel each other as shown in the
diagram below:

726 515
 516Page 516 of 726

P1 = P2 =Force X S

dv1./dt Sinλ=a

λ dv1./dt Cosλ=b
dv2./dt Sinγ=c OCutting.

γ OGluing

dv2./dt Sinγ=d

Where (S) now is the distance between OCutting.

And OGluing. Or the distance as Function Of The Phase
Angle.

726 516
 517Page 517 of 726

P1. = m.a X S.= m. d X S.= a X Ϭ. S2/2 =d. Ϭ. S2/2

P2 =m.b X S = m.c X S = b X Ϭ .S /2 =C X Ϭ .S /2
2 2

a= d & b=c

Resolving the horizontal components:

dv1/ dv2 = Cos λ/ Cos γ

Resolving the vertical components :

dv1/ dv2 = Sin λ/ Sin γ

Cosλ/ Cos γ = Sinλ/ Sin γ

Tan λ = Cot γ Or

Sin λ Sin γ - Cos λ Cos γ =0

Cos ( λ + γ ) = 0 Giving : λ + γ= π/2

This important result since it proves we are still in the

same plane (Both organically linked) :

726 517
 518Page 518 of 726

δ
C =G

δ C ≠G ∫ d θ = δ C,G
Maximum =∏/4(See Below)

Where dθ = λ – γ

As its clearly shown by the above triangle when

θ0 .Throughout the free fall:

r .(ῳCutting )2 =r.(a2 + b2 )

r .(ῳGluing )2 = r.( c2 + d2)

[ (ῳCutting )2 - (ῳGluing )2 = a2 + b2 - c2 - d2 =0

Since: a =d. And b =c.Substituting in Equation -1

Above: AParticle. = √[ g2 –{r .(ῳCutting )2 -r. (ῳGluing )2} ]

AParticle. = √[ g2 – r{0 ] =g.

726 518
 519Page 519 of 726

B-Now Back to The Isamic Delta:

Kinematics Of The Particular Case Of Free Falling
Particle (m) At θ=0 :
Example Five
At C ≠ G : (δ C,G )= π/4 .

Therefore : Sin (δ C,G ) = Cos (δ C,G ) =1/√2

But due to the restriction of (Maximum Ratio) Allowed

by the Lag(Phase)Angle OR the Transfer Function in its

oversimplified form: V*

Tan-1 (ῳCutting /ῳGluing) d V*/dt=g

And Let (V*) = V maximum. t

V/ V* = 1/√2 Where d V*/dt =The constant (g )

(At B & C) Where r ῳGluing = r ῳCutting

Let Velocity V* =√2 .V . Sin δ C,G Giving:

V=0 i.e. Stationary.

726 519
 520Page 520 of 726

Since at C=G Sin δ C,G =0 And :

Between (A & B OR C& D) :

C≠ G

Where δ C,G = 1/√2 :

V* =√2 .V . Sin δ C,G

V* =√2 .V .(1/√2)---------------------- Equation-1.

But since at C ≠ G :

Sin (δ C,G ) = Cos (δ C,G ) =1/√2

Equation-1 Can be Rewritten:

(V*)= √2 .V . Cos δ C,G -----Equation-2.

=√2 .V . (1/√2)

Or V=v

Now when the particle is :Between (A,B, ) Or

(C And D).

726 520
 521Page 521 of 726

Accelerations:

At points (B Or C) C=G δ C,G =0.

And from Equation-2:

d( V*)/dt = √2 .d V /dt Cos δ C,G

=√2 .d V /dt (1/√2) =g

Since by definition d V*/dt =g Whenever the

particle is stationary.

Between (A & B OR C& D) C≠ G Where δ C,G = 1/√2 :

d(V*)/dt = √2 .d V /dt Cos δ C,G

=√2 .d V /dt (1/√2) = g. (Again ).

And between (C & D).Since : ῳC <<ῳG

Therefore:(ῳCutting - ῳCutting ) Is negative Giving (-g)

“So far this is the most significant pointer to the

existence of the cosmic flux.”

726 521
 522Page 522 of 726

Suggested Practical Experiment To Verify My Theory

That Has The Potential Of Relacing Newtonian
Mechanics.
“ Today’s technology made such experiment possible.”
If we prepare a box or transparent enclosure containing as
Near perfect vacuum as Technically possible! And electro
magnetically neutral i.e. Fields ἕ &Ἧ =0
Then from one corner of this box there is an opening of a gun
making an angle (θ ) With the vertical and firing
Particles of needle like shapes but extraordinarily thinner as
thin as its technically possible :
These particles have different lengths starting with length =S
then S/2 ? S/3 etc
Both the front and the rear of each these particle will be
vibrating in flight.
On each side of this box there is an instrument one measuring
Front vibration ( ῳC )the other measuring Tail vibration (ῳG ) .(θ
) The firing angle is reduced after each salvo.. All results of
these readings should be tabulated as follow then carefully
analyzed to conclude that :As :
S 0
a-p1 - p2  ? b- ῳC ≠ῳG

726 522
 523Page 523 of 726

Marginal Error = 1%

Pure Vacuum Plus ἕ &Ἧ =0

S S S/2 S/4 S/16 etc.

Θ
ῳC= ?
π/4 ῳG= ?

π/5

ῳC =?
π/6 ῳG=?

ῳc = ?
etc etc
ῳG + ?
Also:
See Isamic Thought Experiment Number Three.?
And freqummechanics part11-13 ??
www.scribd.com/isamtahersaleh

Frequencies !Wavelengths !And The Triangle Inequality.

726 523
 524Page 524 of 726

“Frequencies breath life in to geometry.”

The Red monk.

“The following will prove two Fundamental points:

a-That although frequencies offer Irreducible
Dimensions Hence more manoeuvrability !
All information lost are retrievable.
b- Frequency and geometry are Organically linked.”

726 524
 525Page 525 of 726

a- The Triangle Inequlity:

A Triangle ( ABC ) Has the sides:
AB +BC >> AC.

b- Frequencies :
Now if we colour each side of this triangle : (AB)With
Red (Emitting low frequency fRed ) ? (BC) With neutral
or very dark colour (Very low frequency f0 )And
(AC)With blue or violet (Very high frequency fBlue).
Then clearly this violate the Triangles Inequality
Because :

fRed + f0 < fBlue.

C- Wave Lengths .
On the other hand if instead of frequencies we had
assigned wave lengths to these sides :
λRed. ? λ0 ? λBlue.
Then by the same procedure :
λRed. + λ0 > λBlue.

726 525
 526Page 526 of 726

Clearly Section (b)Violate The Triangular Inequality!

While Section(C) Re-establish it !
So What Is Wrong ?:
That we used in section (a)The Units Of Lengths In the
triangle inequality while we used the units (Numbers)
Of frequencies in section (b) However section (C)
Restored the Units Of Lengths which are Compatible
with the units of the Triangular Inequality In section –a
Moreover for the sake of Simplifications I used
frequencies (ωn) Instead of wave lengths (λn ) And I am
not going to Rewrite all the above calculations in terms
of (Wave Lengths)I leave it an exercise for the reader
given the standard equations of :
ωn = [K] .C .

Where (K) Is the Propagation Vector of the wave.

And C =Speed Of Light.
Also By Applying:

ωn . λn= 2 π .C.

726 526
 527Page 527 of 726

Probing Higher Dimensions With Frequencies.

Clearly from the above configurations for the

triangle(ABC) It’s easy to see that as long as all the

sides of the triangle are of the Same Colour (Whatever

the colour)i.e. Emitting the same frequencies where:

(fAB = fBC = fAc )

Similarly all wave lengths also will be equal:

λAB. = λBC = λAC

And the triangle’s Inequality will holds true whichever

method is applied be it :

Conventional Length where :

AB +BC > AC.

Or Frequencies : fAB. + fBC > fAC

Or Wave Lengths : λAB. + λBC > λAC

726 527
 528Page 528 of 726

This Theory Of Mine Is Based On The Following Tenets :

a-There Is An Organic Link Between Geometry And

Frequencies this can be proven as follows :

As long as Colours of the triangle discussed above

remain identical emitting the same frequencies i.e.

fAB. =fBC = fAC The (Triangular Inequality)Holds true for

all colours !However if any side changes its colour

hence its frequency then there is no way of knowing if

this (Inequality )Will hold because :

Let the sides of the triangle be of same dark colour

emitting low but identical frequencies with values (On

some arbitrary scale of (1-100) All three are(f1 , f1, f1 ) ?

Now let us say one of the sides changes its colour

emitting Higher Frequency of (f69 ) Then clearly :

f1 + f1 << f69

726 528
 529Page 529 of 726

Therefore The Inequality Can Be Violated And Its This

Very Concrete Fact Implying That Organic Links Can Be

Derived Between Geometry And Frequencies .

b-If : (f1 = f2 = f3 ) Representing the triangle :

Its Own Peculiar Property And Peculiar To The Triangle

Alone . While ( f0 ) =Represent the circle of one

possible colour .

C-That most of geometrical objects can be reduced or

broken down in to triangles and circles.

For Example If we needed to probe the Eleventh

Dimension it can be of a shape constructed from :

(f1 Plus f2 Plus f3 = f4 = f5 Plus f6 = f87= f8 Plus f9 =f10 =

f11) .(The subscripts now representing each dimension

not the value of the said frequency ).

726 529
 530Page 530 of 726

Hence the 11thDimension Can Be Composed For

Example From :

= n X Circles + m X Triangles.

With two concentric circles and three triangles all need

to be Ordered And Connected Something like the two

Alternative Shapes of the tripod below:

OR:

726 530
 531Page 531 of 726

Needless to say the Fifth Dimension Can be composed

of One Triangle And One Circle .

The triangle representing the :

Three Signature Frequencies of the (X,Y,Z) Axes :

While the circle obviously represent the Cyclical

Movement of (Time)Dimension.

And So Forth :

The same procedure will apply for any higher

dimensions we wish to investigate their Geometrical

Shapes.

By applying the following Formula Of Mine :

Any Dimension (N) Can be represented by

= n.(Circles ) + m . (Triangles). + K.

726 531
 532Page 532 of 726

Abstract:
“To probe higher dimensions :We need to resolve the
problem of Pictorial Entanglements :The possible
shapes that can be constructed from higher
dimensions.”

“If we are given a line or volume there are infinite

ways these can be deformed or constructed while still
can be identified as lines or volumes. However if it’s
area then there are Very Limited Choices simply
because an area will not remain strictly an area but
either crushed to lines or it will be circumscribing a
volume !With the exception of the cylinder (The Most
Perfect)Even the surface area of sphere has cut-off
regions i.e. Areas are Untouchable :Its very much
related to our Two Dimensional Perceptions Of The
Real Multi-Dimensional World .”
“The mathematics may be fluid ?But the idea remain
solid !This in itself concrete proof that whichever
mathematics we may apply the ideas remain valid .”

726 532
 533Page 533 of 726

Resolving Pictorial Entanglements :

1-All lines must be touching as in electrical circuits.

2-All dimensions in principle can be broken in to Basic

ensemble of circles and triangles..

3- The circles and Triangles need to be Geometrically

Ordered. I.e. grouped together

4- Circles always precede triangles .

5-Number of circles (n)Is the Maximum Possible that

can satisfy the two metrics !While the number of

triangles (m) Are Kept to the Minimum Possible .

6-My Metrics Exploit the fact that dimension are known

only as Full Integers!

726 533
 534Page 534 of 726

7 – The condition of : σ (Sigma) < 1. Let σ =6/7.

Is Essential to turn the expression on the right in to

full integers .As we shall see this is central to Both

Limiting The Choices And DeterminingThe Shape

That can be constructed inside the said dimension.

8-Any Dimension (N) Can be represented by a Shape

(S)of total Surface Area=n.(Circles)+m(Triangles)+n. σ.

9-

r=The radius of these circles.

And all areas of circles or triangles are multiples of (r2 ).

10-

S(N). r2 =n.(Circles ). r2+m . (Triangles). r2+ n.σ. r2

726 534
 535Page 535 of 726

10- These shapes must satisfy My Two Metrics ( A &

B):

The total Surface area of the possible shapes for the

(N)th Dimension S(N)= n .Circles + m. Triangles .

= n.π r2 + m. r2 +n. σ r2 -------------Metric -A

Where :

m = (N-4)/n Or : m.n = N-4.-----Metric -B

11-

Except for (σ )All the rest must remain full integers this

can be realized by Induction : Manipulating (m &n)

Until suitable full integers can be obtained . .

12-The four dimensions (x,y,z,t)Are discounted by the

term : (N – 4).

13-If there is any Fraction Left inside (A)Or (B) Then

My Metrics Are rejecting that choice of shape: Unfit

representation for that particular dimension .

726 535
 536Page 536 of 726

Proofs And Application:

“After certain amount of practice you will begin to see

its once more belonging to the methods of backtracking
applied extensively by this book ?
And how the miniaturized (σ)Not only restrict our
choices of (m Or n) ?But also define what shapes are
Possible and what is Not Possible Which can be
constructed from the given area? It’s very much a case
of :Tail Wagging Dog (As In Remainders Theorem)!”

If we are given certain value for area then we can

construct the relevant shape from an Ensemble Of

Basic Circles And Triangles Obtained by the above

procedure and according to My Two Metric ( A& B)

Above:

How to Proof ?

And How to determine the shape for any given degree

of the dimensions with the following procedures ? ?

726 536
 537Page 537 of 726

Example One: The Fourth Dimension;

To illustrate the point in question further simplification

is required :Let
r=Radius of the circle representing the Cyclical time.

h= Height of the right angle triangle representing

(X,Y,Z)=2.r. While its base is the radius (r)of the circle .

Giving the area for each triangle =2r X r/2= r2.

Also let σ = 6/7.
The total area of the possible shapes for the (N) th
Dimension= n.Circles +m Triangles . +n. σ.
S(N). r2= n.π r2 + [ ( N – 4)/n +n. σ ] r2
At ; N= 4 . r=1. And n=1 σ=6/7. m=(4-4)/1 =0.
We have The total area of the possible shapes for the
(4)th Dimension S( 4) = 4. r2.
Or one circle plus (6/7 ) Of one triangle (As in Sundial).

726 537
 538Page 538 of 726

Example Two: Fifth Dimension:

S(5). r2= n.π r2+ [ ( N – 4)/n +n. σ ] r2------A

And : n.m = N-4. m.n = 5-4 =1 .------B
Therefore both of My Metrics ( A & B) Can only be

satisfied with only one choice for : n=m=1.That is :

S(5). r2= 1 .π r2 + 1. σ r2 + 1/1 . r2 = 4 +1 =5.

S(5).= One circle + One triangle .

Example Three Six Dimension :

S(6). r2= n.π r2+ [ ( N – 4)/n +n. σ ] r2 ---------A

S(6). r2= 1.π r2+ [ ( 6– 4)/n +n. σ ] r2

= S(6). = (1. π r2+ 1. σ) +2 = 6.

And : n.m = N-4. ----------------------------------B

1.2 = 6- 4 =2 Also satisfied.

Therefore both of My Metrics (A & B)Are satisfied by

the shape for S(6).=One circle +Two Triangles .

726 538
 539Page 539 of 726

Example Four Twentieth Dimension :

S(20). r2= n.π r2+ [ ( N – 4)/n +n. σ ] r2 ---------A
S(20). r2= n.π r2+ [ (16/n) +n. σ ] r2
Also Metric (B) Is satisfied by n=4 And m=4.
n.m =N-4 .Or 4X4 =20-4. =16. -----B
Therefore The Possible Shape For (S20) Is Four Circles
And Four Triangles .

Example Five Thirtieth Dimension :

S(30). r2= n.π r2+ [ ( N – 4)/n +n. σ ] r2 ---------A
S(30). r2= n.π r2+ [ ( 30– 4)/n +n. σ ] r2
n.m = 30-4 =26.
The figure (26) Can be either (2 X13) Giving n= 2
m=13 By substituting above we get :
2(π r2 + σ r2 )=2 X4 =8.
S(30). = 8 + [ 13 ] =21.

Which does not add up therefore both of my two

metrics are rejecting this particular shape of two

726 539
 540Page 540 of 726

circles and thirteen triangles as unfit representation for

the (30th)Dimension.

However :Again by induction next we try dividing this

indivisible number by itself ; with n=1 and m=26.
Giving :
S(30). = 1.( π r2 + σ r2 )+ 26 /1 = 4 + 26 =30.
Therefore the metrics only allow the shape constructed
form One Circle And Twenty Six Triangles !
And so forth by the same procedure we can probe any
other dimension pictorially !
This is of Great Importance if we recall what we said in
earlier sections about how we can probe dimensions
with the aid of Frequencies ?
Also Equally Important Noting that when adding two
Shapes or more :e.g.
S (Neven) +S (Neven) = S ( Neven) .
S (Nodd) +S (Nodd) = S ( Neven) .

It will be only applicable if the result does not include

any Fractions But full integers i.e. Combined shapes
are accepted in Most cases of :

726 540
 541Page 541 of 726

Even + Even Or Odd + Odd.

Exercises. :
What dimensions the following diagrams represent?
Where the lines are Not Touching And the vertices of
the triangles are at the centre of the circles??

None.

None.

Or When Touching As In Electrical Circuits(n=0 m=10):

10th

726 541
 542Page 542 of 726

One Circle And No Triangle :

n=1 m= 0. But m=0 Only at N=4.
Total area = n. π r2 + (N-4)/1 .r2.. + n. σ. r2
Total area = 4. - 4th Dimension.
This agrees with both metrics (A) & (B).
Therefore this shape is permitted to represent the 4th
Dimension jut as that earlier shape of one circle Plus
(6/7)Of any meaningful shape could represent it !
(Permitted But Which One)?.
Recall we said any Fraction will eliminate the shape
from our choices therefore the first option is Not Valid .

Two Touching Circles And No Triangles :

n=2 m= 2. But m=2 Only at N=10. (First Choice.)
= n. π r2+( 10-4)/3 .r2.+ n. σ. r2
= 2 X4 + 2 -- 10thDimension :

726 542
 543Page 543 of 726

Agreeing with both metrics (A &B).Touching But Open

Shape :Now which is Preferable this or the earlier
shape of ten touching but closed triangles ?

Three Touching Circles And No Triangles :

n=3 m= 3.
But m=3 Only at N=16. (First Choice.)
= n. π r2+( 16-4)/3 .r2.+ n. σ. r2
= 3 X 4 +4 ----16th Dimension.
Again agreeing with both metrics (A &B).

Closed Shape:
Preferable (Meaningful) Closed shape :

726 543
 544Page 544 of 726

Where the diameters of the circles form Equilateral

Triangle.

Relating My Geometry To Frequencies (Part-One) .

The limiting case of my two metrics (A & B)Is the fourth
dimension of N= 4.
S(N). r2= n.π r2+ [ ( N – 4)/n +n. σ ] r2------A
And : n.m = N-4. m = (N-4 )/n .------B
Where S(N) Is the Total Surface Area of the Real Or
Imaginary Unknown Shape Yet to be determined inside
any given dimension(N) Which can be multiples of (r2)
Whatever this shape may be (Spheres ? Cylinders?
Cones ? Prisms ?etc. Or any combinations of these ?).
Now put N=4. Let r2 =1 And as before : σ = 6/7.
And ABRACADABRA You get an expression for the
Cyclical Nature Of Time as follows :
S(N)= n.π + [ ( 4 – 4)/n ]+n. σ = (π + σ)n = 4.n.
n= S(N)/ 4
But n =The Number Of Circles Or Cycles Inside the
diagram representing the fourth dimension which is no

726 544
 545Page 545 of 726

other than Time itself! Hence n ≡ The frequency (F).

Giving : F= S(N)/ 4 More generally :
F= S(N)/ N. = ωn

Applications :
1-The Number Of Circles Allowed To Fill The
Hypothetical Shape (n )Is a Function of the Natural
Frequency (ωn) For that Hypothetical Shape
representing that particular dimension .
2-
The number of triangles (m) Determine the preferred
discrete levels at which these frequencies can operate.

3-In accordance to earlier sections establishing that :

YT= k ℮2i Л(m/L).  ±(k)m/L.
4-
And the equation derived from My Matrix Earlier :
( Ω) ῳC . Ir-∆r -√Ir-∆r

- √Ir ῳG . Ir
[ Ir ( ῳG ) - Ir-∆r (ῳC)]2 >0. (The Torque

Macroscopically Or the Spin Microscopically).

726 545
 546Page 546 of 726

Implying ῳG ≠ ῳc

5-
All terms are as defined in earlier sections and
illustrated with the aid of several graphs for :
Time And Space Densities.
Keeping In Mind :
6-That :
It’s been already established from previous
graphs and definitions that we are operating
inside One Unit Of Time Therefor :
n= Number of circles ≡ Frequency =Oscillations
=Vibrations =Any Other Periodic Motion.
7-And that :
(Ω ).r = (ῳC ).r- (ῳG).r As Vectors :

The Column:
ῳC . r Or : [(ῳC ).r- (ῳG).r ]
-ῳG

726 546
 547Page 547 of 726

Alternatively :
By comparing the Eigen Values λ1 And λ2 From the two
characteristic equations for the following two matrices:

ῳC .- λ1 -√Ir-∆r =0 Ir-∆r - λ2 ῳC =0

- √Ir ῳG - λ1 ῳG Ir - λ2

Giving:
(λ1)2 - λ1 (ῳC+ ῳG) + ῳC ῳG + Ir . Ir-∆r =0 ---1
And:
(λ2)2 – λ2 (Ir + Ir-∆r) + Ir . Ir-∆r + ῳC ῳG =0 ----2
Subtracting (1-2) :
(λ1)2 -(λ2)2 - λ1 (ῳC+ ῳG) – λ2 (Ir + Ir-∆r) =0
Let : K= m.r2 Therefore K. λ1 = λ2= λ :
But now subtracting (2-1)
λ [(Ir + Ir-∆r) -(ῳC+ ῳG)] =0 Giving :

λ = (ῳC+ ῳG)/ (Ir + Ir-∆r) !Again implying that ῳC ≠ ῳG

Since :λ - [ῳC /I. ]Also; At ῳC =ῳG λ1 =ῳ And at Ir =

Ir-∆ λ2 = I

726 547
 548Page 548 of 726

The Prolificacy Principle.

“Strangely enough the best illustration for this idea of
mine comes from Biology Not Physics ! That the species
both own survivals and Dynamics Depends largely on
Copying itself (i.e. Reproductions) The more the
merrier! Regardless of the size of its individuals !By
similar analogy in the physical world the Dynamics of
quantum effects are maintained by how big their
numbers rather than the size of the individual particle.”
The Red Monk
(See Page--The ProlIficasy Principle Parts 1-3 In Volume Three
Of My Book) ? By Visiting: www.scribd.com/isamtahersaleh

The Particular Rule .

(The Prolificacy Principle.)
Generally speaking macroscopic objects will display
quantum behavior if they satisfy the Prolificacy
Condition described earlier i.e:
If there was enough Copies of the observed to the
point where quantum effects can be observed.

726 548
 549Page 549 of 726

Calculations ?And The Universal Equations.

“To observe any Quantum effects on any Macroscopic
object of size (v) ? There must be at least(N)copies of
the observable ?When the observer at N(v) distance
from the observable .”
Recalling the Heisenberg Principle.

∆x . ∆p ≈ h(Planck Constant.)

Multiplying both sides by (N)as defined above .

N (∆x . ∆p ≈ N(h).=H (My Universal Constant.)

The Interpretation Of :N (∆x).

If we let the size of the observable (v) = ∆x

Then :N (∆x) Is simply the distance (L)between the

observable and the observer ?

The Interpretation Of : N(h).

This is a slightly more Complicated case ?

a-First Moment About The Observable:#

726 549
 550Page 550 of 726

N m=∑m=M.

i.e. the total mass of the whole ensemble.

L.∆p = H=(∆x).M(∆x)/T. =(∆x)PA Or

b- First Moment About The Observer :

H=(∆x)mN(∆x)/T=m (∆x).L/T. =(∆x)PB

(L)/Time dimension (T).The speed of the observer

relative to the observable .

Note: PA ≠ PB Now: L.∆p = H

=(∆x).M(∆x)/T.= m (∆x).L/T.=H.

Rearranging will yield:

(∆x)./L=m/M Or:

(∆x)./N(∆x).=m/N(m). Or1/N=1/N

Giving the identity :

1=1.

726 550
 551Page 551 of 726

Practical Illustration On The Cosmic Flux.

“To maintain its orbit around the sun the earth perform
two maneuvers ?First it has to cut the Cosmic Flux
between itself and the sun by Revolving around the sun
preventing its orbit from collapsing in to the sun.
Secondly the earth must cut the Cosmic Flux between
itself and the rest of the universe(Minus the sun)by
Rotating on itself.”

Let the angular velocity of revolving around the sun be

ῳE.S. =360 degrees per 360 days (Approx)=One degree
per day.
Let the angular velocity of the earth rotation be :
ῳE.E. =360 degrees per day (Approx).
Let the Mutual Inertia (Moment of inertia .)?
between the Earth and the Sun be =IE.S. ?
And between the Earth and rest of the Universe=IE.U.
Now the angular momentum for both should be
approximate? In order for the earth to remain in orbit
i.e. for the orbit not to collapse in to the sun and at

726 551
 552Page 552 of 726

same time not to run away from the Sun.

Outward Energy =Inward Energy.
IE.S. [ ῳE.S ]2 = IE.U. [ῳE.E. ]2 Or:
IE.S./ IE.U = [360]2 ? ! ?
=2π X 2π=Rotation X Revolution.
(Anywhere in the universe.)
The above is Analogous to the Cross Product indicating
that Outer Space is superior (Prior)to Inner Space (The
Dot Product.)
The Precession of the planets can be taken as guide in
calculating the Tug Of Inertia between them.

Applications:
“To understand the above we need to imagine the
ensemble as discrete chain of observables stretching
between the observer and the observable.”
The above identity of 1=1. tells me:
That by introducing the appropriate Unitary Operators
and with little Manipulation we can Transfer it to
meaningful useful Quantum Operators obtained from

726 552
 553Page 553 of 726

the above equations.

Where the Two Uncertainties in the Heisenberg are

replaced by Three !
Or if you like One uncertainty of measurement now
replaced by Two !

Test Your Self:

Can you relate the above stated equality of :

=2π X 2π
=Rotation X Revolution.
to Gyroscopic Forces (Effects) Anywhere in the
universe ? ??

Where To Look For The Proof ?

Distance galaxies may display a case for the
Macroscopic Quantum Effects .

726 553
 554Page 554 of 726

Exercise:
“By similar analogy to that of the planet earth
Revolving and Rotating against the cosmic flux:”
a-
How does the electron cut the flux between itself and
the nucleus ?
1- By revolving ? 2- By rapidly changing its orbits (The
so called Behr’s Cyclotron)??
b-
How does the electron cut the flux between itself and
the world outside its own atom Again :
1-By revolving ? 2- By rapidly changing its orbits (The
so called Behr’s Cyclotron)??
C-
How can you relate pie (π)In the expression for the
Plank Constant (h) to the (π) In the above exercises
and analogies ?
d-
Can any of these arguments be explained by what
particle physics calls (The Spin)?And if so how ??

726 554
 555Page 555 of 726

How To Relate Geometry To Frequency (Part-Two) .

A-Colour each side of the so called (Isamic Diagram)
Differently
B-Place a Spectrometer at fixed distant (X)From this
diagram.
C-Shine Monochromic source of light at distant (Y)From
the diagram.
D-Rotate the diagram by angle (θ). Keeping the

spectrometer and the light fixed Where :

ῲ = dθ/dt
E-
Define the frequency of Cycles /seconds or
Radians /second recorded by spectrometer as
(θs / dt. )Where (θs ) Is an arbitrary imaginary
quantity of Cycles per second Or Radians per
second . And the (S)For Spectrometer.

726 555
 556Page 556 of 726

E-Now rotate both the Spectrometer as well as

the diagram ?Giving the following relationship :
dῲ /dt = d2θs /dt2
After rearranging and integrating w.r.t. Time we
have;
θs = ῲ .t. – K.t.

Where k= Constant.
Recall that all the frequencies here are per second or
per unit time ?
Then if we put t =1 We Get
θs = ῲ . – K.
And The Frequency (F) Becomes the Identity Of ( Θ )
The (Geometry).
Now revise all previous (Isamic Diagrams)
Especially those with (Mirror Reflections)In
terms of the above Equations Of Mine.

726 556
 557Page 557 of 726

Eureka ! Eurika !Eureka !.

“Here is what I found ?Concise list illustrating my
ideas:”

1-As with Friction :The cosmic flux always opposes the

motion.
2-Every Stationary object in the universe has a Front
Cutting Per Unit Time A Constant Number Of Flux Lines.
An arbitrary number of lines (N). By (ωN )= Constant.

3-Every Stationary object has Tail Gluing Per Unit Time

Any Variable Number (n).of the above defined lines (N).
By (ωn )=Variable. Where 0 ≤n ≤ N.

4-The number (N)Is constant property of the particular

geometry of the object related to (ϴ )As defined in the
Isamic Diagram below rather than any cross section !
Something like the angle of attack in Aerodynamics.
Defined by : Tan ϴ = [[ωGluing/ ωCutting]]Absolute.
Hence objects is stable at : ϴ=0 Or at =π/4.

726 557
 558Page 558 of 726

5-L=The distant between the Front of the object and its

Tail .Also its the length of the path running Tangential
to the two circles representing the two cycles (Of
cutting and Gluing).

6- Both circles are centred at (O).And All Are In The

Plane Of The Paper.
7-When L=0 (As in Neutrinos ) ωn=0. i.e. Un-Gluible. or
unstoppable.
8-( ωN )Has radius (RFront. )Perpendicular to its path (L)
with velocity (VFront )Along the path (L)Which remains
constant. Since both ωN And .RFront. are constants .
Therefore VFront = Constant.
9-While(ωn)Has radius (RTail)And velocity (vn = ωn .RTail )
But its velocity Along the path (L) Will be (VTail ) As
shown in the Isamic Diagram below.
10-
For any Stationary object (N=n ) !
For any Moving object (N ≠ n ) .
For Runaway objects n = 0.

726 558
 559Page 559 of 726

The Convoluted Logic Of Free Particle.

Let (m)be particle rotating at the end of string length
(r) in Vertical Plane with angular velocity (ωBounded.) .
Then at the exact point when the tangential velocity
(ωBounded.X r )Is pointing upward the particle is released
(Catapulted Instantaneously Upward )To climb the
vertical to height (h).With an Arbitrary (ωFree.).
Therefore the particle now start ascending with
velocity:
V0 = ωBounded.X r = ωFree.X dh .
Until it reaches the top of the trajectory where its
Velocity (Vh )=0.
Keeping in mind that (h)Now had become the direction
of the centripetal acceleration while :
r =f(h)
Now this is the direction of the tangential velocity i.e.
as before the two had Exchanged Places .
Meanwhile the particle path will be described by :
Acceleration=∫h(ωFree.)2X dh=[ωBounded.X r –O ]/t.
Where (h= r. Sin θ ) And (t )The time it taken to reach
the top.

726 559
 560Page 560 of 726

BOTTOM LINE.
“The most startling discovery of this century proving
(dA) The overlap area as defined above.”
dA= r X h.
Net Velocity (V) = ωN . RFront. -(Minus) ωn . RTail . Cos ϴ.
And the Acceleration :
(dV/dt ) = d vFront /dt - d vTail./dt =0 – g. ).
g=Constant acceleration of gravity.
At The Top Of The Trajectory :
(ϴ) = 0 And Net V=0 But (dv/dt ) =-g.
Since: ωN = ωn And RFront. = RTail.
The Constants are : ωN ! RFront. ! And VN.
The Variables are : ϴ ! RTail ! ωn ! And Vn.
Proof:
Clearly when (L)Is rigid body :
VFront = VTail . Or :
VFront =ωN . RFront =ωN . RTail . Cos ϴ
VTail =vn . Cos ϴ. =ωn . RTail
Therefore : ωN . RTail . Cos ϴ =ωn . RTail
And this can only be possible if : ωN ≠ ωn

726 560
 561Page 561 of 726

Diagram One.

O RFront. Front
ϴ

RTail
Tail.
vn
( VTail .)

The area of intersection of the two circles (dA)As

defined by earlier diagrams :dA/dt = K.d (RFront RTail)/dt
Or Simply dA/dt =K. d (rf . rt)/dt.=K. rF .d rT/dt
Since (rF) Is constant.

726 561
 562Page 562 of 726

Calculations.
“Proceed as follows:”
1-As indicated in previous diagrams (dA) Is the
intersection area between the two circles representing
the Cutting and Gluing Cycles.

2-As stated earlier these two circles can never be

drawn unless they intersect i.e. (dA) Is Never zero(No
Disjoints)But starts from (∆A )To Maximum ∏(rF )2.

3-(dA) Increases as function of (Cos ϴ ).

Therefore dA/d ϴ = - K.Sin ϴ. =K . h/rT.

4-Now let rT.=r h= The height (free Particle is

climbing) And d 2r /dt2 = Acceleration :
Sin ϴ.=h/r Or r= h. Csc ϴ
dh/dt=dr/dt Sin ϴ + r . Cos ϴ. =Net Velocity ---A And
dr/d ϴ = -h csc ϴ ctn cscϴ. + Csc ϴ .dh/dt.
dh/dt.=[dr/d ϴ -h csc ϴ ctn cscϴ.]/ Cscϴ=Net Velocity—B

726 562
 563Page 563 of 726

Equating A and B:
dr/dt Sin ϴ + r.Cos ϴ=[dr/d ϴ -h cscϴ ctn cscϴ.]/ Cscϴ
And:
dr/dt=- r.Cos ϴ/ Sinϴ +[dr/d ϴ -h cscϴ ctn cscϴ.]/1.
=[dr/d ϴ-h cscϴ ctn cscϴ.]+r.Tan ϴ.
=dr/dh –h/Sin ϴ.Cos ϴ And : dϴ /dt=
dr/dh –h/Sin ϴ.Cos ϴ–(h/Sin ϴ.Cos ϴ)+ Csc ϴ .dh/dt.
dA/dt = d/dt (K. Sin ϴ) =d/dt (K. h/r)
=K. [h.dr/dt – r.dh/dt]/r2 =K(h. dr/dt - r. V).
As you see the change in the intersection area is
function of both the velocity and the centripetal
accelerations simply by differentiating again w.r.t
Time.!

5- Alternatively :
∏(rF )2

∫∆A
dA =(∏(rF )2 - ∆A)

726 563
 564Page 564 of 726

dA= -K. Sinϴ =K. ∫0 (-Cos ϴ)=K.(1 - Cos ∆ϴ )

But :Cos ∆ϴ --0.
Hence (dA )Grows from K. ∆ϴ.To . K .
For this expression to have any meaning at all :
∆ϴ Must be > 1. And Subsequently ∆A >1.

6-
Now to plug in some figures e.g. let the Geometrical
And Mechanical Configuration of the object such that
n= ½ N. i.e. ωN =2 ωn. Then at At rF = rT
r . ωN = r . 2 ωn Or: r . ωn = r . 1/2 ωnN
VT = ωN /2 X [ h .cscϴ ] ∆ϴ ∏/4
= ωN / 2 Xh [∆A - √2 ] ≈ - h ωN /2√2.
Height. =- VT 2√2./ ωN Or
h=-r. VT. 2√2 / r. ωN = 2.r. √2.
IFF (If and only if ):
The body is rigid then clearly ;VT= VF
And the height appears (Negative ) Since its measured
below the indicated (Front)Line in the above diagram..

726 564
 565Page 565 of 726

Therefore we can plug in the above equations all these

values to obtain expressions for the Height ? Velocity?
d2r/dt? dϴ /dt ?etc: Of the free particle.
What is Most Significant about this result that:
Any other dimension of the object e.g. the (Width)
becomes irrelevant .L=the length or the height.
If (h) -----0 As it’s the case with the neutrinos for
example:
Then the velocity V---------∞ or if you insist (C ).
Hence the neutrinos appear to be unstoppable only in
the direction of motion! But not in any other directions.
There is nothing new in all of this !
Its already known in Aerodynamics and it’s called the
Drag.
Hence these neutrinos are captured only by
interceptions in other dimensions than that of motion.
Again this was Recently But Empirically Discovered in
the designs of the wide bodied aircrafts or even wide
body ships.

726 565
 566Page 566 of 726

BOTTOM LINE.
“What is new about my hypothesis ? It does not
distinguish between the length of the particle or its
path along this length .Therefore if the speed of light
was infinite (Or not constant )Then the length of the
photon should be (Zero)Since it only take (Zero Time )
To cross itself! On the other hand if the speed of light is
constant :Then the length of the photon must be:
L= C X T =2.99 X 1010 cm/s. X 7 X 10-24 S ≈ 21 X 10-12
Where :T =(Nuclear Time).Giving : L>Compton Radius.”

“This hypothesis yield more significant results than

what appears at first sight :
For example it predicts that the shape of photon is an
Exact Cylinder with its length infinitesimally longer
than its diameter !”

726 566
 567Page 567 of 726

Frequmechanics (Part-Eleven).
The Isamic Theorem.
“ The magic is in modulo n.”

“Resonance of frequencies are the Physical equivalence

of congruence in Mathematical Numbers”

726 567
 568Page 568 of 726

“Perhaps the simplest way to explain my idea is by the

following definition: If we to freeze our universe inside the one
second then when we are Counting frequencies we really are
Counting Numbers inside that one second for what is frequency
? It’s not measurement of length breadth or anything else !Only
the Number of cycles inside that second regardless of any
frame of reference or any initial conditions !!Inside that one
frozen second we can say :
ω1 =6 and ω2=3. And ωN + ωN =9 Or ωN - ωN =3 etc.
i.e. we can add or subtract frequencies exactly like numbers
but Not Division And this is in complete agreement with
congruence theory of modulo!!! Hence I conclude that the
resonance of frequencies is the physical manifestation of
algebraic congruence .”(See Page---Redefining Frequencies ) ?

“ My theory proposes to relate the Mathematical Modulo

Between Numbers! To the Physical Resonance Between
frequencies .Since the frequencies at certain Poles Concur with
each other producing another Ensemble Of frequencies at
different modes. e.g. :
9 X 27 KHtz Resonance_
9 X(2Khtz +7 KHtz)=81 KHtz Resonance_
(8
+1)KHtz =9KHtz .etc. “

726 568
 569Page 569 of 726

Diagram One.

VFront =ωN X RFront .Cos(dϴ)-Sin(dϴ).

Front. (m)

L=dh

RFront.(Variable)

O dϴ RTail (Constant) Tail (m)

VTail.= ωn.X RTail

Particle of mass M=(m+m)Rotating inside Vertical Plane

(OTF)With Angular speed (Ω)And radius R(Both not shown)
Cutting the Cosmic Flux At point (F)With (ωN)And radius (RFront)
Gluing it at point (T)with (ωn.)And radius (RTail )!!
L=Virtual Length or Diameter of the particle !Not necessarily its
physical length e.g. (Quantum Mechanic’s Cross Sections).
Particle suddenly released at point (T)to climb height (h) As
Free Particle. First released at (T) The after (∆ϴ)And
(∆t)Released at (F)Such that in the limits :
Ω= dϴ/dt.

726 569
 570Page 570 of 726

If a microscopic or macroscopic particle with length (L)Or

Diameter (D)Attached to two Physical Strings Or Electro
Magnetic Bonding And rotated as shown in the above diagram :
Then the object is First Released from point (T) To climb
vertically with velocity( VT.)
Then its released at point (F) With velocity (VF).
But by the time the point (F)Is released after time (∆t ):
( VT.) Is reduced in to :
VT VT .Cos ∆ϴ.

And the acceleration is = ∆V/∆t

= (VF - VT .Cos ∆ϴ.)/ ∆t. =Constant (g ).
Since :
If (L) Or (D) Increases or decreases then both ∆t And
∆ϴ Also changes accordingly :
Thus (∆V) Changes and the ratio (g)Remains constant.
That is if the object was rigid ?
If the object was not rigid then by applying the findings
from the (Coupling Oscillator)Treated later in this
section we still end up with same result of two
frequencies.

726 570
 571Page 571 of 726

Physics.
1-Velocity:
The Vertical Component of the velocity at point (T) :
VTail = (ωn X RTail ). And:
The Vertical Component of the velocity at point (F) :
VFront = (ωN X RFront ). Cos(dϴ).
Therefore Resultant (V)
= (ωN X RFront ). Cos(dϴ).- ωn X RTail
But at the top of the trajectory the particle comes to
rest hence : V= VTail – 0.= VTail
Also ωN X RFront .Cos(dϴ).=0
But since it was assumed ≠ 0 And ωN ≠ 0
Hence Cos(dϴ).=0 And ϴ  π/2.
Which is in full agreement with Diagram One.

2-Acceleration :
Vertical component at point (F)= AFront
= (ωN )2 . RFront Cos(dϴ).
Vertical component at point (T) ATail=0.
Net Acceleration = (AFront – ATail.)= AFront =Constant(g).

726 571
 572Page 572 of 726

Since : Net Acceleration= (VFront-VTail)/Time(t)=- VTail/t.

VTail =dh/dt.
But : ATail =dVTail /dt = d2h/dt2 = 0
Therefore:
dh /dt =Constant = L/t.

∫ L/t . dt. = ∫dh.

h=-L Log t +Constant.
Log t = K(h-L)

t= ek(h-L)
From this it can easily be seen that :
The Acceleration = Constant (-g ).
Also:
(ωN )2 . RFront = (ωn )2 . RTail.
(ωN )2 / (ωn )2 = RTail./ RFront
But from earlier definitions: (ωN ) / (ωn )=Lag or phase
angle =Tan dϴ. And Tan dϴ = h/ RTail.
Hence :

726 572
 573Page 573 of 726

[h/ RTail]2 = RTail./ RFront h2 = (RTail)3/ RFront

[(RTail.)2- ( RFront )2 ]X RFront =(RTail)3
(RTail.)2 X RFront - ( RFront )3 =(RTail)3
(RTail)3 +( RFront )3 = RTail.2 X RFront
(RTail)/ RFron + ( RFront )2/ RTail.2 =1.
Now let:
(RTail)/ RFront = S.
And the above expression becomes: S2 + S -1 =0
Giving:
S= {-1 ±√[ 1 -4(-1)]}/2 =1/2 ±√5./2 .
But :
RFront / RTail =1/S =Cos dϴ =2 /1±√5
Hence the solution is correct because Cos dϴ In either
cases is (<< ±1.)
Now at dϴ π/2: h= RFront Cos π/2 =0
Therefore (dϴ ) Always << π/2 .
And We have: h≠ RFront.
Therefore the expression is correct And:

∫dh = (RTail)3/2/ √ RFront =L .

When the particle had traversed its own length.

726 573
 574Page 574 of 726

3-We can also consider (L) To be made of.(∑m ) .

And (∑ῳ ). Where (∑ῳ )Is given by an earlier Equation :

[∆Velocity] .( ῳ ) =√2 . g =∆ Acceleration --- Equation-2.

Multiplying through by (m):

∑m.[∆Velocity] .( ∑ῳ ) =√2 . mg = ∑m .Acceleration

This can be interpreted in two ways:
a- Since : ∆Velocity = Acceleration Giving :Acceleration =√2 . g

ice Acceleration >> g Which is not possible for free

particle. Therefore:
b-
∑m ( ∑ῳ ) =√2 . mg/Acceleration

∑m. ∑ῳ =√2 . mg /Acceleration.

When Acceleration =g Then:

√2 . m =∑ (m.ῳ) And it follows that :

m=Mass measured inside that one second ie
or m/s. While (ῳ)Is number of cycles inside tat same
second.

726 574
 575Page 575 of 726

Alternatively:
If we have Macroscopic Object of mass (M) that can be
energised by its own (N) Microscopic particles each of
mass (j)then it follows that :
Energy = mc2 =N[ h. ∑ῳ ] = H.F.=1/2 ( I )f2 .
Where (H) Is my proposed Universal Constant and (F)is
an arbitrary (Imaginary) Force at which the
Macroscopic object Vibrating . I=Moment of Inertia.
(f)=The rotational frequency. Then From Equation-2.
above :
[ ∆ Acceleration/∆Velocity] = (∑ῳ ) e(m-n)t. --------Equation-2
N [ h. ∑ῳ ]= N .h [ ∆ Acceleration/∆Velocity] . e(n-m)t.
n-m =-(m-n). But N=M/j Therefore:
M. h∑ῳ /j [ ∆ Acceleration/∆Velocity] . e(n-m)t. =N.h
h∑ῳ [M. ∆ Acceleration /j. ∆Velocity ]. e(n-m)t. =N.h
∑ῳ [ ∆ Force/∆ Momentum.]. e(n-m)t. =N. In The Limits:
N =∑ῳ . ∆t. e(n-m)t.
If ∆t= one second ? If N = is already known for each
element (e.g Avagadro Number)! Then The Number Of
Flux Lines Cut (m-n)Can Be Calculated Or Tabulated.

726 575
 576Page 576 of 726

Mathametics.
If :
9.n = m.
Where (n)Is any number and (m)Is made of the digits
(a) +(b) or module of digits (a),(b),(C=d+e) etc .
Then:
9.n=m=(a) ,(b )a + b = 9.
e.g. : 9X3=27=(2) ,(7) (2) +(7)=9. Similarly :
9 X21=189=(1) ,(8) ,(9) (1) +(8) +(9)=9+9 =18 
1+8 =9.etc?
The most interesting result is when dividing through by
(9) :
(n )Behave as Unitary Operator (U).

Or More General :
If :
f(x),g(x),And h (x) Are integral polynomials then by
modulo division: f(x) /g (x) ≡ h(x) Modulo n.

726 576
 577Page 577 of 726

Let: ωCutting And ωGluing : The frequencies as defined

earlier. Then as above:9 ωn = (ωCutting)+ (ωGluing) =9.
After dividing through by (9) It clearly shows that any
frequency(ωn)Can be split in to At Least two
Organically Linked frequencies [(ωCutting)/9 ]And
[(ωGluing)/9.]
The Simplest Case With Specific Reference To The
Diagram One Of The Two Cycles :

Diagram Two.

√9 (ωn)2 = ± 3 ωn -----------A.

VFromt.

VTail.
VHeight.

726 577
 578Page 578 of 726

At the instant when ∫ dh=r.

VTail = ωn.R . VFromt.= ωCutting.r . VHeight.= ωGluing.r
(VTail )2= (VFromt.)2 +( VHeight.)2
Giving From (A):
3 (ωn) = ± 3 ωn
And it follows that :
(ωn)2 / [(ωCutting)2 - (ωGluing)2 ] = (R/h )2
Or:
h/R = √[(ωCutting)2 - (ωGluing)2 ] / (ωn)
i.e. :
Curvature(1/R)X Height (h)= √[(ωCutting)2-(ωGluing)2]/ωn.

The Following Add Credibility To My Equations :

a-
ωCutting = ωGluing When h=0 Or Curvature =0.
i.e. When the Hypothetical (R=∞) Is descending from
an optimal point at infinity !

726 578
 579Page 579 of 726

b-
ωn Can never be zero because the expression blows up.
Which is true for all natural frequencies.
For more complex cases follow the mathematics in
previous section e.g. :
9X21 KHtz =189 KHtz =(1) ,(8) ,(9)= Resonance 
(1)KHtz +(8) KHtz +(9) KHtz =9+9 =18 KHtz
Resonance  1+8 =9 KHtz. etc?

Note:
Elsewhere in this book I claimed according to relativity
itself :
the curvature ∞ At Time (t) =0.
This by now should be clear from the fact that At t=0
R =o. And 1/R ∞.
e.g.
for Gaussian (R-2) Sphere Where curvature:
K= 3/∏ Lim (2∏.r-C)/r3 . C-For Circumference.
R0

726 579
 580Page 580 of 726

My Mathematical Physical Equation Of Motion:

“If : f(x),g(x),And h (x) Are integral polynomials then
by modulo division: f(x) ≡ g (x) h(x) Modulo n.
Now If These Polynomials Are Representing Any Set Of
Frequencies Then We Have Two Pictures :The Classical
And Quantum Mechanical.”

“All the coupling oscillator is trying to tell us :That its

possible to split frequency in to two!Just as we can
with mass.”

726 580
 581Page 581 of 726

The Classical Picture :

The nearest and simplest scientific example offering
both the Illustration And The Proof : Inside the
Classical Picture is that of Coupled Oscillators e.g.
coupled pendulums each of length (l)And mass of the
bob (m) coupled by spring of Restoring Force constant
(a)They are displaced by X And Y Respectively as
shown below in

Diagram Three.

l
X Y
m m

726 581
 582Page 582 of 726

The standard differential equations for both are :

m .d2x/dt2 +mg x/l + a (X-Y).=0
m .d2Y/dt2 +mg Y/l + a (X-Y).=0
- - (m. ω2-mg/l –a) A – (Alpha)B=0
- -(Alpha)A –(m ω2 –mg/l –a)B =0
- (m ω2 –mg/l )2 – 2 a (m ω2 –mg/l ) +a2=0
 (ω1)2= g/l And (ω2)2 =g/l +2a/m Equation (A)

1-Clearly the two frequencies are not the same :

2-Now if we Replace The Spring By Rigid Body i.e. the
mass now becomes (m+m) As before and since no
object microscopic or macroscopic can ever be 100%
Rigid therefore it’s Reasonable to assume we can
introduce variable Stifness or Elastic Restoring Force .
∞
3-Where (a) Now F= ∫0 d(a) But in reality this is not
an open ended integral its restricted by the previously
defined Lag(Phase )Angle where :
Tan (θ) = Modulus of [[ω1 /ω2]]And (F )Now = k.f (θ).
Now let K=k/m.

726 582
 583Page 583 of 726

4-Therefore Equation (A)Above need to be rewritten as:

(ω2)2 =g/l +2a/m =g/l + 2 F/m = g/l +K. ∫ d(θ ).

Hence by the previous notations of Diagram One :
(ωN)2 =g/l (i.e. ωCutting =Constant).
(ωn)2 =g/l +2a/m =g/l + 2 F/m = g/l +K. ∫ d(θ ).

5- As you see (ωn) Now is Variable Dependent on (θ ).

i.e. on the Geometry !This by itself good news because
its Consistent With Practice Since in practice the
Stiffness Of any object Microscopic Or Macroscopic is
very much dependant on its length .or on its geometry:
(L) , (RFront),( RTail) (θ )As defined by Diagram One.
The Quantum Picture:
“Referring back to the above integral polynomials and
modulo division: f(x)/ g (x) ≡ h(x) modulo n.”
Let ( Un )Set of observed frequencies (ωn )Inside the
state function then : ωUn (ωGluing)=

∫U*n (x) , ω (x, ∂/∂x) Un (x) dx / ∫ U*n Un (x) dx.

=∫U*n (x) ω,Un (x) dx / ∫ U*n Un (x) dx.= ωN(ωCutting ).

726 583
 584Page 584 of 726

Frequmechanics (Part-Twelve) .
The Interception Of Cosmic Flux By Rotational And
Revolving Motions.
“With reference to diagram one above of microscopic or
microscopic particle with determinable length or radius
(e.g. the atom ).It’s reasonable to make the following
two assumptions :”

1-No such particle can be rotated Evenly just from one

single point be it physically e.g. by string or
electromagnetically (including gravity ).It has to be
from At Least Two points :Point (Tail)And Point (Front) As
shown in diagram one in the previous section of this
book.

2-It’s not possible to release the particle from both

points Instantaneously.
Once the particle is free from both ends then it will be
governed by the following kinematics :

726 584
 585Page 585 of 726

a-Linear Vertical Velocities:

At point (T) VTail = ωn. RTail. And Net velocity = VTail
After (∆t )Of releasing this point :
RFront.  RTail. +L. i.e. RFront. > RTail And it follows :
VFront= ωn. RFront. Clearly Now : VFront > VTail But the :
Vertical component of VFront = VFront Cos θ

As the particle climbs θ π/2 Reaching (V =0 )

At the top of the trajectory which is in total
agreement with practical observations and the
Acceleration will be = (0- VTail) /∆t =(-) g.
Then By Referring To The Diagrams Inside
(Direction Of Flux Between Particle (M) And
Earth.)Where accelerations and Velocities
Exchange Directions And Introducing :
Θr≡ θ.r And Φr ≡ Φ .r Where r again is that
hypothetical radius desendingfrom infinitum to any
point on the path of the particle turning the angular in
to linear. i.e. :

726 585
 586Page 586 of 726

d2(Θr) /dt2 = - (Minus) (d Θr /dt )2 .R

∫ d2Θr/ dΘr = ∫ dΘr .dt .dt .R Or
Log dθ = dθ . dt .R +A. =m
And dm/dt =R. dθ +0
dθ = em ∫ dθ = ∫ em  θ =B em
Now dm/dt= dθ .R
dΘr/dt = dΘr/dm X dm/dt = B em .X dΘr .R
d2Θr/dt2 =B R.dθ em .X dΘr/dt .R=B.R2. ωn em. . dθ

∫ dΘr/ dΘr =B ∫ em .dt .R ----------------------A

Log Θr = B ∫ em . dt .R OR:
Θr = eR∫ em dt
ButFrom (A) Above :
∫ em .dt .R =(1/B )∫ dΘr/ dΘr Hence:
Θr = C. ∫ dΘr/ dΘr

726 586
 587Page 587 of 726

R∫ em .X Θ. dt .+ B R/ Θr X em .Θ. dt+ B

Hence :
Θr =eR/ Θr X em .Θ. dt+ B
= C .e em (R/ Θr )dt

But : m (R/ Θr )dt =R. (m/ ωn )= R2 / ωn Where

(A) And (B) And (C) Are the constants of
integration.

b-Angular Velocities And Acceleration:

Moreover the difference in the two velocities create a
turning couple around the centre of the particle such
that : Φ=(V – V Cos θ )/L/2 Where :
Φ =Angular velocity of the particle spinning about itself
with radius (L/2 ) Or (r) . Where r=L/2. And
V= The tangential velocity of the spin at any point:
Φ =(V – V Cos θ )/r Or Φ = V/r(1– Cos θ )
dΦ /dt = 1/r [(dV/dt )- d (V Cos θ )/ dt ].
=1/r [ dv/dt –(dv/dt Cos θ- V Sin θ dθ/dt
=1/r [ dv/dt –dv/dt Cos θ+ V Sin θ . Φ.

726 587
 588Page 588 of 726

At point (F) :
When θ π/2 Giving Cos θ =0 Sin θ =1. dv/dt =0
Therefore :
dΦ /dt  1/r[ 0 -0 + V . Φ. ]=V/r ( Φ).But :V/r=Φ
Hence : dΦ /dt = Φ (Φ)= Φ2 This is true statement
since acceleration = Φ2.r And (Φ) B e+t.

At point (T) :
When θ=0. And Cos θ =1. Sin θ =0
dΦ /dt=1/r[ dv/dt – dv/dt +0 +0.]=0
And This Comply With Experimental Observations since
the particle was assumed to start spinning only After
point (T).
Hence the particle rotates with constant angular
velocity about Its Own centre as well as climbing
against gravity :

726 588
 589Page 589 of 726

This fact Gives Away The Existence of the Cosmic Flux

Since it Must Be Cut Not only in the direction of the
movement of the object itself but also in the direction
of movement of its own Frame Of Reference Inside
which the particle is Spinning And the best example is
that stated in earlier sections of this book about our
planet Earth Cutting the Cosmic Flux in two ways that :
a-Between itself and the cosmos by Spinning Around
itself !
b-And that between itself and the sun by Revolving
Around the sun.

Now we already said that :

θ  Ae-t And (Φ) B e+t. herefore :
Total angle of the system= (θ )+(Φ) Ae-t.R +B e+t.R
= L/2e-t.R + L/2 e+t.R =L . Cosh(t.R).
GIVING MOST INTRIGUENG RESULTS;
Net Velocity =d/dt (L . Cosh(t.R)=R.L.Shine R.t
And Net Acceleration=d/dt (R.L Shine Rt)=LR2CoshRt

726 589
 590Page 590 of 726

Notice:
Once point (T)Is released then the particle of radius R
Or object of length (L)Rotates Anti –Clockwise While
the Field (The strings )Are rotating Clockwise hence the
signs are opposite i.e. (t) And (-t).

This idea can be extended (Universalized)To all points

inside the particle simply by :Point (T) ∑Ti And:(F)
 ∑ Fi ! θ  ∑ θ And Φ  ∑ Φ Also :
RTail.  ∑RTail. And RFront  ∑ RTail.
This can only plausible inside same time frame of
reference.

726 590
 591Page 591 of 726

The Hodograph.
Only After Writing all my theories stated above !
I accidently stumbled on something that may be
helpful to both of us :
The Reader :
in understanding my theories stated above.
And To Myself:
By giving me the Confidence to go public with my
theories in spite of Tightly Jewish Controlled Scientific
Media. Its the Hodograph Which can be found inside
any standard mathematical text book:

((The Hodograph Is a curve used to determine the

acceleration of point (P)Moving with known velocity
along a curved path. The Hodograph is drawn through
the ends of lines drawn from reference point (O) Whose
length and direction represent the velocity of (P) at
successive positions i.e. at successive instants along its
path . Thus these lines are Vectors .

726 591
 592Page 592 of 726

If OH and OH” Representing the velocities at times(t)

and (t +∆t)Then HH” Represent the change in velocity
during a time (∆t)Thus(HH” /∆t )Represent the average
change in velocity i.e. Acceleration of point(P)During
this interval and also the average velocity of the point
(H) in the Hodograph .
It follows that after letting ∆t 0 the velocity of the
point (H) represent in magnitude and direction the
acceleration of (P).

H”

726 592
 593Page 593 of 726

Frequmechanics © (Part-Thirteen) .
Determining The Existence & Direction of Cosmic Flux.
“Instead of the force defined as the differential
w.r.t.Time Of the momentum ! I am Redefining It as
the difference between two momentums each inside
two different spaces ri (The Foil)And Ri (The Bond).
Such that (ri / Rin = Sin θ/ Sin ɸ ) Physically related by
what I call the the cosmic flux.”

“With specific reference to diagram one and the

diagrams of Section Seven (the centre of frequency) In
Frequmechanics(Part-Eight).Where the first diagram
(Redrawn below )Had illustrated how velocities and
accelerations Exchange their directions ?Also by
refereeing to the Hodograph described earlier:”

726 593
 594Page 594 of 726

B
m
n P
OC
A Og Ɣ θ

O
1-Modern technology will have no problem creating
Electrically Neutral Fields !As for Gravitational Fields:
Just recall how years age ?Astronauts were trained on
weightlessness inside aircrafts stimulating zero gravity
by flying at special speed in special curves.
Therefore the following mechanism are assumed to be

inside Vacuum (No air or other mechanical influences )

Also there are absolutely No Electrical !Electrostatic!Or

Gravitational forces whatsoever on the mechanism

described for this hypotheses !

726 594
 595Page 595 of 726

ɸ rj Tail
Front Ɣ Ɣ

RFront. RTail.
θ
O

Half Free Particle: Rotating Paticle Unhinged At (T):

Vj Tail
rj O
Front

∆ɸ
∆θ
Vi O

726 595
 596Page 596 of 726

After (∆t) Particle Released At Both Points (T) And (F):

OTail
O
Front O
O

2-No particle Macroscopic Or Microscopic is completely

free :
Therefore all particles are bonded (None-Rigidly) Or
Elastically ether Mechanically e.g. by strings or
Electromagnetically e.g. by gravity.
3-
Since there is no such thing as Point Particle :
Its assumed the Rotating particle is bonded At Least
from Two Points(T) For (Tail)And (F) For (Front)Cutting
the flux.Later it will be extended to all points on the
particle length where:
L= ∑i (rj).

726 596
 597Page 597 of 726

4-
Since Quantum Mechanics Dismiss any Notion of
releasing the particle from both points Simultaneously
at least in the microscopic world :
Its assumed that the particle first Unhinged at point (T)
(Half free) Then only after time (∆t)Released from point
(F).

5-“I Proposing Solutions Alomg These Seven

Treatments for This Problem:”

First Solution. The Graphical Solution.

Once the particle is unhinged at point (T) The tail then:

Although it still describe Circular Motion about the
point (F)The front But not around the initial reference
point (O).Here its behaviour will be a Hodograph.
Therefor the intersection of the hodograph with the
circular motion represent one solution.

726 597
 598Page 598 of 726

Second Solution
We designate the points along (r) the radius or length
(TF) of the particle (The Foil) as (ri)Measured from the
point (F)!And the points along the length of the Front
Bond (R) as (Ri) Measured from the Reference
point(O)Such that:
ri/r =Ri/R

Once the particle is unhinged at (T) Then:

Although it still describe Circular Motion about the
point (F)But not around the initial reference point
(O).Here its behaviour will be a Hodograph.
The Velocities ( Vr) Perpendicular to the particle which
Vary along the length of the particle according to how
far the point (rj)Is from point (F)? Thus the further the
point is from (F)the higher the velocities along ( r - the
Foil ) Similarly ( VR )Are the velocities along the (Bond-
R) Again Varying according to how far they are from
the reference point (O) :

726 598
 599Page 599 of 726

Once the particle Detached from point (T)Then there

are Three Possibilities for its behaviour:
The Path It Takes Will Expose Both The Existence And
Direction Of The Cosmic Flux :
By Inertia :
It stays attached to (T) ((Highly Unlikely)) Or One of
the following two Cases : ( A Or B):

Case (A)-
Deflect outwardly Anti –Clockwise In the direction of
Rotation (Most Likely). The upper limit of ɸ = Ɣ + θ

Vj Tail
rj O
Front Ɣ

∆ɸ
∆θ
Vi

726 599
 600Page 600 of 726

To simplify what the calculations otherwise will be

formidable I introduce the variable angle ɸ(t) While
Ɣ=Remains constant And θ(t).Off course is variable:
In case (A) The upper limit of ɸ = Ɣ + θ
Clearly from the initial diagrams above :
Just Before Detachment:
ɸ = Ɣ + θ And 2Ɣ + θ =180. Giving: dɸ /dt = dθ /dt
That Is To Say The Rate Of Change Of (ɸ)Is Twice As
Fast As That Of (Θ)Only If The Triangle (OTF)Is
Equilateral.
Let:
aR & ar=The centripetal Accelerations along ( R )The
Bond And(r)the Foil respectively.
(AH )And ( AV) =The horizontal and vertical components
of aR & ar
(ω)=The Net Angular Velocity Of The Whole
Mechanism.
S = Hypothetical radius vector from infinitum to the
mechanism. Or what I call the Cosmic Flux Vector.

726 600
 601Page 601 of 726

Resolving Horizontally (Accelerations Are Opposite):

AH = aR .Cos Ɣ - ar Cos ɸ
AH = (dθ/dt)2 .R .Cos Ɣ - (dɸ/dt)2.r Cos ɸ
But from above : dɸ /dt = dθ /dt Hence :
(dθ/dt)2 .R .Cos Ɣ - (dθ /dt)2.r Cos ɸ
AH =(dθ/dt)2 .(R .Cos Ɣ - .r Cos ɸ )

Resolving Vertically (Both Accelerations Are

Downward):
AV =aR .Sin Ɣ + ar Sin ɸ=(dθ/dt)2.RSin Ɣ+(dɸ/dt)2.rSinɸ
But from above : dɸ /dt = dθ /dt Hence :
AV=(dθ/dt)2.RSin Ɣ+(dθ/dt)2.rSinɸ
AV =(dθ/dt)2 (RSin Ɣ+.rSinɸ)
But resultant of the acceleration components:
√[(AH )2 + ( AV)2 ]= ω2. S.
[(AH )2 + ( AV)2 ]= (ω2. S.)2
(dθ/dt)4 [(RCos Ɣ -r Cos ɸ )+(RSin Ɣ+.rSinɸ)]2=(ω2. S)2
EQN-1

726 601
 602Page 602 of 726

Case B-
Deflecting inwardly Clockwise To align itself with radius
(OF)Or (RFront.) Here the limit of ɸ  Ɣ.

“Since the initial conditions at point (T)Are identical !

And by the principle of Conversation Of Energy There is
no reason why (ω)The Net Angular Velocity Of The
Whole Mechanism. Is not the same in both cases i.e.”
ωA = -(minus)ω B

Here the limit of ɸ  Ɣ.

rj Tail
Front ɸ Ɣ
Ɣ
RFront. RTail.
θ
O

726 602
 603Page 603 of 726

Resolving Horizontally (Accelerations Are Opposite):

BH = aR . Cos ɸ - ar Cos Ɣ
BH = (dθ/dt)2 .R . Cos ɸ - (dɸ/dt)2.r Cos Ɣ
But from above : dɸ /dt = dθ /dt Hence :
(dθ/dt)2 .R . Cos ɸ - (dθ /dt)2.r Cos Ɣ
AH =(dθ/dt)2 .(R . Cos ɸ - .r Cos Ɣ )

Resolving Vertically (Both Accelerations Are

Downward):
BV =aR .Sin ɸ+ar Sin Ɣ=(dθ/dt)2.R Sin ɸ+(dɸ/dt)2r.SinƔ
But from above : dɸ /dt = dθ /dt Hence :
BV=(dθ/dt)2.R Sin ɸ +(dθ/dt)2.r. SinƔ
BV =(dθ/dt)2 (R Sinɸ +.r Sin Ɣ)
Again Smilarly :
[(BH )2 + ( BV)2 ]=[ (Minus)ω2. S.]2
(dθ/dt)4 [(R Cos ɸ -r.Cos Ɣ)+(R Sinɸ+r.Sin Ɣ)]2=(ω2.S)2
EQN-2.

726 603
 604Page 604 of 726

Equating EQN-1 And EQN-2:

(dθ/dt)4 [(RCos Ɣ -r Cos ɸ )+(RSin Ɣ+.rSinɸ)]2
=(dθ/dt)4 [(R Cos ɸ -r.Cos Ɣ)+(R Sinɸ+r.Sin Ɣ)]2
Eliminating (dθ/dt)4 And taking square roots :
(RCos Ɣ -r Cos ɸ )+(RSin Ɣ+.rSinɸ)
=(R Cos ɸ -r.Cos Ɣ)+(R Sinɸ+r.Sin Ɣ)
R(Cos Ɣ +Sin Ɣ) +r(Sinɸ- Cos ɸ) =R(Cos ɸ +Sin ɸ)
+r(Sin Ɣ-CosƔ). EQN-3.
Now there are Two Ways to read this equation :
1-Simplfy by r=R .
(Cos Ɣ +Sin Ɣ) +(Sinɸ- Cos ɸ) =(Cos ɸ +Sin ɸ) +(Sin Ɣ
-CosƔ).
Cos Ɣ +Sin Ɣ -Sin Ɣ +CosƔ = Cos ɸ +Sin ɸ -Sinɸ+Cos ɸ
Giving:
2 Cos Ɣ =2 Cos ɸ Or that ɸ Ɣ
2-Use The Sine Law ;
r/Sin θ=R/Sin Ɣ Or r/R = Sin θ/Sin Ɣ
Dividing EQN-3 Above By R Then Substituting for r/R:
R/R(Cos Ɣ +Sin Ɣ) +r/R(Sinɸ- Cos ɸ) =R/R(Cos ɸ
+Sin ɸ) +r/R(Sin Ɣ-CosƔ).

726 604
 605Page 605 of 726

(Cos Ɣ +Sin Ɣ) + Sin θ/Sin Ɣ (Sinɸ- Cos ɸ)

=(Cos ɸ +Sin ɸ) + Sin θ/Sin Ɣ (Sin Ɣ-CosƔ).

Multiply Through By Sin Ɣ:
(Sin Ɣ Cos Ɣ +Sin2 Ɣ) + Sin θ (Sinɸ- Cos ɸ)

=( Sin Ɣ Cos ɸ + Sin Ɣ Sin ɸ) + Sin θ (Sin Ɣ-CosƔ).

(Sin Ɣ Cos Ɣ +Sin2 Ɣ) + Sin θ (Sinɸ- Cos ɸ)

=( 2 Sin Ɣ Sin ɸ) + Sin θ (Sin Ɣ-CosƔ).

(Sin Ɣ Cos Ɣ +Sin2 Ɣ) + Sin θ Sinɸ- Sin θ Cos ɸ)

=( 2 Sin Ɣ Sin ɸ) + Sin θ Sin Ɣ- Sin θ CosƔ).

Differentiating w.r.t Time and since dƔ /dt = 0:

0 +0 + Sin θ Cosɸ + Cos θ Sinɸ+ Sin θ Sin ɸ - Cos θ

Cos ɸ =2 Sin Ɣ Cos ɸ +Cos θ (Sin Ɣ-CosƔ).

(Sin θ Cosɸ + Cos θ Sinɸ) - (Cos θ Cos ɸ - Sin θ Sin ɸ)

=2 Sin Ɣ Cos ɸ +Cos θ (Sin Ɣ-CosƔ).

726 605
 606Page 606 of 726

Sin(θ+ɸ) - Cos (θ+ɸ) =2 Sin Ɣ Cos ɸ +Cos θ (Sin Ɣ-

CosƔ). EQN-4
Now if recall that the limit of ɸ  Ɣ Derived above We
have:
ɸ Sin(θ+ɸ) - Cos (θ+ɸ) =2 Sin Ɣ Cos ɸ +Cos θ Sin

Ɣ- Cos θ CosƔ).
And again :
Sin(θ+ɸ) - Cos (θ+ɸ) =2 Sin ɸ Cos ɸ +Cos θ Sin ɸ -
Cos θ Cos ɸ).

Sin θ Cosɸ + Cos θ Sinɸ+ Sin θ Sin ɸ - Cos θ Cos ɸ=

2 Sin ɸ Cos ɸ +Cos θ Sin ɸ - Cos θ Cos ɸ).

The terms ( Cos θ Sin ɸ )And (Cos θ Cos ɸ) Cancels out

And by rearranging :

Sin ɸ Cos ɸ-2 Sin ɸ Cos ɸ + Sin θ Sin ɸ = 0

Sin ɸ Cos ɸ=- Sin θ Sin ɸ Giving :

Cos ɸ=- Sin θ= Cos (π/2- θ)

726 606
 607Page 607 of 726

Therefore ;
ɸ + θ = π/2
Substituting In EQN-4:
Sin(π/2) - Cos (π/2)
=2 Sin Ɣ Cos ɸ +Cos θ (Sin Ɣ-CosƔ).

2 Sin Ɣ Cos ɸ +Cos θ (Sin Ɣ-CosƔ).=1

As you see we had successfully established Physical

Connectivity Between (θ)And the rate of change of

(ɸ) !And this can only happen if there was Connective

Medium other than any mechanical or other
electromagnetic forces etc. since we had already
eliminated these forces And Nothing Involved Here But
Geometry And Frequency.:

“I am Proposing Solutions Alomg These Seven

Treatments for this Problem:”

726 607
 608Page 608 of 726

Third Solution
aR & ar=The centripetal Accelerations along ( R )And(r)
Respectively.
(ω)=The Net Angular Velocity Of The Whole
Mechanism.
Anti Clockwise :
ω = 2 dθ /dt - dθ/dt = dθ/dt---eq-1
Although initially when the particle just about to be
unhinged from (T) It could deflect inwardly Clockwise
since at this moment of time all forces acting along the
length of (rj)Are equal. In which case : ω = dθ /dt -

Clockwise :
ω = dθ /dt- 2dθ/dt = -(Minus)dθ/dt
Also:
r/Sin θ=R/Sin Ɣ
Or
r/R = Sin θ/Sin Ɣ---eqn -2

726 608
 609Page 609 of 726

Vr
ar
rj Tail O
Front ɸ
Ɣ
Ri. RTail.
VR aR θ
O

We Need To Obtain An Expression For (Ɣ)In Terms Of

(Θ) Alone After Detachment From Point ( T):
First Resolving Vertically (Both Accelerations Are
Downward):
aR .Sin Ɣ + ar Sin ɸ = ω2.R Subsituting for ω= (dθ/dt)
From eqn=-1 And for aR & ar :
(dθ/dt)2 .R .Sin Ɣ + (dɸ/dt)2.r Sin ɸ = (dθ/dt)2.R
Dividing by ( R)and rearranging:
Sin Ɣ + (dɸ/dt)2/(dθ/dt)2 r/R Sin ɸ = (dθ/dt)2
From eqn—2:

726 609
 610Page 610 of 726

Sin Ɣ +(dɸ/dt)2/(dθ/dt)2 ( Sin θ/Sin Ɣ)Sin ɸ = 1

Sin Ɣ + (dɸ/(dθ)2 ( Sin θ/Sin Ɣ )Sin ɸ = 1 eqn-3

Resolving Horizontally (Accelerations Are Opposite):
aR .Cos Ɣ - ar Cos ɸ = ω2.R
(dθ/dt)2 .R .Cos Ɣ - (dɸ/dt)2.r Cos ɸ = (dθ/dt)2.R

Cos Ɣ - (dɸ/(dθ)2 ( Sin θ/Sin Ɣ )Cos ɸ = 1 eqn-4

Eqn3 =eqn4 Giving:
Sin Ɣ +(dɸ/(dθ)2( Sin θ/Sin Ɣ )Sin ɸ =

= Cos Ɣ - (dɸ/(dθ)2 ( Sin θ/Sin Ɣ )Cos ɸ

Sin Ɣ - Cos Ɣ =-(dɸ/(dθ)2( Sin θ/Sin Ɣ )Sin ɸ - Cos ɸ

Sin Ɣ - Cos Ɣ=(dɸ/(dθ)2 ( Sin θ/Sin Ɣ )[ Sin ɸ - Cos ɸ ]

(dɸ/(dθ)2=(Sin Ɣ - Cos Ɣ)/( Sin ɸ - Cos ɸ)Sin θ/Sin Ɣ

= Sin θ(1 - Cot Ɣ)/ (Sin ɸ - Cos ɸ)

If we assume(For simplifications))As before : dɸ /d θ =2
And substitute this in the above :
4 (Sin ɸ - Cos ɸ)= Sin θ(1 - Cot Ɣ) ?
Moreover it imply ɸ=2θ

Again by substituting this :

726 610
 611Page 611 of 726

4 ( Sin 2θ - Cos 2θ)= Sin θ(1 - Cot Ɣ)

4[2 Sin θ Cos θ-( Cos2 θ –Sin2 θ)]/Sin θ=(1 - Cot Ɣ)

4[Sin2 θ - Cos2 θ +2 Sin θ Cos θ]/ Sin θ =(1 - Cot Ɣ)

4(Sin θ – Cosec θ + Sin θ +2 Cos θ)=(1 - Cot Ɣ)

( 2Sin θ – Cosec θ +2 Cos θ=(1 - Cot Ɣ)/4 eqn-5

Now if we differentiate both sides of the bove equation

w.r.t Time the L.H.S. Will vanish sine we had already

assumed that ( θ )Between the two bonds is fixed

therefore:
Cot Ɣ =1 or Sin Ɣ = Cos Ɣ i.e. (Ɣ )= π/4 eqn-6
Meaning 2 Ɣ = 90 Leaving ( θ ) =0 Hence
(Ɣ ) Can only be = π/4 After the detachment from point
(T).
On the other hand if ( θ ) =0 Then the L.H.S ∞
Meaning ( Ɣ )is also=0.
Which justify the above Foil Mechanism to detect the
cosmic flux.
726 611
 612Page 612 of 726

Fourth Solution
“To calculate the strength of the Cosmic flux field”
The main thrust is the net horizontal forces !the et of
the vertical forces must be zero:
m .aR .Sin Ɣ + m.ar Sin ɸ = 0-----eqn 7
m. aR .Cos Ɣ – m. ar Cos ɸ = m.ω2.R =m. aR ---eqn 8
(m)as defined earlier the hypothetical uniform density
running through both the particle (The Foil)And the
bond which cancels out :
From eqn 7 aR/ ar = -Sin ɸ /Sin Ɣ And from eqn 8:
Cos Ɣ – (ar / aR)Cos ɸ =1
Giving : ar / aR = ( 1- Cos Ɣ)/ Cos ɸ
The most interestingresult out of this :That the
centrpital acceleration through the foil as well aste
bond become one andthesame i.e. ar = aR Only if
ɸ0 And Ɣ π/2 But both foil and bond still nota
straight-line forming one single rigid body at these
parameters so there has to be other forces
compensating for this anomaly by treating the

726 612
 613Page 613 of 726

mechanism as straight-line which we call the Cosmic

Flux?

Fifth Solution.
“ Since there are no other forces whtsover eg
mechanical or electromagnetic forces involved
and no bending moments or forces acting within
each part of this mechanism ! So I Redefined the
force as the deferential of momentum between
two points (ri) And (Ri)Instead of at the same point as
follows:”

Let:
(m) =Is Hypothetical uniform mass density !Later it
will be seen why is (Hypothetical )Because it cancels
out .

F= d/dt (mVr )- (m VR)=d/dt (m) [dɸ/dt - dθ /dt].

But fro m above ω = 2 dθ /dt - dθ/dt = dθ/dt

726 613
 614Page 614 of 726

Giving :

=m d/dt dθ/dt =m .d2θ/dt2 =0 Substituting in the equation

for dɸ /dθ =2:

0=(2dθ/dt)2. rj/R Sin 2θ +(dθ/dt)2. rj /r Sin Ɣ

4 rj/R Sin 2θ = - rj /r Sin Ɣ
r/R = -1/4 Sin Ɣ/ Sin 2θ
By Applying The Sine Law On The Diagram Before The
Detachment Of (T):
R / Sin Ɣ =r/ Sin θ Or r/R = Sin Ɣ / Sin θ
R= ( Sin Ɣ)2/ Sin θ
Sin Ɣ / Sin θ=-1/4 Sin Ɣ/ Sin 2θ

=-1/4 Sin Ɣ/ 2SinθCosθ

Cosθ = -1/8. But -Cosθ =Cos –(θ)
And also from the diagram :2Ɣ = (π – θ)
Sin Ɣ = Cos θ/2 =√1/2(1 +Cos θ)

r/R=1/2(1 +Cos θ)/ Sin θ =1/2 (Sin θ +Cot θ).

Where :

726 614
 615Page 615 of 726

Θ = Sin-1 (1/8)

Sixth Solution
Let the distances along ( R )From the reference point ( O)
=Ri And Vi = dθ/dt . Ri.
Let the distances along ( r )From the Joint ( F)=ri
Vi= dɸ /dt . ri
From the above diagrams :
Velocity at (F) VF = Vi + Vj Sinɸ
= dθ/dt . ∑ Ri.+ dɸ /dt . ∑ ri . Sinɸ
Substituting for dɸ /dt=2 dθ/dt
VF = dθ/dt [R. +2 r Sin ɸ ]
But initial velocity at (T) =VT = dθ/dt .R
Therefore :
Change Of Velocity:
∆V = VF - VT
= dθ/dt [R. +2 r Sin ɸ -R]
∆V =2 dθ/dt.r. Sin ɸ
=2 dθ/dt.r.Sin 2θ=4 r.dθ/dt Sinθ Cosθ-------------------A

726 615
 616Page 616 of 726

Clearly from this equation the acceleration (∆V/∆t)

Will diminishes as both (θ) Or (ɸ) Increases and no
matter which one and how far each increases giving.
Force opposing cosmic flux 0
As both (θ) Or (ɸ) ∏/2.----------------B
Keeping in mind all what been said previously by the
Isamic Diagrams:
its worth Exploring what happens at :
(θ) = ∏/4 ?
And the question of how can this reveal any Cosmic
Flux?
Or its direction ? ?

726 616
 617Page 617 of 726

“I am Proposing Solutions Alomg These Seven

Treatments forThis Problem:”

Seventh Solution .
“The Magic Begin To Unfold At (θ) = ∏/4 “

When Sin θ =1/√2 =Cosθ =1/√2

Substituting in (A) :
∆V =4.r/2 dθ/dt =2 .r.dθ/dt=r. dɸ/dt. =VT
And this simply means that the difference in velocities
remains the same at (VT) Even after the detachment of
point (T)
Implying that there are invisible but still physical
connectivity which we called the Cosmic Flux !
Clearly this invisible but physical connectivity is Related
to (dɸ /dθ =2).

726 617
 618Page 618 of 726

That is why it will be designated later as the most

significant result !

Nothing Involved Here But Geometry And Frequency.:

Substituting R=2r. In equation (A):
∆V =2 dθ/dt.r. Sin ɸ =2 dθ/dt.r. Sin 2θ
= 2 dθ/dt.r.2 Sin θCosθ
Again at : Θ= ∏/4
∆V = 2 dθ/dt.r.2 Sin θCosθ =2.r dθ/dt.=R. dθ/dt=VT
Meaning the (∆V)Stays the same Even after the particle
Or Object have detached itself from point (T) Hence the
acceleration ;
∆V/∆t =Constant
And that VF = 0 As its with all all projectiles.
Nothing Involved Here But Geometry And Frequency.
It was stated at (Number One)Above :
There are no electrical gravitational or mechanical
resistances involved (Vacuum)Then the only forces left
offering any resistance must be those belonging to the

726 618
 619Page 619 of 726

cosmic flux :These are Weak And Extremely Difficult To

Detect as proven by the above (Equations A & B) .
Hence we conclude by stating that :

Electric Potential = f(1/r2).

Gravity = f(1/r2)
The Cosmic Flux =f (1/rn )
Where n >2.
This can easily be shown by integrating the following :
Vr= r. dɸ /dt =r.2 dθ /dt
dv/dt = r. ( dɸ /dt)2 =4 r ( dθ/dt)2 =dVr/dt =2dr/dt .dθ /dt
Similarly :
VR= R. dθ /dt
dv/dt = R. ( dθ/dt)2 =dR/dt dθ /dt
Givig;
dR/dr =2 dθ /dɸ----eqn d

∆V =(R-2r) dθ /dt
∆ acceleration =R. ( dθ/dt)2 – 4 r . ( dθ/dt)2 = (R-2r) dθ /dt
∆V =( rj dθ/dt.-.Ri. dɸ /dt.) Since dɸ/dt=2dθ /dt

726 619
 620Page 620 of 726

= (rj dθ/dt.- 2 R. dθ /dt.)

Force = m ∆V/dt =
= dθ/dt (rj - 2 R. .)/dt =acceleration (a)

Force =d/dt m.v

Multiplying by (dt) and dividing by r
a.dt/r =
Since After detachments : 2R= r+R
= (rj .- r) – (R.)/dt = R.( dθ/dt)
=d/dt ( ∆r –1) = ∆r Since d/dt(1)=0

∆r/r -1 =( dθ/dt)dt = dθ
After integrating:
Log r ≈∫dθ +Constant
Therefore:
r =c eθ =c e ɸ/2
i.e.
1/r = 1/c√ e ɸ

1/rn ~ Ke-2nθ
726 620
 621Page 621 of 726

Clearly by Inductions :n >2For The Cosmic Flux.

Here it follows a curve where the Hodograph stated

earlier become applicable
Therefore :
Length of particle or (TF)Becomes the equivalent
of(HH”)In the Hodograph representing the Acceleration
(a) .Hence:
∑ Fi= M.a

The Most Important Result :

” Only in the case of equilateral triangle.”

Most Significant Result Happened To Be That dɸ /d θ =2

That is to say the rate of change of (ɸ)Is twice as fast
as that of (θ).

726 621
 622Page 622 of 726

And this is exactly what happens with mirrors [if you

deflect the mirror by (θ)The image will be deflected by
2(θ)!]

And this will take place Regardless of the lengths of the

sides ?Or the values of angles of the triangle (OTF)Drawn
above. But This Is Mechanism ! Not Mirrors .

Hence What Happens Inside Mirrors Is Exactly Where

The Cosmic Flux Repeating Itself.
By reminding ourselves that Hypothetically Inside the
mirrors all forces (Electrical !Gravitational !Mechanical
Etc Are Actually Neutralized )!!!
E.g. you cannot change the Image of the original beam
of light once it had left the source and already inside
the mirror.
All of the above arguments understood correctly can
prove the existence and the direction of Cosmic Flux

726 622
 623Page 623 of 726

per say as in in the (( a?b?C?)) of Number Five above

which is the equivalent to that Critical Angle inside
mirrors.

Alternatively :
“An alternative arguments to the seven solutions
proposed above will be Along the following lines :”

726 623
 624Page 624 of 726

If there was no Cosmic Flux But only gravitational or

electric potentials the Particle will not have had three
choices (a,b,OR: c)To deflect if Neutrally positioned ?
While Giving The Same Results Whichever Way It
Deflect (Inwardly Or Outwardly)?!?!?!

Speed Of Light And The Cosmic Flux.

r r A B
Ɣr+dr.

Ɣr
dθ
O Cross section areas.
Ω B. >A.

With reference to the above diagram :Imagine there

was a planet with very luminous atmosphere rotating
at constant angular velocity (ω).Thus it should be

726 624
 625Page 625 of 726

emitting light Photons-Ɣ with velocities according to

the equation: Vi = ω.ri
Where (i)Is any point along the vertical (r) Measured
from the centre of the planet (O)Upward .Clearly the
velocities of any particle ejected at V(r+dr)Is higher than
that of Vr Implying that the speed of the photon
Ɣr+dr >Ɣr

And this example or Observation from astronomy can

be mimicked in laboratory experiment with luminous
arm rotating at constant angular velocity and emitting
photons according to . Vi = ω.ri
Now these observation present us with the following
Contradictions:

a-

If the speed of light to remain constant then the

above equation of ( Vi = ω.ri ) Will be violated.

b-

726 625
 626Page 626 of 726

On the other hand if the equation above is to remain

valid then the speed of light is never constant.

C-
Always keeping in mind there is no way for us to
distinguish between : ( Ɣr+dr Or Ɣr )
Therefore later we need Q.M. To understand the full
picture.

Resolving Contradictions By The Cosmic Flux.

“The central question now :What are these
Compensatory Physical (Not mathematical)Forces
which keep the photons at constant speed ( C) When
they ought to vary along the rotating ( r )According to
Vi = ω.ri “

However the above stated contradictions can only be

resolved by the following which also act as proof for
both the Constancy Of Speed Of Light ( C )And proof for
the Existence Of The Cosmic Flux.
Since B > A .Therefore:

726 626
 627Page 627 of 726

The photon (Ɣr+dr )Encounter more flux lines i.e. more

Resistance than (Ɣr).
Minimum of flux lines are encountered at θ=0
While the maximum at θ= π/2.
The photons Ɣr Emitted when (r )is vertical has cross
section area (A)Which is smaller than the cross section
area (B )For the photon Ɣr+dr After ( r) Had rotated by
by angle (dθ) .

Therefore photon (Ɣr+dr )Need to cut more flux lines

than (Ɣr )Which slow down the first according to the
followings :
If the cross section are denoted by the variable
(S)Then:
S =f(θ) Or ds/.dt = F(dθ/dt ) = K ω.
Then substituting in:
Vi = ω.ri = dθ/dt .r = K , ω.r
If V=C(Speed Of Light )then:
C= ds/dt .r
But :

726 627
 628Page 628 of 726

r.dS /dt= σ
=The flux density per unit time per volume.
Giving:
C= K. σ = Constant.
This is the simplified Classical Picture !
However to understand my theory better we need to
study the Quantum Picture which happened to be the
exact Inverse of the Standard Quantum Scattering
Theory only slightly more complicated:

Simply instead of the target of scattering placed at the

origin of (Z)the target now is outwardly V(ri) !
And (V ) Now is the potential in the Schrodinger
equation. by replacing the following : dθ dΏ
Where Ώ is solid angle measured in Sterdens.

σ  ρ = [ eikz]2 =1

ρ = [ eikz]2 =1

726 628
 629Page 629 of 726

F(Flux).= ρμ

And rV ( r)In the Schrodinger equation .

And So Forth :

The Argument Above Still Hold For All Classical Or

Quantum calculations.

BOTTOM LINE.
“There is no such thing (Stationary) ! Every point in the
universe is oscillating around another point !! The
question is :Why ? ”

It could not have been possible for the speed of light to

remain constant if it was not for the cosmic flux
slowing down the faster photons ejected by the
rotating arm according to :
Vi = ω.ri

726 629
 630Page 630 of 726

Hence the contradiction stated above is resolved for

neither the equation above nor the velocity of light ( C )
are violated.

And this argument provide Solid Proof for both the

existence of the cosmic flux !
And why the velocity of light always appears to us a
constant.

©
The Isamic Oscillator By Isam.T.Saleh.

rA rB B
A

N Ɣ r+d AA

Ɣr
dθ
O Cross section areas.

726 630
 631Page 631 of 726

Ω B. >A.

N=Number of cosmic flux lines cutting the diagram:

(Per The Smallest Particle).
r=Length of the arm rotating at ( ω) rad/Sec.
dθ =The angle clockwise from position (rA )To (rB).

The Ensemble.
“Let (r) Emitting an Ensemble of elementary particles “

Ɣr = Identical Macroscopic particles (Classical)Or

similar Microscopic particles (Quantum)Ensembled
along the length of ( r)Cutting the cosmic flux lines

when (Ejected)With velocities Vi = ω.ri

A & B Are the cross sections areas cutting the cosmic

flux lines in positions A & B.(The Quantum Case.).
To resolve the above stated contradiction:
726 631
 632Page 632 of 726

We Split the velocity (V) in ω. r =V For the case of

photons in to Two Components (U &S): V = U ± S :
Where (S )Is the corrective or compensatory velocity
which keeps the speed of photons constant at ( C ).And
ω. dr =dV = du ± ds ------------------------ Eqn -1.
Integrating both sides :
ω. r + K1 = U- S + K2 But : U- SCosmic Flux Resisance. =C.
At r=0 K1 = K2 And at r =RMAX. ω. R= Constant.
Or:
ω. r = U- S

Clearly ( S )Here Is velocity produced by this cosmic

flux to resist or to slow down the original speed of any
ejected particle. And in the case of (Photons ):
U- S =C (The velocity of light.) ------------------Eqn-2
Hence thus equation Proves And Provides two
arguments a&b:
a-
That the speed of Photons will exceed that of ( C )
Speed of light without being reduced by(dSCosmic Flux.).
b-

726 632
 633Page 633 of 726

If the speed of light to remain constant then there has

to be this cosmic flux.
Relativistic Transformation.
“Relativity can only provide the mathematical answer
as follows :”
Let :L
U =Velocity in tn the (S)Frame.
U// =The parallel of ( U ).
V=Relative velocity between (S )And ( S/ ) Frames.
U/ = [U// + v]/ [1 + (U.V)/C2 ]=( c + ωr)/[1+C. ω r/c2]
=C.

The Central Question Now :

What actually are these Compensatory Physical Forces
(Behind the mathematical terms) which keep the
photons at constant speed ( C) When they ought to
vary along the rotating ( r )According to
Vi = ω.ri .
Calculations The Classical Case :
Clearly from the above diagram :
Θ =0 r=0 And at : Θ = π /2 r = RMaximum.
dθ/dt = f ( dN/dt) Or : Sin θ =K3 . N Note that :

726 633
 634Page 634 of 726

π/2 N

∫0 (dθ) =f [ ∫0 (dN) ]
Therfore As :
Θ =0  Θ = π /2 :
Nj  NMaximum Hence :
K3. . N= Sin Θ K3. . NMaximum = π/2
Or K3. = π/ 2 NMaximum ----------EQN---3.

And The Deducting Velocity Due To Resisting Flux :

V =f (N) Or V=K4.N

K4. = V/N ------------------------------------------------EQN-4

Substituting in EQN -2. (dθ/dt .r – V =C)
K3. . dN/dt . r - K4.N =C
N

K3 .∫dN.r - K .N ∫dt = ∫ C.dt.

4

K3 . N.r - K4.N .t =C.t + K5

N= ( C.t + K5 )/ (K3 r –K4.t)
How To Evaluate The Constants K4 & K5 ?

726 634
 635Page 635 of 726

We need to rewrite two equations one for the point (i)And

the other for the point -j (JAY) Along the Isamic
Oscillator©.
Ni = ( C.ti + K5 )/ (K3 ri –K4.ti) ---------Eqn -5
Nj = ( C.tj + K5 )/ (K3 rj –K4.tj)-----------Eqn-6
Recall at θ =0 ( N)Was assumed to be zero. And :
EQN-5: 0 = ( C.ti + K5 )/ (K3 ri –K4.ti) Giving:
K5 = - (Minus)C.ti. And after substituting in EQ-6:
Nj = (C.ti - C.tj ) /(K3 rj –K4.tj) = C( T )/ K3 (rj –K4.tj)
And:
Ni = C( ti -tj )/ (K3 ri –K4.ti) Now Let (ti)=0 Giving:

Nj = C tj / (K3 rj –K4.tj)

Nj = C tj / [K3 . rj {1–(K4. tj / K3 . rj } ]
Nj = [C tj / [K3 . rj ][{1–(K4. tj / K3 . rj) } -1 ]

Nj ≈ [C tj / [K3 . rj ][{1+(K4. tj / K3 . rj) } ]

But : tj/ rj = 1/ vj
Nj ≈ C tj / ( K3 . rj )[(1+ (K4./ K3 ) 1/vj ) ]
Nj ≈ (C / (K3 .vj )[1+(K4./ K3 .) 1/vj ) ]

726 635
 636Page 636 of 726

Nj ≈ (C / K3)[(1/ vj +(K4./ K3 ) 1/ (vj )2 ]---------------EQN-7

Now this is a curve has maxima at (dNj /dt) = 0
0= (C / K3)[ - 1/ ( vj )2 - 2 . K4./ K3 . 1/ (vj )3 ].
Multiplying through by (K3):
(C )[ 1/ ( vj )2 = - 2K4 . 1/ (vj )3 ] Giving :
K4 = (Minus)1/2 (C. vj. ) Substituting back in to EQN-7.
Nj = (C / K3)[(1/ vj –1/2 ( C. vj. / K3 .)( 1/ vj )2 ]
Nj = (C / K3)[(1/ vj – 1/2( C / K3 .) (v/ (vj )2 ]
Nj = (C / K3)(1/ vj ) [1 – ½ C / K3 ]
Nj = (1/ vj ) [(C / K3) – 1/2( C / K3 )2 ]------EQN-8.

But from EQN- 3 K3 = π /2N

Substituting back in EQN-8.:
N = (1/ vj ) [( 2 C. N /π ) – 1/2( 2C.N / π )2 ]
N ≈ 1/ ( vj ) [(2 CN/ π ) – 2( CN/π )2 –etc].
For First Term Approximation Of This Expansion Series
Divide Through By (N) Giving :
N/N = 2/ ( vj ) [( C.1/ π) –2 ( C/ π)2.N /v].
1=2C/ (π v ) – 2 N/( C/π)2 /v
½ v = C/π - N( C/π)2
726 636
 637Page 637 of 726

N= [ C/π -½ v ] ( π/c)2

N= π/c - ½ v( π/c)2 –etc.

N= π/c - ½ n∑1 vi ( π/c)2
Let: vi  Vn And ri  rn Then:

N = (-1/n .ω. rn )n-1 n∑0 ( π/c)n EQN-9.

Where (n) Is a Discrete Number as we shall see next from

the quantum case ?

Now since (ri )And (rj ) Are measurable .

The Time (ti ) And (tj )of the segment rotation From point

(i) To point (j) Are also known .

And that (vj )Is known as defined earlier !Also :

C=Known constant speed of light (2.99 1010 cm/s.)

726 637
 638Page 638 of 726

Therefore :The above equation and expansion to the

nearest approximation. can yield the number of Flux Lines

(Or Flux Resistance ) At Any Point (j).

At this interjection : Few words are due about the

dimensions:

N ≡ Rad.Sec/Cm.
Or:

N/Sec = Rad/cm.

The Rate Of Cutting The Flux =The Curvature.

Alternatively This is same as saying :

N X V = Radians.

726 638
 639Page 639 of 726

We already said that the Magnitude of (V) Is now

( S )treated as function of the Resistance Exerted
By The Flux On the particle :
Thus reminding us of its analogue in
electrodynamics: Ohm’s Law :

Current X Resistance = The Potential Difference.

Since it represent the angular difference in radians

between ( r )At position (A)And ( r )At position (B)And
this will be the same difference as that between the cross
sections at (A) And (B) As we shall see later from the
Quantum Case !And how this is related to the potentials ?

Calculations; The Quantum Case :

“The classical case proved that (N)Was only dependent
on the two dimensional ( ѳ –Theta )But we know from
practice this cannot be the full picture !Something is

726 639
 640Page 640 of 726

missing ?And the Quantum picture will throw some

light on this problem .”
“The actual treatment here is to keep in mind that the
particle released at ( θ =0) Cutting the Minimum of
flux lines could be the Very Same particle e.g.
Photon that is cutting the Maximum Number of
lines at (θ = π /2 ) Since we have no way of
knowing which photon was released first ?Or last
It’s here where Quantum Mechanics Plays in to
this picture !
Also To realize how huge are the figures involved for :
(V = ω.ri ) ?
it’s good to remember that :
( ω =[K].C )
Where [K]Is the propogation vector of the wave .”

However to understand my theory better we need to study the

Quantum Picture which happened to be the exact Inverse of the

Standard Quantum Scattering Theory Slightly more complicated :

726 640
 641Page 641 of 726

If we now let the Isamic Oscillator Get studded with other

elementary particles instead of just photons:

Simply instead of the target of scattering placed at the origin of

(Z)the target now is outwardly V(ri) !And (V ) Now is the potential

in the Schrodinger equation.by replacing the following : dθ

dΏ

Where Ώ is solid angle measured in Sterdens.

σ  ρ = [ eikz]2 =1

ρ = [ eikz]2 =1

F(Flux).= ρμ

And r V ( r)In the Schrodinger equation .

And So Forth The Argument Above Still Hold For All Classical Or
Quantum calculations.
There Are Two Things That Must Be Remembered Here:

1-The velocity of (Any)Particle is Function of its own

position at (r) Or ω. dri = dvi . -------- EQN-10
2-The Reduction Velocity (S )Due to the resisting flux

726 641
 642Page 642 of 726

(N) Is a Function of ( θ ) Or:

ds = K5 . dN. –---------------------------------EQN-11
And
dN. = K6 . d θ ----------------------EQN-12.
And as before :
ω. dri - dvi . = 0 Then after integrating as before:
r – v = Constant !And we assumed thie resulting
constant of integration must be (C )(Speed of light )
dvi . – dS = C. Then substituting EQN (2 )And ( 3)
ω. ri – K5 . dN. =C.
d θ /dt . ri – K5 . K6 d θ. =C.
d θ . ri – K5 . K6 dθ dt =C. dt
ri – K5 . K6 . dt =C. dt / d θ = C/ ω
Let K5 . K6 = K7 After substitution and rearranging:
r. ω - K3 . ω = C Giving:
K7 = (C/ ω ) –ri,j,k --------EQN—13.

The significance of this equation will transpire later in

concrete quantum relationships!

726 642
 643Page 643 of 726

Meanwhile The Equation Offers The Following

Interpretations:
a-
For the R.H.S. Of EQN-13 To remain constant (ω )Must
vary in response to Positions (i,j,k)! But (ω = d θ/dt ) Is
constant for all points along the length (r ) Which in
turn imply that ( C )Need to be varied ! ? !

b-
That the expression above can only holds at r=0
( θ =0 ) And r- rMaximum At θ=π /2.
Since:
K8 = (C/ ω ) –0 -----EQN-14
And:

K9= (C/ ω ) – RMaximum ---EQN-15

All are constants .

c-

726 643
 644Page 644 of 726

Clearly the figures of (C/ ω ) Are huge compared to R

Therefore ( r ) can be neglected for all values between
r=0 and r= RMaximum
K10= (C/ ω ) .

d-
In line with the notations for Planck’s Constant :
( h-Bar) =2π h . We designate :
K11= (π /2 )K10
Or :
K11= (πC/ 2ω ) ---EQN-16.
Implying that (K11) Is now the Distance ! The Maximum
Distance Th particle allowed to travel once it leaves its
point at (r ).

e-
At extremely high frequencies e.g. that of the Electron
the distances allowed to travel are Microscopic as its
evident from EQN—16.

f-
726 644
 645Page 645 of 726

Now compare EQN-9. Above:

N = (-1/n .ω. rn )n-1 n∑0 ( π/c)n

To EQN-16:
K11= (πC/ 2ω )

g-
Now Back To Equation -15.
K9= (C/ ω ) – RMaximum
K9 X K9 = [ (C/ ω ) – R ]2
Let (π)2 X K9 X K9 = K12
K12 = (π C/ω )2 – 2 πR . π C/ω + (π)2 R2---EqN.17

And these are the units of the (AREA Or Ϭ sigma ).

726 645
 646Page 646 of 726

h-

We are now discussing the extreme quantum limits of

weak interaction ( Vr ) Between the beams of particles

emitted and the flux resistance (S )As defined in EQN-2.

Where the energy of the beam : E = P2/2m.

Now we need to remember what been said earlier that :

1- Vr +dr Is function of ( r) Only .

2- (S) Is function of (θ ) Only.(Two Dimensional)

3- The ( Z-axis) And the Solid angle dΩ (Three

Dimensionals)

Also to avoid another Set Of Multiple Constants :

Let : k = P /h .

726 646
 647Page 647 of 726

The State Function and the energy Eigen Functions for the

corresponding Schrodinger equation for this energy :

Uk (r) = eikz + f ( θ , ф ) + eirk/r

The particle density emitted from (r ):

Row = [eikz]2 =1 And the Velocity = hk/m

The flux eRow .v = v = ω. rn ---------------------EQN-18

The number of emitted particles from volumes between ( r ) and

( r + dr ) in the solid angle - dΩ(ѳ,ф}.

[ f ( θ , ф ) eikr /r ]2 . r dΩ. dr = [f ( θ , ф ) }2 dΩ.dr

Now remember what was said about ( N/sec )Is

function of (θ) only Per (dΩ);

Hence the differential cross section (The number of flux lines per

dΩ per second ) Per unit flux:

726 647
 648Page 648 of 726

Ϭ ( θ , ф ) dΩ. = [ f ( θ , ф )]2 dΩ.

Total Cross Section =∫ [ f ( θ , ф )]2 dΩ

Measuring the cross section above is related to V ( r )

Since : UE ( r ) = eikz + f ( θ , ф ) + eirk/r

Is a solution to the Schrodinger Equation .

V( r) Is the potential energy again keeping in mind that :

f ( θ , ф ) And Subsequently Ϭsigma . f ( θ , ф ) Are both

independent of ( ф ).

Therefore from EQN-17 :

K12  = Ϭsigma

= (π C/ω )2 – 2 πR . π C/ω + (π)2 R2

And

N. Ϭ ( θ , ф ) dΩ. = N [ f ( θ , ф )]2 dΩ.

But from EQN- 9.

726 648
 649Page 649 of 726

.N = (-1/n .ω. rn )n-1 n∑0 ( π/c)n

Now substituting from EQN- 18 :

eRow .v = v = ω. rn In the above :

Ϭsigma . N = (-v/n )n-1 n∑0 ( π/c)n

N = (-v/n )n-1 n∑0 ( π/c)n / Ϭsigma

Where (n) As before any Discrete positive number .

Therefore: (N ) is now dependant on both ( v)And

the Cross Section instead of just (θ)As it was in the

classical case .Clearly the solution Again Broken down to

Bare Frequencies and Geometry Hence the name

(Frequmechanics)!Since (V)is function of frequency and

the geometry of (r) .To Be Continued With More Calculations

(See Page—Speed Of Light Part-One) ?

726 649
 650Page 650 of 726

The Cosmic Flux And The Problem Of Locality.

By definition the cosmic flux are Cosmic and Universal ! However

we need to understand how does it react with local objects and

vice versa ?

The best way to illustrate this problem of Locality is by taking for

simplification an object with three elementary particles A,B, C as

shown in the diagram below:

Let each particle Vibrate Rotate Or Emitting (By Colouring The

Isamic Diagrams ) Frequencies fA , fB, fC. All running clockwise as

far as the observer can see along the line LL Which is the

direction the object is moving by cutting the flux with (ωCutting )

The frequency described and defined in earlier sections.

Then let each has spin Vector (In The Direction Shown) Of :

SA , SB, SC. Each of these are making angles:(ΘA , ΘB , ΘC ).

with the Line Of Attack (L.L) Since all three spins need to be

aligned As follows:

726 650
 651Page 651 of 726

SA Tan ΘA ? SB Tan ΘB ?SC. Tan ΘC ?

Now We Redefine That Locality As The Case When :

(ΘA , ΘB , ΘC )  ∆ΘA =∆ΘB , = ∆ΘC

Hence : (SA Tan ΘA SB Tan ΘB ,SC. Tan ΘC )

 SA ∆ΘA SB∆ΘB ,SC. ∆Θ : OR:

n
∑0 S. ∆Θ  n. ∆Θ n∑0 S.-----------------EQN-1

Now we make the Reasonable assumption that :

SA , SB, SC. = k. fA , k. fB , k. fC

Where (k)Is some constant. After substituting in EQN-1

And rearranging it can be shown that :

1/k = Z= n. ∆Θ n∑0 fn.-----------EQN-2

And this (n) Turned out to be the (N) Number of flux lines

required to be cut per second or :

ωCutting = n/second substituting in EQN-2:

Z= second. ωCutting . ∆Θ n∑0 fn. Giving :

n. ∆Θ n∑0 fn. = Constant.--------------EQN-3.

726 651
 652Page 652 of 726

ωCutting
L
A ΘA
ΘC
ΘB
L
C

726 652
 653Page 653 of 726

Exercise:
Having obtained the above expression for (ωCutting )

n. ∆Θ n∑0 fn. = Constant.Or

n
n= K/ ∆Θ ∑0 fn. -----EQN-3.

Calculate (ωGluing. ) By Cotangent Θ Instead of Tangent Θ And K2

Instead of K And (n∑1 fn )Instead of ( n∑0 fn ) Since (ωGluing. ) Can

only be meaningful after (ωCutting )Had cut At Least One Line.

Giving:

n. 1/ (∆Θ n∑1 fn = K2 Or:

n = K2 (∆Θ) n∑1 fn --------------EQN-4

Multiplying EQN 3 By EQN- 4 :

ωGluing. X ωCutting =K1 K2 = K3--------EQN-5

Dividing EQN 4 By EQN- 3 :

ΩCutting / ωGluing = (∆Θ)2 ∑ (fn )2 / (fn-1 )2

From EQN-5 :

ωGluing. = K3 / ωCutting Subsituting in the above :

726 653
 654Page 654 of 726

(ΩCutting )2/ K3 = (∆Θ)2 ∑ (fn )2 / (fn-1 )2

ΩCutting = K3 (∆Θ) ∑ (fn ) / (fn-1 )

Now from EQN-4 :

n = ωGluing =K2 (∆Θ) n∑1 fn = K2 (∆Θ) ωGluing --------------EQN-4

Implying that (∆Θ) Now (While Gluing And After The Cutting )Is

Constant . Hence:

ΩCutting = K3 (∆Θ) ∑ (fn ) / (fn-1 ∑ (n) / (n-1)

At ( ∞ ) this is convergent series 1 Where

ωCutting = ωGluing. ± 1. (Excellent Proof).

Final Secret:
Revealing that final secret behind my theory :
(At the cross section of any bundles of lines Regardless
Of How Many Times Any Line Been Cut Or Glued
Lengthwise :We can only see and count whole(Not
Fraction)Of numbers)Such that : (∆Θ)2 = 1 Or (∆Θ)2 = 0 .
You Can Read The Rest Of My Book In Four Volumes By
Visiting: www.scribd.com/isamtahersaleh

726 654
 655Page 655 of 726

Summary To Some Of My Results on The Cosmic Fluix:

1- “Geometrical lines with concrete physical manifestations.”
Just as we can see the lines of magnetic or electromagnetic
flux by sprinkling iron filing on piece of paper on top of magnet
or dynamo !Except the Cosmic Flux is weaker and harder to
detect. However my suggested experiment may one day yield
concrete evidence for this cosmic flux. See Isamic Thought

Experiment Number Three.

For More Details See Chapter Seventeen Also At Volume Five –
Frequmechanics visit: www.scribdf.com/isamtahersaleh

2-The cosmic flux is weak inside gravitational fields but

strong outside it.

3-Every object in the universe is cutting and gluing this

cosmic flux with frequencies (ῳCutting And ῳGluing) .
4-Phase angle (ɸ ) = ῳCutting /ῳGluing .
∫ dR = ∫ d ɸ . K
For more calculations :(See The Corona Phenomenon.
For More Details See Chapter Seventeen Also At Volume Five –
Frequmechanics visit: www.scribdf.com/isamtahersaleh

726 655
 656Page 656 of 726

5- Deriving Expressions For The Acceleration:

(See The Tangential Acceleration (AT )

For More Details See Chapter Seventeen Also At Volume Five –

Frequmechanics visit: www.scribdf.com/isamtahersaleh

6- Determining The Existence & Direction of Cosmic Flux Part

Three.

Deriving Expressions For The Force (F)Due To The Cosmic Flux

“To fully understand the picture? Splitting the
frequency (ΩGravity)In to (ῳCutting. And ῳGluing.)Is not
enough? We need also to split (Moments of Inertia)As
follows :”
Let: ῳCutting. = ῳC ῳGluing. =ῳG (Ω )= ῳC - ῳG
Ir =Moment of inertia at (A)Around(P).
Ir-∆r=Moment of inertia at (B) Around(P).
Then by the Matrix :
( Ω) ῳC . Ir-∆r -√Ir-∆r

- √Ir ῳG . Ir

= [Ω (ῳC) . Ir-∆r X( ῳG ) . Ir ] - [Ω √Ir . √Ir-∆r] -- Mv2

726 656
 657Page 657 of 726

= Energy Where; VA = r X ῳG = VB = ( r-∆r.) X ῳC

(Ω)2 = (ῳC - ῳG )2 =(ῳC)2 + ( ῳG )2 -2 ῳC . ῳG

Clearly: [ Ir ( ῳG ) - Ir-∆r (ῳC)]2 >>0. It follows that:

F >0
For More Details See Chapter Seventeen Also At Volume Five –
Frequmechanics visit: www.scribdf.com/isamtahersaleh

7- Determining The Number Of Flux Lines These Are

Calculated In My Second Hypothesis:
For More Details See Chapter Seventeen Also At Volume Five –
Frequmechanics visit: www.scribdf.com/isamtahersaleh?
8- My First Equation Of Motion.
We split [J ῳ]2 In to +ῳ= ῳGluing And - ῳ= ῳCutting
For one dimensional movement along the X-axis :

[ῳCutting - ῳGluing] 0 -Jθ = dῳ = K dx.

[ῳCutting - ῳGluing ] 0 -Jθ ~ d2ῳ = K2 dx.

[ ῳCutting + ῳGluing ] 0 -Jθ
For More Details See Chapter Seventeen Also At Volume Five –
Frequmechanics visit: www.scribdf.com/isamtahersaleh

9-

726 657
 658Page 658 of 726

My Second Equation Of Motion.

[ ∆ῳ / ∆ῳG,C ]2 ≈ - ( dbn/db).

For More Details See Chapter Seventeen Also At Volume Five –

Frequmechanics visit: www.scribdf.com/isamtahersaleh

10-
My Grand Equation Of Motion :G.E.M.
dΩ.r(Unit Vctor)=[√2 (Vy)2 /√(1+(Vy)2] 1/2

Alternatively
1/(dt)4 = (VL)2 [1/ (1 +Vy)2 ] -1

1/(dt)4 ≈ (VL)2 [ 1 - (Vy)2 ] ≈ (VL)2 - (VL)2 (Vy)2]

≈ [√2 (Vy)]2 - [√2 (Vy)]2 (Vy)2
≈ 2 [(Vy)2 - (Vy)4 ] =2 (Vy)2 [1- (Vy)2]
dΩ.(r Unit vector)≈ [√2 (Vy)√(1-Vy ) (1 + Vy] 1/2

For More Details See Chapter Seventeen Also At Volume Five –

Frequmechanics visit: www.scribdf.com/isamtahersaleh

11- My Mathematical Physical Equation Of Motion:

726 658
 659Page 659 of 726

“If : f(x),g(x),And h (x) Are integral polynomials then

by modulo division: f(x) ≡ g (x) h(x) Modulo n.
Now If These Polynomials Are Representing Any Set Of
Frequencies Then We Have Two Pictures :The Classical
And Quantum Mechanical.”

“All the coupling oscillator is trying to tell us :That its

possible to split frequency in to two!Just as we can
with mass.”
For More Details See Chapter Seventeen Also At Volume Five
Frequmechanics visit: www.scribdf.com/isamtahersaleh

12 - First Application :The Accelerating Universe.(Part-One ).

726 659
 660Page 660 of 726

“According to Conventional Physics the universe should be

Slowing Down Not accelerating !My theory of cosmic flux offers
the best explanation There Is for a runaway universe”
“The longer the time (The more objects are Formed Or
Deformed (Geometrically)The more they get in each other’s
way gravitationally (Cutting the Cosmic Flux)?The more the
universe runs away in its expansion.
“And there is the question of why the solar system remained
Co-Planar ?When the primordial disc of plasma began the
process of condensation there was no reason whatsoever for
the components to remain Co- Planer .Gravitation towards the
centre (The Sun)Is necessary but not sufficient condition to
prevent them from flying out of the condensing disc !Only
explanation left is that the gaseous disc had already carved a
pocket in the cosmic flux which made it easier for these
components forming our planets to remain inside the disc.”
13-Also See:The Accelerating Universe.Part-Two
Function of The Difference Between Objects Formed And Deformed(Geometrically)Per Unit Time.
The Acceleration= ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Mass Of The Visible Universe .

For More Details See Chapter Seventeen Also At Volume Five

Frequmechanics visit: www.scribdf.com/isamtahersaleh

14- My Cosmic Flux Analogue To The Diffraction Pattern (Q.M).

“ Two planes separated by time not distant “

726 660
 661Page 661 of 726

Imagine a bundle of cosmic flux lines piercing through the plane of the
paper these lines are Cut by ῳCutting. = ῳC As in plane (A ) the points shown
are the cuts in this plane!
while Glued Together by ῳGluing. =ῳG in plane (B )
It been already shown that these two frequencies operate with lag or
phase angle ɸ= ‖ ῳC/ῳg‖
That is to say the points on plane (B) Will be Gluied but lagging by the
angle (ɸ ) With values Diverging Outwards i.e. Starting low from the
Inner Most Points to higher values for Outer Most Points sweeping a cone
of angle ɸ as shown in these diagrams below:

O o o

O o o o
O o o o o

Oo o o
O oo o o o o
Plane –A
This Cone is the equivalent of the Diffraction Pattern in Q.M.
O o o

O o o o
O o o o o
ɸ
Oo o o
O oo o o o o

Plane –B

15-
t” Plane-A

726 661
 662Page 662 of 726

ῳC

Plane-B
ῳg

∆ t” = ∆ t/√ [1- (ɸ )2]

Important Conclusions:
1-Gravitationa; fields can effect magnetic filds through third
party e.g.:(The pull of the moon on the iron core (the Magma)
at the center of Earth deflecting the Magnetic North from the
Geographical North.
2-The Ideal State:
When at the deal Centre of ideally concentric symmetrical body:
the gravity =0 Since all the Radial Gravitational Forces Cancel
Each Others at such Ideal Centre .

3- In the above equation When ɸ=1 Then: ∆ t”∞ .

I.e. time will become infinite at such ideal centers because ɸ=1
And these results tally with all theoretical predictions about
the fields inside cosmic bodies such as Black Holes.
Conversely:
If we are ever able to technically separate ῳC from ῳg In Time But also
making them identical in value ῳC ≡ῳg Then we have
Lift Off Defying gravity as initially promised in chapter seventeen.

16-
Extracts From Parts One Two And Three Of :
The Prolificacy Principle:
726 662
 663Page 663 of 726

“Quantity always lend itself to quality”

A Concept From Philosophy.

(S)Distance between the observer and these

Macroscopic Or Microscopic Objects /

(Divided By)

(N)Number of Identical Copies Required to display

Quantum Effects

X (V)Size (Radius) of the copied object .

=Constant (K)

OR;

K= S/N .V

17- In Chapter Seventeen of this book on the geometry of

Rectangle I Deliberately kept going in Circles In Confusing
Tautology. It was meant to prepare our minds to understand
my following Quantum Theorem which in turn it’s hoped will

726 663
 664Page 664 of 726

make us understand quantum gravity via cutting the (Cosmic

Flux).If ᴪLinear =The probability of finding the

particle on line cut in to two Equal halves.
Its assumed that cutting the rectangle along the
diagonal is Never Perfect And there always be
added area (+dA)To one half on the expense of
(-dA) Subtracted from the other half !
Then the probably of particle found in one half of
rectangle cut along the diagonal should be:

ᴪArea =function(+dA) (-dA)=- F(ᴪLinear)2 And so forth

ᴪVolume =function (+dv) (-dv)(+dv)= ± F(ᴪLinear)3
( For further illustrations and definitions Please visit Volumes
Three And Five Of My Book At:
www.scribd.com/isamtahersaleh

18-

726 664
 665Page 665 of 726

My Theory Having The

Potential Of Replacing
Newtonian Mechanics.

Isam .T . Saleh. ©
September -2016-London. (Part-One).
For Further Detais Pleas See Volume Three In My Book
And Frequmechanics By Visiting:
www.scribd.com/isamtahersaleh

Definitions;
1-
The universe permeated by Cosmic Flux These are real

726 665
 666Page 666 of 726

or imaginary lines with physical manifestations just as

the real or imaginary(Thought)Lines drawn by
Pythagoras can acquire physical manifestations !
2-
Quantum Mechanics world vision is that of fizzy balls ?
Frequmechamics also see it as world of fizzy balls
vibrating ! Oscillation!!Or in any other Periodic Motion!!
i.e. a world of frequencies.
Frequmechanics is a branch of science founded entirely
by myself is studying this world of frequencies and
offering alternative but concrete analysis to countless
physical phenomena ranging from the Gyroscopes to
the angle of attack in Aerodynamics .Expressed at
various parts of this book.
3-
Each object in the universe is cutting and gluing this
cosmic flux with cutting and gluing frequencies ωcutting
And ωGluing

4-
R Is an arbitrary radius vector extending from infinitum
to the particle thus ;

726 666
 667Page 667 of 726

The Cutting Velocity (VC ) = (ωcutting). R = ῷ (Omega Twidle)

The Joining Velocity (VJ ) = (ωGluing). R = ῷ (Omega Twidle)

Thus throughout this book (ῷ -Omega Twidle) Imply on its

own a velocity vector .
5-
The velocity (V) of free particle or projectile (as shown in the

diagram later) V = VC - Vj = ῷCutting - - ῷGluing

dv/dt =dῷC/dt- dῷG/dt=g(Constant acceleration of gravity)

d2V/dt2 = d2ῷC/dt2 - d2ῷG/dt2 = dg/dt =0 Thus:

d2ῷC/dt2 = d2ῷG/dt2 After Double Integrating both sides :

∫∫ d2ῷC = ∫∫ d2ῷG/dt2

ῷC +K1.t +C1 = ῷg +K2.t +C2Where K And C Are constants :

But at the tip top of the trajectory: ῷC = ῷg. Giving:

t(Time) = (C2 – C1)/( K1– K2) = Constant per any height(h).

Which proves it all .

Introducing: Two Wave Functions Instead Of One .

When i split the frequency Ω in to two (ωCutting ) And (ωgluing )
We are essentially Manufacturing Two Wave Functions guided
by one and only one condition that :
726 667
 668Page 668 of 726

Their total probability is one i.e. P (ωC ) +p(ωg )=1.

Since the phase or lag angle :(ɸ ) = f (J ῳ Gluing /ῳCutting )

For example if the Eigen Vector (ɸ ) = 3

Then the discrete Eigen Vales are = 3/1 ? 6/2? 9/3 .etc.

And in general If (ɸ ) = m Then the Discrete Eigen Values are

= m.n/n Where n=1,2,3,4,5,eyc ? (ɸ ) = m.n/n And Since:

Ω2 = ( ωC )2 +( jωg )2 = (nm)2 - n2 =n2( m2 - 1)

As you see this is just a Number i.e. ( Ω )Now been reduced in
to a number !And this tally with my concept expressed
elsewhere in this book that Every Particle Inside Any System
Can Be Assigned An Identity Frequency By (Emotion?
Oscillation ? or vibrations )And if we Freeze That System Inside
That One Single Second Then this identity will become just
number e.g. if the particle emitting 50 HZ Then Inside That
Universe Of Just One Second we can only count fifty cycles
assigning it to that particular particle in that particular
dynamical system. And so forth in the next fifty seven pages.

The Kinematics Of Free Asdendind And Descending

Particle.

726 668
 669Page 669 of 726

B (r.ῳCutting = r. ῳGluing C

. Direction of Flux
ῳC >> ῳG ῳC <<ῳG

A D
All are in the plane of the paper.

For More on The Definition Of The Cosmic Flux See The

Second Hypothesis In My Frequmechanics By Visting:
www.scribd.com/isamtahersaleh

(Page One Of Fifty Seven)

First We Need To Redefine ne Frequency:

“Distances can be measured by length! Mass can be
measured by weight!etc.: But frequency can only be
Observed as Number of cycles per time. It’s the same if
this Number was round the earth or round a nucleus
and can only be differentiated when the Observer

726 669
 670Page 670 of 726

Measure the radius for each from within i.e. From

Same Frame Of Reference (Relativity)! There again it’s
no longer frequency but angular velocity etc.”
What Is Frequency ?

1-if we say 50 Hz it means 50 cycles per second but

time itself is cyclic and the second can be written as

1/60 Minute or 1/60 Cycle therefore the frequency can

be rewritten as:

F = 50 X 60 Cycle/Cycle =50 X60 i.e. a Number !

2-Frequenvcy is Differentiable Number .

3-Frequency is a Number Differentiable w.r.t Itself And To

Time(T)Only. (Page Two of Fifty Seven)

Having shown frequency is a Number It will be

reasonable to Identify it with the number of flux lines!

Therefore if : ῳCutting = 50 HZ It can only mean its

cutting Fifty Lines of this cosmic flux. And if for

726 670
 671Page 671 of 726

Example : ῳGluing= 49HZ?It can only mean its gluing

Forty Nine Lines and leaving One Free and so forth.

Let : Ω = ωCutting - ωGluing And : dΩ /dt= The Rate Of

Change Of Ω Throughout The Movement And Only The

Movment . Therefore: dΩ /dt= Constant (C1).

Integra ting  Ω = C1 . t+ C2 It’s also

reasonable to assume that the radius Unit Vector for

this line (Or Lines)Is: ( K )Hence we have the following

general expression for the velocity of the particle:

V= Ω. K = (C1 .t+ C2 ) K = C1 . t . K + C2 . K -----EQ-1

(Page Three of Fifty Seven)

And since K Is definitely constant we have after

differentiating EQN-1

dV/dt= C1 . dt /dt . K + 0 = C1 . K =Constant (g).

Since It’s perfectly reasonable to choose our notation

726 671
 672Page 672 of 726

for Time as in the following graph i.e. the particle start

from Negative Time Climbing to zero at the top of the

trajectory then descending in Positive Time:

t=0
Height.

Time. (-t) (+t)

dV/dt= dΩ /dt . K = (± g). -------------------EQN-2.

Hence at the tip top of the trajectory t=0 :

Substituting in EQN_1:

(Page Four of Fifty Seven)

V= Ω. K = (C1 .t+ C2 ) K = C1 . t . K + C2 . K

V= C2 . K. Which is a constant?

But (V) Can never be constant Therefore it must be that

(C2)=0 Giving that at the tip top of the trajectory :

726 672
 673Page 673 of 726

V= C2 . K =0 -------------- EQN-3.

The General Case Of Projectiles:

“In case of Projectile i.e. when the particle is Not
ascending or descending in absolute verticals as
shown above but following curved path at angle (θ )To
the vertical:”

θ V= d Ω. K Sin θ.

(Page Five of Fifty Seven)

Dimensionally:
1-We established the Frequency as the Identity for Cosmic
Flux Lines .
2-Now remember we said although the rate of change of (Ω)
Remains constant each of (ῳCutting) And ( ῳGluing ) Is Variable
Therefore : d/dt ( ῳCutting - ῳGluing )= +(ῳGluing)2 - (ῳCutting)2
Thus Dimensionally : g= K/T2
726 673
 674Page 674 of 726

3-The fact that V=0 At the very top Imply:ῳCutting = ῳGluing Which
is in full agreement with all Macroscopic And Microscopic
Observations at the tip top.
4- The Constant Radius is introduced and defined extensively
Several Times at other places in this book.
5-As To Why (dΩ /dt) Should Be Constant ?
Let: dΩ /dt = Variable (S) dΩ = S.dt
After integration:

Ω= ∫ S. dt
Then by applying the Fourier transforms as

t or ῳ∞ Ω = 1/√2π [ -t ∫ +t
eiSt (S)dt ]

S= 1/√2π [ -ῳ ∫ +ῳ
eiSΩ (S) dΩ ]
Clearly by rearranging the above two equations we can see

why (S)Is constant not variable . (Page Six of Fifty Seven)

Alternatively:
For simplification we can apply Fourier transform;

F(f(t) ) = 0∫∞ e-pt f(t) dt =f(P)

726 674
 675Page 675 of 726

Again let f(t) =S= dΩ/dt And recall that t =0 At the

point C. And t ∞ From the point D. Thus:

F(f(t) )=S = 0∫ ∞
e-St f(t) dt = 1/S [e-∞ - e0]

= 1/S [0 -1] Giving : (S )2 =-1 -------------- EQN---1

Therefore : dΩ /dt = Constant (j) =j X1.
Now recall at the top of the trajectory ῳCutting = ῳGluing
Therefore ῳCutting /ῳGluing =1
And the above equation become
dΩ /dt = Constant (j) =j X ῳC /ῳG.
Also Recall We Said :
ῳC /ῳG = ɸ The Lag Or Phase Angle. And the equation
can be rewritten as :

(Page Seven of Fifty Seven)

dΩ /dt =j X ῳC /ῳG.=j . ɸ

Also at t=0 ῳC = ῳG Giving: dΩ=0 Hence ɸ=0 .

726 675
 676Page 676 of 726

Which Is Exactly The Case Since The (Distant )Between

The Two Frequencies Reduced To Nothing(It’s A Proof).

Now we can Renormalize (ɸ) To insert in the equation

as follows: ‖ɸ‖2 =1 dΩ /dt =j X ῳC /ῳG.= ‖ j .ɸ‖2

This is extremely important result because apart from

Proving my theory it opens the door to Quantum

Gravity .And the Transfer Function H (jw)= ) Becomes

constant as follows :

H (jw)= 1/(1+j ῳC /ῳG.)  H (jw)= 1/(1+j dΩ /dt)

Since (dΩ /dt) Already proven to be constant.

dΩ /dt (H )* = ‖ j .ɸ‖2

And the total forces on any object of mass (m)

∑F =mass (m) X Acceleration +m.\/.ɸ+m. dΩ /dt(H )*K

(Page Eight of Fifty Seven)

(m.Grad.ɸ ) Is the force due to gravitational field.

726 676
 677Page 677 of 726

Now recall in Section Six Above we established by the

matrices of Moments of Inertia that although the force

exerted by the Cosmic Flux [m. dΩ /dt (H )* K ]May be

small but its always >0.

(H )* Is not the same as (H) It was defined in other

parts of this book.

Therefore in Outer Space

if the gravitational field  0.

Then :

∑ F = mXa + m. dΩ /dt (H )* K

And in the Apparenyt Stationary Case where ∑ F=0

mXa = -(Minus) m. dΩ /dt (H )* K

Or: dΩ /dt (H )* K = (Minus) The linear acceleration.

(Page Nine of Fifty Seven)

The Convolution Theorem:

726 677
 678Page 678 of 726

“As to how did we expressed the above frequencies from the

Time Domain in terms of Complex Laplace Domain Without the
insurmountable problem of multiplying several integrals with
dummy variables and all the rest of treacherous calculations?
Fortunately there is better way provided by the Convolution
Theorem Stating that the convolution in the time domain
becomes multiplications in the complex laplace domains !And
vice versa Expressed as:”

The star here denote Convolution :

L[f(t) * g(t) ]= F(s) G(s)

L[f(t) g(t) ]= F(s) * G(s)

Applied in the case above

ɸ(ῳC* ῳG)= ᴪ(1/ S ) 2

See EQN-1 ?

The star (*)Expressing convulsion above also Often used to

express conjugations in Quantum Theory is an irony pointing
the way for us how to open the door towards quantum
gravity ? ( For further illustrations and definitions Please visit Volumes
Three And Five Of My Book At:www.scribd.com/isamtahersaleh

(Page Ten of Fifty Seven)

Splitting Frequencies Not The Atom.

726 678
 679Page 679 of 726

“If we to accept Quantum Mechanics As solid proven

science ? We need to accept the Duality of the
universe(Parallel Universe Best Illustrated By The
Schrodinger Cat Or as the Quran Repeatedly Talk of the
Two Worlds of Uns (Man)And Jins (Genies).And if we
find the concept of parallel universe imposed by
quantum mechanics Inescapable the idea of Medium i
call Cosmic Flux Connecting both universes will be
Equally Inescapable !The irony is : Though we cannot
see or feel the effects of this cosmic flux yet we can
calculate it with my Frequmechanics.”
The Capillary Analogy.
A helpful analogy to my splitting the frequency in to that of
Cutting and Gluing The cosmic flux is the surface tension in the
capillary tube where the liquid On One Hand try to curl on itself
On The Other Hand Raising itself ! t’s the only known
phenomenon Defing Gravity By Self-Propelling mechanism. For
those who can think it further ?Or take it up further this is the
Micro-ism of the cosmic flux Macro-ism. “
(Page Eleven of Fifty Seven)

With specific reference to the diagram on the first page (Of these Forty Two
Pages) For free falling projectile we already said that: The Cosmic Flux Is

726 679
 680Page 680 of 726

Cut And Glued By the frequencies ῳCutting (ωC) And ῳGluing (ωg) Rrespectively
also by this very basic definition: To Maximize The efficiency of this process
of cutting and gluing to the two frequencies must satisfy the following Three
Criteria:
1- (ωC ≈ ωg )
i.e. Both need to be close to each other.
2-( ωC ≠ ωg ) Ie The frequencies ωC And ωg Again By Definition
Can never be one and the same.
3-( ωC > ωg ) .Mathematically the following equation can only
be satisfied when all the above three conditions are met.

‖ ωC /ωg ‖ = ‖ωC - ωg ‖ ----EQUATION-A.

Since 1 ≠ 0
‖ ωC /ωg ‖ > ‖ωC - ωg ‖ ----Inequality-A
We borrow from relativity the expressions (-Like e.g.
Time-Like Or Space-Like) And we say that:
(ωC ) Is Velocity -Like Frequency i.e. Velocity = ωC.R
while (ωg) Is Acceleration Like Frequency i.e.
Acceleration = (ωg)2.R :
Where (R )Is the Unit Radius Vector as defined at
various places and exercises inside this book.
And as we shall see later how (ωg)2 =Constant Though
(Ω) Itself not necessarily constant ?
Equation (A) above yield the following quadratic
equation: ωC = ωg ωC – (ωg)2 OR:
(ωg)2 - ωg ωC + ωC =∆ ωC . ∆ ωg--------- EQN-B
Let us now examine just Six Of Many Possibilities:
(Page Twelve of Fifty Seven )

The First Case :

726 680
 681Page 681 of 726

(ωg)= Constant Giving (ωg)2.R =Constant acceleration of

gravity(g).Differentiating EQN-B w.r.t. Time :
2ωg (dωg/dt ) -( ωC . dωg/dt + ωg . dωC/dt) + dωC/dt =0
0 – 0 + dωC/dt (ωg+1 ) = d(∆ ωC . ∆ ωg)/dt =0 EQN-C
Since ( ∆ ωC . ∆ ωg) = (H)Q (My Universal Constant for any
particular Q See later ?)as defined at many topics of this book.
Therefore : EQN-c Imply :
ωC= Constant at : ωg= ( - 1)When the particle flips over the tip
top downward.
The Second Case :
(ωc)= Constant and Differentiating EQN-B w.r.t. Time:
(ωg)2 - ωg ωC + ωC =∆ ωC . ∆ ωg
2ωg (dωg/dt ) -( ωC . dωg/dt + ωg . ωC/dt ) + dωC/dt =0
2ωg (dωg/dt ) -( ωC . dωg/dt + 0 ) + 0=d(∆ ωC .∆ ωg)/dt
dωg/dt (2ωg - ωC ) =0
Implying that (ωg )=Constant at (ωg =½ ωc ) ?

3- The Third Case :

When (dωc / dωg )=Constant:
Differentiating EQN-B w.r.t. (ωg ):
(ωg)2 - ωg ωC + ωC =∆ ωC . ∆ ωg
(Page Thirteen of Fifty Seven)

2ωg – (ωg dωC / dωg + ωC ) + dωC / dωg =0

726 681
 682Page 682 of 726

dωC / dωg ( 1 - ωg )+ ωC + 2ωg =0

At the tip top of the trajectory V=0 (Implying ) ωC =0
Since (R )Can never be (0) Substituting in EQN-B Above
We get two results :
dωC / dωg ( 1 - ωg )+ o + 2ωg =0
dωC = - 2ωg / ( 1 - ωg ) dωg =2ωg / ( 1 - ωg ) dω g
Integrating both sides and for the sake of both
simplification and Nearest approximation (Without
losing the central point of the argument ) Let us apply
the integral :

If M=a+bx Then ∫ x .dx /( M) = 1/b2 .[x-a Log M]

a=1 b=-1 x= ᵚg

∫dω = ∫2ω / ( 1 - ω ) dω
C g g g

ωC/2 = (-1)2 [ωg – Log (1- ωg)]

ωC/2 -ωg= – Log (1- ωg) Log (1- ωg) = ωg - ωC/2
(Page Fourteen of Fifty Seven)

726 682
 683Page 683 of 726

+ᵚg-ᵚc/2 +K
(1- ωg) =e

+ᵚg-ᵚc/2
ωg = 1- e +K
+ᵚg-ᵚc/2 -ᵚg+ᵚc /2
‖ωg ‖ =K+
2
e =K +1

EQN-D.
Giving that ‖ωg ‖2 (The Acceleration –Like Frequency )

Remains constant even when (ωg )itself is variable or

when ωC=0 Hence this term can describe the constant
acceleration of gravity (g)= ‖ωg ‖2 .R
The Fourth Case:

Recall Inequality –A : ω C / ωg > ωC - ωg

If as it was in the Third Case (dωc / dωg )=Constant:
This imply that the difference (ωC - ωg )=Constant. Ω
Substituting in EQN –D Above:
(Page Fifteen of Fifty Seven)

726 683
 684Page 684 of 726

+ᵚg-ᵚc/2 -ᵚg+ᵚc /2
‖ωg ‖ =K+
2
e

+ᵚg/2 -ᵚc/2 -ᵚg+ᵚg/2 +ᵚc /2

= K+ e

1/2Ω-ᵚg/2 +ᵚc /2
‖ωg ‖ = K+
2
e

1/2Ω - 1/2Ω
= K+ e

‖ωg ‖2 = Constant (K)

The Fifth Case .

“Energy per unit mass “
Earlier introducing the Convolution Theorem stating

that : The convolution in the time domain becomes

multiplications in the complex Laplace domains! And

vice versa expressed as: L[f(t) * g(t) ]= F(s) G(s)

L[f(t) g(t) ]= F(s) * G(s)

The star here denotes Convolution:

(Page Sixteen of Fifty Seven )

726 684
 685Page 685 of 726

These methods simplify the following otherwise

complicated ways of multiple integrals such as :

(ωC * ωg )(t)=( ωg *ωgc ) (t) = - ∞∫ ∞

ωC (q ) ωg (t-q)dq

Where (q)Is dummy variable. Hence applying the

convulsion methods to equation (B) yield :

∆ ωC . ∆ ωg =(ωg)2 - ωg ωC + ωC=(H)Q (my universal

constant for any particular Q See later ?)

But : h. ω =Energy Where (h)Is Planck constant :

Therefore : h. ∆ ωC . h. ∆ ωg = (∆ Energy )2

H= ∆ ωC . ∆ ωg = (Energy )2/h2----------EQN(E)
Or : Energy (E) = h. √ωC . ωg = h. √H
Let S=The height f(t) of the particle such that when
(ωC)=0? S=0.

L f(t) = 0 ∫∞ e -s.t
f(t) dt =F(S).

(Page Seventeen of Fifty Seven)

726 685
 686Page 686 of 726

 Ln x 1/s .1/s = ( L ). (H)Q .

The Laplacian Term L =L n-1

n=Number of

integrals.
Substituting EQN(E) In to the above:

Ln =
S2 . L . (H)Q —-----------------Eqn-F.
Now let (m)=Density of mass (m) per unit area
m=Mass/A :Where (A)Is the Maximum Cross section
area Inside The particle perpendicular to the path of
the particle itself. Hence from EQNs-E And F:

Ln= S2 .L .(H)Q = S2 . L (Energy )2/h2 = V2

Since (E )2/h2 1/(sec)2 V2= S2/h2

Therefore:
After multiplying both sides with (1/2m):

1/2m X V2 = ½. m X S2 . L . (H)Q

Energy (E) = ½ .m X S2 . L (H)Q 

S2= 2.E /m. L (H)Q But from :

(Page Eighteen of Fifty Seven)

726 686
 687Page 687 of 726

E1 =1/2 m V2

And ( E2 )2 =L H . h2

Giving: E3 ≈ L /2 m. V2 . h2 . (H)Q . Or In general

terms:

Eq ≈ L /2 m. V2 . hq-1 . (H)Q. Where (q)Is variable ≠0.

The Sixth Case:

h.∆ ωC . h ∆ ωg = (∆ Energy -E)2

But (H)Q = ∆ ωC . ∆ ωg
∆ ωC . ∆ ωg = (∆E )2/h2 ∆E=h (H)1/q
More generally:

q (∆E) = hq H1/q But q (∆E)=E Therefore:

Energy =∑ p
q p,q 1/p,q
(h) .H

(Page Nineteen of Fifty Seven )

726 687
 688Page 688 of 726

Particle.
Eq

Height(S)

Ep
Definitions:

(H)Q =My universal constant for particular p or q .

S=Height f(t).
Q=f(t,S)
Ep,q,etc =Energies of unit mass per unit of area :The
maximum cross section area inside the particle normal
to the path of the particle
New Concept New Physics:
New concept where Energies at particular quantum
values Incorporate all the other data e.g. Mass ?
Distance? Velocities Or Accelerations .
(Page Twenty of Fifty Seven)

726 688
 689Page 689 of 726

The Seventh Case.

With particular reference to the definitions and

diagrams earlier especially those in the fifth and six

cases :Another Way to understand this theory of mine

will be by carefully examining what is happening at the

tip top of the trajectory. Where (ωC )And ( ωg )

Although they remain very Different In Functions One

is (cutting )The other (Gluing) The cosmic flux yet

there is no way of telling which is which ??Because

they exchange places !This Switching is both

Mathematical And Physical.My hypothesis is Similar to

the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Essentially a

Negative Statement where it’s not possible to measure

the distance and the momentum instantaneously. ∆ ω x .

∆ p =h (Planck Constant): Similarly: (Page Twenty One

of Fifty Seven)

726 689
 690Page 690 of 726

( ∆ ωC . ∆ ωg) = (H)Q

(My Universal Constant for any particular Q.)

However I extended this concept to the entire path of the

particle Since Any Point On This Path Can Be Taken In Principle

As The Tip Top Of The Trajectory For Different Condotions

Defined By (Q) And by V=0 ?Now As introduced earlier :Let:

ΩVelocity =Is Velocity -Like Frequency While (ωg) Is

Acceleration Like Frequency

ΩVelocity = ωC - ωg =0 At the top of the trajectory since (ωg)

Catch up with (ωC) i.e. When both are Equalized .Therefore :

Velocity = ΩV.R =0 Let:

Ωg = ∆ ωC /∆ ωg = ( H)q / (Ωg)2

Dimensionally this is just a number fixed by (Q)

therefore d Ωg/dt = 0 that (Ωg)2 Is constant Hence :

=(Ωg)2.R =The Constant Acceleration Of Gravity .

(Page Twenty Two of Fifty Seven)

726 690
 691Page 691 of 726

The Eighth Case.

Why My Theory So Indifferent To Directions?
“According to our Euclidean perceptions the tangential
velocity of rotating or vibrating particles are always
perpendiculat to the centrepital accelerations! Until we
take the following equally legitimate route:”
As stated earlier The Quantum mechanics picture of the
world is that of fizzy balls therefore my
Freqummechanics Picture is that of frequencies since
anything fizzy or vibrating can only be doing so with
frequency Ω. Hence: The Tangential velocity Velocity
=Ω.R And (Ω )2 .R=The centripetal acceleration .Also
we said that (R)is some arbitrary or dummy radius.
Let (m) the mass of particle in free fall from height(S):
Since the tangential velocity at certain different
intervals in the path of this particle (S1 , S2 , S3---etc?)
Will be definitely pointing downward parallel to its path
And since there is No Way Which We Can Distinguish
This From The Velocity Due To Gravity As The Particle

726 691
 692Page 692 of 726

Can Not Have Two Velocities At The Same Point And

The Same Instant ! ( Page Twenty Three of Fifty Seven)

Potential energy =kinetic energy thefore:

m.g.s = ½ m(V)2
After substituting:
m.g.s = ½ m(Ω.R )2
g= ½ 1/S .(Ω.)2 (R )2 =1/2 R/S .(Ω.)2 .R=1/2 (R/S )(Acc)
But for the constant acceleration of gravity (g)to
remain constant the Ratio (R/S) Need to stay constant
i.e. (R1/S1) = (R2/S2) =(R3/S3) =etc.
R/S =K R=K.S.
Hence now we have reached the Conclusion That our arbitrary
or dummy radius changes with the height(S) So its feasible to

make the Bold Assumption of R≡ S.

And this will have far reaching physical and
mathematical interpretations.
Notice at many parts of my Frequmechanics we said
that ( R)IS constant : what was meant that (R) the
same for ωC And ωg ! Thatr is all.
As You See We Have Obtained Expressions For Velocity And
Acceleration Of Particle In Trajectory From Tangential

726 692
 693Page 693 of 726

Velocities And Centripetal Accelerations Regardless Of

Directions ! ? ! (Page Twenty Four of Fifty Seven)

The Ninth Case

“ Applying Quantum Mechanics? Spherical Harmonics?
And Angular Momentum”
Previously in the eight case it was shown than once the
components of velocity and acceleration of(ωC ,ωg)Align
themselves with the vertical (S)There is no way we can
distinguish these from those due to gravity!
ωc (Of Virtual Particle ) ωg( Of Virtual Particle)

Particle.
0
∆s =The Drop.
0 ∏/2
Height(S)
3/2 ∏

(A) (B)
Velocities:

726 693
 694Page 694 of 726

Sn Are the intervals on (S)where the velocities of both (ωC ,ωg)

are aligned parallel to (S). At : n=0, ∏ /4, ∏ , 5/4∏ etc?
(Page Twenty Five of Fifty Seven )

Accelerations:
(SN)Are the intervals on (S)where the Accelerations of both (ωC
And ωg) are aligned parallel to (S).At :

N=∏ ? ∏/2 ? 2∏ ?3/2 ∏ etc?

1-ɸ = Tan-1 ῳc /ῳg The Lag Or Phase Angle.

2- The particle descend or ascend by (∆s)Where ∆s =f(ɸ)
3-Quantum Mechanics And Spherical Harmonics
Yml (θ ,ɸ ):
By applying the relationships between classical and quantum
angular momentum here the angular momentum is measured
in units of (h-Planck constant ) then the quantum Eigen values
of l(l+1)Correspond (Approximately ) to the classical (l) Then:
Yml (θ ,ɸ )= (i)m +[m] (2l+1(l-[m[) !/4∏(l+[m])!]Pml (Cos θ) eimⱷ
When (m)=0

-1 ∫+1Pl(w) Pl(w)dw =2/(2L+1) ∆u

Pl (1) =1 Pl (-1) = (-1 )l

726 694
 695Page 695 of 726

For state specified by (L & m) the probability of

particle having the orientation (θ ,ɸ ):

(Page Twenty Six of Fifty Seven)

Pl,m (θ ,ɸ ) = [ Yml (θ ,ɸ ) ] 2

When the states l=1 and m=+- 1 Favoured values

are θ= ∏/2 In the X-Y Plane And the total angular
momentum will be up and down the Z-Plane
For l=1 m=0 Favoured values of θ =0, ∏
Here the orbit is in the Z-Plane
Hence the following analogous vector diagram can only be
compared in the correct quantum formulation in the classical
limits ? (l)and (l+l ) are very large and the difference between
them is negligible. Taking us to the classical picture :
z V ῳg
2
1
0
-1

-2 Sn V ῳc

726 695
 696Page 696 of 726

-3

SN (B)

(A) (Page Twenty Seven of Fifty Seven)

Alternatively:
It may be easier to understand my hypothesis by carefully
studying the above two diagrams:
A-
Clearly from the diagram representing (Sn ) the angular
velocities V =R .ῳg And V =R .ῳc Though aligned with the
vertical(S)Do not cancel each other but form a Constant
Rotating couple of =(∆v) . due to the constant phase angle
which can be expressed in units of time (∆t) Such that :
(∆v) /(∆t) =Constant acceleration of gravity.=g
B- If ∆v ≠ 0 Why the particle at the tip top of the trajectory
Appears to be stationary V=0 ?
The answer for this : :At the very top as we said earlier the two
frequencies exchange signs(But not their Functions).
Therefore while passing each other’s at some Microscope[Ic
Moment appears to be equal thus the particle Appearing
Macroscopically to be stationary
C- The diagram representing (SN) Shows very clearly that the
two centripetal accelerations Due To Both Frequencies are

726 696
 697Page 697 of 726

exactly on the vertical path of the particle but acting in

Oppositeb Directions cancelling each other’s :Thus having no
effect on the acceleration due to (∆v) /(∆t)Stated Above.
(Page Twenty Eight of Fifty Seven)

The Tenth Case Some Conclusions.

The Connector:
But what Physically connects ωCutting ( ωc )With ωGluing
( ωg )The answr is in what I call the Connector Of Cosmic Flux !
It manifest itself as Weak Gravitational (Lines or particles
Representing thw force !Or as in Electromagnetic Fields such as
when you sprinkle some iron filing on piece of paper on top of
magnet !Or as Strong Nuclear Forces !
It was aleardy shown with the aid of Inertial Matrices As it was
shown in my book (Frequmechanics ) Under the heading (The
proof part three) That this Force >0.
( Ω ) [ ῳC . Ir-∆r √Ir-∆r ]
[√Ir ῳG . Ir ]
Also it can easly be shown by the same method that :
0<Force >∞ Where the Connector

(Co)= [ωg/ ωc ]0 ∞ Inside nucleus : Con  ∞

Let PC =the centripetal acceleration due to (ωC )2.R

726 697
 698Page 698 of 726

Let Pg =the centripetal acceleration due to (ωg )2.R

Let ∆p = PC - Pg
And as defined before: (Page Twenty Nine of Fifty Seven)

Let VC = ωC .R And Vg = ωg .R Thus:

(∆v) = ωC .R - ωg .R = (ωC . - ωg .) R And let

∆ ω = (ωC . - ωg .)

PC - Pg = (ωC )2.R - (ωg )2.R =[(ωC )2 -- (ωg )2]R OR:

∆p = (ωC . - ωg .) (ωC . + ωg .)R =∆ ω (ωC . + ωg .) R

Although the above equation is important relationships
between velocity the Two Frequencies and the Centripetal
accelerations it cannot be differentiated as its :However
Intuitively If we can express the phase angle (ɸ) In seconds
such that : ɸ = e K .∆t Or for simplification : ɸ = K. ∆t
Then And Only Then Can We Divide Both Sides Of The Equation
By (ɸ = K. ∆T ):The (Constant (K)Cancels Out? Meanwhile
Keeping In Mind That (∆P Or ∆V ) Though Can Be Infinitesimal
They Are Not The Same As The Differentials ( Dp )Or (Dv )Since
Both (∆P Or ∆V ) Are Not Directly Dependant On The Time
Dimension But On The Specific Intervals When The Direction Of
The Angular Velocity Is Parallel To The Path Of The Partic;E And
All Other Components Here Are Neglected According To What

726 698
 699Page 699 of 726

Is Allowed Frequmechanically ) Or what Is Favoured By The

Quantum Mechanics And Spherical Harmonics Yml (Θ ,ɸ ) As
Shown In The Previous Ninth Case With Diagrams i.e. :-
(Page Thirty of Fifty Seven)

Only Between The Limits:

(VC - Vg )/ (tC - tg ) And (PC - Pg )/ (tC - tg )
∆p /∆t = (∆ ω /∆t )/(ωC + ωg .) R=(∆ω.R /∆t )(ωC+ωg .)

∆p /∆t =∆V/∆t (ωC . + ωg .) Only now can we say:

dp /dt =dv/dt (ωC . + ωg .) But:

dv/dt=The vertical constant acceleration of gravity (g)

Therefore: dp /dt = g (ωC . + ωg .)

Integrating :

∫dp = ∫g (ωC . + ωg .) dt

P +K=g.t (ωC + ωg .) Or

g.t = (P +K)/ (ωC + ωg .) EQN-1

“Now For The First Time A Concrete Equation Obtained

Relating The Acceleration Due To Gravity With That
Centripetal And The Two Frequencies! Examining

726 699
 700Page 700 of 726

Carefully The Above Expression We Conclude The

Following Two Fundamental Results:”
(Page Thirty One of Fifty Seven)

1-When (ωC + ωg .) 0 The expression for (g)∞

AS it will inside strong gravitational fields such as that

of Black Hole which means  (ωC = - ωg .) Cancelling

each other exactly like the Points Of Inflexionion at the
tip top of free projectile as shown in previous cases.
But most significant to note that (P ) will not vanish
since it’s a function of ( ± ωC )2 i.e. Always positive.

2- Vindicating My Hypothesis Of Splitting The

Frequency In To Two:
If the denominator (ωC + ωg) In the above expression
was One Singular Frequency Instead Of Two and if this
one singular frequency ω  0 As it would (To make g
large )then : (p ) 0 I.e. (P) At any time (t) vanishes
and the whole expression vanishes Even inside strong
gravitational fields such as inside the black hole :

726 700
 701Page 701 of 726

Meaning (g) Will Vanishes Therefore There Has To Be

Always Two Frequencies Instead Of One.
(Page Thirty Two of Fifty Seven)

Calculating The Hypothetical Radius (R):

Established above that: dp /dt = (dv/dt ) (ωC . + ωg .)

Hence: (dp /dt ) = (dv / dt) / (ωC . + ωg .) -1

Approximating (≈ though it can be Exact by fully expanding the

polynomial) And multiplying both sides with 1/R

(dp /dt ) dt . 1/R ≈(dv / dt) /( (ωC . - ωg .) R

When either ωC . Or ωg =0 Then

(dp /dt ) . dt /R ≈ ± (dv /V .) Integrating boyh side :

P +K ≈ ±R Log V

Log V ≈ ±(P+K)/R
V ≈ (K/R) . e ±(P)
The Significance Of This Equation Becom Apparent

When:V C (Speed Of Light ):

726 701
 702Page 702 of 726

C ≈ (K/R) . e ±P

(Page Thirty Three of Fifty Seven )

The Eleventh Case Three Dimensional Picture:

“ When cutting sheet of paper the scissors or knife are placed
Vertically Perpendicular to the paper !Then to join or to glue
the two pieces together the force or the glue need to be
applied Horizontally on both ends of this paper! Now imagine
the Cosmic Flux is flowing inside the paper while the scissors
are (ωCutting )Or ( ωc) With radius (Rc )While The effort to join
the two pieces together is ; (ωgluing ) Or ( ωg) With radius
(Rg).And we proceed as follows :”
1-Normalizing The Two Orthogonal Radii (RC). And (Rg).
Clearly from above the two radii are orthogonal and from the
tenth case above we established that:
RC ≈ (K/c) . e +P Rg ≈ (K/c) .e –P
P=f(RNormalised.) RC. Rg ≈ ∫A e +fR . e –fR . dR.=δC,g = 1 at ωC=ωg

Where (A)Is the constant for normalization

= (K/c)2 Hence : RNormalised = (C/k )R

2-“Also it was established in the Ninth Case that according to

the spherical harmonic analysis the values Most Probable

726 702
 703Page 703 of 726

Quantum Mechanically are ( 0, π)While the position of the

particle Allowed Frequmechanically are ( 0 ?π/2 ? 3/2π ?π )As
it was shown in diagrams (A &B )Which we now combine in to
one diagram giving the allowed vales Frequmechanically as: ”
(Page Thirty Four of Fifty Seven)

A= (2n /2 )X Ӆ n=0,1,2,3,etc
B= (2n+1)Ӆ /2 n=0,1,2,3,etc.
And the energy levels for:A= E(1/2)2n And for B= E(1/2)(2n+1)
The Factor (1/2)Is Typical Of All Classical Averaging for Energy e.g.
(1/2)mv2 ! At The Top Of The Trajectory : ωc =ωg And The Velocity
(ωc .Rωc) =0 Since (Rωc .Rωg)= δC,g =1Therefore If (Rωg ∞)Then (Rωc
 0 )And velocity = Zero .
Also recall from the diagrams (A&B):

The Drop.
F(ɸ) = Figure (B) - (Minus)Figure (A) =F(∆s/∆t)
The final results by this 11th case from my Frequmchanics is:
Diagram (A) +Diagram (B) = 2n X Ӆ + (2n+1)Ӆ /2.
These are the simple clear concrete results obtained from the
concepts of my Frequmechanics :Let us see if Quantum
mechanics agrees with my results above :The three
dimensional
Schrodinger equation for electron €:
[(-h2/2m)◊2 - e2/r] UE (r, ᶿ , ɸ )=E UE (r,ᶱ, ɸ )

726 703
 704Page 704 of 726

For simplifications this can be reduced in two dimensions for

the Eigen state function (U) And Energy (E):

(-h /2m)
2
d /dx
2 2
Un (x)= En Un (x)

(Page Thirty Five of Fifty Seven)

With reference to page (26):

Let: w= √(2m En/ h2 )--------------------------EQN-A

( d /dx
2 2
+ W2) Un (x)=0

Solving the above D.E.

U2n (x)= A Sin W2n (x)
a.W2n =2n(Ӆ/2) n=1,2,3 etc. Solving again:

U2n+1 (x)= B Cos W2n+1 (x)

a. W2n+1 =( 2n+1)(Ӆ/2) n=1,2,3 etc
Rearranging the above :
Wn = (Ӆ/2n)a

And rpm EQN-A: W2 = (2m En/ h2 )

En = h2 /2m (Ӆ2 /4a2 ) n2

Clearly these were Exactly the same positive energy levels
shown by the diagrams : You can see for yourself how the
results obtained from the Physics Derived by the concepts and
726 704
 705Page 705 of 726

diagrams of my Frequmechanic Are strikingly Identical to those

obtained from the Mathematics of Quantum Mechanics.( U2n &
U2n+1 )What More Proof Do We Need That My Frequmechjanics
Is Exact Scinese Like Quantum Mechanics And Not Just Another
Theory. (Page Thirty Six of Fifty Seven)

The Twelfth Case.

“Earlier diagrams had shown Two Orthogonal Circles
representing two frequencies we called one the horizontal (In
the plane of the paper) VGluing. =ωg .
While the vertical circle representing (VCutting. =ωC although in
practice the reverse also can be valid. Proceeding as follows:”
1-Thepoints of intersection of the two circles are A&B
By borrowing familiar expressions from Quantum Mechanics
my Frequmechanics preferred (Most
Probable Relevant velocities are taken only at positions (A&B)
i.e. At ( Π/2 & 3 π /2 As it was shown in previous cases:
Where VB –VA=∆V !
While most preferred positions for centripetal accelerations PA
& PB are taken only at the aphelion (The Furthest Points ) Not
shown for the vertical circle i.e. At ( 0 & π ).
2-Hence We Form The Following Position Matrix

[π 0
3π/2
π/2
]
726 705
 706Page 706 of 726

3-And Marix For Velocities And Accelerations:

[VB VA
PB ]
PA

(Page Thirty Seven of Fifty Seven)

4-Multiplying Both Matrices :

[π 0
3π/2
π/2
] x [VB VA
Pg
PC
]
5-By Substituting For:
VA = ωc .R And Vg = ωg .R Also for
PC = ( ωC )2. R And Pg = ( ωg )2. R
We obtain rather Cumbersome expressions which can only be
simplified by investigating what happens at the top of the
trajectory to see if the velocity is -0 i.e. stationary but at top of
the trajectory as we said earlier both frequencies Converge in
values (Though Not In Direction) Hence the final form after
substituting and rearranging will be :

ΠxR4 [[( ω)3 Minus-( ω)3 + 3( ω )4 Minus 3( ω )4 ]] =0

6- But since
[π0 3π/2 ] ≠0
π/2
Therefore

726 706
 707Page 707 of 726

[VB VA Pg
PC
]=0  VA.Pg=VB.PC
7- Since the centripetal accelerations are equal at the top of the
trajectory implying that the velocities are equal but opposite
VA = VB Hence their resultant velocity will be zero i.e.

stationary . (Page Thirty Eight Of Fifty Seven)

Fundamental Remarks:
There is nothing special about the results obtained so far !Since
we already for simplification arbitrarily equated the two
frequencies and naturally it will follow that both angular
velocities and centripetal accelerations will be equal too !
But what is special we never assumed the direction of the
velocities VA & VB Remains opposites throughout the flight:
The equation (VA.Pg=VB.PC ) Relates the two frequencies
Organically We can read the following from it:
a-If instead of simplification we carry out the calculations fully?
Far more interesting conclusions will emerge from the Physics
of the particle by the Methods Of My Frequmechanics .
b- VA /VB = PC /Pg
Since PC OR Pg Can never be =0 Therefore Neither
VA Nor VB Can be Separately =0
C-However both together can be =o Such that :
0/0= PC /Pg Implying  PA ≈PB

726 707
 708Page 708 of 726

d- If we multiply both sides with mass (m)Of the Rotating

particles We obtain (F)For the force:
VA /VB = FC /Fg And in general:

VA.Fg -VB.FC = δC,g x d2ɸ /dt2

Where as before δC,g=RC . Rg
(Page Thirty Nine of Fifty Seven )

Thirteenth Case Angle Of Attack In Cosmic Flux.

“ Unlike gravitational fields the size of any object
inside the cosmic flux matters because the Density
factors enter in to the calculations as shown in earlier
sections!.”

1-As before two orthogonal circles representing two

orthogonal (Frequencies ?Oscillations?Vibrations?Or
Any Other Periodic Motion.).

2- Their points of intersection are arbitrary sample

taken inside the path of the particle from infinite
number of identical points on the path.

726 708
 709Page 709 of 726

3-Therfore By Definition Although the Radii of both

frequencies become equal and concurrent at these
instances still does not violate the lag or phase angle

since it remains that : (ωg < ωgC.).

(Page Forty of Fifty Seven )

The Drop:
“ My Frequmechanics Is borrowing two concepts :
a-From Quantum Mechanics :That we canot measure
simultaneously the two velocities VA VB :
VA = (Vc )2 + (Vg )2 And VB = (Vc )2 + (Vg )2
b- From Quantum Gravity :That we cannot measure
(ds) From another gravitational field by the same
methods!”
4-We must not confuse (ds )Which is the physical drop
(Descend Or Ascend )Of the particle due to gravity and that of
(∆S )Which is due to the difference (∆V= VC –Vg) Whereby :
(∆V = ∆S/∆t )While V =ds/dt. Let Gravitational Field=G.F.
[ (ds)/ ] G.F (B) X ωC = [dS ] G.F (A) x ωg
5-Along the intersection line (AB) Both centripetal accelerations
become not only concurrent (PC ≈Pg )But also pointing towards

726 709
 710Page 710 of 726

the same centre given the resultant acceleration =PC +Pg

=( ωC )2. R +( jωg )2. R Hence : Ω2 .R = ( ωC )2. R +(

jωg )2. R OR: Ω2 = ( ωC )2. -( ωg )2.
Well this is it folks: It’s the only way to split any

frequency (Ω) : As always: j= √-1 And

h=Planck’s constant. (Page Forty One of Fifty Seven)

6-“Either both of VA &VB =Zeros or none is Zero”

Now back to the equation that relates any two
frequencies Organically:
VA /VB = PC /Pg

Examining this equation carefully renders that the two

accelerations (PC /Pg )By Definition Can never be =0
Therefore The only alternatives is (PC /Pg =0/0=1)
7- The AOA (Angle Of Attack):

Let the plane of the cosmic flux tilted with inclination angle (θ)
to the vertical: From above (∆V= VC –Vg ) Or:

(∆V/R= VC/R -Vg/R

Tan θ = Arc/R = ∆V/R= VC/R –Vg/R = ωC - ωg
But from EQB-A On Page-Twelve we established that :
‖ ωC /ωg ‖ > ‖ωC - ωg ‖
726 710
 711Page 711 of 726

Substituting for Tan θ = ωC - ωg

‖ ωC /ωg ‖ > Tan θ

And (ɸ ) Still the lag or phase angle as defined earlier:
ɸ = ‖ωC /ωg ‖ Rearranging:
Θ (The AOA) < ɸ
(Page Forty Two of Fifty Seven)

The Fourteenth Case Free Energy.

From previous cases the two centripetal Accelerations acting
on the line of intersection (AB)Are pointing towards the center
meaning the centripetal Forces are opposing each other!
To avoid complex integral equations let us now Approximate
the mass density along each string (Line)Representing the
frequency (ωc) And (ωg) By equivalent masses (mCutting ) And
(mGluing ) Attached at the end of each line for Where their total
mass : M= (mC )+(mG ) it was established that:
Ω2 =( ωC )2- ( ωg )2.
Also established that : [(ds)/ ] G.F (B) X ( ωC )= [dS ] G.F (A) x(ωg).
Let M ≠ M/ And Ω≠ Ω/ Such That:
(M x M/)/ (Ω x Ω/)2= Constant of the system.
And since the radii vectors are Implicitly Present in all terms
we can now rewrite them as the centripetal Forces :
M/ x (Ω/)2= (mC )( ωC )2-- (mg )( ωg )2
726 711
 712Page 712 of 726

Multiplying through by (ds)/ And substituting in the above :

M/ x (Ω/)2 .ds/= (mC )( ωC )( ωC ds/ )--- (mg ) ( ωg) (ωg ds/)
M/ x (Ω/)2 .ds/= (mC )( ωc)( ωC ) (ds)/ -- (mg ). ( ωg) (ωC ds)
Since : ds/= ɸ .ds= ‖ωC/ ωg‖ds

M/ x (Ω/)2 .ds/= (mC )( ωc)( ωC ) ‖ɸ ‖ds - mg ( ωg) (ωC ds)

M/ x (Ω/)2 .ds/ = ( ωc)( ωg ) {(mC )( ɸ)2 – (mg } ds
As always: j= √-1 And h=Planck’s constant.
(Page Forty Three of Fifty Seven )

The Fifteenth Case The Macroscopic Argument.

“Here we apply the transformation ds/= ɸ .ds= ‖ωC/ ωg‖ds To

any System: S(Distance ,Forcemeat)ds/=S.ds/(Distance.Forceme,etc)

We already said hat M= mC + mg

Let : mC =mg =m  M=2m Substituting back in the above
Equations from previous cases :
Let The Energy E/ = M/ x (Ω/)2 .ds/
= ( ωc)( ωg ) {(mC )( ɸ)2 – (mg } ds
M/ x (Ω/)2 .ds/ = m( ωc)( ωg ) {( ɸ)2 -1 } ds :Since M=2m
M/ x (Ω/)2 .ds/ = ½ M ( ωc)( ωg ) {( ɸ)2 - 1 } ds
M//M x .ds/ = ½ ( ωc)( ωg )/ (Ω/)2 {( ɸ)2 - 1 } ds
Now if at Uniform Densities M M/ And ωc = ωg
(e.g. at the tip top of the trajectory )Hence:
Then from the fourteenth case Ω2 =( ωC )2- ( ωg )2:

726 712
 713Page 713 of 726

(Ω/)2 /( ωc)( ωg )1 Then : ds/ = ½ {( ɸ)2 - 1 } ds

OR: ds/ds/ = 2/{( ɸ)2 - 1 } Subsituting :
M//M x . = ½ ( ωc)( ωg )/ (Ω/)2 {( ɸ)2 - 1 } ds / ds/
1 = ½ X 1 x {( ɸ)2 - 1 } x2/{( ɸ)2 - 1 } =1
Recall that the Unit radius vector is implicit in all these
calculations therefore the Force (F):
F/ = M/ x (Ω/)2 . =½ M ( ωc)( ωg ){( ɸ)2 - 1 } ds/ ds/
= M( ωc)( ωg ){( ɸ)2 - 1 } 2/{( ɸ)2 - 1 }
F/ = M( ωc)( ωg ) = EC X Eg
(Page Forty Four of Fifty Seven)

The Sixteenth Case The Microscopic Argument.

“Applying same terms and equations of previous cases”
E/ = M/ x (Ω/)2 .ds/= ( ωc )( ωg ) {(mC )( ɸ)2 – (mg } ds
Multiplying both sides by (h)2 :
(h)2M/x(Ω/)2 .ds/=(h)( ωc ) (h) ( ωg ){(mC)( ɸ)2 –(mg}ds
Let:
EC = h ( ωc ) And E g =h ( ωg ) And (E/)2=(h)2.x(Ω/)2
(h)2.M/x(Ω/)2 ]/{(mC )( ɸ)2 –(mg } ds=(ECX Eg)ds/ds/
At mC =mg =m where M/ Now =2m Substituting:
(M//m )(h)2.x(Ω/)2 .]/{(( ɸ)2 – !)}=(ECX Eg)ds/ds/
But from the Fifteenth Case :
ds/ds/ = 2/{( ɸ)2 - 1 } Substituting:
(2m/m )(h)2.x(Ω/)2 .]/{( ɸ)2 – !)}=2(ECX Eg)/{( ɸ)2 -1}
726 713
 714Page 714 of 726

(h)2.x(Ω/)2=( ɸ)2 – !)}/(ɸ)2 – !)} ECX Eg)

(E/)2=( ECX Eg) OR : E/=√ ( ECX Eg) But from the
Fourteenth Case Ω2 =( ωC )2- ( ωg )2. Again multiplying
through by (h)2)  (EΩ)2 = (EC)2 -(Eg)2 =(EC -Eg)( (EC +Eg)

Clearly (E/)2=( ECX Eg) >> (EΩ)2=(EC -Eg)( (EC +Eg)Since:

ECX Eg > EC ±Eg.
And this is the Free Lift -Off Energy claimed by various
topics inside this book. (Page Forty Five of Fifty Seven )

Summary Revision And Corrections.

An arbitrary frequency (Ω ) Splitting in to two such that:
Ω2 =( ωC )2 +( jωg )2.
Multiply through by unit radius vector we have:
dVC/dt - dVg/dt = dV/dt =g Constant Acceleration of gravity.
Integrating both sides w.r.t.
VC -Vg = V+k( A constant)
For Free Particle :
At the top of the trajectory: VC =Vg Therefore:
V+k=0 And K=0=V
For The Microscopic Argument :
Multiplying the above EQN by (h)2
(h)2Ω2 = (h)2 ( ωC )2 + (h)2 ( jωg )2 (EΩ)2 = (EC)2 -(Eg)2
(EΩ)2=(EC -Eg)( (EC +Eg) = EC ( 1 -Eg/ EC) . EC ( 1+Eg/EC)
(EΩ)2= (EC)2.( 1+Eg/EC)/ ( 1 -Eg/ EC) -1
(EΩ)2 ≈(EC)2 ( 1+Eg/EC)/ ( 1 +Eg/ EC) ≈(EC)2

726 714
 715Page 715 of 726

Now let Epsilon ( ᵋ )Represent the error in the approximation of

the denominator in the above expression therefore:

(EΩ)2 = ᵋ. (EC)2

But it may be argued that ((look here the above approximation

was by mathematical polynomial that has no physical
manifestation ))!
In which case all the above and all mathematical physics are
just an exercise in chorography.
(Page Forty Six of Fifty Seven )

Universal Resonances(Plr). Part-Two.

Therefore the error (Or Deviation) Represented by the
Above Epsilon:

ᵋ= ( 1 +Eg/ EC) - ( 1 - Eg/ EC):

Classically:

(EC/ Eg) = [m. ( ωC )2.R .ds/ ] / [m. ( ωC )2.R .ds ]

(EC/ Eg) =[( ωC )2 .ds/ ] /[( ωg )2.ds ]

=( ωC )2 /( ωg )2X ds/ds/
By definition :
ɸ= ωC/ ωg And from the Fifteenth Case :
726 715
 716Page 716 of 726

ds/ds/ = 2/{( ɸ)2 - 1 }

Therefore: (EC/ E g) = (ɸ)2 X 2/{( ɸ)2 - 1 }

ᵋ= (ɸ)2 – 1) /2(ɸ)2

(EΩ)2 = [(ɸ)2 – 1) /2(ɸ)2 ](EC)

2

=½ (1- (ɸ) -2}(EC)2

(Page Forty Seven of Fifty Seven)

The Quantum:

(EC/ Eg) = (h)2 (ωC )2/(h)2 (ωg )2 =(ɸ)2

Substituting back:

-1
ᵋ= 2 (Eg/ EC) = 2 [ɸ ]

From definition them Substituting:

(EΩ)2 = ½ ɸ . (EC)2
(EΩ)2 = ½ √ EC/ Eg) . (EC)2
Clearly at ωC = ωg
EΩ  1/√ 2 (EC)In the quantum case !
And EΩ 0 In the classical case !!
726 716
 717Page 717 of 726

And this is what I call the :

Universal Resonance :
When The Energies In Both Cases Are Not The Same.

∑n Classical (EΩ)2  Quantum.(EΩ)2

At: [1- (ɸ) - 2 ]2= EC/ Eg

(Page Forty Eight of Fifty Seven )

Universal Resonances(Plr) Part- Three.

“Imagine a coin or lamina vibrating in the vertical direction
with frequency (f) And a crystal or an atom inside this coin
oscillating with frequency (Ωθ ) Inclined to the vertical with
angle (θ )!In the introductions to Volume Three and that of
Frequmechanics Under the title of ((The Cyclic Nature Of
Information)) It was shown that with frequencies these
information could be lost but its Retrievable! As it was the case
in the previous and in the following calculations !But how can
we relate them when both Energy And Frequency Are
directionless Scalars ? However their relevant forces are not?
Therefore in order to Retrieve the corresponding Vectors
representing the required forces we need to Divide The Scalars
By Distances Except we need to be Extra Careful since we are
talking here about two frames of references ! That is to say
726 717
 718Page 718 of 726

((Any observer inside the plane of the lamina or coin can

measure (Ωθ )But cannot measure (f) And vice versa !Therefore
Transformations From One Frame Of Reference To The Other Is
required by applying the previously established transformation

metric of : ” ds/ds/ = 2/{( ɸ)2 - 1 }

Also from previous procedures in Universal Resonances
Parts One And Two it was established from:
(Page Forty Nine of Fifty Seven)

Eherfests Theorem:
m d<x> ψ = < P >ψ
dt

d<P> ψ = m< dv/dt >ψ =< F >ψ F-Force

dt
Energy (A) = h. Ωθ Energy (B) = H* . f.
Resultant Force ( F ) = Force (A) +Force (B) Cos θ
Since Only the vertical components counts.
< F >ψ = h. < Ωθ >ψ Cos θ + H . < f >ψ. / ds/
Dividing then Substituting for:
ds/ds/ = 2/{( ɸ)2 - 1 }
< F >ψ =h. < Ωθ >ψ /ds + H . < f >ψ . Cos θ / ds/
Multiplying through by(ds)
F< F >ψ .ds = h. < Ωθ >ψ Cos θ + 2 H . f. /{( ɸ)2 - 1 }
Total Energy (T.E)= h. < Ωθ >ψ Cos θ + 2 H .< f >ψ./{( ɸ)2 1}
Resonances Occur At A=B Or At (T.E)=0
726 718
 719Page 719 of 726

H = - (1/2f ) h < Ωθ >ψ {1- ( ɸ)2} Cos θ

Examples Of Universal Resonances (Plr):

1- -At θ =0 H = - (1/2f ) h < Ωθ >ψ {1- ( ɸ)2}

2- H 0 At ( ωC = ωg) ɸ =1 And ɸ = j

3- H  -h At ɸ =-j And at : θ =0 H h.

(Page Fifty of Fifty Seven )

Generally:
“With particular reference to the Two thought
experiments by (Stern-Gerlach) Of directing a beam of
non-ionized silver atoms through a vertical magnetic
field splitting in to two streams A &B. The bottom line
of it all relevant to this discussion is :
( A)Representing pure quantum states:
ψA = 1/√2 ( I up > + I down> )!
While (B)represent mixed states behaving exactly like
Classical Probabilities.”

726 719
 720Page 720 of 726

“Let us now consider lamina with n- number of

Identical particles keeping in mind two fundamental
distinctions:
a-Only the vertical components count.
b-That Ωn is made up of two frequencies ωC And ωg”
(Page Fifty One of Fifty Seven )

The above derived expression:

< F >ψ = H . < f >ψ +h. < Ωθ >ψ . Cos θ
Essentially made up of two terms :
A-
Classical Term: [H . f.]
The term < f >ψ Was Unnecessary for the classical case except
to emphasize we are talking about the same state (ψ)Inside
same lamina .
B-
The Quantum Term [h. < Ωθ >ψ ]
Here we need to consider the Quantum Ensemble Except there
is one Problem that of Summing up the term (Cos θ )for all (n)
Identical Particles Without Violating Randomness ?Fortunately
we know this is Not The Case Outside The Maximum And

Minimum Confined To The Subsystem of Cosθ are (+1&-1)

Hence :

726 720
 721Page 721 of 726

∑+1-1 Cos θ  n X ∑+1-1 Cos θ  -n ∑+nCos θ

For each ( θn ) There is < Ωθ >ψ
Implying :
Mixed Staste Ensemble Of Identical Particles Hence:
Ψ>={+1IΩ1>+1.IΩ2…..n>-1 . IΩ-1 …..n > -1 I Ω-2…..n >}/√2n .
H*=-[( h/2f ) {1 - ( ɸ)2} X -n ∑+n Cos θ . < Ωn >ψ ]/√2n
(Page Fifty Two of Fifty Seven )

Subtracting Violated Subsystem:

H* = -[( h/2f ) {1 - ( ɸ)2} X -n ∑+n< Ωn >ψ ]/√2n

=-[( h/2f ){1-( ɸ)2}X -n∑+n< Ωn >ψ ][1-n∑+n Cos θ]/√2n

Therefore:
H*=[( h/2f ){1-( ɸ)2}X -n∑+n< Ωn >ψ][n∑+nCos θ-1]/√2n
Returning to the Classical Term:

E= [H . f.] E=p2/2m  <E> = < p2/2m > 

<E>= -∞ ∫ +∞ψ* (-ih2)∂2/∂t2 ψ dx
Now For Classical Energy (H.F) We Need The Hamiltonian :

<  >= < ih ∂/∂t > =+-∞∫ +∞ ψ* (ih)∂/∂t ψ (x,t)dx

Or In Non Relativistic QM:

 = - p2/2m +V(x,t)  (-ih2)/2m ∂2/∂t2 ψ +V (x,t)

< >= <( -ih2)/2m ∂2/∂t2 ψ +(V (x,t) >

726 721
 722Page 722 of 726

< > =-∞∫ +∞ψ*(x,t) [-ih ∂ /∂t2 2 2 +

V (x,t) ]ψ(x,t) dx

For Free Particle V (x,t) =0

Giving:

<  >= -∞∫ +∞ψ*(x,t) [-ih2∂2/∂t2 ]ψ(x,t) dx=<H>.f

(Page Fifty Three of Fifty Seven )

Now We Are In Position To Add The Above Two Terms :

(A -Classical) And (B-Quantum): A + B =H* + =T.E

=-[( h/2f ) {1 - ( ɸ)2} X -n ∑+n Cos θ . < Ωn >ψ ]/√2n + (1/f)-∞∫

+∞
ψ*(x,t) [-ih2∂2/∂t2 ]ψ(x,t) dx

A+B =- h[{1 - ( ɸ)2}/2f. X -n ∑+n Cos θ . < Ωn >ψ ]/√2n +(1/f)-

∞∫ +∞ψ*(x,t) [-ih ∂2/∂t2 ]ψ(x,t) dx ]Substituting for f=E/H

And C=h.H. S=x E2 = (- h.H )[{1 - ( ɸ)2}/2. X -n ∑+n Cos

θ . < Ωn >ψ ]/√2n +-∞∫ +∞ψ*(x,t) [-ih ∂2/∂t2 ]ψ(x,t) dx ]
Clearly Universal Resonances Occur At:

1-At :ɸ =1  E2= (-h.H) -∞∫+∞ψ*(x,t) [-ih ∂2/∂t2 ]ψ(x,t) dx ]

2-At θ=0 -n ∑+n Cos θ  2n And 2n/√2n =√2n

E2= (-√2n h.H) [{1 - ( ɸ)2}/2. < Ωn >ψ ]]

Critical Mass Or Critical Resonance .

726 722
 723Page 723 of 726

“The ultimate resonance occur at A= B.”

(- C/2 )[{1 - ( ɸ)2} X -n ∑+n Cos θ . < Ωn >ψ ]/√2n

=-∞∫ +∞ψ*(s,t) [-ih ∂2/∂t2 ]ψ(s,t) ds ] 

< Ωn >ψ = [4n/{C.{( ɸ)2 -1} ] X -∞∫ +∞ψ*(s,t) (2n) [-ih

∂2/∂t2] ψ(s,t) ds . (Page Fifty Four of Fifty Seven )

©
Higher Frequmechanics.
“Lamina means flat space !A Hilbert Space.”
From Above: Where P.n=Mass R=Radius Vector.
(- C/2 )[{1 - ( ɸ)2} X (2n). < Ωn >ψ ]/√2n

=-∞∫ +∞ψ*(s,t) [-ih ∂2/∂t2 ]ψ(s,t) ds ]

Riding On The Same Wave Function By Multiplying Both

Sides With ( ℮R.ɸ )Then Differentiating w.r.t.ɸ:
(- C/2 )[ d/dɸ {1 - ( ɸ)2} ℮R.ɸ X (2n). < Ωn >ψ ]/√2n

=-∞∫ +∞ψ*(s,t) [-ih ∂2/∂t2 ]ψ(s,t) ds ] d/dɸ( ℮R.ɸ )

And:

(- C/2 )[ -2ɸ (℮R.ɸ )+R .(℮R.ɸ ) {1 - ( ɸ)2} X(2n)< Ωn >ψ

]/√2n =-∞∫ +∞ψ*(s,t) [-ih ∂2/∂t2 ]ψ(s,t) ds ] (R. ℮R.ɸ )

The Terms ( ℮R.ɸ ) Camels Out From Both Sides Leaving:

726 723
 724Page 724 of 726

(- C/2 )[ -2ɸ +(R ) {1 - ( ɸ)2} X(2n)< Ωn >ψ ]/√2n

=-∞∫ +∞ψ*(s,t) [-ih ∂2/∂t2 ]ψ(s,t) ds ] ( R. )

And:

(- C/2 )[ -2ɸ +(R ) {1 - ( ɸ)2} X(2n)< Ωn >ψ (R )]/√2n

=-∞∫ +∞ψ*(s,t) [-ih ∂2/∂t2 ]ψ(s,t) ds ] ( R. )

(Page Fifty Five of Fifty Seven )

OR:
[+Cɸ -C.R/2 +C.R. ɸ2/2 ] Ωn >ψ (R )] 2n/√2n
=-∞∫ +∞ψ*(s,t) [-ih ∂2/∂t2 ]ψ(s,t) ds ] ( R. )
OR:
[+Cɸ -R.C/2 ( 1- ɸ2 ] Ωn >ψ (R )] √2n
=-∞∫ +∞ψ*(s,t) [-ih ∂2/∂t2 ]ψ(s,t) ds ] ( R. ) Giving:
‖R‖= √(2/n ) [ɸ - 1/C -∞∫ +∞ψ*(s,t) [-ih ∂2/∂t2 ψ(s,t) ds < Ωn
>ψ ]/ { 1- ɸ2 }
Following exactly the same procedure by replacing ( R ) With
(P) in ( ℮p.ɸ ) To obtain:
‖P‖= √(2/n ) [ɸ - 1/C -∞∫ +∞ψ*(s,t) [-ih ∂2/∂t2 ψ(s,t) ds < Ωn
>ψ ]/ { 1- ɸ2 }
Mass M= P.n
Multiplying through by (n):
M= √(2.n ) [ɸ - 1/C -∞∫ +∞ψ*(s,t) [-ih ∂2/∂t2 ψ(s,t) ds < Ωn
>ψ ]/ { 1- ɸ2 }

726 724
 725Page 725 of 726

Then substituting for (M) & (R) in:

< E>ψ =½ .M.‖R‖ .[ RC (<ωC >ψ )2 – Rg (<ωg>ψ )2]

Orthogonality :
RC . Rg*  R=± 1.

(Page Fifty Six of Fifty Seven)

Natural Philosophy.
“What is the significance of the following Commutative
Relationships? Take for example small heap of
uranium on the table?How dormant and harmless it
may looks?? As long as there was no Commutation
Between what is Microscopic ?And Macroscopic ??
Otherwise all hell of energy break loose at RC= Rg ”
The previous equation can be rewritten as:
< E/>ψ = ½ .M.‖R‖ .[ RC (<ωC >ψ ) (<ωg>ψ ) – Rg
(<ωg>ψ ) (<ωC >ψ )]
Implying The Following At E/=0 And RC = Rg :
a-(<ωC >ψ ) (<ωg>ψ ) = (<ωg>ψ ) (<ωC >ψ )]

726 725
 726Page 726 of 726

b-That Even When E=0 It Does Not Mean The Two

Dynamics Vanishes But Simply Cancels Each Other’s .
Exercise:
Consider the following Absolute Numerical Commutative
Relationship between the two dynamics of cutting and gluing
what does it mean ? e.g. :
5 X 2 X 4 = 2X4 X3 ? OR: 3X5X6==6X3X5 ?
(Page Fifty Seven of Fifty Seven )

726 726