TP Portal
TP Portal
UNIT I
Momentum Transport – transfer of momentum which occurs in moving media (fluid flow,
sedimentation, mixing, filtration, etc.)
Heat Transport – transfer of energy from one region to another (drying, evaporation,
distillation)
Mass Transport – transfer of mass of various chemical species from one phase to another
distinct phase (distillation, absorption, adsorption, etc.)
Levels of Analysis
Microscopic Level :
Molecular Level:
All the three transfer operations, Momentum Transport, Energy Transport and Mass Transport
are governed by the rate law similar to the Electrical energy transmission
Momentum Balance
The momentum balance equation for the steady state flow is written as
{Rate of momentum in} - {Rate of momentum out} + {Sum of forces acting on system} = 0
Heat Balance
• For determining the Thermal flux distribution and temperature distribution in solids and
in laminar flow, an elemental thin shell is considered and thermal energy balance is made
on that.
• Shell energy balance equation for steady state can be written as follows
{Rate of thermal energy in} – {Rate of thermal energy out} + {Rate of thermal energy
production} = 0
• Thermal energy may enter or leave the system by the mechanism of heat conduction
according to Fourier’s law.
• Thermal energy may also enter or leave the system by virtue of the over all fluid
motion;(convective transport) and the energy entering and leaving this way is commonly
called the sensible heat in and out.
Mass Balance
• Shell Mass balance equation for a specific chemical species can be written as follows
Rate of mass of ‘A’ in} – {Rate of mass of ‘A’ out} + {Rate of production of mass of
‘A’ by homogeneous chemical reaction} = 0
CONTINUUM CONCEPT
• At the microscopic level, the description of the motion of a fluid involves a study of the
behaviour of all the discrete molecules, which make up the fluid.
• However, when dealing with problems in which some characteristic length in the flow is
very large compared with molecular distances, it is convenient to think of a lump of fluid
sufficiently small from macroscopic point of view, but large enough at the microscopic
level so as to contain a large number of molecules, and to work with the average
statistical properties of such large number of molecules.
CONTINUOUS CONCEPT
• In such a case, the detailed molecular structure is washed out completely, and is replaced
by a continuous model of matter having appropriate continuum properties, so defined as
to ensure that on the macroscopic scale, the behaviour of the model resembles with the
behaviour of the real fluid.
• When the characteristic length in the flow is not large, compared with the molecular
distances, the continuum model is invalid, and the flow must be analysed on the
molecular scale.
• The smallest lump of fluid material, having sufficiently large number of molecules, to
allow statistically of a continuum interpretation, is here called a “fluid particle”.
REFERENCE FRAMES
• Reference frames are said to be the approaches, in which the coordinates of the transport
properties are fixed in the fields by the observer, who is attempting the above said
transport problem.
• There are two ways to set up a transport problem: the Eulerian approach in which the
coordinates are fixed in the reference frame of the observer; and the Lagrangian
approach, in which the coordinates are fixed in the reference frame of the transported
fluid.
• In general the Eulerian approach is the commonly used one. However, a number of
formulations of quantum transport theory are expressed in terms of Lagrangian variables
• The term “field” refers to a quantity, defined as a function of position and time
throughout a given region.
• There are two different forms of representation for fields in transport phenomena,
namely, the Lagrange’s form and, the Euler’s form.
• The difference between these approaches lies in the manner, in which the position in the
field is identified.
• In the Lagrangian approach, the physical variables are described for a particular element
of fluid, as it traverses the flow.
• This is the familiar approach of particle, and rigid-body dynamics. The coordinates (x, y,
z) are the coordinates of the element of fluid, and, as such, are functions of time.
The coordinates (x, y, z), are therefore, dependent variables in the Lagrangian form.
The fluid element is identified by its position in the field at some arbitrary time, usually, t =
0. The velocity field in this case is written in the functional form as follows:
v = v (a, b, c, t),
where, the coordinates (a, b, c) refer to the initial position of the fluid element. The other
fluid flow variables, being functions of the same coordinates, may be represented in a similar
manner.
The Lagrangian approach is seldom used in transport phenomena, since the type of
information desired is usually the value of a particular fluid variable at a fixed point in the
flow, rather than the value of a fluid variable, experienced by an element of fluid along its
trajectory.
For example, the determination of the force on a stationary body in a flow field requires that
we know the pressure, and shear stress at every point on the body.
The Eulerian approach gives the value of a fluid variable at a given point at a given time.
In functional form, the velocity field is written as follows: v = v (x, y, z, t), where x, y, z, and
t are all independent variables.
For a particular point (x1, y1, z1), and t1, the above equation gives the velocity of the fluid at
that location at time t1.
REFERENCE FRAMES
• Reference frames are said to be the approaches, in which the coordinates of the transport
properties are fixed in the fields by the observer, who is attempting the above said
transport problem.
• There are two ways to set up a transport problem: the Eulerian approach in which the
coordinates are fixed in the reference frame of the observer; and the Lagrangian
approach, in which the coordinates are fixed in the reference frame of the transported
fluid.
• In general the Eulerian approach is the commonly used one. However, a number of
formulations of quantum transport theory are expressed in terms of Lagrangian variables
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
• Differential equation resulting from the differential conservation balance describes what
is happening within the system.
• Values of the arbitrary constants are determined by the specification of the boundary
conditions.
• Number of arbitrary constants is dictated by the order of the differential equation, and
therefore, the number of specified boundary conditions must be equal to the order of the
differential equation.
• As engineers we typically deal with specific problems, and consequently, the boundary
conditions are every bit as important as modeling the physical system to obtain the
applicable differential equation.
• It is important to realize that these conditions must have an assignable numerical value, in
order to be viable boundary conditions.
• We must be able to assess, what is happening at the physical boundaries of the system,
and then to specify numerical values for the dependent variables and / or their
derivatives.
• Sometimes, the numerical values at the boundaries are given symbols, so that specific
numerical values can be substituted as they become available.
• The engineering task is to evaluate the physical phenomena and to then decide, what the
realistic boundary condition is.
METHODS OF ANALYSIS
• Equations for laminar, or turbulent flow are, in general, so complex that in most practical
cases, exact solutions are impossible.
• If there are many variables, as usually is the case, the resulting correlations in terms of
any one variable are hopelessly complex; however, if variables are grouped in a logical
manner, the correlations are considerably simplified.
• Experience has shown that, dimensionless groups of variables are the most useful tools in
correlating the experimental data.
Following are the different methods of analysis, which are encountered under practical
situations in transport phenomena:
a) Inspection analysis,
b) Dimensional analysis
c) Modeling analysis.
• The goal here is to derive differential equations, which describe the conservation of
energy (heat), mass, and momentum at a point.
• Equations, which apply at a point, are then capable of producing solutions to a wider
variety of problems, that is, by solving the differential equations over the region of
interest.
• Thus, the first task is to decide what this element should look like.
• The construction of the element will not only depend on the geometry of the system
being analyzed, but also on the anticipated direction of the transport
• The next step in the differential analysis is to apply the conservation equation to the
differential element over some time period.
• The final step in the differential analysis is to divide the entire conservation equation by
the volume of the element, and the differential time increment, and then let the
differential quantities approach zero in the limit.
• After simplification of the entire conservation equation, the result was integrated in order
to obtain the velocity, temperature, and concentration distributions for specific
geometries, and boundary conditions.
• For many cases, such detailed information as given in differential method of analysis is
not necessary and, in fact, is impossible to obtain because of the complexity of the
equations, and the nature of the boundary conditions.
• The complexity of the system is often due to the presence of a turbulent flow in a
complex flow geometry, together with heat and / or mass transfer.
• Balance equations can be applied over a finite volume of the system, thereby obtaining
the overall balance of mass, momentum, and energy (heat).
• Since the overall balance equations represent an integration over a volume, they can give
no information as to conditions inside the system.
• Since the details of the flow are not needed in the integral analysis, the equations apply
equally well for both turbulent, and laminar flow. However, the nature of the flow will
have an effect at both the entrance and the exit.
Let us consider two parallel plates located in a continuous media of fluid. These plates may
be separated by a small distance ‘Y’ Let us consider that both these plates are initially at rest.
At, t = 0 the lower plate is set in motion. At the final state of steady motion, a constant force ‘F’ is
required to maintain the motion of the lower plate. This force may be expressed as follows:
[Laminar flow]
i.e. The force per unit area is proportional to the velocity decrease in the distance y; the constant
of proportionality is called Viscosity of the fluid. This can be expressed in a an explicit form:
The fluid in the layer immediately next to the wall is kept in that steady state of motion by the
lower plate which is at Y = 0. This layer in turn keeps the layer above that in motion and so on.
Or the shear stress exerted in the x-direction on a fluid surface of constant y by the fluid in the
region of lesser y is designated as yxand the x-component of the fluid vector is designated.
This states that the shear force per unit area is proportional to the negative of the local velocity
gradient; this is known as Newton’s law of Viscosity, and fluids that behave in this fashion are
termed Newtonian Fluids. All gases and most simple liquids are described by Eqn.[2] Fluids that
do not obey this simple law(primarily pastes, slurries and high polymers) are called non-
Newtonian Fluids.
Another way the eqn. [2] can be interpreted. In the very neighborhood of the moving surface at
y=0 the fluid acquires certain x-momentum. This fluid, in turn, imparts some of its momentum to
the adjacent layer of liquid causing it to remain in motion in the x-direction. Hence x-momentum
is transmitted through the fluid in the y-direction. Consequently, yxmay also be interpreted as the
viscous flux of x-momentum in the y-direction.
It can be seen from eqn.[2] that the viscous momentum flux is in the direction of the negative
velocity gradient., i.e. the momentum tends to go in the direction of decreasing velocity. In other
words, the momentum travels “downhill” in the sense that it coasts from a region of higher velocity
to a region of lower velocity. [ e.g. like a sled going downhill from a region of high elevation to a
region of low elevation or heat flows from a hot region toward a colder one] A velocity gradient
can thus be thought of as a “driving force” for momentum transport.
TYPES OF FLUIDS
NEWTONIAN FLUIDS:
A fluid which obeys Newton’s law of Viscosity is called Newtonian Fluid. The
relationship between shear stress and the velocity gradient is given by: yx = - µ [d vx /dy]
This shows that there is a linear relationship between shear stress and the velocity gradient.
Draw the graph [sketch] between shear stress yx , and velocity gradient - [d v x / dy] and show
how the Newtonian fluids plot is straight line passing through the origin with viscosity µ as
its slope.
According to Newton’s law of viscosity given by: yx = - µ [d vx /dy] , a plot of yx
shear stress and the velocity gradient -(dv x /dy) for a given fluid should give a straight line
through the origin.
NON-NEWTONIAN FLUIDS :
Those fluids that do not follow this law are called non-Newtonian fluids. For these fluids, the
steady state behavior can be expressed by a generalized form:
yx = - [d v x / dy] where may be expressed as a function of either [d v x / dy] or yx.
1)Time Independent Fluids
a) Bingham plastics: A finite shear stress (yield stress) is needed to initiate the flow.
Examples: Tooth Paste
3)Viscoelastic Fluid displays both elastic and viscous properties. Part of deformation is
recovered upon the removal of stress. A true visco-elastic fluid gives time dependent
behaviour. Examples: polymers, metals at temperature close to their melting point
Rheology is the science of “deformation and flow”, and it include the study of the
mechanical properties of gases, liquids, plastics, plasticizers and crystalline
materials, for non-newtonian fluids.
The steady state behavior of most fluid can be expressed by a generalized form as
given in the following equation.
dVx
yx
dy
Where, can be expressed as a function of either dVx
or y x
dy
Bingham model:
Two parameter model, to describe the deformation and flowing nature of
Bingham fluid.
The substances that follow this model is called Bingham plastics or Bingham
fluids, and these types of fluids can resist a small shear stress but flows easily
somewhat like a Newtonian fluid under larger shear stress.
At low shear the viscosity is infinite (No movement of Bingham fluid) and at
higher shear stress the is decreases.
Eg: toothpaste, jellies, sewage sludge etc.
The same plot as shown above between shear stress yx and velocity gradient -[dvx/ dy]
for the Bingham model fluid is to be drawn. The Bingham model is given by:
yx = - µ [d v x / dy] + 0 if |yx| > o and
[d v x / dy] = 0 if |yx| < o
A Substance that follows this above two parameter model is called Bingham Model
Plastic which remains when the shear stress is of smaller magnitude than the yield stress
o but flows somewhat like a Newtonian fluid when the shear stress exceeds o .
Suppose that we get into a canoe, and, not feeling energetic, we simply float along counting fish.
Now the velocity of the observer is just the same as the velocity of the stream (v). When we report
the change of fish concentration with respect to time, the numbers depend on the local stream
velocity. This derivative is a special kind of total time derivative, and is called the “substantial
derivative”, or sometimes (more logically) the “derivative following the motion”.
The substantial derivative is related to the partial time derivative as follows:
[Dc/Dt] = [c/t] + vx[c/x] + vy[c/y] + vz[c/z],
in which vx, vy, and vz are the t] is the derivative at c/ components of the local fluid velocity
(v). Here, [ a fixed point in space, and [Dc/Dt] is a derivative computed by an observer floating
downstream with the fluid.
TOTAL DERIVATIVE:
Instead of standing on the bridge and observing the fish concentration if the observer gets
into a speed boat and sped around the river , sometimes upstream and sometimes down stream and
sometimes across the current. Thus if one reports the change of fish concentration with respect to
time , the numbers reported should reflect the motion of the boat. This, called total time derivative
is given by:
dc / dt = c /t + (c /x) (dx/dt) + (c /y) (dy/dt)+ (c /z) (dz/dt)
in which dx/dt, dy/dt and dz/dt are the velocity components of the boat.
Suppose we stand on a bridge and note how the concentration of fish just below us changes with
time. We are observing then how the concentration changes with time at a fixed position in
space. Hence by c/t mean the ‘partial of c with respect to t, holding x,y,z constant’.
Problem No :1
1. Toluene is contained between two identical and parallel plates each of area 5m2. The top
plate is pulled in minus x direction by a force of 0.083 N at a velocity of 0.3 m/s. The
bottom plate is pulled in the opposite direction by a force of 0.027N at a velocity of 0.1
m/s as shown in fig. The plates are 10mm apart. Calculate the viscosity in centipoise.
Solution:
U = - 0.3 m/s
F = -0.083N
10 mm
A = 5m2 , du = V2-V1
= -0.3 – 0.1
= -0.4 m/s
= -0.022/ (-0.4/0.01)
Problem No : 2(EXERCISE)
2. The distance b/w two parallel plates is 0.00914m. The lower plate is being pulled at a
relative velocity of 0.360 m/s greater than the top plate. The fluid is soya bean oil with
viscosity 0.4 x 10-2pa.s at 303K.
(ii) If glycerol at 293K having a viscosity of 1.069 kg/m.s is used instead of soyabean oil.
What relative velocity is needed using the same distance between the plate that the
same shear stress is obtained as (i) and what is the new shear rate.
Reduced viscosity as a function of reduced temperature for several values of the reduced
pressure
if critical p-V-T data are available, then c, may be estimated from these empirical
relations:
For N-component fluids with mole fractions x, the "pseudocritical" properties are:
EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE
For Liquids:
forces with increase of temperature the cohesive forces decrease rapidly resulting in
decrease of viscosity of liquid.
For Gases
Effect of Pressure
• The viscosity under ordinary condition is not appreciably affected by change in pressure.
• Viscosity of gas and liquid has be found to increase with in pressure at constant
temperature.
•
MOLECULAR THEORY OF VISCOSITY OF GASES AT LOW DENSITY:
u =(8kT/m)1/2
in which K is the Boltzman constant. The frequency of molecular bombardment
per unit area on one side of any stationary surface exposed to the gas is,
Z =u.n/4
The average distance traveled by a molecule between successive collisions is the
mean free path is given by,
=1/[(21/2)d2.n]
on the average, the molecular reaching a plane will have experienced their last collision
at a distance a from the plane, where a is given roughly by,
a=2/3
The concept of the mean free path is intuitively appealing, but it is meaningful
only when is large compared to the range of intermolecular forces. The concept is
appropriate for the rigid – sphere molecular model considered here.
The concept of the mean free path is intuitively appealing, but it is meaningful only
when is large compared to the range of intermolecular forces. The concept is
appropriate for the rigid – sphere molecular model considered here.
To determine the viscosity of a gas in terms of the molecular model parameters, we
consider the behavior of gas when it flows parallel to the xy-plane with a velocity gradient
dvx/dy. The flux of x-momentum across any plane o constant y is found by assuming the
x – moments of the molecules that cross in the positive y direction and subtracting the x
– momenta of those that cross in the opposite direction, as follows,
yx =Z.my-a-Z.my+a
yx= -1/3u.mudvx/dy
This has the same form as Newton’s law of viscosity yx = dvx/dy. Comparing the two
equation gives an equation for the viscosity,
=1/3n.m.u. =1/3u
This expression was obtained by Maxwell. The quantity d2 is called collision cross-
section.
However, because of the close parking, the motion is largely confined to a vibration
of each molecule within a “cage” formed by its nearest neighbors. This cage is
represented by an energy barrier of height in which is the molar free energy of
activation for escape from the cage in the stationary fluid. According to Eyring, a liquid
at rest continually undergoes rearrangements, in which one molecule at a time escapes
from its “cage” into an adjoining “hole”, and that the molecules thus move in each of the
co – ordinate directions in jumps of length a at a frequency per molecule. The frequency
is given by the rate equation,
in which, k and h are Boltzmann and Planck constants N is the avagadro number and
R= NK is the gas constant.
In a fluid i.e. flowing in the x – direction with a velocity gradient dvx/dy, the frequency
of molecular rearrangement is increased. The effect can be explained by considering the
potential energy barrier as distorted under the applied stress so that,
Where is the volume of a mole of liquid and is an approximation with the applied
shear stress or against the applied shear stress. + is the frequency of forward jumps and
- is the frequency of backward jumps. From (1) and (2),
The net velocity with which molecular in layer A slips ahead of those in layer B is just the
distance traveled per jump (a) times the net frequency of forward jumps (+ - - ), is`
xA-xB=a (+--) (4)
The velocity profile can be considered to be linear over the very small distance
between the layers A and B, so that
-dx/dy =(a/f)(+--) (5)
The thermal conductivity of dilute mono atomic gas is described by the kinetic theory
of gases at low density. We use the model of rigid, non-attracting spheres of mass m and
diameter d. The gas as a whole is at rest (V=0), but the molecular motions must be
amounted for.
For a rigid-sphere gas,
u = [8KT/(M)]1/2 (1)mean molecular speed
The molecules reaching any plane in the gas have had, on an average, their last collisions
at a distance a from the plane, where,
A= 2 /3 (4)
The only form of energy that can be exchanged in a collision between two
smooth and rigid spheres is translational energy; the mean translational energy per
molecule under equilibrium condition is,
For such a gas, the molar heat capacity at constant volume is,
Qy = Z (Mu2/2y-a - Mu2/2y+a )
= 3KZ(Ty-a-Ty+a)/2 (7)
The above equation is based on the assumption that all molecules have velocities
representative of their region of their last collision and that the temperature profile T (y)
is linear for a distance of several mean free paths.
T =T - 2 (dT/dy)/3 (8)
T = T + 2(dT/dy)/3 (9)
This corresponds to Fourier’s law of heat conduction with the thermal conductivity
given by
K=[{MKT/}^1/2](K/M)/(d2)=2[{MKT}^1/2]/(32d2).cv (12)
A kinetic theory for the thermal conductivity of monoatomic liquids was developed
a half century ago, but it has not yet been possible to implement it for practical
calculations.
According to Bridgman’s simple theory of energy transport in pure liquids, the molecules
are arranged in a cubic lattice, with a center spacing given by (V/N )1/3 in which V/N
is the volume per molecule. He further assumed energy to be transferred from one
lattice plane
to the next at the sonic velocity for the given fluid. The development is based on
reinterpretation of rigid sphere gas theory,
The heat capacity at constant volume of monoatomic liquid is about the same as
for a solid at high temperature, which is given by Dulong and Petit formula,
The mean molecular speed in the y-direction, |uy|, is replaced by the sonic velocity vs.
The distance a that the energy travels between two successive collisions is taken to be
lattice spacing (V/N )1/3. Making these substitutions in (1) gives
which is Bridgman’s equation. Experimental data show good agreement with (2) even
for polyatomic liquids, but the numerical co-efficient is somewhat too high. Better
agreement is obtained if the co-efficient is changed to 2.80,
This equation is limited to densities well above the critical density, because of the tacit
assumptions that each molecule oscillates in a “cage” formed by its nearest neighbors.
The success of this equation for polyatomic fluids seems to imply that the energy transfer
in collisions of polyatomic molecules is incomplete, cv = 3(K/M) is less than the heat
capacities of polyatomic liquids.
Vs=[(cp/cv). (P/)T]
The quantity (P/)T may be obtained from iso thermal compressibility, measurements
or from an equation of state, and (cp/cv) is very nearly unity for liquids, except near the
critical point.
The mass diffusivity for binary mixture of non-polar gases is predictable within about
5 percent by kinetic theory. Considering a large body of gas containing molecular species
A and A, which are identical except for labeling. We wish to determine the self-diffusivity
DAA* in terms of the molecular properties on the assumption that the molecules are rigid
spheres of equal mass MA and diameter dA.
Since the properties of A and A* are nearly the same, the following results of kinetic
theory for a pure rigid sphere gas at low density in which the gradients of temperature,
pressure and velocity are small:
u=[(8KT)/(M)]1/2 (1)
Z=nu/4 (2)
=1/[21/2d2n] (3)
The molecules reaching any plane in the gas have on the average had their last
collusion at a distance a from the plane, where
A = 2/3
In these equations, n is the number density (total number of molecules per unit
volume). To predict the self diffusivity DAA, we consider the motion of species A in the y
direction under a mass fraction gradient dWA/dy, where the fluid mixture moves in the y
direction at a finite velocity, mass average velocity V throughout. The temperature T and
the total molar concentration are considered constant. The net mass flux of species A
crossing the plane in the positive y direction and subtracting the mass A crossing in the
negative Y direction;
(WAVy)y+[(uWA/4)y-a-(uWA)y+a]
Here, the first term is the mass transport in the y direction because of the mass motion
of fluid that is, the convective transport and the last two terms give the molecular
transport relative to VY.
It is assumed that the concentration profile WA(y) is very nearly linear over distances
of several mean free paths
This is the convective mass flux plus the molecular mass flux, the latter being given by
(1). Therefore, we get the following expression for the self-diffusivity:
DAA*=u/3
= 2[(MAKT)1/2/dA2]/(3)
The development of a formula for D for rigid spheres of unequal masses and diameter is
considerably more difficult.
DAB=(2/3)(KT/)1/2 {(MA-1+MB-1)/2}1/2((dA+dB)/2)2n-1
That is 1/MA is replaced by the arithmetic average of 1/MA and 1/MB and dA by the
arithmetic average of dA and dB.
The kinetic theory for diffusion in simple liquid is not as well developed as that for
dilute gases, and it cannot presently give accurate analytical predictions of diffusivities.
As a result, our understanding of liquid diffusion depends primarily on the rather crude
hydro dynamic and activated-state models. These, in turn, have spawned a number of
empirical
Correlations, which provide the best available means for predictions. These correlations
permit estimation of diffusivities in terms of more easily measured properties such as
viscosity and molar volumes.
The hydrodynamic theory takes as its starting point the Nernst-Einstein equation,
which states that, the diffusivity of a single particle or solute particle A through a
stationary medium B is given by,
In which yA/FA is the “mobility” of a particle A. If the shape and size of A are known,
the mobility can be calculated by the solution of the weeping flow equations of motion.
Thus, if A is spherical and if one takes into account the possibilities of “slip” at the fluid-
solid interface, one obtains,
In which B is the viscosity of the pure solvent, RA is the radius of the solute particles and
AB is the “coefficient of sliding friction”. The limiting cases of AB = and AB = 0 are
of particular interest.
a. AB = (no slip condition)
If the molecules A and B are identical and if they can be assumed to form a cubic lattice
with the adjacent molecule just touching, then 2 RA=(VA/NA )1/3.