Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 424 views

    Ejercicio 7.2 Diseño de Ingenieria Mecanica

    Uploaded by

    Brajack Rh
    1) This document describes solving a problem involving successive trials to determine the optimal shaft size based on factors like stress and material properties. 2) The first trial uses an initial diameter guess of 22mm, calculates related factors, and determines the diameter is too small at 20.6mm. 3) The second trial uses 20.6mm, recalculates related factors, and finds the optimal diameter is 20.5mm, with a decision to use 32mm to allow for readability in diagrams.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Ejercicio 7.2 Diseño de Ingenieria Mecanica

    Uploaded by

    Brajack Rh
    424 views2 pages
    1) This document describes solving a problem involving successive trials to determine the optimal shaft size based on factors like stress and material properties. 2) The first trial uses an initial diameter guess of 22mm, calculates related factors, and determines the diameter is too small at 20.6mm. 3) The second trial uses 20.6mm, recalculates related factors, and finds the optimal diameter is 20.5mm, with a decision to use 32mm to allow for readability in diagrams.

    Original Description:

    Solución ejercicio 7.2 de Shigley

    Original Title

    Ejercicio 7.2 Diseño de ingenieria mecanica

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) This document describes solving a problem involving successive trials to determine the optimal shaft size based on factors like stress and material properties. 2) The first trial uses an initial diameter guess of 22mm, calculates related factors, and determines the diameter is too small at 20.6mm. 3) The second trial uses 20.6mm, recalculates related factors, and finds the optimal diameter is 20.5mm, with a decision to use 32mm to allow for readability in diagrams.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    424 views2 pages

    Ejercicio 7.2 Diseño de Ingenieria Mecanica

    Uploaded by

    Brajack Rh
    1) This document describes solving a problem involving successive trials to determine the optimal shaft size based on factors like stress and material properties. 2) The first trial uses an initial diameter guess of 22mm, calculates related factors, and determines the diameter is too small at 20.6mm. 3) The second trial uses 20.6mm, recalculates related factors, and finds the optimal diameter is 20.5mm, with a decision to use 32mm to allow for readability in diagrams.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    budynas_SM_ch07.

    qxd 11/30/2006 15:31 Page 179

    FIRST PAGES

    Chapter 7 179

    7-2 This problem has to be done by successive trials, since Se is a function of shaft size. The
    material is SAE 2340 for which Sut = 1226 MPa, S y = 1130 MPa, and H B ≥ 368.
    Eq. (6-19): ka = 4.51(1226) −0.265 = 0.685

    Trial #1: Choose dr = 22 mm


     −0.107
    22
    Eq. (6-20): kb = = 0.893
    7.62
    Eq. (6-18): Se = 0.685(0.893)(0.5)(1226) = 375 MPa
    dr = d − 2r = 0.75D − 2D/20 = 0.65D
    dr 22
    D= = = 33.8 mm
    0.65 0.65
    D 33.8
    r= = = 1.69 mm
    20 20
    Fig. A-15-14:
    d = dr + 2r = 22 + 2(1.69) = 25.4 mm
    d 25.4
    = = 1.15
    dr 22
    r 1.69
    = = 0.077
    dr 22
    K t = 1.9
    Fig. A-15-15: K ts = 1.5
    Fig. 6-20: r = 1.69 mm, q = 0.90
    Fig. 6-21: r = 1.69 mm, qs = 0.97
    Eq. (6-32): K f = 1 + 0.90(1.9 − 1) = 1.81
    K f s = 1 + 0.97(1.5 − 1) = 1.49

    We select the DE-ASME Elliptic failure criteria.


    Eq. (7-12) with d as dr , and Mm = Ta = 0,
       1/2 1/3
     16(2.5) 3 2  3 2 
    1.81(70)(10 ) 1.49(45)(10 )
    dr = 4 +3
     π 375 1130 

    = 20.6 mm
    budynas_SM_ch07.qxd 11/30/2006 15:31 Page 180

    FIRST PAGES

    180 Solutions Manual • Instructor’s Solution Manual to Accompany Mechanical Engineering Design

    Trial #2: Choose dr = 20.6 mm


     
    20.6 −0.107
    kb = = 0.899
    7.62
    Se = 0.685(0.899)(0.5)(1226) = 377.5 MPa
    dr 20.6
    D= = = 31.7 mm
    0.65 0.65
    D 31.7
    r= = = 1.59 mm
    20 20
    Figs. A-15-14 and A-15-15:
    d = dr + 2r = 20.6 + 2(1.59) = 23.8 mm
    d 23.8
    = = 1.16
    dr 20.6
    r 1.59
    = = 0.077
    dr 20.6
    We are at the limit of readability of the figures so
    K t = 1.9, K ts = 1.5 q = 0.9, qs = 0.97
    ∴ K f = 1.81 K f s = 1.49

    Using Eq. (7-12) produces dr = 20.5 mm. Further iteration produces no change.
    Decisions:
    dr = 20.5 mm
    20.5
    D= = 31.5 mm, d = 0.75(31.5) = 23.6 mm
    0.65
    Use D = 32 mm, d = 24 mm, r = 1.6 mm Ans.

    7-3 F cos 20°(d/2) = T, F = 2T /(d cos 20°) = 2(3000)/(6 cos 20°) = 1064 lbf
    MC = 1064(4) = 4257 lbf · in
    For sharp fillet radii at the shoulders, from Table 7-1, K t = 2.7, and K ts = 2.2. Examining
    Figs. 6-20 and 6-21, with Sut = 80 kpsi, conservatively estimate q = 0.8 and qs = 0.9. These
    estimates can be checked once a specific fillet radius is determined.
    Eq. (6-32): K f = 1 + (0.8)(2.7 − 1) = 2.4
    K f s = 1 + (0.9)(2.2 − 1) = 2.1
    (a) Static analysis using fatigue stress concentration factors:
    From Eq. (7-15) with M = Mm , T = Tm , and Ma = Ta = 0,
     2  2 1/2
     32K f M 16K fs T
    σmax = +3
    πd 3 πd 3

    You might also like