Experimental Investigation On Partial Replacement of Cement With Dolomite Powder PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9

ISSN(Online): 2319-8753

ISSN (Print): 2347-6710

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,


Engineering and Technology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Website: www.ijirset.com
Vol. 6, Issue 7, July 2017

Experimental Investigation on partial


Replacement of Cement with dolomite powder
Athulya Sugathan
Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, New Horizon Engineering College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

ABSTRACT:The main aim of this experimental investigation is to focus on the possibilities of utilizing
dolomitepowder (DP) in cement and concrete production. Cement is one of the most important constituents of concrete.
Most of the properties of concrete depend on cement. Cement is manufactured by calcining argillaceous and calcareous
materials at a high temperature. During this process, large amount of CO2 is released into the atmosphere. India is the
second largest producer of cement in the world. It is estimated that the production of one ton of cement results in the
emission of 0.8 ton of CO2. The reduction in the consumption of cement will not only reduce the cost of concrete but
also the emission of CO2. Dolomite powder obtained by pulverising the sedimentary rock forming mineral dolomite
can be used as a replacement material for cement in concrete up to certain percentage. Dolomite powder has some
similar characteristics of cement. Using dolomite powder in concrete can reduce the cost of concrete and may increase
the strength to some extent. This paper examines the possibility of using dolomite powder as a partial replacement
material to cement. The replacement percentages tried were 0%, 5%, 7.5%, 10% and 15% by weight of cement. The
compressive and split tensile strength of concrete with dolomite powder was compared with those of the reference
specimens. The results indicate that replacement of cement with dolomite powder increases the compressive and split
tensile strength of concrete.

KEYWORDS: Dolomite Powder, Mix Design, Compressive Strength, Split Tensile Strength

I. INTRODUCTION

The concrete is one of two largest producers of carbon dioxide (CO2), creating up to 5% of worldwide man-made
emissions of this gas, of which 50% is from the chemical process and 40% from burning fuel. The carbon dioxide
CO2 produced for the manufacture of one tonne of structural concrete (using ~14% cement) is estimated at
410 kg/m3 (~180 kg/tonne @ density of 2.3 g/cm3) (reduced to 290 kg/m3 with 30% fly ash replacement of cement).
The CO2 emission from the concrete production is directly proportional to the cement content used in the concrete mix;
900 kg of CO2 are emitted for the fabrication of every ton of cement, accounting for 88% of the emissions associated
with the average concrete mix. Cement manufacture contributes greenhouse gases both directly through the production
of carbon dioxide when calcium carbonate is thermally decomposed, producing lime and carbon dioxide, and also
through the use of energy, particularly from the combustion of fossil fuels.
One area of the concrete life cycle worth noting is the fact that concrete has a very low embodied energy relative to the
quantity that is used. This is primarily the result of the fact that the materials used in concrete construction, such as
aggregates, pozzolans, and water, are relatively plentiful and can often be drawn from local sources. This means that
transportation only accounts for 7% of the embodied energy of concrete, while the cement production accounts for
70%. With a total embodied energy of 1.69 GJ/tonne concrete is lower than any other building material besides wood.
It is worth noting that this value is based on mix proportions for concrete of no more than 20% fly ash. It is estimated
that one percent replacement of cement with fly ash represents a .7% reduction in energy consumption. With some
proposed mixes containing as much as 80% fly ash, this would represent a considerable energy savings.
One reason why the carbon emissions are so high is because cement has to be heated to very high temperatures in order
for clinker to form. A major culprit of this is alite (Ca3SiO5), a mineral in concrete that cures within hours of pouring
and is therefore responsible for much of its initial strength. However, alite also has to be heated to 1,500 °C in the
clinker-forming process. Some research suggests that alite can be replaced by a different mineral, such It has a roasting

Copyright to IJIRSET DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2017.0607041 12748


ISSN(Online): 2319-8753
ISSN (Print): 2347-6710

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,


Engineering and Technology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Website: www.ijirset.com
Vol. 6, Issue 7, July 2017

temperature of 1,200 °C, which is significantly lower than that of alite. Furthermore, belite is actually stronger once
concrete cures. However, belite takes on the order of days or months to set completely, which leaves concrete weak for
an unacceptably long time. Current research is focusing on finding possible impurity additives, like magnesium, that
might speed up the curing process. It is also worthwhile to consider that belite takes more energy to grind, which may
make its full life impact similar to or even higher than alite.
Another approach has been the partial replacement of conventional clinker with such alternatives as fly ash, bottom
ash, and slag, all of which are by-products of other industries that would otherwise end up in landfills. Fly ash and
bottom ash come from thermoelectric power plants, while slag is a waste from blast furnaces in the ironworks industry.
These materials are slowly gaining popularity as additives, especially since they can potentially increase strength,
decrease density, and prolong durability of concrete.
II.LITERATURE SURVEY

Kamal M.M, (2012) evaluated the bond strength of self compacting concrete mixes containing dolomite powder. The
result showed that the bond strength increased as the replacement of Portland cement with dolomite powder increased.
All SCC mixes containing dolomite powder up to 30 % yielded bond strength that is adequate for design purpose. They
reported that the shear strength of RC beams were better than that of the conventional SCC without dolomite powder.
Deepa Balakrishnan S and Paulose K.C (2013) carried out an investigation on the workability and strength
characteristics of self compacting concrete containing fly ash and dolomite powder. They made high volume fly ash
self compacting concrete with 12.5percent, 18.75percent, 25percent and 37.5percent of the cement (by mass) replaced
by fly ash and 6.25percent, 12.5percent and 25percent of the cement replaced by dolomite powder. For all levels of
cement replacement, concrete achieved superior performance in the fresh and hardened states when compared with the
reference mixture.
Bhavin K, (2013) presented the details of the investigation carried out on paver blocks made with cement, dolomite
block and different percentages of polypropylene fibres.They reported that addition of 0.3% and 0.4% of polypropylene
fibres improved the abrasion resistance and flexural strength of paver block.
Salim Barbhuiya (2011) carried out an investigation to explore the possibilities of using dolomite powder for the
production of SCC. Test results indicated that it is possible to manufacture SCC using fly ash and dolomite powder.

III.MATERIAL AND METHODOLOGY


3.1MATERIALS

CEMENT: ordinary portland cement (opc) of 43 grade was used throughout the course of the investigation. The
physical properties of the cement as determined from various tests conforming to Indian Standard IS: 1489:1991.
DOLOMITE POWDER was collected from the dolomite powder manufacturing factory. It was sieved by IS-90
micron sieve before mixing in concrete.Dolomite is a carbonate material composed of calcium magnesium carbonate
CaMg (CO3)2. The term is also used to describe the sedimentary carbonate rock dolostone. Dolostone (dolomite rock)
is composed predominantly of the mineral dolomite with a stoichiometric ratio of 50% or greater content of magnesium
replacing calcium, often as a result of digenesis.
Advantages of Dolomite Powder
 Dolomite has good weathering resistance
 Higher degree of purity, wet ability and whiteness.
 Dolomite is popular for its shear and compressive strength.
 Fire resistive and solid.
 Long lasting life and stiffness.

Copyright to IJIRSET DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2017.0607041 12749


ISSN(Online): 2319-8753
ISSN (Print): 2347-6710

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,


Engineering and Technology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Website: www.ijirset.com
Vol. 6, Issue 7, July 2017

Dolomite is a rock forming mineral which is noted for remarkable wettablity and dispersibility as well as moderate oil
and plasticizers absorption. Salient features of natural dolomite are shown in Table:1
Table:1 Salient features of natural dolomite
Sl.No Property Dolomite Powder

1 Formula CaMg(CO3)2
2 Specific Gravity 2.85
3 Color White, Grey to Pink
4 Tenacity Brittle
5 Moisture Content (%) Nil
6 Crystal System Trigonal
7 Sieve Analysis Zone III

COARSE AGGREGATES are those chemically inert materials which when bonded by cement paste form concrete.
Aggregates influence the strength of concrete to great extent. The properties of concrete are directly related to those of
its constituents and as such aggregate used in a concrete mix should be hard, strong, dense, durable, and free from
lumps of clays, loam, vegetable and other such foreign matter. The presence of all such debris prevents adhesion of
cement on the surface of aggregates and hence reduces the strength of concrete.

FINE AGGREGATES (M-SAND) the material which passed through I.S. Sieve No. 480 (4.75mm) is termed as fine
aggregates. Function of fine aggregates is to make concrete dense, by filling voids of coarse aggregates, reduces the
shrinkage of cement and makes an economical mix. Natural sand or crushed stone dust is used as a fine aggregate in
concrete mix. Sand may be obtained from sea, river, lake or pit, but when used in a concrete mix, it should be properly
washed and tested to ascertain that total percentage of clay, silt, salts and other organic matter does not exceed specified
Limit.
3.2. METHODOLOGY
• Mix design for self compacting concrete (SCC) are made using the properties constituents of concrete. Grade of
concrete is taken as M30 and the mix design are done as per IS:10262-2009 and IS: 456-2000 for different dolomite
powder percentage replacing of cement, using M-sand as fine aggregate. All mixtures are prepared for room
temperature.
• Test specimens of prescribed mix designs are done and allowed them to cure in water for 7, 14 and 28days at room
temperature.
• Finally, tests on Compressive Strength, Split Tensile Strength on 7th ,14th,and 28th day respectively.

IV.INITIAL INVESTIGATIONS
The basic properties of materials like specific gravity (cement, coarse aggregates, fine aggregates),fineness of
cement, standard consistency of cement etc are shown in Table:2.

Table: 2 Basic Properties of Materials


Sl. Test Conducted Results IS code
No
1 Specific Gravity of Cement (OPC 53) 3.15 IS 12269:1987
2 Specific Gravity of Fine Aggregates 2.58 IS 2720:1980-Part 3

Copyright to IJIRSET DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2017.0607041 12750


ISSN(Online): 2319-8753
ISSN (Print): 2347-6710

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,


Engineering and Technology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Website: www.ijirset.com
Vol. 6, Issue 7, July 2017

3 Specific Gravity of Coarse Aggregates 2.69 IS 2386:1963-Part 4


4 Specific Gravity of Dolomite powder 2.84 IS 3812:2003
5 Standard Consistency of cement 29% IS 4031:1991-Part 4
6 Fineness Modulus of Cement 91% IS 4031:1996
7 Initial Setting time of Cement 33 mins IS 4031:1988-Part 5
8 Bulk Density of Fine Aggregates 1628 kg/m3 IS 2386:1963-Part 4
9 Bulk Density of Coarse Aggregates 1550 kg/m3 IS 2386:1963-Part 4
10 Water Absorption of Fine Aggregates 1.9% IS 2386:1963-Part 4
11 Water Absorption of Coarse Aggregates 0.5% IS 2386:1963-Part 4
12 Fineness Modulus of Fine Aggregates 3.09 IS 2386:1963-Part 5
13 Impact Value 28% IS 2386: 1963-Part 4

4.1 SIEVE ANALYSIS OF COARSE AGGREGATES

After the material has been sieved, remove each tray, weigh each size, and record each weight to the nearest 0.1 g. Be
sure to remove any aggregate trapped within the sieve openings by gently working from either or both sides with a
trowel or piece of flat metal until the aggregate is freed. Banging the sieve on the floor or hitting the sieve with a
hammer will damage the sieve. The final total of the weights retained on each sieve should be within 0.3% of the
original weight of the sample prior to grading. Particles larger than 3 in. (75 mm) should be hand sieved. When passing
large stones through sieves, do not force the aggregate through the sieve openings. The sieve analysis of coarse

I.S Sieve Size Particle Size Weight of Percentage Cumulative Percentage


(mm) Coarse Weight Percentage Fineness (100-
aggregates Retained Weight a)
Retained Retained (a)
(grams)
20mm 20.000 240.0 08.000 08.00 92.00
10mm 10.000 1960 65.330 73.33 26.67
4.75mm 04.750 770.0 25.660 98.99 1.010
2.36mm 02.360 8.700 00.290 99.28 0.720
600micron 00.600 5.100 00.170 99.45 0.550
75micron 00.075 7.700 00.250 97.70 0.300
pan 8.500 00.283 100.0 0.000
aggregates are shown in Table:3
Table:3 Sieve Analysis of Coarse Aggregates

4.2 SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FINE AGGREGATES


 The test sample is dried to a constant weight at a temperature of 110 + 5oC and weighed.
 The sample is sieved by using a set of IS Sieves
 On completion of sieving, the material on each sieve is weighed
 Cumulative weight passing through each sieve is calculated as a percentage of the total sample weight
 Fineness modulus is obtained by adding cumulative percentage of aggregates retained on each sieve and
dividing the sum by 100.The sieve analysis of Fine aggregates are shown in Table:4.

Copyright to IJIRSET DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2017.0607041 12751


ISSN(Online): 2319-8753
ISSN (Print): 2347-6710

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,


Engineering and Technology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Website: www.ijirset.com
Vol. 6, Issue 7, July 2017

I.S Sieve Particle Weight of Percentage Cumulative Percentage


Table:4 Size Size soil Weight Percentage Fineness (100- Sieve
Analysis (mm) Retained Retained Weight a) of Fine
(kg) Retained (a)
4.75mm 4.75 0 0 0 100
2.36mm 2.36 .068 6.8 6.8 93.2
1.18mm 1.18 .224 22.4 29.2 70.8
600micron .5 .130 13.0 42.2 57.8
300micron .3 .204 20.4 62.6 37.4
150micron .15 .154 15.4 78.0 22
75micron .075 .126 12.6 90.6 9.4
Pan .094 9.4 100 0
Total Percentage Fineness 309.4
Aggregates

V. MIX DESIGN

Step-I Data Selected


Grade : M35
Type of cement : OPC 53
Maximum size of aggregate : 20mm
Maximum water cement ratio : 0.45
Workability : 75mm slump
Exposure condition : very severe
Method of concrete placing : normal
Degree of supervision : good
Chemical admixture type : super plasticizer
Specific gravity of cement : 3.15
Specific gravity of coarse aggregate : 2.69
Specific gravity of fine aggregate : 2.58
Specific gravity of admixture : 1.06
Specific gravity of water : 1.00

Copyright to IJIRSET DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2017.0607041 12752


ISSN(Online): 2319-8753
ISSN (Print): 2347-6710

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,


Engineering and Technology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Website: www.ijirset.com
Vol. 6, Issue 7, July 2017

Specific gravity of dolomite powder : 2.84


Initial water content in fine aggregate : 1.9%
Initial water content in coarse aggregate : 0.5%
Step-II. Target mean strength
F’ck=fck+1.65s Wheref’ck= target average compressive strength at 28days,
fck= characteristic compressive strength at 28 days, and
s= standard deviation.
From table 1, standard deviation, s= 5 N/mm2.
Therefore, target mean strength=35+ (1.65*5) = 43.25 N/mm2.
Step-III selection of water-cement ratio:
From table 5 of IS: 456, maximum water-cement ratio is 0.45.
Based on experience, adopt water-cement ratio as 0.42.
0.42<0.45, hence ok.
Step-IVselection of water content:
From table 2, maximum water content for 20mm aggregate
= 186 litres (for 25 to 50mm slump range)
Estimated water content for 75mm slump = 186+ (3/100*186)
=191litres
As super plasticizer is used, the water content can be reduced up to 20% and above
Let’s assume, water content is reduced by 16%.
Therefore water content is reduced by = 191*0.16 =32litres
Water content = 191-32= 159litres.
Step-Vcalculation of cement content:
Water cement ratio = 0.42
Cement content = 159/.42= 379.57kgs/m3approx.380kgs/m3
From table 5 of IS: 456, minimum cement content for “very severe” exposure condition = 340kg/m3.
380kg/m3> 340kg/m3, hence OK.
Step--VI. calculation proportion of coarse aggregate and fine aggregate content:
From table 3, volume of coarse aggregate corresponding to 20mm size aggregate and fine aggregate
(zone 2) for water cement ratio of 0.5= 0.62.
In present case water cement ratio is 0.42. Therefore, volume of coarse aggregate is required to be increased to decrease
the fine aggregate content. As the water cement ratio is lower by 0.08, the proportion of volume of coarse aggregate is
increased by 0.02(at the rate of +/- 0.01 for every +/- 0.05 change in water-cement ratio).Therefore, corrected
proportion of volume of coarse aggregate for the water-cement ratio of 0.42 =0.632.
Volume of fine aggregate content = 1-0.632 = 0.37
Step-VIIMix Calculations:
The mix calculations per unit volume of concrete shall be as follows:
 Volume of concrete= 1m3.

Volume of cement=(mass of cement/specific gravity of cement)*(1/1000) =(380/3.15)*(1/1000)= 0.12m3
 Volume of water=(mass of water/specific gravity of water)*(1/10002)=(159/1)*(1/1000)= 0.159m3
 Volume of chemical admixture(@1.5% by mass of cementatious material)= (mass of chemical
admixture/specific gravity of admixture)*(1/1000)= (1.5*380/1.06)*(1/1000)= 0.00537m3
 Volume of all in aggregates= [a-(b+c+d)]= [1-(0.12+0.159+0.00537)]= 0.717m3
 Mass of coarse aggregate= e*volume of coarse aggregate*specific gravity of coarse aggregate*1000=
0.717*0.632*2.69*1000= 1218.95kgs
 Mass of fine aggregate= e*volume of fine aggregate*specific gravity of fine aggregate*1000=
0717*037*2.58*1000= 684.44kgs
 Mass of chemical admixture= (1.5/100)*380 = 5.7kgs
Step-IXsight corrections:
Initial moisture content in fine aggregate = 1.9%
Initial water content in coarse aggregate = 0.5%

Copyright to IJIRSET DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2017.0607041 12753


ISSN(Online): 2319-8753
ISSN (Print): 2347-6710

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,


Engineering and Technology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Website: www.ijirset.com
Vol. 6, Issue 7, July 2017

Mass of fine aggregate = 684.44-(684.44*1.9/100) = 671.43kgs


Mass of coarse aggregate = 1218.95-(1218.95*0.5/100) = 1212.85kgs
Total water content = 159+20 = 179 litres.
X. mix proportions: Cement = 380kg/m3,Water = 179kg/m3,Fine aggregates = 672kg/m3,Coarse aggregate =
1213kg/m3,Chemical admixture = 5.7kg/m3,Water-cement ratio= 0.42 .Table:5 shows the final mix proportions. The
mix proportions are shown in Table:5
Table:5 Mix Proportions

Cement Water Coarse Aggregates Fine Aggregates Chemical Admixture


1 3.192 1.768 0.015 0.42

VI.WORKABILITY TEST ON CONCRETE


6.1 SLUMP CONE TEST
To obtain a representative sample, take samples from two or more regular intervals throughout the discharge of
the mixer or truck. Do not take samples at the beginning or the end of the discharge.
Dampen inside of cone and place it on a smooth, moist, non-absorbent, level surface large enough to
accommodate both the slumped concrete and the slump cone. Stand or, foot pieces throughout the test procedure
to hold the cone firmly in place. Fig:1 shows the slump flow v/s time. According to the results slump flow
reduces with time.
Fig:1Slump Flow
200
Slump in mm.

100

0
0 100 200
Time in mins.
VII. TEST RESULTS OF HARDEN CONCRETE TESTS

7.1. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH


The cube compressive strength of concrete was determined by conducting test on 150mm x 150mm x 150mm cube
specimens at 7,14 and 28 days of curing. After curing, three cube specimens were tested on a compression machine.
The specimens were tested in the compression testing machine of 2000kN capacity. The compressive strength results
are shown in Fig:2.According to the results compressive strength is maximum for 7.5% addition of dolomite powder
and further addition will results in the reduction of compressive strength.

7.2. SPLIT TENSILE STRENGTH


Tensile strength of concrete greatly affects the extent and size of cracking in concrete. Tensile strength of concrete is
less when compared with its compressive strength. Cylinders of diameter 150mm and height 300mm were used to
determine the split tensile strength. The Tensile strength results are shown in Fig:3.According to the results tensile
strength is maximum for 7.5% addition of dolomite powder and further addition will results in the reduction of tensile
strength.
Fig:2 Compressive Strength Values

Copyright to IJIRSET DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2017.0607041 12754


ISSN(Online): 2319-8753
ISSN (Print): 2347-6710

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,


Engineering and Technology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Website: www.ijirset.com
Vol. 6, Issue 7, July 2017

Fig:3Tensile strength values

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH.
50
H
T 40
G
N 30
E 7 Days (N/mm2)
R
T
S 2 20
Em
IS m
V / 10 14 Days
SN 0 (N/mm2)
E
R
P
M 0 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 28 Days
O (N/mm2)
C % DOLOMITE POWDER

VIII.CONCLUSION
The Compressive strength of Cubes are increased with addition of dolomite powder up to 15% replaced by weight of
cement and further any addition of dolomite powder the compressive strength decreases. The Split Tensile strength of
Cylinders are increased with addition of dolomite powder up to 15% replaced by weight of cement and further any
addition of dolomite powder the Split Tensile strength decreases. We found out the optimum percentage for
replacement of dolomite powder with cement and it is 7.5% cement for both cubes and cylinders. We have put forth a
simple step to minimize the costs for construction with usage of dolomite powder which is freely or cheaply
available.We have also stepped into a realm the environmental pollution by cement production; being our main
objective as Civil Engineers.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would like to extend my most profound gratitude and deepest thanks to my students, Ashay,Balaji and Jagan,
Department of Civil Engineering, NHCE, BANGALORE for their assistance, commitment and encouragement
throughout the entire period of the research project. Their Dedication and continuous assistance enabled me to remain
focused on the research investigation from the beginning of the project to the very end for all the time spent on
coordinating and supervising the whole thesis

REFERENCES

[1] Deer, W. A., R. A. Howie and J. Zussman, “An Introduction to the Rock Forming Minerals”, Longman, pp. 489–493(1966).
[2] Dolomite.”Handbook of Mineralogy”. Retrieved on 2011-10-10.
[3] J Krauskopf, Konrad Bates; Bird, Dennis K, “Introduction to geochemistry” Newyork: McGraw-Hill (3rd ed.) (1995).
[4] Saussure le fils, M. de “Analyse de la dolomite”. Journal de Physique, vol.40, pp.161-173. (1792)
[5] Klein, Cornelis and Cornelius S. Hurlbut Jr., “Manual of Mineralogy”, Wiley, 20th ed., pp. 339-340
[6] M.S Shetty,” Concrete Technology”, New Delhi: S.Chand & Company ltd, 2012.
[7] IS 456:2000, “Recommended code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete”, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi
[8] Salim Barbhuiya, "Effects of fly ash and dolomite powder on the properties of self-compacting concrete”, Construction and Building Materials,
Volume. 25, pp.3301-3305,2011,
[9] Henning, O., Kudjakow, A., Winkler, K-G, “Influence of dolomite on the hydration of Portland cement”, Scientific Journal of the University
of Architecture and Civil Engineering in Weimar 4. 1980

Copyright to IJIRSET DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2017.0607041 12755


ISSN(Online): 2319-8753
ISSN (Print): 2347-6710

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,


Engineering and Technology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Website: www.ijirset.com
Vol. 6, Issue 7, July 2017

Copyright to IJIRSET DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2017.0607041 12756

You might also like