Organizational Context: Industry Type Iron and Steel, in The B2B Segment
Organizational Context: Industry Type Iron and Steel, in The B2B Segment
Organizational Context: Industry Type Iron and Steel, in The B2B Segment
Organizational Context
Industry Type
Iron and steel, in the B2B segment.
Geographical Presence
Headed in Mumbai, Maharashtra and has its marketing units and plants in more than 50
countries around the globe.
Product Lines
Soft iron, Iron, Cast Iron, Alloy.
Major products
Locomotive parts, Agricultural equipment, Machinery, tinplate, Cable and wire Rebars, flat
steel products, long steel products and steel plates etc.
2. History
Tata iron and steel company came into effect on 26 August 1907 by Jamshedji Tata. The
company is operating since then as one of the key steel manufacturing firm in India.
In 1990 the company initiated extensive expansion plans and established its subsidiary in New
York named Tata Inc. The company changed its name from TISCO to Tata steel in 2005.
3. Company overview
Started in Jamshedpur, Jharkhand (then Bihar) the company now operates at a gigantic level
with its operations based in 26 countries and commercially in over 50 countries employing
around 1,00,000 people.
The company’s motto is to deliver quality over profit by which it serves its diverse group of
customers. It has the second highest domestic production measured in metric tonnes after SAIL
(Steel Authority of India limited).
4. Information Intensity Matrix
IRON
BANKING,NEWS
AND PAPERS
STEEL
RAILWAY
CEMENT
TICKET,GOLD
The ERP system was selected after rigorous analysis to provide transparency, customer
satisfaction, quick decision-making and credibility of data and improve responsiveness to
customers across all areas.
Although the ERP implementation and it’s success ratio is quite low in most of the industries
but still the implementation of ERP was rolled out to around 47 strategic locations across the
country under big-bang approach in just a short period of 8 months
7. Implementation
General Approaches:
Problems faced:
The existing technology was a simple replication of the manual system. Not only did it operate
as individual enclaves of information but the technology had outlived its lifetime and was
completely obsolete. The employees and management at TISCO faced a ponderous task,
bartering and fetching information from the system.
Further, the accuracy of information obtained was questionable because of deviation and
corollary of data from different departments. Also, there was no built-in honesty check for
various data sources.
Choosing SAP:
Various strategic goals was associated while implementing the SAP software. TISCO wanted
to have an environment with evolved and continuous learning and set an industry standard.
This would enable TISCO to achieve a world-class status for its products and services and
strengthen its leadership position in the industry. Apart from this, TISCO wanted to improve
responsiveness to customers across all areas and also to have a faster decision-making process
and clarity and soundness of data.
Challenges:
Implementing any ERP system is a challenge for any organization because of the failure rate
of ERP implementations was high world-wide. The challenge can be compounded if the ERP
provider is a world leader - SAP. The main challenge which was ahead in building more useful
environment where SAP will be embedded in the hearts and minds of the people and the
customers of Tata steel.
Also another parallel activity called 'Change Management' was initiated within the company.
The most important objective of 'Change Management' was to reach out to the customers
involved partially in the project to notify them of the improvments taking place.
Tata Steel completed their big bang implementation of all SAP modules on 1st November 1999,
as per the set deadline and at one go across 46 countrywide locations.
The time period allocated for the implementation of ERP system was 8 months which was
very less as compared to the time taken by other companies for implementing ERP. Since the
ERP was being implemented in such a large scale, the time period for implementation could
have been extended and more training should have been given to the employees as well as the
customers, so that everyone benefits from the ERP implementation.