Apple Case Study
Apple Case Study
0 Main Content
Apple’s vision:
“We believe that we are on the face of the earth to make great products and that’s not
changing. We are constantly focusing on innovating. We believe in the simple not the
complex. We believe that we need to own and control the primary technologies behind the
products that we make and participate only in markets where we can make a significant
contribution. We believe in saying no to thousands of projects, so that we can really focus on
the few that are truly important and meaningful to us. We believe in deep collaboration and
cross-pollination of our groups, which allow us to innovate in a way that others cannot. And
frankly, we don’t settle for anything less than excellence in every group in the company, and
we have the self-honesty to admit when we’re wrong and the courage to change. And I think
regardless of who is in what job those values are so embedded in this company that Apple
will do extremely well.”
In conclusion, all seven criteria have been fulfilled from Apple. Therefore, we can conclude
that this is a good vision statement.
3.2 Analysis of Apple’s Mission Using 9 Components.
Apple’s Mission:
“Apple designs Macs, the best personal computers in the world, along with OS X, iLife,
iWork and professional software. Apple the best personal computers with its iPods and
iTunes online store. Apple has reinvented the mobile phone with its revolutionary iPhone and
App store, and is defining the future of mobile media and computing devices with iPad.”
in conclusion, four out of nine components have been fulfilled. Thus, this is an above average
mission statement. The top management need to be advised to reformulate the mission all
over again in order to get a better mission in future use.
Competitive Advantage/ Major Str engths of the company (SWOT MATRIX)
STRENGTHS WEAKNESSESS
S1 Strong brand equity W1 Selling product with
higher prices
S2 High R & D W2 Short products life
TOWS MATRIX
S3 High profit Margins W3 Weak relationship with
Intel and Microsoft
T4 Loss of innovation
T5 New environmental
regulations
T6 Tax scandals
3.6 Strategic Issues of the company
Functional level strategies
a) Human resource
https://www.channelnews.com.au/apple-admits-to-using-child-labour-to-build-iphone-x/
According to David Richards, Apple has finally come clean and admitted that its biggest
manufacturing partner is employing school kids for up to 11 hours a day to make their ultra-
expensive iPhone X. Almost 1,200 units iPhone X was made by one students. The richest tech
company in the world was exposed after it was discovered that school kids on so called ‘work
experience’ were being forced to work overtime in its Chinese factory run by Foxconn. Foxcom
factory has brought on 3,000 high school student to assemble the red hot smartphones as it
works to make up ground following severe production. The students, who range in age from
17 to 19 were being force by their school to work at least three months. The reason they hired
student because the company want to give a chance and gain work experience as graduation
requirement. In a statement issued by Apple last night the Company said “We discovered
instances of student interns working overtime at a supplier facility in China. We’ve confirmed
the students worked voluntarily, were compensated and provided benefits, but they should not
have been allowed to work overtime,” Apple said in a statement. Initially the Children said that
they were not paid.
Apple and Foxcom have been accused of poor labour practice in the past. Meanwhile labour
rights groups have previously critized Apple and Foxcom for excessive overtime, hiring
underage workers and failing to provide health insurance. Since 2012 Apple says it has reduced
the number of underage workers in its extended supply chain, which includes locations where
rare earth minerals are mined for use in the smartphones.
b) Marketing https://www.ukessays.com/essays/marketing/apple-inc-strategic-challenges-
and-changes-marketing-essay.php
Founded in 1976, APPLE built its early reputation on innovative personal computers that were
particularly easy for customer to use and as a result were priced higher than those of
competitors. Apple remained a full line computer manufacturer from that time, supplying both
the hardware and software. Apple was continued to develop various innovative computer and
related products. Basically, APPLE is high price policy for its products like iBook had trouble
competing in the personal computer market place. In the year 2000, APPLE identified a new
corporate strategy to exploit the growing worldwide market in personal electronic devices such
as CD players, MP3 players, digital camera and etc. It would launch its own APPLE version
of these products to add high value, user friendly software. Resulting products included iMovie
for digital cameras iDVD for DVD players.
Apples main strategy is there appeal to their customers. What you find in general with many
of their products more better looking than the competitions. One thing we can see is Apple
building on the popularity of the iPod. It appeals to the Mass market. Now appeal less as a
computer company and more of a electronics company and seem more user-friendly.
Apple have a differentiation strategy. Apple products are known to have a unique appeal, with
its sleek designs a usability. Due to this it gets a lot of attention from consumers and the media.
Without much advertising or marketing on their part. They give something new and unique to
talk about which everybody gets pulled in to.
With the iPod there not only selling a mp3 player, there selling a social chic. Everybody has
one and everybody wants one. The iPod appeals to the mass market, everyone is a potential
customer. Young or old. They have music, literature and podcasts all available for the iPod
owners. The simplicity and sleek design are what attracts people. Although the latest ones (the
touch) are expensive and may be aimed at higher and older earners.
c) Finance https://businessays.net/apple-inc-strategic-issues/
https://elpais.com/elpais/2013/04/19/inenglish/1366396093_838664.html
The problem of Apple stemmed in the period 1985-1997 when Steve Jobs was not a part of
company. Apple had a small market share of Pcs its means gross profit were decreasing and
the company CEO high turnover. Its share price was low around USD 3. It was making losses
and was on the verge of bankruptcy. Moreover its work environment had become increasingly
relaxed and it was losing its value of creativity and innovation. Mainly they lack of leadership
and innovative culture. Moreover some decisions taken by the management were not in the
best interest of the company. For example during the tenure of one CEO, APPLE tried to movie
into the low priced market and during the time of a later on, the same policy was reversed.
According to El Pais, Apple have lower prices mean lower profits. Situation in India, there are
selling iPhone 4 for 275 euros. Entering into some sort of coupon competition (Samsung has
struck back with a similar scheme) would have been simply unthinkable back in Jobs’ time.
Apple’s slogan “think different” implied paying a premium for an exclusive product. The
firm’s financial health was based on this premise. There is no other company that earns so
much with so little: upgrading from a 16-gigabyte iPad to a 32-gigabyte one, which costs Apple
17 dollars more, sets consumers back an additional 100 dollars. For every iPhone it sells,
Apple’s profit margin is as much as 53 percent, while an iPad Mini “only” brings in a 40 percent
margin, a figure that remains unrivalled in the market. Given these numbers, there is a logical
resistance to joining any kind of price war. But right now there is no choice. Everything seems
to indicate (Apple never talks about its projects) that the company will launch a cheap iPhone
for Asia. The consulting firm Piper Jaffray holds that 75 million units will be sold in 2014...as
long as the price remains below 300 dollars.
and develop. The primary stakeholders for the company include the company’s employees, the
consumers, investors, suppliers, and distributors. Each of these stakeholders has an influence
on the organization's financial performance. The primary stakeholders have a direct influence
on the company’s financial performance as they carry out the company’s activities in the
process of production. Thus, their motivation can determine the company’s financial
they provide financial resources to the company for investment purposes and, also, for running
the business efficiently. Secondary stakeholders have an indirect influence on the financial
performance of the company. Secondary stakeholders include the media and pressure groups,
competitors, the law regulator, banks, clients, competitor and local government. Therefore,
these various stakeholders influence the performance of the company through improving the
brand image and value, for example, the consumer's perception of the brand influences the
Additionally, stakeholders help in the reduction of potential liabilities for the company
through the outsourcing of duties to suppliers and distributors. Moreover, stakeholders like the
which helps in the financial performance of the company by the management of employees
and the raw materials from the suppliers. The stakeholders such as the law regulators have an
influence on the company’s financial performance. For instance, the laws can be changed and
affect the business negatively to a point of closing the premises, for example, when the
company’s product has been prohibited or the taxation on its raw material increased
augmenting the cost of production. Also, the stakeholders assist in increasing the profitability
of the company through the increase in sales levels and cheaper supply of raw materials which
reduces the cost of production. The stakeholders also increase the market for the company
through referrals, loyalty to company products and also marketing, which improves the
Secretary, Senior Vice President & General Apple from Honeywell in 2017, where
Secondary stakeholders include individuals and group who are not engaged in a direct
economic transaction with the firm but are affected by or can affected its action. For example,
the government can affect the operations of an organization through the regulations and policies
that it implement.
The global smartphone and tablet markets are subject to the moderate collective
strength of competitive forces. On one hand, the intensity of competition is reduced by
factors such as high barriers to entry, strong Strategic Analysis and Valuation of Apple
Inc. 40 brand identification and customer loyalties, the domination of a small number
of large device manufacturers as well as the low concentration of suppliers and buyers.
On the other hand, the analysis of the industry 5 forces revealed that industry dynamics
are not all favourable. Decelerating market growth, emerging Chinese manufacturers
of low-cost devices and falling ASPs markedly increase competition in the analysed
markets. In addition, over the medium term, it is expected that the market saturation
will spread from the developed to emerging markets resulting in a growing demand for
low-cost devices. As a result, competitive rivalry in the markets will further intensify
and adversely affect profitability of the market players