0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views

Toughening Mechanisms: Brittle Materials:!

The document discusses various toughening mechanisms for brittle materials: 1. Transgranular and intergranular fracture can increase the fracture toughness (GC) of brittle solids by up to 30% and 50% respectively by increasing the fracture surface area. 2. Crack deflection around grains and particles in composite materials can also increase GC compared to the matrix material alone. 3. Transformation toughening, as seen in zirconia, generates compressive stresses ahead of a crack tip during the martensitic phase transformation, inhibiting crack propagation and improving KC. 4. Bridging mechanisms, such as fibers or whiskers, increase KC by bridging the crack

Uploaded by

Hunny Gupta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views

Toughening Mechanisms: Brittle Materials:!

The document discusses various toughening mechanisms for brittle materials: 1. Transgranular and intergranular fracture can increase the fracture toughness (GC) of brittle solids by up to 30% and 50% respectively by increasing the fracture surface area. 2. Crack deflection around grains and particles in composite materials can also increase GC compared to the matrix material alone. 3. Transformation toughening, as seen in zirconia, generates compressive stresses ahead of a crack tip during the martensitic phase transformation, inhibiting crack propagation and improving KC. 4. Bridging mechanisms, such as fibers or whiskers, increase KC by bridging the crack

Uploaded by

Hunny Gupta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17

V.

 M.  SGLAVO  –  UNITN  –  2011  

Toughening mechanisms

E
theoretical strength ≈ (≈10 GPa)
10
Brittle materials:!
E
failure stress ≈ (≈100 MPa)
10

lack of inelastic deformations at crack tip ¢ limited KC o GC!

defects (c) fabrication!

mechanical strength
K microstructure (KIC) material & processing!
" f = IC
# c

intreaction between defects and microstructure!


V.  M.  SGLAVO  –  UNITN  –  2011  

fracture mechanics ž homogeneous and continuous solid

KI " K IC K IC c
 fracture  " f =
G " GC # c

policrystalline material:
(grains and grain boundaries)

Path?!
2 !
c
Effect on GC?!
1 !
4 Toughening effects (increasing GC)?!
3

microstructure
V.  M.  SGLAVO  –  UNITN  –  2011  

Transgranular and intergranular fracture

fracture on clivage planes (transgranular)!

tilt

twist

GC increases (θ, φ ≈ 45°, ΔGC ≈ 30%)

crack surface increases, too

Fracture of brittle solid 2nd ed., B. R. Lawn, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993

V.  M.  SGLAVO  –  UNITN  –  2011  

fracture along grain boundary (intergranular)!

G(" ) GC bg GC0 # $ bg $ $
> = = 1# bg = 1# bg
G(0) GC 0 GC 0 GC 0 2$

θ if θ = 90°, G(θ)/G(0) ≈ 0.25 ➠ γbg > 1.5 γ


! usually θ < 90° , γbg > γ (impurities)

GC increases with fracture surface (≈50%)

Other effects:!
• Statistical rotation and deflections!
• Intersections among deflections! limited effect on GC!
• Residual stresses !
V.  M.  SGLAVO  –  UNITN  –  2011  

Crack deflection

Composite materials!

4
G C comp
GC matr bars
3
disks

2 spheres

1
Problems:! 0.2 0.4
• Intergranular fracture! volumetric fraction

• Residual stresses!
V.  M.  SGLAVO  –  UNITN  –  2011  

Toughening - mechanical strength

KC constant! KC increases with c !


K K
σφ2
σφ

σφ1

stable growth! KC (c)
KC2

KC1
σφ1

c00.5 c0.5 c00.5 c0.5


σf depends on c σf independent

R-curve or T-curve effect


V.  M.  SGLAVO  –  UNITN  –  2011  

Toughening mechanisms
(a) (b)
(a) process zone (frontal wake)

weakening of frontal zone material

σ grain bridging
dislocations

σC !G C " 2# $ C % T h

εT ε microcracking fibers

(b) bridging zone (bridged interface)


whiskers
closure stress (t) phase transformation
u*
!G C " 2# $ t(u)du
0

ductile particles
ductile particles
V.  M.  SGLAVO  –  UNITN  –  2011  

Process zone mechanisms

Transformation toughening !

zirconia (ZrO2) temperature

allotropic phases: cubic (c), tetragonal (t), monoclinic (m)

martensitic transformation (MS ≈ 1200°C - 600°C)


ΔV ≈ 4%, εij ≈ 1-7%

MS decreases with:
•  stabilizing oxides (MgO, CaO, Y2O3, CeO2)
•  (grain size)-1 t phase can be !
•  compressive stresses (matrix) metastable at Tamb!
V.  M.  SGLAVO  –  UNITN  –  2011  

ZrO2 - Y2O3 system

partially stabilized zirconia


(t in c, g ≈ 30 - 60 µm)

tetragonal zirconia polycrystals


(only t, g ≈ 0.5 - 2 µm)
V.  M.  SGLAVO  –  UNITN  –  2011  

Toughening mechanism

σχ

ε
εΤ φ
σr

t m
V.  M.  SGLAVO  –  UNITN  –  2011  

** asymptotic fracture toughness:

E
"KC = 0.22 %T & h
1# $
t grains fraction

Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 1990



V.  M.  SGLAVO  –  UNITN  –  2011  

Bridging mechanisms
1. Bridging by fibers or whiskers! weak interface (Γi<Γf)
limited friction coefficient

strong interface (Γi>Γf)


high friction coefficient

asymptotic fracture toughness (long fibers):


interface fracture toughness
fiber strength friction stress
pull-out length
'# 2 2
2 4&i *, 2- " hp
!KC = " d ) f $ E % T
)( E
( ) +
R 1$ " ,+
(
+
R
)
differential deformation fiber radius

Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 1990



V.  M.  SGLAVO  –  UNITN  –  2011  

2. By bridging grains !

fundamental condition: intergranular fracture

Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 1990



V.  M.  SGLAVO  –  UNITN  –  2011  

α-SIALON
V.  M.  SGLAVO  –  UNITN  –  2011  

Si3N4
V.  M.  SGLAVO  –  UNITN  –  2011  

Al2O3 - SiCw
V.  M.  SGLAVO  –  UNITN  –  2011  

grain pull-out
friction at grain boundary

2R=W
pull-out stress: σ = 2 τ (L-u)/R = 4 τ (L-u)/W
L
2
L /2 dx x 1 & L )
energy for pull-out: G = V #0 # " du = $ % W ( +
L/2 0 6 'W *
u
fraction of “working” grains

!
2 2
EG E% ' L * ' L *
"KC = 2 2
& W ) , = - & W ) ,
1# $ = 6(1# $ ) W
( + W
( +

!
ΔKC > 0 (200 - 300%)

You might also like