Process Selection and Facility Layout
Process Selection and Facility Layout
Aero Maintenance is a small aircraft engine maintenance facility located in Wichita, Kansas. Its new
administrator, Ann Daniel, decides to improve material flow of facility, using the process layout method.
The current layout of Aero Maintenance’s eight departments is shown in the figure below:
The only physical restriction perceived by Daniel is the need to keep the entrance in its current location.
All other departments can be moved to a different work area (each 10 ft square) if layout analysis
indicates a move would be beneficial.
First, Daniel analyzes records to determine the number of material movements among departments in an
average month. These data are shown below. Here objective, Daniel decide is to layout the departments
so as to minimize total movement (distance traveled) of material in the facility. She writes her objective
as:
8 8
Where Xij = number of material movements per month (loads or trips) moving from department i to j
Where Cij = distance in feet betwwen departments i and j (which in this case, is equivalent of cost per
load to move between departments.
(Note that this is a slight modification of the cost-objective equation we have discussed)
Daniel assumes that adjacent departments, (please refere to the “FROM-TO” matrix below) such as
entrance (now in work area A) and receiving (now in work area B), have a walking distance of 10 feet.
Diagonal departments are also considered adjacent and assigned a distance of 10 ft. Non-adjacent
departments, such as the entrance and parts (now in area C) or the entrance and inspection (area G) are 20
feet apart, and nonadjacent rooms, such as entrance and metallurgy area (area D) are 30 feet apart.
Material Movements