Criminal Trial & Procedure
Criminal Trial & Procedure
“PROJECT WORK”
17RU11020
Session:-2017-2022
Semester:-V
1
Page
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I take this opportunity to express our humble gratitude and personal regards to MR. ADITYA
CHOUDHARY for inspiring me and guiding me during the course of this project work and also for
her cooperation and guidance from time to time during the course of this project work on the
topic “TYPES OF CRIMINAL TRIAL AND ITS PROCEDURE”
Rajat Kaushik
2
Page
INTRODUCTION-
The code of criminal procedure 1973(CrPC) is a procedural law providing the mechanism in
which manner the criminal trial is to be conducted on the basis of substantive criminal i.e. I.P.C.
and other criminal statue. The primary object of the criminal justice system is to ensure that the
trial must be fair. The presiding officer is supposed to treat the accused innocent till charge is
proved against him but at the same time the guilty person should not be escaped from the
punishment.
The word “Trial” is not defined anywhere in the Criminal Procedure Code, however, it means an
commonly understood the stage of trial began after framing the charge and end with the
conviction or acquittal. The criminal procedure for judicial adjudications is divided in 37
chapters and classified in two schedules
The nature of the trial are divided on the basis of the gravity, seriousness of the offence the
substantive law i.e. I.P.C. is divided into 37 parts by granting separate nomenclature particularly
the nature of offences like the offence against State, human body, property, public tranquility,
documents, marriage and etc.
Many a times we come across the term called criminal trial. In general parlance, we understand
trial means that a person is facing a case in court of law. But generally people are not aware of
the process of criminal trial in India. So here is the procedure for criminal trial that generally
takes place in India.
according to Criminal Procedure Code, criminal trial can be of tree types namely Trial in
Warrant cases, Trial in Summon Cases and Summery Trial
Warrant cases are those cases in which an offence attracts a penalty of imprisonment for more
Page
than seven years and it includes offences punishable with death and life imprisonment. In such
cases, the trial starts either by filing of FIR or by filing a complaint before a magistrate. And if
the magistrate finds that the case relates to an offence carrying a punishment for more than two
years, the case is sent to the sessions court for trial. Section 193 of the Criminal Procedure Code
clearly states that the session court can not take cognizance of any offence unless the case has
been sent to it by a magistrate. The process of sending it to sessions court is generally called
committing it to sessions court.
The stages of trial in warrant cases are given from Section 238 to Section 250 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973.
A summon case is a case which is not a warrant case. So in simple words, those cases in which
an offence is punishable with an imprisonment of less than two years is a summon case. In this
case, one must understand that if a magistrate, after looking into the case, thinks that a case is not
a summon case, he may convert it into a warrant case. In respect of summons cases, there is no
need to frame a charge. The court gives substance of the accusation, which is called “notice”, to
the accused when the person appears in pursuance to the summons.
•
Page
The different stages of criminal trial in a summon case are given from Section 251 to Section
259 of the Code of Criminal procedure.
SUMMARY TRIAL-
Case of offenses punishable with an imprisonment of not more than six months can be tried in a
summary way. It is also to be noted that if the case has been tried in a summary way, a person
can not be awarded a punishment of imprisonment for more than three months.
PERTIAL STAGES-
i. REGISTRATION OF FIR- FIR stands for first information report which is lodged under
section 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The FIR is only the basis information which
is made available to the police when a cognizable offence takes place. FIR is the first
stage from which a criminal case takes the birth.
ii. INVESTIGATION- FIR in a criminal case leads to investigation in the case. Investigation
leads an investigating officer to reach to a conclusion whether a chargesheet has to be
filed or a closure report has to be filed in the case. If the investigation result in discovery
of an offence, a chargesheet is filed, otherwise a closure report is filed before the
concerned court.
iii. TRIAL- If the investigating officer finds out that a case is fit for trial then he files a
5
witnesses brought by the prosecution are expected to support the case presented by the
prosecution and if they fail to do so, they are declared hostile and the prosecution may
request the court not to rely on the statement of such a witness. In case the witness
supports the case of the prosecution, the defense is entitled to cross examine the witness
so that they could find out the discrepancies in the statement of the witness concerned. If
the defense succeeds in finding the discrepancies in the statement of the witnesses, they
may ask the court not to rely on the statement of the said witness.
vii. STATEMENT OF THE ACCUSED- Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure code empowers
the court to ask for an explanation from the accused if any. The basic idea is to give an
opportunity of being heard to an accused an explain the facts and circumstances
appearing in the evidence against him. Under this section, an accused shall not be
administered an oath and the accused may refuse to answer the questions so asked. The
answers given by the accused may be taken into consideration in such inquiry or trial, and
put in evidence for or against him.
viii. EVIDENCE OF DEFENSE- After the statement of the accused is over, the court applies its
mind and tries to find out if the accused has committed any offence or not. If the court
reaches the conclusion that no offence has been committed by the accused, he is
acquitted. It must be noted that while acquitting an accused, the judge is expected to give
reasons for acquitting the accused.
In cases of accused not being acquitted by the court, the defense is given an opportunity
to present any defense evidence in support of the accused. The defense can also produce
its witnesses and the said witnesses are cross examined by the prosecution. In India,
generally the defense does not provide defense evidence as the criminal justice system in
India puts burden of proof on the prosecution to prove that a person is guilty of an
offence beyond the reasonable doubt.
ix. FINAL ARGUMENTS OF BOTH THE SIDES - Once the defense evidence of the accused is
over, the prosecution presents its final arguments. In final arguments, the prosecution
generally sum up its case against the accused. After the final arguments of the
prosecution are over, the defense also present its final arguments. After the final
arguments of both the sides are over, the court generally reserve its judgment.
x. DELIVERY OF JUDGMENT- After application of mind, the judge delivers a final judgment
7
Page
8
Page
REFERENCES-
➢ https://criminaltrials.blogspot.com/2012/09/stages-of-criminal-trial.html
➢ https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Stages-in-criminal-trial-84286.asp
➢ http://www.mondaq.com/pdf/clients/318472.pdf
➢ https://www.lawfarm.in/blogs/process-of-criminal-trial-and-proceedings-in-india
9
Page