Scribd
Upload
60 views4 pages

Musical Interest Rating / Categories SD D NLND L SL Total: Correlations

1) The respondents had average levels of Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Openness according to the Big Five personality traits. 2) The respondents had a preference for reflective and complex music, as well as upbeat and conventional music. 3) There were significant relationships between some personality traits and certain musical preferences. Extraversion and Openness correlated with a preference for reflective and complex music. Agreeableness correlated with preferences for intense and rebellious music and upbeat and conventional music. Neuroticism correlated negatively with preferences for upbeat and conventional music and energetic and rhythmic music.

Uploaded by

Christian Miranda
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
60 views4 pages

Musical Interest Rating / Categories SD D NLND L SL Total: Correlations

1) The respondents had average levels of Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Openness according to the Big Five personality traits. 2) The respondents had a preference for reflective and complex music, as well as upbeat and conventional music. 3) There were significant relationships between some personality traits and certain musical preferences. Extraversion and Openness correlated with a preference for reflective and complex music. Agreeableness correlated with preferences for intense and rebellious music and upbeat and conventional music. Neuroticism correlated negatively with preferences for upbeat and conventional music and energetic and rhythmic music.

Uploaded by

Christian Miranda
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

1) What is the level of personality traits of the respondents according to the Big Five

Personality Traits (EACNO)

Personality
Rating / E A C N O
Categories f % f % f % f % f %
Very Low 1 0.5 0 0 0 0 10 5 0 0
Low 64 32 28 14 54 27 122 61 36 18
Average 135 67.5 172 86 146 73 68 34 164 82
High 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Very High 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 200 100 200 100 200 100 200 100 200 100

2) What is the musical preference of the respondents according to:

Musical Interest
SD D NLND L SL Total
Rating / Categories
f % f % f % f % f % f %
Reflective & Complex 0 0 4 2 78 39 109 54.5 9 4.5 200 100
Intense & Rebellious 2 1 22 11 96 48 65 32.5 15 7.5 200 100
Upbeat &
Conventional 0 0 6 3 30 15 103 51.5 61 30.5 200 100
Energetic & Rhythmic 4 2 20 10 76 38 85 42.5 15 7.5 200 100

3) Is there a significant relationship between personality and musical types?

Correlations
Reflecti
CON NEU OPE veCom
AGE EXT AGR SC RO N plex
AGE Pearson
Correlatio 1 .026 -.017 -.009 -.053 -.053 -.050
n
Sig. (2-
.718 .815 .905 .460 .452 .483
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
EXT Pearson
Correlatio .026 1 .085 .065 .179* .056 .127
n
Sig. (2-
.718 .232 .362 .011 .429 .073
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
AGR Pearson
.224* .387*
Correlatio -.017 .085 1 * -.113 * .125
n
Sig. (2-
.815 .232 .001 .110 .000 .077
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
CONSC Pearson
.224*
Correlatio -.009 .065 * 1 .021 .178* .150*
n
Sig. (2-
.905 .362 .001 .768 .012 .034
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
NEURO Pearson
-
Correlatio -.053 .179* -.113 .021 1 .065
.166*
n
Sig. (2-
.460 .011 .110 .768 .019 .362
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
OPEN Pearson
.387* -
Correlatio -.053 .056 * .178* 1 .085
.166*
n
Sig. (2-
.452 .429 .000 .012 .019 .233
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
Reflective Pearson
Complex Correlatio -.050 .127 .125 .150* .065 .085 1
n
Sig. (2-
.483 .073 .077 .034 .362 .233
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
IntenseRe Pearson
bellious Correlatio .031 .088 .006 .096 -.007 .086 .366**
n
Sig. (2-
.660 .214 .936 .176 .918 .225 .000
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
UpbeatCo Pearson
.222* -
nventional Correlatio -.059 .047 *
.065 .129 .262**
.150*
n
Sig. (2-
.407 .505 .002 .362 .034 .068 .000
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
Energetic Pearson
Rhytmic Correlatio -.059 -.005 .007 .006 -.129 .123 .276**
n
Sig. (2-
.404 .939 .926 .937 .068 .084 .000
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
SEX Pearson
Correlatio -.049 .040 .084 .047 -.071 .004 -.143*
n
Sig. (2-
.492 .574 .234 .511 .318 .960 .043
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200

Correlations
IntenseRebellio UpbeatConvent EnergeticRhytm
us ional ic SE
AGE Pearson Correlation .031 -.059 -.059
Sig. (2-tailed) .660 .407 .404
N 200 200 200
EXT Pearson Correlation .088 .047 -.005
Sig. (2-tailed) .214 .505 .939
N 200 200 200
AGR Pearson Correlation .006 .222 ** .007
Sig. (2-tailed) .936 .002 .926
N 200 200 200
CONSC Pearson Correlation .096 .065 .006
Sig. (2-tailed) .176 .362 .937
N 200 200 200
NEURO Pearson Correlation -.007 -.150* -.129
Sig. (2-tailed) .918 .034 .068
N 200 200 200
OPEN Pearson Correlation .086 .129 .123
Sig. (2-tailed) .225 .068 .084
N 200 200 200
ReflectiveComplex Pearson Correlation .366** .262** .276**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 200 200 200
IntenseRebellious Pearson Correlation 1 .361** .400**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000
N 200 200 200
UpbeatConventional Pearson Correlation .361** 1 .384**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000
N 200 200 200
EnergeticRhytmic Pearson Correlation .400** .384** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000
N 200 200 200
SEX Pearson Correlation .000 .066 .019
Sig. (2-tailed) .999 .351 .792
N 200 200 200

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).


**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

NONPAR CORR
/VARIABLES=AGE EXT AGR CONSC NEURO OPEN ReflectiveComplex IntenseRebellious
UpbeatConventional
EnergeticRhytmic SEX
/PRINT=BOTH TWOTAIL NOSIG
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.

You might also like