Session 6: Measuring Capacity in Customized and Variety Driven Processes

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 30

Session 6:

Measuring capacity in customized


and variety driven processes
Impact of Batch size on Capacity
Process Flow Diagram

Preparation

Artwork
Generation
Manual Drill
Setup (min) = 29 run: 0/panel (7)

Inspect & Punch Tooling 15 320/panel Metallize


Shear Holes
20 0.5/panel 10 0.5/panel CNC
Micronic (1) 10 0.75/panel

240 16/panel

1 panel = 8 boards
Image Transfer
Dry Film Photoresist

Panel Prep Laminate & Develop Electroplate Strip DFPR Etch & Tin
Expose Strip

5 0.2/panel 20 2/panel 20 0.2/panel25 8.5/panel 5 0.2/panel 10 0.2/panel

Fabrication
Punch Press

Soldermask Solder Dip 50 1/board Inspect, Test


and Pack
45 1.5/panel 30 0.5/panel CNC Router
45 1.5/board

150 0.5/board
Rework
Decisions
• Design

– Equipment selection- type, degree of


automation, capacity
– Flexibility of the process
– Information flow design
– Technology choice
Technology choice
• Drilling: manual vs CNC
Breakeven analysis:
Total time on CNC = Total time on manual
240 min + (2 min/board)*B = 15 min + (40min/board) * B
B = 5.9 boards

• Profile: Punch press vs CNC router


Total time on CNC router = total time on punch press
150 min + (0.5 min/board)*b = 50 min + (1 min/board) * B
B = 200 boards
Capacity Analysis:
Dry Film Photoresist
• Assume order size of 1 panel (8 boards)
Capacity Analysis:
Dry Film Photoresist
• Assume order size of 1 panel (8 boards)
Panel prep: 5min/order +(0.2min/panel x 1panel/ord) =
5.2 min/order
Max orders/day = (480 min/day)/(5.2 min/order) = 92.3 orders/day
Max boards/day = 92.3 x 8 = 736.5 boards/day

Set Up Run Total Daily Capacity Daily Capacity


Time/Order Time/Order Time/Order in Orders in Boards
Panel & 5 0.2 min 5.2 min 92.3 ord/day 736.5 boards/day
Prep
Lam & Exp 20 2.0 min 22.0 min 21.8 174.4
Develop 20 0.2 min 20.2 min 23.8 190.4
Capacity as a function of order size
Order Size Order Size Lam & Exp Daily Daily
(boards) (Panels) Process Capacity Capacity
Time (min) (Orders) (Boards)

8 1 22 21.8 174.4
80 10 40 12 =(480/40) 960

800 100 220 2.18 1745

• Maximum capacity assuming no set-up=


480/(2 min/panel) = 240 panels = 1920 boards/day
Batch process example

Set-up C1 Produce C1 Set-up C2 Produce C2


60 min 1 min/unit 60 min 1 min/unit

Capacity = ?
Batch process example

Set-up C1 Produce C1 Set-up C2 Produce C2


60 min 1 min/unit 60 min 1 min/unit

)"&$ℎ +%,-
!"#"$%&' =
/0&"1 +-&2# &%3- + (670$-++%89 /%3- : )"&$ℎ +%,-)
Batch size vs. Capacity
Batch size vs. Capacity
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 50 100 150 200

Capacity without set-up for a batch size = 90/(180) = 0.5units/min


Capacity with set-ups = 90/(120+180) = 0.3 units/min
Set-ups are causing loss of production capacity of (0.5-0.3 = 0.2 units/min)
Insights: Job shops/Batch Process
• Careful analysis of physical flow is important to
analyze the performance of a system
• Bottleneck shifts according to product mix
• Product mix is a management choice
– Driven by business strategy
– Capacity is not an absolute number
• Product mix, batch sizes, technology choice etc. determine
the capacity
How much variety is good?
Batch Process
• Process interruptions
• Set-up times and variety trade-offs
• Managing processes with set-up times
– Contrast Ford and Toyota
– External and internal set-ups
Complexity of variety
• 3000 different types of elements in 50
different colors
• Each element has a unique mold and incurs
set-up time
• 55 billion elements per year [~1 lac elements
per minute]
• @3000 element types ~ 18 million units of
each type of element
Capacity Type: Dedicated vs.
Flexibility
Capacity pooling with flexible
manufacturing
• Consider the following stylized situation faced by Maruti Suzuki
– They have 10 production facilities
– They have 10 vehicles to produce (Swift, Dzire, Versa, SX4…..).
– Each plant is capable of producing 100 units.
– Demand for each product is Normally distributed with mean 100 and standard
deviation 40.
– If demand exceeds capacity, sales are lost.
No flexibility to total flexibility

Cachon 2008
Benefits of flexibility
• Flexibility allows production shifts to high selling products to avoid lost sales.
• Consider a two plant, two product example and two configurations, no flexibility and
total flexibility:
Correlation of demand
{
cov ( x, y) = E ( x − µ x ) ( y − µ y )}
cov ( x, y)
ρ xy =
σ xσ y

−1 ≤ ρ xy ≤ +1

σ pool = σ x2 + σ y2 + 2 ρ xyσ xσ y ≤ σ x + σ y
Benefits of flexibility
• Adding flexibility increases capacity utilization and expected sales:

1000
Total flexibility

20 links
950
These data are
collected via simulation
Expected sales, units

900 12 links

11 links

850

No flexibility

800
80 85 90 95 100
Expected capacity utilization, %

• Note: 20 links can provide nearly the same performance as total flexibility!
Cachon 2008
When is flexibility valuable?
• Observations:
1000 20 links, 1
C=1500 chain – Flexibility is most valuable when
C=1250
C=1130 capacity approximately equals
900
C=1000 expected demand.
– Flexibility is least valuable when
800 C=880
capacity is very high or very low.
Expected sales, units

No flexibility

700 C=750

600

500
C=500

400
60 70 80 90 100
Expected capacity utilization, %

C = total capacity of all ten plants

You might also like