UNITED

NATIONS
INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT
ORGANIZATION

REGIONAL AFRICA
HIDES & SKINS, LEATHER AND LEATHER PRODUCTS IMPROVEMENT SCHEME

US/RAF/88/100

.OUTPUT 4

CGUJJIIQ)~~ IF<CDll& ~lING (Q)W IBoOrnIm~ .&.NlD) ~

IB3lY~1I1~

Based on the work of

Mr. Alfred Lesuisse, Senior Leather Industry Consultant

Backstopping officers:
Juhani Berg, Aurelia Calabro
UNroo, AGRO-BASFD INDUSTRIES BRANCH

*This document has been reproduced without formal editing.

The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any
opinion whatsoever on the part of UNIOO concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities.
The responsibility for opinions expressed rests solely with the authors and publication does not constitute an endorsement
by UNIDO of the opinions expressed. Reference to names of firms and commercial products and processes does not
imply their endorsement by UNIDO.
 2

TABLE OF CONTENT

Explanatory Notes 3

I. Foreword 4

Oassification of Skins by Quality 7

o. Introduction 7
1. Scope 7
2. Definitions 7
3. Trimming 8
4. Preservation 8
5. Classification by Quality 9
5.1. General 9
5.2. Faults and defects 9
5.3. Oassification of Skins 9
6. Graphic representation of the classification 11
Table l/S 12
Pictogram 1/ S 13
Pictogram 2/S 14
Pictogram 3/S 15
Pictogram 4/ S 16

III. Classification of Hides by Quality 17

O. Introduction 17
1. Scope 17
2. Definitions 17
3. Trimming 17
3.1. General 18
3.2. Trimming according to International Standard ISO 2820 18
3.3. Trimming according to British Standard BS 3935 19
3.4. Trimming according to United States Commercial Standard CS-268-65 19
4. Preservation 20
5. Classification by Quality 20
5.1. General 20
5.2. Faults and defects 20
5.3. Classification of Hides 21
6. Graphic representation of the classification 22
Table l/H 23
Pictograms l/H, 2/H, 3/H First Grade 24
Pictograms 4/H, 5/H, 6/H Second Grade 27
Pictograms 7/H, 8/H, 9/H Third Grade 30
Pictograms 10/H, l1/H, 12/H Fourth Grade 33

Annex 1 Reference to the Oassification of Skins and Hides 36

Annex 2 Illustration of National Standards (Ethiopia, Tanzania,
Zambia) and Trimming and Ripping Guidelines 39
Annex 3 Subdivision of Cattle Hides 43
 3

EXPIANATORY NOTES

UNIDO UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION, Vienna, Austria

FAO FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS, Rome, Italy

UNCTAD/
ITC UNITED NATIONS COMMITTEE FOR TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT/INTERNATIONAL
TRADE CENTRE, Geneva, Switzerland

IDF UNIDO Industrial Development Fund

ICT INTERNATIONAL COUNQL OF TANNERS

ICHSALTA INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF HIDES AND SKINS & LEATHER TRADERS

ASSOCIATIONS

IHATIS INTERNATIONAL HIDES & ALLIED TRADE IMPROVEMENT SOOETY

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARDIZATION ORGANIZATION

AFNOR ASSOCIATION FRAN<;AISE DE NORMALISATION

BSI BRITISH STANDARD INSTITUTION

USCS The UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL STANDARD

 4

1. FOREWORD

The studies prepared and research conducted for the UNIDO global leather sector
consultations (Innsbruck, Austria, April 1984) and the deliberations of the ninth UNlDO Leather
Panel (pecs, Hungary, October 1988), the Sectoral Meeting on the Leather and Leather Industry in
Africa (Alexandria, Egypt, January 1987), the FAO Inter-governmental Sub-Group Meeting on Hides
and Skins (Rome, Italy, January 1987) have dearly proven that there is an enormous waste of raw
hides and skins in Africa, brought about by inadequate slaughtering and flaying techniques,
defective tanning, poor capacity utilization, low productivity and lack of training.

It was, therefore, recommended that an improvement in this sector could be achieved

through the implementation of a major technical assistance programme.

Following this general recommendation, in cooperation with FAO and lTC, UNlDO's
Leather Unit developed the large-scale Regional Africa Hides and Skins, Leather and Leather
Products Improvement Scheme, US/RAF/88/l00, which comprises several new elements in the
so-called "programme approach".

UNlDO is the main executing agency and provides the total funding through the IDF
special purpose contributions from six donor countries namely, Austria, France, Federal Republic
of Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Switzerland and is well under way in eight countries
of East Africa namely, Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Somalia, Sudan, Tanzania, Zambia and
Zimbabwe.

The main objectives of this large scale project are the following:

a) to establish a regional pilot scheme and to demonstrate, in practical terms, the

process of hides and skins improvement from butchering and flaying to
conservation, grading and collection;

b) to act as a catalyst to national authorities to introduce incentives for improved

quality performance;

c) to rehabilitate existing infrastructures and selected leather tanning and processing

plants by increasing their efficiency and capacity utilization, upgrading technical
standards, operational methods and skills, product quality, as well as the knowledge
of those attached to these industries at various levels, starting from primary
producers.

According to Output 4 of the Project Document, "Improved quality of raw hides and
skins through incentives to primary producers, and a realistic quality grading system, based
on a well-operating hides and skins improvement scheme (as per output 2). The quality
monitoring is closely connected with improved statistical intelligence and the results of this
output will be judged on the basis of the statistical data on pricing and grading to be
collected under output 3".

Several national projects and FAO experts have been pursuing this same goal and it was,
therefore, thought that the Hides and Skins Improvement Seminar, held in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe,
from 19 - 23 November 1990, could be an excellent opportunity to get more information and
compare experience.

During this Seminar, a draft compendium for grading of trimmed skins was prepared and
distributed to the participants in order to show how it should be visualized as a suitable
 5
guideline to be used by the project target areas personnel and also later as an internationally
accepted standard.

This compendium was based on a grading system developed by A.H. Robinet, Docteur
Vetermaire, INSTITUT D'ELEVAGE ET DE MEDIONE VErnRINAlRE DES PAYS TROPICAUX, and consisted
of a set of pictograms showing various defects acceptable in trimmed, raw sheep and/or goat
from grade 1 to 4. These pictograms were shown during the Seminar in order to be further
developed and to improve the system.

A set of empty prints of the skins was also distributed to the participants to be filled with
their own ideas on how the various grades should be illustrated.

As the Seminar was attended by several participants from nine African countries (Uganda
was also included), who work in this area daily and also by several top international experts,
the results of this exercise have provided UNIDO's LEArnER UNIT with valuable material and
have once again proven the necessity of elaborating a compendium to be submitted to such
bodies as the ICT, ICSHALTA, IHATIS and FAO for their comments and recommendations and,
finally, presented as a recommended grading norm for the participating countries.

A further effort in this direction was made through the presentation of the same draft
compendium for grading of trimmed skins during the EeOC Workshop on Trade in Hides and Skins
and their Derived Products organized by FAO from 29 July to 2 August 1991.

This Workshop, attended by more than 40 participants representing 13 English-speaking

African countries, with additional participants from UNIDO, ITC and the International Council
of Tanners, recommended that:

"The Draft Guidelines for the grading of sheep and goat skins prepared by UNIDO
and presented to the present Workshop should be further elaborated and expanded
to include the grading of cattle hides." These guidelines should then be presented
for the consideration of the Sub-Group on Hides and Skins."

The purpose of this paper is, therefore, to elaborate a quality standard for hides and skins
grading by quality to be applied in all interested countries.

However, before going into technical details, it is useful to give some clarifications on the
terms used.

According to the Oxford dictionary the main definitions for standard are: a) weight or
measure to which others conform or by which the accuracy or quality of others are judged; b)
thing serving as basis of comparison; c) document specifying (inter)nationally agreed properties
for manufactured goods i.e. the British Standard, etc.; while grading is described as: a) degree
in rank, proficiency, quality, value, etc., class of persons or things alike in these; b) variety of
cattle produced by crossing native stock with superior breed; c) group of animals at similar level
of development; d) arrange in grade, class, sort; etc.; and, finally, quality is defined as: a)
degree of excellence, relative nature or kind or character; b) faculty, skill, accomplishment,
characteristic trait, mental or moral attribute; c) possessing high degree of excellence; concerned
with maintenance of high quality, etc.

It is easily seen that there is a large variety of possible ways to interpreter the three words,
grading, quality and standard; however, instead of confusing the issue, when it comes to the
Hides and Skins Sector, by Standards for Grading by Quality, it is usually meant:
 6

Criteria specifying (inter)nationally agreed methods of classification of hides

and skins according to their properties and usefulness.
(Inter)national institutions such as the INTERNATIONAL STANDARDIZATION ORGANIZATION
the BRITISH STANDARD INSTITUTION, L' ASSOCIATION FRAN<;AISE DE NORMALISATION and the
UNITED STATES COMMEROAL STANDARD have prepared different standards for grading by quality
of hides and skins. In addition to this, valuable work has been carried out by various other
organizations and individual experts. Annex 1 presents references to the classifications of A.
Skins and B. Hides and other reference material published on the subject matter.

National (draft) standards have been prepared in some of the African countries and copies
of presentations of such standards from Ethiopia, Tanzania and Sudan are enclosed as Annex
2. It is of importance that when individual quality grading standards - based on this draft - are
prepared, that the work already carried out by the various international and national standard
organizations, are referred to.

Generally speaking, the structure of this paper follows the pattern for the Presentation of
International Norms and Technical Report prepared by the INTERNATIONAL STANDARDIZATION
ORGANIZATION (ISO, Annex 1, reference hides: 8).

Referring to the substantive part, the two standards, which are hereby proposed, originate
from the existing documents; however, their main feature is that part of the assessment has been
reproduced in pictograms visualizing the grading of hides and skins step by step.

It is widely realized that improvement of hides and skins quality can be achieved only if
quality grading norms are applied. The primary producer, as well as the whole chain of related
services, including flaying, curing, handling and storing, should be rewarded by better prices
for improved quality. The main purpose of this draft is therefore to provide a basis for such a
quality gradin~.

It must be realized that countries cannot successfully enter the export trade of value-added
leather products without having first solved the raw material problems.

It is, therefore, anticipated that this paper will be considered as a contribution to create
more understanding at all levels of the important role of hides and skins grading and that the
various African countries concerned will use these guidelines to prepare, up-date and enforce
the individual grading standards.

The paper will be presented to the Committee on commodity Problems,

Intergovernmental Group on Meat, Sub-Group on Hides and Skins, at its third meeting in
Rome, 21-24 April 1992, in order to benefit from the Intergovernmental Groups' guidance and
recommendations on the following issues:

1. Is the quality grading system, presented in the paper, also applicable to countries
other than the seven African countries participating in the joint UNIDO/F AO/ITC
Regional Africa Hides and Skins, Leather and Leather Products Improvement
Scheme? If so, what measures should be taken to assure the widest possible
distribution and implementation of the system?

2. Should UNIDO/FAO/ITC launch a special project to implement the system and

what role could the NGO's, such as the International Council of Tanners (ICT),
the International Council of Hides, Skins & Leather Traders Association
 7

II. Classification Of Skins by Quality

o. Introduction
It is widely' realized that improvement of hides and skins quality can be achieved only if
quality grading norms are applied. The primary producer, as weft as the whole chain of related
services, including flaying, curing, handling and storing, should be rewarded by better prices
for improved quality. The main purpose of this draft is therefore to provide a basis for such a
quality grading.

This standard gives a classification by quality applicable to raw and cured sheep or
goat skins intended to be transformed into leather.

It should be noted that this standard:

does not apply to specific skins or pelts for fur-making;

to be applicable in a wide variety of countries, it dO£S not indude classifications by

weight, size or shape which are too dependent on the origin,. breed, age, sex, etc.;
and

can be adapted to "c~mmercial" or "customer" classification and for incentive

payments.

The standard shows a graphic representation visualizing the different grades or classes
through a schematic pictogram of a skin without relation to origin or breed. This is based on
a grading system developed by Dr. A.H. Robinet.

1. SCOPE
The purpose of this standard is to specify procedures to be used in the classification by
quality of raw or preserved trimmed sheep and goat skins.

2 DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of this standard, the following terms and definitions apply:

Sheep skin: Outer covering from a wool or hair ovine animal

Goat skin: Outer covering from a caprine animal

Fallen skin: Skin from an unbled or improperly bled carcass

Ripping: The cutting-open of the OU'CQSS of an animal along the belly from the neck-end to the
taiI-end and along the legs.

Trimming: The shape given to a skin with its ultimate use in mind (~paragraph 3).

Pattern: The shape or contour of a flayed skin when laid flat as ddcmined by the position,
length and direction of the ripping cuts made duringflayin g. The bleeding-cut, be1ly-
cut and Ieg-cuts must be directly in the centre ~ the throat, belly and legs (see
 8

Trimming: The shape given to a skin with its ultimate use in mind (see paragraph 3).

Pattern: The shape or contour of II flayed skin when laid flat as determined by the position,
length and diredion oftk ripping cuts madeduringfIaying. The bleeding-cut, belly-
cut and leg-cuts must be directly in the centre of the throat, belly and legs (see
figures).

Preservation: Treatment to protect the skin against harmful influences from the time of flaying
until it is put in tannery processing (see paragraph 4.)

Curing: Synonym of preservation.

Defects: A general term for any damage from whatever cause on raw or cured skins and likely
to depreciate the leather produced from them.

Latent
Defects: Are those which are discovered after hair removal, e.g. puller or clamp or other
mechanical damage, also including defects hidden by hair or wool.

3. TRIMMING
The trim of sheep and goat skins shall comply with the following requirements and shall
be presented:

3.1. without head, with legs cut immediately above the knee or the hock, with short tail;

3.2 without scrotum, udder, anus, navel,

3.3. without adhering fat or meat (see figures).

Please note that untrimmed or poorly trimmed skins are classified as

Rejects !

4. PRESERVATION

For the purposes of this standarc:L the following preservation methods are accepted:
- drying by hanging and in the shade
-salting
- brining
- dry-saIting
- cooling

It is generally accepted that raw or green skins may also be classified according to this
standard.

Please note that ground or ball dried skins and smoked skins are classified
as Rejects!
 9

5. CLASSIFICATION BY QUALllY
5.1. General

Sheep and goat skins shall be classified in four grades in relation to faults reasonably
ascertainable at the time of classing.

Please note that fallen skins, poorly trimmed or shaped skins, ground or
ball dried skins and smoked skins are classified as Rejects !
5.2. Faults and defects

For the purposes of this standard, faults and defects are divided into six groups:

5.2.1. defects related with the health of the animal:

diseases, abscesses, anthrax, tumors, etc.

5.2.2. defects coming from the husbandry conditions of the animal:

brands, hot iron or chemical brands (paint, dyestuff), freeze branding, etc.

5.2.3. defects from insects and parasites:

cockle, lice, worms, mange, tick, etc.

5.2.4. wounds open or cicatrized, caused:

- on the living animal:

bruises, scratches, tears, injuries, hom rake, wire damage, etc.

- and/ or caused during flaying:

holes, cuts, score, corduroy, gash gauges, etc.

5.2.5. All kind of preservation defects:

putrefaction, chemical stains, hair slip, red heat, etc.

5.2.6. Any type of dirt:

dung, urine stains, seeds, prickles, sand, dust, etc.

5.3. Oassification of Skins

For the purposes of this standard, the classification shall be done according to the
following four grades:
 10

5.3.1. First grade

The first grade shall be done according to the following requirements:

No visible defects in the central part of the skin;

No sign of putrefaction;

Free from dirt;

Coming to the periphery of the skin or the legs or tail, ONLY ONE of the following
defects is accepted:

a. few defects caused by diseases

b. few defects from parasites

c. one branding mark

d. one wound open or cicatrized

5.3.2. Second grade

The second grade shall be done according to the following requirements:

In addition to defects in the periphery of the skin, on the legs and tail, defects are
accepted in shoulder or bellies:

a. few defects caused by diseases

b. few defects from parasites

c. one branding mark

d. one open or cicatrized wound

few traces of putrefaction and

some dirt are accepted in the periphery of the skin on the legs and tail.

5.3.3. Third grade

The third grade shall be done according to the following requirements:

In addition to the defects mentioned for the second grade, the following defects are
accepted in low/medium concentration in the best part of the skin (butt):

a. few defects caused by diseases

b. few defects from parasites

c. few branding marks

 11

d. open or cicatrized wounds

traces of putrefaction and

some dirt are accepted except in the best part of the skin (butt).

Please note that all defects mentioned should not cover more than 25 % of
the total area of the skin!

5.3.4 Fourth grade

The fourth grade shall be done according to the following requirements:

In addition to the defects mentioned for the third grade, defects are accepted in
low/medium. concentration on the skin if they do not cover more than 40% of the
total skin area!

5.3.5 Rejects
All skins presenting more defects than those accepted for the fourth grade and skins of
which more than 50% of the area cannot be transformed into leather are classified as rejects.

In addition, the following skins shall be included in the rejects:

- Fallen skins
- Untrimmed or poorly trimmed skins
- Ground and ball dried skins
- Smoked skins

6. Graphic representation of the classification

6.1 The following table summarizes the coding for the grades in relation to the defects, their
location and concentration as well as their depth and surface.
 12

Table 1/5

GUIDELINES
for grading skins

Defects
G Health, Marks, Insects, Wounds, Putrefaet Dirt,
R diseases, brands, para- holes, ion, dung,
A tumors, paint, sites, cuts, hair slip, urine,
D etc. etc. cockle, scrat- read seeds,
E ticks, ches, heat, sand,
etc. etc. etc. etc.

1st Location 1-2 1-2 1-2 1 0 0

Concent. 1 1 1 1 0 0
Depth 1 1 1 1 0 0
Surface 1 1 1 1-2 - 0
2nd Location 3 3 3 2-3 1-2 1-2
Concent. 1 1 1 1 1 1
Depth 1 1 1 1 1 -
Surface 1 1 1 1-2 1 1
3rd Location 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4 3 3-4
Concent. 2 1 2 2 2 1
Depth 2 2 2 2 2 -
Surface 1 1 1 1-2 1 1
4th Location 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4
Concent. 2 2 2 2 2 2
Depth 2 2 2 2 2 2
Surface 1-2 1 1-2 1-2 1-2 1-2

LEGEND - code
0 1 2 3 4

Location periphery legs, tail, shoulder, central part

cheeks belly
Concentration none low medium high
Depth superficial through
Surface grain flesh

6.2. For the purposes of this standard, the tables 2, 3, 4 and 5 are showing the graphic
representation of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th grade.
 13
Pictogram 1/5
First Grade

Wounds
Holes
Cuts
etc.

Putrefaction
Read heat
Hair slip
etc.

Dirt
Dung
Urine
Seeds
Sand
etc.

Health diseases
Tumors
etc.

Marks
Brands
Paints
etc.

Insects
Parasites
etc.
 14
Pictogram 2/S
Second Grade

Health diseases
Tumors
etc.

Marks
Brands
Paints
etc.

Insects
Parasites
etc.

Wounds
Holes
Cuts
etc.

Putrefaction
Red heat
Hair slip
etc.

Dirt
Dung
Urine
Seeds
Sand
etc.
 15
Pictogram 3/5
TIUrd Grade

Health diseases
Tumors
etc.

Marks
Brands
Paints
etc.

Insects
Parasites
etc.

Wounds
Holes
Cuts
etc.

Putrefaction
Red heat
Hair slip
etc.

Dirt
Dung
Urine
Seeds
Sand
etc.
 16
Pictogram 4/5
Fourth Grade

Health diseases
Tumors
etc.

Marks
Brands
Paints
etc.

Insects
Parasites
etc.

Wounds
Holes
Cuts
etc.

Pu trefaction
Red heat
Hair slip
etc.

Dirt
Dung
Urine
Seeds
Sand
etc.
 17

ilL Classification of Hides by Quality

O. INTRODUCTION
It is widely realized that improvement of hides and skins quality can be achieved only if
quality grading norms are applied. The primary producer, as well as the whole chain of related
services, including flaying, curing, handling and storing, should be rewarded by better prices
for improved quality. The main purpose of this draft is therefore to provide a basis for such a
quality grading.

This standard gives a classification by quality applicable on raw and cured cattle
hides intended to be transformed into leather.

It should be noted that this standard:

in order to be applicable in a wide variety of countries, does not include

classifications by weight, size or shape which are too dependent on origin, breed,
age, sex, etc.

can be adapted to "commercial" or "customer" classification.

The standard shows a graphic representation visualizing the different grades or classes
through a schematic pictogram of a hide without relation to origin or breed. This is similar to
the grading system developed for skins.

1. SCOPE
The purposes of this standard is to specify procedures to be used in the classification by
quality of raw or preserved trimmed cattle hides. .

2. DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of this standard, the following terms and definitions apply:

Cattle hide: Outer covering from a bovine animal

Fallen hide: Cattle hide from an unbled or improperly bled carcass.

Brand: Man-made permanent mark on a hide, generally for identification, and made by means
of a hot or cooled iron or chemical products.

Pritch hole: Hole made by a flayer's pritch, i.e. an instrument used to support the carcass during
flaying.

Warble hole: A damage (perforate) caused by Hypoderma species.

Blind warble: A damage (imperforate or cicatrized) caused by Hypoderma species.

Trimming: The shape given to a hide with its ultimate use in mind (see paragraph 3).

Ripping: The cutting open of the carcass of an animal along the belly from the neck end to the
tail and along the legs (see figures).
 18

Pattern: The shape or contour of a flayed hide when laid flat as determined by the position,
length and direction of the ripping cuts made in flaying. The bleeding cut, belly cut
and leg cuts must be directly in the center of the throat, belly and legs (see figures).

Preservation: Treatment to protect the hide against harmful influences from the time of flaying
until it is put in tannery processing (see paragraph 4).

Curing: Synonym of preservation.

Defect; A general term for any damage from whatever cause on raw or cured hides and likely
to depreciate the leather produced from them.

Latent
Defects: Are those which are discovered after hair removal, e.g. puller or clamp or other
mechanical damage, also defects hidden by hair.

Please refer to the figures for definition of various parts of a cattle hide!

3. TRIMMING
3.1. General

With regards to the trimming, the present standard follows the pattern recommended by
the International Standardization Organization, ISO 2820 Method of trim for raw hides of cattle and
horses. This method was approved by the following countries:

Australia Iran Spain

Chile Ireland Thailand
Czechoslovakia Israel Turkey
Egypt Italy USSR
France New Zealand
Hungary Poland
India Romania

However, as the United Kingdom and the USA did express disapproval on the ISO
standard, and taking into account the importance of USA hides in the international trade and
the British involvement in East Africa, paragraphs 3.3. and 3.4. present the British and the
American standards respectively. Some African countries including Ethiopia, Tanzania and
Zimbabwe have prepared their own standards which are presented as Annex 2.

3.2. Trimming according to International Standard ISO 2820

According to the ISO standard, the trimming of cattle hides shall comply to the following
requirements and the hide shall be presented:

3.1.1. without head (head cut straight behind the ears), shanks cut off at right angles
immediately above the knee (fore shanks) and hock (hind shanks);

3.1.2. tail cut off not more than 25 an from the butt;

3.1.3. without excess fat, flesh or any other material unsuitable for making leather (see
figure 3).
 19
Please note that in order to establish with certainty the origin· of a hide,
it may be necessary to retain a part of the udder containing a teat on
hides from cows!

3.3. Trimming according to British Standard BS 3935

According to the British Standard, the trimming of cattle hides shall comply to the
following requirements and the hide shall be presented:

3.2.1 Before weighing, fore shanks shall be knee-trimmed, hind shanks trimmed square
at the hock;

3.2.2. fat removed from rump and brisket;

3.23. butt fairly shaped, and horns, tailbone and head meat removed;

3.2.4. Heads shall be trimmed by removing masks (pates) and ears leaving only cheeks.

3.2.5. Tail shall be trimmed not more then 30 em (see figure 3).

3.2.6. If the cheek of a hide bears a cut of more then 8 em in length, the portion of the
cheek beyond the cut shall be removed by continuing the cut in both directions.

3.4. Trimming according to United States Commercial Standard CS-268-65

According to the United States Standard, the trimming of cattle hides shall comply to the
following requirements and the hide shall be presented:

The specifics of cattle hide trim, which is illustrated in figures, are as follows:

3.4.1. Shanks

Fore-shanks should be trimmed straight across through the center of the knee.

Hind-shank should be trimmed straight across one-third the distance from the
dewclaw holes and the wide flare of the shank. Any hind-shank having a cut or
hole below the knee or hock 25 em or more in length, should be corrected by
trimming straight across the top of the cut or hole. If the cut or hole is smaller than
the above, such a shank is acceptable without trimming, providing it is of proper
pattern otherwise (see figure 3).

3.4.2. Head

Trim requires that all ears, ear butts, snouts and lips, fat and muscle tissue be
removed from the pate side of the head by cutting through the eye-hole.

The narrow side of the head should be trimmed through the eye in a similar
manner.

Removal of all ragged edges is necessary.

'" origin =gender

 20

3.4.3. Cow bags, teats, cow navels and cod bags.

These should be removed straight with the belly line, preserving a standard pattern.

3.3.4. Pizzle pocket

This should be split through the center for curing and left on the hide for steer
identification.

3.3.5. Tails

Maximum tail length should be no more than 10 em, cured, measured from the root.

4. PRESERVATION

For the purposes of this standard, following preservation methods are accepted:
- frame-drying in the shadow
- stack salting
- brining
- dry-salting
- freezing

It is generally accepted that raw or green hides may also be classified according to this
standard.

Please note that the International Standard ISO 2821 Preservation by

stack salting describes the nature and origin of preserving process defects
and recommends a preservation method of hides by stack salting!

5. CLASSIFICATION BY QUAUTY
5.1. General

Hides shall be classified in four grades in relation to faults reasonably ascertainable at the
time of classing.

5.2. Faults and defects

For the purposes of this standard, faults and defects are distributed in five groups:

5.2.1. Natural defects caused by diseases and parasites on the living animal:

anthrax, scars, ringworm, tumors, or ticks, lice, warble, etc.

5.2.2. Mechanically caused defects by the living animal:

brands, bruises, scratches, wounds, wire damage, etc.

 21
5.2.3. Dirt, dung, urine stains, sand, seeds, etc.

5.24. Flaying defects:

cuts, scores, corduroy, holes, grain cracks, pulling machine damage, etc.

5.25. Curing and storing defects:

Putrefaction, hair slip, red heat, salt stains, etc.

5.3. Oassification of Hides

For the purposes of this standard, the classification shall be done according to the
following four grades:

5.3.1. First grade

The first grade shall be done according to the following requirements:

hide of good pattern, clean and well cured, NO SIGN OF PUfREFACflON,

free of defects in the butt and neck area, except for a maximum of 5 blind
warbles,

with only a few score marks or one hole in the bellies,

without brand marks.

5.3.2. Second grade

The second grade shall be done according to the following requirements:

hide of good pattern and well cured, NO SIGN OF PUfREFACflON,

with few small holes or cuts or other defects from group one and two in the butt,

with moderate number of defects from groups one, two - except for brands - and
four in bellies and neck,

with ONE brand which is wholly within 18 em of the perimeter of the hide,

with a maximum of ten open warbles or twenty blind warbles,

with dung and urine stain not more than an area of 30 x 30 cm on each of the
hind shanks.

5.3.3. Third grade

The third grade shall be done according to the following requirements:
 22

hide of poor pattern or spoiled,

with some putrefaction defects,

with defects from group one, two - except for brands - and four up to 30 % of the
hide area,

with a brand of which any portion is more than 18 cm from the perimeter of the
hide,

with more than ten open warbles and 20 blind warbles,

with more dung and urine stain than acceptable for grade 2.

5.3.4. Fourth grade

The fourth grade shall be made according to the following requirements:

very poor pattern or very spoiled hide,

with any kind of defects covering up to 50% of the hide area.

5.3.5. Rejects
All hides presenting more defects than accepted for the fourth grade are classified under
rejects.

6. Graphic representation of the classification

6.1. The following table summarizes the coding for grades in relation to the defects, their
location and concentration as well as their depth and surface.
 23

Table lIH

GUIDELINES
for grading hides

Defects
G Natural Mechani- Dirt, Flaying Pu trefaction,
R defects, cally dung, defects, hair slip,
A diseases, caused urine, cuts, red heat,
D parasites, defects, sand, holes, salt,
E ringworm, brands, seeds, scores, stations,
anthrax, wound, etc. cracks, etc.
etc. etc. etc.

1st Location 1-2 1-2 0 1 0

Concent. 1 1 0 1 0
Depth 1 1 0 1 0
Surface 1 1 1 1-2 -
2nd Location 3-4 3-4 3-4 2-3 1-2
Concent. 1 1 1 1 1
Depth 1 1 1 1 1
Surface 1 1 1 1-2 1
3rd Location 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4 3
Con cent. 2 2 2 2 2
Depth 2 2 2 2 2
Surface 1 1 1 1-2 1
4th Location 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4
Con cent. 2 3 2 3 3
Depth 2 2 2 2 2
Surface 1-2 1 1-2 1-2 1-2

LEGEND - code
0 1 2 3 4

Location periphery legs, tail shoulder, butt

belly
Concentration none low medium high
Depth superficial through
Surface grain flesh

6.2. For the purposes of this standard, table 1/H, pictograms 2/H - 12/H, show the graphic
representation of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th grade.
 FIRST GRADE

PUTREFACfION no
DIRT putrefaction no marks
t-:)
~

BRAND MARKS

~
f)'
8'

1
-
.....
::x:
 25
Pictogram 2/ H

UJ
-~
of
~
~
C!J
"0
:§
.Q
•
~
•••• ~
~ s::I
&; S
.~
S

• •• •
26

Pictogram 3/ H
 SECOND GRADE

PUTREFACfION no sight of dirt t>:I

...:!
putrefaction max 30 x 30 em brand marks
DIRT
BRAND MARKS

f
-
Ill..
~
 SECOND GRADE

Maxhnumof
Maximum of twenty
Maximum of
ten
WARBLES I:'-'
OJ

"t1
~.

~
~
-
01
::x::
 SECOND GRADE

D
1\ .. -- ~ ~
SCARS
TICKS
\ /

RINGWORM, etc. \,- f \ I • ~ J \,-

BRUISES ,. I I /, I ~
(0

SCRATCHES
WOUNDS, etc.

FLAY CUTS
I
,
\
I
... \ Jill II n\ ) I
,
With few small holes or cuts or other defects from group one and two in the butt.
With moderate number of defects from group one, two - except for brand - and four in bellies and neck.

~
l)"

f
-
0)

::t=
30

Pictogram 7/H

do)
....t>oCI
8..:9
o do)
II.l ....:=
'""

c:l..
 THIRD GRADE

SCARS
TICKS
"-
..
- -
.... -
:;;It--

RINGWORM, etc.
/fj
t
w
....
BRUISES ..., ..-
SCRATCHES •
......'.
WOUNDS, etc. .' .
FLAY CUTS

With defects from group one, two - except for brands - and four up to 30% of the hide area.

~
1')"
8"
~;:t
~
 THIRD GRADE

SCARS
- ~

TICKS
RINGWORM, etc.
...
..... ... Vol
BRUISES .-......
....- •,. N

SCRATCHES
WOUNDS, etc. )) IJ ..
FLAY CUTS
HOLES

With defects from group one, two - except for brands - and four up to 30% of the hide area.

'i:l
R"
.....
~
~
~
33
Pictogram 101H
 FOURTH GRADE

... --

NATURAL DEFECTS
MECHANICAL DEFECTS
IV
~,

d . . aff
....
-e..~;::
e._._-
...
..-...
'
I' . IJ I
, ... 1/
~

FlAYING DEFECTS IJ I \ l ~\
0 /I~'.\
" . ...

Any kind of defect covering up to 50% of the hide area.

'\j
o·
0-
~;:t
~
~

~
 FOURTH GRADE

~\ t1
} I) w

.....:.- U1

V({! _ti,
ANY KIND
.-.-...
OF
DEFECTS I
Any kind of defect covering up to 50% of the hide area.

~
O·
.....
~;:.
;;
fool

~
 36

Annex 1

A. References to the Classifications of Skins:

(1) ISO Guide for Preparation of Standard Methods, 1972

(2) AFNOR French Standard G 50-001 Defauts des peaux brutes d'ovins - Vocabulaire, 1976
(3) AFNOR French Standard NF G 53-003 Peaux Brutes d' ovins a laine - Designation -
Presentation, 1976
(4) Ethiopian standards ES B.J6.001 to OlD
(5) Tanzanian standard TZS 424
(6) Sudan Hides and Skins Ordinance 1954
(7) Leather Technical Dictionary, Eduard Roether Verlag, Darmstadt
(8) Jean J. Tancous: Skin, Hide and Leather Defects, Lee Corporation, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA,
1986
(9) A. Jeannin, M. Lobry, A. Robinet: Manuel des agents du conditionnement des cuirs et
peaux en zone tropicale, 2eme ed. Paris SEAE, 1971
(10) T.J. Devassy, G. Argaw: Hides and Skin Improvement Handbook, FAO, 1990

B. References to the Classifications of Hides:

(1) ISO 2820 Leather - Raw Hides of Cattle and Horses - Method of Trim, 1974
(2) ISO 28210 Leather - Raw Hides of Cattle and Horses - Preservation by Stack Salting, 1974
(3) BS 3935 - Guide to Classification and Marking of Cattle Hides and Calfskins, 1991
(4) AFNOR G 51-001 Classement des peaux brutes de bovins fraiches et salees d'apres
I' aspect et la masse, 1970
(5) ANFOR G 53-001 Mode de presentation des peaux brutes de bovins et d'equide, 1970
(6) ANFOR G 53-002 Regles de conservation par salage en pile des peaux brutes de bovins
et d' equide, 1970
(7) United States Commercial Standard CS-268-65 Hide Trim Pattern for Domestic Cattle
Hides, 1972
(8) ISO Guides for Preparation of Standard Methods, 1972
(9) Ethiopian standards ES B.J6.001 to OlD
(10) Tanzanian standard TZS 424
(11) Sudan Hides and Skins Ordinance 1954
(12) Leather Technical Dictionary, Eduard Roether Verlag, Darmstadt
(13) Jean J. Tancous: Skin, Hide and Leather Defects, Lee Corporation, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA,
1986
(14) A. Jeannin, M. Lobry, A. Robinet: Manuel des agents du conditionnement des cuirs et
peaux en zone tropicale, 2eme ed. Paris SEAE, 1971
(15) T.]. Devassy, G. Argaw: Hides and Skin Improvement Handbook, FAO, 1990
(16) Flaying and Curing of Hides as a Rural Industry, FAO, Rome, 1955

repraflII:grading.rep
 37

ISO 2820 STANDARD

 38

Till

British Standard US Standard

BS 3935 CS-268-6S
 Annex 2
nlustrations of National Standards
Trimming and Ripping Guidlines

,_ MJddle
~

Tal

Presentation according to Presentation according to Presentation according to

Ethiopian Standard ES B. 16 002 1973 Tansanian Standard TZS 424 1989 Zimbabwe Standard SAZS No 295:1989
 40

TRIMMING

ripping cuts

1. scrotum or
2. udder
3. legs at the knee
4. neck
5. anus
6. navel
7. tail
result of good ripping

good pattern poor pattern

METHODS OF PRESENTATION FOR FLAYED SKIN

In Ethiopia In Tanzania
 41

RIPPING CUTS

I
·
I.
I.
I•
1
..
.J
I
·
'-, .-...1./
\
 42

Dewlap

good pattern

poor pattern
 43

Annex 3
Subdivision of cattle hide

B C
•
------~--------- :HEAD.............. _......A
CR.OP........................A+B+D or
SHOUlJ)ER. ..... B+C A+C+E
BEND............. D or E BACK.................. B+D or C+E
D E BELLy............F or G COROUPON..................... D+E
SIDE........ .A+B+D+F or DOSSET.... B+C+D+E+S or -A
A+C+E+G CULA'ITA .............. D+E+F+G

F and G includes shaded area except cu1atta

Shoulder

Hind-shank Tail Hind-shank

Bovine Hide Calfskin