Pinteresque - Ask
Pinteresque - Ask
Pinteresque - Ask
com Encyclopedia
Web Images News Videos Encyclopedia More Settings Sign In
Pinteresque
« Search the web
Characteristics of Harold Pinter's work identifies distinctive aspects of the works of the British
playwright Harold Pinter (1930–2008) and gives an indication of their influence on Anglo-American
culture.[1]
Table of Contents
1 Characteristics of Pinter's work
1.1 Pinteresque
1.2 Comedy of menace
1.3 Two silences Related Web Searches
1.3.1 The "Pinter silence"
Harold Pinter the Birthday Party Analysis
1.3.2 The "Pinter pause"
The Birthday Party Cliff Notes
Some examples of Pinter's influence on Anglo-American popular Harold Pinter's Play the Birthday Party
2
culture Summary of the Birthday Party by Harold Pinter
2.1 Notes Themes to the Homecoming by Harold Pinter
Pinter restored theatre to its basic elements: an enclosed space and unpredictable dialogue, where
people are at the mercy of each other and pretence crumbles. With a minimum of plot, drama
emerges from the power struggle and hide-and-seek of interlocution. Pinter's drama was first
perceived as a variation of absurd theatre, but has later more aptly been characterised as 'comedy
of menace', a genre where the writer allows us to eavesdrop on the play of domination and
submission hidden in the most mundane of conversations. In a typical Pinter play, we meet people
defending themselves against intrusion or their own impulses by entrenching themselves in a
reduced and controlled existence. Another principal theme is the volatility and elusiveness of the
past. [2]
Over the years Pinter himself has "always been very dismissive when people have talked about
languages and silences and situations as being 'Pinteresque'," observes Kirsty Wark in their interview on
Newsnight Review broadcast on 23 June 2006; she wonders, "Will you finally acknowledge there is such
a thing as a 'Pinteresque' moment?" "No," Pinter replies, "I've no idea what it means. Never have. I really
don't.… I can detect where a thing is 'Kafkaesque' or 'Chekhovian' [Wark's examples]," but with respect
to the "Pinteresque", he says, "I can't define what it is myself. You use the term 'menace' and so on. I
have no explanation of any of that really. What I write is what I write."
Comedy of menace
Once asked what his plays are about, Pinter lobbed back a phrase "the weasel under the cocktail
cabinet", which he regrets has been taken seriously and applied in popular criticism:
Once many years ago, I found myself engaged uneasily in a public discussion on theatre.
Someone asked me what was my work 'about'. I replied with no thought at all and merely to
frustrate this line of enquiry: 'the weasel under the cocktail cabinet'. This was a great mistake. Over
the years I have seen that remark quoted in a number of learned columns. It has now seemingly
acquired a profound significance, and is seen to be a highly relevant and meaningful observation
about my own work. But for me the remark meant precisely nothing.[4]
http://www.ask.com/wiki/Pinteresque 1/4
22/11/2553 Pinteresque | Ask.com Encyclopedia
Despite Pinter's protestations to the contrary, many reviewers and other critics consider the remark,
though facetious, an apt description of his plays. For although Pinter repudiated it, it does contain an
important clue about his relationship to English dramatic tradition (Sofer 29); "Mr. Pinter … is celebrated
for what the critic Irving Wardle has called 'the comedy of menace' " (Brantley, "Harold Pinter"; cf. "A
Master of Menace" [multimedia presentation]).
In December 1971, in his interview with Pinter about Old Times, Mel Gussow recalled that "After The
Homecoming [Pinter] said that [he] 'couldn't any longer stay in the room with this bunch of people who
opened doors and came in and went out. Landscape and Silence [the two short poetic memory plays
that were written between The Homecoming and Old Times] are in a very different form. There isn't any
menace at all.' " Later, when he asked Pinter to expand on his view that he had "tired" of "menace",
Pinter added: "when I said that I was tired of menace, I was using a word that I didn't coin. I never
thought of menace myself. It was called 'comedy of menace' quite a long time ago. I never stuck
categories on myself, or on any of us [playwrights]. But if what I understand the word menace to mean is
certain elements that I have employed in the past in the shape of a particular play, then I don't think it's
worthy of much more exploration."[5]
Two silences
Among the most-commonly cited of Pinter's comments on his own work are his remarks about two kinds
of silence ("two silences"), including his objections to "that tired, grimy phrase 'failure of
communication'," as defined in his speech to the National Student Drama Festival in Bristol in 1962,
incorporated in his published version of the speech entitled "Writing for the Theatre":
There are two silences. One when no word is spoken. The other when perhaps a torrent of language
is being employed. This speech is speaking of a language locked beneath it. That is its continual
reference. The speech we hear is an indication of that which we don't hear. It is a necessary
avoidance, a violent, sly, anguished or mocking smoke screen which keeps the other in its place.
When true silence falls we are still left with echo but are nearer nakedness. One way of looking at
speech is to say that it is a constant stratagem to cover nakedness.
We have heard many times that tired, grimy phrase: 'failure of communication' … and this phrase
has been fixed to my work quite consistently. I believe the contrary. I think that we communicate
only too well, in our silence, in what is unsaid, and that what takes place is a continual evasion,
desperate rearguard attempts to keep ourselves to ourselves. Communication is too alarming. To
enter into someone else's life is too frightening. To disclose to others the poverty within us is too
fearsome a possibility.
I am not suggesting that no character in a play can never say what he in fact means. Not at all. I
have found that there invariably does come a moment when this happens, when he says
something, perhaps, which he has never said before. And where this happens, what he says is
irrevocable, and can never be taken back.[6]
In his "Presentation Speech" of the 2005 Nobel Prize in Literature to Harold Pinter, in absentia, Swedish
writer Per Wästberg, Member of the Swedish Academy and Chairman of its Nobel Committee, observes:
"The abyss under chat, the unwillingness to communicate other than superficially, the need to rule and
mislead, the suffocating sensation of accidents bubbling under the quotidian, the nervous perception that
a dangerous story has been censored – all this vibrates through Pinter's drama."
One of the "two silences"–when Pinter's stage directions indicate pause and silence when his characters
are not speaking at all–has become a "trademark" of Pinter's dialogue called the "Pinter pause": "During
the 1960s, Pinter became famous–nay, notorious–for his trademark: 'The Pinter pause' " (Filichia).
Actors and directors often find Pinter's "pauses and silences" to be daunting elements of performing his
plays, leading to much discussion of them in theatrical and dramatic criticism, and actors who have
worked with Pinter in rehearsals have "reported that he regretted ever starting to write 'Pause' as a stage
direction, because it often leads to portentous overacting" (Jacobson). Speaking about their experiences
of working with Pinter in rehearsing director Carey Perloff's 1989 double bill of The Birthday Party and
Mountain Language (for Classic Stage Company), American actors David Strathairn and Peter Riegert
agreed with Jean Stapleton that "Pinter's comments … 'freed' the cast from feeling reverential about his
pauses," and, while Strathairn "believes pauses can be overdone," he also "thinks Pinter's are
distinctive: 'The natural ones always seem to be right where he wrote them. His pause or beat comes
naturally in the rhythm of the conversation. [As an actor, you] find yourself pausing in mid-sentence,
thinking about what you just said or are going to say.…' " Perloff said: "He didn't want them weighted
that much. … He kept laughing that everybody made such a big deal about it.' He wanted them honored,
she said, but not as 'these long, heavy, psychological pauses, where people look at each other filled with
pregnant meaning' " (Jacobson).
More recently, in an article elliptically headlined "Cut the Pauses … Says Pinter", a London Sunday
Times television program announcement for Harry Burton's documentary film Work ing With Pinter, Olivia
Cole observes that he "made brooding silence into an art form, but after 50 years Harold Pinter has said
directors should be free to cut his trademark pauses if they want.…" In Work ing With Pinter (shown on
British television's More 4 in February 2007), Cole writes, Pinter "says he has been misunderstood. He
maintains that while others detected disturbing undertones, he merely intended basic stage directions"
in writing "pause" and "silence". She quotes Pinter's remarks from Work ing With Pinter:
These damn silences and pauses are all to do with what's going on … and if they don't make any
sense, then I always say cut them. I think they've been taken much too far these silences and
pauses in my plays. I've really been extremely depressed when I've seen productions in which a
silence happens because it says silence or a pause happens because it says pause. And it's
totally artificial and meaningless.
When I myself act in my own plays, which I have occasionally, I've cut half of them, actually.
Exemplifying the frequency and relative duration of pauses in Pinter's plays, Cole observes that "Pinter
wrote 140 pauses into his work Betrayal, 149 into The Caretaker and 224 into The Homecoming. The
longest are typically 10 seconds."
Pinter's having encouraged actors to "cut" his pauses and silences–with the important qualification "if
they don't make any sense" (elided in Cole's headline)–has "bemused directors", according to Cole, who
quotes Pinter's longtime friend and director Sir Peter Hall as saying "that it would be a 'failure' for a
director or actor to ignore the pauses":
A pause in Pinter is as important as a line. They are all there for a reason. Three dots is a
hesitation, a pause is a fairly mundane crisis and a silence is some sort of crisis.
http://www.ask.com/wiki/Pinteresque 2/4
22/11/2553 Pinteresque | Ask.com Encyclopedia
Beckett started it and Harold took it over to express that which is inexpressible in a very original
and particular way, and made them something which is his.…
Cole concludes that Hall added, however, that, in Work ing With Pinter, Pinter "was right to criticise
productions in which actors were fetishising their pauses".
Quoting J. Barry Lewis, the director of a recent production of Betrayal, by Palm Beach Dramaworks, Lisa
Cohen observes that Pinter has "even entered popular culture with what is called 'the Pinter pause,' a
term that describes … those silent moments 'filled with unspoken dialogue' that occur throughout his
plays." [7]
Exemplifying Pinter's cultural influence for several decades, a line in "The Ladies Who Lunch", a song in
Company, the 1970 Broadway musical by George Furth and Stephen Sondheim, alludes to Manhattanite
"ladies who lunch" taking in "a Pinter play", "fashionable" at that time (Merritt, Pinter in Play 217).[8] Yet
Pinter told John Barber ten years later, in 1980: "'This really is an awful business, this fashion. I must tell
you I feel I've been unfashionable all my life. I was oldfashioned from the very beginning, and I'm
unfashionable now, really.' " [9]
Episode 164 of the very popular American television series Seinfeld, entitled "The Betrayal" (originally
broadcast 27 November 1997), is structured in reverse somewhat like Pinter's play and film Betrayal.
Jerry Seinfeld's comic parodic homage to Harold Pinter, the episode features a character named
"Pinter".[10] Since the first airing of that Seinfeld episode and since the subsequent release of films like
Memento and other popular works with reversed chronological structures, some media accounts (such
as that in the IMDb) refer to Pinter's plot device in his play and film as a mere "gimmick". But scholars
and other critical reviewers consider the reversed structure a fully-integrated ingenious stylistic means of
heightening multiple kinds of ironies energizing Betrayal's comedic wit, its cumulative poignancy, and its
ultimate emotional impact on audiences, and the play has been produced throughout the United States,
Britain, and parts of the rest of the world with increasing frequency.[11]
A character in the fourth episode of the second season of Dawson's Creek , "Tamara's Return" (28 Oct.
1998), alludes to Pinter's so-called "sub-textual" use of silence as "a classic 'Pinter' moment". In
dialogue between lead character Pacey Witter (played by Joshua Jackson) and Tamara Jacobs (Leann
Hunley), his former English teacher with whom Pacey has had an affair, Tamara tells Pacey that an
awkward moment of silence between them is "what we ex-English teachers call a classic 'Pinter'
moment, where everything is said in silence because the emotion behind what we really want to say is
just too overwhelming. … silence is an acquired taste. The more complicated life becomes the better it
is to learn to say nothing." When Pacey inquires "Who is this Pinter guy?" Tamara urges him, "Stay in
school." Later Pacey tells Tamara that he has "looked up this Pinter guy. Harold, playwright, the king of
subtext. You say one thing, but you mean another," wondering further: "Do you think it's possible for us
to have a moment without all the subtext?" "Uh, I don't know, Pacey," Tamara replies. "Words have
always gotten us into so much trouble." Pacey and Tamara finally agree that "This Pinter guy was really
onto something."[12][13]
Further alluding to Pinter's renowned "pauses and silences", the song "Up Against It", from the album
Bilingual, by the English electronic music/pop music duo Pet Shop Boys, includes the lines: "Such a
cold winter/With scenes as slow as Pinter" (Tennant and Lowe).
Also illustrating the frequent allusions to Pinter's "silences" in commentaries about others' work, in a
book review of Nick Hornby's "debut teenage novel" Slam (Penguin Books), Janet Christie observes
hyperbolically that Hornby is "spot-on with the way a conversation with a teenage boy contains more
meaningful silences than Harold Pinter's entire oeuvre …."
Notes
1. ^ For some further perspectives, written after Pinter's death (24 Dec. 2008), see the articles by Dorfman
and Edgar and the Guardian editorial, along with others listed in Bibliography for Harold
Pinter#Obituaries and related articles.
2. ^ a b "Biobibliographical Notes" in "Bio-bibliography" for Harold Pinter, by The Swedish Academy, The
Nob el Prize in Literature 2005, The Nobel Foundation, Nob elPrize.org, Oct. 2005, precede a
"Bibliography" of selected publications (mostly in English but also including some in French, German,
and Swedish), compiled by the Swedish Academy. (These notes include the full Nobel Prize "Citation".)
3. ^ Another version of the OED is cited in the BBC press release about Pinter at the BBC (10 Oct. 2002): "
[']Pinteresque pin-ter-esk', adj. in the style of the characters, situations, etc., of the plays of Harold Pinter,
20th-cent. English dramatist, marked esp. by halting dialogue, uncertainty of identity, and air of menace."
The "Draft Revision" (June 2005) of this entry in the Oxford English Dictionary Online (2006) is:
Pinteresque, adj. (and n.) Brit. /pntrsk/, U.S. /pn(t)rsk/ [< the name of Harold Pinter (b. 1930), British
playwright + -ESQUE suffix. Cf. PINTERISH adj.]
Of or relating to Harold Pinter; resembling or characteristic of his plays. Also occas. as n. Pinter's plays
are typically characterized by implications of threat and strong feeling produced through colloquial
language, apparent triviality, and long pauses.
4. ^ Harold Pinter, "On Being Awarded the German Shakespeare Prize in Hamburg" (1970), rpt. in Various
Voices 39.
5. ^ Qtd. in Gussow, Conversations with Pinter 18, 24.
6. ^ Rpt. in Various Voices 25, first published in Harold Pinter Plays One (London: Methuen, 1962); Merritt,
"'Progress' and 'Fashion' in Pinter Studies", chap. 1 of Pinter in Play 15.
7. ^ Beau Higgins, in "A Pinter Play – 'Betrayal'", b roadwayworld.com, Mar. 2007, accessed 6 Sept. 2007,
also reviews this production, which opened on 9 Mar. 2007 and ran through 15 Apr. 2007. Three other
production revs. appear on the Palm Beach Dramaworks website; in one of them, Jan Sjostrom,
"Dramaworks Stays True to Fine 'Betrayal'", Palm Beach Daily News, 19 Mar. 2007, accessed 6 Sept.
2007, states: "The show is impeccably directed by J. Barry Lewis, who ensures that no scene is
overplayed and every unspoken nuance is communicated. And there are plenty of nuances in this play.
In fact, what's left unsaid is as important as the dialogue."
8. ^ Furth and Sondheim's allusion to "a Pinter play" in "The Ladies Who Lunch" in Company is repeated
by London theatre critic Mark Shenton, in his commentary entitled "A Matinee, a Pinter Play …", The
Stage (Blog), 9 Oct. 2007, accessed 27 Jan. 2009. Shenton segues from this allusion to "a matinee, a
Pinter play" into the pleasures of attending afternoon matinees in general.
9. ^ Qtd. in Merritt, Pinter in Play 3; cf. 217–18 & 278n12.
10. ^ For production details, see Seinfeld:"The Betrayal" at the Internet Movie Database.
11. ^ See Merritt, "Betrayal in Denver"; cf. Merritt, comp., "Harold Pinter Bibliography" (1987– ).
12. ^ Season Two, Episode #204: "Tamara's Return", as listed in the official Episode Guide for Dawson's
Creek, dawsonscreek.com, copyright © 2007 Sony Pictures Digital, features a video link to different part
of the same episode. There are no official scripts on that site. Unofficial transcripts containing this
http://www.ask.com/wiki/Pinteresque 3/4
22/11/2553 Pinteresque | Ask.com Encyclopedia
dialogue are posted online at derivative fansites like TVTwiz.com and Dawson's Creek "Script Archive".
13. ^ A discussion of critical controversies about Pinter's presumed use of "subtext" appears in "Some
Other Language Games", chap. 7 in Merritt, Pinter in Play 137–70.
Works cited
Christie, Janet. "Cautionary Tale about a Boy and Girl". Scotland on Sunday, Books. Scotsman Publications, 7
Oct. 2007. Web. 9 Oct. 2007. [Outdated link.] "Cautionary Tale about a Boy and a Girl" (archived version).
Internet Archive, 13 Oct. 2007. Web. 2 June 2009.
Dorfman, Ariel. "The World That Harold Pinter Unlocked". Washington Post. Washington Post, 27 Dec. 2008,
A15. Print. The Washington Post Company, 27 Dec. 2008. Web. 9 Jan. 2009.
Dorfman, Ariel. " 'You want to free the world from oppression?' ". New Statesman, Jan. 2009. New Statesman, 8
Jan. 2009. World Wide Web. 9 Jan. 2009. ("Ariel Dorfman on the life and work of Harold Pinter [1930–
2008].")
Edgar, David. "Pinter's Weasels". Guardian, "Comment is Free". Guardian Media Group, 29 Dec. 2008. Web. 23
Mar. 2009. ("The idea that he was a dissenting figure only in later life ignores the politics of his early
work.")
"Editorial: Harold Pinter: Breaking the Rules". Guardian.co.uk. Guardian Media Group, 27 Dec. 2008. Web. 7
Mar. 2009. ("Pinter broke the rules in art and in life.")
Tamara's Return (1998) at the Internet Movie Database. Episode 4 of Season 2 (204). Dawson's Creek: The
Complete Second Season. DVD. Sony Pictures, (released) 16 Dec. 2003. Web. 2 Oct. 2007.
Tennant, Neil, and Chris Lowe (The Pet Shop Boys). "Up Against It". Song lyrics. petshopb oys.co.uk: The
Official Site. 2 Oct. 2007. ["Browse all lyrics alphabetically" accessible via "Lyric of the day: Read more".
Requires Adobe Flash Player 8 or above.]
External links
The content on this page originates from Wikipedia and is licensed under the GNU Free Document
License or the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA license.
Pinteresque
About - Privacy - AskEraser - Advertise - Careers - Ask Answers - iPhone - Help © 2010 Ask.com
http://www.ask.com/wiki/Pinteresque 4/4