Learner's Experiences Through Consensual Qualitative Research. de Lasalle University

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

RANENIEL S.

LOMIBAO
GRADE 12- STEM
11.11.19

Gaerlan, Marianne Jennifer M. 2016. Learning in L2: An analysis of less successful Filipino ESL
learner’s experiences through Consensual Qualitative Research. De Lasalle University,
Philippines

Filipino learners were considered a bilinguals, nevertheless, there are controversies that
despite of Filipinos bilingualism in English and Filipino language, not all of them can come up
with the ESL and MOI of the Philippines. The researcher noted that that not all Filipino learners
are successful in learning in English which is their L2 and is the MOI in Philippine schools
(Gaerlan,2016). In this study, the researcher examined the variables that renders the learners "less
successful" concerning with English language. While this study produced significant results
demonstrating how the mind stimulation could affect the learning capacity of learners regarding
English language there are limitations related to generalizability, sample and replicability. The
overall idea of the topic is related to identifying certain ways that affects the learning in English of
the Filipino learners. Notwithstanding, there are disputes involved like the role of mother tongue
in second language learning.

Gaerlan (2016) uses 15 samples coming from two private schools and two public schools,
the participants were said to be a unsuccessful learners of English as their second language. The
research uses CQR paradigm to analyzed the data, CQR is an inductive method that is characterized
by open-ended interview questions, small samples, a reliance on words over numbers, the
importance of context, an integration of multiple viewpoints, and consensus of the research team
(Hill,2012). With the help of this method the researcher was unable to explore the learner’s
subjective experiences and provide insights on learning in second language and a hypothetical
understanding about this group. After multiple examines and analyzation of data, Gaerlan found
out that "successful learners" are highly interested in learning English as it would help them to
ensure success.

The utilization of CQR method affects the generalizability of the research, thus, it only
determines the factors by examining small sample and providing multiple viewpoints. In this case,
the research shows unjustifiable claims due to the use of small sample. On the contrary, the
researcher must have gathered multiple participants in order to provide reasonable supporting
details of the claims. Furthermorehe researcher must include participants coming from different
regions that speaks contrasting mother tongues which is their L1, because according to Early
Childhood Care and Education, UNESCO (2007) the children who are exposed to learning in their
mother tongue are much likely to be a "successful learner". Moreover, the researcher must have
considered this as a factor in learning in English. Considering this claim, if the learner must have
embraced the English language as his mother tongue there is a higher possibility of being a
"successful learner". "The self-determination theory (SDT) of Ryan and Deci (2000) maintains that
in order for learners to function optimally, the processes of intrinsic motivation, internalization,
and integration require that basic psychological needs be supported." Based on further research, I
disagree with the aforementioned use of SDT theory in supporting the idea of the research, because
the essence of intrinsic motivation is degraded by the idea of the content familiarity and the ability
to recognize and comprehend English words. English proficiency is an important variable to
academic success. Academic English proficiency, according to Hakuta, Butler, and Witt (2000: 1).
Without the competency in English language in terms of learning in English will affect the learner’s
academic performance. Even though, the learners have the will and motivation to learn. As it was
supported by this assertion, several factors could account for the lack of English language
proficiency and preparedness among bilingual students (Zeegers, 2004).

The interpretation emerged logically from the data gathered. It clearly shows the insights
of Filipino learners towards learning in English -- their thoughts how do use L2 as learning
language affects their performance, their perception regarding the usage of it, and so on and so
forth. Also, the researcher rationalizes the ideas very well. In addition, the researcher provides
differing opinions and views about L2 as a learning language. The replicability of the study is
unquestionable, it is credible a source for studies related to this research.

The research overall focus is to provide analysis of less successful learners in L2, to
discern manner and course of action to gain competence in learning in English. Gaerlan (2016)
shows that motivation and awareness of the cognitive benefits in learning in English will help to
improve academic success of the learners. However, the small sample size and lack of diversity
among participants limits the generalizability of these findings. For future research, a more diverse
sample is necessary to provide more differing views and evidence about the different factors that
affects learning in English, like competency in English language and role of mother tongue in
learning.

Reference:

Hakuta, K., Butler, Y. G. & Witt, D. (2000). How long does it take English learners to attain
proficiency? The University of California Linguistic minority Research Institute, Policy Report
2000-1.

Hill,C.E.(2011).Consensual Qualitative Research: A Practical Resource for Investigating Social


Science Phenomena.United States:American Psychological Association.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic
motivation, social development, and well-being . American psychologist, 55 (1), 68.

Zeegers, P. (2004). Students learning in higher education: A path analysis of


academicachievement in science. Higher Education Research and Development,23 (1),35-56.

You might also like