3.1 Non Surgical Treatment 3.1.1 Maxillary Anterior Protrusion Nursing English 2 by Ilham
3.1 Non Surgical Treatment 3.1.1 Maxillary Anterior Protrusion Nursing English 2 by Ilham
3.1 Non Surgical Treatment 3.1.1 Maxillary Anterior Protrusion Nursing English 2 by Ilham
Chapter 1
A fixed tool can also correct the anterior maxillary protrusion where the fixed
device is constantly in the oral cavity so that the results are
faster than removable devices, it's just that control of fixed tools must be more
frequent and thorough so that all deviations from the operation of the tool can be
avoided.
because orthodontic repositioning teeth and oral surgeons use orthognathic surgery
to reposition all or part of one or both jaws. This is because by moving the jaw, there
is also tooth movement. Orthognathic surgery is performed in conjunction with
orthodontic treatment so that the teeth will be in the right and stable position after
surgery
Malformation of the jaw can occur at birth or the possibility of being manifest
when the patient grows. This can cause difficulty chewing, abnormal speech
patterns, early tooth loss and damage and dysfunction of the temporomandibular
joint. The aim of orthognathic surgery is to correct various small and large facial and
jaw irregularities, and the benefits include increasing the ability to chew, speak and
breathe. In most cases this surgical treatment results in a perfect harmony of the
face
3.2.1 Indications
Indications for orthognathic surgery include severe class II or III skeletal
discrepancies, deep bites in non-growing patients, severe anterior open bites, severe
dentoalveolar problems (too severe for
corrected by orthodontic correction), very weak or disturbed periodontal situations
and skeletal asymmetry.15,16
Ricketts (1982), proposes 4 specific conditions that are indicative of surgical
action, namely if: 1) the expected improvement of dental position is difficult to
achieve with only orthodontic treatment, because malposition is very severe; 2) poor
skeletal patterns for the possibility of good orthodontic correction; 3) only with
orthodontic treatment can not be obtained compatible facial aesthetics; and 4) only
with orthodontic treatment or other restorations that functional occlusion cannot be
achieved. Whereas Alexander (1986) stated that orthognathic surgery can be
performed if orthodontic treatment cannot be obtained by dentoalveolar balance and
facial soft tissue profile.15
3.2.2 Contraindications
All general health conditions, namely all surgical interventions, are
contraindicated. 15
When the balance of indirect gains and losses leads to the decision to treat
the patient with orthodontic surgery, one can decide to delay treatment.17
If the complaint is mild, or when the patient has not seen the need for
treatment, a plaster model can be taken, allowing the evaluation of changes later.17
In young patients, it is recommended to allow complete growth before surgical
intervention. The exception to this is the treatment of mandibular deficiency with the
inclined, low mandibular (convergent morphology), which can be treated with split
sagittal osteotomy or distracted osteogenesis before growth is complete. 17
Financial reasons can also be a decision not to do orthodontic surgery at that
time.17
4.1. Prabedah
4.1.1 Prabedah Evaluation
Preoperative diagnosis is very important for the success of orthognathic
surgery. Diagnosis aims to determine the nature, severity and etiology of possible
dentofacial deformities
General medical evaluation is the patient's general medical history must be
recorded to prevent medical errors from occurring. Patient's dental health must be
evaluated. Pulpo-periodontal problems must be corrected before surgical
intervention.
The socio-psychological evaluation of the patient is assessed to determine
whether he is aware of the dentofacial abnormalities experienced and what he
expects from surgical therapy. This is very helpful in determining and motivating
patients. The patient's social status must also be evaluated.
Cephalometric evaluation is an important evaluation in determining the
nature and severity of cases. Commonly used are cephalometric Burstone analysis
and quadrilateral analysis. Analysis of frontal cephalometry helps in determining the
asymmetrical face
bilateral bicuspid area, where previous extractions have been carried out (premolar 1
over bilaterally withdrawn both) .19
The incision pierces the subperiosteal, dissecting forward to the piriform edge about
5mm above the peak level of the canine teeth. The buccal cortex of the bone is cut
with an oscillating saw or fissure bur, first vertically and distal to the canine teeth and
then horizontally to the piriform edge above the tooth apex. Osteotomy
bilateral completion. 19.20
Gambar 7. Insisi vertikal ditempatkan pada area kaninus, flep tercermin dan
potongan tulang terbuat dari daerah premolar pertama untuk batas lateral bukaan
pyriform, jauh di atas apeks akar dari kaninus. (Mani V. Surgical correction of facial
deformities.Mosby: Jaypee medical,2010: 112-4)
An incision made crossing the palatal and posterior palatal tissue will be seen to
allow the surgeon to complete the palatal osteotomy
transversely. 19.20
Gambar 8. Midline sagital insisi dibuat untuk mengakses palatum untuk osteotomi.
(Mani V. Surgical correction of facial deformities.Mosby: Jaypee medical,2010: 112-
4)
A short vertical incision is made directly above the anterior nasal bone. Minimal
dissection of soft tissue is done to allow placement of an osteotomy to separate the
6
premaxila from the nasal septum. The premaxillary segment can now be rotated in a
superior direction to the soft tissue, allowing the surgeon to directly access the
osteotomy site for cutting. 19.20
When a segment can be placed in a planned position, this condition is
stabilized by orthodontic wire, intermaxillary fixation and orthodontic protection. Then
suturing the mucosal and submucosal tissue is done to seal the opening of the
surgery with
absorbable synthesis suture. 19.20
Gambar 11. Lower subapical anterior osteotomy (A) diagram (B) foto (C) Lower
subapical anterior osteotomy dapat dikombinasikan dengan genioplasty. (Mani V.
Surgical correction offacial deformities.Mosby:Jaypee medical,2010: 112-4)
results in improved patient comfort, comfortable speaking and oral hygiene and
better postoperative jaw stability and function.14
During surgery, a small occlusal acrylic wafer is used to help reposition and stabilize
occlusion. When the IMF is released (usually in the operating room), the splint is
attached to the maxilla or lower jaw. The light elastic rubber is then placed on the
splint and the combination of the splint and elastic rubber serves to help the jaw into
the new occlusion after postoperation. After an adequate period of time, an occlusal
splint will be removed and the patient referred for orthodontic treatment.14
If the desired jaw movement and stability in the osteotomy area have been reached,
orthodontic treatment can be stopped. The procedure for composing and
repositioning teeth has been achieved when each remaining extraction room is
closed. Vertical elastic rubber is left in the osteotomy area to cause proprioceptive
impulses from the teeth, where if not done the action will cause the patient to look for
a new position of maximum intercuspal. The adaptation process takes place quickly
and rarely takes longer than 6 to 10 months. Retention after orthodontic surgery
makes no difference to adult patients and definitive periodontal and prosthetic
treatment can begin as soon as this final occlusal relationship has been reached.
Patients should be recommended for tooth and periodontal control for about 10 to 14
weeks postoperatively. After the orthodontic appliance is removed, thorough oral
hygiene is recommended with prophylactic techniques
4.4 Complications
4.4.1 Injury nerves
Nerve injury in orthognathic surgery can be caused by indirect trauma, such
as compression by surgical edema, or direct trauma, such as compression, tearing
or cutting with a surgical or stretching instrument
during segmental osteotomy manipulation. Seddon (1943) classified neurosensory
and motor deficits into three categories to describe the morphophysiology of
mechanical nerve injuries, namely neuropraxia, axonotmesis and neurotmesis.21
Neuropraxia is the mildest form of injury and is described as damage to the
myelin sheath locally without continuity defects. The majority of inferior alveolar
nerve (IAN) injuries after split sagittal bilateral osteotomy in the mandible (BSSO) are
neuropraxias and may be caused by nerve manipulation, traction or compression.
Normal sensation or function usually resolves within two months.21
Axonotmesis is characterized by disruption and damage to axons and myelin
sheaths without interference with perineurium or epineurium. This is due to greater
or longer damage, and neurosensory deficits longer and more profound than those in
neuropraxia. 21
Neurotmesis is a severe disorder of the nerve stem, which can cause deep
and possibly permanent neurosensory deficits.
Facial nerve injuries in orthognathic surgery are rare, but the consequences
of these injuries can be detrimental to the patient. Damage to the marginal branch of
the mandibular nerve is a complication of the extraoral approach to the mandibular
ramus or angles, but this approach in orthognathic surgery is rare. Facial nerve has
been reported to have been damaged in vertical intraoral subcondylar osteotomy
and in BSSO regression procedures with an incidence of less than 1%. The
mechanism of trauma is thought to have caused compression
by a retractor behind a fracture, the posterior ramus from the styloid process and
direct pressure as a result of the decline of the distal segment. 21
Disorders of the palatine and infraorbital neurosensory nerves are most likely
to occur after maxillary osteotomy. The incidence of prolonged sensitivity to
10
disorders has been reported to be lower than 4%, and they do not seem to bother
patients.21
4.4.4. Relapse
Relapse is an unexpected risk of orthognathic surgery. Relapse may occur on
dental or skeletal or both.
In general, advancing the mandible will be stable, if internal fixation is stiff
and anterior facial height is maintained. Several factors that can affect recurrence in
11
the process of advancing the mandible are: surgeon's skills, control of the proximal
segment, including the condylar position and prevention of proximal segment
rotation; prevention of opposite rotation of the distal segment in cases with a high
mandibular angle; the degree of progress of the mandible, and stretching of the
perimandibular tissue, including the skin, connective tissue, muscles and
periosteum.
Mandibular deterioration is not always stable and the inclination of ramus
during surgery seems to have an important influence on stability.21
4.4.5 Infection
Infection after orthognathic surgery can be acute or chronic, local or general.
Most postoperative infections are caused by endogenous bacteria
most likely by aerobic bacteria, streptococci. Infection occurs when the balance
between the host defense system and the virulence of the bacteria is lost. Factors
contributing to orthognathic surgery include steroid use, duration of surgery, patient
age, impaired blood supply to bone segments, dehydration from injuries, presence of
foreign bodies, hospitalization in large wards, nutrition, hematoma and smoking. The
experience of the surgeon, good aseptic techniques and good handling of tissues
are also relevant factors.21
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSION
THANK YOU