International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and

Development ​January 2014, Vol. 3, No. 1 ISSN: 2226-6348

The Effects of Problem-Based Learning on

Self-Directed Learning Skills among Physics
Undergraduates

Majed Saleem Aziz

University of Baghdad
Email:
[email protected]

Ahmad Nurulazam Md. Zain ​National Higher Education

Research Institute & School of Educational Studies Universiti Sains
Malaysia Email: [email protected]

Mohd Ali Bin Samsudin ​School of

Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia
Email: [email protected]

Salmiza Binti Saleh ​School of Educational

Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia Email:
[email protected]

DOI: 10.6007/IJARPED/v3-i1/694 URL:

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v3-i1/694

Abstract ​The aim of this study is to compare

the effects of three methods: problem-based learning (PBL), PBL with
lecture method, and conventional teaching on self- directed learning skills
among physics undergraduates. The actual sample size comprises of 122
students, who were selected randomly from the Physics Department,
College of Education in Iraq. In this study, the pre- and post-test were
 done and the instruments were administered to the students for data
collection. The data was analyzed and statistical results rejected null
hypothesis of this study. This study revealed that there are no signifigant
differences between PBL and PBL with lecture method, thus the PBL
without or with lecture method enhances the self-directed learning skills
better than the conventional teaching method.

Keywords: Self-directed learning skills; problem-based learning; PBL with

lecture method; conventional teaching

126 www.hrmars.com/journals
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and
Development ​January 2014, Vol. 3, No. 1 ISSN: 2226-6348

Introduction ​The science and its applications are

part of daily life to make our life better and therefore the development of an individual’s
understanding of science and its applications is one of the objectives of science
instruction (Adiguzel, 2006). Rapidly changing recent science applications require
science students to gain self-directed learning skills for lifelong education, where skills
are part of the efficiency to react to development in knowledge. Moreover, the teaching
of science has become important now more than ever (Montero & Gonzalez, 2009;
Sahin, 2010b). One of the most effective approaches is problem-based learning (PBL),
which is a scientifically accurate model (Bouwma-Gearhart, Stewart, & Brown, 2009;
Cakir Olgun, 2008; Miller, Streveler, Yang, & Santiago Roman, 2009). PBL enhances a
set of pedagogical results such as skills of self-directed learning (Neild, 2004).
According to Hmelo-Silver (2004), PBL as a teaching method, is based on
students-centered learning, where students learn through simplified problem solving
and where problems should be complex, ill-structured, and real. Students participate in
self-directed learning for solving problems. PBL is a student​-​centred teaching approach
that enables students to become active participants in solving problems, answering
questions, cooperating in learning, working in teams on problems or projects, and taking
on more of the responsibility for learning (Ates & Eryilmaz, 2011). In PBL method,
learners are encouraged to take the initiative for their own knowledge (Lee, Mann, &
Frank, 2010). There are evidences in support of PBL which seemingly have a superior
effect on self-directed learning skills for fostering it, compared with conventional
curricula (Evans, 2009; Koh Khoo, Wong, & Koh, 2008). Under skills of self-directed
learning, students can run the planning, conceptualization, conduct and evaluation of
learning (Brookfield, 2009). Self-directed learning is present in education statuses, and
variety of actions including reading, cooperation, debate, accessing resources,
research, and development. Using the time to prepare their course and studying
in-depth are expected from students in self-directed learning (Deepwell & Malik, 2008).
Consequently, self- directed learning means an ability to sub-edit education objectives,
name resource, select and carry out proper education strategy, and evaluate instruction
outcome as well as learning experiences. In addition, under self-directed learning, a
person takes the primary responsibility and initiative for planning and diagnosing his/her
learning requirements (Deepwell & Malikb, 2008). In the current study, the PBL alone or
with lecture method compared with conventional teaching method were used to
investigate their effectiveness on the self-directed learning skills among physics
undergraduates.

Problem Statement ​There is the weakness of the

traditional science teaching method, under it that teacher-centred learning assumes that
all learners take in recent material in a like speed and have like degree of knowledge in
the topic being taught. A teacher guides the students and offers them new information.
The focus of teaching is on the transmission of knowledge from the expert teacher to
the novice learner (Cheong, 2008). The role of students, in the conventional manner, is
passive rather than an active, thus hindering learning among bachelor’s degree physics
students. Under the conventional manner, students listen and watch, and most teaching
time is spent with the instructor lecturing. In the traditional method, a teacher is required
to have or to

127 www.hrmars.com/journals
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and
Development ​January 2014, Vol. 3, No. 1 ISSN: 2226-6348

learn effective writing and speaking skills. Mostly, under traditional experiments of
science, students have conceptions on what the findings will be, or what they anticipate
it to be, and the student tries to emphasize on this (Azu & Osinubi, 2011). Therefore,
there is a need to adopt problem-based learning (PBL) for solving the problem of the
traditional science teaching method, which is one of the most successful approaches
(Prince, 2004; Sahin, 2009a; van Berkel & Schmidt, 2005). In recent years, educational
institutions have evidenced the requirement of utilizing substitutional teaching methods
to develop learners’ abilities (Azu & Osinubi, 2011). PBL, as a teaching method, was
primarily developed to address the attendant difficulties in conventional methods and
respond to the conventional methods which failed to enable students to solve problems
of to solve problems of various topics in physics material (Hung, Jonassen, & Liu,
2008). Instructors in PBL are more creative with their teaching while old methods, which
are based on boring lectures and memorization of material, are challenged with this
delivery method (Ates & Eryilmaz, 2011; Sulaiman, 2011). Based on previous literature,
the PBL allows the development of the self-directed learning skills to enable students
assume individual responsibility for their learning. The PBL allows learners to pursue
information from any subject, and this allows them to deeply understand Physics
concepts (Ates & Eryilmaz, 2011; Ball & Pelco, 2006; Cheong, 2008). Lycke, Grottum
and Stromso (2006) demonstrated that PBL students showed “significantly more
self-regulated learning and they perceived themselves as more active contributors to
group learning process and used a broader range of resources than students in the
traditional programme” (p. 113). Consequently, PBL environment can provide
opportunities for students to develop their skills of self-directed learning which will help
them to manage in designing, solve problems, performance, and evaluating learning
outcomes (Bell, 2012; Downing, Ning, & Shin, 2011; Thornton, 2010; Whitcombe,
2013). It is worth mentioning that using the PBL approach alone and adopting it only as
a teaching method, is considered risky because it entails complete shift from a
teacher-centred learning in conventional manner to another student-centred learning in
the PBL. PBL, as an instruction process, centers on the precept of using problem, which
should be complex and ill-structured, that will lead to drastic change in learning
approach. Under the PBL method, students are encouraged to be active rather than
passive and cooperate rather than compete (Cheong, 2008). Incorporating PBL into
traditional method could be a useful tool to reinforce material covered in traditional
lecture, which will leave a positive influence on the learning process (Liceaga, Ballard &
Skura, 2011). According to Saalu, Abraham & Aina (2010), “there should be an
intelligent combination of using both the traditional and PBL approaches for teaching
anatomy which may provide the most effective training for undergraduate medical
student” (p. 197).

128 www.hrmars.com/journals
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development
 January 2014, Vol. 3, No. 1 ISSN: 2226-6348
Objective of the Study ​To compare the effects of using PBL, the PBL with lecture
method, and the conventional teaching on self-directed learning skills among physics
undergraduates.
Research Question ​Are there significant differences on the linear combination of
posttest mean scores of self- directed learning skills among physics undergraduates
who followed PBL, the PBL with lecture method, and the conventional teaching after the
effect of mean scores of pretest is controlled?
Research Hypothesis ​There are no significant differences on the linear combination of
posttest mean scores of self- directed learning skills among physics undergraduates
who followed PBL, the PBL with lecture method, and the conventional teaching after the
effect of pretest mean scores is controlled.
Methodology Research Design ​This study’s design can be represented schematically

as O​1 ​the pretest on the self-directed learning

​ skills; O​2 ​the posttest on the self-directed

learning skills; X​a ​represents PBL treatment; X​

​ b ​represents PBL with lecture method

treatment; X​c ​represents the conventional teaching method,

​ as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 ​No Group ​Nonequivalent Control Pretest

​ ​Group Design
Treatment Posttest

1 Experimental O​1 ​X​a ​O​2

The

2 Experimental O​1 ​X​b ​O​2

3 Control O​1 ​X​c ​O​2

sample consisted of three groups of the bachelor’s degree physics students. The first
experimental group used PBL treatment, and the second experimental group used the
PBL with lecture method treatment, while the third group was a control group and it
used conventional teaching.
Distribution of Groups ​Table 2 shows distribution of groups based on the teaching
methods. There were 42 subjects for the PBL method, 39 subjects for the PBL with
lecture method, and 41 subjects for the conventional teaching method. The all groups
consist of 122 subjects involved in the study.
129 www.hrmars.com/journals
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and
Development ​January 2014, Vol. 3, No. 1 ISSN: 2226-6348
 Table
2

Distribution of Groups Based on the Teaching

Methods
Group Teaching d
Metho Subjects Percent

In the current study, the five problems were developed in the field of thermodynamics in
physics for problem-based learning (PBL) as the teaching method alone or with the
lecture method (PBL with lecture method) to investigate their effects on self-directed
learning skills among bachelor’s degree physics students, compared with the
conventional teaching method.

Population and Sample ​The population for this study comprised of male and female
(176) students enrolled in the Physics Department, College of Education in Iraq, for
academic year 2011-2012. They were randomly selected from the college. Five subjects
dropped from the sample, so the actual sample size was 122 students.

Instrument of the Study ​Questionnaire on self-directed learning skills was adapted

based on some resources (e.g., Fisher, King, & Tague, 2001; Lee, Mann, & Frank,
2010; Stewart, 2007) to collect data for the present study. Aforementioned
questionnaire consists of of 25 items measuring student’s self- directed learning skills.
The self-directed learning skills questionnaires were administered to the physics
undergraduates, before and after the treatment to measure the effectiveness of PBL
alone or with lecture method, on the self-directed learning skills, compared with
conventional teaching method. The difference between pretest and posttest results on
student’s skills of the self-directed learning determined the effectiveness of three
teaching methods, on students’ self-directed learning skills.

130 www.hrmars.com/journals
1 PBL 42 34.400
teachin
2 PBLwith lecture
g
39 32.000
41 33.600

3 conventional

Total 122 100.000

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development
January 2014, Vol. 3, No. 1 ISSN: 2226-6348
Findings
The results revealed that univariate test of statistical significance on the differences
observed in the scores of posttest across the various groups, as shown in Table 3.

S​ource
Posttest of
.00 self-directed learning
Intercept Posttest of
self-directed learning
131 www.hrmars.com/journals
S​
iF ​g.
Corrected Model
.00
Pretest of self- directed learning skills

2297.49 1 2297.49 19.5​1

Posttest of
11570.34 1 11570.3
98.2.00 self-directed
4

3 learning
​
Group Posttest of
.00 self-directed learning
Error Posttest of
self-directed learning

3831.55 2 1915.77 16.2​7

13663.46 116 117.79
Total Posttest of
self-directed learning
122
Corrected Total Posttest of
self-directed learning

1015586.​0
30263.90 121
Table 3
Univariate Analysis of Subjects’ Posttest Scores on Self-directed Learning Skills in Various
Groups

t ​Variable

D​ependen
16600.44
5 3320.09 28.1​
c​ 9

S​quares

S​um of

T​ype III

d​f

S​quare

M​ean
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development
January 2014, Vol. 3, No. 1 ISSN: 2226-6348
The scores of posttest questionnaire on self-directed learning skills across the various
groups with ​F (​ 2, 116) = 16.27, Mean Square = 1915.77 and ​P = ​ .00. Therefore, these
differences in the scores of posttest questionnaire on self-directed learning skills among
the three groups were significant. So, the statistical results rejected the null hypothesis.
Thus, there were significant differences on the linear combination of posttest mean
scores of self-directed learning skills among physics undergraduates who followed PBL,
the PBL with lecture method, and the conventional teaching. Overall, the results of
comparison among the groups which were the PBL, the PBL with lecture method, and
the conventional teaching, indicated that there were statistical significant differences.
Thus, the results of univariate statistics were further investigated by performing a post
hoc pairwise multiple comparison using LSD command for self-directed learning skills in
order to identify significantly where the differences in the means resided. Table 4 shows
a summary of post hoc pairwise multiple comparisons across the groups of the PBL
method, the PBL with lecture method, and the conventional teaching method, to study
superior effects on students’ self-directed learning skills.
Table 4
Summary of Post Hoc Pairwise Multiple Comparisons Observed Means Scores of Posttest of
Self-directed Learning Skills

D​e​E​prernodr e
132 www.hrmars.com/journals

S​ig.
Posttest of self- directed learning

n​t V​
​ ariable
.45 (1) PBL PBL with
lecture

conventional 14.55​* ​3.2​0

.00
(2) PBL with lecture
PBL -2.47 3.2.45

4
conventional 12.08​* ​3.2​6
.00
(3) conventional
PBL -
.00 14.55​* ​PBL with lecture
3.2​
0
-
3.2​
.00 12.08​* ​ 6

(​I) Group

(​J) Group

e ​(I-J)

2.47 3.2​4

D​ifferenc

M​ean

S​td.
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development
January 2014, Vol. 3, No. 1 ISSN: 2226-6348
* The mean difference is significant at the .02 level.
Stat istic al results showed there were significant differences, with ​P ​< .02 on posttest
mean scores of the self-directed learning skills between the PBL method of first group
and the conventional teaching method of third group, with Mean Difference = 14.55​*​, in
favor of the PBL method which was superior and better than methods of other groups.
​ .02 on mean scores of
Likewise, there were statistically significant differences, with ​P <
posttest of the self-directed learning skills between the PBL with lecture method and the
conventional teaching method, with Mean Difference = 12.08​*​, in favor of the PBL with
lecture method which was better than the conventional teaching method. In addition,
​ .02 on mean scores of posttest
there were no statistically significant differences, with ​P >
of the self-directed learning skills between the PBL method and the PBL with lecture
method. Thereby, the PBL method was superior and better than the conventional
teaching method, also the PBL with lecture method was better than the conventional
teaching method. Overall, the PBL without /with lecture method was better than the
conventional teaching method. Therefore, using the PBL method or the PBL with lecture
method promotes the self- directed learning skills among physics undergraduates better
than the conventional teaching method.
Discussion ​The posttest questionnaires of the self-directed learning skills were
administered under supervision immediately after the subjects completed their materials
on thermodynamics. Overall the finding revealed that experimental treatment of the PBL
without /with lecture method was able to promote skills of the self-directed learning
greater and better than the conventional teaching method among physics
undergraduates. This is evident by the significantly higher mean scores on posttest
questionnaires of the self-directed learning skills of students who followed the PBL
without /with lecture method compared to those who followed the conventional teaching
method. In other words, students of the PBL without /with lecture method demonstrated
a greater ability to get higher mean scores of response on posttest questionnaire items
of the self-directed learning skills than their peers of the conventional teaching group.
Thus, the finding of this study found that the the PBL without /with lecture method
enhances skills of the self-directed learning. This result concurs with the findings of
numerous studies which assured the efficiency of the PBL without /with lecture method
to allow the expansion of the self-directed learning skills, thus making learners progress
in taking responsibility for their own learning (Ates & Eryilmaz, 2011; Ball & Pelco, 2006;
Cheong, 2008). This finding also replicated the results obtained by Prince, van Eijs,
Boshuizen, van Der Vleuten, and Scherpbier (2005) who had earlier demonstrated the
superiority of the PBL over the conventional teaching in bringing about students’ skills of
self-directed learning. This study provides evidences that students under the PBL
without /with lecture method are preferable prepared in skills than their peers who were
not taught under the same method (Prince, van Eijs, Boshuizen, van Der Vleuten, &
Scherpbier, 2005). the PBL without /with lecture method allows students to take
responsibility and control of their own learning, to foster, enhance, as well as to develop
self-directed learning skills (Barrows, 1986; Bereiter & Scardamalia, 1989;
133 www.hrmars.com/journals
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and
Development ​January 2014, Vol. 3, No. 1 ISSN: 2226-6348

MacKinnon, 1999; McParland, Noble, & Livingston, 2004; Norman & Schmidt, 1992;
Rahimi, 1995; Suh, 2005; Sundbladi, Sigrell, John, & Lindkvist 2002).
Under skills of self-directed learning, students can run the planning,
conceptualization, conduct and evaluate their learning (Brookfield, 2009). Self-directed
learning is present in education statuses, and variety actions cover reading,
cooperation, debate, accessing resources, research, and development. Students
spending their time to prepare their course and to study in depth employ self-directed
learning (Deepwell & Malik, 2008). PBL without /with lecture method provides students
to implement self-directed learning as they have to be more autonomous in defining the
problem, deciding what should be learnt, collect information and determine the best
approach to solve the problem. The improvement of effective self-directed learning skills
is an educational objective that learners would attain during the PBL method (Barrows,
1986). Current approach can aid learners in improving skills of self-directed learning,
which are a crucial part of continual regular knowledge (Williams, 2001). The
information processing theory is based on the perspective that the individual mind
processes are responsible for analyzing information (Gray, 2010). Under PBL, the
current study showed the development of self-directed learning skills which are based
on the information processing theory, that skills enable students to take the initiative and
responsibility of diagnosing their learning. So, students need of information and
knowledge, like the input of data in computer. The mind will process that through
planning, carrying out, and evaluating their own learning, and finally assessing the value
of the outcomes (Deepwell & Malikb, 2008; Tsay, Morgan, & Quick, 2000). Thus, this
study supports the information processing theory. That stated the mind possesses
attention mechanisms, working memory and long-term memory. It addresses growth
development in the ability of individual’s brains to process and react to the received
information (Gray, 2010).

Current approach can aid learners in improving skills of self-directed learning, which is a
crucial part of continual regular learning (Williams, 2001).

Conclusion ​Based on the aforementioned findings of this study, using the PBL without
/with lecture method enhance and develop the self-directed learning skills, among
physics undergraduates, better than using the conventional teaching method.

References ​Adiguzel, R. (2006). ​Mitoz ve mayoz bolunmesi konusundaki kavram

yanılgılarının tespiti ve bu konuda fen bilgisi ogretmenlerinin çozum onerileri (Mugla lli
​ npublished Master Thesis. Mugla University, Mugla. Ates, O., & Eryilmaz, A.
Ornegi). U
(2011). Effectiveness of hands-on and minds-on activities on students’ achievement and
attitudes towards physics. ​Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. ​Vol.
12, Issue 1, Article 6, pp.1-22.

134 www.hrmars.com/journals
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and
Development ​January 2014, Vol. 3, No. 1 ISSN: 2226-6348

Azu, O. O., & Osinubi, A. A. (2011). A survey of problem-based learning and traditional
methods of teaching anatomy to 200 level pharmacy students of the University of
Lagos, Nigeria. ​African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology​. Vol. 5, No. 2, pp.
219-224. Ball, C., & Pelco, L. (2006).Teaching Research Methods to Undergraduate
Psychology Students Using an Active Cooperative Learning Approach. ​International
Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.​ Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 147-154.

Bell, J. (2012). Introducing problem-based learning as a learning strategy for Masters

students.
Practitioner Research in Higher Education.​ Vol. 6, No. 1,
pp. 3-11.

Bouwma-Gearhart, J. Stewart, J., & Brown, K. (2009). Student Misapplication of a

Gas-like Model to Explain Particle Movement in Heated Solids: Implications for
curriculum and instruction towards students’ creation and revision of accurate
​ ol. 31, No. 9, pp.
explanatory models. ​International Journal of Science Education. V
1157-1174.

Brookfield, S. D. (2009). Self-Directed Learning. International Handbook of Education

for the
Changing World of Work​. I​ n R. Maclean, D. Wilson (Ed.), ​ChapterXV.7,​ pp. 2615-2627.
Cakir Olgun, O.S. (2008). Examining the fifth graders’ understanding of heat and
temperature
concepts via concept mapping. ​H.​ ​U​. ​Journal of Education​. Vol. 34, pp. 54-62.
Chakravarthi, S., & Vijayan, P. (2010). Analysis of the Psychological Impact of Problem
Based Learning (PBL) towards Self Directed Learning among Students in
Undergraduate Medical Education. ​International Journal of Psychological Studies.​ Vol.
2, No. 1, pp. 38- 43. Cheong, F. (2008). Using a Problem-Based Learning Approach to
Teach an Intelligent Systems
Course. ​Journal of Information Technology Education.​ Vol. 7, pp. 47-60.
Deepwell, F., & Malik, S. (2008). On campus, but out of class: an investigation into
students’ experiences of learning technologies in their self-directed study. ​Journal of
ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology. ​Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 5-14. Downing, K., Ning,
F., & Shin, K. (2011). Impact of problem-based learning on student experience and
metacognitive development. ​Multicultural Education & Technology Journal.​ Vol. 5, No.
1, pp. 55-69. Evans, D. (2009). The role of schools of public health: learning from
history, looking to the
​ ol. 31, No. 3, pp. 446-450. Fisher, M., King, J.,
future. ​Journal of Public Health. V
& Tague, G. (2001). Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale
​ ol. 21, pp. 516-525. Hmelo-Silver, C. E.
for nursing education. ​Nurse Education Today. V
 (2004). Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? ​Educ
Psychol Rev. ​Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 235-266. Hung, W., Jonassen, D. H., & Liu, R.
(2008). Problem-based learning. In J. M. Spector, J. G. van Merriënboer, M. D., Merrill,
& M. Driscoll (Eds.), ​Handbook of research on educational communications and
technology ​(3rd Ed., pp. 485-506). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Koh, G. C., Khoo, H. E.,
Wong, M. L., & Koh, D. (2008). The effects of problem-based learning during medical
school on physician competency: a systematic review. ​CMAJ.​ Vol. 178, No.1, pp. 34-41.

135 www.hrmars.com/journals
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and
Development ​January 2014, Vol. 3, No. 1 ISSN: 2226-6348

Lee, Y. M., Mann, K. V., & Frank, B. W. (2010). What drives students’ self-directed
learning in a
hybrid PBL curriculum. ​Adv in Health Sci Educ​. Vol. 15, No. 3, pp.
425-437.

Liceaga, A., Ballard, T., & Skura, B. (2011). Incorporating a Modified Problem-Based
Learning Exercise in a Traditional Lecture and Lab-Based Dairy Products Course.
Journal of Food Science Education. V ​ ol. 10, pp. 19-22. Lycke, K. H., Grottum, P., &
Stromso, H. I. (2006). Student learning strategies, mental models and learning
outcomes in problem-based and traditional curricula in medicine. ​Medical Teacher.​ Vol.
28, No. 8, pp. 717–722. McParland, M., Noble, L. M., & Livingston, G. (2004). The
effectiveness of problem-based learning compared to traditional teaching in
undergraduate psychiatry. ​Blackwell Publishing Ltd Medical Education.​ Vol. 38, pp.
​ iller, R. L., Streveler, R. A., Yang, D., & Santiago Roman, A.Y. (2009).
859-867​. M
Identifying and Repairing Students Misconceptions in Thermal and Transport Science​.
Paper Presented at the AIChE Annual Meeting, pp.1-8. Montero, E., & Gonzalez, M. J.
(2009). Student Engagement in a Structured Problem-Based Approach to Learning: A
First-Year Electronic Engineering Study Module on Heat Transfer. ​IEEE Transactions
on Education. V ​ ol. 52, No. 2, pp. 214-221. Neild, T. (2004). ​Defining, measuring and
maintaining the quality of problem-based learning [​ On-line]. Available from:
http://auqa.edu.au/auqf/pastfora/2004/program/papers/Neild.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug
2009. Prince, K. J., van Eijs, P. W., Boshuizen, H. P., van Der Vleuten, C. P., &
Scherpbier, A. J. (2005). General competencies of problem-based learning (PBL) and
non-PBL graduates. ​Journal of Medical Education.​ Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 394-401. Prince,
M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. ​Journal of Engineering
 Education. V ​ ol. 93, No. 3, pp. 223-231. Saalu, L., Abraham, A., & Aina, W.
(2010).Quantitative evaluation of third year medical students’ perception and
satisfaction from problem based learning in anatomy: A pilot study of the introduction of
problem based learning into the traditional didactic medical curriculum in Nigeria.
Educational Research and Reviews. V ​ ol. 5, No. 4, pp. 193-200. Sahin, M. (2009a).
Exploring University Students’ Expectations and Beliefs about Physics and Physics
Learning in a Problem-Based Learning Context. ​Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,
Science & Technology Education. ​Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 321-333. Sahin, M. (2010b). The
impact of problem-based learning on engineering students' beliefs about physics and
conceptual understanding of energy and momentum. ​European Journal of Engineering
Education,​ First published (iFirst). Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 519-537. Stewart, R. A. (2007).
Investigating the link between self directed learning readiness and project-based
learning outcomes: the case of international Masters students in an engineering
management course. ​European Journal of Engineering Education.​ Vol. 32, No. 4, pp.
453-465. Suh, S. (2005). ​The Effect of Using Guided Questions and Collaborative
Groups for Complex Problem Solving on Performance and Atitude in a Web-Enhanced
Learning Environment.​ Unpublished PhD thesis in education. Florida State University.

136 www.hrmars.com/journals
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and
Development ​January 2014, Vol. 3, No. 1 ISSN: 2226-6348

Sulaiman, F. (2011). Students' Perceptions on the Suitability of Implementing an Online

Problem-Based Learning in a Physics Course. ​Malaysian Journal of Educational
​ ol. 11, No. 1, pp. 5-13. Sungur, S., Tekkaya, C., & Geban, O. (2006).
Technology. V
Improving achievement through problem-based
learning. ​Journal of Biological Education. ​Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 155-160. Thornton, K.
(2010). Supporting self-directed learning: a framework for teachers. ​Language
Education in Asia​. Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 158-170. van Berkel, H., & Schmidt, H.
(2005). On the additional value of lectures in a problem-based
curriculum. ​Education for Health.​ Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 45-61. Whitcombe, S. W.
(2013). Problem-based learning students’ perceptions of knowledge and professional
identity: occupational therapists as‘knowers’. ​British Journal of Occupational Therapy.
Vol. 76, No. 1, pp. 37-42.
137 www.hrmars.com/journals