Chapter I

INTRODUCTION
1. OBJECTIVES OF TEACHING TECHNICAL ENGLISH IN ENGINEERING
COLLEGES

The present thesis “A Case Study and Analysis of Course--Content, Materials

And ESP Curriculum Design in Teaching Technical English and Communicative

Skills in Select Engineering Colleges” is an attempt at pointing out some of the much-

overlooked lacunae that exist in the pedagogy of English at the Engineering level; four

State Universities have been taken for research; two of them are State managed

Universities and two are privately managed Deemed Universities. They are: Acharya

Nagarjuna University, Nagarjuna Nagar; Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University

(Kakinada); Koneru Lakshmaiah University and Vignan University, Guntur. The study

also aims to critique the pedagogy of Technical English at the Engineering level with

specific reference to the objectives of teaching/learning English. The study is concerned

with the practice of teaching and its productive results, rather than the ideology of

teaching English. It also makes an attempt at suggesting measures to better the existing

conditions.

In the Post-Colonial Indian context, many “Roles of English” have come under

close scrutiny, and English has become a term representing not merely “language and

literature,” but a divergent range of areas. English has become as large and capacious as

a subject, as Prof. K. Narayan Chandran comments in A Companion to English in India:

Reflections on a Project and a Proposal:

English is now generally understood not only as ‘language and

literature’ (as it used to be) but also as an instrument for the
institutional and cultural practices that underpin them. Literature

1
 and other arts; literature, philosophy, and the social sciences;
disciplinary measures and categories that involve translation,
creative writing, media and gender studies, and many more ---
English may be shown to mediate crucially, or it may be gainfully
aligned for professional purposes (2001: 17).

English has been playing varied roles as mentioned above, though no attempt has been

made by any institution or body to evolve a definitive plan of action for realising the

success of any of these roles. As far as the tertiary courses of higher education are

concerned, some institutions helped in strengthening the professional courses in the

national system of education; they are: University Grants Commission (UGC), All India

Council for Technical Education (AICTE), Indian Council for Agricultural Research

(ICAR) and Indian Medical Council (IMC). In 1968, the National Policy on Education

(NPE) laid emphasis on the study of English and other international languages. The NPE

insisted that India must not only keep pace with scientific and technological knowledge,

but should also contribute to it significantly. It is for this purpose that the study of

English is required to be strengthened.

As the present research concentrates on English in the Engineering and

Technological institutes, it would be worthwhile to look at the norms of AICTE the body

which monitors the technical education in the country. AICTE ensures the co-ordination

and integrated development of technical and management education. It is exhilarating to

note that at this level considerable thrust has been given to various disciplines; it is also

depressing that very little importance is being given to English language which is, at

present, the language of communication on the global scenario. AICTE is vested with the

statutory authority for planning, formulation and maintenance of norms and standards,

accreditation, funding priority areas, monitoring and evaluation, maintenance of parity of

2
certification and awards, and ensuring the co-ordinated and integrated development of

technical and management education. A duly constituted Accreditation Board conducts

the mandatory periodic evaluation to maintain the desired standards.

1.2 THE IMPORTANCE OF OBJECTIVES

Objectives play a very important role in indicating the direction of an educational

programme in which teaching, learning and evaluation have to operate. They are crucial

in making these three processes methodical and systematic. They indicate a starting point

in planning. As Ivor Kevin Davies has rightly put it, “They are an ideal, an aspiration

and a direction in which to go” (1976: 12). Objectives are vital in making educational

activities valuable, fruitful and worthwhile.

In an ideal situation, the objectives of the course are translated into reality by the

teachers with the help of certain teaching methods and materials. Thus, the teachers,

methods and the syllabus are just a means to realise the objectives of the course. In other

words, they are expected to execute the formulated objectives of the course which, in

turn, are based on the needs of the students. When a course does not take the needs of the

students into consideration, it will not be meaningful for them. Robert Frank Mager has

stated that it is indispensable to have objectives in any educational programme because

“If you’re not sure where you’re going, you’re liable to end up at someplace else and not

even know it” (1975: vi).

1.2.1 The Rationale for Using Objectives in an Educational Programme

Having acknowledged the fact that objectives decide the success of any

educational programme, it is necessary to examine the rationale for using them.

3
 Educational Accountability

As teaching like any other enterprise, represents an investment in human and

financial resources, it is essential that whatever is done by way of teaching is

accounted for. Accountability entails a balance between investment (in terms of both

money and man-hours) and student learning. If an educational endeavour, like any

other endeavour, has to prove its success or utility to the society, it must have a set of

explicit objectives which everyone involved in the endeavour is aware of.

Educational Accountability can be translated into reality only when the

objectives are made explicit and a demonstration of the extent to which these

objectives have been realised is made at the end of an educational endeavour. Merely

stating a list of objectives does not ensure educational accountability. What is needed

is a circulation of these objectives among all the participants who are involved in the

endeavour and also among the people who are interested in it.

In the syllabi of most Universities, the objectives are categorically mentioned.

As both the teachers and students are given the copies of syllabus in

technical/professional colleges, it is assumed that they are aware of the objectives of

the course. But a look at the performance and proficiency of second and third year

Engineering Students make us wonder if there is an attempt on the part of the teachers

to fulfil the given objectives. This is where educational accountability plays a

significant role in matching the objectives with the final result of the course

completed by the students.

Thus, as far as ensuring educational accountability is concerned, having a set

of objectives for a course is as good as not having any objectives at all if they are not

4
 known to the beneficiaries and not carried out by the executioners, and ultimately are

not achieved. In such a situation, the objectives often remain unfulfilled.

 Facilitation of Course Design and Syllabus Design

Given a specific set of well formulated objectives, the task of designing the

Course and Syllabus becomes easy, in that the designers have some guidelines in the

form of objectives to proceed with their respective tasks. In this context, one has to

bear in mind that the Syllabus Design is only a part of the Course Design. A Course

Design includes not only the syllabus but also methods, evaluation procedures,

administrative aspects etc.

A syllabus must reflect the objectives; and, the course is meant for their

realisation. Coordination between syllabus and course design presupposes a set of

explicit objectives. A glance at the objectives given in the syllabus in this context has

revealed that they are neither meticulously worked out nor do they contain any

specificity. For instance, Acharya Nagarjuna University mentions that the objective of

teaching “Technical English Communication Skills Course” is to make the learners

“linguistically aware and communicatively competent.” It also demands that “special

attention” should be paid “to contemporary texts on language and industrial needs.”

These phrases appear mere rhetoric in the absence of the awareness of the teacher on

the communicative method of teaching; and, the inadequacy of the language texts to

cater to the desired objectives.

The main drawback of teaching English in India is clearly evident in this

context. The facts to be noted are as follows:

5
 i. The teachers of English in India possess a Post-Graduation qualification (M.A.) in

English Literature. This course contains modules from English literature of

different periods-1400 A.D. to the present - and writing in English from different

countries (Commonwealth literature, American literature, Canadian literature,

African literature, Indo-Anglican literature etc.). These inputs, no doubt make

them enhance their knowledge of literatures in English. But what they have to

teach in Engineering colleges is purely functional English which is the need of the

hour. In the absence of proper orientation on Technical English and English

Language teaching methodology, even a brilliant teacher might fail to fulfil the

objectives given in the syllabus of technical English.

ii. The Technical English syllabus is provided with a long list of books for reference,

without any information and guidelines on the books useful for particular units.

The untrained teachers cannot use these reference books in the absence of micro

details concerning the syllabus and the specific material prepared to deliver the

syllabus; and more so in the absence of any hint on the methodology. For

instance, Koneru Lakshmaiah and Vignan Universities mentioned different topics

in their prescribed syllabus. In the same way, Unit II of Acharya Nagarjuna

University mentions “Corporate Information” without any hint on what should be

dealt with under that heading. Similarly “technical words” are supposed to be

taught; but the list of words is not given.

 Making the Teaching Objective-Oriented

The objectives of a course give direction to teaching and make it an objective

6
 oriented activity which would prove to be meaningful and purposeful. A constant

watch and review by the teachers and the students has to be taken up as the

fulfilment of objectives is to be monitored. Success has to be measured in terms of

empowerment of the student but not on terms of completion of the syllabus. This

can be achieved only by making the entire teaching, interactive activity learner-

oriented and through continuous assessment.

 Facilitation Evaluation of Student Learning

Evaluation is an inseparable part of any course. The purpose of evaluation is to

test how far a specified set of objectives has been realised. Objectives enable to test

the learning capacity of the students. They act as guidelines by providing

information about what should go into the evaluation procedures. In other words,

the evaluation procedures must not only test the students on how far the specified

objectives have been realised by them, but also assess the success of the teachers in

delivering the material meaningfully.

 Facilitation Evaluation of Teacher Performance, Teaching Materials, Methods

and Evaluation Procedures

Objectives provide a yardstick with which one can gauge the success and

efficiency of the teacher performance, teaching methods and materials. If a course

fails in the realisation of its objectives, there could be many reasons for it; the chief

among them being the use of improper methods, materials and evaluation

procedures. One cannot realise the given objectives without adopting the right

methods of teaching and testing. Since methods, materials and evaluation procedures

are a means to achieve the objectives, one cannot evaluate their success and

7
 effectiveness without gauging them. Thus, objectives become indispensable in

evaluating the methods, materials and evaluation procedures of a course.

Besides the functions listed above, the objectives of the course may serve many

more functions, but objectives by themselves are of no use unless they are realised.

1.2.2 Formulation of Objectives

Having argued that one cannot really do away with objectives in conducting any

course successfully, it becomes imperative that one knows the sources from which the

objectives are derived. The sources of objectives one chooses are dependent on the kind

of educational philosophy that underlies the thinking. There is no single answer to the

question “What are the sources of objectives?” However, at present, considerable

emphasis is placed on need-based learning/teaching and the needs of the students should

serve as the sole source of objectives.

There are basically three ways in which objectives figure in the process of

planning. A detailed account of these three ways is given by Ivor Kevin Davies in his

book entitled Objectives in Curriculum Design (1976: 86). The three ways are:

i. Systematic Planning
ii. Expedient Planning
iii. Piecemeal Planning

i. Systematic Planning

In Systematic Planning, objectives are formulated first and the means to achieve

these objectives are determined next. Systematic Planning is based on Ralph

Winfred Tyler’s model (1949: 5-47), that is to say; objectives are derived from a

study of learners, society and the discipline concerned.

8
ii. Expedient Planning

In Expedient Planning, the reverse of what happens in Systematic Planning takes

place. The ends or objectives are formulated after defining the means. The

planning is not from objectives to means, but from means to objectives. On the

face of it, this kind of planning might seem illogical and irrational but it is after all

expedient.

iii. Piecemeal Planning

In Piecemeal Planning neither the end nor the means is predetermined in clear cut

terms. It involves a merging of ends and means. As the name itself suggests, no

master plan is drawn in advance. Instead, the objectives are formulated in a

Piecemeal Planning, keeping certain aims at the backdrop. There is no one thing

always determining the other. That is to say, neither the objectives nor the means

have control over each other. It is a very flexible kind of planning in that, it can

incorporate at any stage any new discoveries related to either the subject matter or

the means or the objectives themselves.

Given these three alternative kinds of planning, one must decide on the best way

of planning necessary for designing Technical English Course at professional level. If

one follows the Systematic Planning meticulously, it has the demerit of isolating ends and

means as two successive steps in the process, rather than recognising them as two integral

parts of a whole. If one follows Expedient Planning in toto, it has the limitation of the

means constraining the system from having objectives that are beyond the available

means. Piecemeal Planning might be ideal in a situation where deciding on the objectives

and means is carried out by the teachers at the classroom level. Implementing Piecemeal

9
Planning requires expertise on the part of the teachers and it also means decentralisation

of education.

Perhaps a combination of all the three types of planning mentioned above would

be ideal for Technical English at the Professional level. Apparently, it might seem

impossible to blend these three conflicting ways of planning. But an eclectic blend of

these three modes is not as impossible as it might seem and it can be done by an effective

teacher, based on the needs of the students.

1.3 THE OBJECTIVES OF TECHNICAL ENGLISH COURSE IN

ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES

An attempt has been made here to enumerate the implicit and explicit objectives

of the Technical English in Engineering disciplines.

Based on the responses of the teachers and the syllabi of different Universities, a

general tentative list of some implicit and explicit objectives of Technical English Course

in Engineering disciplines has been prepared and these objectives are enumerated below

in their descending order of importance.

 To develop in the students the critical ability to judge the texts prescribed

dispassionately.

 To prepare the students to face competitive examinations such as GRE,

TOEFL, CAT, CAD, GMAT etc.

 To prepare the students for post graduate courses in their respective disciplines.

 To inculcate certain “moral” and “ethical” values in the students.

 To familiarise the students with Technical English texts of different countries

and to make them capable to understand these texts.

10
  To develop in the students the ability to communicate their ideas cogently and

effectively.

 To develop in the students “Oral Communicative Skills and Soft Skills.”

 To stimulate in the students a “desire” to read even beyond the prescribed

texts.

 To prepare the students for the needs of a job and building up a career.

 To develop in the students a taste for “Technical English.”

How far the stated objectives of Technical English in Engineering disciplines are

operational through the three most important components of the course namely –

syllabus, methods and evaluation, has to be examined.

 To develop in the students the critical ability to judge the texts prescribed
dispassionately

The students of Engineering disciplines come from different academic

backgrounds and might follow different learning methods during their earlier period of

study. They need the ability to understand and to analyse their academic texts in an

objective manner and according to the context.

 To prepare the students to face competitive examinations such as GRE,

TOEFL, CAT, CAD, GMAT etc.

This objective of preparing the students for important competitive examinations

has to be taken care of, by the syllabi of the selected Universities. It is be noted that even

English medium students, who study English as a subject of study, from the L.K.G. to the

Graduation, under the 2+10+2+4 pattern, for nearly eighteen years, are also in need of

taking special coaching to appear for competitive examinations at national and

11
international levels. The Technical English that they study during their Engineering

course and its components does not match the level of language proficiency expected in

these examinations. Though the objectives of English courses at Engineering level make

a mention of the language skills - vocabulary enhancement, composition etc., the inferior

quality of the course materials and unsuitable methodologies of teaching and testing

followed in India belie the hope of students to acquire the required English language

proficiency.

If at all this implicit objective has to be realised, the Universities should adopt

similar course materials and the same testing methodologies followed in these

examinations. Alternatively, intensive training in English could be given in the third year

of Engineering to the students who desire to take such tests. This training would enable

them to succeed in the tests.

 To prepare the students for post graduate courses in their respective

disciplines

In order to prepare the technical graduates for higher courses, intensive teaching

in technical English is imperative. As is followed by most of the Universities abroad, ESP

(English for Specific Purposes) should be offered to the first year Engineering students. If

it is found, on diagnosis, that they do not possess the required proficiency in English, they

should be given an English course in the first year of study to bring them upto the mark.

Technical English course could be offered in their second year.

 To inculcate certain “moral” and “ethical” values in the students

The students of the first year Engineering courses are usually in the age group of

17-19 years. That is a volatile period of their life, where they feel that they are adults,

12
though they are not yet adults. After facing the entrance examinations they wish to enjoy

a new-won sense of freedom. It is at this stage of their life that they should be shaped on

right lines. Value-education goes a long way in shaping the character and conduct of the

students in this age-group, the importance of which they are also realising. In this

respect, the response of the first year JNTU(K) Engineering students to their prescribed

textbook, Dr. Abdul Kalam’s Wings of Fire is worth noting.

This book has two advantages:

i. It inculcates reading habit in the students and improves reading proficiency.

ii. It increases their ambition and provides direction in their life.

 To familiarise the students with Technical English texts of different countries

and to make them capable of understanding these texts

To achieve this objective, the students could be encouraged to browse the

Internet for information on various subjects and fields for preparing essays on

them. Internal assessment can include some assignments which demand such

reference work by the students. This exercise has the following advantages:

i. It encourages the students to do independent reading.

ii. It develops in them a taste for extra information and thirst for knowledge.

iii. If the topics are chosen from technical field, it improves their proficiency in

Technical fields.

 To develop the ability to read with comprehension and write cogently and
effectively

This objective is probably the most explicitly mentioned one in the syllabi of

all the Universities. Within the syllabi in Acharya Nagarjuna University,

13
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (Kakinada), Koneru Lakshmaiah

University and Vignan University, there is no prerequisite for this particular

objective. There is no special or exclusive module pertaining to the development

of the ability in Reading or Writing. Even in teaching, this objective gets hardly

any focus. The ability to read or write cogently and effectively is something

which can be acquired only with adequate practice. Every time the students

attempt something in reading or writing, they need to know their individual

lapses. This demands considerable personal effort on the part of the teacher. But,

the Engineering students of all the disciplines hardly get any practice in reading or

writing. It would be appropriate to quote here the words of Francis Bacon:

“Reading maketh a full man, conference a ready man and writing an exact man”

(1941: 15).

The objective of improving the Reading or Writing skills of the students,

thus, is not operational through the course, either in its content or in its teaching

methodology. Most students manage not only to just scrape through but also get

first classes despite their poor reading and Writing Skills. Though unpalatable, the

reason for this state of affairs is that most of the teachers in Engineering colleges

do not possess expertise in evaluating appropriately. To impart any skill to a

group of students, particularly in a large class, the teachers should have thorough

expertise. The teachers of English in Engineering colleges are expected to impart

the required spoken and written skills to their students. This exercise depends on

the following factors:

14
 i. The homogeneity and heterogeneity factors in English language

proficiency of the students.

ii. The ability of the teacher to teach communication skills to the students.

iii. The number of classes allotted for English.

iv. The infrastructure and other facilities provided by the college authorities.

The real scenario reveals that most of the Engineering graduates do not

possess adequate communication skills in English despite their technical

brilliance. A survey says that 83% of Engineering graduates are

unemployable. Hence, it can be concluded that efforts and results do not

match the laudable objectives given in the English syllabi of these

Universities.

 To develop “Oral Communication Skills” and “Soft Skills” of the students

This objective, the most important one in the context of the present thesis, is

concerned with promoting communication skills of the students. It includes the

development of communicative abilities both in speech and writing. This is the

most important objective from the point of view of the students. But the course as

such seems to do very little towards the realisation of this objective. What the

course offers in the form of its Technical English Communication Skills does not

cater either to the objectives of the course or students.

What is required for the students is an exclusive paper on communication

skills and a different orientation to the teaching methodology that is currently

used by most of the teachers of the professional courses. Teaching through the

stereotyped lecture method does not help the students at all in developing their

15
 oral communication skills. Latest ELT methodology and teaching techniques have

to be adopted to promote communicative competence among the students.

Various techniques should be used in the classroom in order to promote the

communication skills of the students.

 To stimulate a “desire” to read even beyond the prescribed texts in the

students

This objective is akin to the first objective in that, its realisation depends

on many factors like the methodology, the course material provided, the students’

general attitude towards it and their motivation.

During the survey conducted for this research, the following two questions

are posed to the first year Engineering students of different disciplines.

 Have you read all the units in the prescribed texts?

 How many English books have you read in the first year, which are not

prescribed for your study?

The responses of the students to these two questions have not been positive.

Quite expectedly, most of them conceded that they have not read even the

prescribed texts. In all the classes surveyed, there was not a single student who

has read all the prescribed textbooks. In one section, there is only one student

who has read two of the prescribed textbooks; and, all the others have confessed

to have tried reading only one or two textbooks. The two chief reasons, most of

them have stated for not reading even the prescribed textbooks, are: 1) want of

time; and, 2) unintelligibility of the textbooks. Apparently their pace of reading is

slow and hence they are not able to finish reading even half of the prescribed

16
 textbooks. The objective of encouraging the students to read beyond the

prescribed syllabus in an ESL (English as a Second Language) situation is an

ideal one; but, in this scenario, it hardly gets operational.

 To prepare the students for the needs of a job and building up a career

This objective is the most practical of all in the sense that it pertains to the most

practical requirements of the students. This objective is not directly reflected in

the syllabus, except in a small component called English Language Teaching

(ELT).

 To develop a taste for “Technical English” in the students

The syllabi of Technical English should create an interest and aptitude towards

the course among the students. Through formal and informal talks with the

students and through the tests conducted, it is noted that many of the Engineering

students do not show enthusiasm towards their Technical English syllabus. They

are of the opinion that Technical English is one amongst their technical subjects.

1.4 PROFILES

The profiles of teachers and students who take part in the survey are placed in a

sequence in an order to assess their background, their perceptions on the course which

they are teaching and learning.

1.4.1 Profile of the Teachers

Teachers in the Engineering Colleges have the basic qualification of M.A. (Litt.);

a few of them have M.Phil. Degree, which is also in English literature; and, very few

17
possess a doctoral degree. Most of them do not have any training in teaching or testing

Technical English Courses prescribed for the students of Engineering disciplines.

However, some exceptions are to be found; a few of them who have the Post Graduate

Diploma in Teaching of English (PGDTE) from the Central Institute of English and

Foreign Languages (CIEFL) (now EFLU), are well aware of the teaching methodology of

English. The opinion of the teachers who do not have such training has also not been

positive with reference to the handling of Technical English Courses in the Engineering

Colleges.

1.4.2 Profile of the Students

The Engineering students in Andhra Pradesh come from diverse backgrounds and

thus possess diverse levels of proficiency in English language. Due to this diversity in

their academic backgrounds, there is a need to strike a balance between the conceptual

and linguistic level of each learner. The encouraging factor is that these students who

take admission into Engineering colleges usually possess a high degree of motivation to

learn.

With such conditions prevailing in a language class room, a single approach

towards teaching of English would be inadequate to meet the requirements of all the

students. Use of different methods and materials of different levels, books specific to the

communicative requirements of language have to be recommended when the students

form such a heterogeneous group. Therefore, a learner–centred approach should be

followed. Before this process of teaching - learning begins, a thorough analysis of the

needs of the learners should be made; and, this should form the basis for designing the

syllabus. As the target students here are prospective professionals, suitable ESP (English

18
for Specific Purposes) courses in English should be of prime choice: In view of Chris

Kennedy, “The essence of ESP is in catering to the needs of particular groups of students,

taking into account the variables and constraints involved” (1984: 1-15).

A single common course book to a heterogeneous group may arouse diverse

feelings in the students; it may bring disillusionment to the abler students, while the

average students may find it to be very suitable and the below average students may find

the same text to be difficult. Chris Kennedy advocates in his book The Future of English

Language Teaching (1984: 1-15), the introduction of three different course books, or,

developing a course book, which can address the needs of learners at these three levels.

This point, however, is controversial and requires an in-depth study.

1.5 VITAL FOCUS OF THE THESIS AND OBJECTIVES OF STUDY

The vital focus of the thesis is on critiquing the objectives of teaching/learning

Technical English at professional level. The most glaring deficiency in the pedagogy of

Technical English lies at the grass root level. The incompatibility of various objectives is

present both at the grass-root and system levels.

The following facts point at some of the most glaring gaps that exist in the

pedagogy of Technical English at the Engineering level:

1. The First year students who belong to different disciplines in Engineering courses

have English as a common subject. Most students expect their English paper to

improve their communication skills (this is made evident in the survey conducted);

but the course seems to do little, either directly or indirectly, with realising this

particular desire or requirement of the students. This shows that the syllabus as well

as testing patterns in English, as offered by different Universities, do not take into

19
 account even the primary objectives of the English syllabus meant for professional

students studying in the Engineering and Technology courses. Further, it also shows

how oblivious and indifferent the courses have remained to the practical and realistic

needs of the students.

2. There seems to be little compatibility between the objectives of the students and

those of the teachers. Most students aspire that the course would somehow improve

their English communication skills; but most of the teachers teach the course through

the use of traditional methods which are teacher-centred rather than learner-centred.

3. The long-held objectives of the students and those of the teachers seem to be

different from operational objectives. While most students do hold that improving

their communication skills is their main objective in this course, they eventually give

importance to securing a pass mark in the examination. The objective of passing the

examination sidelines the primary objective of the students. Thus, there is a wide

gap between the held and the operational objective of the students and that of the

teachers.

4. Many a time, Technical English course does not seem to follow even the explicitly

stated objectives, which renders the existing evaluation meaningless.

5. Admissions to Engineering courses are made through an open entrance examination

irrespective of their medium of instruction at the +2 levels of different disciplines.

Consequently, the disparate needs of the students coming from non-English medium

background are not taken care of by the course.

6. Primarily at the beginning of the course one needs to conduct an examination to test

the abilities and the capacities of the students in the course and divide them into

20
 three categories--active learners, average learners and slow learners rather than

following the present pattern of all the students of different capacities being put in

one section.

A random sample of five scripts written by the first year Engineering students (2009-

2010) on their first–day in the college testify to their diverse levels of proficiency in

English in joining the course. It is this diversity in English proficiency of the

students of the same class that has triggered the interest of this researcher. The

question posed is: “What do you expect from this Technical English Paper in your

course?”

7. Since there is no continuous and formative evaluation, the students do not get

opportunities to write and to learn from their mistakes. In the entire four-year

B.Tech. programme, students take just one examination at the end of their first

academic year. Even this examination is conducted only with the sole purpose of

awarding marks. The students do not get any feedback of their performance. They

are never shown their scripts and are never apprised of the mistakes or errors in their

writing. Consequently, the Writing Skills of the students do not show any

considerable improvement even by the end of their four-year B.Tech. programme.

A random sample of five answer scripts taken from the students after

completing their first year (2009-2010) substantiates the above mentioned

observation. The question posed is: “What do you learn from this Technical English

Paper in your course?” And the answers are not very encouraging.

21
1.6 OBJECTIVES OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE

The hypothesis of this thesis is to explore the English language needs of the

students in Engineering disciplines and to examine how far these have been fulfilled

through the prescribed English syllabus in the selected four Universities of the State of

Andhra Pradesh. The responses of the students and teachers were elicited through a

questionnaire. A critical analysis of the objectives of some of the more important

questions given in the questionnaire becomes imperative to justify their suitability in the

process of the survey conducted. The objective of each question is presented here:

Q.1. Do the Textbooks create an interest in you?

Creating an interest in language-learning plays a vital role. It produces effective

second language communicators by creating interest in the learners. It successfully

makes them continue their learning even after the achievement of the goal. To enable the

English instructors to motivate such students, a number of methods, both implicit and

explicit, are needed both within and outside the class room.

Speaking about the success of a second language learner, Johan Gorham and

Diane Marie Millette in their article entitled “A Comparative Analysis of Teacher and

Student Perceptions of Courses of Motivation and Demotivation in College Classes” in

the journal, Communication Education have listed out the required prerequisites of

language learning, all of which are interconnected with the factor of motivation:

Positive self-concept, high self-esteem, positive attitude, clear

understanding of the goals for language learning, continuous active
participation in the language learning process, the relevance of conductive
environment that could contribute to the success of language learning
(1997: 245-261).

22
 In this context, a question arises whether the textbook provides necessary

inspiration to the learners as well as to the teachers. The interest created alone makes

them go forward to achieve the desired objectives. Regarding the fulfilment of the above

objective in the syllabus, the opinions of the learners have been put together.

Q.2. Are the topics in the textbook relevant to the Engineering Course?

The topics in a language textbook should not only impart skills in the target

language, but should also be relevant to the learners and the course. The textbook should

provide material on the topics appropriate to the age, psychological and linguistic level of

the learners. When the question is asked whether the concerned textbook is relevant to

the Engineering course, the researcher could get diverse responses from the students of

the selected Universities.

Q.3. Are the technical terms included in English syllabus properly designed?

As the syllabus of Technical English is designed for a specific purpose, it aims at

introducing the technical terms. This objective is required to be properly defined as the

learners are unfamiliar with Engineering subjects when they join the college. The learners

are asked whether they are able to comprehend the technical terms, and if the definitions

are clear. The response of the students to this question has been put together, to ascertain

their level of comprehension.

Q.4. Do the technical materials in the textbook increase the technical knowledge
of the learners or enhance the language learning?

The answers are glaringly transparent on the question whether the technical

materials had helped to increase the technical knowledge or were helpful only in

23
enhancing language learning. The tilt has been towards the language-learning rather on

the learning of Technical English.

Q.5. Do the tasks in textbook encourage you to use your creativity?

The materials in the textbooks give wings to the imagination of the students and

bring out their creativity, apart from developing linguistic skills and providing

information. It is important, therefore, that the students develop a love for books,

particularly their textbooks and have unrestricted access to other books to satisfy their

curiosity. Moreover, Creativity is an important factor of personality which endows new

perceptions and helps perceive new relationships among old things or ideas. Providing a

wide range of tasks to a learner can give confidence and sharpen creative abilities. This

question has been posed to assess the capabilities of the students on the aspect such as

sharpening their use of creativity.

Q.6. Is the cover design attractive?

It is true that a picture is worth thousand words and the cover design is not

an exception. In fact, one of the major objectives that impress a reader to read the

book is its cover page. The fact is that it creates a long lasting impression in the

eyes of book-lovers. As Shakespeare said, “first impression is the best

impression.” The cover sets the tone for the reading of the book and is so

designed as to motivate the learners to focus their attention on learning.

Q.7. Do you find it easy to use new words (vocabulary) in your interaction/in
other situations?

Vocabulary in any language cannot be learnt or is used merely in the classrooms.

24
Learning vocabulary in a language requires communication in real life situations. Thus,

students need to acquire an array of communication skills that can enable them to use in

various contexts, with different people.

Hussin, Maarof and D’Cruz (2001: 245-261) have stated that

What occurs in the language classrooms must be extended

beyond the walls of the classroom so that a link is created
between what is learned in the classrooms with what occurs
outside of the classrooms.

One cannot deny the fact that if a person achieves competence in a language

he/she ought to apply it in real life situations. It fulfils the objective of language learning.

Hence, a question is asked whether the textbook helps the language development of the

learners, and to what extent, so that the learnt language is used in other situations.

Q.8. Are the topics easy to understand through the material in your text?

The topics prescribed for the courses should be easily assessable to the students

then only students will try to navigate into creative learning which gives scope to the

exploring into new ways of learning. In order to know the competence of the students in

the topics prescribed for them and the difficulty level of the material, this question is

posed. To supplement this question the following question is designed to collect the real

data from the students.

Q.9. Are there adequate pictures, charts, graphs to understand the context of the
topics in the textbooks?

The textbook appears to be simple in language presentation if the majority of

students find it comprehensible. The textbooks for Engineering students should have

these aids similar to their use in textbooks meant for optional subjects. Moreover,

25
“information transfer” from one medium to another is an important skill. Hence

converting the text into a picture or graph or representing the material studied in the form

of a table improves not only the skill of learner but also his imagination. Keeping this in

view, this question has been posed in order to assess the comprehension skills of the

students.

Q.10. “Do you think that your language has improved with respect to Grammar
through the material in your textbook?”

Among the questions related to the objectives, one is regarding the development of

language proficiency with respect to grammar. As Nicole Geslin et al. (1998: 8) have

said:

Grammar is described as a set of shared understandings that enable

people to communicate successfully. It is a resource used for
making meaning in texts and it is always related to acceptance and
intelligible meaning made in a particular context.
(http://www.und.ac.za/und/ling/archieve/gestl-vl.html)

Grammar rules should help the learner in understanding the working of the language;

giving them confidence that they can understand and control what is going on. Through

the language activities, learners can discover more about the facts, rules and functions

involved in using grammar. Hence, this question is put to the students to know the

degree of grammar included in the prescribed textbook.

Q. 11. How do you rate these tasks?

The textbook enumerates a number of items like Reading Comprehension,

Paragraph and Essay Writing, Vocabulary, Synonyms, One-word Substitutes and

Common Errors. When the Engineering students are monitored to do the tasks given,

they must be able to actively involved in these tasks, instead of staying passive. The

26
success of this activity lies in the active participation and involvement of the learners. So,

this question is asked in order to know the involvement level of the students.

Q. (12-15). Are the tasks set forth in the textbook helpful in improving your LSRW
skills?

Yes To some extent No

Please use the following grades to show how the tasks are helpful in your
learning.

A-Excellent / B-Very Good / C- Good / D-Average

Listening Speaking Reading Writing

Good communication skills are necessary for the success of any professional. If

one wants to reach out to people, he or she has to speak effectively. English language, in

particular, has become indispensable to the younger generation aspiring to advance their

career, anywhere in the world. English language learning has therefore become a must

for an Indian student today. Language learning is not the same as learning any other

subject. It is not confined to writing an examination and getting a Degree or Award. The

four skills of reading, writing, listening and speaking have to be practiced.

Communication involves one’s ability to listen carefully so as to grasp the meaning and

to respond in turn with apt words and clarity of pronunciation. This question is asked to

assess the improvement level that the tasks have rendered to them.

27
Q.16. Do you have Communication Skills Lab in your first year course?

Yes No

 If “yes” please name the software (or provider of software) in use in your Lab.

a)……………………………

b)……………………………

State how far the software is useful in developing your skills.

a) To a great extent b) To some extent c) Not at all

 If “no” do you want to have Communication Skills Lab in the first year itself?

Yes No

If so, why do you want to have Communication Skills Lab?

Communication skills are essential for expressing ideas, opinions, views,

emotions etc. The main objective of Communication Skills Lab is to prepare students for

campus recruitments. As it has been observed that many students have speech anxiety, at

the beginning of the course, effective measures are taken to help the students overcome

communication apprehension by introducing communication skills lab.

An attempt has been made in this chapter to make clear the importance of

objectives in an Educational Programme, outlining the three important types of planning

that could be followed while formulating objectives, viz., systematic, expedient and

piece-meal planning, the questionnaire was designed accordingly. The next chapter,

entitled, “Relevance of ESP in the present Educational Scenario” deals with the concept

of ESP, its origin, development, approaches, materials and methodology.

*****

28