Mini Case On Organizational Behavior
Mini Case On Organizational Behavior
Mini Case On Organizational Behavior
Submission
Story
Shafi joined ‘X’ Solutions in December ’10, 2016 as a Software Engineer. He was initially satisfied
with the salary and the assigned projects within his team were going quite well. The team members
were friendly and also dedicated to do their designated tasks efficiently. The job environment was
initially very good and he continued to serve for the company for some months. As he became an
integral part of the company he came to discovering some facts within the company that started to
make him feel resentful and dissatisfied. He noticed a very negative discrimination going on within
the company. The salary structure and increment policy for the employees were not fairly
designed; people from top universities of the country got a higher initial salary and a faster
increment although their performance might have been inferior to the people from other
universities. Not only through the salary scheme, this unsporting favoritism kept showing up when
people from the top management level made any sort of communication with the employees. By
the process Shafi failed to receive a previously declared increment by the company although some
of his colleagues with a menial performance got that in time.
Shafi thought that the situation might change by the course of time and continued serving in the
company for some more months. But as time passed by, his initial satisfaction about the workloads
and job scheme continued diminishing. He found that he was doing the same tasks over and over
again; there was no real challenge in his designated duties. As a willing learner and a professional
employee, Shafi kept losing his interest in the assigned projects as he was not seeing any noticeable
development of skills.
Also, he found that the job environment of the company kept getting gloomy. Although he had a
very good relationship with his team members, there was a huge communication gap among the
employees from the other teams and also with the top level management. Members from other
teams barely used to talk to the members of Shafi’s team. He found that teams with inferior
performance were getting more projects then them. Everything became so hostile and his
motivations continued to diminish. Finally, he decided to quit this job.
Shafi left the job in August 31, 2017. Then after a few months he joined Orbitax and he is now
currently serving for them. I asked him about his current job, basically about job environment and
satisfaction. He claims that the environment here is much better in terms of employees’
interpersonal relationship. The number of total employees in the company is merely 30 and
everyone knows each other. The overall environment there is more friendly and lively which
ensures a better job position for him. He now has a good understanding with his boss and has a
good communication with the top management level. He is more engaged in his job and much
motivated to work as a dedicated employee.
Deduction
From the study given above we can deduce some concepts based on organizational behavior.
Firstly, the discrimination Shafi faced can be pointed as surface level diversity. He was not getting
as much salary as the employees graduating from top universities. Salary, increment and other
facilities within an organization should be based on the performance of the individuals, but here
the boss is making an unfair discrimination influenced by stereotyping. So the diversity found in
this company is clearly not an effective one. An effective diversity program is actualized by deep
level diversity which discriminates employees based on their intellectual abilities and thought
processes.
Secondly, we know job satisfaction comes from the positive feeling or attitude of the employee
towards his/her job. But in this case, Shafi had a very negative perception about his job, which
triggered the continuation of his dissatisfaction about his company. In his case there was a
prominent lack of psychological empowerment from the management level which failed to make
him involved in his job. We know less job satisfaction results in absenteeism, turnover and
workplace deviance. Shafi eventually made an exit, so for him the outcome of less job satisfaction
was the worst one. Also, from the fact that he left the company, we can infer that his response to
job dissatisfaction is active and destructive.
Finally, from Equity theory we know that, “Employees compare what they get from a job
(outcomes) in relation to what they put into it (inputs), and then they compare their inputs
outcomes ratio with the inputs-outcomes ratios of relevant others”. Shafi was initially happy with
his company’s salary structure. But when he came to know that some other employee of equal or
inferior performance gets as much as him, he decided to do something about it. Comparing to our
academic studies we can name his action as voluntary resignation.