INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: MARIA ELEONOR C. BAÑARES Name of Rater: GLENMARK A. DAL, MT-I
Position: SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER - I Position: MASTER TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: GUSA REGIONAL SCIENCE HIGH SCHOOL - X Date of Review: OCTOBER 24, 2019
Rating Period: S.Y. 2019-2020

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied Quality No acceptable 2 2 2.000 0.150
Services Knowledge and knowledge of evidence was
Pedagogy content within and Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge shown
across curriculum of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within integration within 2
and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
7.5%
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
lessons using MOV lessons using MOV lessons using MOV the given MOV evidence was
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by shown 2
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Used a range Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable 2 2 2.000 0.15
Services of teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
enhance learner promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading
achievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or 2
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
numeracy skills shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered evidence was
lessons as lessons as lessons as lessons as shown
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the other 2
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 given MOV
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given given

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Applied a range Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable 2 2 2.000 0.150
Services Knowledge and of teaching teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was shown
Pedagogy strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical
develop critical and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative thinking
and creative skills and/or other skills and/or other skills and/or other skills and/or other 2
thinking, as well HOTS as shown in HOTS as shown in HOTS as shown in HOTS as shown in
as other higher MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
order thinking
skills. 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as as evidenced by as evidenced by as evidenced by any evidence was shown
evidenced by MOV 1 MOV 1 and MOV 1 and of the other given
and supported by supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV 2
any 1 of the other of the other given of the other given
given MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality No acceptable 2 2 2.000 0.15
Services Environment classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom evidence was shown
and Diversity of structure to management management management management
Learners engage learners, strategies that strategies that strategies thatstrategies that
2
individually or in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
engage learners in
groups, in activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
activities/tasks as
meanigful shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
with a rating of 4
exploration,
discovery and Efficiency Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons supported by any of evidence was shown
hands-on lessons supported supported by MOV 1 supported by MOV 1 the acceptable MOV
activities within a by MOV 1 and any 1 and any 1 of the and any 1 of the 2
range of physical of the other other acceptable other acceptable
learning acceptable MOV MOV MOV
environments. Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Managed Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable 2 2 2.000 0.150
Services learner behavior management management management management evidence was shown
constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that
and non-violent promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive
discipline to and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown 2
ensure learning-
focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
environment
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
of the given of the given of the given the given strategies evidence was shown
strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in only
2
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2 1 lesson
4 lessons lessons lessons

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 2. Learning 6. Used Quality Applied Applied Applied No acceptable 2 2 2.000 0.15
Applied
Services Environment differentiated, differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was
and Diversity of developmentally teaching strategies differentiated teaching strategies teaching strategies shown
teaching strategies
Learners appropriate to address learner to address learner to address learner 2
learning diversity as shown to address learner diversity as shown diversity as shown
diversity as shown
experiences to in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
address learners’ rating of 7 in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 rating of 4
rating of 6
gender, needs,
strengths, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
interests and differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was
7.5% teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy in shown
experiences.
in at least 2 in at least 2 in 2 lessons as only 1 lesson as
lessons as lessons as evidenced by MOV evidently shown in
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the 2
1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable 2 2 2.000 0.15
Services and Planning managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and 2
teaching and learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as
learning shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
processes to with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
meet curriculum
requirements and Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
varied teaching 7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was
contexts. sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced shown
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in 2
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the given
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV
of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No acceptable 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services and Planning collegial participated in participated in participated in in LAC/FGD/ evidence was
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/ meeting to discuss shown
use teacher and gs to discuss gs to discuss meetings to discuss teacher/learner
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich 5
to enrich teaching feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as
practice. instruction as instruction as instruction as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted
7.5% submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable

least 4 LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LAC/FGD/meeting evidence was
LACs/FGDs/meetin gs as evidently gs as evidently as evidently shown shown
gs as evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the 5
shown in any 1 of the given MOV the given MOV given MOV
the given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable 2 2 2.000 0.15
Services developed, used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was
organized and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown
used appropriate learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources,
teaching and including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to 2
learning address learning address learning address learning address learning
resources, goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in
including ICT, to MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
address learning of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
goals.
Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No acceptable
7.5%
teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
Submitted at least 4 learning resources, learning resources, learning resource, shown
varied teaching and including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as
learning resources, evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
including ICT, as MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the 2
evidently shown in supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV
MOV 1 and of the acceptable of the acceptable
supported by any 1 MOV MOV
of the acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Designed, Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
Services and Reporting selected, organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was
organized and diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, shown
used diagnostic, formative and formative and formative and formative and
formative and summative summative summative summative
summative assessment assessment assessment assessment
assessment strategies strategies strategies strategies
strategies consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with 3
consistent with curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
requirements. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5%
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable

varied assessment assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was
tools as evidently as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown
shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the any of the 3
the acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 11. Monitored and Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No acceptable 3 3 3 3.000 0.225
Services evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated evidence was
progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress shown
achievement progress and progress and progress and and achievement
using learner achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner 3
attainment data. learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as
data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in shown in the MOV
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV evidence was
least 4 of the the acceptable shown 3
the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was 3
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Communica Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable 3 4 3 3.333 0.249
Services and Reporting ted promptly and showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and prompt and clear evidence was
clearly the clear communication of clear communication of shown
learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs,
progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs, progress and
achievement to progress and achievement to key progress and achievement to key
key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, 3
including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/
guardians. including parents/ guardians as including parents/ guardians as
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV
7.5% shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown 4
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was 3
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.400
Services various related performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was
works/activities related related related work/activities that shown
that contribute to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the
the teaching- contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning 4
learning process. teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning process as shown
process as shown process as shown process as shown in the MOV
10% in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was 4
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
Satisfactory 2.674
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory MARIA ELEONOR C. BAÑARES GLENMARK A. DAL, MT-I BRENDA P. GALARPE, SSP-I
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCR
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: ARIAN M. EDULLANTES, SST-II Name of Rater:

Position: SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER - I Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: GUSA REGIONAL SCIENCE HIGH SCHOOL - X Date of Review:
Rating Period: S.Y. 2019-2020

Weight per Numerical Ra

KRA Weight per KRA Objectives Objective Q E
Objective 1 7.5% 2 2
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 2 2
Objective 3 7.5% 2 2
Objective 4 7.5% 2 2
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 2 2
Objective 6 7.5% 2 2
Objective 7 7.5% 2 2
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 5 5
Objective 9 7.5% 2 2
Objective 10 7.5% 3 3
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 3 3
Objective 12 7.5% 3 4
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 4 4

Ad

MARIA ELEONOR C. BAÑARES GLENMARK A. DAL, MT-I

Ratee Rater
MENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Rater: LUZVIMINDA B. BINOLHAY, MT-I

MASTER TEACHER I
Date of Review: OCTOBER 24, 2019

Numerical Ratings
Score
T Ave
2.000 0.150
2.000 0.150
2.000 0.150
2.000 0.150
2.000 0.150
2.000 0.150
2.000 0.150
5.000 0.375
2.000 0.150
3.000 0.225
3 3.000 0.225
3 3.333 0.249
4.000 0.400
Final Rating Satisfactory
Adjectival Rating 2.674

GLENMARK A. DAL, MT-I BRENDA P. GALARPE, SSP-I

Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FOR

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality
Services Knowledge and applications of content Modeled effective Modeled effective
Pedagogy knowledge within and applications of applications of
across curriculum content knowledge content knowledge
teaching areas. within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3
lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
1 and supported by 1 from colleagues
any 1 of the other and supported by
MOV given any 1 of the other
MOV given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Collaborated with Quality Conducted, Conducted and
Services colleagues in the completed and completed action
conduct and application disseminated action research with
of research to enrich research with colleagues
knowledge of content colleagues
and pedagogy.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of
7.5%
of the given MOV the acceptable
MOV
Timeliness Presented the Completed the
research report research report
within the rating within the rating
period period

Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Developed and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated
Services Knowledge and applied effective effective teaching effective teaching
Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as well creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
as other higher-order well as other well as other
 Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as well creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
as other higher-order well as other well as other
thinking skills. higher-order higher-order
thinking skills as thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5% with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7

Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3

more lessons as lessons as
evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Worked with Quality
Services Environment and colleagues to model and Modeled and Modeled and
Diversity of share effective shared effective shared effective
Learners techniques in the classroom classroom
management of management management
classroom structure to strategies that strategies that
engage learners, engage learners in engage learners in
individually or in groups, activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
in meaningful done in different done in different
exploration, discovery physical learning physical learning
7.5%
and hands-on activities environments as environments as
within a range of shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
physical learning with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7
environments.environm Efficiency
ents. Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3
lessons supported lessons supported
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 2. Learning 5. Exhibited effective Quality Exhibited effective Exhibited effective
Services Environment and and constructive and constructive and constructive
Diversity of behavior management behavior behavior
Learners skills by applying management skills management skills
positive and non-violent by applying positive by applying positive
discipline to ensure and non-violent and non-violent
learning-focused discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
environments. learning-focused learning-focused
environments environments
7.5% shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7
 Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of
the given strategies the given strategies
as observed in at as observed in 3
least 4 lessons lessons
Timeliness
Basic Education 6. Worked with Quality Worked with Worked with
Services colleagues to share colleagues at least colleagues in the
differentiated, in the department or
developmentally district/cluster level grade level to share
appropriate to share lesson lesson
opportunities to address
Efficiency Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1
learners’ differences in 7.5%
lesson as evidently lesson as evidently
gender, needs,
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
strengths, interests and
and supported by and supported by
experiences.
any acceptable any acceptable
MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 7. Developed and Quality Developed and Developed and
Services Planning applied effective applied effective applied effective
strategies in the strategies showing strategies showing
planning and developmentally- developmentally-
management of sequenced sequenced
developmentally teaching and teaching and
sequenced teaching learning process as learning process as
and learning processes shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
to meet curriculum with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7
requirements and varied 7.5%
teaching contexts. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 2-3
lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 8. Reviewed with Quality Consistently Frequently led
Services Planning colleagues, teacher and participated in collaborative
learner feedback to LACs/FGDs/meetin reviews of teacher
plan, facilitate and gs to discuss and learner
enrich teaching practice. teacher/learner feedback as
feedback to enrich evidenced by the
instruction as MOV submitted
shown in the MOV
submitted

7.5% Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3

collaborative collaborative
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher
and learner and learner
feedback as feedback as
evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Advised and guided Quality Consistently Frequently advised
Services colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the
selection, organization, in the selection, selection,
development and use of organization, organization,
appropriate teaching development and development and
and learning resources, appropriate use of appropriate use of
including ICT, to teaching and teaching and
address specific learning resources learning resources
learning goals. as shown in the as shown in the
7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3

teaching and teaching and
learning resources learning resources
as evidenced by at as evidenced by at
least 1 of the least 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked Quality Consistently Frequently
Services and Reporting collaboratively with reviewed reviewed
colleagues to review the collaboratively collaboratively
design, selection, assessment tools assessment tools
organization and use of with colleagues as with colleagues as
a range of effective shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
diagnostic, formative 7.5% submitted submitted
and summative
assessment strategies Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3
consistent with assessment tools assessment tools
curriculum as evidently shown as evidently shown
requirements. in any of the in any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 11. Interpreted Quality Consistently Frequently
Services and Reporting collaboratively collaborated with collaborated with
monitoring and colleagues in the colleagues in the
evaluation strategies of interpretation of interpretation of
attainment data to assessment data assessment data
support learner as shown in the as shown in the
7.5%
progress and MOV submitted MOV submitted
achievement.
Efficiency Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 3
different types of of the same kind of
MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 12. Applied skills in the Quality Consistently Frequently applied
Services effective communication applied skills in the skills in the
of learner needs, effective effective
progress and communication of communication of
achievement to key learner needs and learner needs and
stakeholders, including progress to progress to
parents/guardians. parents/ guardians parents/ guardians
7.5% as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3

of the acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently
Services related works/activities performed special performed special
that contribute to the tasks and/or tasks and/or
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently
Services related works/activities performed special performed special
that contribute to the tasks and/or tasks and/or
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as
process. shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
10% submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3
different kinds of different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory 0
below 1.499 Poor Ratee
ENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

NNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
No acceptable 0 0 0.000 0.000
Modeled effective Modeled effective evidence was
applications of applications of shown
content knowledge content knowledge
within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 6 of 5
Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as as evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV MOV 1 from shown
1 from colleagues colleagues and
and supported by supported by any 1
any 1 of the other of the other MOV
MOV given given

Conducted action Proposedaction No acceptable 0 0 0 0.000 0.000

research with research with evidence was
colleagues colleagues shown

Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable

MOV MOV evidence was
shown
Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable
research report research report evidence was
within the rating within the rating shown
period period

Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable 0 0 0.000 0
effective teaching effective teaching evidence was
strategies to strategies to shown
promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
well as other well as other
 strategies to strategies to shown
promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
well as other well as other
higher-order higher-order
thinking skills as thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable

lessons as as evidently shown evidence was
evidently shown in in MOV 1 and shown
MOV 1 and supported by any of
supported by any 1 the other MOV
of the other MOV given
given

No acceptable 0 0 0.000 0
Modeled and Modeled and evidence was
shared effective shared effective shown
classroom classroom
management management
strategies that strategies that
engage learners inengage learners in
activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
done in different done in different
physical learning physical learning
environments as environments as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6with a rating of 5
Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
Submitted 2
supported by any of evidence was
lessons supported
the acceptable shown
by MOV 1 and any
MOV
1 of the other
acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
Exhibited effective Exhibited effective No acceptable 0 0 0.000 0
and constructive and constructive evidence was
behavior behavior shown
management skills management skills
by applying positive by applying positive
and non-violent and non-violent
discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
learning-focused learning-focused
environments environments
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
 Applied at least 7 of Applied any of the No acceptable
the given strategies given strategies as evidence was
as observed in 2 observed in only 1 shown
lessons lesson

Worked with Worked with No acceptable 0 0 0.000 0

colleagues but no colleagues but no evidence was
evidence of sharing evidence of sharing shown
with others with others

Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable

lesson as evidently lesson, as evidence was
shown in MOV 1 evidenced by either shown
and supported by MOV 2 or 3 but no
any acceptable evidence of sharing
MOV with others

Developed and Developed and No acceptable 0 0 0.000 0

applied effective applied effective evidence was
strategies showing strategies showing shown
developmentally- developmentally-
sequenced sequenced
teaching and teaching and
learning process as learning process as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Submitted 1 lesson Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable

as evidenced by as evidenced by evidence was
shown in MOV 1 any 1 of the shown
and/or 2 and acceptable MOV
supported by any 1
of the other
acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable 0 0 0.000 0
collaborative collaborative evidence was
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher shown
and learner and learner
feedback as feedback as
evidenced by the evidenced by the
MOV submitted MOV submitted

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

collaborative collaborative review evidence was
reviews of teacher of teacher and shown
and learner learner feedback as
feedback as evidently shown in
evidently shown in any of the
MOV 1 and acceptable MOV
supported by any 1
of the acceptable
MOV
 Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable 0 0 0.000 0
advised colleagues colleagues in the evidence was
in the selection, selection, shown
organization, organization,
development and development and
appropriate use of appropriate use of
teaching and teaching and
learning resources learning resources
as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

teaching and teaching and evidence was
learning resources learning resource shown
as evidenced by at as evidenced by
least 1 of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable 0 0 0.000 0.000

reviewed collaboratively evidence was
collaboratively assessment tools shown
assessment tools with colleagues as
with colleagues as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV submitted
submitted

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was
as evidently shown evidently shown in shown
in any of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
Occasionally Rarely collaborated No acceptable 0 0 0 0
collaborated with with colleagues in evidence was
colleagues in the the interpretation of shown
interpretation of assessment data
assessment data as shown in the
as shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted

Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

of the same kind of the MOV evidence was
MOV shown

Occasionally Rarely applied skills No acceptable 0 0 0.000 0.000

applied skills in the in the effective evidence was
effective communication of shown
communication of learner needs and
learner needs and progress to
progress to parents/ guardians
parents/ guardians as shown in the
as shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted

Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1

MOV MOV

Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable 0 0 0.000 0.000

performed special special tasks and/or evidence was
tasks and/or assignments as shown
assignments as shown in the MOV
Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable 0 0 0.000 0.000
performed special special tasks and/or evidence was
tasks and/or assignments as shown
assignments as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV submitted
submitted
Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
different kinds of the acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV MOV shown

RATING FOR OVER-ALL

Poor 0.000
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

0 NAME OF THE APPROVING AUTHORITY

Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IP
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teache

Name of Employee: 0
Position: 0
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: 0
Rating Period: 0

Weight per Weight per Numeric

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q
Objective 1 7.5% 0
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 0
Objective 3 7.5% 0
Objective 4 7.5% 0
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 0
Objective 6 7.5% 0
Objective 7 7.5% 0
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 0
Objective 9 7.5% 0
Objective 10 7.5% 0
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 0
Objective 12 7.5% 0
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0

0 0
Ratee Rater
REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
y Proficient Teacher)

Name of Rater: 0
Position: 0
Date of Review: 0

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
0 0.000 0.000
0 0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
Final Rating 0
Adjectival Rating Poor

0 #VALUE!
Rater Approving Authority