Project On Corporate Governance
Project On Corporate Governance
Project On Corporate Governance
1
1. Introduction to Corporate Governance:
It is a relationship of trust and faith. However, the interests of shareholders are not
always protected by the directors. They tend to use shareholders’ money for
their personal benefit and not for the benefit of the company. While
shareholders attend meetings where annual reports are presented with profit
and loss statements and balance sheets, they do not technically know the way
these accounts have been prepared.
Some expenses may not be shown in the profit and loss statements and, thus,
inflated figure of profits may be shown. The firm is shown to report profits while
actually it may have suffered losses. Such financial irregularities can, in the long
run, lead to scams which the country has witnessed in the past. The companies
try to use loopholes in law for their personal benefit at the cost of shareholders’
money.
With increasing competition in the market, companies want to make high and
quick profits. They want sustainable competitive advantage for which they start
looking to short cuts to the basic business fundamentals which provide them
competitive advantage like differentiation in price, product, service and
promotion, cost leadership, market focus etc.
As a short cut to price differentiation, CEOs may reduce the price of goods but
at the same time, may also reduce the quality of goods buying raw materials
from their known suppliers. While supplier gets an order, the CEO gets his share
from the supplier. Such malpractices become long-term habits resulting in long-
term loss of profits and goodwill of the companies.
2
As these problems became rampant, there arose the need to form committees
to look into financial and non-financial irregularities of the firms and bring the
business back to the age- old value-based management system based on
cultural and ethical beliefs. The formation of such committees to look into the
problems of companies came to be known as corporate governance.
It ensures that corporate managers run their businesses successfully and take
care of long-term interests of their stakeholders. It improves capital efficiency of
companies and attempts to deploy their wealth in productive areas of the
economy.
3
2. Meaning of Corporate Governance:
4
objectives and monitoring organisational performance to ensure that objectives
are optimally achieved.
2. Concerned with identifying ways to ensure that strategic decisions are made
effectively.
The corporate governance structure specifies the rules and procedures for
making decisions on corporate affairs. It also provides the structure through
which company objectives are set and means of attaining and monitoring the
performance of those objectives are also framed.
5
3. Objectives of Corporate Governance:
6
4.History of Corporate Governance:
The first formal attempt to evolve a code of corporate governance for Indian
companies was put forward by the Birla Committee Report (or Kumar
Mangalam Report). The objective of this committee was “enhancement of the
long term shareholders’ value while at the same time protecting the interests of
other stakeholders.”
7
(iv) Accounting standards and financial reporting:
The committee recommended issuing of Accounting Standards by the Institute
of Chartered Accountants of India regarding upgrading of accounting
standards and financial reporting system in India.
(ii) Financial reporting for each of their product segments so that shareholders
have complete financial picture of the company in one statement.
(v) Management:
While the Board of Directors ensure that corporate policies and strategies are
laid according to the code of corporate governance, management of the
company ensures that policies and strategies are implemented successfully for
attainment of corporate objectives. The role of management should be clearly
defined by the Board of Directors.
(vi) Shareholders:
Shareholders are owners of the company. They have the right to obtain timely
information from the company, right to transfer and register their shares,
participate and vote in shareholders’ meetings, elect members of the Board
etc. These rights recommend that shareholders evaluate corporate governance
performance of the company.
The Birla Committee Report laid sound foundation for good corporate
governance of Indian companies.
8
5. Need for Corporate Governance:
9
6. Importance of Corporate Governance:
10
7. Principles of Corporate Governance:
3. Review of the compensation arrangements for the chief executive officer and
other senior executives.
4. The way in which individuals are nominated for positions on the board.
7. Dividend policy.
2. Accountability:
Chairman, board of directors and chief executive of the company should fulfill
11
3. Independence:
4. Reporting:
other stakeholders, for example, a company should publish quarterly, half yearly
12
8. True Spirit of Corporate Governance:
The true value of corporate governance is much more than just ensuring
compliance with regulations. In fact, our policy makers, through the design of
the revised Clause 49, require company to review and manage the totality of
risks facing it. This is because the spirit of corporate governance is about putting
in place safeguards around any eventuality that could have serious negative
impact on a company and its stakeholders.
In other words, while a CEO with questionable integrity and the wrong tone can
seriously affect a company, it is also important to recognise that other risks such
as poor controls around financial processes, operational inefficiencies, and the
inability to compete effectively in the global marketplace can also produce
disastrous results.
Every business faces risks in the areas of strategy, operations, financial reporting
and compliance. Companies that manage these risks by establishing a system
of internal controls provide reasonable assurance to stakeholders along several
key dimensions. These include the effectiveness and efficiency of operations,
compliance with laws and regulations, and reliability of financial reports that are
provided to the public. These constitute fundamental elements of good
corporate governance.
At every step of this effort, the CEO ensured that all elements of the new policy
were well-aligned with the core values of the organisation. This enabled the new
policy to gain quick acceptance from the rank and file.
14
9. Code of Corporate Governance:
The SEBI Board in its meeting held on January 25, 2000 considered the
recommendation of the Committee and decided to make the amendments to
the listing agreement in pursuance of the decision of the Board. It is advised that
a new clause, namely clause 49, be incorporated in the listing agreement.
This initiative by CII flowed from public concerns regarding the protection of
investor interest, especially the small investor; the promotion of transparency
within business and industry; the need to move towards international standards
in terms of disclosure of information by the corporate sector and, through all this,
to develop a high level of public confidence in business and industry.
A National Task Force was set up with Mr. Rahul Bajaj, past President, CII and
Chairman & Managing Director, Bajaj Auto Limited. This Task Force presented
the draft guidelines and the code of Corporate Governance in April 1997 at the
National Conference and Annual Session of CII.
15
10.Provisions relating to Corporate Governance under new Companies Act 2013
The word Governance is derived from the Latin Word Gubernare which means
to steer usually applying to the steering of a ship. Similarly the application of
Governance in Corporate Houses is known as Corporate Governance. The term
Governance refers to a set of systems, by which an organization is run.
Corporate Governance under the new companies act 2013 have broadened its
meaning. They are a complete module for fixing a liability on the corporate
entity. It is a landmark piece of legislation and likely to have far reaching
consequences on all companies incorporated in India. The repealed act
Companies Act, 1956 was in existence for well over fifty years and was lately
seeming quite ineffective at handling present day challenges of a growing
industry and the complexities related with the growing stakeholders’ interests
and segregation of ownership from management. These parameters relates to:
16
i. Composition of the Board/Non-Executive Directors
ii. Admitting of Woman Director
iii. Admitting of Independent Directors
iv. Directors Training and Evaluation
v. Constitution of Audit Committee
vi. Nomination and Remuneration Committee
vii. Subsidiary Companies Management
viii. Internal Audit
ix. SFIO purview
x. Risk Management Committee
xi. Compliance centre
Section 134 provides that a report by the Board of Directors containing details
on the matters specified including directors responsibility statement shall be
attached to every financial statement laid before a company. The responsibility
statement includes that the applicable Accounting Standards have been
followed in preparing the financial statements and reporting the material
departures therefrom, that the companies follow their accounting policies
consistently, the accounts have been prepared on a going concern basis and
compliance of all applicable laws.
Section 177 provides the requirements and manner of constituting the Audit
Committee. The Audit Committee shall consist of minimum three directors with
Independent Directors forming a majority and majority members must have
ability to read and understand financial statements. The Section also provides
for a vigil mechanism in every listed and prescribed class of companies and
such mechanism shall be disclosed at the website of the company and should
be mentioned in Board’s report.
17
Section 184 ( corresponds to section 299 of the Companies Act, 1956)
Section 184 provides the manner and periodicity in which the every director
shall made disclosure of his concerns or interest in any company, body
corporate, firms and parties to the contract. He concerned director should not
participate in the meeting taking the decision in such cases. The contract or
agreement entered in to by the company without disclosure shall be voidable
at the option of the company.
The information that needs to be included in the annual return has been
increased. The additional information required, includes particulars of holding,
subsidiary and associate companies, remuneration of directors and key
managerial personnel, penalty or punishment imposed on the company, its
directors or officers [section 92(1) of 2013 Act].
18
the 1956 Act is limited to a place within the city, town or village in which the
registered office is situated.
3. General meetings
The 2013 Act states that the first annual general meeting should be held within
nine months from the date of closing of the first financial year of the company
[section 96(1) of 2013 Act], whereas the 1956 Act requires the first annual
general meeting to be held within 18 months from the date of incorporation.
Currently, the 1956 Act does not define business hours, which the 2013 Act now
defines as between 9 am and 6 pm. The 2013 Act states that annual general
meeting cannot be held on a national holiday whereas the annual general
meeting cannot be held on a public holiday as per the existing provisions of
section 166(2) of the 1956 Act [section 96(2) of 2013 Act].
In order to call an annual general meeting at shorter notice, the 2013 Act
requires consent of 95% of the members as against the current requirement in
the 1956 Act which requires consent of all the members [section 101(1) of 2013
Act].
The 2013 Act states that besides director and manager, the nature of concern
or interest of every director, manager, any other key managerial personnel and
relatives of such director, manager or any other key managerial personnel in
each item of special business will also need to be mentioned in the notice of the
meeting [section 102 (1) of 2013 Act]. Also, the threshold of disclosure of
shareholding interest in the company to which the business relates of every
promoter, director, manager and key managerial personnel has been reduced
from 20% to 2% [section 102 (2) of 2013 Act].
The 2013 Act states that in case of a public company, the quorum will depend
on number of members as on the date of meeting. The required quorum is as
follows:
19
• Fifteen members if number of members is more than one thousand but up
to five thousand
A limit has been introduced on the number of members which a proxy can
represent. The 2013 Act has introduced a dual limit in terms of number of
members, which is prescribed as 50 members and also sets a limit in terms of
number of shares holding in the aggregate not more than 10 % of the total share
capital of the company carrying voting rights* [section 105 (1) of 2013 Act].
Listed companies will be required to file with the ROC a report in the manner
prescribed in the rules on each annual general meeting including a
confirmation that the meeting was convened, held and conducted as per the
provisions of the 2013 Act and the relevant rules [section 121 of 2013 Act].
4. Other matters
Listed companies will be required to file a return with the ROC with respect to
the change in the number of shares held by promoters and top ten
shareholders within 15 days of such a change[section 93 of 2013 Act]. This
requirement again demonstrates the effort made towards synchronising the
requirements under the 2013 Act and the requirements under SEBI.
Additionally, on an annual basis, companies are also currently required to make
the disclosures with respect to top shareholders under the Revised Schedule VI
the 1956 Act.
The 2013 Act requires every company to observe secretarial standards specified
by the Institute of Company Secretaries of India with respect to general and
board meetings [section 118 (10) of 2013 Act], which were hitherto not given
cognisance under the 1956 Act.
20
CONCULSION:
In conclusion, we can say that corporate governance is a way of life and not a
set of rules, a way of life that necessitates taking into account the stakeholders
interest in every business decision.
21