Redfern Station Upgrade - New Southern Concourse: Consultation Report
Redfern Station Upgrade - New Southern Concourse: Consultation Report
Email [email protected]
Visit www.transport.nsw.gov.au/redfern
November 2019
Contents
1 Purpose of this report 6
2 Project overview 7
3 Objectives of consultation 9
How we consulted 9
4 The options 11
Option 1 – Little Eveleigh Street Connection 11
Option 2 – Wilson Street Connection, ground level pathway 12
Option 3 – Wilson Street Connection, aerial walkway 13
Option 4 – South Eveleigh to Wilson Street Connection 14
5 What we heard 15
Early consultation – May and June 2019 15
Options consultation – July and August 2019 15
Option 1 17
Option 2 17
Option 3 18
Note Option 4 18
Throughout this report we have included quotations from participants across various engagement activities. These have been
Key themes 18
incorporated ‘as is’ without any changes from Transport for NSW.
Traffic, pedestrians, safety and bus connections 18
Disclaimer Heritage 19
Information in this report has been gathered from community consultation activities. The information has been prepared in good
Concourse width, cycling routes and unpaid access 19
faith and with due care to ensure that views that came out of the consultation were accurately represented in this report. Transport
for NSW makes no representation or warranty (express or implied) as to the accuracy, adequacy or reliability of any statements, Urban design, local character and visual amenity 19
opinions or other information contained in this report. The information, statements, or other opinions provided by third parties in this Platforms 11 & 12 (Eastern Suburbs Line) 20
report are neither endorsed or supported by Transport for NSW and does not necessarily reflect any policies, procedures, proposals
or plans of Transport for NSW or the NSW Government. To the extent permitted by law, Transport for NSW (including its agents and Resident amenity 20
employees) disclaims any liability whatsoever in connection with, reliance on or use of this report by any person. Alternative suggestions 20
This document contains important information about public transport projects in your area. If you require
6 Consultation outcomes and next steps 22
the services of an interpreter, please contact the Translating and Interpreting Service on 131 450 and ask
them to call Transport for NSW on (02) 9200 0200. The interpreter will then assist you with translation. 7 Next steps 26
Chinese
Acronyms and Author: Transport for NSW
abbreviations Date: November 2019
Community responses make an important Transport customers, key stakeholder groups and the
contribution to the decision on a preferred alignment community were initially asked to provide feedback
for the concourse. Other factors are also considered, on an early concept design that included a new
including transport integration, operability and station concourse at the southern end of the station
maintenance, deliverability, customer experience, connecting Little Eveleigh Street to Marian Street.
urban design and precinct planning, environment,
During this first round of consultation, we heard
sustainability and heritage.
support for improving accessibility and decreasing
How we consulted congestion at the station. We also received feedback
Engagement with the community and stakeholders asking for more detail on other design options.
has been ongoing for a number of years on potential In July and August, consultation on four potential
opportunities to upgrade Redfern Station. design options, including the original design option
The Redfern Station Upgrade – New Southern was undertaken. A range of consultation activities
Concourse was announced in February 2019. In May were undertaken in each phase of consultation.
Upgrading Redfern Stations will make it easier for all customers to access key destinations like Carriageworks. 2019, consultation began with the local community
and stakeholders.
1
transport.nsw.gov.au/redfern
“[Option 1] is the most legible option with the most direct connectivity. Little
2
yoursay.transport.nsw.gov.au/RedfernNSC Eveleigh Street can cope with the increased pedestrian demand provided it is
3
1800 684 490
4
[email protected] converted to a shared zone with managed traffic access”
Option 2 – Wilson Street Connection, ground level pathway Option 3 – Wilson Street Connection, aerial walkway
“I don’t think I would feel as safe walking “The gradient [of Option 2] may be a “There may…be some personal security “This option will result in loss of views
on this [Option 2] alone at night” problem especially for elderly and issues at night” on Little Eveleigh Street and the
disabled people...” concourse is too close to the houses
on the railway side. The proposed
concourse is imposing and intrusive”
5 What we heard
Early consultation – May and Options consultation – July and
June 2019 August 2019
Community feedback received during the May Feedback received during consultation in July and
and June consultation phase showed support for August continued to show overarching support for
the construction of a new southern concourse for improving accessibility and reducing congestion at
Redfern Station. Redfern Station. However, differing levels of support
The potential for congestion on Little Eveleigh were received regarding the alignment for each
and Marian Street due to an increased number of of the four options, with respondents expressing
pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles was a key theme. differing viewpoints about the potential benefits and
Some responses also proposed relocating the negatives of each option.
“[Option 4] is by far the worst, it’s like a confusing maze... As somebody who walks concourse entrance to other streets, such as Wilson
More than half of the people who responded to
this section everyday, I think that Option 1 is by far the best for all kinds of pedestrians and Cornwallis Streets.
the survey lived in the local area, and used the
and will improve the people traffic flow immensely through the station” Other suggestions by the community included station to travel to and from home and to access
providing lift access to Platforms 11 and 12, having various local destinations, including South Eveleigh,
ungated access between the two entrances and Carriageworks, The University of Sydney and local
facilitating bicycle access across the concourse. shops, cafes and restaurants.
Potential impact to heritage and the visual amenity
of surrounding streets were also identified as aspects In general, Option 1 received the highest levels of
that were important to the community. We also support both stated (Figure 1), and based on seven
received feedback asking for more detail on other different quality-based criteria, as self-identified by
design options. survey respondents (Figure 2).
60
Option 1 Option 4*
50 Preferred
not preferred)
20
Option 1 – Little Eveleigh
Street Connection
10
Option 2 – Wilson Street
0 Connection, ground
level pathway
-10 Option 3 – Wilson Street
Connection, aerial walkway
-20 Option 4 – South Eveleigh to
Wilson Street Connection
-30
-40
* Tally includes respondents who stated both Option 4 or a variant of Option 4 with a ground level pathway as a preferred option.
** ‘Other’ refers to respondents who identified that they would prefer an alternative design, including the two community
group suggestions. As these suggestions were not formally consulted on by TfNSW a ‘not preferred’ and ‘total’ figure could
not be produced.
Figure 2 Qualitative based options assessment where the listed qualities are seen as a benefit or negative of Natural Amenity
A large number of respondents felt that accessibility This design included a substantially a wider
upgrades to the underground Eastern Suburbs concourse that would be ungated at the entry/exit
& Illawarra Line platforms (Platforms 11 and 12) points, allowing pedestrian and bicycle access across
should be included as part of the project. Some the rail corridor. Ticket gates would be located where
respondents also felt that the existing access to the stairs and lifts connect to the new concourse.
these platforms (from the northern concourse) By having the dual Marian and Cornwallis Street
needed to be improved, including lift access. entrances, the design aimed to provide connections
towards both South Eveleigh and the Gibbons Street
Resident amenity bus stands, while minimising interaction between
pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles
Amenity, such as parking, noise, local character and
privacy were highly valued by respondents who This design would require a part of the ground level
identified as local residents. pathway to go through, the existing heritage-listed
communications building. This was seen by the
Privacy was a particular concern for residents respondents who put this suggestion forward as an
on both sides of the corridor and suggestions opportunity to activate the building and provide a
were made to protect privacy such as enclosing more direct connecting pathway below residential
the concourse, constructing screens or planting fence lines.
vegetation, or in regard to Options 3 and 4,
lowering the aerial walkway to restrict sightlines ‘H-design’
into properties. Potential noise and lighting The community group also proposed a concourse in
impacts were also raised by residents. the shape of a ‘H’ as a possible concept design. This Option 5 as received in feedback
design was similar to Option 1, but the footbridge
A small number of respondents also queried
was positioned further south, placing the entrances St
whether residents’ parking would be permitted, and e
in South Eveleigh and connecting directly straight bi
whether service vehicle and garage access would be om
across to Wilson Street. A wide, gated station cr
maintained on Little Eveleigh Street and Ivy Lane if b er
concourse would then extend off the footbridge A
St
Option 1 was chosen as the preferred design.
gh
along the rail corridor towards the station platforms
ei
nt St
so that lifts could be installed.
el
Some respondents noted that the streets
Ev
St
Lawso
Rege
surrounding the station on the northern side of
s
As with ‘Option 5’, this design aimed to provide n St
on
Ivy S
bb
the station were ‘green’, with trees and vegetation ungated access across the rail corridor for
St
Gi
contributing to the area’s distinctive character. pedestrians and cyclists, while retaining gated entry h
ig
ele
into the station. It also aimed to remove pedestrians REDFERN
Alternative suggestions Ev
from outside the front of residences on Little le STATION
tt
Li
Two concept designs developed by a local Eveleigh Street, and reduce pedestrian and cyclist Redfe
rn St
community group were also presented to Transport interaction with vehicles on Marian Street.
for NSW for consideration. These concept designs E
are referred to in this report as ‘Option 5’ and RS
OU
‘H’ design. Feedback was received from a number “I just want to reiterate my love of green NC
CO
of respondents identifying these concept designs space, beauty & heritage.... We need to
St
ns
as preferred or as areas to be further investigated. be creating places that people want to
t
bo
tS
Transport for NSW would like to thank the
Gib
be in, walk-through and enjoy.”
gen
community for developing these concept designs
Re
and has considered them alongside the other
four options.
Planning process
Early 2019
Transport for NSW (TfNSW) develops initial concept design for the Redfern Station Upgrade – New Southern Concourse, including consideration
of environmental constraints, risks and opportunities
›
May and June
Have
TfNSW commences preparation of a State Significant Infrastructure (SSI) application and invites community
your say
feedback as part of early consultation
›