Article

Synonymous codon usage bias in Staphylococcus aureus phages
Asif Ali Khan, Aditya Roy Choudhury, Suvodip Jana

Guided by: Keya Sau
Department of Biotechnology, Haldia Institute of Technology, Haldia
The use of bacteriophages (phages) as antibacterial drugs, frequently referred to as “phage therapy” has been
discussed and deployed since these bacterial viruses were discovered in the early 1900s. Interest in phage therapy
has waxed and waned in various parts of the world, heavily influenced by the availability, affordability, and
efficacy of potent small-molecule antibiotics. The current resurgence of interest is persisting in light of the
growing urgency of the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) crisis, which predicts that AMR will be the leading cause
of human death by 2050, causing 10 million global deaths per year. Staphylococcus aureus, one of the ESKAPE
pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter
baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp.) is a problem in both hospital-associated and
community-associated infections. It is a significant problem in many clinical settings and the antibiotic-resistant
forms are classified as a “High Priority” pathogen by the World Health Organization (WHO) and a “Serious
Threat” by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Since 1999, nine antibiotics targeting
methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) have been approved (linezolid, daptomycin, tigecycline, ceftobiprole,
telavancin, ceftaroline, dalbavancin, oritavancin, tedizolid). Of these, only the oxazolidinones, now nearly 20
years old, were a completely new class. Clinical resistance has already been observed for all nine of these drugs,
though it can be difficult to predict how quickly or widely some of these resistances will spread
Staphylococcus aureus is an extremely flexible organism: it can be a commensal but also a dangerous pathogen,
causing skin abscesses, wound infections, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, pneumonia, and toxic shock syndrome. S.
aureus can also adapt to live inside cells, where it finds protection from host defence mechanisms and antibiotics.
The number of staphylococcal infections continues to increase—in parallel with the increased use of
intravascular devices—while the treatment of these infections becomes ever more difficult because of the
emergence of staphylococcal strains resistant to multiple antibiotics, including vancomycin. To search for S.
aureus phages suitable for phage therapy, relative synonymous codon usage bias has been investigated in the
protein-coding genes of forty new staphylococcal phages. All phages appeared to carry A and T ending codons.
Several factors such as mutational pressure, translational selection and gene length seemed to be responsible for
the codon usage variation in the phages. Codon usage indeed varied phage to phage. Of the phages, phages G1,
Twort, 66 and Sap-2, 44AHJD, P68 and K may be extremely lytic in nature as majority of their genes possess
high translational efficiency, indicating that these phages may be employed in curing staphylococcal infections.
A frequent point of discussion for phage therapy is whether a fixed composition phage product will remain active
against globally circulating strains of bacteria for long enough to be useful. It has sometimes been postulated that
the rapid pace of bacterial evolution might cause the clinical populations of a target pathogen to change rapidly
enough that a phage product might no longer be relevant by the time it obtains market approval, or that once in
use, resistance may develop too quickly for the phage product to remain useful. While resistance development is
a relevant issue for any novel antibacterial, we are not aware of evidence that this risk or rate would be higher for
phage products than for other antibacterial agents being developed with a similar focus on novel mechanisms of
action and resistance management. On the contrary, traits such as complementation among component phages
and phage evolution offer a means of combating this and the evolution of phage resistance often carries other
fitness costs. Phage therapy offers a promising alternative to combat staphylococcal infections. Phages can be
used as microbiological tools able to damage bacterial cells and defeat difficult infections. Phages are
particularly useful in the battle against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Implementation of phage treatment may help
to reduce the frequency of potentially lethal infections in the hospital environment, with related costs that can be
significantly lower than those of antibiotics.

Article

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Article

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Article

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Synonymous codon usage bias in Staphylococcus aureus phages

Asif Ali Khan, Aditya Roy Choudhury, Suvodip Jana

You might also like