Unlocking Potential. Releasing The Potential of The Business and Its People Through Learning

Unlocking
Potential
Releasing the potential 2016-17 Learning
of the business and its Benchmark Report
people through learning November 2016
Towards Maturity Research
The Towards Maturity Benchmark Study is an internationally recognised
longitudinal study on the effective implementation of learning innovation
based on the input of 5,000+ participants and 25,000 learners gathered since
2003. Towards Maturity continuously surveys and studies how people learn at
work and the impact this has on organisational performance. By turning data
into insights and insights into action, this research is used to help L&D leaders
assess and improve the appropriateness, effectiveness and efficiency of their
learning provision.
Insights specifically gathered during 2016 have been published in a suite of

reports that can be downloaded at: www.towardsmaturity.org/2016benchmark
Previous studies in this series can be downloaded at:

www.towardsmaturity.org/static/towards-maturity-benchmark-reports.
Additional sector specific and In-Focus reports will also be available over the
coming months. Please visit the Towards Maturity Shop for more details:
www.towardsmaturity.org/shop
Acknowledgements
The 2016 Benchmark research has been made possible thanks to the support
of the Towards Maturity Ambassadors who share our passion for ensuring that
independent research and advice is freely available.
See page 92 for details of the Towards Maturity Ambassadors.
Find out more about our Ambassadors at: towardsmaturity.org/ambassadors
Towards Maturity Supporters: The 2016 study remains current and vendor
neutral thanks to the independent experts, industry communities and
membership bodies who kindly offer Towards Maturity their support. Find out
more at: www.towardsmaturity.org/supporters
Research team: Laura Overton and Dr Genny Dixon

Publisher: Emerald Global Publishing Group Ltd
About Emerald
Emerald Global Publishing Group uniquely marries strong roots in the

publishing of applied research, with innovative author services and expertise
in management education, learning and development. It bridges theory and
reality so that the conclusions of research can really be put into practice. The
differing audiences served by the Group enable issues facing practitioners and
professionals to inform the research agenda.
Terms and conditions relating to this report: www.towardsmaturity.org/static/terms-and-conditions/
© Copyright Towards Maturity CIC 2016. All rights reserved. No part of this material protected by
this copyright may be reproduced or utilised in any form, or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without
prior authorisation.
Page | 2 © Copyright Towards Maturity CIC, 2016 London.

Contents
Towards Maturity Research 2
Foreword by Jane Hart 4
1. Introduction 8
Unleashing the power of your people 9
The new learning organisation 10
Report aim – Make It Happen 12
Research methodology 12
2. Learning today 14
Resourcing 14
Technologies 16
Delivering formal learning 20
Learning outcomes 22
Barriers to change 26
Unlocking potential 27
3. Outcome 1 – Improve efficiency 28

The efficiency achievers 29
Tools to improve efficiency 30
Tactics to help improve efficiency 32
The Towards Maturity key for unlocking potential: Improve efficiency 34
4. Outcome 2 – Fine-tune processes 36

The process improvement achievers 37
Tools to fine-tune processes 38
Tactics to fine-tune processes 40
The Towards Maturity key for unlocking potential: Fine-tuning processes 42
5. Outcome 3 – Boost performance 45

The performance achievers 46
Tools to boost performance 47
Tactics to boost performance 48
The Towards Maturity key for unlocking potential: Boost performance 50
6. Outcome 4 – Cultivate agility 52

The agility achievers 53
Tools to cultivate agility 54
Tactics to cultivate agility 55
The Towards Maturity key for unlocking potential: Cultivate agility 57
7. Outcome 5 – Influence Culture 59

The culture achievers 59
Tools to influence culture 60
Tactics to influence culture 62
The Towards Maturity key for unlocking potential: Influence culture 63
8. Unlocking potential in L&D 65

Priority skills for today's L&D professionals 65
The achievers 67
Tools of top performers 69
Tactics of top performers 70
9. Next steps – preparing for the future of work 73
Appendix A. Study design 78

Appendix B. Organisations involved 85
Appendix C: The Towards Maturity Model 87
Appendix D: Towards Maturity Ambassadors 91
About Towards Maturity 95
© Copyright Towards Maturity CIC, 2016 London. Page | 3

Contents
Foreword by Jane Hart

In 2016 the world of work is changing rapidly and the learning professionals
that support today’s organisations are slowly waking up to the fact that we
can’t just train colleagues once and then retain them for life. Their work
needs to move away from ‘pushing’ programmes and ‘organising’ initiatives for
people to thinking about how people are really learning in the modern world
and how to support them on a continuous basis.
Helping organisations to do just that has been the focus of my work for
25 years and for the last 10 of those, I have been an active supporter of
the Towards Maturity Benchmark as it has tracked the extent to which
organisations have been successful in achieving this goal. It is encouraging
that people professionals have become painfully aware that learning is no
longer about the course, but about cultivating a continuous learning mindset.
However, it is also alarming that, for many, this awareness is not leading to
action, let alone results.
That is why I welcome this year’s Towards Maturity 2016 Learning Benchmark
– Unlocking Potential – and its use of detailed analytics to identify the step
by step actions that L&D professionals need to take to support the agile The detailed analysis
workforce needed in the future. Their new analysis this year has identified a
in Unlocking Potential
number of actions that, in my experience, all L&D leaders need to be aware
of in order to support modern workplace learning. identifies the step
by step actions that
It pinpoints the critical role of managers and the extent to which successful L&D professionals
organisations are working with the wider enterprise to support learning at
work. It also highlights the importance of understanding how staff actually
need to take to
learn in the workplace with Top Deck learning teams three times more likely support the agile
than the rest of their peers to be proactive in this area. workforce needed in
the future
What’s more, Unlocking Potential is peppered with real insights from 5,000
workers challenging the perceptions of the readers to think differently about
workplace learning.
The fact that almost two-thirds of learning leaders report that staff lack skills
to manage their own learning and line managers are reluctant to encourage
new ways of learning confirms that change is needed to tackle these
important issues.
Unlocking Potential shows whilst L&D teams are using more technology than
ever before, it is not enough. Most are just using the tools to tweak and
modify their original approaches. Cutting courses into tiny pieces does not
equal performance support. Social learning is much more than adding a
discussion forum into a course.
It is clear that the high performing learning organisations are challenging the
status quo head on.
They are prepared to go the extra mile, they are constantly listening
to and trusting their workers. It is encouraging to see that they are
predominantly led by true learning leaders who also have a passion for
learning, for experimenting and taking risks to support business and
individual performance.

Contents
Unlocking Potential highlights that those leaders who are taking action are
also making the biggest impact on what matters most to their business
leaders – improved agility, customer loyalty and retention.
Learning professionals today are hungry for change but many are
overwhelmed. This report helps break down the vision for truly integrating
learning and work into practical steps. However, there are no cookie cutter
solutions! The data presented provides readers with a confidence and
security to identify what needs to happen next. Whilst the Top Deck may
use evidence to guide their thinking, they show us that their results come
because they trust their gut and trial out new ideas. This report will help
you unlock your potential as a learning leader but your success will result
from not rigidly replicating what others have done but by being bold and
courageous and doing things differently for yourself!
Those leaders who

are taking action
are also making the
biggest impact on
what matters most
to their business
leaders – improved
agility, customer
loyalty and retention
Jane Hart is a well-regarded international speaker and writer on modern

approaches to workplace learning. Jane is also the Founder of the Centre for
Learning & Performance Technologies (C4LPT), one of the world’s most visited
learning sites on the Web and author of the Social Learning Handbook and
Modern Workplace Learning.
www.c4lpt.co.uk/
www.janehart.com/writing-2/writing/
www.janehart.com/speaking/
Twitter: @C4LPT

Contents
Fast Facts
Today’s successful workplaces are fast moving, global and digital.
Learning innovation, done well, delivers results that can support
sustainable, agile workplaces. Business and learning leaders alike
need to expect more.
Learning professionals aspiring to build a dynamic

learning organisation
>> 93% want to integrate learning and work (up from 80% in 2015)
>> 95% want to respond faster to the speed of business Expect more:
>> 98% want to support the sharing of good practice
14% productivity
>> 90% want to play an active role in supporting business innovation (up
from 80% in 2015) 15% time to
competency
However, learning provision today has not changed much in 5 years 18% cost
>> 56% is delivered face-to-face

>> 19% of budget is allocated to learning technologies
>> 22% is delivered via blended solutions
7 in 10 staff learn
What’s more, the use of technology in learning is focused on online online in order to
course delivery rather than performance support do their job better
and faster
>> 9 in 10 are using live online learning and e-learning content
>> 3 in 4 are using Learning Management Systems
>> 7 in 10 are using video and mobile
The Top Deck are at least twice as likely to report that they are
achieving the five outcomes investigated in this report
>> Improving efficiency – 42% on average vs 77% Top Deck

>> Fine-tuning processes – 33% vs 64%
>> Boosting performance – 26% vs 62%
>> Cultivating agility – 20% vs 54%
>> Influencing culture – 17% vs 46%
Data from 600 Learning professionals

Barriers to achieving desired outcomes include: and 5,000 learners
>> Staff lack skills to manage own learning (reported by 62%) Top Deck organisations are those in the
top 10% of the Towards Maturity Index
>> L&D lack the skills to implement and manage e-learning (59%)
>> Line managers are reluctant to encourage new ways of learning (58%) Towards Maturity 2016 Benchmark
www.towardsmaturity.org/benchmark

Contents
Unlocking potential – unleashing the power

of your people
This study explores the tactics most likely to correlate with successful
outcomes. Here are some examples of tactics that can unlock potential:
Comparing the achievers with the non-achievers for each outcome

we find that:
Those successful at improving efficiency:
>> Integrate technology into face-to-face training (45% vs 21%)

>> Regularly review programmes to maintain relevance (66% vs 35%)
Those successful at fine-tuning processes:
>> Analyse the business problem before recommending a solution

(76% vs 50%)
>> Use stakeholder steering groups to support design (66% vs 37%)
Those successful at boosting performance:
>> Deliver learning in time to meet business needs (71% vs 43%)

>> Use activities to practice learning outcomes (66% vs 41%)
Those successful at cultivating agility:
>> Proactively understand how staff learn (43% vs 28%)

91% of staff like
>> Have a culture that supports learning from mistakes (60% vs 35%)
to learn at their
own pace Those successful at influencing culture:
>> Actively provide new work experiences as an opportunity to learn (63%

vs 35%)
>> Communicate success to line managers (67% vs 36%)
Top Deck organisations consistently deliver more across all these

outcomes. What is more, 3 in 4 practice all the tactics above
Top Deck teams are most likely to be led by those with an L&D or business
background who invest in their own learning and skills.
Top Deck leaders are also building the skills and networks of their L&D
teams today, to deliver the learning organisation of tomorrow:
>> 82% invest in CPD for L&D staff (52% in the rest of the sample)
>> 74% L&D staff join internal networks to learn for themselves (53%)
>> 63% agree that staff spend time in other operational areas of business to
learn (43%)
>> 87% have good links/relationships with the IT department (46%)
>> 90% formalise working with subject matter experts (47%)

Contents
1. Introduction
Why we need to unleash the power
of our people
All of the current research with business leaders shows that they are under
immense and increasing pressure to adapt, grow and deliver in an increasingly
Only 57% of C-suite
complex and uncertain world.
believe that their
In our recent review of the ‘C-suite’1 research we identified a number of key risks academies are “very
that business leaders are having to deal with [see figure 1]. Their pressure to or fully aligned” with
deliver presents a prime opportunity for people professionals as they step up
to the plate. Unleashing the power of their people through innovative processes
corporate priorities2
will be key to future success but business leaders continue to fail to adapt.
Towards Maturity’s longitudinal research has highlighted that, done well,

digitally enabled learning innovation can deliver an impact that helps the C-suite
reduce risk and drive their organisation forward. The potential for change
is considerable:
>> Improve agility – implement change faster
>> Increase revenue and customer satisfaction
>> Attract and keep the best people
>> Maximise resources
And yet the C-suite research does not consider that their people professionals
are able to deliver or are equipped to deliver – limiting their expectations of
help. For example, only 57% of C-suite believe that their academies are “very or
fully aligned” with corporate priorities.2
It is time for business leaders and learning leaders to expect more. It is time
for change.
Organisations need a new learning agenda that will equip them for the future
– one that is driven by business needs and supports the journey of the internal
customer.3 The changes that are taking place in L&D are seismic. These are
exciting times to be in L&D as we shift from delivering course transactions to
delivering bottom line value. However, how to effect those changes still remains
a daunting prospect for many. 1
www.towardsmaturity.org/c-suite2016
In last year’s study4 we identified that L&D professionals are not the only ones 2
Benson-Armer, R., Gast, A. and van Dam, N.
finding it hard to change their mindset. Business leaders need to change their Learning at the Speed of Business. McKinsey,
perception of L&D and their relationship with L&D, as current perceptions are May 2016.
a major obstacle to change. Our research provided L&D with a persuasive,
evidence-based business case for change to stimulate new commitment from 3
See New Learning Agenda
business leaders. www.towardsmaturity.org/2013benchmark
What remains clear is that both business leaders and people professionals need 4
Embracing Change
to take action to make progress. www.towardsmaturity.org/2015benchmark

Contents
Risks in the C-suite – it’s time to unleash the

power of your people
Figure 1: Review of recent research with the C-suite highlights a number of significant risk areas
Organisation risks
External • Growth in a complex world – 72% of CEOs believe the next three years will be more critical for
their industry than the last 50 years
• Managing the demands of overregulation – 78% of CEOs are concerned about overregulation
Internal • Driving digital – 80% of businesses cite digital transformation as a priority. Only 35% have a
‘clearly defined’ strategy to achieve this
• Intelligent data analytics – 72% believe technology and 71% market factors are by far the
biggest of the various external forces buffeting their organisations
People risks
External • Continually innovating and exceeding customer experience – over half of CEOs (53%) define
their organisation by the value that’s created for customers
• Addressing major ‘talent and capability gaps’ – 72% of CEOs are concerned about the availability
of key skills, especially with 48% planning to increase headcount in the coming year
Internal • Leveraging value from more demanding employees – 94% say that workforce development
requires continuous investment and improvement
• Unleashing the power of your people – over 50% report skills gaps in key business functions
Source: www.towardsmaturity.org/c-suite2016
Figure 2: Learning innovation done well can reduce risks and deliver significant impact on
business results
Organisation risks
External
Increase organisational Increase organisational Reduce costs

revenue by 10% productivity by 14% by 18%
Internal
Speed up pace of change to Speed up the rollout of new Reduce learning

procedures or products by 24% IT applications by 25% delivery time by 27%
People risks
External
Improve customer Reduce staff Reduce learning study

satisfaction by 18% turnover by 7% time (off job) by 21%
Internal
Increase employee satisfaction/ Improve speed to Increase qualifications gained

engagement by 18% competency by 15% by employees by 16%

Contents
The new learning organisation

Peter Senge first talked about the learning organisation in his book The Fifth Senge, P. 1990. The Fifth Discipline:
The art and practice of the learning
Discipline. In a subsequent interview he stated that a learning organisation is organization. OCLC: 318247346
a group of people working together collectively to enhance their capacities to
create results they really care about.
Over the years Towards Maturity has been tracking outcomes that
organisations really care about – indicators of staff and customer
commitment, measures of growth, innovation and the ability to respond
with speed.
Since 2003, we have been investigating what learning-related activities

are most likely to deliver those outcomes. Following research with over
5,000 people practitioners and 25,000 learners, we see a number of
characteristics and traits of an active learning organisation emerging from
the evidence gathered.
6 Characteristics of the new learning organisation
Clarity of purpose – a shared vision of outcomes that matter
Holistic staff experience – a trusted brand that expects and facilitates continuous learning from start
to finish
Thriving ecosystem – individuals, managers and the extended enterprise working towards
common goals
Agile, digitally enabled infrastructure – supporting and enabling a fluid exchange of ideas and skills
Continual engagement – self directed, connected, accumulating collective understanding
Intelligent decision making – using performance analytics to inform and adapt
1
Towards Maturity, Modernising Learning: Delivering Results, 2014. www.towardsmaturity.org/2014benchmark

Contents
Figure 3: The Towards Maturity Model
The continually evolving Towards Maturity Model provides the framework

for mapping an organisation’s journey as they adapt to the changing work
and learning landscape. The six workstreams of implementation behaviours
directly relate to improved business performance (see Appendix B for
full details).
The Towards Maturity Index™ (TMI), based on this model, gives a

single, unique measure that organisations can use to benchmark against
their peers.
Figure 4: Defining the Top Deck
We define the Top Deck as those in the top 10% of the TMI.6 These
organisations report the best business results, staff engagement and
responsiveness to business change whilst citing fewer barriers to
implementation.
They are also the organisations who are closest to becoming new learning
organisations working hand in hand with business leaders to deliver agility
and competitive advantage.
Note: Facts and figures relating to the Top Deck are highlighted in pink in
this report.
Embracing Change. Towards Maturity, 2015. www.towardsmaturity.org/2015benchmark

6

Contents
The aim of this year’s report –

Make It Happen
In Embracing Change, the Top Deck organisations provided inspiration for
what a new learning organisation can look like.
The characteristic
What stands out as we take an objective look at the development in behaviours of the
technology-enabled workplace learning over the 13 years since we started Top Deck provide
this research programme, is that the performance gap is widening between inspiration and ideas
those that are achieving the best results and the rest.
for those on their
Whilst our top performing learning organisations are achieving greater journey to becoming
reach, efficiency and business impact, and establishing a positive approach a new learning
towards learning that is evident at every level in the organisation, too many organisation
learning and development professionals are struggling to change attitudes
and engage with their various stakeholders.
This year’s annual Towards Maturity Benchmark digs deeper into the data
to help organisations understand what action they need to take, at any
stage of their journey, to make it happen.
We explore the factors that link to successful achievement of critical

business outcomes. If you are a people professional, whether you are just
starting out on your career, or have shedloads of experience, this report
will help you to take the next step on the learning modernisation journey.
Research methodology
There are three main sources of data for this report:
1. The Towards Maturity 2016 Benchmark Review with over 600

participants taking part between September 2015 and August 2016,
summarised in Figure 5
2. A sample of over 4,700 learners that took part in a learning landscape

survey during the same period, described in detail in Learner Voice 37
3. Secondary research referencing senior business leaders from the

C-suite8
Further information on this year’s benchmark study and data analysis is

given in Appendix A.
7
Learner Voice 3, 2016. www.towardsmaturity.org/learnervoice3
8
Risk in the C-suite. Towards Maturity, 2016. www.towardsmaturity.org/c-suite2016

Contents
Research demographics
Figure 5: Study participants
About the businesses
USA/Canada
8%
Public sector Single Asia
16% location 15% Pacific
8%
Not-for-profit
sector 17% South/Central
Multinational America
40% 1% UK
61%
Private sector
67% Multiple
locations -
one nation
Other Middle-East/
45%
European Africa/India
countries 7%
15%
About the people
76% to HR/L&D central 15% to HR/L&D within 9% to a line of business

a line of business outside HR/L&D
About the learners in Learner Voice 3 Can we trust the benchmark?

Longitudinal study over 13 years – started in 2003
Over 4,700 learners:
Scale: Over 5,000 professionals and 25,000
learners have taken part to date
Over 3,000 organisations have received

Personalised Benchmark Reports™ to help
them with strategic planning
23% have been in 43% have worked 45% with a 360° review of learning in the workplace: L&D and
their current role for their company management their staff views both considered
for over five years for over five years responsibility
International reach: 32 countries represented in
this year’s study
Dynamic annual review: The question-set is

32% under 30 25% 31-40 22% 41-50 21% over 50 informed by input from top thought leaders
and practitioners
Freely available: Supported by Ambassadors from

the learning technologies and training industry
35% 26% 25% 11% 3% Recognised by academics as a leading authority

North UK&NI India and Asia Europe on benchmarking in learning and development
America Sub-Sahara Pacific
Africa Statistically speaking, only variables with a Pearson
Correlation coefficient of 0.3 and above are
taken into account in model calculations;
<1% Middle East/GCC/North Africa
significant at p<0.01.

Contents
2. Learning Today
Today’s learning leaders are optimistic that budgets will grow (or
at least remain static), and have high expectations of what they
want to achieve. However, barriers to change remain equally high.
Overall, progress has remained static and in some cases started to
reverse whilst Top Deck organisations continue to forge ahead.
Resourcing
For some years, people professionals have remained optimistic that training
budgets will hold steady despite the economic uncertainty facing most “Uncertain economies
organisations. Fewer than one in four (23%) have predicted that budgets mean few L&D departments
would decrease, although 28% have experienced a cut in their budget in the will expand.”
last year. Back in 2014, 35% were predicting that their budget would have
increased, but only 31% have seen them rise. Training Manager,
Financial Services
The greatest increases have been in the professional services, small
companies with fewer than 500 staff and non-European countries.
Organisations in the public sector have been hardest hit, with 44%
experiencing a cut in training budget in the last two years.
The greatest cost for most training budgets is staffing. Despite a continued
optimism for the last five years that L&D teams will increase or at least stay
the same size, one in four organisations have had to cut their L&D team size.
Those in the voluntary sector, education and professional services have faced “Budget and finance
the smallest cuts. strategy will impact on
the capability of the
Again, cuts in the public sector have been highest, with 34% experiencing a organisation to respond to
cut in team size since 2014 compared to just 16% in the not-for-profit sector. technological changes.”
Large organisations report the most severe cuts in team size with those with
over 20,000 employees faced with a staffing cut of 38%.
L&D Manager,
Local Government
Figure 6: L&D Team changes
Sector Team size
Team size cut since 2014 Team size cut since 2014
Team size predicted to Team size predicted to decrease in the next two years
decrease in the next two years
38%
34% 32%
24% 25% 25%

22% 23%
20%
16% 17% 16%
14% 15%
12%
8%
6% 6%
Average Public Private Not-for- Under 500 500-999 1,000-4,999 5,000-19,999 20,000+
sector sector profit

Contents
The pressure is on these teams to become ever more efficient and deliver
Technology more for less.
accounts for an Moving to a technology-enabled modern learning strategy would appear to

average of 18% of offer the solution and for some years; over two-thirds have predicted that the
training budget proportion of budget spent on technology would increase. In reality, there
has been no change in the last six years despite massive advances in learning
technologies and in the reliability and connectivity of the IT infrastructure. With
technology spend proportionately still at 2011 levels, our data leads us to be
somewhat sceptical that the balance of budget will swing further away from
staffing towards technology in the immediate future.
Figure 7: Average percentage of L&D budget spent on learning technologies
USA/Canada (29%)
Asia/Pacific (19%)
UK (17%)
Middle East/Africa/
India (12%)
Finance (20%)
Retail (20%)
IT & Telecoms (21%)
Charity (14%)
Health (18%)
Table 1: Budget changes in the next two years
Increase Stay the same Decrease
Overall training budget 32% 45% 23%
Proportion spent on technology 72% 24% 4%
The actual size of the budget varies widely, but the average reported spend
“With budgets either per employee on technology-enabled learning varies from £87 in the private
stagnating or decreasing, sector, to £47 in the public sector, to just £27 in the not-for-profit sector.
use of learning technologies
that deliver greater ROI Top Deck companies do not have the biggest budgets or L&D staff relative
will be key to maintain a to the organisation size, but they do allocate more of their budget to learning
learning culture.” technologies (28%).
Vice President of Learning

& Organisational
Development,
Financial Services

Contents
Top ten technologies in 2016 How do you see your

organisation’s use of
Figure 8: Increase in the number of learning technologies
learning technologies
changing in the next
Live online two years?
learning 89%
"More engaging, more
social, more gamified, more
realistic/relevant."
e-learning "More blended learning,

objects 88% more user content creation,
more collaboration."
Surveys and "More use of video

questionnaires to and gamification."
help understand 80%
learning transfer "More use of smartphones
via apps"
Internal/ "Increasing sophistication,

Enterprise-wide 79% integration with competency
information assessment and more
services (such as personalisation."
SharePoint)
"Introduction of apps
Learning and greater use of iPad in
75% the classroom."
Management
Systems
"More use of support
resource hubs and
Communication webinar technologies/
tools (chat, IM, SMS, 74% virtual classroom."
newsletter, forum)
"More focus on mobile for
just in time and just in need."
Online assessment
(eg to support "Increasingly mobile;
71% much more attention to
certification/
qualifications) learning analytics."
"Making more use of online

Job aids (e.g. courses, MOOCs and video."
PDF checklists, 70%
infographics) "Integration with HR portal
for talent management and
competency framework."
Video "Increase in performance

69%
management and tracking of
staff training."
"We are planning to

enable a new LMS cloud
Mobile devices (e.g. 67% based solution."
smartphone, tablet)

Contents
Even though we have reported that the proportion of budget spent on

technology is declining, the number of different technologies in use is
increasing. 21 tools out of a reference list of 45 different learning technologies
are used by over 50% of respondents in 2016 – more than double the usage
in 2011.
Figure 9: Number of different technologies in use by over half of the sample, 2011-2016
25
21
Number of different technologies in use
20
18
17
15
13
11
10
10
0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Years
The choice of free courseware and cloud-based file-sharing services available

has increased markedly. L&D leaders have a keen eye for products in the
public domain that they can adapt for their local situation. 64% are now using
open education resources (such as YouTube videos and TED talks), rather
than developing their own in-house videos (58%) or blogs (29%). They are also
more likely to develop their own e-learning courseware in-house (72%) rather
than investing in external custom-made solutions (57%).
The rate of increase however, is slower than predicted and for some
technologies has plateaued. For example, live online learning (using webinars,
virtual classrooms, videoconferencing etc.) jumped to use in more than 4 out
of 5 organisations as VOIP tools such as Google Hangouts and Skype were
widely adopted by L&D four years ago, but further increase is not evident.

Contents
Figure 10: Technologies that have reached their peak adoption
Mobile LMS Third party Live online

devices social learning
networks
80%
75% 74% 75% 86% 86% 89%
80% 65% 49%
74% 75%
45% 48%
47%
38%
35% 26%
21% 11%
10
12
14
16
06
10
06
12
14
08
10
12
14
08
10
16
16
12
14
16
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
What’s going up?/What’s going down?
The level of use of specific technologies fluctuates from year to year, but over
a longer period trends become more apparent.
Figure 11: What’s going up?/what’s going down?
File and presentation sharing applications such as Googledocs, Dropbox, Slideshare

(up by 183%)
Mobile devices (up by 72%)
In-house social networks (up by 55%)
VOIP conferencing (up by 40%)
Course authoring tools (up by 36%)
Enterprise-wide information systems (up by 36%)
Electronic performance support systems (up by 33%)
Open education resources (up by 19%)
e-portfolios (down by 45%)

Podcasts (down by 32%)
Serious games and simulations (down by 27%)
In-house wikis (down by 27%)
SKills diagnostic tools (down by 28%)
Virtual classrooms (down by 18%)

Contents
In the last three years, there has also been a significant and steady increase in
the number of organisations using:
>> MOOCs (currently in use by 32% of organisations)

>> Single sign on processes (51%)
>> Software as a Service (31%)
Changing the technology in use takes longer than most L&D professionals
predict. At a time when budgets are tight, any new infrastructure
project demands a strong business case for investment. The predicted
implementation of Learning Record Stores, wearables, augmented reality,
achievement badges and other emerging technologies has not occurred.
Indeed, many of the current users of these technologies are only beginning
to experiment with them.
Table 2: Technologies being tested out for their potential impact on learning and development
Technology All using now “Just experimenting” Planning to use

as a proportion in next two years
of those using the
technology
Hot right now
Augmented and virtual reality 8% 81% 22%
Artificial intelligence tools (e.g. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 6% 77% 48%

virtual assistants)
Wearables 11% 44% 21%
Stuff that’s been around a while
Feeds, curation and social bookmarking 14% 66% 32%
Mobile app development tools 15% 63% 30%
Achievement goals, badges or leaderboards 17% 58% 39%
At the same time the choice of free courseware and cloud-based file-sharing
services available has increased markedly. L&D leaders have a keen eye for
products in the public domain that they can adapt for their local situation. 64%
are now using open education resources (such as YouTube videos and TED
talks), rather than developing their own in-house videos (58%) or blogs (29%).
They are also more likely to develop their own e-learning courseware in-house
(72%), rather than investing in external custom-made solutions (57%).
Last year we reported the greatest planned increases in communities of

practice (to 78%), virtual classrooms (to 72%), and online evaluation of
business impact (to 57%), but the rate of increase has been much slower
than expected.

Contents
Delivering formal learning –

shifting expectations
Compliance training is the mainstay of technology-enabled learning,
with 68% of participants using technology to support mandated training
programmes. Face-to-face classroom training is still the primary delivery
mode for formal learning in most organisations. Courses in problem
solving, team working, communication, customer handling and study
skills are the most likely to be delivered in the classroom. However, most
participants expect the balance of media to shift over the next two years.
Table 3: Technologies to watch out for in the future
Technology All using now Predicted level in two

years’ time (In order of
predicted increase)
Integrated mobile apps within an LMS 17% 50%
Virtual classrooms 39% 69%
Bespoke mobile apps for learning 24% 54%
Communities of practice 48% 77%
Apps to specifically support performance at the point of need 18% 47%
Online evaluation of business impact 25% 54%
Figure 12: Shifting the balance from face-to-face learning to blended learning
56% Sample average
Top Deck
42%
30%
28%
22% 22%
Face-to-face only Blend Online only
Despite the fact that last year 74% of delegates expected face-to-face
learning to decrease in favour of blended and online learning, the
proportion of learning offered face-to-face remains high:
>> 56% of programmes are offered by face-to-face alone (similar to 55%

last year)
>> 22% of programmes are offered online only (up from 19%)
>> 22% are offered using a blend of face-to-face and online (slightly down
from 26%)
Those in the private sector are slightly less dependent on face-to-face delivery
(53% vs 61% in the public sector and in not-for-profits).

Contents
The balance shifts towards online or blended programmes are dependent on a

number of factors:
>> Location – multinational companies spread over multiple locations are

50% more likely to use technology than those in one location. Face-to-face
is more prevalent in the Middle-East/Africa/India; online in the USA.
>> Sector – those in the private sector are using more technology in formal
learning than not-for-profit or public sector organisations
Table 4: Variation in the blend across sectors and locations
Sample Multi- Companies Private Public NPP USA Middle-

average nationals based at East/
a single Africa/
location India
Face-to-face 56% 50% 65% 53% 61% 61% 42% 66%
Blended 22% 25% 16% 25% 17% 19% 27% 22%
Online only 22% 24% 20% 22% 22% 20% 31% 12%
The courses that are most likely to be delivered either wholly online or with an
element are:
“We are moving away from
face-to-face training to >> 66% IT user skills
the provision of a range of
>> 66% Health and safety
flexible learning resources.
This needs a shift in >> 60% Industry-specific compliance training
mindset not just for L&D >> 56% Induction
professionals but for our
>> 54% IT professional skills
customers too, who need
to recognise their own
The business critical ‘soft’ skills of problem solving, critical thinking, teamwork
responsibility to access
and communication, which are offered in over 80% of organisations, are less
the learning.”
likely to be e-enabled. However, those in the Top Deck are twice as likely
to use technology for these skills than the rest of the sample. They are also
Senior HD Manager, much more likely to offer and to e-enable study skills programmes (e-ena-
Public Sector bled by 59% vs 37%).
Blended learning programmes are on the increase, with 81% predicting an

increase in the proportion of blended learning in the next two years. Only 6%
expect the level of face-to-face training to increase.

Contents
What outcomes are L&D

leaders expecting?
The benchmarking process takes companies through a review of their
current practice, beginning with a consideration of the goals and outcomes
"We want L&D to help
they have set for the learning and development function.
us embed significant
organisational growth
L&D professionals aim high.
and change."
They are optimistic that their modernised learning strategy will deliver
tangible benefits to the business and result in a comprehensive Senior Manager,
change in the organisational learning culture. Presented with a list of Food Manufacturing
potential benefits, respondents cite ever increasing numbers of drivers
for investment.
It is clear in a changing economic climate, L&D leaders around

the globe want learning innovation to improve business agility
and success
>> 95% want to respond faster to business demand (94% in 20156)

>> 90% want to play an active role in improving business innovation
(significantly up from 80% last year)
>> 99% want to increase flexibility and access to their services (98% in 2015)
– the same number want to improve the quality of their offering (98% in
2016 and 2015)
We want to use technology to help us move learning nearer to the

heart of the business
>> 98% want to play a part in increasing the sharing of good practice (96%
in 2015)
>> 93% are looking to integrate learning into the workflow (up from 80%
last year)
>> 97% want to speed up the application of learning in the workplace
(remaining high, 96% last year)
Overall, the desire for introducing behavioural change is greater

than the desire to reduce cost (although that is still important)
>> 96% want to use technology to improve organisational performance "We want to move from
(significantly up so far, from 85% last year) being a supplier of training
to the organisation toward
>> 87% want to focus on building compliant behaviours – moving beyond the
being a partner in the
tick in the box experiences (up from 78% last year)
business with a focus on
>> 87% want to reduce cost (down slightly from 88% last year) performance improvement."
L&D Designer,
See appendix pages 87-89 for full list of outcomes expected. Automotive Services
6
In Embracing Change

Contents
However, experience over the 13 years of this study has shown that many
fail to achieve the goals that they have set. For some goals, particularly
those that relate to increasing the agility of the organisation or shifting the
culture, remain out of reach for most. Indeed, the level of benefits reported
is actually lower than in previous years.
Overall, despite the investment in a growing range of technology tools,

organisations are reporting fewer achievements against the same
aspirations now than five years ago.
Figure 13: Level of benefits achieved
Average proportion citing a core list of 27 drivers

Average level of benefit achieved of these same drivers
87% 87% 87%

85% 85%
75%
34% 34% 33%

31% 31% 29%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Clearly some outcomes are easier to achieve than others. Figure 15 shows
that those outcomes linked to improving efficiency and reach of learning
delivery are more likely to be achieved than those linked to improving the
overall process of learning. Making an impact on wider business issues
such as productivity or agility is just as important but is tougher still.
The holy grail of all, but achieved by only 1 in 5 organisations, is a set of
outcomes that indicate a widespread learning culture within the business.
Each organisation will prioritise a different set of outcomes but we have

grouped them so that we can begin to isolate the factors that contribute to
success for each outcome category.

Contents
Figure 14: Five categories of learning outcomes
Drive business innovation

Influencing Share good practice
culture –
Integrate learning and work
achieved by 17% avg
Capacity for problem solving
Speed up the application of learning

Cultivating Improve engagement
agility –
Improve staff retention
achieved by 20% avg
Improve communication and teamwork
Support new ways of working

Boosting
performance – Adapt to individual need
achieved by 26% avg Increase productivity
Increase self-directed learning
Improve consistency
Fine-tuning
processes – Extend learning to remote workers
achieved by 33% avg Implement new IT systems

Inform customers and suppliers
Increase volume
Improving Demonstrate compliance with regulatory needs
efficiency –
Extend reach
achieved by 42% avg
Improve onboarding
What factors influence results?

Over the last eight years, we have consistently seen that, as an
organisation’s Towards Maturity Index increases, so does the level of
benefit reported. Figure 15 shows that those in the top quartile for TMI are
having more success than most with the hard-to-reach benefits, but still
report that they have a long way to go to achieve their aims.

Contents
Figure 15: Proportion of sample achieving outcomes in each category
Improving Fine-tuning Boosting Cultivating Influencing

efficiency processes performance agility culture
77%
65% 64%
62%
54% 54%
50% 47% 46%
37% 39% 40%
32% 35%
25% 28%
18% 20% 20% 18%
12% 13%
10% 8% 10%
Bottom quartile
Q3
Q2
Top quartile
Top Deck
Bottom quartile
Q3
Q2
Top quartile
Top Deck
Bottom quartile
Q3
Q2
Top quartile
Top Deck
Bottom quartile
Q3
Q2
Top quartile
Top Deck
Bottom quartile
Q3
Q2
Top quartile
Top Deck
When compared to those in the bottom quartile, those in the Top Deck are:
Over 11x more likely to report that their modernised learning strategy is delivering:
>> Improved capability of the organisation to solve problems
Over 7x more likely to report:

>> Ability to respond faster to changing business conditions
>> Increased ongoing sharing of good practice
>> Integration of learning into the workflow
Over 6x more likely to report they have:

>> Facilitated new ways of working
>> Increased in self directed learning
>> Reduced time to competency
>> Driven business innovation
Who is in the Top Deck?

Top Deck organisations are from a wide range of backgrounds across the
private, public and not-for-profit sectors
>> 18% have under 500 people, 33% over 20,000 people
>> Just 41% of those in the Top Deck have been working with learning
technologies for over 10 years and 24% have less than three
years’ experience
The stories of some Top Deck organisations are told in a series of case studies
to be found at www.towardsmaturity.org/tag/top-deck/. Whilst individuals
contribute confidentially to this study, some award-winning programmes
give real evidence for change and they have given permission to release their
names with their stories.

Contents
Barriers to change
While the Top Deck storms ahead, the majority report a number of
significant barriers to change. Two-thirds of organisations cite the cost
of development, set-up and maintenance as a barrier to implementation
of digital learning, making this the most important barrier for the third
year running.
Top barriers across the sample as a whole
>> 66% cost of development, set-up and maintenance

"I have found that we need
>> 62% lack of skills amongst employees to manage own learning
to ensure that our learners
>> 59% Lack of skills amongst L&D staff to implement and manage e-learning are ready to learn. Do
>> 58% Reluctance by line managers to encourage new ways of learning they have the knowledge
and skills to effectively
>> 57% Unreliable ICT infrastructure/low bandwidth/technical
use the tools you want.
restrictions firewall
Technical literacy should not
>> 54% L&D staff lack knowledge about the potential use and be assumed."
implementation of technology
The level of barriers reported changes little from one year to the next. Across Chief Instructor,
the sample as a whole, 47% recorded barriers from a core list of 15 barriers Defence Sector
that have been included in the study for each of the last five years, varying
only 2% since 2011. In the Top Deck, this falls to 39%.
One in six or more report problems that are simply not an issue for those
in the Top Deck:
"One of our biggest
>> L&D staff lack confidence in having business conversations with business barriers is the buy-in and
leaders (3% vs 19% average) skill development of the
>> L&D are too remote from their learners/internal customers (5% vs 14%) L&D department."
>> L&D are not sufficiently customer-focused (8% vs 15%)
>> L&D staff do not feel they have permission to experiment or try new Technology specialist,
approaches (5% vs 16%) Financial Services
Those with lower scores for their TMI are more likely to cite barriers relating
to the level of management support, learner ICT skills and the knowledge
and skills of the L&D staff. However, the overall proportions reporting these
barriers has remained remarkably constant for several years. Despite the
wealth of evidence that L&D staff are very aware of the external challenges
they face in such a fast-changing business environment, little progress has
been made to address the internal challenges which they can potentially
bring under control.

Contents
Unlocking potential
Top learning companies are overcoming barriers to change and delivering
results. However, few organisations are achieving across the full range
of benefits they seek. Can our analysis teach us something new about
unlocking the potential in each area?
We found that across the whole sample:
>> 31% were achieving five or more benefits related to efficiency

and compliance
>> 18% were achieving five or more benefits related to processes
and programmes
>> 18% were achieving five or more benefits relating to productivity
and performance
>> 12% were achieving four or more benefits relating to agility
and talent
>> 8% were achieving four or benefits relating to culture and innovation
What’s more, 61% of the sample were not achieving five or four benefits in
ANY area – we have much to learn from each other.
To address this challenge, we consider each area in turn in the subsequent

chapters, to understand how to unlock potential. We look at the
technologies used by those that are realising some success in each area
and highlight one or two features that have the strongest correlation with
results. We also explore what the Top Deck can teach us and what we can
learn from learners themselves.
In Chapter 8 we consider how to unlock potential within the L&D team itself
– a starting point for all leaders regardless of their journey.
We’re going to help you Make It Happen one step at a time on your
journey towards maturity.
Look out for the 'Make It Happen' box at the end of each chapter to turn
the ideas in this report into action.
MAKE IT HAPPEN - MAKING THE MOST OF THIS REPORT
✓✓ Identify the outcomes that you are going to prioritise for the short-,
medium- and long-term
✓✓ Look for specific actions that can help you where you are right now
in your organisation
✓✓ Use the findings to stimulate new conversations with stakeholders
✓✓ Compare the report findings with your own Personalised
Benchmark report
In the next chapter we consider how to unlock the potential

around building greater efficiency in learning programmes and
demonstrating compliance to industry or legal requirements.

Contents
3. Outcome 1 – Improve efficiency
earning technologies increase programme efficiency and ability
L
to prove compliance, but those seeking to increase these benefits
need to look critically at how they blend technology into face-to-
face learning. Good learning design and engaging classroom trainers
play a vital role.
Delivering ‘more for less’ has been a primary focus for people professionals
using technology for the last 30+ years. As budgets are squeezed and Only 42% on average
demand increases, L&D staff are turning to technology in order to improve
efficiency across core training programmes whilst maintaining the quality of
are achieving their
programme delivery. efficiency goals
compared with 77%
Figure 16 below shows the full range of efficiency outcomes cited by 9 out of in the Top Deck
10 organisations.
Figure 16: What efficiency outputs are today’s L&D leaders expecting
to achieve?
Increase learning access and flexibility 99%
Improve the quality of learning delivered 98%
Improve induction/onboarding process 96%
Increase volume of learning – reaching more people 93%
Reduce training cost 87%
Comply with new regulations 86%
This year we have seen that learning innovation, done well, can deliver
real improvements in efficiency so we can and should expect more from
our investment.
Expect more efficiency

“Nearly all our
>> 18% reduction in cost programmes contain
an element of learning
>> 27% increase in reach/volume of learning delivered technology now and we
>> 27% reduction in training deliver time have reduced the actual
classroom time required
Top performing companies show that this is a real opportunity to for nearly all roles.”
deliver. One of the first demonstrable benefits of introducing digital
learning is the improvement in programme reach. No longer are L&D Design Leader,
those that can be released for classroom courses the only ones able Automotive Industry
to benefit from job-related training.

Contents
The efficiency achievers

So what can we learn from those that are most successful in this area
paving the way to real learning transformation?
To isolate the behaviours of organisations who are specifically achieving

efficiency outcomes we focused on organisations who reported success
in five or more outcome areas- a total of 31% of the full sample – the
efficiency achievers!
Table 7 highlights what types of organisations are efficiency achievers.

Those in mid-sized companies, in North America and in certain
industries, such as IT and Finance, report efficiencies well above average
and have a significantly higher proportion of organisations achieving
efficiency outcomes.
Table 7: Who are the achievers of outcomes related to efficiency and compliance
Average Top USA/ APAC Not-for- IT sector Mid-sized

Deck Canada profit 1-5,000
sector
Proportion achieving five or more 31% 79% 35% 17% 38% 45% 37%
benefits in efficiency and compliance
What contributes to improving efficiency success?

“Particularly in relation to
e-learning we wish to get to What differentiates the ‘efficiency achievers’ with the ‘non achievers’ – those
a position where all staff are who are looking for benefits in this area but, despite investment in new
engaged in our LMS and see tools and approaches, are not having the same levels of success?
it as a feasible alternative
to classroom learning, To find out we compare the tools and approaches most likely to be used by
providing a reduction to the ‘efficiency achievers’ with the non-achievers. We also reveal the tactics
existing training costs and that show the strongest correlation with the efficiency outcomes and
time out of the office.” explore the extent to which the ‘efficiency achievers’ are using those tactics.
Senior OD Adviser, By identifying specific tools and tactics we can provide shortcuts for others
Local Government to accelerate performance and achievement in this area.

Contents
Tools to improve efficiency

Compared to the non-achievers, the efficiency achievers are spending
30% more of their training budget on technology and using a much wider The role of
range of technologies with over 9 out of 10 using both e-learning content
and live online learning tools to support learning delivery. Video is also
technology is vital
an important tool for improving efficiency with 80% using the medium to in improving reach
capture effective practices from within the organisation. and efficiency
Figure 17: Technology for delivery, application and influence
For the 31% achieving five or more benefits in efficiency and

compliance:
Use e-learning objects 96%

“We are providing online
Use surveys and questionnaires 94% learning as an option and
trying to demonstrate the
Use live online learning 93% business benefit – cost
savings, reduce time away
Use online assessment 85% from business etc.”
Use best practice video 80%

Learning Technologist,
Housing Association
Have a Learning Management System 75%
Whilst these tools clearly contribute to improving efficiency, learners

themselves provide a word of warning about how they should be used in
the box overleaf.
8
Towards Maturity Benchmarks are based on three-year rolling averages to smooth out
year-on-year variation.

Contents
The learner perspective: Don’t just use technology to deliver efficiency
e-learning content has been the stock answer to moving learning online for ten
years or more. It has also been a constant complaint from learners that learning
content is uninspiring (35%) or irrelevant to their needs (26%). Learners are
looking for quick answers, online support and a blended approach to learning.
Contrary to popular opinion, our research would suggest that many also really
like e-learning!
>> 47% find self-paced e-learning courses essential or very useful to help them learn what they
need to do their job
>> 69% of learners are able to quickly put into practice what they learn online
>> 36% are using Open Online Courses (MOOCs)
>> 26% have used online learning outside work in the last 12 months for non-work-
related learning
What do learners find contributes most to a smooth and successful online

learning experience?
Ranked in their top three factors by:
>> 79% the overall quality of the learning design

>> 78% online elements are easy to use and navigate
>> 77% relevant and timely for my work situation
However, one in four learners report that they cannot find what they need
When they are hard-pressed for time, time wasted on unfruitful searches leaves learners
reluctant to engage with digital learning. When 95% of the overall sample are using their
Learning Management System to store, track and deliver e-learning courses, system success
might be better measured from the learner perspective in terms of how easy it is for them to
find the learning they need.

Contents
Tactics to improve efficiency

The Towards Maturity Model illustrates that actions across a number of work
streams combine to deliver results and help build the learning organisation.
“We would like to make
Whilst it is important not to ignore the bigger picture, we have identified
much more use of blended
certain actions within the model that have the strongest correlation with
learning, increasing use of
efficiency success for the efficiency achievers, these include:
the flipped classroom model
of teaching.”
Providing appropriate and timely content
>> 82% agree that they support the skills the business needs through their
Learning Technology
learning initiatives (vs 57% non-achievers)
Adviser, Health Sector
>> 74% allow learners to access their online provision at any time (53%)
Basic design – harnessing technology appropriately
Those successful at improving efficiency are working with technology to

improve the learner experience and are leveraging the learning opportunities
across their whole IT infrastructure.
>> 73% use video, audio, images and animation appropriately, as well as text
in their e-learning content (vs 40% non-achievers)
>> 67% know what technology-enabled learning their general IT systems can
support (41%)
Keeping it clean
Clutter can slow down efficiency gains resulting in disengaged learners.

Regular reviews and culling makes a real difference at this stage.
>> 66% regularly review programmes and check that they support and
enhance organisational goals (vs. 35% non-achievers)
>> 68% clear out all the irrelevant content that is slowing down the search
process (47%)
Supporting face-to-face training with online learning
>> 45% of the efficiency achievers agree that their face-to-face training
actively integrates technologies within the programme (vs. 21%
non-achievers)
>> 45% also agree that their face-to-face training actively builds on
knowledge gained through online learning (24%)
The last two points highlight how classroom and online learning need to be
considered hand-in-hand when looking to achieve efficiencies that training
lead to improved quality. The classroom trainer plays a critical role in achieving
success at this stage.

Contents
Spotlight on the classroom trainer
“We have content that we 94% of organisations want to use technology to increase
use in our current classroom the effectiveness of face-to-face learning, but only 39% are
based courses. It is mostly achieving this benefit.
PowerPoint presentation
and pdf booklets. We need When classroom training still accounts for at least 56% of learning
help to make this content for the organisations in this study, we can’t ignore the role of the
more engaging and also classroom trainer in improving the overall efficiency of learning
allow colleagues to access delivery. They play a critical role in promoting and implementing digital
this on demand via PC, learning to support delivery and in thinking through how technology
tablet and mobile.” can enhance the learning design. They are often the people working
most closely with learners and can support and facilitate change. Yet
one in three organisations report that their classroom trainers are
Engineering Trainer,
reluctant to adopt new technology.
Utilities Industry
The first challenge for L&D leaders is to address how to involve
classroom trainers in engaging learners with digital programmes and
in gaining confidence in using it themselves.
Top Deck organisations consistently prioritise working with their

classroom trainers:
>> 85% involve classroom trainers in the design process for

e-learning (compared with 49% across the rest of the sample of
600 organisations)
>> 87% integrate technology into face-to-face learning (24%)
>> 82% ensure that their face-to-face training actively builds on
knowledge gained through e-learning courses (26%)

Contents
The Towards Maturity key for

unlocking potential: efficiency
Compared to both the efficiency achievers and to the rest of the sample
overall, Top Deck organisations are almost twice as likely to agree that
they have:
>> increased the proportion of staff now on learning programmes (72% vs
39% rest of sample)
>> increased the volume of learning that they deliver (73% vs 35%)
Whilst the Top Deck organisations consistently apply tactics across the full
Towards Maturity Model, it is clear that there are a number of the priority
areas within the model that specifically help improve efficiency. These include
providing staff with relevant content in places that support where and when
they need to learn, harnessing technology appropriately within the mix and
working with classroom trainers as agents of change.
Figure 18 highlights the focus areas within the Towards Maturity Model that
will help organisations to unlock potential efficiency outcomes.
Figure 18: The Towards Maturity key

for unlocking potential in efficiency
Defining need
Strategic alignment
Business alignment Building capability
L&D essentials
Designing learning
Transferring learning
Supporting performance
Understanding learners Demonstrating value
Facilitating collaboration
Learner choices Gathering feedback
Measuring impact
Learner motivation
Ensuring engagement Communicating success
Implementing change
Empowering learners
Engaging leaders
Work context Involving trainers
Business environment
Talent management
Work culture

Contents
The bigger picture

Improving efficiency is just one outcome, but even highly efficient L&D
teams can struggle to embed new ways of learning into their organisation
and deliver across a range of outcomes.
Top Deck organisations proactively address the challenges of limited

budget and tired-looking e-learning content to provide learners with work-
arounds that can help improve learning access and flexibility and better
meet their needs.
Table 8: Addressing barriers holding back process improvement
Barrier Reported by Top Deck

Efficiency achievers
Cost of set-up, development 66% 56%

and maintenance
Online learning too generic 46% 33%

and not sufficiently tailored
to our needs
MAKE IT HAPPEN – TIPS FOR UNLOCKING EFFICIENCY
✓✓ Take a critical look at current classroom training practice and

brainstorm with your trainers how technology might improve
engagement - as well as efficiency
✓✓ Examine your course catalogue and don't be afraid to let go of
things that are past their sell-by date - however good they were
✓✓ Ask your learners how easy it is to find what they need - and act on
their advice
✓✓ Refresh your video collection with short internal best practice
examples that can act as job aids or skills refreshers
In the next chapter we will explore how those that are achieving
outcomes related to processes and value have reduced line manager
reluctance by a factor of over 11%.

Contents
4. Outcome 2 – Fine-tune processes
Organisations that are successfully improving business processes and
delivering value are using technology to modernise formal learning and
integrate talent management. Involving leaders and other stakeholders in
learning and development are key to implementing change effectively.
The potential opportunity The average

Learning professionals are continually being asked to support the rollout of achievement of goals
projects, engage with customers and adapt learning solutions to meet the related to process
demands of an increasingly flexible and agile workforce. They are looking improvement is just
to technology to help fine-tune the formal learning process, increasing
33%, rising to 64% in
consistency, value for money and qualifications.
the Top Deck
Figure 19 shows the full extent of potential opportunity wanted by the overall
sample of participants.
Figure 19: how are L&D looking to fine-tune processes?
Improve management & administration of learning 96%
Deliver greater value for money 95%
Develop a better qualified workforce 91%
Reduce time away from the job 88%
Speed up the implementation of new internal processes or IT systems 88%
Inform customers/suppliers of new products/services 59%
However, we have seen that only 33% are achieving their goals compared
to 64% of the Top Deck companies.
Expect the speed

of rollout of new
Expect more fine-tuned processes IT applications
The potential for using learning innovation to fine-tune the formal
to increase by up
processes of learning and deliver results is exceptional: to 25%
>> 25% reduction in speed of rollout of new IT applications
>> 21% reduction in study time Expect study time to
>> 16% increase in staff qualifications
decrease by 21%
This means that implementation projects that once might have taken
five days now take four. Staff spend less time away from their day job Expect qualifications
and L&D can deliver greater value back to the business. gained by staff to
increase by 16%

Contents
The process
improvement achievers
When it comes to fine-tuning formal learning processes, 18% of the total
sample reported that they were achieving five or more of their goals (our
‘process improvement achievers’). This group are not only demonstrating a
step-change in the percentage achieving each particular benefit compared
to ‘non-achievers’ in this category, but they are also tackling the issue of line
manager reluctance head on.
Those most likely to be achieving benefits at this stage include:

“We are still working to
convince leaders that they >> Large companies of over 20,000 staff (24%)
have joint ownership for
>> Those reporting to a line of business outside HR (22%)
talent development along
with their employees.” >> Those in the IT sector (30%)
>> Those in Asia/Pacific (7%); single site companies (10%); very small
HR Manager, companies under 500 staff (11%) and those in the public sector (11%)
Utilities (Electricity are lagging behind in this category
and Gas)
Table 9: Who are the achievers of outcomes related to processes and value?
Average Top USA/ APAC Public IT Sector Large businesses

Deck Canada sector 20,000+
Proportion achieving five or 18% 56% 19% 7% 11% 30% 24%

more benefits in processes
and value
We analysed the tools and tactics of the process improvement achievers

compared with those looking for these outcomes but not reporting the same
level of results (the non-achievers) to identify opportunities to accelerate
results in this area.
It is important to note that high achievers in business improvement were also

strong in improving efficiency so the tactics and tools are likely to build on
rather than replace the practices that deliver efficiency.

Contents
Tools to fine-tune processes

Compared to the non-achievers, those achieving five or more process and
value benefits are using a wider variety of technologies in their learning
programmes. In fact over 50% more.
The process improvement achievers are more likely to be sourcing learning

content externally:
>> 62% use external best practice video (41% for non-achievers)
>> 82% use free open education resources (60%)
>> 69% use learning portals with paid-for content (45%)
They are also using more internal information systems and services to share
company documents and provide quick and easy access to useful resources
as required:
>> 84% use enterprise-wide information systems (70%)

>> 83% use job aids (66%)
>> 71% use internal learning portals to bring together related content (44%)
Learning administration is more automated, with 67% using a single sign

on process (47%) to make life simpler for learners to get to what they need,
48% using competency management systems (31%) and 89% using online
assessment (66%). There is also a clear shift to integrating management
information systems across learning and other HR business processes.
Figure 20: Integration of LMS within HR systems
Process improvement achievers

Non-achievers
“We need to embrace and
92%
create a diverse range of
70% technology to support a
55% much more agile learning
41% environment and culture.”
Director,
Health and Social Care
All LMS Integrated LMS with (Not-for-profit)
HR systems
The active use of technology to support not just individual formal learning
programmes but the overall journey of the individual as they progress
through their career will not go unnoticed by learners in the workplace.

Contents
The learner perspective: Learners will invest time to advance their careers
Learning for work is too often pushed out of the busy day as work deadlines take
priority. Learning is frequently crammed into breaks (28% of learners) or done during
lunchtime (26%). However, many are willing to invest their own time during travel to
and from work (28%), in the evening or at weekends (43%) to learn what they need to
do their job.
However, 26% are learning online outside work for their own purposes.
What motivates staff to learn online?
Continuing Professional Development is the most common topic for learners studying online outside work
(9% of learners).
Motivators for learning outside work
29% I just like to keep learning

21% To keep up with my Professional Development
19% For personal interest
16% For general career progression
14% To progress my career within my organisation
11% There is no motivation for me to learn outside of work
2% To progress my career as an external agent/contractor
As people move from one job to the next every few years, particularly in the early years of their career,
they are building a portfolio of skills and experience to demonstrate their potential value to any
new organisation.
High on the agenda of staff is the ability to build formal recognition through certification
and qualifications
60% of learners strongly agree that recognition that they have completed online programmes is important
to them. 20% find having a completion certificate an essential feature of the online experience.
They report that formal certification is a great motivator for learning:
>> 53% find the fact that learning contributes to a certificate/qualification is in their top three factors that
contribute to a smooth and successful online learning experience
>> 45% are motivated by the wish to obtain professional certification
>> 45% are motivated by the thought of promotion
>> 40% are motivated by wanting to maintain or achieve a higher certification level
>> 20% are motivated by the inclusion of assessment

Contents
Tactics to fine-tune processes

A number of tactics within the Towards Maturity Model showed a high
correlation with the results associated with fine-tuning formal learning
processes. The ‘process improvement achievers' were stronger than their
peers in the following tactics:
Closely aligning to the needs of the business – and to those of

the individual
When it comes to fine-tuning processes the critical starting point is asking

the right questions to help understanding the requirements of a programme.
Order taking must be a thing of the past for success at this level.
>> 76% agreed that they analyse the business problem before
recommending a solution (vs 50% of non-achievers looking for
process improvement)
Knowing that formal learning is part of a seamless bigger picture
Staff members do not work in the same silos as traditional HR and learning
- they want to be able to do their job and progress their career. Those
successful at fine-tuning process recognise this:
>> 38% support career aspirations (or personal job goals) with technology-
enabled learning (20%)
>> 37% agree that learning technologies reinforce the way they recruit,
onboard and develop people (15%)
Communicating continually with stakeholders
Successful organisations draw on insights from a wide range of stakeholders

as part of fine-tuning learning processes and actively communicate the
benefits of change.
>> 66% pull key stakeholders together into a steering group to support
programme design and implementation (vs 37% of non-achievers)
>> 63% ensure there is a communication plan in place for all key
stakeholders (35%)
Actively engaging line managers
See boxout overleaf.

Contents
Line managers – the secret sauce for transforming formal learning processes
58% of participants cite that line managers are reluctant to encourage new ways of
learning and yet they are critical to a transformed formal learning process.
Learners are in no doubt. They listen to their line managers and look for advice and
support regarding their learning. A good manager is the key to good engagement and
a productive team. No wonder 78% of learners find support from their manager essential or very useful
and 48% say that it is their manager or director that would most influence them to learn online.
>> 41% of learners report that it is their line manager who is most likely to influence them to learn online
>> 64% say that direct pre- and post-learning support from their line manager is one of their top three
factors for a smooth and successful online learning experience
>> 78% think that support from their manager is essential or very useful in helping them learn what they
need for their job
From the perspective of managers as learners (taking part in the Learning Landscape), those with a
management responsibility are using more self-paced e-learning, live online learning and networking
online, and feel that they can quickly put what they learn online into practice.
Building a rapport with line managers can help to equip them to support their staff and be more prepared
to take a greater responsibility for skills development.
>> 80% of ‘process improvement achievers’ agree that their organisation expects managers to take
responsibility for developing the skills of their staff (60% non achievers)
>> 47% equip line managers with resources so their teams get the most out of learning (22%)
>> 30% agree that managers provide active support in the application of learning in the workflow (11%)
‘Learning by doing’ starts with looking at the programmes that are offered to the leaders and managers
in the organisation and how technology is used to support their own learning. When the managers’ own
experience of digital learning is positive, they are more likely to promote and encourage their teams.
Although 95% of organisations have offered leadership and management skills training in the past year,
less than half (44%) of this is offered as online or blended programmes (rising to 73% in the Top Deck).
In the Top Deck:
>> 82% agree that learning technologies are used to support the way we develop our managers and leaders
(29% others) (65% achievers vs. 26% non-achievers) (0.42 Correlation)
“We have found that line managers are the most effective people to
communicate to their teams about the key messages. Media can be
email, f2f briefings, social media, pulse checks.”
Managing Director,
Professional and Technical Services

Contents
The Towards Maturity Key for

unlocking potential:
Fine-tuning processes
Overall, the Top Deck organisations (who score highly across the whole
Towards Maturity Model) are at least twice as likely to agree that improving
efficiency and process is having an effect on staff engagement:
>> 87% agree that staff can access learning relevant to their job (vs 45% rest
of sample)
>> 49% agree that staff are likely to recommend technology to colleagues to
improve performance (17%)
Top Deck organisations are defined by their the results that overall activity
across the Towards Maturity Model help to deliver. The specific focus of
analysis in this chapter has highlighted a number of activity areas within the
Model that are most likely to support the fine-tuning of learning processes.
Figure 21 illustrates the priority areas that are most likely to influence
these outcomes. These include establishing a stronger relationship
between the goals of the programme and longer term aspirations of the
learners, working more proactively with leaders and managers to support
the design and transfer of learning and a strong focus on managing and
communicating changes.

Contents
Figure 21: The TM key for unlocking potential: Fine-tuning processes
Defining need
Strategic alignment
L&D essentials
Designing learning
Demonstrating value
Understanding learners Facilitating collaboration
Measuring impact
Learner motivation
Implementing change
Empowering learners
Engaging leaders
Talent management
Work culture
The bigger picture

The ‘process improvement achievers’ are, by definition, strong in delivering
outcomes at this level.
However, we have seen that Top Deck organisations are not only more
likely to be achieving goals in these additional areas,11 they are also less
likely to report a number of barriers that are holding back their progress,
for example:
Table 10: Barriers holding back further progress in improving

productivity and performance
Barrier Reported by Process Top

improvement achievers Deck
L&D lack confidence in having 10% 3%

business conversations
Mobile learning is perceived as being too 51% 46%

complex to support
11
See page 90 Appendix

Contents
MAKE IT HAPPEN – TIPS FOR UNLOCKING

PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS
✓✓ Identify and engage with stakeholders early on when planning any

new learning initiative
✓✓ Line managers in particular need to become your greatest ally, so
make sure their own programmes are the very best examples of
technology-enabled learning
✓✓ Think about what motivates your learners and how this will
influence the way you approach learning design. Short, sharp
pieces of content; tests with helpful feedback; certificates - find out
what works for them
✓✓ Can learning systems be integrated with other HR or management
information systems to provide a more streamlined and joined-
up approach?
In the next chapter we will explore how those that are achieving outcomes related
to increased business performance and productivity are more confident in having
business conversations and more confident in embracing mobile technology as part of
their solution.

Contents
5. Outcome 3 – Boost performance
The old order in which 'learning' was somehow separate from the
everyday job is being replaced by integrated approaches in which learning
is part of what happens naturally in the workplace. Mobile devices are
transforming the way in which people are engaging with learning to
improve their performance at the point of need.
The potential opportunity

The majority of today’s L&D leaders not only want to improve the traditional
The average training transactions of the function, they are also hungry to have a wider
impact on organisational productivity, performance and even external
achievement of
customer service. The connection is clear. Learning programmes that help
benefits related individuals to do their job faster or better, increase accuracy or quality, or
to performance reach technical competence more quickly, will not only have an impact on
and productivity is their individual performance, but as the effect is scaled up to organisational
level, will begin to have a tangible impact on the business bottom line.
just 26%, rising to
62% in the Top Deck Figure 22 below shows the full range of performance goals cited across
the sample:
Figure 22: What performance related outcomes are today’s L&D

leaders expecting to achieve?
Improve organisational performance 96%
Increase self-directed learning 96%
Increase on the job productivity 95%
Reduce time to competence 95%
Improve external customer satisfaction 91%
Facilitate new ways of working 78%
Expect a boost in performance
>> Expect to reduce the time to competence by up to 15%

>> Expect to increase productivity by 14%
>> Expect to improve organisational revenue by 10%

Contents
The average achievement of goals related to productivity and performance

outcomes is just 26%, compared with 62% of Top Deck organisations.
The potential bottom line impact of learning innovation, done well, on

performance and productivity is extensive.
Having a competent workforce is critical for success in every sector, and to

be able to reduce the time to competency by 15% will have a massive impact,
especially in larger organisations where finding skilled and/or specialist staff
is a particular challenge and recruitment is an ongoing issue.
Over 700 organisations that have measured performance increase as a

“We want L&D to help
direct result of learning modernisation, have recorded an average 14% rise in
us embed significant
organisational productivity and 10% increase in organisational revenue.
organisational growth and
change, and while we have
made some progress in the
last 18 months, there is still
some way to go.”
The performance achievers Learning and

Development Manager,
Food Manufacturing
18% of the sample stand out in terms of achievement of the goals outlined
and Processing
in Figure 22 as they are achieving five or more from that list. Although
the proportion is the same as reported in the last chapter, the individuals
concerned are from different organisations with only 50% overlap.
By comparing these ‘performance achievers’ with the non-achievers for this

outcome we have identified a number of tools and tactics that show the
"Managers are engaged
strongest correlation with productivity improvement.
with our performance
Table 12 highlights the types of organisations most likely to be 'performance management technology
achievers'. The proportion is highest in retail (27%), in professional services because they can see the
(28%) and in education (33%). Scale of operations does not appear to be benefits. I think if we can
a major consideration – there is no significant difference between those in sell the benefits and then
single locations and multinationals/multiple locations. demonstrate this in practice,
managers will buy in."
However, e-maturity is hugely important, with those that have embedded
Employee Development,
technology in every programme realising the most benefits (46%), and
Housing Sector
experience also comes into its own as those with over 10 years' experience
of using learning technologies are also getting the best results (29%).
Table 12: Who are the achievers of outcomes related to productivity and performance?
Average Top USA/ APAC Charity Retail Under 500

Deck Canada sector sector Staff
Proportion achieving five or 18% 64% 22% 13% 14% 27% 7%

more benefits in productivity
and performance

Contents
Tools to boost performance

Achievers in this area are using a wider range of technologies and are more
than twice as likely to blend their use of several different learning technologies
in comparison to the non-achievers (38% of performance achievers vs 16%
non-achievers).
One aspect of technology use stands out for the achievers in this category.
They are embracing mobile technologies and supporting learning with
bespoke apps, using the technology to support productivity at the point
of need.
>> 40% use bespoke mobile apps (20% of non-achievers)
>> 82% use mobile devices (64%)
>> 87% use job aids such as pdf's or checklists (65%)
These tools are more closely aligned to the tools that staff themselves are
using to boost performance (see below). They are also more likely to be using
skills diagnostic tools (52% vs 24%) to identify requirements and tailor learning
to individuals.
The learner perspective: Staff are motivated to succeed
People naturally want to do their jobs well.
>> 69% are motivated by wanting to do their job better or faster

>> 57% are motivated by wanting to increase their productivity
>> 90% are clear how their job is helping the organisation to achieve its objectives
>> 83% are seeking out the opportunity to gain new skills in the workplace
Channelling this energy into using digital learning to increase productivity and engagement demands a range of
different solutions tailored to the needs of the learner.
And staff are learning on the move

61% of learners like to be able to learn on the go and 38% of learners are using their own mobile phone or
tablet to access the resources they need to do their job better – with a further 12% happy to do so if they only
knew what resources were available.
Interestingly, 40% of performance achievers of these outcomes use bespoke mobile apps for learning: a higher
proportion than achievers in any other outcome categories. When we look at the Top Deck, almost 50% use
bespoke mobile apps for learning compared with 21% across the rest of the sample.
Correspondingly, 28% of achievers also use mobile apps to specifically support performance at the point of
need, suggesting that access to video content, e-learning objects, job aids and much more via mobile devices is
increasingly important.
Achievers are also more likely to use their LMS to integrate a range of learning offers. Indeed, Top Deck
organisations are more than twice as likely to integrate mobile apps within their LMS than the rest of the sample
(36% vs. 16%).

Contents
Tactics to boost performance “We need to change the

perception that it is easier
Whilst the ‘achievers’ are consistently more likely to adopt certain tactics to be offsite uninterrupted
than the ‘non-achievers’, there is still considerable opportunity for further at a learning event than
improvement. The following tactics from within the Towards Maturity Model using mobile technology in
are the most highly correlated12 with success at this level. the workplace.”
Integrating learning and work Head of Training

& Development,
Across the whole benchmark sample of 600 L&D leaders around the globe, Science, Engineering
93% are looking to integrate learning into the workflow (up from 80% last and Manufacturing
year). This significant jump shows the growing awareness that the focus of (Top Deck)
L&D professionals has to now moving beyond the course.
However only 50% on average agree that their approach to learning and
development is shaped by models that support learning directly in the flow
of work. Does this matter?
Not if your only focus is on delivering efficiency and improving the process “We do not restrict to
of learning. Where it really starts to make a difference is at the stage of ‘fashion’ in terms of
improving overall business productivity and organisational performance. At models – we work with
this level of output, 69% of achievers vs 46% of non-achievers have their staff and managers to
approaches shaped by models such as 70:20:10.* create approaches they
need in the way they best
For Top Deck organisations, this shifts dramatically use – approaches vary and
percentages of mix vary
85% of Top Deck organisations agree that their approach is shaped by across different categories
models that support learning directly in the flow of work, compared to 46% of learning.”
of the rest.
CEO,
The Towards Maturity Research has found that it is not the model used, Professional and
or the percentage of activity in each area, but creating the right balance Technical Services
between learning in the workflow, social interaction and formal learning.
The tactics that correlate strongly at this stage highlight the foundational shift
in thinking required from L&D professionals to move from delivering courses
to having an acknowledged role to play in building business performance.
They show that integrating learning and work starts with the basics:
>> Listen and respond to business needs at a more strategic level

>> Consider how to support performance beyond the course
–H
ow can course design be improved to transfer behaviour into
the workplace?
– How can we directly support individuals at their point of need?
>> Get serious about setting and tracking business performance goals
12
Rank correlation efficient P>0.3 (p<0.001)
*In-Focus: 70+20+10=100: The Evidence Behind The Numbers. Towards Maturity, 2016.
www.towardsmaturity.org/702010

Contents
All stakeholders recognise L&D alignment with wider

organisational goals
“We would like to report
on all learning and Business leaders offer both their support and resources when they see the
development activity ways that learning can impact their wider business performance goals:
and provide the business
with a clear picture of >> 80% of achievers agree that if something is important to the business,
our contribution and the learning interventions will be resourced and managed correctly (vs 56%
support we have provided.”
non-achievers)
>> 68% agree their business leaders recognise that learning interventions are
L&D Consultant,
aligned with the overall business plan (37%)
Professional and
Technical Services
Responsive to building performance support at the point of need
Timeliness is essential for boosting performance – offering support when and

where it is needed is critical:
>> 71% agree learning initiatives are delivered in time to meet the needs of the
business (vs 43% non-achievers)
>> 47% ensure staff have access to job aids online or via mobile devices (20%)
Ensuring digitally enabled programme design supports

learning transfer
Performance improves when new skills are applied in the workplace. Active
focus on activities that result in learning transfer during the formal learning
process makes a big difference to results back at work:
>> 66% include activities that help individuals to practice the desired outcomes
(vs 41% non-achievers)
>> 39% use highly interactive methods, such as games and simulations, in their
learning solutions (18%)
>> 22% apply techniques such as spaced learning to aid retention and
application of learning (11%)
Evaluating progress and performance against business metrics
Workplace performance is boosted when business leaders and learning leaders

"We are moving more to
work together to improve common performance metrics:
user-generated content
and agile and flexible
>> 53% identify specific business metrics/KPIs they want to improve through
collaboration, rather than
learning in partnership with senior management (vs 26%
rely on traditional learning
non-achievers)
storage through a static
LMS. Also, we are driving >> 31% measure specific business metrics when evaluating the effectiveness of
more content to be available learning technologies (14%)
through mobile devices."
Of course some of their success comes back to the skills of the L&D
L&D Manager, professional themselves and, in the Top Deck, 82% agree that L&D staff are
Telecoms confident in incorporating new media in learning design (25% others). We
explore this theme further in the final chapter.

Contents
The Towards Maturity key “The challenge of L&D

to unlocking potential: is not only to improve
the performance of
boosting performance existing employees but
also help them envisage
Top Deck organisations start to pull away from the pack when we explore the future in order to
improvements in productivity and performance. Compared to the rest of the develop competition.”
sample, they are three times as likely to agree that learning innovation has:
>> Contributed to productivity improvements (64% vs 19%)
Operations & Admin
>> Contributed to revenue increase (62% vs 15%) Manager,
Facilities Management
Whilst the broader actions of the Top Deck organisations across the Towards
Maturity Model contribute to a wide range of learning outcomes, analysis of
the performance achievers at this highlight a number of priority areas within
the model that will specifically start to boost organisational performance.
The Towards Maturity key for unlocking performance potential includes

aligning to the performance indicators of business up front and working
with business leaders to track mutual goals throughout. It also highlights
the importance of proactively designing learning interventions to support
the transfer of and application of learning back in the workplace. (see Figure
23 below).
Figure 23: The Towards Maturity

Defining need key for unlocking potential:
boost performance
Strategic alignment
L&D essentials
Designing learning
Demonstrating value
Understanding learners Facilitating collaboration
Measuring impact
Learner motivation
Implementing change
Empowering learners
Engaging leaders
Talent management
Work culture

Contents
The bigger picture

The ‘performance achievers’ are, by definition, strong in delivering outcomes
at this level, but too great a focus on a single outcome can limit the potential
improvement across the board.
We have seen that Top Deck organisations are not only more likely to be
achieving performance and productivity goals, they are also less likely to
report a number of barriers that are holding back their progress:
Table 12: Addressing the barriers holding back progress in

business responsiveness

Productivity achievers
Past experience of learning 40% 36%

online has not met
expectations
L&D staff do not feel 10% 5%

they have permission to
experiment with new ideas
MAKE IT HAPPEN – TIPS FOR UNLOCKING BUSINESS PRODUCTIVITY
✓✓ Use job aids to bring learning closer to the point of need, and
integrated into the workflow
✓✓ Tap into the natural motivation and habits of your learners by
facilitating the use of mobile learning
✓✓ Ensure course design enables transfer of desired behaviours into
the workplace
✓✓ Focus on priorities - set and track business performance goals in
partnership with senior managers
In the next chapter we will explore how those that are achieving outcomes related to
business agility are reducing resistance to change. We investigate how those that are
achieving outcomes related to agility and talent have reduced barriers relating to the lack
of such outcomes by a factor of over 11%.

Contents
6. Outcome 4 – Cultivate agility
Organisations require responsive L&D functions to succeed in today's
fast-moving economic and competitive environment. L&D need to step
up to meet these demands and facilitate the use of tools to encourage
conversation and sharing of best practice.
The potential opportunity

In the last chapter a pivotal contributor to building business performance
was the alignment of learning provision to business needs responding to the
The average
rapidly changing technology environment is important, but from the point of
view of senior business leaders, a responsive L&D team is one that is working achievement of goals
with them to implement organisational change. Part of this is to react when relating to agility is
new processes are introduced, new products and services are brought to 20%, rising to 54% in
market, or new customers or suppliers enter the business chain. Part is to be
the Top Deck
aware of more general change and to be proactive in helping to prepare staff
to be receptive to new ideas.
When things go wrong, staff motivation and ultimately retention will suffer,
with resulting cost to the business. Figure 24 shows the full range of
agility related outcomes that the vast majority of today’s L&D leaders are
looking for.
Figure 24: What agility outcomes are today’s L&D leaders looking
to achieve?
Speed up and improve the application of learning in workplace 97%
Improve employee engagement with learning 96%
Provide a faster response to changing business conditions 95%
Push updated information to employees at the point of need 93%
Improve staff motivation 93%
Improve communication and team work 92%
Improve staff retention 75%
These goals are not easy to achieve. On average only 20% of those looking
for agility-related outcomes are achieving them. This rises to 54% of the Top
Deck organisations.
Expect to improve agility
>> Expect to change new products and procedures 24% faster

>> Expect your measures of staff satisfaction and engagement to improve
by 18%
>> The average level of outputs related to agility and motivation is just 20%

Contents
"L&D professionals need

The agility achievers
to become more business
Despite high aspirations, agility is tough to achieve. Only 12% of the sample
outcome focused and be
are achieving four or more of the outcomes in figure 18 – we will refer to
agile in the way they work.
these as the ‘agility achievers’. The Top Deck, are four times more likely to be
Impact of learning needs
reporting agility related benefits (51%).
to be fast, appropriate and
create a tangible difference Higher achievement is evident in Central Government (24%), Finance
to the business." (15%) and those in the Middle East, Africa and India (17%) – all sectors
and regions under intense pressure to respond quickly to the changing
business environment.
Employee Development,
Housing Sector
Table 13: Who are the achievers of outcomes related to agility and talent?
Average Top USA/ Mid- Central IT sector Finance

Deck Canada dle-East/ government sector
Africa/
India
Proportion achieving five or more 12% 51% 3% 17% 24% 6% 15%

benefits in agility and talent
By comparing the tools and tactics of the agility achievers vs the non-
"We need the ability to achievers in this outcome area, we can start to prioritise the areas of focus
deliver digital content for accelerating performance.
quickly at the time when the
business has identified the
need. To be agile enough to
arrange, script and direct
digital learning content and
support that with discussion
and problem solving in
communities of practice."
Training Manager,
Professional Services

Contents
Tools to cultivate agility

The agility achievers are using a wide range of tools and strategy that
have been previously discussed as contributors to success at improving
transactional learning. What stands out for those successful at supporting
agility is their use of social technologies that connect staff with one another.
Encouraging conversation
>> 57% make use of learning communities (e.g. action learning) (vs 42% of
non-achievers)
>> 57% promote communities of practices (communities to support working
practices/subject interest groups) (47%)
>> 87% utilise communication tools (e.g. chat, IM, SMS, newsletter,
forum) (71%)
“We use social learning
such as hipchat to help us
Facilitating connection create continuous threads
of discussion regardless of
The agility achievers not only promote increased connectivity between their time zones.”
colleagues but also make it easy for them through the technology they use:
>> 77% maintain file and presentation sharing applications (e.g. GoogleDocs, VP Client Strategy and
Dropbox, Slideshare) (vs. 55% of non-achievers) Product Development,
They are also more likely to use tools that engage individuals as they learn Professional and
together on line: Technical Services
>> 26% have audience response tools (vs. 19% of non-achievers)
Tailoring learning to individual need and context
There are a number of software tools to support competency management,

but they are not in widespread use apart from by the agility achievers:
>> 46% are using a Competency Management System (vs 32% of

non-achievers)
>> 52% are using skills diagnostic tools (26%)
>> 67% have personal development plans (49%)

Contents
Tactics to cultivate agility

A significant number of Top Deck organisations are amongst the ‘agility
achievers’, underlining the fact that it is important not to ignore the wider
factors that come into play across the Towards Maturity Model. That said,
analysis of the ‘agility achievers’ reveals the tactics that have the strongest
relationship with being more responsive and encourage a more responsive
work force. They are also more likely to gather and use evidence to inform
their strategy and analyse success.
Developing a strong profile of their ‘customer’
High performing learning teams at this level have a 'customer-activated'

learning strategy that is totally learner-centric. They are more likely to use
data and diagnostics to understand and respond to individual need:
"We need to embrace and >> 43% of ‘agility achievers’ agree they are proactive in understanding how
create a diverse range of staff currently learn what they need for their job (vs 28% non-achievers)
technology to support a >> 19% use electronic diagnostic tools to help tailor learning to individual
much more agile learning needs (7%)
environment and culture."
Director, Using content to connect and engage staff

Health and Social Care
Connection with the user and speed is essential for cultivating agility:
>> 62% apply storytelling techniques in our instructional design (vs 32%
non-achievers)
>> 42% provide micro-learning (i.e. under five minutes) where
appropriate (18%)
Stronger feedback related to business outcomes
More in-depth data is likely to be gathered and analysed by those looking to

support a more responsive and agile organisation:
>> 38% collect information from line managers on the extent to which the
learning points have been applied at work (vs 10% non-achievers)
>> 31% collect financial data related to the programme benefits when
learning technologies are involved (10%)
Recognise the importance of trial and error
The more open an organisation is to learning from mistakes, the more agile
they become:
>> 60% encourage staff to learn from their mistakes (vs 35% non-achievers)

Contents
The other factor that influences success at this stage is when staff are
themselves proactive and understand how to identify the right information
appropriate for their job (44% of agility achievers agree with this compared
to 25% non-achievers).
Those L&D leaders that are achieving agility outcomes understand how
their staff learn. They are using this information to adapt their programmes
and plan the actions they need to take. They recognise that staff need
opportunities to connect and to have experiences that stretch them -
something that many learners are already seeking out for themselves.
The learner perspective: Learning is about experimenting and sharing
Learners are keen to share what they know and to learn from others in turn. 61%
of learners are motivated to learn online by using technologies that enable them to
network and work with others. In the 2016 Learning Landscape:
>> 86% find working in collaboration with other team members essential or
very useful
>> 82% find general conversations and meeting people essential or very useful
One in two learners rank collaboration in their top three factors contributing to a smooth and successful
online learning experience.
>> 80% are willing to use technology to share their knowledge to help others learn
>> 61% are downloading and using apps for social networking to their mobile
Learners are, however, slower or more reluctant to harness the benefits of social media to help them
make choices about learning. Unsurprisingly, there are more followers than leaders where social media is
concerned. Even those in L&D roles can learn something from their youngest recruits:
Figure 25: Use of social media in L&D
I value the recommendations for courses from others that I see on social networks
I use social media to collaborate and ask questions with my peers about courses
I use social media to tell others what I think about a course
I use social media to find out what others think about a course
Average of learners under 20 Average of learners who are in L&D roles Sample average

Contents
The Towards Maturity key for

unlocking potential: Agility
The Top Deck are more than twice as likely to report benefits related to agility
than the rest of the sample.
>> 62% agree their learners put what they learn into practice quickly
(compared to 25% in the rest of the sample)
>> 55% agree that managers see additional business benefit from technology-
enabled learning (27%)
Whilst the broader actions of the Top Deck organisations across the Towards
Maturity Model contribute to a wide range of learning outcomes, analysis of
the agility achievers highlights a number of priority areas within the model
that will specifically start to unlock potential outcomes related to driving
business agility.
These include an emphasis on empowering staff (focusing on their needs and

maximising their opportunities to learn in the most natural way) designing
learning in smaller engaging chunks and gathering feedback and data to
inform ongoing decision making.
Figure 26: Cultivate Agility - the Towards

Defining need
Maturity key to unlocking potential
Strategic alignment
L&D essentials
Designing learning
Demonstrating value
Understanding learners
Gathering feedback
Learner choices
Measuring impact
Learner motivation
Implementing change
Empowering learners
Engaging leaders
Talent management
Work culture

Contents
The bigger picture

The ‘process improvement achievers’ are, by definition strong in delivering
outcomes at this level, they are also still looking to improve outcomes across
a number of additional areas that are important to them.
Top Deck organisations are not only more likely to be achieving goals in
these and other outcomes, they are also less likely to report that barriers
related to the level of management involvement and buy-in where learning
innovation is concerned.
Table 14: Addressing the barriers that are restricting culture change

Productivity
achievers
Reluctance by line managers to encourage new 54% 49%

ways of working
Lack of management priority 31% 23%
MAKE IT HAPPEN – TIPS FOR UNLOCKING BUSINESS AGILITY
✓✓ Use new and emerging social and collaborative technologies to

break down the barriers of communication
✓✓ Consider skills diagnostics and competency management to help
tailor learning to need
✓✓ Involve learners in the learning design process - they know what
they need and what works best in their busy schedule
✓✓ Break long and complex learning interventions into short, sharp
resources that embed active and collaborative learning
In the next chapter we will explore how those that are achieving outcomes related to
enriching culture have reduced line manager reluctance by a factor of over 17%.

Contents
7. Outcome 5 – Influencing culture
he elusive 'organisational learning culture' is difficult to achieve, even
T
for those with technology-embedded programmes. Innovation and
experimentation with technology can both help and hinder progress.
Culture change begins with the L&D team itself.
The average The potential opportunity

achievement of goals Today’s learning professionals are looking to not only provide active
relating to culture is interventions that improve responsiveness and performance. 9 out of 10
17% rising to 46% in are also looking to support the way that the organisation continues to learn
for itself.
the Top Deck
Figure 27. What culture-related outcomes are sought by L&D leaders?
Increase the ongoing sharing of good practice 98%
Increase ability to personalise programme to individual need/context 97%
Improve talent strategies to keep the best people 94%
Integrate learning into the workflow 93%
Drive business innovation 90%
Increase ability to attract talent 87%
Build capability of organisation to solve problems 77%
On average only 17% of those looking for agility related outcomes are
achieving them. This rises to 46% of the Top Deck organisations.
The culture achievers

"We want to release learning
from a culture which The proportion of those achieving four or more goals in influencing culture
is currently centralised drop significantly at this stage with only 8% across the whole sample
(learning is led by L&D ... achieving this – this rises to 36% in Top Deck organisations.
to learning is owned by
the individual)." Specifically organisations in the financial services (16%) and professional
services (16%) sectors are more likely to report achievement of benefits
relating to their organisational learning culture, as are those with over 10
Head of L&D,
years' experience of using learning technologies (15%). However, even
Recruitment Services
those who have embedded technology in every aspect of learning and in
every programme and department, still find difficulty in achieving these
goals (29%).

Contents
Table 15: Who are the achievers of outcomes related to culture and innovation?
Average Top Deck USA/ APAC Not-for- Finance Mid-sized

Canada profit sector 1,000-5,000
sector
Proportion achieving four 8% 36% 11% 2% 4% 16% 9%

or more benefits in culture
and innovation
Comparing outcomes of the 'culture achievers' (the 8% achieving four or

more culture related outcomes) and the rest allows us to identify the tools
and tactics most useful to influence culture.
Tools to influence culture

"Our #BeMore culture
Those reporting an improved learning culture within the business are twice change campaign, using
as likely to be creating an environment in which users can contribute to the video, user-generated
learning of others. content, speaker series,
development challenge,
>> 66% are supporting user-generated content (vs 29% non achievers)
all ran on our social
>> 49% are supporting podcasting (25%) collaboration platform."
Head of Social Learning

They are helping individuals access useful resources and are more likely to
and Collaboration,
be analysing what resources are being used:
Financial Services
>> 27% are using feeds, curation and social bookmarking (13%).
>> 27% are using learning record stores to track progress through a wider
variety of content (16%)
General learning activity within the organisation is also more likely to be

recognised using tools like achievement goals and badges:
>> 32% are using achievement goals (vs 15% of the non-achievers)
They are also more likely to be willing to take risks with new approaches, and
are experimenting with the latest opportunities that technology provides:
Figure 28: Exploring emerging technologies in a learning context
Culture influencers Non-achievers
19%
14%
11% 11%
7%
5%
Looking at wearable technologies Starting with augmented/ Using artificial intelligence tools
as part of learning virtual reality (e.g. Intelligent Tutoring Systems,
virtual assistants)
When it comes to enhancing culture, many L&D leaders working with

knowledge workers will find that they are pushing at an open door.

Contents
The learner perspective: Staff are taking control of their own learning
89% of staff consider that they are responsible for managing their own learning
and development, rising to 93% for those working from home, and 94% of those
educated to postgraduate level.
60% learn more by finding things out for themselves than from formal courses:
>> 82% know what learning they need (68% know how to access it)
>> 79% know what on-the-job support they need (64% know how to access it)
91% like being able to learn at their own pace and they are generally resourceful and more than
capable at searching for the information they need:
>> 70% find Google or other search for web resources essential or very useful, rising to 81% for those
in senior management roles
>> 55% find internal company documents essential or very useful
Traditional e-learning courses are valued by nearly half, with 47% finding self-paced e-learning courses
essential or very useful (rising to 69% for those who are under 20).
Staff are more likely to know how to organise their personal learning strategies than many L&D
professionals give them credit for:
>> 72% have a clear personal plan about what they want to learn and why
>> 63% know how to build a personal network to help them learn
>> 70% curate topics that interest them and file for future reference but only 39% publish curated
content to share with others
>> 73% make time to reflect on what they have learned

Contents
Tactics to influence culture

A number of tactics are highly correlated with influencing culture. Tactics for
success amongst the achievers include: "I share ideas and
case studies of other
organisations who have
Proactively encouraging ownership of learning changed their learning
culture to highlight
>> 81% of culture achievers agree that their people understand how their
the benefits."
work is linked to the organisation’s performance (vs 51% non-achievers)
>> 49% agree that staff know how to productively connect and share (15%)
L&D Manager,
Manufacturing
Making content easier to find
Successful organisations ensure that useful resources can be accessed and
found faster by leveraging technology and support processes surrounding
the individual: "We use technology to drive
>> 35% have curation strategies in place to help staff make sense of the the new strategic direction
resources available to them (vs 11% non-achievers) of our business and embed
a new culture worldwide."
>> 47% use tags and meta data to make it simpler for people to find what they
need (24%)
e-Learning Manager,
Travel and Tourism
Identifying opportunities to support learning in the workflow
>> 68% develop challenging and stretch tasks to embed learning in behaviour
(vs 22% non-achievers)
>> 63% actively encourage staff to take on new work experiences as an
opportunity to learn (35%)
Begin and end formal learning in the workplace

Formal learning continues to play a part in establishing a learning culture but
at this level culture is enhanced by interventions pre and post course:
>> 70% agree that objectives and aims of learning are discussed with
individuals before they start learning (vs 35% non-achievers)
>> 69% routinely collect information on the extent to which the learning points
have been understood (25%) and 50% collect information on the extent to
which the learning points have been applied (16%)
Actively celebrating and sharing successes

>> 46% agree that individuals are rewarded or given some recognition for their
achievement (vs 20% non-achievers)
>> 67% regularly communicate learning successes to line managers and
supervisors (36%)

Contents
The Towards Maturity key

for unlocking potential:
Learning culture
Top deck organisations are more likely to report that their staff can
determine their own paths through the learning opportunities available in
an organisation (49% of Top Deck vs 29% of the rest), and are contributing
their own learning resources to share with others (23% vs 7%). Indeed, 67%
of the Top Deck have noticed positive changes in staff behaviour as a result
of their learning engagement (17%).
Whilst the broader actions of the Top Deck organisations across the
Towards Maturity Model contribute to a wide range of learning outcomes,
analysis of the culture achievers highlight a number of priority areas within
the model that will specifically start to unlock potential outcomes related to
enhancing learning culture.
Figure 29: TM key to unlocking potential in learning culture
Defining need
Strategic alignment
L&D essentials
Designing learning
Demonstrating value
Understanding learners
Gathering feedback
Learner choices
Measuring impact
Learner motivation
Implementing change
Empowering learners
Engaging leaders
Talent management
Work culture

Contents
The bigger picture

We have identified tactics from the top performing organisations within each
category of outcome. However, over two out of every three organisations are
not achieving the majority of their goals in any of the outcome categories.
What is more, over half of the sample continue to report barriers in the core
skills of the L&D team to embrace digital change.
Table 16: Addressing the barriers relating to L&D staff skills

61% of organisations
Barrier Reported by Top Deck are non-achievers
culture achievers in all five
L&D staff lack knowledge about the 54% 31% outcome categories
potential use and implementation
of technology
Lack of skills amongst L&D staff to 59% 41%

implement and manage e-learning
MAKE IT HAPPEN – TIPS FOR UNLOCKING A TRUE “We want to change the
LEARNING CULTURE culture of the organisation
so that learning happens
✓✓ Ask how you are empowering your learners to take control of their
at the speed of need, is
own learning
supported by line managers
✓✓ Make sure that information on learning opportunities and learning and makes a demonstrable
resources is readily available, clear and easy to find difference in the workplace.”
✓✓ Don't be afraid to experiment with new technologies - this will help
build team confidence and encourage greater collaboration Head of Learning
✓✓ Read widely and network widely - to feed your hunger for new & Organisational
ideas and to discover what is working well elsewhere Development,
Higher Education
✓✓ And celebrate success!
We have seen that Top Deck organisations are not only more likely to be achieving
goals across all categories, they have invested in the skills and capabilities of their
own teams. What can we learn from the most successful organisations about
unlocking potential within L&D itself?

Contents
8. Unlocking potential in L&D

Unlocking potential of today’s people professionals is essential if they
are to support the rapidly changing workplace of the future. This chapter
looks at the skills today’s learning teams need and provides insights into
how the Top Deck organisations are addressing the challenge.
24% have the The potential opportunity

right skills to – priority skills for today’s
exploit learning
technologies to learning professionals
business advantage This year’s participants are very clear about how the L&D team needs to
develop to ensure success of their modernised learning strategy. They
have identified and prioritised a wide range of skills to help them unlock
potential within their team as they seek to understand the business needs
more effectively, design learning interventions across all media and support
performance in the heart of the workplace. They are looking to manage
the learning function more effectively and use data analytics to evaluate
and adapt.
"Many of the social learning
skills are being taught by an
However, despite recognising the need for collective team competence over
external partner."
a range of skills, many learning leaders find themselves with worrying skills
gaps and shortages.
Group L&D Manager,
Hotel and Catering When we compare the skills that are considered a priority today with those
that are currently in existing teams, there are shortages, in performance
consulting, business acumen, evaluation and data analytics, marketing and
communications. Practical digital skills, too, are in short supply, with only 30%
having in-house skills for webinar delivery, 34% having in-house skills for
digital content development and 41% having technology/infrastructure skills.
"Analysis of data is a
significant gap within the Evidence would suggest that understanding and then addressing skills gaps
team and an area of skill we and shortages is very important for those in the C-suite, but only 32% of the
need to develop quickly." L&D leaders in this study have even done an audit of the skills they actually
have in their L&D team against those that are required.
OD Manager, Local
Nearly 30% of executives said a lack of skills, resources and experience
Government
with analytics within the HR function was diluting HR’s effectiveness inside
an organisation.

Contents
Figure 30: Skills of today’s L&D teams
Priority skills (average)

Skills already in place (Top Deck)
Skills already in place (rest)
Understanding the
Personal business problem
Evaluating
impact
Learning
Business management/
acumen strategy Performance
consulting Design and
Personal skills 100%
delivery
Stakeholder
90% engagement
Data analytics 80%
70% Instructional
design
60%
Programme
evaluation 50%
40%
Classroom
delivery
30%
20%
Marketing and
communications 10% Teaching and
0% assessment
Learning
management/ Virtual
administration classroom/
webinar
Project
management Digital content
development
Coaching and
mentoring
Technology/
Facilitating infrastructure
social/
collaborative Implementing
Supporting
learning blended
workplace
learning
performance
Managing
learning Design and
Supporting delivery
performance (technical)

Contents
"We outsource the skills

The achievers
to help curate and blend
Top Deck organisations are three times more likely to agree that L&D
learning solutions to include
staff are confident in incorporating the use of new media in learning design
digital, flipped classroom,
and that their L&D staff have the right skills to design solutions that exploit
action learning sets and
learning technologies to business advantage.
collaboration groups."
When it comes to specific skills, the Top Deck is twice as likely to have
Senior L&D Manager, the core skills in place for harnessing technology. These include basic
Travel and Tourism instructional design, digital content development, delivery via virtual
classroom and blended learning.
Figure 31: Who has digital skills in-house?
Top Deck
Rest
84% 84%
63%
58% 62%
55%
45%
34%
28% 37%
Digital content Implementing Instructional Virtual classroom/ Technology/

development blended learning design webinar infrastructure
The Top Deck are also twice as likely to have the capability to integrate
learning and work. They are thinking beyond the course to the business
issue and more able to understand the impact of learning. They are also
more equipped to support collaborative sharing amongst staff, essential
for influencing a wider learning culture.
Figure 32: Skills in integrating learning and work

78%
59%
52%
41% 42%
39%
37%
32% 36%
21%
Performance Facilitating social and Marketing and Data analytics Programme

consulting collaborative learning communications evaluation
Organisations in the USA/Canada (42%), Professional services (35%),

Education sector (50%), and those with over 10 years’ experience of using
learning technologies (39%) are the most likely to have these design skills
in house.

Contents
There is an urgency by organisations to build social and collaborative

learning with over half (53%) highlighting that they need to develop this 29% are confident in
skill immediately, while one in five say they need to develop this in the next using new media in
two years.
learning design
Figure 33: The top skills priorities for immediate development
Performance
40%
consulting
Stakeholder 41%
engagement
Digital content
development 44%
Virtual classroom/
44%
webinar delivery
Supporting
ongoing workplace 46%
performance
Programme
48%
evaluation
Data analytics 53%
Facilitating social
and collaborative 53%
learning

Contents
Tools of top performers

Top Deck organisations are proactive in applying the strategies they use
to support business to themselves. Table 17 illustrates that they are more
active in providing formal learning opportunities for their own teams. They
are also more active in encouraging learning through social networks both
internally and externally. Stretch assignments and reflection regarding
lessons learned in the workplace also play a significantly role in keeping skills
fresh and current.
Table 17: Building L&D capability
Rest Top Deck
Networks They join internal groups to learn form each other 53% 74%
We encourage them to join external networks or professional bodies 72% 89%
Formal Learning We encourage them to undertake professional HR/L&D qualifications 49% 76%
Our organisation provides continuing professional development (CPD) 52% 82%

opportunities to support use of technology for learning
Experience L&D staff spend time in operational areas of business 43% 63%
We encourage L&D staff to keep a reflective CPD log/blog 12% 24%
Disturbingly, 31% of the sample overall don’t know how their L&D
professionals develop their own skills and either expect them to keep up-to-
date (17%) or leave it up to them whether they wish to do so (14%). What’s
more, compared with last year’s figure this proportion has increased by 20%
(31% vs. 26%).

Contents
Tactics of top performers

Personal responsibility and background
It appears that the personal experiences of individuals leading the

L&D teams may play a part in their success. This year we explored the
backgrounds of the participants in the study and how they kept up to date.
Almost all of those leading Top Deck teams actively sought out new
opportunities to gain new skills in the workplace. They are active online
learners, and 71% of them are likely to recommend online learning to
others as a result of their own experience using it (vs 59% across the rest of
the sample).
Table 18: Learning strategies that L&D leaders use for their own learning L&D leaders
Rest Top Deck
I have a clear personal plan about what I want to learn and why 50% 74%
I know how to build a personal network to help me learn 69% 81%
I seek out new opportunities to gain new skills in the workplace 78% 94%
I do online learning 77% 81%
I would recommend online learning to others as a result of my own experience using it 59% 71%
Three quarters of those leading Top Deck teams have a clear personal plan
about what they need to learn and why (compared to just 50% of the rest).
They invest time in themselves and seek opportunities to continue to grow.
This focus may account for the fact that the majority of those leading high
performing teams come from an L&D background rather than a business or
HR perspective. Typically those who come from an HR background are half as
likely to be leading Top Deck teams.
Table 19: Background of L&D leaders

Rest Top Deck
teams
Learning and development 56% 71%
Other HR role 17% 7%
Sales and marketing 8% 4%
Business support (Finance, Quality, Procurement, etc.) 9% 14%
Technology specialist 4% 0%
Technical/subject expert in business 6% 4%

Contents
Extended network
"We are using external
consultancy to help the Top Deck teams not only build their own skills but they also rely heavily on
team use technology the skills of those around them.
and neuroscience to
embed learning." Figure 34 shows how the Top Deck teams are twice as likely as the rest
of the sample to work with a wide range of stakeholders in the learning
design phase, including subject matter experts, stakeholder steering groups,
Senior L&D Manager, classroom trainers, as well as the learners themselves and their managers.
Central Government
When it comes to evaluation, they are three times as likely to work with
managers to identify performance objectives and nine times as likely to
work with line managers to understand the impact. Demonstrating return
on investment for Top Deck teams is a joint responsibility that starts and
"Engaging and freeing up finishes in partnership with business stakeholders.
the relevant stakeholders
to participate in resource They leverage good relationships with departments who have the skills
development is a big and insights that they lack in their own team (for example, marketing, data
challenge for us." analytics and IT).
The Top Deck also bring in skills from outside of the business to ensure that
L&D,
they continue to provide a great service. They are three times as likely to
Construction Industry
benchmark externally with peers or seek external feedback on the quality of
programmes (e.g. through awards).
Which other skills do you bring in from other internal

teams or outsource externally?
"Specialist knowledge"
"Technical skills"
"Some soft skills"
"External qualifications"
"Video production"
"Negotiation"
"Graphic design"
"Apprenticeship"
"Professional printing"

Contents
Figure 34: Building communications with stakeholders
Internally Top Deck Rest
Learning Design
Use stakeholder steering groups to support programme design and implementation:

92% 39%
Involve managers in the design of the most appropriate solution:

69% 34%
Involve classroom trainers in the design:

85% 49%
Involve users in the design of the most appropriate learning approach:

77% 34%
Formalise approach to working with internal subject matter experts:

90% 47%
Learning Evaluation
Identify specific business metrics/KPIs to improve in partnership with senior management:

79% 25%
Encourage peer-to-peer feedback about the impact of learning:

64% 36%
Collect information from line managers on the extent to which the learning points have been applied at work:
49% 9%
Working with other professionals
Have good links/relationships with the IT department:

87% 46%
Draw on business expertise in our organisation to support (e.g. Marketing, Data Analytic experts):
60% 32%
Externally
Learning Development
Understand the critical questions that we need to ask of external providers:

90% 56%
Learning Evaluation
We seek external feedback on learning quality

67% 22%
We benchmark our learning strategy and practices against other companies in our industry
51% 16%

Contents
9. Next steps – preparing for the

future of work
The world of work is changing and today’s learning professionals play
an essential role in equipping staff for constant change. However, a
fundamental shift is required to unlock potential in today’s organisations.
Learning professionals must move from a sole focus on supporting
organisational learning to the wider remit of underpinning the very fabric
of the learning organisation. Towards Maturity’s analysis of the data from
5,000 learning professionals shows you how.
The C-suite have identified a number of risks that will need to be tackled
Top Deck for today’s organisations to be sustainable and successful in the future. At
organisations are the start of this report, we saw that external risks of accelerating customer
demands and global growth are balanced with internal risks linked to
unleashing the power technology and talent. The C-suite today is faced with challenges that offer
of their people. both uncertainty and opportunity but they recognise that the answers lie not
in the process but in the people.
Peter Cheese, the CEO of the CIPD, highlights that the future of work is
human. Times of great uncertainly provide profound opportunities for
today’s people professionals. But we need to step up to the challenge.
This is a challenge recognised by the learning professionals participating

in the Towards Maturity 2016 Benchmark. They see their role, enabled by
technology, shifting from delivering courses to supporting innovation, agility
and productivity at a fundamentally different level.
Over the years, the Towards Maturity Learning Benchmark has taken
an active role in analysing the data to identify key actions that influence
that change.
The results are not just a new model or hypothesis. Top Deck organisations
are making active progress across all of the key actions and, as a result,
“The future of work reporting more impact. Figure 35 shows the typical characteristics, the DNA,
is human.” shared by 75% or more of the Top Deck teams that contribute to them
improving efficiency, fine-tuning processes, boosting performance, cultivating
Peter Cheese, agility and influencing culture.
CIPD
As a result, Top Deck organisations are unleashing the power of
their people.

Contents
Figure 35: Shared tactics of Top Deck learning organisations
Top Deck Rest
...that improve efficiency Efficiency achievers

92% 87% 87%
82%
62% 66%
58%
35% 41%
Learning supports the skills Integrate technology into Regularly review programmes to
the business needs face-to-face training ensure relevance
...that fine-tune processes Process achievers

92% 90% 92%
76% 80%
61% 66%
53%
39%
Analyse the business problem Managers expected to take responsibility Design supported by steering
before recommending a solution for staff development group of key stakeholders
...that boost performance Performance achievers

97% 94%
87%
68% 71% 66%
37% 45% 41%
Business leaders Learning delivered in time to Use activities to practice outcomes

recognise alignment meet business needs
...that cultivate agility Agility achievers
74% 72% 82%

43% 60% 62%
25% 35%
31%
Pro-actively understand Culture of learning from mistakes Engagement through stories

how staff learn
...that influence culture Culture achievers
81% 85% 74% 82%

63% 67%
54%
34% 33%
Staff understand link between New work experiences actively Success regularly communicated
their work and org performance used as an opportunity to learn to line managers
Top Deck organisations, defined by their activities across the Towards

Maturity Model, help us identify how to make the shift from delivering
organisational learning to becoming the learning organisation that we
discussed at the beginning of this report.

Contents
Six Characteristics of the new learning organisation:

Clarity of purpose – a shared vision of outcomes that matter
Holistic staff experience – a trusted brand that expects and facilitates continuous
learning from start to finish
Thriving ecosystem – individuals, managers and the extended enterprise working

towards common goals
Agile, digitally enabled infrastructure – supporting and enabling a fluid exchange of

ideas and skills
Continual engagement – self-directed, connected, accumulating collective understanding
Intelligent decision-making – using performance analytics to inform and adapt
This research has analysed over 1.3m data items to isolate specific tactics
that help deliver the outcomes that today’s learning professionals are looking
to achieve.
In doing so, we have identified three key areas of action and used data
analytics to clarify the actions that are required to unlock potential.
Transforming the transactional
Top Deck organisations have not ignored the traditional learning and
development role in providing active support through programmes and
initiatives. Instead they have combined technology, new liaisons with
business and new models of learning to transform the transactional. They
are active in improving efficiency and fine-tuning process by establishing
clear purpose and goals, working in collaboration with line managers and
traditional classroom trainers to deliver a learning experience that does not
start and end in the course.
Integrating learning and work
The Top Deck do not stop there. They move beyond the transactional to
identify how they can fully integrate learning and work. They are turning
Harold Jarche's statement that ‘work is learning and learning becomes work’
into a reality. They are actively considering how to use a digitally enabled
infrastructure to boost performance through providing support the point
of need. They are leveraging thriving ecosystems of connected motivated
workers to cultivate agility.
www.jarche.com/2012/06/work-is-learning-and-learning-is-the-work/

Contents
Preparing for an agile future
The only certainty about the future of work is the fact that organisations and
the people within them will be facing constant and accelerating change. Top
Deck organisations recognise this and are proactive in influencing culture
by helping people to learn how to learn; encouraging and enabling continual
engagement through a culture of sharing. They are also active in unlocking
the potential of their own people, harnessing analytics, identifying
opportunities and continually investing in the skills and capabilities of the
people professionals to equip them for the future of change.
Unlocking the potential in your organisation – Make It Happen
This performance analysis of today’s L&D teams has highlighted evidence

that can help learning professionals turn their aspirations into reality.
The shift to becoming a learning organisation does not happen by chance,

it is understood and recognised by business leaders who work with smart
people professionals to turn a vision into reality. The Top Deck are not
perfect but they are already on the journey and are actively building new
skills and supporting new approaches to unlock potential today.
What are you going to take from the evidence presented in this report to
Make It Happen in your organisation?

Contents
Appendices

Contents
A: Study design
Data collection
Data for this report is drawn from three main sources
1. Online Benchmark review through the Benchmark Centre

Individuals who have taken part in previous studies with Towards
Maturity were invited to review their learning and development strategy
using an online Benchmark Centre. The review is a seven-stage in-
depth process which the L&D leader can revisit repeatedly to check and
update their answers as their circumstances and approaches change. All
data used in this report was updated after September 2015.
2. Online Benchmark review through an online survey tool

Individuals with responsibility for modernising learning strategy in
the workplace were invited to participate in a two-part online review
between May and July 2016. The online review mirrored the questions
in the Benchmark Centre such that data could later be uploaded for
participants to revisit and refresh their data. The questions followed the
sequence shown below:
Figure 36: The Towards Maturity benchmarking process
3. Learning Landscape Audit

This report also references data from a sample of responses from over
4,700 learners that took part in a Towards Maturity Learning Landscape
Audit between September 2015 and July 2016
The Benchmark question set

The Towards Maturity Benchmark questions have been developed following
extensive industry collaboration to reflect current trends and thinking.
We are particularly grateful to Nigel Harrison, Jane Hart, Charles Jennings,
Cathy Moore, Bob Mosher, Clark Quinn, Clive Shepherd, Don Taylor, Emma
Webber and others who have provided input into the 2016 question set.
Many questions have remained consistent with earlier studies to enable a
longitudinal analysis over time.

Contents
The questions are of four main types:
>> Factual questions: Details of the benefits and barriers, skills and
technologies, users and locations for learning – continuing a longitudinal
study first reported in 2010
>> Forecasts: Participants were asked to forecast the changes in budgets,
L&D teams and technologies expected by 2018 and comment on their
challenges and vision for the future
>> Quantitative questions: Development costs, training costs, study
time, delivery time and time to competency resulting from implementing
learning technologies. Responses were used to derive Key Performance
Indicators in each of these areas
>> Benchmark review: Consisting of 132 action statements that
respondents were asked to agree or disagree with on a nine-point scale.
Questions were largely opinion-based and used to derive the Towards
Maturity Index™ first introduced in 2010 and detailed in Appendix C
Promotion and communications

An extensive email campaign ran during June and July 2016. The study
was promoted by our Ambassador network and supporting media and
networking organisations.
As an incentive, all respondents were offered access to the Towards Maturity

Benchmark Centre™ to revisit their responses and received a Personalised
Benchmark Report™ to support performance improvement. This report
provided benchmark data on both factual performance indicators, such as
the Towards Maturity Index™, efficiency benefits, take up and business agility,
together with a benchmark profile of their own implementation practice in
order to highlight areas of strength and weakness.
Data analysis
In most cases the analysis and data presentation is a summary of the data,
expressed in percentage terms. Since respondents could opt out of any
section as they progressed through the study, the actual size of the sample
varies from question to question. Responses are segmented on the basis of
several factors:
>> Quartile/Percentile in the Towards Maturity Index™. Those in the top

quartile are referred to as ‘Top Learning Companies’. Those in the top
decile are referred to as the ‘Top Deck’
>> Organisation location, size, industry, sector and length of time using
learning technologies
>> The job role and line of reporting of respondents
Differences between groups are given only when there are over 30 data sets
in the group and the difference is statistically significant.

Contents
Benchmark participant
demographics
About the individuals taking part
Over 600 individuals provided detailed information for this study. 386
individuals completed every question, and a further 45 completed questions
in at least three workstreams. 431 participants received their Personalised
Benchmark Report™.
80% of participants were completing the TM Benchmark for the first time.
Dropout was greatest amongst those in very small companies, those not “As a new L&D Manager
in L&D roles, or with limited experience of using learning technologies, for the organisation, the
and those reporting in the line of business – who either did not have the benchmark gives me a real
knowledge to hand to complete all the questions or felt that they were not focus on priorities to achieve
the best suited to answer. over the coming year.”
Over 83% of participants stated that simply taking part in the Benchmark
Senior HR Manager
review had provided food for thought and generated new ideas to
aid implementation.
Nine out of ten were L&D leaders reporting either to HR/L&D central or
within a line of business:
Figure 37: Location of participants within their organisation structure
Reporting to
HR/L&D central
76%
Reporting to HR/L&D
within a line of business
15%
Working within the

line of business
9%
77% have a managerial responsibility, either as senior managers in HR

(11%) or L&D (48%), or with specific responsibility for e-learning strategy
and management (15%). 18% of the sample operated alone or in very
small teams and had a multi-faceted job role embracing aspects of strategy,
learning management, development and delivery.
The median L&D team size is five staff.
Each team member supports the learning and development of a median of

250 employees/learners.

Contents
Figure 38: Job roles of Benchmark participants
Business leader/senior manager (not in L&D/HR) 3%
Senior manager – HR 11%
Senior manager – L&D overall 48%
e-learning strategy and management 15%
Content developer 2%
Classroom learning/training delivery 6%
Learning administration 2%
Technology specialist 2%
Learning consultant 11%
Performance consultant 0%
v
Figure 39: Length of time in current job role
28% of participants have been in their job role for over five years
Under 6 months 9%
6-12 months 10%
1-2 years 20%
2-5 years 33%
Over 5 years 19%
Over 10 years 9%
About the companies and organisations that they represent
Figure 40: Types of organisation represented
Participants were evenly distributed between industries and all sectors were represented:
Private sector 67%
Not-for-profit sector 17%
Public sector 16%
Multiple locations – one nation 45%
Multinational 40%
Single location 15%

Contents
Figure 41: Organisation size
4%
1-9
17% 14%
20,000+ 10-249
10%
250-499
19%
5,000-19,999
11%
500-999
25%
1,000-4,999
Organisation size varied, ranging from micro businesses with fewer than
ten employees, to large multi-nationals operating globally from a number of
locations worldwide.
The 2016 benchmark attracted respondents from around the world.
61% of participants were from the UK, with 15% from other
European countries.
Figure 42: Location of organisations
7% 1%
Middle East/Africa/India South/Central America
8%
Asia Pacific
8%
USA/Canada 61%
UK
15%
Other
European
countries

Contents
Figure 43: Countries represented in the study
Honduras
USA
India
UAE
Abu Dhabi
Norway
Australia
Mexico
Greece Ireland
UK
Thailand
Finland
Ghana Malaysia Germany
South Africa Canada
Saudi Arabia
Venezuela Hong Kong Belgium

Qatar Denmark Italy
Romania
Switzerland New Zealand

Kosovo
France Singapore
Netherlands
Figure 44: Industry sectors of Benchmark participants
Social care, early years, children and young peoples services

Chemical and pharmaceutical
Central Government,
Public Administration and Defence Charity/voluntary sector
Public sector Hotel and catering, travel and tourism
Justice and legal sevices
Local Government
Higher education Health
y Science, Engineering and Manufacturing
Automotive service industries
Food manufacture and processing
Financial and insurance Justice and legal services
Wholesale and retail trade

d Cleaning; housing and properties;
facilities management
Professional and
technical services
Police and emergency services
Utilities (electricity and gas)

other service activities Further Education (College, WBL, ACL)

Contents
Maturity of Benchmark participants
Participants reflected a similar pattern of perceived maturity to previous

years. The majority (32%) still considered that they were starting to develop
and coordinate their use of learning technologies. Just 7% describe their use
of learning technologies as ‘embedded’ across their organisation.
Top Learning Companies could be identified at all stages of experience of

implementing a technology-enabled learning strategy. However, 41% of
them were drawn from those with over 10 years’ experience (45% in 2015).
9% of those who had over 10 years’ experience were to be found in the
bottom quartile. Only 30% of those who were just getting started were in the
bottom quartile.
77% of Top Deck companies had four years or more of experience. 90%
were organisations from the private sector and 72% had between 1,000 and
20,000 staff.
Figure 44: Variation in level of maturity with sector
f maturity Novice Sporadic Developing Established Embedded
Private sector Public sector Not-for-profit Sample average
Table 20: Level of experience with using learning technologies
Years of Experience % of Top Deck % of Top Learning Companies % of Bottom Quartile
10 years plus 41% 31% 9%
6-10 years 15% 17% 13%
4-6 years 21% 25% 25%
1-3 years 21% 24% 23%
Under 1 year 3% 3% 30%

Contents
B: Organisations involved
In total, over 600 organisations provided data for this report. The following responded in full to the Benchmark
review and did not withhold permission to use their name in this report:
Abbvie Certitude LGSS – Northamptonshire

County Council
ABN Amro Chemanol
Lion Co
AGEAS Cheshire West and Chester Council
Liverpool Mutual Homes
AkzoNobel Citibank
Lloyds Bank
AL TRADE HOLDING Citizens Advice Bureau
London Borough of Croydon
Amici Procurement Solutions Coca Cola Amatil
LV=
Angela Wood Design Ltd. Credit Suisse
Markel International
ASOS Curo
McDonald's
ATOS Deluxe Corporation
MOD, Defence Academy
ustralian Financial
A Dimensions
Security Authority Molnlycke Healthcare
Dixons Carphone Warehouse
AXA Money Advice Trust
East of England Co-op Society
Bard Pharmaceuticals National Trust
E.ON
BBT Pty Ltd Newport City Homes
ERM
BDO NOMS
Eurocell
Bernicia One Housing Group
Fidessa
etsi Cadwaladr University Health
B Ooredoo Qatar
Board Focus Birmingham
PA Consulting
Bidvest Foodservice Great Ormond St Hospital
Paradigm Housing
Boots Guys and St Thomas NHS
Ricoh UK
Brambles Health Services Executive
River Island
Bristol City Council Hospiscare
RMA Group
BT PLC Institute of Directors
RNLI of London
Carnival UK Kible Education and Care Centre
Central Queensland University Lavendon Group
Cerner Corporation Lewisham Council

Contents
The business potential

The Key Performance Indicators below are average values from
quantitative data provided by over 750 organisations that have measured
the impact of modernisation for specific learning programmes. The
average values have remained very consistent from year to year, but three-
year rolling averages are presented to increase the sample size in each
indicator and smooth out any annual variation.
Table 21: Key Performance Indicators
Key Performance Indicator Average
Business Impact Indicators
Our ability to change procedures or products has improved by 24%
Our measure of customer satisfaction has improved by 18%
Our ability to speed up the rollout of new IT applications has improved by 25%
Learning interventions have increased organisational productivity by 14%
Learning interventions have increased organisational revenue by 10%
Staff Impact Indicators
Our measure of staff satisfaction/engagement has improved by 18%
Time to competency has improved by 15%
Qualifications gained by staff have increased by 16%
Staff turnover has been reduced by 7%
Training Efficiency Indicators
Cost of training has reduced by 18%
Reach/volume of learning has increased by 27%
Delivery time has reduced by 27%
Study time has reduced by 21%
These figures are conservative views on the potential impact of learning

innovation compared with traditions courses associated with the L&D
function. If just a fraction could be achieved by your organisation it is worth
considering a new conversation with your L&D team about how they could
be achieved.

Contents
C: The Towards
Maturity Model
Through our previous research, we have been able to identify six
workstreams of implementation behaviours that characterise maturity and
directly link to the successful outcomes of learning strategy modernisation.
Now, with 13 years of Benchmarking data from over 5,000 participants, the
reliability of the Towards Maturity Benchmark is established in the UK and
across the world; many organisations are using the Towards Maturity Model
as a strategic framework for change.
Figure 45; The Towards Maturity Model
The Towards Maturity Index™ is a single benchmark of

implementation maturity across all six of the workstreams in
the Towards Maturity Model. Improving the TM Index will help
organisations improve adoption and overall performance
The results for the individual statements in the Benchmark Review are
averaged into dimensions. The rating of the dimension is calculated from
the average of the individual scores of each question in the dimension. We
define good performers in any given dimension as those who ‘strongly agree’
and have scored 7 or above out of 9. Percentages listed in this report are the
proportion of respondents that ‘strongly agree’ in each dimension.
The dimensions are grouped into the workstreams and action areas of the
Towards Maturity Model using a method of Factor Analysis called Principal
Component Analysis (PCA). Statements with the strongest correlation to the
level of benefits achieved are then averaged across all workstreams to derive
the Towards Maturity Index. A full explanation of the PCA technique used is
available from the authors of the report.
Tables 22-26 show how those in the top 10% of the Towards Maturity Index
are consistently reporting more benefits across the five stages than average.

Contents
Figure 46: Towards Maturity Model Work Stream14
Top performing organisations, mature in their use of learning technologies, are increasingly
likely to:
Defining Align implementation with strategic and tactical needs of the

Defining
Need
Defining organisation. Strategic alignment supports long-term organisational
goals with clearly defined vision (endorsed by business leaders), which
Need
Need is flexible enough to shift with changing business priorities. Business
alignment ensures relevance, delivering short-term results.
Provide staff with the confidence, motivation and opportunity to learn

Understanding in a way that suits them best. They consider individual choices for
Understanding
Learners
Understanding their staff (in terms of control, access and information available to
Learners them), as well as addressing issues of individual motivation (such as
Learners recognition, career development and supporting work life balance).
Maximise opportunities to integrate learning into the wider working

context. They consider the business environment (relationships
Work with other departments and technology infrastructure), work culture
Work
Context
Work (line management and workplace performance culture), and talent
Content
Content
management (proactively supporting the wider talent strategy).
Understanding
Learners Build the skills and confidence of the L&D professionals who are
Understanding
supporting workplace learning and performance. This includes
Building
Learners understanding current skills and attitudes (L&D essentials),
Capability designing and transferring learning, supporting performance
and facilitating collaboration.
Work Focus on change management and marketing activities to engage

Content
Ensuring influential stakeholders. Implementing change effectively within the
Work business includes involving leaders for top down support, engaging
Engagement trainers providing critical integration with the classroom and
Content empowering individuals to create engaged and confident learners.
Understand and highlight business impact by gathering feedback,

Demonstrating measuring effectiveness, in terms of business metrics and
Value
Demonstrating communicating benefits of learning programmes back to
Demonstrating key stakeholders.
Value
Value
Organisations can use the Towards Maturity Model to benchmark their

learning strategy with peers at www.towardsmaturity.org/benchmark.
14
For a more in-depth article on the Towards Maturity Model – see Impact, the journal of applied research in workplace
e-learning at: www.towardsmaturity.org/article/2010/01/15/impact-journal-applied-research-workplace-e-learni/

Contents
Tables 22-26: Five categories of outcomes and the extent to which they are achieved
Table 22: Improving efficiency
Average Average Top Deck Overall reporting

wanting reporting reporting outcome
outcome benefit benefit Avg vs Top Deck
Increase learning access and flexibility 99% 43% 85% 42% reporting
benefits (77%)
Improve the quality of learning delivered 98% 38% 77%
Improve induction/onboarding process 96% 41% 74%
Comply with new regulations 86% 62% 89%
Increase volume of learning – reaching more people 93% 38% 73%
Reduce training costs 87% 39% 19%
Table 23: Fine-tuning processes

Improve management & administration of learning 96% 31% 67% 33% reporting
benefits (64%)
Deliver greater value for money 95% 33% 62%
Develop a better qualified workforce 91% 32% 68%
Reduce time away from the job 88% 34% 66%
Speed up the implementation of new internal 88% 31% 61%

processes or IT systems
Inform customers/suppliers of new products/services 59% 35% 66%
Table 24: Boosting performance

Improve organisational performance 96% 25% 63% 26% reporting

benefits (62%)
Increase self-directed learning 96% 25% 56%
Increase on the job productivity 95% 28% 76%
Reduce time to competence 95% 23% 58%
Improve external customer satisfaction 91% 30% 66%
Facilitate new ways of working 78% 25% 61%

Contents
Table 25: Cultivating agility

Speed up and improve the application of learning 97% 18% 53% 20% reporting
in workplace benefits (54%)
Improve employee engagement with learning 96% 20% 55%
Provide a faster response to changing business conditions 95% 19% 66%
Push updated information to employees at the point of need 93% 23% 54%
Improve staff motivation 93% 20% 47%
Improve communication and team work 92% 20% 58%
Improve staff retention 75% 19% 43%
Table 26: Influencing culture

Increase the ongoing sharing of good practice 98% 20% 54% 17% reporting
benefits (46%)
Increase ability to personalise programme to individual 97% 19% 42%
need/context
Improve talent strategies to keep the best people 94% 16% 46%
Integrate learning into the workflow 93% 15% 46%
Drive business innovation 90% 17% 42%
Increase ability to attract talent 87% 15% 41%
Build capability of organisation to solve problems 77% 17% 53%

Contents
D: Towards Maturity Ambassadors

This report is free to download thanks to the support of Towards
Maturity’s Ambassadors, who share our belief that independent research
should be freely available to all.
We’re the CIPD — the professional body for HR and people development. We
are the voice of a worldwide community of 140,000 members, committed
to championing better work and working lives. We’ve been setting the
benchmark for excellence in people and organisation development for
more than 100 years. Through our expertise and independent research, we
provide a valuable point of view on the rapidly changing world of work.
Strategic Partner
www.cipd.co.uk
Quality research, nurturing fresh thinking and delivering impact, are at the
heart of our publishing philosophy. With this in mind, Towards Maturity’s
highly respected Benchmark research is a perfect fit for us. By making
the Benchmark available on the Emerald digital platform we will increase
the impact it has upon organisations. We are also excited to make the
Benchmark available across our academic networks, enhancing its global
reach and positively influencing the research agenda itself.
Publishing Partner
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com
Learning Technologies, incorporating Learning & Skills, is Europe's leading

showcase of organisational learning and the technology used to support
learning at work. And it continues to grow in importance, value and
attendance year on year.
Founding Ambassador
www.learningtechnologies.co.uk
In a faster, more complex world than ever before, LEO sits alongside
organisations to help them move learning to the heart of their business
strategy. With an unrivalled combination of experience, expertise and
capability, we design and deliver a strategic mix of world-class multi-device
learning content, media, tools, and platforms. This enables us to deliver end-
to-end learning architectures that fit seamlessly into global businesses and
Founding Ambassador transform performance.
www.leolearning.com
The benchmark is a fantastic way for our members to evolve their digital
strategy. Year on year, they can benchmark against others and where it
really makes a difference, benchmark against themselves. There is a lot
of talk about the L&D department of the future and its role - measuring
performance and aligning strategies more with business goals. There is a
long way to go, but by working with Towards Maturity and being part of such
a great group of industry leaders, we know we will get there.
Founding Ambassador www.charitylearning.org

Contents
Acteon develops award-winning communication and learning solutions to

empower growth, change and development. Acteon’s solutions reflect the
specific requirements of their clients – from bespoke blended programmes
on induction, product knowledge and compliance training, to support
with improving engagement and driving change. Whether the need is a
single ‘course’ or a global corporate programme, Acteon creates learning
interventions that align with individual and organisational goals.
www.acteoncommunication.com
CrossKnowledge is an engaging, forward-looking digital learning solution,

driving business outcomes and the ability to transform individuals and entire
organisations. We provide a customized, fully integrated learning solution
and implement it at unmatched velocity. CrossKnowledge, a Wiley brand,
serves over 10 million users in 130 countries.
www.crossknowledge.com
Developing People Globally (DPG) leads the way with flexible learning
solutions that guarantee success in professional qualifications. With over 25
years’ experience delivering innovative and credible quality programmes, we
enable professionals to build their capability, drive the performance of their
organisation and fast track their career unlike anyone else. Our philosophy is
simple: Your success is our success.
www.dpgplc.co.uk
Docebo is a cloud-based, Learning Management System (LMS) designed to

increase performance and learning engagement. Docebo is embraced for its
ease of use, elegance, and ability to blend coaching with social and formal
learning. Sold in more than 80 countries and offered in over 32 languages,
Docebo offers an enterprise solution for training employees, partners and
customers worldwide. Docebo has been heralded by PCMag.com as “the
best online learning platform for business on the market.”
www.docebo.com
Dossier is a point solution for enterprise competence management and

learning compliance. Our customers operate in high consequence industries
such as health, aviation and finance. We ensure capability where it matters
for our more than 300 customers and 300,000 users.
www.dossiersolutions.com
As companies increasingly struggle to maintain sustainability of their

organisations, they recognise the value of learning to keep growing, looking
for curated, compressed learning content. getAbstract is an ideal solution
with its library of 13,000 business book abstracts in 7 languages sourced
from 500+ publishers. getAbstract is now the most heavily used learning
resource in many Top Deck companies.
www.getabstract.com
GoodPractice provides toolkits, e-learning, consultancy and development

assessments for a wide range of different organisations. These can be
utilised as standalone resources or seamlessly integrated into a blended
learning solution.
www.goodpractice.com

Contents
Kallidus is a leading provider of integrated learning and talent solutions,

with 15 years’ experience in making learning and talent a success for over
200 clients. With a passion for delivering outstanding customer service, we
work in partnership with many leading brands, including McDonald’s, O2,
AstraZeneca, Transport for London and Eurostar, to help achieve business
transformation and drive long-term performance success.
www.kallidus.com
Kineo literally means to set things in motion or stir things up – and that’s
what we aim to do when it comes to workplace learning. We work with
the world’s leading businesses to improve their performance by making
innovative, creative learning solutions that really get results. Talk to us about
the full range of digital learning solutions. We’re flexible, creative and on
hand to help no matter what your learning and development challenge.
www.kineo.com
KPMG is a global network of professional firms providing Audit, Tax, and

Advisory services. Our clients choose us for our breadth and depth of
knowledge coupled with our learning technology skills. We deliver the
measurable skills capability an organisation needs to realise their strategic
aims. We develop learning solutions that are designed with the learner
experience at the heart. We develop bespoke learning solutions and have a
wide range of simulations, bite-sized modules, and off-the-shelf resources
across a diverse selection of content areas.
www.kpmglearningacademy.co.uk
Towards Maturity’s dedication to promoting good practice and innovation

are values that Learning Pool shares. We hope that our contribution
will help create an environment where real-world research informs
organisational improvement.
We’re thrilled to extend the benefits of the programme to our customers,

with Personalised Benchmark Reports to help make improvements to areas
that are important to them.
www.learningpool.com
LRMG is a performance agency, aligning people and environments to optimal

performance through a variety of performance-enhancing solutions. LRMG
currently has offices in Johannesburg, Cape Town, Kenya, Ghana, Zambia,
Mauritius and representation in another 18 African territories.
www.lrmg.co.za
Lumesse is leading the movement to people-driven learning, via personal

learning paths, knowledge at the point of need and a rich mix of learning
experiences. We create award-winning, insights-driven digital learning,
supply courses and resources from the most extensive library of world-class
providers, support client teams with our authoring tool, CourseBuilder –
and our learning management system, Learning Gateway, provides not just
administration but truly personalised learning experiences.
www.lumesselearning.com

Contents
Raytheon Professional Services (RPS) is a global leader in performance

training and learning solutions. In more than 100 countries and 28
languages, RPS leverage decades of training expertise and the latest
technologies to design tailored learning solutions that align with an
organisation’s key business objectives and goals.
www.raytheon.com/ourcompany/rps/regions/uk
Redware is a market leader in learning solutions, which are revolutionising

the way people do business throughout systems with a difference.
Designed to get the most out of the user experience, their platforms
empower organisations to learn in a way that's flexible and creates engaging
learning journeys.
www.redware.co.uk
Saba delivers a cloud-based 'intelligent' Talent Management solution used

by leading organisations worldwide to hire, develop, engage and inspire their
people. With machine learning at its core, intelligent talent management
offers proactive, personalised recommendations on candidates, connections
and content to help employees and organisations lead and succeed. Saba
has more than 31 million users and 2,200 customers across 195 countries
and 37 languages.
www.saba.com
Skillsoft is the global leader in eLearning. We train more professionals than

any other company in the world. We are trusted by the world's leading
organisations, including 65% of the Fortune 500. At Skillsoft, we believe that
knowledge is the fuel for innovation and innovation is the fuel for business
growth. Our 100,000+ courses, videos and books are accessed over 130
million times every month, in 160 countries and 29 languages.
www.skillsoft.com/emea
Speexx helps large organisations drive productivity by empowering employee

communication skills across borders. The award-winning cloud-based
solution features blended language learning for more than 8 million users in
1,500 multinational organisations all over the world, as well as administration
service, business analytics and API for enterprise customers, from SMB to
Fortune 500. Speexx is headquartered in Munich, London, Madrid, Milan,
Paris, Sao Paulo, New York, and Shanghai.
www.speexx.com
Award-winning elearning company Sponge UK, specialises in boosting

workplace performance through the creation of custom-made learning
solutions. We specialise in innovation that works. Whether you’re looking to
achieve improved productivity, increased sales, enhanced staff effectiveness
or legal compliance, we can help you get results. We were named
Outstanding Learning Organisation at the 2015 Elearning Awards, and have
also won a range of national and regional awards for our work.
www.spongeuk.com
Find out more at: www.towardsmaturity.org/ambassadors

Contents
About Towards Maturity

Towards Maturity is an independent benchmarking practice that provides authoritative research and expert advisory
services to help assess and improve the effectiveness and consistency of L&D performance within organisations. The
Towards Maturity portfolio includes:
The Towards Maturity Benchmark Study™

www.towardsmaturity.org/benchmark
The Towards Maturity Benchmark Study is an internationally recognised longitudinal study on the effective
implementation of learning innovation based on the input of 5,000 organisations and 25,000 learners over 12
years. Towards Maturity continuously surveys and studies how people learn at work. This data is used to help
L&D leaders assess and improve the appropriateness, effectiveness and efficiency of their learning provision.
Previous research papers and sector specific reports are available through the Towards Maturity Shop.
Towards Maturity Benchmark Centre™

www.mybenchmark.towardsmaturity.org
A dedicated centre to complete your Benchmark and apply everything we know about good practice to gain
personal, practical time saving advice in one place. Follow the online three-step continuous improvement
process and benchmark your current approach with your peers.
Towards Maturity Strategic Review™

www.towardsmaturity.org/strategicreview
The Towards Maturity Strategic Review is a deeper analysis and comparison of your Benchmark against those
who are already utilising learning innovation to deliver bottom line results and success. It helps you analyse and
interpret your personalised Benchmark Report to establish a base line and identify the next action steps for
performance improvement leading to good practice within your organisation.
Towards Maturity Learning Landscape™

www.towardsmaturity.org/learner
The Towards Maturity Learning Landscape provides critical insights to help you understand
the behaviours of your staff so you can design learning solutions that can be embedded more
effectively into the workflow. It supports new learning technology strategies whilst mitigating risk
when introducing new programmes or models of learning.
Towards Maturity Sector Benchmark Groups

www.towardsmaturity.org/benchmarkgroups
Join senior L&D leaders in your sector three times a year to use the Towards Maturity Benchmark to support
performance improvement, prioritise action planning and accelerate progress. Attendance supports faster
business results, strategic and tactical insights and an invaluable opportunity to network.
Visit www.towardsmaturity.org for more information.
Follow on Twitter: @towardsmaturity
Email: [email protected]
Tel: +44 (0)208 545 2613

www.towardsmaturity.org/2016benchmark

Unlocking Potential. Releasing The Potential of The Business and Its People Through Learning

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Unlocking Potential. Releasing The Potential of The Business and Its People Through Learning

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Unlocking Potential. Releasing The Potential of The Business and Its People Through Learning

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Unlocking

Insights specifically gathered during 2016 have been published in a suite of

Previous studies in this series can be downloaded at:

See page 92 for details of the Towards Maturity Ambassadors.

Find out more about our Ambassadors at: towardsmaturity.org/ambassadors

Research team: Laura Overton and Dr Genny Dixon

Emerald Global Publishing Group uniquely marries strong roots in the

Terms and conditions relating to this report: www.towardsmaturity.org/static/terms-and-conditions/

Page | 2 © Copyright Towards Maturity CIC, 2016 London.

3. Outcome 1 – Improve efficiency  28

4. Outcome 2 – Fine-tune processes  36

5. Outcome 3 – Boost performance  45

6. Outcome 4 – Cultivate agility  52

7. Outcome 5 – Influence Culture  59

8. Unlocking potential in L&D  65

9. Next steps – preparing for the future of work  73

Appendix A. Study design  78

© Copyright Towards Maturity CIC, 2016 London. Page | 3

Foreword by Jane Hart

Page | 4 © Copyright Towards Maturity CIC, 2016 London.

Those leaders who

Jane Hart is a well-regarded international speaker and writer on modern

© Copyright Towards Maturity CIC, 2016 London. Page | 5

Learning professionals aspiring to build a dynamic

>> 56% is delivered face-to-face

>> Improving efficiency – 42% on average vs 77% Top Deck

Data from 600 Learning professionals

Page | 6 © Copyright Towards Maturity CIC, 2016 London.

Unlocking potential – unleashing the power

Comparing the achievers with the non-achievers for each outcome

Those successful at improving efficiency:

>> Integrate technology into face-to-face training (45% vs 21%)

Those successful at fine-tuning processes:

>> Analyse the business problem before recommending a solution

Those successful at boosting performance:

>> Deliver learning in time to meet business needs (71% vs 43%)

Those successful at cultivating agility:

>> Proactively understand how staff learn (43% vs 28%)

>> Actively provide new work experiences as an opportunity to learn (63%

Top Deck organisations consistently deliver more across all these

© Copyright Towards Maturity CIC, 2016 London. Page | 7

Towards Maturity’s longitudinal research has highlighted that, done well,

>> Improve agility – implement change faster

>> Increase revenue and customer satisfaction

>> Attract and keep the best people

>> Maximise resources

Page | 8 © Copyright Towards Maturity CIC, 2016 London.

Risks in the C-suite – it’s time to unleash the

• Managing the demands of overregulation – 78% of CEOs are concerned about overregulation

Increase organisational Increase organisational Reduce costs

Speed up pace of change to Speed up the rollout of new Reduce learning

Improve customer Reduce staff Reduce learning study

Increase employee satisfaction/ Improve speed to Increase qualifications gained

© Copyright Towards Maturity CIC, 2016 London. Page | 9

The new learning organisation

Since 2003, we have been investigating what learning-related activities

6 Characteristics of the new learning organisation

Clarity of purpose – a shared vision of outcomes that matter

Continual engagement – self directed, connected, accumulating collective understanding

3. Outcome 1 – Improve efficiency 28

4. Outcome 2 – Fine-tune processes 36

5. Outcome 3 – Boost performance 45

6. Outcome 4 – Cultivate agility 52

7. Outcome 5 – Influence Culture 59

8. Unlocking potential in L&D 65

9. Next steps – preparing for the future of work 73

Appendix A. Study design 78

1. The Towards Maturity 2016 Benchmark Review with over 600

2. A sample of over 4,700 learners that took part in a learning landscape

3. Secondary research referencing senior business leaders from the