INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: MRS.MELANIE L. BALANE Name of Rater: MR. WILBERT I. TANGI

Position: TEACHER II Position: MASTER TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Date of Review:
Rating Period: SCHOOL YEAR: 2018-2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DUR

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied Quality No acceptable 4
Services Knowledge and knowledge of evidence was
Pedagogy content within and Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge shown
across curriculum of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within integration within
and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
7.5%
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
lessons using MOV lessons using MOV lessons using MOV the given MOV evidence was
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by shown
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Used a range Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable 4
Services of teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
enhance learner promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading
schievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
numeracy skills shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered evidence was
lessons as lessons as lessons as lessons as shown
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the other
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 given MOV
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given given

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Applied a range Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable 4
Services Knowledge and of teaching teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was
Pedagogy strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical shown
develop critical and creative and creative and creative and creative
and creative thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills
thinking, as well and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS
as other higher as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
skills. 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV any of the other shown
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by given MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality No acceptable 5
Services Environment classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom evidence was
and Diversity of structure to management management management management shown
Learners engage learners, strategies that strategies that strategies thatstrategies that
individually or in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
engage learners in
activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
activities/tasks as
groups, in
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
meanigful
7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
with a rating of 4
exploration,
discovery and Efficiency Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
hands-on supported by any of evidence was
lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported
activities within a the acceptable shown
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
range of physical MOV
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
learning acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
environments. Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Managed Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable 4
Services learner behavior management management management management evidence was
constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner shown
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that
and non-violent promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive
discipline to and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
ensure learning- discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown
focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted
environment with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
of the given of the given of the given the given strategies evidence was
strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in only shown
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
of the given of the given of the given the given strategies evidence was
strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in only shown
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2 1 lesson
4 lessons lessons lessons
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q
Basic Education 2. Learning 6. Used Quality Applied Applied Applied No acceptable 4
Applied
Services Environment differentiated, differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was
and Diversity of developmentally teaching strategies differentiated teaching strategies teaching strategies shown
Learners appropriate to address learner teaching strategies to address learner to address learner
learning diversity as shown to address learner diversity as shown diversity as shown
experiences to in MOV 1 with a diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
address learners’ rating of 7 in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 rating of 4
rating of 6
gender, needs,
strengths, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
interests and differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was
7.5% teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy in shown
experiences.
in at least 2 in at least 2 in 2 lessons as only 1 lesson as
lessons as lessons as evidenced by MOV evidently shown in
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the
1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable 4
Services and Planning managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as
learning shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
processes to with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
meet curriculum
requirements and Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
varied teaching 7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was
contexts. sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced shown
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the given
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV
of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No acceptable 4
Services and Planning collegial participated in participated in participated in in LAC/FGD/ evidence was
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/ meeting to discuss shown
use teacher and gs to discuss gs to discuss meetings to discuss teacher/learner
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich
to enrich teaching feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as
practice. instruction as instruction as instruction as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted
7.5% submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable

least 4 LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LAC/FGD/meeting evidence was
LACs/FGDs/meetin gs as evidently gs as evidently as evidently shown shown
gs as evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the
shown in any 1 of the given MOV the given MOV given MOV
the given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable 4
Services developed, used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was
organized and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown
used appropriate learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources,
teaching and including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
learning address learning address learning address learning address learning
resources, goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in
including ICT, to MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
address learning of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
goals.
Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No acceptable
7.5%
teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
Submitted at least 4 learning resources, learning resources, learning resource, shown
varied teaching and including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as
learning resources, evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
including ICT, as MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the
evidently shown in supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV
MOV 1 and of the acceptable of the acceptable
supported by any 1 MOV MOV
of the acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Designed, Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable 5
Services and Reporting selected, organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was
organized and diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, shown
used diagnostic, formative and formative and formative and formative and
formative and summative summative summative summative
summative assessment assessment assessment assessment
assessment strategies strategies strategies strategies
strategies consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
consistent with curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
requirements. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5%
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable

varied assessment assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was
tools as evidently as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown
shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the any of the
the acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 11. Monitored and Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No acceptable 5
Services evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated evidence was
progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress shown
achievement progress and progress and progress and and achievement
using learner achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner
attainment data. learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as
data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in shown in the MOV
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV evidence was
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Communica Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable 5
Services and Reporting ted promptly and showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and prompt and clear evidence was
clearly the clear communication of clear communication of shown
learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs,
progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs, progress and
achievement to progress and achievement to key progress and achievement to key
key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders,
including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/
guardians. including parents/ guardians as including parents/ guardians as
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV
7.5% shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable 5
Services various related performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was
works/activities related related related work/activities that shown
that contribute to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the
the teaching- contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning
learning process. teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning process as shown
process as shown process as shown process as shown in the MOV
10% in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
Very Sa
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory MELANIE L. BALANE WILBERT I. TANGI ABNER C. RE
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Aut
ENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III
MR. WILBERT I. TANGI
MASTER TEACHER I

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Rating
Ave Score
E T
5 4.500 0.337

5 4.500 0.337
Rating
Ave Score
E T
5 4.500 0.337

4 4.500 0.337

5 4.500 0.337
Rating
Ave Score
E T
4 4.000 0.300

4 4.000 0.300
Rating
Ave Score
E T
4 4.000 0.300

5 4.500 0.337
Rating
Ave Score
E T
4 4.500 0.337

4 5 4.667 0.350
Rating
Ave Score
E T
5 5 5.000 0.375

5 5.000 0.500

Very Satisfactory 4.484

ABNER C. REYES
Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: MRS.MELANIE L. BALANE Name of Rater: MR. WILBERT I. TANGI

Position: TEACHER II Position: MASTER TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Date of Review:
Rating Period: SCHOOL YEAR:2018-2019

Weight per Weight per Numerical Ratings

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.5% 4 5 4.500
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 4 5 4.500
Objective 3 7.5% 4 5 4.500
Objective 4 7.5% 5 4 4.500
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 4 5 4.500
Objective 6 7.5% 4 4 4.000
Objective 7 7.5% 4 4 4.000
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 4 4 4.000
Objective 9 7.5% 4 5 4.500
Objective 10 7.5% 5 4 4.500
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 5 4 5 4.667
Objective 12 7.5% 5 5 5 5.000
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 5 5 5.000
Final Rating
Adjectival Rating
MELANIE L. BALANE WILBERT I. TANGI ABNER C. REYES
Ratee Rater Approving Authority
UMMARY SHEET

WILBERT I. TANGI
TER TEACHER I

Score

0.337
0.337
0.337
0.337
0.337
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.337
0.337
0.350
0.375
0.500
Very Satisfactory
4.484
 ABNER C. REYES
Approving Authority