Criminal Law 1 Midterm Art 11-13

2012 C R I M I N A L L A W 1 (REVIEWER) | ARELLANO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
Primary Ref: The RPC 8th Edition by Luis B. Reyes interpretation favorable to him shall
Act. No. 3815 – An Act Revising the Penal prevail
Code and Other Penal Laws
(December 8, 1930) “Where the inculpatory facts admit of several
interpretations, one consistent with
Criminal Law – branch or division of law which accused’s innocence and another with his
defines crimes, treats of their nature, and guilt, the evidence thus adduced fails to
provides for their punishment. meet the test of moral certainty and it
becomes the constitutional duty of the Court
Limitation on the power of the lawmaking to acquit the accused.” [People vs. Sayana,
body to enact penal legislation under 1987 405 SCRA 243 (2003)]
Constitution:
1. No Ex Post Facto Law or Bill of Characteristics of Criminal (Penal) Laws
Attainder shall be enacted (Art.III,
Sec.22) 1. Generality – means that the criminal
2. No person shall be held to answer for a law of the country governs all persons
criminal offense without due process of within the country regardless of their
law (Art. III, Sec. 14[1]) race, belief, sex, or creed.
3. No to infliction of cruel punishments
R.A. No. 75 AN ACT TO PENALIZE ACTS
Ex Post Facto Law is one which: WHICH WOULD IMPAIR THE PROPER
• Makes criminal an act done before the OBSERVANCE BY THE REPUBLIC AND
passage of the law INHABITANTS OF THE PHILIPPINES OF
• Aggravates a crime, or makes it greater THE IMMUNITIES, RIGHT, AND
than it was PRIVILEGES OF DULY ACCREDITED
FOREIGN DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR
• Changes the punishment and inflicts a AGENTS IN THE PHILIPPINES
greater punishment
• Alters legal rules of evidence, and
It is well settled that a consul is not
authorizes conviction upon less or
entitled to the privileges and immunities
different testimony than the law required
of an ambassador or minister, but is
• Assumes to regulate civil rights and subject to the laws and regulations of the
remedies only country to which he is accredited.
• Deprives a person accused of crime Schneckenburger vs. Moran, 63 Phil. 250
some lawful protection to which he has (1936)
become entitled
2. Territoriality – penal laws of the country
Bill of Attainder – is a legislative act which have force and effect within its territory.
inflicts punishment without trial. Its essence is
the substitution of a legislative act for a judicial 3. Prospectivity – penal laws only operate
determination of guilt. prospectively (moving forward); also
called irretrospectivity.
Construction of Penal Laws
• Liberally in favor of the accused Article 1. Time when Act takes effect. — This
• Strictly against the State Code shall take effect on the first day of
• Doctrine of Equipoise – when the January, nineteen hundred and thirtytwo.
evidence of the prosecution and of the
defense is equally balanced, the scale Theories in Criminal Laws
should be tilted in favor of the accused
in obedience to the constitutional (1) Classical (or Juristic) Theory
presumption of innocence. • Basis of criminal liability is free will and
• “voidforvagueness” doctrine the purpose of penalty is retribution
• Doctrine of Pro Reo – when a • Man is essentially a moral creature with
circumstance is susceptible to two absolute free will to choose between
interpretations, one favorable to the good and evil, thereby placing more
accused and the other against him, that
Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 1

stress upon the effect or result of islands of the obligations and

felonious act than upon the man, the securities mentioned in the presiding
criminal himself number;
• It has endeavored to establish a 4. While being public officers or
mechanical and direct proportion employees, should commit an
between crime and penalty (“oculo pro offense in the exercise of their
oculo, dente pro dente”) functions; or
• There is scant regard to the human 5. Should commit any of the crimes
element. against national security and the law
of nations, defined in Title One of
(2) Positivist (or Realistic) Theory Book Two of this Code.
• Man is subdued occasionally by a
strange and morbid phenomenon which The Philippine court has no jurisdiction on the
constrains him to do wrong, inspite of crime of theft committed on high seas on board
contrary to his volition a vessel not registered or licensed in the
• Crime is essentially a social and natural Philippines. (US vs. Fowler, 1 Phil. 614)
phenomenon
Crimes punishable in the Philippines under
(3) Eclectic (or Mixed) Theory Article 2 are cognizable by the Regional Trial
• Philosophy is based on the combination Court in which the charge is filed. (Sec.44[g],
of Classical and Positivist Theory Judiciary Act of 1948, R.A. No.296)
• The Revised Penal Code today follows
this theory or philosophy EXCEPTIONS OF APPLICATION (RPC)
• Treaties
Rules on Repeal of Penal Laws • Laws of preferential application
O RPUS Visiting Forces Accord
As a general rule, penal laws will generally O Military Bases Agreement
have prospective application except where O Diplomatic Immunity (R.A.75)
the new law will be advantageous to the • Public International Law
accused. In this case R.A. 8294 will spare
accusedappellant from a separate conviction Continuing offense on board a foreign vessel.
for the crime of illegal possession of firearm.
Accordingly, said law should be given Failing to provide stalls for animals in transit is
retroactive application. [People vs. Avecilla, within the jurisdiction of Philippine courts once it
G.R. No. 117033, February 15, 2001]. reached the territorial waters (violation of Act No.
55) even if when the ship sailed from foreign
port. (U.S. vs. Bull, 15 Phil.7)
Art. 2. Application of its provisions. —
Except as provided in the treaties and laws Rules as to the jurisdiction over crimes
of preferential application, the provisions of committed board foreign merchant vessels.
this Code shall be enforced not only within
the Philippine Archipelago, including its French Rule – such crimes are not triable in the
atmosphere, its interior waters and maritime courts of the country, unless their commission
zone, but also outside of its jurisdiction, affects the peace and security of the territory or
against those who: the safety of the state is endangered.
1. Should commit an offense while on a English Rule – such crimes are triable in that
Philippine ship or airship country, unless they merely affect things within
2. Should forge or counterfeit any coin the vessel or they refer to the internal
or currency note of the Philippine management thereof.
Islands or obligations and securities
issued by the Government of the
In the Philippines, we observe the English
Philippine Islands; Rule.
3. Should be liable for acts connected
with the introduction into these

Crimes not involving breach of public order Elements of felonies in general are:
committed on board a foreign merchant
vessel in transit not triable by our courts. 1. That there must be an act or omission,
Mere possession of opium in a foreign 2. That the act or omission must be

merchant vessel in transit not triable in the punishable by the Revised Penal Code,
Philippines.
3. That the act performed or the omission
Possession of opium in a foreign merchant incurred by means of dolo or culpa.
vessel not in transit (terminal port) in the
Philippines is an open violation of Philippine Act – any bodily movement tending to produce
laws. (U.S. vs. Look Chaw, 18 Phil. 573, 577 some effect in the external world, it being
578) unnecessary that the same be actually
produced, as the possibility of production is
Smoking of opium aboard English vessel while sufficient.
anchored 2 ½ miles in Manila Bay constitutes a
breach of public order. (People vs. Wong Omission – or inaction, refers to failure to
Cheng, 46 Phil. 729,733) perform a positive duty which one is bound to
do. There must be a law requiring the doing or
performance of an act.
Philippine courts have no jurisdiction over
offenses committed on foreign warships in
territorial waters. nullum crimen, nulla poene sine lege – no
crime when there is no law punishing it.
Distinction should be made between a merchant Classification of felonies:
ship and a warship. The former is subjected to
territorial laws.
1. Intentional felonies – committed by
means of dolo or with malice. There is
Title One
deliberate intent and must be voluntary.
FELONIES AND CIRCUMSTANCES
WHICH AFFECT CRIMINAL LIABILITY
2. Culpable felonies – performed without
Chapter One malice or intent to cause evil.
FELONIES
Imprudence Negligence
Art. 3. Definitions. — Acts and omissions Deficiency of action Deficiency of perception
punishable by law are felonies (delitos).
Lack of skill Lack of foresight
Lack of precaution Failure to apply diligence
Felonies are committed not only be means of
deceit (dolo) but also by means of fault
(culpa). A criminal act is presumed to be voluntary.
There is deceit when the act is performed Acts executed negligently are voluntary.
with deliberate intent and there is fault when
the wrongful act results from imprudence, Reasons:
negligence, lack of foresight, or lack of skill. 1. Revised Penal Code is based on
Classical Theory (basis of criminal
liability is human free will).
Felony acts and omissions punishable by the 2. Act or omissions punished by law are
Revised Penal Code. always voluntary, since man is a rational
being.
Felony violation of Revised Penal Code 3. Felonies by dolo must necessarily be
Offense violation of Special Laws Crime voluntary; in felonies by culpa,
violation of ordinary/public law imprudence consists in voluntarily but
(in some books, “infraction”) without malice, resulting to material
injury.

Requisites of dolo or malice: Requisites of mistake of fact as a defense:

• FREEDOM 1. The act done would have been lawful
• INTELLIGENCE had the facts been as the accused
• INTENT believed them to be;
2. The intention of the accused in
Intent presupposes the exercise of freedom and performing the act should be lawful;
use of intelligence. 3. The mistake must be without fault or
carelessness on the part of the accused.
One who acts without freedom has no intent.
Ah Chong case and Oanis case distinguished.
One who acts without intelligence has no intent.
One who acts with freedom and intelligence, In Ah Chong case (U.S. v. Ah Chong, 15 Phil.
but without intent, he is not criminally liable. 488) there is an innocent mistake of fact without
any fault or carelessness on the part of the
accused.
Existence of intent is shown by overt acts of a
person.
In the Oanis case (People vs. Oanis, 74 Phil.
257), the accused found no circumstances
Intent, being a mental act, is difficult to prove. It whatever which would press them to immediate
can only be deduced from external acts action.
performed by a person.
Dolo is not required in crimes punished by
Criminal intent is presumed from the special laws.
commission of an unlawful act.
Intent to commit the crime there must be
Criminal intent and will to commit a crime are criminal intent
always presumed to exist unless the contrary
shall appear. (U.S. vs. Apostol, 14 Phil. 92, 93)
Intent to perpetrate the crime it is enough that
prohibited act is done freely and consciously
But the presumption of criminal intent does not
arise from the proof of the commission of an act
which is not unlawful. In those crimes punished by special laws, the
act alone, irrespective of its motives, constitutes
the offense.
actus non facit reum, nisi mens sit rea –
a crime is not committed if the mind of the
person performing to act complained be Good faith and absence of criminal intent not
innocent. valid as defenses in crimes punished by special
laws.
mala in se mala prohibita
Motive – the moving power which impels one to
Inherently immoral and Wrong because of
action for definite result.
wrongful in nature prohibition by law
Generally refers to Generally refers to
Motive is not an essential of a crime, and need
Revised Penal Code criminal Special Laws not be proved for purposes of conviction.
(People vs. Aposaga, 108 SCRA 574, 595)
MISTAKE OF FACT Motive is essential only when:

there is doubt in the identity of the
ignorantia legis non excusat – ignorance of assailant (People vs. Gadiana, G.R. No.
the law excuses no one from compliance 92509, March 13, 1991, 195 SCRA 211,
therewith. (Art. 3, New Civil Code) 214215)
in ascertaining the truth between two
ignorantia facti excusat – ignorance or mistake antagonistic theories or version of killing
of fact relieves the accused from criminal liability. (People vs. BoholstCaballero, No. L
23249, November 25, 1974, 61 SCRA
180, 191)

the identification of the accused was persons or property, were it not for
from unreliable source (People vs. the inherent impossibility of its
Beltran, No. L31860, November 29, accomplishment or an account of the
1974, 61 SCRA 246, 254255) employment of inadequate or
there are no witnesses to the crime ineffectual means.
(People vs. Melgar, No. L75268,
January 29, 1988, 157 SCRA 718, 725)
evidence is merely circumstantial Requisites of Article 4(1):
(People vs. Oquiño, No. L37483, June • Intentional felony has been committed
24, 1983, 122 SCRA 797, 808) • Wrong done to aggrieved party
O DIRECT
When motive is material O NATURAL consequence
(Atty.L.Macababbad) O LOGICAL
1. the act brings 2 or more crimes
2. question of accidental or intentional “el que causa de la causa es causa del mal
3. need to determine the nature of crime causado” he who is the cause of the cause is
4. claims for selfdefense the cause of the evil caused
5. perpetrator not identified
EXCEPTION: when there is an intervening or
Motive is established by testimony of witnesses a supervening cause or event
on the acts or statements of the accused before
or immediately after the commission of the When a person has not committed a felony, he is
offense. Such deeds or words may indicate the not criminally liable for the result which is not
motive. (Barrioquinto vs. Fernandez, 82 Phil. intended.
642, 649)
Error in Personae – mistake in the identity
Disclosure of the motive is an aid in completing (requires 2 persons)
the proof of the commission of the crime.
Aberratio Ictus – mistake in the blow
But proof of motive is not sufficient to support a (requires 3 persons)
conviction.
Praeter Intentionem – injurious result is greater
(requires 2 persons) than that intended
At any rate, motive becomes relevant, and its
absence may assume determinative significance,
only when the accused has not been positively Any person who creates in another’s mind an
identified, and proof thereof becomes essential immediate sense of danger which causes the
only when evidence of commission of the crime is latter to do something resulting in the latter’s
purely circumstantial or is inconclusive. This injuries, is liable for the resulting injuries.
Court has time and again ruled that lack of motive
does not preclude conviction when the crime and
the participation of the accused therein are The felony committed must be the proximate
definitely established. People vs. Ballinas, 202 cause of the resulting injury.
SCRA 516, 524 (1991)
Impossible crimes [Article 4(2)], requisites:
Lack of motive may be an aid in showing the
innocence of the accused. 1. The act performed would be offense
against persons or property;
Art. 4. Criminal liability. — Criminal liability 2. The act was done with evil intent;
shall be incurred:
3. That its accomplishment is inherently
1. By any person committing a felony impossible, or that the means employed
(delito) although the wrongful act is either inadequate or ineffectual;
done be different from that which he
intended.
2. By any person performing an act
which would be an offense against

4. That the act performed should not render the proper decision, and shall report
constitute a violation of another to the Chief Executive, through the
provision of the Revised Penal Code. Department of Justice, the reasons which
induce the court to believe that said act
In our jurisdiction, impossible crimes are should be made the subject of legislation.
recognized. The impossibility of accomplishing
the criminal intent is not merely a defense, but an In the same way, the court shall submit to the
act penalized by itself. Furthermore, the phrase
Chief Executive, through the Department of
"inherent impossibility" that is found in Article
4(2) of the Revised Penal Code makes no Justice, such statement as may be deemed
distinction between factual or physical proper, without suspending the execution of
impossibility and legal impossibility. Intod vs. CA, the sentence, when a strict enforcement of
215 SCRA 52 the provisions of this Code would result in
the imposition of a clearly excessive penalty,
It is but, a considered opinion of one taking into consideration the degree of
Criminal Law Book author (Abelardo C. malice and the injury caused by the offense.
Estrada) that the Supreme Court erroneously
applied Art. 4(2) in the case above (Intod vs. The first paragraph contemplates a trial of
CA). The law applicable should be Art.4(1). criminal case not punishable by law, requiring
The accused are liable for the crime that the judge to make a report to the Chief
resulted from their felonious act, that is, Executive, through the Secretary of Justice,
destruction of house, which is Malicious stating the reasons which induce him to believe
Mischief (Art. 327) as a result. that the said act should be made the subject of
penal legislation.
Crimes Against Persons:
• Parricide (Art. 246) The second paragraph, in case of excessive
• Murder (Art. 248) penalties, requires the judge to submit a
• Homicide (Art. 249) statement to the Chief Executive, through the
• Infanticide (Art. 255) Secretary of Justice, recommending executive
• Abortion (Arts. 256259) clemency, in consideration of the degree of
• Duel (Arts. 260 and 261) malice and the injury caused by the offense.
• Physical Injuries (Arts. 262266) This shall be made without suspending the
• Rape (Arts. 266A, B, C, and D) sentence.
Crimes Against Properties: Art. 6. Consummated, frustrated, and

• Robbery (Arts. 294, 297, 298, 300, 302 attempted felonies. — Consummated
and 303) felonies as well as those which are frustrated
• Brigandage (Arts. 306 and 307) and attempted, are punishable.
• Theft (Arts. 308, 310 and 311)
• Usurpation (Arts. 312 and 313) A felony is consummated when all the
• Culpable Insolvency (Art. 314) elements necessary for its execution and
• Swindling (Estafa) and other deceits accomplishment are present; and it is
(Arts. 315318) frustrated when the offender performs all the
• Chattel Mortgage (Art. 319) acts of execution which would produce the
• Arson and other crimes involving felony as a consequence but which,
destruction (Arts. 320326) nevertheless, do not produce it by reason of
• Malicious Mischief (Arts. 327331) causes independent of the will of the
perpetrator.
Art. 5. Duty of the court in connection with
acts which should be repressed but which There is an attempt when the offender
are not covered by the law, and in cases of commences the commission of a felony
excessive penalties. directly or over acts, and does not perform
all the acts of execution which should
— Whenever a court has knowledge of any produce the felony by reason of some cause
act which it may deem proper to repress and or accident other than this own spontaneous
which is not punishable by law, it shall desistance.

In case of an attempted crime, the offender never

STAGES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF FELONY passes the subjective phase in the commission of
Acts Stage the crime. The offender does not arrive at the
point of performing all of the acts of execution
Internal Acts (intention and effect
which should produce the crime. He is stopped
must concur) short of that point by some cause apart from his
Preparatory acts (ordinarily are not voluntary desistance. People vs. Caballero, 400
punishable) SCRA, 424 (2003)
Overt acts – external act No crime yet;
exception Art.304 of
RPC (for robbery) Overt act – is some physical activity or deed,
Overt acts – external act indicating the intention to commit a particular
No felony yet crime, more than a mere planning or
have direct connection
(subjective phase) preparation, which if carried to its complete
with the crime
Acts of Execution – termination following its natural course, without
commenced, incomplete No felony committed being frustrated by external obstacles nor by
due to spontaneous (subjective phase) voluntary desistance of the perpetrator, will
logically and necessarily ripen into a concrete
desistance
offense.
Acts of Execution –
incomplete due to
Attempted Felony Frustrated felony – the offender performs all
accident or cause other
than own desistance the acts of execution which would produce the
felony as a consequence but which,
Acts of Execution – Other inferior
nevertheless, do not produce it by reason of
completed w/o producing felonies may be causes independent of the will of the perpetrator
felony due to own applicable; ‘not
spontaneous desistance attempted’ Elements of frustrated felony:
Acts of Execution –
Completed w/o
• The offender performs all the acts of
producing felony due to Frustrated Felony execution;
accident or cause other
than own desistance
• All the acts performed would produce
Acts of Execution – the felony as a consequence;
Consummated
Completed producing
Felony
felony intended • But the felony is not produced;
Elements of attempted felony:
• By reason of causes independent of the
will of the perpetrator.
• The offender commences the
commission of the felony directly by Stages NOT necessary for the following
overt acts; cases:
• He does not perform all the acts of • Formal crimes – consummated in one
execution which should produce the instant, no attempt (e.g. slander, sale of
felony; prohibited drugs)
• The offender’s act is not stopped by his • Crimes consummated by attempt by
own spontaneous desistance;
mere attempt or proposal or by overt
• The nonperformance of all acts of acts (e.g. treason, corruption of minors)
execution was due to cause or accident • Felony by omission – there can be no
other than his spontaneous desistance. attempted stage
• Crimes requiring intervention of two
It must be borne in mind, however, that the persons to commit them are
spontaneous desistance of a malefactor exempts
consummated by mere agreement
him from criminal liability for the intended crime
but it does not exempt him from the crime (betting in sports contests, corruption of
committed by him before his desistance. (People public officer)
vs. Lizada, 396 SCRA 62 (2003) • Material crimes (e.g. no frustrated rape)

Added by Atty. L. Macababbad Stages of Execution of Rape

• When punished by special laws
• Impossible crimes The AntiRape Law transformed and reclassified
rape as a felony against persons, under Title
Attempted Frustrated Eight, Chapter Two, Book II of the same Code. The
Offender has not Offender has reached criminalization of the penetration of a person’s
passed the subjective the objective phase sex organ or anal orifice and the insertion of a
person’s penis into the mouth or anal orifice of
phase another, whether man or woman, and the
Offender merely Offender performed classification thereof as rape (sexual assault)
commences, overt acts all acts of execution were designed to prevent not only the physical
No mortal wound Mortal wound was injuries inflicted on the victim but also his
inflicted inflicted subjection to personal indignity and degradation
and affront to the psychological integrity
In both, the offender has not accomplished associated with an unwanted violation. People vs.
Nequia, 412 SCRA 628 (2003)
his criminal purpose.
EVIL INTENT In cases of rape where there is a positive

Attempted/Frustrated testimony and a medical certificate, both should
Impossible crimes in all respects complement each other; otherwise,
crimes to rely on the testimonial evidence alone, in utter
Possible of Cannot be disregard of the manifest variance in the medical
accomplishment accomplished certificate, would be productive of unwarranted or
What prevented the Accomplishment is even mischievous results. It is necessary to
accomplishment is the inherently impossible carefully ascertain whether the penis of the
intervention of certain or because the means accused in reality entered the labial threshold of
the female organ to accurately conclude that rape
cause or accident employed by the
was consummated. Failing in this, the thin line
which the offender had offender is inadequate that separates attempted rape from consummated
no part or ineffectual rape will significantly disappear.
Consummated felony – all the elements Under Art. 6, in relation to Art. 335, of the Revised
necessary for its execution and accomplishment Penal Code, rape is attempted when the offender
are present. commences the commission of rape directly by
overt acts, and does not perform all the acts of
In determining the stage of felony, consider: execution which should produce the crime of rape
by reason of some cause or accident other than
• Nature of offense his own spontaneous desistance. All the elements
• Elements constituting felony of attempted rape and only of attempted rape are
• Manner of committing present in the instant case, hence, the accused
should be punished only for it. People vs.
All are deemed to be consummated: Campuhan, 329 SCRA 270 (2000)
• Theft there is no crime of frustrated Art. 7. When light felonies are punishable. —
theft. Light felonies are punishable only when they
have been consummated, with the exception
 Robbery there is no frustrated of those committed against person or
robbery even if the offender did not property.
materially benefited.
Light felonies under the Revised Penal Code:
• Arson even with partial or incomplete • Slight physical injuries (Art.266)
damages. • Theft (Art. 309, par.7,8)
• Alteration of boundary marks (Art.313)
 Impossible crimes there are NO • Malicious mischief (Art. 328 par.3; Art
attempted or frustrated impossible 329, par.3)
crimes. • Intriguing against honor (Art. 364)
Arresto menor (imprisonment 130 days), or

fine not exceeding P200.00)

CASES OF CONSPIRACY
The commission of felonies against persons or
property presupposes in the offender moral Direct proof is not essential to establish
depravity. conspiracy; which may be inferred from the acts
of the assailants before, during and after the
commission of the crime. In a conspiracy, it is not
Art. 8. Conspiracy and proposal to commit necessary to show that all the conspirators
felony. — Conspiracy and proposal to actually committed all the elements of the crime
commit felony are punishable only in the charged; what is important is that all of them
cases in which the law specially provides a performed specific acts with such closeness and
penalty therefor. coordination as to indicate an unmistakably
common purpose or design to commit the crime.
A conspiracy exists when two or more Thus, the act of one becomes the act of all, and
each of them will thereby be deemed equally
persons come to an agreement concerning guilty of all the crimes committed. People vs.
the commission of a felony and decide to Caraang, 418 SCRA 321 (2003)
commit it.
There is proposal when the person who has Conspiracy must be proved as convincingly as
decided to commit a felony proposes its the criminal act itself. Like any element of the
execution to some other person or persons. offense charged, conspiracy must be established
by proof beyond reasonable doubt. Conspiracy
A mere conspiracy or proposal is not a felony, may be shown through circumstantial evidence;
except when the law specifically provides a deduced from the mode and manner in which the
penalty therefor. offense was perpetrated; or inferred from the acts
of the accused pointing to a joint purpose and
design, a concerted action, and a community of
Requisites of conspiracy: interest. People vs. Gregorio, 412 SCRA 90 (2003)
• That two or more persons came to an
agreement;
• The agreement concerned the
commission of a felony; Previous agreement to commit a crime is not
essential to establish conspiracy, it being
• That the execution of the felony be sufficient that the condition attending its
decided upon. commission and the acts executed may be
indicative of a common design to accomplish a
Cases where mere conspiracy is a felony: criminal purpose and objective. If there is a chain
• Conspiracy x x x to commit treason of circumstances to that effect, conspiracy has
(Art.115) been established. People vs. Esponilla, 404 SCRA
421 (2003)
• Conspiracy x x x to commit coup d’etat,
rebellion or insurrection (Art.136)
• Conspiracy to commit sedition (Art.141)
• Monopolies and combinations in The existence of conspiracy cannot be presumed.
restraint of trade (Art.186) Similar to the physical act constituting the crime
itself, the elements of conspiracy must be proven
Quantum of evidence: A conspiracy must be beyond reasonable doubt. People vs. Samudio, 353
established by positive and conclusive evidence. SCRA 746 (2001)
Requisites of proposal:
• That a person has decided to commit a
felony, and Conspiracy is always predominantly mental in
composition because it consists primarily of a
• That he proposes its execution to some
meeting of minds and intent. Conspiracy must be
other person or persons.
proved with the same quantum of evidence as the
crime itself, that is, by proof beyond reasonable
Cases where mere proposal is a felony: doubt. However, direct proof is not required.
• x x x proposal to commit treason Conspiracy may be proved by circumstantial
(Art.115) evidence. People vs. Caballero, 400 SCRA 424
• x x x proposal to commit coup d’etat, (2003)
rebellion or insurrection (Art.136)

Implied Conspiracy special laws are not subject to the provisions

of this Code. This Code shall be
In conspiracy, direct proof of a previous supplementary to such laws, unless the
agreement to commit a crime is not necessary. It latter should specially provide the contrary.
may be deduced from the mode and manner by
which the offense was perpetrated, or inferred Special law is a statute enacted by the
from the acts of the accused themselves when Legislative branch, penal in character, which is
such point to a joint purpose and design, not an amendment of the Revised Penal Code.
concerted action and community of interest.
Conspiracy may be inferred from the conduct of
the accused before, during or after the Chapter Two
commission of the crime. People vs. Liad, 355 JUSTIFYING CIRCUMSTANCES
SCRA 11 (2001) AND CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH EXEMPT
FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY
Art. 9. Grave felonies, less grave felonies
and light felonies. — Grave felonies are Art. 11. Justifying circumstances. — The
those to which the law attaches the capital following do not incur any criminal liability:
punishment or penalties which in any of their
periods are afflictive, in accordance with 1. Anyone who acts in defense of his person
Article 25 of this Code. or rights, provided that the following
circumstances concur:
Less grave felonies are those which the law
punishes with penalties which in their First. Unlawful aggression;
maximum period are correctional, in Second. Reasonable necessity of the means
accordance with the abovementioned article. employed to prevent or repel it;
Third. Lack of sufficient provocation on the
part of the person defending himself.
Light felonies are those infractions of law for
the commission of which a penalty of arresto 2. Anyone who acts in defense of the person
menor or a fine not exceeding 200 pesos or or rights of his spouse, ascendants,
both, is provided. descendants, or legitimate, natural or
adopted brothers or sisters, or his relatives
Capital punishment: by affinity in the same degrees and those by
Death (now prohibited under R.A. 9346) consanguinity within the fourth civil degree,
provided that the first and second requisites
Afflictive penalties: (x>P6,000.00) prescribed in the next preceding
Reclusion perpetua circumstance are present, and the further
Reclusion temporal requisite, in case the provocation was given
Perpetual or temporary absolute by the person attacked, that the one making
disqualification defense had no part therein.
Perpetual or temporary special
disqualification 3. Anyone who acts in defense of the person
Prision mayor or rights of a stranger, provided that the first
and second requisites mentioned in the first
Correctional penalties: (P200.00>x>P6,000.00) circumstance of this Art. are present and that
Prision correccional the person defending be not induced by
Arresto mayor revenge, resentment, or other evil motive.
Suspension
Destierro 4. Any person who, in order to avoid an evil
or injury, does not act which causes damage
Light penalties: (x<=P200.00) to another, provided that the following
Arresto menor requisites are present:
Public censure
First. That the evil sought to be avoided
Art. 10. Offenses not subject to the actually exists;
provisions of this Code. — Offenses which Second. That the injury feared be greater
are or in the future may be punishable under than that done to avoid it;

Third. That there be no other practical and It is axiomatic that the mere thrusting of one’s
less harmful means of preventing it. hand into his pocket as if for the purpose of
drawing a weapon is not unlawful aggression.
5. Any person who acts in the fulfillment of a Even the cocking of a rifle without aiming the
duty or in the lawful exercise of a right or firearm at any particular target is not sufficient to
office. conclude that one’s life was in imminent danger.
6. Any person who acts in obedience to an

order issued by a superior for some lawful Retaliation is different from selfdefense. In
purpose. retaliation, the aggression that was begun by the
injured party already ceased to exist when the
accused attacked him. In selfdefense, the
There is no crime committed, the act being
aggression was still existing when the aggressor
justified.
was injured by the accused. People vs. Vicente,
405 SCRA 40 (2003)
Art.11(1) Selfdefense
Reason why penal laws make self-defense When there is a second stage of the incident as
lawful because it would be quite impossible for in this case, treachery should be considered as
the State in all case to prevent aggression upon a qualifying aggravating circumstance if used as
its citizens and offer protection to the person a means to insure the success of an attack
unjustly attacked. against a fellow protagonist during the said
second stage of the incident.
Requisites of selfdefense:
Art.11(2) Defense of Relatives
1. Unlawful aggression, (indispensable)
The natural impulse of any person who has killed
ACTUAL someone in defense of his person or relative is to
SUDDENAttack bring himself to the authorities and try to dispel
UNEXPECTED any suspicion of guilt that the authorities might
have against him. Balunueco vs. CA, 410 SCRA 76
Immediate or Imminent (2003)
Possible exception: LIBEL (varying opinion) In the case at bar, petitioner (Ricardo) utterly
failed to adduce sufficient proof of the existence
Threat is not an unlawful aggression. of a positively strong act of real aggression on
the part of the deceased (Senando), with the
exception of his selfserving allegations.
2. Reasonable necessity of the means
employed to prevent or repel the
unlawful aggression, and Art.11(3) Defense of Stranger
3. Lack of sufficient provocation on the part With the absence of unlawful aggression that can
of the person defending himself. be attributed to the victim, it becomes
unnecessary to determine the remaining
requisites for they obviously have no leg to stand
Unlawful aggression is a condition sine qua non on. Thus, in this case, the defense of stranger will
for the justifying circumstance of self defense. It not lie, complete or incomplete. Almeda vs. CA, 80
contemplates an actual, sudden and unexpected SCRA 575
attack, or imminent danger thereof, and not
merely a threatening or intimidating attitude. The
person defending himself must have been
[W]hen the victim fell down and staggered after
attacked with actual physical force or with actual petitioner shot him pointblank in the head, any
use of weapon. Of all the elements, unlawful supposed unlawful aggression by the former,
aggression, i.e., the sudden unprovoked attack on assuming that it has begun, had ceased. If so,
the person defending himself, is indispensable. the one making the defense has no more right to
People vs. Rubiso, 399 SCRA 267 (2003) kill or even wound the former aggressor.

Art.11(4) “State of Necessity Doctrine” To consider a valid “battered woman syndrome”

at least 2 cycles of the following are completed:
Requisites: 1. Tension building phase
2. (Acute) physical aggression
1. That the evil sought to be avoided 3. Reconciliation (tranquility)
actually exists;
[I]t is equally important to determine whether
2. That the injury feared be greater than appellant Genosa had acted freely, intelligently
that done to avoid it; and voluntarily when she killed her spouse. The
Court, however, cannot properly evaluate her
batteredwomansyndrome defense, absent expert
3. That there be no other practical and less testimony on her mental and emotional state at
harmful means of preventing it. the time of the killing and the possible
psychological cause and effect of her fatal act.
People vs. Genosa, 341 SCRA 493 (2000)
Art.11(5) Fulfillment of a Duty/ Lawful
Exercise of a Right or Office BURDEN OF PROOF
The reasonableness of the resistance is also a In ordinary cases, the accuser is the first to
requirement of the justifying circumstance of self present evidence.
Self – defense or defense of one's rights under
defense paragraph 1 of Article 11, Revised Penal Code.
When the appellant fired his shotgun from his In cases of selfdefense, defense of relatives,
of
property? window, killing his two victims, his resistance was or defense of stranger, the accused has the
disproportionate to the attack. People vs. Narvaez, burden of proof.
121 SCRA 389 (1983)
• This is called Reverse Trial
Art. 429 of the New Civil Code provides: (Admission and Avoidance)
The owner or lawful possessor of a thing Art. 12. Circumstances which exempt from
has the right to exclude any person from the criminal liability. — the following are exempt
enjoyment and disposal thereof. For this from criminal liability:
purpose, he may use such force as may 1. An imbecile or an insane person, unless
be reasonably necessary to repel or the latter has acted during a lucid interval.
prevent an actual or threatened unlawful
physical invasion or usurpation of his When the imbecile or an insane person has
property (Emphasis supplied). committed an act which the law defines as a
felony (delito), the court shall order his
Art.11(6) Obedience to a Lawful Order of a confinement in one of the hospitals or
Superior asylums established for persons thus
afflicted, which he shall not be permitted to
leave without first obtaining the permission
An individual is justified in performing an act in of the same court.
obedience to an order issued by a superior if such
order, is for some lawful purpose and that the 2. A person under nine years of age.
means used by the subordinate to carry out said 3. A person over nine years of age and under
order is lawful (Reyes, Revised Penal Code, Vol. 1, fifteen, unless he has acted with
1981 ed., p. 212). Notably, the alleged order of discernment, in which case, such minor shall
Hiong's superior Chua Kim Leng Timothy, is a be proceeded against in accordance with the
patent violation not only of Philippine, but of provisions of Article 80 of this Code.
international law. Such violation was committed
on board a Philippineoperated vessel. Moreover,
When such minor is adjudged to be
the means used by Hiong in carrying out said criminally irresponsible, the court, in
order was equally unlawful. People vs. Tulin, 364 conformably with the provisions of this and
SCRA 10 (2001) the preceding paragraph, shall commit him
to the care and custody of his family who
shall be charged with his surveillance and
Starting year 2004 thru R.A. 9262, additional
justifying circumstance: education otherwise, he shall be committed
BATTERED WOMAN SYNDROME (see p.18)

to the care of some institution or person Art. 12, Pars. 2 & 3 of Revised Penal Code
mentioned in said Article 80. has been amended by Sec.6 of R.A. No. 9344
4. Any person who, while performing a lawful
act with due care, causes an injury by mere SEC. 6. Minimum Age of Criminal
accident without fault or intention of causing Responsibility. A child fifteen (15) years of
it. age or under at the time of the commission
of the offense shall be exempt from criminal
5. Any person who act under the compulsion liability. However, the child shall be subjected
of irresistible force. to an intervention program pursuant to
6. Any person who acts under the impulse of Section 20 of this Act.
an uncontrollable fear of an equal or greater
injury. A child above fifteen (15) years but below
7. Any person who fails to perform an act eighteen (18) years of age shall likewise be
required by law, when prevented by some exempt from criminal liability and be
lawful insuperable cause. subjected to an intervention program, unless
he/she has acted with discernment, in which
case, such child shall be subjected to the
Justifying Exempting appropriate proceedings in accordance with
No crime committed No criminal liability this Act.
No civil liability With civil liability
With Civil liability for No Civil liability for The exemption from criminal liability herein
Par.4 Par.4 established does not include exemption from
civil liability, which shall be enforced in
accordance with existing laws.
Imbecility (always exempt) exists while a
person of advanced age, has a mental
development of a child between 2 and 7 years of Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006
age.
Intervention
Insanity (exempt, except if on lucid intervals) SEC. 20. Children Below the Age of Criminal
Responsibility. If it has been determined that
when there is a complete deprivation of freedom the child taken into custody is fifteen
and intelligence of the will. Mere abnormality is
not enough. (15) years old or below, the authority which
will have an initial contact with the child has
the duty to immediately release the child to
Crazy (not an exemption) is not the same as the custody of his/her parents or guardian, or
insane. The popular conception of the word in the absence thereof, the child's nearest
“crazy” is being used to describe a person or an relative. Said authority shall give notice to
act unnatural or out of the ordinary. A man may the local social welfare and development
behave in a crazy manner but it does not officer who will determine the appropriate
necessarily and conclusively prove that he is programs in consultation with the child and
legally so. People vs. Florendo, 413 SCRA 132 to the person having custody over the child.
If the parents, guardians or nearest relatives
(2003)
cannot be located, or if they refuse to take
custody, the child may be released to any of
Effects of Insanity to the Accused: the following: a duly registered
nongovernmental or religious organization; a
a) At the time of the commission of the barangay official or a member of the
Crime – exempting. Barangay Council for the Protection of
Children (BCPC); a local social welfare and
development officer; or when and where
b) During trial – criminal proceedings will appropriate, the DSWD. If the child referred
be suspended. to herein has been found by the Local Social
Welfare and Development Office to be
c) After judgment or while serving abandoned, neglected or abused by his
sentence – the execution of judgment parents, or in the event that the parents will
or sentence will be suspended and the not comply with the prevention program, the
court shall order the accused to be proper petition for involuntary commitment
committed to a hospital. shall be filed by the DSWD or the Local
Social Welfare and Development Office
pursuant to Presidential Decree No. 603,

otherwise ,known as "The Child and Youth harm or injury to someone or to something not in the
Welfare Code". least in the mind of the actor – an accidental result
flowing out of a legal act. Indeed, accident is an event
14 years old and below that happens outside the sway of our will, and
Parents although it comes about through some act of our will,
Guardian it lies beyond the bounds of humanly foreseeable
consequences. In short, accident presupposes the
Nearest of kin lack of intention to commit the wrong done.
N.G.O. or religious (Talampas vs. People, G.R. No. 180219, November
organizations Barangay 23, 2011)
chairperson/officials DSWD
Art. 12, Par. 5 Under the Compulsion of an
Diversion Irresistable Force
SEC. 23. System of Diversion. Children in
conflict with the law shall undergo diversion The accused acts only not without a will but is
programs without undergoing court
proceedings subject to the conditions herein against his will. The irresistible force must be
provided: either physical force or violence and must come
(a) Where the imposable penalty for the from a third person and produces an effect upon
crime committee is not more than six (6) the individual that in spite of all resistance, it
years imprisonment, the law enforcement reduces him to a mere instrument and as such
officer or Punong Barangay with the incapable of committing a crime.
assistance of the local social welfare and
development officer or other members of Art. 12, Par. 6 Under the Impulse of an
the LCPC shall conduct mediation, family Uncontrollable Fear of an Equal or greater
conferencing and conciliation and, where Injury
appropriate, adopt indigenous modes of
conflict resolution in accordance with the
best interest of the child with a view to The fear must be insuperable and the person
accomplishing the objectives of restorative who acts under insuperable fear is completely
justice and the formulation of a diversion deprived of freedom.
program. The child and his/her family shall
be present in these activities. Actus me invito factus non est meus factus –
(b) In victimless crimes where the an act done against my will is not my act.
imposable penalty is not more than six (6)
years imprisonment, the local social
welfare and development officer shall meet Art. 12, Par. 7 Prevented by some Lawful
with the child and his/her parents or Insuperable Cause
guardians for the development of the
appropriate diversion and rehabilitation Insuperable cause – a cause which prevents a
program, in coordination with the BCPC; person to do what the law requires. It applies to
(c) Where the imposable penalty for the felonies by omission.
crime committed exceeds six (6) years
imprisonment, diversion measures may be Prescribed filing of cases, within:
resorted to only by the court.
12 hours for light felony
18 hours for less grave felony
16 and 17 years old acting with discernment 36 hours for grave felony
If 6 or less years of imprisonment: ADDITIONAL EXEMPTING CIRCUMSTANCES:
Reconciliation thru barangay or police
(by reason of jurisprudence)
If more than 6 years of imprisonment:
Suspended proceedings/trial • Absolutory causes – are those where
the act committed is a crime but for
reasons of public policy the accused is
Art. 12, Par. 4 Performing a Lawful Act with exempt from criminal liability.
Due Care
• Instigation – as exempting
[T]he legal provision pertinent to accident,
contemplates a situation where a person is in fact in circumstances for law and peace
the act of doing something legal, exercising due care, officers; does not apply to private
diligence and prudence, but in the process produces persons.

5. That the act was committed in the

Instigation Entrapment immediate vindication of a grave offense to
Takes place when a peace Signifies that ways and the one committing the felony (delito), his
officer induces an innocent means are resorted to spouse, ascendants, or relatives by affinity
person to commit a crime by peace officers to within the same degrees.
apprehend a person
who has committed a
6. That of having acted upon an impulse so
crime
powerful as naturally to have produced
Exempting circumstance Neither exempting nor
passion or obfuscation.
by reason of public policy mitigating
The law officer conceives Mens rea* originates
the commission of the from the mind of the 7. That the offender had voluntarily
crime and suggest it to the criminal surrendered himself to a person in authority
accused who adopts the or his agents, or that he had voluntarily
idea and carries it into confessed his guilt before the court prior to
*guilty mind the presentation of the evidence for the
execution
prosecution;
Article 332 provides for an absolutory cause in 8. That the offender is deaf and dumb, blind
the crimes of theft, estafa (or swindling) and
or otherwise suffering some physical defect
malicious mischief. It limits the responsibility of
the offender to civil liability and frees him from
which thus restricts his means of action,
criminal liability by virtue of his relationship to the defense, or communications with his fellow
offended party. x x x The “continuing affinity beings.
view”considers that, where statutes have
indicated an intent to benefit steprelatives or in 9. Such illness of the offender as would
laws, the “tie of affinity” between these people diminish the exercise of the willpower of the
and their relativesbymarriage is not to be offender without however depriving him of
regarded as terminated upon the death of one of the consciousness of his acts.
the married parties. [This] view is more consistent
with the language and spirit of Article 332(1) of the
Revised Penal Code. Intestate Estate of Manolita 10. And, finally, any other circumstances of a
Gonzales Vda. De Carungcong vs. People, G.R. No. similar nature and analogous to those above
181409, February 11, 2010. mentioned.
Privileged Mitigating Ordinary Mitigating

Offset by any Cannot be offset Can be offset by a
Chapter Three aggravating generic aggravating
CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH circumstance circumstance
MITIGATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY Effect on Effect of imposing If not offset, has the
penalty the penalty by 1 or 2 effect of imposing
degrees lower than the minimum period
Art. 13. Mitigating circumstances. — The that provided by law of the penalty;
following are mitigating circumstances; provided the
1. Those mentioned in the preceding chapter, penalty is divisible
when all the requisites necessary to justify Kinds Art.13 Par.1 and 1st Those
(Sources) Part of Par. 2. circumstances
or to exempt from criminal liability in the (minority, incomplete enumerated in
respective cases are not attendant. Selfdefense), two or Article 13, except
more mitigating Par.1 and 1st Part of
2. That the offender is under eighteen year of circumstance without Par.2
any aggravating
age or over seventy years. In the case of the circumstance (has
minor, he shall be proceeded against in the effect of lowering
accordance with the provisions of Art. 80. the penalty by one
degree). Art. 64, 68
and 69
3. That the offender had no intention to With respect Unlawful aggression Only unlawful
commit so grave a wrong as that committed. to Art.11 plus 1 of 2 other aggression is
Pars. 1, 2, circumstance are present in self
4. That sufficient provocation or threat on the and 3 present defense, defense
part of the offended party immediately of relative or
defense of stranger
preceded the act.

Applicable Not Applicable

Art. 13, Par. 1  Robbery with  Offender
• Incomplete selfdefense homicide; employed brute
• incomplete defense of relatives  Physical injuries, force
• incomplete defense of stranger (mitigating only  Felonies by
• incomplete accident when the victim negligence
There must always be unlawful aggression. dies)  When intention is
 Material harm immaterial
 Malversation of  Slander
Art. 13, Par. 2 funds  Defamation
Par.2. Impliedly repealed by R.A. 9344 or the

Juvenile Justice Welfare Act of 2006
Par.3 is appreciated in murder qualified by
circumstances based on manner of commission,
BASIS: Diminution of intelligence (not on state of mind of accused) but not on
murder qualified by treachery.
Age Legal Effects
15 and below exempting
Above 15 but Exempting unless he acted with Art. 13, Par. 4
under 18 discernment; if acted with
discernment, the penalty is
BASIS: Diminution of intelligence or intent
reduced by 1 degree lower than
that imposed (Art. 68 of RPC as
amended by RA 9344) Par.4 That sufficient provocation or threat on the
Minor delinquent Sentence is suspended (PD 603, part of the offended party immediately preceded
under 18 PD 1179, RA 9344) the act.
70 years or over (Generic) Mitigating and no
imposition of death penalty* Provocation
*if already imposed, sentence is • any unjust or improper conduct or act of
suspended and commuted the offended party, capable of exciting,
inciting, or irritating any one;
Diversion – refers to an alternative, child • any act of the offended party that excites
appropriate process of determining the or stirs up emotions or actions;
responsibility and treatment of a child in conflict
with the law on the basis of his/her social, Requisites of provocation:
cultural, economic, psychological, or educational
background without resulting to formal court 1. That the provocation must be sufficient;
proceedings.
2. That it must originate from the offended
party;
Art. 13, Par. 3 Praeter Intentionem
3. That the provocation must be immediate
BASIS: Diminution of intent to the act; i.e. to the commission of the
crime by the person who is provoked.
Intention, being an internal state, must be
judged by external acts. “Immediate” means that there is no interval of
time between the provocation and commission
Intention may be ascertained considering: of the crime. People vs. Pagal, 79 SCRA 570.
• the weapon used
• the part of the body injured Art. 13, Par. 5
• the nature of injury inflicted, and,
• the manner of attack; which may show Par.5 That the act was committed in the
that the accused intended the wrong immediate vindication of a grave offense to the
committed. one committing the felony (delito), his spouse,
ascendants, or relatives by affinity within the
same degrees.

Requisites: When mitigating When NOT mitigating

1. Grave offense done to the one  Act producing  After 24 hours
committing the felony; passion or passed
2. Felony is committed in vindication of obfuscation, time  Jealousy with
such grave offense. not far from nonspouse or
commission of illegitimate
A lapse of time is allowed between the grave crime relationship
offense and the vindication. • Rivalry for the
hand of a woman
Provocation Vindication
 Made directly only  Also with Vindication of grave offense cannot coexist
to person offender’s with passion and obfuscation.
committing felony relatives
 Cause need not be  grave offense to Passion or obfuscation compatible with lack of
a grave offense the offender or his intention to commit so grave a wrong, but
 Immediately relatives incompatible with treachery.
preceded the act  Proximate time
Passion/obfuscation Irresistible force
 mitigating  exempting
Basis to determine the gravity of offense in  cannot give rise to  requires physical
vindication: irresistible force force
1. Age of the accused;  from offender  from a third
2. Social standing of the person; himself person
3. Time and place of the commission of the  must arise from  is unlawful
crime. lawful sentiment
[A]ccusedappellant was urinated on by the victim To be considered as a mitigating circumstance,

in front of the guests. The act of the victim, which passion or obfuscation must arise from lawful
undoubtedly insulted and humiliated accused sentiments and not from a spirit of lawlessness or
appellant, came within the purview of a “grave revenge or from anger and resentment. In the
offense” under Article 13, paragraph 5, of the present case, clearly, Marcelo was infuriated upon
Revised Penal Code. Thus, this mitigating seeing his brother, Carlito, shot by Jose. However,
circumstance should be appreciated in favor of a distinction must be made between the first time
accusedappellant. People vs. Espina, 361 SCRA that Marcelo hacked Jose and the second time
701 (2001) that the former hacked the latter. When Marcelo
hacked Jose right after seeing the latter shoot at
Carlito, and if appellant refrained from doing
Art. 13, Par. 6 anything else after that, he could have validly
invoked the mitigating circumstance of passion
and obfuscation. But when, upon seeing his
Par.6 That of having acted upon an impulse so brother Carlito dead, Marcelo went back to Jose,
powerful as naturally to have produced passion who by then was already prostrate on the ground
or obfuscation. and hardly moving, hacking Jose again was a
clear case of someone acting out of anger in the
Rules for application (Par.6) spirit of revenge. People vs. Bates, 400 SCRA 95
(2003)
1. The act is committed in a spirit of
lawnessness; or,
2. The act is committed in a spirit of
revenge. Art. 13, Par. 7
The act of the offended party must be 7. That the offender had voluntarily surrendered
unlawful or unjust. himself to a person in authority or his agents, or
that he had voluntarily confessed his guilt before
Exercise of a right or fulfillment of a duty is the court prior to the presentation of the
not a proper source of passion or evidence for the prosecution;
obfuscation.

Voluntary surrender cannot be appreciated The physical defect referred to in this paragraph
where the accused fled immediately after the must affect the means of action, defense or
killing and took him more than a monthanda half communication of the accused. It must relate to
to surrender to the authorities. Peolple vs. the offense committed.
Almendras, 372 SCRA 737
The fact that the accused is deaf is not
Voluntary surrender must be made to a person mitigating in homicide or rape.
in authority or his agent. The law does not
require that the surrender must be before or Art. 13, Par. 9
after the issuance of warrant of arrest. Surrender
to the Treasurer is not mitigating. He is a public 9. Such illness of the offender as would diminish
officer but not a person in authority. the exercise of the will power of the offender
without however, depriving him of the
Person in authority – one who is directly consciousness of his acts.
vested with jurisdiction which is the power to
govern and to execute the laws, whether as an The Supreme Court in the Marivic Genosa case
individual or a member of some court or only appreciated “battered woman’s syndrome”
governmental corporation, board or commission. only as a mitigating circumstance that
(Art. 152, RPC) diminishes will power.
Agent of a person in authority – one who by After the Genosa case RA 9282 was enacted
direct provision of the law or by election or by and now a new Justifying Circumstance. The
appointment by competent authority is charged battered woman does not incur both criminal
with the maintenance of public order and and civil liabilities. (also see p.12)
security of life and property and any private
person who comes to aid of a person in Art. 13, Par. 10
authority. (Art. 152, as amended by RA 1978)
10. Any other circumstances similar in nature
[T]he appellant’s alleged surrender to the
barangay chairman was not voluntary. On the
and analogous to those above mentioned.
contrary, it was solely motivated by self
preservation from what he feared was an Examples:
imminent retaliation from the immediate relatives • extreme poverty, as similar to state of
of Alfredo. Consequently, the same cannot be necessity
appreciated in his favor. People vs. dela Cruz, 416
SCRA 24 (November 18, 2003) • impulse of jealousy, similar to passion
and obfuscation
• voluntary return of funds in
Voluntary plea of guilty, to be mitigating:
malversation, similar to voluntary
• the offender spontaneously confessed surrender
his guilt
• over 60 years old with failing sight,
• the confession of guilt was made before analogous to a person over 70 years of
a competent court age and voluntary surrender
• the confession of guilt was made prior to
the presentation of evidence by the Chapter Four
prosecution CIRCUMSTANCE WHICH
AGGRAVATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY
Art. 13, Par. 8
Art. 14. Aggravating circumstances. — The
BASIS: Diminution of voluntariness following are aggravating circumstances:
8. That the offender is deaf and dumb, blind or 1. That advantage be taken by the offender of
otherwise suffering some physical defect which his public position.
thus restricts his means of action, defense or
communication with his fellow beings. 2. That the crime be committed in contempt
or with insult to the public authorities.

3. That the act be committed with insult or in any other artifice involving great waste and
disregard of the respect due the offended ruin.
party on account of his rank, age, or sex, or
that is be committed in the dwelling of the 13. That the act be committed with evident
offended party, if the latter has not given premeditation.
provocation.
14. That the craft, fraud or disguise be
4. That the act be committed with abuse of employed.
confidence or obvious ungratefulness.
15. That advantage be taken of superior
5. That the crime be committed in the palace strength, or means be employed to weaken
of the Chief Executive or in his presence, or the defense.
where public authorities are engaged in the
discharge of their duties, or in a place 16. That the act be committed with treachery
dedicated to religious worship. (alevosia).
6. That the crime be committed in the night There is treachery when the offender commits any
time, or in an uninhabited place, or by a of the crimes against the person, employing
band, whenever such circumstances may means, methods, or forms in the execution
facilitate the commission of the offense. thereof which tend directly and specially to insure
its execution, without risk to himself arising from
the defense which the offended party might make.
Whenever more than three armed
malefactors shall have acted together in the
17. That means be employed or
commission of an offense, it shall be deemed
circumstances brought about which add
to have been committed by a band.
ignominy to the natural effects of the act.
7. That the crime be committed on the 18. That the crime be committed after an
occasion of a conflagration, shipwreck, unlawful entry.
earthquake, epidemic or other calamity or
misfortune.
There is an unlawful entry when an entrance is
effected by a way not intended for the purpose.
8. That the crime be committed with the aid
of armed men or persons who insure or 19. That as a means to the commission of a
afford impunity. crime a wall, roof, floor, door, or window be
broken.
9. That the accused is a recidivist.
20. That the crime be committed with the aid
A recidivist is one who, at the time of his trial for of persons under fifteen years of age or by
one crime, shall have been previously convicted
means of motor vehicles, motorized
by final judgment of another crime embraced in
the same title of this Code. watercraft, airships, or other similar means.
(As amended by R.A. 5438).
10. That the offender has been previously
punished by an offense to which the law 21. That the wrong done in the commission
attaches an equal or greater penalty or for of the crime be deliberately augmented by
two or more crimes to which it attaches a causing other wrong not necessary for its
lighter penalty. commissions.
11. That the crime be committed in

consideration of a price, reward, or promise. Kinds of Aggravating Circumstances
12. That the crime be committed by means of 1. Generic – that apply to all crimes. It
inundation, fire, poison, explosion, stranding increases the penalty up to maximum
of a vessel or international damage thereto, period prescribed in the crime. It may be
derailment of a locomotive, or by the use of offset by mitigating circumstance
Ex. Dwelling, nighttime, recidivism

2. Specific – that apply to specific crimes.

Ex. Ignominy in crimes against chastity or Art. 14, Par. 2
cruelty and treachery in crimes against
persons
That crime be committed in contempt of or with
insult to public authorities.
3. Qualifying – change the nature and
gives the name exclusive of the crime. It
Requisites:
must be alleged, otherwise will be
treated only as generic aggravating
circumstance. It cannot be offset by a 1. That the public authority is engaged in
mitigating circumstance. the exercise of his functions;
Ex. Alevosia or evident premeditation to
qualify killing of a person to murder 2. That he who is thus engaged in the
exercise of said functions is not the
4. Inherent – those that must of necessity person against whom the crime is
accompany commission of the crime. committed;
Ex. Evident premeditation is inherent in
robbery, theft, estafa, adultery, concubinage 3. The offender knows him to be a public
authority;
AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES
Circ. Generic Specific Qualifying 4. His presence has not prevented the
1 X offender from committing the criminal
2 X act.
3 X X
(DWELLING ONLY) (EXCEPT DWELLING)
4 X Art. 14, Par. 3
5 X
6 X Crime committed with insult or disregard of the
7 X respect due to the offended party on account of
8 X his rank, age or sex or committed in the dwelling
9 X
10 X
As if to add insult to Rebecca's injury, accused
11 X
appellant presented a witness, one Isabelo
12 X
Goloya, who in his affidavit would have us believe
13 X that Rebecca is a woman of such loose morals
14 X that she would consent to have sex with him, a
15 X X married man, in a public place. People vs. dela
16 X X Torre, 373 SCRA 1104 (1997)
17 X
18 X
What aggravates the commission of the crime in
19 X
one’s dwelling?
20 X X
(EXCEPT MOTOR
VEHICLES)
(MOTOR VEHICLES
ONLY)
• The abuse of confidence which the
21 X X offended party reposed in the offender
by opening the door to him; and
Art. 14, Par. 1 • The violation of the sanctity of the home
Applicable only when the offender is a public by trespassing therein with violence or
against the will of the owner.
officer.
If the accused could have perpetrated the crime Offended party must not give provocation.
without occupying his position, then there is no
abuse of public position. In the case before us, no If provocation was:
evidence was adduced to show that the killing of • Given by the owner of the dwelling;
Zandro Vargas was in any way facilitated by the • Sufficient; and,
accusedappellant’s public position. It was not
even shown whether the accusedappellant wore • Immediate to the commission of the
his uniform or used his service firearm when he crime.
committed the crime. People vs. Sumaoy, G.R. No. Then dwelling is NOT aggravating.
105961, October 22, 1996

Dwelling includes:
• Dependencies In the case at bar, the accused neither sought the
• Foot of the staircase (dissented) nighttime nor took advantage of it to commit the
• Enclosure under the house crime with greater facility or to escape. If he had
• Bed spacing hidden behind the tree and attacked the deceased
• Paternal home without warning or availed himself of the
darkness to prevent his being recognized or to
• House of relatives escape, then nocturnity would have been an
• Guest rooms aggravating circumstance. People vs. Coderes,
130 SCRA 134 (1981)
Art. 14, Par. 4
Nighttime – (Viada) that period of darkness
That the crime With abuse of confidence or beginning at the end of dusk and ending at
obvious ungratefulness dawn.
Abuse of confidence, requisites: Uninhabitated place – one where there are no

houses at all, a place at a considerable distance
1. That the offender had trusted the from town, or where the houses are scattered at
offender. a great distance from each other.
2. That the offender abused such trust by Uninhabitated place answers the issue: Whether
committing the crime against the or not in the place of the commission of the
offended party. offense there was a reasonable possibility of the
victim receiving some help.
3. That the abuse of confidence facilitated
the commission of the crime. Band – whenever more than three armed
malefactors shall have acted together in the
Ungratefulness must be obvious, i.e. manifest commission of an offense (all must be
and clear principals by direct participation).
In the information, the People erroneously

Art. 14, Par. 5 charged the accused with "robbery in band with
homicide." There is no such crime in the Revised
Penal Code. The felony is properly called robbery
Committed in the place of the Chief Executive or with homicide. In the landmark case of People vs.
where public authorities are engaged in the Apduhan, Jr., we ruled that if robbery with
discharge of their duties or place dedicated to homicide is committed by a band, the indictable
religious worship offense would still be denominated as “robbery
with homicide” under Article 294(1) of the Revised
Penal Code, but the circumstance that it was
In these cases, the offender must have the committed by a band would be appreciated as an
intention to commit a crime when he entered ordinary aggravating circumstance. People vs.
the place. Buayaban, 400 SCRA 48 (2003)
Art. 14, Par. 7

Art. 14, Par. 6
Conflagration, shipwreck, earthquake, epidemic
Nighttime/ uninhabited place/ by a band or other calamity or misfortune.
As to nighttime, this circumstance is considered BASIS: Reference to the time of the commission
aggravating only when (1) it was especially of the crime.
sought by the offender; or (2) the offender took
advantage of it; or (3) it facilitated the commission
of the crime by ensuring the offender’s immunity REASON: Debased form of criminality met in
from identification or capture. x x x The mere fact one who, in the midst of a great calamity, instead
that the killing was committed at night would not of lending aid to the afflicted, adds to their
suffice to sustain nocturnity for, by, and of itself. suffering by taking advantage of their misfortune
People vs. Avendano, 396 SCRA 309 (2003) to despoil them.

2012 CRIMINAL LAW 1 (REVIEWER) | ARELLANO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
Art. 14, Par. 8 Art. 14, Par. 10
In aid of armed men or persons who insure or Reiteracion

afford impunity
Requisites:
Requisites:
1. The accused is on trial for an offense;
1. That the armed men or person took part
in the commission of the crime, directly 2. That he previously served sentence for
or indirectly; another offense which the law attaches
an equal or greater penalty, or for two or
2. That the accused availed himself of their more crimes to which it attaches lighter
aid or relied upon them when the crime penalty than that for the new offense;
was committed. and
Aid of armed men By a band 3. That he is convicted of the new offense.

Up to 3 armed malefactors Requires 4 or more
armed malefactors Forms of Habituality/repetitions:
Enough that offender Actual and direct • Recidivism (Art. 14, Par.9)
relied on aid participation necessary • Reiteracion (Art. 14, Par.10)
• Habitual Delinquency (Art. 62, Par.5)
Aid of armed men includes armed women • QuasiRecidivism (Art. 160)
Recidivism Reiteracion
Art. 14, Par. 9 Offender previously Offender previously
convicted by final punished
judgment
Recidivist (generic aggravating circumstance) Offense must be Offenses are not
embraced in the same title embraced in the same
BASIS: Greater perversity of the offender, as of the Code title of the Code
shown by his inclination to crimes. If present, always Not always aggravating;
aggravating depends on discretion of
Requisites: the court
1. The offender is on trial for an offense; Habitual Delinquency – if within a period of 10

years from the date of conviction or last release
2. That he was previously convicted by a of a person for any crimes of:
final judgment of another crime; • Serious physical injuries
• Less serious physical injuries
3. That both the first and the second • Theft
offenses are embraced in the same title • Robbery
of Code; • Estafa
• Falsification
4. That the offender is convicted of the new Is found guilty of any of the said crimes a third
offense. time or oftener.
No recidivism if the subsequent conviction is Quasi-Recidivism – any person who shall

for an offense committed before the offense commit a felony after having been:
involved in prior conviction. • Convicted of a final judgment
• Before beginning to serve sentence, or
Pardon does not obliterate the fact that the • While serving the same sentence
accused was a recidivist.
shall be punished by a maximum period of the
Amnesty extinguishes the penalty and its penalty prescribed by law for the new felony.
effects.

Art. 14, Par. 11 Evident premeditation was not attendant because

the prosecution failed to prove the elements
Price/Reward/Promise thereof, namely: (1) the time when the offender
determined to commit the crime; (b) sufficient
lapse of time between the determination and
BASIS: Greater perversity of the offender, as execution to allow himself to reflect upon the
shown by motivating power itself. consequence of his act. People vs. dela Cruz, 398
SCRA 415 (February 28, 2003)
If without previous promise it was given voluntarily
after the crime had been committed as an expression
of his appreciation for the sympathy and aid shown by Art. 14, Par. 14
other accused, it should not be taken into
consideration for the purposes of increasing the
penalty. US vs. Flores, 28 Phil. 29, 34) Craft, fraud or disguise
Art. 14, Par. 12 Craft – involves the use of intellectual trickery or

cunning on the part of the accused.
Inundation, fire, explosion, stranding of a vessel
or intentional damage thereto, derailment of a Fraud – insidious words or machinations use to
locomotive, or by use of any other artifice induce the victim to act in a manner which would
involving great waste and ruin. enable the offender carry out his design.
When there is no actual design to kill a person in Disguise – resorting to any device to conceal
burning a house, it is plain arson even if a identity.
person is killed.
RA 8294 – Amending PD 1866 (firearms, Art. 14, Par. 15

ammunitions, and explosives) and providing
aggravating circumstances therefor. Advantage be taken of superior strength/ means
be employed to weaken defense
Art. 14, Par. 13 Applicable only for crimes against persons (e.g.
homicide). Sometimes with crimes against
Evident Premeditation persons and property (robbery with rape).
Requisites, the prosecution must prove: Abuse of superior strength cannot likewise be
appreciated even if there were at least two
1. The time when the offender determined assailants as superiority in number visavis that of
to commit the crime; the victim does not of itself warrant a finding of
abuse of superior strength. There must exist
proof that the attackers deliberately took
2. An act manifestly indicating that the advantage of their superior strength. People vs.
culprit has clung to his determination; Cantojos, 370 SCRA 105 (2001)
3. A sufficient lapse of time between the

determination and execution, to allow Art. 14, Par. 16
him to reflect upon the consequence of
his act and to allow conscience to Treachery (alevosia)
overcome the resolution of his will.
Treachery – there is treachery when the
Evident premeditation cannot be appreciated. The
two accused allegedly planned to kill Waje at 7:00 offender commits any of the crimes against
o'clock in the morning and the killing took place person, employing means, method or forms in
at 9:00 A.M. The two accused did not have the execution thereof which tend directly and
sufficient time to reflect during the two hours that specially to insure its execution, without risk to
preceded the killing. People vs. Crisostomo, G.R. himself arising from the defense which the
No. L38180, October 23, 1981 offended party might make.

Art. 14, Par. 17

Requisites:
Ignominy
1. That at the time of attack, the victim was
not in a position to defend himself; and Ignominy – pertains to moral order, which adds
disgrace and obloquy to the material injury
2. That the offender consciously adopted caused by the crime.
the particular means, method or form on
the attack employed by him.
But it was incorrect to appreciate adding
ignominy to the offense because the victim was
The essence of treachery is the sudden and already dead when his body was dismembered.
unexpected attack by an aggressor without the This aggravating circumstance requires that the
slightest provocation on the part of the victim, offense be committed in a manner that tends to
thus depriving the latter of any real chance to put make its effects more humiliating to the victim,
up a defense, and thereby ensuring the that is, add to his moral suffering. People vs.
commission of the attack without risk to the Carmina, G.R. No. 81404, January 28, 1991)
aggressor. People vs. Escarlos, 410 SCRA 463
(2003)
Art. 14, Par. 18
In the case at bar, it was established that
appellant came from behind, went towards the That crime be committed after an unlawful entry.
right of the victim, and suddenly stabbed the
victim’s chest while holding the latter’s left
shoulder. Evidence shows that, first, at the time of There is unlawful entry when an entrance is
attack, the victim was not in a position to defend effected by a way not intended for the purpose.
himself, as he was unarmed and totally
unsuspecting when appellant suddenly held and To effect entrance, not for escape.
stabbed him; and second, appellant consciously
and deliberately adopted the particular means of
attack, as he was seen surreptitiously following
the victim with a balisong tucked under his waist. Art. 14, Par. 19
Clearly therefore, treachery attended the crime.
People vs. Alfon, 399 SCRA 64 (2003) That as a means to the commission of the crime,
a wall, roof, floor, door, or window be broken.
The presence of treachery, though, should not
result in qualifying the offense to murder, for the The act of entering through the window, which is
correct rule is that when it obtains in the special not the proper place for entrance into the house,
complex crime of robbery with homicide, such constitutes unlawful entry.
treachery is to be regarded as a generic
aggravating circumstance, robbery with homicide
being a case of a composite crime with its own Also to effect entrance, not for escape.
definition and special penalty in the Revised
Penal Code. People vs. Cando, 334 SCRA 331 Exceptions under Rules of Criminal Procedure
(2000)
• Under Rule 113, Section 11, to make an
arrest
Summary of rules: • Under Rule 126, Section 7, if refused
(1) When aggression is continuous, admittance to the place
treachery must be present at the
beginning of the assault; Art. 14, Par. 20
(2) When the assault was not continuous, in
that there was interruption, it is sufficient
Crime be committed with aid of persons under
that treachery was present at the
15 years of age or by means of motor vehicles,
moment the fatal blow was given. airships, or other similar means.
In treachery, intent is immaterial, and must NOTE: 15 years now 18 years of age
always be appreciated even if it was not the
person the accused intended to kill.
Motor vehicles do not include bicycle under
this aggravating circumstance.

Art. 14, Par. 21 When committed under the influence of

drugs
Deliberately augmented by causing other wrong
(cruelty) Sec.25 RA 9165
Qualifying Aggravating Circumstances in the
Commission of a Crime by an Offender Under the
Cruelty – when the culprit enjoys and delights in Influence of Dangerous Drugs. – Notwithstanding
making his victim suffer slowly and gradually, the provisions of any law to the contrary, a
causing him unnecessary physical pain in the positive finding for the use of dangerous drugs
consummation of the criminal act. People vs. shall be a qualifying aggravating circumstance in
Dayug, 49 Phil. 423, 427 the commission of a crime by an offender, and the
application of the penalty provided for in the
Revised Penal Code shall be applicable.
Requisites:
(Emphasis supplied)
1. That the injury caused be deliberately
increased by causing other wrong; Use of unlicensed firearm in homicide or
murder
2. That the other wrong be unnecessary
for the execution of the purpose of the Thus where an accused used an unlicensed
offender. firearm in committing homicide or murder, he may
no longer be charged with what used to be the
two (2) separate offenses of homicide or murder
The trial court held that the crime was committed under The Revised Penal Code and qualified
with deliberate cruelty “considering that the illegal possession of firearms used in homicide or
victim suffered twentyone (21) hack and stab murder under P.D. 1866; in other words, where
wounds, contusions and abrasions on the murder or homicide was committed, the penalty
different parts of his body.” The number of for illegal possession of firearms is no longer
wounds is not the criterion for the appreciation of imposable since it becomes merely a special
cruelty as an aggravating circumstance. The mere aggravating circumstance. People vs. Malinao,
fact that wounds in excess of what is necessary G.R. No. 128148, February 16, 2004
to cause death were inflicted upon the body of the
victim does not necessarily imply that such
wounds were inflicted with cruelty. It is necessary When the owner, driver, passenger of a
to show that the accused intentionally and carnapped vehicle is killed/rape
deliberately increased the victim's suffering. In
this case, there is no evidence showing Section 14 of RA 6539
appellants’ intent to commit such cruelty. People
vs. Solamillo, 404 SCRA 211 (2003) Sec. 14. Penalty for Carnapping. Any person who
is found guilty of carnapping, as this term is
Rapes, robbery and other forms of cruelties are defined in Section Two of this Act, shall,
aggravating circumstances of ignominy and irrespective of the value of motor vehicle taken,
be punished by imprisonment for not less than
cruelty in treason.
fourteen years and eight months and not more
than seventeen years and four months, when the
carnapping is committed without violence or
When committed by a Syndicate intimidation of persons, or force upon things; and
by imprisonment for not less than seventeen
years and four months and not more than thirty
Sec.23, RA 7659
years, when the carnapping is committed by
means of violence against or intimidation of any
person, or force upon things;and the penalty of
The maximum penalty shall be imposed if the reclusion perpetua to death shall be imposed
offense was committed by any group who when the owner, driver or occupant of the
belongs to an organized/syndicated crime group. carnapped motor vehicle is killed or raped in the
course of the commission of the carnapping or on
An organized/syndicated crime group means a the occasion thereof.(Emphasis supplied)
group of two or more persons collaborating,
confederating or mutually helping one another for People vs. Garcia and Bernabe, G.R. No. 138470,
purposes of gain in the commission of any crime. April 1, 2003

Chapter Five
ALTERNATIVE CIRCUMSTANCES INTOXICATION
When mitigating When aggravating
If not habitual When habitual
Art. 15. Their concept. — Alternative Not subsequent to the plan Intentional
circumstances are those which must be
taken into consideration as aggravating or DEGREE OF INSTRUCTION
mitigating according to the nature and When mitigating When aggravating
effects of the crime and the other conditions Low degree High degree
attending its commission. They are the When schooling was When offender took
relationship, intoxication and the degree of confined in studying and advantage of the
instruction and education of the offender. finishing caton only degree
The alternative circumstance of relationship o

shall be taken into consideration when the
offended party in the spouse, ascendant, Title Two
descendant, legitimate, natural, or adopted PERSONS CRIMINALLY LIABLE FOR
brother or sister, or relative by affinity in the FELONIES
same degrees of the offender.
Art. 16. Who are criminally liable. — The
The intoxication of the offender shall be following are criminally liable for grave and
taken into consideration as a mitigating less grave felonies:
circumstances when the offender has 1. Principals.
committed a felony in a state of intoxication, 2. Accomplices.
if the same is not habitual or subsequent to 3. Accessories.
the plan to commit said felony but when the
intoxication is habitual or intentional, it shall The following are criminally liable for light
be considered as an aggravating felonies:
circumstance. 1. Principals
2. Accomplices.
Alternative circumstances are:
• Relationship Three Types of Principals:
• Intoxication 1. Principals by direct participation
• Degree of instruction and education of 2. Principals by inducement
the offender 3. Principals by indispensable cooperation
RELATIONSHIP
Accessories are not liable for light felonies
Crimes When When
against mitigating aggravating
Persons Less serious Less serious physical Rules relative to light felonies:
physical injuries, slight physical • Punishable only when consummated
injuries, slight injuries, if the offended (Art.7, RPC)
physical party is higher in • Punishable if committed against persons
injuries, if the degree; or property, even if attempted or
offended frustrated (Art.7, RPC)
party is lower When admitted: • Only principals and accomplices are
in degree; ascendants, liable for light felonies (Art.16, RPC)
descendants, legitimate,
natural or adopted • Accessories are not liable for light
brothers or sisters, felonies, even if committed against
relatives by affinity within persons or property (Art.16, RPC)
the same degrees;
Chastity N/A Always aggravating Only natural persons can be active subject of
Property Robbery, N/A crime.
Usurpation, (No criminal, only civil
Fraudulent liability on theft, Reasons:
insolvency, swindling and
Arson malicious mischief)

• The RPC requires that the culprit should 3. Those who cooperate in the commission
have acted with personal malice or of the offense by another act without which it
negligence. would not have been accomplished.
• A juridical person cannot commit a crime
where willful purpose or malicious intent In conspiracy (committing felony), act of one is
is required. act of all. It may exist even without evident
premeditation.
• There is substitution of deprivation of
liberty (subsidiary imprisonment) for
pecuniary penalties in case of In abduction, all are liable even if only one acted
insolvency. with lewd design. (lewd = obscene)
• Other penalties consisting in
imprisonment and other deprivation of In multiple rape, each rapist is equally liable for
liberty, like destierro, can be executed the other rapes.
only against individuals.
Requisites of Par.1:
1. Participation in the criminal resolution
Juridical persons are criminally liable under (conspiracy);
certain special laws
2. Culprits carried out their plan and
personally took part in its execution, by
Examples: acts which directly tended to the same
• B.P. Blg. 68 – Corporation Code end.
• Com. Act No. 146 – Public Service Law
• B.P. Blg. 178 – Revised Securities Act Conditions:
• B.P. 881 – Omnibus Election Code
1. Directly forcing or inducing the other to
commit a crime;
In such cases, only the following are liable:
2. Principal by direct participation
• Principals committed the act induced.
O By direct participation
O By induction
Forcing to commit crime:
O By indispensable cooperation
• By irresistible force
• Accomplices
• By uncontrollable fear
Manager of a (juridical entity) is liable even Inducing to commit a crime:
when there is no evidence of his • Giving price, reward or promise
participation in the commission of the • Using words of command
offense
• Internal Revenue Code
Requisite of Par.2:
• Motor Vehicle Law
1. That the inducement be made directly
with the intention of producing the
Passive subject of crime holder of the injured commission of the crime, and
right. (man, juristic person, group, the State)
2. That such inducement be the
determining cause of the commission of
Corpse or animal cannot be passive subject the crime by material executor.
Exception: Art.353 of RPC, defamation against Principal by inducement Offender who made
memory of the dead. proposal to commit
 Inducement to  inducement to
commit crime commit crime
 Liable only when  mere proposal

Art. 17. Principals. — The following are crime is committed punishable in
considered principals: by principal by treason or
1. Those who take a direct part in the direct participation rebellion
execution of the act;
2. Those who directly force or induce others  Inducement  must involve only
to commit it;

involves any crime treason and 2. That he operates in execution of the

rebellion offense by previous or simultaneous
acts;
Possessor of recently stolen property is a 3. That there be a relation between the
principal. acts done by the principal and those
attributed to the person charged as
Requisites of Par.3 accomplice.
1. Participation in the criminal resolution,
i.e. there is either anterior conspiracy or Art. 19. Accessories. — Accessories are
unity of criminal purpose, and with those who, having knowledge of the
intention immediately before the commission of the crime, and without having
commission of crime; participated therein, either as principals or
2. Cooperation in the commission of the accomplices, take part subsequent to its
offense by performing another act, commission in any of the following manners:
without which would not have been
accomplished. 1. By profiting themselves or assisting the
offender to profit by the effects of the crime.
2. By concealing or destroying the body of
Art. 18. Accomplices. — Accomplices are the crime, or the effects or instruments
thereof, in order to prevent its discovery.
those persons who, not being included in
Art. 17, cooperate in the execution of the 3. By harboring, concealing, or assisting in
offense by previous or simultaneous acts. the escape of the principals of the crime,
provided the accessory acts with abuse of
Quasi collective criminal responsibility – his public functions or whenever the author
between collective criminal responsibility and of the crime is guilty of treason, parricide,
individual criminal responsibility, where some of murder, or an attempt to take the life of the
the offenders in the crime are criminal and the Chief Executive, or is known to be habitually
others are accomplices. guilty of some other crime.
In case of doubt, the participation of the offender Accessory distinguished from principal and
will be considered that of an accomplice rather accomplice
than of a principal. • The accessory does not take direct part
or cooperate in, or induce, the
Accomplices Conspirators commission of crime.
 Know and agree  Know and agree • The accessory does not cooperate in
with criminal with criminal the commission of the offense by acts
design design either prior thereto or simultaneous
therewith.
 Came to know  Decided upon • The participation of the accessory in all
after principals such course of cases always takes place after the
decided action commission of the crime.
 Concur only  Decided that crime P.D. No. 1612 (AntiFencing Law of 1979)
be committed
 Merely instruments Fencing – the act of any person who, with intent
whose acts not  The authors of the to gain for himself or for another, shall buy,
essential crime receive, possess, keep, acquire, conceal, sell or
dispose of, or shall buy and sell, or in any other
manner deal in any article, item, object, or
To be considered as accomplice, the following anything, of value which he knows, or should be
must concur: known to him, to have been derived from the
1. That there be community of design, i.e. proceeds of the crime of robbery and theft.
knowing the criminal design;

Fence – includes any person, firm, association, or to be used in the investigation of, or
corporation or partnership or organization official proceedings in, criminal cases;
who/which commits the act of fencing. (c) harboring or concealing, or facilitating the
escape of, any person he knows, or has
reasonable ground to believe or suspect,
Value of Property Penalty
has committed any offense under existing
Above P22,000.00 Reclusion Temporal penal laws in order to prevent his arrest,
+ accessory penalty under
RPC; Max. 20 years prosecution and conviction;
(d) publicly using a fictitious name for the
Prision Mayor to its purpose of concealing a crime, evading
maximum periods: prosecution or the execution of a judgment,
+1 year every P10,000.00 or concealing his true name and other
value exceeding P22,000.00 personal circumstances for the same
P12,000.00 < x ≤ purpose or purposes;
Prision Mayor
P22,000.00 (e) delaying the prosecution of criminal cases
P6,000.00 < x ≤ Prision Correccional in its by obstructing the service of process or court
P12,000.00 medium and maximum orders or disturbing proceedings in the
periods fiscal's offices, in Tanodbayan, or in the
200.00 < x ≤ Prision Correccional in its courts;
P6,000.00 minimum and medium
(f) making, presenting or using any record,
periods
document, paper or object with knowledge of
P50.00 < x ≤ P200.00 Arresto Mayor in its medium its falsity and with intent to affect the course
period to Prision
Correccional or outcome of the investigation of, or official
proceedings in, criminal cases;
P5.00 < x ≤ P50.00 Arresto Mayor in its medium
period (g) soliciting, accepting, or agreeing to accept
P5.00 and below Arresto Mayor in its any benefit in consideration of abstaining
minimum period from, discounting, or impeding the
prosecution of a criminal offender;
Liability of Officials of Juridical Persons – the (h) threatening directly or indirectly another with
president or manager or any officer thereof who the infliction of any wrong upon his person,
honor or property or that of any immediate
knows or should have known the commission of
member or members of his family in order to
the offense. (Art.4) prevent such person from appearing in the
investigation of, or official proceedings in,
Presumption of Fencing – mere passion of any criminal cases, or imposing a condition,
goods, article, item, object or anything of value whether lawful or unlawful, in order to
which has been the subject of robbery or prevent a person from appearing in the
thievery shall be prima facie evidence of fencing investigation of or in official proceedings in,
criminal cases;
(i) giving of false or fabricated information to
mislead or prevent the law enforcement
P.D. No. 1829 (Obstruction of Justice) agencies from apprehending the offender or
from protecting the life or property of the
Penalty of prision correccional in its maximum victim; or fabricating information from the
period OR a fine of P1,000.00P6,000.00 OR data gathered in confidence by investigating
both. authorities for purposes of background
information and not for publication and
publishing or disseminating the same to
Prohibited acts: mislead the investigator or to the court.
(a) preventing witnesses from testifying in any

criminal proceeding or from reporting the
commission of any offense or the identity of Art. 20. Accessories who are exempt from
any offender/s by means of bribery, criminal liability. — The penalties prescribed
misrepresentation, deceit, intimidation, force for accessories shall not be imposed upon
or threats; those who are such with respect to their
(b) altering, destroying, suppressing or spouses, ascendants, descendants,
concealing any paper, record, document, or legitimate, natural, and adopted brothers and
object, with intent to impair its verity, sisters, or relatives by affinity within the
authenticity, legibility, availability, or same degrees, with the single exception of
admissibility as evidence in any investigation
of or official proceedings in, criminal cases,

accessories falling within the provisions of 3. Must be personal – no one should be

paragraph 1 of the next preceding article. punished for the crime of another;
Grounds for Exemption: 4. Must be legal – it is the consequence of

• based on ties of blood a judgment according to law;
• preservation of cleanliness of one’s
name 5. Must be certain – no one may escape its
which compels one to conceal crimes effects;
committed by relatives so near as those
mentioned above. 6. Must be equal for all;
Exempted, is principal is a: 7. Must be correctional.

• spouse, or
• ascendant, or Theories of penalty:
• descendant, or
• legitimate, natural or adopted brother or a) Prevention – the State must punish the
sister, or criminal to prevent or suppress the
• relative by affinity within the same danger to the State arising from the
degree criminal acts of the offender.
EXCEPTIONS to exemptions: b) Selfdefense – the State has the right to

1. By profiting by the effects of the punish as a measure of selfdefense so
crime; as to protect society from the threat and
2. By assisting the offender to profit by wrong inflicted by the criminal.
the effects of the crime.
c) Reformation – the object of punishment
in criminal cases is to correct and reform
Title Three the offender.
PENALTIES
Chapter One d) Exemplarity – the criminal is punished to
PENALTIES IN GENERAL serve as an example to deter others
from committing crimes.
Art. 21. Penalties that may be imposed. — No
felony shall be punishable by any penalty not e) Justice – that crime must be punished
prescribed by law prior to its commission. by the State as an act of retributive
justice, a vindication of absolute right
Penalty – is that suffering that is inflicted by the and moral law violated by the criminal.
State for the transgression of the law.
Subsidiary penalty for a crime cannot be
Penalty in its general sense signifies pain; imposed, if it was “not prescribed by law prior to
especially considered in the judicial sphere, it its commission”
means suffering undergone, because of the
action of human society, by one who commits
crime. Art. 22. Retroactive effect of penal laws. —
Penal Laws shall have a retroactive effect
Judicial conditions of penalty: insofar as they favor the persons guilty of a
felony, who is not a habitual criminal, as this
1. Must be productive of suffering, without term is defined in Rule 5 of Article 62 of this
however affecting the integrity of the Code, although at the time of the publication
human personality; of such laws a final sentence has been
pronounced and the convict is serving the
2. Must be commensurate with the offense same.
– different crimes must be punished with
different penalties; General rule is to give criminal laws
prospective effect.

Be it procedural, substantive or remedial for Pardon, as well as compromise, afforded by the

as long as the law is favorable to the offenders must come before the institution of
accused who is not a habitual delinquent, the criminal proceedings.
law must be given a retroactive application.
People vs. Ramirez, G.R. No. 135094, February Art. 24. Measures of prevention or safety
28, 2001. which are nor considered penalties. — The
following shall not be considered as
Exceptions to the exceptions: penalties:
1. The arrest and temporary detention of
1. Where the new law is expressly made accused persons, as well as their detention
inapplicable to pending actions or by reason of insanity or imbecility, or illness
existing causes of actions. requiring their confinement in a hospital.
2. Where the offender is a Habitual 2. The commitment of a minor to any of the

Delinquent under Article 62of RPC. institutions mentioned in Article 80 and for
the purposes specified therein.
Habitual delinquent – within 10 years, from date
of release or last conviction of the following 3. Suspension from the employment of
crimes (see p.41): public office during the trial or in order to
• Serious physical injuries institute proceedings.
• Less serious physical injuries
• Falsification 4. Fines and other corrective measures
• Robbery which, in the exercise of their administrative
• Estafa disciplinary powers, superior officials may
• Theft impose upon their subordinates.
Is found guilty of any said crimes for third time or
oftener. 5. Deprivation of rights and the reparations
which the civil laws may establish in penal
Criminal liability under the repealed law form.
subsists, when:
1. The provisions of the former law is Art.24(1) refers to confinement by “accused
reenacted; persons” only and not those already convicted.
2. The repeal is by implication; or,
3. When there is a saving clause; They are not penalties, because they are not
imposed as a result of judicial proceedings but
No retroactive effect of penals laws as regards merely preventive measures before conviction of
to jurisdiction. the offenders.
Fines under Art.24(4) should not be imposed by

Art. 23. Effect of pardon by the offended Courts, otherwise it will appear that such
party. — A pardon of the offended party does constitute a penalty.
not extinguish criminal action except as
provided in Article 344 of this Code; but civil Example of Art.24(5) is when parents are
liability with regard to the interest of the deprived of their parental authority if found guilty
injured party is extinguished by his express of the crime of corruption of their minor children,
waiver. in accordance with Art.332 of the New Civil
Code.
Pardon by under Article 344 is only a bar to
criminal prosecution.
Chapter Two
In the crimes of Adultery, Concubinage, CLASSIFICATION OF PENALTIES
Seduction, Abduction, Rape and Acts of
Lasciviousness (ACSARAL), “express” pardon Art. 25. Penalties which may be imposed. —
by the offended party relieves criminal liability. The penalties which may be imposed
according to this Code, and their different
classes, are those included in the following:

Scale
Principal Penalties Accessory Penalties – those that are deemed
Capital punishment: included in the imposition of the principal
Death. penalties.
Afflictive penalties: Principal Penalties, Classification:

Reclusion perpetua, 1. Divisible (fixed periods)
Reclusion temporal, a. Maximum
Perpetual or temporary absolute b. Medium
disqualification, c. Minimum
Perpetual or temporary special 2. Indivisible
disqualification, Prision a. Death
mayor. b. Reclusion perpetua
c. Perpetual absolute or special
Correctional penalties: disqualification
Prision correccional, d. Public censure
Arresto mayor,
Suspension, CLASSIFICATION according to:
Destierro. Subject Matter Gravity
 Corporal (death)  Capital
Light penalties:  Deprivation of  Afflictive
Arresto menor, freedom (reclusion,  Correctional
Public censure. prision, arresto)  Light
 Restriction of
Penalties common to the three freedom (destierro) These corresponds to
preceding classes:  Deprivation of rights classification of
Fine, and (disqualification and felonies in Art.9 of
Bond to keep the peace. suspension) RPC (grave, less
 Pecuniary (fine) grave and light)
Accessory Penalties
Perpetual or temporary absolute
disqualification, Art. 26. When afflictive, correctional, or light
Perpetual or temporary special penalty. — A fine, whether imposed as a
disqualification, single of as an alternative penalty, shall be
Suspension from public office, the right considered an afflictive penalty, if it exceeds
to vote and be voted for, the profession or 6,000 pesos; a correctional penalty, if it does
calling. not exceed 6,000 pesos but is not less than
Civil interdiction, 200 pesos; and a light penalty if it less than
Indemnification, 200 pesos.
Forfeiture or confiscation of instruments and
proceeds of the offense, Payment of costs. Penalties cannot be imposed in the
alternative.
Simply said, no penalty shall be imposed not The law does not permit any court to impose a
bearing the nomenclature of under Art.25 above. sentence in the alternative, its duty being to
indicate the penalty imposed definitively and
R.A. 9346 prohibited the imposition of death positively.
penalty.
Fine/ Bond to keep the peace PhP
Signed into law June 24, 2006 and provided for Afflictive Over
the imposition of reclusion perpetua in lieu of P6,000.00
death penalty when the law violated makes use Correctional P200.00 to
of the nomenclature of the penalties of the RPC. P6,000.00
Light Penalty Less than
Principal Penalties – those expressly imposed P200.00
by the court in the judgment of conviction.

If the FINE imposed is exactly P200.00: Penalty Duration

Reclusion perpetua 20years + 1day up to
What kind of PENALTY is it? 40years
Ans. CORRECCIONAL penalty (Art.26, RPC) Reclusion temporal 12years + 1day up to
20years
Prision mayor; 6years + 1day up to
What kind of FELONY is it? Temporary disqualification 12years; except when
Ans. LIGHT FELONY (Art.9, RPC) disqualification is an
accessory penalty, in
which case its duration
is that of the principal
Chapter Three penalty
DURATION AND EFFECTS OF PENALTIES Prision correccional, 6months + 1day up to
suspension and destierro 6years; except when
Section One. — Duration of Penalties suspension is an
accessory penalty, in
Art. 27. Reclusion perpetua. — Any person which case its duration
is that of the principal
sentenced to any of the perpetual penalties penalty
shall be pardoned after undergoing the Arresto mayor 1month + 1day up to
penalty for thirty years, unless such person 6months
by reason of his conduct or some other Arresto menor 1day to 30 days
serious cause shall be considered by the Bond to keep the peace Effective period
Chief Executive as unworthy of pardon. discretionary on the
court
Reclusion temporal. — The penalty of

reclusion temporal shall be from twelve When Destierro is imposed?
years and one day to twenty years. • Serious physical injuries or death under
exceptional circumstances (Art.247)
Prision mayor and temporary
disqualification. — The duration of the • Failure to give bond for good behavior
penalties of prision mayor and temporary (Art.284)
disqualification shall be from six years and
one day to twelve years, except when the • Penalty for concubine in concubinage
penalty of disqualification is imposed as an (Art.334)
accessory penalty, in which case its duration
shall be that of the principal penalty. • In case where after reducing penalty by
one or more degrees, destierro is the
proper penalty.
Prision correccional, suspension, and
destierro. — The duration of the penalties of
prision correccional, suspension and Bond for good behavior (Art.284) is required of a
destierro shall be from six months and one person making grave or light threat, is not
day to six years, except when suspension is required to be given in cases involving other
imposed as an accessory penalty, in which crimes.
case, its duration shall be that of the Life imprisonment Reclusion perpetua
principal penalty. Imposable for violation Imposable for violation of
of special law the Revised Penal Code
Has no fixed duration Has fixed duration (up to
Arresto mayor. — The duration of the penalty 30 years)
of arresto mayor shall be from one month Has no accessory Has accessory penalties
and one day to six months. penalties
Arresto menor. — The duration of the penalty

of arresto menor shall be from one day to xxx
thirty days.
Preventive imprisonment – when the offense
Bond to keep the peace. — The bond to keep charged is nonbailable, or even if bailable, he
the peace shall be required to cover such cannot furnish the required bail. [ Full or 4/5th ]
period of time as the court may determine.

Art. 34. Civil interdiction. — Civil interdiction

shall deprive the offender during the time of Art. 37. Cost; What are included. — Costs
his sentence of the rights of parental shall include fees and indemnities in the
authority, or guardianship, either as to the course of the judicial proceedings, whether
person or property of any ward, of marital they be fixed or unalterable amounts
authority, of the right to manage his property previously determined by law or regulations
and of the right to dispose of such property in force, or amounts not subject to schedule.
by any act or any conveyance inter vivos.
Costs includes:
Disqualification is withholding a privilege, 1. Fees, and
not a denial of a right. 2. Indemnities, in the course of judicial
proceedings.
Civil interdiction shall cause the following
effects: Cost de officio = no costs
• Deprivation of the rights of parental Art. 38. Pecuniary liabilities; Order of

authority or guardianship of any ward; payment. — In case the property of the
offender should not be sufficient for the
• Deprivation of marital authority; payment of all his pecuniary liabilities, the
same shall be met in the following order:
1. The reparation of the damage caused.
• Deprivation of right to manage his
property and the right to dispose such 2. Indemnification of consequential
property by any act or any conveyance damages.
inter vivos (or donation made during 3. The fine.
lifetime). 4. The cost of the proceedings.
Art. 36. Pardon; its effect. — A pardon shall Article 38 is applicable in case the property of
not work the restoration of the right to hold the offender should not be sufficient for the
public office, or the right of suffrage, unless payment of all his pecuniary liabilities. The order
such rights be expressly restored by the of payment is provided above.
terms of the pardon. • If the offender has sufficient or no
property, then Article 38 has no use.
A pardon shall in no case exempt the culprit • Courts cannot disregard the order of
from the payment of the civil indemnity payment.
imposed upon him by the sentence. • There is reparation in the crime of rape
when the dress of the woman was torn.
Pardon may be granted only after conviction by
final judgment. If it is granted in general terms, it Art. 39. Subsidiary penalty. — If the convict
does not include accessory penalty. has no property with which to meet the fine
Exception: Absolute pardon. mentioned in the paragraph 3 of the nest
preceding article, he shall be subject to a
Pardon after 30 years does not remove subsidiary personal liability at the rate of one
Perpetual Absolute Disqualification. day for each eight pesos, subject to the
Exception: Such right be expressly restored following rules:
by the terms of the pardon.
1. If the principal penalty imposed be
Pardon by Chief Pardon by Offended prision correccional or arresto and
Executive (President) Party fine, he shall remain under
Extinguishes criminal Criminal liability is not confinement until his fine referred to
liability of offender extinguished in the preceding paragraph is
Cannot include civil Can waive civil liability the satisfied, but his subsidiary
liability offender must pay imprisonment shall not exceed one
Can only be granted In cases provided third of the term of the sentence, and
after conviction by final (Art.344), it must be given in no case shall it continue for more
judgment prior to criminal institution than one year, and no fraction or part

of a day shall be counted against the if convict has enough property to meet the fine
prisoner. and not exempt from execution, convict cannot
2. When the principal penalty imposed choose to serve subsidiary penalty instead of
be only a fine, the subsidiary paying the fine.
imprisonment shall not exceed six
months, if the culprit shall have been The word “principal” should be omitted.
prosecuted for a grave or less grave
felony, and shall not exceed fifteen The word “principal” referring to the penalty
days, if for a light felony. imposed is not the correct translation. As in
3. When the principal imposed is higher “when the penalty imposed ”.
than prision correccional, no
subsidiary imprisonment shall be
Subsidiary imprisonment is not an accessory
imposed upon the culprit. penalty.
4. If the principal penalty imposed is not
to be executed by confinement in a
penal institution, but such penalty is The culprit cannot be made to undergo
subsidiary imprisonment unless the judgment
of fixed duration, the convict, during
expressly so provides. (People vs. Fajardo, 65
the period of time established in the
Phil. 539, 542)
preceding rules, shall continue to
suffer the same deprivations as those
RULES AS TO SUBSIDIARY PENALTY
of which the principal penalty
consists.
1. If the penalty is Prision Correccional or
5. The subsidiary personal liability Arresto with Fine:
which the convict may have suffered 2. If penalty imposed is Fine only:
by reason of his insolvency shall not
relieve him, from the fine in case his 3. If penalty is higher than Prision
Correccional – no subsidiary
financial circumstances should
imprisonment.
improve. (As amended by RA 5465,
April 21, 1969). 4. If penalty imposed is not to be executed
by confinement but fixed duration –
same deprivations as 1, 2 and 3.
Subsidiary penalty – is a subsidiary personal
5. If financial circumstances of the convict
liability to be suffered by the convict who has no
should improve, he should still pay the
property to meet the fine, at the rate of one day
fine, notwithstanding the fact that the
for each eight pesos*.
convict suffered subsidiary personal
liability therefor.
*Amended by R.A. No. 10159
If the convict has no property with which to meet RULE 1 Example:
the fine mentioned in paragraph 3 of the next
preceding article, he shall be subject to a X is convicted of falsification by private individual
subsidiary personal liability at the rate of one (Art.172) and sentenced to 4 years 9 months
day for each amount equivalent to the and 10 days of prision correccional as maximum
highest minimum wage prevailing in the term of indeterminate penalty and pay a fine of
Philippines at the time of rendition of P223,000.00.
judgment of conviction by the trial court
Answer. If X has no property to meet the fine,
Prevailing minimum daily wage now (2012) is: he will have to suffer a subsidiary imprisonment
P426.00 (basic) + P20.00 (eCOLA) = P446.00 at the rate of one day for every P446.00 but not
to exceed 365 days:
No subsidiary liability for nonpayment of of
other pecuniary liability. 365 days in one year
x4 years
1,460 days in 4 years
R.A. No. 5465 has retroactive application since it
270 days in 9 months
is favorable to the accused. Only fines are 10 days
subject to subsidiary penalty. It applies only if the
convict has no property to meet the fine. But 1,740 days in 4 yrs + 9 mos + 10 days

580 days which represent

1/3 of penalty imposed Chapter Four
APPLICATION OF PENALTIES
P446.00/P223,000.00 500 days Section One. — Rules for the application of
Which is less than 1/3 of penalty
imposed (580 days).
penalties to the persons criminally liable and
for the graduation of the same.
Although 500 days does not exceed 580 days
(1/3 of penalty imposed), X can only be made to Art. 46. Penalty to be imposed upon
suffer subsidiary imprisonment of 365 days principals in general. — The penalty
because “in no case shall it continue for more prescribed by law for the commission of a
than one year”. felony shall be imposed upon the principals
in the commission of such felony.
RULE 2 Example:
Whenever the law prescribes a penalty for a
felony is general terms, it shall be
X is sentenced to pay a fine of P44,600.00 for a
understood as applicable to the
less grave felony. What is the subsidiary
consummated felony.
penalty?
P44,600/(P446.00/day) = 100 days The penalty prescribed in general terms shall be

imposed:
1. Upon the principals.
Answer. Since this does not exceed 6 months,
the subsidiary imprisonment shall be all 100 2. For consummated felony.
days.
Exception: When the law fixes a penalty for a
frustrated or attempted felony.
But suppose X is sentenced to pay a fine of
P8,920.00 (equivalent to 20 days) for a light
felony, he cannot be made to suffer a subsidiary Art. 47. In what cases the death penalty shall
penalty more than 15 days. not be imposed. — The death penalty shall
be imposed in all cases in which it must be
imposed under existing laws, except in the
RULE 4 Example: following cases:
X is sentenced to 4 years 9 months and 10 days 1. When the guilty person be more than
seventy years of age.
of destierro and pay a fine of P223,000.00. X
has no money to pay the fine. What would be
the subsidiary imprisonment? 2. When upon appeal or revision of the
case by the Supreme court, all the
Answer. X shall suffer an additional period of members thereof are not unanimous
destierro at the same rate of one day for every in their voting as to the propriety of
P446.00. the imposition of the death penalty.
For the imposition of said penalty or
P223,000.00/(P446.00/day) = 500 days for the confirmation of a judgment of
the inferior court imposing the death
Same rule applies for principal penalty of sentence, the Supreme Court shall
suspension and fine. render its decision per curiam, which
shall be signed by all justices of said
But for example, the principal penalty is not to court, unless some member or
exceed P11,150.00 and censure. If the accused members thereof shall have been
cannot pay the fine, there can be no subsidiary disqualified from taking part in the
liability because the penalty of censure has no consideration of the case, in which
fixed duration and is not to be executed by even the unanimous vote and
confinement. signature of only the remaining
justices shall be required.vi
No subsidiary penalty for violating Tax Code.
Cases where Death Penalty is not imposed:

1. When the guilty person is below 18 yrs

of age at the time of commission of the Murder, arson and robbery are mere ingredients
crime. of the crime of rebellion, as a means ‘necessary’
2. When the guilty person is more than 70 for the perpetration of the offense. Such common
years of age. offenses are absorbed or inherent in the crime of
rebellion. In as much as the acts specified in
3. When upon appeal or automatic review Article 135 constitute one single crime, it follows
of the case by the Supreme Court, the that said acts offers no occasion for the
vote of eight members is not obtained application Article 48, which requires therefore
for imposition of death penalty. the commission of at least two crimes. (People vs.
Hernandez, 99 Phil. 515)
The 1987 Constitution merely suspended the
imposition of death penalty. R.A. No. 7659 Under R.A. No. 6968 AntiCoup d’ETAT Law,
restored the death penalty while R.A. No. Rebelion may be complexed with common
9346 prohibited the imposition of the death crimes.
penalty.
Single Larceny Doctrine – from the doctrine
Art. 48. Penalty for complex crimes. — When that taking of property or properties belonging to
a single act constitutes two or more grave or the same or different persons by a series of act
less grave felonies, or when an offense is a or acts arising from single criminal intent or
necessary means for committing the other, resolution constitutes only one crime. The
the penalty for the most serious crime shall courts have abandoned separate “larceny
be imposed, the same to be applied in its doctrine” which is the opposite.
maximum period. Same place
Same time
A complex crime is only one crime. Single criminal impulse
Kinds of complex crimes: Exception: use of (sub)machine gun, grenade

1. When a single act constitutes two or
more grave or less grave felonies. The trend in theft cases is to follow the socalled
(compound crime or delito compuesto) "single larceny" doctrine, that is, the taking of
2. When an offense is a necessary means several things, whether belonging to the same or
for committing the other. (complex crime different owners, at the same time and place
proper or delito complejo) constitutes but one larceny. Many courts have
abandoned the "separate larceny doctrine," under
which there is a distinct larceny as to the property
Applying article 48, it follows that if one offense is of each victim. Also abandoned was the doctrine
light, there is no complex crime. The resulting that the government has the discretion to
offenses may be treated as separate or the light prosecute the accused or one offense or for as
felony may be absorbed by the grave felony. Thus, many distinct offenses as there are victims.
the light felonies of damage to property and slight (Santiago vs. Garchitorena, 228 SCRA 214)
physical injuries, both resulting from a single act
of imprudence, do not constitute a complex crime.
They cannot be charged in one information. They Other kinds of Plurality with single penalty:
are separate offenses subject to distinct • Composite or Special Complex crimes
penalties. (Reodica vs. • Continued crimes (delicto continuado)
CA, 292 SCRA 87) • Continuing crimes (transitory crimes)
The plaint of petitioner's counsel that he is Ordinary Complex Special Complex

charged with a crime that does not exist in the Crime Crime
statute books, while technically correct so far as Composed of 2 or more Made up of 2 or more
the Court has ruled that rebellion may not be crimes punished in crimes which are
complexed with other offenses committed on the different provisions of the considered as
occasion thereof, must therefore be dismissed as Revised Penal Code components of a single
a mere flight of rhetoric. Read in the context of indivisible offense
Hernandez, the information does indeed charge Penalty imposable is the Penalty imposable is
the petitioner with a crime defined and punished most serious crime in its specifically provided by
by the Revised Penal Code: simple rebellion. maximum period law
(Enrile vs. Salazar, 186 SCRA 217)

Exceptions:
Examples of Special Complex Crime • Article 142 (accessory punished as
• Robbery with homicide, Art.294 par.1 principal)
• Rape with homicide, Art.335 • Article 250 (penalty for frustrated
• Kidnapping with homicide, Art.267 parricide, murder and homicide)
(as amended by R.A. No. 7659) • Article 346 (liability of ascendants,
guardians, teachers, or other persons
Cases where there are no complex crimes entrusted with custody of the offended
• Offense committed to conceal crime party – as principals)
• Offense inherent, absorbed or an
element of a crime Diminution of Degrees of Penalty (Art.5057)
• Offense punishable by special law
Stage of
Participation Execution Article
Art. 49. Penalty to be imposed upon the Degree
principals when the crime committed is s Consummated 46
different from that intended. — In cases in lower
from Principal Frustrated 50
which the felony committed is different from Principa
that which the offender intended to commit, l Attempted 51
the following rules shall be observed:
1 Accomplice Consummated 52
1. If the penalty prescribed for the 2 Accessory 53
felony committed be higher than that
corresponding to the offense which 2 Accomplice Frustrated 54
the accused intended to commit, the 3 Accessory 55
penalty corresponding to the latter
shall be imposed in its maximum 3 Accomplice Attempted 56
period. 4 Accessory 57
2. If the penalty prescribed for the Art. 58. Additional penalty to be imposed
felony committed be lower than that upon certain accessories. — Those
corresponding to the one which the accessories falling within the terms of
accused intended to commit, the paragraphs 3 of Article 19 of this Code who
penalty for the former shall be should act with abuse of their public
imposed in its maximum period. functions, shall suffer the additional penalty
of absolute perpetual disqualification if the
3. The rule established by the next principal offender shall be guilty of a grave
preceding paragraph shall not be felony, and that of absolute temporary
applicable if the acts committed by disqualification if he shall be guilty of a less
the guilty person shall also constitute grave felony.
an attempt or frustration of another
crime, if the law prescribes a higher Article 58 applies only to public officers who
penalty for either of the latter abused their public functions.
offenses, in which case the penalty
provided for the attempted or the Art. 59. Penalty to be imposed in case of
frustrated crime shall be imposed in failure to commit the crime because the
its maximum period. v means employed or the aims sought are
impossible. — When the person intending to
Article 49 applies only to error in personae. It commit an offense has already performed
does not apply to aberratio ictus and praeter the acts for the execution of the same but
intentionem. nevertheless the crime was not produced by
reason of the fact that the act intended was
General Rule: by its nature one of impossible
• Article 50 – 1 degree lower accomplishment or because the means
• Article 51 – 2 degrees lower employed by such person are essentially
inadequate to produce the result desired by
him, the court, having in mind the social

danger and the degree of criminality shown 3. When the penalty prescribed for the
by the offender, shall impose upon him the crime is composed of one or two
penalty of arresto mayor or a fine from 200 to indivisible penalties and the
500 pesos. maximum period of another divisible
penalty, the penalty next lower in
Penalty for impossible crime is arresto degree shall be composed of the
mayor or a fine ranging from 200 to 500 medium and minimum periods of the
pesos. proper divisible penalty and the
maximum periods of the proper
Art. 60. Exception to the rules established in divisible penalty and the maximum
Articles 50 to 57. — The provisions period of that immediately following
contained in Articles 50 to 57, inclusive, of in said respective graduated scale.
this Code shall not be applicable to cases in
which the law expressly prescribes the 4. When the penalty prescribed for the
penalty provided for a frustrated or crime is composed of several
attempted felony, or to be imposed upon periods, corresponding to different
accomplices or accessories. divisible penalties, the penalty next
lower in degree shall be composed of
Accessories punished 1degree the period immediately following the
lower (instead of 2degrees) minimum prescribed and of the two
next following, which shall be taken
• Knowingly using counterfeited seal or from the penalty prescribed, if
forged signature of the President possible; otherwise from the penalty
(Art.162) immediately following in the above
mentioned respective graduated
• Illegal possession and use of false
treasury or bank note (Art. 168) scale.
• Using falsified dispatch (Art.173 par.2)
• Using falsified document (Art.173 par.3) 5. When the law prescribes a penalty for
a crime in some manner not
Art. 61. Rules for graduating penalties. — For especially provided for in the four
the purpose of graduating the penalties preceding rules, the courts,
which, according to the provisions of proceeding by analogy, shall impose
Articles 50 to 57, inclusive, of this Code, are corresponding penalties upon those
to be imposed upon persons guilty as guilty as principals of the frustrated
principals of any frustrated or attempted felony, or of attempt to commit the
felony, or as accomplices or accessories, the same, and upon accomplices and
following rules shall be observed: accessories.
1. When the penalty prescribed for the The lower penalty shall be taken from the
graduated scale (no. 1) in Article 71:
felony is single and indivisible, the
penalty next lower in degrees shall be 1. Death
that immediately following that 2. Reclusion Perpetua RP
indivisible penalty in the respective 3. Reclusion Temporal RT
graduated scale prescribed in Article 4. Prision Mayor PM
71 of this Code. 5. Prision Correccional PC
6. Arresto Mayor AMa
7. Destierro D
2. When the penalty prescribed for the
8. Arresto Menor AMe
crime is composed of two indivisible
9. Public Censure C
penalties, or of one or more divisible
penalties to be impose to their full 10. Fine F
extent, the penalty next lower in
degree shall be that immediately The indivisible penalties are (1) death, (2)
following the lesser of the penalties reclusion perpetua and (3) public censure.
prescribed in the respective
graduated scale.

Illustration of rules:
Maximum
First Rule: when the penalty is single Reclusion Temporal

Medium
indivisible.
Reclusion perpetua (ex. Kidnapping and failure to Minimum (1) Penalty for
return a minor, Art.270). The penalty immediately principal in
following the lesser of penalties is reclusion temporal. Maximum consummated
felony.
Prision Mayor
Medium
Second Rule: when penalty is composed of
two indivisible penalties. Minimum (2) Penalty for
Reclusion perpetua to death (ex. Parricide, Art.246). accomplice or
The penalty immediately following the lesser of the Maximum principal for
penalties is reclusion temporal. frustrated felony
Prision Correccional
Medium
Third Rule: when the penalty is composed of Minimum
two indivisible penalties and the maximum
period of a divisible penalty.
Fifth Rule: (by analogy, because “not
The penalty for murder (Art.248) is reclusion temporal
in its maximum period to death. Reclusion perpetua, specifically provided for in the four
being between reclusion temporal and death, is preceding rules”).
included in the penalty. The proper divisible penalty is
reclusion temporal. The penalty immediately following Other analogies: When penalty has two periods.
reclusion temporal is prision mayor. Under the 3rd Ex. (1) For Abduction (Art. 343) Prision
rule, the penalty next lower is composed of the correccional in its minimum and medium
medium and minimum periods of reclusion temporal periods.
and the maximum of prision mayor. (People vs. Ong
Ta, 70 Phil. 553, 555)
Maximum
Death Prision Correccional (1) Penalty
(1) Penalty for Medium
prescribed for the
principal in
Reclusion Perpetua felony.
consummated Minimum
felony.
Maximum Maximum (2) Penalty next
lower
Reclusion Temporal Arresto Mayor
Medium (2) Penalty for Medium
accomplice or
Minimum principal for Minimum
frustrated felony
Maximum
Art. 62. Effect of the attendance of mitigating
Prision Mayor
Medium or aggravating circumstances and of
habitual delinquency. — Mitigating or
Minimum aggravating circumstances and habitual
delinquency shall be taken into account for
Fourth Rule: When the penalty is composed the purpose of diminishing or increasing the
of several periods. penalty in conformity with the following
The word “several” in relation to the number of rules:
periods, means consisting in more than two periods.
Hence, this applies only to penalties with at least 3 1. Aggravating circumstances which in
periods. The several periods must correspond to themselves constitute a crime
different divisible penalties. The penalty which is
specially punishable by law or which
composed of several periods corresponding to
different divisible penalties is prision mayor in its are included by the law in defining a
medium period to reclusion temporal in its minimum crime and prescribing the penalty
period. The two periods of prision correccional, the therefor shall not be taken into
penalty next following in the scale prescribed in Article account for the purpose of
71 since it cannot be taken from the penalty increasing the penalty.
prescribed.
2. The same rule shall apply with
respect to any aggravating

circumstance inherent in the crime to For the purpose of this article, a person shall
such a degree that it must of be deemed to be habitual delinquent, is
necessity accompany the within a period of ten years from the date of
commission thereof. his release or last conviction of the crimes of
serious or less serious physical injuries,
3. Aggravating or mitigating robo, hurto, estafa or falsification, he is
circumstances which arise from the found guilty of any of said crimes a third
moral attributes of the offender, or time or oftener.
from his private relations with the
offended party, or from any other Examples:
personal cause, shall only serve to
aggravate or mitigate the liability of Article 62.
the principals, accomplices and
accessories as to whom such Par. 1 – dwelling in trespass, means of fire in
circumstances are attendant. arson, derailment of locomotive in Art.330;
4. The circumstances which consist in Par. 2 – public officer in malversation of funds,

the material execution of the act, or dwelling in robbery, evident premeditation in
in the means employed to robbery and theft;
accomplish it, shall serve to
aggravate or mitigate the liability of Par. 3 – moral attributes of the offender; private
those persons only who had relations with the offended party;
knowledge of them at the time of the
execution of the act or their Par. 4 – material execution of the act; means to
cooperation therein. accomplish crime;
5. Habitual delinquency shall have the Par. 5 – Habitual delinquent

following effects:
Habitual delinquency Recidivism
(a) Upon a third conviction the culprit Crimes committed are Crimes under the same
shall be sentenced to the penalty specified: S/L/T/R/E/F title of RPC
provided by law for the last crime of Within 10 years No time fixed by law
which he be found guilty and to the Must be found guilty the Second conviction
additional penalty of prision 3rd time or oftener
correccional in its medium and Additional penalty is Not offset by mitigating
maximum periods; imposed circumstances;
increases penalty to
(b) Upon a fourth conviction, the culprit maximum
shall be sentenced to the penalty
provided for the last crime of which
he be found guilty and to the Article 63 may be disregarded. In any case, it
additional penalty of prision mayor in simply fixes the penalty regardless of any
its minimum and medium periods; mitigating/ aggravating circumstances
and present.
(c) Upon a fifth or additional conviction,
the culprit shall be sentenced to the Art. 64. Rules for the application of penalties
penalty provided for the last crime of which contain three periods.— In cases in
which he be found guilty and to the which the penalties prescribed by law
additional penalty of prision mayor in contain three periods, whether it be a single
its maximum period to reclusion divisible penalty or composed of three
temporal in its minimum period. different penalties, each one of which forms
a period in accordance with the provisions of
Notwithstanding the provisions of this Articles 76 and 77, the court shall observe
article, the total of the two penalties to be for the application of the penalty the
imposed upon the offender, in conformity following rules, according to whether there
herewith, shall in no case exceed 30 years. are or are not mitigating or aggravating
circumstances:

1. When there are neither aggravating Courts cannot lower the penalty by a
nor mitigating circumstances, they degree if with aggravating circumstance.
shall impose the penalty prescribed 6. Courts cannot impose a greater penalty
by law in its medium period. than prescribed by law in its maximum
period; no matter how many aggravating
2. When only a mitigating circumstance are present.
circumstances is present in the
commission of the act, they shall Art. 65. Rule in cases in which the penalty is
impose the penalty in its minimum not composed of three periods. — In cases
period. in which the penalty prescribed by law is not
composed of three periods, the courts shall
3. When an aggravating circumstance is apply the rules contained in the foregoing
present in the commission of the act, articles, dividing into three equal portions of
they shall impose the penalty in its time included in the penalty prescribed, and
maximum period. forming one period of each of the three
portions.
4. When both mitigating and
aggravating circumstances are Article 65 simply provides for the alternative
present, the court shall reasonably in obtaining artificially three periods when
offset those of one class against the the penalty does not have any.
other according to their relative
weight.
Art. 66. Imposition of fines. — In imposing
fines the courts may fix any amount within
5. When there are two or more the limits established by law; in fixing the
mitigating circumstances and no amount in each case attention shall be given,
aggravating circumstances are not only to the mitigating and aggravating
present, the court shall impose the circumstances, but more particularly to the
penalty next lower to that prescribed wealth or means of the culprit.
by law, in the period that it may deem
applicable, according to the number Outline of this rule:
and nature of such circumstances.
1. The courts can fix any amount of the
fine within the limits established by law.
6. Whatever may be the number and 2. The court must consider:
nature of the aggravating a. Mitigating and aggravating
circumstances, the courts shall not circumstance; and,
impose a greater penalty than that b. More particularly, the wealth or
prescribed by law, in its maximum means of the culprit.
period.
7. Within the limits of each period, the
Article 67 applies when all the requisites of
court shall determine the extent of
the exempting circumstance of accident (Art.
the penalty according to the number 12 par. 4) are not present.
and nature of the aggravating and
mitigating circumstances and the
greater and lesser extent of the evil If all the conditions of Art.12 par.4 are not
produced by the crime. present, the act should be considered reckless
imprudence if the act is executed without taking
Outline of the rules: those precautions or measures which the most
common prudence would require. This will fall
under Art.365 par.1.
1. No aggravating and no mitigating –
medium period.
2. Only mitigating – minimum period. Article 68 has been partly repealed by
3. Only an aggravating – maximum period. Republic Act No. 9344
4. Offsetting of mitigating and aggravating A child in conflict with law shall be entitled of a
circumstances. penalty next lower than that prescribed by law,
5. When there are 2 mitigating and no but in the proper periods.
aggravating, next lower penalty applies.

Art. 69. Penalty to be imposed when the convict's sentence shall not be more than
crime committed is not wholly excusable. — threefold the length of time corresponding to
A penalty lower by one or two degrees than the most severe of the penalties imposed
that prescribed by law shall be imposed if upon him. No other penalty to which he may
the deed is not wholly excusable by reason be liable shall be inflicted after the sum total
of the lack of some of the conditions of those imposed equals the same maximum
required to justify the same or to exempt period.
from criminal liability in the several cases
mentioned in Article 11 and 12, provided that Such maximum period shall in no case
the majority of such conditions be present. exceed forty years.
The courts shall impose the penalty in the
period which may be deemed proper, in view In applying the provisions of this rule the
of the number and nature of the conditions duration of perpetual penalties (pena
of exemption present or lacking. perpetua) shall be computed at thirty years.
(As amended)
Penalty to be imposed when the crime
committed is not wholly excusable: 1 or 2
degrees lower if the majority of the conditions for The ThreeFold Rule*
justification or exemption in the cases provided 1. Maximum duration of the convict’s
in Arts. 11 and 12 are present. sentence: 3 times the most severe
penalty imposed
Art. 70. Successive service of sentence. — 2. Maximum duration: shall not exceed 40
When the culprit has to serve two or more years
penalties, he shall serve them 3. Subsidiary imprisonment: This shall be
simultaneously if the nature of the penalties excluded in computing for the maximum
will so permit otherwise, the following rules duration.
shall be observed: *The threefold rule shall apply only when the convi ct is
In the imposition of the penalties, the order to serve 4 or more sentences successively.
of their respective severity shall be followed
so that they may be executed successively Art. 71. Graduated scales. — In the case in
or as nearly as may be possible, should a which the law prescribed a penalty lower or
pardon have been granted as to the penalty higher by one or more degrees than another
or penalties first imposed, or should they given penalty, the rules prescribed in Article
have been served out. 61 shall be observed in graduating such
penalty.
For the purpose of applying the provisions of
the next preceding paragraph the respective The lower or higher penalty shall be taken
severity of the penalties shall be determined from the graduated scale in which is
in accordance with the following scale: comprised the given penalty.
1. Death,
2. Reclusion perpetua, The courts, in applying such lower or higher
3. Reclusion temporal, penalty, shall observe the following
4. Prision mayor, graduated scales:
5. Prision correccional,
6. Arresto mayor, SCALE NO. 1
7. Arresto menor, 1. Death,
8. Destierro, 2. Reclusion perpetua,
9. Perpetual absolute disqualification, 3. Reclusion temporal,
10 Temporal absolute disqualification 4. Prision mayor,
11. Suspension from public office, the right 5. Prision correccional,
to vote and be voted for, the right to follow a 6. Arresto mayor,
profession or calling, and 7. Destierro,
12. Public censure. 8. Arresto menor,
9. Public censure,
Notwithstanding the provisions of the rule 10. Fine.
next preceding, the maximum duration of the

SCALE NO. 2 must expressly state that the offender shall suffer
1. Perpetual absolute disqualification, the subsidiary imprisonment in case of
2. Temporal absolute disqualification insolvency. (People vs. Fajardo, 65 Phil. 539, 542)
3. Suspension from public office, the
right to vote and be voted for, the Article 74 may be disregarded since there is
right to follow a profession or calling, no imposition of Death.
4. Public censure,
5. Fine. Article 75. Increasing or reducing the penalty
of fine by one or more degrees. — Whenever
Art. 25 Art. 70 Art. 71 it may be necessary to increase or reduce
Penalties are Classifies Provides for the the penalty of fine by one or more degrees, it
classified into: penalties for scales which
(1) principal and purpose of should be shall be increased or reduced, respectively,
(2) accessory successive observed in for each degree, by onefourth of the
penalties. The service of graduating the maximum amount prescribed by law, without
principal sentence, penalties by however, changing the minimum.
penalties are according to their degrees in
subdivided into severity. accordance with
capital, afflictive, Art. 61 The same rules shall be observed with
correctional and regard of fines that do not consist of a fixed
light. amount, but are made proportional.
Destierro Destierro is Destierro is placed
classified as placed under above Arresto
correctional Arresto Menor Menor. Example:
penalty; Arresto according to A certain crime is punished by a fine of not less
Menor is a light severity.
penalty.
than P200.00 but not more than P6,000.00. One
fourth of the maximum of PP6,000.00 is
P1,500.00. The fine immediately higher in
In Scale No.1 all personal penalties such as degree in accordance with this article will be
deprivation of liberty are grouped together; from P200.00 to P7,500.00.
Under Scale No. 2 are grouped all penalties
consisting in deprivation of political rights
The minimum shall not to be changed. In case
the minimum is not fixed by law, the
Art. 72. Preference in the payment of the civil determination of amount shall be left to the
liabilities. — The civil liabilities of a person sound discretion of the court.
found guilty of two or more offenses shall be
satisfied by following the chronological
Article 76 simply shows the manner divisible
order of the dates of the judgments rendered
penalties are divided into three periods.
against him, beginning with the first in order
of time.
Exception: The division of arresto mayor into
three equal parts does not follow the rule.
The order of payment of civil liabilities is not • Minimum – 1 month and 1 day to 2 months
based on the dates of the commission of the • Medium – 2 months and 1 day to 4 months
crime. While criminal liability is satisfied by • Maximum – 4 months and 1 day to 6 months
successive service of the sentences in order of
respective severity (Art.70), civil liability is Art. 77. When the penalty is a complex one
satisfied by following the chronological order of composed of three distinct penalties. — In
the dates of the final judgment.
cases in which the law prescribes a penalty
composed of three distinct penalties, each
Article 73 presumes that accessory penalties one shall form a period; the lightest of them
are deemed imposed. shall be the minimum the next the medium,
and the most severe the maximum period.
The accessory penalties provided for in Article
40 to 45 are deemed imposed by the courts Whenever the penalty prescribed does not
without the necessity of making an express have one of the forms specially provided for
pronouncement of their imposition. in this Code, the periods shall be distributed,
applying by analogy the prescribed rules.
Subsidiary imprisonment is not an accessory
penalty and therefore, the judgment of conviction

Complex penalty – if there are three distinct

penalties, there shall be a minimum, medium “If homicide or murder is committed with the use
and maximum. of an unlicensed firearm, such use of an
unlicensed firearm shall be considered as an
aggravating circumstance.” (People vs. Narvasa,
INDETERMINATE SENTENCE LAW (Act
298 SCRA 637)
No. 4103 as amended by Act 4225)
• Applies to complex crimes
• Mandatory Reason for fixing the MINIMUM and
• Applies to special laws MAXIMUM penalties in the indeterminate
sentence:
Steps in applying ISL 1. Whenever any prisoner shall have
served the minimum penalty imposed on
1. Determine the crime and the penalty
imposable; him, and it shall appear to the Board of
Indeterminate Sentence that such
2. Check application of Art.64 par.5 (2 prisoner is fitted for release, said Board
mitigating, no aggravating = 1 degree may authorize the release of such
lower), Art. 68 (minor, 1degree lower) or prisoner on parole, upon such terms and
Art. 69 (incomplete justifying and
conditions as may be prescribed by the
exempting circumstances, which may be
Board.
1 or 2 degrees lower);
3. Fix the Minimum: 1degree lower “ in 2. Whenever such prisoner released on
any of its periods” parole shall, during the period of
surveillance, violate any of the
4. Fix the Maximum: 1degree higher than
conditions of his parole, the Board may
No.3, apply the mitigating/aggravating
issue an order for his arrest. In such
circumstances and state penalty “in
(appropriate) period” case, the prisoner so rearrested shall
serve the remaining unexpired portion of
the maximum sentence.
Examples:
3. Even if a prisoner has already served
X, with intent to kill, shot his roommate B, and
eventually died. Apply ISL. the minimum, but he is not fitted for
Ans. release on parole, he shall continue to
serve the sentence until the end of the
• Crime is Homicide; Penalty is reclusion maximum.
temporal;
• N/A 4. To prevent unnecessary and excessive
deprivation of liberty (According to A.
• Indeterminate sentence of prision Estrada);
mayor in any of its period as
minimum; and 5. To enhance the economic usefulness of
the accused since he may be exempted
• Reclusion temporal in its medium from serving his entire sentence
period as maximum.
depending upon his behavior in his
physical, mental and moral record
X, with intent to kill, shot his roommate B (People vs. Onate, 78 SCRA 43)
using unlicensed firearm. But because of timely
medical assistance, B survived. What is the Case where ISL is not applicable to:
crime committed and stage of execution. 1. Offenses punished by death or life
Determine participation. Apply ISL. imprisonment;
Ans. Crime is frustrated homicide. Accused 2. Convicted of treason (Art.114),
committed the crime by direct participation. conspiracy and proposal to commit
• Frustrated homicide is one degree lower treason (Art.115);
(Art.50); Penalty is prision mayor; 3. Convicted of misprision of treason
• N/A (Art.116), rebellion (Art.134), sedition
• Indeterminate sentence of prision (Art.139) and espionage (Art.117);
correccional in any of its period as 4. Those convicted of piracy (Art.122);
minimum; and 5. Habitual delinquents (Art.62 par.5);
• Prision mayor in its maximum* period 6. Those who escaped from confinement
as maximum. or those who evaded sentence (Art.157)
*due to the presence of special aggravating circumstance.

7. Those who violated the terms of 3. While serving sentence, No.1 and No.2
conditional pardon (Art.159); shall be observed.
8. Those who are already serving final 4. But payment of civil or pecuniary
judgment upon the approval of liabilities shall not be suspended.
Indeterminate Sentence Law.
9. Penalties other than imprisonment. If the offender was insane at the time
of the commission of the crime, he is
Chapter Five exempt from criminal liability (Art.12
EXECUTION AND SERVICE OF PENALTIES par.1)
Section One. — General Provisions
Article 80 is repealed by Sec.38 of R.A. No.
Art. 78. When and how a penalty is to be 9344, under suspended sentence of a minor.
executed. — No penalty shall be executed
except by virtue of a final judgment. SEC. 38. Automatic Suspension of Sentence.
Once the child who is under eighteen (18) years
A penalty shall not be executed in any other of age at the time of the commission of the
form than that prescribed by law, nor with offense is found guilty of the offense charged, the
any other circumstances or incidents than court shall determine and ascertain any civil
those expressly authorized thereby. liability which may have resulted from the offense
committed. However, instead of pronouncing the
judgment of conviction, the court shall place the
In addition to the provisions of the law, the child in conflict with the law under suspended
special regulations prescribed for the sentence, without need of application: Provided,
government of the institutions in which the however, That suspension of sentence shall still
penalties are to be suffered shall be be applied even if the juvenile is already eighteen
observed with regard to the character of the years (18) of age or more at the time of the
work to be performed, the time of its pronouncement of his/her guilt.
performance, and other incidents connected
therewith, the relations of the convicts
among themselves and other persons, the Upon suspension of sentence and after
relief which they may receive, and their diet. considering the various circumstances of the
child, the court shall impose the appropriate
disposition measures as provided in the Supreme
The regulations shall make provision for the Court Rule on Juveniles in Conflict with the Law.
separation of the sexes in different xxx
institutions, or at least into different SEC. 40. Return of the Child in Conflict with
departments and also for the correction and the Law to Court. If the court finds that the
reform of the convicts. objective of the disposition measures imposed
upon the child in conflict with the law have not
The judgment must be final before it can be been fulfilled, or if the child in conflict with the law
executed, because the accused may still appeal has willfully failed to comply with the conditions of
within 15 days from its promulgation. But if his/her disposition or rehabilitation program, the
deendant has expressly waived in writing his right child in conflict with the law shall be brought
to appeal, the judgment becomes final before the court for execution of judgment.
immediately. (Rule 120, Sec.7, Rules of Court)
If said child in conflict with the law has reached
eighteen (18) years of age while under
Article 79 merely reiterated Art.12 par.1 suspended sentence, the court shall determine
whether to discharge the child in accordance with
Rule regarding execution and service of this Act, to order execution of sentence, or to
penalties in case of insanity: extend the suspended sentence for a certain
specified period or until the child reaches the
maximum age of twentyone (21) years.
1. Becomes imbecile after final sentence,
execution is suspended (personal
penalty); Articles 8185 pertaining to administration of
death penalty are no longer applicable.
2. If he recovers his reason, sentence shall
be executed unless the penalty has
prescribed; Article 86 provides the place or penal
establishment for execution of sentence

provided by Administrative Code or which

may be provided by a law in the future. Remember:
1. Extinction of criminal liability does not
Art. 87. Destierro. — Any person sentenced automatically extinguish civil liability.
to destierro shall not be permitted to enter 2. That criminal liability is totally
the place or places designated in the extinguished is a ground for motion to
sentence, nor within the radius therein quash.
specified, which shall be not more than 250 3. Criminal and civil liability is extinguished
and not less than 25 kilometers from the only when the offender dies before final
place designated. judgment.
4. As a general rule, a pending appeal of
conviction extinguishes criminal and civil
In destierro, entering the prohibition area is liability based solely on th offense
evasion of service of the sentence. committed.
5. As an exception to No.4 above, claim for
civil liability survives the death of
Art. 88. Arresto menor. — The penalty of
offender if the same may be predicated
arresto menor shall be served in the
on a source of obligation other than
municipal jail, or in the house of the
delict (i.e. laws, contracts, quasi
defendant himself under the surveillance of
contracts and quasidelicts );
an officer of the law, when the court so
provides in its decision, taking into 6. Right of the offended party to file
consideration the health of the offender and separate civil action is not lost by
other reasons which may seem satisfactory prescription when accused dies pending
to it. appeal.
7. Death of the offended party does not
extinguish criminal liability because the
Penalty that may be served in the house of offense is committed against the State.
the defendant, “when the court so provides
in its decision” by reasons of health or ther
Amnesty – an act of the sovereign power
satisfactory to the court.
granting oblivion or a general pardon for past
offense.
Title Four
EXTINCTION OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY Pardon – an act of grace proceeding from the
Chapter One power entrusted with the execution of the laws
TOTAL EXTINCTION OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY which exempts the individual on whom it is
bestowed from the punishment the law inflicts
Art. 89. How criminal liability is totally for the crime he has committed.
extinguished. — Criminal liability is totally
extinguished: Amnesty Pardon
A blanket pardon to Exercised individually by
1. By the death of the convict, as to the classes of persons or the President
personal penalties and as to communities
pecuniary penalties, liability therefor Involves political crimes Involves any crime
is extinguished only when the death Exercised even before trial Exercised only when
of the offender occurs before final or investigation person is convicted
judgment. Looks backward and Looks forward and
2. By service of the sentence; abolishes and puts into relieves the offender
oblivion the offense itself from the consequences
3. By amnesty, which completely as though no offense was of an offense he has
extinguishes the penalty and all its committed been convicted
effects; Private act of President; By proclamation of the
4. By absolute pardon; must be pleaded and President with
5. By prescription of the crime; proved by the person concurrence of the
6. By prescription of the penalty; pardoned Congress
7. By the marriage of the offended Both do not extinguish the civil liability of the offender
woman, as provided in Article 344 of
this Code.

Prescription of the crime – is the forfeiture or Libel 1 year

loss of the right of the State to prosecute the Oral defamation; 6 months
offender after the lapse of a certain time. Slander by deed
Arresto Menor, Public 2 months
Prescription of the penalty – is the loss or Censure (including Simple
forfeiture of the Government to execute the final Slander, fines not exceeding
sentence after the lapse of a certain time. P200.00)
there be final judgment
period of time prescribed by law
for its enforcement has lapsed. [T]he Rules of Court is explicit that an order
sustaining a motion to quash based on
Marriage of the offender with the offended prescription is a bar to another prosecution for
woman must be contracted in good faith. Hence, the same offense. Article 89 of the Revised Penal
marriage contracted only to avoid criminal Code also provides that "prescription of the
liability is devoid of legal effects. (People vs. crime" is one of the grounds for "total extinction
Santiago, 51 Phil. 68, 70) of criminal liability." (Cabral vs. Puno, 70 SCRA
606)
Art. 90. Prescription of crime. — Crimes

punishable by death, reclusion perpetua or Under Act No. 3763 amending Act No. 3326
reclusion temporal shall prescribe in twenty Penalty (Special Laws) Prescription
years. Fine or imprisonment or not 1 year
more than 1 month, or both
Crimes punishable by other afflictive Imprisonment 1 month to less 4 years
penalties shall prescribe in fifteen years. than 2 years
Imprisonment of 2 years to 8 years
Those punishable by a correctional penalty less than 6 years
shall prescribe in ten years; with the Imprisonment of 6 years or 12 years
exception of those punishable by arresto more
mayor, which shall prescribe in five years. Offenses under Internal 5 years
Revenue Law
The crime of libel or other similar offenses Violations of Municipal 2 months
shall prescribe in one year. Ordinances
Violation of the regulations or 2 months
The crime of oral defamation and slander by conditions of certificate of
deed shall prescribe in six months. convenience by the Public
Service Commission
Light offenses prescribe in two months.
When the defense failed to move to quash
When the penalty fixed by law is a compound before pleading, he must be deemed to have
one, the highest penalty shall be made the waived all objections, and cannot apply to
basis of the application of the rules the defense of prescription thereafter.
contained in the first, second and third
paragraphs of this article. (As amended by RA
4661, approved June 19, 1966) The accused cannot be convicted of an
offense lesser than that charged if lesser
offense had already prescribed at the time
Penalty (RPC) Prescription the information was filed.
Death, Reclusion Perpetua or 20 years
Reclusion Temporal Art. 91. Computation of prescription of
Perpetual or Temporary 15 years offenses. — The period of prescription shall
Absolute/Special commence to run from the day on which the
Disqualification, Prision crime is discovered by the offended party,
Mayor the authorities, or their agents, and shall be
Prision Correccional, 10 years interrupted by the filing of the complaint or
Suspension, Destierro information, and shall commence to run
Arresto mayor 5 years again when such proceedings terminate

without the accused being convicted or

acquitted, or are unjustifiably stopped for A2: Ten years. The issue here is prescription of
any reason not imputable to him. penalty.
The term of prescription shall not run when If Prescription of Penalty Article 26 prevails
the offender is absent from the Philippine over Article 9.
Archipelago.
The prescription shall be interrupted when the Art. 93. Computation of the prescription of
proceedings are instituted against the guilty penalties. — The period of prescription of
person, and shall begin to run again if the penalties shall commence to run from the
proceedings are dismissed for reasons not date when the culprit should evade the
constituting jeopardy. (Sec. 2, Act No. 3326) service of his sentence, and it shall be
interrupted if the defendant should give
Outline of the provisions: himself up, be captured, should go to some
1. Period of prescription shall run from the foreign country with which this Government
day the crime is discovered by the has no extradition treaty, or should commit
offended party, the authorities or their another crime before the expiration of the
agents. period of prescription.
2. It is interrupted by filing o the complaint
or information.
Evasion of service of the sentence is an
3. It commences again when such essential element of prescription of
proceedings terminate without the penalties.
accused being convicted or acquitted or
are unjustifiably stopped for any reason
Chapter Two
not imputable to him.
PARTIAL EXTINCTION OF
4. The term of prescription shall not run
when the offender is absent from the CRIMINAL LIABILITY
Philippines.
Art. 94. Partial Extinction of criminal liability.
— Criminal liability is extinguished partially:
Article 92 refers to prescription of penalty
1. By conditional pardon;
2. By commutation of the sentence; and
Penalty (RPC) Prescription
3. For good conduct allowances which
Death, Reclusion Perpetua 20 years the culprit may earn while he is
Other afflictive penalties 15 years serving his sentence.
Correctional penalties (except 10 years
Arresto Mayor) Conditional Pardon Parole
Arresto mayor 5 years May be given any time May be given after the
Light penalties 1 year after final judgment prisoner has served the
minimum penalty
For violation of pardon, the The convict cannot be
convict may be ordered prosecuted under
Q1: X committed a crime for which the law rearrested or Art.159; he can be
provides a fine of P200.00 as penalty. What is reincarcerated by the rearrested and
the prescriptive period of crime President reincarcerated to serve
the unserved portion of
A1: Two months. The issue here is not the original penalty
prescription of penalty.
Article 95 speaks of obligations incurred by
If Prescription of Crime Article 9 prevails peson granted a conditional pardon.
over Article 26
Article 96 speaks of the effects of
Q2: X was convicted, cannot pay the fine of commutation of service, i.e. substituting the
P200.00 and was made to serve subsidiary original sentence with lesser periods.
imprisonment. While serving sentence, he
escaped, evading the sentence. What is the
Art. 97. Allowance for good conduct. — The
prescriptive period?
good conduct of any prisoner in any penal

institution shall entitle him to the following

deductions from the period of his sentence: Art. 158. Evasion of service of sentence on
the occasion of disorder, conflagrations,
earthquakes, or other calamities. — A convict
1. During the first two years of his
who shall evade the service of his sentence, by
imprisonment, he shall be allowed a leaving the penal institution where he shall have
deduction of five days for each been confined, on the occasion of disorder
month of good behavior; resulting from a conflagration, earthquake,
explosion, or similar catastrophe, or during a
2. During the third to the fifth year, mutiny in which he has not participated, shall
inclusive, of his imprisonment, he suffer an increase of onefifth of the time still
shall be allowed a deduction of eight remaining to be served under the original
days for each month of good sentence, which in no case shall exceed six
months, if he shall fail to give himself up to the
behavior;
authorities within fortyeight hours following the
issuance of a proclamation by the Chief
3. During the following years until the Executive announcing the passing away of such
tenth year, inclusive, of his calamity.
imprisonment, he shall be allowed a
deduction of ten days for each Convicts who, under the circumstances
month of good behavior; and mentioned in the preceding paragraph, shall give
themselves up to the authorities within the above
mentioned period of 48 hours, shall be entitled to
4. During the eleventh and successive the deduction provided in Article 98.
years of his imprisonment, he shall
be allowed a deduction of fifteen Art. 159. Other cases of evasion of service of
days for each month of good sentence. — The penalty of prision correccional
behavior. in its minimum period shall be imposed upon the
convict who, having been granted conditional
(During) Sentence Deduction (for every pardon by the Chief Executive, shall violate any
month of good conduct) of the conditions of such pardon. However, if the
02 years 5 days penalty remitted by the granting of such pardon
35 years 8 days be higher than six years, the convict shall then
suffer the unexpired portion of his original
610 years 10 days
sentence.
11 year + 15 days
Article 99 ensures that when lawfully

No allowance for good conduct while justified, allowances for good conduct, once
prisoner is released under conditional granted, shall not be revoked.
pardon.
Article 98 provides for a deduction of 1/5 of Probation Law

the period of sentence if after evading a P.D. No. 968 as amended by P.D. No. 1257, as
sentence under Art. 158 gives himself up to further amended by B.P Blg. 76 and P.D. No. 1990
authorities within 48 hours after the passing
of calamity. Kinds of Probation:
1. Mandatory
Art. 157. Evasion of service of sentence. — 2. Discretionary
The penalty of prision correccional in its medium
and maximum periods shall be imposed upon If with pending probation, sentence is FINAL
any convict who shall evade service of his but NOT executory.
sentence by escaping during the term of his
imprisonment by reason of final judgment.
However, if such evasion or escape shall have Procedure:
taken place by means of unlawful entry, by 1. Accused must file for probation within
breaking doors, windows, gates, walls, roofs, or fifteen (15) days before rendition of
floors, or by using picklocks, false keys, deceit, judgment;
violence or intimidation, or through connivance 2. Judge will order the Probation Officer to
with other convicts or employees of the penal make an investigation report;
institution, the penalty shall be prision
correccional in its maximum period.

3. Probation Officer within sixty 60 days As a general rule, an offense causes two
shall submit to the Judge the report. If classes of injuries:
favorable to the accused, the Judge will
immediately set for a hearing; 1. Social injury – produced by the
4. Judge shall render a decision or a disturbance and alarm which are the
resolution on the application for outcome of offense.
probation. 2. Personal injury – caused to the victim
of the crime who may have suffered
Disqualified offenders (Sec.9, P.D. No. 968): damage, either to his person, his
1. Sentenced to serve a maximum term of property, his honor or his chastity.
imprisonment of more than six (6)
years); Civil liability arising from offenses
2. Convicted of subversion or any crime
against national security or the public Every person who, contrary to law, willfully or
order; negligently causes damage to another, shall
indemnify the latter for the same. (Art. 20, NCC)
3. Who have previously been convicted by
final judgment of an offense punished by
Civil obligations arising from criminal offenses
imprisonment of not less than one shall be governed by the penal laws. (Art. 1161,
month and one day and/or a fine of not NCC)
less than two hundred pesos;
4. Who have been once on probation Exception: If the felony committed could not or
(under P.D. No. 968); did not cause any damage, the offender is not
5. Who are serving sentence at the time civilly liable even if he is criminally liable.
the substantive provisions of [P.D. No.
968] became applicable (pursuant to If the person is criminally and civilly liable is
Sec. 33, P.D. 968, as amended by P.D. acquitted, does this mean extinction of his
No. 1990) civil liability?
"The conclusion of respondent judge that "probation The extinction of penal action does not carry
will depreciate the seriousness of the offense with it extinction of the civil. However, civil
committed" is based principally on the admission by action based on delict shall be deemed
the petitioner himself, as reflected in the report of the
extinguished if there is a finding in a final
probation officer, that he [petitioner] was actually
caught in the act of selling marijuana cigarettes. x x x judgment in the criminal action that the act or
omission from which the civil liability may
rise does not exist. (Sec.2 Par. 4 Rule 111,
The observation of the Solicitor General on this
increase in penalty is apropos: Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure)
The implication is clear. The penalties were Article 101 specified the rules regarding civil
increased to take it out of the range of probationable liability in certain cases.
offenses. Thus, the State has spoken and considers
that this is one case where probation will depreciate
the offense committed, and will not serve the ends of Civil liability of persons exempt from
justice and the best interest of the community, criminal liability
particularly, the innocent and gullible young. • No civil liability in Par.4 of Art.12 which
Underscoring supplied.(Tolentino vs. Alconcel, 121 SCRA 92)
provides for injury caused by mere
accident.
• Also no civil liability in Par.7 of Art.12
(when prevented by insuperable cause)
Title Five • There is no civil liability under justifying
CIVIL LIABILITY circumstances.
Chapter One
PERSON CIVILLY LIABLE FOR FELONIES Article 102 refers to subsidiary civil liability
of innkeepers, tavernkeepers, and
Art. 100. Civil liability of a person guilty of proprietors of establishments.
felony. — Every person criminally liable for a
felony is also civilly liable.

It is not necessary that the effects of the guest person not being an heir of the
be actually delivered to the innkeeper. It is deceased. (Art. 2206 par.2, NCC)
enough that they are within the inn. 4. Moral damages for mental anguish in
favor of the spouse, descendants and
Article 103 refers to subsidiary civil liability ascendants of the deceased. (Art. 2206
of other persons (particularly schools and par.3, NCC)
industries) 5. Exemplary damages in certain cases.
(Art. 2230, NCC)
Elements:
1. The employer, teacher, person or Rape with Homicide imposed* with:
corporation is engaged in any kind of • P100,000.00 civil indemnity
industry. • P75,000.00 moral damages
2. Any of their servants, pupils, workmen, • P25,000.00 temperate damages
apprentices or employees commits a • P100,000.00 exemplary damages
*In People vs. Gumimba G.R. No. 174056 Feb. 27, 2007
felony while in the discharge of his
duties.
3. The said employee is insolvent* and has Temperate damages – to be awarded if the
not satisfied his civil liability. court finds that some pecuniary loss has been
suffered but its amount cannot be proven with
*broke, impoverished certainty.
Chapter Two Art. 108. Obligation to make restoration,

WHAT CIVIL LIABILITY INCLUDES reparation for damages, or indemnification
for consequential damages and actions to
demand the same; Upon whom it devolves.
Art. 104. What is included in civil liability. —
The civil liability established in Articles 100, — The obligation to make restoration or
101, 102, and 103 of this Code includes: reparation for damages and indemnification
1. Restitution; for consequential damages devolves upon
the heirs of the person liable.
2. Reparation of the damage caused;
3. Indemnification for consequential
damages. The action to demand restoration, reparation,
and indemnification likewise descends to the
heirs of the person injured.
Examples:
Art. 109. Share of each person civilly liable.
Restitution – in theft, the culprit is duty bound to
return the property taken. (applicable only for — If there are two or more persons civilly
crimes against property) liable for a felony, the courts shall determine
the amount for which each must respond.
Reparation – in case of inability to return the
Art. 110. Several and subsidiary liability of
property stolen, the culprit must pay the value of
the property stolen; in case of physical injuries, principals, accomplices and accessories of a
the reparation of the damage caused would felony; Preference in payment. —
consist in the payment of hospital bills and Notwithstanding the provisions of the next
doctor’s fees to the offended party. preceding article, the principals,
accomplices, and accessories, each within
their respective class, shall be liable
Indemnifications for consequential damages
severally (in solidum) among themselves for
– the loss of his salary or earning.
their quotas, and subsidiaries for those of
the other persons liable.
Damages recoverable in case of death
1. In recent cases, SC raised it to
P75,000.00 (People vs. Lucero, G.R. The subsidiary liability shall be enforced,
No. 179044, December 6, 2010) first against the property of the principals;
next, against that of the accomplices, and,
2. For the loss of the earning capacity o lastly, against that of the accessories.
the deceased (Art. 2206 par.1, NCC)
3. Support in favor of the person to whom
the deceased was obliged to give, such

Whenever the liability in solidum or the

subsidiary liability has been enforced, the
person by whom payment has been made
shall have a right of action against the others
for the amount of their respective shares.
Art. 111. Obligation to make restitution in

certain cases. — Any person who has
participated gratuitously in the proceeds of a
felony shall be bound to make restitution in
an amount equivalent to the extent of such
participation.
In solidum – each is liable in full payment or

performance.
Chapter Three
EXTINCTION AND SURVIVAL OF
CIVIL LIABILITY
Art. 112. Extinction of civil liability. — Civil

liability established in Articles 100, 101, 102,
and 103 of this Code shall be extinguished in
the same manner as obligations, in
accordance with the provisions of the Civil
Law.
Art. 113. Obligation to satisfy civil liability. —

Except in case of extinction of his civil
liability as provided in the next preceding
article the offender shall continue to be
obliged to satisfy the civil liability resulting
from the crime committed by him,
notwithstanding the fact that he has served
his sentence consisting of deprivation of
liberty or other rights, or has not been
required to serve the same by reason of
amnesty, pardon, commutation of sentence
or any other reason.
Civil liability is extinguished by subsequent

agreement between the accused and the
offended party.
Offender is civilly liable even if stolen

property is lost by reasons of force majeure.
SPECIAL TOPICS:
In engaging minor prostitutes
R.A. No. 7610 R.A. No. 9208
Not considered Considered trafficking,
trafficking considering: ACT, MEANS
and PURPOSE
>>> END OF CRIMINAL LAW BOOK 1 <<<

Criminal Law 1 Midterm Art 11-13

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Criminal Law 1 Midterm Art 11-13

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Criminal Law 1 Midterm Art 11-13

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2012 C R I M I N A L L A W 1 (REVIEWER) | ARELLANO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 1

stress upon the effect or result of islands of the obligations and

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 2

Mere possession of opium in a foreign 2. That the act or omission must be

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 3

Requisites of dolo or malice: Requisites of mistake of fact as a defense:

MISTAKE OF FACT Motive is essential only when:

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 4

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 5

Crimes Against Properties: Art. 6. Consummated, frustrated, and

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 6

In case of an attempted crime, the offender never

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 7

Added by Atty. L. Macababbad Stages of Execution of Rape

EVIL INTENT In cases of rape where there is a positive

Arresto menor (imprisonment 130 days), or

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 8

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 9

Implied Conspiracy special laws are not subject to the provisions

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 10

6. Any person who acts in obedience to an

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 11

Art.11(4) “State of Necessity Doctrine” To consider a valid “battered woman syndrome”

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 12

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 13

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 14

5. That the act was committed in the

Privileged Mitigating Ordinary Mitigating

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 15

Applicable Not Applicable

Par.2. Impliedly repealed by R.A. 9344 or the

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 16

Requisites: When mitigating When NOT mitigating

[A]ccusedappellant was urinated on by the victim To be considered as a mitigating circumstance,

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 17

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 18

11. That the crime be committed in

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 19

2. Specific – that apply to specific crimes.

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 20

Abuse of confidence, requisites: Uninhabitated place – one where there are no

In the information, the People erroneously

Art. 14, Par. 7

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 21

Art. 14, Par. 8 Art. 14, Par. 10

In aid of armed men or persons who insure or Reiteracion

Aid of armed men By a band 3. That he is convicted of the new offense.

1. The offender is on trial for an offense; Habitual Delinquency – if within a period of 10

No recidivism if the subsequent conviction is Quasi-Recidivism – any person who shall

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 22

Art. 14, Par. 11 Evident premeditation was not attendant because

Art. 14, Par. 12 Craft – involves the use of intellectual trickery or

RA 8294 – Amending PD 1866 (firearms, Art. 14, Par. 15

3. A sufficient lapse of time between the

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 23

Art. 14, Par. 17

Notes By: ENGR. JESSIE A. SALVADOR,MPICE http://twitter.com/engrjhez Page 24

Art. 14, Par. 21 When committed under the influence of