Session 4 - Structural Design Criteria
Session 4 - Structural Design Criteria
Session 4 - Structural Design Criteria
Seminar on
Earthquake Resilient Design for School Buildings
Day-1
Session 4 Structural Design Criteria
3
Introduction
• One of the sector considered in the overall PDNA is Education, which identities the
needs for rehabilitation and reconstruction of effected infrastructure for education
sector, including the school buildings and facilities.
• As part of the rebuilding strategy, guidelines have been developed for the design of
new schools.
4
Introduction
• This document presents the proposed design criteria and overall methodology to be
used for the structural design of school buildings.
• This document has been prepared by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and Japan
International Cooperation Agency (JICA).
5
Scope and Purpose
• This document is intended to provide a unified and consistent criterion for carrying
out detailed structural design of school buildings in Nepal, for resistance to the
effects of earthquakes and other natural hazards.
• The document is particularly applicable to the Type Design of new school buildings
for the post-earthquake reconstruction in the 14 most effected districts.
• The document may also be used for structural design of school buildings in general
for all districts in Nepal, either in mountains, hills or plains.
6
Contents
• Introduction
• Design Philosophy and Approach
• Basic Materials
• Loads
• Structural Systems
• Code-based Design
• Seismic Performance-based Evaluation
7
Structural Systems
8
Two Design Approaches
Approach 1:
Code based and Performance Based
Approach 2:
Code based and optional verification
9
Difference Between CBD and PBD
• Code Based
• Create an elastic model, ignore nonlinearly
• Reduce elastic seismic demand to get design demand (By R or K)
• Increase design force by load factors (1.4 to 1.8)
• Hope the combined factors provide adequate performance
• Performance Based
• Use nonlinear model
• Use defined hazard level without scaling
• Compare capacity with demand, without load factors
• Confirm the expected performance explicitly
10
Why Two Approaches
• The basis of Hazard levels in the Code are not clearly
• There are arbitrary factors in Codes (K and R) used to scale the elastic
response
• The capacity and response of specific structural systems can be
verified/confirmed using the code approach only
• Schools are for the future, and codes will be revised, greater reliability
is required
• This criteria is for “Type Designs” to be used for large number of
replications
11
12
Elastic Response and Code Response Spectrum Curves
13
The Two Design Approaches
sta
Re nt
ura
School
Resta
urant
Loading Severity
Approach 1: Directly
confirm this response,
after code based design
Resta
Approach 2: Use urant
14
Architectural design
Step 4: Verification of
design using
performance-based
approaches for seismic
loading
NO
Step 5: Is
performance
acceptable?
YES
Step 6: Preparation of
structural drawings 15
Overall Design Procedure – Approach 2
16
Typical Structural Member and Components
Structural System Element Typical Component Types
RC isolated footing for column or
Foundation
RC strip footing for column and wall
Column RC column
Beam RC beam
Slab on grade Generally not required
Sys-1: Ordinary RC moment
frame with masonry infill Plinth beams RC beam
walls
Lintels RC beam
Intermediate floors RC slab
Unreinforced masonry walls full contact
Walls
with bounding frames
Roof system Steel truss or RC slab
17
Determine member
Design Procedure for Ordinary demand forces
Reinforcement detailing
18
Typical Structural Member and Components
Structural System Element Typical Component Types
RC isolated footing for column
Foundation
RC strip footing for column
Steel hollow box or H, I or W shapes, or
Column
built up sections
Steel hollow box or I sections, or built
Beam
up sections
Slab on grade Generally not required
Sys-2: Special steel moment
Plinth beams RC beam
resisting frame
Lintels RC beam
Intermediate floors Composite slab
Unreinforced masonry walls, Light
Walls weight partitions (non-load bearing
walls)
Roof system Steel truss or composite slab
19
Special Steel Moment Resisting Frames
Determine member
demand forces
21
Reinforced Interlocking Bearing Walls
Determine out-of-plane
and in-plane demand
forces
22
Design Procedure for Reinforced Interlocking Bearing Walls
Typical Structural Member and Components
Structural System Element Typical Component Types
RC isolated footing for column
Foundation
RC strip footing for column
Column RC column
Beam RC beam
23
Reinforced Concrete Special Moment Resisting Frame
Determine member
demand forces
Reinforcement detailing
24
Design Procedure for Reinforced Concrete Special Moment Resisting Frame
Typical Structural Member and Components
Structural System Element Typical Component Types
RC isolated footing for column
Foundation
RC strip footing for column
Column Cold-formed channel sections
25
Cold-formed steel ordinary moment resisting frames
• Cold-formed steel ordinary moment resisting frames shall be proportioned and
detailed in such a way that the frame will remain essentially elastic or design the
higher strength to reduce the high ductility demands under earthquakes.
• As the mass of structural system is small, the design will be primarily governed
by wind loading.
26
Typical Structural Member and Components
Structural System Element Typical Component Types
RC isolated footing for column
Foundation
RC strip footing for column
Steel hollow box or H, I or W shapes
Column
sections
Beam Steel hollow box or I sections
27
Hot-rolled steel ordinary moment resisting frames
• Hot-rolled steel ordinary moment resisting frames shall be designed and detailed
for higher strength to reduce the high ductility demands.
28
Typical Structural Member and Components
Structural System Element Typical Component Types
RC isolated footing for column
Foundation
RC strip footing for column
Column Timber column
29
Timber structure
• Wood-frame shear walls sheathed with shear panels of particle board, structural
fiber board, and gypsum wall board are used to resist the seismic forces.
• Bearing wall system category would be applicable because shear walls used for
seismic force resistance also function to support gravity loads of a building.
30
• Materials, loading and load combination should be according to code based
provisions.
• Typical modeling, analysis and design procedure of structural systems are also
explained in document.
31
References
• Structural design criteria for type design of school buildings, DOE, Nepal
32
Any Questions
33
34