0% found this document useful (0 votes)
137 views6 pages

School Dropout Issues: (Research Starters)

High school dropout rates remain a significant policy issue in the United States. Dropping out is associated with numerous negative consequences for individuals and society. Factors like socioeconomic status, academic struggles, and family responsibilities influence a student's likelihood of dropping out. While dropout rates have declined since the early 20th century, many argue they remain too high. Effective dropout prevention programs address an array of risk factors.

Uploaded by

verna
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
137 views6 pages

School Dropout Issues: (Research Starters)

High school dropout rates remain a significant policy issue in the United States. Dropping out is associated with numerous negative consequences for individuals and society. Factors like socioeconomic status, academic struggles, and family responsibilities influence a student's likelihood of dropping out. While dropout rates have declined since the early 20th century, many argue they remain too high. Effective dropout prevention programs address an array of risk factors.

Uploaded by

verna
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

School Dropout Issues

(RESEARCH STARTERS)

 print Print

 document PDF
 list Cite

 link Link

In today's brain-based economy, where academic skills are valued, increasing the
graduation rate has become a top policy issue among educators. High dropout rates are
associated with factors such as retention and socioeconomic status. Dropout programs
address various risk factors associated with dropping out of high school. Dropout
programs may include add-on programs such as after-school programs, or may also
attempt to get at deeper roots of the issue through systemic reforms.

Keywords Add-On Programs; Alternative Schools; Differentiated Instruction; Dropout


Rate; Graduation Rate; Out-of-School Time; Retention; Risk Factors; Socioeconomic
Status; Tracking

Overview

At the beginning of the twentieth century, the high school dropout rate in the United
States was estimated to be hovering around 90 percent (Schargel & Smink, 2001, p. 4).
In 1983, A Nation at Risk, a report from The National Commission on Excellence in
Education was published. The authors called for education reform in America, stating
that it would be impossible for the United States to continue to be economically
competitive in a rapidly advancing and changing world. The report called for immediate
action—raising student achievement and high school graduation rates through state and
federal reforms. Between the turn of the century and A Nation at Risk, the United States
economy had become more "brain-based," requiring increased levels of education in
the work force. Today, the use of technology has skyrocketed, and thus, graduating with
a high school diploma is now a minimum requirement for most jobs. Roberts (1995, as
cited by Schargel & Smink, 2001) estimates that nearly 80 percent of jobs in the United
States are in the service industry. Therefore, a well-educated work force is imperative to
the success of our economy.

Today, the dropout rate has declined dramatically. The National Center for Education
Statistics approximates that the status dropout rate, the percentage of sixteen through
twenty-four-year-olds who were not enrolled in school and who have not earned a high
school diploma or equivalency credential, declined from 12 percent in 1990 to 7 percent
in 2011 (US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, 2013).
Other estimates are lower. Orfield (2004) contends that less than 70 percent of students
who enter high school actually graduate with a diploma. However, researchers and
policymakers insist that even the best picture displays a dropout rate much too high for
an industrialized nation like the United States. It is estimated that 3.8 million individuals
between the ages of eighteen and twenty-four are neither participating in the work force,
nor in school (Annie E. Casey Foundation, 2004). In school year 1999 to 2000, the US
high school completion rate decreased in all but seven states, while students who were
dropping out were younger—in ninth and tenth grade (Barton, 2005).

Negative Effects Of Dropping Out

Schargel & Smink (2001) list the problems and conditions associated with dropping out
of high school. High school graduates earn 70 percent more than dropouts do over the
course of their lifetime; dropouts are much more likely to

• Be single parents,

• Be on welfare,

• Commit crimes, or

• Go to prison.
Seventy-three percent of state prison inmates and 59 percent of federal inmates are
high school dropouts (Harlow, 2003). Furthermore, only 60 percent of those who drop
out are employed within one year of leaving school (Office of Educational Research and
Improvement, 1991). In 2001, only 55 percent of dropouts reported being employed,
while high school and college graduates reported a 74 percent and 87 percent
employment rate, respectively (Sum, 2002).

These statistics have a ripple effect that influences more than the individual. Levin
(2007), an economist, recently used economic analysis to estimate the gains of dropout
prevention. He hypothesized, using very conservative estimates, that if the United
States were to spend $82,000 on each student through successful intervention
programs that increased the graduation rate, every individual who graduated would
contribute $209,000 in additional tax revenues, and lower their need for health care,
social welfare, and the justice system by $70,000 over the course of their lifetime.
Furthermore, individuals who stay in school longer also live longer—the death rate for
those with less than twelve years of education is two and a half times greater than for
those who completed thirteen or more years (Alliance for Excellent Education, 2003).
Once dropouts do enter the work force, they typically earn much less than an individual
who has a high school diploma. In fact, the earning potential of dropouts is only
declining as the United States economy becomes more skill-based (U.S. Census
Bureau, 2002). As of 2011, a high school dropout will earn $200,000 less over his or her
lifetime than a high school graduate. The unemployment rates for dropouts is anywhere
from 15 to 18 percent (Sanchez & Wertheimer, 2011).

Reasons For Dropping Out

Students who drop out do so for a variety of reasons. The 1960 Project Talent Survey
(Combs & Cooley, 1968, as cited by Roderick, 1993) found that dropouts had lower
levels of measured achievement, lower levels of aspirations when questioned about job
or work prospects, had more negative attitudes towards school, lower self-esteem, and
lower participation rates in school sponsored activities than those individuals who
graduated high school. Similarly, the Youth in Transition Survey (Bachman et al, 1971,
as cited by Roderick, 1993) surveyed sophomores that dropped out compared to those
who did not. The study found significant differences between the groups in academic
achievement, participation in extracurricular activities, and attitudes towards school and
learning. They additionally found that youths who had repeated grades prior to high
school were up to 40 to 50 percent more likely to drop out, and the likelihood of
dropping out soared to 90 percent when students repeated two or more grades.
Similarly, the High School & Beyond survey data found that the more difficulties youth
have in school, the more likely they are to drop out (Roderick, 1993).

Socioeconomic status has a large impact on an individual's likelihood of dropping out of


school. One study found that students from low-income families were nearly three times
more likely to drop out of school than their more affluent peers (Annie E. Casey
Foundation, 1993). In 1997, the Department of Education reported that students from
families in the lowest 20 percent of the income bracket were seven times more likely to
drop out than those from families in the highest 20 percent (Schargel & Smink, 2001).
Roderick (1993) reports that students from disadvantaged and poor families are much
more likely to have problems in school, academically and socially, and thus more likely
to fall behind in school or have to repeat grades.

In 2011, over 40 million Americans had never graduated from high school, and the
majority of dropouts are Latinos and blacks (Sanchez & Wertheimer, 2011). The
reasons students give for dropping out are numous. Many claim they were bored with
school, others had missed so many days that it was too overwhelming to catch up.
Some students explained that their work or family responsibilities caused them to drop
out of high school (High School Dropout Rates, 2012).

Decreasing The Dropout Rate

Starting in the 1980s, a variety of state and federal programs surfaced and aimed to
decrease the high school dropout rate. The most common programs were add-on
programs such as preschools, pilot programs such as full service schools, and
programs promoting an increase in testing (Schargel & Smink, 2001). These types of
programs had various rates of success. However, the high school dropout problem does
not seem to be changing. If anything, according to many researchers, the problem is
becoming more and more prevalent, especially among the poor or disadvantaged
(Orfield, 2004).

There are other factors linked to dropout rates, including socioeconomic status, race
and ethnicity, and the conditions of a school and how a student feels about his or her
teachers and administrators. Experts have found that predicting dropout is no easy task.
Today, a wealth of programs exist to help students graduate high school. The
components of these programs are varied, and encompass a wide array of
interventions. However, to understand the successes and shortcomings of these
programs, one must first understand the intricacies behind the dropout problem.

Further Insights
Calculating

The actual high school dropout rate in the United States is uncertain because there is
no single accepted definition of the term. Dropout rates are calculated in various ways.
We will discuss how the term "dropout" is defined and calculated by four different
organizations, the Department of Education, the National Center for Education
Statistics, the Current Population Survey conducted by the Census Bureau, and the
Cumulative Promotion Index., as well as the strengths and weaknesses of reporting
data using these methods.

Department Of Education Calculations

According to Schargel and Smink (2001), the Department of Education defines dropout
rates four different ways:

• Event,

• Status,

• Cohort, and
• High school completion.

Event dropout is calculated by the percentage of students who leave high school, even
if they receive a General Equivalency Diploma (GED) later. Status dropout rate is
calculated within a specific age range. For example, a status dropout rate might be
recorded as, "On January 1, 2007, fifteen percent of all students ages sixteen through
twenty-four were either not enrolled, or had not completed high school." A cohort rate is
calculated when the same group of students is followed over a period of time, such as,
"In the 1997 cohort, 85 percent of students graduated high school." Finally, the
Department of Education calculates high school completion rate as the proportion of
eighteen to twenty-four year olds who have completed high school, or received a GED
(Schargel & Smink, 2001).

While the Department of Education gathers dropout data, there is no federal supervision
of data reporting. Orfield (2004) cautions that much of the available graduation data is
grossly misrepresented and inaccurate due to the vagueness of the definitions, as well
as the lack of oversight in enforcing the accuracy of reporting.

You might also like